🔴 RED PILL NEWS | IRAN-ISRAEL WAR? 🇵🇸

I'm so lonely

Yes.

Come save me before I fall.

So for me de la

Mm-hmm.

To me he don't, but an east year man, Shuro Sarmasiaman, Jebunda Osamo, and to me he's done, Bishano Suzes of Anam, Camovo Zejuman, Hamilton, Batanam, Batanam, Batam, Bishano Suze of Anam, Kenabo Gerin Chemila Java Talam, Batanam Gotanam, Gotanam Batalam, Hamilbo Yeknomunisho, Betafovota Haranguzabon, Hamilbo yek no munishon, Betafovo to her rang, Hamesho Dukojona Bazanon, Sisalbati Lonjamon, Besola T long, Sisa Bati Long Jam.

Welcome everybody, it's happening.

I'll mince words when I say that.

Of course, I'm not an oracle, and things can go in a way that I haven't foreseen or couldn't predict, but let's be honest.

Iran has acted.

They've done the unprecedented.

Nobody has struck the Zionist entity as a sovereign nation this hard.

Since seventy three

Now this depends, as the Iranians themselves have said, on the response by the Zionist entity.

What do you think?

You think Israel's not gonna respond to this?

You think they're just gonna let this pass?

No, they're gonna respond.

And then Iran is gonna respond.

And before you know it, we're gonna have a full fledged war that will undoubtedly involve the United States.

And if the war bleeds into Syria, it'll undoubtedly involve the Russian Federation.

We may be right now in the midst of a Third World War, and it's very real.

I'm gonna drop the act.

I'm gonna drop the news anchor shit.

I'm gonna stop swearing, but I'm gonna be real with you guys.

It's going down.

It's happening.

Like, it's actually for real.

Like, this is some real shit going down.

All right.

Excuse my French.

Excuse my French.

As a matter of fact,

I don't want to get ahead of myself.

But I might become more Muslim now.

I'm gonna start swearing less and I'm just gonna be following the rules more and I j I just might become more Muslim now.

I just might hang a portrait of Ayatollah Khomeini in my set up

And Iranian flag.

Matter of fact, I'm not Arab no more.

I'm Persian.

You understand?

I'm Persian now.

Haj is the Persian.

And I'll tell you why, because I'm definitely mixed with Persian somehow in my family bloodline.

Going back, I may as well be Persian.

You know what I mean?

I'm Persian now.

I'm 100% Persian.

I'm going to become more Muslim.

Glory to the Islamic Republic.

I had skepticism a little bit.

I'm not gonna lie, I didn't really talk about it or air it out, but privately I was just like, Why aren't they attacking?

Why and they they made a move big and I'm hearing that it combined with all the resistance forces, we're talking about hundreds, hundreds of missiles.

I heard four hundred.

Where did I hear that?

Four hundred.

So before we get into anything, yes, it's happening.

Yes, something is going down.

It seems very unlikely that Israel is going to ignore this and just let it slide.

It seems very unlikely that Israel isn't going to respond to this by actually striking Iranian territory directly.

Not striking Iran's proxy.

You know, I see some dipshits on Twitter say, oh, all Israel is going to do is strike some Iranian proxies.

Really?

You think so?

You don't understand how the Zionist entity works then.

You're an idiot who's not familiar with anything.

Masjid, what's up?

Thank you for being good this year.

Thank you, Masjid Uncle, for the five.

Appreciate you.

But there's some people that think this is somehow not going to escalate and I'd love to know their reasoning.

Oh, Israel's gonna barely you know, they're what?

Do you know Israel's mentality?

You think Israel's gonna tolerate an attack by a sovereign country and let that go unnoticed?

Look at how they responded on october seventh.

The whole mentality, the whole MO of the Zionist entity is disproportionate responses.

And I know the US is begging, begging, begging the government of Israel not to respond, but they will respond.

Because if they don't respond, it's the death of Israel and they know it.

They have to respond or else.

They're not going to let it slide.

They're not going to let it and if they do and they're that stupid because if they don't let it slide, they do respond, their typical Zionist ways, Iran is going to wipe that fake country off the face of the earth.

And we are facing the real prospect it's actually real this time.

And yeah, it's happening.

That's the most important thing.

It's actually happening now.

And you know, I don't even care.

I'm gonna t I don't I don't I'm not trying to promote division, but all the people talking smack about Iran, all the people talking smack about Iran, saying Iran's not about it, Iran will never do anything, Iran will never hit Israel, name me anyone who's hit Israel as hard as Iran just did.

Name me anybody who just hit Israel as hard as Iran just did.

Who did?

Who did?

Saddam's thirty-nine Scud missiles, those are nothing compared to this.

To the in terms of the total combined attack, the audacity of this attack.

Nobody's done this.

We haven't seen anything like this since 1973 by a sovereign country.

This is the first time Iran has attacked.

Designist entity directly, by the way.

First time ever.

And you don't think that's going to spiral and escalate into something big?

It will.

It will.

And they're prepared and they know that.

And this is a game over scenario, because how is the US gonna fight a war against Iran?

With what troops?

Where's the morale?

How are they gonna whip us?

How are they gonna build k they don't have a mandate for war.

France is already apparently sending warships to go defend the Zionist entity.

With what consensus from the French people?

Wasn't it just months ago that Paris was burning?

Wasn't it months ago that Paris was burning?

Wasn't it years ago that we saw the yellow vest?

France was on the brink of a revolution.

Matter of fact, a lot of countries in the West are.

Look at the uprisings with the farmers and whatnot.

You think they have a mandate to wage a world war right now?

You think they have a mandate to go to war with Iran right now?

With what troops?

Maybe if you had a cyborg, if you had an iRobot, robot, android army, maybe you could do it.

Maybe this is Star Wars the 2, the prequel, and you had a droid clone army or whatever.

Maybe you could do it.

But with what troops?

And people say, well, it's not about manpower anymore.

I beg to differ.

Look at Russia-Ukraine.

Of course, manpower is really important.

They needed it during the Iraq war.

You know?

With what troops?

Even the troops we have right now in the US military.

You think they want to go and die for Israel to fight Iran?

Where is the morale?

I don't see it.

The US is fucked.

And yeah, I'm going to swear because we're talking about people dying.

All right.

The US, the West, NATO, and Israel are fucked and they know it.

I don't see a way out of this.

I mean, Israel's going to respond to this directly.

They're not going to do some indirect.

No, they're going to respond directly.

And here's the thing: even if I'm wrong.

Thank you, Chris.

Netanyahu needs this war to survive.

He would be arrested for unrelated corruption the day the war ends.

Biden and the U.S.

has no room to move.

They might regime change him this week.

The thing is, there's no Israel without Netanyahu.

Netanyahu and the Likud are literally the culmination of the Zionist ideology.

White boys.

I don't know what the fuck that means.

Listen, this is the culmination, but thank you for the five.

This is the culmination of the Zionist project.

Is in Netanyahu.

What is the alternative for Zionism?

What alternative path does the Zionist entity have?

They're going to do democratic two-state solution?

Nope, nope, nope, nope.

You just killed 30,000 people.

Sorry.

The state of Israel, the so-called state of Israel, will be destroyed.

And there is no salvaging it, and there's no saving it.

And even the Zionists themselves know it.

It's over.

It's literally over for the Zionist entity.

Maybe not this month, maybe not next month, maybe not even this year.

But it ends with Netanyahu.

Same with the U.S.

Empire, too, by the way.

Civil Wars is not just a movie, okay?

Um.

But yes, it's happening and

And this is real, this is serious.

And I don't just say this for no reason, this is actually serious.

This is actually serious.

Please explain the rationale for people who think it's not going to escalate.

I'm not even just saying that in a hostile way.

Is there even a one percent chance that so called Israel doesn't respond to this directly by hitting Iranian soil?

And if they do that, Iran will they just said they will.

They just said that if Israel dares respond to this, we're gonna hit him twice as hard, even harder.

So guys, unless some i unless some exceptional circumstance intervenes, extenuating circumstance, I think that's the correct word, unless something like that happens.

We're in the thick of it already.

We are straight up in the thick of it.

And it's time to start thinking of how we're going to cope with that and how we're going to deal with I mean, it's kind of too soon in a way, right?

For us here in the US, that doesn't matter, of course.

Nobody should care about that.

But I mean, there is a very high chance the US is going to get involved in an actual war.

Because now, for the first time, and I'm saying that to be fair, for the first time, now it has been proven to everybody in the region, to everybody in the world, that Iran means what they say, that when they threaten to do something, they actually mean it, and they will do it, and yes, they will risk a world war to defend their national honor.

And that they're not just bluffing.

After Soleimani, a lot of people got too comfortable thinking that Iran would not respond.

To attacks on its sovereignty.

First of all, Iran is going to respond and avenge Soleimani's death.

And now we know they are because they backed up.

They said they're going to retaliate against Israel.

A bunch of people said they weren't going to do it.

And look, they just did it.

And they're doing it.

What was it, three waves of missile attacks, ballistic missiles?

I believe it was Scott Ritter who said they actually used hypersonic missiles.

They mean what they say.

So, when Iran says, let me show this to you.

When Iran says,

And let me just show this to you directly.

When they also say, for example,

that they are going to target American bases in the region if the United States intervenes in any kind of way.

Now you know they mean it.

Now you know it's not a bluff.

Now you know they mean it.

Okay?

Now you know it's for real.

This is what it looks like for the multipolar world to take shape.

See this man, Ayatollah Khamenei?

He means what he says.

For all the people who doubted Iran, for all the people who said Iran wasn't nothing, you should feel ashamed.

Light of the moon, because here's the thing, guys.

Even I had my doubts.

Even I had my doubts, but I didn't dare.

I didn't dare have the audacity to go out in public and start talking down and bad about Iran.

Because at the end of the day, I don't know.

See, a lot of people had doubts, right?

But they acted too quickly and jumped the gun and made a fool of themselves.

by questioning Iran's integrity.

Even I was perplexed at how long it took them to respond.

I mean, Dugan used that exact word.

He was perplexed, right?

But did I go in public and start talking bad about Iran and say, oh, Iran's fake, Iran doesn't do anything?

Did I do that?

No, I didn't do that because I knew I was lacking critical information.

And we have to actually wait and see what happens.

So that's a good example of a lot of people who need to shut their mouths, not make a fool of themselves when it comes to the unfolding events in geopolitics and in international relations and affairs.

So many people kept saying, Iran's not about nothing.

Iran's not about nothing.

What now?

What now?

What now?

You saw, I mean, I'll show it to you.

Jackson might come on stream.

Jackson's gonna come on stream in a few minutes.

Thank you so much.

Saber 8, appreciate you, Sabre 8.

Iran means what they say, and they also mean what they say when they say they're going to attack U.S.

bases if the U.S.

gets involved in any capacity.

Okay?

So.

Everyone who doubted them should feel stupid right now.

That's the first thing, right?

So look at the response by the Zionist entity, by the way.

Um, you think this is not going to escalate?

Look what they're saying.

We are strong, we are prepared, we are resilient.

Okay, so they're not gonna follow that up with an actual attack on Iranian soil.

This will escalate.

This will escalate.

Jackson's about to join.

Let me tell him to get in show cue.

Jackson's gonna join.

And uh he's been covering it.

I have his profile open.

Because I'm to c to give you guys a rundown of the news, I'm just going to scroll through his profile because he's literally got everything on the dot.

You know, people ask why did Jackson go viral?

Because look at his timeline.

Look at how persistent he is and committed to being on top of everything.

But

Yeah, he's he's gonna join.

Um

Look at this.

Iran has sent another 80 drones to Israel.

So the attack isn't even over.

It's not even over.

And by the way, these drones, these are big drones rigged with explosives that detonate upon impact.

They're kamikaze drones.

And look at this.

This is something else that's really outrageous.

One billion dollars of our tax dollars were used to defend themselves from Iran.

One billion dollars of our tax dollars came from the United States of America.

One billion dollars.

You know what we could have done with one billion dollars?

And people ask, what do we mean by free America?

I don't know.

Free America from a country that's robbing us of our tax dollars.

for something we have nothing to do with as a people.

Now this is a big thing.

I'm going to save this for last.

But I f I I find this significant and but I'm not going to cover it right now.

So look, Biden's senior official is say stating directly Jackson's here.

Yo.

What up?

No, one second.

One second.

Yeah, for sure.

So, guys.

A senior official from the Biden administration, the United States is now dealing with a possible direct war between two countries.

And they've already stated they're going to come to the aid of Israel no matter what.

So that's going to be a war that probably involves us.

It's not what Biden wants right now.

It's not what the U.

S.

wants right now, but it's what it's going to get.

And Iran knows that.

The fact that the United States is revealing its weak position openly

Iran is taking advantage of that.

Can you see me?

Uh, let me put you on.

Uh let me let me put your video on.

Give me a sec.

Alright, let me let me do this.

Yeah, yeah, you're all yeah, you're literally on s screen.

Yo, what's up?

Yo.

So what a day.

Yeah, it's happening, isn't it?

It's actually happening.

'Cause here's why, right?

Here's my angle.

In what universe does Israel not respond to this by a direct attack on Iranian soil?

Uh

In the event that they're just using this for more uh US weapons and cash.

I they are doing that.

That's a given.

But I in the entirety of the existence of the so-called State of Israel, they have never let anything slide from a sovereign country.

Not even one time.

And we remember when Saddam attacked them, they responded.

This is even bigger than that attack.

And Iran is a more formidable enemy.

It's the most formidable enemy that the Zionist entity has ever had in the entire history of its existence.

And this is the first time it's actually struck their soil.

So think about it.

Imagine the Zionist entity does not respond to this.

Imagine if they just ignore it, right?

That is so unimaginable and unthinkable to me.

You know, they ignore it.

And they have no response?

Then they're gonna look like how Iran did after Soleimani was killed.

And they know that's a weak look.

They're not gonna fucking allow that.

Look at their response to October 7th and how disproportionate that was.

I think we need to suspend the assumption that Israel is a rational actor because they're straight up not.

And it is 100% part of their ideology that if anyone touches us, we have to like break their legs.

Like if someone slaps us, we have to behead them.

You know, if someone shoots us, we have to bomb them.

Like, they believe in extreme disproportionate responses to show strength.

And you know, it's Netanyahu says it all the time.

He's like, you know, we live in a tough neighborhood and people only respect strength in this neighborhood.

A sovereign country pulls off an attack like this on their soil, quote unquote, and they're not going to respond to that, there's no chance in hell, dude.

I swear there isn't.

If they don't respond to this, they're done.

They're straight up done, probably within a year.

No, I don't disagree with you.

I think that they're obviously going to respond.

I just am also aware of the fact that, yeah, there's a bunch of people in the coalition in Israel that want a full war and whatnot.

They want this really bad, but there's also people, there has to be people who are rational and understand not rational, but they rational in the sense that they understand that if they go to war with Hezbollah, like...

They're going to have northern Israel occupied.

If they go to war against Iran, they're completely screwed.

That's why they're going to pull the U.S.

in.

Yes.

But I think even with the I mean, the US just got got fucked on by the Taliban.

Like, the Taliban are the the meme of the Taliban being goatherders is like applicable when you look at the relative scale of uh power compared to Iran and Hezbollah.

Like it's not it's not gonna do anything.

They're not gonna do anything.

They said my mic's too th they're saying my mic is either too loud or too quiet.

I don't know.

The hypersonic missiles bypassing the iron dun and smaller militias synchronizing their strikes were a geopolitical warning.

So someone's saying this is a geopolitical warning shot.

I think, see, here's the thing, it's not about how much casualties you get, it's not about how many people you kill or what high-ranking generals you get, it's about sending the message that we're gonna bomb as a sovereign country your supposed territory, your soil, and get away with it.

And that's really what it is as an attack.

Like Iran bombed think about this.

Think about this.

Just re put this sentence in your head.

Iran bombed Israel.

Think about that.

Listen, dude, when Saddam sent those pathetic scud missiles against Israel, the whole Arab world was just.

They were so ecstatic.

Oh my god, Saddam's such a badass.

He hit them.

He hit Israel.

He bombed them.

What Iran just did?

It blows that out of the water, right?

And it's like

Just think about how crazy that is.

Iran bombed Israel.

Iran bombed Israel.

That is such a nice thing to recite.

You know, it was a pretty big deal what they hit.

I mean, of course, Israel's gonna like Ukraine, they're gonna come out and say, like, we are AD hit 99%.

But I mean, we all saw the videos, countless videos, the videos above Al-Aqsa, the videos above the Knesset.

It's like we saw the videos of the missiles, cruise missiles, and maybe even ballistic missiles getting through.

And they hit all the relevant military targets.

I mean, they hit the military base with the F-35s.

I think that was called like Nevigit or something, airbase.

They hit the base that was responsible for the attack on the consulate.

The one that was associated with the attack on the consulate.

Did they use hypersonic missiles for that, or was Scott Rooter?

Uh I think he was gassing up that one a little bit.

Yeah.

I don't think they use it.

Sorry.

I said that uh Iraq uh that Israel retaliated against Iraq after that attack.

Apparently they didn't.

I was confused thinking about an attack they did ten years prior against the um I think it was like uh the nuclear power facilities Iraq was trying to develop.

That was in the 80s.

That was a decade earlier.

But here's the thing: here's the difference, to be fair.

Back in the 90s, Israel had a different government and a different strategy for the preservation of the Zionist entity than what Netanyahu and the current Lakudniks have now.

Before then, they were pretending to be a little more conciliatory.

You know, this is around, I hope I don't get this wrong again, the era of the Oslo Accords.

Let me double check that, alright?

Here's the thing everyone in in this community should under understand, by the way.

Can you hear me?

Yeah.

The thing everyone in this community should understand is that, like, if Israel tries to screw with Iran, Israel's done.

And what does that mean?

It means exactly that everything that Dugan has prophesied for the multipolar world coming into shape in a very quick manner.

And this community, my community, which is made up of a lot of the guerrillas and whatnot, I mean, and the org that Haas and I are going to be launching very soon.

I mean, we are the only political faction in the United States.

I mean, leave aside communism for a second.

We are the only political faction in the United States that is promoting multipolar development with America, you know, a true patriotic, non-hostile America being a pillar within it.

There is no other political faction in America who is promoting multipolarism.

So this is just a huge development for all of us and exactly what we have all theorized is going to be taking place throughout our lifetime, and it's happening very quickly.

Yeah, I mean, um, no, you're you're completely right.

There's no other political faction in the United States.

MAGA's the only one that used to get close to us.

And when I say MAGA, I mean like the isolationist aspects there.

But that was never positively multipolar.

It was just kind of a negative isolationism.

Our American communism is expressly founded upon.

Multipolarity as the premise of the theory and the ideology itself.

It's multipolar communism and the view that America is actually a pole amidst other polls, right?

So there's no other faction or political force in the United States right now which is expressly part of the change, the multipolar world going on.

Absolutely none.

The big question we have to ask ourselves now is: I don't think we're getting ahead of ourselves by speculating or wondering about.

How is this going to turn into a war that involves the United States?

Because I'm calculating it in my head, and I'm just trying to think about the possibilities of this and the different possibilities, okay?

Israel will respond to Iran.

If they don't, then yeah, at at the very bare minimum, if they don't respond, this is the end of Netanyahu, the Lakudnik ideology and that specific variation of Zionism.

At the very bare minimum, because the whole posture was based on this idea, this view that the conciliatory route was a failure, now we have to play hardball and be super hardcore and whatever.

And this is a complete dent and a complete blow to that image that Israel has been trying to project in the region for a very long time.

Now here's the thing.

Uh if Israel responds by hitting Iranian soil and I think that's all it would take for Iran to attack harder, because the Iranians did say that if Israel retaliates in response to this, then they're also going to respond.

Did they not say that or?

No, they did say that.

Yeah.

So that will happen.

And Iran is not speaking to the U.S.

at the moment, right?

No.

Yeah.

I mean, best case scenario for Israel is they do something like they attack Iranian proxies in Iraq and they do some like cyber attack on Iran.

Like that is the best case scenario for Israel.

That that if they are wise, that should be their method of response.

I just don't see it.

I don't it's just not their MO, you know, and I know it's I know it's not rational for them to yeah, you're right.

If they were you know, as a matter of fact, if they were rational, they would not respond at all, actually, if they're smart.

If they're smart, they would not respond at all.

Well, yeah, but that that's out of the question.

Yeah, that's out of the question.

But I'm saying within the realm of actual possibilities.

You're right, but I think that they think of it politically.

Like, this country from its soil hit us.

We have to hit them back on their soil, right?

And that's being generous.

Generously, if you if predicting this generously, Israel will attack Iranian soil proportionately, tit for tat.

I don't think that's what the Zionist entity is going to do.

I think there's a strong possibility that they're going to go for a disproportionate attack.

You know, they're going to attack major civilian centers in Tehran, or they're going to do something else that's just we didn't even expect, right?

I mean, I think they were even alluding to that, were they not?

They were saying, telling Israelis, don't go to bed just yet.

Just wait, and we're going to what did they say exactly?

Do you remember?

I mean, I I thought that was in reference to more attacks coming their way from Iran.

But I think they also said they're gonna retaliate hard.

They're gonna hit him hard.

At the uh the the truth of the matter is that um you know Iran uh

Sorry, I lost my train of thought.

The the the the uh something funny just happened.

The the truth of the matter is that um

Yeah, I don't know what I was going to say.

I'll come back to it.

Yeah, I mean, I don't see a way for this not to escalate without.

Also escalating in a different way, if that makes sense.

Like, if Israel doesn't hit Iranian soil, they're saying my mic gain is too high.

Fix my mic, bro.

Your mic is at 100%.

So, you know, if gain is too high, you invite me to your home and then you treat me like this.

My gain is too high, or yours is.

My gain is too high.

Yours is not bad at all.

Oh, everyone in the chat is saying it was too high.

I think people are just like better now.

Bitching and crying for no reason.

What were you just talking about?

You were saying something about.

I don't see a way out of this without it.

I don't see a way for this not to escalate.

I was on that Mario Nafal space.

Yeah.

And, you know, I wasn't really saying anything.

I was just sitting there to get the followers and stuff.

I was like tweeting non-stop during that whole thing.

But I didn't say a lot.

But it was interesting to hear because there was an Israeli woman in there.

And I don't know what her affiliation with the government is.

She, you know, positioned herself as somewhat of an expert on the Israeli military.

And she's like, she's like, but they launched hundreds of.

I'm not going to do the accent.

She's like, they launched hundreds of drones and missiles at us.

And yeah, we have the Iron Dome.

So we stopped most of it.

But like, you know, if we didn't have that, imagine how many people they would have killed.

So, of course, we're going to respond in the same way.

They launch hundreds of things at us.

We're going to launch hundreds of things back at them.

I'm like, that is the least rational way of looking at this situation.

But that probably is how a lot of them are thinking now.

I mean, if you think about it, you have to understand Israel has an internal political so-called Israel.

They have an internal political discourse.

You know, they have an internal ideological battle, an existential battle, if you will, defining the nature of Zionism and the strategy for maintaining the Zionist project.

And they can see clearly it's not viable, right?

They can clearly see, you know, there's no solution.

That's most Israelis, quote unquote, will literally admit that there's no solution.

Because on the one hand,

Israel, if it continues its settlements, I mean, they're hoping that what they can do is just keep displacing the Palestinians, keep demoralizing them, keep having them kind of diminish eventually and depopulate, and then the problem will just disappear somehow.

It's clearly not going to happen, right?

They understand that their position is untenable, it's not viable, the occupation isn't.

A two-state solution that they try, they didn't try, sorry, the Zionists did not try at all to pursue a two-state solution whatsoever.

They pretended to and very conveniently made sure that it wouldn't happen anyway, right?

But in any case, they're not going to settle, they're not going to tolerate a Palestinian state, period, because they understand that the Zionist project, first of all, wants all of what they consider the territory of Israel.

And second of all, because

The possibility of coexistence with a Palestinian state for them.

has been completely nullified because of the settlement, uh the increasing uh settlements that have occurred in the past decades.

And that is game over, right?

There's no possibility in the minds of the Zionists for a two-state solution.

And this is why Likud is on top within Israel right now.

Because the so-called democratic and liberal elements, who I'm sure that Biden favors over Netanyahu, because of the settlement issue, they are straight up.

Irrelevant.

What are they they're not going to advocate for the dep deportation and removal of all these Israeli settlers from uh within the sixty seven borders of Palestine.

So Likud is Zionism's last stand, you know?

And once they're gone, Zionism as we know it fails and Israel's gone.

And I could be wrong, I could be eating my words here.

But when I say that because of the dominant ideology within Israel, because of the dominant forces within Israel right now, right?

There is no way that they can let Iran's retaliation slide without political suicide.

And if they engage in political suicide, that may as well be the political suicide of the Zionist state as a whole, because there's no alternative to them within the Zionist camp.

All other forms of Zionism are dead.

You see what I'm saying?

Yeah, but either way is suicide.

I mean, if they go all-out war, that's suicide in the long run, not really long run, but in the longer term.

And if they don't respond, if they don't do anything meaningful, then they're dead that way.

So either way, there's no off-ramp whatsoever.

You got to think about it.

Why did they kill 30,000 people in Gaza?

Why are they so aggressive in Gaza?

Because Netanyahu.

I mean, it's of course the nature of the Zionist state, but Netanyahu's specific strategy is basically telling the people of Israel, quote unquote, that, oh, yeah, you know, we're not going to let October 7th slide.

We're going to project strength and we're going to have peace through strength only, you know.

And that's why it's part of that strategy.

So with Iran's attack now, if they don't respond, if Israel doesn't respond, it has just nullified the entire rationale that it tells itself for the genocide in Gaza.

And it's like done, you know, even internally, how it justifies itself to itself.

So, this is an important thing to keep in mind.

Like, this is not just a crisis of Israel versus its neighbors.

This is a crisis that can blow up the Zionist state from within itself.

Yeah.

Today was a very historic day.

Oh, yeah.

And

I I'm of the opinion that that it's happening.

Like this is actually no way to no way to de-escalate this.

But I could be wrong.

But what do what do you think?

Is there any way to de 'cause I'm trying to think and I just I literally can't think of any way for that this could ever be de-escalated.

Though what I said earlier was like if they strike some Iranian proxies in Syria or Iraq or something like that, that's a way that they could de-escalate the situation.

But other than that, I mean, I don't know if they're gonna I don't think they're gonna do that, but that would be de-escalatory and still preserve the Israeli state, probably.

Not for sure, but probably.

Yeah, I think yeah, I don't know if Iran would respond to that if it's just one of its proxies were hit.

I don't think so.

But I think the mentality of the Zionists is that actually we were justified in originally bombing their embassy.

So they're not going to be like, okay, fair game.

You know, you retaliated.

Now we're even.

I don't think that's their mentality.

I think their mentality was, no, actually, we were originally justified in attacking you.

And you just doing this to us means that we have to hit you 10 times harder because that's a second.

You know, so the Zionists, the way they reason, the way that this ideology hijacks people's brains and the way they see the world is completely different, right?

And I think people like that crazy woman in that space probably represent the view of people in the war room right now and in the Israeli government.

Yes, but Netanyahu's primary concern is his political longevity.

So, you know, you got this U.S.

House bill that's being discussed about more funding for Israel.

You got Israel asking for the United Nations Security Council emergency.

That was interesting.

Yeah.

The UN Security Council meeting, which is already slated to take place tomorrow.

And so those are interesting developments that make me be like, maybe they do see the bigger picture here, and maybe they're not going to nuke this whole thing.

But if recent history is any sign as to what is going to unfold, then yeah, they will be delusional.

They will do something insane.

But here's what I think is this would be the most appropriate response for Israel, given that they do something.

Strike some proxies, go through the UN, get your money from the Congress, and then if this is a rational, I'm putting that in quotes, that Israel would respond.

They'd also do some like ISIS-K terrorist attack on Iran again through a proxy.

That would be a rational way for them to go about this.

But again, recent history has shown that they are not rational.

You know, you bring up a good point.

They did actually send that letter to the UN, which is a I found that to be a very peculiar move on their part, which actually might signal their strategy of dealing with this.

It might not be as retaliatory as I'm predicting it will, you know, because why are they if they are going to act how I think they would, why are they pleading to the UN to condemn Iran, to the international community?

Wouldn't they just say, fuck the UN, fuck the international community?

You just fucked with us.

We're going to hit you 10 times harder.

Just like they did with Gaza, for example.

So I don't know, actually.

I think.

And what do you think is behind that move in the first place, by the way?

Why are they petitioning to the Security Council to condemn Iran?

Do they think that somehow Russia and China are going to see, you know.

Come around to them, or I don't understand.

Well, the whole goal of October 7th was to mobilize international support for Palestine and the resistance, and that was extremely successful.

So I think this is their opportunity to play victim and be like, see, it's not just one-sided at the United Nations and maybe score some political points at the United Nations amongst international powers at the Security Council who have otherwise taken a pretty, with the exception of the U.S.

and the UK and France, taken a pretty harsh support of Palestine, even going so far as these permanent members are floating the idea of a Palestinian state at the UN.

I mean, is there a chance that Israel is going to win the sympathy of, and guys, remember, every time I say Israel, it's in quotes, is there even a chance they're going to win the sympathy of people not already firmly behind the Zionist project?

Like, take, for example, the so-called non-aligned countries and some countries in Latin America and Africa.

You know, the ones that simultaneously condemned Russia, but also had enough wits to condemn Israel as well.

Like, like, these.

Israel was so harsh in condemning Israel for bombing the consulate.

Yeah.

And I think if Iran had decided to go, because, you know, Scott Ritter also said this is eye for an eye.

It's really not I for an eye in any way, shape, or form.

I mean, eye for an eye would be Iran targets some generals and some commanders, like you said earlier.

This is strategic, it's morale, it's psychological, and it's economic, but it's not eye for an eye.

And that's not to say it should be scoffed at what they did.

I think it should be celebrated what they did.

But this is not eye for an eye.

So I think maybe if it was eye for an eye and they targeted like generals and stuff like that, I think maybe there would be some words of condemnation, or maybe like you'd see some parties say stuff like we need to pursue peace and stop the escalation.

But it's really not escalation.

Everyone knew Iran was going to have to respond, and they did it in a way.

Of course, it was unprecedented, but they did it in a way that was, in a sense, got the message across.

But it was brilliant, actually, what they did.

It was brilliant.

And they targeted the strategic sites, but they did it in a way that prevented further escalation.

This was really not escalating.

Do you do you what's the casualty count so far?

They're not gonna say.

It's just like when the it's like when the US Navy SEALs randomly, you know, mysteriously passed away after the Houthis said that they killed multiple Navy SEALs.

Yeah.

Okay, yeah.

I I was expecting as much.

What what do you think the casualty count is if you had ballpark it?

Well, they said that serious damage was done to that air base.

We also know that they targeted Erbil in Iraq and maybe another and they usually hit the barracks where they have the soldiers.

Was it Iran who attacked Erbil or was it their proxies?

I don't know.

It could I don't know.

Because like it's hard to gauge because Iran was this was another crazy thing about the attack.

Iran was firing from all across the country.

Like the entire all their all their uh all their launch sites were firing off.

So they were firing from everywhere.

And then Hezbollah was firing.

The Iraqi factions were firing.

The Houthis were firing.

And I didn't even know this till I was streaming, but I hadn't seen it confirmed anywhere.

But Syria was firing too.

The Golan saw a lot of action today.

And I think that was strategic as well, not just because it's important territory, but I think they strategically targeted that because that is technically internationally disputed territory.

Yeah, yeah, true.

I mean, um

Yeah.

In terms of

In terms of the um

The Iranian attack, as you said, it was all over Iran they were firing.

I heard the claim that this is the longest.

Missile attack?

Was that bullshit?

Like like uh it was the it was like the biggest drone attack.

I what do you mean in a moment?

Like, no, geographically, like.

Uh oh, like as uh I don't know, was that just a troll or something?

Someone was like, This is the um.

Iran strike was like the world record of the longest missile launch not missile launch, uh drone attack launch.

From point to point.

I don't know.

That might be true.

I mean, it's either Russia, Ukraine, or them.

I don't know.

Yeah.

But the thing is, Russia uses the same exact drone.

So it wouldn't be surprising if it was similar distance.

They use those Jaren 2 kamikazes.

But what is interesting is they did target the south of Israel as well because everyone was thinking like, well, actually, not everyone.

There was a lot of people who cast stones in our direction for saying that Iran was going to attack.

I saw leftists being like, they're just doing this to clickbait.

And it's like, no, we're living in the middle of this.

Like, bro, when you and I were in Moscow, like, when you're in the middle of it, when you're talking to all these people, you realize that everyone's about it.

Everyone's about it.

Yeah.

And there's no, it's not about, it's not about the posturing anymore.

Like, everyone's about it.

So when, um, so what was interesting was like Hezbollah was doing those attacks yesterday with those like 50 missile barrages on the north.

And I was looking at that.

I'm like, oh, maybe they're only going to hit the north because maybe they're trying to weaken the iron dome there and the AD systems there.

But they went full scorch earth and like hit every like all of Israel had red alerts.

All of Israel had air raid sirens going off.

All of Israel was in a declared state of emergency.

And it was a very big deal.

So Biden is not going to address the nation, right?

Okay, I don't know who this idiot is.

Literally 99% didn't land.

Yeah, well, if you believe those numbers, I'm sure you probably believe Ukraine's numbers about their AD systems as well.

So like, that's just so stupid.

Of course, Israel's going to say 99% were intercepted.

Watch the videos I posted.

Like, you can literally see in the videos I posted that far more than 99% made, far more than 1% made contact.

And they're not going to tell us how many people died.

It's the same thing with the war in Gaza.

It's like everyone knows that Israeli hospitals are filled with injured and they have tons of KIAs, but they're not going to say that because if they say that, then that is an admission of defeat.

Israel is an extremely casualty-averse military.

They've never lasted in a conflict beyond like 2,000 KIAs.

So the fact that this is happening, this is unprecedented for Israel.

And they know they can't admit the real numbers because it would just be politically disastrous for them.

I mean, you know, I.

I'm really curious about something.

You know, um

Wh when it fuck, I forgot what I was gonna say.

Holy shit.

Fuck, what was I going to say?

I literally just slipped out of my mind.

Um.

Give me a second.

Give me a second.

I literally just slipped out of my mind.

Uh yeah, yeah, oh yeah, yeah.

I saw this guy quote tweet, an Indian guy, who said that according to Israel, they claimed that Iran warned them before the attack and told them everything.

If that's actually true that Israel is claiming that, if Israel is actually claiming that in any capacity or Israeli media, I know for a fact that it's not true.

Because if it was true, they would not report that to the public.

If Iran warned Israel beforehand, Israel would not tell the public because they wouldn't want to encourage.

So, if they're actually spreading that fake news to make Iran look bad and make Israel look stronger than it is, then I know for a fact it's a lie.

You know, that's not true either.

Israel came out, the IDF came out, and Marco Rubio also came out, and they all said the same thing.

It was like a script almost.

They said that Iran's attack was larger than anticipated.

That's what they all said.

So, that's not true, according to the IDF sources that I saw.

But that really wouldn't make sense either.

I mean, they were saying for like the past week that Iran was going to strike every 24 to 48 hours.

They're like, Yeah, they're going to do it right now.

They're going to do it right now.

Iran was just toying with them like cat and mouse.

Strategic patience.

They were keeping them on the edge of their seats.

They were inducing them into this psychological shock for a week on end after that peace proposal was rejected that Iran put forward about a permanent ceasefire in exchange for not doing this.

And for a week, they kept them in this state of shock, fear, instability, chaos, and also a form of economic hemorrhage because they had to be on constant alert and have their defenses ready every single second of the day.

So, no, that's not true.

You think Biden's sleeping right now?

He might be, right?

I think he really might.

I think he really might be sleeping.

Bedtime.

He's got a.

Yeah, it's bedtime.

Bedtime for Biden.

I don't know.

So is it over now?

Like, on Iran's side, is it over?

Like, are all the attacks concluded?

What I told you this morning was like, I actually got it pretty on the nose with what I said because we talked right the second that the first drone announcement was launched when they were just saying it was like two dozen drones.

And I said, I think they're going to send the drones.

And then like when the drones get close, they're going to do missile attacks and they're going to use that to obfuscate the iron dome air defense systems and muddy the waters around that.

And then I also said, I think that maybe they'll do multiple brages of these attacks, maybe even for a few days.

So, you know, I'm not going to be surprised if tomorrow there's like more of this, you know, another 80.

I mean, it's kind of sounding like it might be over, but I would not be surprised if tomorrow, you know, we see another 80 drones or another, you know, few missiles coming out of Iran.

Is there...

When was the last barrage of drones that they launched?

Literally, like an hour ago.

I don't know if they like when we were talking halfway through our conversation, I saw reports that they were starting to intercept them over Jordan.

So that like it's still it's still you know going on.

Is it really true that Iran said it's over though, that you know, this is it, and if you respond, then we'll respond.

But we consider this

Well, they again, they were just they really are brilliant because they were they were the masterminds behind October 7th.

And then all this stuff has just been brilliant.

They told, I mean, it's kind of kind of weird, but they told the Iranian ambassador to the United Nations said, like, oh, we're done.

That's everything.

That's it.

And then about 40 minutes later, after they said that to the UN, was when the second brage of missiles was announced to have been fired.

So they lied to the UN and Israel.

And maybe they kind of caught them off guard with that because they were like, yeah, it's over.

And then they launched more.

And then Hezbollah launched more and did, they had successful strikes in the north after that statement was made.

That is so strange, isn't it?

Yeah, it's very strange.

Could it be a division and the messaging?

Or is it planned?

Well, yeah, no idea.

That that's for that's for the Iranians to deliberate, I guess.

I don't know.

But it was weird.

It was very, because I was on the stream with I was on the Mario Nafal space and there was a guy from Iran and he was like, no, there's like the IRGC is saying they're launching more.

And then Mario was like, no, you're wrong.

Stop saying that.

The ambassador to the UN said that it's over.

And the guy kept pressing.

He's like, no, you're wrong.

Like the IRGC is saying they're going to launch more.

They're doing more videos of like the missiles being loaded.

And Mario was kind of getting pissed off.

And I was confused too.

I was like, wait, what's happening?

But he was right.

The guy was right.

Yeah.

And then Mario was like, oh my God, like you are actually right.

Like they're not done.

They're sending more.

It was very weird.

How did that guy know?

What's his source?

Uh I think he's like affiliated with contacts, IRGC contacts.

Yeah, people need to understand the IRGC is a very very strong cohesive force and unit.

It's like it's a state within a state.

I don't I don't mean to denigrate the Islamic Republic, obviously not, but the IRGC is a machine of its own in a way, in many ways, you know.

Um

And you know, they they they so so we're basically we're kind of

Not able to know how far this is going to go in terms of the retaliation.

It could they like you said, it could be for a few more days.

How how quickly do you think Israel is going to respond?

Right away or

I think they'll do that UN Security Council meeting, and then maybe they'll wait a few days and then respond, right?

Yeah.

When is that meeting convening or is it convening?

Tomorrow.

I think it's like tomorrow at like four.

I don't know what time, but tomorrow.

They said Sunday.

They said Sunday at 4 p.m., but they didn't specify the time zone in the statement I saw.

But it's New York, so probably like 4 p.m.

Eastern.

I think it would be very funny if.

This would be super funny if during the meeting Iran was still sending drones at them and sending missiles their way.

That would be really funny.

It's not out of the realm of possibility.

And I don't know if that'd be funny.

I think that might be smart, but I think it'd be funny if during the meeting China decided to take Taiwan and Maduro decided to take that'd be the greatest comedy show of all time.

And not just comedy, but glory.

That'd be the most glorious thing ever.

But now I think a lot of people are observing what's going on and they realize this is the multipolar age.

This is the time to seize the moment.

There will never be a better time than this.

There will never be a better time than this to seize the day.

There's I mean, the US I mean, I have never seen have you ever seen the US behave this way?

Like begging Iran, oh no, no, please stop.

Biden's literally last week.

Last week, they were begging the Houthis.

They had their Operation Prosperity Guardian that failed, and they're begging the Houthis to conform based on the promise that a terrorist label will be removed.

It's like Biden's calling Iran and getting rejected.

I've never seen the U.S.

on the back foot this hard before in my whole life.

Yeah.

Yeah.

There is no better time to just you got it you got some territory you want to take back, just go and take it straight up.

China, whatever, go and take it.

Nobody's gonna stop you.

It's true.

It's true.

And it yeah.

And and you know

Mr.

Kim Jong-un should do the same.

I mean, this is the best time.

Like, this is there's never going to be a better time.

You know, I might eat my words, actually.

Slightly on a slightly, it's slightly related, I guess, but um.

I don't think anyone really knew for certain that Iran had hypersonic missiles until they posted that video, the video called 400 Seconds to Jerusalem or Tel Aviv or something.

Yeah.

No one I don't think they had ever shared any videos of their hypersonic missiles, but it's not that surprising considering their close coordination with Russia and just like the prowess of their already pretty mighty missile supply.

But, you know, this week, I don't know if you saw it, but this week North Korea unveiled their first hypersonic mission.

I heard about that, yeah.

And North Korea, I mean, they can't spend like that much on their military.

They've obviously benefited immensely from the Ukraine war, but like, how much you it's got to be like less than like $10 billion that Korea spends on their military, right?

I don't even know here's the another interesting question is like how much does money apply?

I mean if they're buying foreign weapons obviously it applies but if they're just manufacturing it by themselves they have a totally different economic reality and system they have.

But that's that's what I'm saying.

It's like we spend a trillion dollars on on our military and we like we still haven't even gotten to the process.

I don't think we've tested a hypersonic missile in the United States because like the metal alloys keep failing that we're producing.

But now Russia, Iran and Korea all have hypersonic missiles before the United States.

Like that's insane.

I think one of the biggest signs of an empire on its way out is when it starts getting outdone in the arms race.

And I think the hypersonic missile technology is a big example of that.

And drone technology.

Yeah, exactly.

I mean, Iran's drone development is so impressive that Russia buys drones from them, right?

And Korea.

Russia's been buying a lot of drones from Korea recently.

But the other thing is, it's like, take away the military aspects, the economic aspects are also still continuing to fall in the multipolar world's favor.

This week, the Yuan replaced the dollar as the number one top foreign currency exchange on the Russian 4X exchange.

So, like, the U.S.

is just taking L after L after L.

Yeah, this, and, and, like I said, this could be the, I mean, Biden does not want this to be the moment.

He's like, no, no, no, no, we're not prepared for this.

De-escalate, de-escalate.

He doesn't know what's going on.

It's literally all those.

It's literally all those retards that went to like.

like Columbia yeah, it's his it's his um it's his staff, the people he staffed the White House with.

I mean, who we don't even know who's in charge at this point.

Like, who is in charge?

Is it actually the staffers and the administration and the cabinet?

Or is it

You know, i is is it something else?

I d I I d it's even hard to tell.

That all we can all we know is that as a as a machinery, the machine of US foreign policy, foreign uh

Foreign policy and foreign relations

And obviously, the domestic state machine, but more importantly, the U.S.

Empire as an administrative machine, let's call it that, is broken.

It doesn't matter who's controlling it.

It's fundamentally broken.

It simply doesn't work.

You know what it reminds me of?

Because you say, like, oh, who's running the show?

I mean, like, Victoria Newland is gone.

All of the sages, if you will, of the deep state are parting ways and retiring and leaving before shit really hits the fan too hard.

And it reminds me of when Mike Gravelle was running for president and he just let his Twitter be run by like Dylan Burns and all his friends.

And they were just like, it was like, what the fuck are they posting sometimes?

And then when the campaign ended, they just started posting some really gay shit.

And it kind of reminds me of that.

It's like you have this weird cabal of like recent Yale grads who were in the Skull and Bones Society doing their masturbation initiation like two years ago.

And now they're running U.S.

foreign policy against Iran and China and Russia.

It's just like, it's such a cluster fuck.

It's terrible.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I, you know, I, it kind of seems like the news is simmering down right now surrounding the events.

Do do I do I think that?

Yeah, it d i it kinda seems like that, right?

And maybe for tonight, it's yeah, yeah, I'm probably gonna peace out of here.

I gotta run, but oh, yeah, that was good, good talking and a historic day.

Do you hold on before you go?

Um

Flip a coin when you wake up tomorrow.

Is it World War Three?

Probably now, right?

Not tomorrow.

Not tomorrow.

I don't know how anyone's going to sleep tonight.

By the way, okay, okay.

Finally, give us your thoughts on Civil War, because you saw that recently.

Oh.

My thoughts aren't that entertaining about it.

I think everyone should go watch it.

The cinematography was insane.

It feels like you're in the movie.

Liberals are freaking out because it wasn't like too political, which is a good sign.

It was really good.

See it in IMAX, but overall, and I told this to you, Hawes.

I was, and you know, I told it to my friend I saw it with.

I was like, honestly.

And no one really knows war unless you're in it.

And obviously, I've never seen war.

I've never been in it or anywhere close to it.

But over the past two years of covering Ukraine and Gaza and every day looking at these photos and videos and testimonies and even speaking to people in the Donbass and Yemen who are in the middle of it, it's like I've thought about this so much about what the U.S.

is going to look like and feel like when it was in when it when it's when it goes through this, if it does.

And so for me, seeing the movie, it was just very unsurprising.

And I thought it was pretty accurate.

And it didn't really trigger me emotionally in any way.

And I think a lot of people who are watching it are triggered emotionally.

And they're like, wow, this is going to be crazy.

You know, it's like for me, it didn't really do that.

The only thing that, and I told you this as well, the only thing I think could have made the movie better, and obviously this was, I'm not going to spoil anything, but the movie follows around a team of journalists in the middle of it all.

I think it'd be, and they kind of depict everything as being like impoverished and like no money.

And everyone's like, you know, you know, trying to find their next meal and stuff and no homes.

It would have been interesting if they'd looked at it from a more the military angle and depicted like the warlordism and the who's supplying the weapons and that sort of stuff.

And not taking a political angle, but looking at the different factions and their leaderships.

And I think that would have been more interesting for me.

But I think finally, you know, like I just wanted to say this, and maybe we get a clip of this, but you know, for all the people that are criticizing Civil War for not being too political, I'm not even saying, I'm not trying to defend the movie politically or ideologically, but did you watch the same movie that I did?

Because I am going to spoil it because I don't care.

And I'm just going to say the whole point of the movie was to depict how it's impossible for journalists and for media to be neutral.

Because in the end, the journalist literally gets caught in the crossfire, gets shot, and then they get, then the other journalist just takes a photo of them and it's showcasing how it's as a spectator, it's impossible not to get caught in the crossfire and be corralled into the polarization and the partisanship.

In other words, the message of the film is the unavoidability of the polarization, that you are going to get swept up into it no matter what.

Even as you try to avoid it and be above it, there's no, and then the final picture I know is when they shoot the president, but the real final picture is when she takes the picture of her journalist.

Huh?

I said, you're really spoiling the whole movie.

Yeah, because I don't care.

You know, because guess what?

If a movie's good, you can know everything.

You can read the script and then watch it and it'll be the same.

Yeah.

Yeah, but I mean they did they did um

You know, they did t it that that is the mar that is the message, but they did also talk about like, oh yeah, my dad's on a farm in in Iowa, Colorado, acting like this isn't happening.

They did say that stuff too.

But the other the other thing that aligns with your message is like when they go in the town and it looks all normal, and then they have like the snipers on the roof, and it's like even that, it shows that same message.

You know, even then, the film wasn't neutral.

It straight up demonizes Mago way more than the other side.

Yeah, but it was very it's very bearable.

Like in 2024, that is an extremely no, no, it wasn't done in a it wasn't done in like a retarded way, but it's clear there is a bias there.

It's like it wasn't, it wasn't just neutral, you know?

It's kind of a stupid complaint people have.

Yeah.

No, it wasn't neutral, but it was very, you know.

It's very tolerable.

Yeah.

All right.

Yep.

See you later, Jackson.

Thanks for coming on.

Long live the resistance.

Peace out.

Long live the resistance.

See you later, man.

Okay, so

Um, guys, I uh wanted to show this to you because.

A lot of people are curious about MAGA communism, whatever, and I'm just going to show you this clip, which seems pretty remarkable and unbelievable, right?

And I'm not going to get ahead of myself.

I'm going to show you the clip and explain what it means politically, right?

What it means ideologically, what it means for our understanding of American domestic politics.

Let's watch the clip.

She is our big problem.

Jesus I.

They're not wrong.

They're not wrong.

He's done everything wrong.

Alright.

So I think some of our detractors will look at this and then raise the bar of where they previously were placing us.

We're not claiming Trump is anti-Zionist.

We're not claiming that anti-Zionism is the default in MAGA.

MAGA Stalinists, thank you.

We are not claiming that it's automatically the position MAGA has to be anti-Zionist.

What we are claiming is that if this was a Democrat rally and someone was shouting this in the crowd, they would get booed out and escorted out by security.

That's what we're saying.

We're saying it is possible.

To call out the Zionist genocide in the MAGA camp and at least have an audience and at least make it possible for this to be a and and have Trump himself be conciliatory to you.

Now, many people will see this be like, yeah, well, Trump is just kind of like.

Not being genuine or sincere here.

Okay, I mean, you just raised the bar though, because nobody's nobody nobody made it about whether Trump is a serious or genuine anti-Zionist.

It's about whether anti-Zionism is a possible form of politics to have within the MAGA movement.

And this is clearly evidence that it is.

And that's all we've ever said.

In the MAGA movement,

This is possible.

It is possible to accuse Israel of genocide.

It's not possible in the Democratic camp of Biden.

and and the movement of liberals and and liberal bohemians that are pan leftist detractors accuse us of writing off

or of sorry, of uh discrediting communism in in front of.

Those people are not important for a communist movement.

They're not.

The Biden supporters, they're a tiny, tiny, small minority of America.

Even if they're a significant minority, they're not the masses, they're a minority, okay?

You don't have to see, weren't we just told that MAGA was Zionist?

Wasn't everyone telling us MAGA is Zionist?

If MAGA is Zionist, why are they chanting Genocide Joe at a rally?

You would at least have to concede that MAGA is not inherently Zionist.

Sure, there's evangelical Zionists, there's Zionists in MAGA, but it's not inherently Zionist.

That's all the MAGA communism thing was saying.

That there's a possibility here that's not there when it comes to the Democratic Party and its pan-leftist NGO civil society allies in the universities or whatever.

Like, that's all we're saying.

But it's astonishing.

I mean, Trump said, you're not wrong.

I mean, that's see, all Trump is saying about these events is like, oh, if I was president, none of this would have happened.

Which is a really hilarious thing to say, actually.

It's exactly what the government deserves to have as the president.

Somebody who is mocking.

U.S.

politics so much that he's literally like a cartoon.

He's like, oh, if I was president, none of this bad stuff would.

It's actually hilarious.

It's hilarious because it's just not serious.

It's just like he's just saying whatever to gas himself up.

He's not being a partisan for Israel.

Yeah, he's going through the motions saying all the things that he feels like he has to.

But what he's really saying is, oh, there would be no problems if I was president.

That's what he's saying.

Um meanwhile you see

You see, I'm not saying MAGA is inherently anti-Zionist, that's not what I'm saying.

I'm saying it's possible for anti-Zionism as a viable form of politics to have a basis in a mass movement by learning the lessons and in a lot of ways inheriting MAGA, you know, taking over MAGA, directing it out of the two-party system.

That form of consciousness that's there is very open to dissident perspectives in general.

That's really all we've been saying.

Should we vote for Trump?

No, I do not tell my followers to vote for anyone.

I think voting is pointless and a waste of time.

Why should I vote in sham elections in an occupied country?

Why should I vote?

Because you're a citizen, it's your responsibility.

What I'm not gonna demean myself and make a mockery of myself by waking up and going and casting a ballot and voting like an idiot in a system that's rigged anyway.

Not gonna do it.

I'm not voting in a system that I'm not sovereign in.

I'm not voting in a system just so all of the crimes committed by the government can be blamed on me and they can say, Well, this is what you voted for.

I'm not voting.

I'm not voting.

And I and I would never make the mistake to vote as an individual.

That's another mistake.

You shouldn't be voting as an individual.

You should be voting under the directive of an organization where your voice matters and you are sovereign.

Because this government is whoever we're voting for is occupied.

So if we're going to cast our vote for someone, it should be strategic and it should be under the directive of an organization we trust, which isn't the government, right?

Not just me as an individual voting for someone I trust, because I'm just an individual.

You know, I'm just a person.

How am I supposed to know who to trust?

Only when we collectively organize.

And actually come to an agreement and come to decisions collectively, should we act strategically and say, actually, this is who we're going to vote for?

Because this is what's strategically beneficial for a new form of government to take this one's place.

And we do need a new form of government in this country.

If you think otherwise, you're an idiot and a shill.

I think voi voting you just don't have to vote.

On the day of the ele I mean, do you want to vote?

Is it fun?

Is it fun to wait in line?

Why?

Why do you feel compelled to do it?

You could literally be doing anything else.

If you get a thrill out of it, and if it's fun to you, then go and, you know.

Just like

Just like draw something instead of go on the ballot and take wipe your ass with it.

I don't know.

Yeah, literally wipe your ass with the ballot.

Is this illegal to advocate for?

Go into the voting booth.

Uh wipe your ass with the ballot and uh

Right in.

Um

Smell this.

Just write in smell this, and then a ballot worker will be like, huh?

That's who you want to be, president?

And then enough people do that and then smell this becomes president.

But how it is a smell occupies political office starts a crisis in this country because it just confuses people too much.

Because uh technically a smell is not a person.

So the smell becomes a kind of hyper object in the sense of Timothy Morton.

It's just this kind of pure presence, almost like a Lovecraftian deity exerting influence upon us somehow.

It's not necessarily a personified being, but it's more like a transcendent

force, literally coming from the void,

The void

Between the cracks.

Of no man's land.

Smell is the president.

Literally schizophrenia.

Anyway.

Um

That's that's what I think you should do in the and if you feel like you have to go to the ballot booth or whatever Wow, Anonymous, what's going on?

Thanks for the five, but but also thank you for that analogy and and um bringing that to our attention.

It's it was really important you did that.

It was just so important, you know, we couldn't have gotten along without that.

Um it would have it would have been impossible, actually.

It would have been totally impossible for that not to

Happen.

Yeah.

I mean Israel quote unquote is done.

Look at Ukraine battle map.

Look out this retarded diarrhea nonsense they're saying.

331 and the vast majority were shot down.

They're claiming all drones 103 of 110.

Ukrainian math.

It's literally a meme.

It's literally a meme.

Ukrainian math and Ukrainian statistics.

This is literally the d the this is the ghost of Kiev Ukraine bullshitter logic.

All we need is Zelensky to come and just start talking about.

Um

Okay, um so funny.

Possible US direct war

Uh the US is possibly dealing with a direct war.

Wow, this is just

This is news.

This is definitely

It's happening.

All the people who say nothing ever happens, it's probably their worst day ever.

All right, look at this.

U.

S.

Secretary of Defense has just released this statement.

Let's read it.

At the direction of Biden, US forces in the Middle East on the 13th intercepted dozens of missiles and UAVs on their way to Israel, launched from Iran, Iraq, Syria and Yemen.

But there were 400 total, right?

So dozens isn't even that much.

Our forces remain postured to protect U.S.

troops.

Yada yada yada.

We condemn this.

We call them to halt any further attacks and to de-escalate.

That's what they want, to de-escalate.

We don't see a conflict with Iran.

We know you don't because you can't afford one.

But we won't hesitate to act to protect our forces and support the defense of Israel.

I think you will hesitate and you just show that you will hesitate.

So he just released a jibber jabber, nothing burger, meaningless statement that has no bearing on anything.

Just a complete nonsense waste of time statement.

Uh nobody cares about

Okay, apparently

No way.

Look at this.

Biden told Netanyahu the US will oppose any Israeli counterattack against Iran.

Or he will not participate in one.

I don't know what that means.

You will oppose one or you just won't participate in one.

Mario kinda waffles.

The Iran attacks appear to have paused for now.

That was as of eleven thirty-nine, which was about twenty minutes ago.

That was approximately twenty minutes ago.

But apparently, the U.S.

isn't going to participate in offensive operations against Iran.

Biden to Netanyahu.

What?

you won.

President Biden told Netanyahu that he should consider tonight a win due to Iran's attacks being largely unsuccessful.

So previously, I got some mid dates mixed up

It seems like the US is trying to do something similar to what they did

In 90, well, what year was it?

It was 91 during the Gulf War when Saddam.

uh fired missiles at

Israel and he was persu and Israel was persuaded not to respond.

I think the US is crossing its fingers and hoping this is a similar situation.

The issue is that it's not a similar situation.

A.

There's a different government in Israel.

That's very important.

B.

The context is totally different.

This isn't in the context of the Gulf War.

This isn't in the context of the U.S.

already in an offensive posture against Iran saying, oh, don't worry, we'll take care of it.

No, no, no, no, no.

This is a totally different cir circumstance and scenario, and the geopolitical significance of it's totally different.

Back in nineteen ninety one, Iraq was getting slapped around by the US and its allies.

Who is no one's slapping Iran around right now, nobody's putting them in check.

So, Israel looks weak by not responding, right?

It's a totally different context.

Um

So the US is really, really engaging in some wishful thinking, actually.

When it comes to this, they're engaged in some wishful thinking if they think that this is going to end the way it did in 91.

This is not Iran is not Iraq in 91.

This is a totally different circumstance.

And I think Netanyahu is going to respond.

And if he does, Iran's gonna bitch slap him back into the Stone Age.

And the Zionist entity is wiped off the map and it's done.

It's finished.

Israel cannot win a war, they can even if they use nukes, they're committing suicide.

Even if they use nukes, they're gonna commit suicide.

Doesn't matter.

Is it a glowy opinion to want acceleration of this conflict?

It's not about what you want.

The US wants to de-escalate right now at all costs because it cannot afford this war.

So keep that in mind.

Trev Ali, what's going on?

Notice how Lloyd Austin said we will not hesitate to support the defense of Israel and not that we would directly defend Israel.

Yeah, I know, they have to word themselves in such an ambiguous way so that it's not actually a decision.

They're not committing to any real decision.

Okay, apparently Israel quote unquote will respond to Iranian attack within 24 hours.

Thank you, Wallo, appreciate you.

So this was three hours ago.

Let's check this out.

Uh let's see.

Israeli cabinet members authorized Netanyahu to make decision on response to Iran's attack.

Update Israel

Now it's our turn.

Is this a real quote, or what is this?

What is this?

So Suleiman is uh sharing this.

Uh Israel is going to respond within twenty four hours.

So tomorrow the United States uh Security Council is going to be convening to make a decision about whether they should condemn Iran for for for doing what.

For doing what it actually has the right to do under international law, which is retaliate for the attack on an embassy by another country.

Supposedly it's another country.

I think it's a fake country, but it's besides the point.

Uh yeah, who's gonna condemn Iran?

Who's gonna condemn Iran?

Who's gonna condemn Iran?

Nukes.

How much nukes do you guys know this?

How much nukes does the Zionist entity have?

Do we just not know?

Is this not known?

How many nukes do they have?

Anyone know?

How many nukes does Israel have?

Unknown.

They got him.

Up to 400.

Wow.

Two hundred seventy plus, well that's kind of a lot of variance.

They don't have nukes.

Ha!

Uh we got a retard who's saying as many as the US has

Not sure about that.

Not sure about that.

Not sure about that.

Between seventy five to four hundred, according to Google.

Got it.

So, Israel uses all its nukes.

What would that look like?

I am very ignorant when it comes to like because it's what it's, I don't know what kind of yield these nukes have.

How would that be enough nukes to destroy the entire Middle East and kill everyone in it?

Not no way, right?

That would destroy the entirety of Iran.

What it

Would it?

Would it?

What it 'cause what what type of nukes are they, first of all?

So even if they use all their nukes

What then?

What can they do after that?

What then?

What then for Israel?

What then for the Zionist entity?

Like, what would happen?

They would get destroyed immediately by what remains.

They say, Oh, it's the Samson option, the Samson option.

Shut up, the Samson option These fucking people running Israel, quote unquote, bunch of fucking diamond traders and like big shot international capitalists you think they're gonna fucking commit suicide?

For some stupid ideology, they're gonna flee an abandoned ship and go to London and New York or some shit.

And Israel will simply be no more.

You think they're like jihadists and they're gonna die for it?

Yeah, there's some settler in the West Bank who might.

That guy has a M sixteen

And a few rolls of fat.

I guess he can sit on his opponents.

But that's not the guy in control of the nukes.

Sorry.

The fanatics on the West Bank who are willing to die for the Zionist cause.

They're not that formidable, I'm sorry.

Okay?

So don't sit here and t try to scare me about the damn Samson option.

Because I don't buy it.

I don't buy it.

I don't buy that at all.

Who is gonna die for Zionism?

Didn't already over a million people flee?

And leave?

Who's gonna die for Zionism?

Tell me who's gonna die for it.

I underestimate Zionist lunacy.

No, I don't, because I understand Zionist lunacy.

Zionist lunacy.

is murdering children and slaughtering children and women from a safe distance.

Zionist lunacy never ever enters the territory of bravery.

Zionist lunacy is not brave, it's not bold, it's not suicidal, it's not I'm gonna go and die for this.

It's I'm gonna sit on a hill where I'm totally safe and slaughter a bunch of children and pregnant women and elderly people and that's that's what they do.

But do they do they rush into the heat of action as brave warriors to die for a cause?

No.

No they don't.

No they don't.

That's what the Palestinians do.

Call me yeet, what's up?

I mean, dude, they're not the Japanese and they're not gonna do kamikaze attacks.

That's not what they do.

They are such cowards.

They fear death.

Listen, the Zionists Zionists fear death.

So profoundly

that even when I DF soldiers are killed by the resistance, they go in and tamper with the balls and the testicles of these dead corpses to extract sperm.

That's how much they are terrified of death.

That's how much it terrifies them.

Okay?

This is the master-slave dialectic.

He.

who values his honour more than his life,

is a more formidable warrior.

Period.

Okay, and finally, I want to address the bigger picture.

And you know, this is really hint, hint, this is the clippable moments coming up.

Red saffron, I want to do a critique of my own community with few exceptions.

American Partisan does a very good job, others do a good job.

Jesus Motorcycle does a great job.

I know I'm missing people, but some people do a good job.

Guys, I go on the clip channel and it's like I see the most dog shit.

I'm horrified by how bad these fucking clips are.

They're so bad.

I don't, I'm speechless.

All right.

And yeah, I'm going to be an asshole and just like straight up tell you guys: like, you really suck at making clips because you don't put yourself in the shoes of a normie.

You just like put your, I don't know what's going through your head.

I don't know what's going through your head.

Like this dude put up made a clip in the Clips channel and it was this the the horrific bad looking stream I did in the hotel room on my MacBook when I was in Florida.

last year and I was wearing like a red hat like dude

What is going through your head?

Like, first of all, I look horrible in that clip.

So, right off the bat, we're off to a horrific start.

Second of all, my setup doesn't look good.

Third of all, I wasn't even saying anything that a random person would understand.

So, like, what was going through your head that that's a good clip?

I don't understand it.

A good clip is just like, let's, it's, it's like 60 seconds.

To be honest, they should really be 60 seconds.

And sometimes you guys overdo the speeding up.

You guys notice our ideological rivals never speed up their clips.

How come every single clip you guys do is condensed and I'm just sped up?

And it looks so trashy and filthy and unprofessional.

It's extremely

Bad, okay?

Don't take a five-minute clip of me and then speed it up.

And condense it into 60 seconds.

Instead, find 60 seconds of me talking that you can show to a random person, and it's like actually a good clip overall.

Like it's a like a random person would find it persuasive and whatever, or funny, it could be comedy, whatever, but like.

I don't understand I don't understand the what's going through you guys' head when I see these clips.

It's ridiculous.

Like I saw a clip where half of it should have just been cut out and it it would have been fine with just like the latter half.

I don't get it.

Clips are everything.

Guys, clips are literally everything.

Nobody's gonna discover the streams or anything without clips.

If you guys want this community to grow,

If you want I should rather say if you want the streams to grow

And yeah, by extension, if you want the guerrilla army to grow, you have to step up your clip game.

I don't know what to tell you.

I'm don't shoot the messenger.

I'm just telling you: if you want the guerrilla army to grow and become more powerful, it's all clips.

At this point, it's all the content is here.

It's literally all clips.

Okay.

Um,.

Yeah, it's all clips.

It's all about clips.

And it's like clips are about like, who is this?

Imagine you're a random person.

Who is this guy?

What does he look like?

What does he sound like?

Because you guys also are keen on clipping me when I'm yelling like this.

And it's like, I know you guys like it because you know me and you know who I am.

And you get hyped up when I yell and shit, okay?

A random person sees that and can't get past the yelling.

They can't get past the loud voice.

They're just like, This is a bearded man yelling at me and I didn't do anything wrong.

And that's how you lose 99% of people right away.

Right away.

Okay?

So, I'm going to provide you content that I want you guys to make good clips of.

And let's just see if you guys can do it.

All right.

Anyway, but I also did want to say this because I think if we look at the bigger picture, I think people are looking at the events today and what happened today, and they're basically saying, why is Iran doing this?

Why is Iran attacking Israel?

Why is Israel the victim?

We're basically being gaslighted to make it seem like Iran's the aggressor because for one faint moment, for the first time, Israel is getting 1% of their own medicine.

But that's besides the point.

Let's ignore the context of the fact that Israel attacked an Iranian embassy, something unprecedented.

They bombed an embassy.

Who does that?

If any sovereign country attacked a U.S.

embassy with missiles and blew it up, you think we wouldn't respond?

Name me a single country that wouldn't respond to that, okay?

But let's ignore that context because we can go back all the way from Israel saying, no, we bombed them because they're arming Hamas and stuff.

So we have to ask the basic question.

Why is Iran so involved in this conflict?

Why is Iran so involved in the Palestinian struggle?

Why is Iran helping the resistance in Yemen, in Lebanon, in Palestine, in Iraq?

What is Iran's end goal?

Why do they have their hands everywhere?

Because Iranians are not even Arabs.

They're Persians.

So clearly this isn't a nationalistic cause.

And while you might say that it's an Islamic cause, and that would be more on the dot, Iranians are Shia and Palestinians are Sundi.

Moreover, Iran helps the Syrian government, which isn't an Islamic government.

Moreover, I can continue, Iran actually helps anyone who's the resistance whatsoever, not even just Islamic ideologists.

They help the PFLP.

They're willing to help communists.

They don't care.

So what's Iran's end goal?

Why is Iran so involved in this conflict?

Well to understand that, we have to go back to nineteen seventy nine, which was the context of the Iranian revolution.

After the modern age and the age of colonialism,

The people of the Middle East

Some call them the Fellahin, right?

The peasants or the people of the bazaar.

But basically the type of culture and civilization that predominates the majority of people in the Middle East was repressed.

It had no voice.

The people of the Middle East, the Islamic peoples, they were being stepped on, they were being oppressed, they were being deprived of their humanity and their subjectivity.

They had no way of making sense of their place in the world.

And meanwhile, the Middle East was just a battleground of different bigger powers either competing over and vying over influence, or, as it is in most of the case actually, the United States and the West imposing its will and its domination upon them against the norm of history.

Because in history the Middle East, that region in general, has always been the host of independent powers, whether it's the Ottomans, whether it's the Safavids, whether it's the Persian Empire, hell, whether it's even the Byzantine Empire.

It was always something indigenous to the region.

that characterized the dominant power that was there.

And up until recently

People from that region, whether they're Arabs, whether they're Persians, whether they're Shia, whether they're Sunni, part of that Islamic civilization did not have a voice.

They didn't have an existence.

They barely mattered.

They were invisible.

In places like Tehran, before the Iranian Revolution, the overwhelming majority of Iranians basically didn't exist.

The only people who existed and who were recognized by the powers that be were a small minority of westernized city dwellers in Tehran.

Meanwhile in Palestine, where the Palestinian resistance was quite literally fighting for their lives,

The whole world seemed like it was being stacked against them.

I mean, sure, they were receiving support from the socialist bloc, China, the Soviet Union, and so on and so forth.

But in terms of the indigenous regional struggle against Israel, the nationalist cause represented by Nasserism broke down.

Baathism broke down.

So by the 1970s, after the 73 war, after Sadat sells out, and Nasserism as a project fails and collapses, and Arab nationalism fails and collapses.

There's nothing there that's standing up for the dignity.

Of this specific type of subject, of this specific type of civilization, of this specific type of people.

And those Iranians in Persia living in those slums, living in the outskirts in the rural parts of Persia in Iran, their solidarity with the Palestinians wasn't just empathy.

It wasn't just because they were against injustice.

It was because on a fundamental sociological level, they are the same people.

It was a sense of solidarity based on brotherhood.

They are the same people dwelling in slums, dwelling in poverty, dwelling in a marginal existence in the modern world, with no representation, with no voice, and with no existence.

And after the Iranian revolution, they made it their solemn commitment.

that they would uplift and they would have the utmost solidarity with the forces of revolution and resistance in the region in general, because the Iranian revolution was about an awakening.

It was about the awakening of a civilization that maybe for over a hundred years was being deprived of its existence, was being oppressed, was being repressed.

and was being quite literally killed.

Killed off, forgotten, and erased.

That revolution empowered and dignified not only the masses of Iran, but the masses of the whole region, the poor and downtrodden in Lebanon, the Palestinians, you name it.

So, Iran's commitment to Palestine is very fundamental and it's existential.

It's not just a cynical game of Iran wanting to expand its power.

It's not just an ideology based on Islam or something else.

It's definitely not nationalism.

What it is, is existential for Iran.

Iran's solidarity with Palestine is in full continuity with the same causes of the Iranian revolution in the first place.

They do not see the Palestinian people as different from themselves.

They see them as exactly the same kind of subject left behind by history in general, and in need of being given recognition, in need of standing up for itself, and finally acquiring the dignity to take its rightful place on the world stage.

The world must recognize that Islamic civilization, that the peoples of the Middle East, are a great power in their own right, with their own independent history, civilization, and culture.

And that is the hill Iran is willing to die on.

So this is why Iran is so involved in the Palestinian conflict.

Because it is an extension, the very revolution upon which the Islamic Republic founds itself upon.

That revolution carries with it a mission.

The mission to emancipate, empower, and

And liberate

The people of the Middle East, the indigenous peoples of the Middle East, I should say.

Iran's goal is to unify the region around driving out Western imperialism, driving out neocolonialism.

That is the fundamental purport of the Iranian Revolution and the Islamic Republic.

Unity of the indigenous peoples of the Middle East region to drive out the foreign occupiers, to drive out the neo-colonialists.

And Iran is leading the charge.

Did you just see that movie, Dune 2?

Yeah, Iran is like leading the Fremen.

If you want to put it in terms, you can understand.

That's what it is.

So.

This is what people should understand.

Don't be cynical and try to be like, oh, what is what is Iran wants this power?

Iran is motivated by this economic gain.

Iran is not motivated.

Iran has to support Palestine.

Iran has to support Palestine because they don't see Palestinians as different from themselves.

Iranians do not have a conceit upon which to stand that allows them to distinguish themselves from Palestine.

So when Palestinians are being attacked, they can't help but feel attacked as well.

They don't have some type of purport that makes them somehow so foreign and so alien to the Palestinian people that, you know, Palestinians are Arab, Iranians are not.

Sure.

Sure.

But they're both Muslim.

They're both indigenous to the region.

They're both they both share in common the fact that they've been left behind by modern history.

And downtrawn attacked and occupied by the neo-colonial West, they share Islam in common, that's an important thing.

But even if they didn't, they share in common the fact.

That they're part of the same pole, it's part of the same region.

They share a common history.

So this is why, this is why Iran is involved.

Hope that clears it up for you guys.

Alright guys, it seems like we're going to be live tomorrow as well.

To be honest.

Um

Okay.

Alright guys, I am gonna be live tomorrow.

Good stream.

Um

Yeah, we'll be live tomorrow.

Don't worry about it.

Okay, guys, signing off.

We'll continue following this situation very closely and uh

I'm sure by tomorrow we'll have we'll have a much clearer idea of where this is headed and where this is going.

Uh than we do now, at least.

Anyway guys, bye-bye.