🔴 RED PILL NEWS | IRAN-ISRAEL WAR? 🇵🇸

What's up, everybody?

Uh I'm not gonna talk about my disappointment tonight in um

Your total incompetency and pathetic failure to accomplish a basic task.

Yet again, we're not going to talk about that.

You know what?

I don't care though, 'cause I'ma keep fighting.

You know what I mean?

I'm gonna keep doing the same shit I always been doing, you know?

And for those of you that

For those of you that are putting in the effort, that's all I need.

We will build this shit, all these other lazy motherfuckers.

Once we get our shit up and running, which we are.

We're gonna have a caste system and they're gonna be the fucking untouchables.

All right?

Yeah, they're gonna flock to us once our shit is up and running and we're making headlines and we're getting big and you know.

W11, what's up?

Once our shit is up and running and we've got attention and we build the authority and stuff, then all these fucking sheep will come to us, but they're gonna be the fucking untouchables.

You understand?

Oh, Heis, I've always been a fan.

Shut the fuck up, bitch.

You a goddamn untouchable, is what you are.

Remember, I said this shit.

Understand?

Anyway, yeah, we're gonna have a cast.

It's like reincarnation.

You can be reincarnated as a worm.

What up, Waylo?

What's going on?

Waylo in W11.

What's up?

What's up?

For those of you that that are high energy,

For the rest of you.

That's how it is.

You understand?

That's how it is.

In any case, uh

Alright, on a serious note, we got some important stuff to talk about.

Columbia protests.

And the community doesn't know how to respond.

And a lot of people are confused about how what they should make of it.

And how it should be addressed and how it should be understood.

So, today I'm gonna offer some clarity on that.

Before we get into it, here's a few things, a few announcements I'm gonna say.

I'm gonna be streaming tomorrow, two days streaming in a row.

Woohoo!

I'm gonna be streaming tomorrow.

Friday, I'm gonna be headed off to ATL.

What's up, Psyop Shorty?

What's going on?

What's going on, Shya?

What's going on, Syop Shorty?

Let me tell you what's going on.

I'm going to go to the ATL, 7 a.m.

at ATL, if you know what I'm talking about.

You understand?

I'm gonna be driving 7 a.m.

in the ATL.

I'm going to ATL Friday, going to Atlanta.

You understand?

I'm going to the Black Capital of America, Atlanta.

To tap into my Afro Asiatic roots, Afro-American.

Strong emphasis on the Afro part heritage, you understand?

But in addition to doing that,

In addition to doing that, I'm actually gonna be uh attending a special little event.

And I'm gonna try to live stream as m I'm gonna try to li 'cause you know who else is gonna be there is Jackson.

You understand?

Me and Jackson both gonna be in ATL Atlanta.

I'm not gonna spoil too much, but I'm gonna try to live stream it and do some live streams.

It's gonna be a fun time, you understand?

So Sunday I'm not gonna be streaming 'cause I'm gonna be in Atlanta, but I'm not gonna be streaming in this setup, but I I might be streaming.

By other means, you understand with my phone, another kind of stream.

What's up, Red Demos?

What's up, Red Ambiance?

How are you doing?

How are you doing?

What's up, Red Ambiance?

What's going on?

What's going on?

How are you doing?

I got a message for our programmers and coders.

For the organization technical infrastructure.

We're running out of time.

I will pay whatever.

I will pay whatever.

We're running out of time.

No fucking joke.

I already gave you guys the green light months ago.

Red Saffron, what's up?

Is Singapore socialist?

Not particularly.

See how I warm my way out of it?

Not particularly.

Not any more than uh France's.

Thank you so much, Red Saffron.

What's up?

This is gonna be an important stream.

It's going to be an important stream because

It's going to be a lot of theory in it, it's going to be a lot of strategy in it, it's going to be a lot of these kinds of things in it.

So, I recommend.

You carefully listen to every single word I tell you.

Today, Caleb Maupin, what's up?

These niggas prayed on my downfall.

You understand?

You know what, Caleb?

They didn't only pray, they took action.

But you know, you got yourself to blame.

And then you also got yourself to blame for.

I mean, you've been preying on Jackson Hinkle's downfall.

you know, in collusion with Fiorella.

Fiorella the ogre, you understand?

Been talking mad shit about me and Jackson.

I mean, guys.

Every single stream I could really just bitch about how much lies are being spread about me and Jackson and just have that be the whole stream.

Anytime somebody complains about being lied about, nobody listens.

You ever notice that?

When someone complains, like, oh yeah, I'm being lied about, everyone's like, what are you talking?

No.

Are you kidding?

No.

Okay.

I mean, it's like exactly what Zijek says.

I know very well, but it's like, okay, you're being lied about.

But you're not really being like, people can accept this superficially, but they don't really understand that it's actually true.

You understand?

Like, in their head, they're like, okay, whatever, you're being lied about.

But like, they don't understand.

Like, no, no, you're actually, I'm actually being lied about.

Like, it's actually a fucking lie.

And I've come to be at peace no, no, you're never at peace with it.

It's more like I've come to understand it better.

Because I'm a communist with a capital C and I'm a Marxist Leninist.

And I finally understood

So many Stalinists who knew the truth about Stalin and the Soviet Union s been seeing it with their own eyes.

They were going up an avalanche up against an avalanche of lies, and you know what they thought to themselves?

Fuck the world, if this is what you want to believe, fuck you and suck my dick, bitch.

I'm not even gonna argue with you.

That's straight up why Stalin gets lied about.

That's why it's only people like Grover Fur.

And a few others in the English-speaking world that fight back so hard against it to the detriment of their own mental health.

Thank you so much, Krass.

What's going on, man?

What's going on?

But it's like.

I mean communism is the single most lied about historical phenomena in the history of mankind.

In the history of all humanity nothing has been lied about more than that.

And the Communists who know this empirically gave up trying to defend it because it was just so tiring.

They're like, you know what?

If the world and if history chooses it to remember it in this way, may you all be damned to hell and fuck all of you.

Like you guys would be surprised to know

That Marxism-Leninism was actually true as an outlook and as a method.

Like it was actually the truth.

Communism was actually real, it was actually the truth, it was describing what what Communist propaganda was saying was actually true.

Like it was actually true.

That's what's shocking to so many people.

No, no, look it was actually true.

The anti-communist propaganda was all lies, it was literally all lies manufactured by demonic Satanist scumbags lying through their teeth from scratch, just liars.

All the people in the CIA and the OSS and whatever not the OSS because that was World War Two but all the people in the CIA and MI6 and all of the anti-communists who were spewing lies in the twentieth century.

Every single one of them is getting raped in hell right now if they passed away.

If they passed away, right now they're being raped in hell by dogs, by demonic death hounds, right now in hell.

for their disgusting, filthy, evil fucking lies.

What kind of faggot do you have to be to spread lies?

Like, what's your whole MO?

I'm just gonna fucking lie.

You deserve what's coming to you in the afterlife, you piece of shit.

How do you tell a lie like that?

I don't understand that.

I'm just gonna twist it.

What is what's the motivation?

Giggling at how fucking stupid and retarded people are for believing in it?

That's why I believe we should go back to medieval times.

We should straight up torture liars publicly in the most brutal medieval manners.

If you're a liar and you're one of these demonic, disgusting goblins who methodically and intentionally spreads bullshit about others, such as myself and Jackson, I believe you should be tortured in public in the middle of the town square, tortured to death.

Um that is what I believe.

And you know, I'm just saying this.

It's not even the truth.

The truth is, you should just get a prison treatment and just get shanked.

Because that's what they do to people in prison.

You know, if you start fedjacketing people in prison, like Fiarella and all them people are boosting this shit.

In prison, if you start fedjacking people, don't shoot the messenger.

I'm just telling you how it works.

And you don't have proof and you're just spreading lies and rumors and shit.

You get shanked to death and die.

You get beaten to death and you die.

They straight up murder you for less.

That's an honor code, you know, and straight up, that's an honor code.

I don't know why I'm on this crazy talk, because this has nothing to do with the topic.

This was all spurred on by a Caleb Maupin donation.

There you have it.

There you have it.

But no, it comes to the great surprise of many people that I don't lie.

I straight up just like tell the truth.

I don't lie about my enemies.

All I do is tell the truth.

What have I lied about?

What do I lie about?

Nothing.

Literally nothing.

I straight up just tell the truth.

That's why nobody gets in my VC and challenges me.

Because I stand on business.

I ain't got to remember shit because I just tell the truth.

You understand?

It's that simple.

It's really black and white.

It's really black and white.

Okay, so let me talk about Colombia.

All right, now we're going to talk about Columbia.

We're going to talk about Columbia.

Seemingly it's a it's a paradox.

So

Let's get a few things out of the way that we know, which is why this is a difficult issue for the community.

The protesters at Columbia, by and large,

are not our friends.

They don't like us, and we don't like them.

Uh they are on a class level, not allies.

of any revolutionary movement in this country in terms of their class basis.

Th th that that specific demographic and personality is also the same one that we have a very, very bitter, bitter, bitter, bitter relationship with.

These are the type of people that we've literally been dealing with, right?

Straight-up demons.

Dishonourable, disgusting, evil scum.

We also regard them as optically bad for the socialistic movement in general.

They give socialism a bad name in America and they're responsible for We have so many different criticisms of them, which I'm sure you're used to and I'm used to.

So these are the students.

We don't like the students generally.

We don't like the students generally.

So that should be a done deal.

It should be a

Open and closed case.

But but it's actually not that simple.

It's actually not that simple.

And I'm going to try to explain this in the best way I can.

What's up, Red Saffron Revolutionary?

What's going on?

Now, I'm going to simplify my position.

Red Saffron, let's go!

Let's go!

Um

You know, I'm gonna go ahead and simplify my position, which is there is absolutely no reason anybody should be speaking against the Colombia protests.

There is absolutely no reason anybody should be help spreading propaganda against them and accepting the in framing of, oh my god, these ridiculous BLM students.

I mean, I mean, choose your side, America.

Are you gonna be shut the fuck up, you Zionist bitch?

We see your tricks a mile away and we, I'm not gonna let myself or my community fall for it.

What's up, Australia?

Steady with the 25.

Let's fucking go.

Let's fucking go!

Excuse my volume.

There's no reason we should condemn the protesters or accept the in-framing, the convenient.

You know, I saw a clip, for example, of a Zionist woman counter-protesting by herself.

Everyone was wearing masks around her, and she wasn't.

And she was like, look at all these NPCs wearing masks.

I'm not wearing a mask.

So they're trying to like rope in a bunch of other things.

And it's very, this is why the media, by the way, is constantly covering the protests instead of covering what's going on in Gaza.

Because they want to frame the issue precisely in this way.

Oh, if you were against mask mandates, then you should be pro-Israel, right?

It's a very convenient framing that they're engaging in.

But you know what I think?

I don't think it's going to work.

And to be quite honest, this is what I wanted to talk about today,

I am deeply fascinated.

Not simply by these protests in Colombia and elsewhere.

EKS, what's up, man?

Not simply what's going on in Colombia and elsewhere.

I'm deeply fascinated with the

The Pro-Palestinian Movement in America.

Because al i it has really enthralled

People otherwise, you know, I would totally be against them.

Otherwise, totally you'd be against them.

A bunch of shit libs, libtards, whatever.

But there's something about the Palestine movement that I find so fascinating.

And I know there's be all these critiques of it because of its connection to uh the billionaire class and whatever.

But I think th a lot of those people kind of are missing the real point.

The Palestinian issue somehow manages to supersede.

All of this baggage and present itself as this fundamental contradiction, which is somehow able to cut across.

All of these different social formations, all of these nebulous connections, and I mean, put it this way: if you're one of these retarded parapolitics faggots, constantly like, I'm gonna draw the connections, we're gonna draw the connections, right?

One of the things I find so hypocritical about these people is that all of the connections are among the progressive leftists.

That's where you find all the connections.

There's so many, it's like you're you're it's very selective what connections they pay attention to.

You know, a guy can meet someone and shake his hand one time on camera and that's an that's an indictment as far as their connections.

But an activist group can literally get millions and millions and millions of dollars from billionaire or NGOs that are connected with the CIA or something, and then they just like turn a blind eye to it and ignore it.

But I actually think the Palestinian issue, in a way,

I think it's it's really a rebuke of parapolitics, the whole paradigm of parapolitics.

And the paradigm of parapolitics is more or less this notion

oftentimes it see these idiots like Jimmy Fallingong

Uh this is an example of how it's become a total clown show, right?

Oh, the LaRoucheite conspiracy.

Whatever.

But these guys the basic thesis is that, like, you know, there's the uh politics on the surface and then when we do parapolitical analysis, we're gonna try to like tie together all of these different

You know, all these different connections, invested interests, and whatever that are somehow occluded.

um in the in the official form formal form of politics right

And that to get to the truth of where the true power lies, you have to pay attention to all of these connections and you keep digging deeper and deeper into the rabbit hole until you find, like, it's really, you know.

I think that of course we Marxists have a notion of hegemony.

Of course, we don't accept politics at face value.

But it's so ironic because I think that

The Palestinian protests are an example of how the parapolitical paradigm is actually missing something.

It's missing how the object that they're looking for, deep, deep under the rabbit hole or whatever, that object is actually a surficial object.

It's a superficial object.

It's something actually on the surface.

And it's something imperiled on the surface.

It's not a deep vested private interest behind everything.

It's a radically public interest, a radically anonymous public interest.

That's how the object manifests itself and exists.

And this is precisely kind of.

Um

A good example of this is like South Africa and the Palestinian.

Movement.

A lot of people are trying to kind of what is the real motivation behind.

The student protests surrounding Palestine.

This is secretly serving the interests of George Soros or whatever.

And I don't think this is an.

I'm going to sound very schizophrenic in this stream, but I think this is an outlook and this is a worldview that comes before the Iranian revolution, revolutionary paradigm, where everything somehow has to be reducible to some carnal private interest.

I think this is precisely what the Iranian Revolution.

Outmoded as a default assumption for if you're a you know a kind of person disposed of revolutionary consciousness.

This vague notion of

Let's call it um reductionism to the private interest, reductionism to some kind of immediate interest, more specifically, not just private, but immediate, right?

And

There's something I find so fascinating about footage I see in Colombia.

Like, yes, a bunch of shit libs and libtards and whatever.

We all I don't even I'm preaching to the choir, right?

But between the lines, it's almost like they are a kind of instrument of some kind of hyper-object and they're exhibiting symptoms of it.

It's almost like that there's a Hamas virus that's just overtaking them and they're wearing kefiyas and all this.

And it's like, yes, they're cringe and whatever.

We don't like them on a personal individual level.

But at the aggregate level, you can see how this thing that's going on in Gaza and in Palestine is somehow affecting.

The highest institutions of the liberal hegemony that's behind the hegemony in general, the capitalist hegemony, and such as the institutions of higher learning.

And I think we should not

Underestimate

The significance of that.

I don't think we should be too quick to engage in a reductionism.

I think we should, first of all, appreciate that.

We are witnessing the the development and the unfolding of a radical, irreconcilable, within the framework of the institution, contradiction taking place at the highest levels of a hegemony, of the hegemony, such as in this case the institution of higher learning.

And

You know, i it got me thinking about a few things.

Like, for example, the Iranian revolution, once again.

And actually the role that students played in that revolution.

It's always been a kind of inconvenient difficulty for the Marxist worldview to grasp why is it that in the post-war era of the twentieth century, why have students played such a fundamental role in the decolonization, in revolutionary movements?

And why and we know in the West, the workers' movement was totally outpaced by the student movement in the West when it comes to the anti-war movement in Vietnam and so on.

Okay.

And we talk about, for example, there's the students and they're totally isolated from the people they're claiming to represent.

Like compare their degenerate hippie students and the Viet Cong.

There's no comparison, right?

It's not like

they represent the same interests at all.

They don't.

Actually, the opposite is true, right?

But this is what I mean about this kind of post-individual, post-parapolitical outlook we should really cultivate, is that that doesn't matter.

Put it this way: the immediate interests, the immediate self-interest that's underlying the phenomena doesn't matter.

We should kind of adopt.

A political phenomenology.

Just like in Hercel's phenomenology, where we say, Okay, the underlying immediate interests this seems heretical for Marxism, because in Marxism everything is about these underlying uh particular interests, class interests clashing.

But but

Stay with me.

We should adopt this kind of phenomenology which says, Let us shelve, let's shelve any and all immediate self-interests behind the phenomena.

Let's just appreciate the phenomena by itself, what it is, how it discloses itself to the society and to the discourse, and how it affects it, right?

How it relates to other kinds of phenomena, right?

And I think that is uh uh that i that is kind of what

That is kind of the infection.

by Islamic metaphysics, I think, that Western civilization is now experiencing.

And I regard that as a good thing.

I regard it as a good thing, actually.

I think in many ways,

You know, it's, it's, I'm, I'm again, I told you this was going to be a schizophrenic stream, but it's like, and I saw Dune 2, and I'm like, you know, I kind of am very fascinated by this Islamicate Orientalism that's infecting America specifically.

Like, I kind of think it's a positive development, actually.

There's so many suspicions you can have, but at the fundamental level, I choose to believe.

That

There is no immediate cynical private George Soros is not behind this.

Behind this is actually precisely nothing.

An era that can deliver us beyond the narrow, immediate metaphysics of self-interest and into a radically

Uh let's call it

desubjectivized, uh objective, objective, phenomenal form of politics, where immediate interests no longer matter.

All that matters is the thing itself, the object itself.

It's like object oriented ontology translated into politics.

It's speculative realism, but translated into politics, right?

I think that is an example of how Islam has infected the West.

Again, I find that a good thing.

I think it's good Islam infects the West in general.

Uh, and all I hope the far right quotes me and whatever, but I think it's a good thing.

I think a lot of the problems the West has objectively, on an objective level, came from its inability to not to be reconciled with Islam.

The West kind of

is a fortress based civilization constantly trying to isolate itself

from the universal civilization created by Islam and which was constantly knocking at its door, sometimes with those dardalis guns.

And I'm not necessarily saying that the West is bad and the Muslims were the good guys or whatever.

History is history.

What happened happened.

On the one hand, you know,

The Western Europe represented a usurious civilization, whereas the Islamic civilization was not that.

On the other hand, Western Europe also is what gave us modern science and modernity in general, and also uh communism.

So I'm not trying to say good or bad here, I'm just trying to say there was a radically irrevol irresolvable tension.

at the heart of Western civilization, which which became defined in the Middle Ages, if we're being honest, what we call Western civilization, because of its inability to cope with the existence of Islam.

By the way, I'm not saying this is a problem of Christianity as a whole.

I think, for example, the Russian.

Russian civilization did come to an understanding with Islam in its own way, even being influenced by it in these indirect ways and so on.

But for Western Europe, it never had its proper acquaintance with Islam, I think.

And Islam, I think, is it, just like Christianity, is an unavoidable historical reality.

It's an unavoidable world historical phenomena, which every civilization has to be acquainted with in some form.

I'm not saying everyone has to become Muslim.

I'm just saying you have to respond to it in some kind of way.

You have to kind of be acquainted with this reality, this specific.

horizon, the specific kind of horizon of uh existence, civilizational existence.

Maybe Islam is a bad word.

Maybe Islamicate is a better word.

I kind of like that word, you know?

I kind of like the word uh Islamicate.

Londonistanis are completing the dialectic in real time.

No.

Mormons are.

That's kind of what I wanted to get to.

Not them, but Mormons.

See, I think America is what takes the West to its furthest possible conclusion, both in the world historical civilizational sense, but also in the geographical sense.

And I think that's why I'm fascinated by this new Islamicate.

Taking form, this Islamicate influence penetrating America.

From the specter of the fear of Sharia law or whatever, uh, to this kind of uh um

Uh what should we call it?

To this kind of dune to Islamicate Orientalism that's becoming very trendy, to the rise in proliferation, very strangely, I should add.

Maybe I'm wrong about this, but it kind of seems like there's a lot of aspects of Islamic culture that are starting to be just kind of adopted as tre like in a trendy way, right?

It's like people kind of not drinking that much anymore and more kind of leaning on coffee culture.

It's so funny, actually, because we hate, of course, we don't like the baristas.

But American coffee culture is obviously we know the origins of that, right?

Civilization, world historical origins of that.

Yes, also the nation of Islam.

Also, Malcolm X.

These are completely indigenous American versions of Islam.

So, I'm just saying, there's all these different kinds of Islamicate phenomena taking shape in America, which I find actually I'm very fascinated by it.

And I don't like these petty knee-jerk reactions because I think these are pre-Islamic reactions.

They're based in the Jahaliya.

Is that how I say it?

I don't know how to fucking say it.

The Age of Ignorance.

Now, as far as the Sneeko stuff and the Landanistani stuff, that is not.

what I'm talking about.

That is that's the Islam that stops in Britain, okay?

See Islam, we're supposed to kind of dissh we're we're supposed to conquer all the infidels and impose Sharia law on the whole world.

Apparently, that's the goal.

I don't make the rules.

That's what everyone says.

There's a version of that that stops in Britain and goes no farther than that and cannot cross the Atlantic.

And it's produced the most disgusting, depraved, grotesque abomination.

It's produced ISIS, it's produced the fundamentalism and terrorism.

That kind of version of Islam deserves to be exterminated.

Unconditionally exterminated.

It's not a version of Islam.

It's a disgusting, disgusting, degenerate abomination.

which I have no sympathy with at all.

Uh although br although British Orientalism and kind of British literary figures, there is an interesting, fascinating Orientalist relationship with Islam.

That I don't want to dismiss.

I will dismiss the kind of, I don't know what we want to call it.

Anglo f Anglo n I don't I don't even call it 'cause that makes it sound cool.

It's just kind of this disgusting reductionist version of Islam, which totally betrays the spirit of Islam, which I blame the British for.

I blame the British for that.

But if we cross the Atlantic and go to America, I think we see a different Islam.

We see uh kind of we see uh uh an Islam of Malcolm X.

We see an Islam of ba in and based on a kind of um

Strong sense of

Uh how should I call it?

We see an Islam that occupies really in the Hegelian sense, the strongest metaphysical sense of the word, the moral, right?

An Islam that intervenes there.

It intervenes at the level of issues of utmost moral significance, world historical.

So for the Hegelian sense of the moral, that's not not the Kantian one.

That's not like what choices you should make.

That's like this undecided sphere of our future as a people, right?

Future of world history and civilization.

So we see an Islam that's kind of very lofty, that's very kind of high-minded, that's very rather than the parochial pettiness of the British version, we see one that

is like Mormon, you know, it's commensurate with this notion of

this future-oriented outlook, uh you know.

I'm not just doing it its I'm not giving it its best, uh its proper justice, but

I think in America it's a little different, right?

So uh back to the topic of students.

I think it's at this level that we should appreciate the protests.

And I wish the only people who could watch me were smart, but unfortunately, you're always going to get enough retards to not understand what I'm talking about.

I'm not telling you to go to the protests and LARP as a protest.

Finally, I'll make friends with these.

They're not our friends.

And make no mistake, we will have nothing to do with any of this.

Make no mistake.

We will have nothing to do with any of this.

Okay, make no mistake.

We're not going to build a movement among these people, and we should not be pandering to them or tailing behind them.

I'm just saying you should think twice before attacking them.

Because you're not just attacking them, you're attacking a phenomena that is bigger than them.

And that's what I'm trying to say.

If it was just attacking them individually at the level of the class warfare or whatever, yeah, whatever.

But that's not what's going on here, right?

And I think.

One should

One should holster any kind of reductionist instincts when it comes to this.

Now, let's try to understand if we're going to avoid reductionism and engage in a kind of phenomenology of historical materialism, let's call it that.

Historical materialist phenomenology.

Let's kind of try to understand what it is and what's going on.

Because, again, a classical Marxist would be a little.

would find it difficult to make sense of.

This phenomenon.

There's too much psychoanalysis that would have to be involved to square it with the traditional Marxist view.

Why is it that on a superficial level, students appear to be at the vanguard of anti-war movements, anti-imperialist movements, or movements in general that just have moral significance in general?

Why are they at the forefront of it?

Now keep in mind, I'm impressed in a way, because, for example,

They uh there's all these other stupid things that students get caught up in activism about, the gender stuff, total nonsense, right?

Environmentalism, uh, not en just environmentalism, but kind of

Like Extinction Rebellion level stuff, right?

There's so many ridiculous things.

Uh, the Trump, oh my god, whatever.

But somehow they're able to sh brush everything aside.

Brush all of this LGBT aside, brush everything aside, and fully, fully own up to the immediacy of the contradiction represented by the genocide in Gaza.

Or let's say it is a genocide, but the war for Palestinian liberation.

It doesn't matter, Hamas is.

It doesn't matter if Palestinians don't have a liberal culture.

They don't have a liberal culture, but no one cares.

They're focused on the immediacy of this.

I find that.

I choose not to be cynical about that.

I think there's something about that worthy of.

uh an optimistic appraisal.

I find it I mean, like

To me, that's impressive.

You know, I'm impressed by it.

I'm impressed by their ability to ignore.

All this meaningless nonsense and just focus on this issue and put this issue before everything else.

So let me go ahead and say that.

I'm I'm very um

Impressed by that.

Second, how how is it we should understand?

the phenomenon.

In general.

Well, I would like to kind of go back to the era of the Vietnam War.

to do it.

To understand it.

It's a big.

Um it's a big uh let's misconception, that's the word I'm looking for.

that the Vietnam War

was one of the catalyzing factors of US defeats in Vietnam.

Not true.

Not true.

For the first years of the Vietnam War, we didn't see a huge student movement or anything.

It was only after it became clear that the United States could not win in Vietnam, only after they started losing all these major battles and what not, that's what catalyzed the student movement.

And you know the same exact thing is going on when it comes to Palestine.

The Palestinian issue is not new.

The criminal treatment of the people of Gaza is not new.

Why only now are these university protests happening and occupation happening?

Why has it now gotten to a breaking point where the government is trying to send in the National Guard and brutalize these protests just like Kent state during the Vietnam War?

Why now?

Well, I'll tell you why now.

Because now, unlike before, the Palestinian cause is no longer hopeless.

Now, Hamas and the Ribukawama are going to win this.

And so

As if to get ahead of the fact, the Western subject, American subject, the student,

who is otherwise a drone of the hegemony.

Who is otherwise completely subservient to it, wants to.

beat material reality to the chase, so to speak, and flesh out the existential and moral consequences

only to avoid having to confront the fact of the material consequences preceding those.

Now, what I'm saying it may be very difficult for you to understand.

I'm going to try to simplify it as much as I can.

But take Vietnam, for example.

If the Vietnamese are losing, who gives a shit?

Nobody cares, right?

The students don't care.

But if the Vietnamese are winning,

It is much less humiliating for the bourgeois subject

To say, I'm against this war for moral reasons and it's an outrage, and we need to pull out because it's wrong.

Versus them just winning and leaving you looking like an idiot, how would you respond to it, right?

So it's like you're beating material reality to the chase by attempting to make it seem as though it's determined by morality.

Students did not win the Vietnam War.

The Viet Cong with guns won that war.

Likewise.

The Mukalama has not gotten as far as it has because of liberal protesters or college protesters.

It's gotten as far as it has because of the strategic genius and brilliance of the IRGC in coordination with the resistance groups of the entire region, including and especially Hamas and its allies.

That's why it's gotten as far as it has.

In other words, brute material force.

which is not at all premised by any kind of

uh abstract morality at all.

So, this is what needs to be appreciated here when we understand this.

And

It's only happening now because the liberal hegemony, the Democratic Party, is imploding.

It's implo put it this way: this is why the Zionists are so foolish.

They say, oh, Hamas is going to win because all these stupid, naive liberal persons.

No, that's your cope.

Hamas was winning.

And inside of your own house.

It's br you're not even able to maintain morale anymore because of that fact.

If the Palestinians were unable to put up any resistance at all, like in twenty fourteen and before,

You wouldn't see these students in protests.

They wouldn't care, right?

But now that the Palestinians have the strength.

to prove their ability to really, really

when, actually, only now um is it i impossible to maintain morale within the institutions of the hegemony.

And I'm not necessarily saying this makes students bad or this makes these people bad or good.

I'm just trying to tell you why it's happening now versus not before.

You should not elevate the student protests to the level that the Zionists want you to elevate it to, to the point where you're taking a side.

No.

Sorry, you're taking a side against them.

Because, first of all, it's even absurd on face value.

You're gonna side with Columbia, college.

Look, everything we dislike about these students in terms of their worldview.

Where do you think they fucking learned that from?

They learned it from Columbia.

They learned it from Columbia professors.

They learned it from the people who fund Columbia.

They learned it from what Columbia as an institution teaches them.

All of the things we hate about the students actually blame the university institution in the first place.

If they're causing a ruckus...

And they're causing trouble for Colombia.

Why should we not be happy about that?

Why should we not be happy about that?

I'm happy about it.

You think, I mean, what kind of pussy do you have to be?

To be like, well, it's disrupting their people's classes.

Who gives?

I'm glad it's disrupting classes.

At least it's not disrupting ordinary people going to and from work and going to and from home.

And it's not disrupting a guy driving his daughter to the hospital.

Yes, it's disrupting the academic learning environment.

I'm glad it's doing that actually, because that academic learning environment is a breeding ground for terrorism against the American working class, first of all.

So I don't understand why anyone would think it would be based to side with the university against the protesters.

It's just a no-brainer.

Even from our extreme version of our position, right?

Um

So so let's just get that out of the way.

Um

That doesn't mean my heart is with the protesters or whatever.

Like, I have no illusions.

I have no illusions that taken individually, we don't like these protesters, only taken individually.

But we should prioritize the phenomena over the immediate self-interests involved.

See, a lot of people will say things like, you know, SJP and all these groups are all funded by Soros and yada yada yada.

And it's like, okay.

But clearly, the phenomena has exerted itself over and above the network of immediate self-interests, which kind of appear to be responsible for it, but they're not responsible for it.

What's responsible for it is something completely outside of the control of Soros or anyone else.

We should appreciate that.

That irreducible element of

indeterminacy or contingency perhaps

where in contrast to the views of the parapolitical thinkers, you cannot reduce it to the network of vested interests.

This is genuinely a novel moment which whose outcome is is undecided actually.

I'm trying to articulate myself, but

In a more cl in a more um

Clear in a clearer way.

So, you're going to have to bear with me because I'm not exactly satisfied with how I'm presenting my perspective here.

Um

Because what do I mean by this kind of like ability to supersede immediate self-interests?

Am I so naive as to believe that yes, this is the realm of pure morality and universal justice and it's just about like being a good person, man?

Like, should we choose between this kind of naïve bourgeois universalism and a kind of bourgeois cynicism and nihilism, even?

Like, is the choice really between Habermas and Nietzsche?

I disagree.

I disagree.

Is the choice really between Haber uh Bertrand Russell and Nietzsche?

No, I think Bernd Rand Russell and Nietzsche are actually two sides of the same same coin.

And I reject both actually.

I reject both of these kinds of uh presentations of the world and understandings of the world.

Is it really binary?

No, that's funny.

That's actually funny.

It's not funny, it's just kind of uh

Clever.

It's not funny.

It's clever.

Slightly clever.

As a hater, I'll give you credit.

That's slightly more clever than what we usually get.

But no, it's not about rejecting binary logic.

It's about saying what Stalin said when he said, which is worse, the left deviation or the right deviation.

He said, both are worse.

Implying that this golden middle.

Is the good position, right?

That a priori we have this position.

Now it's just a matter of rejecting the deviations.

So, uh

That's not necessarily what I mean to say.

Going back to the Iranian Revolution, it's important to remember that.

One of the biggest critiques by the Islamic thinkers of the Iranian Revolution of Marxism was precisely the class reductionism, actually.

They said y you materialists try to reduce every uh existential horizon, every belief, for example, to some kind of

Preexisting interest, preexisting concrete interest.

Concrete, I'm not going to use that word, preexisting immediate interest, right?

But the Islamic thinkers of the Iranian Revolution said, no, this is a folly.

Clearly, there is this realm, this let's just call it this kind of

Ontological sphere

this existential horizon that all of us as a whole, all of society is faced before.

Questions as fundamental as like the meaning of our existence, the meaning of life, the meaning of

Uh reality and so on and so on, right?

That is something which, as far as consciousness is concerned, pre-exists immediate self-interests.

This is going back to my commentary on the Iranian Revolution a few streams ago, which is, it really, after 1979, it really was about like the Iranian Revolution versus this kind of Anglo-Benthem, Bentham outlook.

Like, are people just motivated by wanting to get more Funko Pops?

Or is there an existential horizon that we all collectively face, even regardless of class differences, even regardless of differences of individual interests or whatever, vested interests?

Is there some open existential horizon which pre-exists all of that when it comes to our consciousness?

Keep in mind I'm saying when it comes to our consciousness.

Because there is a discrepancy between consciousness, the sphere of consciousness, and actual material reality.

For example, one can say that in actual material reality, yes, there's a radical contradiction at the heart of it, which is the class contradiction at the heart of our social reality.

But in terms of how this registers to us immediately for consciousness,

are we first faced with the immediacy of self interest?

Or are we first faced with a broader existential horizon which we all are imperiled within, which in a sense is indifferent to our

our tangibility as individuals in the first place.

Is there an object set before us that pre exists our individuation, let alone classification into different social strata?

And I think that was, first of all,

Uh huge

A huge underlying theme of the cultural revolution in China, actually.

What do you think the cultural revolution, it was the great proletarian cultural revolution?

It's literally in the name.

The whole thing was about how the proletariat, at the level of its disclosure to consciousness, was no longer a seamlessly immediate, self-evident reality.

Thus, culture now has a significance it did not have before.

Now we have to appreciate the realm of culture, the phenomenal realm of appearance and consciousness and ideology and so on and so forth.

Then this is, in my opinion, taken to its final conclusion in the Iranian Revolution, actually.

Um

And I think this is what I'm trying to say.

Like

Like, uh I think I think at this point, you know, the meaning of materialism as we know it now starts to take form, the bad sense of the word materialism.

Like, you know, when someone uses the word you're too materialistic, they're like, You just like too many Gucci bags or Prada bags.

You just care about worldly things too much.

You know, when Lenin used the word materialism, that's not what he meant.

He didn't mean having a petty fixation on immediate the immediate satisfaction of, you know, your desires.

Lenin's materialism was a broad outlook.

It was a lofty outlook I mean, so much so that he accused his enemies of being Philistines, of being unable to see the deeper beauty of the whole concrete existence of reality as it all comes together into this kind of single horizon of

Uh of of uh

of meaningfulness and uh eloquence and so on.

It's after the information age and the age of consumerism that we kind of start to have a confusion about the meaning of materialism.

And to me, this is what justifies

The

Uh position of the Islamic thinkers of the Iranian Revolution against the Iranian Marxists and Communists.

Obviously I don't entirely agree with the anti-communism.

I just think

Whether you want to understand it as a shortcoming of the Iranian Marxism or whether you want to give more good faith and say, you know, the Islamic thinkers were onto something.

They kind of had a point.

You don't really blame them that much for rejecting Marxism, given that that the Marxism they were acquainted with was kind of um

was kind of immature, right?

Uh in any case.

Let's go back to the students and oh let's continue with Iran actually.

You know, it's always a funny irony that happens in both the Cultural Revolution in China and in the Iranian Revolution.

Where it's almost as if

Tremors are felt

In the ground.

In Iran tremors were being felt.

At the level of the social reality of Iran.

Clearly there's these tremors.

Faintly, we're feeling them here in Tehran in our universities.

Where are these tremors coming from?

Clearly, they're coming from the countryside.

It's about to explode.

This huge social explosion is about to take place.

Same thing in in Russia.

MIG, what's up?

Same thing in Russia with the Narodniks.

They f Narodniz Narodism arose because they felt a tremor.

There's a social implo explosion about to happen with the rise of Russian peasant subjectivity.

So it's always the students that feel the tremor first because they're at the center.

So they feel the tremor first,

And now they're tasked with responding to it.

They're tasked with making sense of it.

So it kind of imposes itself upon them as this kind of existential horizon in general, where they are tasked with responding to it somehow, right?

And always the response by students is always a kind of takes the form of the negation of the authorities, of the institutions they themselves are based at.

It's a pure negation, right?

Like, we stand against the university authorities.

If you're a Russian Narodnik, you stand against the Russian university authorities.

If you're in Tehran, same thing with the universities under the Shah.

And in China, same thing with the universities in Beijing and so on.

You're fighting against the authorities, the party bosses, whatever.

And it takes this kind of form of the pure negation surrounding the inadequacy of the institution.

to account for this tremor, this contradiction.

Let me translate this to you in a way you will fully understand, okay?

On university campuses, why is it that people brainwashed in liberal, universal liberal human rights ideology are outraged about what's going on in Palestine when that ideology has its foundation in American imperialist hegemony, which the Zionist entity is an extension of?

So, what's their problem?

Shouldn't they support the Zionist entity?

And it's like, well, what they are doing is existentially giving form to the contradiction within liberal, universal liberal human rights ideology, for example.

Like, it's clear that the reason they oppose the actions of the Zionist entity is that.

It is insufficiently universalist and pro-human rights, right?

It's a no-brainer.

Like the protesters at Colombia are protesting Colombia because they regard the university establishment of Colombia as not adequately fulfilling its own values as an institution.

It's not adequately enough giving expression to the values of democracy and human rights and all the things the institution is founded upon, right?

So this is the pure negation.

It's a pure negation based on a contradiction.

The contradiction between the values the institution claims to stand on and the inability for that to be kind of reflected

And the actuality of its behaviors and actions, in this case, the support for the Zionist entity.

So it's the same thing with the Narodniks in Russia.

Right?

It was the same thing with uh especially in China.

It was the same thing in Tehran and Iran.

It's always this kind of one sided negation.

And then part two of these revolutions

Part two is always something.

That is is is uh very profound.

It's the negation of the negation.

So the Narodniks

wanted something

And when did they get what they wanted?

On the October Revolution of 1917.

But tell me why it is that many of them opposed that revolution.

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

Yeah, this is what we wanted, but not like this.

Put it this way: if you're a French aristocrat on the eve of the French Revolution, all the power to the people.

Okay.

You're doing the tennis court oath.

All power to the people.

Then the actual raggedy French peasants, the actual French people, the senses coulot, whatever, they all, all these poor raggedy peasants all get their pitchforks, rise up.

Yes, all power to the people.

And then the aristocracy.

No, no, no, no, no, no, not like that, not like that.

I was just reading Rousseau and the God and I didn't, not like that.

I didn't mean it like that.

It's always that.

Every revolution, every revolution has as an undertone the first revolutionary saying, I didn't mean it like that.

That was Trotsky, was it not?

I didn't mean it's like, oh, oh, you mean the communism and socialism?

Stalin goes with Chadface.

Yes.

Yes.

We're going to see to the this revolution to its conclusion.

No, no, no, I didn't mean it like that.

I didn't mean it like that.

I thought I was just going to be a commissar and, like, shoot a bunch of peasants and, like, repress everyone for not being revolutionary enough.

I didn't know that when we said we are going to build a state.

A democratic dictatorship.

I didn't know that's actually what you meant.

And these actual barefooted peasants are going to start becoming top scientists and filling the ranks of the go.

I didn't know that you actually meant what you said.

During the Chinese Cultural Revolution, did you know that the same thing happened?

The Red Guards initially

Yo, the vote!

Okay, whatever.

Then, then, when the then it actually happened.

Like, the actual half-illiterate peasants in the Chinese countryside actually did start rising up.

And suddenly, they had second thoughts.

Oh, wait a second.

That's not what we meant.

That's not what we meant.

Exact same thing with the Iranian revolution.

You'll read it in a book called Persepolis.

All the students chanting, yeah, yeah, yeah.

And then what happens?

The actual Iranians, the illiterate peasant Iranians, respond to the revolutionary call, fulfill it, and the students say, that's not what we wanted.

And then they join the MEK or they go abroad as communists and spend their whole lives trying to overthrow the Islamic Republic.

Because that's not what they meant.

It's not what they meant by it.

Not like that.

Not like that.

But it's never like that.

It's never how you meant it.

It's never what you meant.

That is a fundamental reality of communication that I've explained to you in like August 2022, the problem of communication.

But it's the translation error I always talk about.

It's a fundamental law of dialectics that the essence of something never discloses itself on the terms of the form.

uh familiar to you in terms of the form familiar to you.

The real content of your position on a formal level never discloses itself to you

on the terms of that form, right?

It's it's something that uh arises as something novel that radically disrupts the formal purity, the formal consistency, radically disrupts it and throws it into disarray, right?

So what I'm this is why I'm fascinated by the Palestinian campus protests in America, because it seems like that's i it's so strange because America is on this side of the world, and then you have the Palestinians in the Middle East, right?

And it's like

Two opposites seem like they're coming together.

Like the the most privileged.

Living in a bubble, out of touch, university student.

is converging with this kind of um

Peripheral

subject in the form of the Palestinian

Wearing the kefiyas and, you know, listening to the Hamas music and whatever.

And it's like, there's something so fascinating about how it's almost as if.

This is a w this is one of the ways in which the concrete

is disclosing itself and manifesting itself to American subjectivity.

And when I say American subjectivity, I mean the abstract subjectivity, the subjectivity of the pure subject, of the beautiful soul, right, the kind of Kantian type of subject, the one that dwells in the institution, who looks upon the world in an abstract, subjective way, right?

Um.

The most cosmopolitan, uh, abstract kind of

Five hundred genders, non-binary person, whatever.

somehow somehow is discovering a concrete existence and reality in in something that is the total opposite of that.

The the highly traditional, deeply traditional Palestinian people.

Now you see, right wingers constantly make fun of this and constantly try to kind of Zionists, they constantly try to like throw a fit over how ridiculous this.

Why is it that these like transgender whatevers are supporting Hamas, who clearly are not

Socially progressive, but they don't understand the deeper significance of this irony actually, right?

They just kind of have a petty knee-jerk reaction at the contradiction, but they don't understand why that why that this uh contradiction exists in the first place.

In terms of like, why is it that there's this sense of solidarity the students have?

Now, you can do the psychoanalysis and say, Well, they have the solidarity because they're projecting upon the Palestinians their own grievances.

Like, oh, in the same way that I don't have transgender bathrooms, people in Gaza are suffering, so I'm gonna project my stupid problems upon the real problems of the people in Gaza.

I mean, it's sure at the individual level you can say that, but at the phenomenological level, who gives a fuck?

Right?

It doesn't matter.

You know what I mean?

Like, it actually doesn't matter in terms of how this is manifesting.

In terms of how this is manifesting, thousands of people are like camping on the street blasting Hamas music.

It doesn't matter what their personal motivations or background story is.

Like, that is a very significant thing, you know?

Um

Which we we should treat it with more w with more consideration than just this kind of like

One-sided, you know, what the right-wingers are doing, which is the right-wing Zionist nonsense, right?

There's a so, so let me continue though.

This couple between their um

let's say the intelligentsia and the objective social phenomena has always been a tru it's always been a truism of every revolution in history.

I just gave you many examples of it, the French aristocrat, whatever.

But you know, it's not necessarily inevitable that

The revolutionary intelligentsia.

The conscious segment, let's say,

responds negatively when that's not what I meant.

The whole of Marxism actually, Marxism was created actually as a theory and as a method precisely to prepare revolutionaries

For the inadvertence of revolutionary phenomena.

The whole of dialectical materialism is precisely about how things are not go going to go in the way that you expected them to beforehand, and you need to adjust and adapt to it and recognize it and submit to the laws of history.

In the Bolshevik party,

Yes, Bukharin was there.

Zinoviev was there.

Kamenev were there.

Those three, Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev.

Those were the types that said, That's not what I meant.

Not like that.

Right?

But you know who else was in the Bolshevik party?

Stalin.

Stalin was also there.

Stalin was not a proletarian.

Stalin was a revolutionary intelligentsia.

And look at how he responded to the inadvertence of the revolutionary situation.

The revolution failed to spread.

So what did Stalin do?

he recognized the objectivity of the situation.

Things did not go as planned.

But we're not in control of the situation.

The laws of history are, and we must submit to the laws of history.

So clearly this represents a novel this represents something we must adapt our theory to actually.

Not only must we adapt Marxism to this new circumstance, because this is an excuse opportunists will always be able to use, we must recognize in this novel circumstance the very essence of what Marxism is.

This is what actually gives meaning to Marxism.

This is what gives this is what proves Marxism actually.

This is what proves Marxism was true.

This is what proves Lenin's thesis was true.

See, the brilliance of Stalin was not just that he improvised in a situation Marxists didn't expect to happen.

The brilliance of Stalin was actually something a lot deeper.

He saw in this unforeseen situation the total vindication of Lenin's outlook.

A vindication that Lenin himself was unable to foresee.

That's the brilliance of what Stalin did.

He didn't just say, Oh, this is a new we're going to invent socialism in one country because our theory was wrong.

No, your theory was actually right.

It was just right in a way you didn't expect it to be.

That was the brilliance of Stalin.

It's like, no, you were right.

Just not in the way you expected it to be.

Likewise, if you're a student who.

Has grievances with your institution because it's not living up to its values, you are not necessarily wrong.

You are right.

There is a contradiction at the heart of liberalism, but you're just not right in the way you might expect you are.

You're right because liberalism itself is going to be destroyed.

So you were right.

It's just that you were right in a way that may that may that you may not like, right?

But if you're a Marxist, you're you precisely recognize in that inadvertence the ground of objectivity and truth and meaningfulness.

and confidence in your outlook and your belief.

So that's really what I'm kind of trying to get to here.

And, um,.

You know, uh

Anyway, to continue, I think that

I think that uh w why why is so so what so how how would that manifest for the students?

I mean, look, we are not trying to lead a student movement, but our movement is going to have cadres, the cadre masses distinction, right?

Now it's true that we live in an era where cadres can also be workers themselves.

That is a description that fits many of you who are actually blue collar workers.

It's one of the things I'm the prou proud of most about infrared.

But understand many of these students are in debt.

They're in debt.

Students are a reactionary force.

when they assert their specific class interest as students in contradistinction to the rest of the masses.

But students who are indebted and uncertain of their future,

And open to that future, that there's also room for uh participation in a revolutionary phenomenon.

Of course there is.

Many, many blue collar young people are students who had student debt that they couldn't pay off through their degree.

So what did they do?

They went to trade school and they're trying to work real jobs.

This is an example of how the declassing of a petty bourgeois student leads to a kind of proletarian position, proletarian subject.

No, we're not taking in the fucking interpretive dancers.

Are you just trolling me, dude?

Are you just trolling me?

Just completely neglecting everything I'm saying.

Like, why is there an instinct by bad faith action?

Not necessarily saying you that, but like, take the most extreme conclusion possible of what I'm saying in the most bad faith possible way.

You know, if you haven't, if you don't understand this by now, I'm not an extremist.

So when I say something,

I'm s it's the Stalinist golden mean.

It's not the most ridiculous, wacky conclusion.

Possible.

Like yeah, anyway.

Yeah, Hassan, exactly, where they joined the military.

You're right.

Anyway, um.

No, to continue what I'm talking about.

Yeah, go ahead and give me hundred push-ups.

Anyway.

Um

A communist is someone who completely and fully selflessly devotes themselves to the cause of the masses, not on behalf of any immediate personal private self interest at all.

So when you become a communist,

You are sacrificing your self-interests for something bigger than just you.

That's what being a Communist means.

Your self-interest eventually becomes synonymous with fulfilling the interests of the proletariat and of the cause of communism in the last, final and ultimate sense.

On the other hand, student movements are based in a kind of at least a veneer of selflessness.

Students are camping not because of any immediate self-interest, but because they are so moral and so noble that they are willing to sacrifice for the Palestinians.

Now, it's on the one hand, you can be cynical about that and say, actually, this disguises some kind of self-interest, a class interest.

And that can be true for a lot of cases, but in a minority of cases, and that's what we care about.

Maybe these are just selfless people.

Maybe these are exactly the kind of people that would become communists.

In which case,

Something interesting is might be going on on a Hegelian level, which is what I'm fascinated by and interested in.

You know the the first

The way in which the selflessness of the intelligentsia and the interest of the masses converges is when that selflessness identifies itself with the concrete interests, concrete social interests of the masses.

And thus they kind of interpenetrate in the dialectical sense and basically.

Basically, there's a process of mutual recognition that takes place.

Where the workers recognize in the selflessness of the communist their own concrete self-interests and vice versa.

Um this is how the Hegelian predicament of the beautiful soul, moralistic, woke moralist is avoided.

Selflessness becomes united with some concrete interest.

Not the concrete interest of an individual, but the concrete interest of a world historical phenomenon.

You know, this is what Kojev and Hegel, in a misguided way, try to identify in their recognition between the philosopher and the tyrant, right?

It's the same thing.

But uh

But this otherness, which eventually becomes recognized uh reconciled as uh a higher form of the self, right sublated as a higher form of the self, the otherness first takes the form of a radically alien, radically foreign foreign and ulterior being.

So in my naïve optimism, what if for many of these campus protesters, what if the same kind of selfless solidarity they express for the Palestinians, they can eventually, eventually express for

The American working masses

In which case the basis of their moral position is given something concrete, and the two synergize and unite, and these students become selfless political cadres going down to the people, synthesizing and creating a vehicle, a movement,

Where the most lofty aims of the moral subject are united with the concrete actuality of its existence.

This is the stuff of Communism.

It's always the unity of these two elements, the cadre and the masses.

That is precisely how you build an infrastructure contrary to the ruling class hegemony.

Plappy, you're a fucking retard.

Hope that helps.

If you want to get in VC, go ahead.

Anyway

What I'm trying to say, guys, is that here's what I'm trying to say.

In the same way that a lot of these like woke, libtard, disgusting, demonic student leftists have a bad faith interpretation of infrared.

And

Because they personally believe, you know, that if they adopted what we believe is true, they would become Hitlerites, that they accuse us of being the worst possible thing, Nazis, whatever.

We shouldn't have a bad faith view of all of the protesters or all liberals, even.

Some of those hippie liberal libtards.

Became Jimmy Dore.

And um what's that guy's name, Russell?

Guy who dated Katy Perry, what's his name?

Forgot his name.

Those became Jimmy Door viewers.

And they became anti-vaxxers and like super based.

Russell Brand.

Yeah.

And it's like it's the same thing with these kind of like campus protesters.

Like, yeah, sure.

We need to kind of overlook the cringe.

And not have a priori bad faith toward them.

Let's not a priori have bad faith toward all of them.

Now, let's harbor no illusions.

I think the majority of them will always be hostile to us no matter what.

So don't fucking take these words and interpret them to go.

You know, start like pandering and making posts like, Oh, I love the students.

Like, that's not what I'm telling you to do, I'm just saying.

It's worth more for us to just maintain the integrity of our position and not write everyone else off.

You know, let's just maintain our position.

If we don't like what the student protesters are doing or we have critiques of them, that's immaterial because what are we doing in their stead?

You know, like, what let's just do, let's just make our critiques positive by actually doing what we want to do that we don't think they're doing.

Let's just do what we want to do instead.

Let's just do it right instead of focusing on how everyone else is doing it wrong.

Let's just do it right ourselves, right?

That's what I'm trying to say.

Like, if we think they're doing it wrong, let's do it right ourselves.

Let's maintain the integrity of our position and not get caught up in false dialectics.

Let's not get caught up in this false thing where we're gonna go ahead and go out of our way to antagonize the students at Columbia and join in with the right-wing Zionists and calling them a bunch of transgender, retarded, blue-haired, spoiled idiots and like make fun of them and shit, you know.

Because as tempting as that is, especially because of how maligned we have been by them and how much they've attacked us, it would be better to just maintain the integrity of our own position.

And then you know what?

A few of them who are decent might look at what we're doing and being like, you know what?

What they're doing works better than what we're doing.

And I want to go join those guys and learn from them.

Whereas, if you start going out of your way to antagonize all of them and write all of them off.

You know, people who might otherwise be open to what we're doing, they might

identify us with the same Zionist enemy that you know that they're protesting against right now.

I choose to believe on the basis of my Islamic faith.

I don't like to invoke that a lot.

But I choose to believe that there is an irreducible

Okay.

Warlord, thank you.

I agree.

Thank you so much for the five.

What's up, Johnny?

Thank you, man.

I choose to believe.

That cutting across all of the cringe, there is an irreducible.

This is what I believe as a humanist.

I believe there is an irreducible kernel of human solidarity which you cannot attribute to an immediate self-interest.

I reject the Nietzschean cynicism.

I reject that idiot Christopher Lash and says it's all a culture of narcissism.

What he gets wrong is that it can turn into that.

I agree.

Oftentimes that is what it becomes.

But it only becomes that because it's distorting something that is authentic and is real.

If you're a student and you're just like, okay, you could be bourgeois, it doesn't matter.

You can come from a bourgeois background, but if you're genuinely interested in trying to understand the world and make sense of it, there's an irreducible humanness which makes it possible that you can arrive at the correct position on the basis of an integrity, on the basis of an honor.

Like, we do have a shared humanity as a people, right?

I do fundamentally believe that.

And if I didn't believe that, I mean, I didn't come from a proletarian background.

Jackson didn't come from a proletarian background.

Karl Marx didn't.

Frederick Engels didn't.

Lenin didn't.

I'm not sure if Mal did.

Mm-hmm.

Very rarely do Marxists actually come from that background.

Che Guevara did not.

You know?

But that's really not the point.

That's not the point.

You know, a lot of idiots try to do the same shit against me.

They'll be like, you know, freaking streamers, man.

Freaking streamers.

As if I represent the interests of streamers in any capacity.

Like, yeah, that's totally me.

My message is about reproducing the class position of streamers.

Totally.

That's totally my position.

That's why the major streaming websites completely ban and de-platform me.

Because I'm just like Pokemane.

I'm literally the face of streaming, guys.

I represent the interest of streamers.

Like, get the fuck out of here.

Okay.

It's such a joke.

Yeah, not Hassan Piker, me.

I'm the one who represents the immediate self-interest of streamers.

Not Hassan Piker, who lives in a $3 million mansion and who tells people and whose actual message to people is that leftism is about losing.

Not a paraphrase, adverbatum quoting him, that it's actually about losing and failing all the time and just being depressed.

That's me.

I'm the one you should be cynical about and reductivist about, right?

But anyway, you know, i i i it goes back to something that I like about Heideggerian etymological um

Etymological kind of

uh analysis, right?

Where like in order to understand the meaning of a word, let's actually trace it to the origins of how that word came to be, the etymology.

And then we'll get the deeper truth of what the word means, right?

Anyway, um

You also not many people think all these kind of Nietzschean Marxists, quote-unquote Nietzschean Marxists, who try to make it seem like classes are different animal species and that their contrary interests are like the same thing as like, you know, this is we, you know, we do not share any humanity.

That's meaning, it's nonsense, right?

The kind of Nietzschean nonsense of like, just proletariat.

This is like what fascism came out of, by the way.

Because they just then translated to racialism.

They're like, the class interest of the proletariat is.

It may as well be the interest of a totally different species.

That's how Trotsky views it and stuff.

And it's like it couldn't be further from the mark because the proletariat was always a minority of society.

And the purport of Marxists is that the leadership of the proletariat would be good for the whole people, including the majority who are peasants and not proletarians, right?

So it's a partisan position within the battlefield of the whole people, right?

It's always been about that.

But anyway, no, no, no.

What I'm trying to say is that look at the etymology of proletariat.

Proletariat, even in terms of the significance of that term, has always been in reference to some fundamental concrete human interest in general.

The etymology of proletariat, the prole means offspring.

So um

Morlock is the one who reminded me of this today.

Prole means offspring.

The proletarians were those in ancient Rome who had nothing, who didn't own anything, except their capacity and ability to reproduce and produce offspring.

So a general and fundamental quality of just pure human subsistence and reproduction was itself categorized as a specific class, right?

Like I I am not uh classified according to a specialization within the division of labor in particular.

I'm just a human being that can reproduce and subsist, and I'm defined by that.

And, you know, a eugenicist kind of Malthusian would be like, you know, these proles don't contribute anything, they just subsist and reproduce.

And what do they contribute?

They don't have any property to contribute.

But it's like they're missing the proletarian outlook.

Is it's almost like, you know, the real binary is between proletarian humanism and bourgeois Malthusianism, to be honest.

Because it's like it's a totally different understanding.

The proletarian understanding is that.

Um humanity

Hum human existence does not need to be justified by some something else, right?

Like, yes, it is enough that the the interest and the commonwealth of the whole people is attended to.

We are the subject of history.

We are the subject of existence, right?

Whereas the bourgeois outlook is like, okay, I'm a private interest and I have a specific conceit about what humanity should be.

And if you don't fulfill that conceit, you know, you have no value and you have no worth.

And why that's wrong isn't just because we're humanitarians who believe, oh, all human life is sacred for its own sake.

It's not just that.

It's also that, like, that conceit has no skin in the game.

Where is it being proven?

You have this conceit about what must be done.

But why?

What makes yours correct

How do you prove that it's correct?

Before whom do you prove that it's correct?

You know?

Um

What if it's incorrect, or how can you have certainty about it?

You don't have that certainty.

We are all equal before our shared existential horizon.

No segment of pe of a population, no individual can abstract themselves and claim an exclusive relationship with the existential horizon of all of human history and humanity, because it's one that literally in the name we all share.

Right?

We all share that uh existential horizon.

You know, who takes this Malthusian thing into its farthest was Nick Land, actually.

He had this crazy idea of like, okay.

What needs to happen is we create a self-sustaining city that totally walls itself off, isolates itself from everyone, neutralizes all life outside of it, and then just goes on to build a great AI.

Because most of humanity, according to him, 80% of it, they're just leeches who contribute nothing.

And I find it's a funny uh perspective that that's worthy of responding to, right?

Like 20% of humanity needs to kill off 80%.

That was his view.

Because the 80% are contributing nothing at all.

And so why is he wrong?

Why isn't he correct that like, okay, what w the eighty percent aren't contributing a single thing?

And you know, ha but here's here's the issue is that I mean there's many uh reasons why it's a false perspective.

For one, the number one thing that's accelerating the development of technology is the aggregation of these wildly diverse um

multitudes of different desires and interests and data, right?

So, if there is ever an enclosure of this process of the collection of data to the point where it's fully complete.

And you just say, okay, just this 20% is all we care about, and then no one else matters.

The ability for the technological advance of the productive forces, according to how it is doing that today, such as AI, would stall.

It wouldn't be able to advance, right?

So there it's kind of a lot of different issues with the view.

I'm not talking moral issues, even theoretical issues.

But I find it fascinating as a thought experiment to respond to because, you know, you could just say, oh, that's so inhumane.

You can moralize about it.

But it's like, at the end of the day, what's your response?

Because the world is a cruel place and it may not care about your whining and moral outrage, right?

You know?

Just like a tsunami can come and kill all of us and it won't care about us thinking it's immoral, right?

So what is false about that kind of view?

Enclosing a specific segment of humanity, and then the rest can simply be disc disregarded in terms of their moral significance or their significance in general, and so on.

And I think it's precisely how the border is defined.

It's always that Saraites paradox.

It's always that problem of vague predicates.

How do you define the golden 20%?

Because it has to cut off somewhere.

And the paradox is that when you cut it off, exactly where you cut it off will be the hill you die on.

Exactly where you cut.

See, Nick Lyons should know this because he's a Deleuzian, right?

The difference upon which your identity is founded is a difference which will continue to assert itself and reproduce itself.

And schism will produce continual schisms within the identity, right?

On the same basis, to the point where it's a regression.

What's the word where it's uh

It's an infinite regress, right?

An infinite regress which I think Land would say is a good thing, but one that's not conducive to uh

the acceleration of the productive forces.

Obviously not.

The acceleration of the productive forces depends on the aggregation of vast territories and supply chains and resources and minerals and so on and so forth.

In order to and this is the most important thing

uh fulfill the needs of infinitely many different kind of disparate desires, wants, needs, uh goals, and so on and so forth.

So, my issue with him isn't necessarily like, okay, 20% is too low, we should just do 75%.

It's not necessarily that.

It's any time you try to reduce humanity to a discrete or definite portion of humanity whose beginning and whose end is fully known with absolute formal certainty, you fail.

That's always a failure.

It's always an impossibility, actually.

That's my issue.

My issue is you can the line you think you're making is impossible to make, actually.

Moreover, you can also have a kind of Heideggerian, obvious Heideggerian critique, which is that

It's not that the 80% are unproductive necessarily, it's that you are unable to uh reduce their existence to a utility.

But every u u every uh utiliz utilitizer sorry, utilitiseriz utilitarization, is that the correct way to say it?

Of um human existence presupposes an irreducible existential ground, right, which itself cannot be uh the subject of a utilitarian uh reduced to a kind of utilitarian uh function.

So basically it's like yes, the proletari Roman proletariat, which is just producing children and no property, it may seem like they're just a burden on the state, but without them there's no property owners in the first place.

They provide a kind of irreducible

civilizational and existential ground that property itself, the logic of property, is derivative from and which presupposes as its foundation.

Before we can have property, which is the estrangement of human labor, according to Marx, we need an irreducible

Irreducible existence of laboring human beings just attending to their reproduction and subsistence, right?

Uh you can't just get rid of them and then be contended with the property that you have, because your property rests upon that irreducible foundation and depends upon that foundation pre-existing its uh its um l conversion into a form of property, right?

Oof.

Like the Roman proletariat is the subject of Roman civilization and civil society.

And the aims and existence of the state, yes, of course, it's just people living, reproducing their existence, and attending to their existence, right?

That of course is what it is.

The ownership of property is predicated upon having a specific

position in relationship to that.

Which estranges it into a spec and reduces it into a specific form.

My response to Landianism has always been a kind of Xi Jinping.

Uh materialist populism.

There is a wisdom of the peop it's like I'm not an idiot.

I know that the majority of people are fucking stupid.

Majority of people are idiots.

I don't deny that.

You think I deny that?

Majority of people are just picking their ass and picking their nose and just farting around being stupid.

But

They are an irreducible

Ontological ground

that preexists any

Form of individual intelligence.

The masses collectively

Borm into something

That is irreducible to their individual stupidity.

You don't have to be a smart person.

To have brilliant fucking dreams.

You don't have to be an intelligent person to have profound dreams.

You don't need to be an intelligent person to be a part of an intelligent historical existence.

sorry, a historical existence that could only be appreciated from the perspective of an intelligence, I should rather say.

I think that's really the kind of

Message.

And you know, the inconvenient thing about the student protest for us is that we look at the most noble, selfless communist warriors of history: Lenin, Stalin, Che Guevara, Mao, you name it, Marx himself, people who selflessly devoted the whole of their existence, the whole of their life, to the cause of the proletariat.

And what's awkward and inconvenient for us.

is that when it comes to selfless

Um

Conscious intelligentsia leaders of society.

There's a whole obscene in an obscene way.

There's a whole industry that produces that now.

Now everyone wants to be Lenin.

It's so and almost to the point where we're sitting here, we're not students.

We look at the students and we see them as an object, not a subject.

We're the subject.

We see the students as a kind of private.

See, students are supposed to represent the intellectuals.

They're supposed to represent like what Lenin did or whatever, like the highest form of subjectivity in relation to society, right?

But we sit here with an even higher form of subjectivity because awkwardly, even there's a kind of ridiculous proletarian in the bad sense of the word, the Roman sense, aspect of them where it's just this kind of obscene reproduction of their existence and their position as students is happening on an industrial scale in a way that's devoid of any kind of that's not prefigured by any kind of pure consciousness, right?

So put it this way, it's almost like it's literally it's literally like this.

Like you are going to Star Wars at Disney World and you want to be Luke Skywalker.

The only issue is that you're going there and everybody is fucking dressed up as Luke Skywalker.

And there's a whole industry of giving producing Luke Skywalkers to the point where this is no longer the main character.

anymore.

It can't be.

Get what I'm saying?

Like, how can this be the main character?

It's literally like the real hero of Star Wars is looking above on a mountain somewhere being like, Yikes

S but but but

That heroism cannot be maintained.

By being above it all, it can only be maintained by owning up to and acknowledging this obscene proletarian aspect of our the mass production of personalities.

See, the Christopher Lash kind of people try to interpret this to mean that students are a class and they do act as an anti-social segment of society, but there is a way to have proletarian subjectivity.

As a student, and there is a way to do that, right?

Or if you're coming from a student background, I should say, there is a way to have proletarian subjectivity.

Um

Where you do break out of the bounds of the culture of narcissism, and you basically kind of

No longer try you're no longer trying to be Luke Skywalker.

Anymore.

You're directly identifying with your mundane, ordinary existence, in a sense, in the form of uh

the real proletariat, the work the industrial working class,

Instead of trying to identify with Luke Skywalker,

You're identifying with uh

The sand people or some shit.

I don't know.

Maybe that's not a good analogy.

You're identifying with like.

A mass subject subjectivity.

You're no, it's no longer narcissism anymore, right?

It it's the concrete interest of the proletariat, proletarian masses.

And then your personality becomes downstream from that.

And then if you're lucky and if you're worthy, you will be Lenin or you will be Cher Guevara based on your work, based on what you do, based on what you contribute, not what you try to be when you look in the mirror.

We are the Empire.

Yeah, I agree.

Fuck Star Wars.

I totally agree.

Um.

I just kind of.

The reason I'm a little sympathetic.

I'm not.

The reason I'm so fascinated is like.

I feel like uh there's something so interesting about like

This Orient I like the Orientalism of the Palestinian protests.

I like the Orientalism.

I like the Dune 2 Orientalism of it.

I like this kind of Islamicate, new form of Islamicate Narodism, maybe.

Maybe it can turn into an Islamicate Narodism where a new type of Malcolm X subjectivity can form and the students can go down to the countryside and start organizing.

the working people, because you know what, it cuts both ways.

The goal of the Communist movement, the proletarian movement, is not simply to eliminate the distinction between

uh you know, selfless intelligentsia and the actual masses concerned with their immediate self-interests.

It's to narrow the distinction to the absolute point zero minimum.

At the end of the Cultural Revolution in China,

The Red Guards stopped just being people in the cities.

Suddenly, these impromptu schools that were forming in rural China and the most remote regions, knew directly people, the sons and daughters of peasants, would set up these schools and they would be the Red Guards.

Eventually we will have students.

We will have the students from the technical colleges and the community colleges and the colleges out in the boonies and the people that work at the city council and and uh that work for maybe the local government or something.

We will have those kinds of people.

Leading the movement.

instead of an ivory tower in Colombia, right?

That's what the goal is always about.

It's always about narrowing the distinction, you know?

Jackson is calling.

Does he not know I'm live?

Let me call him.

Yo, Jackson.

Okay.

I'm gonna call him.

Let me ask Jackson to join.

Uh let me see.

So that guy is not gonna come to debate me with uh

I want Jackson to come talk about the event.

I'm gonna give him two seconds.

Five, four, three, two, one.

It's not happening.

Wait, no, it's not happening.

It's happening now.

Yo!

It's happening now.

Yo, I'm live.

One second.

Yo, listen.

Um, oh fuck.

Are you live?

One second.

Yo, yeah.

Yeah.

Well, yeah, I can hear you.

I can hear you.

Yeah, we're gonna end the stream soon, but I want to bring you on.

Talk about the event.

Right?

One second.

We d you don't need your video.

Okay.

Um.

Alright.

Yo, hello?

Yeah.

Alright, so uh

Oh, it's working now.

Yeah, yeah, I could see it.

Do you wanna be put on?

Sure.

Alright.

So um Jackson, this is uh if so nobody here knows you, so I'll introduce them.

But uh guys, this is Jackson.

He's just this random guy.

We're doing the um

The Dearborn event with

Um

And hold on, give me a damn second.

This is ridiculous.

Here we go.

And uh I'm not Jackson Hinkle, bro.

Yeah, I don't know.

There's th this guy's kinda weird because he tried to say that Ca the much more famous, uh charming and much more successful Caleb Maupin was Jackson Hinkle, basically trying to co-opt his identity and success for himself.

Why why did you do that, by the way?

Couldn't you just stay in your own lane?

Why did you try to take credit for Caleb Maupin's accomplishments by accusing him of being you?

You checked my telegram?

Yeah, I did.

I did.

Um

So

What do you think about going No, I'm not going to ask you about this.

Uh what do you think about

Going to

Going to have an event.

in Portland, Oregon.

Uh

Uh I I don't I mean

I don't know about that.

What do you mean you don't know?

I don't know about that, bro.

Why?

It's a it's it's the best place to do it.

Look, I'm not into fat chicks like you.

Oh, okay.

Um you know here's the thing.

You know they did a study that says um if your taste in women is they're too skinny

Um you're actually retarded on a mental level.

Uh I'm not into the to the fat Starbucks barista workers.

You know what?

This is literally an N P C conversation out of oblivion.

Listen, here's the thing.

Our event is going to be in one month.

And how many tickets have we sold?

Half, over half.

Don't give the exact, just over half, right?

Over half.

Yeah.

So once if you're coming to that, by the way, once if you're already registered to that and you're coming.

Charmholes.

Charm Holt is coming.

Is he actually coming?

Can you check?

I don't know what his actual name is.

That's a little.

Yeah, that's.

That's a little worry.

I think I did see something where he said he's coming.

He's been saying he's coming.

I just don't think he's coming.

Like in the Discord or something.

He says he wants his actual name?

He wants to be he says he wants to be security.

I'm saying he is what we need security for.

There's no way Charm holds security.

Yeah, the if anything Yo, Visidad, what's up?

Visa Grad, what's up?

No, his name is uh Vizided.

But uh this is the first event we're doing.

That um

Bro, if Charmell's the bouncer, are are are events gonna look like Columbia University front lawn?

That's great.

That'd be great.

So uh you know

I think we're going to have pizzas at the event.

How much would it be?

It'd be like a few hundred.

I'd pay for that.

Pizza's on the side.

You're so generous.

Hassan Piker would never.

Yeah, he wouldn't.

So there might there might actually be pizzas.

That might be a thing.

How much would we need, like?

Bro, the uh yeah, I mean

Uh I mean we could uh

We could get some pizzas.

We're also both.

Yeah, we could get some pizzas.

Yeah.

We're also both.

We could do some.

What do you call that?

We'll do some revolutionary blackout network, mutual aid, hand out the pizzas to everyone who comes.

I like that.

Well, yeah, it'll be activism.

But, um, what do you think about so we're going yo, Hamza, what's going on?

Jackson Al Hinkle with Aus Alden.

So we're going.

By the way, why don't you wear a suit on stream anymore?

I'm the only one who does that.

Bro, I wore a suit.

Uh well no, I didn't wear a suit because I took my suits.

Where did I just come back from?

I don't fucking know.

Oh, Alex Shones.

I I wanted my suits to look nice for that and then I don't want to wear my suits again 'cause I don't have enough time to get them pressed before I go to uh Atlanta.

Let's not reveal the exact 'cause, you know No, I'm not, but I'm going to Atlanta, then Vegas, then Scottsdale, and then LA, and I have to wear suits for all those things.

Yeah.

Yeah, no, Atlanta is uh is are they known for like food, any kind of food?

Yo, Iron Rose, what's going on?

I think they got like Popeye's chicken there.

In fact

You know, my mom's from Atlanta.

No, there's another.

So there's this place, this chicken place.

What is it called?

The famous Southern Chicken Place.

It's only in the South.

There's only one in Michigan.

What is it called again?

It's like not Keynes, right?

Keynes, yeah.

Ah, bro.

We got Keynes in California.

Keynes is so lit.

Yeah, I think I might try that in Georgia.

Keynes is so good, bro.

I thank God I didn't live next to a Kanes.

Keynes was like 30 minutes away from where I grew up, or else I'd.

I've been dieting hardcore.

I'm going to, you know, when I go to Georgia, I'm going to have some Kanes.

Bro, if I lived next to a Keynes, I'd be looking like Compot.

Oh, man.

I don't know why he hates you.

I don't know what his issue is.

He hates me too now.

What happened?

I don't understand it at all.

Stra no, straight up.

Like what did we do?

Straight up.

What did we do?

I d I don't think I've ever said anything to him besides that snide comment I just made.

Uh maybe I have, but I don't remember.

I don't get what we did to that guy.

Like, what happened?

What does he what about us does he find so objectionable that he didn't back in 20?

He used to be cool with us in 2021.

Now he fucking hates us for no reason.

Why?

Did we, dude?

You know what?

You know, I was thinking about the other day.

It's like, you know, all these accusations of like, oh, we're LaRouche sites because all of our conspiracy theories?

We got that from Kantbot and those parapolitical people.

Compod was the fucking one who put us on all that shit.

And now he's calling now he's calling us LaRouche sites or whatever.

It's like, dude, our views about how America got hijacked by the OSS, w I got that from you, dude.

I just realized that.

I was like, what the fuck?

I was so gaslit.

All the parapolitical people that are obsessed about LaRouche, they are the ones who introduced me to who LaRouche was.

I didn't fucking know who LaRouche was before I was on like Cave Twitter.

Like looking at what all these parapolitical people were saying, kind of making him trendy and cool, like in an ironic way.

That's how I was introduced to LaRouche.

I didn't fucking know who he was before that.

Now they're like, oh, there's a LaRouche conspiracy with Hawes and Jackson.

Motherfucker, you are the conspiracy.

I literally got it from you.

The thing is, I tweeted this out and Zerka responded with some gay shit.

But I tweeted out, I said, The rabbit will always hate the fox.

And that's honestly just the truth about us because, like, I was live streaming today and.

Pizza fun.

Thank you.

Thank you so much.

Anonymous.

What's up?

I was live streaming today and I

This is so fucking annoying.

Holy shit.

Your internet does that a lot?

No.

Alright, we're back.

The comp bot comp bot deep state, goddess.

Yeah, I don't know what that guy's problem is.

I don't know what I did to him.

I don't know, but I was saying, and so they were spamming their donation links.

And I'm like, I honestly, like, I obviously spam my dono links a lot when I got banned from YouTube, but that was because I got banned from YouTube.

But I'm like, how come no one else gets attacked for spamming their dono links?

Like, just me.

And I haven't even done it in a while.

And, like, New York Times attacked me for it.

It's like, I literally had to buy a $5 newspaper to read the hit piece against me.

You know, and they're beefing me because I have a $3 a month subscription.

It's like, the rabbit will always hate the fucking.

I'm calling you a fucking grifter, but this is what you do for a living.

If you didn't fucking need to get paid for it, then you would be part of the ruling class and not have to make money because you already fucking have a ton, right?

Grifting would be going out like grifting would be going out like Hassan Piker and saying there's a genocide in China.

Yeah, rifting would be like Hassan who's scared who is scared to criticize AOC because she boosted his fucking streams when she came on.

That's fucking rifting.

Jesus Christ.

It's like, yeah, you so you so you make enough money to continue what you're doing.

That makes you a great, dude.

People think you make like millions of dollars.

Did you know that?

Yeah, I saw that.

People actually be hilarious if anyone saw my bank account.

They don't know we're broke, dude.

Remember Moscow?

I'm like the brokest multi-million followed person on the internet.

They don't know that we're both broke, especially you.

They may believe I'm broke.

They don't know that you're broke.

They literally don't.

They actually broke.

They, you know.

And they also say I have like a trust fund, which help me find it, please.

Yeah, bro.

If I was rich, you'd know.

You would know if I was rich.

Because like.

Uh you know.

You'd show off, yeah.

Bro, me and Jackson, you don't understand.

When we have anything, we show off.

When I have a fucking tungsten necklace that I bought for like $50, I showed that off.

All right.

I was flexing with that bullshit.

All right.

So anything.

Hoswell Post is like the 10th pair of all-black Air Force Ones on Instagram.

Yeah, we flex the dumbest shit we have.

It's all we have.

I definitely would not be driving a Lamborghini.

I would not be driving a what what what is John getting?

He texted me the other day.

He's he's buying like a Lambo.

Yeah, the Uris.

Is that the truck?

I would not drive that.

I'd have some like classy, like old like James Bond Porsche, Porsche, like one of those old Porsche's or something.

How are we grifters, but Hassan isn't?

What would bro?

Imagine if you had Hassan's house in LA.

Uh

And I don't even I wouldn't even get that.

I'd get some like big estate in Michigan and have like hunting dogs.

Like I'd be like British aristocracy and that shit.

Bro, this is why people hate you because they see you as the most like elitist guy ever, but they don't understand you're a broke elitist.

The actual elitist is this.

See, Hassan pretends to be humble, but he's fucking millionaire.

Jackson is extremely elitist, but he's actually broke.

That's the ultimate paradox.

Bro, polo shirts are the ultimate elitist, like, fuck you shirt.

And I have so many, but they're not expensive.

Like, a polo shirt is not expensive.

Yeah.

Bro, that is so real.

That is like a true proletarian actually like tries to be as rich as possible.

Only people, only actual fucking trust fund babies like Hassan Piker tend to be like, oh, I'm just wearing like this tie-dye shirt.

I'm like humble.

It's like, shut the fuck up, dude.

Or like the ones where it's like, it's a billionaire, but he dresses like he's homeless.

Yeah, exactly.

Like, that is some shit.

No, if I had money, I'd have a, I'd have a, I don't even have a car.

I don't even own a car.

I don't own, like, I, I just like don't, I don't, I don't do that.

I literally don't.

So, bro, if I had money, I'd have like one of those things where I have the hunting dogs with a big shotgun and I'd go like hunt for ducks and I'd have horses and I'd have a big estate and I'd have like a nice old car collection of cars and.

What el what else?

Like I mean look look clearly you're better off than most people but for for how many followers you have and how much clout you have you are nowhere near your a the person like who has the same clout and followers you have.

Like somebody who has your followers and your clout is an actual fucking like trillionaire, millionaire.

Why?

Because it's all that thank you so much MIG.

It all fucking comes down to sponsorships.

Isn't that the truth?

Well, I ran the numbers with, you know, my friend Austin.

He was out in Miami.

He's, you know, he came out and hung out with me for a week.

I haven't seen him in a while.

And I ran the numbers.

If I was still on YouTube, if I was still had all my sponsors, which keep in mind, I have made nowhere near this amount of money my whole life.

But if I had everything, like, I would be set.

But every time I started to make a little money, I'd get banned.

So, like, my finances are just fucked because of that.

See, we are, this is our curse.

We both got on the deng Xiaoping shit where we're like, fuck it, let's make money.

Like, who cares?

Making money is fine by any and all means.

Stock market.

Barrio, what's up?

I'm not just talking about.

I don't have any stocks.

I'm not just talking about collecting donos.

Like, let's go full capitalist.

Let's make any kind of money we can.

And we're totally fine with it ideologically.

And only then do we don't get shit, dude.

We literally fail completely.

And meanwhile, Hassan Piker has the opposite messages us, and he's a millionaire.

How fucking crazy!

Not by our own doing.

It's because I get clipped.

Like, like, I get banned and shit.

Yeah, we literally, literally, Austin and I ran through the numbers, bro.

It was like $200,000 a month.

Jesus.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Like if I had if I had all my sponsorships, if I had my ad revenue like I lost all my sponsors.

I lost ad revenue for a year before I got banned.

Lost Patreon, lost Venmo, lost Pa like

Bro.

People try to say that.

People call me a streamer grifter.

But I have zero sponsors.

How am I a fucking grifter without sponsors, you retarded bitch?

You think a grifter just gets donos and no sponsors?

Spons guys, Kai Sonat, all them people, they have like hundred thousand subs, right?

But most of their money's from sponsors.

Did you know that?

Like Nike.

I have no sponsors.

You think anyone's gonna sponsor me?

No fucking way.

Yeah.

Like, and you think about it, sponsors are like you being approved by corporations.

So Hassan, I'm not approved by any corporations.

I'm only approved by Australistani, Iron Rose, MIG, Burrillo, Vizided and Red Saffron and Krask.

Those are the only people that approve me.

That's the thing that pisses me off.

It's like well, if everyone's accusing me of being like a millionaire or having hundreds of thousands of dollars, at least it's like

I should at least have that or s like close to it, but like

No, my favorite part is when they say that we get paid by Russia and China.

We get no We don't get anything.

They don't pay us a damn thing.

It's uh

Honestly, you know, dude, what a tragic existence we live.

I don't want to offend our good friends in Russia, but like all the work we've done for Russia.

It's all free.

It's all free.

We should not only have a lot of money, we should have like a harem of women gifted.

They should.

Oh my God, dude.

Are we live a very tragic existence?

We're the most lied about ever.

Everyone thinks that we're super rich and we're getting paid by all these governments and that like the truth is we're literally telling the truth completely lied about fucking broke we don't get paid by any government

We work really hard just to get recognized by them, and we're literally just going on day in, day out for this message.

What the fuck?

Where, bro, where is

You think I'm above taking money from a fucking oligarch?

Oligarch or whatever, or that just means a billionaire, Russian billionaire.

Send that fucking money my way.

What the fuck are you waiting for?

I'll take it.

You think you think I'm just saying this?

Because, oh, my principals.

No, they're I'm literally not getting shit.

I mean, I'm not going to change my message, but I will happily accept any and all money from anywhere as long as I don't have to do anything in return for it.

You know what I mean?

They would agree with you.

No, because they're like, oh, Haas is pushing this message that it's like, all right, then let me get fucking paid for it.

You know?

Because I'm still going to push it either way.

Yeah.

No, I'm saying like they would agree with like Russian Russian oligarchs would agree with your politics 100%.

Um, I just think Haas with a small loan of a million dollars could do great things.

That's all I'm saying.

That's all I'm saying.

Here's the truth of the matter: you look at my Twitter account, X for now, we'll see how long it lasts, but for now, meritocracy is reigning supreme, and it's like one of the most followed Twitter accounts now.

I literally have a list of all the schmucks from like CBS and Fox News and CNN that I pass in following, and it's like we did that all on our own.

And then imagine if we actually had financial backing and we weren't banned everywhere, how much we would achieve.

It would be limitless, bro.

Here's the thing.

Autism is autists are literally holding the world hostage and they're like terrorists like just the net negative completely and you want to go to Portland wait wait wait no let me finish like usually autism is just like a crisis you know thank you so much anonymous yo exactly what's up anonymous shadow funding from the hazmat guy um so hold on autists are holding the world hostage etc etc but the one example of an aut the only time autism is saving us is Elon Musk Elon Musk's autism is the only reason we're platformed because he's like free speech you know like he doesn't he's just doing that without any regard for the consequences just like when he did that shit where he was like I'm gonna do the Tesla stock at like 420 69 like he just does shit like that as like an example of his autism and that's why we're successful so thank thank the autism

Thank the autism virus for Elon Musk.

Allowing us to be on X 'cause if you if Elon Musk was not autistic, if he was just like a normie.

Uh, we would be fucking banned.

Yeah, we'd be banned everywhere.

Because nor normies have nuance.

Normies are like, well, yeah, I kinda see what you're saying.

Autists are like, no, we're doing free speech regardless.

Yeah.

The only thank you for the vaccines for giving us Elon Musk.

Yeah.

Yeah, no, it it it it's true.

It's true.

Uh

Yeah.

Uh do you think we should live stream at Atlanta and do IRLs?

I mean, I'm not going to say anything right now, but given the guest and who's going to be talking.

I'm going to do for the Friday and Saturday.

Oh, I mean, you can.

I'm not.

No, like I live stream it and you can be in it.

Oh yeah, we'll get like Adriana Lee out there.

It'll be fun.

Bro, don't even mention that.

Oh my god.

No, I mean like yeah, we could do that, that'd be fun.

I know no one.

Yeah, we're gonna, guys, we're gonna, I don't know anybody either.

We're gonna be out in Atlanta, and you're gonna see why Sunday.

But if you're in Atlanta, hit us up.

Especially if you're a fed and you're gonna like

Yeah.

Do some you're why why do fed feds are always like

They'll message you and they'll be like, Yo, Haas Yo, Haas, I'm also gonna be here.

I'm selling this uh AR fifteen from my back of my trunk and it's got this switch on it.

It goes fully automatic, you know.

It's totally what the Feds are scared of.

It's totally how we take down AOC, you know?

Come by and pick it up.

Be totally legit.

And I'm like, oh yeah, what do they think I'm going to respond with?

I felt bad because there were all these Iranians emailing me and messaging me, like a ton of them last week.

You were backed by a car salesman in Seattle.

Trevaly, the car salesman, what's up?

It's proof of my support among the petite bourgeoisie.

Anyway, go ahead.

There was like all these Iranians emailing me and messaging me and saying like, Mr.

Hinkle, this is a message from Iranian Supreme Leader.

That was me before.

Hazmat security is nuts.

What's up, Red Demos?

Sorry, continue.

They're like, this is a message from Iranian Supreme Leader to the youth of the West.

It's a letter head.

I got that too.

Yeah, and like, I looked it up and he actually did write a letter to the youth of the West like in 2015 or something.

And it got a resurgence online this month.

But they were like, click this link to view the letter.

And I'm like, I ain't clicking no links.

Yeah.

I never click any links.

Anyway, did you see that shit on TikTok of that?

That one like troll streamer who's like he was like, he's like playing Fortnite.

He's like, I bet you nobody here can calculate five times a thousand.

Bro, you watch way too much TikTok.

Just finish the book.

Finish the book.

No, it's not.

I'm taking a shit.

When I take a shit, I scroll TikTok.

No way you take that many shits.

I do, actually.

I do.

Anyway, he's like, he's like, I get like 10 TikToks from Hawes a day.

He got like five.

Anyway.

He got like 10, bro.

Bro, bro, listen.

And then he's like, he's like, chat, if you're new to the stream, Calc stands for calculator.

It's just short.

And he's like, he's like constantly being like, if you just join the stream, Calc is short for calculator.

It's just slang.

I don't know, dude.

I can't get over that.

His TikToks, like 70% of them, like they're all random, but like 70% of them aren't even funny.

No, it's like they're all great.

No, bro.

It's like some of it's boomer humor.

Like what?

Like the l like like like the Kanye one, the cringy prom posal one.

That one was fucking hilarious.

What are you talking about?

Wait, which Kanye one?

Uh his apology tour.

I'm not talking about that one, but uh Okay, I I got five TikToks from Hawes yesterday.

Yeah, I told you it was five.

Nah, d bro, d you don't even know about the TikTok Riz party with Turkish Kwandale Dingle.

Yeah.

Oh my god, bro.

They're getting rid of Tick.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yeah, what's going on with Kanye with that porn site?

What is he doing?

Uh I hope it's some meme.

I hope it's all like a joke.

Why is he calling it easy porn?

What does that even mean?

Bro, did you see his post he just made?

Yeah, where it's like a woman announcing it.

Or did you see the one where he said it's like uh I don't even know how to pronounce this word, but he said it's like a bukak box or bukak a box or something he's sending out.

He's losing his mind, dude.

I don't know what to say.

Bro, if that shit's real, if that shit is real and not some like sick joke.

Well, he needs to talk to Norm Finkelstein about gooning and fascism or something.

Now, Norm was so correct about that.

The gooning shit, where he's like, it's a form of fascism.

That was so how did he know that?

'Cause like he's he doesn't know that that's actually like what these extremist neo-Nazi subcultures are about.

Yo, JB, what's up?

He was so on point, it's crazy, bro.

On that same vein, I've only seen this because that Sonny Foz kid keeps posting them, and I follow him.

I've never hung out with him, but like, he keeps posting Destiny's leaked DMs.

Did you see the new one?

I did actually.

I'm not proud of reading that, but I did.

And uh, bro, that shit is yeah, I almost didn't read it, and then I read it, and I'm like, God, I wish I hadn't read that.

Yeah, my reaction is like, why am I reading this?

Like, what?

Why?

I feel like I shouldn't even be here, you know?

Ugh.

Ugh.

Yeah.

But anyway, we're gonna Anything else about the event before we sign off and the stream?

Um

Uh

The Vegan Debate guy's gone, right?

You're gonna debate a vegan?

Yeah, but he leaves the server every night.

I think he's a troll.

Anyway, go ahead.

No, I mean I don't think that there's um

I don't know.

It's gonna be lit.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I mean we've sold more than we've sold more than half the tickets, but there's still more.

So if you guys are in Dearborn, like, you know, tell your grandpa

Bro, grandpas love me.

Grandmas and grandpas love me.

Tell them that, you know, I'll be there.

Tell them the crews.

We have pizza.

I'll go as far as say if you if you um want to protest if you if you um want to debate us in person

Right?

Do you agree?

If you want to come and call us out for whatever, come.

You have to buy a ticket, but yeah.

Stand up, we'll give you the mic and you can say whatever you want to us.

Right?

Yeah, I mean, I don't as long as they don't like interrupt shit.

I'm just gonna go.

No, yeah, yeah.

Like, we'll have a section where, like, all right, you want to bring up um

That you think were disingenuous and you want to in front of the Dearborn Michigan Muslim crowd, talk about how you find us.

Let's get Mikal, Councilmember Mikal from the Minister of Man.

I invite Councilman Mikal to come and air out his grievances with myself or Jackson in front of the Muslim Dearborn Michigan crowd and explain why we are evil, evil Nazis because we have conservative social views, which Dearborn Muslims are famous for not having at all, especially older people.

Please call us please call us fascists and see you know I'm not even gonna spoil it, right?

I'm not even gonna spoil it.

You know what's crazy?

Yeah, is he was like, um, we can't allow Hinkle to come to Michigan.

It's like I'm literally named after Jackson, Michigan.

My grandfather was buried in Jackson, Michigan.

Probably 90% of my extended family lives in Michigan because, you know, my grandfather was one of 14 kids in Michigan.

Like, my family goes way deeper in Michigan than I guarantee McCall's family goes.

It's like, how could you say that?

How could you say that to me?

The worst thing is that he didn't even just say like the city.

He said all of Michigan.

What the fuck?

Who says that?

Bro, I've watched every single Michigan-Ohio State game since before I could walk.

Like, I'm Michigan.

My blood bleeds blue.

I'm as pro-Michigan as you can get.

Fuck Ohio State.

Yeah, how is Jackson not?

You guys actually think Jackson's like a California guy?

He's actually a Michigan guy.

Look at him.

Why do you think we're friends?

No, I mean

I've only been to Michigan like, I think like twice though.

So that is fair.

I've like not spent a lot of time there.

I'm talking about like the race, racial.

There's different races based on states.

I'm serious.

Like probably, I've got probably like hundreds of family members in Michigan, most of whom I don't know.

But I know a bunch in Michigan.

But the thing is, it's like, I think I've told you this.

Like, I don't want to.

I lived in LA.

I live in Miami now.

I definitely don't want to live in a major city when I get like a house when I have my when I have my Hassan Piker millions and I buy my estate.

So Michigan is probably I've got family in Michigan, family in Minnesota.

Like I like it there a lot.

Like getting a house on the lake where you can do some like duck hunting, you can do some fishing.

You don't like fishing, right?

I don't dislike it.

I just have rarely done it.

I love fishing.

Austin doesn't like fishing.

I love fishing.

And like, ever since I was little, I just remember hearing stories, because like my grandpa had a cigarette boat and they'd take it to Mackinac all the time and do like summer trips at Mackinac.

They go fishing all the time.

It's like that honestly is that's pretty ideal.

I think if you moved to Michigan or something and started like just like doing all that kind of stuff, like hunting or whatever, people would like hate you less probably.

Even like your haters, they would just make it harder to hate you.

Yeah, I don't like no one in my family did hunting really.

Yeah, yeah, but you get what I'm saying.

I wish I liked to hunt.

Yeah, same.

Hogs.

Hogs are demonic, evil creatures.

I don't fucking.

I don't like.

My dad, he he doesn't hunt or anything.

Like, he played basketball.

He played basketball in Michigan and like, uh

Louisville and like places like that.

But he, wherever he lives, like he grows this utter distaste for like whatever wildlife is in the area.

And so like when we lived in California, there was like a pigeon problem at the we lived in like a condo when I was growing up.

So like he would like buy airsoft guns and shoot at the pigeons from like our balcony.

The pigeons.

And then now he lives in, now you know, they live in Arizona.

Tarantulas.

And what's that?

Tarantulas.

Uh no.

Arizona, they get my my mom does like gardening and stuff and like so she'll be gardening and there'll be like rattlesnakes and like there were snakes in California, but they they wouldn't be like on our like we lived in a condo so like they wouldn't be like in our home, but like she'll be like go rattlesnakes.

When I was there, I saw you know, you know, the snoring desert toad.

They it makes like the five Meo DMT, you know what those are?

DMT is a drug, right?

Yeah, but the you know what a snoring desert it secretes the shit that hippies lick.

Yeah, yeah, so I went outside and my mom thought it was a snake.

She thought it was a rattlesnake when she was doing the gardening.

And I she's like, she screams.

I'm like, what the?

I was waking up.

I'm like, what the fuck is happening?

I go outside and she's like, there's a snake in there.

And I get close and I'm like trying to uncover it.

It was a sonoran desert toad, no cap, like this big.

It was crazy.

And then there's also two last things: scorpions everywhere.

So, like, my mom likes to put out like decorations for Halloween and Christmas.

And like, you have to let it sit in the garage for like a while because there's there'll be like scorpions on it when they bring the pumpkin, like the fake pumpkins back in or something.

And then the craziest one, oh no, there's also a bunch of coyotes.

I mean, we had coyotes in California too, but they're like, they live like near a riverbed that's dried up.

So they always go there and you hear them at night.

But the craziest one are your chat's going to know what this is, but these things are insane.

These things are insane.

They're called.

They're like wild boars, but they're air.

They're like desert boars.

But they travel at like 45 miles an hour.

They're super fast.

Yeah.

I know what's going on, man.

They'll eat dogs.

Like, they eat small dogs.

My parents have two big dogs, but like they'll eat small dogs.

Is it Javelinas?

Javelina.

Havelina.

Okay.

They, bro, they're if you look up videos of javelinas running, they go like 45 miles an hour and they're these big ho uh like uh boars, but like desert boars.

That's fucked what are the bro.

You're running past last thing, dude.

Did you know did you know that pigs were descended from corrupt humans?

It's like uh the Miyazaki movie.

I'm not joking about this shit.

Pigs have way too many things in common with people physiologically, and you know the holy books say that I don't I don't remember bro, pigs are descended from sinful human beings.

I'm not even kidding.

Like did they say anything?

You know how like um

You know how like pigs are what is it called?

Hadam?

They're like, Yeah, yeah.

And why are they so smart for no reason?

Why are they so they're the only animals that will eat us?

They're smart enough to like say, oh, fuck it.

I don't care.

I'm gonna eat them.

Bro, they're extremely smart, extremely cruel.

They eat people.

They're like demonic and fucked up and shit.

Bro, pigs eat people?

Yeah.

If boars attack you, they'll knock you down and start eating you.

Bro, have you seen the videos where like like uh I don't even know where it is like maybe like um the Midwest or something where they go out on like a giant like Range Rover, a Jeep and they go out with like a fully automatic gun at night time and they just start like shooting all the boars.

The reason hogs and boars are fucking scary and they're so aggressive is imagine if there's like an angry evil man running around the woods, but they're four-legged and they're hairy.

That's what a boar is.

Like imagine a serial killer in the woods just running around trying to kill people.

That's literally boars.

Like people.

You actually convinced me that you convinced me like a few months ago to stop.

No, no, it was like a year ago.

You convinced me to stop eating pork.

I don't fuck with pork.

Yeah, I don't eat that.

And here's the thing, dude.

People are the scariest animal.

Everyone knows that, right?

If you're in the woods and you see a person and you don't know them and like they're hostile, like it's weird, right?

Pigs, imagine evil terrorists.

But they're four-legged, and they're actually like a serial killer in the woods, like Hannibal Lecter.

But they roam in packs.

I think you just have something against animals though, 'cause you don't like dogs either.

No, I I'm fine with dogs.

I don't like dog worshippers who literally like when they say that I will j I will save a dog before an infant, it's literally demonic.

Nah, you don't like dogs, bro.

I've seen you around dogs.

You're right.

I don't like them because I feel like they're dirty.

Like, I don't like touching them because when they lick my hand, I immediately have to go wash my hands.

And I think.

Yeah, you're weird about hands and stuff, aren't you?

I find them to be stinky, and God knows what shit they've been rolling in or whatever.

And I don't want to be able to do it.

You guys, I'll be like eating a meal, right?

And like, yeah, wash your hands before the meal, but like when you're in the middle of eating a meal, all bets are off for like how greasy or gross your hands get.

And Hawes will just look at me mid-meal, and they'll be like, Do you let your hands get like that?

Bro, this dude, this dude, he'll have like, he'll have wings.

He'll get super dirty with his hands.

Chicken wings.

How else am I supposed to eat?

And then after his hands are dirty, he'll just do this and just walk out and just touch his car.

He won't even clean him, bro.

This dude walk around, bro.

People like Jackson and Zerka, what they'll do, they'll have a slice of pizza.

They'll eat the pizza.

And with that same hand, they'll take their phone and start using their phone with their sticky, greasy pizza hands.

Who does that?

No, no, no.

I'll like wipe it off on my shirt or something.

That's fucked.

That's gross.

You got grease on your shirt now?

What the hell?

The thing is, though, like with dogs, with food, you are like this.

You're like a Dr.

Fauci clean freak.

Like.

Like, okay, when I sat down for the Alex Jones interview, he got up like three or four times to take a piss.

We had to take breaks.

You get up that many times in a meal to wash your hands.

So, like, for me, for me, I see it as like the more, you know, I don't want to get germs right before I eat, so I'll wash my hands before.

But the more germs I live around, the better, because it heightens my immunity.

So, like, during COVID, I was going sick.

Where did you learn that?

That's true.

During COVID I was going to TikTok parties in LA because I'm like this is gonna boost my immunity.

Well that that I yeah.

The same premise.

That's yeah, but I I don't see like you don't even I don't you don't no no no I don't you don't even read you don't even read Ray Pete, bro.

You don't bro, listen, I don't give a fuck about health at all.

I just don't want my hands to be sticky and gross.

And smelly and nasty and disgusting.

Yeah.

No.

Fuck.

Say as soon as it comes back, we're gonna we're gonna do an outro.

Charm hole is going crazy.

Okay.

Stream is back.

Once of it's back.

Onesu's back.

Armhol's hacking us.

All right, guys.

I'm gonna stream tomorrow.

Um, so I'll see you guys tomorrow.

And uh, yeah, we're gonna end the stream now.

See you guys later.

I just want to say one last thing.

I really like this new TikTok Bryce Hall haircut thing you're going for.

I think up with that.

This dude's trying to say I got a Zoomer haircut.

Not even.

Look, yeah, I have a normal haircut.

It's like somewhere it's like somewhere between like Bryce Hall and you know the meme with like the Mexicans that get the Edgar haircut?

You're somewhere between like Bryce Hall and the Edgar haircut.

What the hell is the Edgar?

Is that the is that the the hell's that?

Bro, you're not cultured, bro.

The Mexicans love me.

You don't even know.

How the fuck do I have that haircut?

I don't have that haircut.

When I was in high school, the Mexican girls loved me the most.

Like, me and Austin, well, Austin's a half Mexican, but they loved us the most.

I should style my hair different actually.

Anyway, guys, uh, I have a month to look the best.

I got my beard cut today, but

I don't know.

Anyway, guys, one last thing.

Yeah.

One last thing.

Yeah.

What was that photo you made where you got your haircut?

And then he started sending me all these pictures of his haircut and we were FaceTiming talking about something.

And he just kept looking at himself on his phone screen.

I saw him looking at himself.

But then you went in your Discord and you made this photo of you standing on this grassy hill and you're like, you're like, you imposed yourself on this grassy hill in like Norway.

And you're like, damn, I actually look tall here.

Bro, 'cause I had someone take a photo of me.

And I actually have a fitted suit, and I'm like, bro, every other photo I take, I look like I'm four feet, and this one I look like Slenderman.

But uh but you you you like impose yourself on this weird graphic.

No, no, I'll tell you why, because I have to remove the background.

Because I was actually in front of my house.

I was in front of my house, so I had to remove the background.

But, bro, no one knows how tall you look if you're like imposed on this.

True, but I did have to remove the background because it was my house.

No, I was just saying, like, for I'm not talking about how tall, I'm talking about my uh how I look, like, just my build.

Anyway, guys.

Anyway guys, uh one last thing.

We're gonna

I will say, you know, when it comes to Hassan Piker, you know, there are a few things about him that I don't think he's a grifter about, all right?