DOMINATION (I WIN, REDDIT)

2025-11-29T02:57:17+00:00
honestly all over the call me don't like reality it's made so clear You know me
But really
Life is dandy
We are when we don't see
Miss everything
They ain't dreaming
Lay's da-da
Love is man
Where do you all Got the fun to turn in
Lay's the dog
Do you know
Slough is to happen
Why do you all got the
Controbin
Laying
Love is to spend
Why do all got the contrasting? Why do you all got the contrasting?
Like to do?
Love is different.
Why do all get the contrast
I only sound that anxious
Wondry for day, day,
you're in the recess when I feel like that I'm going to only sound that exists when this is all day day
young and rest us
in this way I'm supposed
away from the dream
up
rinsett and not a
white
I'm only
somebody
I know
I'm right
and
let you take
love
different in why do you all got the fun I'm trying Ladies are just going to love to frame it
What are all got to find you in
Lay's together
Love's the baby
Why do all got this come turn in
Laying together
Love us to blame Where do all got to find Why do you get up? Love is a baby
Why do you all
have been Come down
Let you
Love is Baby
Why do
do Come down
I'm
No joke
I can never know I can never know I'm open I'm going to come So the fucker, we'll rest a little new drink.
Wacking up the new me, hoping the new comes to.
So the thick of close, we'll be able to see. Why can't have the moon?
Hoping in the cops, so the think of die die die die I'm in. Laying the time to love to be in.
Why do you all get this on to come to end?
Laying to talk to love to finish.
Why do all get this come to him?
Laying the dog love to friend.
Why do you all got this come to in?
Lady dog, da love is different.
Why do all get that come to it in? And lay the other love to spend
Why do you all got the countering
Light the dog love to spend
Why did all get the concept And Wonderful Because it's wonderful Because of Nothing
No And the dogs were walking out the new one listening to do
And the dogs were working out the new one So that they could die Listen to anymore To be cruising
So that they could die
I Thank you. I am paid to exist
Abundance on my list
Every breath that I take
Is the proof of my gift.
What I see sticks me back.
Every dream is on track.
I am light, I am whole, all abundance falls back.
I align with the flow.
Every seed that I planned it will grow.
I am guided supported by the light of embodied.
I walk fearless and steady, my path in for glory.
My heart is the story
I am paid to
sleep
my name
my name
every breath that I take
the lead
is the proof of my gift
but I see
six weeks every green on dry like it but I see six sweet guys
every green's on
track
and your life
I am old
in the low
all the bond is
back
time is my
eyes and present
my gold
every truth
I embody
for riches untold from the silence
prize from this from this I see all I need
all I ask for peace and peace and to me
I breathe in my sea
I breathe out of belief
I am fear and I here I exist
I am paid to exist
a glimpse
I am paid to exist
bunnies on my leg
every breath that I take
to me
is the proof
but I see
6'5
Because I'm
on track
I am like
I am holding Oh
all of one
and I'm back
And I can't be a good I can't feel I can be in the sky
You may shake in the heart
I'm going to be in the sky
You may ship in the sky
You may see in the sky And they're shaking in the heart
I'm going to be in the sky
In the face the day
The underground
The day
The underground, the underground, the way, the underground, the way, the underground,
and the sky,
the underground,
the way,
the underground,
the world,
the underground,
the underground,
the media,
the world,
the land, the world, and the
the under the sky
the nation
your head
your head
a
down
your
your nation high
I'll go through the sky
your nation in the heart I go through the sky You made she
In the sky
I'm going to
I'm going in the sky
You've made she in the
sky
You're in the sky
You're going to be a
The sky I'm going be sure it a ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha I'm going to be. I'm saying, yeah. I'm going to be. down drunkenness in the sky
draca
drunken draca dr in this scada and down the sky look up in the sky look
in the sky
and
make a ha
ha
ha ha a
ha
a beautiful a
a
a
different and a
I
get a
uh and uh uh and uh and uh and the sky I'm gonna I'm gonna Don't
God
I'm
Don't God
Go ahead
I'm Yeah. I'm
a
I'm The On the sky, On the tongue, Tung, Tung
The sun's
The Sun's The Sun is Mauts
Dung
We're
Our
Our
Free Farm
The
Manming
On the On the
Chou
Chou Chou
I Yeah I I And men, fern down as the one, and the
one
and a year
and
err, and and, and, I'm going to be a
new I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to
be able to and the uh...
uh...
I'm
uh...
I'm
the and the the I'm
a
I'm
I'm Thank you. Our moon in the On the On the
Pongue
The Pian
A Puan
Pong
A Puan
Changue Chenebally Geper
Ech Gepin'
Hanyan
Chepy
Feyey Feyang
The Chian Chown light lighten
the sky-white
Wai'noy-caughtshawn-quy-haired
like yankyne-kinded mien-dney song to ching the chagued chaguer night yen, the ming
the
song
we're
in the
light our
and
a
mow
chou
see
we no unru out of our chie we
are
and
love
you and then, and
the name and you
Wendtchang
Woundtuch
and
I'm I'm not you're
I'm
I'm
I'm... ...that...
...and...
...and... I'm You know, It's just the way it's kind of key. It's just the way it goes.
It's like I waited so long for this. I wonder if it shows.
Head on water now I can breathe
it never felt so good
because I can feel it coming over me
I wouldn't stop it if I could
when I'm ticked over
yeah
you know you can't deny.
When love takes over, yeah, there's something's he denied.
When love takes over, yeah, you know you can watching in your life
When I'll take over
It's going to hear you're sitting in my life
Me a reason
I got no Do you feel you too?
Can't you see me here on overloat?
And this time I blame you.
Looking out for you to hold my hand
It feels like I got to fall
Now hold me right like I know you can
We could lose it all
When love takes over
When love takes over when love takes over when love takes over when love takes over over oh
when I take so far
over Yeah You know you can't deny
When I take over
Yeah
There's something to pee the night
When I take over
Yeah
You know you we looking at the night
the place over
I know that's never
this is going to hear the light Honestly, I honestly, all will become with me
Don't like reality
It's made so clear to me
But really, life is dandy
We are when we don't see
Miss everything day dreaming And And let you close We are when we don't see It's everything they're dreaming
And
Lay's the dog
Love is different
Why do all
have this come to
Let's get
love to love
Yeah
Why do all get things? Why do you all get them come to
man?
Lady
Don't go to love to man
Why do all got to
come to
in?
Lay
your dog love
love to
Why do all love is different? Why do you all get things come to?
I only sound that age is
Wondrous all day, stay
You're only in the rest of
feminist
Where I said I'm going to go away
when you dreamed of
I'm interested in another love I'm a lot of
I'm a lot of
and
Laos
da da
love to
love
sing
Why do all
got this under
And
Lays the
Laos to
love to say Why do all Don't Doe something like the dog so let's see
why do you
have been glass where we're still in a new
where can never know
I'm opening the cone
so that they could close
where I'm going to
know we're selling a new trick
I can have to know
Open it becomes
So that think of day
Die
Die
Dye
Dye
Dye
Dye Dye die die die
man
playing
love is to love is to
why do you all
got this mind
and
playing for dog love do, love is to pray.
Why do all got this gone to happen?
Laying the dog, dog, love to blame it.
Why do all got this content in?
Like the dog, love is to spend.
Why do all got the content in?
Laying the dog, love is to spend.
What are all got these kinds of And now you're just a dog
Not sitting
What are all got to come to
And
I'm a
And
I'm a
Oh, And and wonderful and oh
and
and the
talk's like working out the
no
the noise
the night
listening
and there we're
hoping out the
coming soon and the dark's like working out the Listen in a new time Hope a new come soon
And the dark's like
Wiking out the new one
Listen in a new time
Hopefully it comes in
So let's take a day Thank you. I'm I am paid to exist
Abundance on my list
Every breath that I take is the proof of my gift
What I seek seeks me back
Every dream's on track
I am light I am whole
all the abundance
back
I align with the flows
every seed that I planned it will grow
I am guided supported
by the light I've embodied. I walk fearless and steady, my passing for glory. My heart is the story. I am paid to exist.
I'm on my living. Every breath that I take
The living is the proof of my gift
But I see see see
See back
Every green on track
I am right
I am holding
I'm holding
I know all all the one is flipped
Time is my
alive
The present I hold
Every truth I embody
To wish is unto
From the silence
That cries from the
Stumless
I see all I need
All I ask
With peace into me I am breathing I'm breathing I'm As soon as they see, all I need, all I ask is, but please come to me.
I am bringing in and I see.
I breathe out what I believe.
I am here.
I am blessed.
I exist.
I am paid to exist.
Abundance on my living Every breath that I take
And every week is the fruit of my kid
But I see, see, sleep like
Because the dream on track
I am like I am old
I'm a lot of bunnies coming
Yeah Thank you. I'm All around there are so many races, different colors, the young faces.
One around there is some people crying, are real losers Just don't choose it
I'm only looking for some better places
Wish I knew her
I knew it
I'm also asking for a better future
Can I choose it?
Can I choose it Can I choose it? Can I choose it? and you're
I'm
I'm
I'm BJ, Mix it, BJ, Mixed, PJ, Mixed, PJ, PJ, Mixed, PJ, PJ, Mixed, PJ, PJ,
Mixed, PJ, PJ, PJ, PJ, PJ, Mixed, PJ, BJ, Beijing, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican,
Mixed, PJ, BJ, Mixing,
BJ, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican,
Mixing, B,J, Mexican, Mexican,
Mexican, Mexican, Mexican,
Mexican, Mexican,
Mixed, Max,
Mx,
Out,
Out To do,
Out To do, Out to do, Out to do, PICT PIN PXEDY PXXXXVee
Pige, PXX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, PX, BG, many races, different colors, million faces.
All around there is some people crying. are real losers, just confuse it.
I'm only looking for some better places.
Wish I knew her, wish I knew her.
I'm also asking for a better future.
Can I choose it? can I choose it?
All around there are so many races, different colors, a million faces.
All around there is so peaceful quiet, after you're losers, just confuse it. I'm only looking for some better places. Are we really losers? Just don't use it
I'm only looking for some better places
Wish I knew her
I knew it
I'm also asking for a better future
Can I choose it?
Can I choose it?
Can I choose it? Can I choose it? Beatty, METC, METC, BITC, BITC, BITC, BITJ, BITJ, BITZ, BITZ, BITZ, PETT, PETT, PETT, PETT, PETT, PETT, PETT, BETT, BETT, BETT, BETT, BETT, BETT, BETT, BITS, BITT, BF, BIT B, B, B, B, B, B, B, Bxtit, B, B, Bxtit, B, B, Bxtit, B, B, Bxtit, B, B, Bxtit, B, B, Bixie, B, B DJ mixing
DJ mixing
DJ mixing
DJ mixing
DJ mixing
DJ mixing DJ mixing
DJ mixing
DJ mixing
DJ mixing
DJ mixing DJ mixing
DJ mixing
Pixing
Pixing Pixin DJ mixing DJ mixing mixing mixing Mixing The All around
There are so many races, different colors, million faces.
All around there are some people crying, are real losers, just don't use it.
I'm only looking for some better places.
Wish I knew her, wish I knew her. I'm also looking for some better places Wish I knew were
Wish I knew where
I'm also asking for a better future
Can I choose it?
Can I choose it?
Can I choose it? The The Pige Mix it, Pige, Mixed, Pek, Pek, Pek, Pige, Pige, Pige, J, Mexican, Pekin, Pige, Pigeon, Pigeon, Pigeon, Pigeon, Pigeon, Mexican, Pigeon, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, mix it. B.J. Mixing. B.J. Mixing. B.J. Mixing.
B.J. Mixing.
B.J. Mixing.
Bj.
Mixed. All right All right
There are so many
reasons All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.
All around there is some people crying, are real losers, just confuses.
I'm only looking for some better places
Wish I knew her
I wish I knew her
I'm also asking for a better future
Can I choose it
Can I choose it
All around there are so many races
Different colors, million faces.
All around there is some people crying, after you're losers, just confusing.
I'm looking for some better places.
Wish I knew her, wish I knew her, wish I knew her. I'm also asking for some better places Wish I knew her Wish I knew it
I'm also asking for a better future
Can I choose it
Can I choose it
B.J Masten
B.J Mxton BJ Mixing, BJ Mixed BJ Mixed
DJ Mixed, Mixed, Pee, Mixed, Pee,
Peechid,
Peechid,
Peechid,
Peechid, Peechid,
Peechid,
Peechid, Pizhid,
Pizhid,
Mixed,
Mixed,
Mixed,
I want to do a
I want to do a I want to a love to do a DJ Mixing, Bidjit B.J. Mixed.
B.J.
Mixed.
B.J. Mixed.
B.J.
Mixed.
B.J.
Mixed.
B.J.
B.J.
Mixed it.
B.J.
Mixed.
B.J. Mixed. B.J. Mixed. B.J. Mix DJ mixing DJ, DJ, DJ, DJ,
DJ,
DJ,
DJ,
DJ,
DJ, DJ, DJ,
Mixing,
Mixing, Mixing, Mixing, Mixing, Mixing, and the the
I'm
I'm Oh, Oh,
Oh
Oh oh ha
can't die
oh oh oh oh
oh
there's a
new, if people in blue In blue, I think
through
in blue
and
in the Oh, can't find.
Oh, oh.
Oh.
No, the people
and you see this and I'm so and then you're in
and he said
and he's and he's sandsu
Oh I don't know I'm I'm
you know
I'm
I'm
in jeaned
my
and I
see I'm
I'm
my view I'm
I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm O'ry a few bit of the nivvo from the ventura rapido
and I'll begin to gollarer
in the skyline
infinite
voire infinity Oh
Oh
Oh Oh, oh, no, no, the people of lily, you know, and you said he'd say to be said it's a son, oh, oh, oh. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.
Oh. Oh. In the blue,
Deep in blue
Felicity
And so to be able to be sure Oh, yeah, oh, yeah, oh, ha, ha, ha, can't tell me. catarer
oh
in the Benning to these settings
Rane, oh, oh. Oh Oh
Now
if we believe
you
And he said
and he's
to
Oh
ah
ha la Thank you Oh so I think I'm I'm I'm
I'm going to
never
I'm going to
I'm going to I'm with my
and the flage of me.
I'm afraid of the rivervice of the rivervice, and I mean to
to
learn
in the
Celo
Infinite
Fon
Oh
Oh I love A
can't
I
Oh Oh, Nell who people
in you
and you
see this
sally
Sournese
Sourn' Oh,
my
love
to The One of the No. One of the No.
One of the No.
One of the No. and I don't know and what I know
I'm going to be able to be able to be and the other than the day and they're going to be able to see No, Tulsi, no. Okay, look, all right? Tulsi no okay look all right Tulsi our our professional relationship doesn't need to be compromised by what I'm proposing all right Let's just relax a little bit.
Tocelyn, come on.
I mean, you both feel the same way.
I see the way you look at me.
I see the way you stand it.
You know as well as I do that this isn't happening. Tulsi, come on.
No, Tulsi, forget Jaxon.
Alright.
You insult him with him him It doesn't matter
Forget him
Forget about it
Alright
Jackson doesn't even
Unite the world
To the La Rouge Balls
Lyndon chose me
Tulsi Come on Lyndon chose me.
Tulsie, come on. They'll never suspect a thing.
Alright?
I know that you got Chris to be high bay with you know, alright?
I know.
I know. I understand. Okay? be high bailer you know all right i know i know i understand okay our whole purpose is to just terrorize reditors i get it
i i know that's your job i know trump it's telling you to do putler's bidding. I know, all right?
I know the whole point is just to confuse Redditors about Marxism.
I get it.
But Tulsi, you didn't tell me you had that thing going on.
You didn't tell me about all that. You didn't tell me about all that.
You didn't tell me about all that.
I didn't tell me about all that.
You didn't tell me that for He didn't tell me
I had all that
I mean, shit
I didn't know
the handling it to be, I didn't know she would be handling all that
I didn't know she would be handling all that
you said she was going to be the handler I didn't know she would be handling all that.
You said she was going to be the handler.
I didn't know she was handling all that.
I mean, shit.
All right.
I'm going back to my show to deceive everyone about, you know, our true agenda.
Hey, guys.
What's up? What's going on everybody? Uh, Comrade Kid, what's up, bro? Thank you for the five. Phil with, what's up, bro? Technician with the five. What's going on, bro? Appreciate you. Yo, PJ with the 25.
Holy fuck.
Bro, Australia's
Danny dropped 100 subs
for Thanksgiving.
Bro.
Another 20, bro.
He, 125 subs
from Australia standing.
Bro!
Bro!
Bro!
You know what?
That's so fuck...
You know, what?
Australia's Danny, thank you so much, bro.
And you know what?
You know how I'm interpreting that?
Um... I'm interpreting that um i'm interpreting that by the way i get look how fresh i am y'all
anyway you know how i'm interpreting that uh the way i'm going to interpret that is that I literally spent all day
yesterday on Reddit.
I was on Reddit.
Versaise with the 10. What's up, bro? I was on Reddit all day yesterday. Now, this is so funny, people call me a grifter because, like, I could have just streamed and grabbed it up. But I was like, no, I'm going to, I'm going to do this AMA on Reddit. And I just fucking, like, I think I was like hundreds and hundreds of replies on ready yesterday. Okay. Because I just like put out a thing because like, oh my God, on our socialism or whatever, like everyone's bitching and crying about ACP, like, nonstop.
It's, like, so fucking annoying.
Amila with the 25!
Let's go!
And I'm like, you know, why are you mystifying shit?
Like, you can just confront me directly with these crazy accusations.
You know, so I was just like, shit.
I was like, just... So I made that post, and Eagle and Air Base,
I'm not even kidding, like, down-duted it to hell.
Dark, what's up with the five?
Yeah, there's like with the five? Yeah,
there's like a Reddit war going on between gorillas and these like, I don't even know what the...
You know, I interacted with some of them.
And, oh my God, I can't believe this is what's going on.
Blackpack, what's up? I'll tell you that
75% of the comments I got were about LGBT people. Do you guys support LGBT liberation? No, they would say queer liberation. Would you ask Ayatollah Khomeini thisi this like can you leave me alone can you fucking leave me alone
like why is this the the most important thing that i have to fucking hear about, right?
And then, yeah, and then they asked about Dugin, and then a lot of people were, like, upset about the Russia thing, which is, yeah, I get it, Eagle and Air Base. I understand, right?
True, true leftist is against Putler and stuff, right?
Ossos, what's going on, bro?
Appreciate you.
So that was my Thanksgiving.
I spent it basically doing that. Don't you have a family? And I'm like, yeah, I do, but I
spent it on Reddit.
So
What do y'all think about my cut is it too short did i go too far this time i think it looks good
i think it looks good anyway i just got it like right now anyway
y'all um
yeah so i i was doing that all day yesterday
it was like so tiring
and then austral stanney is such a g
he dropped a hundred subs
because i'm interpreting that is that He dropped a hundred subs.
Because I'm interpreting that is that he appreciated what I was doing.
He was like, you know,
Haas is in the trenches of Reddit.
He was being a redditor.
Um, I,
guys, I don't know what's going on like i need a
i need to like i don't know like back in the day
lenin and mao needed to like develop patience for backward peasants who were illiterate.
They needed to have patience for people who were very backwards,
who didn't understand the basics of modern science,
who didn't understand the basics of the modern world.
They had to very like slowly be patient and teach these people, but they were very humble and whatever.
But going through the experience I did yesterday is, like, instead of being patient with ordinary people or peasants, it's like I have to be patient with like overly educated libtards who are like too educated for their own good in the sense that like they don't even know what they're talking about. And like they're throwing around phrases a lot and they're using all these terms they're like
oh but you're a social chauvinist and a social reactionary
and what about the liberation of the queer liberation of the Ukrainian disabled folks and the usage of these ablyistic terms like retard.
And it's like, how do you unlearn that?
How do I teach people to just live in the real fucking world?
How do I slap people in the face with reality without sending them to Nick Fuentes?
Because I feel like these people are like, actually, I have a new definition of Goim.
I'm just going to say it.
It's like, there's like something about it. It's like there's like something about it.
It's like this is just goyem behavior, right?
I've been thinking about this a lot.
I've been thinking about this a lot, actually, right?
And it's like when you think about it, jewish religion is literally a religion made for people
who like you have no incentive to like buy into this like to worship one god and to like destroy all
the other idols and like the notion of god in judaism it's like very much like a
shatter your reality break your reality obey the commandments follow it by the letter and it's like it has nothing to do with any like social or cultural incentives you
might have had before like one day there were a bunch of like semites in the middle east who were
goyim and they were like i don't know like sacrificing children and shit whatever they were doing
out of convention and like god just like't know, like sacrificing children and shit, whatever they were doing out of convention.
And like God just like,
Bha! He just fucking like comes out of
the sky and shatters
their world. And like
the only people who bought into the religion
were people who like
fundamentally just put all of their like stupid goyish
consumer like immediate interests and desires in the back burner and they were like all right
we're just going to this one god we're going to this religion, we're going to follow these commandments and these prophets.
Fuck everybody.
Fuck everyone else.
Fuck reality.
Fuck all the other tribes, right?
Like, that's what separated the Jews from the Goyim.
Like, the bare minimum of just, like,
Goyim are just like, they only believe what they're incentivized to believe in.
So if, like, sacrifice children to Moloch, and in return for that, you'll get rich.
Or, like, I don't know if, uh, you know, the, the god of sex will give you pussy or something. like, I don't know, you know, the god of sex
will give you a pussy or something.
Like, I don't fucking know, right?
It's just, like, very, like,
menial, conventional desires and interests.
And then, like, the Jewish God
comes and he's like,
you will worship me,
you will obey, and in return you get nothing.
And that's why like Jews were like hated in the ancient Middle East because they were just like us kind of, you know, like there was no like incentive to like believe their god there was like no incentive like you you get nothing in return but you're just doing it because
it's like this fundamental universal truth right anyway so it's like that's how I feel when I go on Reddit and when I like I'm, I feel about our community in a way and it should be, we should be solved critical because we shouldn't, we shouldn't be like these chosen people who are like dealing with hordes of go like we need a way
to embed ourselves in the masses
but we should first understand and realize
why we're having trouble doing that
because your average person
is a goy your average
person is a goy who is incentivized to adopt ideologies to conform to their immediate habits, desires, and worldview, which they are incapable of, like, criticizing or taking a critical distance to in any kind of way.
That's why there's these
established pipelines.
People genuinely are
incentivized to go down
this new class of like,
you know, declassed, I guess,
lump in people.
They are genuinely
like predisposed
by virtue of their like material
conditions to go down
the, you know,
alt-right or Nick Fuentes or whatever
like pipeline. Like there's incentives
there, right?
But they're also incentivized by, like, Breadtube and the Liberal Left, because the Liberal
Left is hedonistic.
The Liberal Left is permissive.
The Liberal Left allows them to no longer live in guilt or shame as far as they're like carnal
desires like pornography and all this other kind of stuff and so like there's all these like
there's like these immediate interests and incentives that lead people to go down these pipelines.
Like, I see these Redditors, and it's like, yeah, they're incentivized to, like, adopt political correctness,
and it's extremely, like, fake, you know, subculture of, like, oh, I'm not going to use retard.
It's ablyest, and, like, they're adopt all these technical terms because they're incentivized to, because
they're getting something in return.
They're getting a sense of belonging.
They're getting a sense of this or that, right?
And it's like,
you compare that to infrared and
there are no incentives
to join this movement that
like appease or
fulfill the immediate interest
of anyone, actually anyone actually like the pipeline to our movement is actually
pain our pipeline is based on pain that's why that's what it has in common I guess I guess
when they call as Jews when O'Canon this is calling me a Jew, I guess that's the grain of truth.
Because, like, Judaism, to become Jewish, you have to, like, circumcise or whatever, right?
There's, like, a pain that's involved in that.
And I guess it's kind of similar, right?
Like, there's the entrance into this cause is pain, right?
Like, you have to actually radically separate yourself from these old prejudices and conventions that you're used to and expectations you have.
And, you know, you have to open yourself up to a more transcendent and, like, absolute truth,
which is not easy, it's not an easy pill to swallow.
Like, we don't make the pill easy to swallow all the
other pills are easy to swallow right there the all right ones the like liberal left ones the
typical leftist ones like they're all just so easy to adopt we make it really fucking hard
and that's why we are not Goyim.
Like we're not Goyim.
We're not straight up.
Call us what you want.
We're not Goyim.
Dark, what's up?
Like the definition of Goyim is just somebody who's just like unable to have any critical relationship toward their position in
relation to the world, right? I kind of feel like that's what it is. It's like this inability to
establish a reflexive distance toward your habits,
your conventions, your desires, your
interests.
And that's what it is. That's why
it's like so, that's why it's
so rooted and based
in consumerism. Like,
even like the all right memes,
when they're like talking about goy slop
and like goy habits,
it's always referring to like blind consumerism,
you know, and there's a reason for that.
On the one hand, you can interpret it as like,
oh, the Jews are peddling all this and people are just like eating it up but when you think about it's like well why aren't the jews being victim of that kind of shit and it's like well because because because... Because I feel like...
I'm not a Jew, but I am part of the Abrahamic tradition.
And I do feel like...
I agree with Slavo Gizek here.
Like, there's something about the Jewish break with paganism that is just absolutely necessary.
If you're part of the Abrahamic tradition, you have to constantly go back to that.
You have to constantly remember and not take for granted this original, transcendent break from paganism that is like epitomized by the uh what was it the thing on mount sign the miracle on mount sinai with moses like there's just something happens, just like this fundamental cut with the pagan
reality that you do absolutely have to embrace if you're part of the Abrahamic or, you know,
you're part of that tradition.
And I kind of like see where it's coming from because, you know, yeah.
And like, you know, say one thing, like Jews also have become goyem for sure. Like, Israel has made Jews
going in. Most Jews are goyem, straight up. Like, I'm looking at, like, Zog, and it's not
very impressive. Like, I see the pro-Israel, like, Astro-Turf zinous shit all over social media i see jewish zionis
pedaling there and it looks pathetic it's not compelling it's not intelligent it's not convincing
so it's really created you know a goyem race out of the Jews, honestly. The Zionism has, which is bad for Jewish people. Like, Jewish people need to... The only way Judaism survives is if Zionism is destroyed. It's just the truth.
Anyway.
Yeah.
So, that's just a rant I wanted to go on.
And look at how Reddit alone inspired me to go on that rant
isn't that interesting like all it took for me
to
all it took for me to want to go on that extremely anti-Semitic rant
was being on Reddit for one day.
Because I don't, I, like, you know how they like say, like, oh, the Jews see the Goyim as cattle?
It's like, that's how I see these redditors.
I'm on Reddit.
I'm trying to be patient.
I don't know if I'm dealing with children.
But when I get a notification and it's like, what about queer liberation?
I'm like, bro, what is this?
Like I see the duck.
Dugan is a fascist.
I'm like, bro, I used to,
like,
make fun of y'all
as a parody.
Like,
I used to make a caricature
of, like,
leftists who are,
like,
retards.
And, like,
you're actually that. It's not a caricature caricature like that's actually how you are you're
actually sitting here telling me how i can't use the word stupid because it offends disabled people
you're actually sitting here like doing the meme.
I didn't know. I thought I was being
harsh on leftists. I didn't know like y'all
are actually in the main like that.
And as a final thing,
fuck Red Libs. And I'll tell you why
fuck Red Libs. Now fuck you.
No, fuck you. Literally, no, fuck you.
Literally, here's why fuck you.
Because 99% of these people hate us because we're pro-China or because we're not pro-Ukraine.
Which are positions that most of the D-program people agree with us on. But D-Program, the D-Program people agree with us on.
But D-Program, when D-Program calls us fascists and gets 10,000 likes, 9,999 of those likes, let's say, are from like literal
Zionist Ukraine supporters
and, you know,
pro-Taiwan independence people
who hate the CCP.
Like, you fucking cowards,
you're literally pandering
to an audience and group of people who are, like, overwhelmingly pro-NATO and pro-CIA and pro, you know, aggression against China and Russia.
And yet you pander to them and you enable you enable these this ideology you know you raise the
flag of NATO so to speak because you have a gripe with us about something so minuscule and
small and stupid like your disagreement with us
about 1776
and about
Jay Sakai, and your
disagreement with us about, you know,
queer liberation or whatever.
And it's like, where are
your priorities?
If you agree with infrared about 99% of issues,
but because of a 1% disagreement,
you're raising the flag of NATO as like a standard bearer
and rallying all these literal like pro nato goyem to your side what else do i
call them these naifo goyem you're like rallying them all to your side what can I fucking say
you know
somebody's asking if i can speak arab
no but i can speak swedish
i can speak swedish
you know
if you know you know
i can speak swedish
i am from elmo If you know, you know. I can speak Swedish.
I am from Elmone. You know what? I'm not going to say shit because there's a based Swedish guy. Actually, there's too many based Swedish people that I know. That's the truth. There's too many based Swedish people who
have interesting views about
Saloths are. Like there's a little too many of them
that I have encountered
and met.
Like one of, some of the
OGs from YouTube. If you know, I'm talking,
they're from Sweden randomly.
And they're like...
And also there's some in RTSG.
It's like, you know, there's some Swedish people that actually...
Are saving single-handedly saving Sweden in my eyes.
It's actually so funny.
Like, you know what?
There is something I kind of do like about Sweden,
because Sweden is known as like this ultimate
lib-tard, deranged country.
But there is such a broad spectrum.
And it's like, it's almost like Sweden is so cringe in Reddit that it becomes the opposite very easily.
That's just how dialectics work when you think about it
you know no in our community. The Gruntvig-Mauism guy,
he's holding up Denmark, like straight up.
Anytime there's a good representative
from any country in our community,
they, like, are protecting their entire nation
and dignity and heritage.
Because I'm like, you know what?
I could shit on Denmark,
but what about this one base guy?
That's how we do anti-racism.
People want to call us racist.
Well, our anti-racism is concrete.
We need at least one based or funny guy from that country
and that country will be protected
if there's no one
representing your country in our community
we're going to destroy and shit on your country
but and we'll be
racist toward them but if there's at least
one person who joins us from that nation,
then that nation will officially have a protected status.
So that's how it works.
You know, like, it's, this is the difference between liberalism is, oh, we're open to everyone.
We're not open to everyone.
You have to prove it first.
Okay.
You got to prove it first.
We are a horde.
This is the Mongol universalism. This is Mongol universal this is the Mongol universalism
this is Mongol universalism
versus the liberal universalism
you know
there's a profound difference
at play
are the Swedish
hospitality
see that's another thing
that I don't understand that's another thing that I don't understand.
That's a horrible. That's an awful thing.
So guys,
apparently this random
Afghan
why did the Afghan and D.C.
Spurge out and
shoot those National Guard
members? What was the
what was the reasoning
behind that if there was a reason?
He was CIA. Yeah, he
was. He was probably a collaborator in
Afghanistan, right? That makes makes sense but so this is a false
flag to what increase to is this going to be like the pretext to militarize all of america because like
some retarded guy in DC just lost his shit
and did that
are they actually going to use this as the
excuse for like national martial law
because that would actually be retarded
that would be really stupid
gotta give Laura Lumer more tweets Jesus Christ That would be really stupid.
Now to give Laura Lumer more tweets, Jesus Christ.
Speaking of Goyim. so guys did i did i go live yet and talk about how I got canceled for racism?
Oh, I did.
Never mind.
I'm not going to talk about that.
Yeah.
I talked about that last stream.
Oh, my God.
That was so funny.
When I, the Zoron calls
You know what?
I looked back and I realized why
Like my tweet
Got 200,000 impressions
And like hit such a nerve
I didn't know this actually
But I realized it afterwards
I think Jesus Motorcycle was using an AI know this actually, but um, I realized it afterwards.
I think Jesus'
motorcycle was using an AI that just released
that's like hyper-realistic.
But what is it called
something banana?
There's this new AI that's
extremely realistic that just
got released.
And I was one of the first people that used
it on Twitter. I didn't know that.
I was one of the first people that used it.
So a lot of people
actually didn't know
that that image was fake.
Nano banana, yeah.
So that's why it's caused such a stir, I think,
is because it just wasn't so, it was so
brutal and racist. Even
Groyper's were quote tweeting me and they're like,
dude, this is like racist. Come on, man.
And the reason it was so brutal and like viciously, like viscerally racist as far as a lot of people's perceptions, it's because of how fucking real it looked.
Even Jackson contacts me.
He's like, yo, what did you use to generate that?
Like, that's crazy.
So I was like one of the first people.
Yeah, that was extremely advanced racism.
That's why it was so fucking nuclear
because it was like that nuclear, because it was like
that AI that was used
was like so realistic.
Like never even
tested before. Like I was one of the first
people to use it on X.
Anyway, guys,
I want to talk about a new fatwa. Or I want to talk about a new fatwa.
Or I want to talk about the new Sharia law on AI.
And I'm just going to tell you my opinion.
You know, as AI starts to become very hyper-. I want to say something actually.
Unless within the context of humor,
let me emphasize that. Unless
within the context of humor,
realism,
straight realism
through AI is reactionary.
Let me just, artistically, it's reactionary.
Let me actually state that very clearly.
Direct, so let's say there's something you could just take a picture on your phone.
Generating that with AI instead is reactionary. So like all of the images of like the girl at the coffee shop and it's a that's fucking reactionary that's reactionary from the perspective of art so it's like what good is AI then well well we should be using AI to do is to depict things that we cannot
ordinarily capture in reality, but things that maybe could exist in the future. So, for example,
science fiction. So for example, science fiction. Besides humor, humor is like off limits. I think there can be serious cooking going on with AI as long as the things that we're
generating and making don't actually immediately exist in reality that we could capture with a camera or a video.
So that's the use of AI.
It should be to explore the imagination and expand the imagination and also to show us a glimpse of what the future
potentially could be but is not yet right i've talked about how i think science fiction is the new
socialist realism of the 21st century and And AI can definitely assist and help.
And then, you know, I go on TikTok and there's some AI like stories, like the
cyberpunk one.
And people are like, actually, this is a cool example of AI art.
And I think the reason people appreciate that
kind of
AI is because
it's not
trying to
mimic something
you could take a
photo.
Like,
whenever you see,
like,
AI of like a
woman dancing
is disgusting
because it's like, well, that could be real. That could be a AI of like a woman dancing is disgusting because
it's like well that could be real
that could be a real woman but it's just like
this weird robot there's this weird like
can I be racist there's this like weird guy
in New Delhi who's generating this
and it's super like creepy
you know
like it like you're trying to it's like
uncanny value you're trying to be something that you're not right whereas AI should be making
things that cannot be made by conventional means, at least not as easily.
Like, you know, if you go outside and take a picture of a car and you generate that with AI, well, that's fucking bad because you're trying, because you're trying to pretend as if this is just something taken with a camera. Do you understand? This is the thing we should be thinking about with AI to be avant-garde about it, right? It's like the AI depiction of that woman in the coffee shop
who's like smiling
well the reason it's reactionary
is because like you're trying to pass
as something taken with an iPhone
why not just take it with an iPhone
what is the artistic significance
blending in camouflage
like trying to be something you're not
whereas when it comes to like
science fiction or fiction or humor even
there's more of an artistic merit there because you're not actually trying
to be something you're not. You're not trying to fit in with something that we find familiar and
conventional. You're not trying to fit in with something we can already have access to without
AI, right? You're giving us something
that could only be made with AI, basically,
right?
I feel like that's my basic
guideline for AI.
It's like my
butlerian jihad kind of thing
So that's my take
Late as fuck, what did I miss?
You missed a lot, dude.
Like, I don't know what to tell you.
You fucking missed so much.
You may as well donate 20 subs.
Out of shame and disgust with yourself.
Like, what the fuck is wrong with you?
Yeah. Thank you. Yeah, so that's something important that I wanted to talk about.
And I have a lot of other things I'd like to talk about.
Like, you know, I'm starting to kind of summarize.
You know, I'm always cooking and creating these new terms to distinguish our movement.
And, you know, last year I tried revolutionary dynasty, which wasn't capturing the essence
of what I'll...
But you know what? The dark Mali shit. I've been thinking about it and it's like,
that... That's what it is. That's what it is.
Like, why and how are we different?
Ben Shapiro
what an incredible contribution to the stream
from Ben Shapiro
that was the literal Ben Shapiro
who's by the way
where is where I'm looking at Reddors
who are using the label Mecha Tanky.
Where are they getting that from?
Where, who's like, who's stealing our term, Mecha Tanky?
I don't know.
Like, where the fuck is that coming from?
Like, who's making that a thing
because that literally is our term
anyway
I'm not going to get into it
so
and people say I'm not influential
well look at
look at the influence
anyway
anyway
um
uh you know like what what actually influence. Anyway, um, uh,
you know,
like what,
what actually characterizes,
like why our movement is different is because we do embrace the dark,
like dark molly.
That's straight up.
Like,
that's what it is.
Like,
all the stuff that distinguishes, like, the fact that we're, like, not afraid.
J.C., what's up?
The fact that we're not afraid, for example, that we have politically incorrect humor.
The fact that we, you know, people say that we're edgy.
I feel like we're quite nice. But the fact that we, like,, people say that we're edgy. I feel like we're quite nice.
But the fact that we like have no illusions, like, it really takes me going on Reddit to
understand, oh, we are Dark Molly.
Like these people, I'm not even kidding.
I understand how the right is so big.
Because these people literally think, like, Stalin would have been like...
I'm not even going to, like, do a voice, because that would be sacrilegious, but it's like these people literally think that like...
That under like Mao, during the cultural revolution, you know, they would be like,
Comrade, we're all
inclusive,
dancing together
with pronouns.
Like,
they,
they actually think
that.
They don't even,
there's something
very uncanny about it.
There's,
there is something
uncanny about it.
There's something
uncanny about the
way red libs ignore all the dark aspects of 20th century
communist experience. There's something uncanny about the way they like, they do have this naive
idealism, I guess, where they literally don't appreciate that. Yes, there was a glorious optimism and it was positive. But that simultaneously corresponded to immense sacrifice, immense hardship, immense struggle.
And, you know, there was this kind of dialectic of the light in the dark, and they only focus on the light.
And so much so that they're extending Obama libit artism like that naive idealism that you associate with liberals and their bleeding hard attitudes. They're like applying that to 20th century communist experience and the result is something
very uncanny and very strange.
It's actually like really creepy
when you think about it because it's like furries
who are like, oh yeah,
they're like, nothing. Oh yeah, it's a utopia. It's a utopia. We're furries. Yeah, it's like, Barney, the... I love you. You love me, but if you're a pet sock, I have to kill you, but I'm happy while I'm doing it.
And it's like, that was not the vibe, all right?
The vibe for Stalinism or communism, when it came to like the
the dark side of things
it was very somber
and it wasn't necessarily sentimental
but it was somber
there's a reason people are
always depicting the Soviet Union is like dark and gray. That's not
because it was, it wasn't, but it's because Westerners don't understand how people in
communist countries did have a sensibility that allowed them to appreciate the somber side of things.
That doesn't mean everything's always gray and gloomy. It's very colorful. It's very beautiful.
But there is an implicit understanding that there is a somber side to life, to existence, to reality,
that nothing is free.
Everything great and glorious comes at a tremendous cost.
And I'm not talking about, like, you know, mass murder or famines or something.
I'm just talking about, like, nothing is easy.
Like, think about the great patriotic war.
30 million people or so die.
You know, it's like, that's not
rainbows and sunshine.
That was a really fucking brutal war.
Yeah, people were not clowns.
Right? That's what I mean it's like this was serious people these were serious people these weren't clowns these weren't happy fun time clowns communism was not happy rainbow
care bear clowns it It was very serious people.
And the full breadth of human emotion and experience and life itself was something they were
internalizing.
And it was in that vein, they were pursuing the communist path knowing full well the full
spectrum of of the light and the dark and the good and the bad that comes with life and i feel like
there's just libtard leftists just have this naivety
that's for some reason they only ever
discard when they become fascists
but our community is peculiar because we don't have illusions
we don't have idealism we don't have naivity but we don't have illusions, we don't have idealism, and we don't have naivity,
but we don't accept the right.
We don't accept right-wing conclusions.
We don't accept fascism.
We're still left-wing.
We're still firmly rooted in this tradition of communism.
And I think most people look at us, and just from the words that we use sometimes, like, just the fact that I say retard sometimes, just the fact that we're extremely jaded and cynical about political correctness and the naive leftist illusions people have about the world sometimes.
How brutal and like sober and realistic we are about things.
People will look at that and they'll be like oh that's clearly right wing that's clearly fascist
and little do they know this is what actually is the bolshevik way lennon was a brutal realist
Stalin was a brutal realist and so what Mao would laugh
Mao was so
brutal and realistic
people thought he was cynical
yeah I mean that this i don't know what it is but it's like people really have created this hugbox
which they confuse with socialism or marxism i'm just saying this from Reddit, from my experience going on Reddit yesterday.
They've created this hug box that they think is somehow, like, related to communism.
They're like, what? Communism is when my feelings are fulfilled and my feelings are never hurt.
And, like, nothing is ever like toxic
and it's like dude no you didn't before the bolsheviks took dude before lenin was born, like before
there were any Bolsheviks on earth
like probably before
Marx's time,
people didn't have such childish illusions
about what revolutionary struggle meant.
Marx certainly didn't.
You know, if you look at
Marx in his writings
and look at his letters to Anglic.
These people are not idealists.
I mean, literally they're not. They're materialists.
They're not delusional. They don't delude themselves. See, there's something called delulu when you think about it. There's something called delulu. It's like,
rainbows and such.
It's like,
no, that's not Marxism.
It's really not.
There is a dark side that we do embrace and accept
rather than like delude ourselves about.
And,
you know, like, what is that dark side?
Well, it's just the fact that whenever you try something, you're going to get the opposite result.
That's part of dialectics in a lot of ways.
Like, whenever you aim towards something whenever you desire
something whenever you want something you're also fulfilling the like exact and total opposite of that
thing right and you need to make peace with that fact.
You need to make peace with the fact that the object, you know, of life and of existence is dialectical.
That in the same sense in which it comes to be right it also kind of um you know uh
is suspended in this like opposing tension right which makes it impossible for anything to be what it is as it appears as it seems as it as it as it you know comfortably affects us as
as something like nothing that exists is as it appears to us you know from in a familiar way
everything is suspended in motion because to be means to be entangled with an exact and opposing tension, right?
And I don't, there needs to be this mature, revolutionary sensibility that people need to adopt and embrace that I think you can only kind of get with literature.
Because like, you know, before the Bolsheviks, they had Russian revolutionary literature, right?
Churnik, fuck, I forgot how to, I'm too tired.
I don't want to pronounce it wrong.
But they would read you know,
Russian Revolutionary Literature
and these were fictional
and it would, no, not Dostoevsky fictional and it would no not dostoevsky and it would it would make them
understand what it meant to be a revolutionary and that's what we're actually lacking today
because i think today what we have is we have star wars we have this Star Wars show what is it Andor
you know I don't know what Andor is but it kind of seems like
it's not fit for this at all because
Chernyshevsky that's how you say it turnishevsky. That's how you say it.
Trinyshevsky, yeah.
Because there's this guy on X who replied to Rev.
I shit you not. He's like, ACPP And then he spit on his phone
I don't know if he got that from Andor
To spit on your phone
Like I'm a red
This what it means to be a revolutionary
Spit on the ablius
Split
Spit
Spit
Spit
Spit on the Pat it's like bro
we need literature
we need like a way to teach people
like what is it
forget about like theory for one second
forget for one second. Forget for one second about, you know, even practice.
Before then, we need something like that just teaches people like, what is the emotional sentiment?
What is the story that is associated with having a revolutionary outlook?
What does it mean to be a revolutionary with respect to the world?
Like, it's just deeper sensibility we need to somehow communicate for people so they don't
run around think, they don't run around think
they don't run around LARPing as the wrong
character because
Lenin
was
LARPing as like Shernashevsky
right or not Shornashvsky
who is the character?
Is it, fuck, what was the, the ascetic character in the novels, who was a total ascetic?
And he would repudiate, yeah, yeah, Rachmatov, there you go.
Rachmatov, that's go. Rachmatov.
That's who Lenin.
That's who inspired Lenin.
So this is who Lenin was larping, okay?
But the problem is
the problem is not LARP per se.
The problem is that people are larping the wrong characters.
That's my take.
LARP is unavoidable, but the problem is people are larping the wrong characters.
Like, who is... God forbid we find out who Black Red Guard is larping.
But he's larping someone, but we just don't know who.
He's larping some, like... Fuck if I know.
I don't... I mean, he's larping Harry Potter?
What is he larping? I don't know. He's in DSA, so
he must be LARPing
Harry Potter, you know?
Because he was, remember when on
Bad Mpana's stream, he was
he was like
Larushite!oushite!
La Roushite!
A transphob!
Larushite! And it's like he's casting
spells like Harry Potter would. So I think he's
larping Harry Potter.
Anyway, I should show...
No, forget. He's larping some character
that he finds very compelling, like emotionally. No, forget, he's larping some character that he finds very
compelling, like emotionally.
Anyway, I have to, it's so
crazy, you have to see it to believe it, I guess.
Let me show you the guy
who's spitting,
the nasty guy who just spit.
Like, yikes yikes so this so i don't know what if is Andor, or where is the inspiration for this?
But this guy spit on his own phone.
And, uh, this is one of the people that, like, threaten us...
They're like, I'm gonna beat you up I'm so
and they're just
like autistic
or whatever
anyway
he's got a mask
so nobody
so
this is
he
I guess
and RTSU
just goes like
so if not
ACP then what
and then this
is how he
is how he responds
so
what about the ACP what about the ACP
and like
the ACP
and like why is his spit like color like there's like like like it's like yellow it's like not even clear
this is honestly one of the most disgusting videos i've ever seen. Like Bro, we need
like literature. That's what I'm saying.
What is this?
What about the ACP?
Free freeze frame you're probably wondering how i got here try to do you what about the acp CP.
Freeze frame.
So you're probably wondering how I got here.
You're probably wondering how I got here.
By the way, this is literally Reddit. This is what Reddit is doing.
This is like the, all over our
slash souls. Like, this is what they think goes hard, I guess. I don't
fucking know.
Ah! I don't fucking know. Ah!
I didn't need... I paused it there.
Oh my God.
Bro, you know what's disgusting about this guy given how musty crusty and disgusting he looks
everyone's joking that he cleaned his phone i don't think he
i don't even think he cleaned his phone i don't even think he cleaned his phone. I don't think he... I don't even think he cleaned his phone.
I think he straight up left it there out of revolutionary indignation.
Out of radical indignation, I think he just left it there.
So, like, the next time he takes, he records a video of himself,
it's just still going to be there.
It'll be, like, dried up a little.
But it's going to be a foggy, foggy camera.
Next time he shows it.
So... foggy camera next time he shows it. So,
yeah, this guy literally spit on his,
his cellular device.
Um,
and you know, it's not often that we ratio
Twitter leftists but
we actually did
like somehow we did
ratio him
I guess it is fair like because I feel like the Like somehow we did ratio him.
I guess it is fair.
Like,
because I feel like the feds gave up on this one. I feel like if the,
I feel like Eagle and Air Base employees saw this clip.
And they're like,
Sarge,
should we bought this one? They're like, Sarge, should we bought this one?
They're like,
Bill Mel.
No way.
Cut him loose.
Let him fend for himself.
There's no way we can salvage this.
Like, because imagine if they did,
imagine if they gave this guy like a thousand likes.
Instantly,
the like system would lose credibility, right?
So they let us have this one.
And,
yeah, they let us have this one. It's and yeah
they let us have this one
scroll down
yeah
it's just
really disgusting
yeah and he filmed really disgusting.
Yeah, and he filmed this during Thanksgiving.
I don't know if he, like, he was, like, probably at his, uh, he's probably with his family, and they were, like, all eating, and he's like, one sec.
And he ran to the corner, or maybe he like ran upstairs to his room.
Grabbed his phone and spit on it.
And then went back to have his turkey or whatever.
Everybody's just clowning on this fucking guy like what the hell
and this guy is really fat yeah
I feel like if you're fat you can't be larping as a Sakai guy
because it's like give some of your food to the needy or whatever, right?
I don't know. So this guy has a Naruto, because I looked in this as Naruto here. So he's got a Naruto reference. He's just some autistic fat guy. He's just some fat autistic guy. It's like, yeah, it was abliest. I don't give it. Did he include abelism? Let me see. Uh, no. No, he just said homophobic.
Got it.
Okay. Pha- Oh my god.
Bro, it's over.
What the hell?
I just saw this on my
timeline
I hope this doesn't become like porn
but look at this guys
look at this
I'm
Oh who would be able to tell
you know you all you all need to be careful because some of y'all
i'm not here to police nobody but i know some of y'all you'll you you know you'll see a cute
girl cute woman you know she'll be in your DMs
and you'll be like
okay wow
and y'all be talking
and shit
and some of y'all have
these cyber relationships
and you'll be like
oh well let's do a video call
to make sure
right and then like it's going to be that fat guy who spit on his phone And you'll be like, oh, well, let's do a video call to make sure. Right.
And then, like, it's going to be that fat guy who spit on his phone.
And this is going to be, it's going to be him in the bottom left.
And this will be your, your internet girlfriend.
And don't worry, he'll have the AI can do the voice changer too.
So y'all got to be careful with this online dating shit.
That's all I got to say, because, like, this could literally, I shit you not.
The person in the bottom left could be an Eagle and air base soldier with his full camouflage uniform on.
Some old guy.
Just sit like some bald guy, you know, just sitting there.
And you think you're talking to your girlfriend, but you're talking to, you know, just sitting there and you think you're talking to your girlfriend,
but you're talking to, you know,
Sergeant,
uh,
you're talking to a lieutenant,
you know,
I don't know.
Talking to, uh, yeah, Lieutenant Gooner or something.
I don't know.
You're here.
Oh, oh, oh, In a way, this is what Zoron did, except instead of pretending to be a woman, he pretended to be a socialist.
Kind of the same.
You think about it.
You know, we should do. We should make a meme.
And it's like, it's
Zoron in the left. And then the bigger one
is also just Zoran. And it's like, oh my God, guys,
AI has allowed people to fool you
into thinking they're socialists.
And it's, oh, that's genius.
Someone should do that.
It's like both the same thing.
Guys, look how advanced we've cried.
I shit you not do that and then put like text that just says this exactly.
We've officially crossed the Rubicon.
AI can now emulate
the appearance
of a socialist to trick
retarded white children.
And it's just so, it's both
Zoron. It's both the same thing.
You guys should do that.
That actually You guys should do that. That'd actually be hilarious.
See, I ruin the joke because we all find it funny because I ruined it.
But imagine if someone who is outside of our community, they would see it and also find it very funny.
She just has to rant against trans girls
and say she's a radical feminist
and the community is going to get honey potted.
Yeah, low-key, there's a bunch of simps and,
you know,
I don't know
what's going on.
Which,
you know,
look,
I kind of,
I don't know
if I sympathize.
I don't know
if I do,
honestly.
I don't know
if I do.
I don't think I do.
I don't think I do.
Because I don't think I do because I think you know you could be like well you know
how are guerrillas
supposed to
you know
get married
and have families
and I'm like
you know
I kind of feel like
I should be harsh on y'all
like go and
go out into the wild go out to the wild and
find yourself a girlfriend in the wild like don't don't use this community to to find a part
it's kind of like weird you know like, because what does that even mean? Like,
I'm your dad. Like, I'm your dad and I'm like the matchmaker. Like, y'all are in the community
and you're looking for a girlfriend and you're, because you're too lazy to just, like, go out
into the wild and do it. You're like doing it through the community.
But it's like, so y'all are going to get married and I'm going to be like the priest and say, you know, you may kiss the bride or what does the fucking priest say?
Like I'll be the guy standing in the middle with a book and I'm going to, like, have you all get me.
Like, I don't want that.
Don't be putting me in this position, all right?
You know, I don't want to deal with that.
I'm not, I'm not anyone's grandparents.
I'm not going to be anyone's grandparents.
I'm literally a 29-year-old, all right?
Yeah. literally a 29 year old, right? Got to go out into the wild.
No shortcuts. Thank you. like for real no no shortcuts
nor
shortcuts
nor or no
that's the question
no no That's the question. Thank you. bro i hate exodusters so much i'm like it's been like one minute of me browsing and he's like
there's no content you know what man you know like what do you fucking want
want me play fucking Minecraft
is that what you want
it's not a fucking gaming stream right
I'm uh I'm looking on YouTube right now
and do do you And do you do, do, do, then...
There's some shit I wanted to show y'all, but I forgot about it.
What's the announcement?
That was literally baked.
Yeah, I didn't, i didn't uh i don't actually have an announcement i was going to confront this chairman but i don't know should i should I do confront the chairman right now?
Logos tweets on AGI.
No, I haven't seen that.
Yeah, I should do confront the chairman, right?
Why not?
I'll do that. We'll do it for about 30 minutes you know i wish i could fucking do it without making a post
nen the ninnan nina da da da da da da da da da N-da-ne-n-din-d-d-d-dun-d-dun-d-dun-d-dun-d-dun-d-dun-d-dun-d-dun.
Dund-dun-dun-dun-d-d-dun.
Let's open up Blue Stacks.
All right, what's a good title?
War on India.
Should that make it that?
By the way, I pissed off a lot of Indian Twitter.
I didn't realize, like, a lot of my quote tweets were just people like,
this person should be some Arabic Lebanese piece of shit.
Jealous of Indian success.
Your failure, Arab.
This guy, Arab.
He is jealous of success of India.
This piece of shit, Arab, he is jealous of success of India. This piece of shit, Arab is jealous of Indian success.
Indian golden excellence.
So jealous.
You aren't very much jealous.
Why is like Indian Twitter full of just like national, I should say Indian nationalist
Twitter is like literally just full of cope.
They're just like gassing themselves up.
Did everyone in jealous of India?
India is making scientific progress.
We're going to achieving the...
You know, I don't fucking know.
Anyway, let's exit out of this.
NCP is racist.
More racism from ACP Oh my god
Remember how I destroyed DarkWoke
I literally fucking
fucking curb stomped DarkWoke
Like I fucking destroyed it
I actually fucking destroyed
Darkwoke
straight up. All right. all right i made my i made my space everyone has to boost my space now so i did the the easy part now the hard part is that everyone needs to find my space.
So what you guys have to do is you have to boost my space.
Okay.
You have to boost it.
Like, and when I say boost it, you have to fucking retweet and like it.
For real.
You have to retweet and like.
Only 20 people have done that.
It's disgusting.
I mean, what the hell is going on?
This is such like non-tartarian behavior.
Everyone fucking boost it.
What am I doing?
What am I doing?
We're bringing everyone in, and I'm saying if you're not a Marxist, you have a mental disability. You're going to talk to who?
I don't know what you're talking about.
Ask Grock to explain this post.
Yeah, thanks Grock.
I love when people were asking Grock to confirm whether my Zoron picture was real or not. That was pretty genius behavior by the Goyim.
And they were tagging Grock to ask if Zoron really was in a New Delhi call center.
And if that was a real image just fascinating
William behavior
Jew, Jew,
Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew.
Jewish? Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew, Jewish. I feel like all the spaces, there's, I'll tell you like the one of five people that come on the space so the the first type of person will come on and they'll be like if you didn't know czechin pang is a jew and that'll be one of the first ones right second one will be somebody who somebody who's like, hey, I just wanted to let you know, I'm a big fan, but I wanted to discuss and they want to like yap.
And I have to be nice to them or else I'm a fucking asshole, right?
And I think the third type of person is just silent and doesn't speak.
And we have to remove them.
The fourth type of person is trying to be a troll.
And they'll usually just say like an edgy word.
And then the fifth person is literally just rambly
but i literally do not get any left libtards in my spaces ever not even one and 2020 i used to get them all the time
i don't even get one.
Like, the last time I've gotten an actual, like,
Reddeter, like, left Libthard in my space was, like, three years ago.
Like, I straight up do not get these people in the space anymore.
You block them all?
Yeah, I did.
I remember I blocked like all of them once.
I think I did.
I had like a tool to like mass block all leftists.
It was like in 23. I did this like in 23 I did this in 2023 or 4
that's why everything was so chill in
2024 because I was like you know I'm just going to
blap I'm gonna block all of them they're all bots
anyway I was like how am I going to win over
furries do not furries in my army I was like, how am I going to win over furries? Do not furries in my army?
I was like, I'm going to block all these people.
So I ended up blocking all them.
And then they forgot I existed, and I forgot they existed.
But then they're remembering I exist now because,
uh, because I don't know, because I'm just so prolific.
Well, we need people in the space, but you guys don't have to join who are watching the stream,
but we need to spread the space so that more people have the courage to join. You know, if you are not requesting to speak, I'm going to assume you are a ride or die
soldier of this army. If you are not not requesting to speak that means you are in a totalitarian
matter absolutely agree with everything i have to say straight up if you don't request to speak
what it means is that you're a soldier of this army.
If you want to be a dissident and be an individual, then you have to request and assert your individuality.
Otherwise, you are part of the hive
so in order to be an individual you need to request to speak and assert your individuality
so that the collective can fucking knock you down because you're dumb bitch.
By the way,
we are, you know that show Pluribus on Apple TV? That's what we are.
The guerrilla army, we're a cult.
We're like Pluribus. We all have one mind.
But instead of doing
favors for you, we just, you know, we surround you and curb stomp you.
We just kick you to death and shit.
We're a malicious type.
We're not the, you know, in pluribus, they're like, you know, they're, the hive is like, they're all're all like doing favors and they're getting like food
and breakfast and we just come to your house and we just kick you to death millions of us max headroom
there we go and a free thinking individual okay what's going on max headroom
the first individual.
Go ahead.
Do you hear me?
Oh, shit, do you count?
So what do you see as a difference between socialism and communism?
I don't understand how to actually implement communism itself, or what it actually means.
People that only call themselves socialists are usually people that are trying to compromise I guess where people that call themselves communists
are fully they fully repudiate and reject the system.
They're revolutionary.
That's the difference.
Right.
Can you expand on what that means,
you know,
in more detail?
What does it mean
to be a socialist
versus a communist?
Thank you.
Yeah, communists basically have a revolutionary position and socialists
don't. Usually they don't.
Well, that's
you know, that's kind of a
once you achieve
the goal,
what does it mean?
Honestly, nothing too exciting.
Once we achieve the goal,
it's not like overnight some exciting thing happens.
Over the long term, you definitely see a radically different trajectory, but the whole point is to change sovereignty.
You know, the goal is sovereignty in the first place.
You know, building...
Once you have sovereignty,
you can adapt to the
inevitable changes that arise from
technology and
society and culture, you know, more or less.
You can do that in ways that don't, you know, empower the interests of a small blood-sucking minority who are retarding human progress. So, like, I'm pretty, I'm a historical determinist in the sense, I guess, that I think society is advancing towards something just based on the nature of how civilization and technology and culture and stuff are developing.
The problem is that because of class antagonism, the ruling class is retarding progress to
maintain its position.
So you need to be a revolutionary,
you need to be a communist to just unleash
the productive forces, that's what we call it.
So that society can be,
can freely develop
you know, in the direction
that it's already aiming toward. You know,
it's already aiming toward the same conclusion.
The conclusion it's aiming toward is,
well, you know, if you
want to put it in simple terms,
the increasing human prosperity you know
advancing people's health advancing people's access to education and information and culture
allowing people to have more free time to, you know, explore the fundamental question of
what does it actually mean to be human, whether that's through art or science.
And I don't think those things are particularly controversial. I think all human beings would agree,
yeah, that's the goal of a society. That should be the goal of humanity at scale. You know, communists don't really fundamentally disagree with what most people's common sense and intuitions would point them toward.
So we're just saying, though, that there's no way to fix the crisis we're in without a revolutionary solution, without a radical overthrow of the entire blood-sucking
you know
parasite class
and the prevailing institutions
of society which are not adapted to the changes that are to come
right that you have covered something that is absolutely necessary and good.
I was just asking about the difference between the socialist versus the communist approach towards that goal, exactly. Can you cover that?
Honestly, I mean, look, I could do it historically. I could do it now or today. There isn't a
fixed definition of either of those terms that applies to like everything.
It's always so up in the air, depending on the context, unfortunately.
But, you know, historically the idea was that socialism would be, you know, more of a transition between capitalism and communism.
So the idea in communist states, states that were led by communist parties, is that, you know, socialism would retain certain aspects of the capitalist mode of production like money, and it would, you know, retain some
aspects like the existence of the state, like the existence of, um, of, of some markets to a
limited extent. But that communism would be this more, you know, comprehensive change in the mode of production that would be, you know, nobody knew exactly how to define it, but they knew that there would be an absence of money. There wouldn't be states any longer. There wouldn't be violence or coerce.
You know, that the principle
that would govern economics would be
from each according
to their ability to each
according to their need.
But that was more of a I would argue that that was more of a utopian perspective that past communists had when they divided communism and socialism into different stages.
Because when Marx and Engels used the term socialism and communism, they actually
use them pretty interchangeably. Now, today, in terms of how people use those words, a lot of the times
when people call themselves socialists, they're just proposing more social welfare, they're proposing
an expansion of the public sector or more government welfare. They're proposing an expansion of the public sector or more government
services. They're proposing a society that, you know, wants to tax the rich more and distribute
wealth more equally. In America in particular, you'll find that's what a lot of the times
people mean when they say socialism
you know health care stuff like that
right so you know there's a lot of ways
to really look at it and define it just depending
on the context but
if you would ask me
you know I would say that technically socialism and communism to me meant the same thing for Marx and Engels, which they did, right?
I would just say that it's more of like, instead of thinking of it in terms of different systems or societies, think of it in terms of like different like gang signs.
Like who's flying up this flag?
What kind of people are they?
What kind of attitudes do they have?
What kind of like what are they about?
You know, usually when people are more, when someone's more comfortable
with saying
they're a socialist,
it usually means
that they're,
you know,
they're not really,
they're still believe
that within the system
there can be these
modifications that,
you know.
I really like that,
the metaphor right there.
That's awesome.
Right.
So somebody who's saying they're a communist is basically saying like, you know, I have no illusions about whether the system can be reformed.
I have no illusions about whether it can be salvaged.
It's totally doomed and that we basically have to topple everything.
Thank you. I appreciate the response.
This person's bio says, seek the kingdom of God.
Go ahead.
Hey, good evening.
I just wanted to ask, I know that this might be a little bit off
topic from what you've set this space
to be about, but
I was recently chatting with Ed Berger
about the
differences between
essentially
the resolving and the unresolving dialectic.
And I was wondering if you had done much study into that.
It's something that I'm looking more into.
What he was talking about is the fact that, as a matter of fact,
reading Mao and then also reading Adorno's negative
dialectics you actually see a strange if you will almost dialectical unity between these two very
opposing figures and the way that they both have an unresolving dialectical form.
I was wondering if this is an area that you're familiar with.
I'm just curious about it. I'm starting to look into it.
I'm not familiar with Edberg's specific argument, but I'm familiar with the way in which Adorno and Mao's dialectic or, you know, could be
characterized as unresolved.
What do you think, this kind of goes back to what you were saying just a few minutes ago with our other interlocutor here.
What do you think is most appropriately descriptive for the world that we actually live in?
I've also recently been reading Leibniz pretty extensively, and it's pretty fascinating to see him as kind of prefiguring Hegel, which is really not an unrealistic thing to say because Hegel was very much a student of Leibniz's work. But from your perspective and the studies that you've done, do you see the world as operating within a resolving or an unresolving
dialectical situation? Can you hear me?
Your mic is kind of cutting in, now a little bit. Hello, hello
Yeah, my mic fell because it's a literal piece of shit
Okay, okay, is there another mic that you're able to switch to?
Is it bad now?
It's a little bit chocky now.
Fuck, it's bad.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
There's something wrong with the signal.
Hello?
Can you hear me now?
We can hear you.
It's just the signal's kind of broken up now, but we can hear you, yeah.
What about now? Is it still broken up unfortunately yeah man it's it's not something too good interference man
oh it's only x all right so on my stream it's fine X. All right.
So on my stream, it's fine.
X is a piece of shit.
Can you guys, like, hear me, though?
Or no?
We can hear you.
It's just interfering, yeah.
All right.
So I'll say two things.
One is that I definitely lead more toward a resolved dialectic view
like hagel i guess well not not exactly like hagel but more i think that the fact that mouse
dialectic was unresolved is a problem
right
problem also for Mao's revolutionary
aspirations whereas I think in the case
of Adorno
I think his unresolved dialectic
leans more toward
basically a kind of
Kantian
orientation that I think is
very deliberate. I think that
I have always seen Adorno's negative dialectic as kind of a way to retain proximity to the kind of Kantian notion of the transcendental and also the Antonymy, for example, although I know that Antenemy is not necessarily the same as the negative dialectic. I think Adorno is more comfortable there, and I think that he basically wants to take the ship of Hegel and turn it back over to Kant.
And there's a lot of drama and stuff that's involved in how he dresses that up and justifies it and kind of, you know.
So you actually have read this text.
I haven't yet read it, but I think that I'm going to read it pretty soon.
Yes.
Yes, I have.
It's been a long, admittedly, it's been a very long time.
I think the last time I've read Adorno was probably
not five
six years ago
but I think there
are fundamental differences
I think with between the obviously the nature and the logic of Mao's dialectic and Adorno's dialectic are fundamentally different.
It's just that, yeah, there is this kind of strange fact that, I guess you could say both are unresolved, you know, at the end, toward their conclusion.
Do you mind if I, I have one follow-up on that, and then I'll let you go and get back to the rest of your conversation here.
I appreciate you letting me on, by the way. It's nice to meet you, man.
You too.
My name's Gabriel, by the way.
That's what my Chinese characters say.
That's you.
Nice to meet you, bro.
But the other thing that I was curious about was...
Okay.
It's departing me.
Uh...
What was it?
Give me a second. I'll try and get it back.
It was carrying on from what you were just talking about and now it's somehow...
Is it Mao or is it Kantian?
Is it Kant? Is it Mao?
Oh, oh, I know what it is. I know what it is.
So I don't know if you saw this recently, but Logo posted a little bit about how Alex Kart's
PhD thesis is about
the Adornian
concept of jargon
right? Essentially
do you remember when Norman Finkelstein
spoke about Alan Dershowitz and said
that he is a person who has managed to completely and totally, like, compromise and utterly destroy his conscience because he is a man who is able to, in one breath, lie and know he is lying and yet also know that he is telling the truth.
And that's what Alex Karp's PhD thesis, which draws primarily for Moderna, is about.
And so the thing I'm curious about, perhaps you know about this as well, in what way...
Sorry, I don't mean to be a little stupid. Is that kind of a reference to the liar's paradox? Or by lying and telling the truth,, what does that mean exactly?
Is it like in the sense that they're, um, they're kind of aware that they're lying and
that by lying, they're telling the truth about their position as a liar or something or what?
So, well, rather what, what it would mean is that someone is, someone is almost like ingested a kind of perverse dialectic to the point where now, for example, in order to be a great lawyer.
It'd be more sophisticated
to lie and believe it so to speak right yeah i see what you mean so they're lying in the
vein of uh like that they have this more fundamental justification i guess
that's what you mean yeah yeah I see okay so
just drawing from that the question
that I have for you again as someone who's actually
touched this stuff and I'm only getting into it
kind of for the for a start now
would you
say that somebody like Alex Carp drawing from Adorno and using him is like an improper instrumentalization of his thought toward like an anti-liberatory end because obviously we know that it is that end or do you feel like that's actually in keeping with Adorno's thought and his directionality?
I would probably say the latter, actually.
I think that Adorno would talk about something like liberation, almost as a way to justify, you know, the conditions of its impossibility. I don't want to like sound too complicated. He would, it would, it would almost be like this thing he knows is impossible to achieve ever in any kind of like real way.
So therefore it means nothing concretely.
But by always hanging over this kind of threshold of the potentiality or possibility of liberation and the failure of our current reality to achieve that, by always kind of maintaining that tension, I guess. He is able to...
He is able to kind of...
How should I put it?
Justify a specific attitude and relationship toward the world that
you know
permits the ability to kind of
because it's falling short of this thing
it's capable of right
I think it kind of does justify this like short of this thing it's capable of, right?
I think it kind of does justify this like amoral
position actually.
You know this thing that you sometimes
hear from people where they'll
say that like, you know,
why even really make efforts to develop some kind of liberatory
project I mean ultimately it's going to fail
obviously it's failed every other time
we should probably just kind of
go about our lives and be hedonistic
and try to enjoy ourselves it's something worse is that kind of go about our lives and be hedonistic. It's actually it's something worse.
Is that kind of?
No, it's much worse.
It's almost like, I would say it's actually like fundamentally zionist because I can
justify that as well.
But it's basically saying like you know
liberation could be achieved
it's not impossible
there's nothing that makes it impossible
and the fact that the world
comes short of that
justifies my
antisocial stance
it's almost like I'm punishing
the world for not fulfilling that
or living up to it. Does that make sense?
Does that make a little bit of time to just make your
microphone work, dude? It's
really bad right now. I have to
end the space and restart it, so it's not going right now. I have to end the space
and restart it, so it's not going to happen.
Anyway,
shit. Yeah, let me
continue.
But
I remember there was this
essay written by the
anti-Deutsche, the anti-Germans, who cited Adorno.
And actually, Adorno was like the forefather of that movement, like, according to them, you know?
Mm-hmm.
And it was more or less, they were making the argument that, like, Israel is actually fundamentally
communist because in a world that has failed to achieve the abolition of nation states,
Israel is, like, basically holding a mirror up against the world about in terms of like showing it the brutality of, you know, the state and of nations, and that all attempts to reign Israel in are actually rooted in hypocrisy because all nations are actually just as evil as Israel.
And it's like, it used this reasoning and this logic that is distinctly, you know, Adornian or it's coming from Adorno.
That sounds like it really, really grotesquely
anti-dialectical.
Yeah.
Well,
that,
well,
you could almost say
negative dialectics,
right?
I don't even really know
what the book is about yet.
Like,
I'm,
I still,
you know,
I haven't even started it.
I just downloaded it from Anazar.
So I don't really know what he, what he tries to do with it.
But, I mean, that sounds like maybe the most canous, unjustified thing I could ever hear from somebody who's attempting
to put together
something like academically rigorous.
But it's a direct,
there's like a direct continuity
from Adorno's logic
that leads to that,
you know?
And it's not, and also,
these, like, circles, these intellectual circles,
used to, like, cross-pollinate with, like,
with a value form, the value criticism,
people that are popular in Germany.
And, like, that's why people, when people don't actually understand
how fundamentally Zionist,
you know,
post-owned and,
and this kind of,
I would even argue that,
you know,
there's a lot of like leftists.
It's fashionable,
it's constantly like jibber
about the value form,
and then they're getting it from the German school.
And you mean the Frankfurt school in particular, right?
Yeah, and I mean, I, yeah, it ultimately is rooted in that, for sure.
Got it, man.
It's rooted specifically, I mean, if you could say Postone is from the Frankfurt School, I don't know if that would be fair.
Haven't read Postone yet.
Yeah, I mean, so there's there's this whole like, you know, pseudo-Marxist, Zionist outlook that lurks beneath the surface of most mainstream Western Marxism that a lot of people just like aren't even aware of.
That is...
See, that's the kind of thing that if you're paying close attention to it,
you can kind of see it without necessarily knowing it
in that articulated way.
But having you spell it out in that way makes it even more obvious that that's kind of, that there's like a latent, you know, if I could use a different term that means the same thing, kind of like a latent, you know, if I could use a different term that means the same thing, kind of like a latent,
it's a latent reactionary tendency is really what it is, right?
Yeah, I mean, objectively, yes, in practice, yes.
But it couches itself
and justifies itself in the terms of the opposite.
So the argument
from the anti-Doiche people
is more or less that all
real socialism was just
national socialism with the Volkskomenchschild.
So yeah, they're saying Mao and Stalin and stuff.
And they're basically saying that
anti-Zionism is fundamentally anti-Semitic
because Israel's like this Jew among nations
and that the highness antisocial depravity of Israel among the community of nations is analogous to the kind of antisocial status of the Jew within capitalist society that Marx talks about.
And that, you know, that by this reasoning they're like
they're basically saying that anti-Zionism is like
this epitome of geopolitical
anti-Semitism more or less
that is reactionary with respect to world history.
And these people actually come to the conclusion
that like American unipolar hegemony
is actually fundamentally progressive,
kind of similar to the Trotskyist neocons
people talk about a lot
but they take it to like another level with this
that's really fascinating because
wait I got to look into this more because I remember
like pretty comprehensive worldview that these
German anti-Deutsch people
I think they had they had a magazine actually
it's called Jungle World I think it's
what it's called I don't know
actually if you look at my Wikipedia
I didn't even know there's they
you know they called me a fascist
so there's that.
I guess that's a badge of honor because they've written a...
I guess.
But they have been a, um...
They've been a pretty, like, significant for...
Would you say that ACP is anti-Troskiist?
Yeah.
And Max, I'm sorry to, you know, I'm sorry, but we're not just going to have random questions being shouted out.
You know, it's just kind of like...
Yeah, anyway, no, it's definitely a rat.
You know, Adorno is somebody that I strove to really repudiate, like, theoretically, like, completely reject and totally.
So you're pretty intimately familiar with him.
Yes, yes.
And I...
I...
Yeah.
I mean, I...
I would say that Adorno is...
I would... I like to measure
my Marxism against Adorno's
in terms of how
successful it is
as being like comprehensively
the exact opposite, you know?
I see.
Okay.
So you, now here's my, here's kind of like a follow-up to this.
Do you feel like there is anything to be redeemed within Frankfurt school thought.
You know, this may sound harsh.
I would say that if I was being incredibly charitable, I would say that people should be intimately familiar with the ways in which Marxism has to or should be rooted into kind of like an intimate familiarity with German idealism. And this way of drawing out the consequences of that in relation to society, the ability to kind of connect these things, I think, is maybe an achievement.
And that's a hard maybe.
But I don't know if there are even...
Sorry, the ability to connect which things, sorry?
German idealism and Marxism
kind of in a more
existential tone, you know,
in relation to society
and what does it mean to be
human or ethical or and what does it mean to be human
or ethical
or moral and stuff? These are interesting
things to think about. Sure.
Oh, absolutely. And you know who
I think have been the two most significant
figures in my thought pertaining
to that region
is actually probably Kierkegaard
and Simone Vei. Have you read them?
I'm a little familiar
with Kierkegaardin. Who's the
other guy?
Simone Vei.
So Simone
She was a
S-I-M-O-N-E
W-E-I-L
She was a French
Oh, okay
I always read that as Simon Wheel
Sorry
I'm pretty No, no Oh yeah But you know, but you know.
Yeah, I know of them. I haven't read them, but I know of them.
She's great on this. I think that she has definitely some similarities with Kierkegaard, but
probably some differences as well but the way that
she discusses the kind of let's
just say dialectical
overcoming of atheism
that's a very interesting thing that you find
in certain strains
of thought and I think that's very useful in kind of
this political context as well. I don't really see very much of that type of, like, I think that
social philosophy needs to be liberatory in the same way that any other kind of philosophy does.
And I think that social philosophy that comes from the Frankfurt School, to me, seems more so masturbatory than anything else.
Well, yeah, I mean, it's...
If, you know, you'd boil it up and it'd say the whole purpose of, you know,
the thing that justifies its stance according to itself is that it's it's creating the proper
conditions of a critical outlook in the age of mass culture and in the age of you know consumerism
and and goyslop.
Yes, you know, I don't know.
That's how they would see it.
I mean, in an age of, and you know, this is, I think, what ties the whole thing together
even, because, you know, Walter Benjamin, I think, is the one that everyone likes and says
as redeemable qualities, which I
sympathize with, you know, but
his work about
art in the age
of mass production, you know,
remains pretty rare.
Yeah, I still haven't read Benymeine either, but I know I need to.
It remains pretty relevant in the age of AI, right?
And people are talking about similar things.
Oh, absolutely, man.
By any chance, just out of curiosity,
do you have any familiarity with, like,
the engineering mechanics of AI? Because I think that that is actually kind of relevant to understanding it from a social perspective. I don't, I mean, I mean, very vaguely. Like I don't know. No, not engineering. I'd say no. You know, I know how a little bit how it works, but I don't know anything about engineering.
Let me, let me give you one thing, just a very basic thing that I think is it really helps us clarify what we're talking about, looking at AI from like a sociological perspective.
I actually work in the field
and do like
kind of AI enabled engineering work.
And I wrote this the other day.
It's a tweet
on my timeline.
I say, with respect to coding,
the difference between compilers and large language models
is that we have a precise mechanical understanding of compilers
as they are born from Chomsky and grammar theory,
while the continued development of LLMs takes place largely within the black box field of interpretability.
Code generated by an LLM may asymptotically approach the sort of accuracy we get from compilers, but it will categorically never match it.
That's the end of the post. What I mean to say there really is just that when you put assembly code into a compiler and it produces a high level programming language,
you can feed the high level programming language back in and it will give you the exact same code.
The assembly code. It's a one-to-one translation.
We're going to have to cut it short.
But thanks for your contribution.
Much to think about.
So let's bring on Casey McGregor.
I think this guy's one of us.
Maybe they're not.
Why is the Eureka collective, like, actually growing?
Has anyone noticed that?
It's like, because I actually, I'm going to be honest, guys, like, I didn't know that would become a thing, but it's like kind of become a thing.
I just see it.
Hasn't it become a thing?
The Eureka collective?
It's kind of become a thing it's pretty surprising uh inkwater what's inkwater got to say go ahead
hello oh he's not one of you. He's banned. Got it. All right, yo, what's up?
How's it going? You wanted to debate about Marxism as an ideology?
You read the title title the title's pretty clear so let's let's all right yeah um so i i i'm a strong believer in the general labor theory of marx my concern is
historiography mainly um I have a lot of friends
from the Siberian region, and
they've told me stories about how
the Soviet government would
they would do a lot of experimental things,
and a lot of those things were good. You had a lot
of experiments in labor, you had a lot of experiments.
All right. I'm just sorry, but it's such a lot of experiments in labor. You had a lot of experiments. All right.
I'm just sorry, but it's such a fucking boring opening.
Can you like...
Casey, go ahead. Yo!
Hello!
Yeah.
Oh, you may a stick.
Just having a little bit of technical
Dville D
Hang on
Well let me know when you figure it out
Raymond go ahead Hello Yo Yo Yup Hello
Hello
Testing
Hello
Yep Hello?
Yep.
Why are you racist to Indians?
How?
I mean, you called him, I'm Donnie a scammer.
Does he use a scammer?
But, like, it's obvious to use that word specifically because he's India I mean
he's still a scammer though
well
okay how is he a scammer
read what I read he he fucking uses the DSA to fucking how is he a scammer?
Read what I read.
He fucking used the DSA to fucking launch a career
to mainstream Democratic Party politics.
He had no intention
of like bringing socialism
to America in any way.
Why would you use the word like scummer?
Like, how is that scamming?
Well, that's fraudulent, but I wouldn't say that scamming.
Really?
We're going to get hung up on the Saman i mean really fraudulent and scamming fraud and scamming is different that's news to me like how are they fucking different
but like it's just like he's india and so you call him scammer
like that's the real reason you call scammers. Like that's
the real reason. And who fucking cares?
Like even if I was, even if I was
you know
referring to Indian call scammers
like who fucking cares? Like, what's
the problem with what I said?
Well, because you're like what's the problem with what I said well because it's racist
I mean
not really
it's just kind of like
I mean like if he was Italian
and I said he's like a
you know
I don't know if like you know I don't know if like
you know I don't know some context
I like said he was like a pizza chef
or something is that racist
I mean it's a stereotype
but is it racist
I mean it'd be racist if you said
he was like a mob boss.
No, he's doing this film.
Yeah, nobody would care.
Nobody would get offended.
Yeah, but there's like, this is like, uh, like, uh,
you know, if I said he was Irish and I said, oh, this guy's like a leprechaun or something, nobody
would give a fuck, all right?
So nobody gives a shit about these things.
It's just like a total distraction from the fact that Mamdani, like, that they fell for it
and that he humiliated them and he scammed them
and they don't want to admit they were wrong so they're just crying
about a racism that just doesn't exist
you know, racism, you know what racism would be
racism when me being like
Mom Donnie, you know,
doesn't belong here because he's a smelly Indian and smelly Indians don't belong in America.
Like, that would be racist, right?
Me saying that he's a scammer and that me, like, referring to, like, New Delhi Call Center scammers is not
racist. It's just like a funny thing I did
to
illustrate the
deeper point, you know?
At hand.
Okay, sure.
I'll concede that.
Like, yeah,
the SA people are like getting conned.
There we go.
So that's all we need.
All right.
So maybe Casey has fixed their, their mic.
Go ahead, Casey. okay
okay
hello
yeah
hey
um
okay so
I noticed you brought
Eureka collective before.
I am sympathetic to the socialist patriotism side of things.
Though I know you also mentioned the value form and stuff before.
I do sort of sit on that libertarian end, but I am sort of more charitable and I'm yet to read the works of Stalin, but I own them.
I just had a few questions regarding, like, China and Russia
Um
You know, I have a question
Myself because like
I love debating like overtly hostile people
When did I become the manager of fence sitters? Why is that my new job is to manage all the fence sitters who are like on the fence? I'm kind of dipping my toes. Okay, keep dipping your fucking toes. What am I going to fucking hold your hand? Why have I become the CEO of managing all the...
It's including on Reddit when I was on Reddit.
You know, like debating these people.
I'm always...
There's so many like, you know, I kind of...
Hey, like, what about me makes me appear like I'm a fenced sitter manager, you know?
Like, I'm here to, like, guide you
along the pipeline. Like, that's not me, all right? I'm here to directly confront the people that
are just, like, overtly hostile to everything I stand for. If you are conflicted and whatever,
you just, I don't know. I don't know like i'm i'm not going to make you
comfy and cozy about it this guy's name is race intelligence willpower i want the unity of
the race loyal black men of the world. Wow. Go ahead, John Gagnan.
Oh, hey there.
Hey, so what about the egalitarian part of Marxism?
The idea that sort of all in the state are deserving of this new order and deserve to own the means of production.
Is that really rational?
What are you talking about?
Well, I mean, it's just my view is that, you know, the average person today is very happy to take the capital capital of capitalists to work against the Marx's effort. That's what happened in the Cold War. The United States gave everyone their own little special house and a second house and a jobs that pay a lot
of money so that they would never turn to the left
which would then be sort of a tool for the Soviet Union
against the capitalist class in the United States.
So is it really deserving
if the Soviets were still around today?
Would it really be rational
in the case of global
marches success to give anything over to the average american who was glad to work against the whole
effort that's it um well people are people easily susceptible to bribery uh to satiate their material needs
I mean of course if the system can do this
in a protracted way
then yes
that's what will happen but
the key word is protracted
how long
could something like that last
and if it's solely coming from the pressure exerted by communism,
then it's part of the victory of communism in a way.
You know, that would be my response.
Very well. That's all. And, John, one last thing. what do you think of a guy named black red guard
uh that guy i don't like black communists because they think race doesn't matter and that we're
all a part of a social class so i don't like that guy so that's
your only problem with him for the most part i don't mind Marxism other than the fact that they're
trying to erase our race yeah so uh and you're are you the leader of a movement, are you not?
Yeah, I am.
And it's what is it called?
Well, it's called zomitism.
It's a black nationalist-esque situation.
I just don't like the idea
that our race shouldn't exist and that
we should sort of integrate into this idea
that class is going
to take over.
Linnae Johnson proved that this was pointless.
Linnae me Johnson proved that the South was totally happy to be robbed by the ruling class in the United States.
If they would just sort of say, hey, look at these other guys, fuck those guys.
So I don't think there's any hope for that happening at the moment.
And if somehow Marxism does succeed, again, globally, I just don't think people who turn against it should get anything. I think those people should go to a gulag ultimately.
So racial purity and preservation, that's what you believe in
yeah
yeah
I don't see why we should
erase that the thing is
you know to engage in it at this
moment while there's such a risk
it's just done because it sounds to a risk, it's just dumb.
Because it sounds to me like integration. It sounds to me
like what MLK was preaching about.
And we all know that was a dumb idea.
So all you're doing is the
equivalent of a Chinese person coming to the
U.S. saying, well, I don't care
about ideology at the moment. and sort of blending in thinking that
you're going to profit on the spirit of honesty?
Sorry, yeah, go ahead. I can't hear you to it, but you can go. Yeah. In the spirit of honesty, can I ask you an honest question?
Go for it.
You have never seen a fine snow bunny in your life?
Believe it or not, no.
I'll never race mix with a snowmoney.
You're a liar.
That's why I know you're not honest.
I mean, if you're saying, is there attractive Caucasian people?
Yeah, sure.
But again, I didn't say that.
That's not what I said.
All right.
You know it's not what I said.
Well, I've never been with a snow bunny.
I don't plan on never being with one.
And you,
you're saying that there's nothing going on there.
Yeah, that's correct.
I mean, I know it's hard to believe.
Sir, I begged to do it.
I'm, sir, we both know that's a lie.
We both know that's not.
If Richard Spencer told you he was never attracted to a black woman, would you believe him or not?
See?
I mean, I don't, I mean, look, I honestly, I don't, I don't know if I would believe it.
Because, I mean, if you're a straight man and you have testosterone running in your veins, you're a straight man.
I don't, I don't know if I would believe.
I don't think I would believe that.
And by the way,
you know, we both know you're not telling the truth about this.
So let's just have the spirit of honesty prevail in the room here, you know?
There's nothing wrong with Americans mixing their races, right?
And the idea that, you know,
that snow bunnies,
that there's nothing going on there,
you know, that's just a lie,
and you know it well i mean
this communism
what uh brown america where race doesn't exist is that is that the ideal situation let's let's
let's not worry about communism for one second and let's just just be honest about the fact that there's something going on there.
Can we admit that there's something going on there?
Dude, no, I literally have never been with Caucasian girls.
I didn't ask you.
I'm saying, is there something to be inquired about in that department?
There's something going on.
Yeah, there is something going on there.
And we know it, and I know it, and you know it, and the whole world knows it.
So let's not kid ourselves and lie, right?
That would be like me saying
there's nothing going on with Candace.
But we all know there is.
We all know there is.
And you're saying nothing's happening with...
I'm not even going to get into it
so you know
you're just a fraud that's all I have to
I mean I would hope
that you'd have something to say about
I wanted honesty that's what I want is honesty
I'm looking for honesty that's how
I measure everything.
If you want me to say that
if like a Caucasian girl
came and sat on it,
yeah, sure.
But other than that, I have
enough self-control.
You didn't have to say that.
Well,
I mean, that's what I have to say like that well I mean that's
what I have to say
about it
I don't
I if you believe me
fine
if you don't
have to say it like that
though
I just put it out there
so
you know
there you have it
well I believe So, you know, there you have it.
Well, I believe in one nation, which is the American nation.
So that's what I believe in.
All right, have a good one, brother.
All right.
So, uh, let's bring on, uh, I'll bring on Apple Blossom in a second, but... Okay, this person,
Enlightenment seems to agree with us.
Let's bring on Apple Blossom.
What's going on?
Hello?
Yeah.
Okay, so the debate topic is non-Marxia's or mental disability.
Okay.
Okay, let's put proper.
What time I'm in America right now?
12.25.
PM or AM?
PM.
Okay then. Good afternoon.
Has Al-Hadildin.
My name is
Apple Blastin 88.
I'm the head of
National Association of Front of China.
And my debate point is that
You're part of what?
What, China?
Yeah.
And you're in China?
You've been to my country.
You didn't see me.
Gone?
You live in China? Didn't see me. Go on? You live in China?
Unfortunately not.
I'm studying outside.
Which country you live in?
I'm not living in.
I'm not living in.
I'm studying in Spain currently. Okay. But I'm learning new things. But, but let's let's debate Marxism with other racialist part on currently because I don't want't want like i don't want to get banned or get like
uh spurrg out but okay so we no banning i mean there's no censorship okay then um okay so me and
my and one of my
Alliance member
had done
like analysis and we had
like a few
conclusion for communism.
First, it's unverifiable
because, like,
you guys are, yeah, you guys are very
pragmatic, but
pragmatism doesn't mean
verifiability. You mean falsifiable?
Huh?
You mean falsifiable?
Like, unrepeatable.
Like, I'm saying like, okay, um, let's say someone open the...
What's talking about falsifiability, right?
Huh?
You're talking about falsifiability?
Like, you guys are... Yeah, um? Like, you guys are...
Yeah, no, you guys are...
You, what do you say?
You guys are...
You guys are lack of testability.
Yeah, okay.
We can't test...
Falsifiability, right?
Okay, let me finish my point.
Okay, that's the first second.
It's putting the economic fact, like putting social factor in a, like society is dependent on a modern factor module um monofactor module this is
very um very
inaccurate to present a uh
a society
because you have there's
there's other society like culture arrays
yeah it's like intersectional theory where they say, you know, it's not just class struggle.
There's abelism, phobia, and all these other things, right?
Yeah, but, okay, but the economy can change natural law?
No, so there's natural law involved.
Okay.
Yeah, that's the big two.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay, well, falsifiability is a nonsense paradigm, which can't explain any scientific discovery, and it's not even accepted within bourgeois academia anymore.
Popper claimed that Darwinism was unfalsifiable
he claimed many things were unfalsifiable
because
because nothing is actually falsifiable
when you isolate
for the proper terms and conditions of
verification there always has to be
a background of assumptions of you, terms and conditions that you just take for granted in order to accept that something is in fact falsifiable. But to be clear, Marxism is absolutely falsifiable. It's falsifiable according to the standard of party praxis. A party can either fail or succeed in achieving its aims. A communist party can either fail or succeed in meeting its goals and targets for five-year plans. Communists can either fail or succeed in anticipating whether their revolutionary strategy
is going to succeed.
They can either fail or succeed in anticipating whether or not the development of class
struggle is going to proceed in a given way within a country, right?
But the difference between
bourgeois science and Marxism is that
the dialectical view doesn't
accept metaphysics.
So Marxism will never say this is going to be X statement, and it's going to either be, you know, falsified or verified by reality.
There's always an active relationship toward the world that implies a relation of practice between theory and practice, such that, you know, you can get things wrong and you're expected to get things wrongs, but the point is to modify your practical relationship accordingly. And in the Marxist's view, that's the essence of what science is.
Science is not about creating a metaphysical, you know,
framework for the verification or falsifiability of truth or falsehood,
and then testing that and then, then uh you know verifying or or falsifying a given
thesis this discounts the relationship between the subject who makes the hypothesis and the object which is the world so to speak so this is why
Marxism regards falsifiability to be you know basically a metaphysical view.
Is it me lagging or is it you're lagging?
Do you're lagging?
One second.
On to the last thing regarding the fact that there's other variables involved in the determination of human society.
It's kind of irrelevant because Marxism never claims that only economics exist.
Marxism rather says that all things have proper material conditions, you know, for being. And everything that comes to be has conditions of being.
Okay, so this is the essence of the materialist view.
The point is not to reduce it to those conditions, but rather to not neglect those conditions.
So, for example, a beautiful work of art.
It would be vulgar and crass to reduce a beautiful work of art to the means by which it was produced, to the means by which it was produced to the means by which it had come to be but to neglect
that side of things would be to neglect the dimension of craftsmanship and expertise and skill and the
boring aspects of making a beautiful painting, like the technical skills that
artists have to have, studying anatomy, like the Renaissance painters had to, and so on and so on.
So this is the Marxist view of materialism. It has nothing to do with economic reductionism. So I hope that answers your
questions. Igness, uh, let's go ahead and you'll be the last guy, I guess. Go ahead,
Ignis. all right i'm losing my patience
i was wondering
what your opinion is on high degrees rejection
of like Marx
in general, but more specific, like,
dialectical thought.
Well,
I think that
I think,
I think think first of all hideger had no understanding of marks i would begin there i would say, I am not sold on the view that he fully rejects dialectics.
But why, better question, why couldn't Heidegger?
I mean, I think it's straightforward when he-
Why couldn't Heidegger arrive at a Marxist insight, which is a fair question?
Well, there are limitations in Heidegger's outlook that are absolutely rooted in his inability to understand, you know, the very question
he himself posed in his question of being.
You know, that would be my basic first observation.
I think his focus on being is like a move away
from metaphysics
I mean he makes that clear
he thinks Hegel is the culmination of metaphysics
right so I think that's something we should always be trying in that case Right. He thinks Hegel is the culmination of metaphysics, right?
So I think that's true. So in that case, he's not necessarily rejecting dialectics from Heraclitus and the pre-Socratics.
What he's rejecting is the terms of Hegel's dialectic, which is
really ultimately the concept, the self-relation
of the concept. So that's what
Heidegger rejects is the
ultimate, you know,
the ultimate kind of like...
Yeah, yeah. He thinks hegel is talking
when hegel talks about being
heidegger takes it like he's really just talking about like an
an on-tick noun instead of
something genuinely about
yeah being an existence.
So you think, okay,
well, yeah, I mean, I guess that's,
that answer is basically what I wanted to know.
Heidegger also thought Hegel really was the end of philosophy.
Hegel and Nietzsche.
So he gave Hegel a proper appreciation that he completed philosophy, so to speak.
Yeah, no, of course.
No, I mean, what about, what about Dugan, too?
Because, I mean, obviously Dugan wouldn't call himself a Marxist, and he's deeply influenced by Heidegger.
I think Dugin
doesn't like the inflexibility
that he associated
with Marxism and specifically
Soviet Marxism, Marxism, Leninism.
And I think
Dugin
thinks that
it's too ideological.
You know, it's unwilling
to explore
um... Um...
I always held the view that Dugan might have been open to a new understanding of Marx and Marxism.
But... new understanding of Marx and Marxism. But
this doesn't seem like something he's
particularly interested in right now.
What do you think it would take? I mean, what do you think it would take i mean what do you think it would take for dougain to
to be more open to marxism more sympathetic to it
well i think that probably the emergence of a new
Marxist
like thing, you know,
would probably catch his attention
and interest.
A new school of thought,
you know, a new movement or something,
it certainly probably would.
But for as long as it remains in this dormant and stagnant,
and Dugan has expressed his open-mindedness toward Chinese applications of Marxism, you know.
But he's obviously not someone who's too interested in replicating China's experiences, you know, so...
Do you think that if he was convinced that Marxism was compatible with his like multiple particular versions of like civilizational linguistic designs that exist that I think that would do it but to be honest i don't really know what i like dougan
but i don't know what he means by different versions or pluralities of dazahn i think it makes
perfect sense to me what doug, by recognizing different logos, which I don't think Heidegger would find objectionable, he thinks this also implies different and distinct, you know, let's say ground zero
of the logos
different da sign
you know
which implies
like retro
I don't know
retro causally or something
so
you know actually it's kind of a materialist logic in a way that
Dugan employs with respect to his notion of a plurality of Dacine. Because for him, the very plurality of da sign because for him the very plurality of logos
in some sense implies a plurality
of da sign
can you allow
because I mean obviously Heidegger would reject any sort of particular da zine and would just say it's it's distinct to i don't want to call it universal but it's distinct to dauzyne itself and humanity.
I think Dugel is making a radical step in the direction away from
Heidegger's as metaphysical agnosticism,
when he implies different structures of the da sign, it's almost as if
Heidegger kind of regards logos as different
failed ways of articulating
the da sign, more or less.
Yeah.
But Dugan
regards the
distinct
existing regards the distinct existence
or let's not say existence
the distinct appearance of
logos
according to different civilizations
as proving
distinct structures baked in to the da sign.
So da sign is no longer this pure kind of thinking presence that is devoid of any, like, preemptive or, you know, determinations.
It's devoid of any kind of, like, biases.
I think Dugan would argue that each different da sign is already determined.
It's already structured in such a way so as to imply
a different conclusion uh-huh.
But to me, that just sounds like you're falling back into... Meditaph's.
And in the subject, yeah, yeah.
The Cartesian subject.
I mean, doesn't it sound like that?
Maybe, but I think also Dugan is actually... I mean, doesn't it sound like that?
Maybe, but I think also Dugan is actually allowing a radical step away from metaphysics as well, because he's allowing Dacine to no longer linger in this kind of half conceptual abstraction and he's making it something that you know in some sense has conditions as terms and conditions and has determination. And so in this way, it's more metaphysical in the sense that it's like, it's prefigured with structure, but it's also less metaphysical in the sense that it is actual. It's something that I would say can be scientifically observed and, and, um, comprehended in the world in an active way.
It's not something that, you know, it's,
Dugan doesn't build some, like, metaphysical world isolated from the real world,
which he then imposes upon the world. He derives from the world distinct
determinations and particularities and so on and so on. So to me, as a Marxist, it's a direction
away from metaphysics.
Okay, yeah, well, thank you.
I mean, I don't have more to say than that.
Nothing comes to mind, so.
All right, see you later.
Hawaii. Yeah. Hi, guys. nothing comes to mind so all right see you later oh why yeah hi guys bye bye bye bye everybody except stupid bitch haters damn fucking deleting this post
why are you saying bye in the fucking
kick chat when i was talking to the fucking ex people
dumbasses I swear you know
Sigma just every time I look in it says Sigma it's just some stupid shit some stupid
comment you know he just goes that sounds mystical like what a stupid thing
this guy owes me reparations this guy owes me 20 subs What? What?
No way.
Yo, look at this.
Galloway quoted the communist manifesto, and then Tucker said,
God bless you.
What a wonderful description.
I got to see this.
No way!
Bro, Tucker is coming around I gotta see this
Tucker is coming around
oh we thank you very much for doing this.
I'm sitting in London in the city of London right now.
I'm an American.
You're a citizen of the country I'm sitting in, but you're not in this country.
You're in another...
The era of cross-dressing and political cross-dressing more than any.
The left are now the warmongers and the peacemakers so far as they exist are largely
to be found on the right, particularly in the United States, particularly, if I may say so,
in your own person. The truth is the right, particularly in the United States, particularly, if I may say so, in your own person.
The truth is, the right wing, slightly unhinged president of the United States is doing
everything that he can to stop a war in Europe. And the Europeans, social Democrats and Christian
Democrats alike, are determined to stop him stopping the war, to continue the war.
That's the ultimate cross-dressing, it seems to me.
I grew up in a era out on the streets protesting about...
I'm going to just ask YouTube.
There's a beautiful new feature called Ask, where you can summarize the video with AI.
And I do that for a lot of the videos on YouTube now because I don't like watching.
I like to read it.
Find the part about the Communist Manifesto. where he quotes it.
Yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep.
All that is solid has melted into air, and all that was sacred is now routinely profaned. And I rage against it.
You know, I want nothing from anybody, and nothing that matters to me can be taken away by
anybody. So I'm a free man in that sense
and I tend to use that freedom to speak my
truth and I think any attempt to stop me
is doomed because there are many, many people ready
to pick up my microphone should they ever be able to prize it.
God bless you. What a wonderful description. There are so few
free men and everyone who is free has a moral obligation to do what you're doing which is to speak his conscience out loud so thank you i follow this as closely as an american can but trying to be honest here european politics is not my politics and it's
oh it lies to you
on YouTube
it doesn't lie
on YouTube
it actually
will give you
the timestamp
on YouTube
there's it's baked
into the
the feature
you
know Tucker
Guy who influenced Maga communism
when Jackson went on his show Hi, everybody.
Is Donald, no, Donald Parkinson is like a deranged hi everybody is
Donald
no Donald Parkinson is like a deranged record dude
he like follows
there'll be like a small
sock puppet account
of the most deranged anti-ACP
person with five followers
and for some reason Donald is one of their followers.
Donald is like straight up conspiring with fucking freaks, and was from the beginning, by the way.
Like, why was Donald involved with like the Shaw-Racker plot?
Like, why was he
and, like, roped into
that? He, like, pretends, like, oh,
this is a cult and it's dangerous.
He's such a fucking snake, dude.
He's, like, um, he's so cynical.
He's just, like, oh, I could just take as many
people as I can.
Because he thinks that,
you know,
when this cult falls,
he's going to reap,
they're all going to be his cult followers,
I guess.
I don't know.
It's really disgusting.
He's so dishonest.
He doesn't fucking believe a word of it, by the way. I've talked to him in DMs or whatever. He doesn't fucking believe a word of any of the bullshit. He doesn't. He doesn't believe any of it. But cynically, he's like, well, I just want, I pray for your downfall.
Anyway, so that MUG will rise.
He's straight up, like, doesn't even have any principles.
He doesn't fucking believe any of the, like, claims made about us at all.
He does, though, go out of his way to, like, try to, like, claims made about us at all. He does, though, go out of his way to, like,
try to, like, get us put in prison.
He's, like, for some reason, he's campaigning
for us to be put in prison.
And, like, oh, what are your ties to Russia?
What are your ties to Russia?
What are your ties to Russia?
Like, bro, what is this guy's a fucking Fed?
What is that? I mean,
even if we had ties like that and we don't.
It's like, what a weird Fed
thing to like
campaign for.
Yeah.
What the fuck He's like
Oh he's he's also has this like
Groyper delusion that like Russia's controlled by Israel
He like he thinks Putin is a Zog puppet He thinks Putin is a Zog puppet which is so I'm so
sick of like deranged people saying this
like oh
Russia's controlled by Israel
no it's not okay Russia
to whatever extent
the USSR collapsed and Yeltsin took over and Russia, like,
opened its doors to the fucking world for infiltration.
Yeah, that's a thing.
But Putin has been steadily kind of going in the opposite direction of that, and that has
also come at the expense of Russia's relationship toward Israel, which is true. I mean,
relations have never been worse, I think.
But you know what, guys, you know what's something funny?
Correct me if I'm wrong.
I think the Soviet Union maintained trade relations with Israel.
Citrus.
Oh, okay, after the Six-Day War, it ceased.
Up until 67, they got their citrus.
They got their oranges from Israel.
I remember hearing about that.
But you know, the USSR was not, principle committed to Israel's destruction. It was always fighting for a two-state.
So there's actually kind of continuity between the Soviet position and the Russian one as far as like what they consider
the solution to the conflict to be. Sadly, and I don't think that's a good thing, but sadly,
that's the truth. So don't blame Putin and Russia if this was in continuity with the USSR's view and position.
This is a limitation of the legacy of the Soviet position.
It is not because Putin is a
Chabadnik you know
puppet of Israel I don't
I have no fucking idea why
yeah
anyway whatever
also like why is Donald
like pretending to be this, like,
extreme anti-Zionist?
What is, what is up with that?
Like, dude, you're not even, like, Arab.
What is, like, you're not even,
you're not Palestinian,
you're not Lebanese, you're not Arabic.
Why does he, like,
virtue signal so hard
pretending to be anti-Zionist?
I don't understand.
Like, to the point where he's like
trying to get us thrown in prison,
I mean, he's not going to succeed
because there's nothing, but it's like, he's trying to get us thrown in prison because we're friendly with Russians.
And he, like, deems, because, you know, he thinks Russia is controlled by Zion.
Like, that's how, like, fucking crazy he is.
Like, what even is that?
That's fucking crazy.
What is that?
Like, we went to, we literally went to the funeral of Sayyad Nasrallah.
Jackson met with Hamas officials.
Jackson and Chris met the Houthis.
It's like, who is more anti-Zionists than us?
And this guy's like trying to get us thrown in jail.
Fucking crazy.
Who claims to be an anti-Zionist.
It's pretty disgusting.
Anyway, guys.
Yeah, he's like a Western supremacist.
I don't fucking know what it is.
It's so weird.
What is this like Kotskyite
pretend thing
where they're like, oh, we're the champions of Palestine.
Where did you come from, dude?
I guess it's like Khrushchev during the Suez Crisis that he's like, they're trying to ape.
They're trying to ape that a little, that energy.
Oh, yeah, we're like Khrushchev during the Suez crisis.
I don't fucking know. why is it
Kotskyite?
Um
I think he has a history with like Zionist leftcoms that has like, that's been very brutal and vicious, which I've seen actually.
I've seen them, like, target him on a very personal level to the point where I was like, oh, that's
pretty bad. And I was never one of these vicious
people.
So I don't know why, like, he has such a personal
vendetta against us.
But, like, I think there's some, like, there's, like,
weirdo Zionist leftcoms
that, like, were, like, bullying him for being a Kotskyite.
Why is it a, why is it a Kotskyite?
Because he comes from the whole like the McNair and the, a little bit of the Lars Lee McNair and the, uh, a little bit of the Lars Lee
McNair and what is the fucking party
in Britain, the CPB?
Which one is the centrist one?
CBC, what?
CBC. I don't fucking know. I forgot all. one is the centrist one. CBP, what? CBP...
I don't fucking know.
I forgot all these fucking terms.
One of the major parties in Britain
is like, they're, I guess they're...
CP...
Oh, it's CPGB.
Okay.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So it's this whole thing, and it's like a combination of Kotsky and Khrushchev.
Krustovite revisionism
I don't fucking know
But the whole
You know idea is more or less that
It's just a way of like being a
Trotskyite without having
To identify with all like the cultish baggage
That Trotskyites
are oftentimes so guilty of.
But it is also a...
It is rooted in a type of chauvinism which says that, you know, there's this kind of kernel of the Western Enlightenment in Lenin.
And London was just a faithful student of social democracy, and Stalin was this evil Asiatic who fucked it all up.
It's kind of like their thing.
That's why they love Khrushchev, I guess.
And I got unbanned from the Discord.
Dude, I don't fucking know.
Like, why are you fucking asking me?
Anyway, guys, I'm leaving because I'm hungry.
So I'll see you guys Sunday.