πŸ”΄ RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ

2024-04-10T02:14:24+00:00
I'm Ha,
ah
ah I'm listening to you know, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
I, I can't see when, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Haarine
Haarlingling,
yeah, ah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm Harik
Yeah
I'm
Yeah
Yeah
I
Haar
Yeah I know Ha'i-o-le-te-we-day-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha- The I'm I'm Oh, Oh, Yeah, I'm
I'm
Ha you get a
I'm
I'm
I'm Oh,
Oh, Ah, you are I'm Oh
uh The The Thank you. I'm
a lot of I'm Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. I'm A Thank you. Oh, Oh,
Oh,
Oh, yeah, hi-ah-law and yeah, yeah. Yeah I I'm Haar yam-telling
Yian, y'all,
Y'i, and I'm-na,
ya, ya, da-da.
D.
D. Let's Let's, ch'allpts, are the Dostoeing of their
Beregity
and
can't
do you
to give
in the
grievee
to us on our
Sunees
to
work, work
so, work so
our
tisela
our
tally
fieler
as
shivier
chlots
and
jolp
and jolts
and
resilies
and
you're but
every
minute be ready to meet able to meet with the other.
Every minute, be able to meet with a trance
and start to attack on the tank and start to do that
to attack on the enemy.
Ready? Get in the bag, get in the air! Thank you, Nagar,
Let's see
Inns
No,
No,
No!
Let's
No! No!
D'
D'clock
T'
We
see We shittin
We Stry On Strait There holtleds in the airs We protect We're in
We're in
We're in
gunned with
force
and with
speed and
speed and
magnetism fire fire
We're
We're We're
We're
We're in Pachianirn't We're in machine
In light in a lot
When we're
We're in war
We're talking
We're going
We're going
We're going
Pollyanna
Pollyanna
Yes, Miss Miss Marnia Miss Miss Marnia! There's Maliya! Yes!
Yes, Mali!
Let's
Maldana!
Let's remember
Vrack
Thefts
We're in
We know
We're in We know We're
We're We're We We We're we We go ahead of We're We're We're
We're not
We're not
We're In We're
We're not We're in We're
We're Go ahead of Machin' In his Rearves' Pothon
But that's
Kornuels
Kovans
And then
Mavis Starrie
And the
Kempry Mock
Your Wov's
Your Wovinae
Ohlian
Cahle
!
Ura! Ura! Yeah, Plead If you're in the war! O'OWOWOW!
If there
there will get a threat matured
He'll be able to sit in the suit and with the
When they'll,
When they'll,
They'll,
and on the letters and on top of the POMADC. When we're Voddivetely start-toury And by the
Pallis
Potholns
In the
We're We're
We're
We're
Incheon We're In there
Pachin We're
We're
We're We're
We're We're We to say we're going to win.
And every match, that's in the war that's in the war, we're going to go in war,
when we're going to go in war, we're going to go in war, Come by the planet Come I'm The city of all we all are still still still is now there still is now that the state is not, the
work is never home, when the workers are found. it's life it's lebe ho when work work
when
workers there
there
there
never
and the and
the state is
there
that
the land
it
it's life it, hock,
work when the worker's not far.
At the beginning was there a
that the wagon that not held
and the axe should
the archer should that's not held and the axe she's just so farce the dutch
tte's was
his plight
but with this
fursing not
there's
we are in
still and
there's still
still is not there still still and the star is there's still there
work
now
there's
there's
there's
work
and
work
and
work
work
and work and
all
the
better
leave
because the soup not was not didn't because the stuff was Salz the Sack the Suss the
Suppe not
Dinh was
And the
Dregn't
Yeah,
There was
That man
From Westen
Rieb
Here get
Right,
But the way
Is cheap
There's
We have We have
In the lot
And the staff is
There's not
The work
The worker We're building
The land
It's
It's creak
Oh
And
Arbiter
There's
And all the world It's Anner work and and all
the world
it's an
sprang as
genders fudgene
fudgian land
between elp
and o'er's strand
there came
the brother and
shwester
an hand
and they
had they
us overran't
"'There's
"'we are
"'in' we are
"'in' still
"'and the state is
"'in' still
"'their-arwebord
"'the land
"'It's
"'It's here
"'ho "'when, "'an-arweights "'Couth!' And when we're playing, it's been, it's here ho, when the workers
I found.
And when we're what to sharding
there came it from even on, that we
knew we, yeah.
But when Us was
To bluen't
There were
We're suddenly
Not more
There's
There's been
We're still
And the
And the staff
is still
There
We're
All this That's It's It's It's And the staff is still there, in all the world of the land.
It's dream, it's dreamer hope,
my work, my work
will be born. You know, The
Thevostrean, He washearerner, His uterine wastack
In his life is important
First Shack
You, hear you,
They're,
Neutrauders'
VIII
Euras'n'
Atax'ra's country with the troyo'erousn of attacks
and
in a new
is the boy
and the
heart is very
in the
and Lennin,
that's a young and young Oghtabry And Lenin, That's And you know
And young
Octabry in
And he'll
And Lennin,
And he's
Likee
Ande
Uny Octabre
In
He gets In all Knotes Ince I'm in front of them.
If it's flet it in all the end of all the Conces, you,
believe you,
will be new
the new
will be new
boys, and the new and will
be
we're
we're
we're we're
in
heart
in the
in the
many
young and young young young young young in New In Newly, Inuit,
Inuit,
Inuit, Income, Income, In men's in the world's in the way of the world's in the way to bea
neveres yet life for the praudy
there are people in this life
only with the life only with with with by the and men's and who's
young and young
men's in
men's in
men's in
men's
young men's
in front
in the men's young combat in We're We're No
No
Segal
No
No No
No No
No men
You
We
We
We We We We Siv S We's We're in three
We're in three
We're in
We're in
We're going
We're We're We're We're
in the world In every In Mervant In he's He's In this in We We're in We're in
We're like
We're young
Ande
We're young
We're young We're
We're Mugue
Mugin Mugue
Gordian
Mugue Gond and we're we're we're men love we're we're we're and the war
continues with a boy and in the world
and in the world in front of the world in front of the war of war on. And men, This boy, We'll be You know in Inuit, I'm dumb in it. Oh! Oh! Oh!
...
... ... One of them Oh and
I'm
a man and the I'm not
I'm going to
I'm I'm not
I'm
I'm I'm
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
and I'm and
I'm
and I'm not. I'm a lot.
And I'm not.
And I'm not.
I'm not
I'm going to
I'm going to
get a
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm and the I'm not
I'm
I'm and and and the I'm Bhopr
Bhopr
Bhopr
and I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm gonna
and the
I'm and I'm going to I'm
I'm
I'm
and Welcome, everybody and, and, uh, you might have noticed a few changes around here.
I spy, you know, I'm not going to point out the obvious, but I do put an effort into this to make it look very good with help of course i also have i changed the tone of
the lighting to test out a brighter color i don't know what to call there the previously it's a
warmer color that makes me look more orange and more popping out. But this is a more light color that makes me just look like how I do naturally. Whichever one of you guys prefer, let me know.
Be sure to let me know.
But there's some things I've done to...
I really think I have a great setup now.
What do you guys think?
I think it looks really good.
And everything is exactly as it's going. Everything is as it's supposed to. Everyone's wondering about the book. Yes, the book has been delayed.
It's been delayed in part because of Michael Hudson's new book.
Because you have to understand all I had before to go off of with Michael Hudson is a series of
blog posts and the collapse of antiquity. And everything I was getting from him is about the temple economy, right?
I find out an entire book devoted to the temple economy and the Bronze Age economics, he's released. Yes, I need to, I need to, um, I need to add way more
content now, you know, I need to read through all of it and make sure I haven't left anything
out. And I take in all that research.
So there's been a delay.
But don't worry about it because everything's going on schedule.
The only reason there's been a delay is because I have room for there to be a delay.
Okay.
If there was no room for there to be a delay, it wouldn't be there. It would have been done
already, right? But I have some wiggle room to make it the best, to make it the best, to make it
perfect, you understand? But I'm not going to talk about that because talking about it is a way to jinx
it actually i do have some interesting topics in mind i want to talk about tonight including
some theory big brain related stuff.
I have things I'd like to talk about that are more free-flowing thoughts I have, but I'll save those for the end.
We may actually do the Patreon Q&A tonight. What am I three months behind?
Oh boy. Oh boy. Put, put the Cultural Revolution Dunstap on me and parade me out in public and shame me
and, you know, throw
tomatoes at me, whatever you have to do.
I delayed the Patreon post
by Quilele while.
What's going on?
Red Saffron!
How's it going, man?
But you guys also have some
Penance you have to pay
Because you didn't
We didn't reach the goal for the tweet
157. This is unacceptable.
So, you know, it kind of goes both ways.
Then again, I did do my stream late, but then again, I've been busy doing stuff, okay?
Regardless, that's in the past.
We can play the blame game.
We're not going to do it.
We're going to focus on the future, actually.
And focusing on the future,
Grandma Americana, very interesting name.
Beautiful name, actually.
Harold!
What's going on?
Wow. Harold's in the building thank you so much harold appreciate you appreciate you no we actually have quite a few things on the itinerary and things I'd actually like to show you.
Things that I found a little shocking, to be honest.
You know, I've always thought to myself, and I'm probably going to get myself in some trouble tonight.
Mecca, Duffy, what's going on?
I don't want to taunt the feds.
Sciop, Shorty, what's going?
I don't want to taunt the feds.
Because I think the feds are only using 15% of their power level against me.
Am I overestimating them?
I think they're only using 15%.
Because, you know, E.K.S. What's going on? What's going on? Because, you know, when they start actually, when all of their bullshit sciops of, you know, the stuff on social media targeting me.
They're behind almost all of it, by the way.
And if they're not behind the original posts, they are behind those posts gaining traction and going viral.
But when that stops working, the second step they take wallo walamanka the second step they take
is uh it's targeting you legally right using legal means so trumped up charges and what is it called? Entrapment to commit crimes.
And pull it in the case of politics, violent crimes. And this is the kinds of things that they do, and they haven't gone there yet.
So I think it's only at 15%.
So I never want to taunt them because they still do have a lot of power.
We still do have to bow before our CIA and FBI overlords who do whatever they want and have unlimited power beyond the Constitution.
The minister, what's going on? What's up?
You know, we are living in a totalitarian country.
John Jackman, what is up?
Wow.
Wow.
Appreciate you, brother.
See, I don't like taunting them.
But sometimes I get tempted to, but I prefer now to.
I keep doing what you're doing, guys.
You guys have gotten me locked down and figured out inside and out.
You know, you guys, you guys know all the things that get to me.
You know, you have a full psychological profile of me.
Sue is, what's going on?
You guys know how to press.
You guys definitely have it locked down.
You know how to press my buttons.
So please keep doing what you're doing.
Don't let go.
Totally not misleading you.
Totally not misleading you in the opposite direction purposefully.
Totally not a dark magician, probably in a literal sense, totally not trained in Reza Nagaristani's dark training facilities, learning how to navigate the astral plane,
and knowing exactly what I need to do to bend consciousness in the direction of predefined goals.
I'm definitely, definitely, just some, just some hairy, loud Arab guy from Dearborn who, you know, what are the things that?
Who's upset about being short?
And, um... short and um and also being really stupid and whatever else people say about me the black pack
what's going on so please feds you're doing a great job this is totally not you know way beyond your pay
grade and you need to really get your higher ups you know your your black lodge higher ups your blue rose higher-ups
to deal with this
totally got it locked down
as it is
um
burial
barrio what's it
yeah the yeah laouche is totally...
See, in terms of the conspiracy pyramid,
LaRouche is totally at the top, guys.
You totally have it right.
There aren't other forces
much higher up on the ladder of the...
Definitely not.
Definitely not.
Definitely no ancient forces
like the Sarmung Brotherhood.
I'm a crazy person.
Australia Stanley, what's going on?
What's going on?
Anyway,
no, it's very good.
Keep going as usual.
Midwest Singh, what's going on?
So I don't like to taunt
Feds. I don't like to do it
because they are very capable people.
Australia, Stanley, what's going on?
What's going on?
And I'm going to be honest, i don't want to taunt them because i'm out here getting away with literally whatever i want to do using pan psychic methods and they're still using their cookie cutter methods against me that they use against you know i don't know some stupid stupid low level half wit dissident and i would prefer to not actually face an equal adversary
and i don't know why i'm saying all this because no they won't even believe it anyway so who cares right anyway guys I'm a crazy person um but I'm self-aware so that's all that matters right uh anyway
i think everything's very simple actually everything's actually very simple
but anyway i always wondered who is behind the screen
doing all this shit wondered who is behind the screen doing all this shit.
Like who is actually behind the screen and what is going through their head?
What is their mentality when they're like attacking infrared and attacking Haas?
Like do they have, don't they have a sense of honor? what is dry what's their motivation? What's their driving force? And I feel like this video revealed a lot of that dates that and we're gonna watch it together. Dark 2036. So if you don't know the crucial context, some undercover, I don't even know who it was, some undercover investigator got a CIA contracting officer to admit that the CIA and the FBI basically set up the trial against
Alex Jones and they were
after him and they wanted to take away all
of his money and they revealed
a bunch of other things including about
Jan 6
and there's a few things that I'm not a hateful 6 and there's a few
things that I'm not a hateful person
but there's a few things that are a little
unsurprising about the agent
in question
and it's like wow this is exactly
what I expected them to be like.
And that's how they roll.
That's how they live with themselves.
That's what they do,
the work that they do,
spreading lies for a living and manipulate, you know, being...
And it's like they're not motivated by ideology.
They're motivated by arrogance and hubris.
They get a thrill and a rush, just the pure power of it.
A pure sadistic power because a lot of these people, they're the sadistic type, you see, and they just get a rush and a thrill out of torture.
Anyway, guys, let's see who we're up against let's see who's
responsible for our opposition oh wow we're not going to talk about
physiognomy dark wow thank you so much brother we're not going to talk about physiognomy.
Dark, wow, thank you so much, brother.
We're not going to talk about physiognomy,
but we're going to do the voice test.
How do they sound?
You can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do.
How?
Does the Bureau practice entrapment a lot?
We get really close.
We call it a nudge.
A nudge.
Sometimes you've got to get a quick little, just to see what happened.
This is literally my, like the, this is literally the CIA officer assigned to like fuck with me and Jackson.
Probably me, actually.
They have, they have so much.
They're overstaffed.
They can do us separately.
But this is the person assigned to like fuck with me and like spread bullshit about me.
They're like, yeah, we just, we just, we just, we just. a sign to like fuck with me and like spread bullshit about me.
They're like, yeah, we just, we just, we just, we just got, I'm trying to be professional.
But that's their mentality when they do it.
They're not like, it's not like a stoic type like this guy haws is bad news we gotta get this evil fuck dark magician haz no no that's not what they're doing what they're doing is i'm like a little evil goblin that's what they're doing. What they're doing is... I'm like a little evil goblin. That's what they're doing, right? That's the vibe. I already got the vibe. I get it now. I understand. They're doing it like as an evil goblin who's taunting you.
Because we can.
We do it because we can.
Because we can get away with it.
You're going to see in this video, this guy's actually like a libtard he actually calls trump cheeto he calls
trump cheeto that's how deep that's actually the type of liberal these people are okay and yes the
CIA is overwhelmingly liberal.
But anyway, maybe the FBI is more right-wing.
But it's two wings of the same damn bird, you know?
Same type of personality.
I think the right-wing types are the more kind of like, those are the more kind of kind of sadistic hypocrisy types, you know, that are like typical dirty cop type of profile whereas these CIA guys are like actual demonic goblins they're like demonic elves you know they're like evil sick
snickering just
just just bad bad
news you know
bad bad news
anyway let's continue
like to fuse and just wait for it to follow
nothing like putting out a fake social media thing
but like really get people mad.
Alex Jones.
Yeah, so...
He's literally talking about me.
He's like, I know what to do to make Haas mad.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
We have a full psychological profile of Haas
and we know how to make him mad.
Ha ha. Ha ha. this is literally what they were
telling destiny when i was beefing with destiny oh yeah do this do this and i totally was just
an unsuspecting victim to all of it.
Anyway, let's continue watching.
We were after him.
You are?
What we wanted?
Which was what? Took his money away. You were after him. You are? He did what we wanted.
Which was what?
Took his money away, chop his legs off.
This guy sounds like he cares about honor a lot.
This is such an honorable type of personality.
I'm not a hateful person.
I'm not even going to say anything.
But I will say, you know, our issue is the decline of honor, actually. Our issue is the decline of honor. Because when you can talk, when you can speak like this, when your voice sounds like this and you can speak this way, you can do anything you want and not feel guilty about it.
You can literally, you can defy everything under God's, everything on God's green earth, under God's everything on God's green earth under God's blue sky
and you have no honor
you have no morals, you have no principles
you're literally a demonic, evil
twisted elf, twisted
goblin, leprecon
um um twisted goblin leprecon um
and you you you just see fit to do
do as thou wilt
shall be the whole of the law right
this is the type of people you know and it's just like
no honor.
I mean, let's start
there. Honor is the most important. Without
honor,
put it this way.
If human beings were
incapable of honor,
ontologically, incapable of honor, ontologically, incapable of honor, all 8 billion people living on Earth would deserve to die right now. If you gave me a button that said, and you said, honor is not possible at all. Everyone's going to become like this guy i would press the button
right away everyone's no more human race no more humanity now luckily this isn't the case
human beings are defined in part by their ability to be honorable.
But honor is more important than life.
That's what I'm trying to say.
Honor is more important than life.
Every single real civilization and culture recognizes that.
So if you are a man who lives in honorless life, if you're a gossiper, if you're
somebody who spreads lies intentionally and knowingly, and if you're somebody who tries to
manipulate in ways like this,
for even even unprincipled ends,
these guys don't believe the fucking ideological justifications that are,
they don't even believe it. they do it out of a sick
power trip right if you live an honorless life you don't deserve to live you should make a
decision right and i'm not going to elaborate you should make a decision, right?
And I'm not going to elaborate further, but honor is more important than life. Remember that? Remember I said that?
Gavin Oblenis is a contracting officer at the CIA.
Oblenis worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2022 in the San Diego office,
moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border,
and now works for the CIA managing multi-million dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors. I work for, I work like this without, I'm not supposed to tell, people kind of job.
I say intelligence, what do you think?
CIA?
Yep.
You work for the CIA?
I do.
That's incredible. I'm the contracting officer.
Amazing.
So I deal a lot with like different agencies.
We're contracting with like, uh, director of national.
This is literally the guy
behind the Adam to hear meme
I'm not even kidding
I'm not even kidding
some guy who's like this
spread all of the
Adam to hear stuff
I'm not even kidding
it's literally
car
it's literally just like that.
I guys,
let's give them a little nudge.
It was so naughty of me to put that out there.
That's literally the type of personality they have.
That's how they do it.
That's how they vibe with it. That's how they justify it.
And it's literally the case. I'm almost 100% certain that a federal agent is behind the Adam to
hear thing. Almost 100% certain.
Intelligence to do stuff.
We do Navy Army.
Maybe of them, really.
I just, FBI.
I used to work for the FBI.
They threw the FBI at me.
They're like, here, you used to work there.
Oh, I'm permanent.
I'm saying.
Yeah.
Good. Why did they call a contract? Because I do the there. Oh, I'm permanent. I said. Yeah. Good.
Why did they call a contract?
Because I do the contract. Guys, remember who the feds are.
There are people like this.
Okay?
Just remember that.
I do all the people.
They don't have our personality.
You can spot them from a mile away because of the lack of honor. There's no honor there, right? People who are
honorless defend the hegemony. How can you defend the hegemony honorably? I mean, put it this way.
There's people in the U.S. military who are responsible for a lot of evil, but they still in their head thought they were honorable. And they were like, well, I'm just doing, I'm just a patriot. I'm just serving my country,
no matter what they tell me to do. I don't care. And some of these guys, because of Russia,
Ukraine, have come out like McGregor, Douglas McGregor, and they're like, you know what, this is,
I can't do this anymore. And those guys are not on our side completely. But I'm just saying like it seems like all of the elements in the imperialist hegemony who at least delude themselves with the pretense of being honorable just basic honor right they are breaking with the hegemony in significant ways, and they can't even do it anymore.
And meanwhile, the people running the show are being replaced by guys like this who do not have honor.
They don't have a sense of honor.
And as a matter of fact, you mentioned the word honor, and they start snickling, snickering, and giggling.
They start snickering and giggling, right?
They mock the idea of honor.
It's like totally so foreign.
They're so cynical about it. It's like, you foreign and they're so cynical about it.
It's like, you know, this is your, this is your Nietzschean last man consumerist subject at the end of history, whatever you want to call it, who just like straight up is motivated by personal pettiness.
I mean, look, I'm going to talk about it.
And I'm not saying this to spread hatred.
I don't hate transgenders.
And I'm not, it's not my intention to spread hatred against transgender's but it makes a lot of sense
for example that a lot of people working for um the imperialist machine whether it's Raytheon, the CIA, you name it, at the high levels of the DoD or whatever, increasingly they're transgender.
And people like, why is that? Well, because if you're motivated by honor or some
other ideal or a cause,
it's become so
inconsistent, it's like impossible.
But if you're just motivated
by something as petty and personal
as like, you know, I want to, I want to inflict
revenge against the people who reject my deepest, innermost identity, and who invalidate
me on a personal level, those are actually good candidates for being feds who will relentlessly
do any and everything in their power to neutralize the target because they're motivated by this like fantasy, this like personal grievance that they have, right? So it makes sense why people from that background is the quintessential type of Fed today you know feds are not you know your your your your
masculine you know agent from the i mean i don't even know if i would call them masculine like for example
what was his name? Jay Edgar Hoover
was like a total weirdo and freak, you know? He was like, something was wrong with him, right? But
the hard-boiled detective archetype, let's just call it that,
if it ever existed, and I doubt it did, but at least the myth of that is gone. Like, it's
totally gone, right? And it's just like this type of thing. Um, the CIA
doesn't have people like James Bond from the James Bond movies in it. That's what I'm trying to
tell you. It's not like James Bond. It's literally like this guy, you know?
It's not like Daniel Craig
who's like, thank you, Blackpack.
This guy spilled the beans in a pathetic attempt
to get laid. Unreal.
Exactly. That's all you need to know.
Okay? But, you know, Hollywood makes it seem like you know
oh it's like Daniel Craig who's just like this badass guy he's like the silent type and he's
like I have to do it's right for the humanity in the world no that's not those these people have
no character they have no morals they're not motivated by any ideas
they're not motivated by any higher cause they are motivated by pure personal pettiness spite nihilism
psychopathy sociopathicies, sadism, you name it.
And during the Cold War, it wasn't that far off the mark either in terms of sick, twisted, evil people being at the helm of these things, you know?
So yeah, you know, straight up.
Go out to vendors and evaluate them.
I love the agency.
Good for you. I like the Bureau too. The Bureau
was a lot of fun. I got to do a lot of cool stuff with the
bureau. I was the guy in the back of the truck and the band.
Oblenis spoke to an undercover sound
investigations reporter about
his work experience involving near entrapment
and his employers as involvement
with political commentator Alex Jones's legal battles. As long as the Bureau is able to progress
far enough to be able to put pro-lifers in jail whenever they want. Yeah. You think that's on the
agenda? We can, we can, we can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do.
How?
You set them up.
You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse.
That once they act on that impulse.
Someone called that new trapment.
It's a fine line.
Because that's what it is.
It's not a fine line.
It's not a fine line. You literally just
adverbatim described entrapment
and then said it was a fine line when it isn't.
Maybe this guy knows he's being recorded.
We get really close.
Not officially.
No.
We get as close as we can.
We get as close as we can to it without doing it.
So they can entrap some of these pro-lifers into doing things that they don't...
Depending.
Yeah.
We call it a nudge.
A nudge.
A nudge.
Mm.
Sometimes you've got to get a quick little...
Just to see what happens, right?
And how does that happen?
You put a post out there,
or you have some fake profile, say something.
This is what Volk Vulture deals with on a...
This is what we deal with on a daily basis.
I mean, guys, when there's accounts on Twitter that are quite literally as a full-time job dedicated to attacking infrared Jackson and Maga communism,
and it's actually a full-time job.
What do you think he's describing here like what what is that like think about it like
look what he's saying we create some fake profile to trigger people to troll to harass and it's
like huh that kind of rings a bell. It rings multiple bells, like many bells, right?
Now, I don't know. I think, you know, I am the one person to destroy their method.
Because I have a new thing where it's not a new thing.
I have a thing where I'm like, all right, yeah, go ahead.
Post and trigger whatever you want.
But get in VC. Use your voice and actually lay your claims
out. Anonymous, what's up?
Inspector Lilithex Neptune
Caldron, CIA.
She slash A. Reporting for
duty.
Thank you.
Anonymous.
Anonymous. Anonymous.
But, you know, the thing that I've cracked their code, I'm like, you know, I will actually talk to anyone.
And I will give you the opportunity.
Forget about trolling on X or BSing on X, get in my VC. And this is like unconditional, you know, even if you're banned and you were banned, if you're willing to get in VC, you will be unbanned.
Get in VC.
Live.
And say literally whatever you want to say.
And I get to respond in front of everyone just so like in front so that we could just in front of everyone right lay it all on the table and see who represents a position of truth and see who represents the position of falsehood and if you're not
willing to do that bye-bye bits i'm going to block you i'm going to block you see you debate me or
i block you because you're a time waster i'm not here to be a pen pal with you on Twitter.
Okay, I'm not here to be a keyboard pen pal with you on Twitter.
I literally do a show every other night right now.
It used to be every night.
It's going to be every night again soon but at least every other
night let's say i do a show where you can actually confront me anyone can actually confront me with anything they want to.
And if you're not willing to do that, it's probably because whatever it is you have to say isn't something you're willing to actually defend, either with an argument or with evidence.
And there are no exceptions to this. Whenever people say things like, oh, I won't because all you do is yell.
And it's like, any time you've ever seen a clip of me yelling, it's quite literally because I have to talk over someone because they are interrupting me ceaselessly.
And it is the only way I can even get a sentence in because they are spazzing out.
See, usually when someone spazes out, they just get muted and then I talk calmly.
But anytime I mute them, they just leave.
So I have to raise my voice.
But I haven't even done that recently, you know? I mean, it's actually rare that I
have a debate nowadays where I raise my voice. So it's not an, it's not, it's not a justifiable
excuse. Even the gay liar debate I had, go rewatch it. In addition to how he kicked me after five minutes, when we spent two minutes arguing tangentially related to a topic, I could not get a sentence in.
Defend materialism.
Why is it metaphysical?
Oh, it's metaphysical.
No, it's not.
Literally would interrupt me.
Two words in, he would interrupt me.
I literally couldn't get a word in
until I said something that he could
twist and then kick me right away and then declare victory.
So that's how it goes, you know?
I don't, I, I, I, I want my opponents to trap themselves and run their mouth saying whatever
they want to say, because I don't want, see, I, I, I am not just a debate person. I'm also a psychoanalyst. When I bring you into my VC, I want you to keep talking and say what you have to say. Get it all out. Get it all out so I could tear you apart. Get it all out so I can tear you apart more efficiently more robustly and
more thoroughly than I otherwise could you know if I don't let you say your
peace I want you to not only be destroyed by me I want you to also feel
destroyed in the most profound emotional sense. I want you to feel like I said
everything I wanted to say, and he used it to destroy me. Like, I had the opportunity
to say my piece, and I dug a hole, fell in it, and got buried alive. That's how I roll. Okay. I let people talk. So I'm a psychoanalyst, actually. I like people being able to say what they want to say.
That triggers, that we know it's going to trigger them, right?
Like, we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about it.
So we're like, oh, this will piss them.
Sean Connery, wow.
The new generation at MI6 are not like the old day.
They could never stop a woman from having the last word when she's already had her last word.
What the fuck is that?
Sean Connery, thank you, but what is going on?
All right?
We're even doing the whole, uh, the whole, oh, it ain't what it used to be.
The CIA FBI death squads ain't what they used to be.
Back in the day, we didn't have so many females yip yapping.
You know, I think about this
because I remember like on Netflix
some of the Korean shows I watched
and some of them like they would be about
it wouldn't be about it but they would like depict
veterans of the army and South korea so-called
south korea and you do get that vibe that those guys are like you know back in the old days
we had honor and it's like but you were bamboozled and you were conned. This global homo, nightmare,
you know, soft,
bourgeois society you see today,
that's what you were fighting and dying for
in the Cold War.
And you were being lied to. And I think that's really my take. You know, my take isn't that, oh yeah, let's go back to when we were based rather than woke.
It's more like we are we are here today where we are because of how you were
based in the past your death squads and your anti-communist crusade in the past is what opened the gates and open the door
for the degeneration and destruction of civilization we not witness no there no, it's like that guy
end-wokeness.
It's literally such a stupid name.
And his profile picture is like,
what was it?
I prefer the former things or whatever, right? And it's like, but the former things or whatever, right?
And it's like, but the former things are what led us to hear.
That's what led us to hear.
You being a based mercenary for the bankers to slaughter farmers in Vietnam
is what opened the door for this wicked Soros open society that you now detest.
Well, why don't you do some...
It's like, you know, it's like when there's a strict dad who clearly doesn't have all of his whatever together.
And then his kids grow up to be like total punks.
And his daughter grows up to be a womano a woman let's say with loose morals and i'm not saying
like a one-off where like you know one of your kids ends up bad or two of your kids ends up bad but
overall not it's a mixed bag.
Because that's not within your control, but like all of your kids turned out to be messed up
in profound deep ways. It's like, well, where did that come from, dude? That came from you,
you know? That came from something in you or your wife something like that you know
and um it's the same thing when it comes to history there's no going back to the old days.
It's stupid.
The old days are what led us here.
So what we should really do is go back to the old days, but in a different way than what they were.
We should go back to an alternative timeline where William Z. Foster won and is in power.
And actually, it's the 50s, but it's the 50s in Soviet America. That's the, see, this is a profound insight I learned from slovojijek which is so true
you can change the past you can actually change the past you can change the past you can change the
past we can go back to the alternative timeline of a Soviet America.
Now, to preface this, I know not everyone is a, you know, a theorist from the background of the French school of the post-war period.
I do not mean this literally, okay, to be clear.
I don't mean this literally.
But I mean it in the sense that in understanding where things went wrong,
how things have gotten to a point where you long for an alternative possibility,
you can actually have nostalgia for a different past, where things went differently in such a precise and specific way that leads to a different outcome. You can change the premises of the present.
That's actually what communist patriotism is all about.
Socialist patriotism
puts a different spin on history.
It's the same facts, same empirical facts of the past,
but a new spin is added where it's almost like it's a different history because it's remembered in a
different way you start commemorating the heroes and the martyrs of the cause of the oppressed
and of the proletariat and of the peasants and of the poor, right?
And you start actually having debates about, okay, was this figure historically progressive or was he reactionary, yada, yada, yada.
History becomes a battleground of contention and you actually see it as something it's almost like you can change the past not in terms of what happened empirically, but in terms of which present is the past
culminating into. In other words, who are we the heirs of? Are we the heirs of the American Revolution, the abolitionists, the civil war, you know, the farmers,
the workers, the labor leaders, William Z. Foster and so on. Are we the heirs of that America?
Or, for example, are we the heirs of that America? Or, for example, are we the heirs of, you know, land speculation and robber barons and, you know, slave owners and financial capitalists, you know, capitalists and so on and so forth. Which America are we succeeding? Which America is our past?
That's what socialist patriotism is about in every country.
Like, socialist patriotism in Germany, socialist Germany, watch people take me out of context.
The DDR, the GDR, the German Democratic Republic.
That was socialist Germany, okay?
People say, so stupid.
And GDR, um... um a profound weight and emphasis was given to the reformation thomas munser and florian geeyer and Martin Luther, for that matter. They were all commemorated.
And even when a figure wasn't totally historically progressive, they could still distill certain historically necessary and progressive aspects of those figures
to the point where they were worthy of commemoration and celebration this is what happened in
east germany on the anniversary of the protestant reformation i don't know if it was the anniversary of the Protestant, it was the anniversary of Martin Luther, something, his birthday, I don't know. And, you know, Martin Luther, they're not saying he was perfect. It's a mixed bag, but they regarded him as historically progressive and part of the German national tradition.
And this is why they honored him.
Now, ditto in the case of the Soviet Union for the figures of Russian history, including Tsars like Ivan Grosny including heroic figures like
Alexander Nevsky. All of these
people were commemorated and celebrated
because they were understood to be
part of the total integrity
of history.
And so when people, so this is actually a big part of Maga communism, even in the name,
make America great again communism.
Even if we ignore like us having to fill people in on the context, no, it's not about Trump.
No, it's not about us agreeing with all their ideas.
Yes, it's about the movement and, you know, filling a specific vacuum in American dissident politics.
Let's put all that on hold and just look at the name.
Make America great again.
Oftentimes people say, when was America great, Haz?
And it's like, but think about it more intuitively in terms of a longing to go back to the past to prevent this present from being ultimately what's necessary, right? That is socialist patriotism. We are making America great again by returning America to a past it didn't even have, but which was nonetheless a possibility Soviet America this is why
retro futurism and kind of like what do we call it historical fiction should be genre, even a genre some of us should explore.
Like America in the 1950s, but it was taken over by the Communist Party and set on a completely different timeline.
William Z. Foster won.
Or even before William Z. Foster, the Farmers Alliance won.
You know, America, as we know, it turned out to be something completely different.
And I think that is just as much something important as having a kind of hyperstition that's future-oriented and future-facing.
Because remember, the futurism is always nostalgic.
Every form of futurism contains a kernel of nostalgia,
where it kind of feels like it's, it's, uh, evoking very vaguely and ambiguously themes, nostalgic themes from the past, right?
Very subtle way, like a lost past the future is always the realization of a lost past you know
and that is the object of futurism itself in many ways I think
a different
way of
making sense
of how the
past will
acquire
determination
how history
itself
will acquire
determination
in the
present
right
if I say, guys, all of history will acquire a new determination
in the present, I'm making a claim about the future. I'm making a claim about something that will happen,
but has not yet happened, right? The Communist Party USA
will be a party of millions in 2036, and then we will really return to the past we never had,
to the history we never had.
That makes sense.
Then we will look upon history in a totally different way, and that's pretty much the same as changing history itself.
What is history? what is history history is just
a record you know if the record changes or even if points of emphasis on the record change, history itself changes.
Not only because we remember it differently, but because it has literally become, it has literally integrated into something new.
Right?
Um... right um um It's not nostalgia for what was, but what it could have been. In a way, yes, but I don't think it's that simple.
Because, again, the first instinct of someone dissatisfied with the present is to be like, I want to go back to how things were.
But if you try to go back to how things were, you're ignoring how that is what led to things being what they are now.
So what is the real source of your dissatisfaction with the present? I think it's a cope to just say, oh, the future will save us.
You know, I'm dissatisfied with the present, but my dissatisfaction is rooted in a future where I will be satisfied. And the only reason I'm not satisfied is I don't have enough time to be, right? And I think that's kind of an undialectical, non-communist way of looking at time. I think that's a kind of naive progressivism associated with liberalism,
is Star Trek liberalism, if you will, right?
Oh, as the future advances, things are just going to keep getting better and better.
It's like, this is not the communist view, per se.
Communist view has a much more
dialectical and complex understanding of time and historical time in particular.
And, you know, so what I would say is that you want to go back, but going back doesn't literally mean turning back the wheels of time. It means going back to the
premises, going back to the foundation, going back to not only how we got here, but how we are here.
That is proletarian class struggle.
When you want to go back to the root, the origins of society, where do you do it at?
The site of production itself.
The laboring class that is actually at the root of society itself and reproducing it
physically, for starters. So, so Maga communism makes sense, not just in the ways we all are familiar with, but also, and I talk about this in the substack as well, also in ways that are more simple than you would think.
You know, it's like, Make America great again means
return
to the greatness
of America's revolutionary history.
And the only way to do that
is to unconditionally embrace the future.
Not replicating and larping the past, but embracing this future, which is going to repeat truly the greatest moments of America,
the greatest moments of America's revolutionary history.
I think that's what I would say.
Anyway, let's continue this.
Sometimes you like the fuse and just wait for it to follow.
Like a railing.
Like a, oh.
So when a railing happens,
sometimes the bureau behind it?
Yeah, sometimes.
Nothing like putting out the fake social media thing
but, like, really get people mad.
Mm-hmm.
Those fake news.
Sometimes it's me.
It's not fake.
It's embellished a little bit.
Who would be like a big influence that you're,
influencer that you're after?
You.
Like a, I don't know, like, um,
I don't even know these names, like a Fox Newsperson or like a Tucker Carlson or like, oh, I'm sure he's.
Right.
You always want to get the loudest.
Like that, what was his name?
The one that said, uh...
Yeah, and that's all you need to know that they're after jackson by the way um
biggest and loudest what does that even mean the sandy hook didn't happen
Alex Jones yeah so we were after him you are are? Are you still after?
Yeah.
Why?
Because he's broke.
He got found guilty and had to pay like $100 million.
So why were you after him?
We're not anymore.
Just to get the money for him?
Yeah.
Was that court case used?
Was that a CIA? That was the agency thing?
Well, actually it was a defamation case.
So it's a civil
government.
But we were looking at all of his followers
coming, like,
who's that going to be this?
Right?
So, even though it's technically not our,
well, not the agency, definitely, but the
Bureau, for instance.
Yeah, it's not our purview. It's a civil,
it's a civil matter.
But since
they got all this
access to his stuff
and it's there
what can we
go find
and did you find it?
I can't tell me if we did.
But
so you know it's just kind of like, you know,
realize the opportunity that you have.
So with Alex Jones, you were watching him long before anything end up happening?
Probably.
It wasn't my office, but, I mean, we would have been well aware of what he was doing.
And the goal with him was what, just to bankrupt him?
Oh, pretty much. And we let the families do it.
What?
We let the families do it.
Were they encouraged to do that by the Bureau? Like, nudged?
We don't encourage people.
But like we just say there's no federal statute being broken.
But you do have the option for a civil case.
It's a pretty good case.
Nice.
In our opinion.
So, oh, that makes so much sense.
I have a cousin who's a lawyer.
So that's a lot of these cases.
They're kind of encouraged by the FBI?
Yeah, like, there's nothing federally, federal law we can do.
But civilly, just go out of that way.
And they did.
Yeah.
So the FBI was happy.
We didn't care.
We were like, oh.
Basically the citizen see these these these obscene um facial expressions and
gestures he's making it's just like so infuriating.
We are ruled by demons. I'm not even kidding. Straight up demons.
Since did your job.
Imagine, imagine you're like in feudal Japan
And like some samurai are beefing or some shit
Some like ancient warrior
And then you know one guy just like finds out another guy dies and he just goes
aw oh oh what is that i mean what is that where is the honor
what is that it's just so uh demonic
like
it's like this like a marvel movie
or i don't i don't know what to call it this is such a disgusting
twisted postmodern subject some evil twisted person of with no morals absolutely
cynical ironic detached subject no humanity who thinks they're above human they think they're above
reality itself sadistically moaning at the misfortune of others.
I mean, when you're in, if you're a medieval executioner and you're chopping a guy's head off
who like, I don't know, was like worshipping the devil or so, I don't know was like worshiping the devil or so I don't know what how they did
things back then chop a guy's head off you're not going oh you're like you're like and so it must be done.
Thigh have been condemned to the deepest pits of hell.
And when he chops the head off, he goes,
hallowed be thy name.
We do it in the service of the Lord. And we may die another day.
And then you go to sleep or some shit.
But what is this fucking guy?
These guys are scumbags.
Wow, so you can encourage a civil lawsuit.
Not encourage.
Educate.
What can you do with people like Alex Jones now?
Because he's still out there?
Good.
He's still chirping.
He can chirp.
Are you still watching?
No.
Why?
He did what we wanted.
Which was what?
Took his money away.
We shut him up for a while.
You're never going to shut him up for him.
Unless you put him in prison.
But again, he didn't do anything to go to prison.
Being ignorant is not a crime, though it's shut.
It is.
I mean, you could bring a nudge.
He did inside a riot, like Cheeto.
You guys think that KGB was like this?
You think the FSB is like this today, but let's not talk. You think that KGB was like this. You think the FSB is like this today, but let's not talk.
You think that KGB was like this?
Judaism seems to do this to people as well.
Dude, your name is Alexander Stone.
You kind of sound Jewish to me.
It's kind of weird how you're ragging on Jewish people.
I don't know what's going on here.
But, uh,
anyway, um,
I don't, I actually don't think this guy's Jewish at all.
I don't think this guy's Jewish at all. I don't think this guy's Jewish at all.
Um,
um,
you know,
a lot of Zionists,
if you look at Jonathan Greenblatt,
or if you look at Rabbi Shmuli, and I'm talking about Zionists who like actually run cover for Israel's crimes and shit, those guys, a lot of them are so fucking delusional and brainwashed by Zionist ideology
that they actually do believe their own
bullshit. Like they actually do straight
up believe that they're defending
you know, the Jewish people
and that, you know, they're defending from another
Holocaust or something and they're like
Rabbi Shmooley and they're like Rabbi Shmooley
and they're like, you know what?
I'm going to get my lawyer
and you're going to realize
like they actually are in it
like skin deep
or whatever.
They have their skin in the game,
and they're completely criminal falsehood, whatever, right?
But let's be clear, this is how I know they're not the ones ultimately at the top of the pyramid.
Okay?
Because... the ones ultimately at the top of the pyramid okay because to be at the top of the pyramid you literally don't believe in anything you don't even believe in anything this is why the
nazis weren't at the top of the pyramid. Because the Nazi ideology still pretended to be an ideology.
That's how you knew they weren't at the top of the pyramid.
People at the top of the pyramid do not have an ideology.
They literally do not believe in anything.
Their actual Satan is who don't believe in anything. Their actual Satan is who don't believe in anything.
That's why Hitler was their tool and their pawn.
As a matter of fact, what they really believe is that every belief
held by humanity is worthy of nothing but mockery
because there's nothing to believe in literally nothing to believe in
literally nothing to believe in anyway Anyway, let's continue.
He didn't encourage people to go shoot.
He didn't.
So he didn't do it.
Additionally, Oblenis states that he knows and works
with FBI agents who were undercover
in the January 6th Capitol riot,
estimating about 20 field agents were there undercover.
While Oblenis notes that they were not involved in violence,
this appears to be the first submission of undercover FBI agents in attendance.
I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at the J6. There are. There always are when there's a big protest in D. I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at J6.
There are always are when there's a big protest
in D.C. Just in case it gets out of him.
But there wasn't
enough to turn that tie.
I mean, I'm talking they may have it
20. You needed
a thousand to get rid of that crap.
So they had like, oh, that was just 20?
Yeah, just to go through it and see what they can hear, you know, that kind of thing.
Wow, that's, yeah, definitely they needed a thousand lease.
Well, that's also capital police jurisdiction.
They're in charge.
So that...
Why they didn't have more on hand?
I don't know.
The Bureau didn't really want people knowing that they were in the crowd.
Mm-hmm.
That would be overstepping their bounds.
A little bit.
Do people know that?
Why?
Did people know that the hero was in the crowd?
Nope.
They probably never well.
Do you know agents that were there?
Mm-hmm.
Really? Mm. you know agents that were there really the agency you know
mega yikes. Mega yikes. Mega yikes.
I don't even know where to begin with that.
Um, yeah, I mean, like, that's the type of people fucking with us, I guess.
In case you were wondering case you were wondering,
um... You know, it's such a shame this book is being covered up.
This one.
This is a really, really cool book, which was gifted to me by one of the showrunners, actually, many years ago from Mexico.
And it's a, it's a it's a it's a it's a it's a it's a about Mexican muralism and I wish there is some way for me to put the
things in it on display but yeah I'll I might have to find a way display. But, yeah,
I might have to find a way.
But it's a
really good book with a really cool cover.
It's got a lot of cool stuff
in it.
But anyway, I was but anyway i want you guys to understand something and what i want you guys to understand is that we are entering the most crucial stage of our journey.
And all is quiet now, but with multiple events coming up and multiple, I don't even know I should announce this.
Multiple organizations which are going to serve different purposes.
The organization, you guys are, so I want to make myself loud and clear, just in case there's no confusion.
Jackson and I are going to be doing an event around Detroit, Michigan, within the next two months.
Okay.
But we are not going to be launching the organization with a capital O. We're going to be launching something different, which you guys don't have to concern yourselves with or be worried about.
And then very, like with probably a month after that is when we're launching the actual organization.
I know it sounds kind of confusing.
But Jackson and I are launching something that is more akin to a think tank.
Let's just call it that, rather than a political organization.
The two are going to work in a symbiotic way, and they're both necessary.
This one is necessary, though.
You just have to trust me on that. They're both going to be necessary. This one is necessary, though. You just have to trust me on that. They're both going to be necessary. And you and you guys don't have to do anything for it at all. It's like you guys are going to be working in the actual organization. This one is just going to be something a little different.
Don't worry about it.
And just don't get confused.
There are two organizations that are going to be announced.
Do not be confused. One of them is being created for a very specific purpose, which you don't have to worry about at all. And the other one is going to be the one you have to fully, fully go all in on and like, really, really, this is the big one. Okay. So I don't want to repeat myself a million times. I don't want to repeat myself a million times. If someone can, if someone can just remember I said this and take a note of it in case anyone asks,
please do, because I know for a fact I'm going to be swamped with like,
Haas, is this the organization? No, this is something else, all right?
That's going to be in Detroit, Michigan.
And we are marketing it local in large part, but if you can make it to Michigan, and if it's not too much of an expense to you to get here, I would really, really appreciate you coming and being at the event.
But I don't want you to feel like you have a duty to be there because this is not the actual event that's launching the major organization.
That event, I do want you guys to do everything within your within your capability of attending.
It's like, yeah, you do have a duty to come to that one
in a way.
But this one is just like optional, I guess.
But I'd love for you guys to come.
You know, I'd love for you guys to come.
I'm not going to give a date.
I'm just going to say within the next two months and leave it at that.
But I want you guys to be aware that, you know, there's a reason we're getting really
aggressive in terms of the info war right now. There's a reason.
Everything I do is for a reason.
I don't do anything for no reason.
Want to know why?
Because if I don't have a reason to do something, I don't do it.
I'm chilling.
I don't say anything.
I don't do it.
I just chill and I just walk on the treadmill for three miles going at a pace of four miles per hour, which is pretty fast.
And I've been losing a lot of weight I don't know if you guys could tell but uh also I don't I don't want to spoil too much but I have a new suit coming in because this suit is too big on me now.
These suits are too big on me, so I have a new one, and I'm going to be wearing that.
I'm so excited for it.
I'm so excited.
And there's just so much, so much coming.
And that's like a really small thing
that's a really small thing
but we have things lined up for the whole year
all right
we have things lined up for the whole year
and um
I We have things lined up for the whole year.
I think I was going to talk about the... Okay, guys, I'm going to actually let you choose for the first time.
One's if you want me to do the Patreon Q&A.
Two's if you want me to talk about the Illuminati.
It's literally up to you. Okay,
Stop, stop.
Now, let me do this differently.
Stop.
Fives, if you actually are a patron
because you may not want the patreon
Q&A because you're not even a patron
but the patrons
okay this is going to be complicated
this is only to be complicated.
This is only if you are a patron.
If you are a patron,
so five to confirm your patron and then space.
One's if you want the Q&A right now twos if you want
the Illuminati thing
and only patrons can vote on this
go ahead
so 51 or 52
wow even the majority of patrons
want the Illuminati thing.
That's actually crazy.
That's actually crazy.
All right, well, you guys have spoken.
The oligarchy has spoken, because it's not a democracy.
It's an oligarchy now.
Now only an exclusive select chosen few are capable. Okay, I'll talk about the Illuminati. But you might feel a little bamboozled because it's not exactly going to be what it sounds like.
But I promise it's going to be interesting, say the least, right?
Anyway, let's talk about the Illuminati.
What is the Illuminati?
What is the Illuminati?
And what is the illuminati and what is this triangle with an eye it's always an eye and it's like the theme the conspiratorial significance of the eye is very clear.
But why?
Why is there such a conspiratorial significance of the eye?
Why did the Freemasons and whatever secret societies,
why was the Eye of Providence such an important symbol for them and what is the
illuminati actually well it's hard to explain the inexplicable and it's hard to explain the inexplicable and it's hard to recall a dream that you just woke up from
and even attempting to remember that dream deepens your forgetting of it.
Translating a dream is just impossible.
Translating it into consciousness. At best, you can remember the same feelings you had during that dream, which will draw to memory some of the imagery and experiences you had in it. But it's always the feeling. It's always the intuition that allows you to reconnect with your dreams not any conscious interpretation
there's something mark said that i always found intriguing what separates a man from an animal
what separates a man from the best of bees what separates an architect from the best of bees he
says is that before realizing his work
the architect raises it into the imagination and it's the mediation by the imagination and i suppose if we're going to interpret that generously or
uncharitably depending on how you look at, we would also say that means mediation by consciousness,
just something that animals don't have. Animals, although they do things, do not do things in ways
that are mediated with conscious intention, with something imagined in their mind before the fact.
But I always found this description by Marx a little bizarre and confusing, given Marx's materialist orientation.
How can it be that the essentiality of humanity is defined by the faculty of consciousness.
This is something that actually, I think, contradicts Marxist humanism more generally.
Because the humanism, according to which man can be distinguished from other animals on the basis of thought, consciousness, their mind, so on and so forth, that is the humanism of the young Higalians, of Hegel himself, maybe, and of Feuerbach, which Marx actually explicitly distinguishes himself from, by arriving at a notion of humanity defined by the species being right species being has
nothing to do with like a zoological species species rather refers to a kind of classification
within logic of a particular being, a being that, a being which is, which attends to the reproduction of its own particular existence, and for whom its own particular existence and for whom its own particular existence
is the object of its being right so this is what species being means so this is a
description of the essentiality of man and contradiction to animals and contradiction to inanimate, intelligible things that is not actually based on the faculty of thought or the mind or consciousness, but something more fundamental, right? The species being.
So I've always found it rather peculiar that Marx understands the essentiality
of human labor in the way that he described it.
I also think it's strange because it's probably not true,
depending on how we interpret it, according to our basic experience.
Workers, according to our basic experience.
Workers, especially in the modern era,
engaging in monotonous and repetitive work day in and day out,
do not do so with a whole lot of thought, actually. When work becomes so repetitive, it almost becomes thoughtless, actually.
You just kind of do it over and over again, and you become so used to it that it actually comes naturally to you
in a way no longer is it mediated by consciousness or perhaps the imagination you just do it
you're just doing it almost spontaneously and intuitively it becomes a reflex you can't imagine that factory
workers working 12 hours a day doing incredibly monotonous repetitive patterns of hand motion and labor are at every instance of activity
raising the object of labor in their imagination and thinking through it maybe that's true for the
more skilled laborer blue collar work that exists today, but it's definitely not true for the industrial factory worker in the Victorian era, which is the time period in which Marx was writing.
Labor is something very repetitive. in which Marx was writing.
Labor is something very repetitive.
Something that most people would say is thoughtless, actually.
Ein Rand, famous Marxist, Ein is the best example
of the sentiment
and the kind of outlook
according to which
yeah the workers are just tools
they're just drones
thoughtlessly droning on. But the visionary, the person behind the ideas is actually the one responsible for the thing being made in the way it is. Any idiot can take a hammer and smash it, you know, repetitively. But the guy with the vision,
the artist, the engineer, that's the brilliant person who builds the world. This is Einron's view.
It's also the view of our friend John Zirka, who always, the very first time I talked to him, would always
reproach me with the following question, who matters more, the architect or the worker?
And he always says it's the architect, obviously.
The worker is someone who thoughtlessly and repetitively just does things that any idiot can do.
He doesn't have the creativity and the imagination and the consciousness.
To be fair to Marx, Marx regards human labor holistically.
And that's why he refers to the division of labor between mental and physical labor both are part of the totality of labor of the way mankind relates to the natural world but why is it that the
physical and menial kind of labor is what's actually essential and fundamental, rather than, let's say, the creative or mental kind, the mental component, that is?
And I think that's something worth talking about and addressing why is that? When a worker engages monotonously in a repetitive form of labor what he's doing maybe from the perspective of someone
looking outside in is internalizing on a intuitive level to the point where it's natural and it's a natural reflex for him someone else's idea so an idea before which struck a person's mind like lightning, a conscious idea they had to focus on and be alert and awake and crafting and creating, suddenly becomes actual and material when a worker can mindlessly reproduce it without having to think about it
whatsoever when it becomes integrated in the material existence of mankind the scary thing about human beings, I'm not saying I agree with that, I'm just saying just to work from a context of a commonplace view. The scary things about human beings is that we don't have natural reflexes and the terrifying thing about human beings is that we don't have natural reflexes and the terrifying thing about human beings
is that natural reflexes can be created within us artificially the most horrific example of this
of course is childhood trauma.
Someone is abused at a young age as a child.
Something has actually occurred an actual trauma. They trauma you know trauma in the real sense of the word it refers to like a physical
kind of um
a physical kind of
uh
alteration or let's say
you're like putting a dent in something, right?
But things like this are actually psychologically traumatic
and they change your intuitive experience. They change your deepest, most sensibility. They change the deepest source of your motivations and your aspirations and your desires and your dreams, whatever you want. they fundamentally change something about you at the most fundamental level.
Your reflexes change.
If you're a veteran of a war and you have PTSD. Loud noises affect your reflexes in ways they didn't before
because your experience is such that you associated with danger and fear for your life.
And I can go on naming these countless kinds of different examples.
The terrifying thing about humanity is that our nature can change.
It's plastic. Contrast to a wolf whose reflexes might be able to change, but can only change to the detriment of their existence as a species one way or another. For example,
this is the cause probably of speciation itself. Geotramatic events. Events in its surrounding
environment can induce changes in a given organism which over time probably will lead to a different species.
This is the Lysenkoist view or the so-called neolomarchist view, which as epigeneticsetics the field of epigenetics shows us is actually a promising
increasingly promising description of how the natural world actually works but in any case, the human species
remains human
in spite of these traumas
imposed upon the human being.
Industrial capitalism in England was also
a trauma. I mean, traumas are not always necessarily bad being potty trained
is a kind of trauma such that it becomes intuitive and natural for you not to wet your bed or
shit your pants while you're sleeping sleeping walking is a trauma in a way it's natural for you to walk
but you have to learn how see it's not just a distinction between nature and nurture, which is the point. We have to learn the things that come
naturally to us. In order to develop an alcohol addiction, we have to taste alcohol, which tastes pretty bad to our senses but once we do it enough times
the taste becomes numb to us and then before you know what it we're addicted it's an acquired
taste if you will every single thing about a skill you can learn, everything about what is becoming of a human experience in a human life is based on acquired natures, acquired taste.
Nothing is given to you from the outset the only thing given to you from the
outset when you're brought into this world are the tears the whining and the crying pure suffering
that's it nothing no language is given to you. No ability for the world to be intelligible is given to you. All of these things are learned. All of them.
Now, you can imagine and maybe speculate the kinds of troubles, the first human beings probably
were having to go through, though I suspect many of their behaviors likely were inherited from the animal kingdom,
from which they descended, if you believe that.
But after hundreds of thousands of years of civilization, after hundreds of thousands of years of the development of history, and finally after the era of modernity, where mankind no longer seamlessly, as though walking through a dream,
experiences the world in an uninterrupted kind of seamless way.
I know I'm repeating myself.
We have the Age of Enlight of enlightenment where we wake up.
We open our eyes.
We wake from the dream world.
And then we're left with trying to recall the dream we just had.
And that's modern science, ladies and gentlemen. Rel relating to the natural world no see before we stumble around reacting to traumas inflicted upon us and finding harmony somehow at the end of the tunnel and acquiring an existence this is each in
every era of history before the modern age a flood comes from the river and wipes out an entire civilization and you build from scratch and suddenly
the flood enters your myths and your legends and becomes part of your harmonious and holistic cosmos, but you still have the privilege of walking through
the world blind and blissfully, not wakefully. Life is like a dream for the ancients. It really not that deep and they're going through
they're they're going with the flow in a way similar to to a dream actually
they're not really remembering or recalling their experiences all that often.
You think in ancient Egypt, they were recalling and recording their experiences as often as we are today.
You think every minute detail of people's lives and the routines of those lives
was being directly recorded all the time.
It couldn't be.
They didn't even have the technology to communicate that.
They didn't have smartphones to record every time they went into the shower
or took a dump or every time a fly came on them. If you notice something interesting about the ancient world or even the medieval world is how much it seemed like they were bullshitting about everything you know you'll see a medieval story real story trying to recall facts about a knight who went into the forest and encountered a grizzly bear and then
they'll draw the grizzly bear not as a grizzly bear but as this monstrous beast that has wings
that has ten tails that has three heads that has a bunch of fangs that has you know it's literally
like the most out of this world alien looking thing ever and you're like why did they draw a bear that
way that's not what a bear looks like.
Why were they, why, why was the way in which they recorded encounters with beasts and even battles or any, why was it so embellished and bullshit, right?
But I think you missed the point. They weren't recalling these events
in the first place in any exact or detailed. Why, they were vaguely recalling a trauma
imagine if you woke up for a dream and you
tried to recall your dream is it going to be accurate
hell no and it's the same thing for the
for the um
the waking world before the modern age.
Nobody was actually recording their experiences with any real degree of precision because people thought that was a ridiculous vanity.
Our experiences will be recorded with true precision on the
day of judgment when God, you know, weighs us, our sins and our deeds and everything. And that's
God's business. Well, who am I to actually, you know, I'm, what, I'm going to draw the bear accurately?
Is it not enough for me to evoke the feeling of terror and fear and anxiety that I had?
It may as well look like that alien monster because that's just what I felt like. I'm just vaguely recording that I
encountered a monster. You know, the details don't matter. The fact that I have to record it in the
first place means it was probably a significant impact and
interruption in my day. And this is another mistake I think modern thinkers make about pre-modern
history and the recording of history. People didn't by default want to record or recall or be consciously aware of their experiences for its own sake.
If you have to be consciously aware of your experiences and recall them, that implies an interruption in the seamless continuity
of your experience, which is a trauma. If I'm recording this huge battle that happens,
it's because I was walking about my day whistling and I had, you know,
I had a string of wheat in my mouth and I, and then all of a sudden, this huge battle happens,
which interrupts my day and I'm, you know and I traumatized me so now I have to record it and remember it see I'm I'm obviously being hyperbolic but you get the idea it's like history is recorded when things cannot go the way they used to go. And I have to record this because this was a significant interruption in my day. If Haas is living his day, let's say I'm a retired man i just you know just going through the motions
walking on the beach every day and living a normal day day in day out whatever sun rising sun
falling waking up going to sleep
and then I'm walking on the beach
and like a man comes up to me
and like
throws a bucket of shit
in my face
and punches me in my face and punches
me in the face and then like
I don't know
for good measure
brings out his phone's like
it was just a prank bro
I don't know uh that's a significant interruption in my day it's probably
something i am going to remember it's probably something i am going to probably tell people about
and record right i didn't want to have to do that. I would prefer to just go about my day and not have to remember a damn thing. So you get what I'm talking about here, more or less about trauma and memory and wakefulness consciousness what we call consciousness conscious activity is really an exception in human history
not the norm this is a humiliating insight
for enlightened Europe
because after the age of enlightenment
we want to be conscious and awake
and enlightened
permanently in a permanent state
and if you think about it industrial capital state.
And if you think about it, industrial capitalism is the ultimate kind of atrocity and scandal for such a perspective.
Oppose the lofty aspirations of enlightened such a perspective.
Oppose the lofty aspirations of enlightenment and permanent state of consciousness and always,
we will never go back to the ignorance of the past.
Compare that to the monotonous, thoughtless work of the laborer.
Just repetitive, like a zombie over and over again, not even thinking about it.
You know?
It's these kind of two extremes, really.
Two severe extremes coexisting one is it being a tremendous scandal for enlightened society proletariat has always been a scandal for the bourgeois society. But fast forward in our enlightened civilized society, even today with our advanced technology and industry, you name it, the waking world, the world of alertness and consciousness and focus, the results speak for themselves.
It's a lot.
But simultaneously, the average person walks through this world walks through this life with their eyes wide shut as though it's a dream as though it's a dream, as though it's literally a dream.
Somehow, the ultimate achievement of wakefulness, of consciousness, of enlightenment,
exists side by side with the most brain dead, seamless, intuitive, natural life.
People live.
Oh, I go to school.
I get on PS5.
I play my video. I mean, video games are one of the best examples of this. I play my video games. You know, I go to the club and I really think about all that much. I'm not trying to crucify people for that. It's natural for a human being to live most of their life naturally
but we we reckon with the fact that it's not given by nature we live natural lives that come naturally to us where we don't even have to, you know, how that they, we don't have to think that much. And it comes naturally to us. It's like a reflex. Yeah, when I go to 7-Eleven you know grab myself you know a power raid and reach for my wallet
pay for I don't even have to think I just just like do it automatically right but none of that
stuff is naturally given. It's not naturally given. That's the thing.
Artificially, we have fallen into a nature, which is not there just by virtue of nature itself.
There's at some point some abrupt discontinuity in a natural, normal experience
that is implied
by society,
especially modern society,
where it is so not as a kind of collective trauma we are just kind of
trying to recover from but one we are deliberately trying to impose i mean the best example of
this probably is how most people see the transgender stuff or whatever it's like they're
artificially trying to traumatize us impose traumas upon our children this is a hyperbolic like
you know extreme example i'm not trying to make a comment on transgender.
I'm trying to illustrate the kind of epitome.
It's the same thing with science, though.
Scientists are also trying to traumatize us.
Fundamentally alter how we experience life, naturally, mind you, with some new kind of invention or discovery. And that's not necessarily a bad thing. But I'm just trying to say we are being we experience life naturally but in reality
we cannot help but confront that at least in some capacity we are being controlled it, there is a conscious intention behind it.
There's a conscious purpose behind it of somebody who was not sleepwalking, right?
Somebody who was awake, consciously designing this.
And that, my my friends is the eye of the Illuminati and that is why conspiratorialism is so intuitive and so natural and so authentic and immediate to someone who acquires for the first time some kind of political consciousness at odds with the hegemony.
When you first break
with what you're being fed on CNN,
when you start rubbing your eyes, like,
you know, I don't believe what I see on the news anymore.
That's BS.
Then you, the first thing you experience is that it's a conspiracy. Somebody, I've been sleeping this whole time, and
there's somebody with their eyes open who's behind all this.
Right?
And this is why conspiracyism is the most spontaneous form of dissident consciousness there is.
Because you realize I've been going through the motions naturally, but this shit ain't natural.
You know, that's a profound realization.
That's a profound realization for people. And this is why books like 1984
resonate with people so much.
It's like, oh my God god we live in this totalitarian artificial
society that's meant to keep us asleep and um unaware of how much we're being manipulated and controlled.
And it's really the trauma of waking up that conspiracy theories give form to
and respond to and react to.
Just like how in the Middle Ages, when a guy who goes in the woods and gets attacked by a bear,
and he recalls it in all these crazy, wacky ways, because he's responding to a trauma,
conspiracy theories have the quality and character they do because when someone wakes up
from modern society
and realizes how much of it is artificial
and controlled they also
respond to that trauma because it is a traumatic realization how unnatural society is
in comparison to how naturally we experience it that's a trauma that's a traumatic experience and it's recalled with the same degree of faithfulness
as the guy in the middle ages recalls his encounter with the bear.
This, my friends, is where I'm going to have to wrap it up, just when it's getting good.
But I'll wrap it up in a way that I hope you find satisfying. wakefulness and dreams have a dialectical relationship, and one cannot exist without the other. If we return back to the original question of why the worker and not the architect, it's simple.
Because there's no reason to think, actually, that the architect precedes the worker.
There's no reason to think that the workers' activity, as activity, as intuitive, natural activity, of labor, of humanity, is something
that comes after consciousness
on the contrary consciousness
comes after and reacts to
it
the seamlessness
of
humanity's being,
the materiality of humanity's being
is what comes first,
whether it's inherited from the animal kingdom,
or whether it's inherited from the most arbitrary lightning strike that hit men and women at the outset of their existence.
It doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter doesn't matter because in any case dreams come before wakefulness we sleep before we are awake. When we're awake, we are responding to the trauma of having awakened.
And it's likewise the case for the architect before human beings are imagining a building they are building something
how do i know this because animals can build animals can survive. That comes first.
Not ideas.
So the problem with conspiracyism, I guess, is when it veers into the territory of paranoia.
And it only veers into the territory of paranoia when it cannot be reconciled with the reality and the fact that dreaming is a fundamental part of human existence. I don't just
mean dreaming when you're sleeping at night. I mean, the way in which we intuitively experience
reality seamlessly without necessarily being consciously aware of it all the time.
That doesn't necessarily mean you're being manipulated or you're being, I should rather say,
that doesn't necessarily mean that ignorance is being imposed on you, or in the case of Emmanuel Kant's paranoia, that you're engaged in a perpetual self-imposed ignorance. That's just a cope. When Emmanuel Kant wakes up in the morning and has a cuff of coffee and gets into his slippers, is that self-imposed ignorance?
Because if he's not really consciously aware of everything the whole time?
No, it's completely natural and normal.
And Marx's humanism, recognizing the exceptionality of humanity, begins with the fact that even humanity in its dreamlike state, in its intuitive state, of just kind of materially subsisting as it is on the basis of its being and not an idea of its being,
that is real humanity.
No one, a human being doesn't need to be conscious to be human.
I think that's really the point.
As for the question of the deeper forces of wakefulness behind our reality there is an accumulated tradition of the ruling class who have accumulated an occult tradition an esoteric tradition which for them is a source of power for them it's a source of reproducing their existence. It's a source
for them of learning the
arts of
maintaining the power that they have,
which they have done so for
centuries. Same
ruling class families.
And how deep the rabbit hole goes, I't tell you but here's what I can tell you
if you want to have a chance against them if you want to beat the Illuminati you have to create a form of organization
which is awake in ways the Illuminati isn't
one that is awake to the reality of dreams itself that my friends is the communist party what wakefulness
wakefulness lies at the end of the continuity of our collective human experience is a question of eschatology.
It always has been.
It's always been understood that the day of judgment is our day of judgment.
That is going to be the moment of consciousness when we wake up to
what we were fully in the form of God's judgment.
In the modern age,
eschatology has become an operative
material fact of
civilization.
There is an eschatology of the elite agenda, what they are planning society to be.
There is an eschatology of Communist Party dictatorships who have five-year plans defining the orientation and development of society.
I mean, think about it. You're in the Soviet Union or you're in China. There's a five-year plan.
You're experiencing life in a rhythmic, kind of, you know, intuitive way. You're not really thinking all the time. You're just kind of going through the motion. But there is a plan guiding the development of society. Isn't there something beautiful and reassuring about that?
That it's all, that, yes, it's not naturally given just as a given it's not the
seamlessness of your experience does not mean that reality itself that that that is uh the
object of that experience as defined by something seamless.
There is an agenda. There is a kind of plan. But it's a plan you have access to. You just, you have access to
you just
you have access to
not only to
have to be educated on
because it's transparent
but even to
contribute to
by contrast
by contrast By contrast, in the Buzwa Society, there is a plan, an elite agenda.
We have no way of having any input in it, because when we wake up to that plan, they deny there is one and they call
us crazy conspiracy theorists. Conspiracy theorists get it wrong because they don't realize
we need our own conspiracy. We need our own eschatology defining the ultimate
orientation and goal of reality and that is the communist party that is the conspiracy of the
people the open conspiracy of the people and of history.
That is proletarian consciousness, if you will.
Now, I hope you guys enjoyed my obscure, silly talk about the
Illuminati
I didn't have a script
so it's all off the top of my head
anyway guys
great stream what do you guys think actually about the light should i go back to uh how it was
where i was a little bit darkened.
What do you think?
Let me actually go ahead and...
Let me actually go ahead and see.
Let me just right now it's at... Thank you.
Thank you to
based populace.
You guys think this is better?
What do you guys think?
Is this better?
Before or after?
One's of this is better,
twos of the previous is better.
Really?
All right.
All right. so what you all wanted.
All right.
Well, I hope you guys liked the stream.
Stream Thursday. stream thursday and i'll probably do the patron q and a um off stream maybe anyway am i actually this pale because I've been tanning
been tanning
am I actually this pale I'm actually this pale.
This is crazy.
All right, guys. See ya. all right guys
see ya
yes Happy Ed. That is now.
Yeah, that is today.
Although, isn't it lunar-based?
I don't know.
I have no idea.
Anyway, guys, that's today.
I know it's today, but I don't know if it's like after 2A, 12 a.m.
Exactly.
That's what I mean.
I know it's the 10th.
It started after if thought, okay, I got you.
I got you.
All right, guys. Happy Aid. all right guys
happy ad
ad mobotic
yeah
see you guys later bye bye bye