DEBATING Orthodox Convert: Is Marxism Satanic?

2023-01-25
all right guys we don't really have time
for an intro I'm already super late to
this shit
um this is like I don't really care
about views I'm just gonna do his debate
I'm live streaming it for your
convenience
uh I was I'm like an hour late I was
family related stuff so I do have a good
excuse
but uh we're here we're just gonna
fucking get into it
and I'm gonna kind of give a lecture
afterwards
so yeah that's gonna happen
when the stream is concluded I'm gonna
be like giving a lecture or something
so yeah so yeah we have I have content
lined up for you all right so I'm gonna
get into this debate with the Orthodox
canonist
and let me just get some stuff ready
all right
foreign
but if we're not gonna do some kind of
like higher criticism or like
intellectual actually kind of thing like
like that part one of the big things on
our show is that we actually think
things mean kind of what they obviously
mean especially in the context of the
scriptures in the church and a lot of
this modern
a lot of these perspectives that people
claim or you know are legit and ancient
ways of interpreting things are actually
just oh the man himself is here Mom
shall let you speak but it looks like
Haas is
um attractive especially in our current
uh world that we live in right because
you look around at the sort of sensible
political Alternatives that you have and
it seems like from for most of the world
or at least for those of us living here
in the west we do not have really
Alternatives outside of liberalism in
any way and you can look to um communism
you can look to Marxism and you can look
at um how Marxist leninist
um and those associated with them or
we're seeing how we're seeing capitalism
and in a way I mean we can talk about
how exactly
um people these thinkers viewed
capitalism but one way they viewed it
was it was like this thing that
fundamentally
um like for instance like economic laws
like one thing's uh you know Engel talks
about Ingles talks about
um is that you know capitalists like to
tell us anything Marx does too like
capitalistic to tell us that there's
certain laws of capitalism but really
it's all random but what the sort of
marxist the theory more or less says is
that but in actuality it's all man at
the root of all these things things and
therefore we can if we kind of adapt the
right Consciousness or you know not
saying it exactly but more or less if we
do that then we're able to change the
trajectory that we're going on and we're
able to you know sort of justify The Arc
of history and the sort of bloody Arc of
history and we're able to make all this
bloody struggle
um you know all these revolutions all
these protests all these all this death
we're able to make it worth it so in
that sense I sort of do understand but I
think that outroot though
um
you know uh Conrad and Orthodox
candidates you guys were talking a
little bit about the sort of historical
context of uh you guys were talking a
little bit about the historical context
of what exactly uh happened with the
Soviet Union some of the martyrs and
even other places on the Eastern Bloc
countries
um you know that is that is one thing
that I think that has a valid point
however I think there's also just the
other point about you know what the
views of religion
um from Marx London and Ingles
themselves were and I don't think it's
by no means is it um really um
compatible with Christianity and I think
even this idea of thinking that oh well
Christianity is actually good well like
uh for instance our buddy here was Saint
our friend here was saying that oh well
friends people like Hegel who marks was
influenced by so that Christianity was
good because it's like this best human
project that we're able to sort of meet
God with but Christianity is not made by
you know human hands it's from God it's
not
um something about it's not based on in
humanity that's like or in the way that
we understand Humanity brother God is it
gives us and the church gives us it
right it's not human creation by any
means
so a lot of these um sort of humanists
will say oh yeah Christianity is
beautiful look at the Aesthetics oh wow
it gives people this sense of like the
supreme or whatever but they all couch
in more or less sort of metaphor because
I showed up late
um I like I can't really expect to like
debate first because they're in the
middle of something I guess
so I guess that's not me I showed up
late but you kind of want to get into
the debate with Orthodox do we humans
made this is not just one of our
beautiful Creations no this is actually
like from God himself
so we would totally reject that
humanistic conception of religion which
um it seems like um our buddy was
espousing here
yeah I tend to agree with that um
actually that analysis where you know
religion is viewed as sort of this
project which needs to kind of align
itself with the material world in fact
Orthodox Christianity goes beyond that
in something obviously above material
and it's metaphysical at the end of the
day you know so has we have much to say
so
uh yeah I kind of wanted to talk about
it seems like you know
you wanted to debate prism or something
and he can't do it so I'm kind of
filling in for prism
when it comes to the legacy of Soviet
communism and specifically Russian
Orthodoxy
and what I'm interested in discussing is
this question of whether or not
the Orthodox church and it's are the
rulings of the Orthodox Church are in
fact infallible
or whether they're constricted by time
and space since they're on Earth so for
example a given um patriarch or a given
you know
Church leader I don't really think it's
in the Orthodox tradition
and I can be corrected if I'm wrong that
what they say is necessarily like
infallible I think they're able to make
mistakes and they're able to change
their mind right according to
circumstance because they are bound by
time and space
yeah I guess look I'll throw you a bone
here and I'm not sure if you're analysts
in your Discord or some of your
community members who actually read
Russian because I take it as you don't
do you speak Russian or
no I don't
okay so if anyone does read Russian I
encourage them at least in your
community to actually read the two
anatomas right and actually look in
depth at the text because that in the
text uh no ideology is in fact condemned
what is condemned is the confiscation of
church property which the Communists
under Lenin Trotsky and the entire you
know essentially the entire government
no one really opposed these decisions
right the early vulture of government I
have to cut you off too early but a few
things that anathema's
are not final they're not it's not the
same as damnation Only God Can engage in
damnation
so someone who is subjective it doesn't
it's not like a certain
it doesn't with certainty condemn a
given person subjected to the anathema
to hell to the extent of my knowledge
now the second thing
is that regarding the confiscation of
church properties I think here I don't
really think it would be justifiable to
blame Lenin necessarily for that you had
a huge kind of anti-religious sentiment
that was fanatically adopted by these
Rank and file
you know young communist cadres
who are and then also a level of
corruption and infiltration uh Below in
the lower commands right
through the chain of um sorry the like
the hierarchical chain of control for
the Bolsheviks and oftentimes trying to
find it here exactly oftentimes you'd
have people like Stalin like for example
in 1923
trying to find the exact quote
um
fuck hold on give me a sec
it's yeah right here we'll intervene and
basically talk about how you know these
people are taking things too far they're
engaging in Blasphemous kind of
desecration of Idols they're burning
things they're and then most importantly
they are using excuses
um
according to the like bureaucratic
registration of properties in order to
close down churches
so let me give you an example of this
because
yeah so for the crime of not registering
right
uh Baptist societies were closed
Orthodox Churches were closed and this
was purely because they wouldn't
register with the local government and
that gave they gave him the excuse to
that right and stop Stalin was pretty
Frank insane in 1923 in an internal
letter to the other members of the
Communist Central Committee that this
was illegal it was a violation of party
directives and it was causing ferment
and discontent and then he was also
mentioning how
the Central Committee is was this he was
involved in the decision that you know
they're going to prohibit the closure of
churches they're going to prohibit the
liquidation of prayer rooms and
buildings prohibit the liquidation of
um
prayer rooms for like non-payment of
taxes prohibit arrests of religious
nature renting premises to religious
societies
uh make them strictly comply with the
decision of the Arce and like don't give
them an under burden
I can respond to these all this but do
you have another Point besides the no no
I I do I do so I understand that in
terms of implementation the people on
the ground were not necessarily
following the spirit of the Communist
Party leadership and specifically the
leadership of Stalin or even Lenin for
that matter
but when it comes to the intentions of
the Communist leaders it was not to
actually and also when it came to the
confiscation of church property I
believe some of this was done
under the pretext of relief um
of uh starvation relief and feeding the
hungry
some of this was also
um
done because of something about military
units
let me find the exact quote but
initially
what from what I read what happened was
that military units were given should
they so choose
that were Church military units if they
wanted to
um convert the units or the property
into non-church property they were given
the ability and this was initially
extremely minuscule
you can you can go ahead I'm gonna find
the thing about the military units yeah
I just want to mention I'm gonna hold on
hold on I'll let I'll let you talk for
the majority of this but I just wanted
to say first of all that like
from a get-go I don't think that you
like from a religious perspective in
general the regime was already
compromised based on its foundation as
ritual murders of children and of the of
the rightfully anointed Czar and any
Orthodox church or institution would be
right to not register with such a
government due to their belief in the in
the martyred Sovereign so that alone I
think from a religious perspective
doesn't exempt this this property
nonsense from just oh it was just a bad
implementation of this property
let me let me but I'm going to say one
other thing and then
I'm gonna let Dimitri talk we've all
seen the video of Christ the Savior
Cathedral literally just being destroyed
like there's just like that was had to
be rebuilt in the freaking
20 like after the fall of the USSR so
that's just like that it doesn't like
again maybe I'm not saying that
discounts all of your points but people
just need to realize some of this stuff
and Dimitri I'll let you actually
address some of the other things
yeah first the
um confiscation of church property so
the Russian Orthodox Church in
particular gave a shit ton of
confessions I mean concessions apologies
not confessions it would have been good
for confessions but concessions were
provided to the bolshevi government in
abundance right and you're probably
aware patriarch tikon did not even
support the white army during the Civil
War because you're right there was
famine and there was you know people
dying in the countryside due to you know
just basically the entire Imperial
infrastructure breaking down because of
the Civil War and you know the post
essentially post World War One Marauders
just going around deserting you know
looting things like that so it was
famine now the I think patriarch take on
in particular he actually did allow for
church decorations to be actually
donated to the Bolshevik government or
you know it was the government at the
time it wasn't necessarily I keep
donated it to Communism or out of any
ideological consideration but just to
assist the people one thing that he
didn't give which is why we have say in
the martyrdoms of Metropolitan Benjamin
of petrograd which is Saint Petersburg
was he said you cannot donate and we
will not allow Bolsheviks or anybody for
that matter to to touch the holy vessels
now I'm not sure if you guys know what
the holy vessels are in the Orthodox
Church those are the chalices and the
instruments usually gold-plated or solid
gold and silver which are used in the
administration of the Eucharist the most
important Sacrament in the church now
the Bolsheviks really didn't I mean they
probably knew what the you know
sacraments were they all grew up in the
Orthodox Society in order to even
graduate from high school you needed to
know the basics of the Orthodox faith in
Russia so they knew what these
instruments were and they still went for
them and this result resulted in
probably several hundreds of martyrdoms
including Metropolitan Benjamin and his
entire Parish
okay so um I first want to address the
question of the killing of the czar's
family an investigation was conducted by
the Russian government unless you wanted
to you were had more to say or no no no
I can talk about the well an
investigation was conducted by the
Russian government within the past 20
years I believe
um and they found that Lenin and his
government
were not guilty of the murder of the
czar's family as far as the
circumstances of like who actually gave
the order
it's not really certain
under what circumstances was the tsar's
family murdered like who was behind this
what was the reason for it but the
Russian government observed well I don't
know if they absolved Landing of
definitive guilt but they could not find
any evidence that Lenin was involved in
the murder of the uh the czars family
it was the intention of the Soviet
government quite openly to try the czar
uh for not his kids obviously but to try
the czar
for his perceived or alleged crimes
against the people now regarding this
thing about the murdered sovereign
that's kind of go kind of goes back to
what I was saying about whether or not
the church is bounded by
I don't want to theologically get in
trouble here I don't necessarily know
the church but whether or not the
functions of the church are bound by
time and space
rather than being in fowl because I
don't think it's the Orthodox view that
you know the the church and its worldly
sense is infallible
I think that um
the church has always been bound by
political circumstance Peter the Great
for example famously prohibited the
elections of the patriarch this is
something that only happened
uh in the 20th century the first time it
happened was after the February
Revolution because the czars have
actually prohibited this and the Loyalty
of the Orthodox Church
to the political time and place
circumstances it's well recorded
throughout history you had murdered
sovereigns for example in the time of
troubles who can forget
the you know
the era of yeah Boris got involved and
the uh sorry basil and even Dmitry II
right like yeah all these characters
yeah we get it it was tumultuous right
it's an that's what I mean the Russian
zardom the Russian sovereignty has
always been tumultuous and I think there
is just the kind of I think the real
some one of the reasons why a lot of
Communists within Russia who are devout
Orthodox Believers don't condemn
don't necessarily like see the
Bolsheviks as satanic because of the
death of the czar's family is I think
it's horrible when children are murdered
by the way I don't I I don't think any
even even the person who was accused of
this who people suspected carried out
this act he kind of lived from what I
know a life of shame in Moscow he wasn't
really he was kind of looked down on and
he was you know
even among fellow Bolsheviks right
so I don't I just I definitely don't
agree with you know anyone's kids any
children being murdered any women being
murdered who were innocent but
you know I think many Russian Communists
have just come to see this like this is
part of the tumultuous history of
Russian sovereignty
similar to the time of troubles right
the Bolsheviks came to especially under
Stalin
um
uh acquire What's called the Russian
viast right the kind of Russian form of
sovereignty that's just kind of like
almost mystical and inherent in the
people
but I mean I'm not here to necessarily
deny
that there was an anti-religious
sentiment among the because of the
Revolution there was I mean I'm not
denying that that's like a fact right
and there was this huge iconoclasm
especially among the youth who kind of
went a 180 usually young people are
inspired by religion they become the
most fanatical Believers but after the
revolution it's like the opposite
happened they became the most devout
atheist and became militant atheist they
were engaging in
desecratory acts and all these kind of
spectacles Stalin openly condemned this
other communist leaders condemned it but
no it did happen the league of militant
atheists
produced a lot of blasphemy
right but the way I see it is I'm not
really trying to portray a one-sided
picture of like every aspect of the
early days of the Communist ideology was
infallible and perfect I kind of want a
more present A Story of Us uniquely
Russian kind of estrangement with
tradition and religion that accompanied
modernity and a Reconciliation and a
development of a learning right I think
there was a maturity of the Communist
ideology which began to realize that and
this is something that was echoed by
um
Orthodox leaders under Soviet rule that
you know a lot of Communism took for
granted this biblical unconscious
Russian Orthodox values of despite all
of this Blasphemous stuff and all this
kind of you know yes we're atheists it
still took for granted these this
fundamental Bedrock of unconscious moral
values that nobody even would dare to
question even the Communists like
iconography and art and literature it
was it's all very much rooted in that
Russian Orthodox spiritual tradition
even if it's superficially estranged
and I think that is something people
have today
become consciously aware of and that's
why we're seeing especially in Russia a
growth of Orthodox communist
or religiously Orthodox Communists and I
don't really see how this is a
contradiction
I mean I'll answer your first thing
about
um epistemology in the church and
infallibility and those kinds of things
I think you're thinking about this in
already a one-post Schism and just a
very Western Way like historically
before the pope and began to assert his
infallibility and his what eventually
became you know fully dogmatized at
Vatican one for the western church and
Papal infallibility and whatnot before
that it's the church is synodal we view
The ecumenical councils as the voice of
the Holy Spirit as I said in the book of
Acts it's to seemed good to us in the
holy spirit that was the first that
Council in Jerusalem in the book of Acts
we what we see in the in this synodality
and a little bit Demetrius I did many
proclamations of the Synod of the
Russian Orthodox Church there were many
examples of synods that were then later
affirmed by an ecumenical council as as
correct and as as teaching Dogma as
effectively being you know infallible
and for that's not and the thing is you
think about that there was you know
there are attracts decades even longer
of time when those things weren't
considered infallible I said ecumenical
council but we now that's not that they
were deemed correct they were always
correct the economical Council then
expounded them as correct in the face of
heresy and in the face of the current
issues of the time and in the time of
Communism that was the church has
expounded its opinion on those things
and we also in that context we believe
in the consensus pocham and the
consensus of the fathers that's one of
our guiding epistemologies in the time
where it's been a while since we've had
an economical Council especially since
there has been no Emperor since the
murder of the tsar martyrdom of the tsar
and the consensus Patron by our
standards now is entirely anti-communist
is entirely in favor of the the church
has its history and the martyrdom as in
hagiographies are how we look back on on
the history of of these things and I
don't think that any kind of nitpicking
about the specific laws and whatnot any
way necessarily make up for the fact
that it happened and the fact that
ultimately they did supplant and put a
new religion on the people and made
London out to be a czar and had him
exposed in his body like my dad saw his
body when he was going going when he
went to Russia near the end of the times
of the Soviet Union like this was there
was an entire this was a this was a new
as the 20th century had many it was one
of the many religions that was forceded
upon an unsuspecting people as modernity
realized itself in its failures and I
think yeah Dimitri has a lot more to say
about the history of some things that
you had mentioned but I think that's
important and after he does I want to
talk a little bit about also some of the
history and about how I'm sorry the
entire communist project in in Russia
was was was put on by by Western
capitalist Bankers zionists so I think
that from historical perspective I'm
sure you have answers to that but I'll
let Dimitri address some other things
the answer just on the on the issue of
monarchy and the Orthodox understanding
of autocracy and and Emperors are a sort
of this figure of secular power in the
church that role is Undisputed since the
time of Constantine the Great and many
would say even the Pagan Roman emperors
held a certain esteemed role even when
they committed persecution as to this
keeper of order in the
um iqumini you know the the cosmos the
Mediterranean Sea so this is what
Apostle Paul talks about Saint John
chrysostomo mentions it so the Orthodox
Church is United what I'm trying to say
is it's United entirely behind the idea
that the Tsar is important the emperor
is important and the emperor is not
bound by any sort of weird parliamentary
regulations things of this nature this
is the
um dominant tradition for the last
hundreds if not close to you know maybe
close to a thousand Saints and they all
affirm the fact that the tsar and the
emperor is important in the church and
this goes back to the Old Testament too
so it's not just the New Testament thing
it's that the Tsar is as important as a
bishop in the church this similar role
similar sort of sacramentology blessing
and the fact that Saint Sonic was the
second was apparently Tried by some
court and sentenced that even if that
was say that did occur so he was
executed by hanging or a firing squad
because the criminal justice system of
the bolsheva government deemed him
guilty like that would still be
inappropriate
so we're not even arguing just the fact
that he was shot what about you have to
interrupt you but just to focus on this
point but there's but that's worldly
state power so yes and Roman Pagan
Emperors they can be deposed there can
be conflicts where they can get killed
so I I'm I guess I'm looking for here
why is it that the Bolsheviks could not
fulfill specifically Stalin why can't he
fulfill the same theological role that
Azar could for example a Roman Pagan
emperor
good point uh good point actually some
Orthodox Communists so to speak in
Russia actually do argue that point
Nicole Stalin's a red star you know
zuganda says that the head of the kprf
party of Russia you know prohana the
famous Communists or what they do say
this it's like oh wow so the Soviet
Union in some way it did kind of
continue on this katek on Legacy but
again this is a bit of a stretch I would
say in the fact that no Orthodox Saints
living all those deceased in the last
100 years actually confirmed this right
the best thing that someone can say
about the best tradition we have is
patriarch Ilia who is like who could be
canonized to sing it after his Repose he
says he believes Stalin repented on his
deathbed so like he even in the sense of
he who wrote looked up to Stalin because
he views him as a co-ethnic as a
Georgian he still has to couch is the
best thing he can say about him is he
believes that due to perhaps some
Israeli Christianity he repented of his
sins and reverted at the end of his life
and that's also rejected by most
Orthodox historians anyway so I think
that's one thing and again the the
there's there was also no like even if
somehow everything you said was true
about that which it isn't there is no
like the idea a lot this this entire
revolutionary basis of something is not
something that a divinely inspired ruler
that someone participating in Orthodox
Symphonia could be based upon but even
more than that there was no basis in
economics for the revolution in the
first place yes the war led to some bad
things there was extreme pressure on
Russia from overseas but even dirty I
mean before William Howard Taft said
that the tsar of Russia whose Imperial
majesties are Nicholas II in a state
bank he created a worker's Paradise that
was unrivaled in history of mankind you
can read the economic numbers on the
Czar and on the on the Empire and I'm
sure I see people laughing it's
hilarious all these Communists and they
think they know everything they got
their big brother to come argue for them
it's hilarious but I think hold on hold
on hold on hold on let me finish let me
finish the you can read the economic
number read Stephen mitford Goodson and
you can look into these things and I
also recommend people read count major
straps spiridovich on all of these
things and recognize that the historical
the entire history Oracle basis for this
is nonsense and the time entire
communist project in Russia from my
perspective was a Bolshevik dude was it
was a Zionist Jewish project sent from
Western capitalists who were going to
overthrow the tsar and that's the
opinion of many especially considering
that his murder was was literally a
ritual which is the consensus of many
Orthodox all right Bishop
here's the problem this is my space man
you can't just interrupt all of us all
the time I'm telling you I'm giving you
as much time you gotta chill out dude
no I'm sure but the I'm making the point
here about I'm you're gonna get heated
now because the narrative in general is
being challenged a bit and I think
that's the perspective of many people
who are Orthodox we're not capitalists
who have no interest in the western
Atlantic narrative that they understand
what communism in Russia was really
about
all right well I just wanted to address
something you said because I think
you're now you're changing this from a
theological argument strictly within the
realm of what's what the concern of the
church is and you're kind of just
shoehorning in these kind of like CIA
British intelligence narratives to
discredit the October Revolution from a
secular historiographical perspective so
just to address that secular argument
that you're making that the Bolshevik
Revolution was illegitimate and there
was no economic basis even figures
within the black hundred movement which
led in astutely observed in 1913 like
Bishop Nikon started to raise the land
quote the land bred and other important
questions of our Russian life what
happened to people like bishan Nikon
they were completely ostracized by both
the church and the black hundred
movement just because they were drawing
attention to the fact that the Russian
people who are being
um indebted you know you have to
understand something about the Russian
State at the time it was fully indebted
to the Russian to the French banks it
kept on taking more and more that the
peasants were starting to become a
miserated their land was being
expropriated especially because of the
stolipin reforms they were being
proletarianized they were losing their
livelihood and they were indebted right
at the same time
so to say that the revolution had no
basis whatsoever and that it had to
somehow be a complete conspiracy it's
just fully a historical and you talk
about all this stuff about oh yeah I
mean you're talking about oh this is
what conspiracy of Wall Street and
you're drawing from Anthony Sutton or
something but you neglect to mention how
the Russians are and the Russian state
was first of all I mean to talk about
the secular historiography here let's
let's do it right the Russian state was
indebted to French banks and therefore
connected to the international
capitalist system of Finance it entered
into World War one because of its
obligation to this financial financier
ruling class visar himself
um
actually descended from the British line
of royalty through Queen Victoria and
through the king of Denmark like the
rest of the European royalty he wasn't
even really are you coming here and it's
all about reconciling the Czar with
Communism and now no no no actually
I am not interested in reconciling the
Romanov Dynasty with Communism I think
the Romanov dynasty was not a Russian
Dynasty but it was kind of this almost
European Colonial Force primarily
Germanic and you know it's not really a
Russian Dynasty when you look at it from
a historical perspective Peter the Great
was a westernizer Stalin took note of
this in his talks with Sergey eisenstein
who Phil who directed the uh Ivan the
Terrible movie and nevsky and even
Stalin's sentiment was pretty clear that
he became aware that he was actually
restoring Russia
to its pre Peter the Great free western
era he was restoring Russia to the
Eastern Christian Eastern Orthodox or
Eastern civilizational tradition that
you saw in Muscovy and so on right
placing more of an emphasis on the
capital of Moscow over Leningrad and St
Petersburg Stalin was consciously aware
of what was going on here and then
moreover under the romanovs the
oppression of the 90 Russian present
majority is so like indisputable these
people had no access to Civil Life they
weren't educated whatsoever you had a
germanized elite and a westernized elite
ruling over a model called Asiatic
non-civilized horde of quote unquote
backward people the Russian State didn't
serve the broad Russian Mass it served
an elite of European
Europe Europe westernizers basically
enlightened westernizers
the black hundred movement for example
didn't even draw huge ranks from The
Peasants the black hundreds were made up
of urbanized lumpin
okay well one sec yeah so do you think
uh
Nikon right you mentioned the bishop
right who was later martyred by
Bolsheviks as well he died on the
mysterious circumstances outside
I was talking about yes
because uh yes it would be Bishop Nikon
Rogers because he did write about you
know these things he wrote actually
Allah he's one of the only bishops who
isn't canonized actually despite the
fact that he was estimably shot by so
why isn't she communist candles
well because I'd actually still can
analyzing science I think every year
it's close to the it's in the in the
tens if not hundreds of folks are being
canonized in Russia there's a waiting
list was he not was he not ostracized by
the church because he drew it he was but
that's a separate subject which yeah I
would actually love to speak about right
like the ostracization of right-wing
conservative clergymen in the church
prior to February but it was it was
because he spoke he wanted to to do the
bare minimum dude I'm really I'm really
not trying to interrupt you but you
can't just interrupt us all right okay
yeah I I want to speak on just the
subject of
um you know you mentioned you mentioned
the fact that you know Communism had
this uh sorry the Romanov Empire firstly
right the 300 year Roman at Empire had
some sort of you know uh oppressing
oppressing notion to it now this
oppressing notion isn't evident in any
of the writings of the Church saints now
you may say well that's because they
were under the thumb of the Synod under
the thumb of the Bishops but we're
talking about Bishops such as Saint
innocent of Alaska Saint Hermann of
Alaska saint but you know we can go we
can list Bishop Saint John of kronstadt
who resurrected people right in our in
our belief we believe he literally
resurrected folks and he was there on
the deathbed of Alexander III and his
famous quote he said well look I've
resurrected people before but for
whatever reason God doesn't wish to heal
you know Emperor Alexander III no like
all these our little anecdotal facts
they build up this compendium that hey
the Roman of Dynasty wasn't perfect
neither was the Communist Dynasty
neither was the dynasty of Constantine
the Great the equal to the apostles or
even Saint Vladimir's Dynasty which
founded Russia essentially with the
early ruse the Dynasty is not perfect
neither are clergyman in the church so
we we will never argue as from the
position that well the romanovs are
something really perfect and we really
need to go back we don't larp the
realistic the matter of fact reality is
that romanovs did make mistakes but so
did the Brewer kids which had thousands
of Civil Wars I mean thousands but you
know tens of Civil Wars which is why the
Mongols invaded there was a lot of
failures and even time of troubles is a
ruined technically like a river kid
conflict right and I suppose if you are
a monarchist you would kind of come to
terms of the fact that dynasties aren't
perfect and the romanovs the romanovs
mind you are not condemned by a single
Saint in the church I would challenge
any Russians or any Russian speakers to
go find me archival documents letters
works of any Saints which condemn the
entire Dynasty this is not
Christian Perspective that we just take
a whole Dynasty take the entire family
and say okay you guys were awful you
guys are pressed and massive now
Orthodoxy does comment on social
equality and things of this nature but
not by condemning the so-called
oppressors and let's not compare a
romantic oppression to the impression of
say the USSR and like the damages that
has done to the Russian people for
example like I think that would be
another conversation altogether right I
think spiritually speaking under the
romanovs I agree you shouldn't compare
it because from a spiritual perspective
it was actually much worse you're
bifurcating I'm not sure I'll let you
keep going I just want to make a quick
point before that tree of a longer Point
you're really bifurcating the spiritual
versus the physical thing in a way with
my mic okay well let me I I didn't
interrupt you so let me continue
so I was just saying making that quick
point because you're like okay here's
what I want to get to though so the
problem is that
it's one thing for czars to be making
mistakes right and you know you could
say oh yeah it was worse in the USSR but
really it was the romanovs specifically
under Peter the Great this wasn't just a
mistake made by any old Czar Peter the
Great fundamentally thrusted the entire
trajectory of Western modernity upon
Russian civilization Peter the Great
opened the floodgates to Freemasonry and
the basic Satanism that you see in the
west now you can blame the you know
Russian modernity as it's called or
Russian Enlightenment purely on the
Bolsheviks but then how do you explain
the non-bolism I would blame it on Peter
dude
okay I interrupt you
so you can't really look at the West
right now you look at the state of
Satanism that exists in America and
Europe and say oh yeah this is all the
fault of bolsomism no this was that
Satanism at the core of the West's
founding what the enlightened civilized
West as we know it that is what Peter
the Great already brought to Russia
right so he was responsible for that so
that's not the same as oh just another
Czar who made mistakes he fundamentally
set Russia on the trajectory of you know
basically completely what went on
probably would call the complete
inversion of
um
the tradition with this kind of
artificial satanic modernism right
everything that was holy sorry
everything that was evil was disguised
as its opposite now evil and wickedness
and Satanism could be disguised as
opposite even the Church of the Christ
the Savior you mentioned the original
blueprints for that church were designed
by a Freemason who used freemasonic
geometrical principles in his
construction they were descended but
then it wasn't that it was a return
that's that's false okay yes maybe the
original blueprints but then it was
changed when the new Star came in after
that it doesn't matter these were the
original blueprints
and yet it just goes to show and this is
a fact how much the so-called
traditional Orthodox Russian
Christianity under the romanovs was
actually disguising Freemasonry
theosophy and other forms of Satanism
and this is a recorded historical fact
they used like a Russian Orthodox
religious tradition to disguise
something fundamentally alien to it and
then you don't even have to get into the
occult and esoteric aspect of it either
because you can just directly point to
how the Russian Orthodox church and this
is just a fact under the Czar after the
20th century at least in the late 19th
century became subservient to the
worldly reality of capital and the
capitalists and the bankers and the debt
the Czar was in so you literally had the
reign of satanic Finance capital and
this was disguising itself in the
Holiness of the Orthodox church and that
is why you had the how hostility to
religion that you saw among Communists
I'm not saying that hostility was
justified because I think they threw the
baby out with the bathwater but in order
for a real reconciliation to take place
it has to be acknowledged that there was
a deep rooted Corruption of the church
at this time and the goal in my view
what the striving of the salt Russian
soul of the 20th century has been was to
return to the authentic Foundation of
both Russian civilization and Russian
Orthodoxy so I'll let you talk
listen I I pre I'm not trying to be too
polemical but that was an interesting
straw man that you built up to tear down
and the straw man being that you can
like we don't have it's not the pope we
don't believe that the Tsar is the Pope
the institution of the Empire the
catholicone as Dimitri espouse We
Believe has a it has a semi-sacadal role
within the church the emperor is
literally allowed behind the altar he
communes he's able to commune himself
this is this has a lot of symbolism if
you this is the kind of thing if you
want to have the sublime thinking that
you all like to talk about these things
actually matter you can't just hand with
them aside as religiosity that
capitalists use these things actually
matter so if you want to be consistent
on your beliefs there I I I I I would
appreciate not hand waving that kind of
things away just because you're you're a
particular tradition or you don't
understand them that also being said I
don't buy at least half the historical
stuff that you're saying it's all this
narrative on the Peter the Great I agree
he had westernizing problems he brought
in Freemasons you notice how you have to
skip all the way up to the economic
problems during the World War One era
because what happened between Peter the
Great and Nicholas II every single Czar
is currently either is either canonized
or considered by many in the Orthodox
tradition to likely be a saint Alexander
III Nicholas the first Nicholas II of
course already a saint these men
preserved Orthodoxy these men rejected
westernization and if you read actual
history and not Marxist revisionism
which I appreciate certain revisionism
but I don't appreciate the Marxist
Narrative of History I think it's
total nonsense but I think broadly if
you read people like spiritovich you
would understand that these people were
killed by Masons they were killed by
Jews and that's the kind of thing that I
don't hear you talking about as much and
that's that's a big key to this
Communists Jews zionists and people who
establish the state of Israel with the
help of the Rothschild banking Jews who
else the people that wanted to kill the
Monarch the historical enemy of the Tsar
has normalized in any globalist
neoliberal tell you now they're all
Zionist Jews and they ritually murdered
Czar Nicholas and you just sit here and
casually slander and repeat the little
narratives and say your little things
and then it's I just don't it's just not
ever going to convince anybody who's a
serious Orthodox professional
uh okay but the problem is that you're
mentioning first of all I'm gonna
address all that but first of all you
mentioned the sanctity and oh it does
matter that these Ares why is the
Bolshevik Revolution more illegitimate
than what Peter the Great did there's a
change in sovereignty in the exercise of
sovereign power I agree was a revolution
but saying that the revolution uh makes
the Soviet government because the Soviet
government rests the foundations of its
power on a revolution makes it somehow
less legitimate than these Pagan you
know czars even before Christianity I
find that complete nonsense right I can
answer that we've explained this like
three times
third row your Third Rome Constantine
through the Byzantine emperors through
the through Ivan the Terrible and the
Paleo logos Empire third row Moscow the
emperor 1917 the true end of Christian
Imperium in the world this is basic
Christians explain what you mean how was
that Dipper Dabber this is known by you
I'm saying are you saying because are
you saying it's because the line of
Constantine like genetically was flowing
through the blood not metaphysically no
but but why isn't it
why is the October Revolution why does
that somehow end Russian sovereignty
explain
because it overthrew the anointed Czar
that the church
all the time that's not new they got
overthrown what would they get replaced
by liberal democracy communism no they
got replaced by another ruler democracy
who what liberal democracy do the
Bolsheviks bring in the Bolsheviks
brought a more tough more effective and
stronger liberal democracy
was a greater Czar than anyone in the
Romanov Dynasty or their decision
you fucking bitch hold on hold on what's
do not make this unpleasant and have me
starting to roast the shit out of you
because it's not gonna bode well for you
dude so keep it respectful
keep it fucking respectful okay you need
to keep your respectful in our space and
not to immediately you understand our
opinion we've made it very clear no no I
haven't called you names I haven't
called you names I haven't insulted you
I haven't done anything like that I've
shared opinions that are making you butt
hurt right now that's not grounds for
you to start taking this to the next
level we shared opinions that make you
butt hurt so you started to start
screaming and talking about the romanovs
being worse
you're dude explain to me you said that
what I know dude you just said I was
making gibberish you said I was speaking
gibberish I told you read the book
because you said you said you said dude
this is why this is why I said it was
jibber jabber because you said dude
we've already explained this and then
you said Christian Imperial I mean you
just gave me a bunch of phrases without
coherently explaining to me why it is
that Stalin is an illegitimate ruler
because the Czar was overthrown in the
February Revolution which by the way
wasn't even led by the Bolsheviks well
look uh firstly has right you firstly
interrupted Conrad and said his
particular statement he was making which
was succinct and maybe didn't include
all the details was gibberger like I
think that's word secondly then explain
it but okay I'll give you another chance
so to explain the idea of the third
round okay The Third Rome idea comes
from the second letter to the
Thessalonians chapter 2 verse six in
particular
so Apostle Paul writes this about the
Roman Empire okay now he writes us about
the Pagan Roman Empire right but with
the role of the emperor and the Empire
as a whole as a sort of preserving this
preserving government which holds back
evil and the Antichrist this is
orthodoxychology so to those who aren't
Orthodox it may sound a little bit weird
it's like what are you guys talking
about it's like yes this is what
Orthodox people believe in in particular
Saint John chrysostom who also wrote Our
most prominent liturgy okay this is what
he believed in as well and the Russian
Saints after him now what Conrad is
saying The Third Rome idea which Dugan
writes about as well right Dugan
believes in the third room ideas
too exactly so let's not let's not
pretend like this isn't me okay
real quick to save time now I don't
disagree I'm not um trying to disagree
with the notion of Third Rome or
anything like that or even necessarily
the significance of the Sovereign or
what you want to call the Czar in
Russian Orthodoxy what I'm hyper focused
on is what specific typically makes
Stalin an illegitimate ruler because
you're saying it's because in the
February Revolution the Czar was
overthrown but czars get overthrown all
the time because their rule is secular
so just explain that I've I've never
said the term illegitimate right now
illegitimacy um only God can determine I
was Stalin a certain Scourge that was
permitted by gods such as balcazar
Nebuchadnezzar and all these you know
awful rulers in the past right in the
Old Testament you read about it in the
Bible yes probably and that's what most
of the Orthodox colleges
but then why why is it that it was the
Bolshevik Revolution and not Peter the
Great that definitively breaks the
lineage of the third role
wrong this is this I disagree with
duganon because
frankly he isn't a historian which you
know he can he's a lot of things but he
isn't a historian he's a sociologist
geopolitical geopolitical expert
philosopher first and foremost but his
knowledge of the Peter the Great's era
is
um has holes in it right so Peter the
Great also saw himself as a Continuum in
his own fashion he even founded Saint
Petersburg and I think he tried to align
the dates of its founding to the
founding of Constantinople in free 313
A.D I believe a 312 so so he actually
tried to align himself with the room
even the fact that he was shading no
notice he called himself an Emperor as
opposed to sorry why he wanted to bring
back that idea of hey I'm actually Roman
like like those guys in the past so he
he had this maybe childish maybe novel
maybe totally not related
by the way sorry by the way can't you at
least accept that there's a possibility
that was related to the Freemasons
generation yes can I let me just make
one point let me make one point sure we
don't we don't base the legitimacy of
our government on whether the government
is good or bad
that's on top of it I have all those
sorts of criticism too especially
compared to the czars government who I
believe was good fundamentally but as
Dimitri's explained the when you're
government first of all when your
government is literally founded on the
mar the previous government when those
people were martyred that's that's a
problem that's a and and when that
government is ongoing persecuting the
church that is a problem
no The Institute because when the ins
when the church itself and Symphonia the
government you talk about how they you
believe that they threw the baby out of
the bathwater and throwing out the
institution of the church and the
Sublimity and all this kind of stuff it
was Symphonia is a fundamental touching
and in Indescribable collaboration
between the church and the state as was
seen in the business
the Pagan Emperors that you claim are
also legitimate according to church
scripture
no no did not a lot of things didn't
exist under the Pagan Roman Empire has
which I'm sure you know but like I know
this conversation isn't really like
scripted or anything so let's just go to
the fact that even metropolitans
Patriarchs Arch deacons all these
additional roles and even Church
Investments were different in the early
centuries so and monasticism didn't
exist in the first centuries like not
additional conscious ship didn't exist
now a lot of things didn't exist in the
early centuries of Christianity now
that's completely different discussion
so we're not necessarily saying that
just because Symphonia as described by
Saint Justinian the Roman Emperor didn't
exist therefore you know it it cannot
exist say in the vulture of period and
that's somehow legitimizes
right but how does the absence is a
problem right it's a problem
I'm not sure what the Practical
consequences of that are supposed to
mean but you could say it's a problem
but how is it again that the Bolsheviks
cannot fulfill the same functions
according to where Orthodox theology
that the czars did that's what I really
want to get to here you can call it
saying that there are problems well I'm
sure you would agree there are problems
with Peter the Great and others ours as
well so what what does it mean to say
there's a problem
well
okay Conrad do you want to go or shall I
well I'm getting some water I mean I
just I just had a drink but I can answer
this have you a drink yeah sure go on
no hold on I can answer this but the
difference being that there's we don't I
don't I would not in the sense that the
government after London after the
Bolsheviks and everything it's not that
I believe that that government should
have immediately been overthrown by a
revolution per se I believe that the
government that was legitimate before
that was overthrown by a revolution that
Revolution was illegitimate one because
it was a revolution in and of itself in
that regard and because inherent in that
Revolution was the overthrow of a
divinely anointed Sovereign in the
Liturgy and the anointing of the Tsar is
a very is almost considered a sacrament
of the church itself to be clear this
does not only happen in revolutions it
also happens in the interfighting
between claimants to the throne like
during the time of troubles so but but
we understand that the difference hold
on one thing I'll let you go the
fundamental institution of the monarchy
and the emperor was abolished I
understand the in form you may believe
it was preserved and I believe that too
and then in many ways God allowed that
form to be safe to be to exist to
prevent Western liberalism from creeping
in that doesn't mean that it's exact and
that it's actual and that someone can
adequately say that that was a Godly God
ordained government in the same way that
the emperor was but why not is the
question okay so I just explained it I
don't know what else there is wrong you
didn't because because immediately what
I'm trying to get at here is that if
SARS can be overthrown in the time of
troubles and that doesn't stop the
Orthodox Church from being loyal to them
is it just the fact that Stalin didn't
call himself a czar formally is just the
etymology of it like what specifically
rendered Stalin incapable of being
treated in the same way as our wood well
first of all yes first of all first of
all I want to be clear about something
because this is kind of getting lost in
the actual history of what happened
Stalin dude dude we can't just um this
isn't us giving you a platform to give
your version of history no no no no I
can I I have come loaded with receipts
here about what the pay the patriarch
the Patriot whatever it's called was was
reconstituted under Stalin and what they
had to say about Stalin while he was
living and while they were eulogizing
for him it's very clear that the Russian
Orthodox Church was in fact loyal to the
Soviet government especially under
Stalin
were they even arguably became
enthusiastic moral Guides of stalinist
rule like they actually they only were
loyal to Stalin in the sense that they
weren't rebelling against him they were
loyal to the government yes they were
active they were actively fulfilling the
aims of the Soviet state under Stalin
specifically
I mean in many ways you can see
Metropolitan and new free right the head
of the canonical Ukrainian Church doing
the same with zelinski now even though
the modern Russian Orthodox Church's
lineage is illegitimate because you just
used the examples
wait a second yeah
but you just kind of contradicted
yourself because you compared the
Russian Orthodox Church's loyalty to
Stalin as what's going on in Ukraine
with the the church with select but then
why but then hold on but then first of
all then you have to somehow break the
lineage of the Russian Orthodox church
and say yeah at this point it was
illegitimate but for some reason the
heaps of Praise okay I never said okay
but you mentioned
you just mentioned all of these not
interrupting no no let me finish it
to point out the argument before I say
anything okay I have to point out the
argument you just mentioned earlier how
there is all these Russian Saints and
all these um you know these Bishops and
stuff that were heaping praises and that
were loyal to the Romanov Dynasty but
for some reason when they're loyal to
Stalin that that's similar to what's
going on with zelenski so can you
explain that all righty all right well
let's start from the fact that yes
Orthodox clergyman can actually support
certain rulers secular rulers who aren't
necessarily the good Gods right you can
see this in Metropolitan and new free
who is the Russians so he's on patriarch
hero and Vladimir Putin's side he
actively supported zielinski right and
we're not saying this is somehow
commendable or good we're just and
notice we're not questioning as
legitimate are we Conrad we're not
saying Metropolitan or nursery and the
Ukrainian Church is somehow you know in
this big you know it's a big Paradox now
no we're just saying like this is what
happens on the political pressure the
church sometimes bends to the will of
the political side right like this is
what happened under Stalin as well we
don't deny that
one thing and then you'll go this there
are no canonized saints the way that the
romanovs were venerated and praised and
held up the way that Stalin was there's
even an entire the church that even
Dimitri is part of the Russian Orthodox
church outside of Russia didn't even
commemorate the patriarch of Moscow
until 2007 because they're compromise
they felt that their compromises to the
Soviet government compromised their
Orthodoxy and I understand you think the
Russian Orthodox Church that's out of
Russia
there's several arguments I don't want
to forget about what I was going to
address with cameras just said okay so
canonist you just I I was hot and ready
before you interrupted me to
to just make this argument right out of
the oven what what exactly did you say
again canonist because his Interruption
kind of made me forgot what I was gonna
say okay what I'm saying is the church
throughout its history at times did
support say okay I got it bad
governments okay I remember what I was
going to say so how do you distinguish
then okay I remember what you said how
do you distinguish then
the difference between being under
political pressure from enthusiastic
support because Conrad said well under
the Romanov Dynasty which lasted 300
years there's this whole history of
saints having loyalty and veneration for
the romanovs the problem is that Stalin
ruled for what 20 years so how is that
comparable Stalin didn't have a dynasty
that lasted 300 years you're gonna tell
me there wasn't political pressure under
that 300-year dynasty for the Orthodox
Church to politically
um to have political pressure I never
said
has I never said the political pressure
was somehow a bad thing it's just the
reality it's a matter of fact Orthodox
like you read the same Apostle Paul's
room that's the square one then how is
let me don't interrupt me please
person wants to challenge me on this
you'll get your cheeks clapped like you
can you can request speak okay you
better come with receipts as well
citations exegesis references to church
Saints okay so if anyone wants to put
off their hand you're welcome but
Warfare the Orthodox church has always
supported in the majority of cases the
particular government in which you know
in whose country it resided okay this is
why Saint Nicholas of Japan supported
the Japanese Pagan emperor during the
russo-japanese war now you may say hey
that's weird but he's not even
ethnically Japanese why did he pray for
the emperor well because he's serving
his Japanese people okay
that see this is what happened in the
Soviet Union it is correct the Russian
church should have prayed for Stalin and
it should have prayed for Lennon as well
frankly and the and that's when they did
the Orthodox Church never stopped
praying for the bolstery government even
in the 20s and 30s right so like I mean
this is the reality here and and for the
romanovs as well except but what the
romanovs have won up over the Bolsheviks
and Communists right and even Stalin
right what they do have and what the
Communists did not is they were also
Orthodox anointed SARS and an actual
Dynasty which is recognized in the
church in the Saints in the sayings of
the clergymen so that's that gives them
a huge one-up and that's what the
Communists unfortunately never gain like
Stalin yes and I agree even Dugan and
Dugan's friend now deceased Vladimir
carpets he does mention he says well if
Stalin in the 50s or after World War II
actually proposed to the church hey
could you guys make me a Tsar the church
will probably say yes
if he had repented like that was a
possibility but Stalin did not pursue it
okay yeah okay again
um
I think we're kind of getting lost as
far as what the argument is supposed to
be here because I agree that it's true
that the romanovs officiated the status
of the church in the for the Russian
state in ways that the Bolsheviks did
not but that has yet to explain exactly
why it is again so you're saying okay
even Lenin was legitimate for the
Russian Orthodox church and never said
legitimate legitimacy isn't in question
I can't comment on legitimacy the
Russian Orthodox Church should have been
loyal to Lenin right
no well they work like exactly what they
were okay but then but then but at the
same time you say that Lenin was a
Satanist and so on so how does you
square this
well that's the thing yes theoretically
there shouldn't have been but they were
Unfortunately they didn't support the
white army during the the majority but
you're saying they should have yes can
you understand that it's important can
you understand that it's important to us
that Tsar Nicholas would take communion
every Sunday and that yeah didn't
believe in Jesus listen I I I'm not one
to even Stalin believed in the
importance of respecting ritual and not
desecrating things that people find holy
I'm not saying that's that's all
meaningless I'm just saying given the
word that has that has fundamental
meaning to us about how someone should
be perceived epistemologically by the
church or by someone who calls it I find
that I find that a historical though
because according to you someone can
follow all of the Motions of of being
religious and so on but in actual
content on a world historical level can
for example be serving the freemasonic
bankers of the West and the satanists
can you name me that person like was
there a person in history like I can
actually you know I can name a couple
but can you and you're going to say
Peter but sure
what yeah the ball is in your court can
you name a certain person who actually
embodied that ideal of deceptive before
that it was even more than that right
the fact that there's because of
somebody it's not that we're judging
Lenin and saying that this person like
he and me and him are going to face the
job the same way and face the same
judgment we're talking about the the
this debate started because I don't
believe that someone can adequately call
themselves a communist in that way in
regards to the Russian Orthodox
tradition and that could be consistent
as someone who's a monarchist or someone
who's a Rome who believes in legitimacy
of the Romanov Dynasty who believes that
actually in the next 50 years
okay dude you do tell me to get to the
point menu how lost I listen to you
ramble in this whole Space you'll just
need to be patient hos okay dude like
you you can just leave whenever you want
okay like that's that's one thing I'm
like debating the three people at once
and he's just like two people dude
you're you're here because your friend
couldn't make a point you're his big
brother here to defend your buddy okay
so well it's okay fine I'm just I'm like
it's like you guys are actually concerns
hey individuals
in the institution that the church has
historically supported in that regard
sacramentally
can you repeat that again
I'm saying even if the Czar is bad even
if Stalin you could say is a materially
better rule or even a morally better man
between the Revolutionary basis of the
regime his rich as Dimitri said he never
approached the church approaching it as
a czar as someone who is seeking
Symphonia and again the sacramental
element with the ordination of the Tsar
his lifetime in communion with the
church this goes back to the story of
people like Saint uh who's at the Saint
Jerome and Saint and the temperature
this is a this is a story that's often
spoken and I'm really not trying to say
with stuff that you don't understand I I
this is how I speak in the context of
the world that I know about but this is
I I I'm gonna try and get to the simple
point that I can parse out from there
what you're basically trying to say is
that despite the fact that the Soviet
government in actual content
was better I'm not saying that I'm just
granting that for argument so for the
purposes of argumentation sure even if
for example the Soviet government
safeguarded Russian civilization from
the Satanism the actual Satanism that we
now see fully in power in the west
despite that fact this
um still would not have been as good as
if God decided for the czars who were
indebted to the French banks uh to rule
just because the czars formally you're
loading the question but like in a just
because of just say epistemologically
yeah no let me finish what I fucking
said don't interrupt me okay I thought
you were done dude I thought you were
not fucking done I've been really
patient with you so don't fucking
interrupt me I'm trying to kick you out
of the space whenever I want man please
then you would concede the debate me to
me because I'm just trying to make this
oh yeah yeah okay I'm trying to make
this fucking simple even for the purpose
basically you're saying for the sake of
argument all that matters is that
they're following the formal procedures
of religion they're not actually
embodying the spirit of the law they're
not actually embodying the spirit of the
religion in actual real content all they
have to do is follow all the fucking
formal procedures and you're saying that
makes them holier than thou and that
makes them better that's basically what
you're getting at
that's not what I'm saying the the at
the end I never once said that there's a
like there's still problems in the
government you can be like this idea
that the government always has to
reflect the idealistic ideology of like
the best situation that's just not
realistic we've already explained that
we believe that fallen in the book let
me offend holy fuck dude let me finish
you just bitched out about everyone
interrupting and this is you are here as
this is our space dude this is we're
here we're entertaining communism okay
please just let me finish this
we're saying even in Israel in the
ancient Israeli context of the Bible we
would say that the Assyrian Empire the
Babylonian Empire Pagan satanic they
served as scourges of God against the
the the people of Israel God's anointed
people who were being scourged for their
paganism their Satanism their communist
was a punishment for the Freemasonry
among the Russian people among the
Russian aristocracy among those things
that's all true that does not
delegitimize the Czar and all of that
institution has been preserved by the
church which is our epistemological
foundation in many ways in the
canonization of Tsar Nicholas II in his
family in the recognition of those
things by the current Russian government
in many ways as well and I again this in
this many way in the way that the church
has spoken and the way it's condemned
Lenin and those ways I cannot say that
Lenin is an Orthodox Christian Stalin is
a somewhat different story but my
opinion is still a note he was not an
Orthodox Christian and the most
charitable interpretation of him in the
church is that he repented before he
died so everything you just said Conrad
that's that's so everything you just
said Conrad is exactly what say Patriot
Carol and the majority of the Russian
clergyman actually believing right which
is what I'm getting at it's not just or
Orthodox
their opinion in particular this is the
opinion of the Russian church and the
the entire Global Orthodox Christian
church so I mean yeah we just have to
contend with that and also has I mean
generally speaking I would ask if any of
your historians are listening and I mean
by your historians I mean colleagues of
yours who are into Russian history I
challenge them to find ways that they
could somehow legitimize the romanovs
collectively as a dynasty from an
Orthodox Christian perspective because
frankly I've tried and I couldn't find
the receipts I couldn't find any
archival documents none of the Saints
speak ill of them actually
right and they do yeah they do say well
thanks Catherine the Great yes Captain
the great made mistakes to speak but he
doesn't sorry speak ill of the Romans
sorry the the dentist okay but what's
what Conrad's saying is you can find
patriarchia.ru the main patriarch Heroes
website patriarch hero paints uh you
know Metropolitan Tijuana Prudence
Confessor the guy who takes Putin to
confession and hears his sins this is
what they believe in this is not some
Bro Science it's not some Hassan Pike or
garbage that you hear on Twitter okay
this is like real life Orthodox
political thought slash and let me just
give one practical example and I'll let
you speak Haz in the in the scriptures
we wouldn't believe that there would be
a legitimate basis for overthrowing King
Saul who was completely fuck he was he
was anointed with a follow-up King there
was no Revolution that was necessary to
overthrow him necessarily in that regard
in the same way that the next king if
they were to become morally corrupt we
wouldn't believe in doing a revolution
and enforcing some kind of ideology
about about dialectics or whatever not
modernist whatever it is that at the
time would manifest itself among the
people or among those discontent
basically we wouldn't believe that that
would be something that would be a
Christian thing to do God brings about
plague and persecution and other things
or you know he will bring about a time
of even in the time when there was no
King he still appointed and anointed the
judges this is just how the true like
people who take the scriptures in
epistemology and their Christian faith
seriously this is how we and we've
explicated this on our show like we have
hours and hours of content explicating
this idea so um I think that we're
sometimes forgetting that I'm not saying
you're this is a problem for you you
just haven't listened to any of our
content so I apologize if I assumed
anything
Conrad would you say that like Putin
would be a Tsar like because in my
opinion he wouldn't be obviously he
would be are we gonna actually like have
this debate or are we just gonna
oh sure sure because there's a lot you
said that I kind of want to respond to
unless I'm not allowed to respond you
are you are yeah I mean you talked about
the oh well we wouldn't we wouldn't even
be against the overthrow of the
Assyrians and the Babylonians and stuff
then just admit that you're not you you
can't really
have a real political role that you're
just focused on the church you just want
to pray all day and that's fine I
respect that right but the problem was
when you start to make political
interventions condemning Lenin and
condemning communism and stuff I just
don't see how it's legitimate if you I
mean it's it's like a retro causality in
the time you're saying the time of
troubles we don't support the deposition
of a monarch but after the Monarch gets
deposed you rally behind the new monarch
and the story they tell as far as the
basis of their legitimate it's always
happened throughout the history of the
church every time right so and it it
also happened on the romanovs who's to
say I mean you're also saying oh I
haven't found any people in the Russian
Orthodox Church who condemned their
Roman arms no we haven't well okay even
even if I grant you that for the sake of
argument that there was no like real
criticism I'll be I'll bet you a
thousand dollars American USD right now
in Bitcoin if you can find me
two of three Saints not support your
position okay
go on go I'm sorry I needed to say that
just like we're willing to put money on
the line all right twitch box whatever
you want okay go on sorry all right
so
even if I granted that for the sake of
argument I think you're and I'm not
trying to insult you but it kind of
sounds like you're coming from a
Catholic or west Christian background
where you're making this assumption that
the Russian that what people say in the
Russian Orthodox Church is infallible in
the same way as like what the edicts of
the Catholic church or what the Pope
says which is not really necessarily
true the functions of the Orthodox
Church
have always been bound by time space and
Circumstance it's possible for people to
have been wrong and it's possible for
New Perspectives to emerge that have not
emerged in the past so I don't really
see what's so significant about even if
it's true that there's this unanimous
consensus right now that yeah the
romanovs were not you know um didn't
harm Orthodoxy or something I don't know
I feel like it's not necessarily even
a religious edict I feel like well could
I could because I let you guys talk for
like 30 minutes all right and then
there's other things you said which is
for example when it came to okay maybe
Stalin was not Orthodox sorry maybe
Stalin it's a complicated story but for
Lenin you can't call him an Orthodox
Christian well obviously consciously he
wasn't but just look at how priests and
religious figures within the USSR talked
about Lenin looked about how they talked
that you know
uh for example that Lenin
that communism has its roots in the
teachings of Christ
and that Christ was the first communist
and that Lenin was a religious person
look at the example of people who say
things like
uh in the poem which was made by demien
bedi bedny that's his name I can't
really pronounce it correct
it was called to the leader and it said
Lenin's writings are the Holy Bible of
Labor castigated Lenin's enemies as
judas's several leading Bolsheviks were
among his friends
they saw uh other secular poets right
there again it's this biblical
unconscious identifying the October
Revolution the second coming of Christ
all of this kind of religiosity latent
in the language and the contextual
background of the the Communist ideology
which is this kind of rooted in this
Christian messianism right now you can
say you don't find it legitimate for
this revolution to happen that's fine
but it did happen so how do you dispense
judgment is the question I feel like the
way you're dispensing judgment on it
contradicts how the Russian Orthodox
Church especially after World War II
actually ended up doing that for example
one last example I want to read out
um this is from
this is from uh the Journal of the
Moscow patriarch patriarchate right 1960
sorry this is from archbickett Arch
Bishop nicodim 1963. many reject
communism because it's linked to the
deadly sin of atheism but they forget
about the atheism within the bones of
Any Given Society
an objective examination of atheianism
reveals needed to distinguish the
motives leading to The Atheist world
view communist atheism represents system
of convictions moral principles that do
not contradict Christian Norms a
different kind of atheism Blasphemous
and immoral arises from the wish to live
independently of Divine Law of Truth
which was present in the depth of the
old society and which often appeared on
the fertile soil of the luxurious and
demoralized lifestyle of the ruling
classes Christian teaching considers
atheism a second type of mortal sin but
looks differently on Marxist atheism
this was the Archbishop of the Russian
Orthodox Church in 1963.
yeah look we
I guess I'll just make the point
um I understand Archbishop
nicodemarotov's opinions he's the
spiritual father of patriarchiro he's
the one who actually promoted
patriarchiral into clergy in the first
place so I'm not saying he was a
he was a bad person of any sort but he
had specific opinions he's not the
canonized Saint he's just one of these
Bishops same as there's you know there's
the Archbishop idahos and the Greek
Church who was uh you know launching
with BLM and things like that in the US
now like so the valuable opinions of
certain individual Bishops and even I
would Grant Archbishop nicodem was in
the 1960s during the Khrushchev ERA this
is a time of still of continued soft
persecution and which I mean in I'm not
going to go into this subject too
heavily but it is a period which we
Define as
a surgeonist okay I'm not saying it's
the whole Russian Church lost legitimacy
because of this but it was a very
intense period similar to how The
ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople
under the Turkish yoke in the 15 and
1600s so was the Russian church under a
very intense Soviet communist yoke in
the 60s 50s I would say even from 1945
onwards until maybe the early 80s so and
then you can see morato's opinion yes
notice how he doesn't cite any Saints
mind you Hearts notice he doesn't cite
scripture or even scriptural exegesis is
because his opinions are novel and I
know
because I can just yeah oh how do I know
I'm taking a guess but am I correct
because I know Archbishop I've read his
works so I'm guessing he's kind of just
stating his own opinions which will find
he can have them as a as an individual
that's fine
I was just going to make the point has
again I'm not we aren't saying that
again I'll just give an example Dimitri
is part of the Russian Orthodox church
outside of Russia the church and we
don't in the sense we don't believe in
papal infallibility we believe the
church is synodly local the patriarch
not in the sense that he can speak
literally infallibly on behalf of God
but he is the Archbishop the local
bishop and the church is we believe the
pillar and ground of truth that's just
basic scripture and to say that what the
church says not to say that everything
the bishop says is infallible but when
you submit yourself to the tradition of
the church that doesn't mean that you
can just because of our political
opinions throw aside if you're in the
Russian Church your Senate has
anathematized somebody your Senate has
said this kind of thing and again you I
understand that you're not a Christian
so this isn't going to convince you very
much and that's fine but like from our
epistemological perspective that's not
just something that can be swept aside
and from a governmental perspective
there's also the entire argument and
again I'm not just trying to derail this
but like we have the quote from Saint
John of kronstadt that heaven is a
kingdom hell is a democracy and
obviously you don't believe in democracy
you wouldn't say anything that you
believe in Liberal democracy Western
democracy and your vision of what Stalin
was is much more close to our form of
government but that's also a faction of
the Communist perspective and of the
Communist belief and in many ways there
are those who I'm sure you know this you
fight them all the time I've seen a lot
of your streams like these what you
consider these Democrats LARPing as what
you would consider you know true Marxist
true carriers on events
and it's hard for us to it we're just
not going for my I'm just not especially
with the current state of the question
where I can see as Russia is in this
transition as the church is re-emerging
I'm going to stake myself towards the
monarchist tradition of a church as
opposed to quote-unquote-based Communism
that's that's that was I think that's
returning this to the original question
that was at hand here
right but my my issue here is that um
I kind of forgot what you originally
said I forgot how I was going to respond
to that it would give me a second to
think we're all tired I also we can't do
this forever it's getting late out of
work in the morning let me let me try to
remember what the Orthodox Cannon has
said because I had I have something
just about the Archbishop mostly about
my issue is that I feel like you're kind
of picking and choosing when it comes to
what constitutes infallible now you're
not directly saying that Saints are
infallible but you're just basically
drawing from the fact that while there
are no saints that have ever he's drawn
from to corroborate this well Soviet
communism lasted 70 years compared to
the 300 years under the romanovs so a
lot of this is just a matter of time and
also it's an unfinished reconciliation
in my opinion between communism and
Christianity which people like the
leader of the Communist Party of the
Russian Federation zayuganov is trying
to kind of
zayuganov was given the award by the
patriarch kiril or Carol I don't know
how to exactly pronounce it
um say it
and he was given an award uh the order
of Glory and Honor for preserving the
values of Faith morality culture Unity
of the people
and uh you know basic Traditional Values
the basic
um fundamental values that he says
Define the life of the country so
there's a collaboration going on right
now between the Communist Party
politically and the Russian Orthodox
Church over on the majority of
Communists within Russia our devout
Christians
who are part of the Russian Orthodox
faith
so I to say that oh well the monarchist
tradition is more legitimate well look
what reality says there are more
Communists there are more politically
relevant within Russia than monarchists
are the Communists are the second
largest party outside of United Russia
within the Russian Federation so to
Discount this and just to throw this
under the table because of the
overwhelming phenomena of this kind of
minority of
psychotic Western liberals calling
themselves Communists I mean look at the
numbers the Russian Orthodox Church
sorry the Russian Communist party is
huge it's like it's the largest
non-governing Communist Party in the
world right you look at America yeah I
would count maybe Max 20
000
so-called Communists in America Max
right
um and these are just the tail end of
The Psychotic liberals now they've
adopted communism because of the Red
Scare edginess associated with it for
the same reason someone would adopt
Satanism they're just doing it to
provoke and scare their parents it's not
actually rooted in any authentic
communist tradition and to prove I don't
want to ramble but to prove that one
last final thing even the so-called
communist Communist party right now in
the rank and file they don't even draw
from the immediate communist tradition
of fucking Williams e Foster and the
Communist Party throughout the 60s and
50s because they reject American
patriotism and say American patriotism
is completely illegitimate even though
it was an orthodox communist line for
like the entirety of its existence so
these are not actual real Communists
it's not even just that they're Western
Communists they're not even real Western
Communists either it's a complete
invention of liberalism I know they're
more prominent on Twitter and on the
internet but in the real world it's the
Communist Party of the Russian
Federation and the Chinese Communist
party that represents What communists
are way more
I just find it a bit funny that you're
saying that we're like picking and
choosing when for every like person that
you can sort of quote
um that some you know it's not a saint
not um you know not a saint not citing
any specific scripture or Saints who's
saying some things that are you know
relatively mild towards um communism
we're not expliciting denounce and it's
like we can have well we we can
celebrate thousands hundreds of
thousands hundreds of saints who are
saying the most vehement things against
Marxism calling it like um you know the
coming of the Antichrist and all these
things we can show you all the icons in
our churches that show
um that depict uh people like Lenin in a
negative why like we can show you all
these things so it's I don't know why
you're saying that we're picking and
choosing given the fact that we can give
you like a you know endless endless
homes of people who are actually Saints
on their way to sainthood or locally
venerated um in some areas
um who are explicitly denouncing
um Marxism stalinism Etc
I didn't want to get the debate too meta
but like this was I was trying to
explain our epistemology like the
consensus pot room the count the Senate
councils and synodality the estimate The
ecumenical councils themselves these are
our this is our epistemology and our
epistemology through history is the
consensus poctum the consensus of the
Saints and
the hypothetical fact that communism
could have reconciled with Christianity
after it fell is irrelevant to me as the
Saints have spoken on this as of now and
maybe if look if communism comes back
and it happens exactly how you want it
maybe this conversation will will become
more relevant but I don't necessarily
see that happening either
right but you have to appreciate the
significance of the actual Communist
Party of the Russian Federation which is
overwhelmingly Christian Orthodox the
leader zayuganov is a devout Orthodox
believer who's friends with patriarch
Carol so I don't think this is
necessarily unlikely that the future of
Communism is going to be religious or at
least in the Russian form it's going to
be Orthodox religious now finally what I
wanted to say was isn't it possible that
there could be Nuance here isn't it
possible that the I understand there's a
mixed feeling toward Lenin at least
within the Orthodox church and I do
think mostly negative I'll concede that
to you among most Orthodox leaders
negative Lenin does have a negative uh
connotation but can't there also be
Nuance here can it also be that Lenin
also represents an internal religious
Strife within the Russian Soul after all
Russia is a collectivistic society Lenin
is considered evil and satanic and
demonic but when you compare Lenin
uh to the actual Western liberalism and
when you compare that to you know
so-called liberal democracy I mean there
was an upfront outward Atheism in the
Soviet Union that I don't necessarily to
have been considered draw gone from
religion it was an internal religious
Strife it was an explicit manifestation
of religious doubt that still was in
with within the realm of the souls
searching and longing for meaning
contrast that to America in the west
where you can have churches be prominent
and it doesn't matter because in the
fundamental texture of the society's
culture that search for meaning is gone
it's not simply that people are atheists
they are devoid of the guiding principle
of of any Divinity they're devoid of God
it's complete debauchery it's complete
immorality it's complete Madness it's
pedophilia it's evil fundamental
Sinister evil man exploiting man like an
animal so on and so on I mean it's
Unlimited did prostitution evil drugs
debauchery I think the explicit atheism
of the Soviet state which you could
easily say was within the Journey of
Russia really consolidating its faith
cannot really be compared to the actual
objective atheism you see in the West
so none of us are saying that you know
none of us are apologists here for the
West
um okay first off and then going on when
you're talking about the explicit
atheism of the of the of the Russian
State under um communism there you make
it sound as if the issue is that it's
like sort of the Russian people have
lost their religion and the Communists
there are just sort of tap or they're
just sort of like a reflection of the
people
um in a way um and and that's just sort
of like outgrowth of that but if
communism could have if the USSR should
have stayed around in the next couple
hundred years or 100 years or so
whatever it would be then they would
adapt a more sort of religious trappings
but you know going back to like even
like Lenin's writings for instance the
1905 pamphlet socialism and religion or
Lenin's like explicitly denouncing
Christianity and he says that you will
need to take up the advice of Ingles and
disseminate among the working class the
literature of the industry French
enlighteners and atheists and looking at
the things that people like you know
people have marks and angles have said
about religion which you yourself have
said in the past isn't necessarily the
appropriate way I think it's very
obvious that there's not just a um that
the leadership of the USSR with various
leaders wasn't just merely a reflection
of the poor spirituality of the Russian
people or something like that but rather
I mean maybe it was to an extent I'm
willing to ascertain that to some degree
but more fundamentally I think it
derives from like the ideological
implications of people like Marx Engels
Lenin and and also just well one other
point I wanted to make was that
um there are people like for instance I
don't know if you're aware of I know I
might get in trouble for this with a
Conrad and uh uh Dimitri here but people
like him Sergey bulgakov who actually
was a um Marxism
right for for a very long time he was he
wrote like whole like books about it and
stuff like that I think even Lenin at
one point you know cites him as this
like great you know comrade or something
like that but then some events happen in
his life and then he becomes a you know
he ends up being committed a priest um
he actually he actually gets ordained a
priest um on the eve of uh I think in
like 1916 that you know very shortly for
the revolution then he has to move out
but even someone like him um just I
guess to kind of give you some Credence
here says that in a way that Marxism
that coming about it's a it's a poor
reflection on us because we as
Christians could have done more to um
sort of stop that by having a more sort
of robust political ideology so on that
level
um that you know that you know addressed
the problems of modernity so on that
level I guess I would agree with you but
I think that fundamentally the the
atheism of the USSR and of Marxism is
inherent to it and to the extent that it
would go away in a few in the next 100
years or so or a few hundred years if it
were to last would not be because it's
adhering still to the the um the doctor
and the dogmas of Marxism
um but rather because it has
fundamentally changed its ideology and
even though it might still call itself
the Communist Party the Soviet Union or
Russia or whatever it would be a
fundamentally different ideological
thing that would not be compatible with
the humanism of Marxism I just the issue
here is that why can't we just look to
the words of Archbishop nicodem because
for him well why can't we look to the
word because he's not afraid
I wanted to interrupt you but I didn't I
let you speak so let me speak okay go
you said oh it's not that it was a
reflection of Russian Society because
Lenin actively wanted to propagate
atheistic propaganda and you know the
French Enlightenment and so on but
you're assuming that the root cause of
this is still coming from ideology and
it's not according to Archbishop nicodem
right the depths of the old Society
and it was the fertile soil of the
luxurious and demoralized lifestyle of
the ruling classes and you know I'm I'm
willing to bet that among the Orthodox
clergy in Soviet times they will point
to the sinful nature of capitalism's
influence
so on a fundamental level of the way the
people's lifestyle is right that is
where it's coming from it's not coming
from some ideology that's being
disseminated it's coming from the fact
that people are becoming atheistic in
practice in actual practice the dog eat
dog barbaric every man for himself sell
out your mother sell out your sons and
daughters that kind of capitalist system
was in Practical effect being imported
to the Russian Empire and this
completely turned everything upside down
even if you don't say you're an atheist
the atheism is there and that was noted
pretty explicitly by Archbishop nicodem
now my problem here is that I feel like
there's a kind of double standard where
on the one hand you'll say okay well the
reason the church supported this at this
time is because they were Bound by time
and Circumstance and he it was
khrushchev's political thought and so on
and so forth but it's not possible to
apply the same standard for Marxism and
say well the reason marks were just so
fervent atheists at this time wasn't
necessarily because of the context of
what religiosity had meant in practice
at this time it's because of some kind
of like fundamental metaphysical atheism
I just I just reject that I think you
look at the moral values you look at the
UN like the basic sensibilities of these
Communists Felix zurczynski
you know the night of the proletariat
these people were far more moral I mean
look at Stalin's ascetic lifestyle for
example this was a fundamental biblical
unconscious I cannot really knowing what
I know about Soviet history it's just a
historical to say it's like this
it's this inevitable metaphysical
atheism rather than a specific kind of
struggle
internal to the religious soul
no I think it is very explicit if you
read people like Marx Lenin angles
they're very explicit about their views
of religion you could say oh no they're
just talking about religion of their
time but where do they ever explicit
talk about oh no well we're just talking
about you know the sort of false form of
religion but we like that true source of
religion to the extent that Marxism has
a true sort of religious core to it I
will go to Walter Benjamin and say yeah
it's just like Kabbalah with no Yahweh
yeah I don't think so because I'm not
saying that marks and Engels and Lenin
said oh yeah we believe in the true
religious Corps I don't think they ever
said that explicitly trying to say they
lived that throughout their entire life
their basic moral sensibilities their
basic aesthetic when I say aesthetic I
don't mean cosmetic I mean like their
sense of the world that you cannot deny
there's a fundamental biblical uncommon
so they're materialism like they're like
they're like like their materialism is
that what you're referring to like what
their views of like metal I mean I know
you have this sort of weird view of
their metaphysics or whatever but hold
on you're still talking about like
philosophy and ideology I agree in that
department they didn't entertain
religion in any capacity I completely
agree but I'm just saying there's a lot
they still in practice not only took for
granted but I would argue had in
material fact more of a proximate
relationship to whether they were
consciously aware of it or not with this
fundamental biblical unconscious kind of
moral Bedrock this this fundamental
sense of justice this fundamental
commitment and loyalty to man who's the
greatest of God's creation right you can
say oh well Marx was a materialism what
does this materialism actually mean in
practice and practice all Marxist
materialism did was open the human hand
right toward fighting for your fellow
man that's what it actually did in
practice materialism didn't mean oh
metaphysically we're gonna blaspheme
religion no it's not even addressing the
question of religion it's addressing the
Here and Now of bringing Justice on
Earth addressing the Here and Now of
eradicating evil and and the day-to-day
tasks the organization the understanding
of how the economy works and so on and
so on that are necessary to do that now
just because he's not mentioning
religion doesn't mean it's not still
implicit whether he's aware of that even
or not
I mean yeah I would agree and that's why
I cited people like you know Benjamin
who point you know things out like this
and but to the extent that they have
this sort of uh Christianity ethos or
religious ethos to them I would say
that's only because they're stealing
from our epistemological worldview and
then but then combining it with their
materialism and their other humanism I
don't mean to interrupt but Benjamin is
an intellectual Marx and Lenin are not
stealing anything they're doing it in
practice they're not even aware
necessarily of how Christian what
they're doing is it's being done in
practice Benjamin can take note of this
as an intellectual but and you can say
oh he stole a lot from the Christian
tradition but that's in his capacity as
like a writer or someone who's just
writing things what about the political
capacity of someone like Lenin what
about the fact that Lenin actually gave
human recognition to the Russian people
and to this to Slavs and others who
never had any political status in the
modern world whatsoever that were slaves
of European colonialism what about the
fact that he redeemed the humanity of
these people and gave them political
subjectivity what about the fact that
Marx more than anyone else in his time
recognized and stood up for this
proletariat that was robbed of its
livelihood that was deprived of its
basic means of reproducing its existence
including its traditional existence
which was being having to sell its labor
like a sheep has to sell its own skin
they were neglected nobody gave a fuck
about them this did not mean some kind
of fundamental metaphysical Injustice
even in the minds of a lot of these
religious church leaders in England and
in Europe at the time it was Marx who
attached primary significances I mean
you can say that's materialist if some
injustice is occurring to your family
and your wife if another man is trying
to come for your wife and uh harm your
family won't you call won't that be a
call to action to you once you have your
fists clenched and rise to the occasion
to defend the honor of your family why
is it wrong to defend the honor of
humanity as Mark marks that why is that
make him a materialist too focused on
worldly Affairs why is it impossible to
point out a fundamental Injustice at the
core of the world right why is focusing
on that necessarily a bad thing I think
that more Christian because to me to me
in my view Christianity doesn't mean
just praying and following all the
rituals now I believe in the wisdom of
those rituals
I'm not saying they're nothing but I
believe walking the walk
matters more not just following the dead
letter of the law but the spirit of the
law which is something you do in
practice
I don't know what I'm sure Mom still
might have one thing to say but I want
to make this one point because it's
about something you said a long long
time ago and I just wanted to say before
I forget what I'm going to say about it
you talked about communism in Russian
Society in my perspective communism in
Russia is kind of a lot like what
neoconservatism or Boomer conservatism
is in America I'm sure you have plenty
examples of some Vanguard communist wing
of the Russian party that you think is
going to change the game but I think
Dimitri can cite this as well as Russian
I think the in many ways that ideology
is something that's held on to due to
Soviet Nostalgia for older people as of
who then experienced the 90s and hated
it as opposed to an actual Resurgence of
what the future of Russia is
sociological let me let me let me just
say one other thing my only other point
I was going to make was you also talked
about Lenin and his spiritual struggle
being symbolic of the Russian mind and
I'm not just saying this to be
inflammatory but we're really
sidestepping the entire Jewish angle of
this entire civilizational struggle with
between Russia the church and and the
and the old Cove and uh the kazarians so
I think to talk sociological
anthropologically there I think that's
to ignore that I don't think we should
ignore it I'm gonna address it but just
want to be clear that the attachment of
Russians to Communism doesn't just have
something to do with some vague
Nostalgia it's actually rooted in their
way of life that they're living off of
Pensions they're living in the
infrastructure built under communism and
capitalism has not been able to
materially reproduce all the things
Russians take for granted now that we're
actually built under communism now
regarding this stuff you're saying about
Jewish stuff
I mean this is I find this to be
completely anti-christian you could say
oh Lenin the accusation which has never
been proven by the way not that it would
matter is that Lenin had a quarter
Jewish blood running through his veins
well so what what I mean even I wouldn't
mind saying okay Lenin
was theologically more Jewish than
Christian but Lenin was raised as a
Christian and his family was Christian
the so supposed a Jewish person that's
in his family tree converted to
Christianity marks his father converted
to Christianity Marx himself was an
actual devout Christian he wasn't faking
it you could see the in the poems he
wrote to Jesus Christ and so on and so
on in his early life so I think you're
making like this racialist not even a
theology you've gone beyond the bounds
of theology talking about all this
satanic racialist stuff that's informed
by English vulgar materialism According
to which mankind please don't stop at me
bro what
just don't strum at me I didn't say like
what like are you gonna ignore the
Christian tradition and Christian
history's relationship with Jews
uh I can accept there's a theological
conflict just like there's a theological
conflict between all of the great
religions there's a civilizational
conflict
that's where you lose me I don't see a
civilizational conflict because here's
the thing oh yeah yeah it's a problem
here's the problem you're dealing with
the situation there's a theological
conflict not a civilizational one period
name me a fucking figure in the Orthodox
tradition from 500 years ago who's who's
saying yeah this is a civilizational
conflict with this small minority of
religious people we disagree with that's
let me read you a fun quote let me read
you a fun quote
what year do you want I'm confused
I want because before the modern of it
before the invention of modern
anti-Semitism look up adverse those few
days by St John chrysostom what's that
look up look up adversus judeos by St
John chrysost
this is in the sixth Century so is this
a was this a oh this is a civilizational
conflict or was this a theological
dispute
I'm gonna guess it's a theological
dispute okay
the idea of a civilizational conflict
comes from the racist secular tradition
hold on it has nothing to do with
religion but I wanna I want it to get at
though
what just give me a minute you give me
give me a second yes let me ask you did
the great civilizational you know
empires of Christianity did they have
specific laws against Judaism and folks
who were members of that Community for
centuries from the time of even 100
years after constantly from the time
yeah
were you aware of that okay
also against Muslims
oh absolutely
that's also a civilization also I've got
that also also against other Christians
what I'm trying to get at here is that
in our era specifically after we've gone
through this problem of modernity are we
going to return to the barbarism
According to which we're going to start
attacking each other over our religion
or can we accept now the conflict is
between the world's traditional peoples
and religions and this fundamental
actual atheistic Satanism that is devoid
of any religious character that's on the
other side why should I
uh speak ill of the Jews Orthodox Jews
in New York who are fighting against
globalism and fighting against the
Satanism why should I make them my enemy
what about them makes them my enemy
rather than my brother in humanity
fighting in the same struggle alongside
me because every Saturday at the
synagogue they curse the Christians who
read the Prophecies of Daniel about our
God
you can I I you can talk to more
scholarly
um educated Jews about this theological
dispute you want to have but on a
fundamental level there are religious
disagreements between Christians Muslims
Jews and even other religions right why
theology is my civilizational
epistemology though no it's not your
civilization epistemology because
patriarchy yes it is hold on page
Patriot Carol in Russia has an
understanding that he is in an alliance
with the Muslims in Russia and with the
Jewish religious leaders of Russia
they're they are aligned together they
meet together they coexist and they
exchange dialogue you're just doing some
fucking stupid LARP where you're trying
to talk back to school bro
the actual the actual Orthodox Christian
Authority in Russia does not share the
view that you have on Jews yes they do
no they don't Patriots
Jewish religious leaders so how could
they have the same view as you
show me the text La patreon Carol you
know this is a synagogue and actually
speaks about besides just you know
sitting at the same table you want me to
find evidence of patriarch Carol
interacting I can't explain to you how
patriotic juice
that's part of Metropolitan T condos
who's likely possible the successor to
patriarchy to patriarchery he's
computing's personal Confessor he
attests the opinion of the Russian
Orthodox Church being that the Czar and
his family were ritually murdered by
Jews that's the opinion that's the
current problem I'd have to look into
that I'd have to look into that now
you're Source checking now you now I
didn't I wasn't getting into the
nitty-gritty and all the things you said
that I totally don't believe no I mean
what you're saying at face value but
even if I accepted it for the sake of
argument
that what even even if there's something
said about the past that's negative
about Jews the fact of the matter is
that here and now this idea that Jews
are a civilizational enemy of Christians
is not accepted it's not canon in the
Russian Orthodox Church you know Russia
closed the Jewish agency right about
repatriations Israel yeah that is
related to the political status of and
foreign relations with the country of
Israel not related to the status of the
Jewish religion in Russia so the Jewish
religion the Jewish State and the Jewish
people are not the Jewish civilization I
understand that because you're perfectly
coherent because there are plenty of
anti-zionist Jews that's what you're
missing here even in Israel Jews even in
Israel itself the Hasidic population
resists conscription why the fuck am I
fuck hold on give me a sec it kicked me
out of the space did I get kicked out
it's probably a glitch
it's probably a glitch hello you there
bro
hello
sorry I'm losing you I think
kicked me out
hello
like hello I don't see any questions I'm
glad this is recorded I think all right
he kicked me off I mean this is a cheap
clapping of enormous proportions I think
like yeah I think it's pretty awesome
yes you can go on yeah yeah no what I
was saying is that even in Israel itself
the Hasidic Jewish population
resists conscription into the IDF so to
say that there is something there's an
equivalence between the Zionist State
and the Jewish people is wrong the
Hasidic population and you you have to
understand hasidics are the Bedrock and
the foundation of Judaism you understand
that Zionism was a secular project all
this it was inspired by German
nationalism applied to Jews it doesn't
have anything to do with the roots of
what you call Jewish civilization which
is what you find in the Hasidic
community and if you look to that
Community they are overwhelmingly
aligned on pretty much every issue at
every level they stand with the
traditional forces against the globalist
agenda of the liberal Elites
for a year bro please Don't lecture me
on the Zionism of Orthodox Jews
what
have you ever been to Crown Heights New
York
uh what's the what's the point
you ever heard of Chabad Lubavitch
dude have you you can name anyone you
want the fact that that's not a person
you fucking idiot okay you can name
whatever whatever thing you want the
name
the fact of the matter is that it is a
fact
yeah I'm not familiar with the thing you
just said you should never speak to
Fuentes about this because it will not
end well buddy
I speak I speak for myself I don't
really give a fuck who disagrees with me
this is my view this is your the reason
you didn't talk about this until two
hours into this thing is because this is
this this is incoherent dude no it's not
yeah you focused I was focused on other
things so you're saying that all
Orthodox Jews or even the o-rung
majority of Orthodox Jews
like it's unanimous
I've explained to you my I've I made it
pretty clue
you're saying they're used
I've made it pretty clear my
epistemology throughout this space being
that of the church and the Saints and
the and all that is rooted no it's not
yes it is
says the Jews are a civilizational enemy
of the Russia I can show you because
patriarchy real reads the Gospel of John
and whenever it comes up in the church
calendar and the Council of John says
and the Jews said let our blood be on
our heads and on our children and our
children's children that's in the gospel
yeah yeah exactly because you have the
silly bifurcation between you talk about
being Sublime you bifurcate the
theological reality of the world and the
simple material because you have this
silly picture
dialectic dude
patriarch Carol himself does that when
your cartoon the representatives when he
meets with the representatives of the
Orthodox Jewish Community despite
theological differences and lends out
his hand and his uh dialogue to say we
are still United against the Satan at
satanic West in defense of the
traditional religions of Russia that's
his opinion I'm not sure that's what it
says he says that the meetings has just
as we don't necessarily we're meeting
here but we don't agree I die with you
saying patriarchy the representatives of
the Jewish Orthodox community and
rebukes them and condemns them you think
that's likely
no unfortunately he meets with them in
the context of advising Putin who is
slightly too compromised to Zionist
interests as well in the context of
Defending Russia's traditional religions
against the Satanism of so-called
Western secularism
because how can you say that the opinion
that Jews are the enemies of uh
Christian civilization is reflected in
someone who's making allies of ask the
Jews
what do you mean look up Norm eyes
the ones in power every Jew in power how
about that
okay
look look the ones that run the media
the runs the one okay well we'll bring
them into the space and have them talk
and make their case until they do I
don't know
the fucking respond to that how do I
fucking respond to such a vague illusion
bring this person into the space and
have them speak and let's parse whether
or not they can be said to speak for all
of the Hasidic Jewish dude this is
sophistry and you know it everyone knows
I think you are I think it's very clear
that you are pathologically above and
beyond what can be afforded by reason
pathologically fixated on this stupid uh
stupid now you're gonna now you're gonna
try to slander us and throw us in and do
this it's not slander but I have a
pathological enmity toward Jews I don't
share
okay has that's fine you don't share a
lot of things with us right including
Christianity to be honest so yeah
I've never lied about that I'm actually
a Muslim so I'm in the same boat as
these Jews as far as I'm concerned
I mean you're not okay yeah Jews and
Muslims are at civilizational war with
Christians that's a historical fact but
but kadirov who's fighting alongside
Putin against zelenski Satanism go tell
him that go tell khadirov he's at war
with Christians right now and see what
could you Rob will do to you
Muslims and Jews are at war with
Christian civilization
you are insulting the alliance in Syria
between the Muslims and Christians that
were fighting Isis you're insulting
you can see the debate no you fucking
idiot you're fagot
what a pussy
debate over manhood conceded I accept
your surrender bitch fucking remove me
from the space you little bitch
I'm sorry there's only so much I can
take it's like I'm trying to explain to
this person there used to be a Unity
between traditional Believers and shit
right and he goes yeah well you're a
Muslim has and Muslims and Jews are at
war with Orthodox civilization I am a
true Russian Orthodox Christian never
mind the fucking fact that khadirov and
the chechens are on the ground fighting
alongside the Russian Armed Forces
they're literally at the Vanguard of it
and he's saying he's trying to cause
division between these fucking people
it's unreal look at Syria look at how
the Muslim and Christian coalitions came
together to fight Isis to defend Assad
Iran doing the same shit it's like where
the fuck do you get this fucking idea
it's so fucking stupid but the problem
is that you have these fucking larpers
living in the fucking West talking all
this big fucking game while people are
actually giving their life on the ground
in a Muslim Christian Alliance fighting
against this fucking Satanism people
actually laying down their fucking lives
and he defames that and disrespects all
that shit sitting in the fucking West
because he found some new fucking
trinket fucking new gimmick novelty
identity oh I mean I tried to respect
their fake Orthodox LARP but it's
fucking LARP dude don't fucking tell me
that these converts are on the same
fucking level as the actual people born
into Orthodox Christian civilization in
Russia in Syria
you know
even in Lebanon where Orthodox
Christians are allied with a certain
type of Muslim group right don't fucking
sit here and tell me that the re that
this reality that's the that's what
people literally breathe live and
breathe he's gonna say oh Moses Muslims
and Jews were at war with Christian
civilization
and then that's not even to mention the
Orthodox Jews and Hasidic Jews in Russia
who also are defending the Russian State
against this fucking Satanism it's like
it's a Fed shit dude no I'm not gonna
throw Jews under the fucking bus no I'm
not gonna condemn my Jewish Brothers in
humanity who are fighting against the
same enemy that I am
it's fucking stupid dude
at least show me you have a fucking chin
before you're gonna fucking crucify me
for not getting on board with your dumb
Jew hatred bullshit at least have a
fucking chin dude
I don't give a fuck how unpopular it'll
make me I don't care dude let's admit
the fact it's easy to go after Jews
because there's not that much of them
because there's not that much of them so
I'm gonna be here to be more popular I'm
going to start attacking Jews and have
enmity toward Jews no I'm not I don't
care if there's only two Jews in the
world I will not betray my brothers in
humanity
I you you dude it's like it's like what
the fuck dude you know what I mean
no mine is the popular position no it's
fucking not dude because the people that
you claim you think that Jews are
running the entire system I disagree
with you but it's not like the system
Cuts me any slack for saying this it's
not like I get any slack cut to me when
I say I will defend my Hasidic brothers
and sisters you want to know why because
they call me an anti-semite anyway the
fucking the fucking liberals in power
call me an anti-semite anyway they call
me a Nazi they call me I don't get any
slack cut to me dude I get doxed I get
fucking threatened I get defamed dude
they throw more shit on me relative to
my actual fucking influence than anyone
I know for anyone at my level of
influence I'm only at 20 000 followers
or something I get more shit thrown on
me than anyone else they don't fucking
they don't fucking cut me any slack for
doing this shit so no it's not a fucking
popular position they cancel the fuck
out they try to kill me dude
they threatened to do that all the time
they don't cut me any fucking slack just
the other day these leftists dude you
have no idea they're literally trying to
find me physically to do harm you know
what I mean you think I get slack on you
I get fucking deep platform and banned
from every fucking platform oh hush but
you got unbanned from Twitter everyone
got unbanned from Twitter
they fucking took me on down on YouTube
they took my twitch away
and by day I mean the fucking liberals
you think it's Jews and you're saying
you're just you're not willing to sell
out your Hasidic brothers because you're
just taking a popular position
but the actual people in power don't cut
me any slack and by the way they don't
even like those acidic Jewish people
learn about it dude those acidic Jewish
people don't have a presence they're not
visible they're extremely marginalized
they live in extreme poverty in Devotion
to their fucking beliefs now do you have
to agree with them theologically you
don't I don't I'm a Muslim right but I
can still respect them as my brothers in
humanity my in my religion
said you have brothers in faith and you
have brothers in humanity
maybe that's just a Muslim thing but I'm
pretty sure Christians believe something
similar I'm sorry that's what I
fundamentally believe
you know what I mean
thank you so much gec us I appreciate
you being polite plus listening to the
Orthodox they're all right hope they
understand you're coming from a good
place appreciate you getting targeted by
the globalists including Newland plus I
don't get any slacks thank you so much
Chris conflating Judaism with Zionism is
the game of liberals and the
establishment
yeah exactly I'm not online thank you so
much based abrahamic alliance against
Satanism yeah
bass thank you so much Stalin is good
it's like damn man sometimes I feel like
I get targeted at least on Twitter more
than the ultra right does how often do
you see fucking tweets go viral about me
5 000 likes based on lies how often do
you fucking see that
every day
right
you saw it yesterday
they don't cut me any fucking slack I'm
still canceled I'm still called a Nazi
I'm still called a fascist I'm still
called an anti-semi they're always
saying oh Haas you you're talking about
the Jews when you talk about global
Assad you're talking about the Jews they
still accuse me of that
I stand with my Hasidic Brothers out of
principle I will not sell out even one
brother in humanity I don't care how
strong the numbers are thank you so much
just like these larpers use plastic
flexible swords likewise they're plastic
words and language cannot defend
anything with real substance it fucking
can't you know thank you so much emila
appreciate Christianity is fading and
these larpers want to play Crusader
Kings shame on you they're fucking
larpers they're literal fucking larpers
holy shit they're LARPing so fucking
hard
foreign
it's so detached from the reality on the
ground you know what I mean
it's like there's a right-wing cancel
culture and there's a left-wing cancer
culture and if you don't hate Jews
They're Gonna Cancel you
what the fuck is that shit because I'm
defending these people thank you so much
because I'm defending these people who
live like in subsistence levels of
poverty fully devoted themselves to
their religion
because I fucking defend those people
that that makes me a sellout get the
fuck out of here man
it's not it's not manly
you can't look those people in the eye
and see me with them and go you are my
enemy what
people who have so much conviction and
belief
and I'm supposed to disrespect that dude
they're more holy than I am I'm an
Unholy guy I do a lot of sin I engage in
a lot of fucking sin and I have in the
past too
these Orthodox Jews are more Muslim than
I am you're a great man can you trust
solid as they come
these a lot of these Orthodox Jews are
more Muslim than I am who the fuck am I
to say on their minds thank you for the
blame juice for their personal failures
exactly that's ex and that's what Putin
said right everyone's a sinner and
that's why I actually wanted to give a
lecture about after this debate was done
because I was thinking a lot about the
Christian idea of forgiveness right
and what I mean by forgiveness is it's
like
I'm not cut any slack and that's why I
forgive everyone despite their ideology
I forgive everyone despite their
ideology right thank you so much
Alexander appreciate it very excited for
the future of infrared let's go thank
you so much Alexander appreciate you I
believe in forgiving all these canceled
people even all these right-wing people
who have these views I forgive all of
them I forgive them because I was
canceled in the same way this is my
Earnest and honest message to all these
good leftists that are out there
there's only a few that are left I hope
I don't I hope they didn't say some
horrible defamatory shit about me I
don't know about because I don't really
keep up with them but from what I know
the midwestern Marx gang and that guy
Noah forgot his last name
those are decent guys from what I know
they're decent they're decent people
right they're decent honest I disagree
with them thank you so much they think
Islam is attacking Christianity when
Islamic Empires were more tolerant to
Christians inside their empire than
Christians were to each other so much
lice Rose you know what I mean and uh
that's that right but my my good faith
just thing on a friendly friendly thing
I want to say is like
I think the disagreement comes from the
fact that I I don't just think the
problem is a certain type of leftist I
don't think it's just the synthetic left
I think when you have a left that
condemns and crucifies human beings on
the fucking cross canceling them and
dehumanizing them in such an
illegitimate way you have to do the
christological thing and forgive
everyone you have to say I'm done with
leftism I'm done with this way of
approaching reality it's really telling
to me that when they tried to use the
Gospel of John against you they couldn't
quote the passages correctly yeah it
doesn't surprise me I'm not even like an
expert when it comes to theology
who participated in the ritual
executions later boasted about his
sacral historic Mission I always
wondered if there was a shibati in
Frankish connection what do you think
great story I'm not familiar all I know
is that Lenin didn't give the order
that's all I know about the execution of
the romanovs that's that's the only
thing I'm aware of right I didn't I
haven't looked into what the motivations
were anything but what I'm trying to say
here is that
a lot of a lot of people like no Haas
don't write off the entirety of the left
why are you writing off all the left
because of these these ones that are
attacking because if they call me a Nazi
if they call me a fascist even the
actual people in America who call
themselves fascists must be forgiven
because how do you even know that
they're legitimately fascists how do you
know they are how do you know they
haven't just succumbed
to the fucking evil reflected by what we
call the Left Right remember that speech
I gave about two years ago I hate the
cloth a snake wears to disguise itself
meaning for me when you're saying Haas
they're not real leftists they're just
CIA people disguising themselves as
leftists but I take the
christianological stance and say even if
it's a synthetic CIA plot I don't care
the fact that they can disguise
themselves in this form condemns the
form
if they can disguise themselves in a
form even that form is condemned
and to me that's the meaning of
Christian Forgiveness Christian
forgiveness is not oh I'm going to
ignore crimes no Christian forgiveness
is about an indictment on the greatest
of all crimes and that is an
illegitimate and unjust institution the
very institution from whence crime and
justice
is judged right is made
that is the true evil which must be
destroyed and that is what frees us from
our debts that is true forgiveness
see through Christian forgiveness true
Christian forgiving of debts doesn't
mean you sit here and go I'm gonna
ignore that this person was financially
irresponsible it means the very
institution of the bank the very
institution by which people are making
money is illegitimate and must be
destroyed forgiveness is a revolutionary
act forgiveness is the destruction of
Empire forgiveness is what destroys the
very source of the evil so my reason why
I reject leftism
is because their way of canceling people
and filtering out and isolating oh this
person is the enemy so anything is
anything is allowed against them
anything is allowed against them kill
torture rape doesn't matter anything is
allowed against them that whole
Foundation is corrupt the whole thing
the fact that evil people are able to
hijack it is a form of corruption I
believe in forgiveness I think something
may be similar happen even with the
Orthodox church with all of the
Freemasons and so on who infiltrated the
Orthodox church maybe the church needed
it was the divine plan for it to be set
on a New Foundation
that is christiological forgiveness
forgive the Bolsheviks for the league of
militant atheists forgive the Bolsheviks
for their uh Blasphemous the rank and
file Cagers on the ground forgive all of
that because it was the ins it was the
corrupt institution of those claiming to
be religious but who served Satan in
reality that led to that in the first
place and because when let me tell you
something when the devil is in Rome when
the devil is in Rome
one cannot distinguish Saint from sinner
one has to forgive everyone equally even
those who are truly guilty
I find this to be a beautiful and
extremely powerful powerful
christianological notion
it's inherent in the christological
concept of forgiveness
which is so fucking revolutionary and
Powerful it's like Hans you're a Maga
communist that means you're going to be
working with all these racists and
bigots yes even the ones that are
actually racist and bigoted yes I
forgive them all of them
all of them I'm not a fucking leftist
anymore I forgive all these people all
of the debt is cleared now let's start
from A New Beginning now let's talk to
these people now let's actually build
hope you want to talk about the evil of
racism let's create a positive Alliance
of races let's unite the white people
and the black people I forgive that
everyone for being racist I don't care
if you're actually a deplorable I don't
care I want to go forward I forgive you
I forgive you I am not a leftist
to me that is christiological
forgiveness
it means even when according to the
state
they say Haas we need to hide behind Joe
Biden to prevent fascism no allow the
fascism allow it I forgive it
the anti-fascist Democratic state is
what must be condemned I forgive the
so-called enemy because the foundation
The church here is corrupt the Cathedral
of liberal democracy is corrupt so I
forgive its enemies
they called me a fascist they called me
a Nazi
that means their entire Foundation of
accusing anyone of anything is wrong and
corrupt
that means even the people that are
actually guilty are now forgiven because
they're it's like it's like if you have
a corrupt Criminal Justice System the
whole prison has to be emptied the whole
prison must be emptied it was in the
song
white white Army Black Baron
Red Army is the strongest
empty the prisons we will empty the
prisons what about the real criminals
even the real criminals because the
whole foundation of the law was corrupt
and then in the future will the
criminals be caught will Justice occur
yes but Justice does not take steps
Justice works like a sword cleaving its
Target in two
all at once
and then afterwards
a New Foundation must be built
the most revolutionary thing is
forgiveness
you forgive them
and then in the future if they stay evil
and they stay Wicked like the anime
Nazis we will confront them as the enemy
yes we will
they say oh you're a sucker has you're
forgiving all these people they're gonna
stab you in the back I don't care I'm
ready for it I'm ready for it I will not
hide behind the corrupt American left
and its corrupt institutions I am in
that same wilderness
even if I have to claw my way out
fighting
will truly evil Wicked people who even
deserved to be condemned even if they
deserve the Judgment of the law when the
law is corrupt they are forgiven
and you must learn why they're evil
again if they truly are evil but you
must give them the good faith you have
to give them a chance and that's what
the left hasn't fucking done for these
Maga people give them a fucking chance
give them a chance I'm wagering on them
I don't believe Maga is fundamentally
bigoted and racist and all these things
I don't believe it
I forgive them
and I start from a New Foundation that's
Maga communism it is based in the
christiological notion of forgiveness
foreign
so this stuff they were saying about oh
the Jews and so on and so forth that oh
baby thank you so much so box you're 100
right us leftists don't want to forgive
they want to be excused only the things
that can't be excused can be forgiven
That's the basis of christology a
dialectic of justice and mercy exactly
thank you so much soapbox
he said something about oh well the Jews
in the crowd said we take it upon
ourselves
the crime upon ourselves and our sons do
you not see how radically at odds with
the Christian logic that claim was this
was yes a polemic against Judaism but
not not in the form of indicting the
Jewish people and their their progeny
and their ancestors
the whole point is that Christ die for
your sins so even if according to
Christian theology some Jews committed
the sinful act even they are forgiven
there is no Eternal burden of of debt on
the Jewish people for what happened to
Jesus that is radically anti-christian
kind of theology Christianity is about
forgiveness
am I wrong about that
how can you do this satanic thing and
have this pathological enmity on Jews
who after all are part of God's creation
as an Orthodox Christian I think these
people have demonstrated the need for
neophytes to reach a certain level of
maturity in the faith before one should
cultivate an online presence God bless I
agree thank you so much night of Babel I
agree now I'm not denying there's a
theological dispute between Judaism
Christianity and Islam just saying that
dispute should not be brought to the
status of human enmity should not have
enmity to another human being because
they're not your brother in faith there
are Christian polemics against Judaism
after all Christianity was founded as a
breakoff from Judaism fine that does not
have to translate into actual enmity
against your fellow man
because he's of a different religion
thank you so much Finn W those two could
be interchanged with the Pharisees in
the story of Christ all words and no
Acts
yeah it's like
laughs
yeah it's so convenient that your
position happens to be the one that's uh
allowed I don't dude I don't get any
slack cut to me that's the fucking thing
thank you so much Texas when Christ was
crucified he said father forgive him for
they do not know what they do
yeah I mean I'm not an expert in
Christianity but isn't that what he said
isn't that what he said
I just think we're living in an era
where Muslims Jews and Christians are
starting to come together and Unite
and I reject I reject
enmity toward the Jews as a whole people
there are individual Jews who are bad
there are individual Christians who are
bad there are individual Muslims who are
bad
foreign
military Cathedral
uh with um
with uh I've seen that I've seen the
Moscow Cathedral
I've seen it
there will not be any alliance between
the abrahamic faiths if you cut off one
of the links
you can't exclude anyone
I don't get any slack man it's like I
already I'm at war with the whole left
you know these people are fucking
vicious too right I will not change in
my principles
I will not change
I don't get anything I don't get checks
cut to me by fucking institutions I'm
not in League with the fucking anything
in power nothing
that's convert zealotry honestly
thank you
know this is one of the reasons I'm
actually just a communist so strongly
there needs to be some way to just be
about Humanity right
I can't do this thing where
oh yeah let's start going and attacking
each other over religious differences I
can't do you know what I mean we got to
be Mongols there's got to be a way for
there to be some Universal Humanity
that doesn't produce enmity between
People based on religion you know what I
mean
for me that's communism I am a communist
everybody needs to be humbled
I'm a Genghis Khan communist Genghis
Khan came and he whooped everyone's ass
he whooped he said all you people
fighting each other over religion imma
whoop all of your ass
and you're gonna have to coexist
that's what I believe
foreign
I mean I am a Muslim in my heart right
but I will never ever put an identity a
religious identity between me and my
fellow man
I will never put let a label come in
between me and my fellow man
if there's any truth to religion it's
true Here and Now
it's not true eventually in the future
it's true Here and Now
as we're sitting here fighting the
wickedness evil and lies the Empire of
Lies ruling over us let's be honest
conservatives and traditionalists except
Agnes uncritically it doesn't mean they
can't be right they often are but they
have not thought anything through I feel
like it's not even true traditionalism
thank you when Christ told God to
forgive those who tortured and killed
him it really spoke to me it still
doesn't I'm not even religious anymore
thank you so much thanks yeah it's
powerful shit is powerful
foreign
Satan is called Satan the Accuser
right
unless I'm wrong pretty sure it was
called the Accuser
I'm not here to be the Accuser
foreign
Jews Christians Muslims atheists Hindus
Buddhists
all can be my brothers in humanity as
long as you're fighting side by side
with me for communism
let God judge us
for our Deeds here on Earth and the
Hereafter but let us never put a dead
letter
in between us and the living task called
before us to fight against the Injustice
evil and wickedness here on Earth
this is my statement
I've seen evil I've seen evil firsthand
I see even in the way they defame me
it's evil it's wickedness they say
things about me
you don't know where it came from it
came from planet Jupiter
what but evil is behind this
it's evil it's wickedness
those who spread deceit
those who slander
those whose Foundation the foundation of
their whole world is lies is based in
lies
the war we are in is black and white
truth and falsehood
it's truth and falsehood
you can surrender the truth you can give
in to the weight of falsehood to slander
it's easy to do that
it's hard to fight for truth
it's hard to fight for truth
the basic idea of christianological
forgiveness it's simple I'm going to
simplify it for you
you can have enmity between two human
beings I'm a leftist oh this person's a
bigot this person's a racist
I have a dispute with this person this
is between you and another person
but when you become condemned by the law
right by Society by The Gaze of the big
other by law right
and this is transcending the enmity
between two human beings and is now an
enmity
between the law and a human being
and what that enmity has as its
foundation
corruption falsehood deceit illegitimacy
it's no longer between you and another
person the whole fucking system is
rotten
and even those who are actually guilty
of crimes must be forgiven
forgiveness destroys an Empire
it destroys the very Foundation you now
have to roll the dice and say I'm going
to free the prisons are some murderers
and rapists gonna Escape along with the
falsely accused yes
and if they commit their crimes again
we'll throw them in prison again but
we'll throw them in a new prison in a
prison whose Foundation is based in
righteousness and justice
that's the meaning of forgiveness year
zero
we will never ever take refuge in any
corrupt form of Justice we won't take
refuge
we won't take refuge in a false system
of justice
so let even the guilty let even the
truly guilty be forgiven we will not
hide behind the powers that be Open
Hearts this person's a Nazi this
person's a fascist but you are my enemy
we'll see if this person is a Nazi or a
fascist in practice we will see if
they're actually engaging in genocidal
extermination against their fellow man
we'll see but you're the Nazi in my here
and now it's you
it's not them
they are now forgiven
to falsely accuse someone is to forgive
even the guilty
one who is falsely accused exonerates
even the guilty that's what I say one
who is falsely accused exonerates even
the guilty
the guilty are forgiven for every one
person who's falsely accused the guilty
one is Forgiven
no point to forgive the devil he only
does it again let him do it again that's
the risk associated with Christian
forgiveness you're taking on our risk
now you're saying I'm clearing the debt
I'm clearing the sins now
yes
they'll sin again they do sin again
since
Christ of course man has sinned
but he still forgave them up until then
and there's a reason for that
because the debt all of it was
illegitimate
I'm saying this as a Muslim by the way
I used to be a leftist I realized they
wanted me to condemn my own people then
I knew they are not what they think they
are
all right
unless we have any more debates
what about pedals
no you don't forgive them
foreign
I'm not saying there are no unforgivable
things
talking about the manner by which
systems
not people become condemned that happens
with forgiven a general forgiveness
but yes there are some individual crimes
that are fundamentally Unforgivable
absolutely
absolutely yes
but
how those crimes are dealt with cannot
be discussed
do we forgive leftists
we fight we fight against those trying
to eradicate and exterminate us
we resist them
the reason I think those who harm
children cannot be forgiven
it's because you're not doing something
against the it's not a crime in the past
it's a crime on the future
to her children is a crime even in the
future
of debts being clear even after deaths
have been cleared you're still engaging
in this metaphysical crime against the
future
right
thank you so much Chris appreciate it
Communists so religious the purpose is
reconciliation only those that foreclose
this are beyond help God only helps
those that help themselves
but
the thing is I said when the prisons
open
everyone is free even the guilty
well some people
the moment they walk out yeah okay
you're forgiven from the prison but then
you walk out of the prison
and one must account for the living
living here and now
um
damage they've done to a child
so how will they account for that
according to a new law
that uh brings back forms of punishment
that only exist
never mind okay follow me on Rumble
I don't also mean this
I don't mean this literally either I
don't literally mean we should empty all
the prisons
no if there's a proletarian dictatorship
you're going to keep a lot of people in
prison murderers just saying kind of
metaphysical and in principle is what I
mean
for example in politics it was the left
versus Maga for a long time
now you must forgive all of Maga because
the left proved its own corruption and
wickedness for example when the DNC
cheated Bernie that's when it should
have been
they should have said okay the whole
fucking thing is rotten we must forgive
all of Maga now
you know what I mean
it's like in it's the logic it's
Christian logical it doesn't literally
mean
literally mean in every circumstance you
forget the wrongdoing in someone's past
it means you can somehow
have this logos
that relates an institution
with people
foreign
guys
good debate
see you guys tomorrow bye
good debate
see you tomorrow
hopefully early stream