UNLIMITED WARFARE

I'd be advanced

I'd have been

to understand

The cune of a bandier

and all over and

go to order To be able to

get in the

Costa Paaestina

in the

country

and the of the that's bell in the black They call

Bandrini Chann

Call

Assassin Chann They called Bandities Journal of

They called

Assassins,

Partigian

We don't credence

We don't credence

In the United

Antirn't

Jordan

Traditor

Whate

Monde

Votes

She has

said

It's been

In Paris Pistina And And still Cantavalo A Pancos How many vases have said It's been in

Palestine

And I've

And still

I've been

A lot of Cance abackal And he

had been

Inns Pugue

A bandiera

And the

I've

Abol

Pant

The Banniera and Parchida in the hoes Parisina and and al-cat Marcia Marcia Marcia

the back

in the place On the side of this

Marr, there's a population,

Every lot,

I'll help an other lot

Afts, I'm gonna'niko, sirenst,

I'm gonna'niko'm a soldier spirited Inalia

Culpice

TIPA Cipomander

Those people

that revolve

The people

RIVAN

FI RIVULior

Vio

Ritoria

We have Ava Sornbe Mepo Avert the victory had

been a

manned

a friend

a friend

in the

bandia

and the

door and the baton

had to

have been

to

baty to in the

bush and

a past and was

in black and like that's not your Thank you. I'm going to I'm The chuna in the Mediterranean, like a buffalo

perit, in fury, the pirate American.

But in the cantile, on the moon, are armed,

and the bannies, and all the Pugnian's his cocine

But don't

I don't pan power in car

Armatis of Israel

The poor terra

To let me liberate

Arracharo

So red and black

And red and red and red The gunna The vallangier The cord of the vallangiera I'd be able to the Roshamed and Permania

and then the Puguella

Abandier and all

and all

Pondyra Pachy

and

the part of Positia

and

a back Pland

and

Penta They called Bandities, The Journal of

The Patronies

They called assassins, journalists of the padronies that called assassins,

partigiano.

We don't creole we'regene

in the bullettines

in the airy,

will beckoned

Jordan,

trademone.

What's the

have said,

it's been in

Palestine,

and still

I'd and I'm gonna sing a little the can't a lot of the cancone. The She's the name of this is my In Palestine And also I've

sung a lot songs

There

Have you

I'm

The

There's

The

Bandiera And And the Mara And there

And the

Rapp Parch Pallest and Canda Pallet and Canda I'll be cast out of the water

appearance

and the house

apparently

when the place All the other of this

Marr, there's a popolo

Fraddle, every lotta

I'm another lotta

Every colpola

Sparato's parato

On the enemy,

Sia isaida

Colvice and he commands

Those papuari revolt

She moves on to the story

Revolution

Vivian

Viva and the

Viova

We're gonna

N to advance the men's

a friend and then

to inquire

and the manned

and the

bandier and

partied to party and partied and the

in the

house

palestina and cannot a

in a place you know. Oh. The Sunni The United The June, in the Mediterranean, like a buffalo

perit, in fury, in pirated American.

But in the camp of the moon, are armed, also the bannies,

and every dama in fulia in his own, and so much, arm armaged and the bannies every manned every gunner and

the

no don't don't

do do

the arms

of

the

battle

and

the never the never the

and

the

black and the and the

and

the

and the of the and the always every a brand of a candle and then a pundia and They call Banditians They call

Bandit

The Journal of

They chasins

They chattain

We not We don't We Journal of the Patrony, that chlamasins, Partigian.

We don't credence

the bulletin

and yariari

Antirano

Georgian,

tragitor

when times

they've said

it's been in

Palestine, and

still I

called to

I'd

psalm

the can't

call the

song we're we're gonna get a in Palestine and then can't travel a can't words

There are the

back in the world

Pounder

back in turn to

the bandiera

and then

again and the

bandier the

partied the in the

place Parenthood

and Palless Palless and there and Yeah, the quantity of the forest like that was like that was the

reality

at the At the middle of this

Marr, there's a popolo

Fraddle, every lotta

Ayoiduio

Every coliolito,

Sparato,

On the enemy,

Siaolpici,

TIPO manda With the people in revolt, She moved to seniorist Italy colpice like Canada called people She's people

revolved

revolved she's

the

story

revolution

vio

to

Cio Vila

Vida

We

have

We're

We're

against

tugna the bianco the bern the borgia the bannier I Have you to march a lot of the men, and then to nudge,

the bandiera, and the cordial to pass.

And I'd pass the bandiera

to party down in the oscar,

back in the forest, back in the middle of the world of the netta. Thank you. I'm going to The The chuna in the Mediterranean, like a buffalo

ferito, in fury of pirated American.

But in the campers on the moon, are armed,

and the bannies, every dama in cune,

and in funnial to the cichyne,

but not

don't have

a power

in cariarmes

of Israel

the water

you have

liberate

have you

liberate

black

black

red and black

the pung the bandia

the borgia

the black a black black and and then the pundra bandier and how are you all right

and pass

back in the

place

part of We call Bandities

Chonale

Who chattain

Channasins

We

don't We don't

credence

In the

Israelis

Prasgerna

Jordano

Traditor

Many times

they have

said it

In Palestine

And still

I canvavlo

the

song

We've

We've We've got We're We're Inns I was A can't Ackon Ackoned

Ackoned

Ackoned A vanier Panktonia

The bandiera

and the

Banniera

Pantia

in the house

palestina

and the cast Pella Pern

and

Penta My name is the middle of this

Marr, there's a people

Fraddle, every lotta

Ayoidu'll

Every coliolus

On the coliolido Sparato

On the

Colvice and he commands

With the

people in revolt

We move to see the

story

Revolution

Vivian,

Vivian, Vivian

Vila

Vita

We have

Avaugh

Nerverville

The Nogne

The Nogne The Noguer The

The Tampura I'm gonna The Banniera The Banniera the The bandera, Furnierna, and then to

batheer

bandia

back back back

in the

house

part of spina

and

in the

place in a man and a man and Thank you. I'm going to The Rune in the Mediterranean, like a Bufofero, in fury and spirata The chuna mediate Like a buffalo

Peritue in fury

The Pirate American

But in the cabby

On the moon

Are you armats

And the bannies

The manna in Fugia

And so farcline

No, don't

Fawura

Incair The cari armat InSrael, The Puerto La Deviro kill. But don't I'm a car arm of Israel

the power

you're

never liberate never have and I'm going to get a black. My name is gone to pass out of the bandied to pass into the

part of course of Palestine, the answer was in the future. They call them bandities the journals of the padrons

They called assassins partisans

We don't seelemen we're We'll see why We'll get in the

Jorzano

Traduone

How many times

have said

It's finita in Paris

Pina

And still

I've called a new

a can't

We have

We've black, black and white and entire and I'm back and I'm have you have been

a friend and then

the gunner

and the man

and I'm

a bandier

to get and

in the house made

and I'm

a place and a and a The Belmont In this My At the In the world of This marre, there's a

Popolo

Fraddle,

Every lot

Aughts

Aughts

Every coles

Afto Sparato

On a manned

Italy

Colvice

TIPmanda

The Popul

Revolta

She moves

Here's

Lovio Revolution Vivio The people that revolted So forth

So I'm here

The Revolution

Vivian,

Vivian,

Viva

Vida

Vita VIII

We have

Aftangelo

The Yanker

Poundier,

the bandiera

and the

glory of

Papa

But he Abtian the bandiera to all right now my dad my name

a bandier to

party to

get a

in the

forest

back

and

a Thank you. I'm going to The Ocean is a Mediterranean, like a buffalo ferrito, in fury, the pirate American.

But in the camp of the moon,

are armed, also the bannies,

the only d'nobna in fournial in her cuisine.

No, not so much,

to have the power of the army of Israel,

the power of all thatata you have you liberate

Backi abandoned

No, black and white and red and black hair

And the pungia the bandiera of the color in a guadar

We have to add me a farquitre

The boss of course of forestry, and I'm glad to that in the airtime. Party about all the bandied the part of vital and the voice was apparently

and the piano

and the girl We call them bandits,

the journal of the padronies,

that chlamasks, partisans.

We don't creduling we'll

we'll get in the bulletin' traitors,

they'll turn to turn to- to Jordan, trademone.

What's the other than,

and times have said,

and it's fined in Palestine,

and still can't rather the song.

We've had said,

and red and black and red,

and black, and white, and the color of the colors of the bat, Had you advanced a The men's A boyneur Feltanguella

Bria and gold

And I'm gonna go

And the ballad

Hadia

Baja

A bandier,

quantity

in the

cross amythe

cast a

Pella

Pella Penaena

Sto'rida In this This

There's a

Every lot of

Every lot

Aught Aught of this marr, there's a popolo every lot of a lot of

all the

whole

sparred on

a manned

a manned

in a

manned

the people

in revolt

she moves

after the

story revolution Revulc Revulc V V V V a V V V V V V revolted if moves to the glory revolution

vivian

vivant

their

victory

have

to pass

a band

a bandier

and

turned to

the

bandiera

and

the

bandiera

to pass in the pass the pass in the past in the past in the part of and alfadar. May advance, the mania to

flyer to

get a

place

in the forest past Thank you. I'm going to The Chuna Mide like a buffalo perit In furia and the pirated American

But in the

Cands

On the lunas

are armed

And the bannas

They're in

Pugne

his focille

But don't

Fawuhroud

Incair

Inus

The

Terri

You

liberate

You

Liberate Liberation You of Israel The power That's You have to liberate

Bytian

I'm glad

I'm black

And red and black

And then

The gunned a bandier

And the color

Inawat

Marcia

The bandiera

And that part

In fact

Pist

and back to the black to that and again me a part of the pastoral and the journals of the padronies,

that called assassins, partisans.

We don't credence we'll

not think of the bulletin' straitiers

As grand Jordan,itor Tritone

When the

times

she has

said,

it's

been in

Palestine

and still

I'm

a song

the

song

the I'm

black

black

black black

black

black

and I hear the of the young boynett, a friender, and then to hear you and all over and

the father

Mariah

about,

and get a partied

in the house

parisina,

when it was

a black back in the world man. On the other than a

Every lot of

Every lot, I'm trying to lot A lotta Every lot Every

Culp

Sparato

on the

enemy

siolista

Inal

Dalia

D'clock

Dio

Dio

people in

revolta

She moves

Gives

The story

Revulci

Vio

V

V

A Vio

V

V

V V V

V glory. Revolutions I've been the victory A bit of

VIII

Aftia

A manned a manned

a manned

a bandiera

and a boy

and al-fat

I've

passed the

bandiera

in the

rose

palestina

and the rose

palestina and a place Thank you. I'm going to you.

I'm The June of Mideolient is like a buffalo

In fury of the pirate American

But in the camp of the moon

are armed, also the bannies

every dama in Puglia in his

Cucine.

No, not so I'm afraid,

armation of Israel,

the power of,

where do you liberate?

Liberate.

But I'm not sure I've been black and black

in the

pungia

the bandiera and the

corner of a car

had you

had been

back in the

place

pastina and a part of and

the

part of

and

the and The voice voice in the middle My name after the crowd They call Banditius, journals of the padronies,

who called assassins, partisans.

We don't credence we'll beckonlemy in the Israelis,

askirn't a georgian,

many times have said

is finita in

Palestine

and

I've been

the song

I've

had been

in the

manned

the

and the and the and and the

and the and the and the in the gunned at all year and all right and all

a bandier

to get

in the place

in the

place

in the All the other than a Myr lot Every Every S S S A I'm going to the victory Have you

Have you Montemeter

The men and practical in the house Apparrestia that's carless a lot of in the rearess Thank you. I'm going to The june in the Middle-O-Rent,

like a buffalo ferito, in fury, the pirated American.

But in the tantus, on the moon, are armed, and my babies, and all the bannas in the world and in the canties on the moon are armed

and the bannies

every bannas

in the cune

in his own their own

in their own

in the same

fear of

Israel

the world

has been liberate

liberate

liberate

black

black black and black black and black black and black and and and I'm here Abia Abolras

always

The end up

Bounder Banda

Borgia Bada

Baja

Banda

Panky

La Jolla

Panky

La Jolla

and Nia that's my black They call

The

Cannes who call call assassins and We call them bandits, the journals of the padronies,

who called assassins, partisans.

We don't credene we don't creditoriali,

Antirn't Giorgian, Jordan, a traditor.

Whenca vases and she has let's have said,

it's finita in Palestine, and she has been in Palestine, and she'll have been to pass a barrenner, and the last month of the blackmail, and yellow, and blacked her, and called the bandiera, and the color of Many about the bandier to

walk in the house

apparently

when I'm playing when the middle

I'm trying All the other of this

Mara, there's a popolo

Fraddle, every lotta

I'll help a lotta

On the coltso, span out of

Aeneco, si'nikoist In'allia, coltice and you command Every colds Sparato On the other SIO

In the air

called

The people

Involves

The people

revolve

The story

Rivocion

Viva Viva

Vila

Viva Viva We have Sarn Sarn We the victory To be a

Ballyamast

Or the manned

The bandiera

And go to hear the bandiera

And go to the bathe

Al-Qa

The bandiera

To picker

In the osama

palestina

And after Pellasthi And so were the

Mettan

And like that's not when I'm going to The June, in the Middle-O-Inty, like a buffalo

perit, in Phuia, the Pirate American.

But in the camp on the moon, on the moon are armed with the children,

the many of them in the gunned and his

Cucine, no, don't fan power

in the car armed in Israel

The water, do you let me liberate.

You have left.

I'm gladi,

black and black, black, and red, the pungia, the gambier, and the robin of the water. back all the point of my

point of

man

and

and

my

and

a

part of

the part of part of that man and a man and a They called They called

The Chonaldi,

The journalists They called assassins Partigiani They call them bandits, the journals of the padronies, that chlamasins, partisans.

We don't crede'emes in bullettin'ryl,

Antirn, Jordan, a traditor.

Whate vows they've said,

it's finita in Palestine,

and, and still chanted a song, d'noburned a song of the cancone

had you passed on the earth and

had been a band quantity in the house

apparently

and the

place when the man At the other of this

Marr, there's a popolo

Fraddle, every lotta

I'm another lotta

Every bolt,

I'm a minute,

Sioist,

In India, the Colbice and he commands With the populis Sparato On a fan of Anna Italia

Colvice

And he

commands

With the

people in

revolve

She moved

So in

Rovio's

Rivouc

Revulcione

Viva

Vila

Vita

We've

We've

We're back And yet Cancunia Cangcunia La Bacor had been back a manned

a manned

a girl

and a boy

and the car

had been back and the

house back in the

back back back and the and you know. I'm The Sunni The United La Juna in the Middle-Orient, like a buffalo

perit, in fury of the pirate American

But in the cadres on the moon are armed

And the bannies are in turn to in their cussile

no,

don't

don't

fear of

the car

armats of

Israel

the power

to

deliver

liberate

let me

get

black

black black black

and black

and

the

pungo

the

bandiera

the black and the black and the The President the young Pounder, I'm Pondy a Pondy

and I'm a

back

to the party

to They call Banditians They call

Bandit

The journalists

They called

Assassins

Partizani We We don't We journals of the patronies that chlamas assassins partisians

we don't

credulett

we're

in the

bellettino

traciton

chardin

tritone

what's

they've said

it's been

in Palestine

and still

we're

we're a little

a

song

a new

can't we're a in Palestine and then for the cantorra that had The other part of the mountainous Maratina Until the

Hell of That's At the other of this

Mare, there's a popolo,

Frasello,

Every lotta,

I use another lotta

Every colpso

Sparato,

So a nemoicco,

Aftia

It's a tippice who manned With the

people

revolve

She moved

to the

glory

Revolusione

Viva

Vila

Vida

We've

We've We're

black

And then

Tugna Mancue

La Biaia and the

Bhopal

and the

Bambas

the

bandiera to

get

in the Berm Berm Berm What are you? What are you?

What are you? and what I know

I know

I don't know

I don't and the other people and the other people and the other people who are we going to be able to be able to get a

one of me

and you know

I'm not going to be the other than the world. I'm gonna be a lot of I'm gonna

I'm gonna

I'm I'm I don't know. I don't know.

I'm a lot of

I know. and the other I'm going to

I'm going to go

I'm going to

I'm going to I'm going to I'm

a lot of

I'm going

I'm a lot of

I'm a

going to be

and a man The I'm a lot of and I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm I'm

and a I'm and I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm Well, Marks with the 10, we already off to a wonderful great start

excellent

excellent and we got

Aztec Grande

Aztec Grande what is up

bro I appreciate you

what is going on?

All right, y'all, it's that time of the week.

The one y'all are anticipating. The one y'all are waiting for what's up y'all

what up y'all what up what up what up what up what up what up what up what up what up what up what up what up what up what up

you know what time it is you know what time it is

this time for the

preeminent

I'm not going to give introductions

we're going to get right into it

unlimited warfare

unlimited warfare

is the type of shit

that we're on tonight okay and we are we've got a lot to talk about

a whole lot including the elephant in the room that pete higseth just ordered all the generals

and admirals of the u.S. military to convene, and people think war is coming, and it's related to Russia and NATO, and probably Iran and China, who knows, it's knows world war three potentially on the horizon

and we're waging a war of our own we're waging a spiritual ideological

war

with

what do you call them the fat frogs the fat frog degenerates what do you call these people

anyway we're having frogs for dinner we're having frog legs for dinner you got to cook first, and of course you got to get rid of all the disgusting infections.

These are truly degenerates, by the way.

They are sick, disgusting people.

But at last, here we are.

Here we are.

I can't pretend like I'm so excited by it.

I can't pretend like I'm so interested and intrigued and so on and so on.

This was inevitable, and here we are.

I can't say much more besides

shit has only gotten started that's all i could really say

anyway let's uh let's get the show on the road

kyle is going to be co-hosting the space.

Shout out to Kyle.

So let's go ahead and... You know, Hold on. I got a great space name.

Perfect.

Perfect.

Perfection.

This is a perfect space name.

So Kyle should come, and I'll change the name if I have to, but I'm going to talk about what I have to talk about regardless.

Let's copy the link here, and you guys absolutely need to spread this space far and wide, by the way.

This is important. Spread the space far and wide, by the way. This is important. Spread the space far and wide. Far and wide. Okay, you got to spread this space. Spread. Boost this space with everything you got. Boost it so everyone can see it.

Spam it in the chat.

Anyway, that's all I can really say regarding that.

Now we're going to get right into the topic at hand. We're on the verge of what could potentially be the next World War. And we are the only ones who understand what's going on, in my opinion, you know, as far as common sense holds it. Common sense holds that the

revolutionary forces are the ones. You see, you know, there's a saying. There's a saying, I want to talk about

something because

we're seeing a proliferation of anti-Israel, anti-Zionist,

anti-Ebstin, anti-system sentiment across the board among the young generations.

There's no doubting it. You know, there's some right-wing grifters who have made a name

for themselves because they profess to be critical of Zionism and Israel and the corruption

of the American Republic by Zionism, right?

But there's a saying. It's the saying is you never stop a revolution halfway. You don't stop a revolution halfway.

You carry it to its fruition, to its conclusion.

Because there are two sides in the struggle that's ongoing.

There's not a third side, by the way.

Just like in international geopolitics, there's two sides. There's the free world,

led by Russia, China, Iran, what they call Kink, North Korea. I would add Venezuela.

And then you have this prison realm, this corrupt, decadent Zionist prison realm, where everyone is completely brainwashed and cut off from what is actually going on in the world and from their own lives, frankly.

This corrupt, oligarchic, plutocratic, capitalist world versus the free world. And there's no third side. There's never been a third side. There is no third position. There is the third position.

There is the revolutionary position, and there's the pro-system position, and there's the pro-system position, and there's no third position.

You're against the system, totally and comprehensively, or you run cover for it, you hide behind it, you rally behind it, you defend the status quo.

For all those who bitch and whine and cry and moan about policies they don't like about political decisions they don't like about israel's capture of u.s politics if you lack a revolutionary stance and position you have no right to whine and bitch and cry this is the nature of the power structure. It's not going to change

on the basis of people crying and whining. First of all. Second of all, if you lack a revolutionary

outlook based on a comprehension of how the system we live in is condemned by its own

contradictions, how it's doomed to collapse under the weight of these contradictions, how it's

inevitable that a higher superior system will advance and surpass and overcome it and replace it. If you lack this kind of

outlook, if you lack this kind of understanding, you're in no position to critique anything

about the power structure. All you're doing is whining and bitching and complaining, but when push comes to shove, what do you do? You rally behind the system. You rally behind the power structure. We're seeing a lot of fearmongering about so-called left-wing terrorism.

You know, recently they caught someone who is shooting up an ice facility.

But there's a lot of strange details about this case. Just like the case with Charlie Kirk.

Just like the case of the Minneapolis shooter, who by the way, what can you call them?

They were like a groiper.

They were a transgender groper, the Minneapolis shooter.

If they weren't a groyper, they were a neo-Nazi of some kind.

They were pro-Azov Battalion.

They were pro-Ukraine.

What can you say?

There's a strange thing going on.

And the first thing that I find strange is this trend where these young people are writing slogans on their guns or they're writing on their bullets.

The Minneapolis shooter was writing nonsense on their weapons.

The Charlie Kirk shooter supposedly was writing Bella Chow on their fucking bullets.

And now this ice shooter wrote anti-ice on their bullet, their bullet casings.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

I've never heard of that.

I've never heard of that being a thing.

What, where does that come from?

Where does this tendency to take a Sharpie and write on your bullet come from? I've never heard of that. They wrote anti-ice on their fucking bullet. If it couldn't even be more obvious that clearly somebody is trying to manufacture perception in a way that's disingenuous.

If you can't see this, you must be a little retarded.

If you're not raising a little bit of eyebrows,

at Luigi Mangione didn't, I didn't know that.

If you're not raising your eyebrows just a little bit,

you must be a little retarded.

Okay, there's something about this

that just doesn't fucking add up.

What's up with this writing your explicit slogans

on your weapon and your bullet?

What is that?

I mean, this is the only

thing that we have definitively

that connects people to certain

political ideologies or motivations

or whatever.

And

you know, it really seems like to me if this is not something that is being done by

Israel and by the feds I am more willing to believe these are these satanic accelerationist cults that are, you know, telling these young people to go kill themselves doing this to accelerate political conflict by writing gibberish slogans.

I saw that, you know, Glenn Clipperstein is not the most

reliable source from what I'm told, but

he did a report where he said,

everyone who knew this anti-ice

shooter

you know, regarded him as like a 4chan

edgy right winger of some

kind. It's very plausible. it's very possible that we're talking

about satanic accelerationist networks and cults which are themselves controlled by the feds and

in all likelihood connected to Israel. Let's be honest.

So there's something very strange going on, and there's a lot of people that are not looking at it through a critical lens.

They're immediately running with the left-wing terrorism narrative.

I know left-wingers.

I mean, I am a left-winger, frankly.

Let's just start with that.

I understand the psychology of a left-wing mind because I'm a left-wing or I come from a

left-wing background.

None of this is adding up.

I mean, we've had precedent for terrorism anarchist terrorism in the past in history like

a hundred years ago and during the the new left in the 70s and so on but you know left wing

terrorism in the post-war period always had the quality of being organized by a group.

There was always some kind of demand in place.

There was always some kind of goal.

I'm not saying I support that or approve of those methods, but it wasn't this sporadic killing, you know, just out of nowhere, just coming out and just

killing people or shooting places up as like a lone wolf or something.

That is, that doesn't make any, I understand the left, leftist psychology

more than most. And it's not the MO of a left wing mind to just take up a gun and just start

shooting people as a lone wolf. It's not.

And, you know, leftists are not even organized enough to do it in an organized capacity.

I think that was snuffed out, you know, after the 80s, after the 70s.

The government found out how to stop that and control that kind of stuff.

So, you know, this new wave of so-called

left-wing terrorism, it's highly suspicious

as far as who the culprits are

and who are the actors behind it. And anyone who's

not looking at it from a critical lens

is probably

themselves a shill

for the real forces behind this

violence.

There's something

very, very bizarre going on.

It doesn't admit they're writing stuff on their bullet casings.

I mean, what is this?

You know, it is so baffling to think.

I mean, maybe I'm just too out of touch with the mainstream left, so on, so-called left, that it's unfathomable to me that this is something that would...

I have a lot of leftist enemies who talk shit. I wouldn't even say they're leftists anymore because most of them have defected over to the Nazi side.

But these people are not confrontational types. They're not going to go and do any. They stay home and they sit home and they cry and they're depressed and whatever.

And these are not the types to do anything, you know? I mean, I'm highly skeptical. I'm highly skeptical.

And in any case, there's a war that's looming on the horizon and there's also a war going on in the

information battle space let's not kid ourselves people can say that i'm irrelevant quote unquote

let's can we just table that?

Can we shelve that nonsense talking about how I am irrelevant?

Let's move past it.

There's nothing irrelevant about me when it comes to this war.

I may be irrelevant in terms of the direct pull that I have with Normies,

the direct pull that I have with Normies, the direct pull that I can command among, you know, casual viewers and audiences. I fully admit that I don't have any pull really with casual mainstream audiences. Nor do I think it's possible for me to have that.

I can't directly, you know, have directly speaking.

I can't directly have tens or hundreds of thousands of people watching me and listening to me.

This is not, this, the content that I put out is not for an unfiltered mass audience. It's for an audience of highly dedicated people that are committed

to a specific cause, who themselves punch above their weight, profoundly punch above their weight.

I mean, pound for pound, right?

Yankee, what's up?

You know, I lead

I lead lions.

I lead a group of

tigers and lions

and whatever and wolves.

I don't lead.

This is not for somebody sitting and eating

Pop-Tarts.

Okay, my show, my content, anything pertaining to me is not for somebody to sit eating Doritos and watch while they have some play fucking video games in the background or some shit.

It commands a high level of engagement. It commands a high level of dedication

to keep up with this shit.

But then people are like, so how is Ha

is able to be so influential?

It's like, well, because look at the fucking audience

that I do have. It's a fucking army.

Every single person that watches me almost

every single person in my chat is not a casual viewer they're all absolutely dedicated to war

this whole community is built on war it's a community built on warfare, not violent physical warfare, but

discursive warfare, information warfare. It's a constant state of bringing out and accentuating contradictions.

There's no steady stream of casual, whatever, banter when it comes to me.

There's no ability for me to just be a peaceful figure in people's eyes and peaceful in the sense of, you know, not partaking in any kind of discursive contradictions. There's no way for somebody to just be like, oh, this is a non-controversal, non-polarizing figure. I'm just going to casually watch them to get the news.

I'm going to casually watch them to keep up with current events.

I'm not a news guy.

Jackson is really good at that.

Jackson's a really good news guy.

He's very good at reporting current events.

And by the way, he's going to start streaming again for the record.

He's going to start doing that again.

But, you know, I never liked covering the news.

I don't like being somebody that Normies can watch because I don't enjoy being a celebrity. It's not my forte. It's not what I actually enjoy doing. What I enjoy doing is unraveling contradictions. And frankly, I'll be frankly, full disclosure about something.

I do enjoy warfare.

I enjoy war.

I enjoy...

I enjoy a conflict where at stake there is one victor and one loser.

This is what I enjoy doing.

This is what I like.

I don't like being popular.

I don't like being loved by everyone.

I don't like because it's just

more problems. It's just more energy

I have to dedicate to people's attention

and whatever. I don't fucking, I'm not here

for it. I'm here to defeat

and crush my enemies.

Whoever they happen to be, you know, I'm here to defeat and crush my enemies, whoever they happen to be, you know, I'm here to completely,

discursively obliterate my enemies. It's what I'm built for, it's what I'm good at, it's what I

meant to do, and it's as simple as that.

You know, by the way,

even communist leaders, like

Lenin and Stalin, they didn't like

being in the public view.

They didn't like, you know, they weren't

demagogues. They weren't like Hitler who would go

out and, you know, give a speech screaming in front of a crowd of millions or something like that.

Because they knew that's a bunch of bullshit.

They knew to do actual work, to actually lead, to actually effectively govern, to actually effectively rule a regime,

you cut the bullshit in the pageantry and you get to fucking work doing what matters.

You be decisive when it comes to pressing issues at hand.

And as far as the masses are concerned... when it comes to pressing issues at hand.

And as far as the masses are concerned, it's their trust.

It's their trust.

Let me tell you something about the difference between Stalin and Hitler.

When Hitler died, nobody gave a fuck.

Did you know that?

Nobody cared. In Germany. There was no mass

mourning. There was no mass crying. None of that happened. But when Joseph Stalin passed away,

you know, may he rest eternal in heaven.

May God bless his soul.

When Stalin passed away, you saw an entire country mourn.

You saw an entire country.

Whitelisted blacklist. What's going on, bro? Appreciate the 10. country.

White listed blacklist. What's going on, bro? Appreciate the 10.

You know, you saw what it looked like. You saw what real love looked like as far as a people loving their leader. Because Stalin wasn't a demagogue.

He wasn't going out and giving demagogic speeches to excite people based on hot air.

But he was present.

He was present.

And when he died, everybody cried, even his enemies. When Lenin died, you know, millions of people came and visited him. When people like Hitler die in these one-trick pony

demagogues when they pass nobody gives a fuck

because they never

actually do anything effectively

they never do what actually matters

when it comes to leadership all they do is

just what throw bones

they entertain a little

hey I'm an entertainer too

I'm not going to deny it

I like doing that

I enjoy doing that

but frankly frankly it's not my calling to simply do that. It's not my calling.

And you see in real time, it's a big mistake to underestimate me.

Big mistake.

It's a big mistake to try to fuck with this movement and this army and this community.

This army may not be an army of tens of thousands of people,

but it is an army that can hold sway and influence over far more many people,

far more many people that are committed to the movement.

Per capita, one of my soldiers can influence and sway thousands and thousands.

This is the leadership. This is...

This is the secret headquarters where all the leaders of this movement gather.

You know, we don't let in anyone.

Not anyone can be part of this community and this movement.

Every single person that's here in this community has some kind of grasp and understanding of dialectics.

It's not true for the enemy.

That's why there's no loyalty.

You know, I saw, by the way, Nick Fuentes,

I saw his stream that one Monday two weeks ago.

It's the only one I've ever watched.

And I saw a sea of L's flood his chat.

I've never had that in my life

streaming.

I've never had my own audience turn on me like that.

I've had,

I think the most I've ever had is in 21.

We had several purges.

We did several things to

to root out dissent in my regime

but I've never had

such a level of disloyalty in my own chat ever

and that's all that matters at the end of the day

that your army is loyal.

The people that are loyal to him are of much less quality than the people that are loyal to this cause and this movement.

And we're witnessing that, because why?

They barely can go toe to toe with us in the information battle space they

barely can they barely can do it they're like breathing they're holding on for dear life

dealing with us and uh what can i say it all comes from a stupidity and miscalculation from

their retarded catboy leader. Anyway, let's bring on this George person. Go ahead, George. Go ahead, George. You never stop a revolution halfway,

and we're the only movement that can carry this revolution of the new generation to fruition.

Hello, George.

Hello? Yeah.

Yeah, I've been a listener since I think your debate with Vosch, and I've been in both your sphere and the Fuentes sphere for a bit.

And first of all, I just wanted to ask, what is your stance on, because I've never heard you really talk about this.

Maybe you haven't. I missed it. Was your stance on the Soviet Union

under Joseph Stalin being the first country to recognize Israel as a state?

That's not true.

It's alleged that there was a de facto recognition first but the first state to officially recognize

Israel wasn't the Soviet Union the decision for the creation of Israel was a decision that was

arrived at by the United States and Britain. The Soviet Union did not have

proxies or it didn't have a foothold

in the Middle East at all.

It was absolutely outside the sphere of influence

of the Soviet Union.

So during the Yalta Conference, during the various

conferences in which the Allies were convening,

the British and the Americans had a foothold in the Middle East, and they themselves made this decision, and regrettably Stalin acquiesced.

But he was having a hard time enough defending what he regarded as the turf of the Soviets.

You know, the Eastern Europe.

Stalin was actually profoundly concerned with India.

He was, because, you know, it's,

India has historical relations with Central Asia that go back very far.

And, um, and, and obviously, you know,

Iran to an extent was of concern to the Soviet Union. But the Soviet Union did not have any borders in the actual Levant or the Middle East. It didn't really have a say in the matter.

They did acquiesce.

They didn't push back against the British and the Americans.

They didn't fight back against them.

They didn't do so on behalf of the Arab cause, which they should have,

and which I'm sure they regretted not doing.

But at the time, there was a negotiation between the three powers in the post-war period.

And the Soviets, you know, they only had so much leverage.

They only had so much negotiating power.

And they were primarily concerned with securing what they considered their own sphere of influence and their own turf and you know for them to strongly you know advocate against Israel and the creation of Israel would have taken, in their own mind,

you know, would have taken away bargaining chips with respect to negotiation with the Americans,

especially the Americans and the British.

Okay. Interesting. Yeah. I mean, from what I've seen, I think it was that initially... The Soviets miscalculated and basically thought that the British, that this was going to be like an American thing against the British.

And obviously the Soviets preferred the Americans over the British.

And the British, you know, were trying to balance their relationship with the Arabs.

So the Soviets, you know, in their estimation, they didn't, there was no net negative to their decision to go along with the American plan, which was, and by the way,

it was very much an American engineered thing as far as which country, I mean, Britain,

with the Belfour Declaration, that goes back decades, but at this time, Britain could not

support

Israel

so overtly, because it would upset

its Arab allies, so-called

allies, you know.

So...

Okay, yeah, that's interesting. And that's the dynamic between America, Britain and the Soviets at the time is cool looking to, because, yeah, even with the Suez crisis, America and the Soviet Union, they got together

and condemned Britain. But I mean, I've seen

our mainstream sources that

and maybe

this is what you were saying too, but the Soviets

yeah, they initially saw it as strategic

because they saw Israel potentially being

a communist stronghold in the Middle East.

I don't think they put much weight behind that, to be honest.

It was more going with the American plan, you think?

It's a combination of they didn't have a lot of leverage to really push back on the

established plan for Israel

and then simultaneously

there was

there was not a lot of willpower

to consider this

a preeminent issue

for them. They obviously had interests in the Middle East. They weren't oblivious to the Middle East, but it wasn't really like their sphere, their sphere of influence.

They were interested absolutely in undermining Britain and European powers in the region, just like they were in the entire world. They wanted to undermine colonialism worldwide. But, you know, they didn't fully recognize the significance of their creation of Israel.

And also, they took the, you know, the, the, the UN stance, you know, what Ben Gurion and whatever.

They took it all at face value. value oh it's going to be a

bilateral state and it was a very naive thing but it wasn't something that they like did

with a lot of energy or a lot of commitment it It was a very passive thing.

Okay.

That's a good explanation.

So it's cool I'm hearing it from you because I've looked on YouTube for specifically your stance on this because you're the you're the stalling guy i like to listen to um and

yeah and one more thing i'd like to add on that's uh relate to what you're saying earlier in this

and i stepped in midway i've been yeah as i said before i've been in your sphere and i guess

the squint his fear for a while

listening to you guys both for a while. And I

100%

do not think that any

of these shooters had anything to do with the ACP

or the Groypers.

Because, I mean,

I've never heard a

Groyper calls him a fascist.

If you're arguing like the etching

on the bullets weren't valid.

But look, there's only one side

that accused the other of being responsible,

at least in the beginning, you know?

And I think it's far more likely it was a groper than one of mine.

So the fact that they had the audacity to try to, and they're still doing it, by the way.

So let their credibility be staked on that for the rest of their existence

as a movement.

Yeah.

Are you talking about when

Fuentes said, oh, when we find out it was an

ACP guy or something, right?

Yeah. And they're still saying

it. His followers still say this. like they're going off the presumption

that it was an ac no they're going off the presumption that they're going to raise enough hysteria against us

that it's somehow going to do damage to us uh i guess, with the public. They don't have any illusions about the veracity of this accusation. His degenerate pedophile anime generals and lieutenants who prey on young boys with Ali Alexander do not with even 1%

conviction believe we had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's shooting. The reason they continue

to assert this and say this is defamation and slander.

That's why.

Yeah.

I mean,

I did see you guys a little weak,

I'll be honest.

Well, look, I think about why they have to

resort to such things

because they don't want to debate.

It's just as simple as that.

They know their leader is

scared of me.

And look, they keep saying

you're not relevant enough to have a debate, but their leader keeps mentioning me.

They keep mentioning me.

I mean, these guys have been in my replies alone for three years or two years, right?

I ignored it.

And I know they're essential.

I know how their movement works. It's centralized.

They're getting orders from the top.

I ignored all that. And then their leader comes out and starts talking about me.

And it's like, look, you want to fuck with me, then debate me, bitch.

It's an honor thing. You want to fucking put my name in your mouth.

Then I am relevant enough for you to fucking

confront me and debate me, you bitch.

Because I didn't

dedicate my

time to talking about them

until recently.

You know, you try to

fuck with us. It's a big mistake. It's a big

fucking mistake. It's all I can say. You want

to settle it in a clean

way, then debate.

You don't want to debate,

then your generational run

is going to come to a screeching halt.

And that's a promise.

It's a promise that we have the means to completely disrupt the growth of that movement and that figurehead. We absolutely have the means to do it. We absolutely have the means to fight this kind of war. And you don't want to do it that way, then fucking debate. Because clearly, you can't keep our fucking name out of your

mouth so there must be some kind of confrontation it's as simple as that we simply demand

the honorable way which is debate let all the audience let let everyone judge for themselves and see what it looks like, for there to be a real debate.

Not a discussion on Zerka's stream that he called hanging out with Zerka and Haas on his own stream.

Not him lightly, barely even putting any effort to push back on anything I say.

Not him trying to spend three hours to be my friend in what he thought was a friendly discussion, but an actual debate where there is a clash between two different perspectives

and one must give way not a discussion a debate where there's one victor and there's one loser this is what we

this is what we demand

this is what we want

just so the masses can choose for themselves

what they find more compelling and convincing

how does he fare because they say what they find more compelling and convincing.

How does he fare?

Because they say he's such a good debater.

How does he fare against me in an actual debate?

Well, yeah, I fully agree that needed to happen. And I watched the full uh it was like an hour long i saw it on youtube and that was this one topic it was about uh africa sovereignty and if they

would be in that was one topic out of a three hour stream by the way and on that topic he was not

it was this on i mean it wasn't entirely

honest he wasn't even making an

argument he was just kind of

it was like he was just saying

well they was just like well I still don't think black

people are smart and it's like he wasn't even

addressing my arguments

your argument was if the conditions prior were met my argument was very simple yeah

inborn genetics and so-called race realism have no explanatory value as far as why civilizations

develop and why technology advances in the way it does because the biology has been stagnant

for hundreds of thousands of years and and the technological progress is a very, very kind of infinitesimally small portion of that, okay, in comparison.

You know, if Europeans live in huts for 50,000 years, and only 4% of that have so-called civilization, you cannot

explain that transition in such a rapid amount of time in terms of innate racial superiority.

So my basic argument was you need something like Marxist historical materialism to explain how people advanced and develop.

You can't explain it in terms of biology. You can't explain it in terms of genetics.

There's no proof of that. You can't say they're inborn, have a physical inability

to be human, have a physical inability to industrialize and partake in a high civilization or something.

That's my argument is very simple. He's like, my argument was very simple.

He's like, well,

you know,

Africa has been,

has been the same for thousands of years.

Not true,

by the way,

but it is absolutely true

that, you know,

that Eurasia did develop

at a much,

in the past 2,000 years, an exponentially faster rate. That's true. But why that is, was the subject of contention in the debate. And all I said was that we have two examples of extremely backward agrarian societies that didn't participate in technological modernity. We have Russia and we have China. And with the right political conditions, such as the establishment of political sovereignty,

Russia proved that a country that for thousands of years was eating potatoes and had nothing and it was backwards and 90% of people were illiterate.

In a 10 year span can industrialize.

We witnessed something similar with China.

You know, he tried to push back a little and say, well,

China was always more advanced

than Africa was.

Like they had a foundational level.

But if we're talking about a leap

from, you know,

wooden houses, you know,

to like, to

fucking high speed fiber

optic cables and fucking

you know, satellite and space travel and fucking, you know, satellite

and space travel and like

that's such an exponentially

rapid transition. It can't

be accounted for through biology.

You know,

it may as well be just as much

of a dramatic leap as living in huts.

That's how dramatic technological modernity has been.

I mean, what goes into a fucking iPhone or a Huawei phone or a smartphone

to manufacture small chips going from living in sheds and backwoods huts which chinese peasants did live in going from that to being able to manufacture... uh... microchips

in like a hundred years

you can't explain that in terms of biology

it's too fast

that leap is too fast

and too dramatic

right

so my argument was

when Africans

are making attempts

to liberate their countries politically

and acquire sovereignty

and develop in a sovereign way,

why not regard

that as a positive development?

Why, nay, say, and say, oh, Africans will always be subhuman and stupid, and they can never do anything.

Like, why get upset when me and Jackson regard these as positive developments for all of humanity, frankly.

I mean, if you're, if you hate mass immigration into Europe and you think it's disrupting

life too much, wouldn't you hope optimistically...

Yeah, wouldn't you hope optimistically that African countries can develop and prosper?

And that way there doesn't need to be economic refugees.

Yeah.

But they know they're so racist and they're so hateful toward black people that the idea of

Africa industrializing or even trying to industrialize they can't accept it as possible they have to

they have to believe they're superior to black people.

It's arrogance.

It's no different than Jewish supremacist Zionism.

It's no different from Zionists who think that they are superior to Palestinians and all non-Jewish people.

There's no fucking difference. It's the same

Luciferian arrogance and pride. And so he knew that, and he didn't even have a strong

pushback against what I was saying. He very passively and casually expressed his skepticism that Africans can be more than subhuman.

And his followers claim that that was already the debate.

If that was already the debate, their leader got dogwalked.

I'm the one who had a strong position.

He had no position.

Yeah, and I would just like to add in,

sorry, can you hear me?

Yeah.

Yeah, I was like to add,

and you made a good point where you said, oh, imagine if the Romans back in 080 were saying with the Germans, oh, they're so bad.

Easily they could have.

And they did.

The Greeks did, by the way.

They regarded the Northern Europeans as extremely

backwoods cave

dwellers. Okay, they didn't

respect them.

They regarded

them as savages.

Even the Arabs regarded the Northern Europeans as savages.

The Arabs didn't distinguish between the so-called sub-Saharan Africans that were not yet discovered, so

to speak, and Northern

Europeans, I think it was

Ibn Batuta. He literally said

it's the same thing. They're just as savage and

backward.

At the same time, I see, and I don't know how long you want me to be on here for, but I'll wrap it up just after this.

Okay.

Yeah, I guess I'll stay with this topic.

I see Wences's viewpoint on,

I guess,

I guess, like,

anime, yeah,

you could say you already addressed it,

but like the foundational level is,

and you,

you could say he overplayed this, but like, for instance, when the European colonizers,

they first reached Africa, they were centuries behind in development.

And in order to industrialize in the level, like what shined in the Great League for,

it would take such radical change, like not in the time frame what China did in the Great Leap Forward, it would take such radical change,

like not in the time frame you were speaking of.

Well, I, I, the reason I would be a little more optimistic,

to be honest, is because,

because China already exists,

and they don't need to do a Great Leap Forward, because China already exists, and they don't need to do a great leap forward, because China can exchange its industrial infrastructure and surpluses of production for a lot of the natural resources that Africa has.

So there is a possibility of win-win cooperation with China

that could accelerate this process.

America didn't have to do a great leap forward

because it had Britain and it had investment from Europe.

Oh, good point.

You know, so we're looking, now that China exists and is the industrial powerhouse of the entire world,

it's unlikely that anyone has to do a great leap forward in order to establish a sovereign industrial base.

You know, it will be necessary to cooperate with China, but China's bilateral type of cooperation

so far has not infringed on the political sovereignty of any country.

And China's setting an example of the world order they would like to see.

And so far, this is true.

This is the case.

Now, as someone who wants to be cynical and say,

oh, it's not how real power works.

Okay, buddy, when you finish watching Game of Thrones,

then just simply tell me when it happens,

because it hasn't happened yet.

You can watch Game of Thrones and think you're a fucking expert on politics all you want.

But the truth of the matter is

that the game theoretical cynics

have not been vindicated

yet, not even close. China doesn't

interfere in the political sovereignty of any

country.

Tank, what's up? I think

China, yeah, they're playing their cards all right.

And the things with the Chinese, they think like 100 years ahead with the Belt and Road initiative.

I mean, that's incredible what they're doing.

It's relevant to what you're talking about with Africa.

Because if they are to become sovereign. do it. It's relevant to what you're talking about with Africa because

if they are to become

sovereign, I think China

would be the backer. And

in their industrialization process.

It's really bad to encourage

ignorance and stupidity. I mean, you could

say China will always be poor and starving.

And if you were living in 1950,

they would have been making that argument and I would be there saying,

no, actually China has the potential and they would have

laughed at me in the same way they do when I talk about Africa.

You know, they have this idea that black people are just not human and it's just ignorance.

Yeah. Um, human and it's just ignorance yeah um and i'll say one more thing i don't want to be here on here for too long once again thanks for me yeah i i mean as i said i've been in your sphere in the

point of sphere and i have my entire life been very,

I would say, even myself,

right wing, like borderline nationalist.

But I,

maybe I align with Fuentes more ideologically,

but with you,

I see you,

I like your character more. Like, I like how you lead. I like, I like, but with you, I see you, I like your character more.

Like, I like how you lead. I like,

I like, well, you do the ACP movement.

Like, I follow you guys.

Like, you go out there, you organize,

you clean up the streets, you go help.

I'll leave it like this, right?

I think in the Bible, there was a passage. I can't quote it off the top of my head, but it was something to paraphrase along the lines. Well, how do we know who the real ones are going to be? Know them by their fruit. Know them by their deeds.

You shall know them by their deeds.

Who's going to be the false Messiah?

Who's going to be the imposter?

Who's going to be the people that claim the word, that claim the letter of the law,

but how do we know what the spirit of the law is?

How do we know if they're sincere?

So Fuentes, he's a Catholic, he's America First, he's Christian.

How do we know?

How can we, and the Bible says, you know them by their deeds.

You shall judge them by their fruits of their work. And what are the fruits of his movement?

Compared to ours, something to think about.

Thank you so much for having me on, Haas. It's great talking to you you I look forward to joining future spaces thank you for sure so let's bring on this guy do-do we'll bring him on go ahead Go ahead.

I guess he left.

Kyle, is there anyone requesting?

You can see?

The only request I saw was this uh dodoid dude who i approved but that's it

you yeah i approved them as well.

Must have left.

He just unmuted.

Maybe we got something.

He just remunited.

I don't know.

I can't even see him.

He's pulled up.

We got a new request.

Go ahead.

Bring him out.

So let's try this. go ahead zero x

yeah i just wanted to ask what you think of the Charlie Kirk thing being a resolve MK Ultra.

Have you, like, read into that?

I think it's likely.

I have no reason to write that possibility off. I mean, there's a lot of spooky weird things going on that make these events intensely psychological, whether it's the Minneapolis shooting or the recent ice one. I mean, there's something

dark going on. And I don't

buy the narrative that this is

Hassan Piker's fault.

I just don't buy it. and i guess what do you think is going like to happen with this whole Russia stuff

I think war

so

should I go to

Polymarket and place a bear for this year

or next year

I don't gamble I don't like gambling and place a bet for this year or next year?

I don't gamble. I don't like gambling.

You don't encourage it.

And... You know, if they have a market where you can bet on our movement, I would do that.

If there's only one thing I'm certain of.

I can't tell you exactly how long it's going to be, but I can tell you I'm fairly certain of the fact that this movement is going to be very successful.

This movement is going to be extremely successful and extremely impactful on the future of U.S. politics.

I could pretty much guarantee that.

I know that with more certainty than I know how many years I have left to live on Earth.

Also, what's your take on Alex Jones? Like he's always does like the fit the mustache today.

I don't know. I i mean what can i say kyle what's going on with the

do-do guy no he's gone um don't have anything as far as a request. I changed the space title. Do you see the new title?

We have a guy connecting. He's got the Rome statue heads, so this ought to be good.

How's it going?

Can you hear me?

Yes, I can hear you, sir.

No, I'm not Indian, but that's good.

I actually wanted to push back a little bit on

what you said about China just a second ago.

I disagree.

I think that China,

I'm not saying they're actively pursuing

hegemony, but the thing is, like,

I think that if they eventually

do become the dominant power

on something beyond

the economic level, I think that they

will eventually be pushed into a position

where they will have to defend

their interest, you know, their economic interest

through military means. I just think that's kind of

a natural... It's just kind of a

speculation. I mean, what's... It hasn't

happened. There's no sign of it. There's no sign of it there's no trace of it and

yeah well i think that i think the reason it hasn't happened is because china is still um i mean china the

u.s is still the military you know unipolar power right

i think russia you know, unipolar power, right?

I think Russia, although Russia is actually surprisingly pretty hands-off,

Russia proves that it is possible to interfere in other countries, you know, even while the U.S. is the dominant power. I mean, hell, even Iran does this.

I'm not going to lie. Iran does.

I will agree with you on that.

I think the thing for that is, like,

you know, U.S.

hegemony is definitely being challenged.

But when it concerns, like, who is the, who still is, like, the overwhelming force that patrols the world's oceans and patrols trade routes?

I'm aware of that. I'm just saying, if China had intentions to interfere in the political sovereignty of other nations, it still could do that while the U.S. is the hegemon.

It doesn't need to be the world hegemon to do that. It can do that without being that.

They just don't, because they have a very strict philosophy of international relations that they follow.

And also,

according to this philosophy,

entangling themselves in the

foreign affairs of other, the domestic

affairs of other countries' politics

is just too costly.

They have a

very self-enclosed, rigorous system of self-governance within China. It's a very

sophisticated system that encompasses multiple provinces, multiple ethnic groups, multiple regions. It's very, very meticulous and precise. Now, including nations outside of China into that mix would probably actually have disruptive consequences for their internal stability and internal system of governance.

So that's why China, it's not just that they do it out of the kindness of their heart, and a lot of people are cynical.

It's just the nature of China's state and their regime. They can't afford to govern other countries for them.

I think that it's true that China tends to be a more kind of isolated civilization and that they prefer to govern through different means.

But I think that if it is true,

the China ever ascends to this position

and the U.S. exits, you know,

it balconizes or whatever.

It just stops being that prominent.

Eventually, just naturally,

there will be a situation that will arise where, I don't know, the Chinese, you know, the PLA Navy will have to go into an African port and take over the port because, you know, the government was unable or the government balkanized.

You know, they committed a miscalculation and now they're going to have to defend their investments.

They're going to have to defend their, you know, copper mines or whatever.

I think that's just kind of an inevitable process of just having power, you know.

And one thing I'll add to that since you mentioned Ukraine, I think that's one of the reasons why a lot of people talk about economic guarantees, right? Like the U.S. is going to have access to all of these minerals or whatever is because that implies that if Russia ever invades Ukraine again, the U.S. is going to have to step up to defend its economic interest, right, or its power plants or whatever, right?

I think that China is a very formalistic country when it comes to its bilateral relationships and that agreements that it makes with other countries, it's an agreement with their government. If their government gets overthrown, the agreement gets thrown out the window.

And, you know, the question is, how would China treat rogue states that do not abide by international

law in ways that harm China's interests economically?

That's an interesting question.

I don't think China wants to deal with that question by itself. that harm China's interest economically. That's an interesting question.

I don't think China wants to deal with that question by itself.

I think China probably wants a framework in which questions like that can be addressed without the entire... China saw what happened to the U.S. Empire or what's happening.

It doesn't want a piece of that.

China doesn't want...

China regards the unipolar hegemony as a state of decadence, and it's an unraveling state.

It's not a steady Pax Americana system. It's, it is collapsing precisely because it's unable to balance, you know, the needs of being the world police with internal governance.

China doesn't want it.

You may speculate that they'll be forced into that position.

I disagree.

I think that globality is an unprecedented era in the history of human civilization.

And

the

theory of the multipolar world

may seem to

optimistic and it may seem to

like, you know, naive. Oh, well,

there's always going to be someone who wants the globe,

the entire world.

But I think it's a fact that

that globality has been regionalized

The province

of Globality

which is the control of the

systems and flow of information

in the last instance. Space

in the abstract, the control of space

and the abstract reflects the need to control the flow of information and the flow of goods.

That has become concrete and regionalized.

The logic of American globalism has become regionalized in Eurasia, in China, and Middle East, and so on and so on.

So we actually don't even have a globe anymore in a way.

We don't have anything universally in common that I can see at least, which could be even like a site of battle for China, Russia or the USA to fight over. What is the globe anymore? What is that?

Well, I agree with a lot of the things that you're saying.

And something I'll say is like I, and I have to speak a little low because it's very late here.

But I actually think that, and here's where I disagree with you. I think that multibularity

in this period of

kind of warlordism that we are

entering represents a

kind of a civilizational recession

if that makes sense.

Like we, because to me

the height of civilization is the height

of empire. It is pax americana is pac

romana even maybe there's never been there's never been pax americana has never happened

is that how so i mean wouldn't you say that it's collapsing right now. The Pax

Americana supposedly began with the dissolution

of the USSR,

and it immediately began

with the Gulf War,

and it immediately

began with 9-11.

There was no Pax Americana.

For maybe the brief period

between the Gulf War

and 2001,

maybe,

maybe you could argue that,

but then there was the Yugoslav wars.

You know, there was all sorts of...

There was a hype

and an anticipation that all the conflicts

in the world were wrapping up.

So people were anticipating a coming

Pax Americana, but it never

came.

I mean, I think it, by historical standards, it overwhelmingly did, and I'd say it goes

as far back as even the end of World War II. I mean, even the bipolar state with the

U.S.S.R. was relatively relatively peaceful that wasn't pax americana that was

bipolarity um

and then maybe it's a tripolarity because there was

european colonialism that america was also against

to an extent so

you know but you know, there, you know, there were institutions that were set up.

And the problem is there's always been a world. Okay, the Roman Empire, their world was the Mediterranean Sea, control of the sea and all of the ports there.

That was the world for them, you know, more or less.

So, uh, elite, what's going on, bro?

So, you know, the world is always something concrete.

Now, Americanism, when American unipolarity, globalism, the abstraction of globality, refers to the space in the abstract and the flow of information. The free

universal flow of information,

the internet, communications technology,

and all of the things about the free flow

of goods and globalization

economically, all of that is downstream

from the information age,

globally.

Now, the problem is that

that has become regionalized.

So what remains of the globe?

Maybe,

maybe,

a new type of

globality has emerged, which is based in the specific global supply chains of the production of chips.

And maybe control of that is going to be the future way

in which a power can rule the world.

Well, let me ask you a question

because I think this is pretty... So far, we don't have

a global form of governance that's based

on that.

Well, let me ask you a pretty, I think,

important question.

Do you think that the objective kind of advancement of civilization, the objective modernization of society, do you think that that implies global unification eventually?

Because I think it quite explicitly does. I think, um,

like for me,

civilization civilization is a process of largely centralization.

It is a process of unification of homogenization

of a region, right, of romanization

kind of. I don't know

if I agree with that. I think that

the process of civilization

leads to

more differences as much

as it does lead to more unity.

And

I would say it's an interesting question.

I mean,

communists long held the belief

that there would eventually be

a world socialist republic, you know, there would eventually be a world socialist republic you know and their

communism would be this global thing there would be no borders and it would all be one

united humanity and i think it's an interesting question as far as what that could even look like. How could that even be imagined? I would say we're at least a few centuries away from something like that. I would say that the first step is going to be a regionalization.

The rise of what Kojev called universal empires, you know, that are regional and scale.

And what would it look like for those to merge together in some kind of way i mean only god knows

that that is for the next chapter of world history not the current one the current chapter of world history is a transition of nation states into civilization states

yeah i mean i i guess I kind of see your point.

The thing for me, and I know you'll strongly disagree with this, is I kind of do see a universality in even kind of the Anglo-American tradition.

I kind of do see, you look at the world system, you look at these cities like Singapore, like Miami, Cancun, Buenos Aires, London, all of these different kind of pearls around the world. And they are kind of like an interconnected kind of web of city states. You know what I mean?

Of cosmopolitan Americanized city states.

I don't... I think you're talking about what they call the Dubaiization of societies where there's a new type of sedentary existence based on consumption, not just confunction, but tasteful, refined consumption, almost like aristocratic consumption, right? And that reflects the dubiousization of everyday civilization.

You know,

matcha and Dubai chocolate and Labooos and all that.

But I don't

I think that's something

definitely happening

I just I wouldn't peg all that

to America

and it definitely is a consequence

of Americanization

but I think we're

that's like you're talking about

saying it's like past a long time where it's I think we're... That's like, you're talking about saying it's like

past a long time, it's redundant.

We're already living in the American

world order, and now it's changing

into something else.

Well, that's the thing.

It's something I do think is that China,

not exactly,

but China might assume kind of the

position of patron of these cities

in some capacity, you know what I mean? Because

if China has economic elites around the world

and interest, then you know, China's got,

China's extracting lithium in Chile, it's going

to have its elites in Chile that are going to be

cynicized and there will be a kind of

string of Chinese city states throughout

the Pacific and throughout the Indian Ocean and so on.

So I do kind of view China as a potential

even philosophicratic empire.

I don't think city states

are a thing

I think that

They're not

States

for sure they're not states

For sure they're not states

Like like Poles

I mean like Poles

They're not Poles

Imperial Imperial

Imperial outposts.

I don't think so.

I think that we're talking about with the rise of these type of cities is something relevant at the level of civil society.

State power is not something that's quite there, you know?

So I think we'll wrap that up there

uh Kyle who else is requesting

uh we have a

K-pop Groyper

go ahead bring him up go ahead and this is some big ass guy right some fat ass man who's got this

woman as a profile picture go ahead speak oh they did they disconnect

they literally disconnected

they really got shy and disconnected no fucking way

yeah we got another one

okay bring i don't know if it's a groyper but

that was about i shouldn't have fucked that up

i should have laughed i Royper, but... That was... By the, I shouldn't have fucked that up.

I should have... They got so ashamed.

Go ahead.

I think I'm the wrong person.

But I do have a question

but I don't know if you want to

prefer the

Grover.

No, he's gone away.

He ran away.

Because the title of the space is

why is everyone scared of me? He got scared, he ran away.

Yeah. Well well then my question is um

will acp or i guess well yeah justP. Will ACP ever have to find itself in, like,

the reactionary politics of America? And I ask this because,

um,

I,

um, like, will ACP ever have to like participate in the in like American politics?

Because I just came back from some guy basically campaigning for Lieutenant Governor, and he kind of just had a pander to, like, the reactionary politics of, you know, today's America. And it was just, like, really, like, unsatisfying to hear and I just wanted yeah that's

that's my question Hello? Hello?

Yeah.

Oh, my guess.

I don't know what's happening, but will ACP ever have to find itself in like American politics? Like, will someone from ACP ever have to run for a political spot whether it be local or you know in state I just came back from like a fundraiser for some guy who's trying to get into the position of

Lieutenant Governor, California.

And it was just really unsatisfying because he was kind of just pandering to the reactionary politics of America today.

You know, he was having to say things like, oh, like, free Palestine and stuff.

But at the same time,

he was like,

yeah,

like he doesn't believe that America is undergoing,

um,

uh,

what's she called?

Basically,

like, people aren't being able to say what should be said.

I forgot the term for it but yeah that was my question

you can skip me if you want honestly because it's kind of it's kind of not really that

um confrontational to you.

We will always be principled in our messaging to the American public.

That's all I can really say.

Thanks for coming on

yeah that's good thank you

so

so Kyle is there anyone else requesting

no they're scared man

they're scared of the title now

yeah it's

an interesting predicament

why is everyone so scared of me

I mean they're definitely not scared to use their fingers

and their keyboard to type about me so why

are they scared to confront me

with their voice

why are they so scared?

Why, what are they afraid of?

Well, we know that they all have a speech impediment, so.

Oh, the K-pop Groyper's back.

Oh, bring them on.

Bring them on back up.

Bring them on back up.

Bring them on back up. Bring him on back up.

Hey, how's going?

And you're a fat-ass guy?

Uh, no.

You're not obese?

No. Nope, you sound nervous. Uh, no. You're not obese?

No.

Nope.

You sound nervous.

Um, um, I, uh, I, uh, I just want to ask.

Uh, uh, please go ahead.

Sorry.

No, what, why, why you still insulting?

I don't understand the whole Are you a Groyper?

Yeah

Please go ahead

I want to know your side

on the whole

The whole debate

Sorry the whole beef with you and Nick

Yeah You want to know my side of the story the whole debate, sorry, the whole beef with you, Nick.

Yeah. You want to know my side of the story? Yeah.

Yeah, my side of the story is that

Nick is a pussy who

talks shit but can't back it up through a

debate, but he

he's got a problem with me and Jackson

because

we are the cutting edge and he's on some

outdated

Gamergate

2016 alt-right nonsense

and he sees we're the next big thing

and we're the next move thing and we're the next move

and he sees that the normie audiences on TikTok

fuck with our message a lot more

he sees that we are the comprehensively revolutionary movement

he sees that we expose all his contradictions

and you know for example he says he's America first, but he's Israel

second. He says that he's against

Zionism, but he supports Zionist

regime change in Venezuela.

You know, there's all sorts of things, but when it comes

down to it, we talk about the ideology all we want. There's a lot to go into there. When it comes down to it, this boy is just dishonorable. He sees Jackson's meteoric growth and gets jealous and starts attacking us.

He calls for Jackson to be killed.

He calls us, quote unquote, third worldists.

Why?

Because we think black people are human.

God forbid we think black people are human beings.

God forbid that we think black people are human beings. God forbid that we understand international geopolitics.

God forbid we understand that the regime that occupies America

is actually part of a global empire and a global system,

and that rebellions and things that break out in the so-called

third world in Africa and Latin America and the whole world, those objectively benefit,

you know, sovereign forces in America. And by the way, Nick himself said this.

I can, we can post a lot of clips of him saying, oh, yeah, we support Russia and China.

The guy said in the discussion he had with me, I asked him, I said, if the U.S. went to war with China,

you know, would you

take an anti-war stance?

And then he surprised me. He goes,

no, I would take a pro-war stance, and I'd be on

China's side.

So he understands why me and Jackson, you know, support the Sahel States and support Burkina Faso.

He perfectly understands it.

But the reason he calls us third world is because he's throwing bones at the BAPists and the BAP audience.

Among the BAPIS, when Maga communism started gaining traction, the BAPIS invented this derogatory term called third worldism. And they said the anti-NATO position, you know, the position that's anti-Zionist, this is actually anti-White. They said it's pro-white to support Zionist colonialism. It's pro-white to support the U.S. Empire. It's pro-white to support the regime because Europe is white and America, I guess, is nominally white. And, you know, those who sympathize with, you know, China and Venezuela and Russia

and this is the anti-white brown

third worldism. So they

crafted this label specifically

for our movement.

And Fuentes, because he's a pussy,

he gets bullied every day by these

Baptists, his whole career. He envies them. He wants to be part of them.

The minute he founded Expedient, it's like he offloaded all of that onto us. All the things they would call him and bully him for. He would like throw that on us so he could just kind of feel a little more confident

oh I'm not the third world is Haas is

oh and Jackson is oh I'm not the brown one

Haasahaz is and Jackson is

whatever so

you know he is a disgusting

opportunist

grifting snake. He has not only

bad politics, he has bad character.

Like, politically, he is a bad actor, absolutely

self-serving, bad actor, conniving, self-serving, actor conniving self-serving

he told his own followers

to storm the Capitol building on January 6th

I think what was it? Three of them got arrested

and he didn't do anything for them

he didn't lobby for them he didn't campaign for them this guy's not a good

leader he's not a good person it's all i could really say well if i remember if i remember

correctly um you've collabed with him twice no you you'll talk with him in Zerka and another time with Destiny, right?

Yeah.

I talked to him twice.

The first time I talked to him and then Destiny joined the call because Destiny was getting worried that I was tapping into a new audience, so Destiny had to come and, you know, collaborate with Nick to make sure that that gets shut down.

And then the second time I was in a call with Zirka and Zirka brought Nick and, and you know zirk and nick named his stream hanging out

with hos and zirka so those were the two times i didn't even know who this kid was honestly i

only started really researching him when he started attacking my party.

So yeah.

But you mentioned bad, but I'm pretty sure he's been beating with bad

correct. I know he has. I know he has.

But he's such a coward.

It's the same thing with Destiny. When I was at war with destiny, Nick did not want to go

to war with destiny. He wanted to instead, you know, win over destiny, right?

And he's the same thing with BAP.

If we were fighting with the BAPIS,

and Nick Fuentes is under heat from the BAPIS,

because the BAPIS call him a brown Mexican,

and they call him a third worldist.

So his way of dealing with that is by offloading onto others.

So the Bapas bully him and call him Brown.

No, no, I'm not the brown one, Haas.

They call him a third worldist.

No, no, I'm not the third worldist,

Haasus, right?

In this way, he has an escape hatch where he can avoid his bullies

by pinning everything on us as a scapegoat.

It's extremely dishonorable snake-like behavior

he engages in, frankly frankly he doesn't have principles it's as simple as that

but um did he accuse you of of um what's called like after the charley crook assassination did, did he accuse you of being involved with that?

Yes, he did.

All to run cover for Israel, by the way, for no other reason.

First of all, let me actually be frank about what happened.

Before Flentes himself accused me,

Jackson was among the first to accuse Israel, right?

So Nick Flentes told his generals and lieutenants, we can only infer, to go on 4chan and spread a false flag saying ACP did it.

Because we had been fighting them previously because Fuentes was talking shit.

So they went on 4chan and immediately tried to blame us.

It was them, by the way.

It was them or it was Mossad or it was both, right?

Then his

those same Groypers went on X,

screenshot of the 4chan shit

and used it as proof

somehow

that we were behind the shooting.

Then Fentes, then we exposed Fentz for being a shill for Israel by just clipping his own show.

Then he took to Telegram at 3 a.m. at night to accuse me of being behind Charlie Kirk's shooting.

So this is what he did. He accused me and Jackson and ACP of killing Charlie Kirk. Why? Because

he just didn't

want anyone to even

suspect Israel had even anything

to do with it. He was so desperate

to deflect away from Israel

that he accuses me of all people.

Um, but that he accuses me of all people. But I heard that that you guys wiped your discourse servers.

Is that true or is I just a false allegation?

We didn't wipe our servers.

Our server is still here.

Okay?

I still have my server.

It's just that two days after the shooting, after we were getting rated, graphic content of the shooting was being posted, mentioning of the shooting, the details, the killing, a lot of violent language that was descriptive in nature was being shared for two days and I decided people

needed to, A, be informed. So everything needed in general chat, needed to be reset.

General chat got deleted, which we do all the time by the way last time we did this i think was the iran war and then i made a new post in general chat saying okay we're banning all

mention of the Charlie Kirk assassination.

Why? Because it's so much content pertaining to a violent event.

It's just a little risky for Discord.

So that was to full two days after.

Okay.

And that general chat

gets

replaced all the time.

It's literally two buttons.

I go on Discord.

I duplicate it,

and then I delete it,

and then it's there.

I mean,

I do it so fucking often.

Nick Fuentes claim this is an extremely suspicious behavior.

That's suspicious, but not...

Not Israel's potential involvement in all this, not Bill Ackman.

And then now he's

denying there was ever $150 million

dollars, but I watched his stream

that Monday. He himself said

that he

confirmed it independently with four different

sources. So what's going on

here?

Didn't it come out that that it wasn't true?

And it was more like $2 million or something like that?

No, it never came out.

What came out was Max Blumenthal reiterating.

He never said Israel directly offered offered that money he said it was

money that was being offered indirectly by israel through the jewish billionaires and jewish

donors that are american but but but you originally said that it was an offer of like what a

150 million million but it turned out to be less i'm not privy to that but even in the odd case

that it turned out to be two million what difference does that make i mean it's a big to be

difference it's millions of dollars and that he turned down from zinous i think that it makes a big

difference sure in terms of the monetary value.

But in terms of whether that makes an intent, you know, likely from Israel, it's, that doesn't reduce the intent by any means.

If I'm not mistaken, I didn't try to quickly make like tens of millions.

I'm running on turning point USA.

Even if he was offered no money and he was instructed to change his tune in a certain way or to pledge some kind of loyalty to Israel, and he didn't, that alone would be enough of an intent because of how much the Zionist lobby already invested into the TPUSA project and to interkirkk How much money have they

already invested into Charlie Kirk?

Notwithstanding

whether this was $150 million

or $2 million or whatever.

By the way, I haven't

even seen the proof that it was

$2 million rather than 150 let me see

also uh flentes was the one to claim 150 million yeah flintes said he had four different sources

confirmed this and then he walked it back yeah remember that

and um and then nick went to see he had a following out with um jackson inkle over

oliver anthony from not, or was something else?

It was a few things. Okay, so Fuentes was attacking the so-called white working class.

That offended Jackson's sensibilities. Jackson has loyalty to that class. That offended Jackson's sensibilities.

Jackson has loyalty to that class.

And so we were in a Twitter space and just very casually, someone brought up Nick Fuentes, you know, how, well, what you're saying contradicts Fuentes

and Jackson was like,

well,

I don't care

what that cat boy

says.

Just a really offhand comment.

It wasn't even like a big deal.

And,

you know,

that set Flentes off.

And, um,

I guess that started the beef, but the thing is

that's all Jackson really did.

And then we all moved on.

And ever since then, Nick Fuentes was ankle biting.

He wouldn't shut the fuck up about us.

Like, we moved on.

Nobody cares, you know?

I guess his feelings got hurt.

He could cry about it.

Have a tissue.

But then he kept going on and on saying Jackson needs to be murdered jackson needs to be killed

he needs to be jailed i hope israel kills him seething with rage and you know what's crazy is that

jackson didn't even lie. Nick

Nick didn't only go

on a date with a cat boy

he literally said in his

streams how he wants a harem of catboys

and this is his fantasy

and he's very strange and he talks

like this and

I'll remember that

Oh you could find the clip it's there

For sure it's there

He's very strange

No one knows what's going on

Well we think we know what's going on.

Well, we think we know what's going on.

But in any case, you know, it's an open secret in that movement.

I'm sure you know it.

You know, would you say your movement respects the age of consent?

Yes or no?

No,

I'll always talk

with that many

group or something

if you're not

in the group

chats where they

talk about that?

You're clearly

not in the hierarchy

then because they really, uh, they really, uh, about that? You're clearly not in the hierarchy then,

because they really,

uh,

they really,

you know,

they have a thing with,

with prepubescent anime,

anti,

and all this disgusting shit.

They're really sick fucks.

And, you know,

there's that British version of Nick Fuentes

that just got caught for something.

And then I saw, I shit you not.

All the Groypers were saying, oh, I've been there.

Yeah, we all do this.

It's an open secret, you know we just do your research man let me bring on ray you have anything else to say um all i want to say

is that is that is that i i'll just like you um uh. I enjoyed your collaborations with

Waserica and Jackson.

I remember you guys went to UCLA

and believed those

those...

You got fucking speech impediment.

Go ahead, Ray.

Go ahead. go ahead ray go ahead and speak i mean i don't even enjoy talking about this kid or his degenerate movement.

Frankly, I don't.

But it's kind of crossing a line to accuse me of killing Charlie Kirk.

I feel like there's a debt to be paid over that, frankly.

Like, you have just been cataloged into the fucking extended lore, you know, of our movement now.

You know, it's like, uh, you, you now are like, um, you've got our attention, frankly.

What a crazy fucking thing to do.

Go ahead, Ray, speak.

Yeah, what's up, man?

I've got a lot of respect for you guys.

You know, I'm running for local office for a mat, for alderman.

And, bro, the competition is very low.

And not only that, I mean, I, I, you're speaking, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I'm, I, I, I'm, what, what myself, ask people what their,

what their concerns are.

It's a small district.

There's about 200,

2,000,

uh,

would say households I got to visit.

Uh,

the election period is a month.

I'm doing pretty good, man.

I'm going to donate my salary

to a homeless shelter.

No one's going to fucking do that.

You know, I'm in the means to do it.

I'm going to donate my salary

to part of it to a homeless shelter

and part of it to a food bank.

And I'm telling you, man,

I'll post it in a jumbo.

You got a...

You're in Quebec. I'm jumbo. You got to... You're in Quebec.

I'm in Montreal.

You got to go through...

You got to go through life like that.

Hey, look, man.

I think what you're doing is admirable and more power to you.

Do everything with a good heart and expect nothing to you. Do everything with a good heart

and expect nothing return.

But listen, man, more power to you.

It's admirable. But when it comes

to political endorsements from our

organization, we take it very seriously.

And it's something we consider

it has to be highly organized.

So you could have a great message, and you could be doing great things, but our party is very strict when it comes to any kind of political endorsements.

I get it. I get it.

I'm just one person, man.

I want to see how far one person could go.

You know, you see it history.

And maybe, you know, if we looked into you and there's, I'm not saying it's impossible.

I'm just saying, you know, this is, this is something.

We take it very seriously and it's organized

for us. For sure, Matt.

I'm just saying the sinus cumb, these

genocidal terrorist bastards

they've tried running my name

and sullying my name and running it through the mud.

The thing is, in the end, you and running it through the mud. The thing is in the

end, you know, they've exposed themselves.

The same fuckers that have

tried to soil my name are

destroying children and babies

in Palestine. So

no one cares what they have to say.

Anybody, you know, we go, we yeah you got the adl and canary mission down there in the states

we're sure i don't know if they well more power to you man i appreciate it uh kyle anyone else requesting uh i'm not seeing a single request okay uh so Nope, we got one now.

Let's go ahead and bring them up.

Yes, person. this person's name is canadian sentinel go ahead canadian sentinel oh thanks um yeah i'm from canada and I just want to talk a little bit about the atmosphere up here in terms of, you know, the Jewish lobby group.

So I think originally people like after two or seven, people are terrified to post any support for Palestine or any objections to what Israel wanted to do.

You've got people like Google applicant out there that are trying to destroy them actively.

I mean, LinkedIn was a mess in terms of if you're in business, like you could never post any support.

I hear lots of stories about anyone posting any support for palestine or opposing israel getting fired like from their jobs um there's a lot of

jewish business owners that they just they can't do it legally that there'd be lawsuits but they do it you know

they come up with excuses to do it so that was kind of the big thing and now the biggest the bigger

thing now is they're trying to really cut down a free speech like any kind of phrase or anything

they object to first it was that the

infatism.

Huh?

I think he disconnected.

That's all right. We got to

move to others.

Kyle, is anyone else requesting?

Yep. No, we don't have anybody. Oh, that's okay. That's okay.

We focus on the topical...

We'll pivot to the topical thing, and then, you know, people want to join, they can join.

But, you know, people want to join, they can join.

But, you know, okay, this guy, what's his name?

Go ahead.

Q, go ahead.

I can hear me.

Yeah. Well, I just want personally Yeah Well I just want

Personally before I ask my question

Is this dedicated towards

Nick Fuentes or is just more like in front of the point?

No no it's not

It's just

I think his fans came on

Or some people brought him off

Oh they're just being fucking schizzo.

All right.

I guess my question would be

in regards to...

Because I'm a big fan, you know,

and I consider myself a Marxist.

What do you think

in regards to

how American leftists now

perceive

abolitionism

centered around

major contradictions like

white supremacy

rather than

capitalism? How can they be, I don't want to say corrected, but what should somebody who leans towards Malcolm X in the perspective that African Americans in American society should be supported through a revolutionary

context rather than

enveloped in some kind of

American identity.

Okay,

I'll respond to that by saying

that

I think that black american identity is is fundamental to american identity itself

um the ethnogenesis of the American nation, so to speak.

And I think that you see the extent of the initiative for, you know, black power movements from Malcolm X to the Black Panthers to organize the black community

was also an unprecedented degree of not just the organization of communities but the

establishment of the foundations of a national popular sovereignty that even white people had not achieved at that time. So, um, you did not have white people as organized from the ground up in a revolutionary capacity

with popular sovereignty as the Black Panthers. We saw this with groups that were inspired

by the Black Panthers, like like the young patriots for example

so you know what i would say is that uh i i think there's a multiracial american nation

but it has different pieces and it has different, you know, segments, so to speak.

And how they all come together is not going to be just a broad brush that's imposed on everybody

simultaneously, regardless of all particular conditions.

But what I think is what can work for the organization of black Americans probably can work for the organization of all america into one unified nation

uh this is what i think i think that black americans in many ways have an exceptional status

as far as the emergence of an American race, so to speak, because they are the only

racialized ethnicity within America. All the other ethnicities do not purport to have an actual racial status, but rather premise their existence

on the basis of institutions and ideals, or a lineage from somewhere else.

And the qualities, by the way, what is a race when you think about it?

A race is something that unites a group of people beyond just the state power, beyond just, you know, um, institutions.

Something that almost seems like innate, you know, it's, it's so embedded, deeply embedded in memory and culture and so on. It's this kind of autonomous principle of the reproduction of people and communities. So for example, America is a strange country because it racialized its only real race is black people and all other races

are defined by not being this in some sense right so I think there's a lot of, there's a lot of disparate ethnic groups that are coming together to form one American nation.

This is how I see it.

And, um, it's a complicated long history, but I can't really give a longer answer, to be honest.

It's very difficult.

Without, like, going on for hours and hours, you know, getting into the nitty gritty of history and so on.

But, you know, I could say that, I could say that what, if we're talking about a unified American nation it has to include black people they are

absolutely decisive as far as that being possible and without that you know there there can be no purport of an American nation.

We can maybe speak of...

Otherwise, you just have LARP, you just have nonsense.

You just have people that are too tethered to some other continent, you know?

Yeah, the guy, uh, dipped that after he asked his question, but, uh, we have a new request.

Sure, bring them on up.

Go ahead.

Ready, thanks for bringing me up like what you're you're saying i'm pretty new to your message but

a lot of the groups that i've been engaging in are a little bit too white nationalist and forget that they're pitting the races, just like they're pitting the culture against each other. And the only way we're going to win is if we team up together.

Yep, we agree fully.

Yeah, yeah. That's why I was like, well, I got to come up because you're making some real sense here, bro.

You know, I think that a lot of the white nationalism stems from a notion that white people are under attack

which is enforced and reinforced and encouraged by you the recent, the trajectory of left liberal politics, which is like, according to which to be white is, you know, there is a kind of left liberal political trajectory, which makes whiteness out of fashion.

But one of the ironies that are lost on a lot of white nationalists is that a lot of this sentiment is a form of bourgeois elitism among the white bourgeoisie themselves,

who themselves don't want to be a particular they want to feel so

cosmopolitan and so abstract

and so interesting and so

exotic

that to be called white is to be

called dull and boring

and and just plain

right

and so it's like they feel comfortable

saying oh well you're white that's bad or oh you know clearly a white guy and it's an it's like

this implicit elitism

which is like a self-criticism

like oh we're so dynamic in cosmopolitan and abstract

that we can

well they're a little bit self-deprecating that way

yeah it's self-deprecating because with their identity

politics because that's

what their damn advisors were doing.

They're trying to transcend

the particularity of any

collective existence in favor

of this hyper-individualism

which

takes other groups of people, like black like Mexicans like any other kind of people and fetishizes them as this kind of like mark of well traveledness well cultured, well-culturedness.

Oh, I'm not just a white person.

I'm in with the black community.

Oh, I'm not just white.

I'm also Mexican.

I'm 5% Native American.

So it's like, this was the big fashion.

And it's a fully, it's not, it's not that white people are facing genocide it's that

individualism has got to such a point where people feel ashamed of belonging to any kind of collective, right?

And the ubiquitous form of collectivity that they name is they name it as whiteness.

Now, why doesn't this apply to black collectives or Mexican collectives?

Because those people are not taken seriously in these institutions and in these high cultures of the bourgeoisie. Black people are seen purely as victims, purely as exotic. You know, they almost... Yeah, they oppress their victim. They almost treat black people and Mexicans and whatever as like zoo animals, where they're like, oh, these people, this is like their way of life.

They treat, they so-called indigenous people as like, you know, animals from Avatar.

Oh, this is them in their natural habitat.

We need to be more like animals.

So it's this complete pathology of the bourgeoisie.

And many...

I have to bring some up.

The origin of woke.

Because technically, I mean,

I have a business part in

San Francisco in

the Hunter's Point

area, which is

sort of projects and whatnot. So

my business partner's

Milato. He keeps reminding me that I trigger him when I say woke.

Because woke used to mean like a white person who understands the plight of the poverty-stricken like projects blacks

and then basically

the gay mafia of San Francisco

hijacked that and inserted

the like civil rights movement to gays so he's really triggered by this woke stuff yeah so look what i could say is that

you know america cannot just be white, black, or brown, or something else.

It can't follow these racial categories from the old world.

And, you know, when we're talking about a movement, a popular front, the goal is to restore popular sovereign. Now, we're

communists. We think there's more details. We think there's class struggle. We think there's

laws of history. But we think that's a science. So we think it's going to prove itself through

the course of struggle. But we can at least be honest about the reality we can all agree we're facing, right?

Which is Americans have lost popular sovereignty.

There's no more any kind of democracy, if there ever was.

And we're basically living under an occupation regime.

So for Americans to restore national sovereignty, they need to have a national consciousness.

And for them to have a national consciousness, they to understand what america actually is america is not

um a european country it's not an african country and it's not a latin country it's something completely different you know it's america it's its own thing

and it needs to be multiracial you know there needs to be one american nation well what about people

that are mixed this is where he comes from I'm not black enough to be black.

I'm not white enough to be white.

That's what Americans are fundamentally.

I mean,

that is just the quintessentially American ethnic background.

And he's seventh generation American

there was slavery

in his

look most of the people

that I know

most Americans are mixed

okay

whether it's a small proportion

I'm a mutt

most most are mixed.

That's just a ubiquitous American.

And some are not.

I mean, Jackson's not very mixed.

And that's fine.

But, you know, it's just, you want to talk about

what the American nation is.

White nationalists and whatever, these left liberals that are doing the opposite or whatever, this is just a way to divide.

Divide a revolutionary movement in this country well i think they also look at the world in this very compartmentalized slice like

all have a message for the educated middle-aged white woman and then we have to have a different message for the inner city black and then what can i do to gain favor with the working-class mexican immigrant families, you know, and

they don't have any unity across

these different compartments.

Look at what Kamala was doing.

She changed, and good

old Jill with her thinking she

was clever with her breakfast taco

Are you like a Bitcoin guy by the way?

I'm looking at your profile.

Oh yeah.

Yeah, yeah.

I'm a OG bit coiner.

I got the white paper handed to me.

Thank God in 2009.

I was working at a

IT media

department for a state

California University at the time.

Okay, and so are you like

a Bitcoin billionaire?

Yeah, I wish.

I've had everybody, I have

4.85 Bitcoin in the

Strategic Reserve that was seized.

The amount of Bitcoin that has been

seized from me is ridiculous.

What the hell really?

I've been debanked multiple times i'm permanently banned from

paypal okay yeah i've been chopped up because i'm also vocal i see i'm uh oh g i just set up my

bitcoin wallet you know.

Oh, cool.

Awesome.

Yeah.

Can I ask which one you picked?

From Coinbase.

Oh, okay.

Okay.

Yeah.

Because like the OGs are like the Exodus or mycelium wallet.

Actually, I don't know if it's going to be something else, but it's definitely a wallet.

But, you know, infrared.g, you can check it out.

Okay.

We'll do.

For sure.

All right.

See you later, man.

Appreciate it.

All right.

Thanks.

We have the Q guy back.

I want to bring on new people.

Keep bringing new people on. Yeah. I don't have anyone else requesting.

Okay, that's okay. We can keep speaking and talking about what I want to talk about.

So guys, I mean, there's a lot of, you guys, this many crabs in the chat, we need to drop a 10. With this many, with this much crabbing it up going on, there's something needs to justify this greed this is not a greed we don't know what's going on

okay we need you want to crab it up in here we truly can crab it up this ain't we you ain't even

seen crabbing okay we ain't even seen crabbing

by the way imagine if i was a a sheikh at a mosque or some kind of religious this is how i

there we go well oh there we go there we go

wallow with the 10

Yankee what's up bro I appreciate you

there we go

okay we crabbing now

Midwest with the 10 we crabbing

now we crabbing it up now

y'all can see the crabbing it up now.

Y'all can see the crabbing it up.

Okay.

Shit, shit is real.

Shit is on some real shit.

Some real crabbing it up.

All right.

Anyway, let's continue.

So let's continue talking about what I'm talking about.

You know, one of the problems with Marxism and communism is that it's really boring to people.

It's just not interesting to them.

It's not fascinating to them.

Even though it's the secret of everything, it's the answer to everything.

And that's kind of frustrating, you know?

It's a little bit frustrating.

Hold on, one sec.

A middle-aged drywaller.

What's going on?

Grant, appreciate you, bro.

Thank you so much.

So we have to talk about some of the things that others do not want to talk about, you know,

the real meat and potatoes behind what's happening in the world what's actually going on

but

see there's people

even this one person in my chat

there's one person who's saying, you know, bad things about Marxism. There's nothing else. There's not, I mean, you can't even be against Marxism without being a Marxist. There's not even possible. Non-Marxists don't even understand Marxism. It's literally a science that surpasses all forms of human consciousness, all established ways of thinking. You can't even be against Marxism without already being a Marxist. There's no way.

And I look at non-Marxists who flail their arms in the dark, and I just see, it's sad to me.

I mean, you're missing the most profound way to understand the world you're missing something so

crucial and important you're missing historical materialism how can you understand anything

going on in the world without materialism without historical materialism

without dialectics you know can marxism explain why you get no hoes? Yes, it can.

Dialectics absolutely can explain that.

I'm not even kidding.

It's all in dialectical logic is the key.

Absolutely it is.

It is so profoundly the case.

And... so profoundly the case. And

it's incredible.

Dialectics actually explains that.

I'm not even kidding.

Like, 100% does with a hundred percent accuracy.

And if you don't understand the dialectical method,

you are walking through this life in the dark.

There are some people that offer occultism, but occultism is just the mystified form of the dialectic. All esoteric and occult ways of thinking are just kind of mystified, idolatrous forms of a more pure dialectical logic

you can understand the dialectic itself

you don't need all the gibber you don't need the metaphors

you don't need the you know the

that other stuff.

But, oh, yeah, it's Marxism, absolutely. Yes. I mean, frankly, you know, there's something about idealism.

You know, I'm not even kidding. Fuck, I feel like this should be implicit.

But idealism

literally causes gynecomastia.

And this can be

medically proven.

Avi Angel, you're

a bitch and you're a pussy.

You're a pussy. And why are you saying, Avi, you're a bitch and you're a pussy. You're a pussy.

And why are you saying, Avie, you come

from a movement of people

who want

cat boy farms and harums.

Who are, what are you even talking about? You fucking

idiot. Osos, what's up?

You're literally going to be the victim on the next night of the long knives when the openness

of your movement is just becoming an embarrassment.

So what the fuck are you talking about?

Anyway, let me continue.

Idealism causes gynecomastia.

Idealism actually corresponds to low-tie.

I'm not even kidding.

You have to be a materialist to be in the real world.

Because materialism means

just do it. Materialism means

real shit.

Like no beating around the bush.

Idealism is cope. It's just like a waste of your energy. It's a waste of your essence.

And it causes gyna comastia in men.

If you're an idealist. I'm not even kidding.

I've never talked to a single idealist

like

of the Anglo

glasses kind.

You know, I'm not

talking about monks or I'm not talking about Orthodox

monks in Mount Athos or something.

I'm not talking about

profound, you know, I'm not Orthodox monks in Mount Athos or something. I'm not talking about profound, you know,

I'm not talking about Khomeini or something.

I'm talking about like, you know,

people who think ideas superficially,

like are responsible for everything in the world

and who think in abstract

conceptual terms

who don't understand

there's a dialectical form and content

I've never seen these people

do a push-up in my life

not even once

because they can't

because they can't manage both.

Look at Avi, this retarded bitch,

get owned by the AutoMod AI.

AI is literally beating the shit out of this fucking retard.

What an idiot.

Um... retard. What an idiot. There's no such thing as a griper who can do a push-up. Never seen it. Doesn't exist.

Because they don't like going... Guys, they don't like going to the gym because it hurts.

Remember that.

They don't like to lift because it hurts. They like ice cream and

chicken tendies and chocky milk.

You know that's such a way to like understand everything about them like

i don't like the gym because it hurts and that's why you don't like marxism because it also

hurts you fucking retard that's why you don't like fucking theory that's why you don't like

actual like um that's why you can't like fucking theory. That's why you don't like actual, like,

that's why you can't read Hegel,

you can't read Marx, you can't understand

Haas, you can't understand our movement.

You can't understand real thinking

because it takes you out of your fucking um noetic comfort zone and imposes

this radical self-criticism that is just so painful when it comes to your conventions and the things you're used to and your habits.

And they don't want the pain, but no pain, no gain. No pain, no gain, okay?

Marxism is profoundly painful to understand.

It absolutely shakes up your whole world, your whole understanding of everything, frankly.

I pity people who are not Marxists.

I just, I don't know how they get on with anything.

Don't they teach Hegel in universities?

No, they don't.

They teach Kant in universities, and they teach... They teach Hegel as a band-aid for Kant.

They don't teach Hegel himself. They teach Hegel as a bandaid for Kant. They don't teach Hegel himself.

They teach Kant.

And they go, remember, it's just a metaphor.

They go, they teach Hegel and they go, remember, this is just the transcendent, the transcendent horizon of communicative reason or some stupid shit.

Some fucking nonsense, Euro-bullshit, Habermas, garbage.

You know, a real Hegelian

affirms

thermonuclear

apocalypse a real

hegelian

believes in the

lysuncoist

great plan for the

transformation of nature

I mean there's stakes

with a real

hegelian

a real hegelian

is a cosmic revolutionary a real Higelian. A real Higalian is a cosmic revolutionary. A real Higalian. A real

Higalian leaves nothing. Leaves no stone unturned. You know, you know what, Hagle,

what? Hagle is that guy from Bloodbourne who's sitting on the chair.

What's his name? The guy from Bloodbourne. He's sitting on a chair right before you fight the

spider boss. What's the spider? A rom. Is that his name Rom?

A spider.

And he's sitting on his rocking chair.

And then the first vicar or whatever, the blood church, that was Marx.

He took Hegel's insight and he applied it.

And Bloodborns a critique of Marxism, but it's still great.

It's a Hegelian critique of Marxism. Yeah, Provost Wilhelm or whatever, that's Hegel.

You know, you need to have so many, you need to have like a thousand eyes lined in your brain

to understand it

fuck

pain pain pain

you know when I

teaching Marxism is so humiliating to others

because it's like no retard

you're wrong people are like oh i think i get it no you didn't get it

go back and come back oh i think i get it no you didn't get it go back and try again oh i think i got it now

no you didn't go back and try again. Oh, I think I got it now. No, you didn't. Go back and try again.

And it's like only when you really get it, when you really fucking get it is when you know

how to work with it. That's the only time you get it when you know how to work with it.

We know how to cook with it. We know how to cook with it.

The chef only knows how to cook.

The chef only knows how to cook.

You know.

The chef only gets it when he knows how to cook.

That's it.

That's how you get it.

When you're working with it.

When you're cooking with it.

Okay? with it. Okay.

Like this guy.

This guy was also a chef.

I'm a chef. He was a chef. He's a chef. I'm a chef.

He was a chef.

He's a chef.

He's a chef.

My whole room has chefs all over. Anyway, everyone's scared of me, you know, everyone's scared to me. Because my message is honestly very simple.

It's like, you're all wrong.

You're all wrong.

All I need to do is be here because when the time comes they're going to be like fuck this is our only option these fucking retarded warlord killer clowns and then no no no acp is here

a c at At X.com

slash ACP main. Look at the work we do.

This is us. We're here.

We're the last beacon of humanity.

We're the bas-leap beacon of

true civilization.

Eh. somebody's name is

Marxism's trash they just followed me

you can't even say Marxism is trash

unless you're already a Marxist

go ahead and request

to speak. Go ahead, debate. Use your voice.

Otherwise, you're nothing.

You're nothing.

I'm not good at teaching people

communism. I need to learn why people aren't already communists.

Honestly, request if you're a non-communist and just tell me why.

Because I don't even get it. I don't fucking understand. I don't get you.

How can you not be a Marxist? How can you not be a communist?

Request to speak right now and just calmly explain to me how you are not a communist.

Like, why not? What's your fucking excuse? Go ahead.

I want to hear it.

I want to know. I don't get it.

Even if you're in my chat, I'm not even being hostile. I don't even know. I don't get it. Even if you're in my chat,

I'm not even being hostile.

I don't even know.

I can't even understand the brain.

I can understand the brain.

I don't understand what's holding you back from just becoming a communist.

If you are a dissident, if you're against the system, what's holding you back?

I don't get it. I don't understand. Doesn't make any sense to me. How could you not be a communist?

Doesn't make sense. Like, there's actually dead-ass people walking around, like,

I'm not a communist.

I'm a, what?

You're a what?

Bro, you are walking around with no head on your shoulders.

Like, it's like a person without being a communist, it's like you're like a turtle without your shell.

Like, what are you doing?

Okay, this guy's going to come up.

His name is something con.

Go ahead.

Why are you not a communist please Go ahead.

Unleach yourself. They are not a communist because they have better in it and are still connecting.

I see the speaker, it's just they're muted. All right. I don't know what's going on.

Okay, this other person who's got... I don't know what's going on.

Okay, this other person who's got America First. This is one of these Groypers. Go ahead, unmute yourself.

Has, did you finally make it to 5'5?

I couldn't hear your master list.

Did you finally make it to 5 foot 5?

What do you mean 5 foot 5? 5? What?

Did you finally made it 5 foot 5?

What's 5 foot 5? What does that mean? Your height. you did you you finally made it five foot five what's five

what does that mean

your height

my height five foot five

yeah

well you're five foot four but

did you finally make it there

what do you mean did I

did I drive there or what what do you tell how do I make it there? What do you mean? Did I drive there or what?

What do you tell?

How do I make it there?

What does that mean?

Your height.

Are you fucking retarded?

No, you're so smart.

Explain it.

Yeah, you're 5'4.

Did you finally make it to 5'05?

You mean

you mean make it how?

Yeah, yeah, you mean

by flying on an airplane?

You're crashed out, dude.

Bro, by the way, you're fucking retarded, dude.

And communists, they all need

fucking die.

Oh,

they do?

They do?

Yeah.

Kind of like you,

if you were in front of me

in real life,

if you were in front of me

in real life,

are you going to make it?

Are you going to make it to

five foot five?

Are you going to make it

to one push up, you fat, bitch? Are you going to make it to 5.05? Are you going to make it to one pushup, you fat bitch?

Are you going to make it to 1 push up?

Are you going to make it to 5.05?

I can hear your hefty, hefty fat voice.

Are you going to make it to 5.055?

Buddy, I'm taller than your cowboy leader.

Are you going to make it to five foot five

when nick does

you're five foot four

i'm taller than your leader bro i'm taller than nick you're taller than anything i'm taller than

your leader, bro.

Shut the fuck up, bro.

Your cat boy leader is like, what?

Five, six, five, five.

You're five foot four.

You're five foot four.

You're five foot four.

You're five foot four.

Yeah, we've seen your pictures, dude. You're a fucking nothing. You're a fucking membrane. You're five foot four. You're five foot four. Yeah, we've seen your pictures, dude. You're fucking nothing. You're a fucking membrane. You're five foot four. Why you're so angry? Like, you're just like angry about this claim.

Okay, let's tone it down. Why are you so like angry? You're so, your ass is bleeding.

Are you

going to make it to 5 foot 5?

I don't understand your question. It doesn't make sense.

Are you going to grow and make it to 5 foot 5?

Am I going to grow to the location of

5 foot 5? What is this location? It's called Earth. You grow to like 5 foot 5 inches. Are you going to get there?

So it's called Earth and then you get to the place called 5 foot 5 inches. Where's

this place? Can you put it on Google Maps?

I might try it.

Google Earth?

I think

that's way too far past

your leader, Nick Fuentes, unfortunately.

I don't want to be so far away from him. I'm trying

to debate him. I don't want to go so far away from him. I'm trying to debate him. I don't want to go so far past him. So, no.

Why would he debate you? You're five foot four.

Yeah, because he's like five foot four.

If I'm five four, then he's, if I'm... If I'm 5... You can even make past 300

subscribers.

Hold on. Hold on, Juan.

I'm 5-4.

Hold on, Juan.

I'm 5-4, right?

I'm 5-4-4?

Yeah, you're 5-4.

If that's true, Nick Fuentes is 5-2.

No, it's true.

It's true. Okay, then he's 5-2.

And he's mogging you.

Okay, so why do you care?

So what does it matter then?

So why?

Why mention it?

Mog that,

mug it right through your brain.

And think about it.

He mocks me,

but you're the one screaming about five foot four,

five foot four,

but your leader's shorter.

Well,

guess what?

You can't even scream

to five foot five.

You can't even get there.

You can't even get there. You can't even get there.

Why are you not angry at

Nick Flentis for being shorter?

I'm going to scream it.

Listen, I'm going to scream all the help.

So are you a fan of Nick Flentis?

I'm going to scream all the help.

Do you like Nick Fuentes?

You can't even get there.

Do you like Nick Flentis? Do you like Nick Fuentes? You can't even get there. Do you like Nick Flentes?

Do you like Nick Flentes?

You can't even get there.

I want to show the retarded logic of Groopers.

Do you like Nick Flentes?

Hell yeah.

Okay, but he's shorter than me.

You're 5 for fucking four.

But you claim that.

You claim that.

But it's an objective fact that he's shorter than me.

Hello, how are you, brother?

Hi.

Okay, I'm talking to someone right now. Please wait your turn. Go ahead. Continue.

Yeah, you're actually shorter than most women in high school. So think about that.

You know what you sound like? You sound very gay. It's like you're just like making these claims about, making these claims about like my physical.

You can't even grow a beard.

Like you're a faggot.

I can't grow a beard, really.

I can't grow a beard.

You can't even, you can't.

Dude, you get mugged out.

You're getting mugged out by Nick.

How about that one?

So I can't grow a beard

but Nick is...

He actually has the inches

over you, bro.

You have no inches.

Yeah, I'm 5'4

and I can't grow a beard.

Okay.

You're 5'4, dude.

5.4. No beard't grow a beard. Okay. You're 5-4, dude. 5-4.

No beard.

Would you like to...

No actual commentation.

Like, I mean, you're nothing.

Yeah, but in real life, you wouldn't say this.

Real life?

No.

Real life?

I would plug you into the ground.

No, you wouldn't, tough guy.

You would cry and bitch and go home.

No, you wouldn't.

I'm a real guy.

No, you're a bitch boy.

You're a bitch boy.

You're a fat bitch.

Yeah, there we go.

There we go.

There we go.

Yeah, what are you're gonna go

what are you gonna do about it boy you're 5 foot 4

I don't think so I think I absolutely

5 4 I'm still looking for that 5 foot 5 bro

you're still looking for it so this is

this is this you're looking for, is this your high IQ?

Did you find it yet? Did you find it? Big and hefty fat fuck. Oh, you didn't. Oh, you didn't. Oh, you didn't. Oh, you didn't. Hey, hey, came up. Did you find that inch? Did you find that inch?

Can you say something else?

I'm going to say that. You're five foot four. Five foot four? Five foot four? Are you going to make it to five five? Are you going to make it? Are you going to make it? Are you going to make it? Are you going to make it? Are you going to make it?

Are you going to make it?

Are you going to make it?

Are you going to make it?

Are you going to make it?

Did you make it?

Did you make it?

Did you make it?

Did you?

Did you? Did you?

Did you?

Are you going to make it?

54? 50 you? Are you going to make it? 5.4? 5.05? 5.5? 5.5? Did you make it?

Did you make it? Oh, you still haven't made it. Are you to make it? Are you to make it?

No, are you going to make it? You haven't made it. You still haven't made it. You still haven't made it. You still haven't made it. You still haven't made it.

You still haven't made it. You still haven't made it. You still haven't made it. You still haven't made it. You still haven't made it. You still haven't been fucking wrecked on our own platform.

All right. Can you make an actual argument? Can you make an actual argument, you pussy boy, you little bitch. Can you make a fucking argument?

Hey, hey, listen, listen, listen.

You are very gay. You're talking

about another man's appearance. You're making

stuff. I mean, it doesn't even matter, but you're just

you come on my space

making claims

about my appearance.

Let's say I'm 5-4 or 4-4 or whatever you want to say.

Make a fucking argument, you pussy.

This isn't a beauty pageant.

You are gay.

Just be open about that fact. You're gay. Just be open about that fact.

You're coming on to another man's space talking about his physical...

I mean, you're talking nonsense.

You're saying, oh, he's...

You're fight for, you're five for.

Even if I was, what the fuck does that have to do with anything?

What is your actual point?

You're a little bitch in real life.

If you're concerned about whether you could go toe to toe with me in real life, I could already your fat, fuck, hefty bitch ass would be pummeled into the ground.

You need a fucking scooter to get around you, fat bitch.

You'd be out of breath.

So shut the fuck up if this is a tough guy act. No one wants to hear it and no one buys it.

So make a fucking argument pertaining to the content of what is at stake in the future of America,

in the facts of what's

going on in this country

instead of fucking talking

about a bunch of nonsense that only

a gay beauty pageant

diva like yourself would give a fuck

about. Go ahead.

Yeah, it's interesting you had to mute it

because you're a fucking fat, four-foot

five-inch

person. Okay, when you have arms

bigger than this, when you have arms that look

like this, you can talk about that. You're a fucking retard.

You got cooked. Dude, you have

nothing to break. Make

a single substantive point

that is relevant

to anything.

I don't want to be physically

liked by you, dude.

You're a dis i mean

you i don't sway that way

you are you don't your culture

your whole movement is not like that

you don't get it it's like not

computing for you

it's like you computing for you.

It's like you're coming on the space.

You have no idea how flamboyant you sound, screaming this so passionately.

Why are you so passionate about this? It's so disturbing, actually. I'll give you one more opportunity to explain why your position politically is superior to mine, why your theory is superior to mine, your leader

is smaller than me.

Okay.

Next to destiny, he was scared to take off his shoes for a reason.

So if this is so important to you, I maug your leader.

So the debate is over when it comes to anything pertaining to appearance if you care about that.

But that doesn't matter at all.

What actually matters is what's at stake in the content of our position, our messaging, our integrity and our character.

That's all that fucking matters. I mug your fucking leader on all physical metrics, okay?

So don't even talk about it. It's not relevant. And it's weird too,

by the way. Go ahead. I'll unmute you.

Why do you have to meet me?

Because you can't control

yourself. Why? Why did you have to meet me?

Because you keep screaming 5-5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5.

Because you keep screaming. Why do you have to meet me. Because you keep screaming 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5. Why do you have to meet me?

Because you keep screaming. Why do you have to meet me?

Because you're just repeating the same thing over and over again. Because you're 5 foot fucking 4.

Okay. Like dude, you're

I would love to run into someone like you in real life

and just see if you could keep this energy.

I'm a troll.

You're like...

Sound like a fat fuck,

50-year-old, fat, hefty big bitch

who's out of breath.

Screaming and repeating the same thing over and over again.

And I know you don't think it's funny. You're actually genuinely upset because you have nothing.

You're upset. You are visibly upset right now. Why are you so upset and emotional?

Go ahead.

Why do you keep muting?

Because you're my bitch, that's why.

Why?

Because I dominate you and you're my bitch, and I own you.

That's why.

Anything else, bitch?

That's pretty interesting from a 5'4 nigger.

Okay.

Well, I own you and you're a bitch.

Anything else?

Pretty interesting from a 5 foot 4 nigger.

You know, and what's pretty interesting is you're my bitch. Pretty interesting from a 5 foot 4 nigger. You know, and what's pretty interesting is you're my bitch.

Pretty interesting that you're a 5 foot 4 nigger.

It's pretty interesting how, you know, you can't speak.

Because you're a bitch and you admit as much

you are a pussy boy

you are a bitch and nothing more

go ahead oh he left

thank you for your surrender that's all

I wanted surrender accepted I

dominate you I dominate you.

I dominate you, you bitch.

Like, that's all I needed.

He left.

I didn't even kick him out.

Absolute red domination.

Are you going to make it? Are you going to make it?

Some fat, hefty bitch.

Okay, this will be the last person we bring on.

Syrian clarinet.

Go ahead. Why are you muting me?

Why amyating me?

And Nick Flander, why are you muting me?

Go ahead, Syrian, go ahead. Unmute yourself.

Oh, I got to unmute you. My bad. I had everyone muted. Go ahead. Unmuse yourself.

Hey, what's up, man?

What's up? What's going on? You came on. What's up?

I just press request every time I join the space. I don't have much to say.

Okay, yeah. You're just kind of a stupid guy. That's okay.

So... stupid guy that's okay so there's a tactical and right I don't care like what do you what I'm supposed to be shocked I said a bad word okay go say it in public

see what happens, you know? Like, like what? You're just a

pussy. Like, you come on my space talking shit like this. You're a fucking pussy. You're nothing.

You're garbage. You get dog walked. Why come on to be humiliated? Like repeating, it's so autistic.

They have nothing. I'm just going to, I'm just go on and scream the same thing over and over again. Okay.

There's a wicked, wicked, disgusting freak in my audience.

You know, the Carolyn, she's like, was best friends with this guy who was a fucking pedophile or some shit.

She was dating him.

This wicked, disgusting woman needs to get out of my fucking space.

Look up that whole backstory.

It's literal sick shit.

Sick, sick shit. You know, What am I going back to TikTok?

When I complete the logo rebrand and everything?

And, uh, yeah.

I guys, I don't enjoy TikTok a whole lot. I, um, I would, I would prefer if you guys just keep clipping me and posting it, honestly.

Like, post this, that shit goes viral like there's huge

I see so much of my clips go viral there's one that what got like a million

impressions a month ago or something it's like just do that shit you know I personally

uh Just do that shit, you know? I personally, uh...

Maybe, I don't know.

Maybe.

I don't enjoy it.

I gotta figure...

I have to find a way to enjoy it.

I have to find a way to enjoy it. I have to find a way to TikTok.

It's just not a lot of fun. You know what's...

I keep thinking about something in my head.

How did I know that guy was fat?

Like, I didn't see what he looked like.

I literally said he's fat and he admitted it.

How did I know that?

It's like I could tell.

Look at this disgusting woman, Carolyn. She, uh, she made a post. I can't, I think she blocked me.

But I got the notification for it anyway.

Okay. for it anyway. You know what? Carolyn didn't even request to speak.

All right, you know what?

Go tell Carolyn to rejoin the space.

Go tell Carolyn the disgusting degenerate woman to rejoin the space.

Let's swarm her shit.

Dr. Carolyn B.

She claims that, oh, he was running away.

Oh, you weren't requesting.

You were just in my fucking audience lurking like a retarded bitch

let's go ahead and uh... why can't even find them maybe have maybe they have maybe they spell it like this i can't even find them. What the fuck? go uh go go go swarm them and bring them go bring them in

i think they blocked me what's how come i can't find them

oh should have been nicer.

Okay, so she's still listening in.

Yeah, well, you know, you claimed you wanted to debate now, even though you didn't request.

So, by all means, debate, fucking retard.

Yeah. debate fucking retard yeah and rev linked to the relevant thing in her replies

rev absolutely she's

look at this the governor

Carolyn Borisenko carried she's look at this the governor caroline borisenko carried on a long year's relationship with a convicted

child pornographer while he was in prison erin campbell brown pled guilty to trafficking child pornography

i shit you not this is real this pled guilty to trafficking child pornography. I shit

you not. This is real.

This is real.

Okay? That's why I remove

this vermin the minute I saw them.

Because frankly,

you'd belong in prison.

There's just some things that are just beyond anything.

But they didn't even request to speak.

So who gives a fuck, right? These are the, this is the degeneracy of anti-communists.

They're a bunch of disgusting degenerate scum.

This is their nature.

This is what they are. You know, all right All right, well, is anyone, Kyle, is anyone else requesting?

Yo, hello?

He might not be there.

Let me see.

Requested.

Who the fuck is this?

Go ahead. Hello? Hello? go ahead uh hello yeah

hey how's it going

what's going on

i don't know i just saw you to space

um i was curious i was wanting to ask you

because I know you've been trying to angle to get

a debate with Nick

and I was wondering

Are you a Groyper General? Is that true?

I wouldn't say I'm a general.

I'm a Groyper.

Okay, what does that mean you're a Groyper. Okay, what does that mean

you're a Groyper? What does that mean?

It means I like Nick.

Okay.

I'm a fan.

How much of a fan?

I mean, I, you know, I've

talked to him a couple times, you know?

Well, you've talked to him, really times, you know? Well, you've talked to him, really?

That's crazy.

Yeah, but I was just wondering, like,

what would you want to debate him about?

What would the topic be?

I could think of a whole lot of things.

The first thing I would say is that I want to debate about solutions.

What's the solution for America's problems? The second thing I want to debate about is so-called race realism.

I want to debate about whether it's credible or legitimate to speak of some races being superior

to others and if black people

are innately incapable and so

this is directly relevant for

American affairs

I want

to debate about Zionism and its root causes.

I want to debate about the root causes of the decline of American sovereignty.

I want it to be solutions oriented in terms of like, what are your solutions? I want it to be solutions oriented in terms of like what are your solutions.

I want it to be about what are the causes of the problem in the first place.

And then I'd also like to fit in there a debate about race realism.

Those are three major topics I can think of.

Okay. Interesting. those are three major topics i can think of okay interesting so you don't really have anything like in particular like not like an individual issue that you want to debate him on you just

really just want to debate him as a person essentially i want to debate about who has a superior vision and a superior

outlook right so why why nick as opposed to anybody else because nick flentes keeps dragging our name through the mud and

mentioning us and it's time that audiences get a you know they for the same reason he wanted to

debate charlie kirk and he wanted to debate all the people in the

TPUSA. He feels like they are ignoring an elephant in the room and I feel the same about him.

He's covering up an alternative, which I feel like a lot of people would find very compelling.

In terms of politics, I think he's covering up an elephant in the room, for sure.

And, you know, he comes after us first.

We don't even pay this guy any mind he came after us

first honor demands that if you're the one talking shit and you're saying this and that

the onus is on you prove it settle it through a debate settle who the better debater is

settle who's smarter settle who's more intelligence settle who the better debater is. Settle who's smarter.

Settle who's more intelligent.

Settle who, you know,

has a more comprehensive,

rigorous worldview.

Yeah, I don't think that's true, though.

I think you talk about him quite a bit.

Since when, though?

I mean, I've seen

screenshots from your Discord

and your tweets.

Since when? Since when?

And it's been going on for, like, I don't know, at least

the past month, and probably

longer than that. I don't keep up too much and probably longer than that.

No, not longer than that.

We're talking the past three weeks.

Carl, what's up?

Appreciate the 10.

The reason for that, by the way, is because he went on his stream, first of all,

he went on a tangent and a rant about me talking shit about me

okay he was calling me a third

worldist he was calling me an idiot

he was calling me this he was calling me that

um

then uh then

Charlie Kirk happens

and what does he do? He accuses me

of killing Charlie Kirk. He accuses my party

of killing Charlie Kirk. He accuses Jackson

of killing Charlie Kirk.

I don't think he accused you guys of killing

Charlie Kirk I don't think that's what I did

yes absolutely he did

he said Tyler Robb he said the ACP is covering up

Tyler Robinson being one of them and them having something to do with it

and they're pointing fingers at Israel because they want to take away the tension and the heat away from themselves.

And he said Jackson Hinkle is going to jail over this.

Okay. So, I mean, who do you think Tyler Robinson was more politically aligned with? You or Nick?

Him, definitely him, and I can prove it. Our leftist detractors who are so-called woke and whatever, they are with Nick over us.

They side with Nick

over us.

We regularly see them

defect from the

left altogether

over to your

ranks.

They are

demographically from

the same class

background.

They usually have the same character type.

They have the same type of personality.

These people have far more in common with you than us. My people are overwhelmingly blue-collar working-class Americans.

They're not jobless needs.

They're people that do good work for their communities.

They're not antisocial.

They're not profoundly edgy, and they don't like to shock and offend people's sensibilities.

They don't hate the world. They don't hate society.

They're absolutely

more in common with you guys than us.

I mean, really?

You think the guy with like a

trans boyfriend or

trans girlfriend, I don't know that orientates you.

You want to go down that road?

Because what is this thing going on with cat boys and,

and, uh,

femme boys in your community?

I have no idea what you're talking about.

What's going on with the British Nick Fuentes?

What's going on with the Groypers who responded to the British Nick?

They were like, we've all been there.

We've all been.

What's going on?

See, you guys have, you guys have, who is?

You guys have something going on for sure.

The British Nick Fuentes?

Like, what are you talking about?

I don't know. I, look, I'm sure you talking about? I don't know

I look

I'm sure you do

If you don't

Your people do

You guys have

Way more in common

With that than us

Way more

I don't think

You don't understand

How normal we are

And compared

To you guys

and this

supposed shooter or whatever

you know assuming that they were

the guilty party and it was about their passion

for transgenderism

I don't

I'm sorry that's a little ridiculous I I don't.

I'm sorry, that's a little ridiculous.

It's not ridiculous.

It's ridiculous if you're only going off of superficial political labels. Oh, one is supposedly on the far left and the other is supposedly on the far right.

But wait a second.

This,

this antisocial,

like degenerate pathology,

um,

it's,

it's a,

it's not even far away from the so-called opposite ends of the spectrum.

It's a,

it's one step away.

And we witness it all the time,

by the way. These same people who attack us that are the so-called woke liberal leftists,

they go to your guys' side all the time, and they absolutely prefer you guys over us.

Well, maybe they just prefer us because we're funnier, but I doubt, like, ideologically,

they agree with us on a lot.

It has nothing to do with class.

Class background is the determining factor.

We don't resonate with

NEETs and we don't resonate with

people who

were our disgruntled professional

managerials who couldn't work their way

up to the top, got a Jewish

ceiling on their head and got bumped back down,

and now have no future. We don't resonate with that demographic. We resonate more with

blue-collar working-class people. Your movement doesn't at all. I'm a blue-collar working-class guy. I live

in Kentucky. Like, you know, I'm a blue collar as a gretch.

Yeah.

You're a streamer.

You're not a blue collar worker.

Before that, I was a plumber.

Well, before then, before you got roped up with this movement that you're in, you probably would have been more sympathetic

with us.

No, I wouldn't.

No, I wouldn't.

Well, time will tell.

Time will show, you know, what position holds more currency.

Nick Fuentes, he denigrates the white working class.

He claims that they're low and that everyone needs to emulate Jewish people and everyone needs to be, you know, worship rich people and so on.

So it's like, you know, I don't know.

I mean, he doesn't believe in a working class power,

a working class movement.

And, uh,

nice,

his own words.

Those are his own words.

I mean,

like,

he was trying to tell people that you shouldn't settle for being poor, and I think that that's...

But you know why that's a meaningless position?

Because it's not in the hands of most people.

Most people...

This is a myth that most people can just get

rich. It's not true. Only a minority

of people can get rich. So what about

all the people who have normal working class

jobs? What kind of future

are they going to have? What kind of future can

they fight for? That's what our movement

addresses. Our movement

of course encourages people to

do as best they can for themselves,

but we don't tell the

American people that that's the solution

to their problem, because it's not.

Okay.

I don't really know the disagreement not. Okay.

I don't really know that the disagreement is other than you seem to think, you tend to believe more in a bottom-up approach as opposed to a top-down approach, that somehow

you're going to mobilize a bunch of working class people in order to make some sort of political change when it really is the people at the top. It is the politicians that are the ones that make the decisions. The power structure at the top is extremely fragile and prone to decadence, which it is decaying right now. And we don't

believe in the long term that it's going to be a source of legitimacy for state power. It's going to

probably splinter into a civil war. It's going to collapse in some form.

So yes, from scratch, some kind of new power is going to have to be made. That's what a revolutionary position entails.

But in any case, the crux of the actual disagreement, like at its essence, stems from his disreputable, dishonorable behavior.

And it also stems from this so-called issue of his half-baked anti-Zionism.

We are fully and comprehensively anti-Zionist.

We are fully and comprehensively anti-regime.

We are fully and comprehensively anti-system.

He thinks he can go

25% or 50%

he thinks we can preserve

all of it all we have

to do is just kind of

somehow limit the Jewish

influence and then every he doesn't understand it's an entire structure

if you don't have a comprehensively revolutionary position you are destined to shill which is

what he's been doing so is your position that like capitalism is inherently Zionist and it must be toppled is that sort of what you're getting at

that Zionism is a consequence of that. Yes. Absolutely.

Okay.

Yeah, I just disagree.

I think that, I mean,

in what way do you think that Nick could become more sufficiently

Zionist or anti-Zionist for you to approve, you know, like, how far as you at the guy?

I think a start would be not soying out over me and Jackson regarding, you know, the anti-Zionist forces worldwide in Africa, in the Middle East, in Asia, successfully fighting against this global empire and global system. Us regarding that as positive developments, and he calls us anti-white third world is

for that he's aping

the Zionist rhetoric of the

Bapis and using it

against us so that

that betrays

a

you know an insufficiently

anti-Zionist stance.

Okay, well, no, that's interesting.

So, and you're talking about, like, for example,

like you'd say he's not sufficiently pro-Palestinian enough.

Is that what you're sort of implying? He's not sufficiently pro-Palestinian enough is that what you're sort of implying he's not sufficiently anti-system he doesn't want to he doesn't believe although he's inconsistent

about it and this is the this is another thing it's just he's unprincipled. Because for example, in my last

discussion with him, he said that in a war between America and China, he'd support China.

He consistently said, oh, we got to be pro China. We got to be pro Russia. But then somehow, the logic elides him, which I don't believe it elides him.

I think he's making a calculated move to gatekeep against the Maga communists by employing

Bapist rhetoric and tactics.

We apply the same logic to the Sahel states, which are overthrowing, you know, pro-NATO regimes in Africa.

And African, you know, Africans are winning their sovereignty with the help of Russia and China or whatever.

And that is very fundamental for global geopolitics.

That's very fundamental for undermining the global system, you know, that he claims to be that, oh, yeah, we need to, he's so against it, supposedly, that he thinks we need to support China and a war between America and China.

But so he understands our position is not quote-unquote anti-white, but he uses this

Baptist rhetoric as a way to gatekeep us from getting more exposure, so that way we could

just be immediately dismissed.

Oh, these people just hate white people, and they're third-worldness. more exposure so that way we could just be immediately dismissed.

Oh, these people just hate white people and they're in their third worldists.

He knows that's not true himself.

And I know that because he employs the same logic or at least did.

And I think he switched up recently.

But he did last time I talked to him when it comes to Russia and China.

But he selectively employs the rhetoric of his Bapist bullies against us as a form of gatekeeping.

Well, I think your representation of his position on China is a little disingenuous. I think the point that he was trying to make was that because he is so censored by the American system, he felt like he would be better off under a Chinese regime just due to the fact of

adverbate him.

When I spoke to him,

I asked him a simple question.

I said,

if America and China went to war,

would you take a principal

anti-war stance?

You know,

because he,

we were talking about

third worldism, and I was like, okay, would you, so you find it necessary to defend American hegemony, let's say there's a war with China. Would you, would you become quote unquote patriotic for America's side and that war?

Or would you oppose the war?

And then he goes, I would be pro-war for China.

That's what he said.

Okay. All right.

Well, I don't way I don't

I don't

I don't know how to answer that

I'd have to look at the clip

that's what he said

that's what he said

again I'd have to look at the clip

in the context of it

in order to make a stance

but either way

it's literally like ad verbatim

what he said.

Okay. Well, like I said,

I'll review the clip.

If there's one thing I've learned about Nick,

is that you have to look at the context

of things, but, you know,

I'll look at the

You can look at the context, sure. It's not going to make a difference because it's what he said.

And he said that because he understands the logic that if you're against the regime and you believe in such a comprehensively distinct alternative, for him, I guess it's

a Catholic monarchy or something, which we think

is nonsense, but regardless,

for us, the decisive thing is being

anti-system. When he feels like

he wants to be anti-system

he'll understand that if you

if you are against the system we have right now

there's no way to be halfway about it

you have to be against the regime

okay and yeah but You have to be against the regime, okay?

Yeah.

But that's no long, but you see how he flip-flops and he dances around this fact.

And he gate keeps against us because we have a more consistently comprehensively revolutionary stance on that.

You know, we don't have to appease Densians of, of, of, um, racist who have a problem with Africans by denying the facts that the revolutions in the Sahel benefit

all revolutionary forces potentially within America or all pro-sovereign forces within America

by undermining the same global system that occupies America.

So the logic is airtight, and he understands it.

It's just he, as a gatekeeping mechanism, smears me and Jackson as anti-white third-worldness,

because he fears

that we are breaking through

the falsely established

dichotomy between the liberal left

and the Republican right.

So he's a gearkeeper. I mean, when Charlie Charlie Kirk died the first thing this guy did is he wants to rally and unite the Republican right you know and he wants to talk about how the danger is the left and we all have to stick together

and he's gearing up

even before

it happened to be recruited

and then he didn't get recruited so now he's

talking bad about the GOP again

so he's unprincipled and he's unreliable

I wanted to ask you I mean I again. So he's unprincipled and he's unreliable.

I wanted to ask you, I mean,

as a communist,

did you find it offensive that he would, I mean, as someone who's anti-sistern,

did you find it offensive that he would take

China side over America? Were you

against that?

No, no. I just didn't believe...

I didn't believe he's telling the truth.

I didn't think he was...

I was surprised.

I wasn't offended. Far from it

for me to be offended.

But I was surprised he would take that stance from it for me to be offended. Okay.

But I was surprised he would take that stance, because it showed me that actually he understands the logic at hand. So the only reason he's running with this, you know, this Bapist gatekeeping shit that he's using against us is because he's intentionally

trying to prevent our movement from getting more attention, from getting more renown, you know,

because he does fear that it is a compelling

position. I don't think that's unreasonable

to say that it is a pretty reasonable

and compelling position that we have.

Gotcha. So,

I mean, would you consider you of someone

who's like pro-China, pro-CCP?

Yeah.

Okay.

Yeah, I just, that's one thing I just, I can't get behind, unfortunately.

I think they are a very inhumane group of people. I think they are a very inhumane

group of people. I think they treat their citizens

horribly and they practice...

I thought you're a Nick Fuentes follower.

I am, man. Don't you think

it's a little disloyal to

counter signal what Nick Fuentes said?

I mean, I'm an individual at the end of the day.

I have my own opinions on things.

I still love Nick, and I still agree with everything that he says,

but I'm just not particularly pro-China,

and I don't think that that really matters

in a movement called America

first, you know?

Yeah, you think it doesn't matter, but, you know, that disagreement you have will probably

become decisive one day, I'm willing to bet.

Whether it's this one or another one. Well, you know, if I'm wrong, I'm willing to bet. Whether it's this one or another one.

Well, you know, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and I'm willing to admit that, but I'm just

personally not very pro-China.

I think the way that they treat people over there is abhorrent and wrong, personally,

in a moral level.

So it is what it is.

Yeah, so, so would you be willing to, like, call him a China shill and he's doing Chinese propaganda or stuff like that or no?

It's just a disagreement that you have with him yeah yeah i mean i wouldn't even say i wouldn't even phrase it as a disagreement because i don't

really know his position on it to be honest with you i'm taking your words frankly i don't know either

because he changes it every day.

So it could be something very different from what he said in that discussion I had.

Yeah, I mean, I think Nick's a super smart guy, and I take a lot of what he says at face value because he's built a lot of trust, you know, with me over the years.

So I just have to hear what he has to say on the issue.

But on my own personal opinion, I'm just not a big fan of China personally.

Why do you think he mentions us so often?

I don't think that he does.

No.

I think maybe you probably get lumped in with Jackson.

No.

And I know he talks

that shit about Jackson a lot.

And maybe you kind of come up by Fox.

Before we get to me, why don't we start with Jackson?

What's his problem with Jackson?

Why does Jackson need to be killed?

Can you explain?

I don't think he needs to be killed.

Nick thinks that, so why does he think that?

I don't think that he thinks that.

I think that was probably just a joke.

Oh, that was a joke?

Because we can't tell, you know.

Well, Nick seemed to be really sensitive to jokes about the sanctity of human life

so it's really hard

to tell. Jackson

was in Yemen and then

Nick said Trump has the opportunity to do

the funniest thing right now but that was a joke right

that's yeah pretty

obviously a joke yeah when he followed it, yeah, pretty obviously a joke.

When he followed up and said, I can't wait to see you in hell with Satan or something,

he said some obscene thing.

That was also a joke, right?

I didn't see that one, but I didn't see the end of one.

You mentioned earlier that you

like context a lot, and context

is very important to you.

In context,

would you say that it's also

relevant to point out

maybe the fact

that the U.S. was bombing Yemen at this time

while Jackson was in it?

Yeah, I mean, we all know that, yeah.

So there was a chance that Jackson could have been bombed, right?

Probably not. Let's be real.

It'd have been fine. Why not?

I don't know. I don't know the logistics of that, but, yeah, I think it was just a...

He was in the place being bombed, okay? Nick knew that. Everyone knew that. It was all over the media.

So that was the context of him saying he hopes Jackson gets bombed and killed.

Did Jackson do anything that justifies that reaction?

A joke? Yeah, he deserves a lot. No, it wasn't a joke yeah he deserves a lot

it wasn't a joke was it was a joke

it was a joke it was totally clearly a

he says Jackson should go to jail

uh no

I don't know I didn't see that one

why should well he says it a lot.

Why should Jackson go to prison or jail?

What's Nick Fuentes' his reasoning?

I don't know.

I haven't heard him say that, to be honest with you.

I don't doubt that he has, but I just haven't heard the context of all of it.

Okay.

Well, he said it many times.

Yeah.

Well, yeah, I believe him.

I agree with him.

I think that people that are too critical of Israel should go to jail?

No, of course not.

Oh, because Nick does.

So I was wondering, because you said you're a follower.

Yeah, what did he say that?

Well, he said Jackson Hinkle belongs in prison because he's a traitor or something.

He said Jackson belongs in prison because he killed Charlie Kirk.

And then he said Jackson belongs in prison

because

he's not loyal enough

to the Zionist

regime.

That Nick himself said he would side

with China against an war

by the way

yeah this is all coming across is like

very silly to me

to be honest with you

I think it's silly too because

Jackson should go to jail

because he lives in Moscow

and he's very pro-Russian geopolitically, obviously.

And Nick claims, he claims this, he made it up.

But let's just even say Nick was right, which he's not.

He's like, oh, Jackson said Lavrov's going to give him some company.

He belongs in jail.

Like, let's say that's true, which it's not.

Okay?

Nick himself said that if there was a war between the USA and China, with me when he was

talking to me, maybe he says different things when he talks to different people.

He said he would side with China in a war.

He'd be pro-war on China's side.

That's a lot more of a

so-called quote-unquote traitor than Jackson

doing a business deal, which he didn't do,

by the way.

So why does Jackson belong in jail?

Or do you think Nick is not being principled?

Maybe he's just doing this because he personally doesn't like Jackson.

But somebody who wants to wish violence and harm and prison on people because they personally dislike them doesn't seem like they deserve to be trusted as a leader for anything.

I don't think somebody who's as emotional as you are deserves to be the leader of anything, to be honest, because a lot

of this is just like, hearsay, emotional

nonsense. What's emotional

about what I just said? I just reported

facts. Is there something I said that was wrong?

You're literally, you're playing

stupid and pretending as if things that were said as a joke aren't a joke.

So the prison thing is a joke.

So if Jackson went to prison, Nick would not support it?

You know what I'm talking about and you're obfuscating again.

About the comment about Yemen, of course, that's what I'm referring to.

Oh, okay. You're referring to Yemen and not the prison

thing. Okay, because I was talking about the prison thing.

Because I don't know what the prison thing is.

I don't think Nick

was joking about Yemen. I think in

context Jackson was in Yemen.

I think the U.S. was

bombing Yemen at the time. And I

think there was a possibility, Jackson

was going to get bombed. That's a

meme. It's a literal meme.

Like, you've heard that meme before

stated in different contexts, right? Where it's like

blank has the opportunity

to do the funniest thing ever.

Yeah, that the structure

of the sentence refers to a meme,

but the content of it was him wishing

Jackson is going to get killed.

Oh my God. No, he wasn't. It's like

you're just being silly now. No, he wasn't. It's like you're just being silly now.

No. In context, Jackson was in Yemen. Yemen was getting bombed.

And Nick was basically like, Trump has the funniest thing to do right now. And then he followed up by saying, I can't wait

for Trump to send you to hell

while you'll be with Satan.

So he followed up and he kept

repeating this. And the reason Nick

Fuentes said this was because

it would have been legal for Jackson

to be killed in this way.

So Nick doesn't support violence.

He just supports legal violence.

As long as he can get away with it, in other words.

If he can get away with grotesque

violence against dissidents

against the system, he'll support it.

He won't call for Jackson to be killed.

He won't say, oh, go kill Jackson and commit a crime because that would be illegal.

But in principle, he has nothing wrong with murder on the basis of such disagreements.

In principle, he has nothing against it.

Yeah.

That's totally...

See, I can understand now

why people are hesitant to talk to you

or have conversations or debates with you

because you're very... This is all very silly stuff.

Okay, look, you can find it silly that I think that Nick Fuentes wasn't joking when he called for Trump or when he wished at least that Jackson would be killed.

But what about the thing about calling for Jackson to go to prison?

Is that a joke?

Again, I haven't seen it, so I can't comment on that.

Okay, assuming that Nick Fuentes said that and it wasn't a joke, what's your take?

I don't know.

Again, I would have to know the context as to what Jackson Hinkle did.

I don't know.

But on the face value, I trust Nick.

But Nick Flintes accuses him of being a Russian agent. Yeah. Do you think he should go to jail. But Nick Fuentes accuses him of being a Russian agent.

Yeah.

Do you think he should go to jail if that's true?

Yeah, for sure.

Okay.

It's not true, by the way, but let's just go with that reasoning.

How does that, should

Nick Fuentes go to jail?

Or if war breaks out between the U.S.

and China, if Nick follows through

and is a man of his word and says,

I'll be pro-war on China's side,

should he go to jail in that

scenario? Why not?

No. It's a political opinion.

He's allowed to have that.

Okay. Well,

is Jackson not allowed to have pro-Russian

political opinions?

Yeah, of course he is, but I think

it goes well beyond that.

Well, don't you think

like a war

where China is literally engaged

in a violent war with

the U.S. government or the U.S.

Isn't that going a little beyond?

I mean, why is Nick Fuentes okay with supposedly, according to him, he's okay with China, like bombing the U.S. Army, but he's not okay with this, with who isn't by the way but just assuming

they were

who's supposedly

an agent of a U.S. adversary

I mean

again you're comparing

like apples to oranges.

To sit here and like try to like make light

of Jackson Hinkle's ties to Russia, I think is very

again, just silly.

You know, like Jackson very cool.

He's traveled there. He's stayed there a long time.

Like we can. We can dive

into all the connections if you really want

to. Okay, yeah, let's do it. Why don't

we do that? Let's dive into the connections.

Yeah. I mean,

let's see.

I mean, he's, again, how much time has he spent there again?

About a year?

Yeah, exactly.

And you're sitting there.

He lives in Russia.

Yeah.

I mean, that already at its face is far more than Nick is done with China.

So again, like this comparison and the psychology was just...

Living in Russia should land you in jail because you moved and lived in a different country

because the country that you're in

is threatening you over you

providing journalistic coverage

to countries like Yemen and Lebanon

and

and elsewhere.

I mean, what are you talking about, buddy?

I mean, Jackson went to Yemen

because we were

bombing Yemen for Israel

and Jackson wanted the American

people to know

what they're bombing.

Do Americans have a right to know

that or no?

Well, who's paying for all this, too?

I mean, that's another curious thing, right?

Who's sponsoring all these tips?

Is this ignore what I just said?

No, I'm just, we're getting into the ties.

I mean, right?

Okay.

Who's paying for the building of popular consensus to bomb Yemen in America?

Who's paying for that?

Yeah, nice pivot.

Is Jackson Hinkle or Russia in your mind more of a threat to U.S. sovereignty than Israel?

It's not about who is more of a threat. It's a matter of who is a threat. In general, anyone who is a threat. That's a problem.

How does that make sense? Israel gets us roped up in a war with Yemen to bomb Yemen on the basis of widespread U.S. public ignorance of what's going on. Jackson, because he wants the American people to know the truth, goes to Yemen to provide insight into what's going on

and what we're bombing

and whether that's justifiable.

It's something we were doing for Israel.

So you tell me,

who wants Jackson to go to jail

over that?

Again, I don't know.

I don't know the context.

I think Israel does.

I think the Mossad does.

I think Israel wants to silence a critic like that.

And you know who is partnering with Israel?

Your leader, Nick Fuentes.

Oh, is that right?

In what way?

By calling for the same thing against Jackson.

Oh, okay.

So if Israel doesn't like Jackson and Nick doesn't like jackson then it must mean that they're colluding and working together like come on give me a break

is trying to join the zionist effort to jail a u.s citizen for first off First off, you're joining the Zionist effort.

What effort, first off, are they making for him to even join to begin with?

Like, what are you talking about?

Why do you think Jackson is still in Russia right now?

Well, it's not because he's hiding from Israel.

Okay.

I can tell you that much.

So you don't think the U.S. institutions are compromised by Israel in any kind of way?

You don't think that...

No, of course I do. No, of course I do. You don't think that... No, of course I do.

You don't think that Zionists weaponize the state to go after anyone they can

who poses a threat to Israeli interest to whatever extent that they're capable.

You don't think people like Laura Lumer and all these Zionist

Mossad shills that are in America don't talk about, oh, this person needs to go to jail. Oh,

Jackson's a Russian. You think they care about Jackson, you know, being disloyal to America.

No, they care about silencing a

critic of Israel, okay?

What social media

influencers are,

is Israel getting arrested?

Well,

what are you talking about?

Well, here's the thing. Jackson

isn't in America.

He's in Moscow right now.

Okay, but if he

was in America, do you think the minute that he

steps foot on U.S. soil, he's going to get

locked up by Mossad because he was critical the minute that he steps foot on U.S. soil, he's going to get, like,

locked up by Mossad because he was criticizing Israel on Twitter.

No, it's much more complicated than that.

It's more like there is a...

He is traveling to Yemen.

He's traveling to countries that the U.S. was bombing.

And there's a lot of unknowns as far as things like how unprecedented is that.

Is there going to be an attempt to change laws and create new precedents to silence dissidents by, you know, exploiting their social media journalism and claiming, oh, you know, if you are using your social media in this way, you know, you're actually whatever. So there's a lot of unknowns.

I mean, technically, Jackson hasn't broken any

laws. He hasn't.

But would you agree

that there's a concentrated

effort by the Zinus

to override

the First Amendment right now?

Are they doing everything in their power?

Are they doing everything in their power to do that?

Yeah, of course.

Absolutely.

That attempt is nothing but accelerating and and intensifying i totally agree so in the midst of

let me let me elaborate in the midst of this because i think this association that now israel is going

to start arresting critics on u.s. soil it's not going to be. No, it's not going to be Israel that does it. It's going to be politicians

bought out by Israel and the regime that's bought out by Israel to pass new laws to create new legal precedence for the U.S. regime to start cracking down on U.S. citizens on Israel's behalf. No one's claiming that Israel itself is going to come and put people in jail. The claim is that they're going to override our First Amendment rights to do that through the U.S. government.

Okay, and what's the precedent that you have that gives you reason to believe that?

What makes you believe that exactly?

Your own leader, Nick Fentes,

believes that's a threat looming on

the horizon. He said so many

times on his own show.

Right. Well, here's the thing. I

agree. Obviously that...

So you think it's something

that they're trying to do do and that there's a high

chance and high probability of happening.

I think that...

At least the significant one that's worth entertaining.

No, here's the thing, because

we're arguing very bigly

and very small here. So what i'm saying here is like

of course israel's always lobbying the american government to change our laws you have the adel

you know the spLC etc etc and and clearly there's there's active censorship going on on social media.

But, I mean, like, if you're going to start getting into this realm of, like, they're arresting people for tweeting critical thoughts about Israel, like, I'm sorry, that's just, that's really silly.

And that's something that I don't

think is ever going to

Trinketshire. The intention is because of

the tweets. Nobody's claiming

that's going to be the direct legal pretext.

The legal pretext is precisely

going to be, you know, accusing people

of being terrorists or accusing people of having ties to foreign governments or accusing people of, you know, being Antifa or something. Of course they're going to drum up some bullshit pretext to do that same thing.

And by the way, your own leader acknowledges that. So why then is he unprincipled when it comes to Jackson? Is he so petty that he can't just be principled and say we don't want U.S. citizens

to be silenced on Israel's behalf? Is he so petty to say that, you know, the whole Russia

Gate thing shouldn't actually be upheld? He's unprincipled. He doesn't have principles.

So how can he be America first?

How is he fit to lead America when he puts his own petty personal ego and petty personal

nonsense, assuming he's a good faith actor and he's not compromised, you know, over what's best for America itself.

Yeah, but again, these examples that you cited about, like, being tied to a foreign government or being, like, associated with anti-file, you know how you don't get arrested for those two things?

You don't have ties to a foreign government and you don't join Antifa.

It's really that simple, actually.

So, first of all, you don't need to join anything called Antifa for them to use that as a pretext.

So that's just nonsense. They can create...

You shouldn't be joining anything, quite frankly.

Okay, you can have any opinion you want about what people should and shouldn't join, but we have a Constitution.

You think that the Constitution should be conceded even one percent to a concentrated

zionist effort to silence americans regardless of the pretext should should our constitutional

liberties that americans have been able to enjoy far, to whatever extent we still have them?

Should those be sacrificed on Israel's behalf?

No, that's not what I'm saying at all. What I am saying is that you...

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, let me elaborate.

Because if you have these things that you that you know

could be a possibility then regardless of whether or right it's wrong you have to be cognizant of the

world that we live in and operate accordingly right that's that's that's what i'm arguing The world we live in is unjust, and we have to be cognizant of that fact, and maneuver it smartly, right? Is that what you're saying? Yes. Okay, but Nick Fuentes is the one contributing to that injustice by himself making these accusations against Jackson

and himself calling for him to be jailed.

Yeah, here we go. Yeah.

You know, the principled thing to do,

acknowledging that of course you have to follow the law that's advice you give to a dissident

what a dissident a principal dissident doesn't go from giving advice to other dissidents to

literally joining the feds to try and silence them

that's what your leader's

doing joining the feds

that's man that's a real bold plane

absolutely

yeah no I'm sure

so silly look I've got to take off but Yeah, no, I'm sure. So silly.

Look, I've got to take off.

But actually, I had a good time talking to you.

And I hope you have a good night.

And maybe we can talk again sometime in the future.

I hope you reflect.

That's all I can say.

God bless.

I don't know who that is.

You guys are saying this is some kind of famous person.

I don't know who that is.

I looked they had 100,000 subscribers

followers.

Anyway, Kyle, is anyone else requesting?

Yes, actually, there's three requests.

Okay. Which one is a Groyper? Yes, actually, there's three requests.

Okay.

Which one is a Groyper?

Um, not entirely sure.

I'm going to look through.

None of them are openly claiming... Which one is a right winger? Let's start with that.

Yeah.

Yeah, I'm not sure I don't think I don't know if any of them are we have

Yusuf from Saudi Arabia I don't know where he stands on anything

all of them seem pretty anti-Israel, but none of them are openly groipers.

Uh, go ahead.

Someone just requested and then dropped, I don't know.

But, yeah, and that was a groiper, requested and dropped.

We have one raising their hand.

I could pull them up.

Oh, yeah, what's up?

Can you hear me?

Yeah, I can hear you.

So, I mean,

I'm new to the whole Twitter space and everything.

I'm recent caught up on Groyper's and all of this and all of that.

All right.

I was supporting Nick.

I mean, I thought he was exposing some pretty, you know, things that others weren't really talking about until this recent, he won't talk about the assassination. But I am actually kind of interested on your whole left and you said that nick is attacking your people and

calling out this that which i agree with i don't know why he's trying to cause civil war and

divide within the people but what is your take on that why is he accusing you guys what is

this whole thing about um look there's two possibilities he's compromised

which i think is very possible right or you know to hype myself up if you believe the second the second option, because it's one or the other,

he is so cognizant of our potential as a movement. And he fears himself, believes in our potential so much

as a movement

that he feels the need to gatekeep

and suppress us

and do everything he can to ensure

that we cannot get more exposure

he fears us so much because he sees us as that we cannot get more exposure.

He fears us so much because he sees us as a threat to his entire grift.

It's one or it's two.

Now, you know, people will have to choose.

It's one or it's two.

It can't be anything else.

Because why mention us?

You know, why, if we're so small and irrelevant and why talk about us? Why mention us?

Why accuse? Why stake your credibility on an event

as significant as

Kirk's assassination? By mentioning us

that's crazy. Why would you mention us?

Like, why would you rope us

into that? It makes no sense.

It's absolutely baffling.

So he's either compromised and just desperate, or he fears us.

What would that mean in your eyes if he was compromised

like in terms of what since he was already your opposition

i think there's a lot of theories about him i think there's a lot of theories about jan 6

and uh what he was doing there

i think there's a lot of weird theories about

you know him getting

a Bitcoin from France

and strangely consistently

I'm not even talking about Candace, consistently for some reason pro Macron.

I remember seeing it.

It was like a year ago during the French riots.

He was like, I hope Macron crushes them.

And this was to suppress the right wing in France.

It didn't even make sense to me.

I don't know. I mean, I don't know. I mean, uh,

why did he attack Charlie Kirk right when, sorry, uh, why did he attack Tucker Carlson

right when Tucker Carlson was turning on Israel?

Yeah, that's, that's what really kind of reeled me into him, that Tucker Carlson, how he called him out on CIA.

Why was that so astro-turfed?

I mean, that was so astro-turfed.

It was incredible.

And by the way,

let me fill you in on something.

They don't

let you go on the algorithm like that

unless

they want to. Correct.

I agree. You don't get to go. You don't get

to be on a quote unquote generational run.

Unless somebody decides, okay, we're going to tolerate this.

We're going to allow this.

The TikTok algorithms, whatever, I mean, these are easy to shut down they don't they can control them however they want to

something weird is going on you know I'm not claiming to know it with certainty I'm just saying his

behavior doesn't add up with a rational actor or a good faith actor.

I mean, I don't think anyone can really be good faith when they're calling for some sort of civil war,

not actually looking into the critiques that other people the people

are calling for, right?

Yeah.

And with that being said,

two years talking about

he fears you guys,

and then who is you guys or who is

us, who is the movement? who is us who is the movement what is well we are a new

generation of communists a new generation of the left wing who you know we're not liberals we're not

politically correct we're not you know we don't have the

identity politics thing we don't we don't punish people for for being

white we don't we don't have any of that insanity.

You know, we embrace people who are socially conservative.

We embrace religious people.

We just so happen to be comprehensively revolutionary in the sense that we completely oppose the system, totally oppose it from its roots. We have a vision of radical, profound transformation of the system with something new. We completely oppose the rule of the money managers in Wall Street. And we want to wipe out all the debt. You know, we want to wipe out all the debt you know we want to nationalize the major corporations and the resources

and we are actually fighting the ruling class.

I mean,

or at least we stand for that.

And it's just extremely comprehensively revolutionary.

And I think a lot of people find that compelling because they just really just don't believe in the system anymore.

Well, it's a failed system that's leading to, you know, all of our demise. But who put the system in place?

Communism is going to only further lead us to our demise, brother.

I beg to differ.

This is the thing about communism, is that it's an entire history we've been lied about since we were in school, in America.

And there was this big war. And I'm starting to think you're a little show for Israel, like with all due respect.

Right?

I have a point of saying that, right?

But you need to...

Okay. When did the U.S. start giving A to Israel

in the volume that it does now?

You know what?

Let me know.

Do you know when?

No, no, go ahead. Tell me.

It was the 73 war.

In 1973, the Soviet Union

armed, equipped, and trained the Arabs

to such an extent

that in 73, they were winning the war with Israel.

Israel was on its last legs.

And so the U.S. had to make a decision.

Are we going to let the Soviet Union win in the Middle East and let them wipe out Israel?

And this blackmail is what the Zionists use to guarantee

and ensure future generations

of unconditional U.S. support

and huge volumes of military aid.

Because that was the only thing

that saved them in 73.

And then after that,

the Zionists were dispatched in the Soviet Union

and throughout the entire Warsaw Pact

for purposes of subterfuge

for subversion

for espionage

and the extent of their ability

to penetrate the communist block was also exchanged with the Americans in exchange for more support

and the Zionists were a decisive and indispensable factor in the destruction of the communist states like the USSR. So you can't say I'm a shill for Israel. And then don't give me started with the Chinese, who were even more radically anti-Zionists than the Soviets in terms of their funding of Palestinian guerrillas, training and arming them.

Soviets didn't even do that. They were training Syria, Egypt, and so on, but directly the Palestinian militants and guerrillas were armed by the Chinese. So it's always been the communists that were fighting Israel.

How would they have got the weapons over there?

How would they have got the training?

Israel knows every single thing that goes on.

I believe that you actually feel into a portion of...

Let me listen for a second.

I think that you fell into a portion of Let me listen for a second. I think that you fell into

a portion of Israeli propaganda and Jewish

propaganda from the Soviets

are going to allow Palestinians

to win and take over the land.

You're speaking from... I'm not talking about

Palestine. I'm talking about Syria and

Egypt and the Arab states that were fighting Israel in 1973.

And they were winning. They were winning that war. I mean, the MiG planes were chasing the Israeli planes out of the sky. They were shooting them down. They were winning. It was only because of American aid that Israel prevailed in that war.

100%. I was 100% for American aid.

100%.

I agree with that.

So the aid was coming, I believe, way before that, right?

Yeah, there was, but it wasn't as much until 73.

That's when the U.S. started getting really serious about, you know, propping up Israel to the extent that it does now.

I mean, if you've been following history and just see it, this isn't something that's been random. This is something that's been written and wrote about for hundreds and hundreds of years, right? This is goals

of thousands of years since the banishment

of the Second Temple, right?

So,

it's not something that's just random. We can all see it.

Look, I'm gonna...

I'm gonna... I'm gonna...

I'm gonna give you my frank opinion,

and I'm just gonna let you think on it. okay, because I don't know, I don't expect I can convince you right now, you know, with the limited time frame that I have. But my frank opinion is this. We don't have to mystify the power structure and the people who realize we don't have to give them, we don't have to lionize them and pretend that they're all powerful and they, there's no way to defeat them and they're magical and it's all this ancient magic from thousands of years ago.

It's so much more simple.

How the whole thing works is a lot, lot more simple.

And it all pertains and relates to a simple thing.

The international financial system that we have.

The system, it's not a conspiracy.

It's a system of how people turn a dime and make money.

Okay.

And that's the key to the whole thing.

And the only way that that system gets defeated, the only way is if you raise the property

question, the natural resources, the industries, the things that are used to securitize these incredible financial abstractions that determine the global chessboard or the pieces on the chessboard in their movement, so to speak, entrust those back into the public interest

and give it back to the people

and the whole basis and foundation

of the wicked system of Zionism

and imperialism disappears

you go for the money.

Go for the wealth. Where do they get this

profound ability to control

the world from?

Where do

Zinus get the power to

influence the U.S. as much as they do through the billionaires?

It is through the money, yes.

Through money.

So go to the source.

Correct.

And the source of all wealth is labor.

If you can control and organize labor, you

cut the supply.

You cut the supply.

You directly control the very source of

wealth, more than money.

There's a few things.

Absolutely.

But if you abolish usury, they're going to call you a communist.

No.

You can't call me a communist.

It's just natural.

It's just law and order.

This is what Jesus came and preached.

It's what Jesus preached. It's what the Prophet Muhammad preached. It's what everyone preached. And it's what Jesus preached. It's what the Prophet Muhammad preached.

It's what everyone preached.

And it's what Hitler first thing he did was get rid of the Gorda

Brother, brother, brother.

This is where I got to

So now I'm going to think of your show for interest.

Why on earth would we be paying interest?

Why on earth is that benefit?

Brother, Hitler didn't get interested.

It's the same people that you want to attack.

Brother, listen, Hitler continued paying the bank.

Aside from Hitler, aside, it doesn't matter.

How can you argue against usury?

No, no, no.

I'm saying, let's get rid of usury and let's abolish the debt.

But you can only do that if you challenge the institution of private property.

Otherwise, it's a contract. It's a private contract. If every single person stops paying their

interest on the credit cords, if every single person started to demand where the tax money goes, right? If all of us united,

if every single person that got a speeding ticket and pled not guilty

then guess what happens to the system okay i know that but let me tell you what they're going to say

if you advocate for that they're going to call you a communist and they're going to say you're stealing

if you call for people to stop paying interest on the credit cards you're stealing money If you call for people to stop paying interest on the credit cards, you're

stealing money because you made a contract.

Who owned the bank, who created this money from thin air, who's stealing it back from us.

40% of taxes were working three to four for five months of the year.

And you're still going to get called a communist

no not if we deny

communism you don't need to throw the labels on it

this isn't a left or a right issue

we're telling you the only people

in history right we don't have to listen to those who are

in command because like you said they're

propped up for a reason

we can't trust any of these people

look I encourage

you to study how the

communists abolished all the debt

overnight I encourage

you to study how

the Ottomans did it.

You know, there's a lot of people that did it.

The Ottomans, a lot of their buyers did it.

He was written by Karl Marx and even before him.

I'm not.

In the 1800s, he was helped by a person named Moses

has he were all Jews brother

right Sidney Floyd Caromarks

all of these guys are all Jews Moses has

He can't say no now you're showing for Israel

So you're just trying to take to people

I have to explain to you

Communism

Listen to me.

Communism. All of these are isms

are all the show for Judaism,

which is leading us to the same demise, right?

This issue, what's going on

is a part of their religious beliefs. It's a fucking

hijack of the system because they're not following

it. Right? So this is

it. They've created every single system and you're

all just leading people down a

fucking path to the slaughterhouse.

People weren't sheep anymore.

I want you to starting to wake up.

This is why as soon as one person

goes against or defends Israel,

we all call you a shield.

You're taking people down a path, and that's what

your path is. That's why it took you so long to explain

it. I'm not here to fight against you or argue

anything, but

this is where we're all going to come to

disagreements, and the people are just going to be

stuck, stand still, not knowing where

to go. I'll show you guys where to go. You turn

the fuck around. I'm just going to quote the Bible.

You shall know them by their fruits.

That's all I can say.

I mean, what is fruits?

What is good fruits now?

Then everybody is corrupt, right?

You shall know them by their fruits.

Look at what the American Communist Party is doing.

Look at what we do.

Look what we stand for and how we walk to walk

and then judge for yourself, that's all I can say.

We're seeing it in full.

We know who created the Communist Party, though,

so we know who's leading.

Look at X. ACP. Main.

There's better options.

We don't just have to rely on these

because there's other ways...

What's a better option than the American Communist Party that exists?

I mean, it's unpopular opinion, but it's the one that everyone's been bashing and trying to turn everyone against.

Look at ACP main.

Look at ACP main.

On X. Look at what we do.

Judge Asp.

How does the world thrive the last thousands and thousands of years before

all of this technology came about?

None of you guys would be doing

anything if this was

150 years ago.

None of you would be doing

what you're doing right now.

None of you.

Yeah, we would.

We'd be talking about.

You would not.

You would not.

You would see the reality

of the world, right? And you would be would be like oh this isn't it fucking right

and you would understand how these different things the war has been going on forever it's been

funded by the same people history always repeats itself when is everyone going to start reading

and waking up are you guys going to continue to and waking up? I think there's two options.

There's an option of defeatism?

There's a defeatism?

Listen to what these guys are saying.

Wake up, people.

Stop fucking going out and start educating ourselves.

Let's wake up.

And I guess all I could say is Nick Fuentes got the call. That's all we can say.

Nick Quintas 100%. He's not only got the call. He's been propped up since 16 years old.

He's been put by Zionist in his ear, giving him money showing him one way. The same way with you. I don't know anything about you. No, don't say that about me. It's not true with me. No way with you. I don't know anything about you.

No, don't say that about me. It's not true with me. No, I'm saying

I don't know anything about you. I'm saying the same way that you're

preaching your ideas and values, I don't know where you came up

with these, right? You're preaching someone

who was taught, you know, who's a Jew

who hated real life people who's a Jew who hated real

life people, who's doing

some of the most... We can't, we can't agree about the past.

You know what? If everybody followed Jesus, I'm not

even joking, like the teachings of Jesus, the teachings

of those who they killed, the the teachings of Jesus, the teachings of those who they killed,

the teachings of Malcolm X, the teachings of all of these people that were killed,

then we'd start following something.

We will disagree.

We'll disagree about the past, but we can agree about the present that Nick Flanca got the call.

How can you disagree about the past?

Because the history always repeats itself if he don't know.

I think Nick Fuentes is the reincarnation of Judas.

Say it again?

Nick Fuentes, it's repeating itself because he's Judas.

He's the reincarnation.

I agree. I think that he, 100% is a show for Israel. I think that he's doing very well.

I think everyone needs to be aware of a lot of these people, the Tucker Carlson's, the Candace Owens.

We don't know any of these people personally. You guys don't know what they do behind closed doors.

Candice Owens' husband is a 100 millionaire plus.

And would you say he used to be a homosexual?

Listen, who used to be openly homosexual.

Right.

Who worked with Peter Thiel, who is homosexual.

And now, you know, Cand canis owns came up with turning point

and all they've all been in the club they've all

been Erica Kirk was under

Trump in 2012 like they all

know each other they're all in the club

I've been overseas I've hung out with these

celebrities and influencers and all of that I see what the

fuck they do behind closed doors.

He's a top guy, right?

Who's top guy?

Nick Fuentes.

He's a Jew, brother. He looks just like Ben Shapiro.

Don't let him fool you.

Jews are allowed to take.

His mother comes from a Jewish state.

He claims she's Italian.

She's of Jewish heritage.

You know what?

I'm open to that.

That could very much.

You guys try to look us up.

Same with Erica Kirk and Charlie Kirk.

He used to work

as a prime uh

him and trump they've all been tied together

who nick flentes

he's a hundred percent jew look at the guy

him and ben shapiro spinning images of one another. He

was pros, rarely. Go watch the

PBOD podcast. Go watch the PB.D. Podcast. The

Jews are allowed to lie. They can manipulate.

They pretend to be

You know what? You're starting to win me over

a little bit.

That makes... He does lie a lot.

He said, I killed him.

This is real life.

I've...

Look into the honey-pop bullshit.

I've been a victim of it.

I've been seeing how the massad will put women in the lives of celebrities or these people and they're controlling them and

they'll make your fucking life miserable okay well control you this is how they do it she was 36 years old

turning 37 i gotta say you, he got the call.

That's what everyone's saying.

Now, uh, very profound.

Now that we are, I think we're about wrapped up.

We're about wrapped up.

And what can I say what was i going to say i was going to say i was going to say kind of got distracted a little i feel like i had something to say oh yeah yeah i yeah, yeah. I didn't record this Twitter space.

I always forget to click the button.

If you want to watch the entire space,

just watch the Vod on Kik.

Kik.com slash infrared.

You can watch the whole thing there.

Anyway, the space is over, and we're wrapping up.

So we'll be here next Thursday.

All right, that's all I can say.

All right, my eyes are killing me

um

anyway

anyway

we're going to wrap that up.

Hold on, wait.

One thing. You know, Guys, I'm really hungry I'm starving

not as hungry as that fat fuck that came on though

Jesus

that guy

oh

oh

a

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha a That's a fire.

That guy who's just heavy, hefty.

That guy who's just heavy, hefty.

They call him big hefty. They call them big hefty. Oh,

Five, I'm wrong.

You know yet?

You're there yet?

Yeah.

Anyway... Yeah. Anyway, y'all, I'll see you Sunday.

Bye-bye. Good suit.