Confronting the enemy...

The I'm from the Hall Knock Academy automatically had to be carrying automatic, sparrant, and accurate.

Lips to the back as they barrel cock and immaculate.

Learned to move packages in the United at Los Angeles, we savages.

Busting off rounds, spraying banana clips, knocking pounds off them like Anna Nicole Smith.

Shit, I'm in the hood, walking with choppers, cocking and popping and coppers.

Glocks be talking like blockety block blocker i probably pop hopper and possibly just forgot where i tossed them this niggas obnoxious me and top got your bitch in the cockpit she want a pit stop just to see how the cops spit these bosses deposit the profit then why do we copping on top of the ostrich and foxes i used to be a little bastard with stress now i'm a boss where i'm firm with a lasca on my chest yes see i know you like my swagger. You know I'm struck when I come through.

Chain hanging like Alibaba.

You know me, you know how I do.

The way that I move, nigger.

You never don't get it, because I'm too smooth, nigger. You never don't get it, because I'm too smooth, nigger.

You never don't get it.

I got you new, nigger.

You never don't get it, but you ain't got a clue, nigger.

Who in the hell left the gate open?

I put it down for the wild wild west like the 1800s and them stage coaches.

It fun strapped in my blaze poking but ain't a six hundred big body the six four hundred spoken the drama spokesman streets endorsed them i'd be opening up my nine and closing my coffin i'm from west covenna ain't Compton. Still money passed around like we take in the offering. I'm something like a phenomenon. When they see the sad happy faces, then they know that the drama's on. It's the West Coast back at your front door We up close in person

No ain't done to the curtains closed

Could be friend of foe love it or hate it

I'm the king but I play with the aces

Run up to find God I keep it loaded like basses

Get wires in your mouth and these ain't braces

Hey See I know you like my swagger

You know I'm strapped when I come through

Chain hanging like Ali Biber

You know me, you know how I do

The way that I'm new, nigga

You never don't get it

Because I'm too smooth, nigga

You never go get it

I bought you a new, nigga

You never go get it

But you ain't got a clue, nigger

You never go get it

See when I walk through the door

I wonder why these fake niggas jockin' before

On display like I can't mistow

You know posing like a mannequin in front of your hole

Off front block more than 50 deep now

Convict surrounding the whole compound Because you don't really want what you're staring at clip full of bullets don't mind sharing that fancy i know you like my swagger you know what's track when i come through Chain hanging like

Ali Diver

You know me

You know how I do

The way that I move

Nigger

You never don't get it

Because I'm too smooth

Nigger

You never go get it

I got you new nigger

You never don't get it But you ain't got a clue Nigger You never go get it. I watch you lose, nigger. Never don't get it.

You ain't got a clue,

nager.

Never going to get it.

Get it, get it. Woo! I'm from the Hard Knock Academy automatically had to be carrying automatic spraineratic and accurate

clips to the back of it

barrel cock and immaculate

learn the mood packages

in the nat of Los Angeles

we savages

busing off rounds

spraying banana clips

knocking pounds off them like Anna

Nicole Smith

shit I'm in the hood

walking with choppers

cocking and poppin the coppers

Glax be talking like blockety

blocker I probably pop

Hoff and possibly just forgot where I tossed

them this nigga's obnoxious

me and top got your bitch in the cockpit

she wanted pit stop just to see how the cops spit

These bosses deposit the profit

And why just we copping on top of the ostrich and foxes

I used to be a little bastard's dressed

Now I'm a boss where I'm from with Alaska on my chest.

See, I know you like my swagger.

You know I'm track when I come through.

Chain hanging like Alibaba.

You know me, you know how I do.

The way that I move, nigga. You never don't get it how I do The way that I'm new, nigga

You never go get it

Because I'm too smooth, nigga

You never go get it

I got you new, nigga

You never go get it

But you ain't got a clue, nigger

Who in the hell left the gate open

I put it down for the wild wild west like the 1800s and them stage soldiers.

It fine strapped in my blaze poking.

It ain't a 600 big body, the 6,400 spoken.

The drama spokesman, streets endorsed them.

I'd rather be opening up my nine and closing my coffin i'm from

west covena this ain't comptin still money passed around like we take in the offering i'm

something like a phenomenon when they see the sad happy faces then they know that the drama's on it's the west coast back at your front door

we up close in person no ain't done to the curtains closed could be friend of foe love it or

hate it i'm the king but i play with the aces run up to find out i keep it loaded like basses

Get wires in your mouth

And these ain't braces

See I know you like my swagger

You know I'm strapped when I come through

Chain hanging like Ali Bava

You know me, you know how I do.

The way that I move, nigger, you never don't get it,

because I'm too smooth, nigger.

You never don't get it.

I thought you new, nigger.

You never don't get it, but you ain't got a clue, nigger.

You never go get it, get it. See when I got a clue nigga Never go get it

See when I walk through the door

I wonder why these fake

niggas jock and they phone

On display like I can't

Mustow

You know

posing like a mannequin in front of your

hole

Off front block

On a 50 deep now

convicts around

in the whole compound

because you don't really want

what you're staring at

clip full of bullets

don't mind sharing that

so I know you like my swagger

you know I'm struck when I come through.

Chain hanging like Dalibaba.

You know me, you know how I do.

The way that I move, nigga.

You never don't get it.

Because I'm too smooth, nigga.

You never don't get it. I got you new, nigga. You never don't get it Because I'm too smooth, nigga You never don't get it

I bought you new, nigga

You never don't get it

But you ain't got a clue, nigga

You never go get it

Get it, get it convict. Convick

Convick Convick

Hey

Hey

Hey

Hey

Go gangster

Hey

Hey

Hey

Hey

Hey Geb Black Boy y'all With me Let's get this Hey, hey, hey, go gangster, keep bobbing.

Block boy, y'all.

Let me, let's get this bitch popping.

Up front of all that.

Go, gangster, keep popping.

Like back when the necker was clocking.

See, nowadays seems like everybody want to be killed.

Guerrillas getting high up, they weed and liquor.

You die quicker.

Her medics drive back slow to the hospital.

You get pronounced dead at full.

The hospital.

Stop fucking when you know you won't pull none.

First quicker to retreat when the tools busts. Playing with death is bad for your health.

All your homeboys are strong.

You're the last one left.

They're hearts beating, but these nickers be scared.

Real ones are all locked up a day.

Nowadays you can't find a good connect.

But if you

do you might be

the best

I don't know you

don't know me

you don't know

the history

I got on these

streets only if you

see what my

eyes have seen

then you'll

understand why

I'm surrounded

by jeez

if you owe me, we got beat

I recommend you reach for you eating no frees

Mars for a minute guarantee you're gonna bleed

Because that's how we was raised growing up in these streets

Go gangsta, keep popping Rock with me. Let's get this bitch popping. Go gangster. Keep popping. Like back when the knicker was classy. See, it's all

good, but easy to do evil. And I ain't really into me with new people

just put the money in the bag and I'll leave you

get the weak oakland bull or diesel

You make a hundred dollars to the streets you made a cheat

When your copper nose they swam you move keys

Bears getting close and the rats seem cheese

and they're trying to find them birds

not the one of sneaky trees

We got that bird

We got that blue

You want short skirts

We got that too

Whatever you need

My nigga show me the cheese

And baby you could believe

That we can make that prove

I don't know you don't know me

You don't know the history I got on these streets only if you see what my

I see

When you'll understand why I'm surrounded by jeez

If you owe me Or we got beef

I recommend you reach

For you eating no freeze

For us for a minute

guarantee you gonna bleed

Because that's how we was raised

woman up in these streets

Go gangsters

Get a pop

Rock rip me let's get this bitch Let's get this bitch pop A Go gangsta, A, pop Rock with me, let's get this bitch pop

A

Go gangster

Keep pop

Like back

When the nick of a clock

Street's been watching

And they don't blink

Sidewalk got tears

The payment no sleep

The Titest will survive

And we just don't eat

Everybody in between

Just getting a rap sheet

The street's been watching

And they don't blink

Sidewalk, got ears

The payment no sleep

We'll survive

And everybody in the street A worksheet I don't know I'm so blind I'm never running

between

I don't know you

you don't know me

We don't know the history

I got on history

Only if you see

what minds have seen

Then you'll understand why I'm

If you owe me We we got beef, I recommend you reach for you eating on a freeze.

Mars for a man, again, you're gonna be.

Just how we was raised where we were helping these streets.

Yo, gangsta, keep robbing.

Rock with me, let's get this bitch popping.

Go gangster, keep popping.

Like back when the knicker was clocking.

Go gangster, keep bobby.

Rock with me, let's get this bitch Bop

Go gangsters

Hip pop

Life back

In the neck of

What's clock

Hey

I'm gonna be

gangsters

I'm really

I'm a new baby

I'm a new baby

See me I'm a new baby See me I'm a new baby I'm really in I'm with new babies I go Beardust To be I'm really

Ending

I'm a new

Peas

I go to be

good

Eager to do evil

I ain't really

A bit

Convict

Yeah

This one Sadie Sadie Sadie Cady Coddy Coddy Coddy Yeah, yeah, yeah. Shady, Shady.

Convick music.

Guess who's best?

Who's bad?

Still with here, haters.

A. Con and Obey.

Trice.

Yeah.

What you gonna do with it, eh?

What you gonna do with it, eh?

What you gonna do?

Come on back to the screen.

I'll keep the 40 cow on my side.

Stepping with the monster of a monster.

You see a nigga pass by.

Touch your chain in because he might rob you got clocks for sale

where cops for sale

anything that you need

I'll leave you I'm gonna lace you

just dope whatever you do

stitch because you will get hit

pray I don't place you

yeah

This wrist eat a bitch tin the rise out of nigga his history will get hit. Pray I don't face you. It's risky.

The bitch tend to rise out of nigger.

His history snitch.

Who decided he's a member?

Once he got pinched,

coincided with law.

Same homie say he lay it down for the ball.

Brought gang squad around ours.

How could it be been homie since superman draws only phoniness never came

the par he had us a true neighborhood actor had his back with caves now we see form like x-rays cuffed in that

adam car no matter his loss we at him it's war knowing out

to cross those reservoir dogs you help plant seeds just to be a vegetable when we invest in

team is to the death for show no ex and o's textose Texcalicos Aimed at your chest

Nika

I keep the 40-calf on my side

Stepping with the

Monde of a monster

See a nigga pass by

Touch your chain in

Because he might rob you

Got Cox for sale Red Tops for sell Anything you got Cox for sale

Red Cox for sale

Anything that you need

I'm gonna lace you

Just go whatever you do

Stitch because you will get hit

Pray I don't lace you

We started out as a crew

When one speak it's all honest

Private conferences when we eat

Benny honors

Reconicists when we peat

Enemies on us

Been in these corners

Selling like anything on us

Knowing heaven is shorn us

Being devils minors

That ain't got shit to do

With the tea in China

We gonna keep the grind

up to death refined us.

Meantime, leaning in them European

whips reclined up. It's I-4-9

for the riders. We ain't trying to get

locked up. We sow survivors.

Popos is cowers. It's no U.S.

ours. We vowed this. Mix mixing Yale with soda powder. Who would have known he would fold and cow. Once the captain showed, he sold the old McDonald's so it's no ex and owes. Teps calicoes. Ain't just a chest nickel. I keep the 40-cat on my side.

Stepping with the mind state of a mobster.

You see a nigger fast by.

Touch your chain in, because he might rob you.

Got clocks for sale, where docks for sale.

Anything that you need

really need

I'm gonna lace you

Just don't

Whatever you do snitch

Because you will get hit

I pray

I don't face you

Nowadays

Sammy the bulls

Got the game full

So he moved to a rural

area to keep cool

They're snitching on a snitch now

It's nothing to tell

Nowadays your circles should be small as hell

Ain't trying to meet new faces

This don't interest me

Even if we bubble slow we get it eventually

No penitentiary though we no clemency

You will meet the Lord snitching giving us a century.

These cats is rats now, the streets need decon.

That's how they react now.

Weak when the heaps on them.

Stop snitching, you ask for the life you live in this act.

It's not permitted nowhere on the map.

It is forbidden

and send a nigga

to prison

if you've been in it

along with them

and then snitch

and become hidden

so it's no

X-N-Os

takes calicoes

aimed at your chest

and the gun

I keep the 40 cow

on my side

stepping with the

monster you see a nigga you see a nigga fast by out on my side Stepping with the mindset of a monster

You see a nigga

Fast bye

Touch your chain in

Cause he might rob you

Got Cox for sale

Red drops for sale

Anything that you need

Believe me

I don't lace you

Just don't Whatever you do, sticks

because you will get hit, pray I don't face you, yeah, you wrecked, bastard. The The The and I'm a

Oh

I'm Oh and you know

I'm

I'm

I'm and you're going to

I'm

running

and I'm I'm I'm I'm The and the I'm

a lot

I'm The and I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm not

I'm

and

I'm not

I'm

I'm I'm a

and

I'm not you know, I'm going to

I'm

I'm The I'm going to be able to Oh my Yo, what's up.

What is going on, everybody?

We have a very nice show lined up today, assuming the enemy shows up.

Well, some of our enemies, not all of them or even the main ones.

But I wanted to have a special stream tonight.

I wanted to give the public an opportunity to basically ask me questions directly,

confront me with their criticisms, whatever. Because although I think the enemy has suffered a major

defeat, more on that later, I think that the public, you know, is confused and maybe deserves some kind of explanation.

Well, not necessarily an explanation, but they deserve to have their confusions cleared up and their questions cleared up and so on and so on i did do a huge stream friday

pretty much there's a youtube video or whatever but just in general i think that right now what's happening that i've noticed which is really interesting

is that this is all introduced a lot of people to the American Communist Party.

I think that the wreckers actually ended up accomplishing the opposite of what they originally intended to.

Their goal was to basically say that ACP was this

crazy cult or whatever, but I actually think that most people who were opposed to us already

had that impression, that our party was just a joke, that it is just a cult of

Haas or Jackson, and it's a grifting, and it's a crypto scheme and whatever. And I think that

the first party controversy actually revealed to people that we are a party that has a diversity of different

opinions and viewpoints inside of it. And it has internal politics. And when people are

unprincipled and undisciplined, those internal divisions can actually explode for the entire public to see.

And I actually think that it's given people, it's actually made people take the party more seriously.

It's made them more interested in it. We can confirm this on our end. It has increased interest in our party. It's made people more curious about us, not only in negative ways, by the way. I think people were very shocked to see this controversy and scandal because they just assumed that everyone who's in the party, you know, it's just one homogenous uniform thing. And it's absolutely not that. It's definitely a political organization, both in the sense that it has politics within

American politics, but there's internal politics and political dynamics, and it absolutely is not

reducible to, well, first of all, the notion that it's a grifting scheme i think is

comprehensively debunked okay um now people understand this is a party with actual beliefs

and goals and and people that are committed to it and so on and so on and so on.

And feds are willing to wreck it.

I think people can see that.

Feds are actually trying to wreck

and take interest in it

and clamp down on it and tear it apart

using classic coin till pro tactics

and so on and so on so um i am very

impersonally noticing an uptick in interest in both me that's always fun hi everyone both me personally and the party um as a whole but uh negative and

positive not just positive i'm saying also negative people are starting to become very intimately interested in me,

which I'm always flattered by because, you know, I consider myself to be quite a...

William! Thank you for reminding me not to talk about myself,

because that's incredibly narcissistic.

William with the 9, thank you so much. I appreciate you, man.

Appreciate you so much.

No, I think that... Basically, I think the change that's been happening

in the world is that there are a lot of losers

who have this idea that you don't

need to have skin in the game. And that anything

that becomes real in real life

basically just becomes a clown show

and that the solution is to black pill and become a

doomer and just to give up and I think that the acceleration of political changes that's happening

in the United States is quickly revealing to people that you don't even have that choice.

You actually have to be committed and have skin in the game,

or else your politics and your political opinions are totally fucking worthless.

Okay?

If you want to black pill, you should just admit to the world that you're a depressed fucking loser.

Because what you're really communicating to the world, by the way, I don't have anyone

in particular in mind, it just occurred to me that this could be misinterpreted.

And I want to go out and say i'm not

talking about yankee um i'm not talking about joey joey's a fighter he's strong i know he's kind of

going through something but i'm definitely not talking about him he's definitely somebody who has skin in the game.

And, you know, I don't want you guys to...

If Joey is telling you guys, you know, he's feeling depressed or some shit.

I feel like that is actually courageous what he's doing

because he's being honest.

Like a lot of these people that are depressed

just become fucking wreckers and psychopaths.

He's straight up from the heart

telling you guys how he's going.

And, you know, you guys should support each other.

You shouldn't tear each other down.

You know, I know we can't be weak out here.

I'm not, that's not what I'm saying.

But you shouldn't punish people.

You should show mercy.

You know, show people mercy and keep giving them chances.

And people say, oh, we give people so many chances.

And it's like, well, keep doing it, you know, until people can figure it out.

Anyway, so I'm not talking about that, but I'm talking about a specific kind of like

pseudo-leftist nihilism.

It's kind of manifesting now into this weird fringe ultra-left, leftcom com and the KKE supporting retards and

and so-called Maoists and stuff

it's just this kind of black pill where

they assume a position of arrogance that

everything in the real world

is a clown show and that they're

somehow correct, right? But in

reality, those people

are engaging in a desperate

cry for help to the world

and what they want is to be hugged.

And that's fine. If that's what you want, just say it.

I'm not saying anyone's going to give it to you, but you can definitely just be honest about the

fact that you are in a weak state emotionally and personally but you don't have a right

to intervene in politics because of that you don't have the right to make these grand

metaphysical and political claims just because you personally happen to not have your shit together psychologically,

and you happen to be depressed and blackbilled or whatever.

And that's kind of my message to this new nihilism that I see is gaining traction

where people are just

kind of like, oh, ha ha,

I'm just going to make fun of everything

and like, well, what are you making fun of?

You're literally the punchline.

You're the clown, you know?

Being in real life means that you're going to be flawed, okay?

The bluff of formalism is such that you have no skin in the game.

You never actually have to reveal the contradictions which propel your development

and your existence as a human being, you could just pretend when you're anonymous or when you're

whatever, that you're just this perfect person who has no flaws at all and that you have your shit together somehow

because you've read...

These people don't even read books, by the way.

But I digress.

Because you're signaling the correct viewpoints, you know, or something.

It means it's total nonsense, all right?

You have no skin in the game and you're not willing to risk demonstrating to the world

that you are an imperfect human being.

You are not a perfect person.

You have flaws. You have defects.

And someone has to do that. And the reason someone has to do that is because people need the mercy of

recognition. Okay. People in the real world need the mercy of recognition, okay?

People in the real world need the mercy of being shown that they don't need to constantly be tortured and constantly need to suffer because they're not living up to a false notion of perfection, that there are, that, that, you know, that this is something true for our reality in general.

And I think that's especially true when it comes to even politics. So many people that are in debt

somehow think that it's their

problem and that it's embarrassing

and they don't want to tell anyone

and they're trying to hide it as much as they can.

Somebody needs to come out here and represent these people and recognize them and they can recognize.

You know, likewise. To understand this is a fundamental existential state our country is in, you know and it's not just an individual problem

and there's so many things that applies to actually not just debt there's so many other things

that applies to, especially economically, right?

So I wanted to say that.

But nonetheless, we're going to be getting right into the Q&A.

And, well, in terms of announcements stay tuned

um really for real anyway let's get right into it.

So I've started the space. We can wait for people to get in. We can continue onto the theme and topic of what we were talking about. But the party is going to be entering into its recruitment drive phase within the next two weeks, I believe.

It was slightly delayed, actually,

because of the sad little wrecking attempt

that a few people

tried or attempted, but

we're going to go push forward with it.

And we're going to go push forward with it. And we're going to be moving forward with our critical plans and strategies with respect to the labor movement and so on and so on.

And everything is on track.

Everything is on track to be what it is.

I think I also need a co-host, by the way.

I'm going to need a co-host not to participate,

but to bring people up and see people that are requesting to speak that I cannot see.

So I'm going to need some kind of co-host.

Let me see.

I don't know if Orvo speaks.

I think Orvo, I think, is someone who's, like, blocked a lot because he has the infra globe as his profile picture. So maybe that's not a good idea. Maybe Slava, if Slava wants. You don't have to stay the whole time because I know you probably can't stay up too late, but let's have Slava co-host.

Why not? It's an ACP Q&A. If you want, you don't have to.

So somebody named Tribune of the future.

Let me just see what this person's ideological background is so i have an idea of what uh what to expect is this a right winger

i think this is somebody coming from the right.

Anyway, we can bring them anyway.

Let's go ahead.

Tribune, go ahead.

Go ahead. go ahead uh mr chairman thank you for giving me the chance to speak i've respect to you for the way

you've handled the party ring issue and staying your course.

My question is this.

How's the party handling the tension right now in the U.S., where we have a lot of state-level

Dems, governors, representatives who are fighting, attempting to nullify executive

orders attempting to block what Trump's doing. Is this a contradiction in the bourgeois

U.S. state

that we should be pressing to

develop. And if so, what

side, what side is

your party pushing on?

And finally, if this

escalates to a worse crisis

where we potentially see conflicting orders given to national guard units like we've seen in Texas in the past year, who do you back? Thank you. Actually a very good question. So right now, I think that as crazy as this sounds, we are actually trying to figure out what's going on still.

And to come to a solid position and conclusion about, you know, with respect to the contradiction you just described, what's whose victory would be more beneficial to us. And I don't want to say who we should back because obviously the answer is we're not going to back either side, right?

But we are trying to understand which forces represent the reactionary force and, you know, maybe I wouldn't say progressive, but maybe the one that's going to allow us to have a little more wiggle room.

So that's actually something we're continuing to wait to play out because we really don't have a very clear idea of which actors involved in this contradiction, what they represent, and so on and so on.

I actually encourage party discussion on this matter. I encourage people to investigate and study it and allow

us to have a better

appraisal of what's

going on right now.

But that aside, that

very specific thing aside,

I think that we are

assuming a position of absolute independence. We absolutely foresee that the

contradiction you just described is going to lead to a constitutional crisis. And I think that what I can

say kind of confidently is that regardless of which side wins we are

going to be very very active in contesting whatever reconstitution they're going to be proposing so if the

democrats propose a reconstitution it's going to be proposing. So if the Democrats propose a reconstitution,

it's going to be about overturning the results of the 2024 election.

If Trump's side is proposing a reconstitution,

we speculate that Silicon Valley is going to have a big part in that, and the whole neo-feudal agenda is going to be there.

And also the imperial tendency, not just in terms of Lenin's imperialism, but strangely in terms of political formations that are emerging, such as the extreme centralization

of the government, as well as the imperial designs on Mexico and Panama, and Cuba and Venezuela,

for that matter. So we are assuming a position of Marxist, Leninist, conservatism.

Let me clarify what that means.

Not conservatism with Slava, kick that person, please.

Not conservatism with respect to U.S. political divisions,

but just like a steady, you know,

classical Orthodox Marxist-Leninist line,

and we're not going to budge.

We're going to maintain our independence.

We absolutely foresee a breakdown of the constitutional order, and we are absolutely going to be carving out a piece of whatever comes in the aftermath of that.

And I'm not saying that in terms of carving out a piece of the hegemony.

I'm saying carving out a piece of contesting the outcome.

And I will allow you to interpret that as vaguely as you want to.

But thank you for the question.

And let's get to the next person a go ahead somebody

uh what's up in the bathroom before they had to excuse themselves anyway sorry go ahead

i'm i've read a decent amount of your recent article in Red America on the Special Military Operation, but I still don't fully understand. What's your reason for backing the Special Military Operation?

Yeah, the article I wrote was very philosophical, and I guess it was, it wasn't like a

political, well, it was obviously political, but it was highly philosophical and highly

theoretical.

More concretely, why I back or I sympathize with Russia's special military operation is because I think it started a world revolution in the political superstructure, the global political superstructure, the so-called rules-based

world order. I think that Russia's defiance of that order has opened the way for many other

anti-imperialist or counter-hegemonic actors, both domestically within the West and the United States, and externally in the so-called global South, in Africa, and Latin America, and in the Middle East. You know, there would be no October 7th without February 22nd, so to speak.

So that is why I support it.

I regard it as revolutionary, historically speaking.

It's the simplest way I could put it.

Don't you feel as though, I mean, when I see Jackson, you know, taking the stances that he does, especially with regard to the culture war, it feels as though he kind of like takes this juicence in just kind of like uh i don't know what the correct word would be

but just like gloating at the uh reactionary turn that i feel the country has gone through. You know, it feels like

I guess... I think...

With all due respect, I don't mean to cut you off.

I want to

be able to answer everyone in orderly

and quick way. But I understand

what you're asking. And I would ironically

respond that I think that in terms of

um the form of media i actually think that your sentiments reflect a reactionary view

and what i mean by that i will i'll pre it very precisely. I think that modernity is about

a kind of dimension of nowness, things that are happening now, instantaneously, where there is not

enough time to react or think about it or whatever.

And the tendency of modernization goes in such a direction that it increasingly closes the amount of time we have to reflexively respond to things that are happening,

whether through contemplation, whether through making moral decisions,

all the way up to social media algorithms,

playing on the most unconstitutional, you know, uh, social media algorithms, um,

playing on the most

unconscious and carnal,

um,

desires of people,

you know,

there's no moral,

uh,

intellectual,

whatever mediation whatsoever. It's only fans, girls, it's violence, it's whatever, brain rot is what they're calling it, I think. So that is, I guess, how it has reached a degenerate tendency in many ways.

But on the other hand, when it comes to politics, the trend of the modernization of media is absolutely irreversible.

And I think that a lot of the problems people have with Jackson is that he represents

the modernization of media.

And they're coming from a reactionary perspective where you'll hear a bunch of different

criticisms, Jackson's, He's sexist.

He's misogynist.

He's this or he's reactionary.

But all these criticisms boil down to the view that Jackson is just not...

He's too quick.

He's not taking enough time to basically reflexively condition his his injection into the

algorithm that he's engaging in. And I would say that Jackson very artfully maneuvers the highly modernized social media algorithm and form while actually carving out a plan and a strategy to to

to catalyze and facilitate

the dominance of a very specific outlook

and a very specific ideology and perspective

and it's not always clear how he's doing that directly, just because every single post,

he's not directly saying things that directly seem to reflect Marxist theory or communist ideology.

But indirectly, they do.

And before anyone criticizes Jackson, I would like them to think very carefully and holistically about how that is. I mean, sure, he could tweet

something and he'll say, well, directly, he's not waving a red flag.

Directly, he's not mentioning Marx and Lenin.

But indirectly, what is he actually communicating?

What is he signaling?

And what does that actually communicate?

Oftentimes people miss the point.

There's so many tweets he'll make where the point is actually to influence people in such a direction

so as to be more sympathetic to Russia than they otherwise would be.

But you have a handful of reactionary leftists or pseudo-leftists will see that,

and they'll say, well, this is not conforming to my ideology this is not speaking to me

but they're falsely assuming that they are the subject

they're falsely assuming that the point of social media

is just to say you know uh... to to directly reflect an ideological form, when in reality, social media is about directing consciousness in a certain direction.

So you have to understand where the baseline is.

If Jackson is tweeting in favor of social conservatism, it's probably because a huge portion

of his audience is already socially conservative.

So what is the actual content of his tweets oftentimes?

It's that Russia or China endorse social conservatism.

So here you have a bunch of people who might politically have come from the right direction or the conservative direction, the religious direction, who are more sympathetic to China, North Korea, and Russia than they were yesterday, thanks to Jackson's influence.

So this is an example of the logic that underlies his strategy.

And I think people really miss that. A lot of people are too quick to point out that he's alienating people.

But the people that he's alienating academics, these are a small minority of the population compared to the one that's actually decisive and important for opposing militarism and imperialism in war.

So.

I really appreciate that perspective, first of all, but I'd like to say that I think Jackson went too far, and I get

that it's just a tweet, but you can't pledge full support for Andrew Tate and claim to be a

communist. That man is a rapist and a

sex trafficker most likely.

We don't have the evidence

for that necessarily, but he's

admitted to so much. Aside from the question of

Jackson pledging full support, which I

think is, again, it's not a,

it doesn't appreciate the modern nature of social media

it's modern it's not you're not supposed to read too much into it or assume he's making this

grand metaphysical statement but even if I were even if I were to directly just to claim is it okay for jackson to support

in any way or express approval in any way of andrew tate despite the fact that he has a history

of being involved in the sex trade and and sexual and allegations of sexual assault.

I have a very simple question I'll just ask you.

What is your opinion of Fidel Castro?

I generally support Fidel Castro.

Was it okay for Fidel Castro to meet with Malcolm X and support Malcolm X?

Do you think the way Malcolm X relates to women is something that the modern woman sympathizes with more than Andrew.

Well, no, we're not talking about sympathy.

We're talking about the fact that Malcolm X used to be a pimp in his past.

He had a history as a pimp.

He was directly involved in the sex trade.

It's a decent point.

I think the final thing that I'll say...

Also, I'm not done yet, though.

What do you think about the Black Panther Party?

I generally support the Black Panther Party.

I know your...

But the Black Panther Party in its leadership...

I know your example of the Leather's leader,

who publicized his sexual assaults in Soul on Ice, which was released in

1969, I believe, during his time in the party.

And it was public and everyone knew about it.

And he wasn't endorsing it, by the way,

but he was admitting to that past,

which was far worse than anything Andrew Tate

is accused of, by the way.

So am I comparing Andrew Tate

to the Black Panther Party

and said Malcolm X because of his politics

or because of his... No, but I'm saying when people just make this statement that, oh, how could you, how could Jackson in any context ever express support for or a positive view of Andrew Tate because Andrew Tate has this background. Well,

there are plenty of figures that leftists approve of without any criticism whatsoever, really,

who have worse backgrounds. Okay. And I think it's fair that if people can support Malcolm X in the Black Panther Party,

Jackson has the right to positively encourage Andrew Tate to continue having a more or less progressive foreign policy outlook when it comes to U.S.

imperialism, specifically when it comes to Russia and North Korea and so on and so on.

And nobody's saying that Jackson shares Andrewrew tate's ideology but it is generally good

for as many large influencers as possible to support counter hegemonic foreign policy positions, regardless of whatever problematic

paths or backgrounds that they may have.

Fair enough. I think the final thing that I would finish with is it is of the

utmost importance that we

have collective discipline in

the organization that you run

and it is of the utmost

importance that you have

faithful

a faithful relationship to the truth.

I think that you generally do a good job,

but I think that you could do a better one.

That's fair.

I mean, we could all be better, and we're all learning.

And look, I will fully confess to the world that I don't have experience

running an organization this is running a political organization this is the first time

this is the first time for a lot of us. We're not experienced.

But this is a kind of thing where it's like when the job says you need at least five years of experience.

Well, how do you get the experience? Where do you get it from?

Well, that's the kind of place that we're at when it comes to communist politics in the USA.

Where are we going to get the experience in terms of building organizations?

Because the ones that existed so far turned out to be complete and total failures. And again, I tried for three years in the CPU. I wasn't in there, but I tried to intervene within the CPUSA or encourage my followers to go there and bring new life to it. And even though they would ban me and smear me, I still kept the course. It's just that it became impossible to be politically involved in that organization for anyone because their recent

national Congress, they pretty much just totally rigged it and they were so unresponsive

to the pressing and very modern nature of the tasks where the issues were facing forget tasks

the issues were facing alone that you know we found it necessary life and death to reconstitute that party and here we are nobody's

saying that our party is perfect or is in the most advanced and best state it could possibly ever be in

but we are saying it is a party and that is much more than anyone else can really

say, you know?

I agree with that and think that the American Communist Party is the best hope that, you know,

Americans have of working people

coming into power

and that's all I have.

Thank you.

Appreciate it.

So,

Sammy.

Hey,

Haas.

Good to talk to you. I actually used to be in the ACP. I left due to, you know, what I'll say publicly was ideological reasons. But, you know, I wanted to come up and talk to you. I do owe you a lot of credit in my

political journey, in my political consciousness, I guess, especially because of you and Jackson

and MAGA communism, really took me from being, you know, basically a normie leftist, culturally leftist,

socialists to, you know, being a bit more, you know, socially conservative while also having, you know,

believing in, you know, the science of Marxism, Leninism.

But ultimately, I did end up, you know, leaving the ACP.

And the reason for that was, you know, originally when you were, when you, your article that you wrote a few years back on MAGA communism, it really called for a new political birth of the American partisan who wasn't really left or right, but was more of coast left, I would say.

Well, to be more precise, it's not the opening part of the article is a rejection of third positionism.

The point is that the actual left-wing political position has somehow no longer become synonymous or is no longer synonymous

with this broad phenomena we could call, I called in it leftism and the leftist

tendency in that article I argue is actually right wing the key word is the ism now I've stopped

using that terminology as much as I did before, because I consider the leftist ideology to be dead now. And it has already, it is all, I predicted that it would merge directly with the right. And I think that

that has actually already happened with two major pivotal events. One was the increasing rightward trajectory of the left liberal centrist camp or whatever, right, that we saw in the aftermath, especially 2023 and 24 after October 7th.

I think that the Zionist

wing of the left liberals

totally actually created a new...

It's set in motion the kind of Hitler leftist synthesis that I predicted would happen.

And then I think that the second thing that happened was the rise to prominence of Silicon Valley and silicon valley's right word shift i think those two

things have definitively put the final nail in the coffin to leftism with the ism thing right

now as far as the left and left wing politics is concerned

that is obviously not something that can be destroyed because all left politics means is

revolutionary politics that's all it means um It has no other meaning.

Leftism was something more meta than that.

It wasn't about revolutionary politics.

It was about this subculture and ideology of attempting to kind of domesticate that politics and turn it into an ideal of some kind, which means not something real.

Yeah, but in terms of telling that to the American people, I mean, that's just not how Americans in general see the left or see leftism. And in terms of selling that to the American people, I mean, the idea of people. The article wasn't meant for the layman, I don't think.

I think the article was meant for the more theoretically inclined, I suppose.

That's fair.

To communicate that this was a very serious

that the Maga Communist meme

I mean that that is open to so much interpretation

it's a meme that's what it is

it spread in so many different directions

and it was highly modern modern in the sense of you didn't need to read my substack to get it.

But for the glasses wears, no offense to anyone wears glasses, but for the glasses wears and these pseudo-intellectuals who kept on pointing out the absurdity

of that meme, that was

what the article was meant to

humble them, basically.

The article was meant

to basically tell these glasses-wheres

who were wrongly

understanding the meme by resorting to pseudo-intellectual

formalism and ideological gibber, basically, that, no, actually, there is a lot of theoretical

depth behind this, and you're just midwits.

The average person who's not thinking about it in a highly theoretical way understood the meme.

It didn't need to be really, it didn't need to be explained in the way I explained it in the substack.

But for these liberal midwits who had all of these extremely stupid criticisms, like, oh, but Maga's right wing and communism is the opposite of that.

And that was really what it was meant to

suppress or or oppose yeah but ultimately and just let me go for a little just like one minute here

and ultimately the the profound theory behind it all, in my opinion,

was the idea that MAGA was revolutionary,

or is revolutionary.

And I think that we need to take a look back on all of this

and see that, you know, in know in 2016 yes maga was revolutionary it

represented you know really nationalism versus a globalism whereas in 2024 it kind of represents

you know this left versus right culture war and And so, I disagree with that.

I think that Maga has actually become the fundamental basis of all politics in the U.S.

right now, such that Maga is no longer an extraordinary thing.

Everyone is Maga.

Hassan Piker is Maga. Everyone is Maga now.

Because the Maga represented a change in the form of American politics, not just the content in terms of policy prescriptions and stuff, but the form.

It's, it turned American, MAGA is the cybernetic form of American political sovereignty.

And as long as it's American, as long as it's formulated in terms of American national self-interest, as long as it's based in, you know, kind of this more inward orientation rather than this this universal

prescription of

liberal morality and humanitarianism

it is fundamentally

Maga, you know, it's building off

of Trump's movement

in 2016.

Yeah, and I agree with you that everyone is MAGA now, but that means that MAGA is no longer revolutionary like it was in 2016.

And now the only, you know, remaining faction of the right that is truly revolutionary in my opinion is the

America first faction of the right

and so you know

I don't see how that's revolutionary

at all what's revolutionary about

them

they

they call for a reconstitution of the country for uh but they can call for whatever they want

but concretely in terms of what politically they represent um i don't see anything revolutionary

uh that's fair enough i think that I don't see anything revolutionary.

That's fair enough. I think there's a lot more common ground. To be a revolutionary means you're a part of a revolutionary strategy. It means that you're part of a revolutionary movement of some kind. Having counter signaling

dominant narratives is not

really by itself

anything revolutionary.

I don't know.

I think that calling for

demographic realism, for, you know, expelling foreign influence entirely from the country, for advocating for theocracy.

I think it's important to understand that if you advocate for anything that is extreme at all and so radically

in contradiction to what exists now, then by the same logic, that's right. If I advocated right now,

for example, for all meat eating to be banned,

that would be so at odds with the reality we live in right now

that it could posture as revolutionary.

But that's not actually what makes something revolutionary.

For something to be revolutionary, it has to be part of a revolutionary movement.

And I don't mean movement in the sense of an organization or an organized group.

I literally mean in the sense of a change, a movement in history itself, something that is actually happening objectively that represents a change in the historical era we live in. And I don't see that for the

for the

online phenomena you're

talking about.

That's fair. I mean, I just think that, you know,

and my friends

in the American First Movement might not like this, but they do have a Leninist tendency within them and that they really are working for a top-down revolution.

They have a pedophile problem. They have a pedophile problem. Ali Ali Alexander you know who that is

Sammy

No who is he

You don't know he he's the guy that

Flenta's enabled to molest

Your own members of your own movement

And groom them.

It was grooming 14 year olds.

I think...

This is the movement that you support. This is your shit. This is

what you're doing? I do support

the America First Movement, yes.

All right, we are done with this topic.

I think your question was sufficiently answered.

We're not here to talk about these right-wing, far-right, neo-Nazi.

Anyway, Art, please go next hi a long time listener first time caller trying to figure this out i have a question for can you guys hear me yes

i have a question for chairman rafik oh first before i just wanted to say um Lyndon LaRouche, but

I was just wondering how many... I was going with

like all of the stupid inside joke

like memes of these terminally

online trolls.

Listen, mailbox said, I waited 10 minutes to talk.

It's my turn.

So what is your question or what is your criticism?

So I was just wondering how many inches is your head up your ass?

I wish there was a cricket sound effect.

Just give me a straight answer.

Why are you so afraid to engage in good faith?

What are you like afraid to hear?

Engage with what?

I mean, you're clearly somebody who belligerently is angry about me and has a

problem with me, and you can't answer your problem in an honest and good faith way. Okay. I'm in a good mood

You don't sound like it

You sound kind of angry

But in any case

You can be angry and upset

And hate me a lot

But you should at least have the courage

To try to articulate

Whatever problem or concern you have

In a good faith way.

At least try.

Excuse me. Sorry. I'm still waiting on my answer.

Well, actually...

Just how many inches? It's a simple question.

I think actually we can work with

things that you've already said

for example LaRouche

what

why do you

why does your crowd

which are millennial

schizophrenics

why are you guys so fixated

and obsessed with LaRouche

and why do you always with LaRouche?

And why do you always mention LaRouche?

Real quick, I am not diagnosed schizophrenic.

Okay, go on.

Yeah, what's the significance of LaRouche here?

Well, I think you guys should tell me you're the LaRushites.

Yeah, why are we LaRusites?

Based on what?

Chappo told you that?

Before I'm asking, what?

Yeah, I mean, like your millennial online friends were talking about your your parapolitical podcaster

Rupis talk about

La Rousse.

Don't have any friends.

Yeah, I mean, but what

significance does LaRouche have for us?

Well, that's what I'm asking you.

Literally none. Well, that's what I'm asking you. Literally none.

Well, okay.

Thanks for answering.

Can you answer my first question now?

I guess that's it then.

Is that it?

How about the first question?

Do you mind answering a little quick before I go?

This is really pathetic and you're a coward.

Hey, Art, can you send me those more to get texts, please?

I just want to read them. Thank you.

Who is speaking?

Anyway, yeah, this person was just a coward.

I gave them an opportunity to confront me,

and they're going to run back to their parapolitical millennial friends and talk about how courageous and brave they were for having literally zero skin in the game anyway uh cryptical go ahead

hey can you hear me yes um okay uh this isn't a loaded question, and I do mean this genuinely. Do you think there's such thing as a normal trans person that it can be part of like the party and society and all of that, or is the whole thing degenerate?

I've been wondering this about you for a long time.

I want to know why this topic is so important to you.

Well, because I kind of like you, and I'm trans myself, basically.

But you're revealing a very private aspect of who you are, which I don't think is relevant at all to anything political. And I don't know why there is such an

obsession and fixation on things like that. Because I think that there's a public aspect to all

of this inevitably. I think we completely reject

encouraging the obsession about

the topic across the board.

That goes for

the, for both

sides. We just

do not want so much attention

to be on such private and non-political, non-collective things.

I mean...

Yeah, I agree.

It shouldn't be...

It shouldn't be political. I agree it shouldn't be It shouldn't be political

I agree

I just think that is a public thing to it

I think that the fixation and dwelling upon such questions

reflects a deep level of individualism

Which I don't think we accept at all I think we completely such questions reflects a deep level of individualism, which

I don't think we accept at all.

I think we completely reject it. I think we reject

navel gazing and all that

kind of stuff. As far as people's

private lives, we are not interested.

We are neither

interested in navel gazing, nor taking a magnifying glass and

interjecting in people's private lives and, and, and worrying so much about it. I think that we

want to focus on what we share collectively not what we are personally and privately it's not

of any concern or significance for politics okay fair enough That's what I had.

All right, very well read. Go ahead.

Hey, Hans, thanks for taking my call here.

Used to be a member of the ACP. I was very excited when I joined up with

you guys. I was connected

with Midwestern marks for a long time.

I guess

I have like a couple

main questions, and I guess I'll tier them and try to keep it brief.

My first question is, is after seeing the Danny Shaw video, the leaked meeting video,

when the leadership of the party says, hey... video. When the

leadership of

the party

says,

hey,

we'll use

this guy

for what we

can get out

of him

until we

can get

rid of him

and then

move on.

I guess my

main question

would be

how are people who sympathize of the party and want to support the party?

How are they supposed to do that moving forward and trust leadership in that type of situation?

I guess that's the first main question that I have.

Well, let's start with that first.

Sure. So basically,

the problem is that we wouldn't have said that ordinarily

for an honest member of the party who is in good faith engaging us and participating with us.

But John was engaging in such an extreme degree of duplicitous behavior with respect to his position.

He was, we held the struggle session and criticism meeting that he wanted. We held other meetings

after that where he was just fine. He was regularly communicating to people that everything is

fine. And he was not being honest about his intentions and his position.

He was concealing his views and he was concealing his real feelings, which made it impossible to trust him.

It made it impossible. I mean, he could tell us one thing, but he's plotting and planning something else. I mean, he was trying to rally the entirety of leadership to depose me and make me resign, which doesn't even make sense constitutionally. So, and he did, he had no regard for the constitution.

So I think he already took steps to break all of our trust.

But at the same time, he had obligations and loose ends to deal with when it came to his position for the party.

We were also worried about him

you know, basically

doing illegal things with his

position because he was legally registered

as our lawyer for our 5-0

and you know, he

God knows what he would, what he would what he would do you know he could

he could try to um uh he had access to our bank account you know he had our credit card as a party

which we don't really have a revenue stream but in any any case, it was a bet. We absolutely had to put the security of our party first. And we prefer to work with everyone in good faith and in a comradly way and honestly, but he already broke our trust and made that impossible.

So we were faced with the question.

This highly emotional, highly unstable and unpredictable individual has our credit card as a party and our bank access to our bank account.

And he has access to all these other things as our lawyer when it comes to the

party formalism the legalism stuff how do we rest this out of his hands first of all and how do we

just make sure that we can have a smooth transition in our legal department, which would have been

the honorable thing to do. I mean, he gained our trust. He was like in our legal department,

the head of our legal department. And then very suddenly he turned on a dime

and it's like well you could at least put your two weeks in

honestly if you're going to commit this much

already and people are wondering like oh well you yelled at him

of course he would want to leave but the reason I yelled at him is because from the moment he began his resignation speech, which was a theatrical spectacle, because before the meeting started, he linked it right then, right then and there, his resignation. So we all knew what he was

going to be doing. I had had enough. He already made up his mind and there's nothing anyone

could have said to dissuade him. So basically, long, long story short, it was because he was engaging in duplicitous behavior that

made it impossible for us to trust him.

If you act in a comradly way and in an honest way, you're not going to force us to be in a position

where we're going to have to soothe your feelings and pretend to be your friend just so you do the honorable thing. For anyone that's in the American Communist Party, you need to put the party first. This is not a friendship circle. This is not about ego. This is not about your social life. This is not a friendship circle this is not about ego this is not about your social life this is not

about any of that all right this is about the party if you don't have that comprehension

that even if you feel like your ego is bruised or you're sad or you're you didn't get your way you know instead of being a baby who wrecks and destroys everything put the party first and if you genuinely need to resign and leave, do it

in an honorable way that's not going to cause

damage to the party that you already

committed and made a vow to commit

to. I don't think that's a lot

to ask, actually.

That's fair.

I guess one small

follow-up question to that would be

is that

is the, especially

coming from you as the primary leader

and as the other leadership that's involved,

are you all

committed to fostering a positive

not in a liberal sense, but like a truly genuinely

revolutionary positive spirit and

network to where people can rely on each other in that close-knit community where we're all

trying to fight for the same thing. Is that something moving forward that is being focused on? And I mean

that as a genuine question. Yeah, that's just comradeship to us.

And that's why you saw the anger that you did in that clip.

The reason you saw me get angry at John is because I genuinely thought John was a comrade.

Even up to that point, as much as I distasted his duplicitous, gossiping,

back-channeling behavior, I still said he was a comrade who's losing his mind and he needs help

and he whatever. But for him to lie to all of us and then surprise us

with his resignation resignation on a business meeting after several meetings where he's pretending to be

fine and then after the meeting where we are alleged, you know, we supposedly sorted the beef.

Like, if you understood what happened, it's like John had a meeting where he tried to do a coup.

It failed.

I just thought maybe this guy is stressed.

He told people, I need to resign.

He realized nobody was going over to his position.

So then he started changing his tone and he started going, you know, I'm willing to move

forward, you know, I'm willing to go forward.

And he started being positive and saying, you know what? Last meeting went really well. I'm willing to go forward. And he started being positive and saying, you know what?

Last meeting went really well.

I'm optimistic, right?

I was just thinking, you know, maybe he just, maybe he just like is too stressed and he's got

doxed.

He's got a big workload. You know, maybe he just kind of lost it a little bit. And I didn't take it personally at all. And I still saw him as a comrade, right? But when we opened that meeting with him trying to hijack it with this theatrical performance

where there's so much personal

anger and resentment

and shit he seems

to have with me

I genuinely did get upset

I was just like dude what the

fuck is your problem I've done nothing to you.

But only now do I look back in retrospect and realize this guy was probably operating under duress.

And that's why his face looked the way it looked where he's red and he's like

looks like he's about to cry and that's the leading theory i'm going with is that he was under duress

and he didn't necessarily want to but he was was being compelled to. But I could be wrong.

I'm not saying I know that with certainty, but it's the only thing that really makes sense to me,

frankly. Well, that's definitely good to hear your side of things and get some more clarification.

I guess I got one more question, if you don't mind.

It's kind of a two-prong question.

So like I said, I was a part of the ACP.

I had pushed Midwestern Marx, who I worked for for

about two years.

I had pushed them to start

a communist party their own

back when CPUSA was not working out.

I had been a part of CPUSA for about a year.

And obviously they were terrible

on just about everything.

So I was pushing them at the time.

I was told over and over again, you know,

hey, you can't start a party outside of CPUSA.

I disagreed.

I thought that could be done.

But I kind of went along with it.

You know, I wanted to. I didn't want to

rile anybody up or cause

any issues. So continued working.

And then Midwestern

Marx and you guys kind of joined forces,

which was great. I saw you guys

getting closer and closer.

And really appreciated that

was happy to see it

Eddie had texted me

a couple of days

maybe

about maybe about a week or so

before the launch of the party and it's like hey man

the stuff

that you've been hoping would happen is going to happen

soon, get ready. And

so he was like, I'll just be ready.

And I was like, cool, let's do this. Whatever

is going on. I didn't even know what it was.

Then the party launches. I went in, joined

right away. I was in the party for not long,

I don't know, maybe a couple of weeks. And there were some questions in our chapter with Kyle

Pettis about dues. And so I understood the perspective of like, hey, do's

are not going to be

necessarily the best way to collect money

because... Sorry, I don't want to be rude, but we need to

speed this up, so really, really

get to the point.

So, trying to clarify

with Kyle Pettis about the do's situation, we just wanted to collect some money so we could do the trash pickup that we were asked to do.

Did not get sufficient information from him as to why that was the case or how to move forward with the situation.

To be clear, chapter finances in terms of that's all decentralized. or how to move forward with the situation. Chapter finances

in terms of, that's all

decentralized. So if chapters want to do something

and want to pool money,

they have to come to an agreement about

that themselves. And it's not

really... We were told we were forbidden.

But that's what the point

the point is is that very early

stages and I also

it is not the

so I don't know if you can do it

in a binding way where you say you have to

but it's still things

it hasn't presented itself as really a problem to us so far.

That's fair, and I didn't think it was that big of a situation,

but the main point was is that I was kicked out of the party.

I was never given an explanation.

Well, look, I don't want to dwell on this question further because Kyle's not here,

and it's not really fair to, you know, for his side of the story.

But I did answer your question, I believe.

That was your second one.

Durant, go ahead.

It was good, man.

So, I mean, I guess, like, my thing is right.

I'm probably, like like one of the only

actually working class people here

you know I make fucking 13 net

per hour

whatever blah blah blah blah blah

or on

my

thing with like Um, my thing

With like with all of this with the ACP

And like I've never been a member

I've never been like a part of it

But like I've supported it

And like I like you

You know, I like the shit you know, I like the shit that

you say. I like the

ACP. I just

personally, I can't bring

myself to invest in that

because I'm trying

to focus on my family

and, like, and on my own, like, personal shit, like on my family and on my own

personal shit like on my life right now

if that makes sense

that's totally fine

I think that if you have a family

your first obligation is to your family

and parties

political parties I hate to say it but in the beginning you know it does

take a certain degree of flexibility and dare i say privilege to fully commit to a communist

party in its early stages before it's a mass movement.

And that has just always been true. And I would never ask someone to, you know, to put the party before their own kids and their own family, you know, I wouldn't.

So I don't think there's anything shameful about your position at all, actually.

And, you know, I wish you good luck and, you know.

Well, you know, it's good. it's good that you say that, right?

Because of like, all the cult accusations, like, I've been following, like, you know,

all this, all this shit, you know, like, people, like, accusing the ACP of being a cult.

That's not something that a cult leader would say, you know?

Well, yeah, I mean, it's ironic because it's not really that they say ACP is a cult.

It's mainly that they say infrared is a cult and that the cult has taken over which doesn't make a whole lot of sense because infrared is just online. I don't know how we could have a cult mechanism beyond the fact that it is just a we have it's a very dedicated following um but nobody is

out here telling people to to isolate themselves from their real lives and somehow sacrifice the obligations that they already have.

But I think that I will comment one last thing on that. I think that as much as people don't have free time, I think that the rise of the information age and social media has definitely made it so that seconds that pass by are seconds wasted if they are not spent consuming information. So it's not

that people have more free time. It's that people have more time that they expect to dedicate to consumption than they did before.

People don't want to spend their free time just staring at a wall or staring at nature or just sitting on their couch doing nothing.

They want to spend it consuming when they're at work, at break, during lunch, when they come home.

And that's what social media and the information age has done.

And, you know, that is what infrared, obviously, has tapped into alongside every other kind of viral online phenomena

and following so that has not actually disrupted the normal cycle of life nobody's quitting

their job and

estranging themselves from their families and whatever because of infrared.

But people are choosing to consume infrared rather than, you know,

video games and pornography, red rather than, you know, uh, game,

video games and pornography and, um,

frivolous, nonsensical content that is meaningless brain rot.

They are filling, they are replacing that with a lot of it with infrared.

Not all of it.

Some people still, I guess, play video games and stuff.

But there is so much time people have to consume things on social media.

And people are choosing, in community to consume the infrared content and be in this

community.

And that has such a level of intensity and such a defining influence on people's, on people's consciousness that it seems to people like it's a cult.

Like, wow, it has commanded this level of dedication.

All these people must be living together in a compound, and they all must be, like, directly taking orders, and the leader, the cult leader must have all of this private information on them and keeping track of them. And it's, no, it's really just that social media has created a highly partisan

highly um centralized or various different highly centralized and partisan online communities.

You know, they call it parasyciality or whatever.

But that's mainly referring to this idea that people in a community think they're literally

friends with an influencer, whereas in this

case, we're talking about

a form of sociality where

like, you know, people are congregating

together and creating content

and consuming content based

on shared convictions and beliefs

which are regarded as highly fringe and marginal in America.

I think that's another thing.

I mean, defending Stalin takes a lot of brain power because you're constantly surrounded by the you could read about the truth about Marxism and about history, but you're constantly going to be bombarded with people who haven't and you're going up against the history channel and basically the entirety of

the mainstream media, plus all other influencers. So when you find people that are like-minded,

that you don't have to spend so much time explaining the truth to,

it is really just a breath of fresh air for a lot of people

that we could just take for granted that we are Stalinists

and we don't need to constantly justify and explain ourselves.

That's how I see it at least, you know.

I mean,

I mean, yeah.

I was thinking about

something that you said earlier

I can't remember if this

was in one of your substack articles

because I do read your substack articles

they're so fucking funny dude

the James Lindsay one

I love that shit I love that and funny dude, the James Lindsay one.

I love that shit.

I love that shit. It's fucking Kina.

I love it. But in one of them, I think it was

the AI one that you wrote,

you said that

something along the lines of

and I may be misquoting you

or misinterpreting you

but you said that like the revolution of

AI and the rise of AI

is going to push people towards historical knowledge and towards reading books, which I thought that was very interesting if that is what you said.

I don't know what you're referring to exactly so it'd be hard for me to comment

damn I can't hear you

yeah I don't uh exactly

remember or know exactly what you're referring to there

in terms of what i've written

i might my a i post i don't know if i did make an a i post on substack

i may have i don't know.

It might have been Twitter. I just assumed that it was your substack,

but it was the piece that you

wrote about AI. I think that

yeah, I don't know. I think that

I don't exactly remember

the argument there

as far as

reading books and historical

knowledge from AI.

Oh yeah, yeah.

I think

I may have made the argument

yeah, that it doesn't matter if AI destroys our ability to determine what's real.

People will have to read books.

They'll have to actually start reading.

Yeah, that was it.

Yeah, yeah.

That was there.

Yeah.

Like brain rot when brain rot is brought to its furthest possible extreme then people will no longer in vain believe that they can have the real truth

just by scrolling through TikTok

they will finally decide that

they need to open books and read books

that's kind of the idea

yeah very very true

very true that was an observation

that I had but like I'm not a very

like well read person

you know but

that like I don't know I

I guess like I'm not able to articulate it

in the in the

way that you do, but I've

had the same exact thought

like for a very long time.

All right, man. I appreciate it.

I'm going to try

to keep these quicker guys because we have a lot

of people.

Let's go with Spanish, Dominican.

Hey, ha, listen, I'm a truck driver at the port of New York and New Jersey.

I belong to a small organizing committee, and we're trying to organize truck drivers here at the ports.

I'm just reaching out to you guys to

help us organize.

I think that...

Spanish, I'm going to cut you off there.

Sorry, I don't mean to be rude.

Yes, you said you're in New York.

That could easily be something we're interested in.

I would recommend if you're in New York reaching out to Spiros, who is American partisan.

I would recommend he's on Twitter, American partisan. I would recommend DMing him.

And that way you guys could discuss details, which i don't think we should do here

but i don't know if that satisfies your question

no it's fine thank you yeah no problem

yeah just just dm him and message him and if he doesn't get back just message me I guess um uh

Vess whatever Veseli or whatever go ahead oh hi I'm Vas rasiliki i'm from arthur's grace

can you hear you yeah i can hear you

is that all you wanted to say or no i just wanted to ask you a question a general question

why do you think people around world

are afraid of leftism. Why don't they understand that they should go on left for their own good? What keeps them away from leftism?

I think that the campaign to demonize the left started to take the form of people that the leftist movement itself basically became a way to smear the left.

I think billionaires started pumping a lot of money in these, you know,

leaders of leftist movements and leftist politicians and think tanks and ideologies and whatever.

That really did repulse populations around the world.

And I think that was intentional to discredit and smear genuine left-wing politics, which is revolving around questions related to economic social justice,

political sovereignty, anti-imperialism, republicanism, and so on and so on.

Thank you very much. Yeah, no problem.

Thank you. thank you very much yeah no problem thank you all right um i see go ahead are you referring to me?

I have my hand up as well.

90 countries.

Were you asking me?

Yeah, go ahead.

Go ahead.

Yeah, you spoke for it.

So I'll be really quick,

because I know you want to wrap up to space.

I have a degree in marketing.

I also taught myself languages to speak Russian and German and French.

And I recently discovered this movement.

And I just want to say, you're totally right about people don't read anymore.

They're just, and

the marketing matters. It really

does. I mean,

thank you for your

implicit question. The answer is

maybe.

Tris, go ahead.

Hey, Haas.

Thank you for the mic.

I just want to bring up the fact that

Stalin got poisoned by Jews.

Lennon was a Jew.

So I'd like to hear your explanation of how you are not a Shabbas Goy.

Well, I know you're not Jewish.

Exactly. Have you read the Groyper Sutra?

Hold on, Kareem.

Because I'm a Bavarian, German Christian.

How do you know you You could be Jewish.

And let me tell you something.

I want to genuinely... Why don't you just answer the question?

I asked you a question.

Well, I couldn't because under the premises of your question, if you are in fact Jewish, then according to your own logic, what you say cannot be trusted.

You could be living Groundhog Day every single

morning where you are Jewish, but you have a mental condition that convinces you, you're not,

and you only remember late at night, such as in a Twitter space such as this, for example,

and then you get shocked,

but you're too tired to do anything about it.

You go to bed, you wake up,

and you think you're going in.

Well, hold on a second.

First of all,

you said you're not very well read.

I mean, I could tell that.

When did I say that?

Honestly, I'm a Bavarian Lutheran. When did I say I wasn't well read? Your whole point is moot. So can you explain how you are not a Shabboskoy? How are you not Jewish? That's a no you.

I'm asking you.

That's exactly what I'm saying.

No you.

Yeah.

Okay.

Well, I'm interested in your...

Why are you deflecting?

Why are you avoiding it?

Why are you dodging it?

Because this is your space.

This is a Q and A.

I'm asking you,

how do you know

about yourself?

How do I know about,

because I know my

vindictions and I know

what I'm about.

So I'm asking you.

How do you know everyone

in your family was being truthful?

Let's start from there. What's that? How do you know everyone in your family was being truthful? Let's start from there.

What's that?

How do you know everyone in your pedigree and in your family was being truthful?

They could be Jewish and have lied about it.

No, I've had DNA tests done and all that.

So back to the question that I ask you.

They're not that reliable.

Back to the question I ask you,

how are you not a Shabbas boy?

Fatal question.

How are you not a Shabbas boy?

How are you not Jewish?

Because I'm not.

So back to the question that I asked you.

How do you know?

Because I'm not Jewish.

But how don't run cover for Jews like you do?

So I'm asking you, how are you not a Shabas Goy?

How are you not Jewish yourself?

Because I'm German and I'm Christian.

Plenty of Jews are from Germany.

Okay, well, I'm German and Christian. So back to the question I asked you. How are you not a established boy? Why are you hate Jews if you're Jewish? I don't hate Jews. I wish they convert to... So you're Jewish, so what's the issue?

I'm asking you. It's not about me.

This is your space. I came up here to ask you a question.

This is a Q&A. Why don't you just admitted that you're Jewish and you don't hate Jews.

So what's the issue?

Why are you bringing this issue to me?

No, I never admit I'm Jewish.

I said I'm a German Christian and I don't hate anything.

You just said you were Jewish.

No, that's not what I said. I have the

space. I think your memory, because your memory is so unreliable,

that just leads cradians to the Groundhog theory.

Groundhog. Maybe you misunderstood what I said. I said I'm German and Christian and I am asking you and you're a little large party that you made. How are you not a Shabbasquoy? How are you not Jewish just because you converted to Christianity according to your own logic?

I didn't convert to Christianity.

I said, I don't hate Jews and Jews can be saved.

Because you are Jewish yourself.

No. Yeah. I said are Jewish yourself. No.

Yeah. I said Lenin was

a Jew and Stalin

got poisoned by Jews. How do you know

you're not a Jew? How do you know you're not? How are you

not a Shabu Koi?

How do you know you're not a Jew?

Because it gets traced via DNA and all that have you checked the early life section of the 23 and me DNA company though yes I have 0% Jew and me.

So what about you?

Have you checked the early life section of the Wikipedia of the company?

How about you answer my question?

How are you not a job of play?

Because there could be a grander thing at play here.

I mean, you could say that, but that's not. thing at play here.

I mean,

you could say that,

but that's not true at all. How do you know?

My question to you...

What if that's what they want you to think?

How are you and what you're doing?

That could be exactly what they want you to think.

Excuse me? That's what they want you to think. Excuse me?

That's what they want you to think.

Okay, yeah, so all DNA tests are alive.

So we could submit to that.

So what you're saying...

You could be Jewish.

London was a Jew.

And you are one.

No, I'm not.

How do we know?

Just because you say that doesn't mean it's true, but Lenin was the Jew.

But how do you know?

Because it's in the DNA, brother.

Where?

Show me.

Show us a picture of this non-Jew-N-A.

Show us a picture of this non-Jewish DNA you have, and we may believe it.

On your mama. Yeah,. I just docks myself

real quick. That's also very Jewish

of you to say. No, I'm sorry. How are you just

not a chappaloid? Please don't show us the microscopic

DNA that is in your cells.

That would definitely docks

you if you showed us

the DNA strands

that the various

peptides and all that stuff.

Well, you mentioned earlier

you weren't very well read and you're

kind of making that point very clear

right now.

So my question is asking you to read into your own heart and soul with a long

look in the mirror where you read into your

own eyes and ask the

question of whether you are in fact

Jewish. So anybody who

criticizes you as a Jew

meanwhile you worship Lenin.

We don't know. Anyone could be Jewish.

No one knows.

Okay, well, I

can assure you I am not a Jew.

But I can assure you, Lenin

was a Jew and stolen that poisoned by Jews.

Why would I believe?

Which is how he died.

How do you know?

Because you do DNA tests, which...

But we're going in circles.

Go back to your roots.

He's doing the DNA tests?

And what's their background?

How do we know?

Who knows? That's kind of irrelevant.

Why?

Wait, wait, wait. Why?

You don't want us to notice?

You don't want us to notice?

All I did was notice.

We're not allowed to notice.

What did you notice?

Exactly.

So we're not allowed to notice.

Did you notice Stalin?

So you want us to shut up and

Lenin was a literal Jew?

And not notice the patterns.

Is that what you're saying?

Did you notice Lenin was a Jew and you worship a Jew?

I'm noticing a pattern here and I read somewhere that the Jews tend to not want to reveal that they're Jewish and that's what you're doing right now.

Therefore, you are yourself Jewish.

No, I asked you...

I think there's a pattern here. No, no, no, no, no, no. We're noticing

and we're on to you.

Why are... Do you refuse to answer the question? I'm just asking you...

I'm not refusing anything.

You are... In the audience, how you are not a Shabbas going.

As soon as you explain, as soon as you explain why you didn't invite me to your bar mitzvah.

Because I didn't have one.

So, on another...

So, so you're lying?

That's your answer?

That you, you had one, but you didn't invite any...

I mean, look, dude, your argument is so bad right now.

Everyone can see that you

are denied. It wasn't even an argument. I just asked you a question.

If you weren't Jewish,

then you would be pretty certain about it.

You don't really sound certain. Your arguments aren't really that airtight,

so to speak. So the needle

is leaning in the direction that you may yourself be Jewish.

Okay, well, you could say that, but that's not true.

That is all I wanted, clipped and shipped.

Lenin, clifton shipped.

That's all I wanted, a confession.

He said, you can say that. Everyone saw what he just said.

He said, you can say that. Sir, thank you for the honesty. Shalom. Shabbat Shalom.

I have no problem with Jewish people, by the way.

But I think this was a

classic case of a self-hating Jew

who had a big problem with their own self.

And we just solved all of that.

Go ahead, LC.

All right, he left.

Jessica. Okay. all right he left um jessica

go ahead and speak

hey

so when it comes to

DNA and all this stuff like

it depends

on what you're looking at

you've got to really dive

into it so don't follow

what the stories your family

is telling you you got to

really go in there

so

100% genome sequencing, you find some answers maybe.

And I definitely found out I was told I was German, but I definitely did not find that out in my DNA.

So what is your question for the ACP?

I don't, I guess I don't have a question. I just said I was making a statement.

I got a question. Who has a question? I have a question. Go ahead, whoever's speaking.

I love Anish. So yeah, nice to meet another communist with a Shi'aab background.

I love the ACP. I really support what you guys do.

I love what you guys have been doing so far.

So my question is, say you reach a level of success or control of political means that is substantial to the point

it becomes a real threat to the establishment.

How would you reconcile

that with the level

of surveillance, intelligence, and sort

of hard power of

American militarism

that exists in the U.S.

and historically has been able to successfully sabotage

movements like the Black Panthers or even overseas stuff.

It's a good question.

I think our party will be successful

if we have a succession, an effective succession protocol. And the sad thing is that I think

there's a very high likelihood that I could be killed if we get to that state. Frankly, I could be

assassinated if it get to that state. Frankly, I could be assassinated.

If it gets to that

point where we're this huge movement

that's making so much waves.

But that's

not the point. The point is not to ensure

my survival. The point is to ensure

the survival of the party and that the party will be able to

respond to things like that and the party if nothing else will need to live on as a symbol if it's true

that they manage to succeed and crippling all of our infrastructure,

we even want this party to survive that,

in terms of the symbol surviving, in terms of the idea surviving,

so that others could... The point is not to have instant success.

The point is for there to be constant iterations that respond to failure.

And

it's just like AI.

AI is not meant to be successful.

The algorithms, the machine learning, it's not supposed to be

successful right away.

It's supposed to be various different iterations

of failure, right?

And then they actually start, that becomes the success, that there's these more and more accurate iterations.

And that's the thing we're trying to initiate politically and and organizationally um we know that we will be testing

limits as far as how far we could get with this but even if we are fully annihilated as a party upon running up those limits, everyone will

be able to see that and learn from the experience and pick up from where we left off.

And we mean to ensure that and plan for that.

And that's kind of how we're seeing it.

Okay, thank you.

Yeah, no problem.

Uh, Wodee, go ahead.

Hey, what's up, Oz, man?

Hey, uh, genuine, uh, I'm not a shit talker or anything like that.

Genuine, skeptic, you know, with just two questions.

Yeah, I really feel that the ACP has touched on something genuine as far as a unique way for the American left to go.

I just, there's a few things that I just, stumbling blocks big time.

Is there any plans of yours to distance yourself from Dugan or any regrets from that association where do you stand

with that man no regrets no regrets i think dougain is an extraordinary thinker i think he's an

extraordinary human being i have nothing but respect and admiration for him. He was a father. He is a father,

in a sense, you know, um, um, and, um, he is, um um fully prepared to you know sacrifice everything for what he believes

in terms of his own safety and his own comfort he paid a heavy heavy price, and he remains resolute, and I have nothing but respect for him.

You may not agree with his politics or the conclusions he draws when it comes to ideology and political theory.

But I see him as an anti-imperialist fighter,

and I see him ultimately as a kindred spirit fighting against an evil global system.

I don't agree with his political theory entirely.

I do think he makes valid points.

Not all of them, but he does make some valid points.

I do think he's a very interesting and mighty thinker that should be reckoned with.

And definitely not dismissed.

I have no regrets at all

in my association with him.

Okay, one more question.

If you don't mind, I'll be quick.

One of the things that I, you know,

I'm somewhat of a class reductionist,

so, you know, I'm kind of sympathetic

to putting the culture war on the backseat, but I'm not totally against it.

Is there any plans for the ACP to try to make alliances with the left that is going to be more into the culture war,

or is it just going to be staying the same direction with the anti-wokeness?

We are willing to make alliances with anyone and everyone who is interested in a counter-hegemonic.

We don't mean that ideologically. We mean that in the sense of,

if you can accept working with us toward any goal and you are on the left,

chances are we will not turn you down.

Boom.

Okay.

Well, thanks for taking my

questions, Hodge.

I appreciate it, man.

Yeah.

Thank you.

Appreciate it.

Alexander,

go ahead.

Hey, Hi. Um, Alexander, go ahead.

Hey,

Haas, can you hear me?

Yeah, I could hear you.

I just want to let you guys know I'm not a Jew, but I wish I... Hold on, I can't hear you.

I said, I just want to let you guys know I'm not a Jew, but I wish I was.

Okay.

Okay.

So anyways, uh, well, I would like to give you credit, Haz, because, uh, you know, I come from a MAGA background originally and you did bring

Marxism into my

political consciousness so

I'm still a baby Marxist

no longer

pro ACP

you know

there's two reasons. One is that I did start looking into Trotskyism,

and I did find their analysis more appealing. But before that, there were certain behaviors,

not just in the party, but in leadership.

And in particular with Jackson, right?

The first red flag that I saw, I mean, there was a couple before that, but the first big one was when Jackson said,

this is, after all, they killed Jesus.

They crucified our Lord in response to the Zionist events, right?

Now, I understand

that there were

justifications made for this, or

a sort of explanations made for this about,

oh, he didn't mean it in that way, he didn't mean

all Jews.

It was meant in a more esoteric way,

referring to imperialism or something like that.

There is Michael, Michael Hudson's ideas about the creditor class, not Jews.

Sure, sure, right.

He was talking about the the hegemony in general

it wasn't talking about jew only it wasn't only talking about Israel either you're talking about the

whole right right but you have to understand right but you have to understand the way it was presented

and the way most people

I don't see that.

I, I

look, my issue is that

Oh, fuck, stuck,

stay cat, 4-m. Don't know. fuck suck up don't for

a

phone

uh

sorry

a brief

interruption

there

um

my issue

is that

I am not interested in offending the religious sensibilities of Jews or insulting Jews or denigrating them at all. But at the same time, I think that with the genocide in Gaza, I don't think it's necessary to walk on eggshells. I don't think I don't think it's

necessary to walk on eggshells.

I don't consider Jews to be an oppressed people

today.

Okay.

And I don't

and so if people misinterpret what he's saying,

I don't think it's I don't think it's going to lead to pogroms or something. I don't see that. I don't see Jews as victims. I don't think that's, you know, what most people get. Right, but I just... I don't see Jews today

as victims.

I see them as like anyone else.

I neither regard them as the

people who control everything

and they're bad or...

But I neither think that they're victims

who are somehow oppressed and you know, there can be

nothing, nothing can be said at all that could possibly, you know, be twisted in a way that,

I don't think there needs to be walking on eggshells, frankly.

It's just... I don't think Jackson, you know, made any Jew or non-Jew lose sleep over that too much.

But the point is that it's still like as far as like your typical, like, Marxist analysis on, on racism or even anti-Semitism, which historically Jews have had...

I don't think the... Yes, but I don't think anti-Semitism today is an existential.

I think the... All of the negatives about an overall majority today of the negatives.

Okay, 95% of the harm from anti-Semitism is not to Jews.

It is to dissident movements. Five percent of it is to Jews in the form of hate crimes.

Right. But do you realize this is what the left says about white a reverse racism that you can't be racist towards white people because they're in a position of power no i i i understand that fully but but the thing is is that jackson wasn't engaging in right you would have to yourself

interpret what he tweeted in a way that and and and if if for example if I make a joke on stream

saying that we're you know I'm going to war with the white race or something, some ridiculous thing when I'm mocking white supremacists, you know, I don't, I'm not saying reverse racism isn't real. I'm just saying it's a joke and it's not.

I don't need to walk on eggshells.

It's like it's not.

But why do you walk on eggshells with regard to Jackson?

I'm not.

I'm not walking.

Far, far, far from it, actually.

Far from it.

If you know about, you know, Jackson, he threw my AirPods away on accident or something.

But I completely criticize him for that shit.

I mean, I had to buy new AirPods in Russia.

It was fucking terrible. He still won't tell the truth about what he did

with my AirPods.

What a fucking Jew?

Unbelievable.

No, well, look, here's the thing.

Jackson is a public figure, okay, and he said these comments in public, right?

And a simple, like, hey, guys, you know what?

I didn't mean it that way.

No, no, no.

You never, never ever apologize or anything.

It's the worst thing you can do.

But see, that's, that's, see, that's the thing.

It's like, that was a red flag, right?

No, you need to understand, you need to understand banana things.

You need to understand, basically, that when you're a public figure and you apologize

you're apologizing to your enemies they're taking it as weakness and they're praying on your

downfall and he should not have shown any weakness or apologize at all.

I don't know.

I'm going to, as a good Christian boy, I'm going to have to beg to differ.

But that's fine.

Okay.

Like, he did that, right?

Um, but he can, like, he continues to show indications of uh it this guy can't be trusted uh on a

on a basis where she's like this i can trust that he's going to make the right decisions. Like, he has appreciation for Marxism.

I think that it's just you're making a lot of assumptions about Jackson's personality and character because you only know.

I'm sure he's a great guy.

Jackson is not, Jackson's a very, he's not,

Jackson actually has like a real life where he, you know,

he has a, he has a girlfriend, he has her friends, he has a real life.

He is not a crazy guy like me who's like, you know, well, I don't really do that anymore, but he's not, he didn't like stream 10 hours a day with the chat telling jokes and being a crazy guy like I did.

Jesus Christ, what is this idiot?

It's this guy, Gore.

Anyway,

Well, here,

Haas, if I may,

because here's the thing,

this is like,

then you get into Andrew Tate.

You were talking about Andrew Tate earlier,

and like, oh, you know, I, look at Malcolm X and look at the Black Panthers and, you know, the stuff they commit. And fairly you said, okay, Andrew Tate's not Malcolm X or the Black Panthers. Right. But, but, but you're saying that there are conditions in which you are willing to look the other way for egregious crimes of the same, if not worse, nature.

No, no, no, no. What I'm saying is that you're willing to look away for Eldridge Glever, who was much worse than Andrew Tate,

and you're willing to look away to Malcolm X, who was also arguably worse,

because he was actually trafficking... Well, I'm not going to create different gradations of severity in the sex

trade because it's all terrible but i just find it hypocritical to in one circumstance look the

other way and in another you know um make it such that it's guilt by association

if you ever say anything positive about them at all

and i he doesn't need to be malcolm x or the black panthers and share their

politics for me to demand moral consistency when it comes to when it comes to how leftists treat these figures they don't need to be of the same level of ideological commitment it's about the morality of what they have done,

which people are focusing on when it comes to Andrew Tate.

Well, you should be morally consistent, then.

It's all I'm saying.

Hans, I agree with you.

I agree with you there.

It's not about Andrew Tate's sexual deviancy, right?

Now, that is an issue in itself, but that isn't, that shouldn't be the crux of it, right?

What I think about Andrew Tate is that he is a figure, a perfect representation of what you would call the Petit Bourgeois, right?

He is like, has anti-imperialist sentiments, yes.

But his ideology, right, even though it may jive some

there may be some overlap

and interest

you can

you

cannot as a

Marxist

associate yourself

with these types of

people

because they cannot

be trusted

now look at the guy

I don't think...

If they could trade the revolution,

Andrew Tate would lick...

But Andrew Tate is not

in our party. He would liquidate

Jackson and you

if you truly... Like, you know, maybe not

so look. First, look look the party hasn't even said anything

about him let alone let him in all jackson did was make a tweet a positive tweet about him

and on his personal account all right to go from there to make the argument that, well, I mean, Andrew Tait, you know, he's not, he's not going to take power with you and share it.

It's like, well, we're kind of getting ahead of ourselves here.

But what I'm saying is, like like who you choose to associate with

even if you agree on certain things like

anti-imperialism, right?

How much is Andrew Tate really an

anti-imperialist?

But what do you mean by association?

What do you mean by association?

I mean, association.

Okay, when you're... I mean, association. Okay, when you're a,

I mean, okay, when you're a public figure like Jackson?

I think the problem is very simple.

The problem is that what you're talking about is like,

you're talking about cancel culture.

I think it's dead.

I'm not saying that.

No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no.

Let me clarify.

This is about cancel culture.

Cancel culture is dead.

It's just dead.

I'm not saying that for better or for worse.

It's just an objective fact.

It's not a thing anymore.

Some communities, fringe

so-called liberal communities.

Would Lenin do this kind

associate himself in this way with Andrew

Tate? Would he defend him

like this? Because Andrew, the type of

anti-imprudism, Andrew-imploid employees is useful.

It's just,

it's just temporary.

Lenin literally positively spoke about the significance of priests and even certain people that were.

Sure, but that's because they had...

There were so many different pragmatic alliances,

even in civil war that the Bolsheviks made temporarily.

I mean, the Bolshevik government in its foreign policy allied with the reactionary government in Afghanistan, you know, in the 20s. There are, I mean, there was an alliance with Ataturk who used the weapons the Bolsheviks gave him to literally massacre Turkish communists.

I mean, you have no idea of the level of realism, political realism, and real politics that characterized the Bolshevik attitude.

And I think, you know, there's always a great risk to that. And what I'm trying to say is like, you had a, you had a caller earlier who, you know, he turned to America first, right? And he's, and he was talking about like, you know, they're the real revolutionaries. They want to, you know, demographic change, theocracy.

All these people really want to do

is just bring back America back to the 1950s, right?

Look, we,

I think you're, look, listen,

man, we're going to have to wrap it up on this

topic because

we're getting into a whole debate about everything Andrew

Tate stands for, which is not relevant to our party or me, but it is all spurred on by the

fact that Jackson made a tweet that was that positively appraised this foreign policy

outlook. Okay.

I don't know

what to tell you. Just because you

like someone's foreign policy

doesn't mean you are here

to create an entire organization

dedicated to them and share everything that they believe

just because of this guilt by association um i think that's reading into it way too much and it's

just a fixation i don't understand. All right, let the guy up.

There's somebody who wants to come up

because he took offense to what I said about Malcolm X.

What's your name on the space?

I don't know what your name is.

You have to request again.

Anyway, let's have

Christian

go.

Right on. Thank you. I just got a few

questions for you.

First question is,

how many people

do you have an ACP

give or take

we have over 500 right now

okay

it would it be fair to say that you get a lot of your

ideology

via Lenin

and Trotsky

so I noticed you laughed about that number

why is that funny to you

because it's minuscule but regardless Why is that funny to you?

Because it's minuscule.

But regarding my next question is... So you had one question, and I'm going to answer your one question, because we don't tolerate Sniid passive aggressiveness here.

And I'm going to explain to you how modern organizations work.

You're going to find a ton of organizations that are claiming thousands of members because

the key to membership and the barrier to entry for those organizations is a button you

click on the website. If we had that same button, which we're going to

have something like that, we would already be in the thousands and thousands and thousands.

We're only at 500 because every single one of those 500 people are active.

They are doing work on the ground on a regular basis, and they have all individually been vetted in direct, like, video interviews, okay?

So that is why the membership doesn't seem, oh, you're not as big as

PSL and all these, because those organizations have an extremely low barrier to entry that is

just clicking a button on the website,

which doesn't reflect active membership.

If you count their active members,

it's way smaller than anything they claim.

Second of all... I mean, Haas, Haas, Haas,

the thing that I don't understand, right, is that you wanted to debate Candace Owens, right? And I think Jackson also wanted to as well. You guys were taking issue with the...

Who the fuck told you you can

interrupt me?

All right? I'm going to finish what I say

and then I'm going to let you go and say what you want.

Jesus Christ.

Yeah, in the future we're going to have a different tier of membership, which is going to be recruits.

So for all new people who join the party, you're going to click a button, you're going to take an oath.

You're going to have actual commitments, and then you will be connected with the chapter that's closest to you, and you're going to be given the opportunity to become a cadre, but we're going to have a codification process. So the difference is not simply going to be fully outside or fully in. We're going to have an intermediary formal status

within the party for people that are either don't have time to fully commit

or, you know, want

to,

you know,

that need time to become

cadre. So, but

if you are here now already,

you are cadre, so, you are cadre.

So you've made it.

So this core 500 we have, Phil, thank you.

They will be the founders, basically, more or less.

Now I'll unmute so the rent guy can speak again

so you're commenting

in all right man listen

okay there's absolutely

zero utility to Andrew Tate

there's no reasonable

okay I talked about

moral consistency if you can address the argument about moral

consistency, I'd be happy to talk about Andrew Tate's utility. But we're going to have to get

to one thing at a time. Go ahead.

If you keep fucking muting me, then I can't get to what i actually want to say so anyways

anyways uh you are alienating a shit ton of people when you say that, or I guess

when you compare Malcolm X

to fucking Andrew Tate.

Malcolm X was a

criminal. He was a criminal. He

went to jail. He served

this time. He was a

pimp involved in the sex trade, okay?

He wasn't just a criminal.

He was a pimp.

And in one case, it's morally acceptable to have that passed, and in another case, it's not.

Now, you can make the argument.

I'm fine with that.

But admit that there are circumstances in which you find that past acceptable.

And then we can move on.

That's all I want these people to admit.

Go ahead. Well, Steve, that's the I want these people to admit go ahead well see that's the problem

Andrew Tate is still doing it

and he's unrepentant and he's lying

about his past

what evidence is there that he's still doing that

based on what

you can look at di caught you can look at gadget on

youtube you can look at a lot of channels that are documenting uh what what what those are all from the

past okay uh all from the past, okay?

Which no one's denying.

It was specifically pornography he was involved in, which is, I don't defend it at all.

But I don't like the moral hypocrisy and inconsistency of people

who are trying to attack Jackson guilt by

association, but

turn a blind eye

to the Black Panthers and to

Malcolm X. It's that simple. That was

my argument.

No, I'm not attacking Jackson.

You keep muting me, right?

Because you're afraid of what I have to say.

You're not attacking Jackson,

and there's nothing to discuss.

All right?

Nesta, go ahead hey um hey has first of all i want to say that i agree with pretty much all of the ACP positions.

And as a European, I consider it to be probably the most advanced Marxist Party.

But yes, my question would be, if the ACP takes power and you in the u.s government stop actually subjugating countries through

imperialism, death groups, military bases and so on and begin treating other countries equally it will be more moral for sure

and probably way better for the world overall but it will it will this still think you can make

america great again as in actually maintaining or improving the quality of life for the american worker class

yeah i think that it's all a matter of a long term versus a short term perspective. So in the short term, there will be many sacrifices made. But in the long term, it will be for the better. And I think that's my simple view. I mean, it's not about sacrificing the material in favor of the moral which marxists completely reject

that idea but when considering material facts you also have to consider them with times the scale of time right it is not about thing it is not about

the most optimal and comfortable thing now that is more like hedonism which marxists reject if marxist believed in hedonism, which Marxists reject.

If Marxists believed in hedonism, then forget about making America great again. Why would I sacrifice even an ounce of my personal immediate comfort as an individual to dedicate myself to politics at all.

You know, so the whole outlook of Marxism believes that the socialism, that socialism, that communism

will be much better

for all mankind.

But when is the question?

And sacrifices,

of course, will be made

for the sake of future generations.

And that has always been the view.

I mean, in the short term, the October Revolution caused a devastating civil war.

Life was terrible in the short term.

Um, hold on.

Amila! What's up?

But in the long term, that was necessary

for Russia to have sovereignty.

So basically that's

how I would put it.

Um, yeah, I mostly agree.

I see it the same way.

It's just that I'm used to the Communist Party selling empty hope

and not pointing at the fact that it will be actually rough for a while at least.

Of course.

Of course.

Yeah.

Thank you.

A guy whose name is just the cross go ahead

hey how's how has it gone

it's actually uh dolfikar but

uh i had a question about um danny shaw if you don't mind

yeah go ahead i've been I've been following up on this

Danny Shaw issue,

particularly with him because he's so fascinating as a character.

It sounds like,

from everything you've shared, he's been very

difficult along the way even before

this whole crisis or this whole issue happened.

So my question is, like,

how did Danny Shaw, like, acquire such an influential position,

given all these issues along the way?

The question, he is a master of duplicity.

And I hate saying that because he is a clown and stuff.

But he is very good at pretending to be someone he isn't and deceiving people into thinking that he is a very good comrade and he is totally on board and dedicated.

And I don't think in retrospect, he is so duplicitous that in retrospect, we would have had to hold him in such a high degree of suspicion and mistrust to see his real, who he really is, you know.

He is incredibly Machiavellian and duplicitous though I will

tell you that and speculate as you may as far as what his real motivations are when it

comes to that but incredibly duplicitous.

It's interesting because when he does speak for himself,

he doesn't really come off as like this criminal mastermind.

No, no.

He very much fakes sincerity in a really scary way.

I see what you're so moving forward,

are there like different plans in motion for like screening members and whatnot?

Yes, but there's only so much we could do with respect to that.

I think the most important thing is strengthening two things. One, party morale, two party institutions to be resilient. Because when it came

to Danny Shaw's plot and alongside John, the reason that it failed the most wasn't actually because it's a cult.

I'm talking about internally within the leadership structure.

It failed the most because it lacked legal and constitutional

credibility. You know, I defended the authority of the Constitution, and they were coming from

a position of, well, the Constitution's bullshit. Well, it wasn't really persuasive and convincing to the leadership because we all already agreed on the constitution and we

if we decide now to throw that away it causes total chaos it's totally impossible so that was really why they failed we can

they would prefer to read into it and say it's because it's a cult and all this kind of stuff but the

truth is is they had no constitutional pretext for doing what they did at all.

And it's that simple.

So we need to really, really respect the procedures within our party and take them seriously, because they're the only thing that's going to

prevent infiltrators and bad faith actors from wrecking the party

when you spoke on this briefly publicly but i just want to ask just in case there's anything new

are there going to be any steps forward in this case?

Are you just like moving on from it entirely?

No, there's going to be steps forward.

You can count on that.

Anyway, thanks for the question.

That's all.

All right. All right. Well, I have a question. That's all. Thank you.

All right.

Well, I have a question, the so-called chairman has.

Okay, pest the mind.

Respectfully.

No.

Manu, go ahead.

Hi, can you hear me?

Yes.

Are you doing?

No, I just wanted to

I just wanted to ask

a relatively light question

I suppose

just sort of

curiosity

just to get a little bit of your

perspective

I'm not from the US

but I wanted to know a bit of your perspective on the officiality of the English language.

Like, if you got into power one day hypothetically uh would you consider well will think the english

language to be like the official language of the country or maybe co-official with indigenous languages or

minority languages where a lot of people speak it or should it just be a...

So I have to cut you off because of the interest of time

but I'll answer your question.

It has to reflect

the language of the people

and what people are speaking.

So right now I see no reason

to change or to remove English as an official language. But if there comes a time when, you know, by the time we come to power, the majority of the country is speaking a different language, we would make that the official language i guess um but it for now it's just about

what people speak in real life in their ordinary it's not something i would like to engineer

artificially basically anyway guys we're going to wrap up the space.

Why are you a short homosexual Shabbas

boy?

So there's another guy who's confused

You're a short faggot.

But can you say it without pinching your nose this time?

Why are you a short homosexual Shabbasquois?

Can you say it without pinching your nose?

Why are you a short homosexual Shavas Koi?

Are you reciting one line?

Why are you a short, fat, homosexual, Shabasboy?

Just say it to my face, and then I'll answer.

Dude, I'd hover over you, and I'd look down on you.

Yeah, yeah, you're an anonymous pussy you're an anonymous pussy on the internet.

Shut the fuck up.

All right.

That's what you are, little bitch.

So simmer down there.

You're a little loud for being an anonymous pussy.

Well, you want to talk shit, say to my face, bitch.

Simple as that. um i think it's as simple as that it really is you know some some pussy mustered the courage to speak but they got so nervous they just kept

repeating the same thing over and over again which shows me they don't have the flexibility

the maneuverability to actually, you know,

even use their voice to stand on business.

They're so nervous and their voice is shaking like the pussy they are

with their nasly bitch

voice that they're

just cornered and

they're resorting to

looping over and over again.

But

you want to talk shit.

I'm out here, you know?

You're on the internet, you little bitch.

Come say it to my face and see what happens.

If you want me to take you seriously, that is, you know.

Anyway, that's the end of that.

All right, we are wrapping up.

That's that.

You know, a lot of people got way too comfortable with these,

these little destiny memes, you know?

Like... these little destiny memes, you know, like, but then they see me in person and it's, it's not exactly what the internet told them, you know, from my experience. Um, and that's why nobody talks shit ever in person to me ever

not even once uh anyway spirit what's up Gigi the issue?

Uh, Gigi, the issue is that you're a time waster wanting to argue about Andrew Tate when no one gives a fuck, frankly.

And I was just making the point that you can't create problems surrounding Jackson's tweets,

given the moral hypocrisy. If you're making, if you're coming at it from a moral place of argument, then you said, oh, I don't have a problem with Jackson. So whatever. So then end it.

It's fucking over.

Nobody gives a shit about arguing about Andrew Tate.

Like, nobody gives a fuck.

It's literally not relevant in all. all right all right

all right

i honestly think the people that constantly make a discourse about that one fucking tweet are feds.

Oh, should I go there?

Should I go there and call them feds? Because why the fuck else are you trying to just,

it's like, you know, we got an angle to divide them. Let's divide them. Let's divide them. You're a

fucking Fed, all right? Why would you want to constantly press this issue and blow it out of

proportion if you weren't a Fed,

frankly.

Yeah.

Let me go there.

That's exactly what a fucking Fed

would do, is just constantly make a

big fucking deal out of nothing.

It's classic coin till pro bullshit. Make a big fucking deal out of nothing. It's classic cointo pro bullshit.

Make a big fucking deal out of something

to divide people and cause rifts and issues.

Huh.

Huh.

Sounds like some bullshit.

And if it's not some fed shit, it's some shit that people do as an excuse for not wanting to do real world work.

And actually get off their ass and fucking do something and show results.

They just want to gibber and talk and sit all day and cry and bitch and whine about a fucking tweet.

Instead of actually going and doing results and put in the work in.

You tell me.

You tell me.

By the way, I just want you guys to know something.

The feds are hyper in hyper drive right now, obsessively focused on me and the party, but me in particular, they are really interjecting themselves in all leftist discourses everywhere on the internet right now.

Because this whole plot failed, so they're just on overdrive um to make up for it and um yeah so that's why by though if you've noticed that that's literally why because this little plot of theirs failed so they have to find some way to make up for it.

They're very active right now, though. Very, very active.

Anyway, all right, guys. very very active anyway alright guys

I will see you guys

I don't know when

Sunday

maybe tomorrow

maybe going on a show tomorrow I don't know actually if that's still happening.

They have to get back to me through DMs. But I had one scheduled for tomorrow. I don't know

if it's still going on. I'll let you guys know. Bye-bye.