James Hake defends SLAVERY? 🚀 Infrared Content Catalog

i think the democrats today are much

more evil than they than the democrats

who own the slave and

slavery was one of the greatest

historical evils how so humanity

in order to keep in order to prop up

your communism you are saying

unspeakably evil things if i i can't i

can't think of anything more fucking

cowardly than trying to downplay the

historical evil of slavery

sure glad to be here thank you so

i think when we have a discussion uh

about the over putting a overall

historical verdict on judging the legacy

of communism i do agree that when we're

talking about communism we do have to

talk about what that actually meant in

reality so this idea that you know

communism has never been tried or it

wasn't true communism or it doesn't

actually reflect the real thing i think

we don't have to that's not something

that has to be in dispute we can all

agree that communism specifically in the

20th century refers to a phenomena that

begins with the soviet union continuing

through countries like china

other countries in the world outside of

europe in america and the eastern bloc

and so on and so on as well as the

legacy of capital c communist movements

uh within

uh the united states and western europe

and so on so i think there's no dispute

about the fact that communism does have

to refer to the you know the thing that

actually propped the name into relevance

and significance in the first place and

to me

uh when you begin from there you have to

have a very honest and sober assessment

of the the record and the facts at hand

now the experience of communism was

obviously very bloody it was obviously

uh something that was fraught with

catastrophes to say the least economic

catastrophes uh famines

um moments of political terror and so on

and so on but we should have a more

broader uh

investigation and criticism of whether

this is specifically because of

communism rather than a feature of

modernity as such because the

modernization of let's say even the

western capitalist countries and the

world at large uh fits the same pattern

that we saw if not far worse actually i

would argue in the case of communism the

prerequisites to the agricultural and

industrial modernization of the

non-communist world uh required in an

immense level of um

famines uh social instability terror

unrest um colonialism slavery and so on

and so on in the new world genocide

these are all things that aren't uh that

can't be brushed to the side when we're

evaluating

how modernization takes place

uh historically so to me you have to

place communism within that context of

this question of pre-modern and largely

agrarian societies confronting and

trying to persevere through this

challenge of modernity and to me uh

modernity specifically in the form of

agricultural modernization somehow

historically inevitably leads to this

kind of um chaos and uncertainty in the

way food is produced and in the way the

foundation of economies agricultures

um

is preserved right so this is obviously

something fraught with several you know

small mistakes can lead to catastrophic

outcomes but at the very least we can

say that these mistakes were on record

things that communist states learn from

uh after they were made very quickly i

should add and when you don't only look

at the negatives that are

mostly mass publicized as a result of

cold war anti-communist propaganda and

uh and elsewhere you have to also have a

fair and sober assessment of the

overwhelming achievements

of communist parties and leading their

respective peoples uh to a position a

social position far superior uh to than

before whether in the realm of literacy

acculturation a medicine

um access to a bare minimum of a

standard of living a basic dignified

means of livelihood a kind of guarantee

of a job and obviously this came to a

certain limit in crisis in the 1970s

where this primary standard of living

was no longer enough um to support the

wants and desires and aspirations of the

peoples and communist states but

nonetheless i think

we can retrace and reevaluate the

original significance of communism in

order to now address and put into a new

light the challenges that we now face

today which our current liberal order

seems to be unable to um to deal with

we're facing a fourth industrial

revolution we're facing an economic

transition not uh dissimilar to the one

that communists were addressing namely

the one from

pre-modern agrarian societies to

industrial society now we're in a

situation of industrial societies

transitioning into an era of smart

cities and you know more internet-based

economy and more kind of

decentralization and i think that

communism has a new newfound

significance uh in this regard

so i think i'll just

end it there you go thank you very much

for that opening statement infrared we

are also thrilled to have here james

hake thanks so much for being with us

the floor is all yours for your opening

statement as well

well thank you and thanks to haas

infrared for coming on as well this was

today was my introduction to haas and

infrared and what they or he i think is

they

believe i think he's a marxist

leninist communist what is interesting

to me about him is that he does not

appear as rabidly anti-white

anti-christian anti-man is the typical

communists that i think of that i run

into i don't know looking around america

like the democrats the black lives

matter antifa people the mainstream

media type i saw a video where he said

you can be patriotic and nationalist as

well as communist but my take on

communism is that it's atheistic at its

root like you have to be an atheist to

be a good communist was one quote from a

famous communist i think i've heard

promoting the insane idea of equality

which is not an ideal nor is it the

truth the serpent told eve in the garden

of eden that you can be equal with god

and that's a lie and feminist communists

have sought to be equal with men and

it's just been a big mess since then

communism seems to be against men and

against nature

around in america it has sought to

render the men unnecessary to the women

and to the children and it's it does not

mind as he said famine abortion forced

vaccination in the name of you know

against healthy individuals who are not

at high risk from diseases that don't

threaten them it's a violation of

individuals they don't mind in uh

violation of individuals rights for the

so-called collective the greater good uh

it pushes the lie of anger to be angry

the communists unions seek to persuade

the angry so-called workers to

go up against and subvert the the bosses

who envisioned started built and led the

businesses that gave them the jobs and

the communist the communists sometimes

pretend to be friends and want

mutual benefit for everyone and some of

them may sincerely feel that way but

in the end it's it's a phony thing the

best intentions are the road to hell as

you may know

communists don't mind lying stealing and

killing to get their way many others do

too dennis prager said words and ideas

are more important for uh the

intellectual which is the same thing as

a communist or a liberal as than actions

and reality it's partly why the straight

talking nazis are much more maligned

than the sweet talking communists which

the mainstream media is you know they

have they have a they pander to

basically in america i think what we we

have what's called what i call kami kami

capitalism because

amazon google facebook all these are in

bed with the government they support

black lives matter antifa just

destruction of the country they support

the mass immigration that's that's

changing the face of the country and the

values of the country they support the

communist shutdowns in the name of the

the virus that we have that has just

destroyed their competition or destroyed

the businesses and just meanwhile

they've made mass profit and

that means more power for them as well

as for the government in america we're

already a socialist country you don't

own your own land or property you don't

have a right to contract for work with

workers to pay them just one or two

dollars an hour if they want to work

that you know be a be an usher or

whatever we've lost a lot of jobs in

that way you have wealth redistribution

which is really more like edo

redistribution through progressive tax

and social programs and affirmative

action and all these things you have the

harsh hand of law quote law coming down

on innocent capital protesters because

they are

the communism seeks to divide and

conquer the whites against the

the people of color or the people of

color really against the whites and the

liberals against the whites and it's

overwhelming the systems the um in order

to destroy them and rebuild them in

their image through immigration you see

the border is just being destroyed

because they like to destroy and exploit

the crisis and then rebuild it in their

image the government and the media are

just filled in my view with communists

from joe biden and kamala harris to

nikki haley and even perhaps greg abbott

over in texas i don't see capitalism as

the opposite of communism i see it

really as good versus evil so i see

capitalism as as just as many communists

do as a stepping stone to communism

because when in capitalism we start to

do well and then we forget god you know

the saying goes tough times make strong

make strong men strong men make good

times good times make

make a weak men and then weak men make

tough time and that's when the

communists like to strike capitalism is

supposed to be about freedom but you

can't have freedom as i think john adams

said without morality but they push

pornography and all of that madness to

just subvert families it's about envy

it's about made up words and false

ideals things like racism and just

division satan came as the angel of

light and evil is subtle it sounds good

it's an imitation of logic and moral so

that's communism don't fall for it i

want to be kind of brief i don't want to

ramble too much but um i think in the

united states and this is one of the

things infrared wanted to embark upon to

kind of change people's perception is

that here in the united states i think

there's a lot of confusion about what

communism meant in other countries and

how that would apply here and i think

that for several reasons there has come

to be this kind of confusion in this

country that there's this association

with communism and the experience of

communism in russia and china the

existing communist states that survived

today and there's this association with

that with the current um you know the

deep state and the democratic

establishment and george soros and the

ngos and

the kind of davos agenda for the great

reset there's this association between

communism and these things i think

because uh in the united states that

democrats are considered left and the

republicans are considered right so

people just have this idea that

communism is just the like ultimate um

logical conclusion of the democrats

current agenda but i think when you um

actually study the experience and

history of communism in the proper

context you will find that um well for

one there is a historical uh tension

between communism and religion but that

wasn't necessarily because communism is

inherently anti-religious or even

inherently atheist it was because the

religious establishments that communists

were going up against in their

respective countries were deeply rotten

and corrupt to the core they defended

the interests of the very corrupt ruling

class and you know many normal ordinary

religious minded people could even see

that within these very same religious

establishments you had utmost cynicism

and hypocrisy these people that were

occupying these uh roles of religious

power didn't actually even believe in it

themselves so there wasn't even really

any authentic faith there themselves and

for that reason communists uh had taken

in the very beginning a negative stance

toward religion but as the experience of

communism was able to mature more

especially now i think a certain

understanding has uh arrived that

between communist internationally and

religion which allows for a communism

that has room for faith not only does it

have room for faith but is actually able

to rediscover itself in the history of

uh the world's great face

frederick engels uh

marks his friend if you don't know who

he is uh toward the end of his life he

wrote about how in um the early stages

of christianity you found pretty much a

a very striking parallel to the

socialist and communist movement in

europe that the principles and values of

christianity are strikingly similar to

those of the communists i mean the

president putin of russia has pointed

out that the uh the code of communist

builders which was the soviet um kind of

like handbook for the komsomol youth he

said all of these things are already to

be found in the bible so around the

world especially in russia with its

communist party and in latin america and

in the middle east and uh i hope in the

united states um communism has not only

been proven to be perfectly compatible

with fake but they appear to even

complement each other because uh from

the perspective of the world's great

religions we can see the kind of

corruption and decadence and inhumanity

uh that capitalism has brought upon the

peoples of the world and the way in

which this has to be addressed

economically and politically seems to be

very much compatible and uh similar to

what the communists are saying right now

in regards to this question of equality

um i think there's also confusion here

too because communists never wanted to

make everyone absolutely equal because

as marx angles and lenin pointed out

people are inherently different some

people have more skills than others some

people are smarter some people are

stronger and people are different in

general so we don't communists don't

have this idea of making everyone equal

we just believe as far as equality is

concerned no more than what was written

in um the declaration of independence

that we believe

uh that men and women were created equal

right which is what the founding fathers

of the united states have said and all

that means that insofar as the

government is going to serve the

interests of the people we're going to

have a government buy for and of the

people it's not going to privilege these

special interests like amazon and

facebook and other monopolies over the

ordinary man this is our government and

we will should be treated accordingly

people like jeff bezos bill gates uh and

other billionaires are not gods among

men they're not somehow more human than

we are they're not somehow more citizens

of this republic than we are so

in that regard we just as far as

equality is concerned believe that

everyone should have a certain equality

before

the government before the law that

allows us to begin with equal

opportunity we're not advocating for an

equality of outcomes in life if you look

at communist states like china you don't

find uh you know an equality of outcomes

between people and yet countries like

china have done a very good job in being

able to crack down on monopolies like

the ones you're seeing with amazon and

the billionaire class china is actually

an example of a country with a

government that isn't able to be

infiltrated by the special interests the

corporations and and with their special

private agendas that are beyond the

interests of the people so i think we

should be clear that communists don't

want to completely level society and

make it even we just want people to be

able to have a fighting chance and that

means people don't own land they don't

own homes we want people to have to be

able to own things because if people are

able to own things in general they're

going to have a solid foundation from

which to begin and

begin as equals are you an atheist um my

personal relationship to religion i

would say is complicated but uh in

certain regards i think i am an atheist

just in the sense that i don't like

making assumptions about what god is and

what god wants and who god is but at the

same time i'm also someone who's

motivated by a profound sense of faith

and um faith in something that i

struggle to call anything but god or a

god but again because religion has been

misused so often in history i i want to

be very careful about

uh my own relationship to faith

personally um where are you from i'm

just curious if you don't mind oh yeah

my parents are from lebanon okay um this

is a quote from

marx the communist manifesto by marx and

angles communism abolishes eternal

truths it abolishes all religion and all

morality instead of constituting them on

a new basis it therefore acts

in contradiction to all past historical

experience

at root is it not atheistic

i i wouldn't say so because i think what

marx and engels were trying to say in

that regard is that communism doesn't

mean to replace all these things with a

new religion and a new dogma and a kind

of a new tradition

and i think that's very

important to you know keep in mind

because

uh

it's very easy to just assume that

because you're having this new political

movement and phenomena that it's gonna

somehow make a new religion and make a

new thing like that

and also i think there's often times a

mistranslation as far as the word

abolish is concerned in a lot of these

texts so oftentimes the word of hebong

which actually means sublate which means

to preserve while at the same time going

beyond is translated into abolish and

abolish means like to wipe out right and

oftentimes marx and angles write about

the sublation of things which is not

necessarily incompatible with their

preservation in a new form right so the

way i look at that and the way i would

interpret that is that companies don't

want to abolish christianity they just

want to give a new

ex ground for the expression of the

authentic christian faith without the

corrupt religious institutions and

establishments which deceive the people

and trick people in the name of tapping

into their real authentic faith who are

just motivated by cynical interests of

serving those in power or serving

special interests or just plainly trying

to scam people into making money i've

seen reports that that china for example

as recently as last year

they were clamping down i think on

christians as well as some other

religions like falun gong or something

like that

and saying

we need marxism not

religion not christianity and i've just

noticed that

for example

armenians i've had some armenian friends

and they

lived in a former communist country and

because of that there is a lot of

corruption and a lot of cheating and low

trust society making

business practices with many armenians

because of that culture that basically

where life is not done life was once

done in america with a handshake you did

not have to worry about a man that you

shook hands with pulling a fast one on

you whereas that's not the case in many

of these uh communist countries because

it seems to it seems to be that

communism does not understand or ex or

else it purposely exploits the weakness

and corruption and laziness of human

nature because it has it has you where

you are

you get something that you didn't earn

and you don't um

you don't appreciate it you don't

properly take ownership of it um in in

regards to the situation of religion

within china um christians are not being

cracked down on china for their

religious faith now there are various

cults among them the falun gong which is

a cult it's not really a historical or

traditional religion um the chinese

government will crack down on those but

not simply because of in the name of

uploading marxism versus religion now

chinese society you have to keep in mind

has historically not had a the same

relationship to religion that other

societies do the chinese society has

been mostly secular throughout its

thousands of years of history just in

the sense that its way of relating to

spirituality and religion all those

kinds of things are done through the

concrete bonds of civil society and

statehood so that's not really an

innovation of communism it's just been

true for china's history

at large but otherwise christians are

free to practice their faith openly and

freely within china and um events like

the taiping rebellion in the 19th

century within china which was a

christian religious uprising against the

qing dynasty was obviously very

influential influencing the communists

the eventual communist movement that

would come later so i think there is an

interesting relationship to christianity

there but again china is not a christian

country now in regards to this cynicism

that prevails within armenia you have to

keep in mind that after the collapse of

communism when the very same forces that

conservatives within america are trying

to struggle against basically engaged in

the wholesale privatization of the

former soviet countries and you know

pretty much looted them and destroyed

their traditions and was trying to

destroy their culture and set up all

these ngos and things like that to

promote the

to promote a society that was more in

line and more within the interests of

the american deep state obviously the

situation in the post-communist states

has been catastrophic but this wasn't

the fault of communists it actually was

the fault of the same global

billionaires and the global capitalist

class who are funding ngos people like

george soros people like uh ford

foundation and the rockefellers and all

these kind of people who have this very

they don't only have an agenda for the

people of the united states and for this

country which i think to many americans

has been revealed they had an agenda to

completely overthrow the communist

states and replace them with liberal

democracies and that has been an

absolute disaster for traditions and for

a culture and for religion so much so

that in countries like russia you find

the communist party to be

fundamentally uh orthodox christian at

its core it's allied with the orthodox

church because both recognize the

forces of anti-communism to be a menace

to religion within their country so

um to me regarding the promotion of

laziness and selfishness i think you

have to keep in mind that in the 20th

century you had this kind of economic

equality within communist states

primarily because they were coming from

a backwards agrarian society and

transitioning into an industrial society

so the goal was just to give people the

minimum of just some kind of

modernization now when that came into a

crisis communist states responded to

that in different ways but the most

successful way a communist state has

responded to the issue is the the path

china took and obviously no one can

really make the argument that in china

these vices of you know a lack of

economic entrepreneurship and innovation

and is is uh being promoted china is a

very industrious hardworking innovative

competitive uh society and then this is

no lying and cheating

and lying and cheating i don't know if

that's well i i i'm not sure i think

that's

a culture of lying and cheating is

common to all you know market societies

or societies that are part of the global

capitalist uh world economy right so

that's not something that's the fault of

communism i think that's more something

that's the fault of the kind of doggy

dog world that we live in but china has

seen profound cultural shifts and

specifically within the president's the

presidency of xi jinping we're seeing a

more of a promotion of morality instead

of the kind of uh nice

unfettered economic growth for the sake

of economic growth there's more of a

promotion of moral values and kind of

cracking down on this kind of cynical

dog eat dog

uh society the uh just a side note you

mentioned china so and you said we you

talk about we communists and you

distance yourself from soros and all

board foundation who i i think of them

as communists you mentioned

xi jinping i guess is that the only

communist who is a public figure that we

would not recognize that you would

consider a communist no there are

several within latin america there's

people like pedro castillo there's the

leader of the russian communist party uh

zayuganov there's other communists

throughout eastern europe leaders of

communist parties and you obviously have

communist states like vietnam

laos cuba and then also venezuela under

the

presidency of both hugo chavez and

nicholas maduro so there's many people i

would consider socialist or communist um

anybody in america

um it's a tricky question within america

because i think that there has been a

big confusion because of the history of

the cold war and the left-right division

leftists within america and liberals

have adopted the communist identity not

because they have any connection to

communism globally but because they just

want to kind of spite the right wing

similar to how people adopt the identity

of satanism despite

christians but within the united states

we have figures socialists or left-wing

figures that i would consider to be more

aligned with uh the global communists we

would like people like jimmy dore people

like jesse ventura figurehead figures

like uh caleb maupin who is himself a

devout christian while at the same time

being a socialist and a communist you

have people like you know michael

parenti and this is a new and growing

movement which i think in the future is

going to be much much larger than it is

now but for now unfortunately the

american left is dominated um by forces

subservient to the billionaire class and

to what we would consider the forces of

uh american capitalism you know um i

think of communism as exploiting the

natural fissures between society i've

heard that they for example race in

america they divide the races they

divide again worker from worker from

boss or whatever

so-called rich from so-called poor when

men from women just the lgbtiq madness

and i mentioned this at the beginning i

don't see you and the infrared people as

being so viciously anti-white so

anti-explicitly anti-christian anyway

how are you gonna get

your

how are you going to get communists to

become reasonable

well

i think you just have to look at the

name so communism it comes from this

common root of common right it's about

finding what is in common and that's why

for me

as americans if we're going to be

communists we're going to promote

communism we're going to try and promote

what is in common between the people we

don't want to divide people or

accelerate or promote these current

frivolous cultural divisions that are

being promoted by the media to distract

people from their real enemies we want

the american people to come together to

be reconciled with one another so as

they can focus their attention on their

real enemy which is the current american

establishment the current billionaire

class the current oligarchy and the

current uh monopolies especially in our

particular uh the big tech monopolies

whose power is so unprecedented that if

allowed to continue they may very well

lead to the destruction of our republic

and of any semblance of uh democracy

these unaccountable big tech companies

which are seemingly above the law and

don't have to answer to anyone who

aren't even being regulated in any

capacity so we want people to come

together we don't want to keep dividing

people along these identities now at the

same time we can recognize that there

are racial tensions in this country

there is a historical and ongoing and i

in my view injustice committed against

america's black people because they have

been denied the post civil war uh rights

of 40 acres in a mule right and that's

not you know some kind of total economic

equalization it's just the the minimum

of having a solid foundation with which

to build their own community i think

that's the last thing they need and

sorry to interrupt but yeah they've been

they've been given and given and given

it's been debilitating i i don't think

they have i don't i'm not speaking so

much of a handout to make them dependent

on the us government which i think the

democrats have played a part in trying

to it's in order to secure them as an

electorate what i'm speaking at is some

kind of fundamental just ability to own

something from which they can build

economically right and that's not that

doesn't take the form of just you know

being dependent on the government or

being dependent on welfare actually if

you look at the history of the united

states this ability for americans to go

and get their own land was the

foundation of american prosperity and

economic prosperity you had the um

forget the specific name of the act in

the 1800s which allowed americans who

were westward to be able to just pretty

much the homestead act yeah these things

were integral and for the prosperity and

economic flourishment of the united

states people were able to have their

own land and from there they could

proceed and build something and then

later on you had the populists and the

farmers alliance who are struggling to

have some kind of land reform and break

up the monopolies and you know have uh

the government

be able to regulate electricity and

things like this so that

monopolists couldn't use it to hurt the

little guy in my view the

the commie capitalism has made that

harder for people to afford things i

think blacks just as much as anybody

have the ability to to gain wealth in

this country but that ability definitely

is limited because of the subsidization

of subsidizing so-called education and

the corruption of education what has

made people and the subsidizing of

housing and the minimum wage those of

all those along with what you just said

have made things harder for normal

people to get along

and they have two they have men and

women working which has only made people

able to afford more but then they just

raise the prices and so so men and women

feel like they don't really have to but

they feel like they almost have to work

both of them and then they're separated

from their children it's a it's such a

corrupting influence has it has it not

been just one quick question i know i'm

adding things on top has it not been the

case that communists

exploited the divisions and

balkanization and all that stuff uh in

order to create a crisis and take power

um no so i think i'll just answer in

order just two things the first thing is

that i do agree that there are current

monopoly impediments to the general

americans ability to

flourish economically but i don't i

don't know if i agree that those things

are necessarily the minimum wage and the

subsidization of housing and education

although those being enamored and all

the bureaucratic red tape and corruption

that they are definitely do need to be

improved and made more efficient i i

agree but in general i think the number

one obstacle is actually the big

monopolies whether in the form of um you

know in housing you have financial

institutions like blackrock that are

buying up america's homes um and madison

what you call commie capitalism i think

i would call it and this is something

that people have referred to it in

america as a kind of socialism for the

rich i mean the the mainstream media

tells us we live in a free market

capitalist society but clearly you have

all these special grants and favors the

government does for the one percent and

for the monopolies right it it gives

them subsidies it gives corporations tax

breaks and subsidies the average

american doesn't have

access to there's tax loopholes that

allow special interests to be able to

gain the system and and basically rig

the system so i do agree we do have a

kind of socialism for the rich all i'm

advocating for as a communist is that we

have a socialism for the people um

instead and to me now the second thing

about um

the the is highlighting the difference

communists haven't tried to create

crisis uh in order to cease power they

were rather the ones that ceased power

as a result of crisis is that no one

else was able to

overcome for example in china you had

the um invasion by the jap

the japanese and communists had a very

important part in the war of liberation

and leading the chinese people against

the japanese imperialists

and the communists were the most

effective in being able to rally the

chinese people and unify actually the

chinese people rather than divide them

to create the people's republic it's not

really the communists that were dividing

people it was their enemies that were

promoting um various divisions between

them

in order for the ruling class of the

time to be able to maintain its grip on

power so again i think the primary goal

of communists is to unify people but

when we unify people you're gonna see

the establishment um the mainstream

media the special interests uh the

institutions the ngos the think tanks

all these kinds of uh universities

they're all going to rally together and

try to stop it so conflict will

inevitably be generated

because it's what we want what do you

think of trump and tucker well here's

what i'll say about trump um i'm

obviously not the biggest fan of trump i

think that he made many mistakes and i

think the primary mistake that trump

ended up making was that

he

had he was completely beholden to the

republican establishment and i don't

think trump really had any independent

direction i mean the media was labeling

him as a fascist and a nazi i don't

necessarily agree with that um i don't

know what trump's personal ambitions or

goals or loyalties were but i can't

appreciate the fact that he did

kick-start a movement um of americans

who were fed up with the system and who

were fed up with the establishment and

he gave them a sense of hope now do i

think trump do i believe trump himself

personally is going to be able to make

do on the expectations he's given to his

movement i don't necessarily think so

and that's why as communists we don't

necessarily want to go against

the trump movement and trump people we

rather want to um show them that there's

a more effective way to fight this

establishment um

than trump can i mean trump for example

was so i agree he was very much treated

unfairly by the media he was very much

uh you know lied about and so on and so

on but at the same time um i think as

communists we want to propose a more

effective and better way of combating

the same uh forces that were demonizing

trump better than trump himself could

right and also part of that means um

making more alliances right if you want

to reach out and make alliances with

leaders of the black community fed up

with these thousands because believe it

or not the black community is not you

know uh as loyal to the democrats as the

mainstream media is trying to say

there's many black people who are fed up

with the democratic establishment many

latinos are fed up with it right so i

think we want to reach out and make even

more broad alliances with uh these

groups maybe in ways that the current

trump movement hasn't uh been too

successful in doing i've noticed that

the um

the communist people who i call

communists the people that who commonly

think of the antifa black lives matter

and i have a broader definition than

than maybe others uh they exploit the

anger of the

so-called minorities it seems like with

this with this uh version of communism

that you have

you want to exploit the anger of

everybody you want to not exclude the

whites

and it seems ripe for that because

whites are getting

angry as well at what's going on they've

been demoralized lack of morals

and they see the injustice against

explicitly in many cases against them

and men too so

i don't know you might you might be

successful in this yeah i think um the

first thing i want to say is that you

know to me the

so-called antifa at least within the

united states they're very clearly foot

soldiers of the democratic establishment

now black lives matter as an official

organization received funding from

george soros we all know that

um

and obviously it's very it's very

ambiguous and mysterious to say the

least about what interest exactly

they're serving but all i could pretty

much say is that there are legitimate

grievances within the black community

but i think those grievances are being

turned against the democrats uh

themselves and as for antifa i think the

the

so-called antifa phenomena they're

they're calling themselves communists

and they're waving communist flags but

this isn't because they're actually

communists it's because they're trying

to instill fear in conservatives they're

trying to provoke fear

in the people that the so-called

deplorables that are against the

democratic establishment and because

most americans and this is a result of

the cold war have fearful attitudes

toward communism

these people are trying to exploit that

fear and make themselves into a boogie

man right now as far as the anger and

grievances that white people or men are

experiencing i don't necessarily think

this is because

uh

white people or or men are necessarily

oppressed but i think that um many

working class people happen to be white

happen to be men many ordinary regular

people and one of the ways that the

establishment is trying to sow division

between people is by you know um trying

to you know target or you know sow

racial divisions and and make people

feel bad or guilty because they're white

and and promote all this bullshit about

how we have to tear down

the statues of founding fathers and all

this kind of stuff

so i do agree that there's legitimate

anger there but i don't think that we

should sow more of the division and more

of this tension i think we should

recognize it as an attempt by those in

power to divide people right and what

communists want to do is we want to

bring people together um

because we think that they're being

distracted with this infighting from

their real enemy and that real enemy is

the american establishment and the

monopolies i don't know i

that is there is some truth to that but

um the enemy is within it's a good

versus evil and anything anybody with

anger is gonna be gonna end up working

against their own interests i don't

think that the black the black community

really has

legitimate grievances at least none of

that they're calling none that they're

uh crying about none that we hear crying

about in the mainstream at least the

black people that are being given

representation in the mainstream don't

necessarily represent grievances of the

black community i do think the black

community has many legitimate grievances

yeah sure um they don't have enough

self-determination and independence

they're ruled by police departments that

aren't really connected to the community

much in the same way that rural people

in the united states have been you know

since the 90s and the 2000s especially

ruled by these federal agencies that are

completely disconnected with them right

so are you aware of the amount of crime

that's happening in in these communities

and they're black they're i'm not

begging for more police right but i'm

not denying that there's a reality of

crime i just think it's a vicious cycle

in which the economic conditions that

are promoting crime uh namely from this

wholesale robbery and scamming of

america's

black population by the democrats

specifically

leads to the end you know the

attempt by the democrats that seems at

least clear to me

to target families right and make

families harder to start this creates a

vicious cycle which then leads also to a

vicious very vicious form of police

repression now i do agree that much of

the so-called black lives matter protest

we're not coming from black people but

we're coming from uh actually primarily

white leftists who are serving the

interests of the democrats i think it's

because the democrats have tried to

twist the legitimate grievances of

america's various minorities and turn

them into a way that will serve their

own interests even though the democrats

are the ones who have betrayed and

robbed these same people for decades now

our solution to that isn't to focus on

the anger and and you know aggravate

grievances but find a way that we can

come together in order to address our

common problems we don't really want

necessarily people to be angry we just

want people to feel powerful enough to

feel brave enough and to feel bold

enough to stand up what's for what's

right and to fight for their own

republic right to fight for republic by

for and of the people because these

corporations uh and our deep state is

nowhere to be found in our constitution

it's an overgrowth right on our republic

that was not intended by our founding

fathers and uh is threatening to devour

our republic itself now i want to make a

prediction i'm looking at the media and

i'm looking how they're promoting people

like meghan markle and it seems to me

they're trying to prepare her for some

kind of uh political existence or

presence and i find it a nightmare that

it's a possibility that our elites are

planning on dismantling our republic and

basically ins installing uh the british

crown to rule us right so i think this

is something we really have to keep in

mind and it's something as a communist i

want to get the word out on you

mentioned fighting for what's right how

are communists to fight for what's right

if they have no god no morals no

absolute standard they just do

by any means necessary is that not a

communistic line or is that just in

america religion by any means necessary

yeah well

religious faith is not dogma if if we

had an absolute standard it wouldn't be

faith we wouldn't need to have faith we

would be able to have a guarantee the

reason we have faith is we're putting

our trust in something we don't

necessarily know right i don't think i

don't believe the majority of communists

are without a god

um even as an atheist for most of my

adult life i have come to

see the value and importance of the

feeling of god at the very least right

um the presence of god right so i don't

necessarily it's not that communists are

against god it's just that we're

reluctant to focus too much on it

because it can very easily be twisted to

serve the opposite now the very

religious the great religions of the

world warn about this they warn about

how people um do things in the name of

god say things in the name of god uh

while in reality serving satan right

it's the you yourself pointed out

earlier that evil does disguise itself

in the form of good and as beautiful as

i consider the great religions of the

world it's precisely because of how

good true and beautiful that they are

that evil forces have used them for

completely opposite purposes

right so that explains really

historically the reluctance of

communists to really

get really deep into the religion but we

saw in the soviet union how for example

uh when the germans invaded their

country they rediscovered the russian

orthodox fate this pure sense of faith

divorced from the institutional

corruption of the church

um which i think was a more authentic

and uh real form of faith than the one

that existed before communism right so

we have to bear in mind communism is not

incompatible with religion i think you

can even go so far as to say that

communists merely want to do good in the

world we don't want to make heaven on

earth but we want to be good people in

this world we don't only want to focus

on the afterlife in heaven because this

world does matter what we do in this

world matters if we didn't believe that

then how could we how could we condemn

and recognize the evil of what our

elites are doing we clearly see that

this is evil because we know that what

happens in this world matters i think

that i think that everybody sees evil

but they're not good at diagnosing it

nor are they good at coming up with the

right solutions for it they end up

creating more evil it's like a it's like

an imitation of logic because karl marx

himself said it

his marxism cannot be conceived without

atheism and i think it's more i think

it's more than you're letting on the

reason there's confusion around this is

because historically religion had taken

the form of philosophy in marx's time

right marx wasn't thinking about

religion beyond philosophy and in the

philosophical sense marx was an atheist

he did wholeheartedly uh reject religion

but that's because in my view the

meaning of religion became perverted by

philosophy and what was once an

authentic and material form of faith

right just based in feeling and

intuition and true faith and conviction

uh turned into dogma and it turned into

this kind of absolute guarantee that's

that i view is inherently corrupt but i

don't i don't think that that you can

reduce people's religious feelings to

that i think people's religious feelings

is authentic marx also agreed it was

authentic marx called religion the heart

of a heartless world he said religion

was the only way people were able to

give expression to their authentic

humanity right whether or not you

believe that in building a more human

world religion is going to disappear we

can all agree that there is something

fundamentally good about religion marx

himself was making the point that the

problem is not religion the problem is

our current world and the evils that we

associate with religion are a reflection

of the evils of our world so it's it's

it's kind of more of a philosophical

issue that shouldn't be taken as face

value historical experience shows and

this is especially true in 2021 that in

no way is um

religion incompatible with communism

have you noticed that males who are

communists have a

like a female version of logic where

it's always excuse after excuse it's not

responsibility like the best the

solution for the black community is

responsibility it's not oh they have

these grievances the police the the

police are not the black community's

problem at all well here's what you

notice that they have like a female

mindset i would just say two things you

know first thing i want to say is i do

consider it an important feature of

manhood that we recognize we're not

going to insert ourselves in other

people's business right so i think black

people themselves are best equipped in

being able to diagnose their own

problems and what those are now i agree

the white left is trying to speak on

behalf of them and you know make excuses

or whatever i agree they they're trying

to speak for black people right but

regarding this kind of uh i guess you're

calling it female logic you don't really

find communist men in this country in

the united states all that much but

that's also because and this is

historically true and this is actually

true in the ex-communist states the

ruling elites and this is especially

true for this more overly socialized and

more urban people right the students and

people don't really work with their

hands they tend to be

more um less manly to say the least and

interestingly in eastern european

countries those are those people are

actually the right winger and it's the

communists who are more conservative and

down to earth and and so on and so on uh

i think this issue as far as manhood is

concerned um it is yeah it's really i

guess as a communist it is embarrassing

to see the type of communists that claim

to represent what this tradition is but

that's why i'm trying to set a different

example and several others are trying to

set a different example so that

communism won't be associated with that

anymore i do agree that the

so-called self-proclaimed uh leftists

and communists in america in the main

majority of them especially the ones

coming out of these universities

and academia they are fundamentally

morally spiritually um however you want

to put it bankrupt people um they have

no sense of honor they have no sense of

dignity they have very slimy you know

tactics i myself know this firsthand

because i've been victim of them right i

know how dishonest and inhuman and

dishonorable these people truly are

right i know that firsthand but at the

same time the way i see that is it's the

same reason why you see religions being

corrupted because to me

evil takes the form of good it disguises

itself as good but i do fundamentally

believe that at its core communism is

good i just think evil people in this

country specifically have been

corrupting it

um for completely and wildly different

ends that's human nature what religion

were you before you became atheist

i came from a shia muslim background

okay

uh last quick question i know that i

think we're running out of time the

hong kong protests

is

my impression is it was communist

students

fighting against the communist

establishment government what's your

take uh the issue with hong kong is is

very complex but needless to say as

we've noticed in the united states and

throughout the world you have uh vested

interests trying to promote these color

revolutions

and these fake revolutions it proved all

this social unrest and it's not really

uh it's not an organic like spontaneous

thing just like how we saw in the united

states with george soros funding

unrest and protests here these same

people were funding the unrest and

protests in hong kong now a lot of that

grievances of people in hong kong came

from the fact that there's no housing in

hong kong right there's no land for

people it's people can't find affordable

housing in it life is getting harder and

harder in hong kong that's also because

the communist government doesn't enforce

its economic policies in hong kong which

are very pro-people policies so it lets

hong kong have its own system this led

to a lot of grievances

that because it was exploited by global

uh forces was blamed on uh

the communist party right in hong kong

so i think we have to look at hong kong

also look at the protests in russia with

navalny look at the protests in belarus

look at the protests in latin america we

should all look at these in the same

lens with which we look at with the same

level of suspicion a lot of the unrest

that happens in this country

interesting ready to become a communist

james

no

his answers for me are has his answers

for me are they muddy the water they do

explain that a lot of this stuff is just

evil human nature but

i think that a lot of it is

um

one cannot tell what actually happened

in history look at look at how the media

lies about the present day so we don't

know who did what and what the motive

was they lie about charlottesville they

lie about the capital mostly peaceful

capital protests on january 6. they lie

about the black lives matter movement

they even seem to have haas

fooled on the black community's

uh grievances

so it's

to me i think it's a

who knows who cares type of thing as far

as the history goes i like to know

present day reality have responsibility

and not throw out

god with the bathwater

juicy any last thoughts infrared

um i think it was an overall productive

good conversation um

you know i guess i would say with

regards to the black community i think

this is our main point of contention

i would just recommend reaching out and

listening to many black leaders right

because these are not people who are

co-opted by the democrats they're

against the democrats and uh i do think

they they they authentically um you know

are leaders of their own community they

have

their own specific views and they're

completely demonized by the mainstream

media as well and it's something that

they have in common with american

conservatives

so i just

think that that's important for unity

but you know i do overall agree that the

media sews unnecessary division but at

the same time that doesn't mean we

shouldn't be trying to make an effort to

bridge those divisions because there are

in my view at least based in very real

realities i like to

yeah do you have any

who would be a black leader that you

think of as a leader

well historically you have organizations

like uh the nation of islam right oh man

yeah i mean you have uh you know you

have other you have the traditional

marcus garvey historically and it's

successors you have malcolm x

historically who famously called the

democrats the wolves and sheep's

clothing so it's a very rich tradition

and there are living people who um i

talk with blacks practically every day

on my on my radio show some of them have

sense some of them agree with me many of

them agree with me many don't many have

that anger they've taken on false

identities they think they're black

hebrew israelites or they have embraced

the

islam stuff the nation of islam what do

your parents think when you left the

shia muslim thing i i think they were

okay with it primarily because you know

i did have issues with religion growing

up but i've come to a perspective where

i have great respect and reverence for

all of the world's major religions and

also i have a new i acquired actually as

a communist a newfound appreciation for

christianity and in particular right

because of how closely entwined

communism historically has been with

christianity so to me um i find beauty

and truth in all the world's great

religions i think it's important that

we not get caught up in the identities

where you can't just tell where you

can't just tell people the truth on

for for example for the hake report i

call on my show i call i call blacks out

i call women out i call the black hebrew

israelites out and they can call in and

and uh disagree with me i call both the

rhinos and the democrats out the

mainstream media but i think that we

should be have the freedom the freedom

of speech to just say our impression

especially whites and men because

they're and christians they're some of

the most docile and submissive lately

and fearful and intimidated falsely

intimidated because you know look at

what is happening with kyle right now

he's charged with murder

over a clear case of self-defense people

are don't have justice and we have lost

a sense of justice and freedom here i i

definitely agree that i do believe that

americans freedom of speech has been

curtailed specifically and especially by

the big tech companies and regardless of

who i agree or disagree with i do think

people should be allowed to give

authentic expression to what they really

do believe and uh what they really do

feel because regardless of whether i

agree with it or not um it's a first

step in being able to come to an uh a

point of unity and mutual understanding

and as i i think a good example of this

was recently and let's not get into the

details of it because you know i'm on

twitch so yeah i'm not sure what but

recently with dave chappelle's netflix

special right and he was trying to just

give authentic you know expressions what

he believed and he was

he was he was cancelled for it he now

he's having trouble finding uh ways to

get his his movie published and stuff so

it's like his stuff published i mean so

you know

it's it's it's really a shame that we've

just created this culture of lying and

people not even being honest because

they're too scared to speak what's on

their mind you know one quick other

point you mentioned black leaders i

think that one of the problems with men

is that we have people that we put put

up as leaders we should not be doing

that we should be our own leader and

then we unite together and work together

and somebody if somebody's going to be a

a president like a trump then

that's fine but he is not he has not put

up on a pedestal where

he is influencing our thought any more

than any other man would be you and you

can hear the truth from any man even

even your enemy i i agree with that i do

agree that we should we shouldn't get

caught up in as men you know especially

as men and i can't speak for women

because i'm not a woman right so i can

just speak for men because that's what i

am

um so i'm not assuming that they they're

different i'm just you know i agree that

we we shouldn't be relying and putting

our putting all of our trust in just

other men right part of being a man is

being your own man having your own

thoughts and being able to think for

yourself so i completely agree with that

you know

um

i think that's been the pro part of the

problem with the black community is

they've had these people that they've

propped up as leaders and they've made

them into heroes and you see it you see

me

human nature to do that especially

nowadays because here's the thing is

that i think ultimately i believe that

black people themselves know what's best

and know how to best diagnose their own

problems right i think that they need

our help we're all human beings and we

all have the freedom of speech and they

can they can hear the truth from other

races they need to learn to do that

especially whites

they close their minds to whites and

it's not good for them well i don't know

if that's necessarily true because they

just have different experiences you know

they have a different situation they

have different uh circumstances right

and oftentimes it's hard for white

people to relate to that because they

don't share those same experiences and

same circumstance but they're but

they're all nose up against this

imaginary problem that that's called

racism whereas whites don't have that

blind spot and sometimes it takes

somebody from the outside looking in to

see through the the madness and

occasionally someone will wake up well

listen that also manifests in the form

of white people not experiencing this

this racism right so if they haven't

experienced it

it doesn't exist

well

that's i think where we would

definitely have to disagree i think

racism is a real thing if racism is real

then blacks are the primary offenders i

i don't agree but one thing i can say is

that to me as far as i'm concerned um

the democrats

uh

are a very racist party and are a big

source of what i would consider real

white supremacy i don't think that rule

ordinary americans

are the main culprits of white supremacy

i think it's actually the democrats and

the liberals who are the most uh

effective sources of racism you think

white supremacy is is happening in

america

obviously yeah i don't know i don't know

which america but i i just think that i

just think ordinary americans and rural

americans who are white actually have