🔴 RED PILL NEWS | IRAN-ISRAEL WAR? 🇵🇸

And you say Sha City

Shy City, Shy City, coming home again.

Do you think about me now?

Yeah, do you think?

Okay.

Years old, and what I love most, she had so much soul.

She said, Excuse me, little homie, I know you don't know me.

But my name is Wendy and I like to flow trees.

And from that point, I never blow her off.

Niggas come from out of town, I like to show her off.

They like to act tough, she likes to toe them off.

And make them straighten up their hat, cause she knows they soft.

And when I grew up, she showed me how to go downtown.

In the nighttime, my face lit up so astounding.

I told her, and my heart is what she always be.

She never messed with entertainers cause they always leave.

She said it felt like they walked and drove on me.

Knew I was gang-affiliated, got on TV and told on me.

I guess it's why last winter she got so cold on me.

She said, Yay, keep making that, keep making that platinum and gold for me.

Do you think about me?

Do you think about Renone?

Okay.

Could start again.

But if you really cared for her, then you wouldn't have never hit the airport to follow your dreams.

Sometimes I still talk to her, but when I talk to her, it always seems like she's talking about me.

She said you left your kids and they just like you.

They wanna rap and make so beats just like you.

But they just not you, and I just got through.

Talking about what niggas tryna do, just not new.

Now everybody got the game figured out all wrong.

I guess you never know what you got till it's gone.

I guess that's why I'm here and I can't come back home.

And guess when I heard that, when I was back home, every interview I'm representing you, making you proud.

Reach for the stars.

So if you fall, you land on the cloud.

Jump in the crowd, clock the lighters, wave them around.

If you don't know by now, talking about shot down.

Do you think about me now, man?

Do you think about it?

Start again.

You always know a song.

And Miss Midwest Sing.

I see you guys.

Thank you so much.

See y'all.

What's up?

Friday, May 24th, Dearborn, Michigan.

Mark it on your fucking calendars.

Excuse my French.

Tickets are going to be on sale tomorrow.

We're making a bigger announcement tomorrow.

Jackson and I are going to be there.

So are some of the guys from Midwestern Marks.

and potentially others we have yet to announce.

Friday the twenty fourth of May next month.

Not a lot of time.

to get your

Get your shit together.

The full announcement's coming tomorrow, you're just hearing it first.

Right here.

This is where you're hearing it.

Okay?

24th of May in Dearborn, Michigan.

And here's the thing, tomorrow tickets are going on sale.

And they're going to be in limited supply.

We don't know how many people to expect.

Crass, what's up?

I want you guys to keep something in mind.

This is not just going to be guerrillas at this event.

Jackson is a very famous person, and we have very, very limited supply.

In terms of how many people we can have in the place.

Put it this way, alright?

Ball parking, two hundred fifty is being generous, okay?

We're going to have two types of tickets.

We're going to have VIP tickets and then we're going to have regular tickets.

You're going to see the pricing tomorrow.

I don't think it's too unreasonable compared to other events.

I think it's actually on the cheaper side compared to some of the events I've seen.

But if you really cannot afford them, and you do want to come

Message me and I could probably help you out.

Maybe.

I mean, don't abuse it.

If too many people abuse it, I can't.

But I'll, I'll, if you, if you're just like poor and you can't afford it, you know, I'll see if I can get you a discount, you know.

But it's not going to be too expensive, all right?

And I'm talking about the VIP tickets and the regular tickets.

VIP tickets, there's way more to come.

I'm just not letting you know right now because tickets are going on sale tomorrow.

The VIP tickets.

Um

They're going to get you better seating.

And then there's also going to be an after

Like an after party, I guess, VIP after party, where you're just gonna basically be chilling with me and Jackson.

And we're gonna have other stuff too.

Don't quote me on food.

Don't hold that against me.

Don't hold pizzas or whatever against me.

But, you know, we'll just like have an after-event.

Where you know, we can just chill.

You can ask us whatever questions you want, meet in whatever, right?

And that's all going on sale tomorrow, so be posted.

And we're also announcing everything tomorrow.

But it's going to be the 24th of May, Dearborn, Michigan.

And I hope you can make it out.

I hope you can make it.

And if you can't make it,

That's okay.

This is not

necessarily I mean, this has been a really important event.

But it's not obligatory.

A attendance is not obligatory.

So if you can make it

That would be really cool.

I'm talking to you, the guerrilla army.

I'd like to see my guerrillas there.

But I understand Michigan could be a ways away for a good deal of you and, you know, but that's being announced tomorrow.

All right.

This is our first event that we have done.

See, every event that we've gone to landed us accusations that we work for the people doing the events.

So when we went to CPI, everyone said that we were CPI and that we worked for Caleb Maupin.

When we went to the Schiller Institute event, everyone said that we were part of a LaRushite conspiracy.

When we went to Russia, everyone said that we were Russian agents.

So in this event, we're finally going to be working for ourselves for the very first time ever because how people's brains work is they can't fathom the fact that just because we haven't done our own event yet doesn't mean that we're not into whatever.

I'm not going to get into it.

But it would be really cool to see you guys there.

And I'm really excited and looking forward to it.

You should too, because it's going to be a banger.

It's going to be a banger event.

And it's me and Jackson.

And you know, I'm telling why am I telling you guys before the announcement?

Because I'm not trying to toot my own horn or overestimate how successful it's going to be.

But as guerrillas, you need to understand you're going to be competing with Jackson's audience to get tickets.

Okay.

Tickets could sell out fast.

Jackson is an extremely popular guy.

And a lot of people know who he is and a lot of people really want to meet him.

So I'm telling you guys this beforehand so you can, if you want, reserve yourself a ticket.

What time tomorrow?

I will let you guys know in the Discord, like right before.

But I want you just like be aware of that, that it's happening tomorrow.

And I'm giving you this tip.

Basically.

Um, you're gonna get y y y bef maybe like 10 minutes before I'll tell you.

That way, you guys can like really quickly get the tickets you need.

It's going to be in the evening.

I'm not going to really announce too many details right now.

Those details are going to be announced.

Tomorrow, right?

I'm just giving you guys a tip that you know early, so you can actually make it there.

First, and and this is something that will really I find really cringy.

Do not buy a ticket if you don't plan on showing up, because what you're doing is you're taking a ticket from someone who could show up, and you're not so if you only get a ticket if you're a hundred percent certain you're going to be able to make it.

Don't just get a ticket so that you can think on it and say maybe I'll go no, no, get a ticket.

If you're going, period.

Because there's a lot of people who have already.

Jesus fucking Christ.

Is is Iran under attack right now?

You know, could this just get delayed a little bit?

You know, this is crazy.

By the way, I'm having Q on.

to talk we're gonna be talking about this

Um and

But we're gonna be covering this because apparently okay, this is old though.

This was an hour ago.

Explosions are occurring west okay, I'm just gonna tell you what's going on.

Explosions are occurring in Isfahan, which is in Iran, which is Persian territory.

Iranian territory.

Now,

We don't know who's taking responsibility just yet.

There were apparently airstrikes carried out in Syria.

And Iraq against Iranian targets, and apparently there's explosions in Isfahan.

Nobody has claimed anything.

We're going to just cover this live actually.

Show you this.

I'm just going to show you what I am reading right now.

Um, and you know.

Maybe I should just button this up.

Maybe I should just be a boring square and just be professional, right?

But, um.

Let's go ahead and get right into it.

Okay, simultaneous explosions reported in Iran, Iraq and Syria.

No one has confirmed who is responsible.

Air traffic is being diverted away from Iran.

This is a developing story.

This was about thirty, twenty minutes ago.

Twenty, thirty minutes ago.

Okay, so we are in the dark as far as who is responsible for this.

Obviously

It's pretty obvious it's Israel, but we need to get some confirmation before we are certain.

Now let's do something that I think is a little bit regrettable.

and join Mario Nafwal's space

Where it's just a panel of idiots except for Jackson, who's actually a smart guy.

And there's a few other cool people.

Usually with something in self-defense.

There's a few other people I like.

Also, the reason why the IRGC keeps losing their generals is because.

So point.

Yeah, speak of the devil.

The guy who's speaking now is a fucking retard.

I'm pretty sure this is the retard.

So there you go.

Mario Nafal Space is just full of fucking retards with like two decent people.

Where a high-level meeting was being held with the presence of several groups supported by Iran and members of the IRGC, Iran's IRGC.

So it seems that a high-level meeting, so he's looking at members of the IRGC, high-level members of the IRGC, potentially present at that meeting that were targeted in the attack in Baghdad.

Just Sam, I'm not attacking Baghdad.

How common is it for Israel to attack Baghdad?

Not common at all, and that's what I was going to say.

I don't necessarily think Israel targeted Baghdad.

I think there's a potential that they disrupt the operation.

What is this bio?

That was probably the same.

I didn't even look at the...

I think the U.S.

I didn't even look at the bio.

I just looked at the flags.

I was like, what flag combination is this?

Opportunity to conduct a strike on Iran.

But it takes several phases to do that.

The first phase was the radar and air defense sites in Iraq and Syria.

We got an expert.

We got an expert in the battle.

They're fighting for the best.

So I'm going to join Mario Knoxville Space, and I'm going to basically lay it out and tell you pretty much what we're talking about.

These guys don't know what to do.

I'm not sure if I can get a situation like this.

The precision on it has to be insane.

So, you know, it looks like they took the shot in Baghdad.

They gave the green light to go ahead and strike those radar and air defense systems and then conduct the strike on Iran, Iran almost simultaneously.

So just the market's response very quickly.

Oil is up 4%.

And obviously the market's closed, but Bitcoin is down 3%.

I'm getting a fuck I'm just trying to click on it.

So I'm talking about fucking Bitcoin.

Who gives a fuck?

I'm getting the fuck out of there.

This is a developing story, guys.

We're gonna be cov looks like we're gonna be spending a good chunk of the night covering it.

Let me know Q that we're let me tell Q that we are ready.

Um to have him on, but we'll also let him know about the situation.

But basically we don't know anything.

According to ABC News and Jerusalem Post, this is what Jackson's saying, Israel is responsible for bombing a site in Iran.

Jackson is just coming out with some breaking news, actual news, unlike the Peanut Gallery on Mario Nawful Space.

Tabriz.

Uh has been attacked.

Israel is targeting air bases that were used in the Iranian attack.

So

Unless Iran is going to go back on its word, this is war.

This is war.

It's happening.

This is war.

This is war.

This is war.

This is war.

This is war.

This is war.

Iran's not going to sit back and say, okay, we're even now.

No, they were even after they hit the Zionist entity.

It's war.

It's actually war.

We're looking at a war s potentially world war scenario.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves, but this is uh going to lead to escalation.

Iran is going to hit back because they promised to, because Iranian soil has been hit.

And if Israel is responsible for this,

and it seems like they are.

We are looking at a war scenario.

This is war, guys.

I don't know.

Look at this.

Iran has activated air defense systems following the Israeli attack on Isfahan.

Now guys, we may actually have a pretty long stream and we may stay up tonight.

Because

There is a possibility.

I'm not saying it's guaranteed, but there is a possibility.

that Iran

There's a possibility that Iran is going to just hit Israel back right away, and they're not going to wait, and they're just going to hit them right away.

and immediately retaliate and send drones and missiles to the Zionist entity right away.

I don't see why they won't do that.

Anon, what's up?

Come on.

It's not war.

Yes, it is.

Well, it's not war if Iran backs down.

If Iran backs down, then Iran.

When it said that if Israel hits us in retaliation for our actions, we're going to hit them twice as hard, then they were lying.

Israeli missile strikes bombed a high-level IRGC meeting in Baghdad, Iraq.

Very concerning.

I mean this is a w this is war.

This is war.

This is war.

I don't know what else to tell you guys, except this is war.

So here's a video of Israeli missiles being intercepted above Iran.

Let me show this video to you.

This is war, by the way, guys.

War is happening.

It's a war.

Um

This is war and I am gonna go ahead and say that

I want you guys to spam Iranian flags in the chat.

Iran flags in the chat right now.

Iran flags in the chat right now.

Iran flags in the chat right now, and I want you to do a whole march spamming them flags.

We ain't got Iran emotes.

We don't have the emotes.

God damn it.

God damn it, I'm sorry to use the Lord's name in vain.

We need a we need an incoming uh we need a supply package of Iran-related emotes in the chat.

We are with Iran, we are with Jihad, we are with Persia, we are with the Persian Empire, we are with Cyrus the Great.

We are with the Persian Empire.

We are with the Iranikate conquest of the world.

That's right, the whole world.

I'm not saying Iran's gonna conquer the world, but Persia, mighty Persia, is the center of the world.

The literal cradle of global civilization.

The first global state.

Iranian Persian Empire.

Okay?

We are with Iran.

1,000%.

It's time to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.

It's time to wipe the Zionist entity off the face of the earth.

It is time to wipe the Zionist entity off the face of the earth.

War is here.

And it's time to wipe the Zionist entity off the face of the goddamn earth.

Let's fucking go.

Let's fucking go.

It's a war.

It's a war.

Wipe the Zionist entity off the face of the earth once and for all.

Once and for all.

We're going to have Persia rise up and bitch slap those Zionists back into the stone age.

Let's fucking go.

It's a war.

It's a war.

It's real.

It's happened.

Four hundred seconds to Tel Aviv Four hundred seconds to Tel Aviv Four Hundred Seconds to Tel Aviv.

Let's bring out the hypersonics.

This is exactly so Jackson is on the same wavelength.

Start enriching that goddamn uranium.

Start getting those nukes ready.

Start enriching the uranium.

It's time to prepare.

For response.

This is

This is gonna be war.

Wow, Mario Naufal.

Oh, never mind.

He's just fucking live streaming.

His space has 20,000 people.

It's not that much.

Okay.

Yeah, sorry.

Henry, if you can mention the source.

And just on that thought, I've seen that as well.

I know Group Suley.

That Israel, I think it was an American source or an American diplomat that says that Israel was not using...

Oh, no, I think it was Michael Rubio saying that Israel can attack Iran without entering Iranian airbase, which was not exactly confirming that they haven't entered the Iranian airspace.

But they say that they could attack Iran without entering the airspace, kind of indicating that Iran is not going to enter the airspace.

Mike?

Right.

So I appreciate you guys bringing me up.

I'm trying to handle a number of different NDMs, things like that.

So I'm just going to be up here for a little bit.

But yeah, let's talk through kind of where, you know, what we know so far just from, I think, an objective military analysis standpoint.

So the first thing I'd say about ISBAN is a number of possible targets there.

And the Israelis, even in the past, have looked at going after weapons production facilities and other things there that have nothing to do with the nuclear program.

So the idea that nuclear sites have been hit, we don't know that yet, right?

I think what you're looking at is potentially a slightly more limited strike going after targets around these key facilities that can be reached from a standoff distance, right?

Using airspace that does not require you to go into Iran to conduct a long-range strike from the US.

What difference does it make?

I know there are, you know, because they want to avoid Iranian defense systems.

I mean, Iran said it's going to be war almost certainly a response by Iran.

Precision-guided munitions from F-35s or something like that risks losing faith going after some of these sites.

And I think that the idea that they would have reached out for the nuclear sites to me is a little less likely given President Biden's comments from a couple of days ago that the U.S.

is not going to go ahead and sort of join in on sort of a more full-scale, kind of robust concept of operations here.

So I think these could be more limited.

It's time to wipe designers entities off the face of the earth reach out and get you around these critical nuclear facilities.

Enough is enough.

But I think the time for Iran to rise to the details on that.

But so far, there's no credible confirmation that any nuclear facilities themselves have been hit.

So I would just caution people.

I don't think I've seen it.

And Mike, on that one, I've barely seen even.

Wait, wait, wait.

Before we get ahead of ourselves, all right, because I'm a hype master.

I'm the king of hype.

And I'm a hype master, you understand?

I am the king of hype.

But I might have hyped my way into this too fast.

And I might have we might have we might be getting ahead of ourselves, all right?

Because we're getting conflicting information.

A reliable Iranian journalist.

is telling us that no airstrikes on any Isfahan sites have been confirmed.

Only anti-aircraft activity is known based on the videos, and not even a defense missile was fired.

Red saffron, what's up?

So we could potentially be getting limited information and it's possible that only Iraq and Syria were actually stricken, not Iranian soil, which means it may not be war.

So this is a journalist from Iran and he is saying that nothing has been confirmed yet as far as strikes and even in terms of the anti-aircraft activity, not even a single defense missile was fired.

So what is going on?

We don't know.

We don't know what happened.

Did an American official confirm anything?

We don't know.

We dunno.

We're getting some conflicting information, guys.

Getting some conflicting information, but let's continue to stay posted.

Well, there goes my sleep for the night.

There goes my.

Uh

Okay, Q is about to join.

I'm guessing I'm gonna fill him in if he doesn't know.

Anon, what's up?

Hi, welcome to Gooning with Mario, where we oil each other up with headlines.

Oh my this is great analysis.

You're gonna break my news.

Oh man.

We got a comedian.

What's up, man?

Thank you for the dono.

Appreciate you.

We're getting a little bit of some conflicting information.

But it's leaning on the fact that Iran was stricken, but nothing is guaranteed.

Uh in terms of knowledge.

Nothing is certain.

Nothing is really certain.

Interesting.

Well, one of the people am I am I sounding selfish?

One of our people who does our logo

Um

lives in the Middle East, and I hope a war doesn't happen tonight.

Because then they won't be able to finish it and we won't be able to announce our event tomorrow.

While my priorities are really in order, but.

That is uh Haas the Cruel.

That's Haas the Cruel and the Heartless.

Anyway.

Let's continue.

Um

We don't know what's going on.

Okay, Matt S a guy named Matt Saylor, thank you, Suez.

A guy named Matt Saylor is claiming that Israeli missiles hit sight in Iran.

And that a senior US official told this to Martha Radaz, who works for ABC.

So, Ma okay, Matthew is a Pentagon reporter and producer at ABC, and he is reporting that a senior US okay, so it's confirmed.

A senior US official told him that, uh,

told his reporter Martha

That it has happened.

Okay, ABC News.

Israel retaliates against Iran.

Senior U.S.

official says the move.

Okay, so this is confirmed.

So, yes, it's war.

Never mind.

Go back onto the uh

Let's go back to the uh

The um

I don't know if I'd call it hype, 'cause hype kind of implies we're happy about it, but let's go back it's happening, that's all I could tell you.

Let's go back to the um high energy

You know, shock, shock, and awe.

It's happening.

It's happening.

Ladies and gentlemen, it's that Ron Paul meme.

It's happening.

Let me do the Ron Paul meme.

Let me do the Ron Paul.

Let me just look it up to make sure I could do it correctly.

Alright, alright, we're gonna do the Ron Paul thing.

Ready?

Because I'm wearing a suit as well, so it's even more credible.

It's happening, it's happening, it's happening, it's happening.

It's happening.

This looks retarded as fuck.

I look like a fucking retard.

I'm not doing that ever again.

Um.

It's happening!

It's happening!

It's happening!

Damn, I look fucking stupid.

I'm not doing that shit ever again.

For the second time.

But uh, yeah, but it's happening.

But it's happening.

I think it's because my undershirt is uh not ironed.

It's I need to get more undershirts.

That's the thing.

Whatever you call these kind of shirts.

But um, pretend it was fully ironed and it wasn't wrinkly at all.

And it'd be perfect, right?

Anyway, guys, uh, it's happening.

It's actually happening.

It's happening.

It's happening.

Netanyahu.

Defiant amidst I C C arrest warrant, fears.

That's old news.

Let's take a um wow, let's take a brief shift over to Syria rather than Iran to get an idea of what happened in Syria.

So the Al

Falla how do I say this?

The Al Fala airport was targeted

In southern Syria.

And there's speculation about the motivation for these strikes, meaning we don't know.

Uh let's see, we have some footage.

Maybe I could show that to you.

I don't know if Grayson actually is going to allow me to announce the symposium, but I'll just go ahead and do it anyway.

In a few weeks, I'm going to be speaking at Grayson's Symposium.

So, if you live in the South and you're nearby, I guess that's another event I'm going to be at to speak at.

Anyway.

So, this is some footage of what's happening in southern Syria.

It's charisma.

Okay.

All we have is the confirmed report from ABC and nothing else.

That's it.

ABC has reported it.

We have nothing else.

Do that.

Give nothing else.

Alright, let me make sure okay, Q needs five.

Do you remember?

Na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na.

Iran calls an emergency meeting.

'Kay.

Okay, we have a steady okay okay okay okay okay okay okay okay uh okay okay okay okay okay okay imagine if that was the whole stream just okay okay okay okay okay

Okay.

Okay, okay, okay, okay.

Iran calls for an emergency you know what I start to sound like?

I'm starting to sound like the AI voice on TikTok.

You know that dude on TikTok who's an AI voice?

And he's like, here are the top five reasons you should never go to Alaska.

One, it's fucking cold.

Two, there's really not much there.

Three.

Why are you even thinking of going to Alaska?

four.

You might run into a grizzly bear.

five.

There's not enough salmon for everyone in the world.

Anyway, Iran calls for an emergency meeting, the Supreme National Council.

It's called for a meeting following the retaliatory strike.

We may see a response by Iran very soon.

It could happen tonight, and if it doesn't happen tonight, it could happen tomorrow.

We don't know.

They've called an Emergency War Council meeting.

The Revolutionary Guard declares a state of maximum alert at all its bases and camps across Iran.

I'm surprised they haven't hit back already, but

I am not a military expert.

Iran to strike Israel's nuclear sites if theirs get hit.

If the Zionist regime wants to take action against our nuclear centers and facilities, we will surely and categorically reciprocate with advanced missiles against their own nuclear sites.

I don't think they're bullshitting about that guys.

I think they're telling the truth.

Okay, so I don't know where this information is coming from, so take it with a grain of salt.

Oh, ABC claims this.

Okay.

Seven cities.

have been attacked in Iran.

Tehran has been attacked.

Fordo, Iraq,

Natans, Karg Island,

Busher Bandara Bas

Seven cities Wow

Yeah, Iran's gonna respond to this, alright?

And in turn, the Zionists entitled.

So the precedent.

So now we know war is coming because the precedent has been established that no one, neither of them agree about what constitutes the score being even.

You understand?

When the Zionists attacked the Iranian embassy originally, thank you so much, Iran Paul Malas.

It hasn't even begun.

What a great name.

So I'll give you guys some clippable moments.

Sure.

Sure.

But also I'll give you some content, right?

And should I be in the center?

Yeah, let's go in the center.

Anyway.

Um

So, I will.

Why is it like one side of me is way higher than the other?

I don't understand that.

Um, oh, because I have a fucking stupid desk.

Anyway.

All right.

I'll just lay I'll just tell you guys what's going on straight up.

To give you a recap of what's happened.

The Zionist entity struck an Iranian embassy doing the unprecedented in Syria.

Iran obviously was justified under international law to respond to this.

Afterwards, the Iranians said, Okay, we're even.

We consider it settled.

But the Zionist entity didn't consider that.

They thought they claimed that Iran's attack on the Zionist entity was a blanket act of aggression that needed a response.

We didn't know if they were going to respond, and now they have.

So, in turn, Iran has to respond for this.

Because again, Iran's original attack, Iran is not going to say we're even.

They're not going to say, okay, we're even now.

I guess we're going to stop.

No, they're going to respond to this in turn.

And then the Zionist entity is going to respond.

We know they're going to respond because they did it this time.

Why wouldn't they do it a second time?

So this is how escalation into wars start.

And there's no reason to think that this isn't going to be a war very immediately.

If Iran responds to this, it will be war.

And that's a guarantee it will be war.

All it takes for what's going on to turn into a war is a matter of the the window of time in which it takes Iran and Israel to respond to these attacks.

What if Iran responds tonight?

If Iran responds tonight,

That's basically a war already.

I mean, you're responding that fast and they're going to respond.

I mean, yeah, we're looking at a very hot situation right now, guys.

To give you a recap, to explain this to you, we apparently, according to ABC News, according to Mario and Awful, the Zionist entity has hit seven cities in Iran.

Seven.

Can you imagine that?

Can you imagine that going unanswered?

They've just convened an emergency council and I'm sure a response is coming very soon.

And if it's not, it will be coming.

And if it's not coming, then Iran has lost face and basically lost the confrontation.

with the Zionist entity.

We are in a very, very tense

Dangerous situation of escalation into a war.

I mean, it will and it will involve the United States, we know that.

hope we're all clear on that, that we're not all stupid here.

It will involve the United States.

So yeah, guys, um this is happening.

'Kay.

Okay, so alright, so Q is gonna come on.

And let me bring him onto the show.

Hey, what's up, man?

How's it going?

Hey, how are you doing, bro?

So, we have a slight, probably a slight change of sudden and slight change of topics.

Probably we're going to be able to exhaust because you probably are keeping up with this, but there's just breaking news right now that Iran has been hit.

Yeah, I just heard.

I just heard that.

Yeah.

Like three minutes ago.

So we're really trying to figure out what's going on, trying to kind of speculate as far as.

Where this is gonna go from here and what we can expect possibly even happening tonight.

But first of all, what what are your thoughts on the uh

Because di first of all, did you think that Israel was going to respond to this?

I thought that Israel would respond, but from what I understand, so correct me if I'm wrong, because like I said, I just heard about it, so I haven't been able to confirm anything.

But I hear that Israel bombed, I think it was like six or seven different locations in Iran.

Yep, seven cities.

Seven s like what the fuck are they thinking?

And I said I said this last week.

I was like,

If there is if there's any such thing as like a nuclear apocalypse, it's gonna be this fucking country that drags us all into it.

Like they would rather end the like they would rather annihilate the world than not exercise what they believe is their God given right to carry out a genocide.

I mean, I knew this was going to happen because I said, look at how they responded to October 7th.

Yeah.

That was not a rational response.

It hasn't been a rational response.

So I knew they were going to respond disproportionately because it's just like it's part of their whole strategic posture that they have to maintain.

I don't even understand what the I don't understand what the value is in it because at this point, I can't imagine that the United States would want to back this plate.

I don't even think Joe Biden has fucking as brain-addled as he is.

I don't think this is what he wants.

Even though the party's not going to live the end game.

Yeah.

So like, well, I mean, here's the thing.

I think that people oftentimes believe that because the U.S.

is an imperialist country, that every element of the U.S.

government is on the same page, and they're often not.

I think you and I talked about this.

How, like, the military arm and then the intelligence arms, they don't fucking like each other.

They don't.

Well, I mean, look, in a broader level, the U.S.

does not want chaos in the Middle East.

They don't want that.

Yeah.

Because it's obvious, because we understand the whole petrodollar system, the international oil markets.

It's so fundamental to the global system that they can't.

And importantly, they're terrified of Iran.

They're terrified.

They're terrified of Iran because they know Iran.

Think about what it means.

Think about what it means right now.

Think about what it means right now for the amount of investment, the amount of investment dollars.

And we're talking like hundreds of billions of dollars in foreign investment that's pouring into Dubai.

Yeah.

The fact that Saudi Arabia controls so much of the world's oil production.

Why would you ever want to have a regional war in that area, especially with global prices being as fragile as they are right now, with interest rates being so high?

But this especially, the way that the global economy functions is this hasn't changed since COVID, and we saw how fragile our global supply chain is during COVID.

You can't disrupt just on-time delivery.

And the way that you do that is by spiking the amount of money it costs to move things from one place to the other.

The world can't afford this right now.

Yeah, I mean.

The state of Israel being a completely irrational actor.

Sorry, go ahead.

It's an irrational actor, but at the same time, it reflects the irrationality of Zionism as a project.

Because from a limited, within a limited frame, in Israel's mind, they have to maintain this extremely aggressive strategic posture, or else, you know, according to Netanyahu, this is quoting him, he says, you know, we're in a tough neighborhood and people here only respect strength.

So Iran, for the first time ever in history that Iran did this, hits Israel's soil.

This is the first time a sovereign country is hitting the Zionist entity, besides, of course, Saddam's attack, which didn't even count because it was during the Gulf War.

And, you know, Iraq.

I would even go so far as to say it was a retaliation, much more than an attack.

Yeah, and also they paid, they used their food money.

Saddam used the food money of the Iraqi people to pay Israel back.

So that was a nothing burger.

And then before then, you had 73.

So it's all the post-73 strategic posture of Israel has been overwhelming and disproportionate responses.

Now, you can maybe argue about some of the administrations in Israel.

No, they don't respond.

They antagonize.

And I know that you know this, but I just want to make it clear for the framing of this conversation.

Because a lot of people will talk about this in terms of Iran responding to their embassy being bombed in Syria.

And it's like, no, they're not responding just to the embassy being bombed in Syria.

They're responding to the assassination of nuclear scientists.

They're responding to the assassination of high-ranking military officials.

That foreign nationals from Iran could be in a country that has nothing to do with the conflict whatsoever.

They'll have like a foreign national who's in government or who's well known among the people, and then Israel will just fucking assassinate them.

It's just like, the United States, if there was some hostile foreign country that was doing this to United States citizens, would never fucking stand for it.

And yet, Iran, as much as they've, I mean, there are some people that say that they cook themselves.

Some people will say that they've just been bending over backwards to accommodate Western interests.

But I think it's fair to say that the amount of concessions they made, yes, and under like the amount of concessions they've made to Western powers, especially where it comes to the development of nuclear technology, the amount of times that they've said, all right, fine, what will you take in exchange for us shutting down our nuclear development projects?

Every single time that they make an advancement forward in being able to provide for their own people, Western powers are like, absolutely not, you can't do this.

This is a technology that belongs to the West and nobody else.

So the amount of sense that Iran has had to stall the industrialization and development within their own country under the auspices that, well, by doing so, you now threaten Western hegemony.

You now are you pose a security threat to the West.

What have any of these countries ever threatened to do anything to the West?

What they've said is that we will respond if attacked.

And that in itself is enough to provoke a response, especially from the state of Israel, because it's not the US that's assassinating their scientists.

So they've been doing this for the last 20 years almost.

At what fucking point do they say, I'm sorry, we're just going to hit back?

At what point is a sovereign state allowed to defend itself?

Yes, um, no, you're absolutely right.

But we're also, um

You know, Israel doesn't have a choice in terms of digging its grave and basically laying the participating in its own destruction.

Because, like I said, the Lakudnik government is the final form of Zionism, the Lekudinik ideology.

There's been many different variations of Zionism, as you know.

There was labor Zionism, there was the liberal Zionism, whatever.

There was many different forms of Zionism.

Ben-Gurionism.

Yeah, yeah.

This is the most fundamental, the most primal, foundational form of Zionism.

Because as we know, the revisionist Zionism was actually what got the state of Israel established.

We all know that.

It was the fascist paramilitaries that actually did the dirty work of creating the Urdu militia.

And then afterwards, they were able to wear this kind of disguise of progressivism and whatever, right?

With Ben-Gurion and so on.

Had it just been Ben-Gurion and had it just been the labor Zionists, there would be no Israel, right?

So the fact that Zionism now has to return to its roots in the form of the revisionist Zionism of, I can't even say that guy's name, Jacob, whatever the fuck his name is.

Jabotinsky.

Jabotinsky, right?

The fact that it had to return to these roots, that's why we've seen the longevity of the Netanyahu administration.

That's why we've seen no political alternative to him within Israel, because this is the final form of Zionism itself as a project.

And it can't go anywhere else.

It literally can't without the destruction of the state of Israel itself.

Well, if you think of the amount of escalations, for example, like what was it that led to the second Intifada?

And this is actually where I became more interested in the conflict than simply accepting the Western narrative that Israel is defending itself against Palestinian terrorism.

It happened when Ariel Sharon went to the Temple Mount, which was a flagrant acceleration of antagonisms.

And at that time, even people in the West were like, what the fuck is this guy doing?

And then within a couple of days, there was a shooting war that was happening.

That was the beginning of the Second Intifada.

And it was the image, I forget the name of the father and the son who were caught in the crossfire.

And they ended up both getting shot and killed.

And I remember seeing the photos in the New York Times.

And I'm like, what the fuck is this?

This is not the story that I've been told.

How the hell could they just shoot a father?

Yeah, for people who are unfamiliar with the.

For people that are unfamiliar with the MO of how the Zionist entity works and why is it that the Palestinian resistance has to be violent?

Why is it that Iran has to defend and arm the resistance in the region?

Why can't a peaceful solution be found to this conflict?

Because what the Zionists are is they're experts in a kind of, and I know everyone hates this word, gaslighting.

I don't know what else I would call it.

Maybe you have a better word.

Where basically what they'll do...

Is that you will concede to them and compromise with them?

There's a really good, there's a really good term called shooting and crying, shooting and crying.

Right, right.

It's even more than that.

What will happen is that you'll strike a deal with them of some kind.

You'll reach a compromise and they'll compromise a little bit.

And then, you know, the bar is lowered or it's raised, whatever.

And it's like, okay, you're in a new, let's say you both agreed to the two-state solution.

So now the Oslo Accord.

Yeah, the Overton window has shifted a little bit, and this is where you both stand.

All of a sudden, Israel will find a way to antagonize you and make it seem like you are continually aggressing upon them just by insisting upon the agreement you had just made with them to this is the issue.

As a matter of fact, as a matter of fact, the funny thing is, that's how Menachem Begin was assassinated.

Was that he actually intended to honor the agreement that was signed?

And because he was honoring the agreement that he had signed in front of Jimmy Carter and the UN and the entire world, it was so much for him to make this.

It wasn't even a concession.

It was just a bargain for last.

This is a state without honor.

And I like that you use that word honor because this took the words out of my mouth.

Israel.

will portray attempts made by the Palestinians or people in the region to enforce agreements honored by it previously as acts of aggression against it.

And you could be doing nothing.

You could literally be doing nothing and minding your own business.

And then they will transgress.

And then if you respond or if you resist their transgression by insisting upon the agreement that they claim to have honored, they will say, oh, look, you're a terrorist.

Look, you're a dangerous person.

So this is why the Palestinians insist.

No, the only time in their history where a state leader had actually intended on following through with the agreement that's best lined.

Yeah, exactly.

Israeli extremists assassinate him.

It wasn't Palestinians.

It wasn't Arabs that killed Machem Begin.

It was Israelis.

Because the idea that they should ever be held to an agreement that they themselves signed, that they agreed to in front of the entire world, too much for them.

Too much.

You should just let them do what they want.

And here's the thing.

It's that the bar and the overtwind always changes.

And it will always ensure that it changes in its direction.

So this is why the axis of resistance and the true forces of resistance in the region ultimately assume a maximalist position.

Now, in the short term, even Hamas wants a two-state solution in the short term.

Sorry, I wouldn't call it that.

It's not a two-state solution.

They want the West Bank and Gaza as a Palestinian state to begin.

That's what they want.

Which was what was supposed to happen.

Which was what was supposed to happen in the first place.

So, but ultimately, they do have a maximalist position where they will never recognize a state of Israel.

And you say, well, why can't they recognize the Jewish state's right to exist or whatever?

And it's like, that is a complete obfuscation of what we're talking about here.

The reason the Zionist state can never be recognized is this is a state that is by nature aggressive, expansionistic.

And exists for this.

What it is, it's a malignant tumor.

It has no intention of participating in any kind of process of regional integration.

And not only that, it is an aggressive, as you said, malicious and expansionist from the very beginning.

It was founded upon that.

So, to even to recognize a progressive liberal Zionist regime, you know, of democratic Israel, even to recognize that is to recognize and effectively acknowledge a power which intends to take more from you.

It's not going to stop anywhere.

You know, the Zionists always have this talking point.

Oh, the Arabs will never be satisfied with anything.

They're going to keep taking and keep taking.

But history has shown that the exact opposite is true.

Every time an agreement was made between Palestinian entity taken, what ground have they ever taken?

Nothing ever done is concede.

Nothing.

It's the Zionist entity which always continues to take, take, take after an agreement was made.

Now, people will say, well, then why haven't they, you know, why haven't they violated their agreement with Egypt?

Because strategically they can't afford to.

That's why.

Because Israel can't antagonize Egypt.

Because, first of all, it's not part of the U.S.'s strategy.

Second of all, Israel itself weighed its options and said, okay, giving up Sinai is worth it to have peace with Egypt for now.

But let's say the Zionists get everything they want when it comes to Palestine and Lebanon for that matter, just for good measure.

What are the Zionists going to focus on?

They're going to focus on Sinai once again.

Once they've secured their Western Front and once they've addressed the internal problem they have, what will Zionism be?

What will be the purpose of the state of Israel's existence?

You think they're just going to be peacefully minding their own business, you know, integrating in the region and being friendly with everyone?

This is the problem with the Zionist ideology.

I'll explain it very carefully.

Because it's a state founded upon ethnic exclusion, that this has to be a Jewish state and nothing else, and this implies the exclusion of others' existence and others' interests, it will never be able to get along with its neighbors.

Because there's a vector always in the direction in any region of integration.

If you look at the nature, for example, Indonesia and Malaysia, I think, don't quote me on this.

When you are neighbors in a region and you don't dispute the other's existence, the natural tendency is some kind of integration.

So, we're going to exclusively trade in each other's currencies, we're going to establish these unprecedented economic relationships, we're going to open up our borders so that our people can go in your country and whatever.

This is what Russia has done with the Central Asian countries and others.

There's plenty of examples of it, it's just overall regional integration.

Israel will never Israel will never do that with its neighbors because this will dilute the so-called purity of the Jewish state.

And so, it therefore always has to maintain an aggressive strategic posture toward its neighbors, no matter what.

So, even if you solve the Iran, because Israel says, oh, the problem is Iraq.

Okay, the Iraq problem was solved.

Now, the problem is Iran.

Even if the so-called Iran problem is solved, even if there's no Hezbollah, even if there's no Hamas, even if there's no Palestinians, Israel will turn its gaze back to Sinai because the Zionist ideologist will say, Well, you know what?

That land in Sinai actually belongs to us.

In the same way that this land belongs to us, so does Sinai.

So, it will never end.

It will literally never end.

No, it's like I said, it's a malignant tumor.

I don't know if you must be familiar with the concept of the golem, right?

Like the what?

The golem.

It's a Jewish myth.

Yeah, yeah.

And that's basically what Israel is at this point.

It's a golem.

Like, it's something that was created for the protection of the Jewish people, or at least in theory, right?

And now it's gone outside of the control of anybody but the most fascist Israelis.

The people who are insistent on the country controlling the entire region, that's essentially what Israel is.

There is no control.

There's no handle that any liberal Zionist or reformist Zionist or visionist Zionist or labor Zionist or any, none of them have any control over the progression of this entity because the only thing that it recognizes is violence and death.

That's it.

Anybody else who thinks otherwise is absolutely bullish.

No, you're right.

But we have some more news.

It's not exactly groundbreaking, but okay, Israel has raised its alert levels after the strike.

So there may be a possibility, and I alluded to this earlier, that we could see an Iranian response right away.

And they may not wait.

They're convening an emergency council now.

That was about 10 minutes ago.

ABC News is claiming that Israel has never directly struck Iran like this ever.

And so to quote them, Israel chose to make a direct response.

It seems limited at this point.

It's not in any way on the same scale as Iran's, but it's the first time in history that Israel has launched a war.

Is it not on the same scale?

Well, here's the thing.

Here's the thing.

U.S.

officials are the ones, and that's where the quote comes from, saying that the Israeli attack was limited in nature.

Now, they're using this language because the U.S.

actually does want to de-escalate this confrontation because they're smart and they know that the logical conclusion of this confrontation will be the destruction of its interests in the region.

Regional warfare, yeah.

Not just, see, here's the thing: in any scenario of a regional war, it doesn't matter who's involved.

Not just Israel, but all of the United States' interests in the region will be undermined, and Iran will assert itself as the preeminent power in the region through any kind of war.

Iran will come out on top over Saudi Arabia, over the UAE, over everyone else.

Because why?

Because when you fight a war, you're the big dog in town when you win that war.

And if everyone else, even if Saudi Arabia doesn't participate in the war, which I doubt, because they participated in intercepting Iran's missile.

That's right.

Yeah.

Even if they sat back and didn't participate, guess what?

Iran in a war coming out on top will be, I wouldn't say hegemon, because hegemonism is a specific phenomenon, but it will be the dominant.

It will be the primary power.

Exactly, precisely.

And U.S.

interests in the region will be.

I mean, think of this.

Just think of it for one second.

Iran and Israel go to war.

What is that going to do to the Arab street?

In Egypt, even in the Arabian Peninsula.

I was actually going to allude to this earlier all across the Muslim world, not even just the Arab world, but especially the Arab street.

Everyone's going to be hanging posters of Khamenai in their bedrooms and waving Iranian flags and welcoming the new Persian Empire as their leader.

You're going to have a bunch of people converting to Shia.

Possibly.

I mean, during 2006, when Hezbollah was fighting Israel, that actually is something that was going on in Egypt.

I don't know what happened to that.

Well, I was actually just going to say that the amount of work the United States put in to undermine Egypt as what used to be previously a steadfast ally to Palestinians.

Yeah.

The amount of work that the United States put in to undermine Egypt and essentially bend them towards U.S.

interests.

So right now, the Egyptian government is just a U.S.

puppet government.

Right.

I think for people that maybe were young during the so-called again?

The Arab Spring?

Yeah, those are a few things that were happening at that time.

It was the Arab Spring, but then it was also the Maidan very shortly after that.

Because the Arab Spring was, what, 2012-ish?

11, yeah, yeah.

Late 2010, early 11, yeah.

Right.

And then there was the Maidan.

So like the progression of color revolutions that were happening across the Middle East region and then across Eastern Europe, etc.

That was essentially like a period where any government that had held either a cold or antagonistic position towards the United States were, through media, through like funding of underground activist networks, which were basically just like CIA cutout groups, et cetera, et cetera.

That was for the entire purpose of turning sentiment towards a favorable towards the United States, encroaching on Russia's sovereign borders and flipping this was attempted in Yemen because that's where it began, right?

Wasn't it Yemen?

I think it began in Tunisia, but I would say...

It was Tunisia.

It was Tunisia.

My appraisement of the situation is that...

See, the Maidan happens in 2014.

Yeah.

And.

I think what happened is that with the so-called Arab Spring.

I feel like the Arab Spring was kind of there, there it did begin as something very authentic, I think.

Obviously, a lot of planning went into it with Qatar and so on.

But it did tap into something very real, very authentic, and it was ambiguous in the beginning.

For example, in Egypt, in Tunisia, and even in Syria.

Syria had a precedent of a domestic kind of, you know, liberal opposition that wanted more rights.

Wasn't necessarily CIA.

These were just kind of like city liberals.

And even then, they started protesting.

And that is not where things started to get violent and where the U.S.

started to aggressively get involved.

For example, in Syria, there's a qualitative distinction between the early protests.

So I'm not even saying I support those protests, but there was a qualitative distinction between those early protests and later the kind of al-Qaeda and whatever getting buttloads of money just poured in, weapons, equipment, whatever.

And that's when it started to get violent.

And also the snipers on rooftops in Syria, that was CIA shit where they were firing at protesters.

But in Egypt, I think it was different from Syria.

I think that the Mobotta government was a U.S.

puppet, more or less.

Maybe he was getting a little cold to the U.S.

But I don't think the U.S.

necessarily wanted a revolution.

I think what happened is that as soon as the Arab Spring started to become a phenomenon, the CIA swooped in to do everything it could to ensure that the outcome would be favorable to it, to basically hijack it.

And then Maidan, by contrast, was just a color revolution, I think.

Right.

There was a writer by the name of Ahmed Ben Sada who wrote about the Arab Spring.

And you're right in that it was in Austin, an authentic and organic movement.

But very quickly, very quickly was co-opted by the United States interest.

And Ben Sada wrote about, he wrote about this, but the thing is, the book is French language, so not a lot of people necessarily even know about it.

And I haven't been able to find any digital copies.

I can read in French, so it's no problem for me.

And if you have anybody in your Discord that can read French, I would highly recommend that you do pick up his book.

But he laid it out, like point by point, how it was very quickly changed from an organic protest movement against what they believed to be a socially oppressive regime into simply lining up a bunch of dominoes along the Arab street to knock down in favor of the United States.

Yeah.

So we have some new incoming reports.

Nothing huge.

It's nine sites in Iran total that were targeted, and apparently, American officials are claiming that Israel confirmed it will not target any nuclear facilities.

And they they're they they're not going to do that because they know Iran will target Israel's facilities in turn.

But a meeting is being convened, and we're going to probably get some updates shortly on exactly where this is going to be headed.

But no, no, continue on that, continuing on the topic.

I don't see Egypt's

Regime.

I don't want to get banned from Egypt, but let's just be real.

I don't see it as sustainable, actually.

There's always been two major powers in that region.

One that's tangentially the Persian world, right?

That could be Iraq or Mesopotamia or Babylon or the Neo-Assyrian, whatever.

But that all culminates in the Achaemenids eventually, right?

And then obviously Anatolia becomes a power eventually.

But even with the Ottomans, those were Persiani.

That was kind of part of the Iranicate, Persianate culture.

Uh, like, what was it?

Like, 20% of the Turkish language is uh Persian or something.

I don't know.

Anyway, uh, the other power has always been centered in Egypt.

So, we've seen this, for example, with the Mamluk dynasty, which ruled the region and the Levant for a very long period of time.

Then, when they were conquered by the Ottomans, the empire was divided into two spheres up until the I think the 19th century when the British took Egypt, more or less.

But it has always been clear that Egypt has been a power in the region.

So, the fact that Egypt has no real regional existence right now and has no active participation in the conflict besides helping Israel, actually.

And this is at the really aggressively.

Against the express will of the Egyptian people to the point.

Look at the Egyptian parliament.

Look at the Egyptian people.

Well, keep in mind, don't forget, Egypt was a signatory to the Abraham courts.

That was I'm aware because Egypt's regime is allied with the UAE and Saudi Arabia, and they're all unthinkable 15 years ago.

But here's the thing: there's such a huge, even in the Egyptian parliament where people are always yelling and saying that they should go to war against Israel because those people in the parliament, you know, I guess are answerable to their constituents.

The current regime in Egypt.

Is in power just because of aid and support coming from the U.S., it's almost kind of like Israel itself.

You know, were it not for USAID, there would be no Israel.

Were it not for USAID, the military regime in Egypt would have been collapsed.

But at the same time, there's no real vacuum in Egypt to see that Egypt is such an interesting country because it's been ruled by a military caste for like a millennia.

The Mom Lukes were the same thing in a way, right?

So you have a very similar, it's very, very deep problem Egypt has.

Uh but in any case

They can only contain the discontent of the Arab street in Egypt for so long.

Eventually, especially in the case of a war between Israel and Iran, I think if you ask me, the red line is Egyptians will never fight on the same side as Israel.

And if Egypt gets involved in that kind of regional war, which I think it probably would, the Egyptian government on Israel's side.

We could be looking at another revolution or a coup or whatever, turning it in the opposite direction.

This is why the United States does not want this to escalate.

This is what I'm trying to say, because a regional war will inevitably create an extremely volatile political situation.

One which I would even argue is probably a revolutionary situation, where it will make or break governments.

Jordan will cease to exist.

The Jordanian monarchy will cease to exist.

The current king of Jordan will be deposed.

The whole region will be transformed if another war breaks out.

A real war.

Talking about like seventy three.

And also, the current political status quo in the Middle East, let's not forget, has been defined by 1973, the 73 war.

For example, the only game changer was the Iranian Revolution in 1979.

But the reason the Arab states are the way they are is it's the aftermath of 1973.

The oil embargo was 71, if I'm correct, or it was 73, yes.

After the oil embargo was settled, and after Egypt settled things with Israel.

That is what changed the face of the region permanently.

That and that is what allowed Israel to basically continue unchallenged doing what it does best.

So, any other kind of real war, but say Iran and Israel, for example, that will also be a revolutionary war that changes the political status quo in the whole region.

Well, here's the other thing, too.

The well, keep in mind, the Arab oil embargo was 73, 74.

That was sort of like the first

Oil-related price shock that the world had known since the end of World War II.

There's actually two things I want to bring up.

There's that, and then the way that Jordan's borders are shaped.

But that's number one, right?

The second shock happens in 79 because that was the global crisis that brought down Jimmy Harter's presidency because of the gas prices and the price of like everything from like, especially commodities like copper.

Yeah.

It's just really funny how all of this stuff is interrelated because like one of the reasons, for example, like why I don't want to go too far here, but I just want to kind of connect the dots.

Zambia, which used to be the richest country in Africa, like a lot of people talk about Libya having once been the richest country in Africa, which is true, but you know, prior to that, what was known as a major power in Africa, one of the richest countries that wasn't South Africa, it was Zambia.

Why?

Because Zambia has these massive copper deposits.

And they had almost more money than they knew what to do with.

But then when the second price shock happens in 1979, it immediately reverses.

I don't mean to cut you off, but my chat is telling me that Israel is now under attack.

Oh!

Oh, God.

No fucking way.

Hold on.

Oh, my God.

Hold on, hold on.

Red alert in Israel.

No confirmation it's Iran.

Uh

Everything that happened was a failed and humiliating attempt for Israeli aviation.

But hold on, I don't know why Chat is saying this because this is really breaking news.

Let's look at the uh what's going on.

First of all, big news.

The IRGC states that Iran will target Israeli nuclear sites in the counterattack.

What?

The source, the insider paper, are they reliable?

I don't know.

But apparently, the IRGC is now saying they're going to target Israeli nuclear sites in their counterattack.

So that's first of all, okay?

Second of all, the information we're getting is that there's a red alert in Israel.

And there's no well, who else is it going to be if not Iran and its allies?

So, red alert in Israel.

So much for U.S.

attempts to call the attacks limited.

Uh, Jackson.

Okay, he's streaming.

Um, let's check on.

I'm gonna briefly tune in tomorrow and off all space.

Um, you're probably not gonna be able to hear it.

But I just want to hear what they're saying really quick.

Yep, Mario.

Can you hear me?

Yeah, we can, we can.

So he said they didn't when you said not get involved, you mean not escalate their attacks, but they're still involved.

Yeah, they're just jacking off and jibber-jabbering about nothing.

Chat, why are you saying that Iran was hit sorry, Israel was hit?

Yeah I'm I'm just looking I'm looking at myself.

I'm seeing I'm seeing a whole lot of red alerts.

Yeah.

Uh Warontel, Mario Notfal, they're saying that there's a red alert in this world right now, but I'm not seeing anything about uh new strikes.

I should probably make a tweet, to be honest.

Uh, let me do that now.

Um

Chat, boost this.

I'll share it in the Discord.

Okay, do you see uh what's really interesting to me is when uh when Iran launched the drones, there were people that I was having conversations with that were saying, Well why why are they launching drones?

Why aren't they just wa launching like hypersonic missiles?

I'm like, no, like this is this is what's called the temperature, right?

If you if you launch missiles immediately, you you've just now found yourself in a hot war.

When you basically like a uh it's like a sack tap you know you know like uh I don't know like like in a fucking on a fucking football team or walking room or something like that, some dude might just like you know basically like uh check on whether another dude's a punk or not, just give him a little tap on the sack real quick, see what's up.

That's basically what that was.

It's like, listen, we aren't gonna actually fucking attack you.

Like we're not actually going to destroy civilian infrastructure.

We're not actually attacking, but we're just letting you know we could if we wanted to.

You know what I mean?

Yeah.

The reason they send drones, the reason they send drones over that can be intercepted, like it went around Saudi airspace and many were intercepted by Jordan.

But it's done a couple of things.

One is check the temperature of Israel's so-called regional allies.

So obviously the king of Jordan's a fucking junk, right?

And then next, it's all right, so that like our next response could be a lot worse than this one.

And I think that was obviously the strategic thing to do because you can't just bomb another country's fucking embassy.

You can't do that.

So n I mean uh I'm not I'm not gonna jump to any conclusions on whether any anywhere's been struck in Israel now.

It would actually surprise me if they were, uh struck by a missile launched from Iran.

But at the same time, at the same time, what do they expect to happen?

Right.

Chat, everybody, I just made an announcement in the Discord.

Go boost this.

And this is a sick thing that was generated by Commander Spyro.

Is that American partisan?

I don't know.

Very cool image.

I love it.

Um yeah guys, boost the shit out of this.

Sorry, I didn't mean to cut you off.

And let's get this going because I want to make history.

I want to make see a lot of the time I just like having a record.

Like, where did I stand on this night?

See, one of the things I'm the most proud of is that the night of the SMO in Russia, I was fully, fully, I mean, I was all in unconditionally supporting Russia, right?

And uh

To me this is part of my oh my god, what happened?

He accidentally did out.

Yo, what's up?

Thank you, Iran.

Paul Mawes, appreciate you.

And uh, we yo, Q, you there?

Yeah, I'm here.

I'm here.

So I don't know if we're getting too like ahead of ourselves or whatever, but like, I don't know, dude.

It seems like this might be war.

Really seems like this might be war.

Yeah, I wanna be careful before I say anything about that.

Especially like, I'm not you know, I'm not doing journalism anymore.

Uh, they announced air raid air raid sirens in the north.

That could be Hezbollah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah, I don't know why.

I really knew it.

That, like, no, Iran's not going to wait.

They're not going to wait.

They're going to just straight up right away as soon as Israel hits them.

They're just going to be like, fuck it.

We warned you.

You know what this is like?

This is like that Tom and Jerry meme where Tom is kind of fucking around.

He just like hits the dog once.

Yeah.

What was it again?

Then he just like turns out, all right, you motherfucker.

I warned you.

Yeah.

I'm done.

This is like some Tom and Jerry shit, honestly.

No, it's like I said, it's a sack tap.

And I'm surprised.

Actually, I shouldn't be surprised at Israel's response, but it's just like you would think that if they had any fucking common sense, that escalation of that because Iron, what did they actually destroy?

Like, so I think it was two young people were killed, and the reason that they were killed was because they weren't given adequate shelter.

Why?

Because they were Bedouins.

Yeah, yeah, but I mean, this is honestly, it's all symbolic, you know.

But also, I wanted to tell you, we're going to be live with Jackson in a few minutes.

That's right with you?

Yeah, that's fine by me.

Yeah, yeah.

So this is.

Are you saying, like, did you, did you want me to jump off so he can be in, or are we all going to be?

No, no, no.

Yeah, you'll stay.

I mean, I don't know.

He might call me, though.

If he calls me, I would probably have to ask him to add you.

That's all good.

But he might be cool with it.

I'm going to get canceled by left Twitter behind this.

I don't give a fuck.

Whatever.

No, I mean, um.

It's alright.

Uh it's like it's like we're hosting a space, you know?

Yeah.

And Mario spaces fucking suck.

But uh yeah, this is some crazy shit and um

We could be looking at war

And because when you think about it, I was saying this earlier.

It's like the only difference between a war and a tit for tat, you know, of just constantly quote-unquote responding to each other is just a window of time.

In a war, you're firing bullets at each other in real time, right?

In terms of the kind of thing that Iran and Israel have been doing, we've seen a window of time of a few days for each.

You know, first it was Iran, took a few weeks, a week to respond.

Then we saw Israel respond days after, and then now Iran is responding right away.

Check.

Okay, he sent a Zoom link.

Okay, uh I'm gonna have to exit.

I'm gonna ask him and then I'll send you the zoom link if he's cool with it.

But uh let me go ahead and disable my camera so I could join the zoom.

Uh okay, so I'm gonna

I'll keep you posted.

Alright, Jackson said to join his Zoom link.

Uh let me see.

Okay.

So he's about to start it.

Oh, he's calling me on Discord now.

Jesus Christ.

Yo, Jackson, you there?

Wait, Jesus Christ, that was so loud.

Okay.

Holy shit.

You're live?

One second.

Okay, talk.

Yo, what's up?

Why is your mic so loud, bro?

Uh, just turn me down.

I'm it's like okay, it's like almost at the bottom.

Okay, try again.

Yo, what's up?

Mike is insane.

Are you gonna share your camera?

Yeah, I I am.

Uh, but I wanted to ask you, I was talking to a guy named Q.

His wife, by the way.

Oh, for sure.

I was talking to a guy b named Q.

Are you cool with uh him coming?

Yeah, sure.

All right, I'll invite him.

Can I say can I stay in this Discord call?

Let me see how it works.

No we have to do a new one.

Fuck.

Yo, you there?

Yeah, we we uh we had to do it in the group call.

Yeah, we're here.

No, no, it's wrong one.

Uh yeah.

Hello?

Hey.

Yo, what's up?

Okay, I'm good.

Yeah, turn on your camera in this one.

Alright, hang on a second.

Jackson, I was telling Jackson.

Okay, so we're gonna pop this out.

Um

Alright, let me just see zoom.

Uh I should actually be able to do it here.

Okay, that's cool.

Yo, Jackson, you hear me?

Yeah.

All right.

This guy got the tricolor headband on.

So I don't know if you know who Q is.

Do you know him, Jackson, or?

Yeah, I think I know of you.

Yeah.

Q is an old friend of mine.

He's cool.

We're just covering the.

We're just talking about the um.

The recent

Escalation.

I think it's war.

What do you think?

Are we getting ahead of ourselves?

Bro, your gain is so high.

I don't even know what you're doing with that mic.

All right, let me know.

Just turn the gain down.

It's absolutely cooked.

Okay, how about this?

Is this good?

Yeah, that's way better.

For sure.

Alright.

Alright, alright.

So, um

Okay, so

As of

Just what, ten minutes ago there's air raid sirens going off.

Yeah.

Yeah.

So you think that's Hezbollah or you think it's Iran or what?

That's the same thing.

That's probably a Hezbollah.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking as well.

But I also predicted on stream that Iran was just going to respond tonight, probably, and not wait.

Um, I'm seeing some weird reports.

Give me one second, I'm fixing this.

Keep talking.

Yeah, I really think that this is um this is the moment.

This is it's happening I knew it was happening the minute that

I saw that they hit Iranian soil, right?

As soon as I saw that they hit Iranian soil, I said, Well, the Iranians have promised that if their soil is targeted at all in any capacity, that they are not going to consider it, oh, we're even.

No, they were even after their response previously, which, if you ask me, was extremely limited in comparison to what they should have done or could have done.

But Iran considers this attack by Israel totally like uh

Totally um

what w what would be the word?

They're running up a totally new tab, so to speak, right?

And it demands a response.

If it's not going to happen tonight, it will happen.

And the only possible outcome of that is an escalation of some kind.

Um by the way, nice headband.

Where'd you get that?

That's what I was saying.

I noticed the strike color that he had on.

It's a Nike headband.

I just painted it before I went live.

That's fucking sick.

Can't do that.

Um, okay, well, you know, we're live here to a bunch of people.

Rumble X, good to have you all here.

So, this is Haz and Q, is this the Q from is this the Q from Twitter or no?

Yeah, yeah, that's me.

Okay, yeah, I was, dude, I was gonna say, I was the one that put you up on Rumble.

Thank you, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

That was a while ago.

Yeah, you got me connected to Rumble, yeah, and that.

Well, I didn't know I Haz was making it sound like I didn't know you, and I'm like, I'm like, I'm like a different, I'm like a different Q.

Do you know how much shit I've gotten for simply saying, like, yo, that's that's mad funny that you addressed Ansarala?

You know, like, you know, pissed off people got at me just for saying that.

Bro, I saw, I saw it all.

It was great.

Oh my god, damn.

The uh, you know, the I just got I framed the picture, I put it up in my uh my my my home.

It's a beautiful picture.

It was an honor to be.

But uh, look, I mean, we got um

So, okay, so da da da, okay.

So, here's the thing.

This is what I'm thinking, and I'm curious what you guys think.

Uh, so you know.

So Iran initially said we're going to respond in seconds with 12 times the force of what we responded with in our first retaliatory strike.

Obviously, Iran has missiles ready to go.

They're currently in a like a, you know, their equivalent of a National Security Council meeting.

They haven't done anything.

Now, this was a, it was escalatory in the sense that they struck on Iranian soil and Syria and Iraq, presumably.

But it was de-escalatory in the sense that, I mean, they didn't really do anything.

And it seems as though Isfahan is okay.

It seems as though I did see farce news said that some windows of buildings at Isfahan military base, not the nuclear site, but some windows had been blown out.

It's not clear what that's from.

And I'm just like.

You know, I'm curious because I always think about it: like, what would Russia or China do?

Because we've seen the precedent of Russian military responses, and I know it's not the same country, not the same leaders, cultures, all that.

But if the United States did something like this to Russia, I would assume that Russia would not respond by targeting U.S.

nuclear sites or something like that.

And I've seen some people online indicate that that might be what Iran's going to do, but that seems very escalatory.

What do you guys think?

Mario Naples, he's a fake news merchant, but he's the one who reported that.

He claims he has a source that has confirmed that.

I don't.

So that's a bunch of bullshit.

Yeah.

I doubt that.

I doubt that.

I saw Zero Hedge post it.

That Bricks news group post it.

And I'm like, they weren't citing anything.

I'm like, what?

So what are you citing?

Like, there's no source.

I think that they're convening an emergency meeting, which means that they regard the response as political, having a political significance, not just an immediate military one.

See, some countries, if you hit them, no one's going to have a political meeting to respond.

You're just going to hit them right back as a part of your military posture and strategy.

But obviously the IRGC is prepared for a scenario like this, but the political leaders within Iran are sitting in meeting to discuss how they should respond, weighing the political significance.

I think also no worries.

Oh, sorry.

No, I was just going to say, I think they are going to respond no matter what, because they promised to.

And they didn't just say they would respond to a harsh attack.

They said any encroachment upon our soil at all will get a response.

And also, the U.S.

attempted to persuade Iran to basically accept a limited Israeli strike just so Israel can save face.

And Iran said no, right?

So, unless they did conclude a deal, a backdoor deal that we don't know about, it seems very clear to me that this is going to warrant a response if it hasn't already.

Q, what do you think?

So, um, the don't I'm trying to think of like any previous conflicts that I can compare this to.

I'm only really coming up with Iran-Iraq and then the Ogaden war.

Um, that was the war between uh Somalia and Ethiopia.

In both cases, um, either encroachment encroachment of territory or uh an actual like military attack with missiles, both of them did warrant a political deliberation before response.

With the Ogaden war, it ended up being much quicker because um uh Somalia and Ethiopia had already been at loggerheads for a number of years over grazing territory.

My thought is that I would be very shocked if Iran made an immediate response to nuclear sites.

That's, I mean, I think that's just fear-mongering.

Um, I mean, first of all, first of all, first of all, Israel has never even admitted out loud that it even has nukes.

We all know that they have them, but uh, for nuclear.

I think these are talking about civilian nuclear infrastructure they were going to strike.

Oh, like, okay, like okay, okay, got it.

So, like, nuclear facilities.

Okay, got it.

But I think it's incredibly responsible for because I saw the same tweet where Mario Nothal was claiming that an Iranian response was going to hit Israeli nuclear sites.

Not only, think about the fact that, like, when Russia conducted, when Russia conducted military operations in the Zafaraji region, most through their nuclear facility, you saw how much care and deliberation they took to make sure that the site was not directly struck.

And there's a reason for that.

Not only are you essentially cutting out power for an entire region, because there is no replacement form of power generation that can be put in place to replace the nuclear facility, the amount of kilowatts of power that it generates, you're going to guarantee that people die, like that civilians die.

But the second thing is, obviously, you don't want to risk the possibility of a nuclear meltdown.

So, for Iran to go from a drone strike that was telegraphed hours in advance to strikes on civilian nuclear facilities, that would be the dumbest possible maneuver that they could take.

So, I think it's just incredibly irresponsible for any Western reporter to even suggest that.

So, we have some news.

I don't know if you're seeing this, Jackson.

Apparently, according to the Iranian press channel, and this is coming from Zaid Benjamin, so it could be correct, incorrect.

I'm not sure.

The reports of the Emergency Iranian National Security Council were incorrect.

Huh.

This could be true.

I don't know.

You know, this is the fog of war.

But this is kind of what I'm thinking.

I could be totally wrong about this.

This is just like my conspiracy brain reigning in.

Doesn't it seem odd that, like, okay, yeah, they said they're they said they were going to do this of whatever, limited strike, and then they're like, maybe it won't be a limited strike.

Maybe we'll target their nuclear facilities.

The ex-Mossad chief said that today.

Don't you think it's a little bit odd that they would choose the location to be so-I know exactly what you're saying.

And the thing is, Israel's been known to do this before, although they've done it in other countries.

I don't know of any exactly.

I think I was going to say, I know exactly that they're going to sabotage their own facilities and say it was Iran.

I know exactly what you're thinking.

I was going to do that.

That's interesting.

Yeah.

Oh, okay.

Okay.

Go ahead, Dan.

I was going to say that this might not be the main strike.

By Israel?

Yeah.

Huh.

When do you think the main strike will happen then?

I I don't know, but like it it just

It doesn't it fell flat entirely.

We saw an Iranian official just come out and said he just mocked Israel and said, you know, there's been no airstrike in Isfahan or any parts of the other country.

They only made a failed humiliating attempt to fly quadcopters and they were all shot down.

It just, it's such an escalatory location.

It seems almost like this was a prelude.

You know, we remember Iran had multiple barrages of missiles, and Israel also told Iran that in their response, they were going to keep them hanging on the edges of their seat for days on end because Iran did that to them.

And that might not necessarily just mean the wait around and see when we're going to launch our missiles.

That could also mean maybe this is not the main strike.

Well, okay, we also have to factor in the huge, and I said this on RT actually, that it's clear the United States didn't really want Israel to respond in any serious capacity.

So maybe this is it.

And this proves and is testament to the amount of control the U.S.

has over Israel.

Remember, Nasrallah's claim was that actually the U.S.

controls Israel, not the reverse.

So we're kind of witnessing in real time the extent of that.

The U.S.

didn't want a response at all.

Maybe we will see.

Maybe it is just going to be a limited response as a kind of balance between these two interests.

But I think what you're saying is also possible as well, that this is not even the full extent of it.

I d I don't know.

I i that's that's like super conspiracy.

It kinda looks like it raises it.

I don't know that that's technically a conspiracy.

It it seems like that's a reasonable position to take, i.

e.

we don't know whether this is the extent of the Israeli response.

Since none of us really knows anything, that's an entirely reasonable position to take.

Yeah.

I'm just sitting here.

There's some people posting online and they're like mocking Israel.

And I'm like, uh, you know, let's go ahead of ourselves.

Yeah.

You know the fact that they the fact that they would actually and uh a lot of people have forgotten this too.

It wasn't just the uh Iranian embassy in Syria that was bombed, the Canadian embassy also took damage.

I don't know if if people are aware of that.

And Canada has said nothing so far.

Our our foreign minister Melanie Jolie our foreign minister Melanie Jolie uh the prime minister nobody said anything.

Like it sounds like no one gives a shit.

We just pretend it didn't happen.

Yeah, yeah, nope, it actually it we did take damage, or at least our uh the Canadian embassy did take damage.

So I I don't know where this headline is coming from, but Twitter news is claiming that the IRGC claims that ninety nine point nine nine percent of the Israeli missiles were intercepted.

That's such a troll.

Yeah.

It's nine that's a new record.

Ninety-nine point you know, I thought about it.

I'm like, the math is so there was a was there a thousand missiles that were launched?

Actually, here's another question I want to ask, Jackson.

So uh now that uh you ticked off An Sarala off your list, when are you gonna be addressing the IRGC?

I don't think they play the.

I don't think they IRGC's not like into the media.

I know, I know, I know, I know.

I'm kidding.

You're you're kidding, but I'm not.

I mean if the opportunity was there, I'm pretty sure you'd take it.

Uh are they are they terrorists?

Well, I'm Sarah Laws terrorists, right?

What?

Who's saying that?

They're they're are they classified as that by the US?

Oh, I I'm pretty sure the IRGC is classified as terrorists by the by the US.

But yeah, I've seen levels of, yeah, this white boy's okay.

This white boy's alright.

Like I'm seeing it come from Iranians too.

And that shit is just wildly funny to me.

No, I mean, I've always, I mean, I've talked about all these subjects throughout the years since I started my show, even when I was like more of a Bernie Sanders supporter.

But the thing that triggered me the most into covering all this was like Syria and when Trump went, you know, like I don't even really, I don't think it's in Iran's best interest to do the whole JCPOA thing.

But like, I think they should have nukes.

But when Trump, at Mike Pompeo's direction, pulled out of that with the lunatic claim that Iran was working with Al-Qaeda, that's when I interviewed Tulsi Gabbard.

That's when I started to really get into it.

And I think Iranians back then were even like, damn, like, there's some people who aren't retarded in the U.S.

See, this is, I don't want to give too much attention to this because it's so fucking stupid.

Sorry, excuse me for swearing, but.

J Jackson is always c uh accused, it's very curious to me, of having flip flopped his position when on foreign policy he has not changed at all on anything.

And and you know, i if anything,

Some of the social progressivism, you know, is different, but

And they claim that he's they try to throw shade at him for meeting with Tulsi Gabbard.

But the only reason he met with Tulsi Gabbard is because of her stance on the Syrian Civil War and regime change in Syria.

So where was Hasan Piker at that time?

That's what I want to know.

Where was Hasan Piker?

There were so many people on the ostensible left that had time for Tulsi Gabbard at that point.

It was really only after the Democratic primaries were over where she started to take a more reactionary turn.

But there was a period of time, I would say for like several months, probably leading up to the Iowa caucus, where, yeah, everybody was seeing Tulsi Gabbard as a possible, like not an alternative to Bernie Sanders, but another leftist candidate in the making.

And it was after the caucus where she started to see things a bit more reactionary.

But more specifically, the record I would like to insist on is that.

I would say 90% of the people who now attack Jackson during that period were pro-imperialist, pro-NATO, you know, were against the Iranian and Syrian regime.

We're against all these regimes around the world.

They were basically towing the liberal Democrat line, and they were shielding AOC from criticisms, justified criticisms, because of her increasingly obvious pro-imperialist and pro-interventionist stance.

And this guy, Jackson, was literally, has been completely consistent.

He's been completely consistent to the point where people like Hassan Piker, the only reason he has beef with Jackson is because Jackson was criticizing AOC in 2020 or 2021 on the force to vote stuff.

And now Hassan Piker pretends like, oh, yeah, I'm pro-Ansar Allah and I'm pro-anti-imperialist, this and that.

And so do all of his orbiters.

But we remember the record.

We remember what positions they were taking.

Back when you know it wasn't popular to, it wasn't trendy to, and you were being i remember, I remember all of the people that were supportive of the white helmets in the Syrian complex.

I remember all the people that would joke around about being gray wolves.

I remember that shit.

I haven't forgotten.

So, the thing is, like, a lot of people have kind of like slowly and quietly redacted their original positions.

But I do remember that if you took any kind of position that was favorable towards Iran, or Syria, it's like now everyone kind of jokes about the line of Damascus.

Like, everyone is now like a Syria fan.

Everyone's a Bashar al-Assad.

But that's all you could be labeled a terrorist in leftist circles for being supportive.

And it wasn't just, he wasn't really even just supporting anyone.

He was just debunking regime change propaganda, which all these people were eating up like slop and claiming you were a Nazi if you were rejected.

Yeah.

Well, I mean, listen, I'm familiar with that.

I was called a genocide denier for using English language sources to debunk this whole idea that there was a genocide happening in Xinjiang against the Uyghur people.

Yeah.

And the same people that used to get all my case and call me a closet fascist and a black dude.

I'm a fucking black man.

They're calling me a Nazi because I'm saying, no, there actually is not a genocide in Xinjiang against Uyghur people.

They're calling me a Nazi for it.

And then quietly, everyone's just begun to change their minds.

So I hear that.

Back to the news, two things.

Some people online are trying to say that like Israeli planes they well Israel said they didn't fire anything from above Iranian airspace.

Some people are saying some that some Israeli projectiles were fired from Syrian airspace.

I don't see how that's possible.

Do you think it's possible that this was done from like Jordanian airspace and they're trying to cover it up because Jordan got so much flack during the last defense operation?

If they did fire it from Jordanian airspace, then they 100% would cover it up and lie about it.

Jordan is in a very volatile, not a lot of people know this, very volatile situation, as are other regimes in the region.

But Jordan, I mean, Jordan has been that since the 1970s.

That is in a very precarious position.

I mean, especially now because of the genocide in Gaza.

I mean, Jordan is a majority Palestinian, if I'm correct.

All the rifles she's

Does no one know?

I don't know.

I don't know if it's the majority of the population, but I do know that it's in like the high double digits, i.e.

like it's cl is close to like 40 odd percent, if not more, of the population.

And that's actually why there was essentially like a mass expulsion of Palestinians from Jordan.

Actually, it's not majority, it's one it's one in five.

So I was off the mark.

Is it?

Okay.

Yeah.

No, but it's a significant part of the population.

Especially like in the Western region of Jordan.

I'm seeing conflict.

Someone's saying more than half of the six point.

I don't know.

I don't know how Palestinians being defined.

Actually, no.

So 3 million are Palestinian and it's 11 million population.

It's close to.

So here's the thing.

And this is actually something that Norman Pinkelson has brought up.

Is that people talk about the population of Israelis versus Palestinians, but when they make that calculation, they oftentimes forget to count.

And I believe the number you brought up earlier was correct.

It's close to about 3.5 million Palestinians in Jordan.

Yeah.

And if a state of Palestine was established, i.e.

per two-state solution, or if a single state was established, that there would be almost population parity between Palestinians and Israelis.

And that's what Israel fears: is a populace that is equal to them in number.

Yeah, yeah.

I mean, that's exactly why they will never accept and people often ignore this demand, I think, when they're talking about all two-state, whatever solution is the right of return, right?

It's so fundamental to the Palestinian cause because of the refugee status Palestinians still hold in the region, in Jordan and Lebanon and so on.

I've got another question.

So two parts here.

Iran, the IRGC has come out and said in Isfahan, the large explosions that were heard were as a result of Iranian air defenses mobilizing.

So that's the first thing.

Second thing is, and they said that no missiles hit anywhere.

That's what they're claiming.

The second thing is Israel is reportedly, according to Hebrew media, holding a Ministry of War national security meeting right now.

Uh, given that Iran is saying that, like, no missiles hit and that the explosions were AD systems, do you think this could be whether that's true or not, do you think this could be Iran's way of saying, like, well, they didn't hit anything, so we don't we're not going to respond?

That's very, that's very possible.

If Israel didn't strike anything and they like they didn't really hit anything, then Iran has a way out of an obligation to retaliate.

And if it doesn't want to retaliate, that would be the position it would take.

And just so we're clear, is Israel's response finished or is it still ongoing?

It appears to be finished, but like I said, the Iranian retaliatory response came in waves that were like had like at least one hour intervals.

Right.

Right.

So basically it's possible that Israel just du did this to fa save face.

Um apparently US officials did not condone it.

And they're guess they're hoping that Iran will not respond to it.

Yeah.

But if I'm an Israeli and they're in a politically precarious position Nenyahu very politically precarious position.

If I'm an Israeli and I know that well, I don't know how many know this, but

Like most of those missiles and drones were very cheap and they were decoys aimed at disrupting the iron dome that Iran launched at Israel.

Iran launched seven missiles at Nevitim Air Base, which is the most secure airbase in the world.

Yeah, five out of seven of those missiles hit Nevitim Air Base.

If I'm an Israeli with all the knowledge in this scenario, I'm looking at Israel's response to Iran and I'm like, no, you need to do more.

So maybe they're going to do, and you know, I think average Israelis are far less hawkish towards Iran than like almost all of the war cabinet.

So that leaves me with the conclusion of like, maybe this is a prelude.

Hmm.

Uh someone is saying that a micro drone attack in Iran

That was done by MEK agents and not even Israel directly.

This is what the ARIA guy is saying, that this some of these attacks were done by MEK and that Israel is claiming them just to make it itself seem more powerful than it is.

That could explain potential discrepancies in the possibility

Sorry, in the narrative based on facts of you know them claiming they did it from Syrian airspace.

The Syrian airspace thing doesn't make any sense.

Right, so someone's claiming actually that it was done by MEK agents within Iran, actually.

And they're and that they're trying to make it look bigger than it is as a form of psychological warfare.

Yeah, like AB, uh, like, that was weird too.

Like, um.

One second.

It was weird too, because Iran hadn't said anything about like actual targets hit.

Everyone was just saying they heard explosions, explosions reported here, here, here.

And then ABC News was the conduit for the information from Israel.

And ABC News was like, oh, missiles hit, missiles hit.

Da da da.

Like they were amping it up.

And everyone was like, well, there's no confirmation that missiles have hit.

They just confirm explosions.

They confirm passenger planes rerouting, airspace closure.

So that's also weird.

Isn't it isn't it so that, um

That the United States' officials are the ones who told ABC?

Oh yeah, for sure.

And what's also clear, if this is the only strike if this is the only strike, what's very clear is that Israel is scared shitless to actually attack Iran or start anything with Iran.

They are scared shitless, as they should be.

I mean, yeah, that's that's also added with the United States's lack of

support for it, that's clear.

But I I um

I don't know if this is it.

I mean, I'm curious: is Iran going to respond to this?

You know, if nothing was actually hit.

And this is it was basically a dud, a dud attack.

Is Iran even going to respond?

My guess would be that if this is the extent of Israel's attack, and frankly, like you know, unless a day goes by and nothing happens, I'm not going to call it either way.

But if nothing else happens, I would say that there's really no reason for them to retaliate.

Then, you know, whatever the extent of the damage was, like, none of us are really going to know because we're not in Iran.

But if they're saying, well, you know, there was a response, nothing was damaged, nothing was hit, then they really have no reason to retaliate.

You know what?

You know what?

Yeah, that's cool-down rhetoric.

That's not escalationary rhetoric.

You know what's weird also about Haas, what you said about the MEK thing is like.

Okay, so we saw the we saw.

So initially, we hear explosions.

Then we get ABC News saying, Yeah, missiles hit these seven cities.

Now,

What was weird also is Jerusalem Post didn't cite Hebrew media first.

Jerusalem Post cited ABC News.

So all the information came from American media.

And then, after the strikes or the attack, then we have the Israeli War Cabinet meeting after the attack, which is also weird.

Like, why would there be like an Israeli War Cabinet meeting after the attack if it doesn't look like Iran is like they said they'd respond in seconds, now they're not responding?

So, it is possible that this could be the US having done this with proxies.

The whole thing is a little odd.

It it it's especially odd because we're not seeing any confirmed verbal responses from Iran.

Israel didn't take credit for it yet.

Is that true?

Are you sure about that?

I could have sworn I just saw something of them saying they took credit for this.

Where have you seen Israel take credit for this?

They took credit for an attack on their airbase, Iranian airbase.

That's what I saw on Twitter.

I lost it.

Lost it on the top.

The more I'm thinking about this, like US media within like minutes came out and said it was Israel.

Yeah.

And now Israel's having a war cabinet meeting.

I didn't see anything about Israel taking credit.

Okay, okay.

And then I haven't seen it.

Hang on.

I haven't seen it.

I'll say I haven't seen anything directly, but there have been reporters from mainstream US agencies that have confirmed that Israel did retaliate.

From US agencies, though.

From US agencies.

That's what I'm saying.

I look at this guy into conspiracies.

You know, it's um

M Mario is claiming that he thinks Iran is lying about the explosion being the result of the activation of the air defense system because they don't want to escalate.

But That yeah, that's possible.

And y and but here's the weird thing is that US sources are claiming that

They hit their target.

So, why is the US the US's rhetoric fueling cause for escalation?

You know, it just doesn't make sense.

You know, I think Iran might be telling the truth.

Uh

Farce News did say that there was.

That's what I didn't get.

Farce News came out and they were like, oh, no missiles hit.

And then they were like, no missiles hit, but windows of buildings at the Isfahan military base were blown out.

So could they blow out windows of buildings just by debris falling or by the activation?

From like the force of the explosion, it could do it.

Yeah, you're right.

The only thing that I'm seeing, like if I'm looking at, for example, like Hawarex, the Jerusalem Post, etc., they're actually pointing to EBC News that Israel has launched a counterattack.

But one thing that I'm seeing Jerusalem Post repeating over and over is why Israel can't make, and this is directed towards an internal audience.

I don't think this is for the international audience, but they're explaining why they can't make a unilateral decision to just attack Iran.

Even that tweet from Marco Rubio, Marco Rubio, yeah, this is getting weird.

Marco Rubio, listen to this: Marco Rubio tweeted out like 10 minutes after the attack was taking place.

He said, Israel, he didn't say Israel's conducting strikes outside of Iranian airspace.

He said Israel has the cape has the ability to conduct strikes against targets inside Iran without entering Iranian airspace from aircraft over Syrian and Iraqi airspace.

So he didn't, he didn't say anything else about like how great this attack is, how he defends Israel.

He's like making a tweet to specifically say, well, they have the ability to do this from outside Iranian airspace in Syrian Iraq.

It's weird.

I think that

If it's true that this was not, that really nothing was stricken.

Iran may not respond to this, and I w I would walk back what I said that this is definitely war.

But if Iran does respond to this, I think it is war.

But like you said, they said they were would respond in seconds.

Seems like their explai their their position right now is that there's nothing to respond to.

Yeah, that's what it seems like to me.

Like if this happened to Russia, it's definitely not war per se in the sense that like they'd target a a nuclear site and it's definitely not a large response and it's maybe not even a response at all.

So we we might just see a uh a conflict of narrative of Iran claiming this was big and then, you know, the Zionists claiming that it was actually sorry, Iran claiming this was small and the Zionists claiming it was big and really just doesn't amount to much.

Um

I guess my question out of this then is, and I'm just going to go under the assumption that if there's no further attacks, if there's no further hostilities, then this is pretty much where it ends.

The question I think that people have gotten a little bit lost in over the last few days is what then does that mean for the Israeli operation that they're carrying out in Gaza right now?

And how does the international community respond?

Because I'm not sure how much, like I know that you guys pay attention, but I'm not sure how much attention you've been paying to the ICJ.

What's been coming out of them?

If there's somebody that you probably want to follow on this, it's two people.

It's Dimitri Lasgaris, strong anti-imperialist, former candidate for the Green Party of Canada's leadership.

And he basically got like Jeremy Corbyn because he's an anti-Zionist.

And he actually was, he was recently, he was in Ruffah, Lebanon, I believe he was in Iraq.

And now he's now I'm pretty sure he's back in Greece.

And he conducted interviews with people.

He was like basically trying to shed light on the fact that there's not a single genocide that they're carrying out just in Gaza, but they're actually carrying out like a double genocide in the West Bank as well.

And he's been trying to say to people, pay attention to what's happening with the ICJ, because the international community, especially with the increased hostilities against Iran right now, are going to be forced to start cutting their ties with Israel.

Like at the at the very same time that they're essentially trying to assert military dominance in the region and essentially push Palestinians out of Gaza, as well as cleanse them from the West Bank, because we know that the Israeli project is ultimately a uh an ethno-nationalist state.

At some point, international business as well as not just elected officials, but like bureaucrats and governments abroad are going to have to cut ties because they could actually themselves face war crime charges.

They could face criminal charges for conducting the same business with Israel that they have been for the the last several decades.

Yeah, I mean, I've been.

I've seen some stuff, like, even possible that Netanyahu could be.

charged by the ICC, right?

Was that something that was news or ICJ?

No, no.

The ICJ wouldn't charge it's the ICC that charges the individuals.

The ICJ is the body that determines whether a genocide has taken place.

The ICJ also, they're the ones that make the recommendation as to whether there should be an investigation into genocide, which they've already done.

But there's been further developments from the ICJ basically to show that It is entirely possible that business communities and governments, members of individual governments, even down to like bureaucrats and administrators, the people who are signing off on arms sales, et cetera, or arms delivery, could themselves possibly face criminal charges if they keep this up.

I I think it's clear that Israel is cornered.

And I think actually see, this is something I was gonna mention.

Like, I know this is probably not gonna escalate into a war so far, right?

Based on what we know now.

But let's say it did, right?

Well,

See, Ukraine and NATO had the advantage in the onset of the SMO to more or less gaslight the world and make them ignore the context of ten years of NATO aggression escalation, the Azovites, the neo-Nazis, the civil war, because of the immediacy of Russia's actions.

Israel doesn't have that advantage whatsoever.

In a war between Israel and Iran, this is what the U.S.

knows.

The whole world would understand why Iran is justified.

Not only because of the immediacy of the context, it is inignorable.

Israel's attack on their embassy happening having happened so recently, but also the genocide in Gaza that's been happening for what is it, six months now, if I'm correct, more than six months.

So, yeah.

So.

This is something Israel would not have.

The US would not be able to portray Iran as an aggressor.

In front of the international community, in the way that it tried to paint Russia, that.

When Russia attacked in late February,

You know, that was at least months after the latest atrocities by the uh Ukrainians in the Civil War.

It wasn't i the immediacy of the event made everyone forget about the context that led up to it.

This is not true for the Middle East region, where everyone can see Israel as the only aggressor.

What do you think the purpose would be for the US to do a proxy attack rather than allow Israel to respond?

It would allow Israel to claim responsibility for some something it maybe doesn't have the capability of doing.

Uh can Israel strike Iran outside of Iranian airspace?

Um I don't I d I that's something that I I don't know, but I kind of doubt.

And it's it's interesting to me that Marco Rubio would have to make that claim.

Right.

It's not always true.

It would allow for a limited response.

To be conducted within Iran by proxy groups, the MEK, allow Israel to take responsibility for it and hype it up just a little bit, just so it's enough for them, and hope the Iranians don't respond to it.

That would be the reason.

I mean, look, you have to place this into the context.

The Biden administration and the Israeli government must have been fiercely negotiating and arguing over the past few days about, okay, what is going to be the response?

The US doesn't want there to be a response.

Israel wants to respond.

The US is saying, no, you can't.

So the compromise they came to probably might have been this.

Allow Israel to save face by utilizing proxy groups within Iran to do the work for them.

That would be my guess.

Mm-hmm.

Just writing something.

How much uh outside of the uh outside of this conflict um how much are you guys wanting to talk about uh what's uh happening in Haiti?

Because that seemed like it it sort of appeared and then disappeared even though the situation is ongoing.

Um and my issue is I think a lot of people kind of dismiss Haiti as like a basket case like they would with most African countries.

That one is actually like outside of what's happening in Gaza and and um inside of like the Israel conflict with uh with Iran, which I assume and kind of hope doesn't escalate any farther.

But outside of that, I think there's two incredibly interesting developments to me.

One is the fact that uh there's only one country left in West or Central Africa that if it essentially nationalizes and kicks out French interests, it establishes sort of a establishes like a chain from East to West Africa of countries that are now sovereign and operate according to their own interests.

And then the second story is not just Haiti, but its relationship with Venezuela and how essentially a new pink tide can possibly be formed.

And I think the key to that is what happens in Haiti.

But I wasn't sure how much you guys wanted to talk about that given what's happening tonight.

Yeah, I think um no, it's definitely a really important topic, but

I I just don't think it's news right now, you know necessarily.

But it's definitely something worth discussing at a much greater length and with more d I think right now the most important thing when it comes to that topic is more of an in depth education about the full context, which I think most people are lacking.

Right.

And that's important for the Middle East as well.

But when you have like breaking news like this, I think we're just trying to kind of figure out what's going on right now.

What's happening?

Exactly.

Yeah, I understand.

I think with this I think with this one though, 'cause there are people that are still

Listen, I don't like speaking against people that are from the region.

I don't like speaking against or over Palestinians.

I don't like speaking against or over Iranians.

At least, like, not like if you're a Pahlaviist, then fuck you.

I really don't give a shit.

I can say whatever the hell I want.

But when you're, you know, when you're an Iranian who's not like a dedicated Pahlaviist and are trying to at least be like moderate in your views, I don't like to butt up against them too much because it's like, well, they've got more, obviously, like experience and expertise than I do.

So, but the one problem I do have is that you still have these holdouts among progressive liberals, even like the socialist left, where they think that there's essentially there's two countries where it's still safe to tow the U.S.

State Department line, and that's with Syria and Iran.

And my big problem is I don't think a lot of people, yes, but I think there's also like a little bit of schizophrenia there.

It's kind of weird.

I think people are more familiar with Russia in the sense that, A, it's gotten covered a lot more last 60 years of U.S.

history.

And the Cold War anti-war movement fostered a political education that I think is way sharper than what you'd find among Americans about the Middle East.

People's opinions and ideas about the Middle East are generally shaped by the war on terror, and then prior to that, the Cold War.

Whereas with Russia itself, there's plenty of education there.

But I get your point.

I think when it comes to Iran, though, they're safe targets in the sense that people don't have to think of them as anything more than a caricature.

I think also there's also Iran.

Here's why, I mean, this is kind of more in-depth, but I think Western leftist resentment toward Iran is also related to the fact that Iran, as a revolutionary power and its revolution, quite literally outmoded the conventional traditions of the Western left in general.

Iran is more, they are tailing behind Iran, basically, in terms of the revolutionary fire.

I remember something fascinating.

And Esrala was interviewing some Trotskyists.

No, no, no, I don't want to demean these guys.

They weren't Trotskyites.

They were pretty based Turkish communists, actually.

And Esrala said, and this was in the early 2000s, he said, look, the socialist world or the world socialism has long left the international stage.

Now they're seeming to come back and we fully appreciate them.

Venezuela, for example, and so on and so on.

And he said they fully support us.

And he says we welcome their support and we're glad they're finally getting back into the ring.

Now, why I'm mentioning that is because for decades, the international left, not only the Western left, died.

It quite literally died.

It became irrelevant.

And it wasn't leading the forces of anti-imperialism.

And Iran was.

And Iran-aligned groups like Hezbollah were.

So.

Western leftists have now come back.

And they're trying and they're still resentful and have a bone to pick with Iran.

Oh, you know what I just, you know what actually just came to mind?

Because I was thinking to myself that it's interesting how a lot of the Western left is now saying what because you have to kind of differentiate between Iranian like revolutionary politics, but you have to differentiate between that and like pan-Arab revolutionary politics prior to that.

Because Iranian revolutionary politics is very self-contained.

It's specific.

It's nationalistic to Iran.

Whereas pan-Arab nationalism, I mean, it's still interesting.

I think it's a little nuanced because the Iranian revolution was definitely something that spread.

Like it was kind of that was the beginning of the Islamic Awakening, as it's called, right?

Right.

What I'm trying to say, though, like, essential conceit wasn't pan-Arabic in nature.

It was.

Yeah.

Yeah.

But what I'm trying to say, though, is that a lot of people are just catching up to where Iran was 50 years ago and catching up to where the Arab world and even the Middle East and North Africa, like people are just catching up to what it was that Gaddafi was trying to accomplish.

They're just catching up now to what Nasser was trying to accomplish in Egypt.

But what's really, well, hold on, what's really interesting though, and I was talking about this the other day.

As a matter of fact, if you or Jackson, I'm pretty sure either of you could score this interview.

I'm also noticing that in this conversation on anti-Zionism, a lot of people are saying the same shit that Louis Farrakhan was saying 40 years ago in the 1980s.

Yeah.

And I I would be I would be very interested to see what would happen uh and how he would respond if either of you were able to uh interview Minister Lewis Harrakon.

I I'd love to.

I'm sure Jackson would too.

Um I just watched the uh I just re-watched the OJ Simpson American crime story where when uh Kardashian and and uh was it Dershwitz and then like uh Farrakhan's men show up to take them to court on the judgment day and and then Kardashian's like you brought you brought Farrakhan's men to come and protect us and he was like freaking out

Yeah, no, it was no, no, no, no.

It wasn't Kardashian.

It was Bob Shapiro that said that.

Yeah, yeah.

It was Robert Shapiro.

But, okay, so the interesting thing, and I've been saying this to people for a while, and I remember when I was saying this back in 2020, it was 2022.

This was happening.

This was back when it was 2021 and 2022.

There were two events.

In 2021, it was the Israeli attack on Gaza.

I think I'm pretty sure that was like post-Ramadan.

And then in 2022, it was back when everyone was getting on Kyrie Irving's ass, and then Kanye was saying all that wild shit.

But it was, there's these instances where Zionists start training their attention on black people as if black people are like the original and most dangerous anti-Semites.

There's always, I don't know if you remember like when Jamie Foxx got out of the hospital and he made an Instagram post referring to like Judas in his life and the Zionists were like, oh, he could only be talking about us.

You remember that shit?

Yeah.

There's just like this, there's this impulse they have to paint black people as uniquely anti-Semitic.

And when I would talk about this, like how it is that, how it is that Zionists specifically target black people.

And notice they do two things.

They target black people as uniquely anti-Semitic, and then they rely on APAC-funded black Democrats, people like Richie Torres, Hakeem Jeffries, etc.

They get them to march out in public and then apologize to Jewish people on behalf of black people.

For something that we had nothing to do with.

Zionism is an ideology of bad faith, you know?

Yeah.

And I think the hostility.

Toward black people that comes from Zionists is basically based in this kind of general racism, actually, which they found a way to justify in a Zionist way by saying, Oh, they're, you know, they're against us as the Jewish people, when it seems to me that that conflict.

There's nothing particularly there's nothing uniquely Jewish about it it's what it is they think no they still they think they own us is what it is it's it's you owe us yeah yeah and the reason the reason I bring that up is because when I was uh when I would say like when I would say to people like what the fuck you talking about what did Kai do to anybody no we're not uniquely anti-Semitic and people were calling me an anti-Semite because and the liberals like people are still calling me an anti-Semitism yeah you know you know what it is it's that the Zionists believe that they see Zionism is not just I'm gonna sound anti-Semitic but it's not what I mean Zionism is not just Israel Zionism is also a specific outlook is a specific mentality it's a specific ideology of making sense of the post-war liberal order by basically identifying every form of you know uh parochial existence every form of collective existence whatever as fascism and and it's a it's a it's a justification to safeguard the liberal capitalist order by invoking the crimes of the Nazis which is ironic obviously we know it's BS but not the not that the crimes are BS but that they're just their invocation of those crimes in defense of capitalism is BS has has nothing to do with anything because the reason forces of liberal capitalism were behind the Nazis right that's all I mean to say but

What I'm what I'm trying to say is that um

They basically try to have a Zionist ideology, try to have a monopoly on defining the terms of the civil rights movement, defining the terms of anti-racism and so on and so on.

Because fundamentally, the society's acceptance of anti-racism among civil society was in large part a response to Nazi racism.

It was a response to.

The vestiges of the traditional European colonialist view that culminates in the Nazis.

So it's after World War II really that racism starts to become taboo, for example, right?

Where it was common, it was just normalized before.

And Zionist ideology tries to have a fundamental role in defining the nature of post-war anti-racist struggles and so on by basically ensuring that it takes a liberal form, ensuring that it's within the confines of liberal democracy.

But when black nationalism starts to take form in the 60s and 70s, which is radically going outside the bounds of respectable liberal democratic politics, suddenly it becomes dangerous and anti-Semitic and whatever, because it's basically being unleashed from.

the context of liberal civil society.

And that's also coincidentally the same time of sixty seven war, which totally turns the tides among the left wing forces and black nationalistic forces uh to uh whereas before they were ambiguous, after sixty seven everyone was totally anti-Zionist and against Israel.

The reason I'm bringing that up is the context, honestly.

No, no, the reason I'm bringing that up is because that's because when people were getting mad at me for pushing back against that and saying, like, well, what are you talking about?

That there's a strain of anti-Semitism in the black community that we have to be concerned about.

Because that's when they were essentially like there was this fear being struck into people's hearts that suddenly black people are turning on the Jews.

And you still see it happening.

Like, you still see whenever there's like some new atrocity that's happening in Gaza, you'll see the Zionists immediately start turning to black people and be like, why are the black supremacists joining with white supremacists to attack us?

But I remember like I caught a whole lot of that flack back in 2022 when I was saying, no, it's really fucking interesting that, oh, sorry, I didn't make this word on your stream because I'm not sure what the other rules are here, but I'm like, it's really interesting that we're now going back to this narrative about unique anti-Semitism in our community because you see how much revolutionary power that exists within the community.

And the thing is, every so often it has to be tamped back down again.

It has to be beaten back down.

You got to make sure that we can never rediscover our anti-Zionist roots.

And I'm like, if you guys go ahead, and I mean, you guys, I'm like, when I was talking to people back in 2022, I'm like, it's really interesting because that's the exact same thing that they did to Louis Farrakhan.

Nobody had a problem.

Like, Zionists did not have a problem with Louis Farrakhan, or at least they didn't really typify him as a massive anti-Semitic threat until the 1980s.

And that's when he turned his critique towards the Zionist entity.

That's when he started to criticize Zionists.

That's when he was talking about Zionism as a tool of the devil, that it is dirty religion, that there are satanic Jews.

When he started saying that stuff, he was talking about Zionists.

But through the lens of media distribution and publication in the 1980s, all of that gets filtered through large mainstream organizations, CBS, NBC, ABC News, etc., the New York Times.

And all of these publications have the ability to just blot out information and then push a specific narrative.

Whereas now, in the age of social media, you can't control that kind of information dissemination.

So I'm like, go back and watch his interviews on Phil Donahue in the 1980s.

And the exact same things he was saying back then that got him labeled an anti-Semite, leftist, it's the same stuff that's coming out of their mouths now.

And it's really interesting to me because they're trying to hold out on that last bit, like the last bit of ground that they feel that they don't have to give up, which is Syria and Iran specifically.

And it's people that are willing to take those steps early to specifically defend Syria and Iran as the major bulwarks against the spread of the Zionist threat in the Middle East.

People who are gonna go ahead and make that defense early on, that is the correct position to be on.

And a whole lot of people are kicking and screaming because they want the right to be able to castigate some group of brown people as being uniquely fascist and being uniquely anti-Semitic.

Um, not to interrupt, but there's some interesting developments.

So, uh, one of one of our sources in Iran, who is on that Twitter space with Mario Nafal, he's a military expert in Iran.

He's so I sent my I put out a tweet a few minutes ago about all the things we were discussing about the questions about like, you know, was this even Israel?

Because there was like six things that added up that were made me question whether it was Israel.

And he said, I sent it in the group chat with him and I said, what do you think?

And I asked that Von Klauswitz Twitter guy what he thought.

And he's also, he's very informed on military affairs.

I said, I sent the tweet and I said, Von Klauswitz, Henry, what do you guys think?

Doesn't this LC mod also?

Am I correct?

No Israeli officials have claimed responsibility at question mark.

He said, no, they just denied it.

And I said, MEK, question mark.

And I said, source.

And he said, yeah, they just denied it according to this is what.

So he's saying, he's saying, I said, where's the source?

He said, I don't have it directly.

I have it from Arab Telegram citing Hebrew media.

So make of that what you will, take it with a grain of salt.

But that's what he's saying, which is really interesting.

And he's pretty.

You know, he he he's pretty uh uh conservative with the things he says about these matters, and he was pretty conservative about and pretty correct with everything he said about the Iran retaliatory strike earlier this week.

But that's very interesting.

So, um Mario is reporting that

He says the sources from Channel 14 that three Iranian sources told the New York Times that Israel did hit the Iranian Air Force base near Isfahan.

And also two Israeli military officials are t told the New York Times the same thing.

So that could easily be a lie, obviously there's no proof, but I'm just throwing it out there.

NBC News says US did not participate in strike on Iran, but that it could still be a proxy.

Yeah, I'm saying Israel.

Um, this is very odd.

Marco Rubio's comments were odd, and then the fact that Israel hasn't taken credit for it is very odd.

Are you sure they haven't?

I have not I've I mean I've followed this second by second since it happened and I've not seen anyone in Israel claim responsibility.

And Iran when Iran is talking about everything, they just keep saying we shot down drones.

They don't say we shot down Israeli drones.

They just say we shot down drones.

You're right, actually.

You're right.

There's no real confirmation Israel did anything except from the US officials.

And there might not ever be.

They might just, you know, talk in this code to save face and not escalate.

Yeah, apparently Iranian officials says that Israeli attempts failed and were humiliating and all its assets were shot down.

I don't know if that's confirmed.

But if that's their acknowledgement of an Israeli attack, it kind of seems like they don't consider that worth responding to.

No.

I'm checking my Telegram channels right now and it's it's I'm seeing the exact same thing.

That uh spokesman Hussein DeLarian says that air defenses were s uh, they successfully shot down uh drones and there's no reports of a missile tonight.

And and that has that quote, the actual quote that I have, he doesn't say Israel.

It says it's it's a random Iranian official.

I don't know which official it is, but it says there's been no airstrike in Isfahan or other parts of the country.

They only made a failed and humiliating attempt to fly quadcopters and they're all shot down.

Okay.

So I haven't seen Iran directly bl blame Israel.

I haven't seen Israel take credit for it.

So do you think I kind of think tonight I'm even checking some of the Israeli Telegram channels that I'm in as well?

They're making it seem as if like Iranians are in a panic right now.

But like nobody is actually confirming anything.

So this could have been a form of bullshit Israel did for domestic polit political reasons just to tell Israelis, oh yeah, we hit them back if that's the response.

But you know guys it doesn't seem like tonight there's gonna be much more happening.

You think so Jackson or?

Yeah, I think I'm gonna wrap.

Yeah, I think it's about time because I was gonna say I'll stay up and whatever, but I'm like, you know what?

It's been three hours and

There's it doesn't seem like this is gonna.

I think tomorrow morning we'll have a clearer picture of what's gonna happen, what's gonna go down.

Um Volk Vulture got a link for me.

From Israel News.

Uh sources in Iran confirm okay, yeah, that says Israeli news.

Um

All right.

Yeah.

There aren't any.

There's no, there's no sources that I'm seeing right now that are coming from the Israeli side that are doing anything besides cheerleading.

So there's no new information coming out.

It's just people's responses to the strike.

So I'm probably going to sign off.

Q, it was great having you on, great discussion.

We weren't really, we weren't really able to get into a lot of other topics, and we can probably schedule for another one sometime.

Yeah, yeah, to make up when you were to come through.

Yeah, for sure.

Yeah.

And then, Jackson, we're not going to, I already told my Discord.

We're not going to say anything.

I'm on your stream.

But we have a big announcement tomorrow telling your stream this.

Very big announcement tomorrow, right?

Yes, um

Big and exciting.

Yeah.

I mean we could probably say it um probably say it now 'cause I'm gonna be traveling tomorrow so I'm not gonna be streaming the next like two three days.

Okay.

Yeah, it's uh it's uh it's up to you.

Or we could wait.

Yeah, let's wait.

Let's wait till we have the post up and everything running.

But I already told I already told my people just to give them a little head start.

Uh yeah.

But 'cause they already knew about it and been waiting.

But uh, yeah, that's coming tomorrow.

It's gonna be really if you if you're watching this live stream, if you live in America and you're watching this live stream, you're watching Jackson's live stream, pay attention to his Twitter tomorrow.

Uh, because something big that might interest you, probably will interest you, is being announced.

And it's not the Alex Jones thing, because I already announced that.

All right, you guys.

It's good talking.

Backpack, what's up, man?

All right, guys.

Peace out.

Take it easy.

See you guys later.

Bye-bye.

Exit out of this.

And reactivate the so guys, I'm actually starving.

It's war, what's up?

Covered myself in olive oil for nothing.

You fucking asshole.

Your name is It's War.

You're mocking me.

I was totally wrong, alright?

But you know what?

Um, because we because the information wasn't being reported correctly.

If the information was correct, I would have been correct, all right?

But it wasn't, it's not my fault, anyway, guys.

Uh I'm like that guy.

Who's the portrait behind me?

It's William Z.

Foster, alright?

Anyway, um, and I think this should be here, right?

Looks better that way.

Anyway, guys, great stream.

I gotta get out of this suit so that I can eat because I'm starving.

I'll see you guys uh Sunday or tomorrow if I have to.

If I have to stream on a day that's not designated my s current streaming schedule, then you know some shit is going down.

Anyway, guys, I'll see you

Soon.

Keep

Just wait for tomorrow.

It's going to be some big stuff.

Anyway, guys, I also have another announcement to make.

I'm gonna announce

I might announce something.

And uh there th th there's there's also something else coming up and it's gonna be

The day that Haz al-Deen no longer has swag.

And I'm I'm with a heavy heart I'm announcing and I'm gonna tell you the exact time I'm gonna tell you the time in which it happens that Hazal Dean has no swag.

As a matter of fact, it has less than exceptional swag.

And I don't want to announce it.

But I'm gonna so I'm ah shit.

Here it goes, guys.

Hazaldin will cease to have swords.