JIHAD

Sing with the 10.

What's going on, brother?

Comrade Kidd with the 10.

I see you, brother.

Thank you.

Outside, Black Pack, Rocksov.

I appreciate you, brothers.

What is up?

Everybody, what's going on?

That's my job to tell you what's going on.

What am I even asking?

What am I even asking?

Well, I'll tell you what's going on.

Um Fell for it again award on the on the part of the crazy Liptards who are screaming and shouting that

Now, only now, fascism is here.

Amila Trump is deporting everyone, and everyone's going to Alligator Alcatraz.

By the way, this is all shit that was going on under Biden and Obama.

But Trump puts a spin on it that is inflammatory on social media.

No, I I acknowledge there are interesting new developments actually which are confirming the thesis that we've always been saying that a civil war is simply coming.

For example, the new ruling by the Supreme Court now someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

But what I've been hearing, because it's all over my TikTok, I'm not sure if this is just propaganda, but what I've been hearing is that there's a new precedent from the Supreme Court where basically Trump or the administrative, they can do whatever they want, and the only redress we have as citizens against it is if we individually pursue it in court.

So they can sign a law, for example, saying they're going to shoot me, and the courts can't stop them unilaterally.

I have to sue them.

Apparently, is this true or no?

That's what I've been hearing.

Well, um

That's definitely going to cause some splits and divisions, and that's definitely going to lead to a constitutional crisis in practice.

Trump in thirty days, he's targeting uh birthright citizenship.

And he was on record saying that he's gonna start targeting the naturalized he's gonna target the the uh people who were alre already citizens.

Uh I'm laughing 'cause of course I'll be targeted.

Of course I'll likely be deported.

If Trump gets his way, maybe they'll just deport me.

Which is fine.

Then I would have to come back to America the same way Jackson would.

In a tank.

That's a joke.

But uh

Well well well.

I guess we all should have voted for Kamala, right?

It's not like under Kamala and Biden.

Similar degree of the suspension of constitutional liberties wasn't occurring.

No, what's did the difference now is that there's a lot of media attention on this.

See, for example, if Kamala did all the same shit, it just wouldn't be talked about in the media.

It'd be the same thing going on, just nobody would be talking about it.

There wouldn't be attention, you know.

The current trajectory of US politics, or I should rather say the U.S.

regime, was on course regardless of who the president was.

Whether it was George Sr., George W., Bill Clinton, Obama, it's all the same trajectory.

You know, Trump puts a different spin on things.

And this is just about a strategy of building consensus among the population.

It has absolutely nothing to do with a new policy of any kind.

But in the face of these developments, which were inevitable, which you've been warning about, we've been talking about that they're going to happen regardless who the President is, now the a lot of leftists are showing their ass.

They're just starting to openly adopt opportunism.

They're starting to opportunistically invoke a few things.

One, which is the concept of the popular front.

We need a popular front with the Democrats to stop the fascist Trump.

Now they're talking also about how, well, reforms, they're abusing the works of Lenin.

They're saying, with respect to Zohron and the new push by the Democratic Party to sheepdog people into the party, they're saying, well, reforms, according to Marxism, we should fight for reforms because we just shouldn't stop there.

We need to keep pushing Biden left until it's revolutionary.

And this is how they distort the words and writings of Lenin and the basic Marxist tradition.

So what I'd like to do in this stream.

is set the record straight and completely clarify

What the attitude of Marxism is toward political reforms and reforms and also to social democracy.

So that's my goal for today.

And then there's also a lot of other things I'm going to be talking about.

But I'd like to get that out of the way first, right?

So firstly, it is true that

Marxism 101 and Marxism-Leninism in particular, shocking, it doesn't advocate abolish everything overnight, abolish everything.

It doesn't advocate an ultra-left or left-wing infantilist position that's devoid of political realism.

That's absolutely true.

But the whole context of discussing the significance politically of reforms is under the pretext that such reforms are being won by a politically independent working class movement.

That's the key, a politically independent working class movement.

So, reforms that are effected by the bourgeoisie and by bourgeois political power, that has no significance within Marxists are not obliged to fall in line and accept or support or rally behind the reforms of the bourgeoisie.

That is absolutely nowhere to be found in Marxism.

The question is whether independent working class organizations

Should pursue reforms or operate within a context of the struggle for reforms in order to lay class distinctions bare, class divisions and antagonisms, and develop those antagonisms in order to help develop and facilitate the consciousness of the broad masses.

Because in the course of fighting for reforms, the whole idea is it will reveal the fault lines of the political class war and the reforms will fail, they won't actually succeed.

And that will reveal the need for a more aggressive posture.

Or if they do succeed, it will be because independent working class organizations can take credit for that and therefore they'll say w it will build hegemony for them, right?

But that's not what's going on with Zohran.

Zohran is a member of the Democratic Party.

He's just a fucking Democrat, bourgeois politician who's promising to do a lot of things.

And there are some Marxists claiming that this bourgeois form of politics is somehow acceptable to tail behind because, well, we can pursue reforms in the short term, you know, for the purposes of harm reduction.

Listen, the thing about harm reduction is not relevant to Marxism.

You want to join a charity, join a fucking charity.

Politics has nothing to do with harm reduction.

It was never in the debate or in the equation.

When Lenin was defending the significance for the class struggle of pursuing reforms, he was not talking about harm reduction.

He was talking about facilitating class consciousness through independent working class organizations.

Where are the independent working class political parties with respect to Zohran?

There's the Democratic Party and then there's the DSA, neither of which are working class organizations.

And even if you want to delude yourself and claim the DSA is a proletarian organization, spoiler, it's absolutely not.

It's not even a political party.

So tell me where the actual working class politics is in the first place that can take credit.

For such victories, in order to facilitate class struggle and class consciousness, nowhere to be found.

Peruvian, thank you.

So everyone who's claiming that reforms are okay because, well, in the short term we can have some comfy health care and listen, the whole point is class struggle and political independence.

That's square one.

That's non-negotiable.

Nobody you don't have to say we have to have a revolution right now.

In order to have principled politics and say we are fighting for this in an organized collective capacity independently on behalf of the working class, no one is doing that.

Okay, this is the Democratic Party and the DSA, and that's it.

It has nothing to do with working class politics or proletarian politics.

That's true for Bernie Sanders.

That's true for AOC.

This form of politics, it's not social democratic politics, it's bourgeois politics.

And not a lot of people understand the distinction.

So I'll explain the distinction.

Social democratic politics was always rooted in mass working class organizations.

So, unions, a broad array of working-class civil society organizations, and so on and so on.

The issue is that social democracy became corrupt because of the emergence of a labor aristocracy.

So, the social democrats started tailing behind the bourgeoisie, but they themselves were still rooted in a working-class movement.

Talking about 100 years ago.

Okay, the USA does not have a social democratic party.

We have two bourgeois parties, not even two bourgeois parties, two fascist imperialist parties.

We have no semblance of any working class independence or organization.

The Social Democrats, you could say they're reformists, you could say this, you could say that, but they were in the they were an independent

Working class party represented by the labor aristocracy and the bourgeois opportunist politicians, but they were still rooted in working class masses.

It's not true for the Democratic Party.

The Democrats are absolutely, fully an imperialist bourgeois party.

That's true also for the DSA.

It's not a party.

And as an organization, you can't say it's a working class organization.

It's not rooted in any working class consciousness.

The DSA cannot claim that it has unionized any segment of the working class.

They can't take credit for the Amazon labor union.

They can't take credit for anything.

So welcome to reality.

Every single person who's pushing this Zoron bullshit is an opportunist and a sellout.

And they also have blood on their hands because the Democratic Party oversaw genocide in Gaza.

Anyone shilling for them in the name of anti-fascism should be tarred and feathered and named and shamed.

Simple as that.

That call themselves Marxists.

They're not Marxists.

You're absolutely a fucking fascist opportunist piece of shit calling yourself a Marxist.

Because you want to tail behind the latest trend.

And it's so incredible how every time these new trends come, all the radical posturing disappears that they were employing against us for years.

It all disappears.

And they're chasing Zohron.

They're chasing this new trend.

Oh my God, the new trend.

I can't...

You can't help but fall for it.

As the founder of MAGA Communism, how much did we put into hype for Trump?

Did we fall for Trump in 24?

Did we lose our senses and lose our principles and go, oh my God, it's happening.

We got to rally behind Trump?

No, we were extremely, extremely.

Solid

In our stance, in our position against Trump, extremely solid.

They don't have this discipline because these people are opportunists.

They don't have principles, they don't have discipline.

They go with the flow.

You call this politics, go with the flow politics.

Oh, something new and exciting is happening.

You gotta chase after it.

It's like a dog chasing a ball.

They impulsively do it without thinking.

As if we're not gonna name and shame them a year later when they're exposed.

The same way they felt for AOC and Bernie and all this bullshit.

Hey, we are you guys are gonna be isolated.

All of you who know better, who are g rallying behind oh, we gotta unite with the social democracy because of fascism.

You're going to be held accountable for the rest of your life for this position you're holding.

It's gonna be rubbed in your face forever.

You're gonna be confronted with the fact you took this stance forever.

But Haas, what about Jackson Hinkle's AI memes where he's next to Trump?

Hey buddy.

You're not fooling anyone comparing a fucking meme to your unabashed, extremely serious, unambiguous support for the Democratic Party.

To be clear, no one's fucking buying it.

Anyone who does buy it's a fucking retard.

And are therefore worthless from the perspective of politics?

Not a single one of us claimed we have to rally behind Trump and support Trump and vote for Trump.

Not a single one of us.

Which would have been less opportunistic even if we did than supporting Democrats.

Why?

Because people still have the illusion that the Democratic Party is somehow affiliated with the left and it's somehow acceptable.

At least if you supported Trump, which we didn't, you're taking a bold radical stance that s contradicts the prevailing opportunistic trend, the comfortable, easy trend that people are slipping into like a fucking pair of slippers.

So, to be absolutely clear, Marxism rejects reformism.

A, but it also fundamentally rejects the type of politics Zohron represents, not because you have to be a purist or an ultra left, you know, revolutionary right now.

But because Zoran, there is no principle of political independence at play in this phenomenon.

There's no working class movement.

There's no mass movement.

It's just the Democratic Party and volunteers for the Democratic Party.

There's no actual working class organizations involved in this in any capacity.

Whether they're reformist or not is immaterial.

They don't exist.

Anywhere to be found in Zohran's cam it's a fundamentally bourgeois campaign.

There is nothing proletarian about it.

It's Fabian socialism.

It's what the Communist Manifesto said was bourgeois socialism.

That's it.

Hey, vote for me.

I'm going to give you I'm going to meet we're going to work with Wall Street, who voted for me, by the way, and we're going to just give everyone free stuff.

That is bourgeois socialism.

You're not fooling anyone.

This is purely bourgeois socialist politics.

It's not even social democracy.

Because social democracy implies at least a mass movement.

That's not here.

Social democracy is dead, by the way.

It just lives on in this disgusting form in a twisted new way that the Comintern, the communists of the past, they were not talking about Zoron and Bernie Sanders when they said united front against fascism.

They weren't saying, hey, let's unite with Bernie Sanders against Donald Trump.

They were saying, hey, you should work with mass working class mass organizations, even if they're reformist, to like stop Hitler.

Yeah, Trump is not Hitler, though, first of all.

Second of all, where the fuck are the working class mass organizations today?

They don't exist.

So no matter how you fucking look at it, there's no such thing as a popular front with Democrats.

The whole premise of the Popular Front was that it was fucking popular.

A

And the idea that Democrats represent a return to constitutional and democratic sovereignty against Trump's fascism is totally delusional.

Both Trump and the Democratic Party represented different trajectories toward the same constitutional crisis and dissolution of our democratic constitutional sovereignty.

Because they are two wings of the anti-democratic imperialist bourgeoisie.

They are two wings of the imperialist bourgeoisie.

The goal of the imperialist bourgeoisie has always been the dismantlement of constitutional sovereignty.

Trump is doing it in a way that is tied to his social media cult of personality, but the Democrats were doing it in a way that was disguised in the form of defending democracy itself.

So what the Democrats were doing.

is that they were engaging in mass censorship, acqu working with big tech companies because they were accusing Russia of attacking democracy.

They were uh they empowered the NSA

Deputizing the NSA to an unprecedented extent under Obama.

They were jailing American citizens for having dissenting political views.

They were politicizing federal agencies.

They were employing lawfare for political reasons that had nothing to do with any neutral judicial sovereignty.

So they're two different paths to the same outcome because there's an irreconcilable contradiction that is at the heart of America's constitutional form as the United States of America.

There's a fundamental contradiction at the heart of it.

And Democrats and Trump, they just represent different forms of attempting to resolve this contradiction.

Both of which end up with the same conclusion, the destruction of the United States of America as we know it.

And that's actually what's going on.

The destruction of the United States of America.

The destruction of the US Constitution.

It's gonna happen whether it's Democrats, whether it's Trump.

It was happening under Biden.

It's just that these leftists didn't give a fuck.

Now that we have Trump and the same thing is going on.

Oh my god, this time guys, let's fear monger this time.

Nothing is new.

Nothing is new.

As far as the collapse of constitutional sovereignty, nothing is new.

You weren't freaking out under Obama, then shut the fuck up.

If you were not freaking out under Obama,

Then shut the fuck up about Alligator Alcatraz.

Okay, everyone freaking out about that.

I just want to let you know: if you were sitting here under Obama saying, Well, it's it, then shut the fuck up because we all see past your bullshit opportunism.

You're just doing what's convenient.

Why?

Because the Democratic Party is pumping a lot of money in the media, they're pumping a lot of money in the NGOs, they're pumping a lot of money on social media, and they're flooding with money in the country a coordinated campaign.

to fearmonger and and and and and spread a narrative that

Benefits their agenda.

That's what the Democratic Party is doing.

All of this I went on TikTok, all these TikToks I'm seeing, they're all Democratic Party and CIA ops.

To spread a certain narrative that spreads that benefits the Democrats, and that's all that's different this time.

I'm saying this as someone who could possibly be deported in the future.

Uh under the Democrats I could be jailed.

A lot of things could fucking happen.

You don't see me crying and and and freaking out.

Absolute you don't think they're gonna try to deport me?

I visited Sayyid Nasrullah's funeral.

I'm the Chairman of the American Communist Party.

They're gonna they'll absolutely they'll pursue deporting me.

And you know what?

I don't even give a fuck.

I'm not gonna compromise my principles and ally with the Democratic Party because I'm scared of what's gonna happen to me.

Yeah, they're absolutely all taking money.

The DNC is on overdrive, pumping money into civil society to absolutely make everyone freak out about what's and spread a certain narrative that benefits them.

And this is what they did under Trump's first term, and this is what they're doing now.

And a lot of people are falling for it, and I'm not gonna.

Now, are we headed toward a dictatorship?

Yeah, we are.

But that was an inevitable outcome, regardless of who the president is.

Would Kamala Harris have posted the alligator Alcatraz meme?

No.

But she probably would have arrested a bunch of dissidents and thrown them in jail and conducted the same rate of deportations that is currently being done.

There just would have been less fear.

See, a lot of fear has been spread thanks to the media and thanks to social media.

It's not organic, by the way.

But the rate of deportations have not increased.

So why the excess of fear?

Because a campaign to spread fear.

was set in motion, I remember, even in February.

I believe I was in Texas.

I was in Houston.

I remember a lot of people were scared to leave their homes.

Nothing had changed as far as the rates of deportation.

But what did change was that there was a lot of fear being spread, unorganically.

Whoever is saying oh this is

This is Nazi Germany right now.

Well no it's not.

No, it's not.

And frankly, constantly going back to this paradigm that we're just gonna repeat something that happened a hundred years ago instead of something bad, I agree, but definitely different.

It's just a type of intellectual laziness and

it's a complete surrender of of any attempt to actually make a concrete analysis of the concrete situation and just defer to something that scares people.

I'm not fucking scared of anything.

You know why I'm not scared of anything?

Because

It's already pretty fucking bad.

I'm not scared.

You're you you are a piece of shit if you're spreading fear.

Why are you spreading fear?

The lowest estimate is 50,000 civilians in Gaza are dead.

How many died in Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya?

Why are you fear-mongering?

What violation of humanity has not occurred yet?

What crime has the US government not already committed?

Oh, but but it has, it's gonna get worse.

How?

Thr people are starving 'cause of their sanctions.

Yemen was starving 'cause of US supplied weapons.

Tell me

Tell me what we have to fear, why we should be fear-mongering and and and oh my god, we have to we have to we have to unite against

against what?

Why wouldn't you want to unite before against Biden or against Obama?

Why only now?

Because the media is on your side, you're a completely toothless, unprincipled piece of shit is what you are.

How is it not absolute chauvinism to say, no, no, no, guys, we slaughtered millions in Gaza, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and from our sanctions

But this time we should be scared.

Only now we should be freaking out.

And we should compromise our principles.

Because now we should be really scared because we're going to go to Alligator Alcatraz.

Hey, motherfucker, if I go to Alligator Alcatraz,

I'm no better than a kid in Gaza.

And neither are you.

You're not better than a child in Gaza getting bombed.

You're just not.

Hey, bra hate to break it to you.

You're not better.

You're not morally worth more than a child getting bombed in Gaza.

You're not.

You're absolutely not.

And isn't it crazy how the Pat Sox have to be principled internationalists on this question of the moral worth of human beings?

Isn't that incredible?

The people that spend so much time attacking the MAGA Chauvinist patriots believe that Americans have more moral worth in terms of their worth of their life and their rights than the victims of our regime abroad.

Why is that?

Why is that?

I'll tell you exactly why it is, because

And it's for the same reason the ACP is constantly under attack.

And you know, this is another thing I wanted to talk about today.

I'll tell you exactly the rotten truth, and I'm not saying this to whine, I'm saying this because there's a tendency I notice sometimes among some of you, which I detest it.

I absolutely fucking detest it.

I detest

This

High ground from a position of weakness position that a lot of people like to adopt.

I really detest it.

And now I'm going to talk about this.

On the question of moral worth.

In our society,

Moral worth is purely associated with power and strength.

If you are weaker and more vulnerable, you have less moral worth according to our society and according to all the left liberals as well.

So for example, the ACP can be correct and more principled and more morally good, but there are different standards that apply to what you're allowed to say about us and what you're allowed to advocate about us than what you are allowed to advocate about them.

Because since there are less of us in numbers and we're less popular, therefore we have less moral worth.

Just like in Gaza,

According to Western media, you can slaughter children in Gaza, you can slaughter scores, tens of thousands, right?

But if a few Israelis are killed, that's the end of the world.

Because according to the Western media, Israeli lives are worth more than the lives of Gazans and Palestinians.

The Palestinians are framed as weak and the Israelis are framed as strong.

If you're stronger you have more moral worth, according to human beings on the planet we live on.

This is a brutal truth.

I want to really, really, really make sure not a single fucking person forgets.

If you're weak, nobody's going to give you any fucking sympathy.

Nobody gives a fuck.

You understand?

If you're weak, you're nothing.

You're absolutely fucking nothing.

It doesn't matter.

Only the strong are sympathized with.

You see?

We can slaughter millions abroad in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Gaza, all with our bombs and weapons.

But we only should start freaking out.

When uh Trump is gonna take our rights away, you weren't freaking out before because you th you don't think these victims of your regime that are funded with your taxes have as much moral worth because they're weaker than you in your mind.

They're weaker, therefore they are less.

So be strong.

Be strong, 'cause nobody gives a fuck about you if you're weak.

Now let me explain to you exactly what this dynamic means.

This is a world of predators and prey.

I'm going to explain to you the metaphysical significance of the animal kingdom.

of the wolf and the lamb.

Of the lion and the buffalo.

This is what I'm going to explain to you.

According to Vijay Prashad.

According to these disgusting,

Left liberal hegemony ideologists, according to Zohran Mamdani, according to Bernie Sanders, according to the DSA.

The carnivores are morally bad.

The herbivores are actually morally superior.

And there's even some vegans that take this to its conclusion.

Some vegans will go as far as to say that every single carnivore should be hunted and killed, and that this should just be a world of herbivores, only plant eating.

Because to take another life is inherently immoral, and it's a type of aggression, and it's a type of evil.

And we should all be peace.

Gandhi, right?

Let me explain to you why the lion eats the buffalo and why the wolf eats the lamb.

And everything will make sense when I explain this to you.

First, let's get rid of some of the conventional arguments you've heard.

'Cause I don't know if you know this, but uh evolutionary synthesis is bullshit and neo-Darwinism is a complete bullshit.

You understand?

So first of all, some say, Well, it's for survival.

Get that out of your head.

The wolf does not hunt for survival.

All of these carnivores

Could have adapted to eating plants.

There's plenty of plants to go around, okay?

They kill prey because, in some metaphysical sense, they choose to.

I'm using the word choose in a way I don't want to have to explain myself.

Oh, they can't make conscious decisions.

It's not a conscious decision.

It's an ontological form of partiality.

It's an ontological decision they're making.

The lion hunts and kills the buffalo

To take a stand ontologically, it has nothing, nothing to do with survival, and I can prove it.

First of all, if it was about survival, why can't they start eating grass or plants?

They can.

They said, Well, they can't digest why can't they digest?

Because they've gotten too used to eating other animals.

But they could change if they really had to.

They refuse to.

Second of all, there's this is another curious thing.

This is really where I'm going to sell you the argument.

About why they hunt prey and kill them and eat them.

They do not say it's a cost-benefit analysis.

All game theoretical models of pure survivability and it's all bullshit because there are a million things these predators could do to maximize resource efficiency and they don't do it.

So, for example, why don't they kill other predators?

They don't.

There's an unwritten code of respect.

And I've studied this.

I wanted to make sure I studied it.

So, for example, even if two

Mammalian, let's say, predators come into contact and one of them is wounded, is not diseased, and is lying on the ground.

The wolf will not eat them.

The wolf oftentimes kills the fox.

But doesn't eat the fox.

Why not?

It's free food.

They won't eat him.

Because the wolf has honor.

The wolf doesn't just, it's not a killing machine that just wants to.

That just, it's not because of they're strong and they want to kill the weak.

No, no, no.

The wolf has a code of honor.

The wolf, for example, almost exclusively chases those bitch ass sedentary animals that just chew ground.

They just hate them, or they don't hate them.

They just insist upon a fundamental ontological difference.

The lion.

Hunts the buffalo.

The lion is not hunting the hyenas and the cheetahs and all this shit.

They could, they don't do it.

The lion has beef with the buffalo.

The lion is telling the lion is making a statement when he's attacking the buffalo and hunting the buffalo.

You understand?

But carnivores can only eat meat 'cause they're used to it.

Listen, I

Already addressed that stupid argument.

You understand?

They could absolutely adapt.

Animals have the ability to fucking adapt to literally anything.

As long as ontologically it reflects the truth of cosmos, they will be that.

Okay?

It has nothing to do with game theoretical models of survival.

Nothing to do with them or resource maximization or any of that nonsense.

Darwinism, neo-Darwinism is totally wrong.

So get it out of your head.

Okay.

I will tell you this, who is cruel, the lion or the buffalo?

Both are cruel, right?

Both are.

Not just the the the buffalo is not innocent.

And I'm trying to explain this to you, okay?

So you can understand why the lion kills and hunts the buffalo, why the wolf hunts and kills the lamb.

I'll explain it to you, okay?

These stupid, stupid sedentary animals, they're much more numerous than the predators, right?

Much more numerous.

Because they have a way of life and a form of survival that is much more uh easy, I would say, much more easy than the lions.

But are they

devoid of cruelty?

Absolutely not.

They are the cruelest animals.

More cruel than the predators.

When the buffaloes have a stampede, sometimes there's a little buffalo

The little buffalo doesn't make it.

They they they trip on something, they just keep going, they keep going, they don't give a fuck.

You think they give a shit, they don't give a shit.

When these stupid animals accidentally harm each other, you think they stop what they're doing and go help their fellow species?

They don't give a fuck.

They don't give a shit.

You see, there's so much cruelty in their stupidity and negligence.

Their lack of awareness of how much they're transgressing and committing suffering and harm upon others.

They don't give a fuck.

A pig will come in your house and shit on your floor and literally it'll bathe in your shit and swim in it and bask in it.

These animals don't have humility.

They don't have humility.

You understand?

They don't have gratitude.

They don't have ontological gratitude.

You understand?

They are absolutely cruel, but not cruel in a way of direct aggression and violence only, but cruel in the sense of negligence.

Cruel as in in asserting their life existence, in asserting their being.

They don't take into consideration others.

So they have no self-awareness.

They impose themselves on their surroundings, regardless of who it harms, who it hurts.

And you know, the buffalo tram retards, they trample on their young.

They don't give a shit.

Just another one, I guess, you know, who's gone.

This is a type of ontological cruelty.

This is cruelty.

And in order to care, and I want to also interject this: why human beings should never aspire to be these sedentary, peaceful animals in their comprehension of what a morally virtuous existence is.

In order to care for another person, that is an act of violence.

You have to violently, in an abrupt way, stop what you're doing and

Give all your focus, attention, and consideration.

On another.

It is absolutely a violence ontologically to have care and consideration to your fellow man.

Because you're going against your own immediate instincts, your own immediate comfortable impulses, and you're saying you're stopping and you're acting.

Okay, if a child falls in the pool and they start drowning.

You can sit in tan and chill.

That's what a buffalo would do.

They would chill because that's it's just they're they're going with the flow, right?

It takes a certain level of violence to fucking get up and jump in and do something about it, right?

That's actually something violent.

That's it's not violent in the sense of causing harm against another person physically, but it's ontologically violent in the sense that it's an abrupt discontinuity with the free flow of experience.

And the herbivoric sedentary animals are not capable of that.

The only violence they're capable of is running away.

The closest thing they get to the ontological toitistry, if I'm saying that right, or death drive, is when they're running away from something.

They're cowards.

They don't afford care and consideration toward one another in any active sense.

So

The predator, the wolf or the lion, really is

a type of karmic retribution of all of the members of the herbivoric species aggrieved and unjustly uh sinned upon

Uh and that's a revenge of being.

They're imposing humility on these animals.

Now, neither of these animals are evil.

Of course, there's a reason the herbivores exist, but the predators are not evil.

The wolf is not evil.

The lion is not evil.

The lion is imposing the same level of violence upon the buffalo.

That was lacking in the buffalo's care and consideration for their fellow members of their species.

Because the buffalo does not have self-awareness or self-consciousness.

The lion doesn't either, to be fair.

Neither have self-awareness or self-consciousness.

But whereas the buffalo imposes themselves upon the world without self-awareness.

The lion pursues that which they will never attain as predator, right?

As a object, which is ultimately selfhood.

They'll never have it, but they chase it, they pursue it, right?

It's a karmic ontological vengeance of being.

The lion is just.

The lion is karmic revenge for the evil of these peaceful, innocent, herbivore animals.

Because not all evil and not all ways of causing suffering are based on violating another person's rights.

Another way you can cause suffering is by lack of consideration, lack of care, lack of consideration for the way in which your existence is coming at the expense of another.

Lack of self-awareness, lack of humility, and lack of shame.

The lion hunts and kills the gazelle because the gazelle or the buffalo is a shameless being.

The lion imposes shame, the lion imposes

Self-awareness.

This is why in the reliefs on the walls of Persepolis they depict both the predator catching the prey.

And they depict this, the catching, because that combination is human self-consciousness, Hegelian self-consciousness.

Because the combination of the two, that is what the human is.

You understand?

But Vijay Prashad and Zoran Mamdani and AOC and Bernie, they're trying to turn human beings into prey animals.

They're trying to turn us into cows, into buffaloes, and to pigs, and these peaceful animals that never cause harm.

Sure, you're not causing harm, but you're not paying attention to the ways in which.

You are actually stepping on another's toes, right?

But it's more in a passive way where there's no intelligence, there's no intelligibility of.

Of how what you're doing comes at another's expense.

And that is also a type of cruelty.

You understand?

So see, and and look, get this idea out of your head that lions and wolves are these evil killing machines.

They have honor.

They don't if you are a human being, and this is the proof, this is what's going to sell it to you guys.

How fucking true is this?

You are in the woods alone and you come across the wolf.

You can choose if you are prey or if you're predator based on the fucking vibes you give off.

That's it.

The wolf, if he sees you,

As a carnivore, if he sees you as a predator, the wolf respects you and will not even think about eating you, won't even think you're not food.

In their mind, you're not food.

It's not that they're scared of you and you're warding them off only.

There's a certain way in which you can communicate to them that you are not food, you are not prey.

Right?

And they will show you that respect.

So these animals the is the same thing is true for lions and tigers.

When you see people, you know, uh uh i i uh playing with tigers and shit because they understand these things.

In fact, some people, when you have a pet tiger or lion, usually they kill you by accident.

Second of all,

When they are hunting you it's a form of play.

So they don't see you that way.

They don't see you like a disgusting pig who has no self-awareness because you are communicating them somehow.

That you have a relation to ontological excess or ontological surplus, right?

That that um that is such that it is in front of you and it is your object.

It is your object of activity.

This is what gives them the your respect.

Whereas you see the the prey animal.

does not have a similar relation to the ontological excess of energy and of being.

The prey animal inadvertently gives expression and form to this excess through gluttony, through being fat and stupid and slow, and through pooping and farting everywhere.

But only the prey animal pursues this excess.

You know, the reason lions and wolves and cheetahs and all these animals and cats this is why I like cats the reason they do this

What sets them off when they want to chase prey, it's literally when they see the prey running, all they see is an ontological excess of being.

And it's like they study them neurologically, and there's like a dopamine release when they catch them.

It's literally the it's like a type of jouissance, you know?

Um anyway, you don't I don't wanna use Jargon.

But you see Zohran and Vijay Prashad and this disgusting cult, this socialism cult, they're trying to turn us into prey animals.

And they think that if we're like buffaloes and cows, then we're virtuous and that we're good.

Because well, you're not committing it's all peace and all no, no, reality is violent.

Now the noble thing of humanity is

To not have this violence be manifested as harm toward your fellow man.

Like you should not torture others, you should not hurt other people.

But labor entails a radical violence ontologically.

And life entails a radical violence.

In the strict sense, in life there will always be winners and losers, even if it's peaceful.

For example, in a competition and a marathon or a a race, there's always going to be a winner or a loser.

In the field of any given art, some artists will be more popular than others, some artists will be more respected than others.

That is absolutely a win-lose relationship.

And that, if you lose, that is something violent.

You lost, you didn't get what you wanted.

Um

So you see, there's nothing wrong with that.

But the socialism is trying to say, no.

We all must become cows.

No, no, no, you know, look.

I am not a cow.

I am.

I'm not gonna be cringe, but I'm not a cow, all right?

Certainly not a cow.

Certainly not a buffalo, certainly not one of these stupid prey animals.

You understand?

And some people think, oh, the you know, the worst thing is Darwinism.

You know, the fascist Darwin interpretation is totally wrong.

The fascist Darwin interpretation says the wolf eats the little bunny because it's the strong over the weak.

Hey, the wolf is not stronger than the bunny.

Both of them exist and survive.

It's not about who's stronger.

Okay?

They represent different ontological principles of existence.

Absolutely, they do.

Okay.

It has nothing to do with who is superior.

It has everything to do with karmic retribution, everything to do with cosmic justice.

And Wolf is a force of cosmic justice.

There's some ugly hamsters.

Let me tell you about these disgusting hamsters, these rodents.

Whenever a defective or disabled rodent is born,

The f uh rodent's father will chase it and kill it.

And eat it, I'm pretty sure.

Oh my god.

They'll chase oh wow, really?

Okay, we're back.

They'll chase it and eat it, okay?

And because why?

Because to take care of the disabled is an act of violence.

It goes against your immediate impulses and your immediate instincts.

It absolutely requires um an abrupt and discontinuous imposition.

That is absolutely violent from an ontological perspective.

And the hamsters don't have that.

Therefore, they get eaten by cats, which is a beautiful thing.

The cat is a karmic force of retribution and justice.

The cat is avenging their retarded hamster that got killed by its parents.

When the cat catches these disgusting rodents and eats them, they're humbling them.

They're humbling those stupid animals who didn't care.

To protect the life of one and another.

It's so just.

It's literally so just.

Like, they don't even care.

Like when the Buffaloes, they're just running each other over and shit, they don't give a fuck.

The lion has to come and humble them.

Because if the lion doesn't come and humble them, they're gonna start thinking they're gods in their head.

Oh, I'm a buffalo, I'm a god, I you can get away with anything.

No, fuck you, the lion's coming to humble you, bitch.

Carlos, what's going on?

What's going on?

But let me tell you the leftist prey herd mentality, right?

Where these people with one and another, they affect a type of cruelty which is based on exclusion, it's based on absolutely cruel but honorless.

They try to passively exclude you, they gatekeep against you, they slander you, such that see the way leftists engage in violence against principled communists.

is that they code you as non-human.

So you are now okay to step on, you're now okay to shit on, you're now okay to attack.

Your life no long it's worse, much, much worse than the rev the the the cruelty of the wolf and the lion is just and honorable cruelty.

But the cruelty of the herd bovine leftists is that they code you in a certain way where you are no longer have any moral value or worth, right?

Therefore, anything that happens to you is not worth consideration.

So let's say Madeline Pendleton runs one of us over with a car.

Unironically, they're just kind of like, well, whatever.

Like, that's how they would treat it.

It's okay.

We don't have any moral worth.

So it's okay.

So that only works if you're allowing these people to code you as a fellow herd member.

We're not part of your herd, you little bitch.

Leftists, Vijay Prashad, all you people, we're not part of your bovine herd.

We are lions.

We are wolves.

We are.

Tiger.

We are big cat.

We are not like you.

We are not part of your herd.

And if you position yourself as a lamb or a goat, not the goat, that's fine.

Then you are setting yourself up to be a victim of their cruelty where they consider you to be worthless morally, and therefore they can do whatever they want against you.

You understand?

You think the lion cares about this?

You think the lion...

Allows this to happen to them.

The Lion Hunts

If they succeed, they live.

If they fail, they die.

That's honorable existence.

You understand?

There's no there's no uh oh, we're gonna code you this way.

We're gonna run you we're gonna be we're gonna have a buffalo stampede and just run you over by accident.

Too bad, so sad if you die.

October, what's going on?

You see herbivoric herbivore animals.

Uh her her her I don't know why I say I'm I'm saying herbivoric.

It's herbivorous not herbivoric herbivorous animals

Are also cruel, but their cruelty is often unnoticed, which makes it much worse.

But the lion kills the cubs of the loser of a challenge.

You know, some of that is fake, actually.

It's over-exaggerated.

But when it does happen, that's the honorable existence they live.

Those cubs knew what they were signing up for.

They're lions.

That's what they are.

They live and they die.

No one lives forever.

They live an honorable existence.

They don't live this buffalo existence where they just chew grass.

And this is peace.

We're living in peace.

This is nonsense.

Fully automated luxury socialism or luxury, whatever.

This is bovine existence.

You understand?

This is total nonsense.

Yeah, I never said lions weren't cruel.

They are cruel.

They're just honorable about the way they're cruel.

Because lions' cruelty is just direct physical violence.

It's not negligence where they stampede on one another and shit on each other and, you know, fart on each other.

And then they pass out and die like a pig, like due to each other.

And the passive aggression of herbivorous animals is disgusting.

You will have two.

You will have two like um

I I don't know.

You'll you'll have two uh

You'll have two of these big stupid animals.

Let's just keep going back to Buffalo, right?

We got beef with Buffalo.

You have two buffalo that are like drinking water and there's like a limited supply of water.

And then a you know, a buffalo will just kind of like

Like, hit another one, like, not even aggressively, but like, and they're just they just fall down a cliff and die, and then they just drink the water so they can have it.

That's the type of shit they're on.

It's like, it's like they're so evil, but they don't stand on business.

About it.

A lion, they fight each other, they'll you know, there's there's violence, but the violence in these herb herbivorous animals that are peaceful and kind and loving, they like.

They kill each other, but in a peaceful way where they oh, I didn't notice it.

This is what Vijay Prashad and and Zohran Mamdani are trying to create for us.

Like basically in their utopia,

There's going to be festivals where there's babies, and you just trample over the baby, and no one cares.

Because, oh, stop being violent and making a big deal out of it.

It was just an accident.

Who cares?

Like, it's such, it's like a lack of care.

It's like a lack of focus.

It's a lack of taking serious the need to understand intelligible differences in your field of experience itself.

You notice, for example, you know, look.

You ever, you know, the only way you're gonna understand what I'm talking about, if you ever have been around potheads, like a group of potheads, when there's like a group of potheads.

It's actually crazy, like, 'cause they're oh, we're so peaceful and chill.

But they'll do shit that is so fucked up and highness and they won't even notice.

Yeah, like Astral World.

It's the same shit.

They're like

They'll step on a fucking hamster or they'll step on a mouse or a cat.

Uh what just happened?

I don't know.

I think I just

Stepped on my cat and it died.

Oh, far out, man.

Hey, that's worse than a big grizzly bear being like, Whoa, I'm gonna eat you, motherfucker.

That's that's honorable.

This shit, where there's just like a lack of care, where you're I got a baby right here.

Let me just uh, let me just throw him off the waterfall in Niagara Falls.

Far out, man.

Whoopsie.

Yeah, that's not violent because.

Nobody is imposing a radical, discontinuous abruption in the stream of experience.

Therefore, it's chill.

But there should be There should be a fucking abrupt

Like, discontinuous, abrupt shift in your field of experience.

That's like, hey, I need to fucking save this baby from being thrown off a cliff.

Okay?

And that's what the lion and the wolf do in nature.

That's what they contribute to nature.

They're less numerous than these herds of stupid animals, but that's what they're doing.

They're desperately trying to give expression to an aspect of existence and of being, which is about, in some kind of sense, not being cognizant and consciously aware, because they don't have that, but in some sense,

They are insisting upon

Um

Giving form by virtue of their biological existence, giving form to a radical excess of being.

And uh and uh uh allowing them to reflect that in their existence.

And this is why I insist upon eating meat.

I don't just say eat meat.

No, I insist, I'm not imposing.

I'm saying this is how I understand it.

I insist upon eating meat.

I insist upon it.

When I said veganism is morally bad, I think it is morally bad.

Absolutely.

Vegans are bad people, is what I said before.

In some sense, it's true.

Lack of attention and lack of intelligibility is more cruel than intentional, intelligent cruelty.

Absolutely, it is.

So, this is how I understand animals.

You know, there's so many things.

People say, Oh, you're anthropomorphizing them.

No, I'm not, you dumb bitch.

Because humans.

What are we?

We have to understand how what we are by looking at animals because we don't know what the fuck we are.

And I find it so incredibly hilariously arrogant how there's some vegans that go, we need to cull and kill all the tigers in the world because what they're doing is morally bad.

It's like, how do you know what is morally good or unless you understand nature?

How do you know what morality is?

And until you understand the wisdom of nature, the wisdom of creation, all of the divine secrets of creation are there.

You need to humble yourself.

Because maybe the tiger is onto something.

And you're just missing it, you know?

You see, senseless cruelty for the sake of just inflicting suffering is a sign of weakness.

Okay?

But ontological violence is absolutely

And that's not necessarily physical violence.

Most of the time it's not.

Ontological violence, if you have a loved one that get gets hurt and you you you put them in the car and you rush to the hospital top speed, that's violent.

And if you don't fucking do that, you're a piece of shit.

Okay?

And you know who doesn't do that?

Cows.

They don't do that.

They don't give a fuck.

Okay, the mama cow, if her if her um, what do you call this, small cows?

The calves or whatever.

If they are injured or they they don't give a fuck, the the cow just kinda um and they walk away like they don't give a fuck.

How cool how cruel and cold is that?

How cruel and cold is that?

Oh, you're so peaceful and good?

No wonder the wolf

Hans

Such animals

No wonder tigers do, you know?

Cows give a fuck.

They don't give a fuck about anything except what's in front of them right then and there.

Pigs and cows don't give a shit about anything except what's right in front of them immediately.

Pigs, cows, and all these stupid herbivorous animals.

Herbivorous animal, we need to invert our understanding of how we understand nature.

Because how we have it is the carnivores are the bad ones.

Herbivores are peaceful and chill.

No, the herbivores are the evil ones.

I looked this up, I studied it.

The first mammals were not herbivorous.

The first mammals were balanced.

They ate insects and they ate other animals.

Um, but then the herbivores, it's like a heretical false religion that they pursued and they became these evil beings.

In some sense, they're evil, in some sense.

You know, and you know, look, they're not necessarily evil, but they represent a passive principle, a passive ontological principle.

And there's always a dialectic between the passive and active principle of being.

For example, the same way there are herds of herd animals, and they depict this on cave paintings: deer, and there's something beautiful about it, I agree.

But the predators have a fundamental role ontologically.

And not simply for ecological reasons.

That's only a byproduct.

But also giving ontological justice to the existence of such beings, right?

And and it's i you can go down to the origin of life itself, the the herd and stream of magma, the volcanic stream of tectonic geological activity occurring below the earth's crust.

From the hydrothermal vents arose distinction in the form of life, right?

So it's the emergence of difference and distinction from this prevailing trend that develops the cosmology of the spirit.

You understand?

And it's the same even when it comes to ideas.

You have a mainstream retard society.

From this emerges

infrared and the ACP, understand?

From the stupid consciousness emerges the advanced consciousness.

Just like from the herd emerges

The lion, the tiger, and the wolf, you understand?

Same thing same pattern, same logic is at play ontologically.

You are not

Prey animals

We are humans.

But as humans we must give ju See, I'm not saying in a one-sided way, only glorify the lion and have hatred.

toward the buffalo or the antelope.

I'm saying, just like in the reliefs on the walls of Persepolis, understand that the human is both

The human accepts and understands the ontological significance of both.

But Zohran Mamdani and Vijay Prashad.

And

The Gandhi Socialists.

will tell you that the lion and the tiger is evil.

And that we all must aspire to be peaceful, peaceful, bovine, uh or or whatever, s uh you know, sedentary animals, and that is the goal of socialism.

We're we're all gonna hold hands and it this is the nonsense that needs to be um completely uh uh rejected.

And once again, I am not I don't glorify the wolf in the fascist sense of ah, the weak deserve to be destroyed by the strong.

No, because what is strong and what is weak?

You know, you're missing the point.

The prey animal is not weak versus the strength of the predator animal.

It's not what's going on here.

Uh strength and weakness or or or you know inferiority or superiority had nothing to do with it.

Because what's the critique we should have of lions and tigers and wolves and shit?

And I'm I totally believe this.

I totally believe it.

We should write critiques of

you know, Siberian tigers and go and and and write little books and give them to them that we critique them.

We I'm not laughing, this is totally serious.

We write critiques of the Siberian tigers, we go to their habitats,

Let 'em know.

Let 'em know.

We make a critique of it everywhere.

Even animals.

They need to hear it.

But I'll give you my critique of the predator animals.

It's that they depend on the prey animal.

You see?

That's a dependency.

Who said the tiger hates?

The boar.

Who said the lion hates the antelope or the gazelle or the buffalo?

They don't hate them.

That's their only friend actually.

They depend on them.

You see?

And that dependency

And the lack of responsivity to the fact of that dependency is the weakness of the predator.

The predator is weak in the same way that without the herd, they start starving and dying.

Only the human.

can master the laws of nature and say the human

Can, like the prey animal, subsist off of

Uh plants.

We can do that.

And thereby, we are stronger than the lion and the tiger and all these animals, right?

And then also we can eat these sedentary animals ourselves.

Because we're both

Predator and prey combined.

Um

I haven't been mentioning the elephant 'cause I think the elephant is uh

I'm not going to get into that.

All right.

I'm not getting into that.

The elephant.

That's like that's like, you know, me getting into uh a full scale breakdown of quantum mechanics.

I can't do it right now.

It's it'll take too long, right?

But um

Let me continue what I was saying, 'cause this is important stuff.

Um

The the thing about

Um

The problem with the predator is the predator is pure negation.

The predator is pure responsivity.

To the herd.

That's the issue, you know?

It's a pure responsivity, a pure reflex.

in relation to the prey.

And

Only when

Predator becomes prey and vice versa do you get the human.

Only when the predator recognizes prey as the object of a self-consciousness do we get the human, you know?

That's why, again, all you got to do is look at what the ancients were saying about this shit.

You just got to look at their...

You go into a museum and look at the Sumerians, the Babylonians, the Persians.

They understood everything I just told you.

They understood all this.

They completely understood everything how it is.

And today, we have the most retarded, retard understanding of nature from the neo-Darwinists who say, it's all, it's all.

Well, you see, you got these genes and everything that you see, it's just like resource utility maximizing strategy game theoretical model of, you know, it's just attempting to survive for the sake of survival.

No, no, no.

There is ontological partiality in being.

It's not all just about surviving for the sake of survival.

That begs the question, the survival of what?

The wolf is proud of what they are.

The wolf is a wolf, not just a gene.

They are a wolf.

Wolf does not eat some things.

Wolf has some kind of honor innately.

Not a conscious honor, honor by virtue of their existence.

And also, look how beautiful these animals are.

And these retard neo-Darwinists tell us that these animals, how they're so magnificent and beautiful.

They tell us that these animals are pure gene reflexes that just exist to carry genes.

And they could not possibly.

Comprehend the brilliance, the divine brilliance of what goes into an organism.

These retarded neo-Darwinists, absolutely wrong about everything.

They can't fucking explain anything either.

All of what we know about animals, they're so much more complex than we understand.

Animals understand everything, by the way.

They just understand it in a different way.

But they're so complex.

Even stupid flies are so complex.

You couldn't under some people say, oh, well, a fly is just a machine.

Absolutely.

No animal is a machine.

No animal is like a machine.

Because machines operate on a completely different basis than even the most stupid animal.

Animals have ontological partiality and every animal, every organism this is where I differ from Orthodox Lacanians and Orthodox Western Marxists.

For me, the uh Freud's concepts apply in some sense to animals.

There is death drive in the animal kingdom, and Georges Bataille's idea of the accursed share and ontological excess is absolutely central to my understanding of animals.

Animals also in some sense have

Object A.

But not in the uh and and and the question is, what is the relation between animals and the let's say the faculty of imagination?

Because it's the faculty of imagination that distinguishes man from animal.

And, you know, we we we tend to have this idea that animals are just machines and that human beings represent a degree of abstraction uh away from the machine and thus we can imagine things away from the immediacy of our sensibilities and so on and so on.

But I think animals are um

not machines, and they are actually it's the opposite.

It's the opposite.

Um, animals, with respect to imagination, they um

They are more detached, more uh in desire than human being actually.

Uh you know, I'm not gonna explain this, but Hegel talks about it.

It's all not not directly.

He doesn't talk about it directly, but it makes perfect sense if you understand Hegel's idea of animals, uh

In the uh in the if uh uh phenomenology of mind, when he talks about nature and uh an so-called animal consciousness.

that basically it's like the animal does dream

It's just stuck in a very specific dream, you know.

A animal experience is probably like a dreamlike state of existence.

It's more dreamy and more uh uh uh fantastic than human one.

Cartesianism is completely f false.

It's the opposite of the truth.

What drives evolution?

Uh natural selection or something else?

Unironically, what drives evolution is the cosmology of spirit.

What drives evolution is a striving within nature

To arrive at something like the human, a laboring being.

It's just all these different animals fail in various different ways in arriving at this goal of nature, right?

And that is, but they stand on business as far as that failure.

They own that failure.

They are that failure.

A wolf is just a wolf, a bee, a hyena.

These are all just different ways of failing to be human.

Um but the human is the goal of nature.

Um

No, it it makes perfect sense.

Human is the goal of nature, absolutely.

And um

Uh an animal evolution is the evolution of different ways of responding to this goal and failing, you know?

Our the the the same frame of understanding of neo-darwinism is the same frame responsible for our comprehension of thermodynamics, you know, and um.

Thermodynamic change with respect to energy and entropy and so on and so on.

And the two completely contradict each other.

You know, what we understand about how.

Uh, animals emerge from nature and biology.

It's just it's it's uh negentropic, you know, it's it's uh countervailing tendency against uh that's the uh tendency toward entropy according to thermodynamics.

And that's what, by the way, who said that was um who said that he wrote a book about it about negentropy.

Who is this guy who's a famous physicist?

Uh guys, I might have to look at the chat because I'm really forgetting who wrote about this.

What the fuck was his name?

Was it Schrodinger?

It was someone else, I think.

Was it him?

Maybe it was it.

Maybe it.

I don't even remember it being him.

I remember it being someone else.

Oh yeah, it was Schrodinger.

I guess it was him then.

Yeah.

Somebody, would you collab with Cuffum?

Who?

Who?

What the hell are you talking about?

My answer is no.

Um.

My answer is no, I don't even know who that is.

Hmm.

Uh so yeah, um

But you need to look.

If you want to take something away from this stream, you need to be cognizant of these dynamics.

of win versus lose versus

Conquest versus defeat

You need to be aware of these one and zero dynamics because they determine in our society they determine your moral worth.

So you absolutely cannot

Be simultaneously weak and constantly appease and appeal to people's.

You know, like, don't pretend to be Jesus if you're not.

You're not Jesus.

And by the way, Jesus was making a point.

You know, he wasn't telling you to be a weakling, he was telling you.

If Jesus look what they did to him.

And he was a perfect man, so

Um, think about it, you know?

Uh because there's a type of morality I detec detest it, which I don't wanna sound like Nietzsche 'cause it's not my point.

But

It's this um

It's this like way of

Accepting being a scapegoat and accepting getting dirt kicked in your face and being okay with it, and also feeling like it makes you morally superior.

I really hate it.

I really fucking hate it.

You know, look, what did he say?

This just shows you how much socialism has regressed.

I'm pretty sure this was S Shelley.

It was Shelley.

Perfect.

Percy Shelley, who was I believe he was a socialist.

If not, he was a revolutionary of some kind.

Revolutionary thinker.

What did Shelley say?

This was the sentiment and spirit and comprehension of socialism that existed hundreds of years ago, before Vijay Prashad, before Zohran Mamdani and AOC.

and the Fabian Socialist scum.

From The Mask of Anarchy, what did he say?

when he was addressing the working masses of England.

He said you will rise like lions from the slumber.

Like lions from slumber.

Isn't that what he said?

Percy Shelley, that's what he said.

You will rise like lions from slumber.

What did Jack London say?

Jack London was socialist.

He was with the American working class.

But he wrote The Call of the Wild, which is a very important book.

Jack London was on the side of the wolf.

You understand?

Isn't that what Netanyahu said?

And you know, it's like all you have to respond with.

Is a few things, okay?

Uh, one, you're not a fucking lion because you need my country and my fucking tax dollars.

I'm sick of this disgusting fake moral framing of the Israel-Palestine conflict, where this is about might is right versus being a weak lamb who's just only weak.

No, it's not.

Israel is weak, they need America.

If they didn't fucking have America, they wouldn't exist.

Stop fucking framing it in this way.

Palestinians are not prey.

They're not prey, they're lions.

They're tougher than any fucking Israeli, they're stronger.

Israel is a fucking parasite that needs America.

If we were strong, if we were lions, we would cut them off and they would suffer the fate that they fucking deserve because they are cows, not lions, they're pigs.

And pigs get what they fucking deserve when they're left in the fucking wild by themselves.

So I'm sick of this framing.

Oh, Netanyahu's the tough guy, and this is about compassion versus strength.

No, it's fucking not.

They're not strong.

They're not what they're not the Bronze Age mindset.

Hamas was that.

Hamas were the Bronze Age warriors.

Not them.

They're cowards.

They have no honor.

Yeah, this is not predator and prey, this is the parasite versus host, okay?

Percy Shelley, read the poem, he said, Rise like lions from slumber.

Why did he say that?

He said because all of the real power and strength comes from the working masses and they're just asleep.

That's why we are ruled by these elites wearing the mask of anarchy.

If people woke up.

The whole fucking thing, all of these neo-Darwinists who say might is right, or Curtis Yarvin, all these people, they'd all come come tumbling down.

We would show who is right.

Who is mighty and who is weak would be shown.

Marx said that Marx responded to the social Darwinists.

He said, Okay, so might is right.

So all it's going to take is the proletariat to organize and they're going to fucking eat you and you'll be the lunch.

They're going to be the lions and you'll be the fucking buffalo.

Whoever is, I don't know where this came from.

I think it was the Fabian socialists from Britain went to India and they taught Gandhi on how to be a pussy.

And then Vijay Prashad and Zohran Mamdani, Zohran went to Uganda, he got kicked out by Edi Amin.

Then he came to America and they're infecting us with this disgusting thing about glorifying being prey animals and victims and saying that we, you know, oh, we're all going to be vegans.

This is total nonsense.

It's suicide.

It totally contradicts the socialist, communist, working class traditions.

Okay.

Intelligence is a type.

You know who I remember writing about this?

Was Reza.

Reza used to write about this.

It's intelligence is a type of cruelty, or it's a type of ontological violence.

Intelligence itself is, you know.

The ability to abstract is a type of cruelty.

upon being, you know?

not cruelty in the sense of making another person suffer.

But

It's about this discontinuous, abrupt act, you know?

And this is what has been missing from left wing.

Even it's so funny because the left wing is supposed to be revolutionary.

So we're supposed to be all about this.

We are supposed a revolution is like uh the lion.

Revolution is not the passive bovine

Animal, stupid fat, retarded animal chewing grass.

The revolution is uh has teeth and claws.

Don't underestimate the power of the blood of the lamb.

I don't know what you're talking about, all right?

Um all I can tell you is that

Our dishonorable enemies have prey herd morality, which is about um.

It's a caste system of moral worth that is purely Darwinist.

If you are considered weak or you're on p you then you have no moral worth, right?

Anything and everything can be done to you.

And they set sometimes they set hyenas on you.

Well, if lions stick together, the hyenas can't do a fucking thing, right?

Animal Farm is a disgusting book.

I'll write my own for I'll write my own book.

Instead of Animal Farm, it's going to be called Savannah.

Animal Savannah.

And I'm going to have this whole story of the buffaloes and the ant.

And I'll write it.

And it'll be the lions.

And the lions will be like Bolsheviks.

And Kotsky is some stupid fat animal.

And it'll be beautiful, actually.

It'll be a great book.

I should write this book.

Kotsky and the Social Democrats are these fat

Sedentary animals that pretend to be uh morally superior but they are enabling all kinds of hideous crimes.

And this would be a great book.

Great book.

Great book, I need to write this book.

Yeah, you know what?

Now that you mentioned it, what do they call them in India?

The Dalits?

They call them untouchables.

See, that's the thing.

They're trying to do this thing.

Oh, you're going to be when you're canceled, you're literally untouchable.

That's how they get you.

If you're untouchable, they can run you over with a car and no one will care.

This is how they affect their violence.

So, sorry, but we say no to that.

Sorry, we don't want this caste system.

Sorry, Zohron, we don't want the caste system.

We don't want Americans to be called untouchables.

We're not.

You think ACP are untouchables?

That's fine.

You can have your bovine delusion calling us untouchables.

But we have teeth and we have claws.

And if you disrespect us.

You will see why the wolf and the lamb both exist, and what is the function of the wolf, what is the function of the tiger, what is the function of the lion.

You know, you'll find out.

You'll find out.

Who thinks I'm insane and crazy?

Who thinks I have lost my mind?

Iron Rose

Every sub

enables my insanity.

Um

What is the function of the dragon?

Literally the same shit.

Literally the same shit.

Okay.

If you look at ancient um

in ancient societies and civilizations, they usually have a type of uh what do they call that?

Uh uh chimer chimerism, right?

Is that what it's called?

Kimmerism?

Combination of prey and predator characteristics.

So the Babylonians and so on and so on, they had this.

And then, um in China they have the principle of the dragon, which is not the same.

uh type of chimeric chemical uh combination of predator and prey, but it's more a chimera of uh different predators.

But um

From my understanding of what the dragon is, dragon is uh

Okay, so uh ancient cosmology is um

Based in a kind of outlook centered in what they call an axis mundi.

So the axis mundi is different levels of being in proximity with the principle of existence, right?

So for example, usually this is interpreted as the world tree.

So there's a world tree.

And the top of the world tree, there's like these winged animals, like birds and all this kind of stuff.

And then on top of the world tree, there's heaven above.

So all the way up is heaven and clouds and the divine principles and so on and so on.

You go lower and lower on the world tree.

And they have snakes, okay?

So, uh, snakes are associated with earth earthiness and uh being on the ground, right?

A kind of like material reality, okay.

So, um, and also, uh, often uh from the underworld, they come from below.

So, uh, the dragon.

uh combines the uh highest with the lowest.

So the snake who is represents earth and below combined with like eagles or something like that who are uh on top of the world tree.

And that's why dragons usually have wings and they can fly.

Um

Uh but they don't always have wings in the Chinese depictions.

Um

So, uh you know the Chinese uh dragon is like uh usually includes characteristics of tigers and uh yeah, but they still fly, you're right, yeah, yeah.

They include combination of tiger and so on and so on.

Uh dragon represents a v ex see dragon is uh an a active um the principle of being that uh

is a unity of opposites of what I just described.

Um and at an imperial level it represents the unity of the heaven and earth, uh for example.

So that's the simplest way I would put it.

Um

Dragon represents uh cosmo cosmological justice.

And again, uh cosmological justice which always is violent.

Uh violent in the sense it has teeth.

It represents an abrupt, discontinuous interjection within being.

So this is why dragons are depicted as like tigers and uh ferocious animals and stuff.

Um

But notice, you see, how come socialism is not of the dragon?

How come it is of, uh, you know, like the vegan?

You think dragons are vegan, they're not.

And, you know, I don't wanna press too hard on this, but

There's a certain animal, let's just say, that the DSA is upholding.

The American leftists uphold that Bernie Sanders, AOC, Zohran, and Vijay Prashad.

And it's a certain animal that is.

Um sacred to some.

But I won't go further 'cause I don't want to insult anything.

But that's all I'm gonna say, you know, it's not a dragon, certainly not a dragon.

Certainly not a dragon.

Um

Certainly not a dragon, that's all I'll say.

Certainly not a dragon.

And I am with the dragon, you know.

I always I've always said I serve the dragon.

I I fight f under the dragon always.

Um

You see the re um

Gorillas are uh we like gorillas, but gorillas are not prey, okay?

So that's why we like gorillas, 'cause they're not prey.

Now, are gorillas predators?

No, but that's okay, 'cause they're not prey.

It's fine.

Um and we have a different significance of the gorilla, you know?

One that absolutely uh is about

Primal human existence.

And we like gorillas, but the the Imperial symbol of infrared if I'm the Khan of Infrared, the Imperial emblem is the tiger, the cruel tiger, right?

It's like my profile picture.

That's the Imperial insignia.

Of the Internet

Internet Virtual

Army

Up infrared.

Out the lion.

It's a lion, it's a tiger, it's the same shit, you know.

Uh, am I still on the Hindu arc?

Well, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm being very careful, but yes, but uh, I um, you see, Western interpretations of Hinduism are cancerous and they are culpable in the problems our society is facing, in my opinion.

You know, because there's the hippies uh they took in aspects of Hinduism that were very much about being sedentary and uh oh, it's all peaceful and we're gonna smoke pot, and it's it's just really bad, it's terrible, it's really a problem, you know.

Um

I would say within Hinduism, the aspects that intrigue me the most are the uh the the the uh veneration of destruction like Shiva and so on and so on.

Maybe there's something to be explored there more, but this

This this other thing, you know, uh, it's it's fun it's it's f radically incompatible with the revolutionary outlook or yeah, Kali or something.

It's definitely not um.

This thing about

The age of Aquarius where we're all gonna be like uh we're gonna be vegans and then no one's no one's gonna suffer.

No, people will suffer f forever and as for as long as they're human beings there will be violence and suffering.

But it doesn't have to be senseless and irrational toward one another.

It can be, for example, um

We should violently harness the power of volcanoes.

We should violently, you know, um

Make use of blast furnaces, and sometimes there will be accidents, and people get blown up, and that's terrible.

But we need to keep going forward.

That's my understanding.

So Zoron is bad because he is weak, he is false.

He is weak, false, and

Evil

False and weak.

I don't like weak people.

That's the truth.

I don't like weak, smiling people.

He is weak.

He is weak.

Zovron is weak.

And he says he loves everyone.

He claims he loves everyone.

He can't love everyone.

He can't do it.

And it's nonsense.

And Zoran's weak, he claims he loves everyone.

He Zoran is promising.

That all of New York will be one big hug box, and everyone's gonna love and care for each other.

And it's just kind of like a nice guy act.

It's totally false and fake.

And we live in a very violent system and world in general.

And there will be no great change that happens without immense struggle.

And he doesn't really communicate that or be honest about that fact.

And therefore, he's like deceiving people with this Barney the Dinosaur thing.

And then the outcome of it is that a bunch of people are going to get scammed.

They're gonna get scammed.

Oh, God.

And think about it.

When you get a call that says

You know, I don't know.

Um, maybe maybe the Nigerian prince

Doesn't love you.

There's some old lonely women that they get an email from the Nigerian prince and they fall for it.

Or maybe if you maybe something that sounds too good to be true is a scam.

That's actually a wisdom that's true.

No, of course there, of course, anything that sounds too good to be true is a fucking scam.

When you think about it, look at ACP.

Do we promise something too good to be true?

We promise a lot of struggle and hardship.

That's what we fucking promise.

You join ACP, we tell you up front: hey, it's not easy, it's going to be a lot of work, it's going to be hardship.

And we're so honest about it.

But these other people, they, oh, everything will be fine.

And no, it fucking won't.

It's going to be tough.

Before Zoron.

Takes on the landlords of NYC,

You know, barbecue from Haiti is gonna have to come to New York and fight on the streets.

You're gonna see Mad Max before you see the landlords overthrown.

How do you think it works?

We're gonna march and go, We Salo.

And it's gonna be like the Lorax where the capitalist class.

Oh my god!

You know what?

You're right.

We sell over.

Like, is that what they're selling?

That's gonna happen?

They're like if we just

Mm.

We're all together.

What's the song from the Lorax movie?

Let it grow, let it grow.

What's the song?

Oh my god.

Let me look it up.

This is what Zohron supporters think will happen when the capitalist class is confronted.

This is how they expect around here.

It's not a pattern.

So everyone's going to march on the street and they're going to be like locked step, hand in hand.

And this is how it's going to go.

But my name's Sy.

This is Zohron.

This is Zohron singing this.

So I say.

And then everyone's going to join together.

My name is Tim and my name's Michael.

But this display of love is all the words.

And that's not good.

We should let it grow.

Let it grow, let it grow.

You can't read what you don't sow.

Fuck the Israel lobby.

I'm gonna fuck you with all my might, Don.

Oh my god.

Oh my god, the child is really like a seer tree.

I'm Grammy North.

I'm the leader of APAC, and I helped oversee the slaughterhouse.

Hundreds of thousands of millions of people.

So I say, I want it grow!

I'm gonna do it again.

Please, bro.

Zelcron wins.

The end.

It's all over.

That's how they actually think it's going to go.

It's the age of Aquarius AOC cult by.

They actually think this shit.

This is how they actually think like AOC used to like promise we're entering a new era, everything's gonna be so great.

This is how they think it's gonna happen.

Like it's gonna be like this beautiful scene where everyone's marching together and like it's all love and you know they're just gonna quit.

The ruling class, there's not gonna be a war There's not gonna be a war, there's not gonna be bloodshed, there's not gonna be struggle, it's all gonna just be this beautiful thing, and it's oh my god, how how beautiful.

Do you hear the people sing?

Oh my god.

Um yeah, this is what Lip Tards actually think, and they call themselves uh leftists, but

What can I say guys?

What can I say?

Um

This is what they think.

And by the way, while they're marching, a final thing I'll say before we go.

But while they're marching, everything I just told you, they trample over a few infants and toddlers, but that's okay 'cause they're all singing and it they're happy.

We say let it grow, let it and like they're trampling over hundreds of toddlers.

And nobody cares 'cause they're all high on pot and they don't give a fuck.

And that's what's and the landlords of NYC will all join in and there'll be a beautiful, spectacular trampling of innocent babies that no one cares about 'cause everyone's so ecstatic and they're just enjoying their bovine herd celebration.

And I I'm sorry, but it's so dishonest about how the world works, right?

John Brown, what's going on?

If I don't see conflict and warfare of any kind, it doesn't have to be like gunfights, just some kind of extremely intense fight, if I'm not seeing that,

I'm calling bullshit.

You know?

Wow, such a radical change with the system and it's for free?

Really?

They're just gonna let you?

I don't fucking trust you if that's the case, bitch.

And everyone forgets what happened in Chile.

You you know something?

Chile was the peak of Fabian socialism.

Like that was their experiment.

And by the way, the Soviet revisionists were absolutely bankrolling this retarded shit worldwide.

It was the Soviet revisionists.

Ben Gazpea.

The Soviet revisionists.

We're bankrolling Gandhi social democracy worldwide and promoting this.

I'm not even kidding.

And including Chile, right?

Um, they were promoting it, they were all about it.

You know, they were very they always discouraged all the militant shit.

Uh Cuba look look what happened in Cuba.

You had a bunch of peaceful student and s city dwellers who were protesting Batista's rule.

And then you had Che Guevara, who was promoting foco theory.

And Che was there was a conflict within the movement even before Batista was overthrown because Che.

was building a base on the r with the rural masses in Cuba.

And the Soviets didn't like Che 'cause of that.

'Cause they say Che, this guy is too militant.

He's too aggressive.

He's Che was too much like a a wolf.

And the Soviets want everyone to be a cow, right?

I mean, Castro is great, he's fine, but let's understand the conflicts that were at play here, right?

Um

And anyway, look, let me continue.

Chile

Was like, oh my god, a democratic election, and it's that was when you know you had these chants people like to use, and people now people go, Viva, viva, and it's their way of just like, you know, it's just this peaceful social democracy thing.

But it failed, you know, it totally failed.

Chile was a failure.

Pinochet didn't care about the military, so the military couped him.

Uh sorry, uh not Pinochet, Allende, what am I even saying?

Allende was he was cooed by the military, by Pinochet.

Pinochet came to power.

He was a fascist.

Pinochet was a Zionist, Wall Street-backed fascist.

Pinochet committed so many atrocities.

He killed so many people.

And it was all because of Allende being a Gandhi, peaceful guy.

But why is it today that Jacobin magazine lionizes Allende?

You know, Basque Buskar Sankara.

That's another name I want to add to the list.

Vijay Prashad, Zohran Mamdani, Buskar Sankara, AOC, uh, Bernie Sanders.

Um

But Baskar Sankara from Jacobin Magazine, he.

He lionizes and glorifies Allende.

And then no one asks, Hey, why did Allende get cooed?

Well, 'cause of the crimes of the U we know It's a fucking war and that's the point of being a revolutionary.

You're toppling the system.

Nobody's expecting the system to be on your side, right?

Anyway, Allende got cooed and it was his fault 'cause Allende didn't want to create a militant revolutionary process where he purges the military and he puts all his people in and he didn't want to do that 'cause he was uh like Gandhi, right?

And I'm telling you the truth, just straight truth.

You know what's disgusting needs to be banned, that one video game, Disco Elysium?

Look at Disco Elysium.

Hey guys, Disco Elysium.

The world sucks.

Is this because the universe is bad?

What the fuck?

The universe is bad 'cause the world sucks.

Is this 'cause of No, no, no, no, don't get ontological here.

You're a fuck up retard and your theory's all fucked up and your whole praxis is shit.

Don't blame God and existence for your failure.

You you deserve and earned your failure, okay?

Um

Leftists are always celebrating, like, they're like, We failed.

Is this is there something wrong with God Himself?

No, there's something wrong with you.

You're just fucking wrong about almost everything.

You're too arrogant to accept that.

Uh, it's this like celebration of defeatism and like romanticizing it.

Like it says as somehow it's like this existentially complex predicament.

We guys, we can't stop AI.

We're failing.

The planet's dying, we can't stop AI.

Capitalists are winning.

Ah shucks.

We're cooked.

But at least I'm on the right side.

This is like really a fucked up like sensibility and aesthetic to have.

Because it's like

No, you're responsible for your failure, you idiot.

It's all your fault.

Because when people who actually have solutions like the ACP Oh, you're not pure enough or you then shut the fuck up, bitch, put the fries in the bag.

You should just be become a full shill of the system like Charlie Kirk then or whatever.

Like just fully just be one of those people that just agrees with whatever the system says.

'Cause stop acting like you stand for like m stop pretending you have this morality.

That is above our current system.

'Cause you don't.

You're not like better.

You're not like a moral person who cares about Palestinians or cares about Gaza.

You don't give a fuck.

You don't give a shit.

Stop acting like you do, 'cause you don't.

What you care about is feeling morally superior against the crimes of capitalism, even though you're not willing to do anything to change them.

And you attack people who do show that willingness because you don't care about Palestinians.

You only care about yourself and your brand.

I'm telling the truth, aren't I?

Straight facts and nothing but the truth.

And hi Hassan Piker and Hassan Minhaj and AOC and the Tropicalista Socialista thing and it's like

I

I'm so baffled that I see like Middle Easterners

Get sucked into this, and like the Middle Eastern immigrant types they want belonging so bad, that's how pathetic they are that they adopt this.

Because if you're truly from the region, epigenetically, you're truly from the region, then some type of violence is in your DNA.

Now, is it necessarily violence of the physical type?

No, not at all.

But it's the type of violence where you're con you have an explosive temperament and you do not shy from conflict.

and arguments you pursue it.

This is why Middle Eastern relationships are just more interesting than other kinds.

Because in a Middle Eastern relationship it's like two T Rexes.

together.

And there's so much destructive explosive power

But they can coexist 'cause it's equal, right?

You know what I mean?

Um.

But the but you American uh leftist politics is not you know, g y you should just be racist toward me because I guess epigenetically it's not for me.

I can't be a Vijay Prashad Jacobin Socialist because my Middle Eastern explosive temperament.

cannot acquiesce to such a passive

Principle of politics, you know, I just can't do it.

I just can't.

I I just can't.

I mean, some of these whitewashed Arabs do it, and good for them.

I just see you as pathetic.

And uh what else can I say?

Too much yang, not enough.

There's zero yin.

Zero, it's just all yang.

Uh if that

Yeah, fifty more years and we'll break from the Democrats type of thing.

Um fifty more years and uh we'll we'll finally form our own party.

What can I say?

What can I say?

I'm just such a dark, twisted person.

I just can't be peaceful and nice.

I'm so evil and mean, guys.

You notice how that?

I'm so evil and mean.

Just like just like the lion is evil and mean, right?

And the the the the the buffalo who tramples infant buffaloes and doesn't give a fuck, they're actually great.

They're morally superior than the lion, who just honest about reality.

With the necessary justice that it takes to

Reimpose

Truth and order and

Authentic existence.

And and the elev I'm not gonna launch the elephant nuke.

I'll tell you the problem with eleph elephants are mighty creatures, especially African elephants.

They're mighty, mighty beasts.

And the elephant has wisdom.

That's the thing.

The elephant has wisdom.

Uh, that's the truth.

They have wisdom, they're not like these stupid buffaloes, they have wisdom.

The elephant is cruel.

Very cruel.

Uh but in a wise way.

They are wise.

And I don't see them as prey animals nor predators.

They're kind of like gorillas, honestly.

They do get hunted by packs of lions 'cause to take one down is really hard.

But they have each other's back and they protect and they're very violent.

Yeah, African elephants will just fucking kill things.

They they defend themselves.

They're violent.

They're mighty.

They trample their enemies.

Uh they fight back on against the Lions, so of course I respect them.

And the elephant is

Probably on the herbi they're on the side of the herbivorous form of existence, but they are um

they represent the side of dignity.

I I'm it's always a balance.

And I told you, I don't consider one side exclusively evil in the ontological conflict of herbivores and carnivores.

But

Elephants are like

Restoring dignity in some way to that.

Uh so I don't hate elephants.

Um

I don't hate anything.

I just I'm trying to defend the lion and the wolf and th these bad uh predator animals because I think those are actually just.

They represent divine wisdom.

What can I say?

Carnivorous elephant um

No.

Nope, not possible.

Not possible.

Not possible.

Y'all remember when I used to stream only from uh here?

'Cause I never used to look at the camera.

Welcome.

Now the stream will begin.

I I wanna know what Zoron's uh what is his policy on w wolves?

'Cause those exist.

And and uh mountain lions.

Does he believe these are evil and they should be killed?

'Cause I think he looks like he would say that.

Zoron looks like he's gonna you know how he's eating the rice?

By the way, no offense to anyone, but I don't I've never heard of eating rice with your hand.

W in my culture, my foreign culture, uh, my family's or whatever, you use bread.

You use um Hebrez.

uh you know, pita bread, I guess, and you you you eat it with rice with the bread, but with your hands directly we don't do that.

Oh, it's an Indian thing.

That's fine.

I'm not saying there's something wrong with that.

I'm just Anyway, he's eating the food.

He's like

So

Yeah, these wolves and mountain lions, the way they kill deer, it's totally unjustifiable.

And we're gonna kill them.

We're gonna lock them up and get rid of them.

And I don't like that.

I think he I can imagine him saying that.

I can imagine him saying, like, the deer are good and the wolves are evil.

I don't like that.

I don't like that.

I mean, hey, we eat with our hands too, we just use bread.

Okay?

Yeah, I'm not here like talking about the superiority of forks.

I'm not saying superior to anything.

But usually you have like for example, I eat Ethiopian food quite often.

'Cause I'm partially Ethiopian.

And in my own brain I am.

In my own mind.

Anyway, I you use the injera and then you eat it with uh something in between.

Not just directly you eat the rice and meat with your hand.

You use like uh bread or something.

Uh now forks and spoons, it's easier, but I don't even prefer eating that way.

When I eat with my hands, it's like tastier.

Right.

Some Arabs eat with their hands.

Oh, okay, I don't I d I can't even imagine it 'cause rice is so small, so when you're you grab the rice, it's just gonna fall out 'cause you're not how are you gonna?

It's just gonna spill everywhere.

Some high level thinking going on.

You have a special technique.

Okay, I mean

He wants to close community gardens for affordable housing.

I don't actually have a problem with his.

I think the best part of Zoron's whole thing.

is the anti real estate landlord.

His whole thing about communal cooperative housing and that's actually pretty good.

I like it.

I like his uh his proposals for housing.

Um, and I think that's his biggest strength, actually.

Beyond attacking the Zionist lobby.

I just the reason I'm so against him is 'cause I know that in order to effect that, it's gonna be a big struggle and he's not preparing people for that.

And and h it it's like he is just a big liar.

Well, he's gonna just do all this and it's not gonna come at the expense of a big fight.

Yeah, the the state owned grocery store and I have no issue with any of these things actually.

I have I have no problem with policy proposals.

I just have a problem with his

False promise of uh political strategy, which just it's not how the fucking world works.

Uh I don't have a in principle, I have no issue with his program.

I have an issue with the political strategy itself, and I think it's bourgeois in nature.

It's a recipe for opportunism.

Does anyone find ones if you found my lecture about animal schizophrenic twos?

And ones if you're like confused and you found it schizophrenic and strange.

Twos if you twos if you found it quite profound.

Uh

Look at the uniformity of the cult.

Wonderful.

And Je oh, Jennifer didn't like it.

Um

Can't win them all.

Yeah.

Uh

That's like one of those things

We're like

I'm not gonna explain it.

You have to actually get it to get it.

Like I can't there's no way I can communicate it like in a way that like makes sense.

So you just kinda have to like get it, you know?

Um

You should debate a biologist.

Uh y yeah, but they're all frauds and I don't want to talk to them 'cause they're fucking stupid.

You know what's so funny?

What I told you is like probably true, biologically, like way more accurately.

Uh, I've talked to like zoologists about these thoughts, and they tell me, like, hey, you know, it is strange.

We don't really know what these animals are.

Like, we don't really know anything.

That's what they're like, we kind of guess a lot, and most of the time, it's a just-so fallacy anyway.

We're like, Okay, why are wolves like this?

And they'll be like, Well, it's and it's it's always so tautological, and it's like a just-so explanation that's meant to cope for our actual lack of understanding of these animals.

Oftentimes we cannot rationally explain their behaviour.

Yeah uh uh you know, according to the neo-Darwinist evolutionary models, we can't

Because there's so much ontological freedom that each organism and species has.

And ontological freedom, what do I mean by that?

I mean it in the sense of like the extent to which it carves out its own niche

And in a way it insists upon being what it is specifically because it is that.

Not because the environment forced it to be that, but because it insists upon being that.

Not consciously, but like

Why is um

Why is the grizzly bear the way it is?

You can talk about all the ways in which how it survives, but begging the question of why does it survive in this specific way rather than in the infinite multitude of other possible ways, you know, it's a tough question.

And you cannot understand why a grizzly bear is the way it is unless you accept ontological difference and partiality.

That it is this way because it is this way, not because of game-theoretical evolutionary models that maximize uh survival and and um

and reproduction for its own sake.

So the whole I would call the fallacy of neo-Darwinism um

Bioontological universalism.

Bioontological universalism, which holds that there is one standard under which all organisms exist by to purely survive for its own sake, for the purposes of the propagation of uh genes.

And that's what Lysenko was really fighting, was the bioontological universalism.

Lysenko was saying that species and organisms.

are not passive receptacles of some kind of universal biological model of survival, that they represent different

Um forms of existence.

He if you read Lysenko, he constantly talks about the importance of form.

And the form of the organism, the form of the species.

And for him, he thought he was discovering something essential in Darwin.

Because remember, Darwin's book was The Origin of Species, and the whole mystery of what is a species, what is speciation.

So Lysenko had a dialectical understanding of these are qualitatively distinct forms.

Of biological existence, they are not.

Uh all reducible to some unified standard of survival where the whole thing is just passing on the genes, passing on the genes.

That doesn't leave any room for different forms and qualitative differences in being, at least biologically, right?

So Lysenko is so profound actually, and he he might have been wrong about uh uh nu nucleus uh nucleic um DNA or something.

I don't know if Volk Vulture's here.

Volk Vulture, wasn't he wrong about how uh there's no um

There are no uh uh

Molecules within the nucleus that participate in heredity or something.

He was wrong about that.

But he was also right about some other things in describing the structure of the cell.

that his d um interlocutors were wrong about.

What do you mean about tree and fungi consciousness?

That's very interesting.

The fungus thing is interesting.

Um.

Because supposedly the fungus are the first form of life, herd life, right?

Um.

Interesting.

I don't know.

I don't know enough.

I just know it's a big mystery.

We just we don't understand anything about how fucking anything works.

It's just the truth.

Hey, cyan toids, just fucking humble yourself.

You don't fucking understand any of this shit.

No one does.

I think we are derivative of fungus.

It's just a hunch I have.

But that's what I think.

I think in some way we are derivative of fungus.

We are emergent and derivative.

A fungus.

Emergent from and derivative of fungus.

I think that fungus is the origin of

Our Dream World

And you want me to explain myself, and fuck you.

I'm not gonna I'm not gonna fucking explain anything.

But fungus are the

They're conduits of the astral plane.

The Dream World

that we dwell in.

You know, fungus is the

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Oh, and I don't I don't know.

I don't even I'm I'm just spitballing here.

I don't actually have a die I don't have a hill to die on on that.

I am very hungry, yeah.

This is definitely like something if you take shrooms you'll be inclined to think that.

Um but it's weird how f they are like a neural network and they it's it's very strange, I will say that.

It's very strange.

Um, but you know, uh, ultimately

If you read Professor Barker's

Um

You know, geo

Was it geospinal theory of trauma?

Is that what it was?

Geospinal?

Geothermal.

But doctor Barker and his

Yes, yes, of course.

Professor Barker.

Life itself is a derivative of geological.

Change and uh the D Pot Biosphere.

Robert K.

Gold, is that it?

That's his name?

Mm-hmm.

Yes.

No, it was Thomas Gold, okay.

Thomas Gould, not Robert.

Thomas Gould's

I don't know where the fuck I got the K from.

Thomas Gold's theory of the D-pot biosphere.

Where basically all life just comes from some shit going on in magma, basically.

Deep below the earth's crust.

And then you know the whole thing where they claim there's fossil fuels, it's a total lie.

It's a total lie.

The abiotic theory of oil.

Ah, because yeah, they just you think it's all from the dinosaurs and you're probably a fucking idiot, you're not gonna make it.

Alright, here's like some like stoner thoughts.

Cause everyone they have these like stupid thoughts where they're like, We're just the universe experience.

Okay, let me tell you about the real

Enigma, right?

Which is like um

If you look at other planets

in the uh solar system.

They're either dead or they're too active and alive, right?

So, for example,

Venus, it's close to the sun.

It's very hot.

It's too hot.

Mars is dead.

There's other dead planets.

They're just dead.

Their core is.

Burnt out or whatever, right?

Or not burnt out, it's like exhausted.

It's c it's hardened, hardened core.

But because Earth is a living planet and it has an active core,

The movement and change and instability of our active core, that is literally what had given rise to life, right?

So that's the origin of life, is a primordial movement, geophysical movement.

Sherelle Stani, appreciate you.

And life is like the derivative of that, right?

So, from a thermodynamic perspective, it's quite interesting, is it not?

That

We're just kind of piggybacking off of

We we tend to think that life is the vital thing, that life is living and versus inanimate matter.

But life is just piggybacking off of

The animate might

of Earth, right?

It's rather interesting, you know.

Quite intr I should be on a podcast and talk about uh adrenal, appreciate you.

I should be on a podcast talk about uh such interesting things.

Uh aliens from Alpha Centaur Centauri.

Look, I aliens um

They're probably among us, we don't know, who knows?

But if they are gonna be like they're not gonna make themselves known, I'm just not gonna acknowledge them.

That's that's my attitude.

You wanna be here and okay, what so what?

Someone's like, What if what if you go to McDonald's and and the the cashier's an alien?

What do you want me to fucking do about it?

What would I do?

Think about it.

Let them be here.

I don't have a fucking issue.

Just

I prefer if they just stay hidden.

I don't even want to know.

That's like some shit I don't even want to know.

Because if I know about it, it's a problem now.

Oh god, it's a problem I have to deal with this.

I don't wanna deal with it.

And

People have theories of aliens and all this stuff.

I saw something funny where someone said that Iran claimed in 2014 that.

There are these aliens that control the White House that

Also control the Nazis.

And I'm pretty sure that was fake.

Uh

But, um, aliens the reason I don't believe in aliens on earth is 'cause of how much I consider life itself to be derivative of the planet or earth.

I don't have this idea

of life.

Yo, Farabi And there we have it, Farabi has paid for the infrared webcast today.

Robbie, thank you so much for this.

Because I have by the way, the sub count is not updating 'cause I fuck this such a useless piece of shit.

Fucking up.

It's so stupid.

Um, it's at nine eleven.

We're at nine eleven subs.

We're at nine eleven.

Subs, and I can go eat now.

Oh my god, Flacco with the ten.

Thank you, man.

Thank you so much.

It's at well, and it's no longer nine eleven.

But now it's 9:21.

Guys, thank you so much.

Please, no one else sub because I'm going to end the stream.

Uh, I'm gonna end the stream.

Don't sub.

I'm literally ending it, and I'll feel real bad if it ends.

And oh, MV, thank you, appreciate the 10.

Thank you so much, brother.

I appreciate it.

Appreciate it.

But guys, okay, now no one sub.

I gotta end the stream.

For real.

But thank you.

Flacco, I see you.

I see you at the five.

Thank you, brother.

But I don't I don't want to uh miss

Anyone?

All right, guys, I'm officially ending it.

I got to go eat.

Bye-bye.

Great stream, guys.

Thank you so much.

Appreciate it.

Great stream.

I'll see you Thursday.

And remember.

We covered cows all the way to aliens.

Where the fuck else are you gonna get that range?

of inquiry.

Think about it.