The Mecha-Tankie MAGA Revolution

2022-12-05
so well she i don't say mo oh i casin know so long we all cok
fill be to a fell ilive it come do it shea'll send it in sall im like ash it mis yours on ts your misal gsh i title
h
s
ap a tchapa
s
n master w n ma
the
did i scare you
it i'll scare you good
good you should be fucking scared
should be fuckin scared
hey guys thiss me hayes from infrared broadcasting from the year twenty thirty five we were on the precipice of a great takeover of the communist part of u s a and the amassing of a movement of millions and millions and millions of people engaged in a
warlord era of america' civil war
the american people's liberation army is about to take
the salt lakes
oh
utah
in a great battle that's amassing on the salt lakes
who will win
the forces
of kanzok
canada new zealand australia and the united kingdom all amassing together with the
dispersed arsenal of nato which had been collapsed
because of the energy crisis of the twenty twenty three
ah it's almost like this city is just meant to be it's almost like it's just meant to be
and everything is falling into place according to a plan it's almost like what do i even need to be here for right
right just kidding just kidding
there's a good reason i'm here trust me if that there was no reason for me to be here i wouldn't be here trust me
i would just resign
and go do something else
speak of which
i want to get back int to my writings and now that i have the time to do it i think i'm going to start it
doing it i'm going to get back int to my writings now
took a big hiatus from that ever since i left my other place i'm in a permanent location now
getting back to my writings that's going to be a thing
another thing i got to say is today i wanted to do the patron q and a i actually wanted to
now
why am i using wanton in pass sense
because i checked the patrion
and there's like only fourteen questions
now
i don't know exactly how many of you are subscribed to the patrion
it has decreased quite a bit
but i think it's more than fourteen people
so go get your money's worth and ask a question
and if you have already asked a question why don't you ask another one
because i don't want to waste this opportunity
to do the patron qen a and then only fourteen people asked questions with only fourteen questions
come on
come on
let's get some more questions in that patriart i mean to take advantage right
you're paying for it it's your right
it's literally your right it's your legal right
i'm not even kidding i can get sued if i don't do this shit
you paid for it it's part of the package
so go ask ar question
yeah you can ask a second question no problem at all the problem at all
no problem at all now i'm going to be real with you guys
i'm in some pretty low spirits
i'm in some pretty low spirits
and what i mean by that is that
he i just the'm just not in a good
bod
i just haven't been right
have not been in a good mood
and the problem is that it's
taking a physical toll on me
and it's making me lazy
and it's making me lack motivation
but i'm guess what i'm goanting to give you guys some advice
for how to like remedy this kind of stuff right
you take cold showers
i'm talking very cold showers right
and maybe this is not good for you i don't know i'm not a fucking doctor so don't ask me for my doctoral advice on this matter
you start taking some cold cold cold showers
and you will be surprised how much that does as far as your motivation is concerned
debate my voice sin
i will debate him actually mod's informed me about that and i will debate him whenever
so whenever he wants to get in show que i'll debate him this stream
definitely i'll debate him
hundred thousand i mean yeah it's even
i heard he wanted to debate about he wanted to debate about maga communism
he's in a show qe oh ok
i guess i geve you guys guess what
we've got a debate on our hands
and that's just some content that just landed on my lap
for free
ok
so we have a debate on our hands and we're just going to get right into it
ya
we're just going to get right into it now is sin is this alacrity
or is that is that synd with a d i don't know actually
not sure
but the
this guy apparently read the substack and he wants to debate me about maga communism
yes i was told he did read the substac that's what marth told me
so there you go
thank you so much crack dealer the first donation
of the stream besides a muriel thank you so much muriel
appreciate youo for the five gifted subs
appre siate to a lot man thanks
but gract deal i see you man i see you i see you thanks so much man for the twiming he appreciate you
ok let's go
hello
hey
what's going on
i have i debate to you before
uh no actually i'm ah i'm a floater around uh like discord politics and stuff but uh
i've been meaning to talk to you for a while
okay
yeah so
my name's sun um
and
i guess like
i generally categorize myself as a leftist and like tendencies and whatnot but
i actually agree with a lot of your base analysis in the the
rise of maga communism substack
it's just the conclusion right which your solution to the problems that you're pointing out which i think most of them are correct to point out
is the maga communism being the solution to
um or the vector by which uh
workers can
get together and unite form a basis here in our formal political affairs
oky go ahead make your argument
yeah
so
one of the things about maga communism that gets me like first and foremost right
is when we talk about
how can we get an inroad for workers to have like
real political power
because i feel like
the original maga movement wasn't actually a workers' movement
obviously it was
propped up and
perpetuated by lake
opposition right bourgeois
uh who
misled i feel in a great many ways the working class who ended up following him
and i get worried i have skepticisms
that this is holding itself
um
it's still within like maga communism
if we're to move forward with this
it's still a tendency
that will show itself the bourgeois tendencies that maga started with
you let's be more precise about what those tendencies are because i don't i don'tsuing be a common
not a common level it's far as what we're talking about here
uhhuh
so what do you mean by those bousgeois tendencies are you talking about sheldon aedlson's money
and that
the israel lobby basically i don't i can't really think of anyone else
from the a ruling class
wheike the bourgeoisie
if you're referring to the small
class of capitalists
like you know people who
small corporations basically
what are you referring to specifically
yeah for sure
so one of the like hallmarks of any given movement we
let's take bernie's left populism
like push right
now i'm not a fan of like burni or whatever
but when it comes to
his
movement or his popularity
tendencies and whatnot he's obviously like part of or at least adjacent to the ruling class in one way or another i mean he's a social democrat right and
but
in the
margo movement
i think it's important to recognize that
this isn't like a grassroots movement and maga communism's trying to recapture
m at least what i'm looking at it's attempting to recapture
of movement that's entrenched with right opposition bourgeois who don't actually care or want anything to do
with their populist party other than it being a voting base
ok so who are you referring to by the busgeoisie let's just get more specific here
yeah for sure
so in this case like originally trump and his but this base has expanded out broader than just him
but but
if we focus on trump real quick as the icon of maga
he still is the icon four workers in the maga movement
uh
it's pretty apparent to me
that
trump
doesn't really have like an ideological tendency himself i think he's just kind of a narcissist
and i'm wondering like what's the strategy for maga communism to try and like
detach itself away and pull itself away from republican pundits
and what notot who are like the who who are
not for the working class
by interest
okay i mean that wasn't exactly what i was asking for i guess i can answer what you were asking right because remember i'm asking what do you mean by the buoisie and when and what do you mean by the maga not being grassroots
i'm not exactly sure what you mean by all that
but is far as how to disentangle mago from the republican party is that we're asking
yeah we can just start with that
yeah i already see the fault lines developing as we speak
the republican party is rallying behind ron de santas
establishment republicans are openly against donald trump
and even the non established the so called non established ones
now rallied behind desantas
i don't think trump is very popular among the upper ranks of the republican party
and it's also splitting the voter base as well because you have two
great factions of the republican party electorate
one of them is the george w bush republican electorate the traditional republican electorate
the other is the blue collar one
that increasingly
moved to the republican party
since the era of reagan democrats
you know nixon the reagan democrats and then even more after obama's great betrayal and then after bernie sanderss great betrayal all these people who were democrat adjacent or democrat sympathetic
union workers non union workers
they all moved to the republican party
and there was already this sizable portion of
you know kind of upper middle class respectable suburbanites
many of whom are migrating to the democrats but a great many of whom are still in the republican party so there's already a republican civil war going on
yeah that's fair
um my
my problem i guess is like i'm worried about the direction that maga communism might present for the right populists in the united states and by right populist i mean the average working class like conservative
a
and i think as all communists should be in favor for i want to unite the working class right
i don't think that it's good to galvanize or create splits or whatnot but i worry that maga communism doesn't have
a
like
a goal
of
uniting the working class as a whole it has a goal of pulling over
um
like right wing populace exclusively
two
it's
like directive or to bringing them closer to like class consciousness and what so you said that you read the substak do you do you think there would be a reason why maga communism would focus on the mago working class
exceptionally
rather than you know
yeah so there's two reasons for this at least reading from your substack what i can get is that you have a particular distaste which is understandable and i do as well for the leftsm in the united states
um and i've watched a decent amount of your content but you go pretty hard to
against what's the second reason because i don't s it's not really
the main resut my set my second reason which is the
primary reason is that you believe that or as you outlined in your substact that maga or the working class under maga is the only
working class movement in the united states at the moment more specifically
it's the only partisan form of politics that exists right now
oh right so when you talk about like the partisan revolutionary
yeah
and i actually agree with your analysis on the partisan revolutionary bit
my
is she
is that i don't think right now this is like a concretely partisan movement
i think it's still it hasn't detached itself and
uh ya
so i don't know if
like
um
if this is a development
that will happen in the future i can't the basic idea of maga communism is that
maga is a different world there's a different world within america
or there's two worlds that constitute america there's the world of
joe bidens america normal america the america that's existed in continuity with
the presidents have passed and then there' is bizarro timeline america
you know rogue america i like to call it north korea america if you will
that's mine
yeah so when i say maga
i'm referring on a geographical level i'm referring on a demographic level
and on a temporal level even
you not even just a spatial one
a completely different world in america a completely different
h existence of what it means for america to be a country right
and so to me maga just means
the
posed currently
of all forms of counter hedemonic
politics ideologies and basically world views
ok
in your
this kind of links back to something i i want to touch on do you mind if we focus on this specifically cause yeah i think this is like the heart of the maga communism like theory that you went through on your substack
because you actually kind of touched on this in your libertarian stalinism video
when you talk about how the goal of like libertarian stalinism
is
or not the goal but one of the
principles behind it
is like
explicit counter hedemonic
like position
you're talking about how like it's not ok to agree with biden just because he does a thing that you like
m like you don't just side with him because he does an infrastructure bill
the east
like you have to be more principled than that
yeah well and i'm not necessarily
about being principled it is more about understanding he gemony
right
so
when it comes to
hegemony
um
and being counter establishment
there are certain forms of being counter establishment
which i feel like
might be like unproductive not to say that it's ok to side with the establishment
uh but there are certain forms that like you're kind of just like replaying into it from the opposite direction right
just because i
you disagree
with biden obviously that doesn't mean you get to go
like agree inside with trump on everything that he says and i don't think that you do that
but i feel like it's a tendency that i've
uh
been seeing
in a number of
and a number of people that i've been talking to in your community
well i guess it would depend on what exactly is being talked about but trump is a symbol and he's a symbol of a counteredgemonic
positan
and if people are going out of their way to agree with him it's sly not because they actually agree with him
but more that they agree with the meaning of what he's saying in relation
to geminy right
if trumps says something that is an alternative fact that is like literally
factually wrong
we may still say yes he's right not because we think he's factually correct
but because he is right to defy jeminy
right he's right to defy
the consensus on what truth is
that is it
instantiated in an institutional way
but what i would really say is that
marga
is
for us much more vague and broad than any specific
grategy or any specific
kind of ideology or anything like that
it is just a
it's just the part american form of partisan politics an american form of partisanship
so that ambiguity is i mean maybe you could say it's outdated right now
especially with
you know for example ron desent is
rose to prominence
on the basis of his covid policies and his you know mandate policies
he's also big on the anti woke stuff
so i at face value it seems like
thissants is also host to some kind of counter hegemonic
position
people who are in that kind of counterhededemonic space
very easily find it symple they find it easy to sympathize with the santas and like to santas
but obviously desantis is not counterhedemonic in actuality right
so
i could see the argument that this is like o outdated magas outdated
but my problem with that is that it has not been succeeded by anything yet
so i thises is
to me maga is just the beginning it's where we are right now
it's not the end point
it's just this is where we are right now
maga communism is pretty much a go down to the countryside slogan
build communism out of the maga movement
the model movement is probably doomed
at the way it's going right now i agree it's a train to
trump twenty twenty four it doesn't look so great right now right
but maga communism is more a call to action
or a
a call to reorient
once do you perceive
on like
where is a communist movement going to be built it's going to be built from
the maga movement it's going to be a successor to the spirit of the counter headsmonic spirit of the maga movement
ok
so do you believe that
and this is the case for many movements
but
do you believe that
maga communism might have had
a
a
far better chance at being like
a vector for like a fully realized vector for partisan participation in
politics for the working class if this was done a little bit earlier
because i feel like
um
like you were talking about the that energy forro magas dying down and this is just an inroads
at this point but i feel like
there could have been something more if
this happened
i think the time for something more is now if maga as it stands is going to die it's going to die for a reason
and there's been plenty of other incarnations of partisanship in the history of american politics
which are just history they've died right
but i think maga communism
is also calling for a marxist leninist understanding of history
so in the marxist leninist understanding of history
there is a continuity there is a revolutionary tradition
and it's basically a flame that just takes new forms right
so maga communism basically means yeah maga may die
but there's this revolutionary flame there's this counter hegemonic kernel within maga
that and you want to concentrate that's going to be succeeded by something new
or something new will be built out of that that's that's our beginning right now is mago
ok
so
the what touched me about
because i hadn't thought about it like this before i think my favorite part of the substack is the partisan revolutionary
because i hadn't thought about it like that before but it opened up a
a
a direction
uh
for partisan politics like theoretically that i
i think might be more
successful
when
if morger communism
is or wll maga is to die out
then i think that
in the grand scheme of things
and you might agree that would be a good thing right because that flame has nothing to latch on to and that gives us the opening
to bill some thing out of that fill and i think what is
it's never a good thing i
before it's necessary that it has to
die out so marxism supposed to be this science right
and according to the science of marxism maga is going to die out right at this pace at least
that's not necessarily because we think it's normatively good it's an insight into necessity if if it
could still exist if margo could still exist
i guess that would not necessarily be bad it would just force us to change our understanding
of the situation strategically
while the situation strategically it's very clear
margot does not have a consciousness
of
its own basis right now it doesn't have a consciousness of
what is mago where did mago come from what makes that movement
the maga movement rather than just
disantiss or the neo cons
or something else
so it's missing class consciousness basically
right
im
that's my understanding like twenty sixteen is not going to happen again
because right now is the time for maga to sit and reflect on what it is
and
what it what it actually was was a working class movement that lacked working class consciousness
it had a tangential kind of blue collar consciousness
but it never developed that into like a political
consciousness or strategy based on the interests of the working class
right
so
in developing past
maga communism because it is just going to end up being one aspect of
i guess you could call a multiplicity of movements that
need two
come up in their partisan form
um
going based off of what i'm
reading here
um
i read
one specific thing that i want you to expand upon and i might have some contentions here and this might be where the debate will pick up
but you said in your stubsack that the leftist is in fact the greatest enemy of the partisan
um
and if you don't mind me quoting you too much here but not simply because they have contrary values but contrary subjectivities
represents the highest development of the bourgeois political ideology
which is based on what is supposed to be the ultimate form of change
i don't
think that
unless you're lumping in like the
a liberal leftism like conflation that americans make all the time like as part of this analysis
i don't think that necessarily
like leftism has become
a
a hedgemonic like appropriated bourgeoie force
i think i think so because leftim
is a theory of political change it's a ideology of political change
it's not actually political change it's an id it's a reflexive ideology of political change
and that corresponds to the rule of the bourgeoisie because the bourgeoisie has to continually change
the laws and political institutions and cultural institutions of civil society
to keep up with the you know detortoralization of capital
if you're familiar with that term
it just basically means like the way capital melts all that is solid into air
which is oh yeah i'm i'm a fan of your uh use of deluz by the way he's um
he's one of my favorites i have my
a ten analytical tendencies and not
sphere of thinkers
um
but
my contention
is that leftisarm or more broadly like progressive liberalism in the united states while it's true that this is like while your analysis is true a political to that i feel like your
community
has
alienated a lot of leftists for understandable reasons but i feel like there is something to be said
trying to find a space to unite both the right populist working class
and the left populace working the problem
the problem is that well i don't first of all i don't think there is a left populous working class that you could argue there was one in twenty fifteen
when bernie was still fresh
a lot of that moved into maga if not all of it
m
but
i i would also say that you know everyone as an individual
is decent i guess right everyone's just a thinker individually we all have our different views and values but leftism would not be leftism if it wasn't a discourse i it wasn't a community
it wasn't a kind of high of mind
and it's precisely that hive of mind that's
what defines leftism for me
i mean it's all well and great to hold certain principles and values
as an individual right
but how does that translate or how does that actually exist or how does it find expression
you know like
for example and any given
form of leftism
twitter social media any leftist organization
you know the dsa to c p sa to p s
it's a hive mind that seems to
in a apparently decentralized but not really decentralized way
act as an enforcer
foror the consciousness
the institutions
and the hegemony that now prevails
miss very mysteriously obviously i don't find it actually mysterious i think there's a reason why
left isum
he's popular
it's not because i think leftist influencers are all cia although you know yeah there's been some strange stuff dug up about that
it's more that
it articulates and distills
the
essence of the hegemony that already prevails
leftism is this kind of like this hermanutic of figuring out how to make your world view the most compatible
with m t v and disney and like mainstream media and academia and all this stuff
so that's what leftism is to me i'm not necessarily saying leftism is all created
by the cia and the rockefellers and so on
a lot of it is
but even in a decentralized way the reason why leftist communities inevitably
go in the direction they do which is wrecking anys possibility
of forming a working clas of reaching the working class
wrecking the possibility of doing anything productively constantly getting caught up in these like
pointless cannibalistic debates about identity politics all this kind of stuff
why it's really because
leftism is actually an ideology of ageminy
of the hegemony that prevails right now
then i guess i should uh
plant myself for also the chot as well but for
our discussion
m i should
plant where i sit ideologically because i sympathize with the partisan thing
wh i say i'm a leftist um i only do that because uh
the majority of the people that i hang out with and talk to are leftist but if you don't mind me doxing myself i live in texas
and
i and the people that i work with on the ground
that we consider ourselves not like
uniquely left us but
as abolitionists now when we talk to the average person we don't say like
i'm not an anarchist or anything but i just mean strictly the abolitionist
the abolitionist tendency towards capitalism
um
sorry i'm rambling
the
what i guess i'm trying to get at is that i live in texas where the majority of us over here are going to be like conservative working class people that i talk to on the day to day
the
mmm
when i talk to these people
and i
bring them around to
my view of things i actually approach it very similarly to the maga communism thing the difference is that i don't use the same rhetoric that you do
so i watched your video on the ground at a trump rally
as very popular video at this point
and one thing i notice is the difference between our language
so you'll use their language their empty signifiers
um
to appeal to them
the deep state red tape
like
a things that would appeal very directly to their sensibilities because that's the language they've been using for years now
a
whenever i like talk to them
i
talk to them with pretty concrete terms about immediate like locality
and immediate local politics to get them activized
to caring about
the infrastructure in their area
like why is it
that the
like
the city council doesn't want to fuck and do anything why are they funded
by like these com these big companies coming in that are like gentrifying our neighborhoods and shit
and they listened to me through that rhetoric as well
um all the same and so i'm wondering why you chose
using their empty signifiers over more concrete rhetoric i think they're there floating signifiers right or am i getting that wrong
n know that i more correct i feel like floating signifier would be more correct
yeah yeah i i i get them mixed up all the time
well i am
i just think they're two different things if you're focusing on the local situation i do think you could probably get away with not
saying things that would be problematic from a leftist's perspective like
you know
you speaking in language that is commonly associated with the right
but the problem is that
that
even from their perspective when you talk about government corruption for example
can i please get on band on the disank you so much expol englis research go in the bottom when you talk about the
the government corruption sorry the corruption at the local level we're getting robbed and stuff
you are
you're doing something that i think
you know maga communists should be doing
yeah i'm always talking about the local level you need to become leaders oft the local level
but the people you're talking to
are still placing your rhetoric
within the context
of
its relationship to hegemines so when they hear you speak
there that is just part of their mago worldview right
you're not really touching upon
their political consciousness
or their national consciousness right
you're just kind of
targeting an aspect of it
like for example everyone likes hamburgers
this is a bizarre example but
go to mcdonald's
like some one person can eat a hamburger
and another person can one person may be maga the other person may be a liberal
but the're reading hamburgers all the same
but in one person's life they're eating hamburgers
while being a mago supporter so their entire world is structured differently
than the liberal even though it's the same thing and i feel like when it comes to local issues
it can kind of work in the same way i think this is actually what the floating signifies
sort of referred to for la claouw it's like
you can have leftists and maga people agree on specific issues
but they're contextualizing it
in completely different ways in relation to hegeminy
so i find it i do find it admirable
to begin from the ground up
and i encourage that
but
even in order to coordinate that something like that at the national level like if i were to tell all my followers
we need to coordinate this
and use this specific kind of rhetoric whatever at the national level
sorry at sorry at the local level but i'm addressing a national audience
the question of hegeminy would have to raise its head because
i'm addressing them
not in a local way
so if you want to form a national strategy of any kind you have to address the issue of ageminy
i
i worry that the the
that
those the average working class individual in the maga
communism movement or in maga like more broadly
um
like you take the average working class individual
ah from anywhere on the political map in the united states and they're going to have a lot of preconceptions misconceptions misinformation to dig through but there's one there's something unique i don't necessarily in the maga movement anyway
that i don't actually necessarily think that they're strictly counter hydromonic
i believe that they're counter the current hedgemony
and that doesn't and i'm not saying that in the sense that they want like a dictatorship with the proletariat and they want a hegemony for them i think that they want um because they've like this is the conditions that they've been in for so long they want a
a
they want their own hegemony represented through
onm various political pundits and whatnot i feel like a lot of them would default toards like elected mooral politics even trump's
administration
which i know was filled to the brim with neo cons and stuff
but
that was a that was like a a
a rogue state
within a state
it was counterheadjim i mean that's what created the maga movement or fleshed it out it's like
the media is constantly saying orns mad bad
is orange man bad actually bad well you go down the rabbit hole there's queuing on there's all this stuff
and it's like all you take the red bill holy shit the whole media the whole institutions of our society
you know
the political class are all lying to us
and that's kind of where mago was
so you know i think
i don't think you they may dream of building a an actual new hegemony
but it's never gone close to that right it's always been counter hedgemonic
um
again the
okay so when i came into this conversation the
i tried coming in without any preconceptions because i've watched a couple of your debates before and i just don't want to
i'm
make any of those same mistakes so i'm glad that this is more of a discussion for the moment
but there is something that i want to touch on
and it's around the uh
the reference to carl schmidt
um i don't actually take an issue with you referencing him because he has fine political theory like depending on what you're looking at but it has to do with your fixation on ruralty
um
and i think this is important sy morality or rrality
ality ality myad
and i just because i don't want to butcher the quote here i
i just want to find it real quick in the substart
i appreciate you having me on by the way
yeah no problem
see
you oh here it is
partisans are not leftists but they are also not righttist either the partisan irregular stands opposed to the standardized order of the regular army
this i agree with
from the perspective of the regular army order it is a force of chaos
and this is my
a point of contention
but it is a deeply terrestrial earthly with a profound attachment to the soil of the nation and the deeper order of rural life
so
in terms of
the urban rural divide
obviously it's not as black and white as there are urban areas and there are rural areas because you can have comparatively rural
area is buried within
like an urban landscape
and what that looks like
this
dependent
but
but if you can
touch on why you have
a fixation on
the
rurality
when most of the working class in the united states whether they're proletarian or just
like wage laborers like baristas or whatever
these people live in
urban landscapes
i would
it depends on what you mean by urban
if you just mean that in a strictly light
m
you know geo
geographic
level
or if you mean that i'm a kind of like
it depends on exactly what you mean by that right because there's towns
like i would say for example
thatli there's
the surrounding flint michigan that in a way that's rule right
but obviously flint is a city
so
i i'll get more into that in a second but the reason i have a fixation on it well the obvious reason would probably be because
as a marxist linist
the entire history of marxism leninism has been a shift
from the urban
you know modernized urban perspective
revolutionary perspective
to the countryside so beginning from lenin's
democratic dictatorship of the workers and peasants
through stalin and the way in which he empowered the peasants
at the expense of the city
rolltes arri it and the through mau
the mo was probably
the one that's clear as day
and the other one which
nobody there's not a lot of familiarity with
from marxist sout eleast in america
is the iranian revolution probably my biggest biggest source of fixation on rural life
it's probably because of the iranian revolution
right now the
i don't know if i'd call it a fixation on rural life
instead of more of an understanding of what relation rurality has to the urbit
and the idea is that
the rule
there is a parasitism of town upon country
as marx describes
that has been reflected
as the parisism of town and country within
a country it's been reflected in the form of colonialism
it's been reflected in the form of imperialism in the imperial corps versus
peripheral states and so on
so that's a that but what underpins that relationship in general
is
where is the source
what is the actual geographic
and social basis of hergeminy
where does geminy need to parasitically replenish itself
in order to sustain itself
the urban urbanity is basically like an extension of hegemonic consciousness
and rationalism
so in urban it's like it's like if you understand in computer language i guess it's like the difference between
a natural language which would be rule versus an artificial language
that's urban right
so
it's an urban life
that
the material necessity out of which social bondage
is formed
is temper
whereas in urban life
there's all this experimentation that's allowed
because it rests upon the back
of this kind of
apparently stagnant
a backward order in the countryside
you know we can
experiment in the cities only because we're getting a steady dose were stitting getting a steady revenue of grain
that's feeding us by peasants
youo are caught in the idiocy of rural life to quote marx
doing the same thing over and over again repetitively
and like that's what gives us the freedom to experiment here in the cities and be like avan guard and stuff
now i'm not necessarily saying this gives agriculture
specifically any privileged significance
but the sociological relationship
has endured
between the rural and the urban even across
changes in the forces of production
so
in a broad sense
factory work
industrial work
in many cases
has actually replaced agriculture sociologically
in terms of the relationship it bears to urbanity
right
so the rural urban distinction
is
more a
it's more based on
a relationship to to
institutions actually
so
urban space
is governed directly by institutions urban space is the
abode of institutions it's where institutions exercise
in a very direct way
the social governance and engineering of life right
mmhmm
like its where life reflects
institutions right that's to me what urban is
okay
ya rule
is
more kind of kept in check
by
like brute
political power
and it's not
it's outside of the reach of institutions
it rather has to just be kept in check with guns in a sense i that's why like the
if you go to the south in america for example
every one knows the
the federal government the f b i
they're way more hard core in the south i mean oh for sure yeah i mean they're way more hard core right
noll
and there's a reason for that because
because the south is more rural
you know the a t f the f b i they have to keep people in check
because they're not domesticated as much by institutions that people in the cities are
that's actually why mout more or less
views the peasants as revolutionary as opposed to the
the city dwellers
yeah
so
translating that to now
um
because in the united states we don't have
peasants unless you want to make an analogy towards like a
incredibly impoverished like immigrants or what not
but we don't really have peasantry any moore
it's if
your
sufficiently into the
like marxist sphere marxist linist fhere then there's a distinction between the proletariat and the working class
um i don't make that distinction much myself but
um
i
i want to
i want to ask
have you read like i don't think i'm
pronouncing his name correctly but have you read a bdo
or elaine buta i think that's using yes yes but do ok
yeah so
a not too long ago i read
m
the a book called philosophy for militants
um
and
it was
something that i kind of want to bring up here when he talks about
what is to be done and the soldier figure
for
if you will or like the hero figure
for the working class or communism or whatever ideology that we're going with
and after maga communism
right
cause this this won't last forever where do you think we need to go
because i'm i'm worried that
we're going to run into a dead end with us and i want something to be
here to take up that torch
afterwards well
i want to say one thing is that i think sociologically
what happened i think
there's been a big misunderstanding by marxist as far as the peasant the presant question
throughout history
and there's this view that in the west the kind of the working class simply replace the peasantry and the peasantry just like
are gone right
but what happened
in reality was more this kind of very bizarre merger right
mhm
and this
officially
began
or culminated
in these like
political revolutions of the thirties
mainly like the new deal in the united states
the stalin revolution in the soviet union
the labor party in britain and so on whatever was going on in france
especially in the post war period
i think kojev alexander kojev kind of describes this process
of is the emergence of this kind of universal state
and
what i would add to that is that i've actually written about this not to have you go read another substack
and the the pat sock split thing where outlined like
this idea of a mecca proletariat where
the working class kind of merges with the peasantry
in the strict sense
that there's this coincidence between
being the vital source of surplus value
and also being the vital source
by which institutions replenish their social power
so the mecca proletariat is like like the peasantry it is outside of institutions
while at the same time being the source of the institution's power
because the institutions are parasitic
in relation to them
and the basic idea is that
the
meca is what i call the or the exo peasantry the meca proletarits pretty much means the same thing
gi's this idea that
um
the peasant is not just a friend
by a specific relationship to agriculture
the peasant is more specifically defined by being moulded
by some kind of socis some kind of sociality
that
you it would not be accurate to call it natural but it would be accurate to call it material that's why it's called earthly that's why it's called
from the soil
that's not because of any immutable
biological features it's more that
this is actually
the real material basis of social relations
of culture of social bonds in general
whereas in cities social relationships and social bonds
are contrived artificially
so in this strict sense the peasantry does not actually the significance at least that that it had for mao
had never went away it was just that
it
changed
like like on the one hand you still had capitalism
on the other hand
you had the rise of this like strange
deep
high high level of imperialism that is kind of entering into a
more socialistic mode of production in which
you know
the sociates organizing
social production
becomes econ it's becomes economical right institutions and the power they exert
in the organization and governance of individuals
becomes a significant factor in the twentieth century right
no one can deny that
the economy becomes more socialized
but also there's this question i think fucauld talks about this a lot right his whole thing about
that's where this this whole shift to understanding everything in terms of power
as opposed to class economic relationships that happens with
i'm very much a fan of fco yeah
yeah that's basically describing kind of like the rise of this
out you can kind of quote call it is quasi socialistic
new economy it's not based on surplus value it's not based on the production of material wealth
it's based on
control it's based on kind of
a
organ organizing
people socially it's based on
it's about biopolitics yeah the meet mediating life on a social level
and that is also something economic because it has to be reproduced
it has it has like a basis in something material other than itself just like the value form does
yeah so the question would be how do we recapture our biopolitics like at the base
like how do we return to the
like base material desires and conditions
well you i don't i don't necessarily agree with foucaul's
terminology specifically especially the biological
mm
analogy but i would definitely say yes return to the base
the base material i think that's more b tie for me
um yah
who was a big inspiration for me when it comes to this
so yeah it's it's more kind of batti like return to the base
upon whose
upon which
these institutions of civil society
have been built
right return to the repressed origins
of our society
yeah
so
in
aping
i
i want
there to be a good follow up
to the project that you're working on here
because skepticism's withholding because i feel like it should be understandable to be skeptical of the revolutionary potential of like
a large portion of
not just conservatives but liberals as well in the united states a lot of the a lot of the more politically active people
for the most part up until very recently have been suburbanites
and those aren't necessarily people that we want to rest are like revolutionary potential in
um
so when we were connected with the working class
uh you focus greatly on like the the
worts brodley
categoriz as the right
right
so i feel like that means that if there is a left populist population
or if there is a
considering that we are the most bisensus state a progressive country in the world
a
when or how
do we bring
these are politically homeless
if you will
like
leftwing people or progressive people who are working class
into the movement
well
to be charitable
maybe you're not necessarily referring to like people who have these strong ideological convictions
because those are there's not significant among the working class yh those that's only a handful of people i'm talking about like the average who may be like apathetic
but who unconsciously
would otherwise be sympathetic to a left wing populist movement
even if they're not aware of one and like the people who are just not involved in politics right now
because there basically has not been a proper
left wing populist voice to give expression to their
something that would actually attract them and draw them into a mass movement
i do agree that exists
in america
but yeah the question stands like there needs to be a co a good political theory which i try to outline that substack
like what is the left wing and what is the right wing
because left wing as a political alignment
which basically means a revolutionary stance toward
politics and
the political spectrum as a whole right the left wing just refers to those who are revolutionary with regard
to the established order of politics that's how i define it
i
wheres leftism
is this kind of
reflexive ideology of the left wing
which it's but it's not actually left wing it's like a theory of what the left wing is
so i came to my faious conclusion i think it was famous because
it was my favorite
which is that leftisarm is actually right wing
like leftism is actually right wing and it's
real alignman
it's just in the terms of consciousness and ideology it tries to approximate or capture the essence of political change and fails to
so i think
in a sense
my focus on the right probably has to do with this idea that
if you can broadly locate see if leftism and if the hegemony is right wing i agree it's right wing
it's an order right
so
you know
to me a leftist is in a sense conservative with with regard to our ancient regime right
then
so
if that's right wing then what is the actual right right
what the actual write
the dissident so called dissident right in america
they're more like partisans right
they're political partisans
then the first form of political partisanship is going to be right wing
because it's going to adopt and carry over the consciousness
of the status quo so for example
the reason why the dissident right
in america is more cancelled and more
anti status quo when actual reality more censored and so on
well that is because
they have stepped out of the current a geminy
so they're aligned outside of it
but they have
just adopted the ready made consciousness
that's already instantiated in the status quo i will i'll give you my favorite concrete example of this
for sure
it's in this sphere of
institutional sciences right
and it's this whole thing about
i q and race and all that the charles murray the bell curve and all that stuff
i was kind of fascinated by this topic
years ago
as someone who was trying to debunk it
but i was like fascinated by the sociological dynamics
and what you basically have is that
you have people who form dissident perspectives with regard to academic institutions
because they're like oh wait
academic institutions
don't believe in their covering up the relationship between race and i q
so we're going to be the crusaders of truth and we're going to be dissidents who are fighting against him now
like on a purely structural level these races
are kind of dissidents right they are kind of partisans
with regard to the academic institutions
but the form of their consciousness which
is based on i q and race and so on
' is just
like immediately and in a ready made way taken from the institutions themselves
like
i q is it's an institutional paradigm right
and
you know
the
notion of humanity according that's based on a biological reductionism
with like all were all were genetically
determine i mean that's already
that's a world view premist
by these institutions
yeah so like the consciousness
is taken from the status quo and rea and given a slight twist
right
usually exposing its contradictions of the status quo in a one sided way
so
the right wing dissidents they're partisan they're politically partisan
but their ideological consciousness
is taken from the hegeminy it's just given a slight twist
usually by exposing the uncomfortable truth
like and know you know in a way i think i said this about connya too
why can't you
he's he is a partisan right now i mean he's getting banned and censored from everything
he is positioned against the status quo right
but in terms of what he's saying he's staying stuff with he likes hitler and
he's saying all this stuff
that
the reason that's scandalous isn't because it's actually against the status quo because we look at the status quo we're funding nazis in ukraine
you know the
globalist order if you want to call it that was formed as a successor to nautism
nazism is the dirty secret of our status quo right
and conner is just kind of like immediately stepping out of it
while fully
fresh on his mind having the consciousness of the hegeminy
and just kind of
looking and giving back to it its own spitting image right
so
that's the conenenzrraum
left is um's right wing
right wingers
are
like a liined in a potentially left wing way
but lack the consciousness to make sense of their alignment
so
i acknowledge
that if i'm serious about wanting to
participate in the counter hegemonic politics that would make it left wing obviously
but there needs that i think that requires some kind of theory
i don't think there's going to be a broad left wing anymore i think
yeah
you know
a left wing is going to have to be
based on an understanding
based on probably based on class analysis and that kind of stuff of
hegeminy
because the dissident right
's just out here
they don't know what they're doing really they just kind of like
realize there's some contradiction in the status quo they expose that contradiction
they get it the but they're still dwelling in contradiction and haelian bad
sorry what is it called
the unhappy consciousness yeah which is also a critique i have for most left is
so how do you give positive expression to a revolutionary and counterhedemonic position
i think that's what communism and marxism leninism is about
because it's actually a science of that whole thing right it's a science of class struggle
and revolutionary strategy
ok
so then can i present to you the i
idea that
when
you're working with
people who have been inundated with rightist politics
or leftist politics
um
there's so many abstractions that a
a what would
i
baudriard call itu or baudriard call it the hyper real
we all live within various like levels of this superstructurer
and um
and when we're trying to pull people back down to the base ground them wake them up like say look at
what is not
what has been made to be
um
like i
one
more concrete
strategy
towards bringing away
on both leftists as well but also like rightist away from the rhetoric of like tucker carlson
the rhetoric of like the daily wire stuff like that because that that these are this is obfuscating their interests and focusing
on a culture war
like the establishment is engaging in a cultural war
that has nothing to do with
our material interests at the end of the day
but there but rightist politics and leftist politics are deeply invested in that
and they've obfuscated our ah
ability to
discern which one is more important
so how do we break people away from that
more concretely
why i don't actually think all of the rhetoric
from toco calson it's not all
it's not all
you have to
see
the under the gram skein idea of gemony which is still important
it's based on the center
so it's based it's not based on tucker carlson's rhetoric
it's based on the central coherent
let's call it a world view or or some kind of hehygemony
that
or let's call it what la claud would call it i think is probably
i think he would call that an empty signifyer right
the thing that unites all of these different signifiers
what needs to happen is there needs to be a
communist to gemany
which
in a sense repurposes
and hijacks these kind of
signifiers you're getting from right wing pundits
into a different
like
a different to gemany right which is a communist to gemany
so i think there's a lot of memes already
about this shit like comrade trump comrade tucker comrade alx jones
it's mostly to like make fun of it
right
right and point out the irony of like oh like this actually sounds communistic
but i think that should on ironically that on ironically has to be the approach
when it comes to understanding
how communist
can
understand
or articulate a revolutionary strategy in this country
so to me it's about building a working class
it's about building a working class political independence
re go a communist party
and b
building a working class a gemini
and part of that to geminy means
you don't necessarily write off all talk crossins this this person's that
you mainly just give
you triy to articulate
what about those people is
attractive to the working class because the working class likes tucker
if were marxes
we understand these different classes with different class interests
and even if we believe in false consciousness
all false consciousness really means is that
you know the working class is adopting a consciousness
contrary to its interests
but that's only possible because that false consciousness disguises itself in such a way
that it speaks to the inner necessities of the working class
so when a wor a blue collar working class person watches tk to carlson
they are situationally and materially
experiencing something entirely different
as opposed to when you know
some kind of like
professional
you know academic or something is watching tuker carlson right even if they both right wing even if they both like tuker carlson
they're different class positions
mean they're making sense of it in completely different ways
so proletarian consciousness that means
you are trying to articulate the essence of what makes tucker for example
attractive to these people
so if we take that because like
i understand
let's jump to a slightly different thing just for reference so
the groomer panic in the united states is rooted in
whether or not there is a groomer like
epidemic or whatever within the l g b t community whatever you want to call it
there is a concerted effort by people like
uh tucker carlson and the daily wire and i'm referencing those two because th the guys i can think of off the top of my head
um who
harp on this like twoenthunyre four seven now they're preying on a very real material concern that all people have right where it's like
well i don't want my kids to like get fucking groomed
i
but
there
on
to to a degree i mean they are like lying about it so
we need to
but instead of
in
i don't want to prey on the working classes like honest
material concerns
with like
empty
rhetoric just to like play into the hands of
like an opposition bourgeois
or like an establishment bourgeois
so when we turn from
h away from them and we say like okay
here's maga communism for example
and we tried to like harness that
institutional
are not institutional sorry wrong term we try to harness that revolutionary spirit or that anti establishment spirit
we need to be able to give them
like
honest to god just better people to listen to like i would much rather have people listening to you
than to like the average blue collar american listening to you
than to tucker carlson because i don't think that you're trying to
whats the the's the dimension
to that epidemic
which one has material basis and the reason there's a culture war over it is again it's this kind of
war of hegeminy specifically in relation to institutions because
there has been this profound disconnect between the
social
socially progressive quote unquote views of institutions
that govern us whether it's in public schools or college universities
which i think are
i think the public school system and the government system we have is downstream from the academic complex we have
and
it is it's a very real thing i mean
it's not
i on a personal level
i know people i mean i'm here dearborn michigan
it's a real thing that in school libraries for example
extremely sexually charged content
is being read to children
and the drag queen stuff is also like very real it's a very real thing right
so
this ha is caused a panic
but the
this panic is not necessarily groundless
and
well the emotions that they um that they're going through the feelings that they're having are grounded very materially because nobody wants their kids to be har uh harmed nobody wants their kids to be um
hurt
and but i feel like uh
like these very real material fears that people have
a
are being preyed upon to a degree like even if there was i can somewhat
to be charitable i know disants is using that issue
to get people to trust him as like of someone they can trust and then he's turning around and he's you know
he's literally a swamp monster if to put it in trump's words
he's literally an establishment shill like unequivocally
and neo con
he's just goinga end up
cert you know he's literally a representative of the ruling class
but i mean the issue has to be acknowledged is a real one
not just in terms of their feelings but what's going on
you do have this crisis this country is facing where
you know
how
how do you raise children how can children be raised what are the factors
that go into
sexual identity and the development of you know
a child's identity
throughout their life
parents
are terrified of this idea
that institutions are going to
hijack the process which they're trying to it seems like
of the development not just institutions but the internet and so on and so on
this wll come a long way since the only people who like since we lived in
like a
at least americans have come a long way from
like living in communities with
a various parents grandparents i read but i just kind of feel like amly there's been something lost when institutions
have attempted to kind of rationally and according to some contrived moral
progressive world view
um you know
morally triy and
fashion and direct to the development of human life
they have lost some kind of fundamental
wisdom
that the people understand intuitively that's passed down through generations
which they're not acknowledging they're just kind of in a brute forced way assuming that
whatever truths they've concocted in their isolated
you know
laboratories if you will
can just be imposed on ag can completely erase people's traditions and people's sensibilities and stuff
and this is the kind of clash that's happening in america right now
there is a clash between people's intuitive
sense of tradition
regularity and sensibility
and this completely contrived
kind of truth
that's not based in anything
you know material or intuitive or unconscious
but is it's based on something contrived
on the basis of a very cold formal
logic whether that logic is based on rational science or whether it's in the case of the covit crisis
it's the same thing right
the covit crisis that social crisis had created
it's the same thing as the grooming crisis right because it's it's this clash between institutions and the people
mmhmm
and a lack of harmony between them
i see
so
um you know funny enough uh coming back to the maga communism thing at heart um i have a lot of like
syndiclus predispositions that's kind of what ma what got me into this uh whole thing
um at first and there was like a definite history of spontaneity that sendeclist were in involved in that's kind of what made them a distinction
from fm
the
is it
other like communist or socialist movements happening at the time and in maga communism this is a very you called it like an impure
ideology or an impure current at one point
it's a very spontaneous thing i think you're developing something very organic
um
and i believe that that's
good
a
i
the problem that the sendeclus had right like we know why
they ended up
like capitulating or falling
is because there was no direction afterwards
like they didn't have a
they rejected like
vanguard parties they rejected
um
for the most part anyway theyd
rejected solidifying their base
as like a partisan
like revolutionary force
and i'm and i want to know like how we're supposed to go
from
a like maga communism
to like a more broad home for the hope like politically homeless working class who right now all they have to go to is the right or the left
a
and i'm and i just don't want this to burn out
you know
yeah thank you so much ang you appreciate the twenty so much man thank you
so
what i would say actually is that
i don't believe in spontaneity
i don't i'm not articulating maga communism from the perspective of spontaneo but the contrary right
my idea is that a communist institution
or a communist party as i like to call it
is calling it s institution this kind of evokes social democracy
it's a party
but it's a party with hegeminy and it's a party with a brain it's not just a body
communism part that's the brain maga part that's the body right
it's it's this basic merger formula uniting marxism
with the working class who are not already enlightened by the science of marxism
so it's that old predicament right like
it's the predicament of prometheus prometheus has to give fire steeal fire from the gods
and give it to the people give it to humanity and there's always a price right
so in a sense maga communism is an inherently
sacrificial
orientation
where communists need to sacrifice something namely their
social comfort and their sense of
you know
their sense of like safe belonging in a specific community and so on
and they need to do what communists have always done is go down to the people
just like from the russian narrodness tradition just like from the bolshevick tradition just like from the maowist tradition or
in one nine hundred twenty eight when the first collectivisation began and
young msomle youth went down to the russian countryside
to spread the good news of communism to peasants
the need to repeat that
heroic self sacrificial
act of
risking their entire world view out of belief and faith in the people so maga communism is also this kind of profound form of
forgiveness right
even if
marga
has all of these very wrong views and
misled views it's almost like saying
we forgive you we still believe in you
and we're going to stick by you it's there's a quote from shi jin ping
that i really i very much appreciate and i want to kind of read it
again
if i can find the exact you hear it is perfect right
so the quote from she is no matter how correct our policies are
if the people don't understand they can't be realized
you must first follow the people
if the people jump into a firepit
you also jump with them
if you don't the party people relationship would be disconnected
so right now the people are maga
and they're jumping into the maga fire pit
and maga communism means we must jump in that pit
with them
and i think that's uh
to me that's just
an extremely orthodox marxist leninist
spirit
ya um and i'm uh
i'm not a marxist linist i'm just a i tend to just
define myself as like a marxist um
the
but from the marxist leninist a so much jan are appreciate you so much man sorry
theo you're ok
yeah
i
i think that
when
we
look towards expanding the body
right
um
as maga dies out becae and if all you have left is the brain communism
and the body is this amorphous
a
not very directed or
just
like it much of our base is riddled with like the american like political apathy right
um
i want to
make sure that that doesn't happen so the body for this movement moving forward
how do we expand out from here
like i think a brain always implies a body
it's just that the brain is not always aware
of what its body is
so
if maga dissolves there will still be see maga
history never really just dissolves
um but straps kind of a bousgeuoi view right
history changes and it transforms emphasis on the transform
right
right
and it's the job of marxist to
remember that historical succession and not forget
the flame
so wherever maga goes it's going somewhere and we need to be there
with it wherever it goes
when i say maga i'm not arbitrarily referring to whatever trump
decides to do politically
i'm referring to you're talking about the conception you outlined in the subset i'm talking about the essence of the movement which is count the counter heagemonic politics of the maga movement
and that has bounced around across american history
you know you had
you had you know you had bernie in twenty fifteen
you had
um
i mean
you had the the the
ro ron paul i don't know you probably wouldn't agree with that but the ron paul thing
in the two thousands against george w bush
that libertarian movement that was a really big thing
militia movement the anti but anti iraq war movement
you had to occupied wall street that was part of it
you have all sors you have these
yeah it's taken different forms yeah yeah
yeah yes for artisan politics
i mean it's never become partisan politics until maga because before then it was not really political
but it was
some kind of counterhdemonic space that did exist
and that space will always exist 'll just take new forms
yeah um let's
talk about what and i agree with you there
i want to talk about one more thing because i don't want to take up too much time from your stream
um
but i want to go all the way back to the very beginning of the substack
a
were
you outline the left or
like
you outlined the left being outflanked
and you mentioned this literally at the very beginning talking about rum paul you reminded me of this
so
for example
you talk about unconditional anti interventionism
like being a thing that the right
mam has talked about before
uh like ron paul or and it's not an uncommon sentiment you can see this in literally like every
a republican representative most of them even a lot of the neo cons have had a sentiments about
like uh isolationism or anti interventionism or whatever
um i don't think that this is like a uniquely left wing thing like unless you're talking about the early
earliest twentieth century which wasn't even necessarily the case when you talk about like the u s s r or
china
i don't think that the left gets out
flaned
by stuff like
uh by positions like that i think it's been a uniquely right wing tradition to be like h
into anti interventionism into
um
isolationism and pulling back from that
a
and
i'm an internationalist
i don't think that the
like in this specific
context that you're bringing up
am
i don't
think that
like the left wing or in this case leftist
get outflanked by the right
on this topic i think it's a uniquely
like right wing what if tradition're talking about if
well if the left is defined by being
revolutionary or somehow opposing
the political order
the political order that we have rests upon imperialism
and when the right opposes interventionism they are opposing the policy of imperialism they are imposing
things that are ruling class find necessary
to preserve the system of imperialism
or
you know express their class interest the ruling class and it's the right that's getting in their way
so
also i'm not sure what internationalism could mean
except
a principled form of
anti imperialism which is unconditional anti interventionism because
how
i mean surely you don't believe american unipolar or unipolar ha geminy
represents some kind of internationalist common will
h no i'm not a globalist i try to make the distinction between the two when i say i
like like i don't believe in anti interventionism i'm anti imperialism i think that if the united states just like how the u s s r in china like moved forward i think if there is a
sufficient
desire or a need
to reason if you will
to to
support
the
affairs and other countries 's a line but i surely you don't mean under the current system like you wouldn't know you know
a decision by biden or the current u s government to intervene in another country
even if i did agree with like the single instance of the united states doing x or y thing or like a country in the e u doing x or y like piece of interventionism even if i did think that that was a good thing i would never side with them
i
eventually so so
and this so what you would be referring to is a hypothetical scenario of a completely different government a completely different system
i mean that's fine but it's still hypothetical so when the here and now
the right is unconditionally anti interventionist with regard to our current state
now whether they would be unconditionally anti interventionist
for a different type of state
based on some like ideological principles i mean who knows right but
materials analysis says that ideology is downstream for material reality and not the reverse
ok
um
i think that clears up
but a lot of it
i think the
final
thing
that i went because i was wondering how this was going to go down
a
the
a lot of the language that you use in your substack uh obviously is incredibly bombastic but there's some vagueness in certain areas like whenever i was asking about the deeper order of like rural life or what notot
that it like
i was worried that there was
a like
blood and soil sentiment at one point h and i'm glad that you cleared that up pretty early on
i think a lot of people do have misconceptions of you and your content
um
i don't necessarily agree that
maga communism was the like best step or is the only vector for the working class at the moment to represent itself
but i do think that
a friend of mine said who was defending the maga communism like said
give us the right to fail
and that's where my skepticism sits right i want to see where this goes
and i appreciate the work that you put into this
uh
thank you for having me on
yeah ok thank you
yeah i like that give me the right to fail
i i agree with that if this smaller e communism still fails
let's fail and learn from it
i think that's better than the current course of action i mean i don't want to be
in leftist communities anymore like
sit there let's go out and
let's fail if we have to fail we will
no problem we'll learn
and we'll get better
right
but
you know i want to i want to address something
because actually i do have stuff to talk about in this stream
i guess the debate was perfect for the stream topic
but
you know in terms of why people dislike me
i think a lot of it
especially when it comes to leftists like
but looking at face value
all the discourse aside
right
at face value like what i say isn't really bad right
it's not really bad
like when i rationally spell out
my world view
and my theo theoretical beliefs in my ideology it's not really bad
but the problem is my aesthetic and my practice
and and what do i mean by that
so for example
why did i originally get cancelled by red lips it's because i constantly use the word retard it's because i speak in a way
that has complete callous disregard for the aesthetic
sensibilities of leftists
and also the way i behave in acts
betrays something
i have a very like real realistic world view where it's like
i don't have any regard for virtue signalling or
respecting the rituals of the left anything like that
and people see me i'm so missogynistic
and you want to ask the question am i misogynistic
on a personal level
yeah i am
on a political level like i'm not really particularly interested in
pursuing a politics that harms women
what i'm real is fuck about the facts
that
like
you know
sometimes i find women retarded
on a personal level right i'm real as fuck about this shit
and
it' as it could also apply to racism
even though i'm not really a racist it's like
you could be
politically against racism on a political level
but then like on a personal level you can be super racist
and a lot of people think that's extremely
hypocritical
and it's not
it's not hypocritical at all it's just like
you have to realize there's a discontinuity between
the way in which you participate in politics
and how you exp likew what you actually
what your sense of the world actually is on a personal level
and that's not hypocrisy that is like an objective
like that's an objective thing
right
yeah there is a public private distinction and that's not hypocritical
a lot of people are like ohas how can you be so religious
or how can you profess such a deep belief
in religion in respect and reverence for religion
and yet you are like out here fucking all these random bitches and shit
and you're violating the perscriptions of islam and so on and so on
and to that i would say it's like well there's a difference between
the appreciation i have for religion
on one level
right
and
how i understand the wisdom
or what i say the lack of understanding of the wisdom of the religion
like i have the faith that there is a wisdom to these religious prescriptions like hat
don't have premarital sex right
and i do think there's a wisdom to that
and every time i do it i get closer to understanding that wisdom
but i keep doing it
right i keep fucking doing it
because at the end of the day
what's going to guide me in this world is just my sense of being here in the world
i respect the people who have devoted themselves
to religion and to the study of religion
those people are not really in the world though
like parts like i'm here in the hell
i'm here participating
in the evil of the world it's almost like what she said
when the people go into a firepit i will go with them
so as long as the people are here
living this normal american way of life i'll be here with them right
i will
indulge
in
temptation and sin
because i am not above
the people
simple as that
if they're going to hell i'm going to hell to
and i think there's a reason for this shit beyond
just that people are bad i think
we have to explore why do demons tempt us what is so damp tempting
about the demons and how they draws
to do sinful things
i think i want to learn these things and
i don't believe hell fire
i don't believe hell is just some place
it's just stagnant and idle and it's just sitting there
and you're just going to go to hell one day
and then
it's just there right
i believe hell fire is a living thing
that is here on earth
you can feel that fire
and you can get close to that fire
you can experience and channel that fire
the fire of hell
because at the end of the day
my interpretation of what hell is
hell is
where we lach
faith
right
hell is like
if you want know what hell is i'll give you hell
i'm going to give you help by talking to you about
one
the founding story of
of h
mecca
right
i i think i might be butchering it but the story of hagar sorry the story of ishmael and hagar right
abraham
his wife sarah
was jealous of his concubine hagar
who had ishmael as the origin of the arabs
and haygar was expelled out into the desert
right
and hagar was searching through the desert
and was praying and praying and praying for mercy
and then
she prayed for water something like that and then water came
right so she drank the water
she survived her son survived
ere go the origin of the arabs right so was a miracle a miracle occurred
that saved her life
and to me
i think hell
refers to
this place
where
the miracle doesn't happen
if you want to you want to ask me what hell is i think hell is like las vegas
where
people are really hoping for a miracle are really hoping for a miracle when they gamble
and then they lose everything
and
they don't get their fucky miracle they lose everything they own
and
you know
that's hell
i think that's what hell actually is
i think light came from fire
right in some sense
in the thermal veins of the earth if you want to do science nerg
whether you believe in that or not it's immaterial
there's something
creative about fire
right
and i think hell fire
it's just referring to this chaos of creation
that you're submitted to
to remind you maybe and humble you to the fact
that you should have been grateful
and you should have hum
um
humbled yourself
to this incredible miraculous act of mercy
by god
that gave us life
amidst all this fucking chaos
and all this contingency and all this
apparent randomness this i mean s nature such a the cosmo such a harsh fucking place
and that out of this emerges life right
and
there's something about that that proves
there's meaning in the falkon world
right there's something about that that proves there's meaning here
and i think fire is just this
chaotic
absence of the confirmation of meaning
that's my interpretation
and
since i'm a
heathen
and a hereity
and i think in a theological society i should probably be headed right but until then
i
i interpret how
as something that's here
so why do we say has why do you sin
because i think
i want to
bathe and hell fire a little bit
just to temper my sense of faith and temper my understanding of it
because i think
we're all burning in hell and away
already
her honor
and it's an
see people can't understand it because they have such like a strick
understanding of
observance versus hypocrisy
so that they see me say something and they're like oh you're such a hypocrite
because you don't actually believe what you say because you're not
walking the walk
like as if i'm too
bound by the gravity of temptation
and i'm not tough enough
to just be like a hardcore
muslim kind of guy i could be a hard coore muslim sure
i genuinely don't believe in that because i feel like
i don't want to just go to heaven and then just be like yah fuck the world i'll just go to heaven all this this evil society
give my middle finger to it i'm going to heaven
i'm going to go get my seventy two virgins everyone else can go burn and hell
i believe that
the meaning of religion the meaning of spirituality is here on earth
i believe it's here on earth
so
i will be here
right
and i'm see
i am not going to repress my desires
i'm not going to repress my desires
i like big booty bitches
if i
let me tell you this
if i resigned myself
personally right now in this stage of my life to religion
i'm not pure enough
if i was out here
repressing my love for big boody bushes
in the name of religious observance
i fee i would feel like a hypocrite
because i would be like well i actually
want big booty bitches
i'm just not doing it
to prove that i can have the discipline
because i want to go to heaven
but i don't actually care about heaven or hell in the afterlife
again i'm a i'm i'm like a fucked up
heretic i'm not claiming to represent any official religion at all
i'm just like speaking from my skizo self
in doing so
you know i don't care about
what happens after i die i just don't
i don't give a fuck
i care about here on earth
that's what i care about
i care about what happens here on earth
so since i care about what happens here on earth
m
i'm not going to do not i'm not going to do things to go to heaven
i'm going to do things
to
make heaven real on earth
and i don't mean that in the sense of a utopia i mean that in the sense of like
i think paradise is here
when i say here i mean it's in our heart it's in our soul
the paradise is already here that's what i believe
and hell is already here
elpire is already here
and
yeah you know what there's something very darmaic about what i'm saying or darmic about what i'm saying there's something very darmic about what i'm saying
and i think that speaks to an interesting interaction
that i think
should happen between islam and dharma
similar to the relationship between
judaism and greek
the greek philosophy or the greek realm
i think that is an interesting encounter that should happen
yeah
yeah it's very darmic what i'm saying very much
buddhist and all that kind of shit
what on
yeah i believe in the world here here and now
and
well it's not it's not just that i believe in the world here and now it's more so that
i believe that the world here and now is the only place
where
since i'm already here like
this is where it matters
this is where you prove yourself this is where you prove the truth
right
a lot of times like
people don't understand like has how can you say i'm a satanist and i'm fucking evil
when you are out here fucking big booty bithes
and then
i will qualify that
by saying
one
thank you so much for robbie prec wt to go i jes m h
the
i mean maybe
maybe
thanks so much for the dono miss e j and other dono think you are both just non linear omniscient perspectives on what we experience as a posteriory experience
that perspective is tied to the physical qualities of light
that i'm going to admit i don't understand what you said
i do not understand it
um
sorry but thank you so much for the don't know
because i really appreciate donnors right now you know i've kind of noticed something
about you tube
reaything about immortality man going beyond man and the end of mankind
brisom i'm going to be in the v c to debate about this because i have been informed
that there's a lot of heresy going on
so i'll be after stream
but i think trans humanism is bolsted
complete bolstt
but anyway what i was trying to say is that
people were like has why are you
m
how can you call people saytanic and evil
when you like you know you don't pray
you fugk big boody bushes
you're a fucking hypocrite you don't follow the religious prescriptions
and then what i would say is that like i don't define evil on the basis of whether an individual follows abstract prescriptions i defined on the basis of
whether you reproduce evil objectively
in the form of how you treat other beings and other human beings like
is your relation to the sociist the substance of evil
i'm going to call you focking evil then
if you're out here
reproducing the substance of
premarital sex
by
giving
like
making it a social phenomenon
like m t we did right
that is fucking evil
now i'm just an individual who's a victim of m t v s evil cause i'm i'm in this i'm born here this is
my world right
but i am not the source of the evil
thank you w levin i'm not the source of the evil
i'm just participating in it
then you could be ok then has according to you
visiting buying prostitutes is not evil
and then i would say
no i think it is evil
because you we have already arrived on some level
to a common social understanding
that this is an evil thing
to do right
and why it's evil and so on and so on like you this is a new avant garde movement to normalize prostitution
and by engaging in it
you are doing something to your senses that's abnormal right
so you're fucking evil right
in a sense
you can repent for it there's forgiveness for everyone
i've had to repent for evil in the past
'm saying i'm above anyone
but that's what makes something like that evil
but like
in terms of
sin
in terms of engaging in sin more generally like
you know i don't i
i don't think
if you're a muslim and you dream
that's not quite the same like let me give you an example this right
if you lie about someone
that is infinitely more evil
then if you just drink alcohol
or you eat pork
you drink alcohol and you eat pork you might damage your brain
you might damage yourself in some kind of fucking way
and woe unto those who are selling alcohol
or not selling alcohol woe unto those who popularized alcohol
woe unto those who have popularized swine
and you can blame them right
but just drinking alcohol eating pork that's not really on the same fucking level
is lying about another fuck and human being and
doing something evil
in the realm of humanity
that's not the same fucking thing
there has been psychopaths in my community
in the past
who like
nons stop spread a bunch of fucking lies about me did all this crazy disgusting
slimy disgusting shit
and then when i called him out were like you know this is
so against islam what you're fucking doing how can you be a moslem and lie like this and they' like oh
how can you
follow islam
while not praying five times a day we're on the same fucking level no we're not
me praying five times that's between me and god what you're doing
you are violating
you are doing something evil you are recreating the substance of evil
which is based on the relation of man to man
you are you are at the root of evil
right
that's fucking evil
what you're doing
you are doing something substantively evil something
imminently
unconscionable
something imminently evil deceptive
it's literally a lie it's deception
right
how can you fucking stomach it in your fucking heart to do something like that
to be a fucking liar right
for example
or you know to to to
to kill a baby or some shit
throw a baby off a cliff
or some evil th like i don't know running someone over some i don't fucking no right some evil shit right
that's on a different level ta you bee the day of judgment is the day you see your own life from god's perspective for eternity
so what you do here and now really matters so i know it does and the holy books made it clear that the here and now is what matters like what you do here
is the test
love your soul and what you arm
um
but it's like evil
is not
evil is not when you violate some abstract precept
evil is
when you do something
that
like effaces the very foundation and basis
of associus
i think that's what fuk and that's what that's how i would define evil right
it's like it's you do something that if faces what it means to be a human being
which is the highest form of creation
like when you create a social relationship
on the basis of a lie
that is the most evil fucking thing you can do
is create an order
of hue of power
of whatever on the basis of a lie that is fucking evil
right
does a human need to be present to make a judgement for what is evil
or does evil occur without the existence of a human
well
i think a human needs to engage in an act of evil
but the evil is there whether someone observes it or not
youre you're doing something that betrays the human heart itself it's just something unconscionable and disgusting
a lot of people think i'm not morally consistent
that's not true i am you just don't understand my world view or my aesthetics
but has
how can you be a communist
to
you know
because i'm a real mother fucker that's why right just like how
you didn't read karl marx
before you decided that you need to fucking drink water
it's the same shit
is this
you need to get your house in order
yourfreudan house in order
before you sit here and talk about ideological principles
cause a lot of you mother fuckers are motivated
by really pathological shit
like envy for example or some kind of mommy issues or daddy issues
or some fucked up problem you had in your life
where you adopted communism as a cope
you know le let's just be real i want to kind of be real about something
does politics actually matter
doesn't just relationships matter and like when your girlfriend broke your heart in high school
isn't that actually all that fucking matters why does politics even fucking matter right
politics is just like abstract
who are you to
care about something so abstract
when you cannot even reckon
with this existential quest to find
fulfillment and belonging
and recognition
from another human being right
that's why women don't give a fuck about politics
and all they care about is relationships and shit
it's not actually because they're inferior
um that would be because of um
you know like
that would be because of like
you know that
they falk in
voted for hillary clinton that would be an example of inferiority
but
the reason women mostly
don't give a shit about politics and only care about like
personal relationships
because it's because like it's the same thing
in a way right
in a personal relationship you are searching for meaning
of your own soul
in relation to another
whereas in politics
you are searching for meaning in the big other with a capital o
the other of society the other of the world the other of countries the other of statehood
the other of the sociates right
well what is a state what is associates what is a fucking society what is a fucking country
isn't that just an abstraction
isn't another human being the only real thing
that's
mostly how women see the world
just they don't really recognize the abstraction it's almost like what do you mean
they're like
youy're like
like they're like they're out here and they're like
the ottoman empire
world war one world war two the cold war
maga communism
what about having a small dick
why don't you stop having a small diate
whatfore you fuckin care about
all that shit
that's actually how they see the world right
it's like
it's like what right do you have
what right do you have
to care about like all these vast things
when you have not even got your house in order
in terms of how you
define yourself
as a human being
in relation to a concrete other right
and then me it's like i get away
with a lot because
you guys are my concrete other right is you know even though
we're going through a rough patch right now if i'm being honest
infrared is going through a pretty rough patch right now
no i still have an audience i still have
very generous
donators
who are keeping the stream afloat clap for the donators guys clap for the donators
the it's the unsung heroes right
but
that's a concrete example of me
putting myself out there in the world
and then getting something back that
kind of confirms
what i put out as
validated
write in some kind of way
but if you don't have that and ninety nine percent of people don't have that
you know
how can you talk about politics if you're not getting your own fucking house in order right
and that's a very difficult
thing to
like you got you gotta sometimes ask right
this happened when i had my first
artbreak
which was from high school
and it was basically something along the lines of
do i care about politics
or is this just a coult
for like me being bitter
and sad
and an insult
toward women
right
and
that's what people on twitter are like oh hands you're just like an insult it's like
they don't know how
like
stupid that statement is
because
o
i spent many years trying to purify
my conviction
and separated
from my personal feelings like i that i i was like a dharmic monk
trying to purify my heart
to like get to the essence of what does it mean to actually be devoted
to the idea
as opposed to using the idea as a way to cope
for your personal heartbreak or your personal ego
or your personal problems and all that kind of fucking shit
and the way i kind of dealt with it was that like
i created a
a very harsh division between the two like
commmunism doesn't care about your fucking feelings
doesn't care about your fucking
your sob story doesn't care that you're fucking lonely doesn't care that your girlfriend broke your heart
doesn't care about all this dumb shit you fucking go through
doesn't it's actually
completely indifferent to all that it's total indifference
now once you establish that indifference k
once you establish the indifference
of the idea
to your personal story and your personal life
and it takes a lot of discipline to do that by the way
right
but once you do that
you can discover something really beautiful
because you can discover
that even when
this thing this idea is indifferent toward you personally
it still has its own logic it still has its own consistency
its own poetical beauty
right there's something poetically beautiful about it
and meaningful it's meaning there
right
and then your problem
i mean your problem may still be a problem but now you can have faith now you can be like
ok
i have this problem
and
my problem is nothing
compared to this reality
and also
my problem is not necessary it's not actually what's necessary the realm of necessity
is outside of me
it's not here
so in a way
if you ask was a has why did you not become an insul
i mean i lost my virginity at seventeen but i don't think insl is defined by
whether you've had sex
i think it's like defined by like
do you like
have like a politics of resentment
based on your personal faelings
and in high school i like had my heart broken and shit
and it did make me very very sad
and it did
it did make me likelook very
black pilled
but never like messa i'm assageynistic now right not back then
i was still very young
and
the question you have to ask yourself is
like
why i didn't go down that path
was because
i decided
i felt like there was something inauthentic
and ingenuine
about channelling your personal problem
into politics
like if you were born
if you're born
like but ugly
it's an ugly duckling
and you use politics as a cope for that i find that in authentic
because the site
first get your shit in order in terms of your ugliness then you can start talking about politics
but you're not ugly because of politics you're ugly because you're fucking ugly
and
the reason i'm a misogynist today
because i feel like so many women who are political
don't understand that
you're not
miserable
because of the political system we live in
you're not miserable
because of
society
you're not miserable because of capitalism
you're just ugly and
you should settle for a
average man because you're not anything special
like some fat three hundred pound blue hair whatever feminist
is out here complaining about capitalism and society and as i actually
the problem is you
not society you're the problem
you should just blame yourself right
and i feel like
the reason i came on to the scene
so belligerent and so cruel
i spent years
like mastering the discipline
of disentangling my devotion to the idea of what communism is
from
my personal story and my personal life
which i understood was totally separate like my personal life
buhu beach right
nobody cares
communism that's out there that
that's not going to fulfill you in any kind of fucking way
that's not going to make you personally happy in any kind of fucking way
you need to devote yourself to an external
truth external beauty and external meaningfulness right
and
don't raify
your personal grievances
into the realm of external necessity
because it's not
that's what insuls do insuls reify the personal grievances they have
into like some necessary truth out there in the world
big fok a mistake right
big fucking mistake
i
because look if you
that's what women do
right that's why women should not be involved in all six thank you carny appreciate you
appreciate you
carney goose goo we sada appreciate it
but as i was saying
you know this is such an interesting thing i'm talking about right now
it's such a shame
all the people were missing
but i've noticed on all live streams i've looked at
everybody's down in terms of use everyone is fucking down i
can you guys name anyone who's like super successful right now
there's like nobody right i couldn't even imagine it actually because the atmosphere we have
but whatever whatever talk i could be wrong about that too by the way it's just something i've observed
but anyway i
is jimmy e been really successful right now
m
yeah i don't know yeah it's it seems like it's like mainly yeah i know redacteds doing good
you're right about that
redacted has
conkyia' is banned from everything though that's what i'm trying to say
he's like banned from everything
but i
the reason i came to online so belligerent so fucking upset
it's like so many of these people they're just using politics
as a way
to feel happier
or have a cote about their own personal fucking problems thank you so much urban savs appreciate you a ton
and it's like to me it's
that's not the case like
i believe in something very cold and harsh about communism it doesn't have any regard
for your personal happiness
notone at all you have to be totally selfless
and i
i do not see that virtue in any communist in america i see these people as just trying to cope
for like i live in berklyn and i want to be richer than i am i don't do a fuck bitch this is a cold world
you're not entitled to anything
you know i am a fucking
ultra right wing libertarian pull yourself up by the fuck and bootstraps when it comes to personal advice
don't fucking use politics as a cope
for the fucking fact
that you're a lazy loser
a
millennial
by the way
who
blames capitalism
for the fact that there aref they found themselves in a shit situation
guess what ever you people find themselves you know there's people who are born with no legs imagine being born with no legs
imagine it losing your legs that's a shitty situation
you can't blame capitalism for that
you have to blame some random shit right
imagine you get can't imagine
your loved one gets cancer and dies
you going to blame capitalism
you need to come to terms with the fact
that there is something cold about
being and the world
in regards to us
right
you're in a relationship
you can enter a relationship with someone
who is a piece of shit
and completely disappoints you
and completely whatever
you know
tough shit
the reason i'm so muslim isn't because i'm out here pretending that i follow all the prescriptions because i just
i love this idea of
god the merciful i love this idea that
as much as that horrible shit
would you just have to accept
happens
isn't it a fucking miracle that there's something rather than nothing it's a fucking miracle that we're here
right now
that's a miracle right that is an act of mercy
because the default is the chaos of the cosmos
the default state
is this cosmic chaos
right
burning stars and all this fucked up shit that's happening
that's the default state
and here we are
that's a fucking miracle
right
even earth is such a scary fucking place
here we are
that's a fucking miracle right
that's a beautiful beautiful thing
that is an act of mercy by god upon us that we need to be eternally grateful for
because out here
creation is a wild thing thanks so much paperwork its capitalism's fault my baris to messed up my tridle chatsor espresso order yettas polish
thank you so much paperw
yeah i mean know it's capitalism's fault
that you know i i
yeah it's it's capitalism's fuck and fault that you know
i don't know how to fucking make choices as an adult
it's like the basic
that's like the basic cote
of your average
anti capitalist whatever leftist
right
but it's like why does there ex why does suffering exist in the world
why does all that why does that exist well
you should be grateful there's meaning in the first place
because that is meaningless
when someone gets cancer and dies
in some sense it's meaningless
but they're still meaning
meaning delves into its origins often
well actually it's not meaningless because we have the power through knowledge
to harness an understanding of why it happens
so when we through some kind of medical technology
not necessarily even modern medical technology which is some kind of medical means
discover the causes of cancer and stuff
we are getting close
to the beauty of
you know the meaning of creation
and that's a great thing
right
it' a beautiful thing
actually
and i think that's like the chinese perspective too like
especially when kovt came around the chinese perspective was like ok
why is this virus here
we don't know what is the meaning of people dying from this fucking virus randomly they're like
we don't know but
we're going to fight it
you know we're going to fight this virus
and survive
that's such a beautiful thing
when they first had the lockdown in the
move on
you know
you're like we're going to fight
it's not even a fighting another person
it's fighting some meaningless thing from nature
supposedly right
according to what we have to say on you tube
according to its mandated
the mandated truth on youtube right
but um
yeah
i just think
i'm i'm throwing gems man i'm givin you guys gems you guys are fuckin lucky
that you get to watch these streams
because
damn
yeah this is something three thousand people should be listening to right
but
you guys are just a lucky three hundred
the lucky three hundred spartans
because i think this is important stuff right i think it's really important stuff
that i'm telling you
you know
is anything that happens meaningless no everything has meaning
so we don't always understand that meaning right
but if we understand there is meaning
right
you need to have faith in that
that's what i believe
so if there's things you don't understand the meaning of it
still havef faith the still meaning
still have faith in the meaning itself
and that meaning is god that's what i think god is
right
it's my understanding at least
in any case
that's i think that's why it's so hard for me to traverse
the
like this ideological sphere
i'm actually going to show you guys some content pretty soon
after i go on this rant you're going to be shown some content
and i'm not ending the stream any time soon because well
i need to make more money but no it's not it's not prom right no obligation i'm just saying
i'm going to be streaming longer because that
not with any entire expectation of entitlement so don't worry i'm just
just you know
just in case i can you know
but also because i have more contents to show you
but i
look
why won't you be a professor you're good at explaining things
i feel it'd be wasted as a professor becuse i shouldn't i tell this to the internet and not a classroom of thirty people
you know who won't even give a fuck anyway
so i would be a professor if i could talk to the internet
you know it's sad we have
four hundred likes and three hundred viewers
that means people just stopped
dropped a light and left
pretty sad
re said
but in any case
me continue what i was saying
i've got one of the reasons it's so hard to navigate
the political
ah sphere
for me on the internet the ideological spheres is like there's two realities
there's this external reality of
social meaning which is completely external
and then there's this like
extremely incestuous
extremely proximate way people have attached
ideology
as an encyclopaedia of personal grievances
and emotional traumas thank you so much maximilian so like leftism is based on like shit like ah ah my god do you use uberites do you use doordash oh my god you're a funcky piece of shit you remind me of the time where i was bullied for being ugly and d and it's just this extremely personal thing that has nothing to do with the external
external truth
of the idea right
oh you shout
what of
only bucking shills are infinitely possible but the
holy shit
is jennifer oil prince
princess
jennifer thank you so much
the ceo of infrared
thank you so much it's the jennifer deep state
oh my god
oh my focking god
holy sit
wheres the fuck did that come from jennifer thank you so much
will no train
clya thank you maan
oh my god jennifer
thank you so much clyth appreciate you man
ah man you know what
ah
i am in debt to jennifer right if jennifer if you ever need a favor
like if you ever need me to knock on someone's door
and say hello to them
like
i am literally like
come down
ok
i'll be a mercenary i don't give a fuck
ight
you know what i mean
it's be it's like it's like be
yeah
holy shit jennifer thank you so much i am st you i can't even put into words how grateful i am
for that
i am like extremely extremely grateful
you have no i i can't even put the appreciation into words
but you you motivate me to just do better and be better put on more videos put better content out there
and reward you guys with better
stuff
and better
content right
and that's what i'm going to do and
you know you know i was saying some shit
like oh i'm misogynistic that doesn't apply to jennifer that does not apply to jennifer at all
jennifer is
a queen
and
she is one of the few exceptions
on planet earth of my misogyny
she has been an o g in this community
from the beginning
from the beginning o g
right
of the community
and never started drama ever
never started any drama
you know how much men starded drama
ninety nine percent of the drama starters were met
ok
so
and the problem the troublemakers but it thank you so much jan aar
appreciate you so much ma'am
m
jennifer is always just chilled you know always has been chill
and
every time she's in the chat it's just such a pleasant
presence for the community
the old infrared days were wild yeah
yeah
ah maen
i feel pretty bad
i just
you know what else i feel bad about the fact that all of it's going to have to go to pokey main
that's just the worst part because
look guys one day she'll notice me
one day pokemin
will notice me
and
you know i gotta do what i gota do
i gotta do what i gotta do guys
i've been at it for a few years
i'm living in my mom's basement because i'm bankrupt and in debt because i gave all my money to poke main
and all the money you guys give me has to go to one place right
and
a just
one day she'll notice me oky one day
she will appreciate me and
she will say my name
she's never said my name on stream
and she has also filed a financial restraining order against me
and she basically said that
i need to stop sending her money and that she' you know aparently she's really like upset
thank you tristan
but she's just
in a mood you know she's
she's just in a bad mood it's just one of the things she does in our relationship
thank you so much christen bs you know in all seriousness thank you so much
fly
christan
and especially jennifer thank you so much
i am very very much
speechless
i'm just i don't know what else to say i'm actually just speechless
thank you so much
i the i really appreciate it
but on
you have a power hourg in a minute what
uh yeah
no we actually have
a good amount of women in the community is just that
a lot of them are not active
chatters
and
yeah but like am i actually mssagynistic
only on an extremely personal level like
but not in a not in reality just like
just in relationships you know
that's what i really mean
but
yeah
and i hope women are missandrast as well because
i just
yh i would feel bad if women didn't hate men
to
because i don't feel like an asshole
but anyway
um
russian missile in what
oh you live in south africa okay i see
um anyway in any case guys
what i was getting at
in the political realm
it's really hard to navigate because i'm always speaking to languages i'm speaking the language of
collective psychological resentments and like pathological problems that are channeled through politics
and then the purity of the external
like
logos of communism right
this is social thing that unites us
as just completely indifferent
to us on a personal level
or at least is not
cannot
rams
a son of
personally we can't use it
as are excuse to hide behind
instead of being like real human beings right
i always maintain that i've always maintained that separation it's almost like i'm calvinistic in a way right
i'm like a calvinist
protestant nordic
like cold mother fucker that's basically saying like n
it's a world of total depravity and there's no salvation
except
thrue
grace
and you know
weer would fate this fate
and whatever bad or good that happens to you is what god wanted and you can't bitch about it or you hide behind religion
that's why you got to work and have the protestant work ethic
and in a sense i have that german mentality there's something jerk see
there's something very german
about hayes
it's because i'm half german because my name is adam to here and my mother is a cia
german woman
and i'm german right
and um
but
no and in reality there is something very german about me
general
s i'm a marxist and
i'm a hganlian
and i'm a german idealist
and you know
that is german right
all that stuff comes from germany
anyway guys
by the way i to say something there's like
or germans i like
that i've met
there for some reason germans hate me
that's fine
um
and i feel like if i was in germany people would just like not like me
but i don't know maybe they would like me i can't tell
i have not had good experiences
with
well
germans
i just haven't
you know i just feel like we don't vibe that well
but it's ok i don't hate them
but i do have the right to make fun of them
whenever i want
anway guys i want to show you some stuff
i want to show you
some stuff
where the fork is it
because if i don't find it fast
i am going to
oh i want to show you this thing about the asiatic motor production
this is really cool
i the mo se an economist
he's basically saying the same shit i said on twitter
that got me you know turned
into a ridiculous absurd person
it's the same shit that i said
originally
apparently you know i got made fun of ford and all this fucking stuff
yeah we're going to need new a mots and shit i'm going to add a mots pretty soon
don't worry about that
but we're going to watch this thing about the asiatic motor production
before we do that
before me is that
ah you are sleeping on armenia armenia can be one of the keys you're missing and you can pull on the revolutionary essence in history
they rek my views on armenia
oky
now i threw the turks a bone
when i went on my rant
diplomatically ceasing to recognize greece as a country
i ceased to give diplomatic recognition to greece
i went on this huge anti grease ranp
and the turks the turkish lobby of infrared love that right
but as in all things there must be balance
and i love armenia and i love armenians and i have never
capped about that
the armenians i have met
are so fucking cool
and i vibed with them a lot
i love armenian food
i love armenians i just do
and there's j s i don't know what it is right
and i think it's because i look armenian
because i did this thing
on tick tok
that allows me
to
i did this thing
that allows me to
on ticktok it like it's a soviet police race chart
and it tells me what race i are
right
base
and where the fuck
i don't know what this shit is templates
i don't know how to do it but
it's the soviet police race chart
like all the different ethnicities and there's this
ap on tick tok
this filter
that lets you see which one you are according to tick sox algorithm
or according to sicktox ai recognition
and tik tog said that i was armenian
and that means something
ok
according to tiktok i am armenian
and you know what it makes sense
because i look armenian i do look armenian
i look like a mountainous caucasus
person
from the rugged caucases mountains of
armenia because i am a north
western
iranian
that's really what it is northwst iran
that's really the source of people who look like me a lot of people are like has
why do you have red hair are you german no
north west iran and i guarantee if i took the twenty three in me
it would say north west iran
the red hair this whole look
soe you look at my face look at my face
i a have a very harsh
distinguished look
right
this is
iranic this is northwest iran
and people who look like me armenians georgians
iranians afghans
it's a rugged
look
ok
it's a rug people from the balkons a lot of slavs
you like has you look russian
northwest iran is the source of a lot of the russian
a you know a lot of the russian makeup is from there
so that is why it's iranic it's o'm not slavic a lot of slavs
the origin of the slavs
iran
did you know that
at least partially
so the whole balcons basically the balcons
is from ya like the scythians in the north
western iranians that's the whole balkans
and i'm part of that shit so congratus that's why i look serbian and russian and i look like i'm yugoslavian
thank you so much you may have aler thought of this
but why don't you debate more libertarians and trump supporters
people you could maybe come to it because most of my debate opponents
have historically
come to me
and i have to seek those ones out
and it's like
you know i want you know what i want to debate
and i don't know how i can set this up i'm going to email him
i want to debate james lindsey
on marxism
and i want to do it in person and i want it to be an event
and i want to make it about mager
communism
madam
the communism
i want to debate james lindsay about marxism
and he's not a stupid guy i don't think he is
i think he's kind of smart actually i've read some of his stuff
and
he's kind of smart
he's a worthy opponent i will debate him i want to debate him
james lindsay i'm going to email him or something
i don't know i'll reach out to him
i will email him
and i want to bebait him
in person
if i can do it in person we'll do it online but i will fly out we could make it an event
and i want to debate it
i want to do it
maybe we can ah
have it through modern day debate
maybe modern day debate
that'll be a fun one
that'll be a fun one
i'll be a fun one
has don't islam and dharmic religions have an oer wrongingly antagonistic relations
i've seen indian burma address this
yeah they do
they do one
so did the greeks
so did the hellenistics and the jews look at the romans and the jews how much they fought
right
same shit
see look judaism and the greek really the greek
whatever philosophy
it's like it's about the intellect
and it's the relation between knowledge and faith
knowledge and faith
but knowledge on the basis of thought
right
islam
and the dharmic religions it's the ba it's the relationship between
faith
islam faiths just like judaism
revelation faith and
knowledge but not of thought
what of sense
darmk
religions are about
the censorus
thereabout
the hearts thereabouts
intuitions the'reabout something
that's not thought
it's more than thought
it's something
it's the unconscious right that's why karl yung
and they're so into
hinduism and stuff
it's the unconscious
that's what the darmic
religions are that's why they're religions actually because they're about the intuitions and stuff
mysticism and all that kind of stuff and islam is about
revelation and faith just like judaism is
and
i want to create a judeo muslim conspiracy
and it's basically a semetic takeover plot
so the judeo muslim conspiracy is
judaism
takes over europe
through greek merging with greek
philosophy
and then islam takes over asia
re fusing
with dharmic religions and then
the semites shall rule the earth i'm just kidding it's just a joke
not in all seriousness
the best forms of islam
are non arabic
easily
easily like
going to ask you like what's my favorite form of islam it's probably somewhere somewhere in like
ubakistan it's not going to be in any arab country
arab islam
is inferior to non arab islam
easily
off gone islam
better than arab islam
right
iranian islam yet better than arab islam
arab islam it's like it's too
ah it's just it's not there's it's just not it's eloquent
right
the'm talking the culture and the art and all that stuff
yeah look at the the huee
the hui and china such a beautiful people
such a beautiful culture
and such a beautiful form of islam that exists in china
ax speaking of the anti semitism shit i there's some twisted part of me
that wants it to start applying to arabs like
i want it i want people to start being just as paranoid about arabs
as they are about jews
because of the
and specifically phonicians because of this sematic connection because think about it
ball worship moloch worship
that's my people's shit i'm phoenician we're the ones who sit
we brought that shit into the world
we worshipped
see i don't understand anti semitism i don't get it
we are the ones
who worshipped ball and moloch and is star and all that sit
and it was the jews
who like really fought hard against that
really fought hard right
they really fought hard against it
and we the sphoenician canonites
are the ones who brought it into the world
so
noy i'm literally like
i am so smart like i'm just out here i'm literally evil like think about it i'm like
i'm like hannibal
i'm like hannibal barka
i am the evil in plain sight
while you are focused on hating jews
i am a literal
phonician
in america
taking over the world
with my evil
and nobody pays attention or notices
it's so weird right
think about it
think about it
and i've always wanted
i wanted i always wanted anti semitism to
expand
to be more inclusive to include
the other semites
such as
the extremely rich gulf arabs
as well as phoenicians
because
why do i want that i just want to feel more included
i just feel like our jewish cousins
they just get too much
attention
and
i just feel like it's not inclusive enough
that's what i feel like it's just not inclusive
it should be more inclusive
you know
we're be we're progressing as a society we're becoming more inclusive
you know day by day and
we arabs
and other we other semites we are excluded from anti semitism
nobody accuses us of conspiracies
and this strange that it's strange why not like for example
for i'm a phnician
lebanese people are the most shady mercantile people in the world
they literally go to countries all around the world they just take over
the you're to south america
you climb up the ladder and there's some lebanese dude hustling
he was like an oligarch
same shit in africa wherever the lebanese go they do that shit right
nobody bats an eye
nobody bats a fucking eye
right we just get away with it
there's no anti semitism against us
but we do worse that we are i always say this we're superjews
everything they said about the jews
we are worse
in every respect
they said jews have big noses
we have big noses
they say jews
are too hairy
we are hairy they say jews are greedy we are greedy they say that the jews
are too mercantile
we are way more merconcile
they say that the jews
are conspiratorial
we are way more conspiratorial are you do you know how much fuck in drama and conspiracy happens in arab families and
in the middle east and all these ruling families and shit
how much crazy
like the arab spring with atar insideia so manyq we're so sneaky and conspiratorial it's not even funny right
everything they say about the jews it applies to us but worse
we oll jews are too perverted and whatever
we are way more perverted than the jews
ok
we are ok
jews are obsessed with sex we are actually obsessed with sex ok
they say oh would jews are just
subversive
we are subversive
we were responsible for international terrorism ight
then they say shit like
oh um
jews are just like
they just there they're responsible for like this revolutionary rage
to overthrow europe
and europe and it's like
that's every arab
country that you go to the arab street they're all revolutionaries they're all got a ks and they're ready to throw it out
always right
and a joke as a joke right
like that's a norm you talk about oh you go lebanon to be like yeah i'm a revolutionary and you like we all are ok and we're still fighting amongst ourselves
you go to palestine know i'm a revolutionary
so what that's
we're all revolutionaries right
think about it
think about it
think about it
i'm just saying
how do you call yourself arab and phonician at the same time
because i am i get to
have that all right i'm from lebanon
and my parents are from lebanon
and that is where phoenicia was now if you're palestinian and syrian you can also be phoenician
i'm not like a meronite phnician i'm saying
but phoenicians were big that was a wee like they invented the alphabet
and they had
carthage and
huge thing you know
i' i'm going a slice of that give me a slice of that
i can have some of that
i can have some of that why can't i have some of that right
if you are iraqi you can take samyria
sumaria
and you can take babylon and shit
i want phonicia
i have a right to it that's for my parents
are from
and before you be like oh but that's not that was not you yes it was if you dig up amther fuckin
betson in lebanon
from four thousand years ago i guarantee you they will look exactly like me
i guarantee you they will look exactly like me
please go try it
i know for a fact
i grew up around
lebanese arabs
my whole fucking life i know for a fact
these people don't
they're still in the same ship for thousands of years
we arabs
do not believe in time
ok
we we just sit on the porch and just
eat cheese and tea
and we can do that for ten thousand years and we won't ever have to change a all
so i'm pretty sure four thousand years ago
you dig up
you dig up someone in lebanon
and
it looks exactly like me
there's no change that happened at all
one hundred is ay one hundred two percent
phoenician with a two percent margin of error no change at all same shitp
this is just identitarian cope nah i need you to appreciate the fact
my parents are from the same village
they're from the same village
ok
that's how it is
yeah we went to carthage
but most of us stayed behind
and we just were here
we've just been here
we didn't leave
the
what is the best argument against meroinite cringe
the best argument is you can say you're summerrian
or you can say you're ancient egyptian or you can say you're phoenician
or you can say
what the fuck aver right
but at the end of the day
we are all a rabs
i that's what i'm saying we're all just a rats
you can say whatever the fuck you want
at the end of the day in a rab is a rab and that's what we are
that's what we are
ok
we are a raps
we you know
it's not nationalism it's just the truth
you can be like oh i'm a special type of a rab ok you're a special type of a rab
but you're still in a rab
that's what you are it's just what we are any
we all got that same bullshit going on we all have the same tribal structure
we all have the same damn thing going on
it's as simple as that
we're all a rerabs
you and the phici the meroinite nationalist thank you dem and demonlims have nothing to print i agree thank you demonits or appreciate you man
that the meronites are here like
oh now we're p nicians ok so you're a special type of a rab nobody cares bitch you're still in a rab
just because you're trying to say you're a special type of a wrap don't mean nothing
the egyptians
we're ancient egyptian ok
youun a
the iraqis o were sumerrian
we're babylonian ok you w a rab
it's not much more to it
you're just a you're just a type of a rab
you ca you can call it whatever you want
you can call it whatever you want but we all behave the same way think about it
think about we all be we have the same
view on everything and we all view
we all think our shit don't stink and if you want to talk about some shit
arab supremacism is a very real thing
i will tell you something we a rabs
are racist against it
everyone
that's why i find it hilarious when there's arab identity politics in the universities i'm a person of color i'm arabic
moll fucker a rabs are racist toward white people
they are they literally
have en superiority complex to the entire world
because they're like
we are in the tribal arab structure and if you're an outsider they're like
you're not even human basically well you are
but it's like
you will always be an outsider
you know what i mean
we actually have an arabcentric mentality
in general like it's it's like actually
all the shit they say about white supremacy it actually applies to arabs that's us
we are the ones
who mould the entire world where we're the center of the world that's us
it's litally true
know what i mean
how come iran and turkey properly became national states above tribal issues
because
those civilizations and that's what they're actually are they're civilizations
actually
that
have something to offer
like those are real civilization those are real forms
of the way humanity
creates a universal existence for itself right
whereas
m
we arabs
are just tribes we're just tribes that's it we're just a bunch of tribes
and
we just follow the whoever's
the biggest tribe i guess
but
it's not really a civil i would not call it a civilization maybe i'm wrong i just i've never seen whate i've never seenan argument for it
we just fight each other
it's all we do
and um yeah
but at ok i will be critical toward my own people all i want i'm very critical toar my own people
but at the end of the day
look i will sing the praises of iran and turkey
and how much their civilizations and we arabs are not a civilization
i will admit i'm like i'm a realist i'm not coping out here right
but at the end of the day in my heart's of hearts
i am proud to be an araf
period i'm proud to be an arab it's just
justs just because it's what i am right
i'm nothing more than that i'm an arab i'll always be an arab
that's what i am
i could be realistic about shit
and not cope and give credit where credit is due to all these various different peoples
and
i can fight against arab chaalvinism which i do and i'm also against arab nationalism
and pan arabism i'm against that
what
personally
i'm a proud a red i just am
period
you know
in what if you whatever whatever you are you should be proud of it
whatever you are
you should always be proud of it
because that's whath you falkon are you're not anything else you'll never be anything else
period
right
that's the way it's got to be
and there ain't much more to it
anyway guys
and we gouys
beautiful stream
gank
tomorrow
earlier stream
and
can i tell you guys something although
i'm not getting a ton of views
live concur viewers
although i'm not
i'm having such a good time are you guys having a good time i am
i'm having a great time
i love
patrion tomorrow yeah
i'm going to make announcement of discord
everyone get your eyes in the patron
ask your damn questions
and we're going to do a long
patron quna tomorrow
ok
but i
this is a great time
and it's high quality isn't it
very high quality shit i'm very optimistic for the future infrad
i'm very optimistic
rumbles the future it may very well be thanks so much p is the future
rumble may very well be the future oil one last thing
jackson inkele
has apparently gone banned
from twitter
and it was because they marked him as a bot spam account and then you on musk was like yeah that was an error
a lot of accounts got taken were trying to correct it
so we'll see i think he'll be back though i think he will be back
i hope he'll be back
i'm optimistic i'll be back though
because it was like he got mistaken for a bot basically
beuse they been doing a big bot purge and a lot of people got caught up in that who were not bots
we'll see
we'll see
but anyway guys
in we guys
i'll see you guys
and uh one last thing right
one last thing
there's one thing that makes me not willing to be optimistic about
future of infrared
and that's
do you think about me do you think about me do you think about me
good bye to the people who trusted me
go bacy to the people who love me
go by to the people who trusted me
go by to the people
trusted me
good bye good bye to everybody
now i need
then h
now i need some move on a life
now
i need to move one in life to move one in life
good bye to the people who trust it