A Guide to Uniting Marxism With MAGA

let's cut the bullshit

oh my God Emilio what the fuck are you

doing man I told you not to

God fucking damn man

ah

fuck's sake

oh my God

don't fucking spam some random fucking

guys Twitter

what the fuck

I literally said not to do this I

literally said not to do that

like I literally said don't do that

oh fuck

no it's it's okay it's okay he didn't

know I don't think he knew he didn't

know

he didn't know it's not his fault

it's my bad my bad I told it to the mods

but I don't think Amiri was in the mod

chat

but I'm gonna mod him again okay I amiro

can you type in the chat I just put him

in timeout

fuck I just panicked all right give me a

sec

mod I don't fucking know how to do this

shit

uh all right oh I timed him out for 10

minutes fuck

all right all right

um

all right it's okay it's okay

let me

let me I was just I just got scared I

got scared all right

um

all right as soon as it's it's expires

I'm gonna mod up again it's my bad

but

yeah

because that's the only way you can mass

delete messages

it's the only way

I didn't mean to like time them out but

it's the only way you can mass delete

stuff

all right forget it forget it all right

uh Lionel thank you for the 10 gifted

appreciate that

all right let's get right into this all

right everybody shut the fuck up okay

just shut up

just shut the fuck up

we're done okay

stop saying free I don't know how to

fucking do the I don't know how to undo

the timeout I don't know how to do it

okay unless you're gonna fucking explain

and walk through how to fucking do it I

don't know how so shut the fuck up okay

fuck's sake

just wait the 10 minutes and I'll

fucking make him odd again all right

oh

Emilio owns like a share of this stream

now okay he's literally one of the

shareholders

so all right give me a sec okay

so I didn't get the haircut

but I found out that if I just took a

shower and this is bed hair right if I

just took a shower it'd be fine the

problem was like when I got my hair cut

he was trying to style it

and it made it like puffed up or

whatever but like you know this is fine

this is fine all right

so I'm gonna get my hair cut next week

and I'm gonna do it before I leave la

but um yeah

all right here we are

I'm gonna do it right before I leave La

so that's that

anyway

today we've got a lot of things to talk

about

um

because

it's gonna be Maga communism Maga

communism Maga communism that's we're

going all in with this thing okay

and I did do a stream about this where I

did instruct you guys

I don't know if I would say instruct but

I did kind of give a guide

on how to do this thing and how like

where you're supposed to be coming from

when you're reaching out and you're

talking to these Mago people from the

you know as a communist and I stressed a

few things right and we're gonna

reiterate it really fast

and why I'm bringing this up you're

gonna see right

uh so again the key to this whole thing

is just honesty and what do I mean by

honesty

it's not a form of deception you're not

going to manipulate people into becoming

communists

it's a way of probing into the

unconscious foundations of your own

ideology okay so that's why I'm saying

it's it's it's a the key to the whole

thing is honesty

but the first form of honesty is honesty

with yourself okay so when you're trying

to make the case to people you don't

it's not like you already made the case

to yourself you haven't it's a dialectic

where the relationship between the

partisan and the people is dialectical

it's intertwined and it's interconnected

Thank You Tristan that's what Praxis is

you you learn from the people as much as

you're educating them okay and that's

what's going to prove your ability to be

effective you have to learn from the

people now what do I mean learn from the

people

I want to introduce you guys to us uh

something called the wisdom of the

people and that means if you have an

idea

and everyone's rejecting it and giving

it if the working people are rejecting

that idea

it's the form of your idea that needs to

be re-examined it's your idea that needs

to be re-examined it's not that you're

not being it's not just that oh yeah

your Optics are bad and you have to put

it in a different way it's also that

you need to reevaluate where you are

coming from because it's not that you're

smarter and that you know you just

didn't manipulate them correctly

that's also a way of

being brought to the fact

that there's a flaw in the idea itself

okay

that's so important that is such an

important part of how this whole thing

works

you need to be coming from a place of

honesty

when it comes to yourself and your own

like okay what so when you're for

example I'll give you an example right

what is communism what does that even

mean what is communism right you don't

have all the answers as far as what

communism means actually what communism

is going to look like is going to be the

result of a dialectical interaction

between the political partisans and the

masses

you think that Mao and the Chinese

Communists had a plan for what communism

was before the fact of immersing

themselves in the masses they didn't

it's the same thing for the Bolsheviks

and it's the same thing for all

successful Communists throughout history

you don't already know before the fact

so many people think this is a fucking

grift

and categorically

you can debunk the fact or the idea that

it's a grift just in the following way

okay

in the case of a grift you have

preconceived end goals and plans and

you're merely using people in order to

realize your end goals and your plans

that's what a grift is okay

so a grift is actually what all leftists

are doing in America it's what all

Communists in America are already doing

they're grifting that's what the cpusa

does it's it's a grifting organization

that is not what Maga communism is

Maga communism

rather than being a form of a grift of

some kind it's an attempt to establish a

singularity it's an attempt to establish

an actual connection not just a

one-sided connection where you're going

to you know implant your ideas among

Maga people but you're going to

establish a relationship between a

movement sorry between a political idea

or a political you know a science of

some kind Marxism leninism and the

masses so it's about establishing a

connection that connection is going to

work back and forth you're not just

going to be here imposing some ideology

on people it's going to be a back and

forth dialectic and I know I stressed

that before

but

it needs to be emphasized to an even

greater degree right now because

we are facing a lot of uh backlash and

propaganda and attempts to like squat

basically attempts to confuse and

obfuscate what Maga communism is

from all sides okay from the left and

from the right The Gatekeepers on the

right and when I say Gatekeepers on the

right I'm not talking about Normie

writers I'm talking about like you know

like the extreme far-right ideologists

like Bronze Age LGBT people whatever

like both of these forces are

positioning themselves against Maga

communism and are acting as epistemic

activists thank you emila appreciate you

Sophia underscore based yeah yeah yeah

yeah we don't have to mention that but

yes

foreign

you're gonna see why I'm why I'm doing

this in a second

foreign

I want to talk for a second and I want

you guys to hear me right

I genuinely think Maga communism

it's not just a meme it is unironically

the correct application

of Marxism leninism within the American

context beginning from the very

foundational humanistic materialism of

Karl Marx beginning from that very

beginning okay

now I'll explain this very briefly

with Marx's materialism his humanistic

materialism

Marx does something pretty unprecedented

in the history of thinking in general

and the history of philosophy and

History of Thought So Marx is beginning

from the highest possible

um

perspective

the highest possible conceit of

philosophy you could possibly imagine

which is hegelianism Marx is beginning

from Hegel okay Hegel if you don't know

basically establishes the most final

complete and developed form of

philosophy a philosophy which spans and

encompasses not only every aspect of

being but every aspect of human society

and human history

and that it culminates in something

called absolute knowledge or absolute

knowing where basically if you want me

to just vulgarize it for you you get the

key to everything and you just you

fucking pretty much you're you basically

are literally a know-it-all okay more or

less

and Marx is beginning from there

now Marx is humanistic or um orientation

which

somehow

takes a step further while at the same

time

uh repudiating this conceit but at the

same time preserving it that's what

sublation means right

he does something really unprecedented

Marx takes a risk okay

Marx takes a risk that no philosopher in

the history of humanity was brave enough

to take

and that risk was the following

Marx risked the fact that the highest

Insight of the highest conceit of human

thinking in the form of the highest

development of philosophy which is

hegel's philosophy

Marx risked that this the essence of

this insight

is somehow related

and not only somehow related but even

somehow identical in essence

with the lowest and most debased form of

Humanity's existence

so

so to to reword that Marx takes the risk

imagine you reach heaven right and you

reach the highest point

uh you know possible

and you take somehow to you take this

risk you take the risk that the

foundation of Heaven

it's not just on a cloud it's on Earth

and you take that risk and if you're

wrong the whole fucking thing will

collapse but you take the risk anyway

because you want to bring people up to

heaven or you want to bring Heaven down

to earth I should rather say so this is

the risk Marx takes he takes this risk

that

instead of finding refuge in the purity

of thought

the highest logos of philosophy the

highest reason of philosophy right lies

at the bottom

in the actual material real existence of

humanity the real living breathing

existence of humanity

and this is the risk that Marx takes

and it's the foundation of marxist

humanism Marx's humanism is not an ideal

humanism like the humanism of the

Renaissance it's not a humanism which

says it's not like the Michelangelo

sorry the da Vinci

um

what is that fucking guy called

it's not like the da Vinci uh

uh whatever that fucking that that

picture that of that symbol of

Renaissance humanism I forgot what it is

that's not what it is it's a humanism

According to which

the moment that we

uh

the moment of the greatest alienation

inhumanism

think thought whatever you want spirit

is directly United with the material and

base level of humanity yeah the

Vitruvian man that's what it is the

Vitruvian man it's not like the

Vitruvian man it's not an ideal humanism

it's a humanism that basically says

the basis of

your thought for example for the basis

of philosophical thought

the basis of the highest development of

religion philosophy whatever you want

that lies in

the real existence of humanity

so this is Marx's humanism

it's a humanism of risk

basically

I guess these things are in no way

immediately or self-evidently United

these two things right

these two aspects of being right

philosophy on the one hand

you can call it whatever the fuck you

want you can call it philosophy you can

call it ideology it doesn't matter right

but it's something abstract or ideal or

separate from the real world right

marks risks this

in its opposite and in its real premises

but for example

if you're a skeptic or if you're an

agnostic or if you're a disbeliever of

some kind

if you risk a conclusion in its premise

you're risking the possibility that

you're not going to

um redeem that conclusion that the

conclusion is basically going to be

pissed away and lost

if you don't have faith and some kind of

fundamental belief in the people

if you don't have belief or faith in the

people

then rather than

have the essence of that beautiful

insight you're finding refuge in be

returned and reflected upon you in some

kind of way

what is going to manifest and what's

going to appear is a complete disconnect

right

which by the way

that is the foundation of Bourgeois

ideology politics and the rest it's

based on this fundamental disconnect

between the ideal and the material

and they are constantly looking for ways

to affirm this disconnection and one of

the ways that they kind of celebrate

or affirm this disjointedness and this

lack of a connection

fuck's sake man fuck's sake

what a fucking disaster

one of the ways

foreign

you know I see the problem now I see why

my background fucking sucks

because those fucking curtains

I don't know how the fuck that happened

there we go I don't know how the fuck

this camera

those ugly fucking curtains that's

what's been bothering

okay it's good now

now this disconnect

this disconnect or the

um

the insistence upon the impossibility of

the unity of the world of humanity

that is the basis of Bourgeois ideology

That's the basis of all the Bourgeois

cynicism and you know this kind of even

the supposedly anti-utopian

pretensis of Bourgeois ideology oh yeah

you know if you try to make the world

human it'll just become a shithole or

whatever right

this is where this is what it is it's

this let me let me try to um

you know what let me let me actually

condense this in a way that will be

intuitively relatable to you okay

that'll it'll be able to relate to you

intuitively

so why do people fear getting their

heart broken

why does a person fear and Marx actually

uses this as an example by the way but

why do people fear getting their heart

broken

why is that

well the reason is simple because you're

risking yourself in some kind of way

you're putting yourself on the line and

you're putting yourself out there and if

you get rejected it's like

it the reason that hurts uh you getting

rejected is because

you you don't have any proof

in some other person

of your own Humanity you don't have any

proof of that you don't have any

validation of

you know the fact that there's some kind

of connection between yourself and the

world and Marx actually uses that as an

example

and politics is and not sorry not not

only politics every other aspect of

the world of humanity is the same it's

all it's all like that right it's all

about this way in which we have to risk

something

for which we have no prior knowledge or

guarantee

in its opposite and in some otherness

now if you're an idealist you don't have

to risk anything you don't have to test

anything and the idea of a Scientific

Socialism or the idea of an ideology

which is at the same time as science is

absurd to you if you're a if you're an

idealist or if you're a formalist

then the perspective that you're coming

from is that you cannot ground

thought in its actual material premises

you can only ground it in artificially

contrived premises for example in axioms

like the law of identity a equals a the

reason a equals a doesn't risk anything

is because it's a tautology you're just

creating a self-enclosed system that you

can always

be secure

so communism from the outset is entailed

by some kind of risk some kind of

fundamental risk

if you want to also simplify this thank

you H pardon your heart from heartbreak

thank you H appreciate you if you want

another example of this I'll give you

one that you're probably familiar with

communism doesn't work

sure you've heard that one before

why is that such a persuasive argument

why is that argument so compelling to us

even on an intuitive level we don't even

have to research the details of

Communist States

to be convinced of that why and why is

that because on the one hand you have an

ideal supposedly I'm just saying this is

how we're thinking about it we're having

a good and nice ideal something that we

are upholding

as

I feel like I'm fucking Biden I like I

took magnesium pills last night to

fucking sleep I don't know if that's

like throwing me off or I can't even

think so I don't fucking know right

because we have this idea of Communism

and it's a nice idea and the reason it's

a nice idea is because it's an idea in

which we find our morality and our

humanity and our longings and our

expectations satisfied right in a

communist world there's no Injustice

there's no crime there's no inequality

there's no this there's no that so it's

like it's like a good idea literally

right

that's how we're thinking of it

and when we say communism doesn't work

when it's tried the reason that is such

a compelling argument is because it's

some kind of acknowledgment of the fact

that for every

for every affirmation

lies a negation okay when a good idea

becomes real

it

becomes the opposite of good and the

reason it becomes the opposite of the

good is because it's no longer an ideal

or an idea anymore it has made a

fundamental encounter

with its opposite

its other

the the other is being material reality

are you guys fucking following me ones

if you're following me right now like

ones if you're following okay

I I'm not I don't know if I'm fucking

speaking in vain or something

the reason the this view that communism

doesn't work

is so persuasive

is because

the idea of Communism is good it's an

idea within which we find

everything about us that's human and

whatever satisfied right it's it's a

nice good world

now the reason you don't even have to

research anything to be persuaded of the

fact that communism doesn't work

is because when it's applied in practice

and in reality it's no longer just an

idea thank you Chris knowledge with the

law of non-contradiction and middle

exclusion has given Bourgeois Elites the

ability to control information

absolutely you're right about that thank

you Chris thank you for magnesium to

kill him without communism thought

yeah I don't fucking know what it is

but um

yeah I'm glad you guys are following I'm

glad you guys are following here

so communism has never been tried

is another cope that people do because

they're preserving the good ideal

and you know everyone sees through that

because it's like you're bluffing right

thank you Johnny

wax more intelligent than my woke at 4rd

professors don't get put off by the chat

we are listening

thank you so much Johnny appreciate you

so communism has never been tried and

communism doesn't work which are two

sides of the same coin are forms of

acknowledging their ways of

acknowledging

the disconnect between the ideal and the

material actually you know what

you know ilienkov is a good thinker here

right

because what we're really talking about

is where are the ideal and the material

connected

okay that's where we should begin we

should begin with that

the connection

or the shared substance I should say

between the ideal and the material okay

because that's what we're talking about

so since we're talking about the

question of the unity of the ideal and

the material before we can even

acknowledge that fact we have to

acknowledge there's a separation between

them the ideal and the material are not

immediately United if they are united

it's not in an immediate way

so to recap

on the one hand you have some kind of

Ideal on the other hand you have the

otherness of material reality the

confrontation with which

produces the affect of negation

if you guys don't know this

Hegel is not someone who doesn't

acknowledge material reality he does but

for Hegel

the material world is the world of

negation

materiality is a world of negation it's

where

the positive idea becomes negated

and Marx does not respond to there it's

like there's no marxists right nobody

understands what Marx actually did Marx

doesn't respond to Hegel just by saying

by saying what the English empiricists

were basically doing which is that oh

yes the empirical world the negation is

the only real thing all your ideals all

of this ideal good and positivity this

notion of unity this is all bullshit all

you have is this cold debased you know

um cruel negation in the form of the

material world the cold hard truth right

but that is not where Marx was coming

from

rather than

accept

sorry rather than Marx simply

emphasizing the middle

uh the middle I don't know what you

would call it the middle term and the

kind of thesis antithesis

uh synthesis you know that the hegelian

Triad one two three rather than Marx

just finding refuge in two marks

establishes a complete shift of

shift of where these terms are mapped

onto so Marx preserves the dialectical

structure of this Triad but instead of

the synthesis taking the form of

knowledge or taking the form of thought

remarks the synthesis the positive being

in other words

really does exist at the level of real

human material world so the way in which

human beings are actually and really

reproducing themselves uh through Labor

and reproducing the conditions of their

subsistence that is the site of positive

being so the world of man and the world

of humanity engaged in the process of

its own reproduction in actuality not in

any ideal sense but in actual actuality

for Marx that is the synthesis

so he just changes

he changes the sight of material being

he doesn't just in contrast to Hegel

emphasize material being

uh as real at the expense of the ideal

remarks the sight of material being at

least as far as the dialectical logic is

concerned shifts to somewhere else

it namely shifts to the third term which

is the sublation

or the synthesis as people like to call

it

did I stream too late I feel like I

stream too late honestly

I really feel like I stream way too late

oh man

oh

should not have taken those fucking

pills

foreign

um

what can I say except people are fucking

retarded what can I say except that

uh you know I've got to the point where

I just I don't understand it I'm trying

I'm trying to you know you know what the

problem is right now guys the problem is

that I'm just

I'm being so fucking charitable

and it's like why am I fucking doing it

why am I going through this crash course

in philosophy and doing all this shit

that nobody even appreciates by the way

when it's like nobody fucking cares we

live in a retarded fucking world

and I I don't I just I don't know how to

respond except what should I fucking say

what do I even fucking say here's what I

have to say I'm too smart for people I

am I'm just too smart for retards on

Twitter and what am I talking about I'm

gonna show you what I'm talking about in

a second I'm too smart for this fucking

shit I'm just I just am I don't know how

to dumb myself down to understand the

level of mental retardation that compels

people to think that this is a good

point being made because 15 000 people

have made it very clear that Maga

communism has failed in their minds

and I'm gonna show you why they think

this and what I'm trying to develop this

you know I guess this like in-depth

philosophical understanding of Marxism

but it's not like anyone gives a fuck

about that people are just gonna say oh

how's it just doing schizo ramblings so

nobody fucking cares about that

so it's like why am I even doing this

right I'll show you what I'm talking

about and it it um this actually pisses

me off it's been pissing me off all

fucking day

I am so fucking baffled I am so fucking

baffled

like I don't know what I don't I I I

honestly don't

know how I can keep having faith in

humanity in general like

I actually feel like the guy in

Idiocracy that's how fucking stupid this

shit is when I show it to you okay

no no I'm gonna show this to you guys

because uh

because I'm fucking

I'm just so baffled by this shit I just

like I can't fucking believe it

and I feel like I'm dignifying it by

trying to like

have a deep response to it because it's

like at face value it's so retarded

but it's so popular that it's like

should I respond to it you know at what

point should I respond to this kind of

shit

just because it's popular

okay it's somewhere here yeah

spreading my good communism over on

Truth social seems to be going well

fifteen thousand likes

so if you don't know this there's like

four tweets

we need Maga no we don't why because

fuck communism

uh so you're for con so you're a

communist

and this guy's saying some

anti-communist shit

and uh

yeah these these um random boomers are

clearly not pro Communists thank you

Jennifer Eisen

us keep going look at Marx he wrote

Capital in The Communist Manifesto thank

you Jennifer involved in revolutions and

parties that went nowhere but he kept

going detractors be damned thank you so

much Jennifer I appreciate that

I appreciate that it's just like but

this is so it's got 15 000 likes and if

I just if I look at the replies I'm

gonna get even more pissed right I'm

gonna get even more pissed if I look at

the fucking quote tweets it's gonna piss

me off even more

good morning Revolution emirio thank you

so much and let me go ahead and uh mod

you again

okay

based

this tweet must be bought it I refuse to

believe there is that many regards Amir

Amira you have to type in the chat and

the chat means I am trying to absorb

what you are saying thank you so much

Johnny Amira you have to type in the

chat for me to mod you

oh you're still mod okay fuck all right

we're good

so yeah 15 000 likes

and this this proves the Maga communism

thing you know the whole Endeavor is

pointless because of these screenshots

and 15 000 people are satisfied with

this conclusion they're like and by the

way this is not just the left these are

all also um the Bap whatever right is

thank you Chris to this situation shows

there is a real effect sure the

introduction is Harsh and even violent

but the Inception has occurred these

ideas didn't exist before your effort

thank you Chris Paul I appreciate you so

much

so it's there's there's The Gatekeepers

on the right right and then the left

they're all they're both uniting against

Maga communism

and this says disproven Maga communism

right

and 15 000 people very smugly and in a

very self-satisfied way click the like

and retweet button on this because they

find this very significant

thank you so much W7 15 000 new world

land bridge volunteers

now if I start going to the quote tweets

and if I start going to the replies

I'm going to become like violently angry

so I'm going to ignore those right

but apparently I need to break down to

people why this is fucking mental

retardation why this is the most

retarded fucking tweet I've ever this

the whole conceit the whole fucking

purport of this view that Maga communism

is a fucking failure because Maga

boomers are not positively disposed to

the term communism it's like violently

like pisses me off so fucking much it's

like it's like making my blood pressure

go through the roof all fucking day I've

been pissed off about this thank you

John R all fucking day I've been pissed

about this

okay the all fucking day all fucking day

I've see I saw this tweet and I've been

thinking about the retards who think

that they're so smart

for thinking this is some kind of own

and I am losing faith in humanity I

genuinely think I am living in Idiocracy

and everyone's retarded but me

and I'm sorry Chad but I feel like for

you guys it's not even self-evident

either I feel like I'm the only fucking

one in the world who can look at this

and be like that is actually so fucking

bafflingly stupid I can't even I don't

even know if I shit am I even the same

species with these fucking people

okay

so let me break this down to you

I have to have patience I'm just praying

I'm praying right now I'm like trying to

pray to calm myself down

so give me a second

okay

okay

so

so I I am just shocked I'm literally

baffled I'm like I'm literally trying to

like speak like retard

so that this can be something that maybe

can be clipped and shared with these

people and actually be intelligible to

retards so just I'm just trying to think

okay so so let's just begin from this

right

whether Maga communism succeeds or not

is not going to be proven

or decided sorry let me take it from the

top whether Maga communism is going to

be successful or not

isn't going to be fucking decided

by whether or not Maga people already

have positive views about communism I

mean like that square fucking one it's

Square fucking one the whole fucking

point of this is that yes they do have

anti-communist prejudices we know that

we're only fucking doing it because we

think that those are not inevitable but

now you're trying to say that those

prejudices they have are inevitable

because if you try to speak positively

about communism in any capacity on Truth

social people in replies are gonna try

and shut you down a fucking Court they

are the anti-communism that they're

getting is something they were raised

with it's something they were born with

the amount of anti-communist you know

propaganda not even propaganda but just

sentiment and conspiracism that

currently exists radically dwarfs Us in

terms of the hegemony that it has so why

are people fucking acting like it proves

anything that

Maga people are not immediately

positively disposed to the use of the

word communism what the fuck is that

supposed to prove why does that fucking

dumbass from revolutionary blackout

Network and yeah I'm calling him that

he's a fucking dumbass he keeps saying

shit like oh we'll see how it goes go

bring a Soviet flag to a Maga rally and

see how it works it's like when have we

fucking denied that people

have bad associations with the word

communism and the symbolism of Communism

where did we deny that the whole premise

and purport of what Maga communism is is

we're trying to bring two things

together that are currently not together

if Maga and communism were the same

fucking thing we wouldn't need to

fucking call it Maga communism we could

just call it communism you fucking

stupid fuck

if they were already the same thing why

the fuck are we combining them

and it pisses me off because people have

gotten this fucking idea that

the the the the the the rank and file

and the base of a communist movement are

going to be the people who spontaneously

and in their immediate circumstances

are most positively disposed to

communist propagandists and and the

presentation of communist ideas so

basically that means that professors and

fucking liberal colleges are the true

revolutionary subject and workers aren't

because it's easier to convince the

glasses wearing Petty Bourgeois fuck

that communism is good then it is a

fucking worker and that's actually how

this and it you know what I'm I'm fuming

right now my blood is fucking boiling

because the entire so-called fucking

communist movement in this fucking

country has made a map of American

politics exclusively based on how

well-received their message is so they

have updated and then they've attempted

to revise and this is since the entire

fucking new left they completely revised

Marx's Theory and communist theory

around how well people receive their

message so they went to the workers and

the workers kicked dirt on their face

and they said fuck off bitch so they

said oh you know what workers aren't

revolutionary anymore but then they went

to fucking crackheads I don't fucking

know they just they just went to these

extremely extremely extremely marginals

punk rock fucking crackhead whatever

sexual minorities and no they're

positive disposed to Communism so that

must mean those are the Revolutionary

subject oh college kids are positively

disposed to this communist idea so that

must mean they're the Revolutionary

subject no you fucking bitch you're

fucking corrupt your ideas are

the problem is you you are not being

self-critical it's not the workers who

are at fault it's fucking you

thank you and commissary they're going

to clip you out of context and say you

were reacting to the Maga people

I know I know they are listen I don't

give a shit anymore I don't care I have

lost faith

I have lost faith in the ability for

these people to be even minimally human

I know and you can clip this out of

context too I know they're gonna clip me

and be like Oh how's this mad

because people on fruit social aren't

positively

oh man it's like but you know what the

tragedy is there it's not even their

fault they're too stupid to actually

understand what I'm even mad about

because it's there's too much or there

are too many orders of complexity to it

they they can't even process in their

fucking head something as simple as

house is mad at the retards on Twitter

who thinks that this encounter means

anything it must be that I'm mad at the

encounter right because they're

genuinely stupid fucking people they're

I am literally just smarter than them

it's that fucking simple

so so you so people went on true social

and experimented with trying to

you know

I don't know use the word communism in a

positive light and people weren't having

any of it what a fucking surprise

what a fucking surprise when we don't

have hegemony

but what if the whole point of what Maga

communism is isn't that we've you know

what it's like leftists

am I speaking in vain does anyone even

understand what I'm saying when I tell

you that leftists think that it has to

be like Napoleon's hundred days you know

when Napoleon escaped Elba and he just

went town to town in France oh yeah

Napoleon and then he just raised an army

and he took power so they think that if

that's not what we can do that means our

effort is in vain we have to be like no

we have to be like Napoleon's hundred

days where we're just gonna immediately

go to Maga people waving communist flags

and we're gonna give some lip service

against the globalists and we're going

to give some lip service toward their

views and then they're just gonna rally

behind us and it's going to be that

fucking easy and it's that simple

and that and if we if we can't do that

that means

the whole thing is a joke and it's

stupid

because manga people don't like

communism has

I don't think you know what communism is

oh but Liberals are more positive to

communismarian is more positively

disposed to the word communism that

means anechosperians the Revolutionary

subject

that's literally how communist parties

in this fucking country have mapped out

politics by the way who is more

receptive to their message yeah don't be

self-critical about your message don't

question your own message blame the

masses not yourself intentional Liars

it's even worse

yeah I know

I know

they do it on purpose they keep just

lying and lying and lying to demoralize

me but it doesn't fucking work

it doesn't piss me off yeah

it's you know I hold grudges I'm a guy

who holds grudges so if you just want to

piss me off

sure I'll fucking have you I'll put you

on my shit list in my fucking head if

that's what you want so fucking bad but

I'm not going anywhere by the way

so you're not it's not you're stopping

me you're just putting yourself on my

shit list thank you rupture thoughts the

Twitter leftists are trying to violently

wake up the passed out subject

oh man 15 000 people though 15

000 people thought it was smart

fifteen thousand people thought it was

intelligent

what the fuck kind of world do we live

in

15

000 people thought it was intelligent

and they thought this that it proved

something right ain't that fucking crazy

thank you soapbox

this whole thing is a rehash of when

those maoists teamed up with that flashy

YouTuber to try to make fun of you the

guy posting those screens as a growiper

and all the relives are clapping

I know I pointed this out

before they're all connected when

they're United

so I'm going to explain

give me a sec let this donation go

through

thank you Johnny appreciate it people

are still more advanced than these left

hoytes anyway remember those clips of

Maga people Bush was the Nazi and eleven

is a good guy

but I want to explain something to you

guys right

so those screenshots were from like

three weeks ago or two weeks ago I don't

know so that was before my video

where I did clarify where we're coming

from with this whole thing and how it's

a dialectic and that's why I'm not

saying I'm trying to I'm not trying to

scold the people in those screenshots

because that was before the stream I did

explaining what Maga communism actually

was

but to be clear I just want to give you

guys some common sense okay

Maga communism

is a purport

if you want to think about what Maga

communism is think about it in the

following two ways it's a down to the

countryside movement or it's like a

narodnik go to the people right

that's the first thing that it is the

second thing that it is

that it's a it's kind of like in the

second sense it's kind of like dark

Brandon where it's like it's a

turbocharged Maga right

and that is not going to be immediately

popular for the masses it's not

it's not going to be immediately popular

for people and the reason that's not

going to be immediately popular to

people is because

the word communism and what people

associate with the word communism

is defined you know

primarily

historically by anti-communists

so when they hear the word communism

they are associating that with the

Democrats they are associating that with

U.S you know the forces of the U.S deep

State and the globalists they're

associating with that you're not just

going to get them to disassociate with

that word

you're not gonna just get people to

disassociate the word communism with

those people by

just outright expressing partisanship

that you're also against those same

people and you are a communist so for

example just because you say hey I'm a

communist I also hate the globalists and

we're fighting a common enemy that's not

going to be enough

to change the association of the word

communism

you actually and I I I keep saying this

okay this whole thing is about honesty

so first of all just be honest with what

yourself be honest with yourself why are

you doing this why are you just going to

people

and trying to prove my what validation

are you looking for what are you looking

for right

be honest with yourself and what you're

doing

because

what it seems to me like is that this

impulse which is an Impulse everyone as

a human being shares right every modern

human being has this impulse where if

you have an ideology you want to see

that ideology reflected back upon you

immediately in a validating way you want

to see it just you want to see the

fruits of it

immediately reflect back upon you in a

validating way

and

for as long as it doesn't do that right

you're going to create the friend enemy

Distinction on the basis

of how successful you know what light

dude just don't

don't fucking just say do you know

I actually think people are fucking

stupid it's just that simple right

and I don't I'm increasingly

losing my ability to dumb

what I'm saying down for retards I'm

just losing that ability

I forgot what I was even saying

just give me a second

give me a second to remember what I was

saying I don't remember what I was

fucking saying

ah

okay yeah yeah they're hitting over

people's head yeah

so

as human beings

when we have an ideology we want to see

the world reflect that ideology back on

us

and an immediate and validating way

right

so if you have the Maga communism idea

you want the fruits of that to be born

very immediately so what you want to do

is you want to go to Maga people and say

oh yeah hell yeah and there's going to

join it's just going to be like

Napoleon's hundred days when he escaped

from Albers I think elbow Right Where

You Escape from elbow and he was

immediately received and it's a it would

kick-started and it immediately took off

right

and you're gonna start arguing with

people because when they don't reflect

back if you if you believe in it right

if you believe in this idea

and it's not being reflected back upon

you in any kind of way

then you're going to see all of the ways

that it's not being reflected back upon

you as obstacles and you're going to see

these as obstacles that are getting in

the way

of the ability for your idea to be

fulfilled

okay

but here's the problem is that that's

exactly the source of leftism that's

what leftism is that's the source of

leftism that's the source of the you

know normal American uh so-called

communists

so you have to think

you know the the root cause and the

problem with leftism and the regular

type of American communism isn't that

they have they have the wrong idea

it's not that we're distinct from them

just oh we're Maga Communists now so you

know we're different from them

if you're just thinking about this in

terms of ideology you are not catching

on to what this is actually about

the word

Maga communism is about escaping

this self-satisfied Echo chamber of an

ideology

that's the whole reason

the whole fucking point is subverting

ideology it's not actually to just be a

new form of leftism where we're just

gonna like argue with randos and and

prostheticize like Trotsky is about Maga

communism and then judge our success or

failure on the basis of whether that's

immediately successful or not I'm gonna

flat out tell you it's not going to be

successful if that's how you're going

about it you may as well just be a

leftist if that's what you're going to

do

if you're gonna be a Maga communist

that means you have to reevaluate your

premises too

and now what does that look like

Maga communism is not going to be

successful

by trying to change people's

associations

of the word communism

through argument

arguing with them isn't going to get you

anywhere and I'll tell you why

if you argue with Mago people or if you

argue with strangers about communism

it's your word versus theirs and at that

point they're saying hey I watch bit

shoot I watch Alex Jones and I watch

this and I watch that I'm educated and

you're trying to tell me I'm wrong

no it's you versus them at that point

why should they trust you what Authority

do you fucking have not okay

what you're trying to do

is take a shortcut

you're trying to take a shortcut

and that's what leftists do they try to

take shortcuts because they don't

have the ability to prove themselves in

actual reality so they try to Blackmail

People based on the pure

validity of an ideology

I'll tell you

how you actually make Naga communism

real

and I'm gonna give you the secret sauce

right now

first of all

we need to build hegemony okay we need

to build our own hegemony

Steve Bannon has his own hegemony for

example right all these other factions

competing for Maga have a definite

hegemony so first of all we need our

hegemony

now typically throughout history

that's a party okay

uh what happened on Twitter I don't know

what happened on Twitter

oh nothing

oh yeah the Twitter my Twitter got that

that's what happened

my Twitter got banned

what's up

um now that was weeks ago so

now what does building hegemony look

like building hegemony means Maga

Communists need to be a force to be

reckoned with we need to be some kind of

power we need to be some kind of real

thing

in terms of a community and in terms of

you know a school of thought if you will

who are producing media who are

producing propaganda who are producing

educational content who are debating not

random Boomers on Truth social but

debating other ideological figureheads

that's what hegemony means okay so first

we need some form of hegemony we need

some kind of hegemonic pull

first of all okay if you don't have a

hegemonic pole

based on what Authority what Authority

are you speaking on behalf of if you are

just going on Twitter

trying to convince Boomers to be

sympathetic to Communism

where are you coming from right is this

just yourself your own personality well

it's your word versus them good luck

right so you need to be coming from

somewhere if you have some degree of

hegemony you could just be like

they will see you and they'll recognize

you they'll be like oh you're one of

those Maga communist people okay

so they're gonna attack you with a

reputation and that reputation is going

to have some degree of authority even if

they have a bad reputation it still has

a reputation

now typically this is what a party is

supposed to serve as the party is

supposed to be a tool for the building

of hegemony but we live in a different

era now we live in the era of

information Warfare

party it's going to be way more

decentralized right

so that's step one okay step two and

this is related to how you build

hegemony but step two is very important

okay

with step two

you need to build influence

not based on ideology

but based on having the most correct the

most articulate the most rhetorically

persuasive

and the most

even entertaining insights you need to

build influence you need to build your

own reputation

you need to actually prove you have

something to offer to the table now

people are not going to be immediately

positively disposed

to the word communism

but if you show you have something to

offer

by articulating people's feelings about

things

your own just your own center of gravity

is going to be enough to change what

they're associating the word communism

with

and since this is the movement the more

of you that there are the more that

builds the hegemony of Communism right

as an idea

which and we're planting ourselves we're

rooting ourselves in the Maga movement

so it's a it's a it's it's a feedback

crisis if you're just going to argue

with people you're wasting your time

instead of arguing with people

build actual clout and build a

reputation among them

and you don't have to hide that you're a

communist but just prove you have

something to offer other than being a

communist don't just die on the hill of

saying something like

oh um

communism is actually uh

based and you know we're also against

the globalists okay that's fine

why should anyone care right you have to

prove for example that you have the best

articulation

of what's going on with the globalists

and so on and so on you have to be a

good influencer

no you don't just say we want the same

things okay

the point of Maga communism isn't that

we want the same things that's not the

point

the point is

they are the same things

just not in overt form

it's not oh we're going to build Common

Ground that's fine too right it's

actually more like

communism is going to Turbo Charge

what Maga is

nobody fucking has said

that you're gonna immediately convince

people

to be positively disposed to the word I

mean we're based on what backing you

need hegemony to do that well that's

what we're trying to do

now second of all

it's not necessarily

pointless to fail

if you can or go argue with people sure

just be honest with yourself about what

you're doing what you're really doing

when you're arguing with people about

this shit isn't

um convincing the masses to make Maga

communism real you're trying to test

your ability to persuade people

you're gonna fucking fail how many of

you know how to ride a bicycle

how many of you know how to ride a

bicycle without training wheels

ones if you know

ones if you know how to ride a bicycle

without training wheels

okay

well by the way that's something you

have to learn

that's something you have to learn

through failure

you're gonna fail multiple times before

you know how to ride a two-wheeler

so that's why you have to learn

that's like every other thing in the

world actually as a human being

by the way even walking even in order to

learn how to fucking walk you're gonna

fall down like a dumbass little kid

multiple times

until you learn how to walk

everything in life is like that

literally everything

even fucking knowing how to chew food is

like that

knowing how to use the bathroom is like

that

everything in life begins with failure

literally everything

so there's nothing wrong with failing

the question is how do you learn from

that failure because let me tell you

where these left void and rightoid

retards are coming from on Twitter

where they're basically coming from

is that oh I've tried to talk good about

communism to my Maga uncle and he would

have none of it so I'm going to

determine my entire

map of American politics and my class

analysis based around who is more

willing to hear me out because like my

liberal aunt who's an artist was totally

down for what I was saying

and then they saw that some of you were

on Truth social and you interacted with

like five people

and oh the Heartbreak that some random

Mago Boomers

disagreed with them and weren't

positively disposed to Communism

that destroyed everything it's all gone

it's all destroyed

it's like those dudes

it's like those you know it's like in

cells right in cells they talk to a

woman once they get rejected

and then they go bury their head into

the couch and start crying and then they

hate all women

you know talking to women also means

you're gonna fail multiple times

actually you're gonna fail most of the

time I've never met a dude

who fails who who succeeds majority of

the time

it's like a dude who is with a lot of

women

for every woman that gets with him there

are a hundred who rejected it

but I'm not saying it's even like that

I'm just saying everything in life is

like that you name it and it's like that

even this anything you can think of is

like that like even typing on your

keyboard is like that

you don't fucking succeed at first

that's what learning means Maga

communism

is a purport it's not a prediction it's

a purport a prediction would be us

saying that this is going to be

immediately successful without any

Praxis

but our purport is a purport to engage

in a Praxis that we want to unify these

two things

even if that means we're going to have

to learn how to do it along the way

we have that intention we have that

purport

a prediction is like imagine this right

imagine you're trying to learn how to

swim

okay that's and you have the prediction

all right I'm gonna have a prediction

can I swim so I'm gonna go in the water

and I'm just gonna fucking drown oh

guess I'll never learn how to swim

because I fucking drowned I guess my

prediction failed swimming btfo

but if you have the purport

of wanting to learn how to swim

you're going to go in the water

obviously with someone that's going to

help

and yeah you're gonna fail

but then after you fail you're gonna try

again you're gonna keep trying you're

gonna keep trying until you actually get

the hang of it

and the reason you're eventually going

to get the hang of it is because you

established the purport

you establish the intention of wanting

to learn how to swim

even at the expense of not immediately

being able to do it

do you know what kind of being

has to immediately be able to succeed

without failing

a fucking baby

think about it

a baby

give me fucking chocolate milk a fucking

baby just screams and cries and whines

until the thing that they want is

directly in their grasp and directly in

front of them

that's what babies do

they scream and cry and if the thing is

not directly in front of them it doesn't

even exist anymore so for example if you

go in front of a baby and you have like

their teddy bear and you're like oh look

at Mr look at Mr

um look at Mr Teddy and then they're

like oh yeah and it's like a infant and

you throw Mr Teddy across the room where

they can't see it anymore they're gonna

start crying because Mr Teddy just died

he doesn't even exist anymore you tossed

him out of the universe you tossed him

out of being as far as that baby is

concerned it does not exist anymore

that's how babies think

and both the terminally online right and

terminally online left

are babies they have that same mentality

if it is not immediately present if it's

not an immediate reality it doesn't

exist it's nothing

All or Nothing

there's no process of learning there's

no dialectic there's no Praxis there's

no purport of actually engaging in the

world

the world everything has to be exactly

how it is right now forever

let me unpause for these donations to go

through because we have a fucked on

thank you light I have schizophrenia

thank you the king westerners need

instant gratification for everything

they lack Eastern values of patience

yeah

true based thank you light leftists

project every ideology they dislike on

maga maga is somehow libertarian fascist

and Christian nationalist all at once

Maga is simply a rejection of the status

quo of bushes clintons Etc

based thank you Scott Fox

they use Cyrus the Beast

now the thing you guys have to take away

here

is a pretty hard pill to swallow and for

some reason human beings have a really

hard time swallowing this pill

and the pill is the following

I'd and it's if you're a materialist

this is what you believe

okay

here's the pill

ideologies

are not inherently meaningful

ideologies are not inherently meaningful

they're not

for example

if

people are Libertarians

it could be any ideology I'm not

singling any without I'm just using that

as an example people are Libertarians

it's not because they're essentially

um

invested in the ideology of

libertarianism

it's just that libertarianism makes

sense for them

in some way

the way ideologies make sense to people

isn't in the form of like taking this

isn't because they take the form of this

like God right

that has its own magical powers it's

because they insert that ideology into a

web of associations so I'll give you

examples of this okay this is how all

language works by the way this is how

all ideas are by the way

so someone might like libertarianism

because for them libertarianism conjures

to mind

the sense of Independence that they have

let's Okay let me give you an example of

this all right

so let's say

someone

is constantly being harassed by the ATF

or the FBI and they they have brothers

and they have family members that were

unfairly thrown in jail

um you know

they're constantly being surveilled

they've got things on their back they

feel like their human dignity is being

taken away

they feel like their people are trying

to enslave them and subordinate them

and then they project this aspiration

and this longing

for you know a return to dignified

Humanity of some kind of way right

this is what gives the ideology of

libertarianism in many respects in many

cases I should say it's coherence this

is what gives sense to it

it makes sense for them in a more

fundamental way if you're a materialist

you're not going to respect the ideology

in the terms of the ideology you're

going to respect every ideology in the

terms of the real material relations

that it makes sense of

can you guys please write that down make

it a quote and spread it and share it

wherever the fuck you go on Twitter

materialism means that you do not treat

ideologies

in terms of the ideology itself you

treat ideologies in terms of the way

that they make sense of the material

relations people find themselves in

now does this also apply to Communism

yes

it does

what does communism make sense of

in ways that other ideologies don't

communism makes sense of the fact first

and foremost and this is historically

true

and this is why it's so ironic that the

biggest

arguments against communism are usually

something along the lines of it doesn't

work in practice it's a nice idea in

theory but in practice it doesn't work

what communism historically has made

sense of for people

shut the fuck up Siri shut the fuck up

you dumb bitch

how do I turn that off

I didn't turn Siri on

oh shit I have donation alerts off okay

I'll unpause them in a sec

I was waiting for that to go over thank

you so much for Star appreciate you

um

what's so funny about this Association

of communism

as being something that works in theory

but fails in practice

is that

the he's the historical sole source of

compulsion

that communist ideology has on people

does not lie in some naive view that

it's going to solve all their problems

or it's going to somehow make the world

ideal right it's going to turn the

material into the ideal

actually the thing that communism makes

sense of

which other ideologies fail to do

is it makes sense of the very failure of

ideology

communism at least in its Marxist

leninist form

makes sense of the failure

of for example the modern state

to satisfy

the necessities of human life it makes

it communism is a declaration for

instance that there are these material

necessities of social life and of

human beings right that are somehow not

satisfied by the ideal

and that is the purport of Communism

basically the purport of Communism what

communism makes sense of in a sense is a

lack it makes sense of for example the

lack of

uh Commons the lack of

some human need that we have for example

the human need for belonging the human

need for shelter and food and a roof

over your head the human need for a

dignified way of life the human need to

be satisfied in a way that an ideology

can't do

okay

and that's what very vaguely that's what

communism

means that's what it makes sense of

it doesn't satisfy some naive longing

to to

um be satisfied in an idea

it satisfies the longing to be satisfied

in a reality that is other than the idea

the reality which is other than the idea

is what

for example it's the economic sphere of

relations of production for example

which is primarily historically

communism was dealing with that it's

communism from the outset was attached

to some form of materialism

and when I say some form of materialism

by materialism all I mean to say is in

some kind of acknowledgment of a reality

or a sphere

that cannot be satisfied

by any modern ideal right

and the reason communism at the outset

takes such a utopian form before Marxism

is because people think okay if modern

ideology and the ideal State the modern

State cannot satisfy our human belonging

uh then we must be more ideological than

before because we weren't being ideal

enough right that's why at the outset it

takes this kind of utopian form but from

the outset communism is defined by an

inadequacy of ideology it's not defined

by anything other than itself that's why

I think communism is probably

not not an ideology

in the proper sense of the word

as Marx put it communism is not an idea

it's a real Force

wherever you find a force

which sublates the present state of

things that is communism remarks it's

the movement that sublates

the present state of things

why did Mark say that

because if the present state of things

is being sublated it is being done so in

a way that comes at the expense of any

ideology or any ideal remember a state

of things correlates quite exactly to an

ideal to state

I ideal doesn't have time ideal doesn't

even have really space it's a state it's

a steady state right

even movement comes at the expense of an

ideal

but every other ideology

in re it's it's like almost kind of like

freudianism

it's kind of like you know it's kind of

like that Oscar Wilde quote we don't

Oscar Wilde he said everything is about

sex except sex itself that's about power

or how Freud will say everything all of

your dreams and aspirations

are secretly about sex something like

that right but what is sex itself about

for Freud

it's not about sex

it's about you know a death drive or

something right

what's the same for communism well

Communists will say every ideology is

about some

fundamental uh

need to give coherence and make sense of

for example alienation

or let's say the lack of comments every

This Is What communists will say

basically Communists will say every

ideology is basically

of um

about trying to solve

the problem of the commons

but what about the commons itself which

is communism right it's the same thing

it's exactly the same thing

so communism has a privileged status

because of this

I think people need to understand this

is step one communism isn't an ideology

I think that's so important to stress

one of the things people get wrong about

Maga communism

is that they think communism is an

ideology and it's not

communism is not an ideology

it's

a purported force

like similar to kind of freudian's

sexuality it's a force the same way

Freud understands sexuality to

individuals

communism tries to understand

with for example social and political

movements so Maga Communists for example

are saying

that there is a key to Maga there's an

underlying reality of Maga

it's not defined by an ideology it's

defined for example by the very human

need for a Commons a common reality

yada yada

uh some form of sociality it's a would

you say oh so you're just saying it's

false consciousness you're just having

this theory of false consciousness

According to which you know everyone

who's not a communist is just under the

thrall of false consciousness and I

would say no

um because communism needs to have form

communism needs to have form communism

is just content communism doesn't always

have form so for example what form does

communism take in the Soviet Russia what

form does communism take in China well

it's being given form

by things which are not overtly

communist right at least in terms of

how they're being presented or defined

so for example

in China the Communist party was

literally an offshoot of sun yat-sen's

you know uh kmt his the kumante right

so the kumuntang is this indigenous

native

authentic Chinese

um

phenomena

and Communists just assume hegemony over

that Communists distill the essence of

it

but they don't determine the form of

Communism the form of Communism is being

determined for example by Chinese

history the form of Communism in China

was determined by Chinese history it was

determined by the experience of the

collapse of the Qing Dynasty the Chinese

Revolution of 1911 it was determined by

the invasion of by the Japanese

imperialists it was determined by the

century of humiliation it was these

kinds of things that Communists have

inherited not themselves created

all Maga communism basically means is

that Maga is the same thing in the

American context

so for people to sit here and say oh

you're failing to make the word

communism

amicable to people on true social

by having one interaction with them like

they are someone on Truth social

interacted with you negatively they

bounced

they bought your idea bounced back to

you in a negative way when you try to

talk to someone on Truth social

and that's extremely devastating

but they're missing the point because

communism isn't an ideology

if you're going to be a communist

that is not going to be significant to

you right

you're not it's not going to be like the

most devastating heartbreak in the world

you're not beginning with this ideal

that is being broken

for example I'll give you an example

right

if you get your heart broken you have an

ideal oh she likes me and it's a

relationship and then she says oh you're

ugly oh it's over or whatever okay you

had your heart broken because you had an

ideal and your ideal was violated

but Communists are not beginning from

that premise communes aren't here saying

oh I have this ideal of Communism and if

Maga people talk bad about communism

that's that's breaking my heart no

or if if Maga people talk bad about Maga

communism that's going to break my heart

no

because it's not an ideology

that's what it would happen if it's an

ideology yes for example in an ideology

that says I want to make a commune in

the middle of the forest

and my ideology is

um

uh let's just call it zoloism okay I

have the zoloist ideology where I'm

gonna make a fucking anime commune in

the middle of the forest and you that's

your ID that's your ideal your ideal is

the zoloist Utopia okay

so you go into the forest and you try to

implement your zoloist Utopia

and the ideal confronts the material and

it obviously fails because they're

different right and then your heart gets

broken because your ideal failed your

heart gets broken okay

your heart gets broken

that's because you began with the

premise of an idea ideal of some kind

right

that is completely antithetical to the

materialist dialectics we're not

beginning from that perspective at all

we're not beginning from the perspective

of any ideal we're beginning from the

perspective

of a material sense

uh okay so what do we mean by that house

what do you mean a material sense

the aesthetic of Marxism leninism

aesthetic is another word for the higher

sense basically corresponds to an

acknowledgment

of contradiction

that there is an inherent contradiction

between ideals and material reality and

moreover this contradiction

is sublated

into the form of some higher positive

being

now historically for Communists that

positive being corresponds to two

elements one is the party the political

party has as its object

an implicit acknowledgment of the

distinction between the material and the

ideal and it synthesizes this

distinction into a unity in the form of

Praxis political Praxis and on this on

the other hand like metaphysically

speaking I should say there's the

proletarian class which is Marx points

out the proletarian class is the

sublation of the contradiction between

the ideal and the material it is the

positive being

that synthesizes this contradiction

and why does the proletariat do that by

the way well if you want to think about

it this way very simply right

the proletariat being the laboring class

um realizes the premises

of every ideal

through Labor

so the proletariat for example

um is the universal class according to

Marx

because it contains the unity of the

ideal and the material or I should say

the unity of the contradiction between

the ideal and the material

it is what

sustains that contradiction so that's

what defines the aesthetic of Marxism

leninism it's a sense in first of all

the historical mission of the

proletarian class

and on the other hand

it's a

it's an engagement in the Communist

party right

so I think there's also a third element

too which has to do with

um

some some kind of ideology actually

right an ideology that

that gives expression to the very

distinction between the material and the

ideal and that sphere is going to

confine itself to First the polemicizing

of Lenin Lenin's Charisma or not his

Charisma but his persuasiveness through

polemicizing first is a huge foundation

of the Bolshevik party

and second is the Stalin cult of

personality and then third is Mao's

cultural revolution

so there's like there's like this Triad

element of the Marxist leninist

aesthetic first is the party then is the

proletariat and then there's a third

element which is this kind of sphere of

like real colloquial Aesthetics like

culture and stuff right

um some ideal defined by its contrary

and these three you can't have one

without the other right so many people

try to make communist parties from

scratch they don't have any proletariat

they don't have any aesthetic right some

people just have to have try to have the

aesthetic

um without the other two

and you know

those people uh

can be given the benefit of the doubt

that that is that has the intention of

realizing

something backwards but you know that

won't get you anywhere if that's all you

have

forever right and then some people just

directly try to go to the proletariat

without a party

when without an aesthetic and it fails

so you need these three elements

ultimately

and by the way the three elements

just refer to the political

the class sorry the political the

economic and the cultural

so economic political and cultural

that's the three the three Triad of the

marxistent

Maga communism is not an ideal it is not

an ideology and it's not an ideal it's a

purport

you know what and I you know what I'll

say

it's not an ideology it's a meme memes

are even better right it's a meme Maga

communism is a meme

memes are not ideologies if you think a

meme as an ideology you're fucking

stupid

a meme is a type of hyperstition

and seeing all these dumb fucks on the

alt media all these fucking idiots

try and like

domesticate the meaning of the meme is

so fucking funny oh my you're coping

that's what you're fucking doing is

you're coping here you have a very

coherent Meme and you're sitting here

coping about

you know you're the limited scope of

what you consider its implications to be

but you're missing an actual

confrontation with the meme itself

plenty of people have tried to counter

signal and counter meme the Maga

communism thing for example

uh when people say something like oh

yeah

you're just a bunch of freaks and you're

overreal online Freaks and real Maga

people hate you and they're

it's like it's like

okay well at least those people are

trying to counter signal with a meme

with those dumb pictures right

skewing on a reactionary form of class

consciousness

it's much more than that if you are not

an expert in information Theory I would

stay away from trying to understand that

at all

it's it it's much more than that

um

as a laconian right

let me uh unpause these donations

thank you so much soapbox appreciate it

always fascinating to see people who

watch infrared discover the same

insights as the shore Runners as it goes

on I think you don't know just how much

of an impact you've already had on

people

I hope thank you a star so appreciate

you so much man solidarity comrade as an

Afghan communist I see the true

liberation of my people and what you

comrade Jackson and comrade Caleb have

began let the haters and unbelievers

drown in their own tears

thank you so much man appreciate you

thank you like no that's an interesting

point leftists will say true communism

has never been attempted it has but the

USSR destroyed itself with liberal

reforms these same leftists would

destroy a reducer yeah true thank you

Daniel C how can you say Stalin had a

cult of personality how is that the

proper name for the relationship between

Class party and leader

first of all Stalin did have a cult of

personality

what she was very skeptical of by the

way

uh and one of the things Stalin was

wrong about is his

lack of acknowledgment of

well I think he did eventually

acknowledge it when he was talking to

his um son his son said he told his son

he said you think that is me you think

Stalin is me no man is Stalin Stalin's a

symbol right that's not me

so I think you're confusing

how is that a proper name for the

relationship between Class party and

leader

that wasn't the relationship formally

speaking between the party and the

leader formally speaking Stalin was just

some guy okay

within the party but he on the other

hand he had this cult of personality so

if you want you want to put this in

modern day terms

Stalin was a General Secretary of the

party who just so happened to have a

twitch stream

and which which was an organ of profound

influence on his part but

that did not give him any extra formal

Powers as far as the party was concerned

and by the way he wasn't a twitch

streamer uh voluntarily

like that was

he was he was an unwitting streamer if

you want he was an unwitting influencer

and it wasn't even him who was

influencing it was the image of him it

was the idea of him right the symbol of

Stalin

would you go back on Twitch if you get a

chance uh not exclusively

definitely not exclusively

so

I need people to really understand what

Maga communism actually means

but here's the thing right people see

that on Truth social I say it's so crazy

you know it's fucking insane

every incel is gonna like lose their

shit

if they see a video of a dude getting

rejected

but it's like

but what does that prove that doesn't

prove anything right if you're like some

oh this is the they try to make it's a

melodrama like oh my God this is who

gives a fuck you're beginning from the

wrong place you're beginning from the

place of an ideal that's unrealistic

and if you're a materialist you're going

to fail a trillion times

right

and I'm not talking about uh I'm talking

about in terms of political practice

reality is not just going to validate

the ideal premise that you're coming

from A and B you're not supposed to have

an ideal premise you're not supposed to

have a condom that you put on

that filters the way you engage with the

real world

if you have a condom I'm just too vulgar

sorry

your ideal

you will have ideals as a communist okay

but your ideals are going to be actively

suspended in a process

of being given

to what is not ideal

so I do this as a streamer by the way

right A lot of people think oh huh

you're like

in a cult or some shit but as a streamer

who's a political streamer with my own

ideology or my own Theory or whatever

the fuck right I have to test the

reception of what I do so whatever ideal

that I have is constantly under the

pressure of being tested

in terms of the reception it's getting

right from other people

and that's primarily the way in which

something is going to be tested at the

very outset

right

now another form of Praxis that is a

form of Praxis by the way Praxis is not

just defined by affecting

um

the physical world it's also defined by

like knowledge it's defined by knowledge

and the lack thereof

if you don't have data on how something

is going to be received

and you're suspended in the process of

acquiring that data that is a form of

Praxis in a way

if you want

please thank you light these same

leftists complaining about Stalin's Cult

of Personality we're sewing out for dark

Brandon when he used his FBI gestapo and

political rates

yeah but that was just a joke

yeah but in any case

in any case

will you react to the Sam Cedar video

actually yes I'm gonna be doing that I'm

gonna be reacting to the Sam Cedar video

I'm going to be reacting to The Young

Turks video

and I'm gonna be reacting to all of

these so yes

and we're gonna have to stomach all

these and react to all of them

but people really

need to understand that Maga communism

you know what Maga communism is it's

socialism in one country you want to

know what Maga communism is it's the

going down to the countryside movement

you're taking a risk

and there's no

there's no guarantee

but we are making it our mission

we're making it our mission

it's a mission

think about it that way actually that's

a good way to think about it Maga

communism is a mission

I love that I love that Maga communism

is a mission it's not a prediction it's

a mission okay

and it's not going to be it's not going

to immediately bear

success

as a mission no Mission does

and the most listen I I hate to break it

because people don't really believe this

right

Marxism leninism

supposed to be a science Marxism is

supposed to be a science because notice

science means

it means it's not an ideology

an ideology is an ideal

and it's defined by the way in which

this ideal

reflects reality or approximates reality

that's I that's an idealism that's an

ideology

a science rather than

um established itself as is as an ideal

is a method that is supposed to Bear

results

other than its premises okay so for

example in a scientific experiment

you have a uh two chemicals

and then they the chemicals interact and

they produce a result that you did not

foresee in the beginning

so there's an input and there's an

output

you could not have predicted the output

based on the input except by experience

okay now we're still in empiricism kind

of here right but that's the basics of

science science is a way of realizing

synthesizing something

through negation and through otherness

okay

so science does not satisfy an immediate

ideal

Unity

and if it satisfies an ideal Unity that

is not the idea of

modern um

of of capitalist modernity modern

Boudoir thought philosophy this is

philosophical thought like like for

example maybe if some Indian Mystic can

say ah yes

science is just the Fulfillment of my

ideal maybe he's right but the Indian

Mystic what he means by ideal

is a deeper coherence of being that is

discovered

or through this like ancient wisdom this

intuition this kind of mystical

intuitive Insight right

and okay yeah I I acknowledge very

interesting things happen there but as

far as what ideal means within the terms

of Western modernity

science does not simply science does not

reflect back or satisfy the premises of

an ideal science

has a beginning point

a middle point and an end point

and scientific knowledge means

um

making patterns out of that endpoint

right like for example all right if I

take water and uh if I mix it with

fuck

if I take uh I don't fucking know if I

take uh water and I mix it with

some chemical

it produces

uh

it produces a uh a gas of some it

produces a fucking toxic gas okay I mix

water with the chemical and it makes the

toxic gas okay so scientific knowledge

is the synthesis of of the interaction

it means like okay I now have knowledge

that a poisonous gas will result from

the interaction of mixing water in a

chemical

so you have a you have a beginning point

you have two things that you know water

and this and then you subject that

to an experiment and then you have a

result that you could not have known

before

so science refers to the system of

knowledge it's the system of acquiring

the knowledge of things

and Marxism leninism and Marxism as a

whole is supposed to be a science

and

if it's a science this is the hard part

it is not just going to consist in

validating

the idea of Marxism or Marxism leninism

in terms of how popular it is so for

example

idealists or ideologists are going to

say the success of my ideology is

determined by how popular my ideology is

going to be among people

but a Marxist

is going to say something different

they're going to say

the success or validity of Marxism is

going to be based on whether or not the

conclusions that I derive using the

Marxist analysis as a form of input are

going to produce a successful output

so for example Marxist let me put it

this way right let's say DeSantis is

coming to snake Donald Trump

and you employ Marxist analysis to

understand the

alignment of class political forces in

America

and then you because of your application

of Marxism

you're able to have the Insight that

holy shit DeSantis is coming to snake

Trump then you start to um you know

sound the alarms oh my God the sentence

is coming to Santa's coming you don't

even mention Marxism you just say oh my

God the Santa is coming to take Trump

and then it happens and then people see

your credible and you clearly have some

kind of insight

and I think that gives you credibility

okay that's one example of proving the

validity of marxist ideas now what about

proving the validity of Communism as an

ideology or as a as a movement as some

kind of um method

well that has to do with people's common

ins Common Sense really really really

common sense if you're able to

articulate people's common sense

in an accurate way their political

common sense in an accurate way

that's another way of proving the

validity of communism

you don't mention communism you just

articulate what people are really

feeling or the common sense people have

and then they will see at a certain

point the source of your Insight is

coming from your communism so this

suddenly gives communism and endows

communism with the character

of something that's connected to their

common sense

and moreover something connected with

real world things so it's like this is

what will make communism successful for

people

not simply saying not simply uh saying

oh yeah we communist agree with you on

everything

so accept us that's not enough right

that will work sometimes granted

but if you want to make communism useful

I mean that's what it is

Marxism is a sociological Theory no it's

not

sociology is a science not Marxism

Okay so

so science is is not science in the way

that you're using it doesn't exist okay

you're talking about a university

Department

and I'm talking about whist the

historical meaning of the word science

in the Modern Age okay so you're talking

about some shit that's credible

according to a fucking University I wipe

my ass with that and I don't give a fuck

about that so you can shove that science

right up your ass

foreign

logo no longer follow each other on

Twitter

I I think that that wasn't I think that

was just not because of Maga communism I

I just I refuse to think that it is

I think that that's for other reasons

actually

that would be my suspicion that it's

just for other reasons

and that's that's a really depressing

thing but you know I I I I I'm sorry but

like that's where I'm just gonna say

it's because of closed-mindedness

there's no other reason for it it's just

close-mindedness

and whatever right people are I don't

you know I I it's always hard that you

don't talk about heartbreak that's what

I find heartbreaking you know

when people are just

fucking close-minded for no reason

like yeah don't don't don't uh

don't even ask don't even inquire don't

even question don't even like don't even

receive things in any charitable kind of

way just like dismissed everyone is a

grifter uh because you know

I don't fucking know right

spawn to Danny High Fong's lip shit

article

okay sure let's read Danny haifong's lip

shit article let's do it

uh

uh opportunism and foolishness have

resulted in the concept of Maga

communism and by the way guys keep up

the fucking hashtag because that's the

source of all this Ruckus

um and mods don't link this in stream

but a close friend of mine who's been

inactive for many many years so I'm

banned on Twitter I'm never gonna be on

Twitter again right

one of my close friends who's not a

showrunner

but I've always been corresponding with

them for years told me that he wants to

make a Twitter and he's making a Twitter

and you know I said okay

uh

I trust him a lot I trust this guy a lot

like it was if it was my own brother

right I trust everything they say and

I'm okay with promoting them because I

think they should have a voice and I

think you know in my absence on Twitter

they're not representing me but like you

know they have interesting insights

and they're a little different from me

you know I'm way more belligerent and

combative

and this guy he he's more of a kind of

Prince he takes more of a leadership

kind of role

so on Twitter uh his name if you didn't

know this already

is the red Ember and that's

at the red

e-m-i-r the red Emery okay

so you can go ahead and check that out

if you want

but that's them

uh if you want to go see check them out

no links okay no links

anyway

let's read Danny iPhone's article

basketball online trend has emerged that

presumes social conservativism and make

America great again

the Trump inspired ideology as a

sufficient responses to the liberal

branding of the Democratic Party

so right off the bat this is wrong

some have been called for a Maga

communist movement

the reason behind this is simple

Maga inspired millions of mostly white

workers to support Trump's anti-free

trade anti-nato and pro-deton with

Russia

campaign message Trump's political base

are therefore soon to possess more

revolutionary potential in the

Democratic party camp

problems formulation are many so before

we get to that I'm going to wash my

hands because I have beard oil

uh first of all

give me a sec I don't have any phone

I'm gonna text the brand

something

okay

got that taken care of

Emilio thank you so much for the five

man appreciate you

okay this is mistaken

problem with this formulation are many

for one it belies even the most recent

history movements cannot be judged by a

portion of the slogans communicated to

the masses by a single or even half full

of Elites

it should be judged by how closely these

slogans match the actions of movement

leaders and those following them by this

measure the Trump movement has quite

obviously served the ends of the elite

and not the working class

okay so do you guys

was anyone paying attention to my

lecture can the class they want to raise

their hand and tell the class

what was like the first mistake Danny

haifong made

in this paragraph alone based on what I

just told you

it's super simple

it's super simple

can the anyone in the class point out

the problem with this statement here

not a single person

okay Chris Morlock got it immediately

all right

no Chris Morlock literally immediately

got it because Chris morlock's an actual

real communist so he knows about all

this

so there you go

Danny highpong

is making the very simple mistake here

of again dwelling

and making a fuss over the contradiction

between the ideal and the material so

for Danny hypong the ultimate measure of

political realities consists in the

relations between ideas

and the act the realization of those

ideas and that's how you Define politics

and that's how you define political

realities this basically reflects a

pretty simple Bourgeois idealism

they're like the L this is the

elementary form of Bourgeois idealism on

part of

I'm part of high point because he's

projecting upon us that we consider Maga

an ideal an ideal of being anti-trade

and anti-nato and all that kind of stuff

and we're not taking into sufficient

consideration how that ideal has come to

be at odds with the actual reality of

the decisions in policy making choices

of trump

the problem is that the premise is false

it's judging reality still in terms of

relations between ideals and material

reality it doesn't for example

um stem from the position of the

partisan

According to which reality is not to be

judged

by the relation between ideals and

material because if we're Marxist

leninism we're materialists we are

already understanding and perceiving

reality from the perspective of their

synthesis namely their synthesis in the

form of a materially positive being

so not in terms of

how slogans are affected in the form of

policy making but

What relation those slogans bear for

example to the alignment of the various

different social and class forces in the

country

so high Fawn gets it wrong wrong right

off the bat

we're not saying that Maga shows promise

because it it has endeavored to pursue

policies that align with our ideal no

you're wrong right off the bat we're

saying Maga shows promise because it

reflects the senses

interests

and realities of a specific

social formation in the United States

which is the American working class

proper that's the beginning from Square

One

other implications I wrote about in my

sub stack

but from the very beginning we are over

it so Danny hypong is like an incel got

his heart broken and he's still talking

in terms of

okay so so so

um it's about like did she respond to my

texts or not and she's like talking

about that okay we're over it Danny

we're already over that instead of

talking about if she's responding to us

through texts

to determine

whether she likes us or not

we're not even interested in her anymore

we don't care about her

we're focused on something else on

veteran bigger things right so you are

beginning from a false place you are the

one invested with this vain attempt to

realize ideals in the material world we

are not concerned with that we are

concerned with the way in which positive

material being reconciles the

contradiction between the ideal and the

material

and the way in which that contradiction

is reconciled in this case is not does

this slogan or does this policy

um signify the possibility of it being

implemented

but more like what is this a symptom of

what does the popularity of this

sentiment and this view attest to as far

as the alignment of social forces are

concerned in this country

that also comes with a media Theory

right a literal media theory about for

example Which social forces are most

disposed

to trusting

you know the mainstream establishment

media by virtue of the way in which they

reproduce themselves and which ones have

the necessary social Independence

that allows them to basically think for

themselves

so it's those kinds of things we're not

we're not begin it's it's a completely

false premise from the very Outlet

we're not I we're not the ideologists

here who are trying to establish an

ideal we don't care that Trump is

pro-israel and that Trump was controlled

by some of the neoconservative elements

and he was being blackmailed and but

whatever we don't care about any of that

because Trump was never an ideal for us

to begin with

he was a meme the difference between an

ideal and a meme

is that in the case of an ideal

you're

holding that up as a standard in regards

to your expectations about what happens

in the real world

but in the case of a meme a meme is a

way of discerning Tendencies

oscillations social antagonisms and

contradictions in the fabric of material

being

there's an acute difference between

those two things Trump was never an

ideal for us to begin with to be

disappointed by or otherwise that is not

his significance

you are still approaching this from the

standpoint of a extremely primitive

primitive and elementary form of

Bourgeois idealism

fuck's sake

it's like we're like we're like this

much in and it's already stupid all

right it's not that long

um Donald Trump's Administration failed

to improve U.S relations with Russia

okay again it doesn't matter that has

nothing to do with the Maga movement's

significance because politics is not

policy the politics has nothing to do

with policy it has to do with the way in

which different social forces

distinguish themselves from others it

doesn't have anything to do with actual

policy

you know what policy doesn't fucking are

we even fucking Communists anymore hey

I'm gonna explain I'm gonna fucking

break this down for you okay if we're

Communists we don't care about policy we

care about

our

political power yeah we care about

political power

you're not gonna make a difference at

the levels of the Bourgeois state in

terms of policy that doesn't mean

anything

what means something is correctly

distinguishing the alignment of social

forces in order to build political

independence with which

you can if you want to put it this way

defend the proper Democratic Liberties

of the people because the Bourgeois

state is not disclosed to that

for example right

but you're not going to get anywhere

when you're analyzing politics in terms

of oh who's more likely to implement the

policies I like who gives a fuck about

the policies that you like when you're

not in power you have to understand that

Communists and proletarian subjectivity

is on a completely different level than

the Bourgeois kind we don't just have

policies that we want to implement

we have a different subject political

subjectivity

from which policies are implemented in

the first place you want to implement

policies from the perspective I mean

that's like that's like reformism right

that's not where Communists are coming

from

that's just reformism

we are interested in building political

power

we're not interested in implementing

policies that are ideal to us and then

people are going to ask okay Haas why do

you want political why do you want to

build political power if not to

implement so and so set of policies or

so and so bundle of policies or avoid

the implementation of so-and-so policies

well

the contestation for political power

rather than have something to do with

policy

which it doesn't by the way

or the implementation thereof I mean if

it does and it's tangential and policy

is just a symptom right

um

it actually has more to do

with an irreducible contradiction an

irreducible antagonism now historically

Marx is called that the class struggle

but you can also understand it in terms

of a paradox that is at the heart of

political modernity which I go over in

my sub stack by the way

now if you presuppose that there's a

contradiction and if you presuppose that

there is an irreducible antagonism

it stands that that has to be tested

well the whole history of Marxism is

being able to prove an irreducible

contradiction or antagonism at the heart

of political modernity

which they're just fundamentally is

so the point and then the the question

stands how do you give Clarity and sense

to that contradiction

so in a way politics rather than being

about implementing policies that you

want

sovereignty proper real political power

and sovereignty

is about

something much more abstract

that makes no sense policy matters that

makes no sense policy doesn't fucking

matter at all doesn't matter one bit

policy doesn't fucking matter one bit

not even one bit you want political

power in order to implement policy no

fuck no that's not why

that is not why in any in any sense

whatsoever

no you don't want political power to

implement policy

if you think that political power

has anything to do with policy you don't

understand the basis of sovereign

political power the basis of sovereign

political power this is Marxism 101 lies

in classes

so the proletariat wants political power

because it wants a state that reflects

the reality of the proletariat as a

class not just implementing policies

favorable to it but the form of State

sovereignty itself reflects and

represents for example a much broader

stratum of society than the capitalist

bourgeoisie

that's sovereignty okay

that means the very character the very

form the very nature of the state

is different

it's not just about different policies

you know what flame you're so fucking

right

policy debates are class humiliation

that's so true that's literally so

fucking true it's ways yeah it is a form

of class humiliation it is

and the problem of reformism

lies in this view that you can just

Implement that the issue is just policy

right

and it neglects the fact

that there's also a contradiction at the

level of the form of the state itself

you can't just presuppose the existing

form and reality of the state

proceed with the ready-made State

machinery and just implement the

policies you want

the state Machinery must be smashed as

Marx pointed out the form of the state

is rotten

I have beard oil I mean wash my hands

give me a sec

now people people must understand what

is meant by the political class struggle

the political class struggle is not a

struggle over differing conceptions of

policy or even different

Notions of the range of the

implementation of different policies

class struggle is a struggle at the

level of metaphysics

it's a struggle over the nature of being

itself

class struggle is about

the threshold of metaphysical

possibility not just policy making

possibility metaphysical possibility for

example

the USSR exceeds the threshold of

metaphysical possibility for the

bourgeois ideologist

it's simply not possible

not because its policies are impossible

its existence the purport of a state by

Foreign of the workers the purport of a

proletarian dictatorship the purport of

socialism

these are impossibilities

why because they

synthesize and sublight the negation of

Bourgeois modernity the Bourgeois

explain this to you hegel's three Triad

positive affirmation negation and the

negation of the negation that's the

third right so this is Bourgeois

Missouri modernity the positive and then

the negation and that's it negation

that's it just the negation okay

and then let's say the USSR is the

negation of the negation now at a

metaphysical level the Bourgeois

ideologist refuses to believe that they

refuse to believe that's possible

not just because they disagree with

policies at a metaphysical level it's

not possible it's an absurdity it's

lysenchoism

that's why I mean that's why lysenka was

so maligned because lysenko literally

did this metaphysically he proved a

connection

somehow between the sphere of ideology

and the physical Natural Sciences the

Bourgeois the bourgeoisie oh my God

lysenko

hell no

you can't do that science is blind

science is blind to ideology

and they're like they find it

inconceivable

cause can you connect your level to one

most people understand

no that's what Jackson does okay

that's what Jackson does I'm I'm the

fucking schizo okay Jackson is the

normal guy

of course the Democratic party's

unhinged Crusade

against Donald Trump played a leading

role in the depravity of the Trump era

okay others in the Trump camp like

majorie Taylor green have made

rhetorical gestures to abolish the FBI

and oppose weapon transfers to Ukraine

which isn't with Trump these are just

words words themselves do not constitute

a movement the Maga policy is no Mal on

the live but that doesn't mean Maga is a

movement Maga is simply an ideological

expression of a political moment where

the duopoly is lost legitimacy with the

masses and a reaction when attacked if

Maga movement was simply an ideological

expression then you would think it would

be ideologically coherent and it's not

if it's not ideologically coherent then

clearly maga's source is not based on

ideology

or it's not characterized by ideology I

should say so you're wrong Maga is a

movement

defined by political partisanship now

you're saying that these are simply just

words because they're not going to be

affected in actual reality because of a

lack of political power but what those

words do politically their political

Words which does mean something is give

articulation give representation and

give expression to a counter hegemonic

and partisan form of politics

it positions them against the FBI

against Ukraine it positions one class

against another

it positions the American working class

or let's even say the non-monopoly

classes against the hegemonic classes

let's bring gromsky classes can't only

just be defined between the workers in

the bourgeoisie there are also the

hegemonic classes and the counter

hegemonic classes

Lenin was the first to acknowledge this

by the way

that's why Lenin said there's a

difference between the peasant

Democratic bourgeoisie and the

established City liberal bourgeoisie

because one is hegemonic the city

liberal loses that's hegemonic but the

peasant bourgeoisie is counter hegemonic

so there's a difference

someone waiting in so cute

okay

yeah what's going on

hello yeah

hey what's up Oz yeah what's up

holy shit I don't think I get on

all right so

I wanted to question your belief that

Liberals are fascists and Nazis and why

I keep calling them that

did you read my sub stack

no

bye bitch

the Maga polity is no monolith but that

doesn't mean Maga is a movement

Maga is simply an ideological expression

okay so I already addressed that some

have argued that Maga consists of

millions of fellow workers that must be

one over to socialism that means

approaching them with language they

understand instead of banishing with

talk to terminology

this misses the key aspect of the

material reality confronting the working

class

even if millions of workers who vote in

the Maga comp

another arguably more Central Dynamic

exists with the Democratic Party

young workers who lean Democrat are more

anti-capitalists than ever

okay I see so what we're doing here is

we're just going to change the

definition of what the workers are

and the reason the definition of the

worker has changed from the actual

productive material worker

to a fucking barista

is because leftists realized that the

actual workers were not receptive to

their messages and slogeneering but

Baristas were so they just changed very

conveniently this definition of what

workers proper are the proletarian

workers proper are

and this is where Danny haifong is

coming from in reality

this is not true because the premise is

that these are the working class proper

and they're not

and and you're saying and arguably more

essential Dynamic exists within the

Democratic party hold on so you're

saying the workers the anti-capitalist

workers of the democratic party uh would

be more essential for a communist

movement than the actual working class

in the Maga movement who can shut the

whole fucking country down in a Split

Second

I mean we're bafflingly stupid fucking

thing to say

union members are not Democrats they

have to fucking vote Democrat most of

the time and they don't have to but it's

like they're in an institutionalized

position they're not voting Democrat

because they like Democrats they're

voting Democrat because that's what the

institution they're in which by the way

is literally tied to the Democratic

party herds them into but but believe it

or not union members I mean let's look

this up

um Union

voting 2020.

I'm sure it's mostly Democrat but how

much

by how much

not that much

okay

so

57 of households with a union member

voted for Biden

compared to 40 who voted for Trump

so that yeah it's not a surprise that

union members are more willing to vote

for Democrats because they're in an

institutionalized Union okay

where it's harder for the Maga message

to reach them and mobilize them because

they're already Consolidated by the

Democrats but the fact that 40 of them

still vote for Trump

it's pretty fucking crazy isn't it

despite that institutional barrier they

still vote for Trump

foreign

okay so this one is even more fucking

cynical I mean

this one is just fucking cynical

the leaders that the appointed leaders

of the black community

are bribed by the Democrats they're

tools of the Democrats

I think he's missing that like it's not

that black workers are pro-democrat it's

like the ones that happen to vote voted

because they were canvassed or haronged

or reached out by

you know the fucking political

leadership

of the black communities that's why the

reason the black community votes mostly

in for the Democrats isn't fucking

because they're pro-democrat it's

because the leaders of the black

community have been Consolidated and

captured

by the Democratic party something which

Malcolm X acknowledged and many others

have acknowledged many times before

none of these constituencies have

received the same kind of attention for

those calling for Maga communism

oh

so you're saying we should go out so let

me tell you this formally speaking Maga

isn't White

there's plenty of Latinos and there's

plenty of black people in the Maga

movement

is it mostly white yes it's mostly white

because most of America is white but

I'll Grant you it's disproportionately

white even compared to America I would

have no doubt about that but formally

speaking Maga is just about America

now what you're saying because so we're

not like going out of our way just to

reach white people we're reaching the um

the America movement right about America

the foundation of America

now the black community as a separate

Community you're saying we should go out

of our way to reach out to them okay who

are we are we black

who am I I'm gonna lead the black

community

we're gonna lead the black community

just because we're Communists why should

black people trust us

and I'm not I'm saying this specific

because you're saying we should go out

of our way to isolate the black

community and reach out to them as black

people

but why would they trust us

why are we going to go out of our way to

reach out to black people as black

people if we're not black

you know what I'm saying here the only

people who are going to lead the black

community are black people

and the forces that represent black

political Independence

we are going to

try to Ally with when we try to secure

positions of prominence within the Maga

movement we're going to create those

alliances right but we're not going to

be the ones to fucking lead the black

community that's fucking stupid now as

for the young workers you mean the

fucking Baristas

who have no political potential at all

whatsoever

why should we why should we reach out to

the fucking Baristas

I'm just saying why should we the young

workers as you're calling them why

should we reach out to fucking Baristas

you cannot interpolate the subjectivity

of General laborers and the general

proletariat

by trying to isolate these exclusive

groups

that stand apart from the predicament of

general labor

now I know you're going to try and say

that Maga is also just a special group

among many others

but this is just an undielectrical

perspective yes Maga is one group among

many others but it's the one group that

represents the universality of the

predicament of Labor namely in the form

of

the loss of General jobs

General jobs you get straight out of

high school yada yada that type of

Universal Labor

now that's the subjectivity from which

Maga is coming from

so that's the that's why they're

privileged over the others like like

young workers in Starbucks or whatever

if you reach out to Starbucks young

workers

you're not reaching out to any universal

segment of society if you reach out to

Maga people you're reaching out to a

segment of society which does represent

some kind of universal interest that's

why it divides all Society into that's

why Maga

that's why I bet you you know if you go

to your local Walmart if you go to your

local

if you go to your local anywhere right

it's like you'll see people divided some

armaga some are non-maga but there's a

division why because Maga represents

something Universal even beyond the the

factory workers

that's why even if you go to a fucking

um EMC workplace some people will be

Maga

right

a lot of non-workers are hustle Maga so

it's like it's Universal

it represents something Universal not

exclusive

anyone can be Maga but the because the

base of magas represents the universal

interests of America

that's the that's the theory of the

proletariat by the way the proletariats

of the universal class

it's clear that work resides in peeling

away the entire working class from the

duopoly okay that is undielectical okay

that's like saying

riddle me this if you're living in

Marx's time

proletariat's a very small minority of

people so you mean to tell me

that this is an extension of Marx's

logic because Marx did say yes there is

a particular segment of society which

represents Universal society's

predicament before they were ever a

majority by the way

now someone could have approached Marx

and this is what Marx and anglos called

the charlatans of democracy by saying

something like no not a particular

faction of society but all the people

the whole people not just the workers

again it's undielectical dialectics

means universality lies in the

particular

you only achieve the universal through

the particular

so laying claim to the universal working

class

is a form of posturing

you're not talking about anything

determinate you're talking about an

ideal subject instead of a real subject

you're talking about a subject

interpolated by the extent to which they

will be receptive to your messaging and

your ideals you're not talking about a

subject

which is actually defined in reality

as possessing some kind of significance

in a determinate way

you're talking about a subject

interpolated only by the extent to which

they're willing to listen to you

not the extent to which

not interpolated by the extent

which they actually represent the

determinate Universal class

this is this is like a biggest fucking

rookie mistake in dialectics you can you

can even imagine

not not a particular faction but the

whole thing well the whole only can be

given adequate and concrete

determination in in it one of its

particular parts that's a basic

dialectics very basic dialectics

if you have as your address see such a

general abstract subject

it inevitably follows that the only

people who are going to listen to you

are General and Abstract types of people

namely fellow intellectuals and

Intelligentsia and this is what the left

has done the extent to which they

organize the workers is the extent to

which workers are Intelligentsia the

more workers are close to being

Intelligentsia the more they have

revolutionary potential why because they

are contriving a position

based on abstraction rather than any

determinate material reality

okay it's like it's like this right it's

like this so when you say I want to

reach the workers that's an ideal you're

setting up an ideal

because you're not answering the

question which workers what workers oh

all of them okay where is the all

which segment of society reflects really

the all

they're all the same are they all the

same

because you're not just analyzing

reality you're trying to intervene into

it which means there's something

significant about you you right you are

someone spreading ideas and your ideas

have a subject which they are meant to

interpolate

so who is your subject

oh it's everyone it's everyone's my

subject really is it

is everyone your subject

ah

how have you proven that in some kind of

way how can that be proven first and

foremost how can that purport

acquire determinacy how can it be proven

how can it become a real thing

it's everyone

oh it's not a particular faction it's

everyone

so how do you

it's like everything ends with give me

power just listen to me blindly and give

me power

there's no actual Praxis going on

there's a political

um

report

According to which you must obey me or

you're an enemy of the people that's

basically where they're coming from you

must obey me or you're the enemy of the

workers that's how trotskyas are by the

way right

my way or the highway

they don't actually imperil their

position across material reality itself

they don't discern their partisanship in

distinctions among the people itself

it's they have this empty Universal

subject they call the working class

whose significance I should add is

contrived from some abstract Theory

rather than anything in actual reality

it's like what do you fucking expect

why are the workers even significant

Danny why are they significant because

Marx told you because Theory told you

they are

what about what did reality tell you

right where's the connection to actual

reality

this is pure idealism

this alone makes Maga communism a losing

message

the problems don't end here are

particular emphasis in place on

conservatism

no an emphasis has been placed on the

extent to which

the so-called white workers as you're

calling them

are positioned in such a way

where counter hegemonic institutions can

be built that are at the expense

of the ones created by the bourgeoisie

that is actually why Evangelical

evangelicism has been so successful the

reason evangelicism has taken root among

the American working class is because

they were fertile soil for these new

non-aligned institutions or at least

apparently non-aligned institutions

to you know to go and prostheticize and

uh have a foothold because no one else

is there doing it

so basically the woke institutions can't

reach these people

so other people can do it instead

it's it's like gromsky's theory of

hegemony the Bourgeois hegemony cannot

extend that far

so that's our opportunity

for example

neoliberal Democrats we are told of

weaponized in antibiotics

yeah this is just a flip this is just a

waffling of confusion on his part he is

the one

who is very much phased by our

opposition to woke a bullshit so he's

making it seem like it's the essence of

our position

no no it's just that you are essentially

attached to wokeness

the gop's identity reductionism

the GOP has served as the white man's

party as late of the 1960s

okay I mean like this proves this just

proves how fucking leftists don't have

foresight

okay because you're saying this

so if the GOP is inherently a white

party

um how do you explain articles like this

by the New York Times which are talking

about the real undocumented phenomena

about how the growing base of support

for the GOP lies in Hispanic voters

[Music]

see you're speaking you're speaking from

a perspective of outdated

I know you learn this in University or

something but because you're not a

Marxist and you don't have the foresight

of a marxistani

in no way where you actually attune to

the things going on concurrently you

were wrapped up in these dogmas about

history that you were learned that you

learned about in school but you look

like a fucking idiot when reality

actually changes in a way that your

theories can't explain if if the GOP is

a white man's party why the fuck is it

becoming so Latino

why is it why are there growing numbers

of black people joining the GOP can you

explain these things Danny no you

fucking can't

social conservative is neither inherent

to Socialism or nor the working class

the cpusa's biggest success came when it

followed Lenin's leadership on the

national question

that has nothing to do with the question

of social conservatism your stance on

the national question has nothing to do

with conservatism okay

Palestinians fighting for

self-determination

are very conservative Danny

I'm sure the Irish fighting the British

with the same fucking way it hasn't

there's no correlation at all okay

uh as a matter of fact I think there's

an inverse correlation I think more

Progressive liberal types have been

forces of

assimilation

and the denial of national uh Liberation

if anything

this is just a false dichotomy you're

creating an ideal of social conservatism

that has nothing to do with what

conservatism actually means for us

conservatism for us means something

completely different than any ideal it

just basically it means the common sense

realistic material instincts

the working class is disposed of at the

expense of the Walk agenda it's that

fucking simple it's not really much more

to it it's not an ideal it's a material

instinct

fucking stupid ass fucking people

in defense of the Scottsboro boys

against Jim Crow internationally

socialist Cuba China dprk

okay

Ayatollah Khomeini who was very much a

social conservative

came out in support

of both Black Liberation in the United

States

going far above and beyond what the USSR

was willing to mind you the USSR was

supporting the you know um MLK and kind

of like civil rights

just basically equality the Iran

supported black separatism okay

and moreover Rolo Khomeini

denounced apartheid in South Africa and

he was very much a social conservative

so I'm not sure what connection you're

you're trying to draw a connection

between defending the Scottsboro boys

and like the LGBT movement I'm sorry to

say there's no correlation at all

as a matter of fact at this specific

time in history

uh there were no LGBT rights to speak of

in places like the Soviet Union

socialist Cuba China and the dprk

and at the time of the defense of the

Scottsboro boys

and Jim Crow

uh being a homosexual was not allowed in

the Communist Party USA to say nothing

of these other I mean much more uh

heterodox

trends

that are being uphold as models of

social progress

okay so there's there's no there's no um

okay so this one has correlation the

Soviet Union was the first nation to

legalize abortion that's a myth bizarest

criminal code was thrown out there was

no explicit legalization of abortion

whatsoever

and Soviets Health uh ministers

experts and Scholars

had a unanimous consensus

that abortion was a social evil

but they did think that temporarily and

for the time being

legalizing abortion would reduce the

death of because it was you're dealing

with the aftermath of the Russian Civil

War

where there's a lot of

women who were you know in destitution

in need of abortions and they were dying

and there was a Health crisis

that and that wasn't a principle that

wasn't being made according to some kind

of progressive principles

um

place the rights of women at the

Forefront of socialist development again

I don't see what is uh I don't see what

relation that has to conservatism at all

okay women can formally be equal to men

in the eyes of the law

the question stands is what were the

Soviet views on the traditional role of

women

at the more fundamental level right now

of course women can get a job they can

be educated and this seems like it's

breaking the mold and whatever and it's

not conservative

but when all these things correspond to

a strengthening of family bonds and a

strengthening of motherhood

you know

you have to understand it dialectically

as much as it seems like it's a

progressive deviation from the human

fundamentals and conservatism seeks to

preserve

it's also an affirmation of those things

too

and so the Soviet Union was very

traditional and it's in its generals

um even if women were doing things they

weren't doing before they were still

doing the things

traditionally expected of women to do

and if anything it's kind of like women

got conned in a lot of ways

It's like because women have to work at

the factory and they had to be the the

household mother right

so

yeah it's not all Rosy

social conservatism makes just as little

sense for socialists in the United

States

again you're establishing this as some

kind of ideal

and then okay it doesn't mean the class

is in itself a monolith race gender are

profoundly influential

even if I were to concede to you that

that's true it's not true in the way

that you presuppose it is

ignoring or going so far as to

characterize them as merely yeah well

the way that these things are brought up

is definitely in the context of

neoliberal woke agendas absolutely

um there's no doubt about that is a deck

that doesn't mean you're saying that

there's no women's question or there's

no reality of race in America

but it does mean the ways in which those

things are currently articulated serve

the neoliberal local agenda now how do

you articulate them in the contrary

okay well first you do create a

fundamentally working class

politics okay where that is that's the

jealous God of Israel that that has no

there's no intersectionality it's just

the fucking workers movement period and

then once you have that foundation and

base

you can you can you can um

interrogate other acts aspects of

society

but you don't do it all uh

synchronously okay at once

you don't do it all uh you don't do all

of this at once

you prioritize

the political movement of the working

class

I mean it's just like Marxism 101 right

it's that's why Marx called for the

expulsion

of American feminists from the iwa

because they were not

placing their primary attention on the

workers movement

and so this is just this is just

intersectionality right he's just

basically rehashing the argument of

intersection oh these things are

connected and they all intersect no they

don't because they're qualitatively

different

communist material conditions must guide

our ideology rather than the other way

around

that's why you're treating everything as

ideology

all issues deemed as woke and identity

politics have a class element to them

can you care to name that class element

because naming for oh just poor people

are disproportionately affected

negatively again it's not a class

element

that's a that's like a philanthropic

spin you're putting on your woke agenda

you're not explaining how it fits within

the alignment of different class

interests now just because some people

are um there's like okay yeah uh trans

people have a Health crisis okay

the poorer trans people are the more in

crisis they are okay but that's not a

class element because it doesn't

actually articulate any actual class

interests

you're just assuming there's a class

interest because I don't know you have

this utilitarian view that

we all want what's best for us and

that's what's in our interests which is

kind of patronizing and not true you

realize class Warfare means classes are

actually involved in a conflict before

experts decide that this is what's

healthy and not healthy for you

thank you so much infrared Clips

appreciate you man

use the example trans workers face

rampant economic discrimination

yeah that's not a class element though I

don't think you know what that means I

don't think you know what class element

even fucking means so because someone's

discriminated against at the workplace

and is poor

doesn't mean it's a class issue

a class issue

has to do with the concrete

manifestation of social antagonism

it doesn't simply have to do with

grievances or ailments it has to do with

concrete instances of social antagonism

again this is Marxism 101.

yeah disability is not a class classes

are not defined by suffering or

discrimination

they're defined by the way in which they

are suspended

in contradictions with one another these

contradictions don't matter it's not

simply inequality okay

fuck's sake man

fuck's sake

so this this okay for example I'm gonna

explain like why this guy's a fucking

idiot so this is an indictment on the

bourgeois purport

of universal equality

okay

so you can maybe do what the cpusa does

and say okay it's not a class issue but

it is a democratic issue

the problem with that is that democracy

confines itself to this fear of

universal equal rights okay trans people

can have equal rights to everyone else

and still face workplace discrimination

and still face

um

and still make less money

and what's especially stupid about this

pay Gap here is that it presupposes

that for the same type of work trans

people get paid less

at which I see no evidence for right

maybe that would be a democratic

struggle but even then it wouldn't be

because if that's economic

you're over extending the sphere of

political rights

and formal democracy to a a a literally

informal sphere which is what the

economy is it's the informal sphere

that has more to do with culture and

things like that that doesn't mean it's

a class issue

it's only a class issue a when it's

Universal okay when represent something

Universal B

when that universality is

um suspended in a concrete instance of

antagonistic contradiction

or even non-antagonistic contradiction

but some kind of contradiction

okay yeah he's gonna do the thing where

yeah

okay well okay yeah no one's saying

black people are not oppressed but

that's the national issue and if you

don't understand how class and Nate

class struggle in National struggle are

related I just like go read Stalin dude

I don't know what to tell you

that that okay so so the oppression of

black people in no way vindicates uh

wokeness or vindicates identity politics

why because identity politics and

wokeness are made from the perspective

of institutions

hegemonic institutions that purport to

be Universal whereas black oppression is

an indictment on

that very same institutional

universality so for example the reason

BLM

isn't justified by the oppression of

black people

is because BLM was a this moral cause

that all even white people in suburbs

all take a knee for George Floyd they're

all doing it

and because of that purported

institutional universality

which by the way

is an extension

or presupposes black oppression

institutionally speaking

um

it does not actually

in any way articulate the national

political independence of black people

black lives matter had nothing to do

with the political and National

independence of black people

so it's not justified by the oppression

of black people

because the national oppression of black

people from the Marxist leninist

perspective

is placed within the context of National

Liberation it's not placed within the

context of a universal moral Mission or

woke agenda or some kind

you don't even have your Marxism

straight

how much more of this is there okay

none of these issues can be divorced

from cloud okay intersectionality

uh Maga has shown no interest in forging

such solidarity

um and it's thrown itself on Trump's

incoherent use of racist so he doesn't

understand Trump

after how many years

six years he still doesn't understand

Trump you see Roots incoherent yeah your

job is to have made it coherent by now

you dumb fuck in an intellectual it's

been six years and you're still saying

this stupid shit

uh for political gain

so Maga has shown no interest in um

pretending to reflect the universal

interests from an Institutional

perspective of all Society but instead

elects to reflect the determinate

interests of the American working class

rather than all of humanity

really

by the way what would that solidarity

look like oh Trans people should be paid

the same okay show me where show me what

workplace says okay if you're trans and

you're doing the same shit someone who's

cisgender is doing you're getting paid

less

you know you and I both know that's not

the case and now you want okay Margo's

not Margo's not speaking on behalf of

black people why would they

why why would Maga speak on behalf of

black people

unless you think the oppression of black

people is an indictment

on the national reality of America as a

country

which is not there still is an American

Nation style and understood there was

maga's position toward black people for

example is extremely agnostic

it's not inherently one way or the other

but I have no doubt that

in alignment of counter hegemonic forces

so black liberation

and Maga can very easily be United but

they're not going to be united through

this like woke

you know moral blackmail

Maga people are working people who want

concrete results show me what you want

if you have an independent force of

black politics

okay shake hands we can be United

but if you're gonna I want all of you to

feel guilty for being white shut the

fuck up you know

this this see this this guy Danny he

reflects the consciousness

of the sentimental liberal bourgeoisie

he doesn't have a working-class

Consciousness he has the consciousness

of this fucking

Bourgeois Bourgeois consciousness

make America great again is an

abstraction only until the history and

current reality built on the foundations

of The American Nation is reckoned with

has it ever concerned have it ever

occurred to you that Maga is that

Reckoning considering the fact that the

history and current reality of economic

order that build the foundations of The

American Nation

are actually the American working class

now you're going to say it's racism and

transphobia but materially speaking it's

not you're isolating the significance of

those things because they prevent the

ideal of America from being legitimate

in your head

so you're assuming that those lie at the

foundation of America

no those lie at the foundation of your

ideal of America

to be impossible

that has nothing to do with their actual

material reality of America which has as

its foundation

the same working class that comprises

the base of the Maga movement

here we go the U.S is a settler colonial

state

turned imperialist albatross

okay Germany was literally a fascist

state

and that somehow didn't prevent

these Soviets who were by the way the

primary victims of Nazi aggression from

acknowledging there was a German Nation

and by the way the Soviets didn't uh

make the Germans just fucking cry and

feel guilty about it

concrete results right

uh making Maga a little more than

Nostalgia for an American exceptionalism

That Never Was

yeah what if that's not true okay you

know what you know what's funny about

this

uh I'll tell you what's funny about this

because they always like to say oh

mago's just Trump right okay that's true

if Maga is just Trump

Define American exceptionalism does

American exceptionalism still exist and

uh what do we do to Grow American

exceptionally okay well I don't like the

term I'll be honest with you I know

people will say oh he's not Patriot look

if I'm a Russian or if I'm a German

or if I'm a person we do business with

why you know I don't think it's a very

nice term but we're exceptional you're

not first of all German is eating our

lunch

so they say why are you accept your

we're doing a lot better than you I

never liked the term

and perhaps that's because I don't have

a very big ego and I don't need terms

like that but honestly

when you're doing business I mean I

watch Obama every once in a while say

American exceptions

I don't like the term

because we're dealing first of all I

want to take everything back from the

world that we've given them we've given

them so much

on top of taking it back I don't want to

say we're exceptional we're more

exceptional because essentially you're

saying we're more we're more outstanding

than you by the way you've been eating

our lunch for the last 20 years

but we're more exceptional than you I

don't like the term I never liked it

when I see these politicians get up with

the American exceptionalism and then

we're dying we owe 18 trillion in debt

I'd like to make us exceptional and I'd

like to talk later instead of now does

that make any sense because I think

you're insulting the world

okay

so that very much reflects the

sentiments of the Maga movement

um

they don't like American exceptionalism

American exceptionalism is the

you know the bougie kind of

snobby arrogance of the liberal Elites

and Obama oh we're American

exceptionalism no they just want America

to be its own country

they don't want America to be the

American they just want America to be

its own country with its own interests

its own people and its own reality

which then that very much comes at the

expense of imperialism Danny as much as

you because you don't understand

unipolarity

and you think imperialism is the

assertion of one people's interests over

the interests of others

that's not what imperialism is

and if it is it that wasn't Lenin's

imperialism and it's certainly not the

American globalism that emerges after

the post-war period

don't fight capitalism with American

exceptionalism or Maga okay retard I

don't know how to so so Danny Boy we

live in fucking America so how is Maga

American except so you're living in

America but you are such a you are such

an exceptional person that you're you're

a universal subject that speaks on

behalf of every fucking country

right or by saying Margo no Danny we're

not we're not purporting to possess a

universal subjectivity

so if we say Maga do you think we're

telling Chinese people to say Maga you

think we're telling Russians to say Maga

no we're Americans

it's like holy fuck

he's literally like a Bourgeois idealist

I have I have defended black workers

from discrimination

now the working class white Mother after

her son

wow you're such a fucking hero dude

in none of these cases that I shy away

from the people

okay but you didn't do anything of any

political significance

in my estimation that Maga need to

engage in self-criticism

no I think you need to read my fucking

sub stat cause you don't even know what

you're talking about

Maga is a small section of the United

States I can guarantee you that half of

America is Mago when I say you have

America's Maga I don't even mean that

half of Americans vote for Trump

I just mean like half Americans see the

world in the way Maga does and half of

them don't it's probably more than half

actually

that that may not mean they vote most

people probably don't vote right but

they still are like yeah Trump was right

you know how many pro-trump people I

know who don't fucking vote a lot

a lot of these manga people don't even

fucking vote

the real work is in developing a greater

like I mean even John zurka

lives in Canada and he's Maga okay

even fucking zerk he can't even vote

he's a fucking Canadian and he's Maga

and I'm not saying he's the example of

all Maga people because he's pretty

eccentric but I'm just saying like

you know you don't know what Maga is if

you think it's about you know

uh

the real work is developing a greater

understanding of Marxism

so okay among people already in motion

against capitalism and imperialism so

what he's trying to say is the real work

is in develop a translation a greater

understanding of Marxism among people

who are already positively disposed to

Marxist ideas

which spoiler alert are the people

closest in proximity to academics

the professional managerial class and

the privileged people who

make their living on the basis of

abstraction

so what a what a self-serving

coincidence

the real work is developing and

understanding of Marxism among people

who are already similar in their class

position to people like Danny hypong

uh which is the opposite of what Lenin

did because Lenin called the

intellectuals the shit of the nation

moreover Lenin's definition of advanced

versus backward forces

was not based primarily on theoretical

or ideological consciousness

but unwillingness to fight

there's a big willingness to fight not

as the realization of an ideal but the

concrete willingness like the concrete

positional partisanship

against the enemy as like a concrete

reality not like the intention to fight

not to want to fight

but those leading the real real fight

that's happening in reality regardless

of our ideology and ideals

if those are spousing manga communism

are truly interested in this endeavor

they would drop the Maga label for its

lack of utility outside of online space

uh you can suck a dick how about you

just suck a dick Danny

so what a stupid fucking article which

is so btfo'd it's just never gonna

recover

um

so yeah

all right guys I think I'm gonna let's

let's do the donations good morning

Revolution good morning Revolution

Emilio thank you so much man

thank you so much like appreciate you I

would argue it's disproportionately

white because it's disproportionately

Rural and minorities are concentrated in

urban and suburbs just my two cents

that's partially true thank you so much

infrared Clips appreciate you

appreciate you it's on

based

where do you draw the line BTW and woke

politics and actual social justice human

rights issues is the class element the

only priority right now

yes and uh it has to do with the

proximity to the institutions

um it's as simple as that

if it's from the institutional uh

subjectivity then it's it's vocal shit I

think you're showing you appreciate you

man these discussions go nowhere when

they can't even differentiate between

statehood and nationhood oh yeah of

course

uh okay guys I'm gonna head out

the stream was way longer than I thought

it'd be see you guys tomorrow