FBI AFTER ME! | IRAN CEASEFIRE

We're international, so international, so international.

You can't test me for all.

I'm overseas and about 100 cheese for sure.

Don't test me for all.

I'm obsessed for all because I ripped with the best for show. Feel about to the death all accessment for all because I wrecked with the best for show

feel about through the death of me

cream in my body

and let the ocean

have what's left in me

but for now

forget about that

blow the whistle

baby you're the rest of room

you're going to die

like New York

Santa

I never speak

wild like

Los Angeles

my fantasy Hot's in Miami

Oh

Oh

Yeah

This international love

Oh

Oh oh Yeah

I don't play football

But I touch down

Everywhere

Everywhere

Everywhere I don't play baseball

But I've hit a home run Everywhere

Everywhere

Everywhere I've been play baseball But I've hit a home run Everywhere everywhere

Top into country

The cities I can't pronounce

In the places on the globe

I ain't no existent

In Romania

She pulled me to the side

Tell me Pitt

You can have me and my sister

In 119

yet the woman

A bomb man in Greece

You guess it the women are sweet

Been all around the world But I ain't going live There's nothing like Miami City

You've got it down

Like New York City

I've never seen

Wild like Los Angeles

My fantasy

I said that Miami

I'm gonna

Oh

You're gonna

You're gonna

You're gonna Oh Yeah Yeah Yeah Oh, oh, oh, yeah. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, yeah.

Down in to y'all, they're looking for visas.

I ain't talking credit cards, if you know what I mean.

In Cuba, like Coca-Darura, but the women get down, if you know what I mean.

In Colombia, the women got everything done, but they're so much beautiful women I've ever seen in in Brazil they're freaky with big old boos and they bounce blue yellow and green in LA Tengo Habegana New York

Chango la barre carpa sit up on a third of my Eddie man in square yeah my hand mean single gonna

yeah you put it down like New York City while like Los Angeles over Why I'm like Los Angeles

I'm serving my own

Oh

Girl is international

Oh

Yeah

There's not a place

That your love That your love that you love don't affect me baby so don't ever change i cross the globe when i'm with you baby can't come you put it head come

you put it down like New York City

I've never seen wild like Los Angeles

my fantasy

I saw that my head

I'm feeling

Oh Oh Yes International love Oh that my end up until the heat oh oh yeah it's international love oh oh oh yeah international love on it down like new

york city i'll never see why like lost and you there's my dream i'm still I'm doing I'm still

a

It's international

love Oh

Oh

It's international

love Oh

International

International

Oh

International International International

so international so international, so international, whoa, whoa, wow,

international love, whoa, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, international love. We're international.

I'm international.

International.

So international.

You can't text me far. Can't catch me far. I'm overseas and I'm about a hundred cheese for sure. can't catch me for

I'm gonna see

I'm gonna be

see that's

me boy

I'm text me boy but I'm wrecked

with the best

show

feel about to death

of me

cream made my

line and the ocean

have what's left

to me

but for now

forget about that

blow the whistle

baby you're

the reptor

red you're the restaurant You put it down like New Year I've seen

I've never seen

Wild like Los Angeles

My fantasy

Hot than my head

Oh

Good is international love

Oh oh oh

Yeah

I'm international love I don't playing football but i touch down everywhere everywhere everywhere i don't play baseball but i've hit a home run everywhere everywhere

cop in the countries in cities i can't pronounce and the places on the globe i ain't no existent in romania she pulled me to the side told me pit you can have me and my sister. In 119, yeah, the woman in a bomb and in Greece, you guessed it, the woman is sweet,

been all around the world, but I ain't going live, there's nothing like Miami City.

You got it down like New York City, I never seen, wild like Los Angeles, my fantasy,

I'm going to be in Miami, one's fantasy. I'm good than Miami.

I'm going to be.

Oh, oh, oh,

good.

International love.

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, yeah.

International love.

They're looking for visas.

I ain't talking credit cards.

If you know what I mean.

Kua, likeoka-d-rura.

What the women get down, if you know what I mean. In Cuba, La Costa Darura, but the women get down, if you know what I mean.

In Colombia, the women got everything done, but they're same out them are beautiful women that have ever seen.

In Brazil, they're freaky with big old booze, and they bounce, blue, yellow, and green.

In L.A. Chango, Havana, New York, Chango L.R.N., New York, capacity, but I'm in Venezuela.

I'm not working capacity for a car, Romayette in love Oh, oh,

yeah, I'm a place

There's not a place

that your love

gonna affect me,

baby

so don't ever change

I cross the globe

when I'm with you baby

Kate

Huh What's going to go. We're going to be able to be I'm going to I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm not I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm and I don't know how to be able to go.

You know what I'm going to be that one.

And I'm

uh...

I'm uh

and I'm and I know I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm gonnae. And I'm gonna

and I'm gonna

I'm a

and I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm ones of once if we good once if we good once if we good be a miracle if we good once if we good once if we good

all right we ain't good oh we good all right shit uh comrade kid with the five what's up bro stephen with the five

appreciate you bro middle age with the five appreciate y'all appreciate y'all First things first,

My Iraqi beard is coming in

Hey, what's up guys?

I got the police on my trail doing about a hundred miles an hour.

All right, sorry, what's going on?

Yeah, the FBI's after me.

FBI's been investigating me.

I've been, uh been under FBI investigation.

And that's because I'm somebody who speaks their mind.

I'm not one of these bitch-ass.

What do you call them?

I mean, they're always complaining about transgenderes and stuff but these

are really some bitch made like type man tities uh you know bitch made punk ass bitches these 15

percent of americans these quartering these these captive dreamers, these, all the people really who were celebrating, finding out that the feds are trying to persecute me, that the government's persecuting.

Zagonel is what I'm going to call. Make a tweet about it. Menopausal men.

Which, they're even worse than transgender, if you think about it.

At least let transgenders be. They're not harming us.

But these people, they're a bunch of menopausal, middle-aged men, Gen X, they're declining,

rapidly declining T-levels,

talking big shit on my name

as if I'm a victim and I'm

I'm, um, you know,

they're winning, basically.

You're a little bitch. I mean, we're all going to die one day, you little pussy,'re winning, basically. You're a little bitch.

I mean, we're all going to die one day,

you little pussy.

You little bitch made...

It's like, look, I'm going to be straight up.

I see one of these people

I'll beat the brakes off of them

because they need to be...

Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,

it's all comedy.

It's a comedy show, is it not? Hey, look, hey, hey. It's all comedy. It's a comedy show, is it not?

Hey, look, you know, no, we all die eventually.

And I'd rather live as a man with aura, a man with purpose, a man with... Who's got big balls, basically.

Versus these people, they're a bunch of...

They're not even men.

What do you call them?

I kid you not.

Captive Dreamer.

All these...

I don't even know all their names.

The right-wing menopausal men, they sit with their

legs crossed and they go to wine bars and they're just kind of, they have a metrosexual twang

in their voice and they type big tough, they type like tough guys on Twitter.

They type on their phones,

on their smartphones,

like they're tough guys.

But if they were in my shoes,

they would have shit their pants multiple times.

I mean,

let's just think about it.

I've been in conflict zones.

I went to

the funeral of Sayyad, Hassan Nasrallah.

I don't give

a fuck what happens to me. You know what I mean?

These people would shit their pants

if they live the life that I live. I'm just

not going to lie. Chairman

of the American Communist Party with that target on your back, but you know, I'm just not going to lie. Chairman of the American Communist Party

with that target on your back.

But you know, I'm basically saying, I'm basically walking

with my nuts hanging, bitch.

I'm basically walking around with my nuts

hanging saying I don't give a fuck.

You don't think I know what I'm doing?

Being the Communist Party chairman walking around with my

fucking giant nuts out hanging you bitch this is my fucking life that i live because i'm a man i'm a lion

and you are a little bitch.

You are a menopausal declining testosterone, Gen X, Goyim cattle.

If I get shot in the head right now, if I get bombed right now, if I get killed and assassinated, I would have lived the life of a lion.

Do you understand?

Why the fuck would I live any other life?

Nobody should feel bad for me, by the way.

Because why the fuck would I want to live any other life?

You think I want to live like these

anonymous

howling mutant? Do you think I want

to live like these people who sit at their fucking office

desk and are terrified of showing their face

because they're going to get fired by their daddy, their sugar daddy bosses?

You think I want to live like these fucking people?

You think I want to live the life of Gunther Eagleman?

And that's who I admire.

Have I seen them in person straight up?

I mean, you talk that shit.

I mean, you're going to be confronted about it for sure.

But, uh, I don't know, all the people that were celebrating the news, it's like,

why do you think this is a win for you, bitch?

I know, how is this a win for you?

First of all, what's it going to take to wake up Americans?

What's it going to take for you people, for all the American people to realize?

They get me this way.

What laws have I fucking broken?

All I've done is live the life of a dignified free man who expresses their opinion independently of what the powers

that be think i've operated within the confines of the law i haven't broken the law i haven't violated

any laws and yet they're persecuting me and they're using our tax dollars to fucking do that

they're going to do that to everybody so unless you want to live the life of a castrated bitch,

as much as these people are crying all the time about transgender,

they have no balls,

they're castrated,

rapidly declining testosterone levels because they're menopausal.

You can, I mean, I can't, honestly, my patience, I have infinite patience,

but I have to think about a specific demographic of retarded Americans,

the hell diver gamer demographic.

America!

The unironic fucking epic bacon.

Epic bacon Americans.

They'll see news that the Communist Party chairman is getting persecuted.

Oh, commies's heck off!

You are Goyim.

I don't know what to tell you.

You are literally just, there's something about you that's just less than human, to be honest.

Wasabi, what's up?

You're just less than human.

It's like, who cares about me?

Do you know what kind of precedent that?

No, no, you don't care.

Of course you don't.

But just like your fathers didn't care, by the time, I'm going to fucking go there. Just like your fathers didn't care. Of course you don't. But just like your fathers didn't care by that, I'm going to fucking go there.

Just like your fathers didn't care during the Cold War, when they also jumped on the fucking anti-communist bandwagon.

From the post-war period until now, Americans, there's not a single population on Earth, more cuckolded, more humiliated, more deprived of their rights than the American people. And it's because the fathers of these same people were also fucking cuckolds. I'm going to go ahead and say their fathers and their fathers' fathers were a cuckolded

race who ate up the McCarthyite anti-communist slop like the Goyim cuck cattle that they are,

just to pass the baton to a cuckolded, castrated generation after them, who does what, does what, collects funco pops, plays hells divers, and spreads heck off commie memes on the fucking internet. You're in debt and you're a slave because your cuck fathers and their fathers bowed before

the propaganda of the american state machine because when they were targeting the communists

during the 50s during the 60s you fucking cheerleaded it it's time for some responsibility and some

reflection it's time for some responsibility and some reflection. It's time for some responsibility

and some reflection, actually. This is a cuckolded, sedentary population, a defeated and conquered

people. And you think you can talk some shit on me? You think you can talk some shit on me.

You are a defeated cuck slave.

You're worse than that.

You're a literal cheerleader.

You're a free cheerleader for the regime.

And you think this makes me look bad?

I will live and die as a free man

until my last breath.

Okay, you're going to live 75 years.

Who gives a fuck?

Honestly, life is not that long.

It's really not that long to be talking all that big shit.

Oh, who fucking cares are you about are you

gonna live and die as a free man are you gonna be a cuckold bitch slave i'm not living the life of

a of a of a captive dreamer i'm not gonna live uh like the man titty's quartering i'm not

gonna be living this life of these

metrosexual gamer menopausal men. These epic game the epic bacon. Yeah, they have a beard

for sure because they, um, they bought man man, man, uh, care products, like dude wipes and stuff that they rub on their face to grow the hair. I understand. Mine is natural, but it's okay. Uh, but then they, you know, they have these giant beards, the epic bacon manscapers.

They have these giant beards.

And then when they open their mouth,

I really think that what President Trump is doing?

Yeah, I really think that what President Trump is doing is extremely justified.

They have this metrosexual twang in their voice.

They have these giant beards and they have these AR-15s.

But then when they open their mouth, this is how they sound.

Do you even know anything about the principles of economics?

Do you even know about economics?

They have this metrosexual twang in their voice while they drink their black rifle coffee. You think I admire you? Oh, you're not being

persecuted by the government, but why would I want to be like you? You're not even human in my eyes, right?

So these are the fit, by the way, these are the remaining 15% of people who still support the current regime and the current administration.

By the way, I'm lying.

Do you understand?

I'm lying. I you understand, I'm lying.

I am saber-toothed tiger.

I don't have to live this life of a cuckold slave who, it gets scared.

Fuck it.

Should I say some shit?

Okay, fuck it. Should I say some shit? Okay, fuck it.

I say everything.

I got aura from that shit.

I open, I'm like, damn, that's aura.

Am I fucking crazy?

I don't give a fuck, bitch.

I don't give a fuck.

I would be disappointed if they wasn't

investigating me.

That shows I'm no threat.

I would be disappointed.

I'm like, shit.

Okay, aura.

100%.

And then these people,

Captive Dreamer,

Oh, I hope I's ghost of prison.

Bitch, do you know who I am?

Do you know who I am?

You're literally, I'm literally going to enslave you one day,

Captive Dreamer.

I'm going to enslave you.

I'm going to put you in chains.

You will literally be a slave. Sorry.

But, look, I'm a good faith person. I understand a lot of people are uneducated about communism. I understand a lot of people. But listen, just because you're a cuckold

slayer, you're talking about your father and his father's cuckold slave lineage, where they were

convinced to be anti-communist by the pederast, pedophile financial capitalist class,

and then you're going to bring that energy upon me

and start talking shit on me and being aggressive with me

because you don't like communists.

I will bitch-slapp you into the concrete.

You come up to me with that.

I will put me in a self-defense situation.

I will bitch- will bitch slap you into

concrete i'm not jesus christ i am not i'm not here to die for your sins i'm here to

defend and assert the rights of the communist party. Do you understand?

Who in turn is fighting for the American people? Sure.

But we communists, we have our own dignity. We walk upright. We walk with our nuts hanging out. We are free men. If you're a communist, if you are Bolshevik, you are a free

man. You understand? I live the life of a free man. If you're a communist, if you are Bolshevik, you are a free man. You understand? I live

the life of a free man. Ain't nobody going to infringe upon my dignity. Some random-ass bitch,

epic bacon, brainwashed piece of shit, quote tweeting me and in my replies.

You know, the other day I saw this this gay.

No, no, it's okay.

That's their life, but they're, you know,

one of these closeted gays, basically.

Autistic.

One of these menopausal

Gen X, when these people that have

meme folders with the helicopter

memes and the 50s

ironic memes like, how about a

nice cup of shut the fuck up? Remember those

Facebook memes that

the low IQ

would share from the

19th, the ironic 50s

style of whatever

that Gen X people still cling to who play

hell divers.

Comey tears. Yeah,

anyway, one of them replied to my post by the way this post attracted more negative responses from the american right than anything i've ever posted on x and the reason is because all i did was make a post with a dog.

And that's like the mandate of heaven for white Americans. So as soon as these

goy slaves, slave

of Zionist Jews, whipped,

literally whipped, they're in chains.

That's why I don't see him as human. Like,

when I take over, you are still

going to be a slave. I will take you. You're the property of Zionists. You'll become our

property. You will clean the shit in our toilets. But you're a slave. You're still in chains. We're

just going to seize you as a property. You're literally a property. You're a movable type.

Guerrillo, what's up?

Anyway, these slaves were sent by the Zionists, the Mossad types, whatever, they got the memo.

Shut it down!

Shut it down!

The Arab is with the dog.

Americans love that. So they had to go and shut it down. The ARAB is with a dog. Americans love that. So they had to

go and shut it down.

An innocent post of me next to a dog.

They

were sent into a, you know,

they activated those cheap Air Force

bots.

Anyway, one of these

one of these

man titty menopausal middle age men,

they replied

and they're like,

this is the frog of ratio.

Like this, if this

gets more likes than the original post, then it sucks. And then all the

goofy goober, 47-year-old men, uh, you know, with their, with their dude wipes and their

black rifle coffee, they saw it. We're, with their, with their dude wipes and their black rifle coffee,

they saw it.

We're supposed to believe that it got

1,000 impressions

and about 700 likes,

which means we're supposed to believe

that every, basically every impression

it got one person engaged with it, which doesn't

exist on X, by the way. So, okay, if you want to know what that actually means, they were botting.

And then I just kind of thought to myself, okay, you're using bots. You block all of my people.

I thought of something pretty devious and devilish.

I was like, okay, if it gives you satisfaction to ratio me,

I'm just going to hide your reply and block you.

And then they couldn't ratio me.

You look at it

Now they couldn't

It's like

Why am I not

I'm just gonna hide

You reply

You fucking bitch

It's not

You think I'm running

From confrontation

With you

I don't hide where I am

You can find me

In person

Or you can

Fucking debate me

Any type of confrontation

I will, you know, if I'm

forced or whatever, you know what I mean? Any type

of confrontation, I'm not running from it though, right?

So you want to play this like game.

You want to use these bots. I will just hide your reply

and block you and shut you me you think

you can just be in my replies for free and just it's a it's a free speech zone uh no i'm just gonna

fucking completely decimate you just like you're decimating,

declining testosterone levels, because you're a menopausal middle-aged man.

You fucking pussy. You fucking have AR-15s, and you go to the range.

And I know y'all put those headphones on when you're at the range.

You tough guys. You have to do it right and you confuse your cowardice with you know technical expertise on how to handle firearms

and then you have me who fires a

PKM light machine gun

without any here

anything no hearing anything

I don't have ear plugs I don't have the

special thing I just fucking do it

because I have big balls

literally suck my dick bitch

you gun gun enthusiast

fucking pussies

you're nothing you're like

you know I saw did you guys see that shit

where they're like Idaho has more

I just have to it's so cringy.

It's so fucking cringy.

Idaho, guns, Canada.

I have to show you this gay, extremely gay.

Extremely gay menopausal.

Just, it's giving big time

hell divers. This is exactly what

I'm talking about. These are the people that I'm talking

about. Like, this is their

entire existence, their sense of humor,

everything about them is this.

Ready?

First of all, look at this extremely, you know, submissive looking, low testosterone,

menopausal, metrosexual pose that they're doing, and there's not even a video playing.

But you should see this and you should understand what we're up against.

The people that are saying they want to kill commies like homath, the homath, the gay guy

screaming about how he can get no pussy, he's 50 years old, he gets no bitches, and he's screaming and crying about it all day

this is them by the way these are the people talking that big shit to us yeah you think

if you think if they say this shit to me and they put me in a self-defense situation i'm not

gonna slap these people into the concrete. Epic Bacon! Epic bacon.

Epic.

Look at this manscaped.

Look at this manscaped male.

Look at this epic bacon manscaped male.

This guy talking shit about transgender's.

This is a transgender.

That's not a man.

They have transmogrified into something else.

And maybe, you know what?

There are more than two genders.

Because this is neither a man nor a woman.

This is some third thing, some fourth thing, some fifth thing.

Definitely on the estrogenic side of the spectrum, you know, since it's a spectrum.

But for certain, for certain, I know that they were right when they said there's more than two genders.

Now I know they are because it's not a man, it's not a woman.

It's definitely some third, fourth, fifth, sixth, something that we haven't qualified or classified.

Definitely has a...

Definitely menstruating.

Definitely menopausal.

Definitely metrosexual.

Definitely not a man.

Definitely extremely gay. But even in a way that would make

gays think it's gay. Even the gays think this is gay. That's how gay it is. Even gays say this

is gay. That's how extremely, I i mean flaming gay this is even the gays are cringing they're saying

you know this you know what even this video has the gays saying, all right, roll back the gay marriage. Roll back the rights. Just roll it back. Roll it back. It was all a mistake. This is too far. Even they're questioning whether they should have rights after seeing this. These are the people who complain about

transgender for a living, by the way.

Can you believe it?

They're picking on these transgenders.

Most of whom I would say are not

bothering anyone.

Most of whom, I think,

live peaceful lives

and their whole life they think they're tough men

because this is their life crying about transgenders all day

okay meet a real man like me bitch

I have never met a single one of you people who have said shit to my face my

entire fucking life, by the way. You know, uh, anyway, you know, it's like, uh, okay, all they can, and then

they cry and they, I'm a big threat. I'm a terrorist. Haas, you're a terrorist.

You're an Islamic terrorist.

Okay, we get it.

Shabbat Shalom.

We get it.

Shalom.

Shalom.

Shalom.

We get it.

We get it.

Tel Aviv Shalom.

Goyim.

We understand.

I understand Goyim. go yem we understand i understand goyem yeah they say enjoy prison enjoy prison okay you want to make you a promise i'll make a promise right now if i go to to prison, if I go to prison,

there will be no more United States of America.

Because they would have to

find a pretext for throwing me in jail

that they will inevitably use on

higher value targets. You think

I'm the highest value target? No.

So if they're going to fucking come after me,

Long guy, what's up?

Whatever illegal standard that they attempt to fucking pull out of their ass against me

for exercising my First Amendment rights,

they're going to use against some fucking Democrat or someone else.

And they're going to fucking light the flames of a civil war.

So I'm here literally fucking completely fine devoid of any cortisol.

That's how confident I am.

Devoid of any cortisol.

Oh, have fun in jail.

You think you're going to be able to terrorize and intimidate 30, 50% of the

country in this way? I'm part of the 30, 50% of the country that have just had enough, by the way.

So you think they're just going to pick me off and it's not going to have consequences for

everyone else good luck really good luck and by the way everyone's going to remember who you were

we're all going to remember you don't worry this administration's not going to last forever

trump will die eventually this will not

last forever you are 15 percent of the country right now all of us are going to remember you every

single one of us are going to remember you who cheered on state repression who cheered on killing extra judicial killings and persecution and murder

and so on and so on, we're all going to remember who you were, we're going to remember your

faces, we're going to remember where you live, we're going to remember every detail about you.

This current situation is not...

This current criminal lawless situation

that you're oinking like a pig

squealing with excitement about

is not going to last forever, I promise.

I know what's going on in the U.S. military where Pete Hegseth is fucking hated by all the fucking active duties, by all the reservists, by all the fucking personnel, by the National Guardists, even by the military hierarchy that they haven't managed to completely fucking replace with loyalists.

Everyone fucking hates the current administration.

You have no fucking ideal of what kind of country you're living in.

If you think you can simply say, throw him in, throw him in jail!

See, these critics of Israel are being harassed and persecuted by the state. And you have

Epic Bacon captive dreamer types. You have Howling Mutant Epic Bacon captive dreamer types

like this, who look like this, by the way.

Metrosexuals who have manscaped beards.

Put him in jail.

Put him in jail.

Put him in jail.

Now, Trump's send him.

No, lock him away.

He's scary. Lock him away. He's scary.

Lock him away.

These beardson.

This is a beard sin.

This is literally what they are, Beardson.

This is my head. I'm in jail.

FBI.

Put him in jail.

Put him in jail.

Even if I'm in jail.

Even if I'm in jail. Fuck it. Even if I'm in jail. Even if I'm in jail.

Fuck it.

Even if I'm shot and killed.

I live the life of a free man.

What do you think victory?

I mean, I don't understand this civilization.

Do you think victory means that you are

comfy? Is that victory?

You have a woman's understanding of victory.

Even then I think women are

less shallow.

You have a child's understanding

of what it means to win.

To you, victory means being comfy.

Okay, so I suppose Napoleon, when he was exiled to St. Helena, after Waterloo, I guess he won because he was living a comfy life, right?

That's how it works.

You fucking retard.

Absolute fucking retards. What kind of civilization is that? What kind of morals are these?

What kind of values? They're not of men.

Yeah. Victory is when you're comfortable. That's what victory. That's what it means to win in life.

Just being comfortable.

Just sitting on your couch and playing video games.

And you know what these subhumans call it?

They call it vidia.

By the way, this guy, he calls it Vidia.

Kill them all in a video game.

I mean, what the hell?

Gavin Newsom, just kill them all in a video game.

I'm sorry.

Like, you know, in the Bolsheviks that they put down the Tambov rebellion with gas?

I don't know.

If we could just funnel the gas into, you know, gamer PCs somehow,

if we, in a legal way, if Gavin Newsom takes power,

and we could just have a law

signed into Congress that

I don't know

poison gas is going to come out of the

gamer PCs of people who

look like this

the world

might be better off for it.

Anyway, guys, I'll be right back.

Give me one second.

The FBI is here.

Give me a second. You know, Sorry, guys. The FBI just took me to jail because I hurt Captain Dreamers' feelings,

a Canadian. And

Drew Pevlu, I was

just in jail because I hurt their feelings.

Because the commies make them uncomfy.

Freaking commies.

This is just like the 50s, ironic

50s. This is fallout. These is fallout. These

metrosexual menopausal declining testosterone males. Why are you even looking in my direction,

bitch? It's like, your slave, you're a slave. slave slave cannot look me in the eyes

don't look in my direction slave

you are slave of Zionist Jews

we're not even gonna

we don't acknowledge you as a subject

when we defeat the Zionists

we're just going to take you as property

just like when we seize the means of production defeat the Zionists, we're just going to take you as property.

Just like when we seize the means of production, you will be part of that.

You are not human.

You are a category.

You are an object.

You are a thing.

Groyper's claim to it was because of Tyler Robinson But they were just joking

You know

It's just like a really funny troll

Like 30 years old

But we're trolling like you know

We're just yeah it's just like a troll

We're 30 years old so don't worry

Um

Yeah Yeah we're 30 years old so don't worry um yeah no look it's all it's the internet it's the

internet somber what's up it's the internet but i okay i'll give you my honest take.

Every single person who has cheerleaded the current regime in its foreign interventions, whether it's Venezuela, whether it's, I'll give you my actual serious take.

I support the persecution to the utmost degree with maximal consequences.

The entirety of the U.S. population, the 15% who support the actions of the current regime that are unconstitutional.

If you support the illegal unconstitutional actions of the regime,

whether it pertains to foreign interventions,

or the persecution of American citizens of conscience,

or Americans in general of conscience,

for their free speech and for their views,

if you were a cheerleader,

if you tried to give this moral support in any kind of way whatsoever,

I believe in Nuremberg trials for you.

I absolutely support any,

the worst possible outcome

occurring to you.

Because you are basically, it's like we're all in a prison right now and these are the snitches.

You got to think about it like that.

We're all in prison right now.

And these are the snitches.

And our morals and our ethics are such that we don't care what happens to snitches.

You are the lowest of the low. You are literally beyond our ability to recognize as human.

We're all in a prison right now in America under this occupation. And these are

the snitches. These are the collaborators.

These are like the Vichy collaborators.

And by the way, half of them are foreign.

Drew Pavlou

in these types. That's okay. Precision

missiles, heat-seeking missiles can deal with

Drew Pavlou.

And I never wanted it to get to this level. Before anyone claims, I'm inhuman. Before anyone claims, what happened to your human values? Why are you? Listen, I, from 2021 until 24, let's say, when infrared was first tier, there was no one more humanistic than me when it comes to this.

There was nobody more, you know, I support dialogue.

There was nobody more, you know, I don't believe we should, you know, take it to this level,

you know, just say, what's up? Differences of opinions should never translate into losing a grasp or a comprehension of someone's humanity.

But when they jumped the gun and started this precedent, I mourned not just for everyone but even for myself because I realized if we are to survive in this new environment if we're able to exist in this new world

we have to operate where the law of the jungle prevails.

We cannot have any regard for the humanity when they are the aggressor,

when they're actively, actively disregarding the humanity of others,

when they're actively violating all red lines, crossing all red lines without limits, without any morals whatsoever, literally the morals of beasts and wild animals.

We're in the jungle now.

I can't vouch for the humanity of these people because we're focused on completely

neutralizing their ability

to do harm to

both the people in our own country

and the people of the world.

And by the way,

we all knew Trump's bitch ass wasn't going to

do shit in Iran.

I knew that at least.

I hope everyone else did.

But in any case, it's the mere pretence to ending an entire civilization.

I mean, on the one hand, it's like, should you even take that seriously in the sense of,

should you even entertain that, right?

But on the other hand, it's like...

It's like the fact that this is the posture people have, the fact that they're providing discursive and moral,

basically put it this way.

At some level,

the discursive and moral cheerleading

by these people

is enabling the regime to get away with what they're doing.

Because the buck stops at the second

lowest chain of command if jd vance can you know suppress whatever conscience he might have

by opening x and reading captive dream's tweets and the chain of command below him and below him and below.

These people, by the way, who do you think follows Captive Dreamer and the rest of these types?

It's people in the regime who are looking for some kind of discursive and moral cover for these outright depraved and criminal actions.

So if they could just open X and feel content that they have this justification of some kind,

they will absolutely take and seize every opportunity they can, every

opening, every out, to continue doing what they're doing.

Even if it confines them to this echo chamber of psychopaths who comprise maybe 15% of the U.S. population.

I mean, Captain Dreamer doesn't even have 80,000 followers, or he has only 80,000.

He doesn't even have 100,000 followers.

And yet he's so influential? who do you think is boosting him?

It goes for others as well, right?

And then you have Cat Turd and Gunther Eagleman and so on and so on.

But these are the people who are enabling the regime

by providing it with the discursive and moral cover

that it needs on an operational capacity even to just get the people who work for the regime

to continue doing what they're doing. Think about that. The regime has employees. It has people working for the government. They need a way. They need to have some kind of morale to continue doing what they're doing. All of the people giving them that morale right now are criminals. They're absolutely culpable in the crimes of the regime and when this regime

falls hell even if when this administration falls um whatever happens to them

first of all square one is whatever happens to them

we support if it's negative

100% any bad thing that happens to them

they get what's coming to them they are criminals

they do deserve it

I used to absolutely be a free speech person who said

no no this isn't about free speech anymore free speech assumes that the constitution is being

upheld it's not they are cheerleading for our free speech to be taken away. And the regime is taking our free speech

away. So it's collaborators, the people running cover for it. We should not see humanity in them.

They need to be treated like Vichy collaborators were when the Vichy regime was overthrown. They need to be treated like Vitchie collaborators were when the Vichy regime

was overthrown. They need to be

seen as like in prison

how you see snitches. Because

we're in prison right now and these are the

snitches. These are the collaborators.

So absolutely I can give every necessary justification.

All current regime shills, whether their shilling is purely propagandistic or something else

you know

they should be tried

as the criminals that they are

and be suppressed

and you know

we should not worry let's say Gavin News newsome takes power by the way i think the

democrats would do the things trump threatens to do by the way that's the difference

democrats are absolutely ruthless trump is morally rhetorically ruthless.

Democrats would actually fucking do it.

In any case,

if Gavin Newsom takes power,

he's going to try to persecute all of us for certain.

But he's also going to maybe hopefully

persecute these people but the sad part is it's wishful it's wishful thinking

because i remember in February 22 during the SMO, the bots that I was dealing with, are the same ones that are now being used to defend the Trump regime.

And that's absolutely what we're talking about here.

There's a continuity of the regime.

That's just across administrations.

And it just, it glows in the dark.

That's how you could tell.

It quite literally just glows in the dark. That's how you could tell. It quite literally just glows in the dark. That's what it is. It just fucking glows, right? And that's really what we're dealing with that's what it means when we say glowie right but um so i want everyone to be on the same page when it comes to, you know, the current persecution level that we should expect these people to experience.

Regardless, I mean, it's no longer about defending free speech.

The defensive free speech doesn't apply to the people actively cheerleading and supporting the destruction of our Constitution.

Frankly.

Frankly.

Now, of course, we're law-abiding, follow all the laws.

But the current regime is not going to last forever. And yes, the day will come when there will be no laws or order for that matter to speak of.

But the American Communist Party will still be around.

So I want to be absolutely clear about that, frankly.

You know, cat turd, all these type of people.

It's like, you know, we didn't want it to get to this point, but they pushed it to that point, and it's as simple as that.

Anyway, yeah, the FBI is investigating me.

Big news.

I suspect this was triggered by my visit to Lebanon

given the timing of the gag order, but

I'm in consultation

with legal

expertise and we'll get to the bottom

of it precisely.

Any case, again, I

have no fear or no regret. Simple as that, i have no fear no regret uh simple as that i have no fear i have no regret when it comes to that

and additionally regarding this news of the iran ceasefire.

It's quite interesting because

there's a huge degree of ambiguity

as far as

what has actually been agreed upon.

After sifting through all of the fake news and information, here's what I can gather as far as what's happened when it comes to the ceasefire.

Trump does not have the balls to promise, to do what he promised.

And I'll tell you why he wasn't going to do it.

It's really simple, actually.

But what's been agreed

upon is that there's going to be a ceasefire

and that the United States

will consider

negotiations

that begin with, you know, it's going to entertain the 10 points.

So has the U.S. acquiesced Iran's 10 points? No. But they will be considered during negotiations.

Now, I hope, and I think perhaps the IRGC and Iran know what they're doing.

Maybe they need the two weeks.

After all, there's a lot of equipment that Iran destroyed that needs years to repair. Maybe weeks for

them are much more precious. I don't know. I could tell you for certain that Iran was not

scared Trump was going to follow through on his threat to end their, quote unquote, end their

civilization or use nuclear weapons

or anything like that.

And I'll tell you why.

If Trump

attacked Iran's power plants,

let's just begin there.

If Trump attacked Iran's power plants, no, no, if Trump attacked Iran's oil fields, let's put it that way.

What Iran would do is wipe Qatar, the Emirates, and economically, Saudi Arabia off the map.

Qatar would probably be done, genocided, exterminated.

Saudi Arabia, considerable portion of its population would be killed.

It would be economically incapacitated for certain all its oil fields would be destroyed.

Iran would destroy the oil fields across the entire Gulf, including the Emirates, and plunged the entire world into decades of chaos and strife and overnight basically collapse the entire global system,

end the United States of America as we know it,

and plunge the entire world into chaos, armed conflict, civil war, resource wars, shortages, blackouts in America,

you fucking name it. If Trump followed through on 5% of the consequences implied by ending Iran as a civilization.

Forget about nukes. Forget about

ending it as a civilization. Just

if he struck their power plants,

Iran would have plunged the entire

world into darkness.

Forever.

I mean, not forever. forever for decades at least

maybe maybe half a century

who knows

the world would take a long time to recover

and it would be an ugly

chaotic world

so Trump to be clear did not ever have the balls. Nobody should have taken

Trump seriously when he said he's going to end Iran as a civilization. Trump is not

ballsy. He doesn't do these apocalyptic crazy things.

And all you have to know is this. Would Trump survive in a post-apocalyptic world?

Before you worry about Trump bringing on the apocalypse, ask yourself the basic question.

Would Donald Trump survive a post-apocalyptic world? No.

Would Haas survive a post-apocalyptic world?

Yes.

Would Trump?

Absolutely not.

Would IRGC commanders and

Iranians

and Hezbollah

and people

of that, people who are built like that, would they survive a post-apocalyptic world?

Yes.

Would Trump?

No.

Would captive dreamer?

No.

Captive Dreamer would be mutilated and tortured and skinned and tortured for days perhaps weeks in really

gruesome brutal ways uh that goes for gunther eagleman cat tur Turd, Howling Mutant, I'm learning about all these people.

Cala Yuga, pedophile, Beardson, Nick Fuentes.

They would not survive a post-apocalyptic world.

They would be immediately perhaps eaten.

Perhaps they'd be eaten if there were food shortages.

Perhaps worse things would happen to them that I won't even name.

Definitely tortured.

They would be definitely skinned alive, definitely brutalized in very gruesome ways.

And the best life they could hope for is being enslaved, really.

They would have just chains. they would be in chains maybe they would be enslaved by some local warlord or something that's not the type of world they

would want to live in. I would be really

ugly for them.

In a...

No, not in a video game. In a post-apocalyptic

scenario,

these people,

if you can call them that, would not

thrive. I can say that. I don't need to say in a video

game i can say i can speculate and give the analytical conclusion that it would they would not fare

well so whenever they make world-ending threats, understand

that they will never follow through with them

because they're not prepared for the consequences.

Especially Trump.

Especially Trump is not.

Trump doesn't have enough support.

Again, the 15% of Americans who support Donald Trump look like the guy that I just showed you,

metrosexual, menopausal, middle-aged gamers.

Those are not people who are actually, okay, do you want to understand why they'll never win a civil war?

Maybe you could clip this.

You want to know why the Trump's supporting right will never win a civil war?

Because in order to win a war of any kind, you have to be willing to die.

You have to actually put your life on the line and be brave enough to die for what you believe in. When you look at the ways in which they rationalize or respond to examples of people being martyred, people who are dissidents, who are persecuted,

people who are that brave, you can immediately see they're not built like that. Because they're always

laughing at them and posturing how you lose i won

see for a martyr

you didn't win i want i live as a lion i died as a lion right

but they don't see it that way when your life is terminated and you can no longer

play video and you can no longer play video and you can no longer

masturbate to child anime porn which is what they do don't make a mistake of it

when you can no longer consume and live a useless louing, hedonistic life, like a captive dreamer or whoever else,

these subhumans, humans, right?

For that to be terminated is what defeat is to them.

And so when they sit in their luxury and comfort and watch people getting killed or persecuted or thrown in jail or something for their beliefs, and they scoff

at that and they go, ha ha ha, ha, you lose.

They're showing their ass to the world.

In a scenario where they would have to actually fight a war

of some kind,

their defeat is certain. Because unless you're willing to take the risk of

putting your life on the line, you don't stand a chance. There's always going to be an enemy who is.

And you will always choose comfort over honor, which means you are what Aristotle called a natural slave.

You are born and bred. You are meant and destined to be a slave. That's what you are. You made the choice. You're a slave. Whether you made a choice or whether you were born that way, we can only speculate.

But you have the morals of a slave. You're not willing to put your life on the line for anything.

Forget about putting your life online. You're not even willing to put your career on the line. That's why these people are

anonymous. So because this is, these are the terms of victory and defeat that are meaningful to you,

you are signaling to people like me

that when shit hits the fan,

I'm coming right for you.

I mean, you are easy pickings.

That's what you're signaling to people like me

who are about some real ass shit.

You know?

If there was no law anymore,

if there was no government anymore,

if nobody was enforcing any laws,

if everything just collapsed,

how would these people survive?

How would they be able to posture and how would they even be able to maintain any pretense when people like me exist who actually

have a life that is purposeful,

who actually devote their life to something,

like literally devote everything that they exist for to something.

How would they be able to fare when people like me are their competition?

They wouldn't.

And it's as simple as that.

And they can talk shit on the internet all they want, and they can jibber and posture

all they want.

But nothing is going to change the fact that when they are actually actually forced is shit going to collapse yes yes it is i wish people saw that with the same level of clarity that I do.

People just tend not to think holistically.

They tend not to think long term.

They tend not to consider the fact that uh well look the american empire has existed since the post-war period

but the last real war that America fought was World War II.

I would say it was the Civil War, actually, but let's just be generous and say it was World War II.

It tested us as a nation, tested our resolve, tested our industrial, productive capacity. B. The You know, The The President The Thank you. You know, Thank you. Wands if you can hear me.

All right.

And whoever said buy a new cable, you're retarded.

All right, I bought a new cable.

I'm being fucked with 100% but whatever anyway I don't care I don't I literally don't care yeah the last time we were

tested as a nation was World War II okay That was the last real war.

And the reason it was our last real war is because it tested the loyalty of this nation.

The entire country had to mobilize around a common goal for victory or for defeat.

Okay.

And that's what tested us.

Now, we live in a violent world.

States are violent by nature.

They rest upon violence in order to exist.

We have not been tested in nearly 100 hundred years.

It's nearly a hundred years that's passed since we have been tested, okay?

And the state cannot continue to exist if it rests upon an untested basis do you understand the ability for the state to even exist, unless it tests the populations will continuously to live and die for something, It cannot continue to exist.

And we are past the point of the state losing all moral authority.

I think we passed that point in the 60s or 70s with the Vietnam War. And after

the Vietnam War, it became about

hedonism and credit cards

and fueling consumerism.

But I think we're just about at the limit

of that as well.

I think that the ways in which

huge swaths of the population are

engaging in self-destructive behavior

shows the spiritual limits of consumerism.

And so we're really

getting to the point where war real war is demanded by the existence of this nation.

A real war. Not a war against Iran, not a war on Venezuela, not a war on Russia, not a war on China, but a war within.

Because every war that we fight abroad is a war that cannot command the morale of the population. So what's left? How can the inherent violence that is at the foundation of the existence of the state continue to have vitality and vigor if it's untested.

The only thing that tests it is a standing army willing to die for it, really.

As Hegel said, that's what Hegel understood as the significance of war.

When you don't have that, the state rests on sand, which it does.

I mean, it does.

That's why paranoia's increased. That's why it's become so internally repressive. It's not normal for states to be as repressive as they are, by the way, as ours. Endemic issues like gang violence, terrorism and gang warfare and all these kind of things.

These are features of a collapsing civilization. A civilization in a normal state has some kind of

relationship with its population that makes impossible the organic

or spontaneous

emergence of stochastic

types of terrorism and mass

shootings and stuff. A normal civilization

doesn't have those. Why?

Because there's a social contract written by blood at its foundation, where, at least in the terms of the modern state, at least, a considerable portion of the population has enforced the will and the existence of the state by attaching their own lives to it, by a willingness to sacrifice their lives for it.

And this is the foundation of a well-ordered and united society under a regime or under a

state. We don't have that. Those basic premises don't exist anymore. And so yes, a collapse is inevitable. And it's very clear and obvious to people like me who understand that

this is a the the clock is running out and it's a game of chicken fortune goes to the bold and the brave

there's a ganger is a gangbanger in Chicago somewhere right now who is waiting.

There's crazy militias in the Pacific Northwest waiting.

There's all sorts of crazy fucking people who have discovered something they consider more

valuable than their own life who are waiting.

And you can't pin it down to an ideology or a boogeyman.

You can't say this is like the Bush era and say this is because of Islamic terrorism.

It's not. It's completely chaotic.

In the absence of a united state

that gives purpose to life,

all other kinds of purposes or lack thereof

will overwhelm civilization and hijack people's biological systems, their self-preservation mechanisms for it. And that has already proliferated like a million flowers blooming, right?

And the only thing keeping it at bay is a logistical and operational capacity that is increasingly unstable and unsustainable for multiple reasons.

First reason is a breakdown in the global supply chains and resources. If there were blackouts

across the country as a consequence of the straight continuing to be closed or other major disruptions in our supply chains, there's no longer a logistical or operational capacity to maintain technological domination and control by the regime.

At the second level, the regime does in fact require a considerable human bureaucracy and personnel in order to enforce its will.

What happens when that bureaucracy becomes internally divided between

loyalists and partisans of a certain flavor or lack thereof simply divided? That's also a breakdown

in the operational and logistical capacity of the state both of these conditions have

already been met yes there's going to be a collapse uh you can absolutely be certain of it

amyla what's up with the ten appreciate you we all know it too and i wish people understood it with the same clarity that i have

i'll say that again you know

but i digress

so um to be clear, you know, how soon?

I can't, I'm not a fortune teller.

People keep asking me how soon?

I am not, what's his name?

I'm not that guy. What's his name? I'm not that guy.

What's his name?

I'm not Zoltar.

I never said I was Zoltar.

I just, I'm telling you, there's, there are logical premises.

Um,

or there are premises we can comprehend logically.

They have a rational relationship and when one or two variables are missing, you know there are going to be consequences.

You don't know when.

You don't exactly know how.

But it is logical to say that there will be a collapse

give me one second guys

my notifications are blowing up

uh people are still, people are still screaming about this tweet from yesterday with the dog.

This is fucking crazy.

This is fucking crazy. People are still, like, freaking out about it. The dog tweet. It's like a track. Holy fuck. Let me see the replies. 603 replies.

These people fuck dogs.

They worship dogs.

It's like, okay, there was a dog who gives a fuck.

They're so, like, freaked out and scared by it.

I'm hiding this anime fuck and blocking them.

Ha ha, having lived in it, no hiding your reply and blocking you.

This guy's talking about fucking dogs, hiding your reply, and blocking you. This guy's talking about fucking dogs,

hiding your reply, and blocking you.

This guy's name is Man Bear Jew,

and he's talking shit.

Goodbye. hi Haas, I lived under communism.

Hide your reply and block you.

This guy's sharing, okay.

I'll continue finding more.

But we'll put a pause on it for now, you know.

All right. put a pause on it for now you know all right i got some shit to talk about y'all i got some shit to talk i mean i wish i was on a more lighthearted mood by the way i was just had an

acp event in st. Louis, Missouri.

For all those who were in attendance,

I'm always in such a lighthearted, unsurious mood,

like such a jolly, unsurious, lighthearted mood.

Because when I'm on stream,

this is when I'm a serious motherfucker. Do you understand? So I want to go back to being light'm on stream, this is when I'm a serious motherfucker.

Do you understand?

So I want to go back to being lighthearted on stream and funny on stream.

But I was just so silly the whole time.

I feel like I have a lot to make up for.

Okay, I want to talk about the ACP social

Maybe I should save that

Okay can I can I say something guys

In ACP when there are ACP events

I was on a PSA all right

Do not have a chud-like antisocial being too serious type of shit.

All right? If it's an ACP event where we're not planning anything or getting and there's no

business going on, you guys need to be a million times more lighthearted.

You need to be like Orvo, honestly.

You need to like, make me laugh a little bit.

Make everyone, make others laugh.

I don't see enough KekWs.

I will critique.

I didn't see enough Kek Ws.

I was really fighting hard for the Kek W's.

There need to be more Kek Ws in real life, all right?

Because we're going to have plenty of time to be sad and serious with the events coming. So every fucking opportunity

you can. All right guys, let's be less

chud-like. Not everyone. I'm not saying everyone. I'm just saying overall.

Every time there's an ACP event, which

is like just chill, people oftentimes want to only focus on serious topics of conversation and serious stuff.

And I'm just kind of like, look, we need to...

Calm down a little bit, right?

We need to chill.

We can't be on this chud thing, right?

It's not even bad.

I'm not saying people are bad. I'm not saying it's bad at bad. I'm not saying people are bad.

I'm not saying it's bad at all.

I'm just saying it's like,

don't act like it's a funeral.

Don't act like it's a funeral.

Don't treat it like a funeral.

I'm not going to lie, guys.

Sometimes I'm walking in the room.

Everybody's just kind of silent.

They're just sitting down.

They're just kind of barely mumbling.

I'm like, is this a funeral?

Like, what's going on?

Right? Okay. That's going on? Right?

Okay.

That's all I'm going to say about it.

You know, we can't be treating our events like funerals, right?

Great and lighthearted, I hope.

No, Jennifer was not guilty of this at all.

Jennifer was super Kekw.

As a matter of fact,

actually, I think almost all of the ACP...

See, this is the thing, the dynamic, is just like our, the female comrades in the ACP are very pro-social and lighthearted when it comes to these events.

I'm not in the main,

and we should, we should,

you guys should,

we need to like break the chud dynamic,

I think, you know,

a little bit.

I think we need a little bit,

you know, there needs to be a little less

of the funeral, funeral atmosphere,

if I may say so.

Because we have plenty opportunity to be serious. It's a serious world we live in. We're going to,

plenty of serious things we do.

You do as a party, as chapters already. Plenty of work and sweat and blood and tears you put

into this. So when we have these ACP events that are just for fun, have fun. Just have fun. Make it

all about KekW.

So,

just make it KekW.

You know, be like Orvo.

Honestly, Orvo gets it.

I hung out with Orvo in real life

and he is a real Keg W

so

I just wanted to say that

just wanted to say that

anyway guys

but now I feel like there's going to be

people who force it next time

that's all right

we start from somewhere

all right anyway

I'll move on to another

topic. The inter-haz...

So I was thinking about some shit, right?

And we keep getting called

Nasbol's. And then I realized something.

It's like, why does it when I say we're internazboz?

I'm like, you know what?

That kind of goes hard.

Like, internationalist Bolsheviks.

I don't know.

It's just like it goes hard.

But then people are going to bitch and cry about the Naz Park.

It sounds like Nazi as if they own that.

Why should they own that?

I mean, it's international and national share the same root word.

Internosble goes hard as fuck.

We are internationalists, but at the same time, we are on some real-ass shit.

I don't know.

Internosble goes fucking hard.

But, and then I thought, it's kind of, forget the Nas, we make it Haas.

Intern Haas Bowl.

International Hezbollah Bolsheviks.

I'm just kind of like, that shit kind of goes hard. I don't know. I don't know. Inter-Hazbole gang.

It's like I wouldn't mind if people pointed at us and said, oh, those are the inter-Naz-Boles. Those are the inter-Haz-Bels.

Okay, fuck it. You need a signifier to distinguish us. I agree. I agree we're not like Finbull. I agree. We are not KK.K.E. Gay-Rie LARPR MLs. We are Orthodox MLs, but I agree there's something about infrared and our whole vibe that's just kind of

different like we bring a whole different vibe to the function and i understand that and your way of

dealing with that is calling us nosbels which is not accurate because we're not nationalists but if you

were to just start calling us internazbolls or interhospels,

it's, I'm like, um, there's something about that.

It would be less triggering to me because I'm just kind of like,

it's kind of like interhazbo gang type of shit, internazbole gang type of shit inter-N-Azbole Gah-Hasbola type of shit

I don't know

it's like something about it is just gangsta

I don't know I fuck with it I kind of

I don't know it's just kind of gangsta

now HOSB is kind of like

it's just like y'all are my followers

and and Now, Hasbo is kind of like, it's just like y'all are my followers.

And it's like, all right.

But, uh, I don't, that's why I cut.

There's aspects of interhazbole that are not.

And it's so funny because interhazbobole sounds like you're fascist or something oh you're fascist all it's international is Bolshevik meaning Lenin was

an inter-Hosble or internazbole okay all the Stalin they were all internazboles when you think about it Stalin was all internazboes.

When you think about it, Stalin was an internazbole, absolutely.

So why is that, it's just like, the word nozbole has just kind of come to mean something different than what either the European third positionist or Le Monsov intended it to mean.

And it's kind of like, oh, you are the leftists that say slurs and tell bad jokes.

And I'm like, okay.

I mean, like, I don't really have a problem being categorized as that.

But Nossbole is just not accurate.

So you could just cause inter-Nosbles or inter-Hazbles.

Like, I don't give a fuck.

Yeah, we're in, like like we're about that like gang

gang type of shit we're about that bolshevik type of shit we're about that um i don't know it's

something kind of punk about it internazbo just kind of punk just like a i don't know what it is interhazbo whatever

we are internationalist internationalist hasbola bolsheviks it's kind of like yeah

wagner hesbola synthesis it's just like i do kind of fuck with that i do like, I do kind of fuck with that.

I do kind of fuck with that Mr. Worldwide shit.

And by the way, can we make... So I want to make an AI song, and it's like International Love, AI.

Yo, appreciate you.

Elite, thank you so much, bro.

Thank you.

We should make a remix of that,

but make it like a Nashid.

We make Pitbulls, Mr. Worldwide, international love, make it a heart style, make it an a nashid we make pit bulls

mr. worldwide international love

make it a hard style make it an asheed

and that will be our anthem

that will be the new international

if someone can do that with AI

I put the challenge upon you

to do that with AI

make it Mr. World I put the challenge upon you to do that with AI.

Make it Mr. Worldwide, international love.

Change the lyrics to something halal,

because it's some pretty haram lyrics in there.

You know, but make it into it into a Nashid.

You can keep, we put it down.

We put it, okay, maybe, maybe not.

You say Nashid, and then we put it down like New York City.

And then the FBI is like, what do you mean you put it down like New York City?

And this shit's an Ashid.

What do you mean by that?

What do you mean by you put it down like New York?

What did you do in New York?

What do you mean?

In New York, what did you put down?

Right?

That would attract some pretty negative attention, to be honest.

Because it basically, who knows what we're referring to?

You know, the Twin Towers?

I mean, I don't know.

You got to be careful about that anyway we don't want to we don't want to be anti-semitic and steal israel's credit

we don't want to be anti-semitic and uh you know um suppress and downplay

Zionist Jewish contributions

and inventions and achievements

that would be quite anti-Semitic

so we have to be careful about that so we have to be careful about that Can anyone make it? I remember I asked someone to make a remix.

Shout out to them, they're great, but I was like,

yo, could you make the Red Army is the strongest

with this AI thing?

And they're like, yeah, and then I listen to it, and it's like,

Mr. Crabs Army, mystic. And I'm like, bro, why is he, Mr. Crabs Army, mystic.

And I'm like, bro, why is he saying Mr. Crabs Army?

Like, what is this even Russian?

What is this?

And like, why?

It's just like, make it good.

Make it go hard.

Through Suno.

Yeah, make it go hard. It don't have to be like that right uh so yeah so that's kind of what I'm thinking.

Those are my thoughts.

I don't know.

Inter-Hosble, internazbo, kind of internazbo.

It's just like, I'm not a nationalist.

Nationalism, it's just kind of gay.

It's just kind of like,

it's just kind of like

coping.

Like, I'm a nationalist.

I'm going to be in my little box.

It's like, I'm about that

Mr. Worldwide shit. I'm about that, worldwide shit i'm about that um global shit i'm a globalist i'm a bolshevik

globalist i am a uh globalist uh wagner globalist i'm a wagner globalist i'm a wagner globalist. I'm a Wagner globalist.

Fuck, that goes hard as fuck. I'm a Wagner globalist, you know?

Nationalism is just kind of like some coping. You know what nationalism is? Nationalism is like the

kid raised by their grandparents

that

is like, I wish we could just go back to the

50s, like that type of shit. It's just

really

like autistic.

Can I say that, Drake?

Nationalism is extremely autistic because you're basically, like, it's like a sonitude medallion.

You're, like, focusing on this part without having this universal thing. You're just focusing on a part and being hyper fixated on it.

And then because it's not dynamic or transcendent enough, you start bringing in anime girls to give it the dynamism and whatever that it doesn't have, right? And that's basically

like the story of all the Nasbo LARP on the internet. And it's like, we got to be about that

dynamic globalityity and we are

internationalists

we are on some

globality type of shit

and interhospal

interhospal gang

interhazble gang

interhazble

I don't know

like I don't know why internazbo

it's kind of like you know what

guilty is charged it's like

we are so we are international especially infrared

they're like they're internazbolls

it's kind of like it has the same punk

rock that Lamonov types

had the kid what's up but it's not the same punk rock that LeMonov types had?

The kid, what's up?

But it's not, it's internationalist, right?

Because what are they going to say?

Even if they clip me and they say, oh, you know, what are you going to say?

Okay, internosble.

What is, literally, they're going to be like, oh, yeah, they're fascists, they okay internazbo what is literally they're going to be like oh yeah they're fascists they're internazboz it's like okay they're internationalist bolsheviks so what about that is

nazi that's it then they're going to be like oh you know what they're internationalist fascists

that honestly the line of attack of our enemies is unironically that going to be like, oh, you know what? They're internationalist fascists.

Honestly, the line of attack of our enemies is unironically that we are internationalist fascists, which makes no fucking sense. Their unironic line of attack is that we are internationalist

fascists.

That's actually their line of attack.

Internationalist fascists.

I'm kind of like, okay, you're calling us internationalist fascists.

That's your line of attack.

And I'm like, well, okay, well, what about it is, how could it be fascist then? Where's the, oh, the transphobia?

All right.

Whatever that means.

I mean, like...

All right.

Or telling jokes about it.

I don't know.

Jokes, bad jokes.

Um... telling jokes about it. I don't know. Jokes, bad jokes. The Russian Oswalds were pretty punk rock. They were pretty edgy. They were pretty young.

That's another thing. They were very young. Youth led. That's kind of what gave them the edge that they had. What can I say?

By the way, Donald Parkinson, let's talk about Donald Parkinson. Everyone loves talking

about Donald Parkinson, right? Okay, Donald Parkinson,

Um,

The spineless holy larp holy larp okay so donald um donald got you know big boy Donald, he got 7.4,000 likes.

I wonder who's liking Donald's tweet.

Totally, I mean, is Donald shameless?

Is he, he's literally a lightning rod for the Mossad and for Zionists

and for fascists and for Nazis

to counter signal us. He just

offers himself as a lightning rod

as a prostitute for Israel,

for Mossad, for feds,

for fascists to counter

signal the Communist Party

and

he can't if only

has there any has there ever been anything

mug has done that's gotten

7.4,000 likes on

social media.

Is there anything Mug has done that has gotten this level of exposure?

Why is it that Donald Parkinson can only get exposure at this level by ankle biting the Communist Party?

And the support he's being given is from Zionists and from fascists, from the right.

And then look, okay, do you want to make fun of us, Donald? from the right.

And then look.

Okay, do you want to make fun of us, Donald?

Why are you making fun of us when this is you?

By the way, I'm going to just nuke Donald right now.

Donald, you can't call us LARPERS.

You want me to prove it and nuke him right now?

I can just bomb him.

Once you want me to bomb Donald and Parkinson, just fucking bomb him. You want me to, once you want me to bomb Donald Parkinson,

just fucking bomb him.

Okay.

Donald,

you can't

call us

LARPers

because there's

nothing we have

to LARP.

We are actually the ones creating our entire fucking vision.

The actions, what actions can we emulate?

Whose drip can we steal?

It's all ours.

Are we operating from

the inheritance of the past? Yes.

But how are we... How could we, we

be LARPs? We the unprecedented.

Be LARPers. What are

we larping? We're in fucking uncharted territory.

We're the ones on this bitch creating

this shit nobody's fucking done what we've done nobody looks like what we look like

nobody's got the style we're larping ourselves exactly who are we lar? What role are we playing?

How could it be a game?

If the role don't even fucking exist,

bitch boy.

Meanwhile, Donald,

I've read the same fucking books that you have.

Mack McNair and Lars Lee and all that. you're larking a turn of the century social Democrat.

You know, before the pre-war, second international, you have in your head created the delusion that we are living in the turn of the century right now, that the DSA is the equivalent of social democracy at the turn of the century

and that you're going to be the next Bolsheviks.

Just keep voting for more Democrats and you'll be there, right?

You are actually larping.

You're like there's a playbook that you're following you are

larping you are larping now and maybe he me by larp he means you guys are putting on theatrics

yet this is theatrical okay is there a single state or serious non-state actor whose

propaganda is non-theatrical have you seen hasbalah hype videos have you seen Hasbullah hype videos

have you seen Iranian propaganda

have you seen Chinese

propaganda you think it's not

staged

you think their propaganda isn't

theatrical and staged

are you a fucking retard?

Like, yeah, of course, yes, we are...

We are making a video.

We are absolutely doing...

Yes, we're taking into consideration.

The camera shot, how it looks, the angle...

Of course we are with this video.

It's propaganda, yes, that we made and produced.

That's what propaganda looks like and is.

You're calling that LARP.

It's not LARP, it's just propaganda.

LARP is being like you who actually genuinely is playing the role of a turn-of-the-century

Social Democrat and getting a sense of certainty and guarantee that everything is going to turn out

fine because you're playing this pre-established

role.

There's no pre-established role any of us can play.

Think about that.

What pre-established role can the ACP play?

Genuinely, what pre-established role exists for us to emulate that we're emulating.

Give us the pre-established role we're

emulating. We created this shit.

We are unprecedented.

We're not following a fucking playbook.

We're writing the fucking playbook.

You understand?

Nobody's fucking, nobody's doing what we've done. Nobody's ever done what we've

fucking done. Hell, the reason you retards call us feds is you've never seen what it looks like

for somebody to write their own fucking playbook. We're not following a playbook written by someone

else, so you think it must have been written by the government.

Meanwhile, you don't fucking know.

We're the ones who fucking wrote it.

That's what it means to embrace history.

That's what it means to open yourself to historical outcomes outside your control.

For the purposes of what?

Advancing the experience and knowledge and skill of a future generation of revolutionaries

who cannot larp, who cannot pretend their turn of the century

social democrats like Donald does.

I see what these mug people look like, man.

They literally wear early 1900s berets, because they actually think their turn of the century social Democrats in our age.

We don't have that.

We really don't even have that.

Genuinely. And yeah, I'm not talking about this century.

I'm talking about from the 1800s to the 1900s. That's that turn of the century. That's what he's larping. Don't talk that shit on us.

Why are you talking shit on us?

Who are you?

What are you?

Nothing.

You're a nothing.

You'll never be anything.

You're worthless. Thanks, You know, The Young Soviet, what's up?

Strah Stanley, what's up, bro, with the 10?

Appreciate you, bro.

What's going on? Can you tell me what a kick is?

What is this thing where you can earn kicks?

What is a kick?

How much money is a single kick worth?

I don't fucking know.

Don't fucking ask me shit.

Like I'm supposed to fucking know. 50 shekels sounds about right we're about to transition into our uh

every time i stream i'm so fucking intense and violent and fucking scary um straight up i'm like

straight up i'm on some

fucking uh scare the scare the hose type shit

honestly

i just love scaring the hose on stream

um I just love scaring the hose on stream.

I'm such a scary fucking person, right?

Anyway, let's get on TikTok.

Are we ready for the debates?

Ones if you're ready for the debates okay but if you actually meet me in real life I'm not like this with my comrades

I'm only like this when I can rage at the void

they got two why are there two phones why you when I can rage at the void.

They got two... Why are there two phones?

Why are you asking too many questions, you fed, bitch?

Guerrilla, what's up, bro?

Uh, yeah, I'm a crazy cult leader.

Orvo, what's up, bro? Good question.

Gorilla, what's up? So Orvo, we actually...

Orvo, why were the fuck were you not at the function, by the way?

You know, is this kind of like...

It's just kind of like, we go there, Orvo's not there.

I'm just like...

Actually, who from Texas was there?

Almost no one.

Literally nobody from... Does anyone from Texas even there, almost no one. Literally nobody from

Does anyone from Texas even show up?

I'm just saying

Orvo, if you like in person,

we would tell you in person. We have

plans, though. 100% we have plans.

I just tell you, we're gonna, we have other forms of communication that don't depend on the internet.

He!

Anyway, let's, you never heard about it.

Yeah, that's fucking crazy.

Who's gonna be in New York, though?

Y'all know what's going on in New York soon?

Y'all hear about it

New York's pretty fucking far from y'all

who's gonna be

in New York you know and I'm not

gonna spoil what it is but it's

something going on in New York soon

I don't know y'all from Texas I suppose is, but it's something going on in New York soon.

I don't know. Y'all from Texas should pull up. I don't know. It's fucking expensive, though. I don't know.

What's going on in New York? Ask your chapter. Ask your CC rep. What's going on in New York?

Straight up. Ask your CC rep don't know all right that's going to be the next

event that we're going to do anyway guys uh let me uh let me uh Let me,

uh,

let me start the TikTok debates.

Fuck,

remember last time?

Ha,

guys,

I ended the stream.

I was straight for five hours.

I was debating autis,

Logic Lord Autis.

Uh, yeah, Laura, just let me know.

Y'all rarely message me, all right?

Let me know.

Let me know.

The next time you all come up,

just keep asking me.

I spent five hours debating with the Autis.

Um... spent five hours debating with the autists. Um,

Dallas. I didn't know,

y'all, Dallas?

Fuck, Dallas.

I don't go to Dallas. But anyway,

um, yeah, anyway, and then my flight was at 8 a.m.

So I ended the stream at when, 3, and then I packed, and then I just didn't sleep.

And then at 5, I went to the airport because I knew the TSA closing.

So I didn't sleep at all. And then at five, I went to the airport because I knew the TSA closing. So I didn't sleep at all.

And then they, you know, the Friday before the event, everyone showed up, had showed up.

I was literally the life of the party.

Hold on. I'm actually the life of the party. Hold on.

I'm actually the life of the party.

When you think about it,

I was the life of the party.

And then maybe if I'm good,

you can say I'm the life of the party,

the ACP.

But the house, I don't know if I call it a house party, but the get together

were like we had, what, 20, 30 people, 40 people. I had no sleep and I look at how much energy

I had. I just want everyone to admire that.

Remember that stream I did

five hours with those logic lords? I never

rested. I went straight to St. Louis

and then

I

was absolutely...

Whoever says I'm antisocial.

Remember when Danny Shaw said that?

He's like, this dark, twisted, antisocial.

Bro, it's just because I didn't fuck with you.

You know what I mean?

It's like, yeah, I don't fuck with everybody.

Sorry. I don't fuck with everybody sorry

I don't fuck with you fed as bitches

it's like that song whole gang with payroll Giovanni in it

bitches want a taste of the prize but can't look straight in the eyes.

I'm trying to think that you a snake in disguise.

I'm starting to think that you a snake in disguise.

You know, that's the type of shit I'm on sometimes.

Anyway, y'all, we're going to be starting the debates

fuck um i will never say... You know, Thank you. but ones if we're good twos if we're good twos if we're good twos if we're good twos if we're good twos if we're good two's if we're good two's if we're good, Tuesday if we're good. Tuesday if we're good.

Tuesday if we're good.

Two's if we're good.

All right.

Some actual unironic fascist.

A real fascist.

Name Tyler. are you doing?

I'm doing fine, but what is this LARP?

This LARP?

How old are you?

I'm 22 years old.

All right.

And why are you...

You are a self-described fascist?

Yeah, I am.

Why do you

adopt a failed

ideology?

How is it failed

necessarily?

Because the whole thing

was like

we're the toughest,

meanest,

baddest guys ever

and then they fought

one more and lost.

That's what you think fascism is?

No, I'm just simplifying it.

So,

so you think because we lost a war,

that's a failed ideology?

Well, if the whole point of fascism is like we're going to, you know, achieve this kind of

Nietzschean, Ubermensch, we're going to be these superhumans, we're going to be, you know,

we're going to treat the state as a military and might is right and we're going to assert our dominance and conquer and enslave others who are inferior to us.

So where in the doctrine of fascism does it save us?

In the practice of fascism, Mussolini invaded Ethiopia for no reason.

Then he invaded Libya.

He invaded his Slavic neighbors, wanted to subjugate them.

Albanians.

That's not a core part of the fascist ideology.

The way Mussolini saw politics internally, where he's just like, we're going to just

like beat people we disagree with into submission.

And just because we can get away with it, that makes us justified.

And I'm not saying politics doesn't involve suppressing your enemies, but even communists had moral justifications. Anyway, Mussolini's like,

we're just going to do it because we can. Like the whole we can ideology like Obama, right?

Yes, we can. He was like, yes, we can. like Obama right yes we can

he was like yes we can go invade Ethiopia we can do all these things

and just because we can you know and then that's the whole like

premise in a way and then they fought one real war and then lost

so that is So you think

like fascism is being your

opposition into submission?

I wouldn't reduce it to that

but I think that in practice

it was a way

for the bourgeois state to

do what constitutional

republics cannot with respect to the

suppression of dissidents

okay so do you think like

class collaboration is a bad thing

um for Do you think like class collaboration is a bad thing?

For who?

For the bourgeoisie, it's great.

For the proletariat, it's treachery.

How it's it treachery for the proletariat?

Because class collaboration is

acquiescing and submitting

to the

principle of a class

whose existence contradicts

your own.

So you think the Borsesbossey

contradicts a proletariat?

Yes, fundamentally, I do.

And even Mussolini had to...

Sorry, I got a call there.

Mussolini rhetorically

agreed with that, by the way, which is

why he constantly

postured and made it seem like

fascism was somehow post-Bougeois

and it was more proletarian, and that

Italy had become a proletarian.

I think he left. I didn't disagree. I didn't and that Italy had become a proletarian.

I think he left.

I didn't disagree.

I didn't, I mean, yes, I didn't disconnect him.

Okay, we'll wait for him to come back.

Maybe he won't.

We'll bring a Sphinx.

Go ahead, Sphinx.

Hey, what's going on, brother Howard? What's up?

Hey, man, I just

want to ask a little bit about your guys' work

with your party.

I think I saw that

Jackson is part of your party too. You guys are founders?

Yeah, he's a co-founder.

Okay, so I just wanted to ask

how much progress

have you guys been making

and getting people to like, you know,

getting people to like, you know,

follow the message and follow you guys party and give support.

It's been... You're fighting a big monster, you know, follow the message and I'll follow you guys party and give support. It's been pretty...

You're fighting a big monster.

Pretty steady and pretty explosive

in 2026. We found out

that we had 6 to

7,000 people, I mean

6,7, right?

Literally 6 to seven thousand people

who tried joining

but couldn't because of technical errors

and so gave up.

So we are much less than...

That's actually crazy, right?

But yeah, we're growing pretty steadily.

Okay.

So you guys, I mean, are you guys hoping to get to a point where you can actually run for,

have one of your members run for president or something?

No.

No, what is this? Elementary school No. No, what is this?

Elementary school politics?

Like, what is that?

No, no, I'm not trying to be funny here or anything.

I'm actually, I'm not exactly sure what you guys are doing.

But I'm just, I'm just here to, I'm not here to, like, challenge you anything.

I'm just here to, I'm just asking to see what you guys are.

What's your, what's your what's your like main goal here if i may ask um our goal is to build a

preeminent you know organization of the American proletariat.

And,

uh,

you guys,

like,

I mean,

I'm assuming we're,

we're preparing because we think we don't,

we no longer

have confidence that the current state is going to last within our lifetimes forever

and we think that there needs to be an organizational framework that survives the coming collapse

I'm with that that makes sense to me lapse. How much that?

That makes sense to me.

How much, I mean, how, like, but in terms of actual progress achieving such, you know,

your goals, like, I don't know what's holding you guys back. How, how well are you doing in terms of like your own, like how much you've been hoping to achieve?

It's been pretty steady growth.

But we're focused on building up resources, which we have to do because we don't get support from the bourgeoisie.

Uh-huh.

Are you in the US, if I may ask?

No, I'm in Belgium.

Okay, so you guys, what's called?

I don't know if Jackson

is trying to get into politics

in America but I was just curious

if he because I know if I'm not mistaken

he's an American citizen

with all the stuff

with all the stuff that he

you know tweets about and publicizes

is he will he be arrested if he comes to the U.S. in the current situation?

There's no current warrant for his arrest.

Yeah.

But we suspect he will be harassed and potentially deprived of travel which would interfere with his career okay so you guys more um international are you guys focusing on the u.s as well is it uh we're internazboles okay i will appreciate

you answering my question best luck brother to you and the party uh nicholas says he knows a little secret about the ACP.

Oh, we love gossip over here.

What's the secret?

This is some low testosterone.

Escedic tells about the secret.

Oh, my God, there's secrets.

They're the master of Unix.

NYC Catholic.

Go ahead, bro.

What's the secret?

All right.

So,

I believe that, okay, so i want to ask you one question right all right

why do you follow why do you follow the teachings of dougan i don't i don't i've i've been hearing a lot of, like, things about you guys following teachings.

Are you, are you ML?

Oh, yeah, yeah.

What are the things you heard about Stalin when you first heard his name?

Oh, yeah. I heard him as a dictator right so so there's a you know

if you're actually a real communist they're just gonna the things that you hear about the real

communists they're not going to reflect reality the system we live in so you know it's no excuse to not do your due diligence

um okay what about your homophobic comments what about that uh which ones i made so many i need to

remember which ones? I made so many. I need to remember.

Which ones?

You made, you made so many.

What?

Remember what you said about like the, um, woman?

Like, woman should be in like the, whatever.

But what is, wait, what is, well, hold on.

Before we talk about that, what about the homophobia?

Queer liberation is with class liberation.

What does that mean, though?

Because they're my...

No, no, no. I mean, what does it mean?

Like, what does queer liberation mean?

Because I'm thinking there's a bunch of queer people

locked in a cage right now

and then we're just going to open the cage and they're

we liberated you and they're going to like spread

their wings and fly like what does that mean you're

liberating them

I'm saying what it means

meaning someone

could finally marry, not be perceding.

China doesn't believe in that. China doesn't believe in gay marriage, but we already have gay marriage in America.

And China is, in China is state capitalists.

Okay, I got you, but America already has gay marriage. So what are you

liberating? That's not already been liberated. Queer people still face oppression in everyday life.

They still, just like African Americans, they still, they still face oppressed. So do fat people. So do fat people.

So do fat people.

So you're saying that

we're saying that we shouldn't

liberate queer people.

Should we liberate fat people?

That's entirely

Let me ask you a question. Are ugly people oppressed as well? And he's that's entirely different

Are ugly people oppressed as well

And these microaggressions?

Because we're talking

We go from something political

Usually liberation in Marxism

It means something concretely political

Or even economic

But you're talking about like vague cultural sensibilities, right?

So according to cultural sensibilities, clavacular talks about the halo effect, right?

Where ugly people get treated worse than pretty people with pretty privilege.

So should we liberate ugly people as well?

Clavigaller is a racist. Why are you bringing him into the conversation? Yeah, he's a racist, but still,

you know, I would agree that ugly people are treated worse than would you disagree with that?

If you're like let's say

you're ugly

as shit

and you walk

into a

KFC

and you know

and the workers

sitting there

at the thing

I mean like

you know

you might

they might spit in your food

they might say

this person's so

nasty and gross I mean but then if you're you might they might spit in your food they might say this person so nasty and gross i mean

but then if you're so good looking and you walk in they're hey handsome like you don't know what's

going on right so isn't that oppression in the same way?

Why not?

That's not a person. Okay, what if you're...

What if you didn't commit a crime?

Like, the cops run up to the scene of a crime.

And there's two people.

There's someone with the halo effect who's great looking. There's like a guy who looks like an ugly dog's ass, and he's like, just looks like an ugly piece of shit.

And the police just tackle him and beat the shit out of them.

Which is like, I mean, let's

be honest, like, that stuff happens.

Should,

should ugly people be liberated?

So, you're making

this argument to say that queer

liberation is not,

is, it shouldn't be important.

Well, the only example of liberation you're telling me is that liberation from distinct

treatment within culture, not within the law, not even within economics, because it's been made

illegal to discriminate on that

basis already.

So what is left to liberate except

the fact that some people might

I don't even know how

widespread this is, by the way.

I mean, there's so many gay billionaires who are like wealthy as hell, who are extremely wealthy actually.

I would say maybe on average they're more wealthy probably.

I don't know if I could say that was certainty.

But I just don't understand

where is the oppression now that you're talking about?

And how could it not also be applied to ugly people?

The oppression, the oppression that queer Why to ugly people?

The oppression, the oppression that queer and queer people face is like... Okay, queer people face unseen oppression.

Yeah.

Is there any way we could refer to it or talk about it in a way that we can hear about it, maybe?

Okay.

First, they are seen in look, even by the government, that's why there's queer conversion camps and everything like that.

They are literally, they're literally put down by the government

as something that isn't

that isn't brutal or

something that needs to be

fixed.

The government that had the pride flag

on the White House?

The government that's

in office right now.

Oh, the current administration, which is

moderately less

pro-LGB

than the Democrats were. Okay,

who put the pride flag on the

drones and on bombs and in military bases and stuff.

This was the norm for the regime for a decade.

But by the way, I want to ask you something.

What camps are you talking about?

Um, queer, um um queer conversion camps yeah where what camps the one the ones that like trump um the one that trump funds. Where?

Gracks me from the location of where they're funded.

Yeah, I've never heard of that.

How have you seen?

I've never heard of queer camps

for to imprison queer people in camps.

Oh my goodness.

It's not queer camps and imprisoning queer people.

Or the convert to convert them.

I've never heard of that.

You're strong in my argument here. No, I'm okay to convert them. I've never heard of that. You're strongmen in my argument here.

No, no, I'm okay to convert them. I never heard of that.

There's literally camps that

are made, they're funded by the

government to convert queer people.

That is a, you could Google

out, you could research that, that is a real could Google that you could research that

that is a real thing

are you talking about children or adults

I believe both children

and adults so the government

is taking adults and putting

them in conversion camps

or I believe it is children.

So it's exclusively children.

Yes.

Yeah, I mean, but that's it then, right?

That's the only thing you would say is if we just put an end to that, that's queer liberation, right?

That children no longer can be sent to conversion therapy camps.

But, okay. I want to get back. conversion therapy camps but okay

I want to get back on the

Dugan topic

so we're not really committing

to the whole queer liberation thing

got it

all right

I've heard

I've literally heard that you you subscribe to Dugan's ideas a you're Asian traditionalist fascist.

I don't subscribe to Dugan's ideas and also those are not his ideas you don't subscribe

to these ideas mean okay like all right like like oh my goodness.

You all subscribe to those ideas, but you are in.

What do you mean?

Like, what do you mean that's not his ideas?

Dugan is not a fascist.

Dugan is literally a fascist.

He's a conservative fascist. He's not a fascist. He's a conservative fascist.

He's not a fascist.

He's not a fascist.

In any Marxist, materialist sense of the word, the way that the common term defied fascism, he couldn't qualify as a fascist. He himself

does not regard himself as a fascist. The reason why this libel has become prolific in the West is because during the 1990s,

Dugan was associated with the Nas Bols, the National Bolsheviks, and the context behind them was that the Yeltsin government created this kind of boogeyman of a red-brown alliance.

And, you know, the twin totalitarian is a model.

So as a way to protest, the American imperialist, you know, financial occupation of Russia, young people from punk rock milieuz started adopting the label Nossbol to kind of provoke and troll liberals, basically.

And part of this was Dugin in the 1990s who wrote an article called Fascism, Borderless and Red.

Where in the article, he says, you know, Nazi Germany and fascist Italy were controlled by capitalists. These were national capitalist states that didn't live to the ideal of a true fascism and a true fascism has to be borderless

and it has to be a communist and it has to whatever so it was just this kind of nonsensical

artistic nonsense he was doing but uh as dougin grew older, he distanced himself from the Nossbol's and distance himself altogether from

third positionism as like the receptacle of his very uniquely

contextually defined

post-Soviet Russian worldview

and you know

started calling himself a Eurasianist

and then a fourth positionist

but never

was he truly in any sincere

or real sense of fascist.

Now, how I would qualify

if someone's a fascist is do they

um, grift off of

xenophobic, um, you know, sentiment, which he never did, that even the Nazbels and Dugin were always very protective and defensive over Russia's religious and ethnic minorities?

And that there was a big anti-immigrant phenomena and tendency in Russia, mind you.

And then, okay, well, did he advocate for some kind of, you know, support for the, you know, the imperialist machine.

Well, the imperialist machine in Russia was the foreign occupation by oligarchs, financial

oligarchs.

That was the objective reality of imperialism in Russia.

And Dugin and the Nossbollls were fighting the oligarchs so they were genuinely a revolutionary force in russia like like their ideology or don't

but they you can't say they were fascists they weren't hired thugs of the regime that was meant to

destroy the communist movement that's the purpose i want to be clear about something i can tell you're

young but i'm going to tell this to you anyway there's no such thing as fascism without a communist movement to suppress.

The only reason you had fascism in Italy or in Germany was because they had very large and powerful socialists and communist movements.

And fascism was the ideology created to fight that and suppress that so don't go

around calling people fascists just because they have beards and their meanies and they're tough

and they're strong and they're you know they're scary. That's not what fascism is.

It says

Dugan's ideas are literally they want to put the world

back into and the neoliberal orders and put the world back

into traditionalism.

That is...

Traditionalism is not the same as fascism.

He has expansionist worldview, which is a very fascist idea.

It's a very fascist idea it's a very fascist idea i would say it's not inherently fascist in the

context of russia because the soviet union was illegally dissolved in the first place. And moreover,

every case of expansionism

has always

come from the defense of minorities,

whether there are Russians, or non-Russians

for that matter, who were left

defenseless and at the mercy of

petty nationalists in the post-Soviet context.

So in Georgia, it was the Osatians.

Not Russians, they're an Iranian people, but they were being harassed by the petty nationalism of Georgia.

And Russia came to their defense.

Russia is a multinational framework, civilization, which doesn't tolerate small-minded petty nationalism.

This post-Soviet republics were infected with this balkanizing

petty

nationalist

disease

that culminates

in the

Ukraine

Maidan.

I've been

to Russia.

Russia is a

multi-ethnic

nation.

It's not

a nation

just for ethnic Russians. Okay? It's not a nation just for

ethnic Russians.

It's a civilizational framework that recognizes

and acknowledges the harmonious

coexistence of different peoples.

If Dugan advocates

an expansionism of Russia with

respect to the post-Soviet space

which I don't think he does unilaterally

I think this is fully justified

I mean the context is that the Soviet Union's

illegally dissolved the state collapses

and is given entirely to oligarchs, and then NATO expands.

Why did NATO expand? For what? So Russia is brought to a point that Russian people are occupied,

and their state had been destroyed.

In this context,

Dugan style expansionism isn't the same

as Germany or Italy deciding that they want to enslave and subjugate

other nations and peoples because they're inferior. In this context,

it is the restoration of a civilization that had been unjustifiably dismantled and destroyed and

preyed upon by financial powers.

All right. Well, I mean prayed upon by financial powers all right well

let me address your comments that

i've um had um

so this is in quote by the way

i'm not saying this because i support this

um this is your comment

shove the effin psychological to your fucking yuppity faggot

ass right now you're a faggot and i don't want to hear from a thing from you that is what you

said that that is is what you said.

That is directly what you said.

Okay. Is there no context that would, that you would find this acceptable?

No. That's like saying the N word. Like, there's no context for that to be i i just disagree it's like it's like

i refer back to the south park episode it's like oh so i disagree being homophobic is no i just

use the bad word it's not doesn't mean anything i i was just homophobic for a little bit, guys. I'm not that bad.

Okay, well, I just used a bad word. It doesn't really mean anything. But anyway, the reason I said that,

do you think that I was like engaging in a hate crime? Like, that's, that was a gay guy I was saying

that. Oh, God, I got violated for hate speech. Thanks, that's, that was a gay guy I was saying that.

Oh,

God,

I got violated for hate speech.

Thanks for that,

by the way.

Pretend me.

Violation,

repeated violations could resolve me.

I'm going to have to remove you in a second,

but,

um,

I'm just going to have to remove you, dude.

It's telling me to remove you.

If they remain, they'll be... I got to remove them.

All right, it gave me the restriction.

And proof of that is on the yellow website,

or the green website.

Anyway, to respond to what you're saying before I bring up the next person, that was to a member of the ACP Politburo who for weeks was acting strangely and erratically,

um,

hostile and constantly like maneuvering for mysterious reasons.

I came back from Russia and then we held a whole meeting Friday for like five, six hours where they criticized. They were given all the time in the world to voice their concerns, their criticisms of me. They had a big problem with me. Very vague vague but we gave him the opportunity to say whatever

they wanted and then they on their own accord said okay i think your response satisfies me so a

week later we had a meeting he said everything's good we had a meeting where we wanted to just get to

continue our leadership business. Then he ambushed us with a resignation, where he wanted to do this

theatrical thing where he's going to read like a two-hour essay

he wrote and ambush us with his

resignation and try to make us all feel so

bad that he's leaving. And I basically said

okay, this is not the time and place for this.

You want to quit? Just go quit.

Then he kept pushing and pushing and insulting me

and attacking me. I had dealt with him for weeks

dealing with very vague, nonsensical.

I just, oh,

Haas, you're, uh, there's

a big problem with Haas.

No, he could never say what his problem was.

Okay, so I took it personally.

I thought maybe this guy just doesn't like me, so I got pissed.

But then later we found out he really, you something had happened to him knock on the door

where he was compelled or convinced that he has to wreck the party and uh so he was acting under

duress, basically.

So literally a guy basically, we think, got a knock on the door by the feds to wreck our party was intentionally trying to waste our time and cause problems for us and i got pissed

and crashed out and uh socialism for all uh clipped it out of context because he's a really good faith actor

who you should definitely trust, right?

Right.

But I did use a bad word.

Because you know why he called in that?

Because he's like, you will sit down and listen, boy.

And I was like, what?

So anyway, Flak, go ahead.

Hey, how's it going?

I'm 25.

I'm just curious, kind of a little bit about the ACP, because I've

heard a bit about you guys, but I've heard some

mixed things. I'm a communist myself.

And I always like to have some

friendly, hearted, you know, left discussion.

They might be able to get into some stuff.

I want to pull up y'all's program

real quick, because I had some

questions.

Jacob, I accepted you,

but then you disconnected.

So you have to go next.

I don't know what to tell you.

Go ahead.

Yeah, like I was saying,

I got some questions about your program

and just, you know, if I was, if you could tell me a bit about your party and why you think someone should be involved with it.

Let's drop a 10, y'all.

Um, I would say if you're a communist with a capital C unapologetically, meaning you're not doing

these cope detours. If you're like actually a communist with a capital C, you're not like saying,

oh, I'm a communist, but Stalin was bad. You're like actually a communist. I would say there's just no other alternative to us for better or for worse. And that, you know, if you think we're doing something wrong, you could do it better, you could make your case to us. We're pretty open. We're pretty flexible. We don't

really have like gatekeepers who are preventing work from being done like other parties do.

We just, we're not ruled by boomers or Gen X people or millennials even.

We're ruled.

Youth led.

And it's a pretty open door, pretty blank canvas in a lot of ways for how do we move forward as a con.

We're learning from experience most of all.

Yeah. But I just don't think there's an alternative to us i mean if it's not us who else you know that that's fair i mean

we're we're in a very interesting error on the left in this country i mean the left hardly

exists to be honest like Like, you probably agree

that the DSA is hard to even call

left at all. It's just supporting the

Democrats. Same things to see the USAs.

So, we're seeing all this pressure for people

to join a communist movement,

and people are looking for something serious out there,

and you seem pretty serious about this.

But I'm curious what you said, like capital C, communist meaning that like you, you said something about Stalin there.

And then also I got a question about point 17 on your program, promotion of American civilization.

I'm not really sure

exactly what you guys mean by that.

Yeah, we just think that

we don't really have a

clearly defined American nation,

you know?

And hold on one said.

Carlos, what's up?

Appreciate you, bro.

Yeah, we don't really have a clearly defined

national existence

as Americans.

And we want to kind of discover

a unique civilization on this land by this people

all the people here right and we're very open to what that potentially could or

has to look like and we

just think we should stop emulating Europe

and looking to Europe for

guidance on how we should be

and we should kind of

embrace

our geography, right?

Okay, interesting. I'm still not really

exactly sure what you mean by that, but if I had to guess, like, what it mean, like,

you could have, like, a, uh, multi-country, multi,

like, racial, ethnic background kind of American culture. Well, multi-country, multi-

racial ethnic background

kind of American culture.

Because when I think of America,

I think of...

We want one American

civilization

that is a fusion

of all those things.

I would say like this,

like China promotes Chinese civilization,

Confucius and the classics.

We want to do that.

We just don't have it.

So we need to also simultaneously build it.

Okay. Well, I see you're coming from with that. Yeah, there's definitely different ideas.

And I think part of society and being able to move forward in a positive way is having a unified national myth or international myth like kind of a i wouldn't say it's a

myth i wouldn't say it's a myth maybe maybe not a myth actually yeah you're right about that like a

collective understanding of who we are and what we're fighting for yeah and right now in the U.S., like you said, it is, like, it is a myth really in this country now,

and it's all over the place.

It's not consistent.

And I think that gives a level of disorientation to people today.

Yeah.

So what would you what was your position on the soviet union would you say you're more of a hardline supporter of them or like critical support i would say critical support is definitely

how what i think of them but i'm curious what ASEC because that's really important.

Critical of everything but to an extent uncritical, you know, like unconditional.

Like, okay, if I would, if Brezhnev was around and things popped off between Brezhnev and the imperialist block.

I understand he's a revisionist.

I understand what de-Stalinization was totally unjustified.

But if that, you know, if that conflict happened, am I going to be going to be critical i mean no i'm going to

send me tie me to a missile and send me to nato well yeah i mean i feel it the same way so like

for example i really like following a lot of trotsky's lines on this i think he's got a

pretty good analysis on the Soviet Union.

But if I was there when the Great Patriotic War started, like you bet that I'd be out there on the front lines just as much as anyone else, right? At the end of the day, a worker state... I can't agree with the Trotsky I think. I'm sorry. It's just...

It's like mentioning the Shaiton and expecting me not to react.

Just casually dropping Shatan right there.

You can't... You can't just be casually dropping Shaton and expect me to be chill with it.

I'm sorry, you know?

It's like Trotsky.

I mean, like, you're just randomly dropping Shaiton in here.

And, uh, can't have that.

It's like casually referencing the mustache painter man.

Anyway, where's the other guy who wanted to...

Where's that guy who requested?

Who said that he...

ACP is unsirious

but what does it mean to be serious

you know think about that

I feel like the only thing that means

serious just means action it doesn't mean like

I'm going to act a certain way on TikTok.

Yeah.

No, it's just stupid.

Like, oh, you're serious because of how you act on TikTok.

I just kind of feel like that's nonsense.

You know, the only thing that determines your seriousness is your commitment.

It's not how you act on social media that determines your seriousness is your commitment.

It's not how you act on social media that determines your seriousness.

It's what are your commitments?

What do you actually do?

Can't tolerate discussion because you can't compete with Trotsky's ideas.

I don't need to compete with ideas that have no basis or foundation.

I mean, there's nothing to correct for. It's a,

it's a dead end. We know what Trotsky looks like in real life. We know what Trotskyism looks like.

It's a dead end. I see no opening. I see nothing to debate about. Why be a Trotsky?

Do a burden is on? Okay, you can request again, but I'm putting the burden on you.

Why should I be a Trotskyist?

Why should I accept Trotsky's ideas?

You know?

I have to put the burden on you

all right

you

you know

big respect for letting me back up here

well I think the main thing

is uh socialism one country versus permanent revolution me back up here. Well, I think the main thing is socialism

one country versus permanent revolution.

But you know how it's a logical

fallacy or contradiction?

Everything's contradictory. What do you mean?

Yeah, but I mean it in the sense it's like a self negate self-negating

uh self-undermining notion of per rolution okay and it's in the etymology okay well let's start here what's a revolution the transformation

of society yeah but what's a revolution wouldn't you say that is what it is

i could i could work with that but I think it's so much more simple what is what is etymologically like what's the actual definition of a revolution

oh like uh well I mean it goes back to dialectics, right?

It's one of these brief periods of significant upheaval

as something, a transformation from one thing to something else.

Mutually exclusive before and after, something like that.

It's way more...

I'm not sure exactly where you can.

There's like a root-reut meaningfulfulness of that word that is so much simpler,

to the point where it doesn't only have to be applied to historical phenomena.

What are you getting at?

Do cars have revolutions?

Yeah.

Right.

Do you know what a revolution is?

A rotation?

Yeah.

Exactly.

Like a cycle.

That's a revolution.

How could that be permanent?

Well, the permanent revolution is a permanent cycling, circling of progress in this spiral that moves forward.

It's like a double helix moving forward, this constant rotation.

Okay.

I could work with that.

But here's the problem.

It can... Okay. I could work with that. But here's the problem. The problem is

you're said progress, the permanent

revolution of progress. Progress always has to acquire a

qualitative determination.

I agree that

the development of nature

and history is unceasing.

Never ends.

But

the specific

transformations do the specific um

transformations

do end. The transformation

of one thing into another thing is

the movement of one determination

to another determination.

The transformation as such cannot

last forever.

Now transformation in the abstract is eternal in this sense.

When we're speaking about the particulars, you're talking about the transformation of one thing into another.

When you're speaking about revolutions, you're talking about a specific revolution, which of course must end and cannot be permanent.

Does that mean the process of change ends forever?

No.

But how can we speak of change?

And this is how Trotsky doesn't understand dialectics. How can we speak of change? And this is how Trotsky doesn't understand dialectics.

How can we talk about change without determinations?

If everything is just flux and everything is just change, we lose the point of reference to the things that are changing in the first place. What is changing,

and what does it change into? So there's a distinction between the qualitative and the

quantitative. There's a distinction between content and the form. Trotsky thought he could achieve the eternity of a content that doesn't have to go through form. That's the problem. Content eventually has to acquire form. In order to further partake in content, by the way.

If you remain suspended in the pretense of content that suppresses form,

once of you can still hear me in the

green

green place

I can still hear you

I believe you

okay you could still

all right

he's suppressing

the formal consequences

of the content of revolution.

But that doesn't mean you will avoid those consequences.

It means that you will be trapped within the formal framework that is pre-revolutionary. And that's why sociologically and demographically,

you will never be able to convince me, short of changing everything I've ever seen and read from

history, Trotskyism and left communism were both sociologically part of the same

historical strata as fascism.

Both of them were reacting to a qualitative revolutionary change that happens sometime after 1929, 1930, that created a new type of political subject and civilizational subject, a mass subject, mass politics, popular.

People associate Nazism and fascism with mass politics, but they were actually a reaction to mass politics.

They were a defense of classical liberal individualism in the face of true organic material mass politics.

They emulated the aesthetics of mass politics

in many respects

but fascism

it's the fascists

it's the kind of

individuals uniting

together and binding together

in a pact

to defend their private property

against the masses

that's basically what it was.

And Trotskyism is part of that reaction, because the mass subject in the USSR was the peasantry.

And Trotsky was defending the sanctity and integrity of the classical,

modern, European individual subject versus this popular subject that was the basis of Stalin's

cult of personality. Could you clarify what you mean by that a little bit more?

I haven't heard a notion like that before.

Yeah.

Russia obviously was-

Maybe like a concrete example.

Sorry to cut you off.

Yeah, yeah.

Okay. A concrete example

was that in the 20s during the debates

following Lenin's death,

Stalin's support

was based primarily in

newer cadre that were joining the party

who were very much coming from

the countryside in many cases, from the Soviets.

I agree on this. They were used to this W.A.R. Communism

where there was little

questioning of the status quo and authority, these newer cadre, and

also this significant base in the peasant class who were more conservative.

And also a lot of support amongst the bureaucracy, which was, like

Lenin said, the Tsarist state

anointed with socialist oil.

Yeah, sure, but ultimately all of these forces Trotsky regarded as having contaminated.

And the fight against bureaucracy,

Stalin did not stop that fight.

And Lenin acquiesced to the reality

that we're faced with this Tsarist imperial machine

that we have not fully replaced.

Lenin also had to acquiesce it.

So the fight against bureaucracy,

I don't think acquires any concrete development in the Trotskyist tradition.

Only in the Marxist-Leninist tradition,

do we finally have something like Mao's Cultural Revolution, where that ability to deal with the impersonal bureaucratic nature of state machines is possible in the first place? It's a different contradiction.

But in any case, I would focus here more on the mass subject of Russian politics and civilization, which was coming from the peasantry.

Trotsky very much believed that the revolution and its sacred principles would be completely destroyed if it embeds itself and defines itself within that context because he didn't regard Russia as advanced enough, right? Because Western Europe has the

proletariat. And Russia does not. And so

we need to

we need to be, you know, we need to, our state has to be ruled by the true

proletariat. The true subject, right? And, but in practice,

this was civilizational racism. In practice, I mean, that's the form it took. The lesser, less developed races the chinese the russians others they they have no

basis with which to lead uh so they have to follow the civilization of Western Europe.

And Lenin said that we should pursue a different path for the construction of civilization,

a non-European path, that's what he said.

I think the last thing he wrote actually, one of the last things. But anyway, I think that Trotsky represented the vanity and the overextension of a very specific type of classical liberal Western subject

faced with the reality of mass politics and reacting against it.

And I would put Mussolini and Hitler in the same camp.

So...

Because the proletarian

politics he was talking about

was mythical.

Never actually existed.

For a brief period, it seemed like

it existed in the October Revolution,

but the city proletariat

were turned out to be only part-time proletarians. They had land in the countryside that they went back to during the Civil War. And meanwhile, in Western Europe, the mythical proletariat was not at all a revolutionary subject. In fact, it was a profoundly conservative and petty bourgeois subject.

In Western Europe?

Yeah.

What? I mean, do you

see the waves of revolutions in Western Europe

after like after 1917?

I mean, 1918 in Germany.

Those revolutions were simply a temporary vacuum that was filled due to the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian and German empires.

So they never represented a positive principle of proletarian politics asserting itself. They were simply the negative consequences of the dissolution of the losing side of World War I, which were the imperial confederations and states that lost.

Some people tried to hijack that and, you know,

in Hungary and in Germany,

but it was a total failure.

Well, yes, they had a lack of

working class leadership, for sure.

A shortage of a quality party

to move them forward. And the reason they

didn't have the party is because they never had a mass

subject. They were focused on trying to

solely and exclusively

base themselves in the

traditional social democratic concept

of the proletariat, which had by that time become institutionalized and no longer revolutionary.

I'm not sure what you mean by the proletariat becoming, like you said, the proletary becoming institutionalized?

Yeah, through trade unions through social

democracy itself becoming an appendage of the state and uh through the growth and rise of a more

of imperialism which very much you know compartmentalized and institutionalized labor and very much institutionalized

things that before were much wilder i mean angles and marks talked about this tendency with

respect to the english proletariat okay for so for example like basically

because the proletariat in these more advanced countries has received essentially bribes kind of

like what lennon talked in the imperialist court countries not not necessarily bribes it's just the way

that they they became a new type of subject, right? They became a subject of institutions. A vacuum of leadership had been filled by petty bourgeois leadership that was allied to the state, the imperialist state, and they were no longer an inherently revolutionary subject.

So you're saying the class became unrevolutionary, or you say, I would say that they were just limited by leadership that was guiding them. I would say that they were just limited

by leadership dollars

I would say that

Dimitrov and the Popular Front

thesis was the good place to start

that it's not that they

were they had no revolutionary

potential it's that you there was

a need to embed party politics in a much broader

stratum of the people than just the traditional factory proletariat. So in the case of England,

Marx and Engels talked about the Irish. In the case of central and eastern Europe,

there was a huge peasantry and farmer class that communists had very much neglected. In the American

context, William Foster came from a farmer worker background of a farmer worker organizing.

And that's why he, you know, was able to kind of grow the Communist Party to this extent that it was.

But focusing solely on the urban proletariat was impossible in order

to undermine imperialism it would have been necessary to establish a counter-hegemonic foundation

in the mass subject.

A mass subject other than the proletarian?

I mean, I agree the pro- it's not just the industrial politarian.

Look, the truth is

the majority of the people

in most countries

cannot be defined on the basis of one class.

They oscillate and they have vacillating tendencies and they are compelled by different class principles and tendencies.

And usually this is a middle subject who usually is called the peasantry.

In Russia, actually, peasantry just meant subsistence farmer and nothing else.

But this subject is almost always the majority.

I mean, the factory proletariat being the majority,

is a crisis that will immediately mean revolution.

That's why it's usually very rare for that to be the case.

What about the proletariat

outside of the factories? Would you say they have a fundamentally

different character to them?

The

Okay, so Marx was describing proletarianization, you know, people being separated from their means of production and they have nothing to sell but their labor. That's broadly the proletariat in Marx's time, not just factory proletarians, right?

Right.

But by the time that process becomes so comprehensive

that the alienation from the traditional means of production

is completed.

So in America, when people are being kicked out of their farms

and all these different divisions

of labor that were not yet proletarianized became proletarianized. The intensity of proletarianization

was symmetrical to the institutionalization and the rise of welfare states and the rise of kind of social policies and a social orientation of the imperialist state that very much created a new social contract and almost a new type of property, subsistence property, that was based in a social contract with the state, where you no longer have nothing to lose but your chains. You have a citizenship that is a guarantee of a certain way of life and a certain minimal

condition of a standard of living that gives you the same level of stability that a farmer used to

have. And so the destabilizing proletarianizing process becomes a process of mass institutionalization by modern states and societies, which is even more stable than pre-modern and feudal society in many ways so it was paradoxical and it's something marxist didn't anticipate at all they thought that proletarianization would lead to people just having nothing but their labor to sell and therefore disposed to revolutionary, you know, social instability would collapse, the superstructure and revolution would be inevitable.

It was partially true, but the way that happened was not anticipated.

A new type of subject emerged that a post kind of post-liberal, post-individual,

post-capitalist, mass subject whose rights, classical political rights were also combined with

certain economic rights, objectively, right? And that more or less offset the destabilizing consequences of proletarianization

it's like instead of being think about it this way instead of being a guy who has

nothing to sell but their labor you're now an employee of an institution of control and command of society

most people aren't directly government employees but that's you know they're they're they're

employees of hegemonic institutions.

And, you know, this is, you're no longer just selling your labor anymore.

What do you mean by that? You're participating in a different and a more broader kind of social contract where you are given

certain guarantees of a certain way of life of a certain standard of living you have expectations

that are indeed fulfilled and that becomes the basis and foundation

of the stability of the state

yeah it's basically like what london

was writing about imperialism where

the super profits that are used from

exploding the no not

okay no that was i didn't really get to that point but

that was a distinct tendency these super profits that were being used to that that that was yes the

institutionalization of the new labor bureaucracy and aristocracy was only the beginning. What Lenin didn't

anticipate is how this basically

would become universalized.

And the financial revenues

that were a product

of imperialism or in the post-war period

super-imperialism

in any

case

people are

no longer

living

solely on

the basis

of their

labor

but from

steady

streams of

revenue that

are very

much

financialized

and the extent this is where a theory of class struggle today would be relevant, is who actually depends upon the surpluses that are solely a consequence of imperialism versus who depends upon the actual material wealth produced by labor, by an industrial civilization. So that was the basis of the whole barista debate, by the way, which we got in trouble for.

People thought that we claimed baristas are unproductive because we think that they're less masculine, and that's not true.

It's just because we're trying to figure out in an era where

imperialist

revenues as the basis of people's way of life is universalized

meaning every class is not paid directly because of the sale of their labor. They're more or less paid because of a

indiscriminate revenue. So within that revenue, you have to distinguish what is actually a consequence of the material wealth produced by labor and what is a

consequence of you know revenues monopoly revenues you know of you know of speculative and

finance and so on and so on.

Okay, so you're

saying that

I'm trying to pick up on what you're saying exactly

because I haven't really heard exactly this

before. It's not this idea

that working class

people in like the West

are counter-revolutionary or like

unrevolutionary. It's not it at all, yeah.

Sorry.

But it's also not

so it's like this idea that you have

steady incomes because of the stability of

imperialism through things

like state benefits for example

and you're guaranteed of relative stability of life

from the system and also it's not

only state benefits like look at Trump

freaking out about the Strait of Hormuz.

The state proactively tries to ensure that there's going to be a minimal standard of living that's fulfilled within the population for political purposes.

And...

Yeah, that's true, right?

But the thing is, I think that the crisis of capitalism doesn't stop that from changing.

Like, we've seen the slowest recovery ever since 2008 for example i i agree to an extent um

but i think that it 2008 can simply last much it's not going to culminate in a marxian crisis

because capitalism as we know it is based going to culminate in a Marxian crisis because

capitalism as we know

it is basically functionally dead

it doesn't have to be ruled by the laws of capitalism anymore

what

yeah it's a

it's a pretty unsustainable yes i agree but it's a it's a it's a command of the

productive forces but via some type of political fiat now are you saying like the laws of capital

or like the notions that marks put forward are changed or like i agree with a new economic system a different financial system those precisely didn't change what changed is history uh we are in 40 trillion dollars in debt and yet the steamboat is still tugging.

Okay.

So think about what that means.

Well, I think we've seen a lot of examples of states in the past capital estate,

Borgiaw states that are able to keep trucking along with huge amounts of debt even even historically right no uh we saw

not really but it's unstable it's almost i mean no this has been happening keep in mind this

is since this is almost a century now. So this is very different.

You're saying that in the past they haven't been able to move along with significant amounts of debt.

But now you're saying that maybe a century where they're just what printing money out of nothing and just keeping the system moving because of aircraft carriers and...

Well, they do have a strange level of control now, but this, like, quantitative easing, for example, this money printing policy, can't go on forever. They're going to hit a very hard limit.

There's going to be a tipping point.

Why can it be forever, though?

Because eventually the U.S. will

have to pay its debts, and eventually

people are going to realize the U.S. is not a very

good debt payer. People are going to stop trusting the U.S. is not a very good debt payer.

People are going to stop trusting the U.S. government

to actually pay that's why. I'd someone take out a bond.

The debt never has to be paid.

A lot of the debt

is, you need to understand how the system

works. As long as part of the debt is, you need to understand how the system works.

As long as part of the debt is continually serviced, everything's fine.

Look, put it this way.

I'm going to explain how we're paying back the debt.

So if you're a Japanese businessman, you're buying U.S. government bonds, you actually are getting paid back.

True.

But when we're paying that back, we're printing money to pay you back.

So you're getting it back.

Don't worry.

But then the balance sheet on our end is that we just printed money we didn't pay for. So we're basically

like in debt to ourselves.

Okay. And the guy in Japan doesn't care

about that. He doesn't care if we're in debt to ourselves.

Well,

wouldn't the Japanese

guy care if we're so indebted to ourselves

that we're having to cut

social services to

just afford to pay the debt?

No? No, he doesn't care.

So you don't think there's any limit to the US

debt spending? The only limits are

political. The only limits are based

in the logic of civilization itself. Like, how much more will the people tolerate psychologically and politically? Yes, I think those are explosive factors. But by the way of the economic system itself, is there going to be a Marxist breakdown?

No, that happened in 1929, and that's when it actually happened.

The one Marx predicted did happen.

But something else has, you know, emerged after that, um made economics less directly you know capitalist crisis no longer

directly corresponded to an immediate uh crisis of of politics.

I see you were coming from.

So I got two points if you can let me finish.

The first one is that I agree

that right now, unless there's a significant

transformation in the activity or the

consciousness of America...

Leonard DuBore, what's up?

Sorry? Don't worry about it. I'm somewhere else. or the consciousness of the American workers in America. Sorry.

Don't worry about that.

I'm somewhere else.

No, you're cool.

Unless there's a significant change in consciousness

or a huge movement of the workers,

they will keep on going up with this, right?

The state can get away with doing almost

anything it needs to without the conscious

intervention of working people. Sorry about the traffic. It was crazy. But at the same time,

there are absolutely limits and they will be hit. And I'm curious what you mean by 1929 being a Marxian crash and the potential for one not like that ever happened.

I just mean the one like Marxian directly predicted what happened based on what he wrote in capital.

Okay.

So I'm not,

can we bring this on back to

permanent revolution and

socialism in one country?

Because I still...

Revolutions cannot be permanent.

They have to have a...

But they are constantly in motion, aren't they? Sure.

Green. One's over good on green. One's over good on green all right we're good on green all right we're good so the earth is is constantly revolving around the sun okay so what we call a qualitative determination. It could be an apple, it could be a biological organism, any qualitative determination, a planet, a solar system, anything. Ultimately, those are,

according to systems theory, there's systems. That's the premise of systems theory.

Systems theory is kind of like the bourgeoisie's approximation of dialectics. It's not quite there,

but it's an approximation.

Every given thing, though, is not just a thing. It's a process. It contains an internal process.

That's the kernel of truth in systems theory. every given thing is really just the form of a

process when the process acquires form the revolution has complete when revolutions complete

yes they continue to move but they don't move in ways that um that uh how should i put it um they move with such a degree of consistency and they move with such a degree of stability and predictability

that they become forms. That's where form comes from. When a revolutionary process stabilizes, we no longer see it as in motion.

The only things we see in motion are the things that, like put it this way

when you see a guy walking around

yeah he's walking around

but it's the same guy right

or

when you see a

um

when you see a car

its wheels are moving,

actually, you really can't see the wheels are moving

if it's going at a sufficient speed. You just see a wheel.

There's so many other examples of like, you see something that looks static,

like a self-same

form but actually underlying it is a is a constant perpetuation of a process and a cycle

so i don't think the october revolution uh ended in the sense that the motion ended it till it's i mean even to this day in the

russian federation it's still turning off those wheels that began in 1917 for sure but what

happened is the revolution acquired a determination. And Trotsky hated that. He thought the revolution

should continue to solely be defined negatively, but revolutions are also eventually acquire a positive definition.

Just negation, eternal negation is not the same thing as revolution.

Trotsky's permanent revolution really means permanent negation.

Well, I think permanent negation. Well, I think

permanent negation is a part of this

process of motion. And I'll

go to what you're saying here about

that's a nice hat. But negation has

the opposing tension of

you know, uh don't actually negation and positive determination

and together they form a qualitative determination so you, you know, even a particle in modern physics, you know, a neutron or a proton or an electron, very much are suspended in negation, but also positive determination.

It's a relationality.

You know, it's a polarity, right?

Sure.

So, so there's this, like, constant transformation of the revolution.

You would argue, like, you say that it's constantly changing, right?

But you'd argue that it doesn't take on these

qualitative leaps that would qualify

it as a revolution again.

Right? Am I getting that right?

A new revolution.

Okay, for example, China.

China had the revolution in 49, but it also had the cultural revolution.

But the cultural revolution did not overthrow the proletarian dictatorship in the party state.

It was the reason it was a new revolution was because it was happening at a different dimension of society.

And yes, there are dimensions of a civilization in society that can continue to be, that can be open to new revolutions but

when a revolution stabilizes

you have a changing of the guard

that is continual that's processual

and which is what?

Denastic.

So I would argue the DPRK is a revolutionary state.

But the succession, the dynastic succession of leadership is revolutionary change, for sure.

But we don't think of it as revolution because it's it doesn't seem like it's new just like when we see a wheel turning it's nothing new

but as such that's it is new right it's it's a passing of the baton it is a change a generational change and so on so i have a kind

of dynastic notion of revolutionary succession okay well all right i see where you're coming from

so it's a bit of a differentiation between the initial revolution

which takes hold, like let's say

1917, and then it

goes through cycles, but you wouldn't call those

for the revolution. So, one

thing I do want to stick

on is the possibility,

sorry? They are

new revolutions but

they are revolutions that deepen and

enrich the

forms and qualitative determinations

that emerge out of the

revolution rather than liquidate them.

Okay. So two things

that are part of this, I'm curious about.

What would you consider the, would you consider

the withering away and eventual abolition

of the state a revolution? And then

how do you think you could have a revolution

that sticks to one country

that's able to actually achieve socialism

without spreading internationally?

Well,

the way,

okay, so

the revolution, okay, so the revolution, so the revolution

corresponding to the withering of the way of the state,

the way I see it is just a continual process

of dynastic revolutionary change,

like Mao's culture revolution, and so on and so on.

These cycles, after a certain threshold of cycles, eventually, yes, the state proper that was defined by angles withers away. Now does that mean central authority

is gone?

I don't think so.

Of course not.

Yeah, you still have to have

a small organizing apparatus.

Yeah, so the deepening

of revolutionary cycles.

Now, the second

question you had was, how can

revolutionary cycles continue to deepen

without inevitably spreading?

And my basic response to this is that

I think that

it is inevitable

that they spread

actually

but they don't spread

like a certain

nodal center

just expanding

and they don't spread

in an expansionist way

they spread more in the sense

of the creation of a revolutionary center

which is like a center of gravity

which then influences the rest

of the world

like the common term

no not even

okay um you know uh our experience of civilization and our reality

globally is very much interconnected what happens in america very much affects the threshold of

possibility that is imprinted upon our what happens in america very much affects the threshold of possibility

that is imprinted upon our brains and our minds

and you know the the the arab spring for example absolutely affected america

so and the way this happens is it just furthers and extends the threshold of what we consider possible within a civilization. Monkey see, monkey do. We tend to, like a tick, like a viral TikTok challenge, like the ice bucket challenge or something, right? Like a trend. There's a certain logic of civil society of like trends can spread.

Yes, like if there was a revolution in the U.S.

It would be a role model for the whole world.

Yeah, yeah, it would spread like a trend.

Trends can spread.

That's the point.

So there's a logic

of civil society at play that's global

for sure.

And I think that's inevitable.

But what's not guaranteed, it's never guaranteed

that the revolution

will influence a given country in a way that you

expected to. Stalin didn't anticipate that the revolution would influence China in the way that

it did with Mao, for example, right?

So that is the way that revolution spreads

in a revolutionary way, by the way,

because I think Mao was more revolutionary

than Stalin in many ways, right?

And... in many ways, right? And this is what guarantees the openness of the revolutionary process, but there's never a guarantee from any central place of control that it's going to expand within your control.

The control aspect isn't there.

So, yes, revolution spread, but not within the control of revolutionary actors within a given context.

So... within a given context so you're saying that it doesn't spread by the

movements of a revolutionary actor I mean wouldn't that be the

party are you saying it doesn't spread across national lines through

revolutionary action yeah yeah if I'm a If I'm the revolutionary actor within my nation

and I'm participating in the revolutionary process,

I can't control how that's going to influence another country.

I am not the leader of that country's process.

You know, even the Robesp—the Jacobins understood this, by the way. That's why Robespierre was so against

expanding the war effort in France. He didn't want to become a war of expansion because he's like, we have,

we are the subject, we are participating in our own revolutionary process. For us to extend

a degree of control over how that's going to influence other nations means that we're going to be assuming a position

with respect to those countries that's not the same

as one we have to our own.

So they could anticipate how that would have a corrupting effect

on the revolution within.

You know, the imperial

tendency, so to speak, that

we see with Napoleon.

Like this push and pull

between a centralized revolutionary

supporter and, like,

in one country, and the influences

of imperialism coming from another one.

Can you repeat that? I don't I didn't quite understand that.

No, it's all right. So, for example, if you had a centralized country that's trying to develop revolutions in other countries, you're saying that there would be influences of imperialism

onto the country that is trying to spread that revolution?

No, I'm saying that, yeah, well, your country would start to occupy and control other countries

in ways that bypass the process of organically acquiring the popular support and being the voice of your own people.

You know, like, if you're in France and you're the Jacobins, you're an organic son of the soil, you're the voice of the French masses and the French people,

okay, and you said, I want to control how the revolution plays out in Spain.

You don't have the same relationship to the Spanish people, though.

You didn't do the long work of building a mass organization of the Spanish.

You don't speak their language.

You don't understand their culture. you don't understand their culture, you don't

have the same relationship.

So you would be kind of meddling and extraneously imposing your will on a nation

who will simply see you as a foreigner, right?

Well, do you think that if there were proletarians in one country that wanted the revolutionist

spread their country, but they do not have the Communist Party built up necessary for that yet?

That, like, wouldn't they appeal to that revolutionary country to support them?

Even though they are not of that country themselves?

The country would have to

judge fairly.

Are you the actual genuine representative

of your nation?

Or, like, do you, because

the common turn absolutely funded

communist worldwide and gave them the resources

they needed to

do that, but

most of them were not successful.

You know, Moscow

funded everybody until the end,

till 91. But most of

the communist parties worldwide

did a very lousy job at becoming

the leaders of their nation

and the voice of their masses.

And usually to do that, they actually had to break

with Moscow, because Moscow

imposed a certain Orthodox institutional

paradigm.

So, you know, you really...

You know, it's not as though Stalin and...

You know, ML states didn't actually help other communists, is that, for example, if you're

Soviet Union, should you risk it all to prop up an unpopular minority of communists in Germany

and prop them

up basically to be the

heads of state using your own

I'll tell you well that ignores and

neglects the protracted and long process

of building up actual support

and good faith and goodwill among your people.

And for this to be imposed, you're seen as a foreign occupier, basically.

I see where you're coming from.

But you said at the same time spreading the revolution by

invading other countries and by stepping that

process. Was that something

that you support? Like for example,

the spread of the Soviet Union by

armed force into

Eastern European countries through the war?

Yeah, it was absolutely a mistake. Because, um, into Eastern European countries through the war?

Yeah, it was absolutely a mistake because

oh, you mean

a great patriotic war, not the Civil War?

Yes.

Yeah, I mean,

yeah, that was of course

justified by right of conquest because it was the USSR that was invaded and those states were used as the launching pad to do it. So it fell within the logical demand of the USSR that those states would not be militarily used against the USSR.

I don't think the USSR actually forced or exported its model onto those states.

They didn't turn Poland and Hungary and Germany into Soviet republics.

They more or less created basic guidelines of, okay, you know, be a nice good democracy

and don't be an aggressive militarist power.

Sure, it definitely imposed certain terms and conditions.

And, you know, the Soviet occupation created favorable conditions for communists, for sure.

But it's a big myth that the Soviets simply appointed the communists in those nations.

It's not true.

They actually preferred, I think they preferred actually that they wouldn't

be ruled by communists as a matter of fact.

Okay.

So I want to go back to

one of the questions I asked earlier is how do you think

socialism is possible?

I think we could agree like Marxist's system based on abundance in a country and a single country.

What do you mean?

Like how can you have socialism in one country um because because what okay so the relationship of a country to a mode of production is the question, right?

And modes of production take national forms.

Now, usually a modality of production, when it is inceptial, becomes a dominant tendency in all

countries simultaneously

because of the logic of civil society

itself. So you could have

a bunch of feudal countries

and capitalism can prevail

simply because, you know, the logic of civil society.

You know, the disruptive nature of profit-mongering by some foreign mercantile power

introduces practices

and relationships of production

that previously did not exist.

Monkey see, monkey do, right?

And

in the case of socialism,

a country can actually

uh... be advanced to the point of a of a more qualitatively advanced modality of

production

while the rest of the world is backward in the same way that, for example, capitalism can develop maybe in a few city-states and then take over the whole world.

And we can see examples of a superior socialist mode of production actually inspiring other nations with the necessity of adopting the modality of production, not only according to the logic of civil society, but according to the logic of politics. So, for example, in order for the USA to fight the Soviet Union, it actually had to adopt a lot of practices that we thought were exclusive to socialist nations, economic planning, control over supply chains, and so on and so on. And we're seeing something similar with China today. So it is inevitable that socialism will influence the world if it is

adopted in one country but is it possible to

build socialism in one country yes

it is

but that simultaneously

establishes the inevitability

that you're going to be influencing

the rest of the world that you're going to be influencing the rest of the world

if your mode of production is truly

more advanced, which

history shows it was.

I agree.

I'm not here to say that a centralized

economy or a planned economy is a problem. It's absolutely supported. I mean, I'm not here to say that a centralized economy or a planned economy

is a problem. I absolutely support it.

I mean, that's the best thing about the Soviet Union

that allowed it to go from a backwards peasant country

to a global superpower

as the planned economy. It's what allowed it to

win the great patriotic W.A.R.

These kinds of things.

But I want to hear your definition

of socialism on socialism

on one country. I can tell you mine first,

but I'll be in Japan so you can go.

Defining socialism? Yeah, and like how that connects to the socialism. defining socialism.

Yeah, and how that connects

to socialism in one country.

Okay, I would say a socialist

mode of production

is a mode of production

according to the principle of fulfilling the needs and well-being of the overwhelming majority of the population.

Off the top of my head, if you put a gun to my head, forced me to define socialization. of the overwhelming majority of the population.

Off the top of my head, if you put a gun to my head, forced me to define socialism.

I would say that the production is governed by a logic and is commanded by the principle of fulfilling some kind of common social interest.

That's not the only way I would define socialism, but it's like gun to my head.

Define it in less than 30 seconds.

That's how I would do it.

Do you think abundance is a critical element of socialism as like an essential element?

No, actually, I don't.

So this is one of my big sticking points with that theory is that socialism, my definition, is a society where the productive forces are controlled by the state, and there is a democratically controlled centralized plan that executes production, production to an extent where society has its needs and wants fulfilled with more than enough to go around of all the necessary products to move

society forward.

And the reason I

emphasize this abundance...

I don't really have time to

get into all that.

I understand the

abundance argument.

I'm just going to say,

and we're going to

probably have to wrap it up here.

I'm just going to say that,

you know,

the way I think about modes

of production is in terms of

modalities,

of cycles and systems. just like when i talk about revolutions right so production is always a

process that has a cycle right a beginning a middle point and end and a reproduction process

and a mode of production it's almost like a biological organism.

It has to reproduce itself, right, in a kind of systemic way, consistently systemic way.

And, you know, this, it's almost kind of like a cybernetic understanding, where you have to think about...

When we're talking about distinct modes of production, we're talking about distinct...

...modalities of, like, what is almost like a living organism right uh distinct ways of a given

integral division of labor reproducing itself how does it reproduce itself and so on and so on

and the capitalist kind of society, it's like an organism, and how does the organism

reproduce?

Well, the capitalist form of reproduction is where the circuit of capital MCM prime, right, is the basis and the foundation of economic activity, right? So the continual accumulation of surpluses in the form of money, right, in the form of

exchange value, creates this kind of retrocausal, almost autonomous process whereby all manner of economic institutions and relationships and

technological innovation proliferates and so on and so on at a huge scale all because

of this kind of underlying logic of this circuit, of capital, right?

And it's the circuit of capital that prevails as the governing logos, the governing logic of production.

And just from that, Spark, you get the... the like governing logos, the governing logic of production.

And just from that, spark, you get the modern industrial civilization we call capitalism.

So I like to think of modes of productions in terms of these kind of like governing and guiding principles or or

a logic of production, right?

That actually pre-exists a given

state of society.

So, I think, saying

the premise is abundance puts the

cart before the horse i think

because that's a give that's just this particular state of society it's not referring

directly to the the underlying principle of society so to speak right so okay that that's fair yeah so i think going off of that it's like you can

have to wrap it up there i got to bring more guess sorry man don't mean to do it abruptly but uh all right

let's bring on more what actual palantir wants to talk to me like the literal palantir

actual palantir

hello yeah what

hey man i just wanted to say hello and i wanted to say, I wanted to ask, what do you think about the, the ceasefire agreement between Iran?

I'm not, I'm just like, you're, you know, your name is Palantir.

I'm like, what it, Go ahead, introduction to coffee.

Hey, can you hear me? Yeah.

All right. So, uh, I am interested.

Are you still holding to the idea or thought that communism was morally good?

You know, I knew, I felt bad that I was going to be mean to you because of your profile picture.

And I wanted to let you speak before I started judging you and I did allow you to speak

and I just want to let you know that I hate you and I knew I hated you just because

when I saw your profile picture.

Okay.

Are you interested

or not? I've got a couple of arguments.

I'd like to run past you.

Not at all related to the last guy

who...

No, I know. I've been talking to you, robotic

glasses wearers for many days now.

So hold on. Are you going to fully hold on to this idea that...

What do you think of PPP?

Of propositional logic? Yeah, PPP. Of

propositional logic?

Yeah, PPP.

You know?

I think it helps clarify

a lot of points.

I don't think it's necessary

for debate,

but I do think it helps

clarify and make sure

people on the same page

and...

I don't like PPP. the same page. I don't like

PPP. It's not, I don't like

the song.

Okay, well, are you least willing to

entertain

thought by thought? And

as I go

through

give me what you have your

contentions?

Just tell me what your problem is

and go from there.

Well, I mean,

first of all,

I don't know what version of communism you promote, so I'm sort of lost in the dark. B.B.A.B.

Interesting.

Well, while you do that, I'm no.

All right, it's the, the Stalinist one, you know, the Stalinist one.

So would you say that the communist?

Yeah.

Would you say that the Communist manifesto then is a good representative of your beliefs?

Okay.

Yeah.

So would you say that communism is ethical even when you take into account Christian ethics?

I think ethics is for peters.

How? Did religious thinkers not engage in ethics at all?

Petirass did.

Can you expand on that?

Yeah, I believe in something called Tahweed, which means, you know, from, you know, Tachweed.

You know, I believe in that.

And I think ethics is a way to violently abstract and establish as a particular division of mental labor, the innate moral cosmos that animates the soul of all mankind integrally with seamless concrete unity.

So do you not think that and box it off in a petter-assed box and call it ethics?

And then glasses wears molested it.

I'm against that.

I don't want glasses wears to molest any, any sacred part of the integral whole of united mankind.

I believe in the principle of al-Wahdad al-Wzhu.

You're appealing to religious elements, are you not?

No elements.

Just one book, the Quran.

So you wouldn't have any concern with Christian virtue ethics at all?

I don't speak, Petter-Ass Babel.

No ethics.

No ethics.

Okay, so let's maybe take this a different way then

so if you're not engaged

in ethics at all

how do you hold on to the idea

in the first place that communism is morally good

uh al kuran is okay but the corin does the koran not

have a code of ethics does it not tell you how to behave and how to act no code no code

no code so there is no instructions for

no instructions

for conduct in the Quran

no instructions are how to put it put a

chair together it's not there

so if I open up to a random page in the koran it's not

going to tell me how to behave um it will not tell you how to behave it will only show you the

truth so is it true

that there is a proper way to behave?

Yes.

So then there is ethics?

Because if there is a proper way to behave, then there is an ethical guide.

There's no ethical guide.

That's what an ethics is. an ethics is a guide to life.

Ethics is a made-up arbitrary division of a whole that is undivided.

And how do you possibly substantiate that claim?

By existing.

By existing? By existing.

Without glasses.

So I still don't see how that's relevant.

So when I am talking about ethics and morality, I am mostly concerned with how one should live their life.

And so when I open to religious texts like the Quran...

From a law.

Okay.

So let's talk about, for example, what is it, do you have any, uh, do you just, do you not think the Quran is a guide for how to live?

Okay.

Well, here's what I'm going to say then. If the Quran, it guides people on how to live, it promotes a ethical prescription.

No.

Yes, it does. But definitely, because ethics is a guide to life. No, it doesn't. Because ethics is a guide to life. No, it doesn't.

Okay.

Ethics is a guide to life.

No.

Why do you contend that and how do you contend that?

How do you possibly...

Ethics is a secondhand attempt at people

attempting to identify

the...

So when Prophet Muhammad

attempted to guide people and how to live,

that was some made-up second-hand concept.

He didn't guide people on the basis of some kind of discrete divided compartment within a mental division of labor he called ethics. He guided people directly through inspiration based on his virtues, his actions, him as a role model.

So you're a virtue ethicist.

He's a role model.

You're supposed to adopt his virtues.

No, I'm not any of these pederat.

These are molestation victims in your head.

I'm not any of them.

I'm actually just Uzbek.

Okay. Am I supposed to imitate Muhammad?

No.

So what is, what's the whole point of the Quran is it not guiding me and how to live?

It It doesn't guide you as a computer

I'm not concerned how it guides me I just don't know how to talk to someone who doesn't know what it means to be inspired by anything, you know?

Well, I'm very familiar. I'm a Christian. I'm inspired revelation.

You're not. Yes, I am. You worship numbers and not computers.

So, hold on.

I have a copy of the Quran,

and I've got three Bibles in riddles.

He spoke in poetry.

He spoke indirectly.

If you can't get it,

if you can't be inspired by truth,

if you can't be inspired by things,

if you just don't get it, if you don't

understand that everything that guides us and compels us in human beings is coming from a source

that is an integral whole of existence that is simultaneously and continuously compelling

the sum integral totality of all that the cosmos is continuously upon us at every second of every breath that we take.

And nowhere within this is there a distinction between the ethical, the moral, the beautiful, the just

and the good? I don't know what to

tell you. You just separate

all these things. You're partially correct in the sense that

religious concepts are matters of

significance. So like you said,

there are going to be matters of parables. There's not, religious

doesn't exist. religious doesn't exist.

Religion doesn't exist.

It's not real. Religion doesn't exist.

It's not real.

How do you come to that conclusion?

It's just some separate made-up thing.

That's just like, I don't accept the justification of separating it into a discrete division of labor there's an integral totality I believe only in the integral totality of existence and labor I do you do you believe that there are matters of instance and labor. Al-Wahdā. Do you believe that there are matters of instance

and then matters of significance?

Like, do you think that there's a difference between a story

that has a moral to it

and then morality itself?

No.

As it is.

There's no distinction in reality.

Only in your head is there a distinction.

So if I say that there is a

cup in front of me, for example,

that is not one

communicative aspect

as opposed to

let's say I describe a woman

like a cup full of love

same thing

so the cup that is in front of me is same thing. So

the cup that is in front of me

is literally full of love.

Literally, yes.

How do you come to that conclusion?

Because all of being

is full of love.

God's love.

Okay.

So let's maybe

is, so you said

everything is full of love? Is that including

the spiritual beings?

Everything.

So what about the deceiver, Satan?

Even he.

How can a deceiver be

full of love?

He was created by

God.

Okay, but that doesn't explain how he's

full of love. I mean, if I love someone, why would I

lie to them?

Because how he's full of love. I mean, if I love someone, why would I lie to them? Because you are deceived.

So,

how?

God gave you free will

So let me get this straight

I'm supposed to somehow believe that

that Satan the deceiver is full of love

But yet I am deceived

Yes but yet I am deceived.

Yes.

Okay, so then I'm really failing, because I'm left here with two options.

Either I'm accepting all these different contradictions

that you've proposed,

or the simpler thing is you just don't want to build a moral argument behind why you think communism is morally good.

It seems like you're trying to have you cake and eat it too.

No cake. No too. No cake.

No cake.

Is no cake supposed to somehow convince me that communism is good?

Yes.

I mean, it explains why communists love to starve people

but okay

if you had to

try to convince me

that communism

is morally good

how would you go about it

stop eating seed oils that lower How would you go about it?

Stop eating seed oils that lower your testosterone.

I'm actually allergic to seed oils.

It's a big problem.

So you have no excuse.

No excuse for what?

For being gay.

So effective.

I am... I'm thoroughly convinced.

Do you, like, actually have an argument that would maybe convince an outsider as to why communism is good?

Yes, I do. I mean,

of course I would.

So what is it? I'm waiting for

it. I'm waiting for it.

I'm an open-minded individual.

I've been inquisitive this entire time.

You really want the argument in a proposition form?

I'm extending an olive branch.

You want the argument in a logical form, correct?

I want the argument in a way that is maybe coherent to that I can track and that we can refer back to. It doesn't have to be P1, P2.

It just has to be

referential.

Yeah.

Okay.

Got it.

It's coming right up.

So... so

let me ask you this

you've been very

unserious this entire conversation

if I am a reasonable person

to what like why If I am a reasonable person,

to what, like, why should I believe that... I have a pen.

I have an apple.

Where is this leading?

Uh, apple fan.

I have a pan

I have pineapple

I just want to make sure you're tracking

Are you tracking that?

I'm not understanding why a new song from 2015 has any content.

He had a pen. Are you tracking it?

He had a pen and then he had an apple.

Do you know what happened?

From there, how do I come to the conclusion that communism is more than good?

Well, you got to track the argument first before you understand the beautiful conclusion.

There's nothing to track. There's no context content so you're not tracking it how can i help you

if you don't want to track it there's no content to discuss you haven't enlightened me as to

how that has any relevance yeah to how communism is really good.

All right, I'll play it again.

So typically when it comes to debate,

refusal to take an affirmative position and explain the position you're holding is a form of like fleet running away.

Concession.

All right. Are you tracking that about about as well as junior is tracking

very similar conversations that he had with inspiring philosophy

but did you track that?

I think we're on two different trains here.

Did you track what the argument was?

I'm on the track.

You are driving a Jeep in the middle of the Oregon Sand Dunes.

Okay, let me ask you a question.

If you were living in Dunn and the Messiah came to Iraqis would you have glasses

and be like

no

what does that have any relevance

to the moral status

of communism

everyone's inspired

everyone's ready

they understand

the situation

they understand

they're ready to go it's a very clear thing being communicated. They're oppressed. They need to be liberated to acquire dignity and so on. Would you be like, let me hear the argument so it can track? Is that how you would respond? I just want to be curious.

I would, well,

first of all, a Messiah-style figure, like what we would expect to see

given God's nature

would be a

something like a father figure. And

fathers, actually, from my experience,

love to sit back and explain the world

and how it works.

That's actually like a key facet of being a father.

Why would he be a father?

If Jesus, would you like logic Lord Jesus

if he was alive and be like when jesus was like you know it is

easier for the wealthy to pass through it's either for a camel to pass through the

eye of a needle than the wealthy to enter heaven would you be like that doesn't track for me can you

explain is like would you be like, that doesn't track for me. Can you explain? Is like, would that be your whole thing?

So, like, how would you respond? How would you respond to that if you said that?

How would I respond? I would ask, I would ask him to what he means by

that but nobody had to do that

except you

actually

if you finish that first

to its logical conclusion

people did have to ask

they really They understood exactly

what he meant. No, no, no, because you're, you're opening

He didn't have to put himself in this formulaic

mechanical way. People understood.

So that means the entirety

of early church history is just kaput?

No, you're saying that. I'm not. I'm saying most...

Okay, do you know why I'm not taking you seriously? I want to be good faith

about it. Okay, the reason I'm not taking you seriously is because

your relationship to truth.

Before you get to this, do you understand the full context of the verse you just referenced?

Okay, what's the context?

So, immediately following the Eye of the needle thing,

people did ask Jesus because he was a rabbi,

rabbi. It means teacher. And he

said that he eventually ended up

in clarifying that all things are

possible through God. So when he said that the wealthy

would have an easier time

get into heaven than passing a camel through the eye of a needle.

He was saying that even God can do the impossible. It was a call to have faith in Christ not to not necessarily saying that rich people can't get into heaven.

He's saying it's really hard by default

for them to do that and that if they wanted to

they would have to have an extraordinary

degree of, you know,

faith in God or whatever. So

I don't know what you're talking about.

Anyway,

look, the reason I can't when i think every man in their gut i can argue i mean i'm happy to argue

but when you're operating on the basis of reducing everything to a um propositional form

and you're calling that logic

it tends to be

a bad faith way of conversing

with someone.

Usually the meaning

that we intend to communicate

usually has to...

That's just the whole thing is

this entire time I've been like,

hey, we can kind of ditch

propositional logic and take something more informal.

But you said you,

you know,

you said you have to track it

and all these kind of things

and I just,

I don't know what you mean by that.

I would say I would say that pretty simple. I would just I would say okay I would say communism is not an abstraction. Okay, first of all, I'm not inventing some kind of system I made up

or I think has been

made up at any point. I think

communism is the very basic and

self-evident demand that does

exist

among populations and people

in many different forms for certain, but it's a basic demand and growing awareness that we do exist within an integral, unified division of labor, and that the common reality

we share

deserves to be given

the consideration that

is befitting of our existence

as dignified human beings.

Now I'm not going to, you can strip that and turn that into a of our existence as dignified human beings.

Now, I'm not going to, you can strip that and turn that into an eternal abstraction and reduce it to that as some kind of universal principle that exists in isolation within a vacuum.

But I'm saying that within the context of the actual world we live in, the actual society

we live in, the actual history that we've inherited, and the actual situation we now find

ourselves in, with all the context it implies. So I would like to assume...

So you... I would like to assume that we can all acknowledge. We do live in a real world and we can talk about it without having to be absolutely certain of whether or not at a propositional or formal level

we are being consistent.

I mean, yeah, I'm a realist.

You have not said anything I'm necessarily

like just there that I disagree

with. We do contact and

interact with reality

and there's very real aspects of human nature and there's a

it sounds like you are communicating some degree of like a most common denominator shared

between people correct yeah so then would you say that this most common denominator is something like a human nature?

Hold on. I'm reading something. What are you saying?

So earlier you said that you would agree that there is some degree of like most common

denominator among workers and people and we should recognize that

as a fact of reality.

I would say that our existence

is materially

interrelated,

materially and practically interrelated,

like in actuality.

We share a means of production, and we share a division of labor.

So you would, as you essentially, are you not grounding this division of labor aspect as a part of human nature?

To the extent that I would say that human nature is that we are, we form divisions of labor, we form communities of labor, upon whose basis our existence depends materially.

I would say it's human nature that we are social beings but i wouldn't say a particular form of the division of labor is a reflection of human nature

okay so sure just the tendency of humans to specialize and deviate the labor.

That's cool enough.

I personally, I think that there is much more to human nature than that.

In fact, I think at its core, humans are rational.

I never reduced human nature to that.

I just said that's an aspect of human nature.

Sure. Would you agree that it would be subordinate to other aspects of human nature, such as the things we have more often in common?

I think that every aspect of our existence is subordinate to the kind of logos that pre-exist our

individuation, pre-exist our sense of subjectivity, pre-exists our individuation, pre-exist our sense of

subjectivity, pre-exists our

command of language

even, and that

before we have any of this, we have to be

socialized in some kind of way. We have to

enter some kind of social cosmos

that interpolates us as a something and way. We have to enter some kind of social cosmos that

interpolates us as a

something and as a someone

and that without this

mediation, we

cannot exist, actually.

Sure. I would still say that that aspect of, you know, human nature exists as an aspect of our

rationality, right?

So humans are rational animals and that it is rational for humans to cooperate.

I think all that all things are rational

in that sense. Even plants

are rational, animals are rational.

But

they'd be bar, plants and animals

would be rational insofar

as the creator has

rationally fit them into the world and into the system it created.

No, they are governed by rational. They're governed by rational principles.

Correct, but the animals themselves are not rational animals.

Why not?

Because there's something uniquely special about the way that humans exchange information and argue and debate.

Okay, well, if you want to understand and understand what separates man from animals and simplified, I agree something qualitatively does separate us from animals. The difference between man and animals is that man has to reproduce, it's the only being within the cosmos that must actually reproduce their existence.

A biological organism, for example, doesn't actually reproduce its existence.

All it does is, all an organism is really, it's a relationship between the organism and its environs can you clarify what you mean by reproduces its existence yeah so all the premises that ground our existence we can say these are causal premises so for example all the

things that made us physically possible in the first place whether in the emergent sense of the

evolutionary conditions of our existence you know since let's say the beginning of the universe or the active conditions of our existence, you know, since, let's say, the beginning of the universe, or the active

conditions of our, the active material conditions that allow us to continue to survive.

It just sounds to be like you're describing general reproduction with all, which all organisms

share in general.

Yeah, but the problem is that you cut me off, so we will never know what I was talking about.

I just want to, okay, so go ahead and continue, so I want to make sure I get your whole thought then.

Yeah, so biological subsistence and reproduction isn't actually an act of reproducing your existence with any discrimination. It's a completely passive process in the same way that physical causes are passive, you know, rocks falling down hills and so on and so on. Biological systems do

reproduce, but they do not do so by, they do not do so by reproducing the existence of the thing,

actively. Do you understand?

It's still completely passive.

So would you say that the

difference between the active

and the passive is some sort of intentionality?

Well, you didn't let me get there,

so we'll never know what I meant.

I'm, like, I have to kind of probe you as you go, because I'm, we have to clarify

you see.

I'm trying to get to that key point, but you keep interrupting me, so we'll never know, I guess.

Well, so then what separates human

reproduction from animalistic reproduction right so like I said all the

underlying premises I just mentioned that premise the possibility of a

human being which are inherited by the human being and not the consequence of human

actions, are set before a human being and made an object of their activity. And in this way, the passive reproduction of our existence is impossible

because the dimension of actual necessity intervenes.

And so when we think about what is an act, well, all an act really is, if you ask me, is the entire fabric of the cosmos actually facing itself and closing in upon itself, a human being is a being that reproduces

itself.

That's burdened with the task, that's burdened with the necessity of reproducing itself for itself.

What is the thing in humanity that's being reproduced here?

There's a woman who wants to talk to me i'd rather talk to her i'm just going to bring her what do you want

yeah i was going to ask if you had an argument for moral realism

bro bro bro what is this you have an arra right

yeah no offense

with radcap they kind of now associate

you with moral realism go ahead

I was just curious go ahead continue

um

so

to kind of get back to where I was at, what is it with, like, what is it in humans that's being reproduced, like down in its core?

I would, no, it's interesting. I would say the thing that's being reproduced is actually being itself.

A human, all a human being is a is actually being itself. All a human

being is a

being as

it acquires

particularity

and which

which

which

really is

the principle of cosmos itself itself it's an ontological principle so being as such

um acquiring self sameness with itself.

That's really what a human being is. So how do you attribute that to humans and not animals in general?

Because it seems to me that animals have an almost automatic code of life.

They have like an instinct that drives them.

They are the like,

even Jordan Peterson

recognizes that.

We don't have that privilege.

We don't have the privilege

of being able to be guided

by an instinct.

We have to decisively face

being as such,

for example.

You want to go to the

Hyde-Ggarian route.

Correct, which is why

that humans have to have that

specialty of rationality to them.

It's the rationality that explains why

they have to be so decisive, which you disagree.

All that reason

consists of is the accordance of being with itself.

That's it.

So then you would say that maybe the ultimate telos of rationality is capital B being, being able to

be one with

the creator or

the intended design of the universe.

Yes, that's the that's what reason can

that's the content of reason.

So then it is by reason that

humans decide how to act. Is that

not correct?

Provided

this is our definition of reason,

then yes.

So then

you would say that morality

is a rational enterprise.

Or that ethics is a rational.

Everything is rational.

I would say there's nothing

that is irrational.

So then

now that we've gotten to this idea that morality in ethics is rational, how do you say that ethics or morality is not like this code of conduct that humans can discover? It seems like we're right back to where we start this conversation. Let me let me just simplify

like my entire world

view to you

because honestly it's

140 a.m.

I'm not going to sit here

and spend three hours

explaining my entire

philosophy to you.

But I'll try to simplify

the best my ability.

All right.

So my view

is that being

does not have the discrimination inherently that we impose upon it through creating mental divisions of labor that maybe make it easier for us to attend to these different aspects of being,

that there are these different aspects,

but those aspects are not the same thing

as the different specializations taken on by our thinking consciousness, which are in fact

distinct forms of mental activity, not distinct realities of being. So the moral dimension of being,

I don't actually think is distinct from the material dimension, from the existential dimension, you know, and so on and so on. I don't think the moral is actually separated from the cosmos. I think cosmos is inherently something moral.

And being

is inherently

something that has

a moral

reality to it. But when we

abstract the moral from a concrete

totality, which is in fact part of, we have to engage in an abstraction and treat it as something distinct. When we do that and treat it with this exclusivity and distinction, we translate it as ethics.

And that's solely something we're doing through our mental activity.

Then after we do that, we then project, this product, this artificial product of our mental activity, onto the thing itself and say, you know, this is ethics, this is religion,

this is this and this is that. The thing itself doesn't know these distinctions. The thing itself

is not separated by these distinctions.

So the distinction is artificial to me.

That's why I don't take it seriously.

I think when we human beings engage in ordinary language,

and we talk about sunglasses,

when a random guy in the street talks

about sunglasses, there's

absolutely a moral significance

to what he's doing.

He may not

know it, he may not comprehend it,

he may not have thought it through. But there is an inherent...

For example, every step you take, this is the analogy, when you walk, there are all manner of different processes going on with the one step that you take. There's biological

processes, physical processes, processes that are relevant at the scale of particle physics, skeletal,

you know, muscular skeletal, whatever, biophysical, all sorts of things that are treated

differently within the mental division of labor are suspended in the process of you taking a step.

But does that mean that with every step you take

there is somehow

all of these divisions of labor

are

some, the knowledge, specialized knowledge

and tail by them and so on and so on. All of this is actually there. No, it's one thing that's happening. There's one thing happening. All of it works together and is interrelated concretely and in reality, right? Mentally, you treat these all as separate things, but they're all actually one thing, okay?

So that's basically my worldview.

I would almost agree.

I would say that matters of significance are, in a certain sense, embedded in a sense that when humans

interact with the world they do so teleologically.

The way in which things are embedded

have no regard

for the distinctions

we project upon those things within the distinctions we

project upon those things within our consciousness.

So would you say that it matters,

it doesn't, would you say it ultimately doesn't matter

what humans value?

It's 1.45 a.m. I have no idea how you would come to that conclusion.

So please give me one reason why we shouldn't just wrap it up here.

I mean, I'm perfectly comfortable. I think I

if I could just...

Yeah, I mean, I don't know how you get from that. Like, okay, so you say

you can't have that... What? No, I'm saying the opposite.

I'm saying that our values are embedded

they're not like these separate distinct things like what are you talking about if i said a guy

on the street with sunglasses that there's a moral significance to him talking about that, or literally anything, really.

Of course, yeah, suspended in this are values and so on and so on.

But abstract values are the artificial creations of our consciousness.

They're artificial secondary products of a kind of secondhand mental activity that is in no way suspended in the vital source of the thing that we call a value.

I don't know how to explain that to you.

One more person can come

one more person and then we're done

and it's not going to be a logic lord i'm not staying up for four hours again

uh if you guys want me to continue debating autis every stream drop a 10 otherwise and i understand

if you don't don't but i will not continue doing this shit every stream

uh because it's just a waste of my time honestly

all right one person request or we're done. why did you kick me when you found out i wasn't a woman dude

i don't know because from far away your profile picture

why are you um why are you a moral realist? Why are you a moral realist?

Why are you a moral realist? I don't know who that is.

Can you hear me?

Oh, you're echoing.

One's on the green place if it's working.

Ones, ones, ones, ones if you can hear me.

One's who you can hear me.

All right, you can hear me.

Yeah, I can hear you.

All right, we're going to, this is going to be literally five minutes.

I have to go after that.

All right.

So what do you, you said, why am I moral realist?

Yeah.

Because.

That's my response because

okay well

I'm an anti-realist because

Seattle doesn't really get us anywhere

no you're right but you're the one who requested

I don't have a problem

with uh I don't I don't I don't have a problem with...

I don't... I want to be clear, like, I don't find it necessary to evangelize common sense.

I want to be clear about that to every...

All the logic lords on TikTok.

I don't, on a mass level, think it's necessary for me to convince autistic logic lords

i'm not even no no no i want to be clear about this because it's like for us to take power

we just have to speak to the masses in terms of what they understand in their stomach their

common sense uh things they can feel and understand.

And we don't need to...

Like, all these things you talk about, I'm a moral realist, I'm a moral anti-realist.

In real life, none of that matters at any

level. It's just, you're creating problems

that only exist in your head,

but are nowhere real in the real world

anywhere. And you're saying, well, how do we

talk about? You're like a person cornering

themselves in a dark room, like, well, what is

real? How do we talk about,

just go outside.

Stop psyching yourself out.

You're treating as the,

this is not a problem of your brain.

It's not a problem of your mind to dwell upon.

Like, you can,

you can be like,

how do I, how do I, how do I know what the grass is green and what

the green is, bro, just touch grass.

You're overthinking it in your head because you're separated from the thing itself.

If you're spending so much time making up these made-up philosophies of morality, it's because you're

removed from the actual reality of what is the moral. The moral is very much something everyone

can sense and experience. When you're engaging in these abstractions, moral realism, anti-realism,

it's because you're separated from the thing itself.

Okay, if you were to say my attitudes about chocolate ice cream are objectively true right right do you think like me

asking for an argument for that it's like what would be the meaningfulness of that statement

what would you say what would be the meaningfulness of that statement?

You'd know you'd be making a basically meaningless statement.

You're basically saying you could not consider the possibility that other people don't experience ice cream the same way you do, which would be something I doubt you believe, unless you were delusional.

Well, no, no, no, I'm not saying I believe that.

Look, I'm just saying how do you were, if you were to say that, right?

And I asked you for an argument.

Big Chud, what do you want?

You've been talking shit, haven't you?

My bad.

I didn't need to, I didn't mean to disrespect you

how you doing tonight bro

I just wanted your submission

and I accepted

you bitch

so everyone in this chat

talking shit

just understand

your leader just submitted to me

uh this guy's saying

oh 57 viewers

yeah totally

I only have 57

you're right

I would never violate

TikTok's terms of service

and be somewhere else right now

wait I'm allowed to do that

I'm not I can that. Am I not?

I can't, I just can't mention where I'm at.

Huh?

Nevermind.

No, I'm just streaming on TikTok right now,

nowhere else.

Trust me.

5-4 brown clown My feelings are hurt by that You know, you just hurt my feelings

I got to think about how I'm gonna cry about this before I do cry, which, don't worry.

I just got to think about it a little more. You know, I'm like, what does this woman want?

And then I click it and it's like,

yo, what up, bro?

That was hilarious.

That was honestly so funny.

That was a highlight. all of these weird, like, logic lords, you guys are just not even human anymore, honestly, like, your whole worldview would collapse if a homeless guy just like um just like

jumped you on the street you're like none of that stuff you spend hours debating about on

tic-tok would mean anything anymore like when anytime shit gets, none of the things you care about matter.

You know, like all these things, all these like made up things you construct in your mind

in your head that don't exist anywhere in the world, all of that collapses the minute shit

gets real. Then you become, you have an integral worldview where you just got to act quick, think quick.

And none of these values and principles you artificially construct in your head become anything. Not a logic, Lord.

Bro, you're talking about moral realism versus anti-realism.

Like, how out of touch from the real world do you have to be to talk about that?

Red Maze, what's up?

Do I don't know my argument against analytic philosophy?

Just look at them.

They're all a bunch of fat people at wearing glasses.

And their whole life is hollow and empty.

You want to die like that?

Go ahead.

Be my guest.

I don't agree.

You only live one time.

Is that what you want to live your life doing,

thinking it matters?

It really doesn't, I promise.

So communism is a rash feeling we should all act on without consideration.

You've had plenty of time to consider it, but because you're obese and play video games, you haven't.

I don't know what to tell you.

Plenty of consideration is devoted to it.

As soon as people understand what it means,

look, it's like, when a fish knows what water is, fish swims in the water when mankind knows what the

communism is he seizes upon the communism with a zeal with a fanaticism like a fish seeking water

and uh this is the truth this is why you like a fish seeking water.

And this is the truth.

This is why you anti-communists have to lie

and deceive and create these convoluted

systems of cope and gibber

to... Even you

ANCAPs lie to people

and say, you want communism communism be an ANCAP.

If you want a dignified way of life and you want to be able to support yourself and your family and have dignity, you say, then you're going to be an ANCAP.

See, the basic demand for other people

to have these things is

inherently communistic.

Nobody says this.

Yes, they do.

Unconsciously, they do. Not consciously. Of course not.

Communism.

You want me to nuke you anti-communist? It was never a theory.

Karl Marx did not invent communism.

Communist manifesto names what five to seven different types of communism. Communism is a tendency that happens to prop up throughout human history.

Its origins cannot be pinned to anything, so it must come from God.

If communism could be debated with, in the way you logic lord seek it.

Who founded communism?

Where's the founder?

The reason you talk of Karl Marx is because he's the boogeyman who embrace the role. But what do the opening lines of the Communist manifest? A specter is haunting Europe. Before anyone who knew who Karl

Marx was, a specter was haunting Europe europe the specter is immortal across history people have

been freaking out and people were freaking out and fearmongering about communism before carl marks even

had a name literally in the press they fear-mongering of communism.

Literally, in the same way they do now.

Mr. Paolo, I think Brazilians are annoying.

Are you Brazilian?

He's taking forever to load. I'm done with this shit.

Yo!

What? load. I'm done with the shit. Yo! Hello, how are you?

Are you Brazilian?

No, I'm not Brazilian.

What are you?

I'm European.

Bye. F you, you reactionary, you brown fascist.

Get out.

Get out from our country.

You're a fascist.

You're not a communist.

Get out.

A white guy telling an Arab to get out of the country?

I'm not white.

I'm Indian.

Get out.

Why is an Indian telling me to get out? If you're,

I'm Arab. Who you would say to get out of

the country? I'm saying get out with their reactionary

politics. Do you know you said get out of the country?

So you believe in deportation?

Deporting fascists? Yes.

Okay, but you said get out of the country, correct? So this is a national framework you're working in?

Well, we currently live in a nation.

That's right.

And that's Lenin as your profile picture, right?

So are you a Bolshevik as well?

Well, Marxist

Leninist. Unlike you.

So national Bolshevik.

I'm not a national Bolshevik. Yeah, you are.

You said you wanted me to get out of the country.

You didn't say, for example... Because we currently live in a capitalist

country. I'm not saying we should establish a new...

But why say get out of the country? But what... Me getting out of the country implies

there's a country that you're okay with accepting me, right?

No. What? So where... How could I get out of the country without ending up in another country?

Well, you could die.

Okay, so just say that's what you want.

But you're a fascist. Of course that's what I want.

Okay.

Do you call your mom a fascist when she gives you a bedtime?

Well, my mom is actually a fascist, but...

Your mom is a fascist, right?

Yes.

So me and your mom...

Me and your mom are together.

No, no, she's not a red-brown fascist.

No, but me and your mom are definitely in the same boat.

In the nationalists.

Me and your mom are in the same

boat. You said you want me to be

deported? Well, your mom will be with

me on the same boat. My mom wants to leave

though, that's the thing. My mom wants to be. Okay, and I'll take

her with me. Is that okay?

No. Why not?

Are you going to go to India?

She's fascist, right?

So you should, you want her to die, right?

Just like me.

No, no, not my mom.

My mom's special.

No, you said, unless you have no principles.

You're bourgeois, petty bourgeois.

Well, not coming to my, when it comes to my mom.

I love my mom.

You don't let your mom?

You said she's a fascist and I'm a fascist.

What?

She's with me now.

She doesn't love you anymore. No, no, no, no. Well, like, she's unfortunately, islamatobic, so...

She doesn't love you anymore.

No? He just says I'm a failure. There's a difference.

I wonder why.

Anyway, uh, you said, get out of my country, you

fascist. Then you said your mom is a fascist.

And then...

Wait, is this actually... Can I talk to your mom?

No. No, she would kill me

if she knew I was on TikTok.

How old are you?

I'm 18.

Okay. I'm 18. Okay.

I'm coming home.

I would say that...

I would say that your mom and me have a lot in common according to you, and that maybe you should introduce us.

No, don't press up my mom, bro.

Maybe I should.

Maybe you shouldn't.

Why not?

Because I like my dad.

Well, he doesn't seem to have a say in it anymore because you just said your mom's a fascist.

Aren't you like the head of like one of the biggest communist parties in the country?

Communist quote-unquote parties in the country?

I would say

second biggest,

if we're calling PSL,

communists,

we're the second biggest. They have

1,400. We're slowly behind them.

We're getting there.

But why?

Damn, I didn't know I was talking to such...

I thought this was like...

I didn't... I didn't... Oh, I mean, I knew you were like...

The Hawes, but like... Yeah. Why do people...

Why are people surprised about how accessible I am?

I understand that.

Because like they were going one guest request here.

Yeah, I don't really publicize my TikTok at all.

And I'm not primarily streaming here. I'm somewhere else, but'm using this to for content for somewhere else

anyway uh what what do you want you wanted to yell at me and say i'm a fascist because the

reddit told you well reddit and media's like that's two sources

Reddit and who?

Medium and Discord and TikTok

So that's four sources

That's like academic media

No I mean I'm sure

When you grew up hearing that Stalin ate babies

I'm sure you

Believe it right away.

Also, why are you guys trying to take over

subredits, bro?

Do you think Stalin was a lied about man?

People are saying the truth about him in the in the mainstream like on Google?

No, they're lying.

Yeah, they're lying about me too, buddy.

You get used to it.

They're lying about me too.

Did you or did you not call someone the absolute?

I did.

Okay, so then...

What are we doing?

I didn't take over subredits.

I didn't do any of that.

I did.

No, but you guys are.

No, they're not.

There's one Australian who's doing it.

Who's not even an ACP,

all right? He's just a sympathizer.

I mean, it doesn't matter because Reddit is like...

Okay, he's an ACP supporter

in Australia who's doing it, all right? Cry about it.

You should denounce that.

Why would I... Why do I?

Because it's immoral. It's like I hope Reddit burns to the

ground. I hope every Reddit data server

fucking gets flooded and is destroyed.

Why are you talking to a communist

and talking about Reddit?

Me too, me too.

But, like,

you have to consider

that it's really cringe

to try and take over separate

that's, like,

really cringe to hate.

Okay, I don't care about that.

I literally,

it's not my problem.

I don't care.

Okay, but, like like you should still denounce

it, though? Like, do you denounce

national Bolsheviks?

No.

Okay, well, that one.

It's okay, so then don't complain when people call you

red-brown fascists.

You know what you remind me of when I was like in elementary school and people like

called all the Muslims terrorists and it's just kind of like exhausting.

Like you're so ignorant.

You don't even know anything, dude.

You don't even know what national Bolsheviks are. You don't even know who they are, where they came from, what they actually believe.

They're like Dugan, bro.

Okay, you don't know who Dugan is. You're just an ignorant person.

You know, like the fourth freaking political in front of

being staged

thing.

Okay.

And what's my

relation?

What about

Dugan's ideas

do I,

am I influenced by?

Yeah,

you guys are like

kind of similar.

Yeah,

just kind of

vibes, right?

Not really any

investigation.

Yeah, vibes, right, no investigation.

There he is for LARPERS.

There he is for LARPERS.

Just a bunch of buzzwords and stuff.

No actual arguments.

I get it.

Yeah, yeah.

Of course.

All right, anything else?

What is the Big Haas' opinion

on the KPD?

The German?

Yes.

From the 1930s?

Yes, from the 1930s.

They were too late.

They should have

got on that A game earlier but uh why

because i i i want i want to ask what's your opinion of the third period thesis and like

should timon have hidden the widow of affair should he what did thailand have hidden the widorf affair

like he didn't what the whit torf affair when uh one of tayloran's allies was embezzling funds and tamon hit it

and the conciliators come in KPD occurs

should he have hit that? What is the relation

of that to the third period?

Well, because the conciliators

were against the third period and

in order for fare was the excuse that

Tamon and his allies used to purge the

Considators and cemented the third period

thesis. Yeah. So that would be the correct thing to do.

Talman was correct.

I mean, I think he was correct, too too but why do you think that because if the purpose is to remove conciliators who would change the party line in a false direction then the means by which that's done are completely justified regardless.

Well, I would be inclined to agree, and I also think that social Democrats emphasize too much the SPD's quote-unquote willingness to cooperate

when the SPD banned the RFB

on the nightly celebration.

What's your question?

My question is, my question is

so you support

the KPD, but yet you support national Bolshevism support the KPD,

but yet you support national

Bolshevism when the KPD was against that.

Serious.

National Bolshev, first of all,

I don't support,

I just refuse to

denounce the National Bolsheviks

of Russia. It doesn't mean mean i what do you mean support

they never existed in the thirties ernest nikish and those national bolsheviks were irrelevant

marginal larpers from the post-war period of the World War I completely irrelevant in Germany.

And so they didn't even exist.

The Russian national Bolsheviks is a punk rock youth subculture that emerged in the post-90s period.

Um, well, I understand that i'm i'm talking about like the aspd um all

those all those parties that espoused sort of syncretic uh views between fascism and communism

the kbd denounced those. Which party?

The, which ASPD?

Yeah, ASPD.

Split from the SPD because...

Yeah, yeah.

Yeah, I mean, completely has nothing to do with the Russian national Bolsheviks.

Why would you say that when they're both like, their core, they're both syncretizing fascism and socialism?

Because that's not what the Russian national Bolsheviks were doing.

Okay.

Fascism doesn't just mean you're adopting provocative aesthetics to trigger liberals. I'm sorry.

Fascism is a concrete phenomena, okay? It's just, it means something.

Well, I'm aware that it means something, but like they're...

No, I mean something material. It doesn't just mean you're adopting aesthetics that are edgy to trigger liberals, which is what the Russian...

It means an authoritarian... Oh, that's a liberal word, but...

No, it means what Demetrov defined it as, which is the dictatorship

of the imperialist finance capital.

The open dictatorship,

the open terrorist dictatorship.

That's what it is, all right?

Well, I mean,

I would define it more like

dictatorship of the bourgeoisiebles... Well more like dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.

Well, not dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, but the state ally with the bourgeoisie to oppress the proletary.

Okay, well, the Russian national Bolsheviks threw Maltaf cocktails at oligarch, so I don't know what to tell you.

Yeah, and the NSDAP also fought with

Jewish bankers and Jewish

No, it didn't. That's the big

myth. I don't know why you keep perpetuating

that.

Hold on, Gabby, listen to me,

Gabby, I'm not interested in you.

You're not my type. So I don't know why you're talking to me, Gabby. Gabby, listen to me, Gabby, I'm not interested in you. You're not my type.

So I don't know why you're talking to me, Gabby.

Gabby, I'm not, you're not my type.

Please stop trying to flirt with me in the chat.

Anyway, uh, what else did you have to say?

Just improve. You should read more theory.

Like, State and Revolution, it's like a really good book.

You should read that.

Okay, yeah, I totally haven't read State and Revolution.

You're right.

What an incredible thing to say.

Apple user.

Go ahead.

By the way, Gabby, the bouncy bend, low testosterone bouncy bend boy, the fact he needs a rematch is a concession that I won.

So let's be honest.

And by the way, who's avoiding anything?

And Gabby, stop flirting with me, okay?

We all know what you're doing.

You're not my type.

Go ahead, Apple.

Go ahead.

I'm just curious on what the major difference between the ACP and the PSL really are?

The major difference is that we don't have, we don't enforce, oh my God, I got restricted. Because Gabby's aggressively flirting with me.

I got restricted.

That's incredible.

The PSL is a basis of strategy on Democrat-Aliant protests.

We are trying to build dual power.

That's basically one of the profound material

differences. Gabby, thanks for

restricting it because your aggressive flirting was

so... Oh, good-day

mate. Hey, I'm not

a commie or anything. I just wanted to talk about

a little bit.

From what I understand,

I don't like people who just, like,

introduce themselves.

Just get to the point, you know.

User, go ahead.

Go ahead. Yeah. go ahead yo hello yeah

oh fuck australians yeah you're you know what i'm not i don't i'm not gonna talk to an

australian right now because it's twom. for me and you guys are just like

zippity do da zip it

you just woke up in the fucking morning

you know you

oh the sun is out

and you're sipping your orange juice

and you're just on you

and I'm fucking tired. I don't want to

talk to you. It's an insult.

Anyway,

we're wrapping this up because

I got censored by

Shabbat Shalom

censored me

Larry Ellison censored me

Shabbat Shalom Shabbat Shalom everyone

Shalom Shabbat everyone

stop censoring me

and we're done

this live me. We're done.

Just Guys, I'm leaving. Bye.

My food is cold. Bye-bye.