Your Ideology is Wrong

i'm fucking going alive anyway

and the reason i'm doing that

is because

i sat down

took a really fucking hot shower tonight which means i'm fucking tired

and then i was like all right i have to fuck and wrte my shit

i have to do like mye

readings and writings and shit

i sat down and i did that

and i was like you know what i'm going to fuck and stream because this shits hard and i want to procrastinate

so i'm actually streaming right now just because i'm lazy and i don't want to actually fucking do my real work

going to do this instead

and i do have a lecture lined up that i do want to give

and you want to talk about

butum yeah earlier today

there was s like no viewers here

and i don't beeel like has

has

isn't that insulting to the people who come and stick around

isn't it no it's not fucking and sulting

because here's a thing

i have an average i have an average amount of fucking viewers

that tune in ok i have an average amount

like a given timeframe like for example the waiting screen

usually like on a good night within the first five minutes

i have two hundred people waiting

now on average with the first ten minutes is two hundred people

but the first twenty minutes of the waiting screen that i do

and there's only one hundred fifty people

like youfner son i'm watching that fucking thing right i'm watching that thing

and then it's a hundred and fifty right

and then it just goes down to one hundred thirty

and i'm like

i'm it pisses me off it's like

it shouldn't piss me off it's not rational for it to piss me off

but it's like why why why does it go

like people don't you realize that if you just

when you put up the stream you know oh nothing's going on i'm going to go do something else

you realize you're delaying the stream and everyone literally just

sat in the waiting screen

we could have the stream start like this

instantaneously

it could literally start instantaneously

right

but people fugking what havever

right

whatever people are fucked stupid there's no way of controlling any of that

talk and shee

but i have a lot of

should i want to talk about today

and i don't think this dream's gonna be long at all

i only is going to this could this might be an hour long stream

focus

th

and my hair looks

garbage because that's a go hot shower

art fox

water

is like

what

devastating

bad

whatever

here we falcon are

but yeah i'm going to start changing the content

i am going to start

changing things in general sjyt tonight i have fuck and low energy i just wanted to do a chill fucking stream

but people are i don't know i guess it's a it's a friday's how

weekend

you know the real truth

people don't want to fuck and hear the truth that's what it is

people don't want to fuck in here abot

how you're fucking ideology is wrong and it's a bunch of bullshit

and actually a lot of this lecture of this stream

was going to be influenced at least in part

by the responses that i was seeing

to the libertarian stalinism thumbnail

which think god went viral on twitter right

that went viral on twitter go like five k likes and apparently toelling viral on facebook as well

so that's super cool

what a

yeah i'd sday i just have not been having a good day

in general

i have just not been having a good day at all

today i've just been focking

you know it's one of those days where i'm like

looking for purpose i'm looking for a reason to keep going

with my day

go to the gym and all that shit

but to be honest with you guys

i've been

i should be more optimistic

because elan musk took over twitter

and i understand like oh yeah it's good times ahead

and i have every reason to be optimistic about it

but i'm not

i'm not really optimistic

i don't know what it is

i don't know what exactly it is

but i i was is very dark foreboding feeling that i'm starting to

feel

as of late

can't really explain it

maybe just me maybe it's a meat thing and it's not a you know something out there thing but

just seems like there's something fucked up about that happen

in the united states

and in the western world in general

i just see everything around me collapse

and then especially with the connier shit then all like the responses to it it's like

i'm not going to talk about it too much but

wow that is never fucking happen

in the history of america

as of late

and i just think like

shittz and then elan musz by twitter

i mean i should be happy about this shit right

but

i always feel like

the people against free speech are always two steps ahead

and it's like this is not

g it

every time something good is about to happen something bad will happen

that's what i'm trying to say

every time it seems like something good is happening

that's exactly when something really bad is about to happen thank you so much alexander appreciate thank you so much for this stream

this is the biggest thing i've learned from you is the smashing of the ideologies

yeah no problem

no problem

the main reason i want to do this stream as well is because again i'm actually going to be completely honest with you point blank

guys

i literally sat down with my fucking macbook

which for some miraculous reason charged m mac books actually fucking broken if you don't know that

but i sat down with it and i was like

i was like

fox

i'm going to act you

i'm going to read my old writings

and then writ

finish one of my books not finish it tonight but work on it

and do readings and shit

and i've read my old stuff so many fucking times i've like

i've i've like memorized it right i've memorized it

so i'm reading it and i'm like i know what i'm going to say because i already fucking memorize this

and

i just don't want to think about this right now

i just don't want to fucky think about it

i'm too lazy

right and i'm like you know what how am i going to fucking procrastinate in distract myself

from the real serious problem in my life

which is this fucking theory shit

oh you know i was going to fuck a stream

why not do that

if even if i only have to stream to one viewer i'll just fuck in do that

right

so this stream is brought to you by fucking procrastination and laziness

but i do have a lecture lined up for you guys

that i am going to talk about in depth and in length

and if you miss it you're a bitch and fuck you and you're going to burn in hell forever

and i

the fact that you couldn't

catch it live means you're actually a

pro see

anyway

no i'm not going to read onwnstream ok

but i want to specifically address a few stupid responses i saw

to the libertarian stalinism

thing that i talked about yesterday

so the first form of mental retardation i've been noticing was people who were like

oh my god

so you're saying that they abandoned

the marxism leninism in the age of multipolarity thing that was the first thing

then they abandon patriotic socialism well that one we never even talked about

then they had maga then they had the mecha tanky thing

then they had mega commmunism

and now they have libertarian stalinism

so they just abandon everything else and it's just like

you know what my response to that is i'm not even kidding

this is actually how i feel

in response to that

because i weep for the stupidity of humanity i'm not just i'm not saying that in an arrogant smug way i weep for the stupidity of humanity

falling dreaming talking in you'll see i know you want to cying sing finding reason to defend all of your fight

see see

don't you grow up in a hurry your mamall be worried it was a part of the story even the scay n thank you for all of your coming it will be remembered thank you to all of the heroes they got to repeat the causs the lies where oll reality is upon us ca trip

niggers a savage niggers niggers timps

i genuinely weep for the stupidity of humanity i genuinely pray and i fucking weep

with the stupidity of humanity i'm like foxmn

you just don't get it man you just don't get it

feel like i should quit infrared for like five months

just start writing again and just turn my back on everything

just

just turn my back on everything

and everyone on the fucking internet

and returned back to my cave

but i have to be here because i'm already in the ring and i have to finish the fight

i'll know peace one day

but just not any time soon

but uh yeah

so to address that

i don't know if i've talked about this i feel like i have djavou right now

for some flucking reason

feel like i've talked about this

for

but

i hate your ideology

i want to blow up your ideologies

you know can't whatok

he said something that was pretty true

he said that ideologies are derivative

of idols and that ideology is a form of idol worship

and he's right

problem with conpot is that he's just a smug guy

who thinks he's above all the ideologies and idols of the world

and he just looks down upon them from his sea

of

you know technical

you know abstract

a

i don't know i don't know that i'm not i'm not smart enough to name it off the top of my head the exact form of athatics

that he adopts it's like this

abstract technical you know very much

im

like geometrical mathematical view of things not really given or partial to

to a specific form of ideology but more looking for the

underlying structure behind things oh my god

oh my godmrereo holy fucked things

holy shit thank you so much maam

i feel like i do't thank you so much adrian because left is just mad they can't come up with any means how do you gts mak com you you read do's you feel hella guilty

because i feel like i don't deserve any money tonight

you know i feel like i don't deserve any donations

and the reason i feel like i don't deserve any donations tonight

is because i already fucking

already fucking and cancelld the stream

already cancelled the stream

and

that was my way of saying like you know what guys you are not enough

you are not enough

right you guys

hundred fifty people waiting

you're not enough for me

right

so i feel like i don't deserve your money tonight

right

as i was telling you guys basically you're not lumh

but

i'm not doing this ram for you guys to be honest

i'm doing a sream for me

doing this dream to procrastinate and get things off my chest

and shot something at the fucking world tonight

now for you guys don't worry i'm going to be doing streams for you

again

but this tonight this is just

want to get some shit off my chest and i just want to rant about some things and i want to give this lecture

because the lecture is also a rant i can't really give a lecture on a stream format without also fucking ranting

anyway

contbot is right about ideologies being a form of ital worship

but contpot is a contient

and contians

have no skin in the game

aantians think they're above it all and they've already arrived at the kind of

you know it's transcendental

um

the transcendental structure of the world and they've already

discerned the truth behind all particular appearances

are false and they've actually arrived at the truth via criticism

yada yadayada

and then so conspat is sitting here saying i all ideologies are bullshit

therefore i'm not going to engage ideologies because they're all wrong

maybe it's a theological dispute

maybe it's not because conpot is

dumb he's not dumb he's actually really smart

that's just the give it

right

but maybe it is theological

so the prophet of islam

when he was

when he was confronting the idols around the cobwbi

i believe it i

i got that wrong

really bad muslim right

it was like ninety nine i believe

or there was like over one hundred i forgot exactly how much i think three hundred right

idols and statues

the prophet

iw was i always found this aport something

particularly fascinating about islam

and even confusing as a muslim growing up when i was told the story

he made a statement

after many days of persecution

where he grabbed his sword and he

basically beheaded and he knocked down all of the idols

but he left one up

the prophet left one idol up

to make the point that there's only one god and he left the idol i believe of

the one that represent tried to represent the law i guess

but

that's obviously

something that sacrilegious within islam

god cannot have a worldly representation

so why did the prophet leave that one idol up

oftentimes christians reproach

with islam with being a religion that never proves itself in the world

it just has this like infinitely remote

and cold god

that can never find any like

partiality in this world

that's intelligible to human beings

because of the muslim rejection

the trinity

and i think this is a misunderstanding

i think in many ways islam presupposes

the in the

i can i can only get away with saying this as an athh

ss a muslim

i should get behded for saying this right

and i think in many ways is ama does thank you so much ies watch your back

souck my deak how about that

and i think i

islam in many ways

presupposes

the incarnation

ah

that

that's represented by christ right

christian obviously islam rejects the divinity of christ very explicitly

but in terms of the more

specific way or the more in like the deeper way in which

the divine incarnation

in a man within christianity

represents this

new way in which the divine

relates to humanity

i think islam presupposes that i think it presupposes the new way in which humanity relates to divinity

which is through something like particular and partial not god is no longer this abstract and remote thing

it's something that relates to us

some kind of partial and particular way it's not just an abstract universal it's something particular

so i think

that criticism of islam is wrong

thin christianity

but then there's also something kind of beautiful within islam

that i don't think you see in other religions but i'm open to being corrected right

i'm just saying this is my personal view

which i don't expect people to agree with everyone to agree with but i'm just telling you

my perspective

what i find beautiful is that

when the prophet laft that one idol

standing

he wasn't saying that this idol should be worshipped

he was making this more fundamental point

that there is one god

and the point was made

when you see all these other itdels

on the floor

and there's one standing he's not saying this idol is special

he's saying there is one god

but so somehow thank you so much many all guid us to victory c p s a twenty thirty six

thank you so much mayop appreciate

so what he's saying

is

he's using idles

he's using the structure of the idol

right as such of idols in general

to arrive

and to give

not representation as much as

intelligibility

to the oneness of god

a one ess

which is intelligible to human beings

not through any aesthetic

representation it's not through a specific image

it's not through a specific statute

it's not through a specific form

it's through what encycle with it when in the

french post structuralism they're going to call a signifyer

what the lachon would call a signifier

islam is trying to give expressions

h

it aorr islam is trying to give expression

to the divine

through a signifier

through

the signifier sorry

not through a particular imaginary form not through a particular imaginary representation

but the signifier as such

cutting through

the multi

the multitude of imaginary forms

to arrive at some kind of

real

embodiment

of the absolute

but it's not really even an embodiment

' more

i mean think about it

where does god well

as far as human beings are concerned

god dwells

in within the religion of islam

god dwells in

just like it's the abrahamic religions in general that share this but in islam it's it's given a new

newfound emphasis in the word

it's in the word

that we can somehow

m

comprehend

however

finite

right

the divine

it's the word

so

guys don't distract me with other sit in the chat right of jacks' is going to raid let him raid

oh my god thank you so much jackson i appreciate

i'm just seeing it now

thank you so much maam appreciate it

appreciate you jacks

pciate you with to man thank you

but im

kind of talking about something a little bit boring

i'm going to be honest

right

i'm'm talking about something a little bit boring

but im

within the

within islam

ykes jackson's got a lot of fucking haters in his at

bunch of seeeding little beaches

who just fucking hate watch him probably right

ok w back to the fucking religion talk the theology i got fucking

r ip fucking vod viewers right

r ip people who are watching this as a fucking bob

his yikes

but anyway

within the religion of islam

um

it's the it's not see it's not the word

as a specific

it's not the form of a word it's not the form of the sentence it's not the way the word is said

it's the word as a signifier of the unconscious as lacan would call it

or which you'll find throughout you know the french school or french post structuralism

or the work of the

who's that fucking guy

saucer i can't fucking say his name correctly

that

that was dealing in semiotics

i can't i don't i don't know his exact name but

that's what you're dealing with in islam

that's what islam means by the word right

the other abrahamic religions are a little bit more ambiguous by what is meant by the word i think at least in my limited knowledge i could be wrong right

but within islam it seems to me that the word

is a signifier

and a signifier is not reducible to the imaginary forms

whose development gives expression to it

and i think this is what is so confusing to people

about why it appears that infrared is like

so incoherent and syncratic

when it comes to the question of ideology

are we maga communists are we mecca tankes are we libertarian stalists

what are you hayes

well

what infrared is

is more fundamental than the ideological forms and the imaginary forms

which are trying to give expression to it

infrared's real

belief want to to tell you the truth right

i don't really like leaking this

but

if people put it if you put a gun to my head and you're like haze

bess up what is this shit

like what is it really right

i'm just going to say islam

i don't really say that often but

for me that's what it is now for you it could be christianity or could be judaism

or who knows it could be some other perennial truth of all

history and religion and ideology but

i don't care about ideology i don't care

right

i don't talk about the islam thing because all the fucking muslim gatekeepers come no you're not a real musli o he and suck my dick

i it means something to me specifically

right

it means something specific to me

yeah

so that's why i don't talk about it though because you have all these fucking muslim gatekeepers on the internet that come and they're like

oh really hate then why don't you fast it because why don't you suck my fucking dick

how about that

because to me revelation

is more profound

then

virtue signaling to your peers about how fucking observant you are

of all these laws

and religious customs and rules

that you don't even fucking know why you're observing in the first place you're just fucking doing it to virtue signal to others

you don't even know the deeper revelation behind these

you know

observances right

like the five pillars

i'm not going to fucking i'm not going to observe the five pillars of islam

until i understand the revelation that gave rise to those right

i can somehow understand

fully why it is right thank you meca appreciate you when i say fully i don't mean like

understand like no god's purpose i just mean like

know why right from a human perspective

but anyway

a

yeah that is my position

i don't care about ideo i think ideologyes

but here's the thing this is what separates me from conpot right

because cont bought again he's just like

oh yeah

all ideology is poison i'm going to stay away well you can't stay away because

the truth is

he's just falling into the vortex of leftist ideology that much is very clear

i don't share the perspective

that you can undermine the idolatry that is ideology

just by like keep like posturing you're keeping a distance from it then you say when i hear islamic prayers and music i feel many emotions

i am not even muslim and i think it is somewhat irrational

it's complicated that's exact yeah that's that's where i'm coming from

in a lot of ways too

but again i don't talk about his i don't talk about islam

ever

because a i hate the gatekeepers so fucking much

b

i feel like it's such an easily perverted message right if i gt oh yeah it's islam

people can just be like

oh

like you know you can give rise to fanaticism and like all this stu stupid shit

you are going to

it's just like leftism right

so that's i don't go near it right

see i'll go near communism and i'll go near marxism

his communism and marxism

are modern

phrases these and it's also modern phenomena in general

so i understand all i will get knee deep in terms of sacrelege there

because i think i think marx would be fine with it i think stalin would be fine with it and lenin would be fine with it

yes we can we can

we can engage in the sacredlige of

mismashing

and engaging in these counterintuitive exercises

forms of mean warfare we talk about ron paul maoism and libertarian stalinism

mean i'm fine fucking doing that

to break people's

ideological i

idolatry right

and and um basically

give expression through these contradictions apparent contradictions

a more fundamental signifier of the unconscious

like i'm fine doing that with

with marxism

but i won't do that with islam i'm not going to sit here and like

bend and twist and play with all these different islamic signifiers

to teach people what i think is the real islam

i'm not going to do that because like i do

respect something sacred

about

the form of islam right

i respect

the sacredness of

not just islam but christianity this is why i won't see a lot of fucking people do this with christianity

uespesedly in america

they'll be like

i am a combination of jesus christ and aliens from outer space and they'll like do they'll engage in this sing like very wild

playing with

these religious associations within christianity i mean to be fair kia does this as well

you have to admit i like on you wes but he does this too

i don't approve of that right i think i want to respect something sacred about the form of religion

so i won't do that when it comes to islam i w't do that when it comes to christianity or judaism right

but i'll do that when it comes to marxism i'll do that when it comes to communism

because

i think what we're trying to do is

understand what the form of these are right the whole history of communism

and the whole underpinning of sectarianism

like leftist sectarianism is really like

tak

what is the form of true communism what is the form of true marxist practice

what does this actually look like right

whereas with religions it's like ok what is the form of islam

well we have the court on we have

you know the five pillars of islam we have all these religious customs and observances

same with christianity

and judaism

and it's like

there is something

time and tested about those things and there's something sacred about those things right

whereas like communism' is more demi urging

marxism it's more demiurgic it's like

struggling to

give form to itself across each historical era

um

and also i'll know the reason i'll talk about islam is because i don't want to turn it into an ideology because there are a lot of id there are a lot of muslims who just make islam their ideology

which is the highest form of sacrilege if you ask me

but anyway i

yeah i guess what i was what i try to say here is that

the going back to what i was saying about

the idols

that the prophet knocked down and he left one

so he wasn't saying that one idol that was left standing

was god he wasn't saying you should worship this idol

he was making a point

right that there is one god

it's not necessarily that idol that is god

it's this act right that he engaged in

of smashing all of the idols and leaving one left

that acts

participated

in the expression

of an unconscious signifier

of one god

and that was his point

right

and the reason i'm saying my disagreement with comtbot might be theological is because

for me

it is the same when it comes to ideology

it's easy to just say

we i'm going to knock down all the ideological idols and be above ideology and be some contient

that's what kant bought this by the way i'm only mentioning him because i respect him

and i respect

the

obvious intelligence

and validity

behind his position

but i just want to vocalize my disagreement with it

to give expression to my position so his position is worthy enough

for me to bring up here just to contrast my own with

for me

the only way to defeat ideology is from within

i want to blow up ideologies from within

give me a second

dude suck my dick how about that literally sucked my dick

i' was laud for a flock and riddle

howbout you suck my cot

i don't give a fuck bitch

how about that

did you know that that i'll give a fuck

stupid bitch

what do i look like i have to lose

its suck my diig bitch

tell you the same shit any context by the way

stupid bitch

i don't give a fuck bitch

the fuck are you talking about

any context by the way i'll tell you the same shit

stupid little bit with your little fuck and riddles

based thank you overll i'm scared of you

i'm so scared of you man

you're so scary man you're so scary

guys what do you think i'm scared of you think hayes is scared of anything

i'm not scared of shed except fc

like if there was a spider that was like five feet long that would scare me probably

but like

even then i feel like i could condition myself

like if that actually happened i could just

i could mentally become a psychopath and not be scared of

i would lose all sense of self and i would lose all sense of reality and i would enter into psychosis

but i could overcome the fear of anything

f you like

i feel like i could overcome the fear of anything

but maybe i'm just

all talk right who knows

anyway guys

thank you so much or i don't know if i think

thank you so much manppreciate it's on

but anyway what i was saying or i was trying to say before i was very rudely interrupted

is that

within the islamic religion

i

there i'm kind of drawing

from that it's like a parallel to the theology of islam

my approach to ideology

i want to destroy ideology from within

not from without

like

the contians or conpot destrying

for me

when you posture as someone who just

can directly perceive

the transcendental structures

behind which we filter reality

and you can there thereby bypass every particular ideology and dismiss them as false forms of idolatry

i think you still will be

you still will fall victims

to the tentacles of some ideology

and i guess it's the same critique hagel leveled against con

when it came to morality right

you can say or when it came to morality and ethics you can say that your activity or your actions are ethical

but you can have and there's no way for you to distinguish

whether your actions are moral or whether they're pathological

and

bit by bit and little by little

you're going to allow the pathology to consume you in the name of some kind of

you know abstract

ah moral stance

and

you know you will become you will uh

you will be a vessel of pure immorality

right

and i think the same thing is true when it comes to ideology

when you attempt to place yourself

thank you so much ro is the north america judge energy weere you must channel

son

gorilla

thank you so muchxoll proceed to a toinament

yeah i got the fucking judge

grip i guess

but when you try to merely place yourself above ideology

which is what a lot of people actually try to do

you're going to fall victim to some kind of ideological curse or ideological

i

spook if you want right

and you're going to be fully

consumed by one ideology without ever taking responsibility for

or acknowledging

just what is so enticing about ideology in the first place

to be clear

ideology

is is

tempting if you will or it's compelling

not because people are too stupid to see the transcendental structure behind everything

even if you did see that

there's still something true about ideologies

which is what gives

free reign

to

the idol

of the idea

right which is what ideology is it's a form of idolgy

that mean that's my interpretation of

right

but

wen you acknowledge

this

the the things about ideology that are actually true

or

meaningful at an unconscious level

you can manipulate a multitude of ideological associations

to give expression to the more fundamental truth behind ideology

in the same way that the prophet of islam

is knocking down every single idol except one

not to elevate that idol

but to use idols as a as a vessel

with which

to sorry to

to

sorry what's the fuck is the word i'm looking for

to employ idols as a means with which

to give expression to the signifier of the unconscious that is the oneness of god

one must employ ideologies in the same exact way

to give expression to that which is both

at the same time beyond ideology

and which is at the same time the basis of ideologies

i

uh

i'm at a loss for works today

the basis of ideologies

potency and

compose it

so

when people are like so shocked by the house how can you like mishmash

like these apparently complete opposites together

like you're just like jumping from one ideology to another

no the my message

infrared's actual message has not been altered

since the very first

piece of content we fucking put out

it's always been the same fucking thing

guys let me ask you a question

by the way

why do you think we're marxists

maybe we're marxists not because we decided

that one of the ideologies amongs amidst the rest of them is true

but that one of the ideologies contains the key

to the destruction

of ideology as such

what if that's the reason we're marxist what if the whole reason we're marxist leninist

isn't to latch on to one arbitrary ideology like weh're

you know in the middle of some fucking mall and we're just window shopping ideologies and all marxism lendsm let's grab that one

no

were marxist leninists

because we want to destroy ideology

and but the difference between us and people like compot is that

we're not here to destroy ideology by sneering at it

from above in this arrogant smug way

we're here to destroy ideologies

through with the same ideologies themselves

from within

that's how you defeat ideology

you don't defeat ideology

by pretending you're outside of ideology

you defeat ideology by going through

the structure of an ideology thank you so much to a question

do you view gud literally realiz a social construct of human ritor as the underlying factor in the fabric of reality

real as a social

construct

how can it be real then if it's just the social construct

i think it's a false dichotomy i think

it doesn't matter if god is real in the metaphysical sense or not

his god is not an object

sorry god is not a modern object

that should be the slogan of a

religious reformation

god is not a modern object

god is not something you're going to look under a microscope to find

not something you're going to measure with the ruler

it's not something you're going to like look for behind a door somewhere

' not something you're going to perceive with your own two eyes

god is

a name

or

a fact of being

and i don't care what you think that name

would amount to in whatever hypothetical scenario

but if you don't acknowledge that

fact of being

that the word god is trying to give reference to

i think you're just coping right

oh there is no god

who cares

what do people mean by god that's clearly something

right

it's clearly referring to this

i mean not just in the sense of the social

like ok it's referring to something socially meaningful

but it's also referring to a specific

ilame about

the nature of our reality which is the absolute what is absolute

oz do you mean obsolute from a social perspective

or like literal

like out there the real being i mean both

because there are those two things are not unrelated

they're actually part of the same reality

clearly god is referring to something

right

it's referring to the absolute

both the absolute as a cause

of reality of some kind

right within reality

and the absolute

as it concerns human meaning

right

oh

but anyway i

i think marxism is the only ideology

which

destroys itself as an ideology constantly

if you look at what marx and angeles themselves have done throughout the entirety of their lives

it was nothing but smacking down

first of all other socialists and communists who mah engles admitted

whre the fiercest opponents of marx and himself throughout the entire duration of their lives

then later it was

other marxists right

when marx wrote the critique of the gotha program he was basically shitting all over

the optimistic and you know the new ideology that was being adopted

which was social democracy

las alay and all those people

mark spent

the latter part of his life just shitting all over those people

and like you know there'd be like they're like these like

optimistic children's of olig and marxjus smacking them down

back into the ground

and then lenin right he does he literally puts the final nail in the coffin

and not only does he blow up social democracy he blows up the established form of orthodox marxism

no one was more devastating

to marxist ideology than lenin himself

he was faithful to marxism as a method and as a science

but

he destroyed it as an ideology because as an ideology it was orthodox marxism which gave rise to revisionism

which betrayed the revolutionary essence of marxism

now

there's a contradiction there's a contradiction between the ideology of marxism and the revolutionary essence of marxism

if you want to remain faithful to the revolutionary essence

you have to be willing to blow up the ideology

because it's not an idea

that's underlying the truth of marxism

it's not an idea

what is it that

it's something real

with a capital r

that's what's behind marxism

something real

i don't care what you want to call it

you can call it humanity

you can call it the proletary

you can call it historical necessity

you can call it

um

can even call nature if you want

i like to call it got

and i think it's the same thing as those other things

i think

the

elevation of the proletaria

by the intellect

to the status of the revolutionary subject

is a way of worshipping god i'm not saying the proletariat is god i'm saying

that specific relationship to humanity

is a form of the veneration of god

just like how you know inhen the bible somewhere i'm sure it says

when

human beings love each other there you will find

god and you will find the appreciation of god

that's what i mean

right

i'm not saying the proletary is god i'm saying

the relation

is a way of acknowledging the relation

by the intellect

to

the proletariat is a revolutionary subject

is away

of

um

acknowledging god

by positioning oneself in a specific way within society

a you know

standing for some kind of universal justice

humanity adya dyada

so that's what i mean by that

that's what i mean by that

but thank you so much the fun appreciate

we show you it's on man

the truth of ideology is not ideology

the way you destroy ideologies is not by discarding

the thing behind ideology

it's by acknowledging that a is not a

the idea is not behind ideology

and i think it's similar for idol worship as well

the way you combat idol worship

isn't just by saying all the idols are wrong

no the profet left one standing for a reason

it's a way of acknowledging that behind these idols thank you so much a

reading his ic book he totally got this about lenon lenin hated people who thought the revolution was inevitable and that we can risk nothing

yeah i mean that's more complicated but they were the five

but on

what i was trying to say here is that the

you the way to defeat paganism and idol worship is to acknowledge

that

they are false they're they're engaging in a form of a

false worship

the thing behind like it like islam will say

the originally there was the true religion islam

and then it corrupted into paganism

so the vital source of paganism

was islam itself

so that's how you defeat paganism

by acknowledging that behind all of these gods is the one god

right

not simply by saying all these gods are false

because that will become a form of atheism

right

when you say

when you use

these gods

as a way of giving expression

to the truth behind them wich is god himself

that's how you overcome

paganism that's how you overcome idol worship

so the same is true for ideology though

you have to use ideologies to overcome them

by giving expression to the more fundamental truth

behind what makes them

um

truthful or meaningful to people

why are people libertarians why are people

you know

is or why are they that

now maga communism

first of all isn't even an ideology it's a strategy

when it comes to libertarian stalinism

this doesn't so much reflect

any kind of

m

like serious commitment to a specific ideology

as much as it's and i have to explain this to autistic people

as much as just like a way of

not really respecting

the importance of ideological labels

all that much

when you're trying to give a like make a broader point

about politics

and about ideologies themselves

right

when i say yeah i'm a libertarian stalinist i'm saying like

like this is a thing about libertarian this is like the truth behind libertarianism

i'm re

which i'm appropriating in some kind of way

so when people are baffled like oh my god like how could you be a libertarian stalinist isn't that an oxymoron

i mean yeah

but that's kind of the point

the isn't the point of the whole fucking thing

the reason why you would be uniting these opposites in the first place is because

you got it wrong when it comes to your fucking understanding of the ideology in the first place

like i'm trying to say your understanding of these of the world in general and ideology as such

is wrong

that's the fucking point

if i say i'm a libertarian stalinist i'm basically saying

you don't know shit about stalinism

you also don't know shit about libertarianism

if i can combine them in this way there's clearly something about them you have gotten wrong

i know you think these things

are fundamentally unrelated i know you think that

right

i'm not stupid who's like

has

don't you know that those are opposite on the political compass quadrants

yeah i do know they are

but i want to blow up your fucking political compass because i think it's bullshit

that's my whole fucking point

you know that's my entire point your whole fucking political compass

is bullshit

that's where i was coming from

to begin with

buckan idiot

how can you be o i want people

like you have to unders

see this is also why i don't want to stream tonight

because i feel like we have gone to the point where i think people should get it by now

you guys fucking get it

it's not an ideology

we're going through we're not above ideology we're within ideology

but that's not the absolute

ideology is not the absolute

who fucking irs yes

ron paul maoism

who fucking cares

we could have shrek socialism we could have fucking

conya west

bucking paul pottersm who gives a shit

it's not about ideology

that's not the point

we're only using ideology to make a point

but it's not actually about ideology itself

so who fucking cares what we call ourselves

that's not the point

so when people like hans

i thought you were a mecca tanky

i'm a mecca ankee

in the proper context that's what i like i called myself ok so people are retarded right

i used meca tanky

as a meam wave

to give expression to this new vibe shift in this new orientation

i wanted to promote

of giving emphasis to the industrial working class

while emphasizing

that the mark soy dogma

that workers who owned their own means of production in the form of trucks

and in the form of mechanical tools

were petite bourgeois

so mecca tanky

was a way of basically

and also a lot of other things like

i wanted to like

you know a revitalized version of tanky

it's like that's what that was it was like

it's like our

right

and bg hant but what happened with maga communism i don't know like

how could you not see how that's just like

a like that's like the next step

right

like how could you not okay if you if we want okay it's like yeah has started this new like trend

where he wants to emphasize the industrial working class

oh my god then he became a maga communist

oh my god i wonder fucking whe

maybe it's because

the maga movement is predominantly based in the industrial working class

mm

a oh my god totally unrelated things

then has called himself a libertarian stalinist

i wonder why

i wonder why i would call myself a libertarian stalinist

maybe it's because

that same industrial working class within the maga movement

has a specific position and stance toward the existing state

that is usually given expression in the form of libertarianism and you know that

whatever snake fucking flag in

but you know what i mean

like ah what a

what a fucking big surprise right

what a crazy like completely incoherent

evolution its like there's no relation between any of these fucking things right

you know what i mean

as what is your real ideology

i don't have one

i'm a muslim

islam that's what i be

want to talk about what i believe

i believe in islam

but to me islam is just a way

of gluing together a signifier

toim islam

it's a miracle after

the destruction of modernity and it's it's a way of relating to and explaining that

now you could be a christian you could be a jew

you can even be an atheist you could be whatever the fuck you want

but if you believe

if you believe in some kind of humanity

you know

if you believe miracles are possible

you could be with infraever

though i mean by miracles i mean like

if you believe there's more to humanity

then

the way humanity is being represented

by the status quo

you could be part of you could roll with infrared right i'm

you don't have to be you don't even have to be abrahamic you don't have to you obviously have the muslim

you don't have to be you don't even have to be abrahamic

you don't even have to be religious

but you do have to believe

in humanity

you know

and what i mean by believe in humanity i mean like

you have to trust the people which is what mao said you have to believe

that we don't need a fucking

we don't have to have this fundamental distrust of human beings

where

you know

this hobbsy and distrust of human beings

which according to which like you know

society has to be constructed according to a race of devils

or you know

people are primordially wrong about the world there's no relationship

between

our truth

right

our inner truth and the outer truth of the world that's really what it is about did you know that

it's about a fundamental connection

between the inner truth

of any given human being

and the outer truth of the world

my humanistic gesture

which you know

i relate you through islam

specifically just me personally

is this

there's a relation

between the inner truth

of a human being

and the outer truth of the world

that's not a coincidence

that's not an accident

something about those two revolutions

thank you so much lionl i appreciate you

something about those two things miraculously

is shared by one object

meaning there' is you humanity can find meaning in

reality

it's not just something we have to construct

through an institution beyond which lies chaos

in that wilderness of the reel of reality

like

you know

the burning bush which told moses

i am what i am

right

you know there's meaning there we don't need we don't have to

we don't have to trust the experts we don't have to rely on institutions

we don't have to rely on some fucking authority some fucking scientists

some fuck in academics or some shit

to tell us what's meaningful about our own fucking in our truth

it's already there for us out there right

that's what i fuck and believe

but im

you know in philosophy

there's a word for this problem

in for example in the

what is a fucking called and speculative realism

they call it and i think it's post comtununism in general right

they call it

but thank you so much

one world religion meeting with all the world religions coming together

catholics

muslims etcetera

the only way to guide is through jesus

the followers of jesus will not submit to the worldh wee will be raptured

thank you so much

i'm life w j

w c j

now there's a french guy

whose name is

i think is

first name is quinton and his last name is may asue

quintin may ensue

and he wrote a fucking book

what was this book called again it was called the

may a sue what is this what his famous book

i'm going to look it up

called something infinity right

what is it call

after finitives

ok that's his book after finished

he talks about the problem of correlationism

right

the problem of correlationism is basically a problem opened up

by the post critical

reality right

it's opened up

by the

by the by

so basically n't

establishes that there is somehow a difference

between

like the real right and that's transcendental screen by which we filter reality

so if you ask emmanuel khan

hey is this water bottle is this water bottle real

he'll be like

of the real we can say nothing

there is a thing underlying the consistency of this object

but you can't actually say this is a real thing

because this water bottle

is only phenomenally consistent and coherent to us

because of the way we transcendentally structure the world

now you guys are probably familiar with this in the form of like post modernism right which is like

is this water bottle sorry is this water bottle real and they'll say something like

well

it's socially can the way we like

our vision of the water bottle and all the assumptions we use to over determinate

our relation to the water bottle

is all socially mediated and socially constructed

and we can't talk about its actual reality

because that would be metaphysical

or maybe we could leave that to the domain of like the hard sciences

but even within the framework of the hard sciences like the stem sciences they're not going to talk about the real they're not going to talk about reality

they're going to probably talk about you know

some kind of view according to which structures

and be consistent the structures and the methods we use to measure reality

can be consistent

but in terms of like

what is it real like we can't say anything about that that's too metaphysically loaded of a question

so

and what is that term called right it's called like

the post positivist whatever fucking

paradigm

that people

and

that's part that that

is mainstream within the hard sciences

so nobody thinks

that

the way we relate to reality and reality itself are the same thing

especially after cont but that in general it's a feature of modernity in general right

we have this separation between the subjective in the objecti

right

so may i sue

quinton may assume he brings up the problem of correlationism within philosophy

which has to do with this assumption

that there is a correlation

between

you know

how we relate to the world subjectively

and the world as it actually objectively is so the world as it is for us as it appears to us and the world as it actually is in and of itself

and

mayor su basically hears that

that

that's an unjust he's trying to get beyond the problem of correlationism

and like move beyond that altogether

does it in a really interesting way which i'm not going to talk about

buthere he tries to in a really interesting way

but

it's called the problem of correlationism

now to me

if if people want to ask me ok what is infrared about i would say something pretty wild maybe this is like too broad

right it's too insane

i would not sum it up in terms of an ideology i would say if you want to know what infrared is about

it's about a correlation

sorry it's about

how how

something that appears to be a correlation a mere coincidental correlation

actually shares the same exact object

it's not a coincidence the inner truth

of humanity and the outer truth of the world

share one object

i would tell people that's what infrared is actually about

but maybe that's too fucking broad like what am i trying to

reat a fucking called

right

but if you want to know why we have so much wiggle room in terms of like how much we can like

mishmash ideologies and just

not give so much importance to ideology

because i don't think ideology is actually the point

i think this

signifier

that the world is meaningful

or that there's meaning in the real

that's the actual point

it's like a signifier of the unconscious

which you develop ideology in order to like be faithful to

right to maintain fidelity to this unconscious signifier

requires a very refined navigation of ideologies

picking and choosing and associating them in specific kinds of ways

constructing them in a way

that gives expression to that signifier

and i'll give ok first of all it's kind of like interesting how much you can yield

just from that thing about like

things that appear to just correlate share the same object

why don't you guys have a look at this symbol right here right

now this means a lot of things this

beyond the visible spectrum

you know we're like

a basic

position of criticism

seeing the

think like got face value when you look at this and it's like ok

they're called in for red

because

they're trying to look at like the hidden realities behind the surface

so they're just going below the surface

uh to like the

to like the true reality right

and

that's not what it is

it's actually something a little more scary

in for red

is opening up the question of

is this is this real

is this real

like if we turned off our infrared scanning machine

would the world still look like this

like in and of itself would it still look like this

that's the question i want to impose on

the problem of correlation is

what if this isn't behind the surface what if this is actually the real surface

this we're bringing something

from inside outside

right

what if this is already the real outside

right what if this is where we begin

that the object of critique

is already on the surface

in contrast to the contient view which says

you know the thing is hidden behind the surface

it's literally on the surface

truth is on the surface

that's what the infrared globe means basically

it means

on the surface

you will find the trails of the thing

that is pretty fucked up onhen you think about it

you will find the inards the entrails

of a thing i i don't know if energ is the right word maybe that's a

is that like a sexual word or something i don't know

i'm not a syllipsis douaid the fucker

the internal

like

transcendental structure of the thing whatever right

that's all on the surface it's all fuckin happening on the surface

and it's a no brainer when you fucking think about it

because

dude i'm on youtube

why a doing the secret marxist revolution in the jungles of fucking peru or some shit

i'm on youtube

on the the most superficial and i was on twitch before which is even more superficial

i am i am engaged in the most superficial form

of information warfare

because

i believe

truth is on the surface

you know i used to be a fucking like theory cell

w

didn't think the world mattered i just like would bury myself in books

i think i'm above everything i was like conbot

and i was like all this stuff is bullshit i gt wipe my ass with all it's all bullshit right

and then i realized

the truth of that inner world is the outer world

so the place to begin

's outside

not

inside outside

that's another insight of this view of

the connection between the

truth from within and the truth from without

and it's the question of beginning

so the cart

begins from by inside thank you so much a meal

find the vision

so for the history of western modernity

kind of begins with de cart

secretly speaking right

not officially decrdes

let you know early madernity so called but

you could say within the history of philosophy unofficially begins with a card

who says i think therefore i am

so the cart begins with his gesture

of subjective self certainty

at the expense of the outside world

and that's the beginning

because the cart does not have this

fundamental faith

that there's a unity between the

internal subjective truth

and the external

a reality

but if you do possess a certainty that those two things share the same object

then you don't begin from within

you begin from without

why

because

as hydriger would put it

you're already in beded

and embodied in some kind of

mm

world

even before it subjectively manifests itself as intelligible to you

the truth of your being is already

from without

that is it's very much

why hehideger is beginning from phenomenology in general

when someone asked heideger to represent what is dosi

i'm going to draw it on microsoft pain

right

they asked hideger what is sign

and he drew it for them

and for heideger this was docign

it's going to draw really is something like this right

and then it was

this

so a specific this thing here stands for a specific horizon

of the disclosure of being

two

um

a being a being

and a specific disclosure of the horizon of being

so this is the inside this is the outside

and this comes first right

only after a specific disclosure of the horizon of being

can a particular being even make itself intelligible and meaningful

so notice how it's this outward kind of phenomenal

horizon hi deegger begins with right

the history of modernity basically

begins more like this

right

something more like this

where it is trying to arrive

it's like infinite fractal

i don't know if this is exactly it it's trying to arrive

at

what is this

right

oh my god

holy fuck atari thank you so much for the fifty man preciate you so much

thank you so much

atori appreciate you

the history of modernity

more so

um

is this question of

what is the truth of the essence so modernity is trying to say

ok here's this here's the subject

right

and here's outer reality

right

so let's just say outer reality is

probably not going to be that it's going to be like

this right

so the history of modernity is like

you know what is truth

kind of right

something like that

right

this is way too big

way to fucking big

ok so

this is basically right here the history of modernity

right

it's a subject

a self certain subject

it's a self certain subject engaged in this question of

what is reality what is truth what is knowledge or more more fundamentally

what are the premises

of myseelf certainty

so you'll find this for example in a

probably most infamously with

's a guy like hume

who is raising the question where does our truth and knowledge come comes from

he's going to say it comes from our senses right

and

that's because

we have a limited relation to the real world and we can only relate to it through our senses right

or it's going to be like the rationalists who say that we can somehow

relate to the truth of all of reality through the device of reason itself

through our

through building like

arithmetically i guess castles on top of this

cartesian self certainty

through some kind of what is it

is it induction is the word

i think it's induction right

through through induction

i think that's what it is right

so

this is the question of modernity heideger

high deeger represents the opposite of that first of all

now

let me erase this

idgra completely inverts this and this is

i diggers

rejection of anthro

set

procenturism

is not so much a return to pre humanism as much as it's saying that

this guy

this figure of human this let's say this is the you know the vitruvian man of da vinci

maybe that's the same is des cartes self certain subject right

for hehideger

this does not simply exist as a given

it is the product of the specific disclosure

of a specific horizon of being

right

something outside something out there first discloses itself to us

a way of relating to beings in particular

which conditions and defines

the way in which you know

we come to relate to ourselves

so yeah

there you go

thank

so there you there's that right

now

i think it was much more accurate when the retards on twitter would cope and just be like

infrared is just hideger

he's just a nazi hidegerp

the reason that's more a little accurate than what they're saying now wherey're like oh my god it's peter teal and steve bannon and it's fucking larouche

and it's like nick land and it's

i mean the route

thing

with nick lan ugan

it is hahrd to grow right

but

i think my relationship to heideger speaking for myself

robably has more in common with the thinkers

behind the iranian revolution

for whom

heideger was a

this this is like fundamental revolution

in the history of the modern west

that

create an opening within the fabric of modernity

with which

one could

sink

m

think through

well of course the question of being that would be tautological but also kind of rediscover

a some kind of way of relating to the meaningfulness of humanity

so for the iranian thinkers

sorry for the thinkers of the iranian revolution

heideger was the key

two

arriving

at islam

through western modernity

he was the he was the opening within

the modern west

that enabled a rediscovery of islam

and i think

for me that is more where i'm coming from

with my emphasis on heidegger and heidegger's

kind of revolution forthought

yeah i know nick land is back on twitter which is great

i'm going to talk more about that in a second

but bear with me guys

me time

i'm going to talk about that though

have no fear don't worry about

i will be talking about the nickelin stuff

y r ts g did write a substack about this

if you're interested in more background infoll of heideger's influence

but to me

the truth is not hide a gup

i just think heideger

was

it doesn't end it can't end withiegieg is just the guy who opens the questions

to me

karl marx

sigmund freud

i do girl

you know i albert einstein

like a bunch of other fucking people if you want

are

attempting to make a breakthrough of some kind

right

uh

and arrive at a more fundamental truth

than the sum of its parts

to me

i am an islamic fundamentalist so to me that truth is islam

but the difference is i'm not dogmatic that's why i'm not an islamist

it could it maybe it's not islam right maybe it's something else

maybe it's christianity maybe it's judaism

whatever right

but

and obviously even if it was i mean

islam would not be enough right clearly that would not be enough

but

it's something

heideggers on to something right he didn't get there though he's just on to some

now philosophically speaking

that something if i gave away like

the word i gave to this like philosophical tendency

it would reveal a few of my blogs on the internet so i'm not going to do that

i have some blogs

that are literally still public

that you guys have not discovered

uh huh

and they're actually publicly accessible to everyone and nobody's discovered them

um is that fhunny

but im

like every ya

you

people were literally docs a random

they'll literally docs or random family a guy named adam to hear and stalk the fuck out of his family

under the false pretense that it's me

before being smart enough to find my fucking blogs

oh you really understand where i'm coming from don't you stupid bitch

thank you so much my name is your view a form of pantheism

now

no

ill i will instead of giving you the name i'll just tell you what my

like phill is basically

my pill is basically that

the question of what is an object

must be completely changed

sorry must be completely

reformulated

objects are typically

thought of as

ready made things or substances

that

m

three exists

sorry or a or that exist at the expense

of the means by which we apprehend them or orient ourselves in relation to them

so

to me an object is something

that

are very

subjective

um

relation to conditions

so it's an inclusive

view of what an object is

and i thought i think that's my breakthrough

you go has isn't that just like con

well no

because i think t is still

strictly speaking in term strictly speaking

within the confines of conceptual thought

he's not he's not talking about objects in every possible context

hes just speaking within the frame of the self certain conceptual thinking

just like the rest of the

modern philosophy

ok has isn't that just object oriented ontology

clos

and someone in the fucking chat

actually put the three os

one

you're getting close

but object oriented ontology

has no regard for the subjective element it doesn't care about humanity object oriented ontology basically says

it doesn't actually include humanity

in the object

it rathers tries to foreclose

the subjective side of things and fully deliver oneself

to the realm of

uh objects like only it's only just objects

the question of meaning is irrelevant like so there's this view of the

wrote ray brasier

from pronouncing his last name correctly by the way i don't i've never talked about ray brassier

before

which is fucking crazy because like

that is an extremely brilliant

an extremely underrated guy

right

but i think he has a word for it it's like

what is it

he calls it ontological indifference or something like that

he wrote a book about nihilism

which was

he used to be part of that kind of movement of speculatives of realism and

he's matured from it and he's extremely extremely brilliant guy

who i have never had the pleasure of meeting

think i was going to meet him and then

something happened like that

got busy or something but

rey brassier is extremely

can't

recommend his work enough

i's actually fucking and saying that in the entire history of infrared i've never

ever talked about him

but it's about the

this on'tological indifference

so that's object oriententology that's not where i'm coming from

but it's close because it shares the same hide garion roots

and it's obviously object orient

right

but

oh oh o is still kind of

pantheistic and it's kind of this spinosst in my view

i know it's not spinozas technically but it's

it's it's pagan and i'm a monotheist so i'm a monotheist

if you want to say

i'm a monotheist o o oh guy which means

i believe

there is

one object

that

defines all objects

right

there is one object without measure if you will

one and only one

y

marx believed that too by the way he just called it the proletariat

m

or he called it humanity right

but there is one object without measure is a significant departure from all

m yes

now i have probably more in common with dougin

then them

bight

since i'm a western thinker wow

i am a western thinker i was born in america

and the fundamental questions

facing the west

are my questions

so i have good news for all the fucking people that think i like hate the west

and i'm like an eastern larper

i am going down with the west so if the west collapses i'm collapsing

if the west is destroyed

i will go down with it

i'm this is a ship i'm going to be going down with right now i'm i say that

about america and the west in general

so if i resign myself to the view that america is irredeemable and is going to be destroyed

saying that's

i'm here i'm not going anywhere i'm not going to move

to the east right

so the question of the west is also personally for me the question of my own life

ause i was fucking born here right

and this is the place that's defined everything meaningful and relevant to my life

m

but i think this of this very broad

position is probably why i like

don't have a problem saying shit like i'm an ain rand communist right

because it's like

that's not the point

right i' maybe i'm like trying to

lead you on to a point

but that is not the point

at the point

is between the lines right

yeah am rand is based

super cool

oh my god

but ain ran isn't my god i just think there's a lot of cool things about aan ran that are interesting because she was right about a lot of things

there's a vibe there right there's a certain vibe there that i

i like

doesn't mean i have to fucking agree

with everything she's ever said because she's not the point you fucking idiot

if you want to get at the point to be to lawyer up and fucking you know how lawyers do they take the law

and they use the law against the law that's what the lawyers supposed to do

so all these retards

who are my enemies

they try to take the point

what they perceive to be the point and use it against me has how can you support china

when china

i'm is rolling out renewable energy when you don't like renewables

this china is not my god you fucked retard but just because china is not my god

doesn't mean i hate china because i'm operating under the inclusive principle of chaos

rather than the exclusive principle of logos

i am also not clinically autistic and there's nothing wrong with being clinically autistic

but

people who were trying to say things like

has has just cast aside maga communism and mecca tankys

for libertarian sonism

you are clinically autistic

because you can't comprehend the fact

that just because none of those things are my god means that i've abandoned the truth that subsists within them

now when people ask me my ideology i just tell them

taliban stal njeo being stalinism

if you want to know the truth

and there is something about the taliban

that i find very interesting

i find very very interesting what's going on in afghanistan

find very very interesting

is regrounding

of the substance of a state

and a civilization even a country

which shares the universalism

an even kind of standardization of modernity

it's not

it's not modern

it's islam

it's souf it's from the bowels of some kind of

you know south asian sufism

of some kind

it has this kind of

similarity with modernity that it's leveling all of society under one common measure

and one kind of universal principle

but it's not devoid of content

it's

it's kind of like an inclusive modernity

the taliban

to me represents an inclusive modernity

now by inclusive i don't mean that

they are allowing pride parades in kabul

quite the contrary

but bi inclusive i mean

it is acknowledging

the universal abstractionism

of modernity

as something that is pregnant

with

always already pregnant with some kind of determinate content

like for example

islam appears to be

at the outset a very abstract

religion right

but then it weaves

its truth through a very kind of aesthetical and beautiful calligraphy

and poetry

and even music

which

gives it content

so it's something that begins as abstractly universal

which is always already somehow pregnant with a particular

and i view

the taliban that way

it's

it's

dearrived

almost

organically right

from the civil society the real

nat not natural but the real

civilizational bonds of afghan society

and through this particularity it's arriving at a universality that i think

is the inversion of western modernity

so my heart is in afghanistan right now

maybe my heart will be somewhere else in a year

but right now my heart is in

afghanistan

right now my heart is with the taliban

taliban is a locust of modernity but a perennial prehistoric modernity

yeah that's where i'm kind of coming from

that's the kind of where i'm coming from

that's really where i'm coming from

give me a moment

now

a there's a few things

rah

many will say something like

o

aren't you aware that the taliban are engaged in all these

the restrictions on the liberties of women

i don't care

reason i don't care

's because

that

those extreme relations between the sexes

that

prevails in afghanistan right now

it's very strict relation between the sexes

very much

a is

has a parallel

to the history of early modernity with puritanism

and you know this kind of religious fanaticism

of

protestant christianity

both in the new world and within europe

not a lot of people remember this but

those dutch calvinists

they wore all black with those hats and their women

were covered up in the very extreme relation

when the sexes prevailed there

and then afterwards

madernity proper

develops

and suddenly men and women are equal

and

you know women can

drive and shit i don't fucking know

so to me

afghanistan is repeating the origins of modernity

and i

which will inevitably give

it inevitably will culminate in a new kind of

equality between men and women

legal and

universal equality between men and women that gives expression to their subjective equality

but here's where i think

there's more hope

with

that's all aoont

in the history of western modernity

the universal equality between the sexes

has come at the expense of their real particular differences and it has annihilated them

so women gained freedom

for example to vote

and to work

and to do the things that men are entitled to doing

but they lost an ability to give organic expression

to their femininity

and theyir female sexuality

i think

for example in communism it was different

communism ok men and women are

there's a ground

to give expression to their subjective equality

but then communism also provides

a way

you

kind of slip back into

you know the organic set realities of sexual difference

while maintaining a universal acknowledgement of the real subjective equality between men and women

now if you're religious what does the universal subjective equality between men and women mean

means who meen and women are equal in the eyes of god we have

our soul we both have a soul right

that's equal

it's just that in the world

we're different

right

so

when the universal state says men and women are equal men women can get education and women can drive and they can

bot

it's just a way of giving expression to that subjective equality

but it's not necessarily saying

men and women are the same

because civil society is supposed to be the ground within which those real organic differences

gn

ca co can exist right and can be given expression

but the problem at madernity operating under the western

exclusive principle of logos

has cut off that

organic sexual difference

within civil society

so i think

there's more hope with the taliban

because theyre yeah eventually

the state that the taliban are building is building eventually is probably going to

allow for

a

an acknowledgment of the subjective equality of women

and men

but

i think it will be more like communism

ware

that will not annihilate the differences between men and women

within this sphere of civil society

you know something crazy about infrared is it's like

this should

is way too broad

the have sectarianism like

look how fucking skits so all the shit i just told you just sounds

doesn't this seem like way bigger

in all the different factions within infrared

it's so much bigger

and we have different factions for a reason we want all these different factions to exist

because

we don't know

you know maga communism just came from one of the factions

and i was we were a little skeptical at first and then were just like you know what we choose that

line that's a correct

basic you know

we want to be a chaotic octopus with many tentacles

and then when one of our factions gets something right

we adopted as the main line

but that's only possible because we have an inclusive principle of chaos

as a follow may you have been intrigued by what you said about earlier

it's long to me

philosophically clashes with many things that influence me

similar to yours would love a dream on this in the future

yeah i tend to not have a dogmatic view about islam

philosophically

because i started i was an atheist

so who cares about religion you know i mean man that's where i started out from

so if i discovered something true about islam

probably because

i was like even as an atheist i was like holy shit

i can't ignore this

doesn't sound skitzo too yeah but

it's going to sound skitz so to like ninety percent of people

that's just something you have to acknowledge

i'm here for the ten percent

tonight

at least tonight i'm just here for the ten percent

ten percent of you for him for whom this will sound coherent

and it will make sense

you have an opinion on guider

i don't know wh that is but thank you for the

alish

nw what is it what is the polish currency

is a lira

it's not the lyric it's the

this is the low toy

lot

the p l

right

i used to do for itx

remember ning

but im

don't get too caught listen

it's kind of like i'm teaching you dialectics yes get caught up in the ideology

but always recognize

there's hope for something beyond the so if the ideology fails you don't worry there's something

there's some light after at the end of the tunnel it's not the end of the world if an ideology proves to fail

because ideologies are just very finite ways of giving expression

to the infinite and absolute truth

god

have faith

that's my message

infrared doesn't have an idol

i don't have an idol

i don't have an idol

you can't name my idol

you don't get the fucking point

try to lawyer up

and use my ideology against me

you sound like a retard

i don't have an ideology

i'm cutting through

the multitude of ideologies

to give expression

to a more fundamental point

that is always what i've been here to do

where does maga start in your final anarysis of modernity

i

america's place in the history of modernity according to heidegerp

is the high point of the extinction of man

it's the high point of

the madness of modernity is america

iideger was very pessimistic about america

he thought america is the end of humanity

why has margat changed that

or why should maga give a new perspective to that there's

maga is not just about america it's about the entire history of the west

which concludes in america

by any soorts john appreciate you i don't think it's skidz so at all and i don't think it's gkits so either

to me

where maga fits within the b so much be out

gehard jamel was a friend of alexander dugan from black order suss time

he called himself ideologist of radical monotheism

that is very interesting i didn't i don't know who that is

i have to look him up

that sounds somewhat interesting

but a

yes what i was trying to say is that

m

with marga

the west

for the first time i think

acquires

a history and a ground

not defined by negation

in it you know book the parallax view

b the basic idea of the paralyx view is that you have one object let's

famous water

one object

right

and the parallax view basically means

the same thing

and he just

slightly look at it in a different way and suddenly it's a completely different object

it's a completely different

and that's what i think mago does for american history and the history of the west

entire history of the west

has culminated

in what iaid grou calls the end of humanity

because it has been driven

it

it has been

propelled

by this exclusive

principle of lo go

genocide erasure of wole people's destruction yada yadyada

but then

in parallel

there's also a people's history of the west i'm saying people's history of the west is a

play on words

howard zin's book

people's history of the united states like there's the history of the united states and then there's the hidden hisory

the people's history

' not written about but which is nonetheless very real

and very much there

so i think there's a people's history of the west as well there's a history of the west

ofh

a humanity

struggling to be born

and struggling to give it

there's a real real history of the weay

that's not justifined

by destruction

andgation

alienation

it's also defined

i struggled

or meaning

and it's a struggle for for

universal justice in humanity yad yada yada

however you want to frame it

i kind of am very sympathetic also with ejx perspective

his book in defense of lost causes where he talks about

that he tries to redeem the history of the french revolution

and i'm very sympathetic

with that view

i

but for me

beyond just the view that there's a revolutionary hisory

ring

there's also a history of a western people's

i

who are struggling to

arrive at a definite way of life

and a stable ground

out of which

a civilization

find expression

and that history has not been explored yet

and for me

marga

is a parallax view of america

which is not looking at america in a totally different way

than before

now america is not defined by an idea is joe biden said joe biden said america's

the only country in the world founded by an idea

oga comes here and he says it's not about an idea it's about

a way of life

it's about a specific people a specific way of life a specific civilization

a specific history

m

and this way mago it links up

the american people

the chinese people and the russian people and the iranian people

and uh

people of the world

basically

in revolt

against

forces

satan is

urney

now people will say something like oh have

you know they're just talking about white people right

no i think they are talking about americans

that's what's beautiful about mago

it's not just talking about whit

peop i was just talking about people who aren't immigrants

well

talking about america

there are real american people

most are white

a significant portion are not weig

they're all americans

you think a black american

in africa

won't stand out

they will

ising a white american in europe

won't stand out

they will

because they're american

so meat for me

maga is the first acknowledgment

of america

as a real country and a real civilization

which is actually a fucking miracle

because america is supposed to be the end and extinction of humanity then margus says hold up

wait a minute

what has silent will now have a voice

that's there

why

that's there

conlusion

not ours

don't forget we the people who have been here

under the yok

of the ruling classes of the west for hundreds of years

fighting against them

from thomas munser's

prest rebellion in germany

all the way through the history of the english civil war

the american revolution

the french revolution

all expressions of the peoples of europe and america

beating their chest

against

the evil ruling class

whose

real traces

are profoundly

historical

that all was there

it's not just would see i disagree with because you all this is the revolutionary history of

negation

it's not just about ideas or abstractions or this alienation

is tearing oneself from one

one's roots it's also

an assertion of

and a form of embeddedness when the french revolution happened

that was french peasants

hungry for fucking french land

right

it wasn't just about alienating oneself from one's context

it was about asserting one's cont

the same thing is true for that youyeomen

of the american revolution

and the peasants of the english civil war

and the peasants

of germany

who rose up

against

the princes and nobles were oppressed

um

's spoken out of brain for

but that's a hidden that's a completely unspoken history

it's completely hidden

i think the same loss

modernity i talk about of the mongols

the lost history of timor

timmords

and the gunpowder empires and that alternative modernity

there is a parallel of that within europe

struggling to be born

and with maga i think it is born

gengs khan bestows his blessing

the maga people in the marga movement

he bestows his blessings

to the militia movement

and uh

the americans resisting the globalists

will

it's one

universal humanity

that lost modernity is about not just the people of asia

also the peoples of america and europe

the mystery with america is e purobus una

out of this multiplicity of splits

secessions

and speciations

and

political

sovereignty this multitude of

look at a map of fuck in europe in the middle ages it's all

little dog oh my god

holy shit solar so thank you so much

and out of that

mm

endency toward difference defining the history of europe

arises

oneness

one thing

m america is an islamic

project

it's a mongol project

it's a magical project

the monothy

wances to perceive

purity of this one

e plurobus funa

what is the truth behind this

very destructive history of

you're up

founded by the exclusive principle of logos heideger talks about

america is trying to give expressions

but the truth of that is its opposite

and

so yeah that's what

aga communism is about thegy

guys i told you the dream wasn't going to be wlong

not going to be

but i

guess is everyone glad i did the stream tonight

ton i was a lecture you know tomorrow will be something different

i'll see you guys later bye bye