Truckers RISE UP in California!

2022-07-21
Tags:
kep changing colors
chan
i ot thanks tosday
next time seeve i jump on the tra le yellow
eight bey
o love for this is not where i should be but i is more good for i want
f
o people the l p the pple k the ps pep the loc pal loc
revoltion
the people thelook pople of the t pl of the pap the many pps the people of the pok
the people ok thelook pople of the t pod of the m people many pps ew people of the t pok
people the lok paple of the tle pild of the peopley ps the er people of the t pel
the people the thelok pople of the in pod of the m ppleny p people of the p
good evening
popcooo pople o of the ocopalpopion of the bal pople of the er poplepy pples the the popion of the ocal pop ocoloal pap
m
wor popw people the pe thelooking people of the b pchildn of the er people many poples the the people of the binal people pople
ath
asley went crazy to thank the bters let go the had
jesus fucking christ that was the longest intro in the history of the fucking world jesus bk in christ i'm so sorry guys
so sorry for such a fucking long intro
thank you so much rake
the sorry for the fucking long
but fucking caught up in a fuck and twitter bullshit
thing give me a second
give me a damn second
mm
well
i got candy
how do i get fucking candy
he we guys we have a lot
it cover and we have a lot to discuss today
particularly
there's a trucker uprising going on in california right now
and its actual details
make things a little bit complicated from the perspective
sound like a
you know
working class
hypothetical movement right so we're going to get into that
we are going to gein the
is this awkward
'll be eating right now
it's
definitely awkward right
thing is
guss can eat with me
ok you don't have to just
watch me do this
there
while the stream was
very late
very late and very postponed
m
look
me a second
after power
i debated that same guy and bc that you were talking to on twitter
he doesn't get the distinction between productive labor from the p ov of capital and productive labor in general yes so basically what he was doing it is actually kind of related
to the california trucker thing
we re not
so we've been having this huge debate about
productive labor and unproductive labor
and he's basically trying to say
that
oh no he just fucking completely got it wrong he was trying to say some shit like
no marx thought that any any labor
that is hired for a wage
he is productive
but marx says directly that sometimes when late labors hired
for a wages in capital volume two when he's talking about commercial workers and clerks
you say they don't produce value
at all therere a cost of production
and the
that theyre the underpayment of their wages
it' is only a proxy for surplus value
it is transferred from other sectors of production
and marx makes that very clear
so no marx does not think all wage laborers produce value whire productive laborers
the basic idea is that
any any labor which corresponds to a profit
that is paid for by a wage
is productive right that's not true at all
according to marx
it is just not true
bas
the breisja stops pouring coffee
revolution
the trackor blocks the porch
he's petite bourgeoisie reactionary
the left in twenty twenty two
bas
gave the rope for the leftist
thank you so much boris
appreciate you so much and thank you so much chris
bas
only and i mean only lower fuel and improved freight rates can help truckers
nothing thank you so much ninos
d on
fuk i hate that fucking donald parkson guy so fuckin much
he's such a fucking dumb ass i fucking ate that guy
i literally can't stand that fucking guy i hate those fucking cosmonaut people so much
i could not stand those fucking people i cauld not fuck and stand
do it so fucking deliberately dishonest
okay let me let me explain to the context o
so i can let you guys in
and i don't i don't i know youus care about puking twittershit
but it's like
lett me fucking explain to you why this is so frustrating
ok
so
i basically made the mistake of falking replying to this shit
i got these fucking ankle biting nerds
you can go read my substab we don't have to bother me here right
so he's saying logo you're a third world is
does this funny mean
this mean
fuckan blew up in popularity why because the average person who's not ideological
agrees with it based on their common sense
left twitter doesn't agree with this but it's still got one point two k likes anyway
is the average person like understands
hoow this is true right
eight
but
okay
so
so yeah and then and then the nerd from cosmonauts and this is what the glass wares do right
said this was third worldsm and i said
you know you guys have in common with third world is that you just deny
that there's an american productive
sector
you know you just deny that there's any american manufacturers
there's no american warehouse workers
there's no american refiners like
none of this exists because all it's largely been outsourced to other countries
eah even if that's been true compared to like the one nine hundred eighty s i mean it's still a very significant part of the population
like these are the people that got trump elected ok it's
it's still a very significant tart
of the american population
they may not be a majority of the work the labor force so what they've never been in history
for most of history at least
so
you know like that's stupid
and he goes no marks
that starbucks employees produce surplus value
and why because they quote mark saying that
workers who perform productive labor and thatt labor's productive
directly great surplus value in valorizes capital
except marx actually does go about defining
what labour is
he also defines
how labor produces value
and that
that is completely
inappoliticbal to how fucking starbucks makes profit period
ok
it's like mcdonald's right
it does not follow this sum
direct form of ground up accumulation based on
the direct sale of commodities it's just fucking isn't that if you think that you don't know anything about how
the modern economy works or starbucks for that matter right it's just funk of stupid
anyway
i say that's not how starbucks makes a profit and
let's not start quoting mark's ca because here's mark saying
that you know in the development of can this is his own words right
the apologist of capitalism just because everyone gets turned into a wage
wage earner in capitalism the oppositive of capitalism go
oh yeah wage laborers
are just people exchanging their service for money
so all different types of workers are the same
a and all workers are productive workers and then marx is saying that's bolsted he gives the example of a mercenary
he says a mercenary isn't a fucking productive worker right
and then here
you know
he talks about how you know the certain labors of menial servants may you know take the form of commodities
all of the same use valve is considered as material objects
but they're not productive labor
because they don't produce commodities
ok
and then he's trying to say that he's just paraphrasing adam smith
ok we're going to get into that
here and that that one now in this one
where there's no room for any argument about whether he's paraphraising adam smith he goes
only the narrow mind mark gos only the narrow minded bourgeois
can't differentiate capital's production
um
from
they can't differentiate productive labor from the
i
standpoint of capital
and productive labor from the standpoint of material reality right
so that's why they think all wage workers are productive laborers and he said not true
that's as marks own words
and then here
he says the kinds of work that paradoxaly might be able to be exploited in a directly capitalist way
um
they constitute infinitesinal magnitudes in comparison of the mass of products
and they should be left out of account
and treated only under wage labor under the same category of wage lab whi is not the same productive labor
now in marx's time it wasn't like there weren't entrep a lot of entrepreneurs who were hiring service workers
it's not like the owners of brothels
or theaters you know didn't exist as entrepreneurs trying to expand
production right
those were very widespread
marx wasn't even talking about that here
he was talking in terms of the capitalist way
of capital accumulation on that basis of labor right
and he said that's just like doesn't exist ass
now you so much say appreciate
mark wexy said that does not exist
for the most part right so we should re just like
we should consider
those
even those
for whom the definition might apply to
they should be treated
as unproductive workers faceal mark says directly
ok
so when he goes
marxist paraphrasing adam smith's second definition
that says it's contradictory and doesn't work he praised this first
so i have to explain this to you
right
so marx in his theories of surplus value
those over two explanations
adam smith gives
for productive labor right
the first one
is that it's exchanged
for capital
and the second one
is that it's realized in a commodity ok
now this guy does not know how to read despite the glasses ok because he goes
c
marx is saying that it's contradictory because he says
in something inconsistent here right it's inconsistent what is you referring to as inconsistent
ok well let's see
so i said first of all that's not true
the opposite is true because if you read the next paragraph is whatll mark says
productive and unproductive labor is here conceived from the standpoint of the possessor of money
from the capitalist and not from the workmen
ok
that's what mark says directly as far as he's concerned
is that people who
think this you know it leads to nonsense
we have so little understanding that they raise the question of whether labor service or function of the prostitute flunkey
and for marx a flunkey is basically a service worker according to marx not me
brings in returns ok
then mark says
later that you know
even malthus are to be preferred than most people
to defend the necessity of
understanding unproductive laborers
ya
now this is the worst part ok
the final
nail in the coffin
is this
he got the definitions wrong
so there's two definitions in this sentence where
the first definition is that productive labor
produces commodities
and it's corresponding to a much more elementary view
then the definition which defines productive labor as labor which produces capital
so adam smith
opponents have disregarded his first pertinent definition
which is here
ok
and instead of have concentrated on the second
which is here
even though there are unavoidable contradictions and inconsistencies
in this
second
definition right here
and the reason why
they could point out the inconsistency and contradictions in this second definition
is because they insisted on the material content of labor that labor has to be a material thing
so they're basically telling adam smith adam smith
if
if commodities or if productive labor is just that which
produces capital
what about the leate the material content of labor does that not matter right
and the specific requirement that labor must fix itself to a more or less permanent product
so he got it totally wrong
he totally confused it
and he gt he doesn't understand what's being said
productive labor is here defined from the standpoint of the capital's production
and adam smith got to the very heart of the matter
and hit to the very nail on the head
ok
that doesn't mean he's agreeing
only with this
standpoint
what marx is actually saying is that by itself if productive labor
were only defined as that which produces capital
it would produce contradictions
but adam smith also includes that it must be realized in a commodity solving the contradictions
there we go that is what marx was trying to say and yeah services are commodities to the extent
they take the form of commodities
literally the element
then why does mark say that adam
smith is
definition
of a commodity
as something
separate
separate
and material
is essential to solving
the contradiction
and all it takes is reading capital volume one's opening set chapters
you see that for marks a commodity
is a separate
material object
marx makes that clear
in capital volume one
so this stod is full of shit
he is full of shit
it service is not
a commodity that can crystallize value and it's not even a commodity at all
ok
by itself
give me a second
me a second
it is just palking ong
hey it's just fopping an oil
god
it's all all to all to defend what
right
all to defend what
finally
finally let's actually talk about the subject we're meant to get to today because
i've already wasted a lot of time on bullshit
just my fault
sorry
sorry
so i'm just kidding i don't apologize for shit
right anyway guys
california right now
is experiencing a wave of protests probably not as big as the canadian truck or convoy right
but it might metastasize into that
because
california's sports if you remember from like last year
there was a crisis on the ports
of america's you know
supply chain crisis right there's
courts are being held up
there's new threats to that though because california's truckers
which are you know
transporting goods from these ports
are starting to protest now why are they protesting ok let's just
lean over the article and you're going to start to see
of the context fine this whole thing
makes this a little bit
yike see
right or at least you know we've got to actually think about this
and think about what's going on
so there is a new law
it's a gig worker law called a b five and i think
this really speaks to the reactionary and outdated understanding
of the relations of production
which not only left this hab but even fugking democrats in general
ok
what's basically going on is there's a new law called a b five
it is a b five law
wants to formalize
the gig economy workers you know who are
basically transporting people around like taxi
drivers used to rite
they want to classify them under the traditional definition of employer
employment
ok
as employees sorry they want to subject them
to the classification of being employees
rather than independent contractors
and it' is going to apply to all drivers ok
what they're saying is that
you know these contractors are being exploited
because they're being classified as independent contractors rather than employers right
well
truckers are overwhelmingly against this law
because they want to maintain their independence
as contractors
they don't want to be employers they don't want to have to work
for some fucking trucking corporation
that and fix them
to that corporation
you know presumably a monopoly
they want to be able to control
brief freelance and who they work for right
and you know you have bought seventy thousand truckers
a
who would fall under this law so the huge protests that have brek broken out
because of this and isn' the largest trucker protest
over the lot
thou in this case something a little weird seems to like it's going on right it seems like
there's like a in firsly proportionate
relationship
between the interests of the truckers who are independent contractors
you know who are owner operators
and they don't necessarily own their trucks most of these people are in debt
right
but even for the ones that do
they're technically considered small business owners
or freelance laborers right leftist would
classify that as petite bousgeois
but one of the weird things is the following guys it's a little weird right
if they are petite bousgeois
then w is the difference between their class status
a
a law
california can just pass a law
forormally categorize them categorizing them as employees
i think the first thing it shows is just how nebulous
mark soy definitions of relations of production are'
all it takes is the fucking law to transform the relations of production
you know that your definition of the relations of production
it's warped
nothing would change
except of course that these owner operators
would be heavily restricted and they would actually be at the mercy
of their employers right
and all of the bureaucratic red tape and all that shit
that comes with it
will obstruct their ability to actually
make a living in a more fluid
wall but that's not the worst part
the worst part of it as far as they're concerned is that if these truckers
were to be classified as employe employees
it would be forced to join
a trucking union
but the trucking union
is one that is already politically loyal to the democratic party
so hm i wonder why the democrats are doing this
so let's just get the story straight
so first what they want to do
is classifi all drivers as employees
rather than independent contractors
and on the other hand
ah what they want to do is they want to have them you know
unionized
by law
ok
now the thing is
this cements
you know a new base of
control for the democratic
party
right
but the fact that there is such a huge backlash against this
very clearly shows
that the reactionary i would argue nature of
at least the establishment unions today right
the isle w you
what is that is that what it is
no
what is the what is it
what is the union
yeah here it is the international longshore and warehouse union
which is a subsidiary of the democrats
i am quite sure
part of the democrats political machine
i
bruckers are democrats dude are you not
good i
this is yeah this is just like whatter you say one thing and then
e
you're not saying what you're actually saying you're saying just some random
what are you do what
the unions are democrats
and they want to force these truckers who would otherwise not be democrats
into the fucking union i mean i don't go with you
but anyway look
a
now let's be very clear right
these industries you know drivers and shit lift
lift
and the light
they're horrible industries
when taken from the perspective of general labor
you can't make a living
doing that shit
but that's also not what they're meant to be most people do it on the side on top of a regular form of employment
or if they're unemployed and can't find a job but are still managing to cose by
that's what they do right so
sould
i mean we can't make a difference but i'm speaking remember i'm always speaking when i'm talking about like what should we do
speaking from the perspective of a hypothetical communist party or the communist party right
so how should we respond to things like this
should we support the law because it's going to
increase
relatively increase the standard of living
some kind of way
were these people
i don't think look if i could snap my fingers right now with no effort i would do it right i would support it
well actually i don't know if i would because of the truckers but i'm saying beyond that
like starbucks unionization
if i can snap my fingers right now and the starbucks whoever works at starbucks
n have a union and those have a better standard of living bucket i'll do it i'll snap my fingers
and make it happen
i'm not against that i have nothing against that
but we were finite a potential communist party
as limited numbers limited resources and limited energy
so the question is not should we be in favor of this the question is
is it
should we be in favor of spending our time on this is always the more permanent question
because we have a finite
ability to spend
you know what i mean like what would it mean to spend time on this is what i'm trying to say
what would it mean for a communist party
to spend time supporting laws like a b five
forget about the question of the truckers
as a matter of fact what it would actually do
is sanctify and sanction
not only the service sector but also the gig economy as in fact a permanent form of employment
but since a communist party is supposed to be political and its aims and demands are also supposed to be political
this would obviously be reactionary right
the demand of the communist party should be eliminating the service sector
and eliminating the necessity of bolstered jobs or even bolster jobs in general
right
that's what it should actually be for it should actually be to eliminate
this as a way of as a necessary way of life
because from a material perspective it's not necessary
so from the perspective
of financial and fictitious capital starbucks is necessary
a the gig economy
lift
and ober are necessary
from the standpoint of financial capital
okay
they're necessary from the standpoint of financial capital
because you know if
oh my god if hoober gets bankrupted or
if starbucks goes bankrupt that's going to send shock waves down
this would you know be
the market there's going to be a market crash all investors will itill thell get wind of something wrong going on and then you know like
your fucking your grandma's house will be fucking foreclosed and s'll be fucking homeless
so there's this irrational disconnect
that' is what i'm trying to say that we have
particularly in this country
but's ' acute
rational disconnect
between the actual material forces of production
in terms of what we actually need as a society
and all these various parasitical bullshit industries that from the perspective of the material forces of production
have no bucking reason to exist
i challenge anyone to sit here and tell me
that starbucks as an industry should exist
as the service industry at least go ahead and tell me that
what ha
some people think it's valuable
and marxists have told me that dude you are repeating
the mis is subjective theory of value
some people think it's valuable i don't give a fuck
if some people think it's fucking valuable
to
to fucking shit
sit in people's kitchen sink i don't give a fuck if that's what they think i'm oull wage a fucking cru
fucking holy war against that trend right
because it's fucking disgusting
but we're talking about something that is objectively wasteful
the only reason again the only reason these bullshit jobs exist is because people's time is being wasted
having to work
bullshit jobs
the fockn get by
if we all worked heavy industry jobs
we would have way less hours nestcause the would be rotations
in ships
because there's not enough heavy industry jobs ha it's not true ok first of all it's not true
this country is in need of reindustrialization
and infrastructural change
so yeah that would create a ton of fucking jobs
but to the extent that this labor is not even materially necessary anymore
we can definitely
lower the work day
and grind it down
i mean materially speaking we could probably grind down the work day to
an hour
they did something in the seventies where like it was like two hours is all they needed
materially speaking right to reproduce all the functions of society
so that'd be two hours a day
so yeah we can reduce the work day i mean severely
and then if there's some fucking guy who's at well i think starbucks is valuable ok then in all of your free time
you can turn your home into your own little starbucks
and you can make coffee for people
that want coffee since you think it's so valuable
you can just fuck and do that on your spare time
and everyone else who needs coffee
can just make their own fucking coffee
i i i i don't even make food most of the time right
you think i'm oa focking
be like well
i find it valuable not to have to make my own food
no of course look you give me a fucking button that will force me to make my own food
i'll fuck and click it
as long as it is long as it
eliminates the service industry
so that're just fucking stupid
that's just really fucking stupid
but how i like going to massage par parlors
ok then in your own free time
you can get with your fucking friends and you can take turns massaging each other how about that
guy
at the end of the day the fucking service industry has no reason to exist
nine
anyone who defends the service industry you're pretty much defending
you're defending
the the collective misery of this fuck and society
you're just defending
you know i'm not going to say you're defending slavery but
you're depending
you are defending the in dignity of t
tens of millions of people
right for what
for what
there' is no excuse
the convenience that is afforded to us by the servicing industry
is literally created by the service industry itself
it's created by the fucking eight hour workday itself
if we had more free time
there would we wouldn't need that convenience it wouldn't be
such a necessity to have that level of convenience becuse we would have time
the fo can do this on our own
okay
so yeah
that's what i'm trying to fuck and say
now as far as these truckers are concerned
it seems like these truckers are selfishly putting their own interests
instead
of these like
big economy workers and drivers
i reject that
i reject that
wash your truckers
why should
thank you so much crismos appreciate a big red pill marx continued smith and ricardo's law of value
he did not deviate from it
the marginal utilitarians are the deviation
very true
very true
what
why should the truckers
have to become you know corporate slaves
this is this epitomizing the paradox so fucking much
they say they're doing this to
defend service workers
but the only reason we have service workers is because of the same fucking policies they have
which also
you know coincidentally correspond to the widespread indebtedness and immiseration of truckers
so it's like
yeah it's like a bound ser servitude oh we're going to make it we're not going to let and lift
exploit their workers anymore we're just going to like make them employees
well
is that would gig economy workers want they want to be permanent employees
with all of the bureaucratic red tape that comes with that
i don't know
i really don't know if that's something they want
right i think
i think
part of it part of the attractiveness
for people who do that type of shit is that the convenience of it
so this is this is like something that is done in the name of labor
but it's coming from the perspective of the consciousness
of the establishment unions who think that every form of employment
or you know way of earning an income
follows the same paradigm as the fordest factory
so unionize everything unionize this unionize that unionize the lemonade stands it just doesn't
by
by the way i'm not
not underplaying the way in which gig economy workers
are falcked over
but
if we're going to make it about morality now
why don't we just agree that the gig economies need we should go to the root cause no matter
instead of saying let's
permanently attached
lift and ober drivers
to to lift and hooer as employees how do we say
let's create real dignified jobs
so that no one will need to be gig workers on the side
you know
you know
let's have real jobs that people can do
so they won't have
to take up
these professions
i
i'm trying to look at poles and surveys of
okay
you is
wh i'm being objective i don't know actually
i don't know what the view is
now
bell
ok what a driver thinks i'm going to share with you without reading it because i have not read it
so they may be in favor of it or they may be against it and that's going to have interesting implications as far as
how we should approach the strouckuer thing
melt about ok so here it is
i
we took a survey and this was in twenty twenty
sid
sent on a survey to our email list of eighty thousand drivers
and asked for a nine question survey
it was determined how they felt about
becoming employees versus independent contractors in the wake of the
ron of virus pandemon
what the farct i didn't
ok
seventy one percent of drivers
want to be independent contractors
look at this
i mean look this is a little weird isn't it so this bill which is presumably being passed
on behalf of the interests
of
you know ouberan lift drivers
only has support
among
seventeen percent
of them one in five
where the overwhelming majority
are against it
there is an interesting
you know i think significant
ah
piece of data here though is that pre covid it was much less so after covid
there's more of a support for and i think that support is probably coming from
you know the need after covid for a
here's why i think after coverd
it became more popular
i think because of the lockdowns right because the lockdowns have destroyed a lot of businesses
and also a lot of forms of employment
uber and lift and the gig economy kind of became more of a
there's more of a necessity probably felt by them for some stable job right
so that's how i'm going to explain that they kind of want
a more stable way of living
right i think that's how i explain the increase
but i mean still
seventy percent
want to remain independent contractors
i did not know what the end goal of that i thought i was going to it was not going to be as convenient i thought ok maybe like fifty fifty or something
but no i
the orang majority want to be independent contractors and do not want to be employees
of oober or lith
so why
so who is this law being passed on behalf of
s it's not being passed on behalf of the employees
who is it actually being passed on behalf of
i think the answer is pretty clear
's probably being passed on behalf of the more monopolized
legacy
industries right
including trucking corporations
paradoxically actually
who you'd think benefit from the independent contractor thing but they don't why
because they're not able to actually control
there's in so far as truckers are independent contractors
there is still competition
right
there's still going to be competition
and that is a problem for them
right
you know
when it it probably has other implications as well as as far as their ownership of their vehicles is concerned and things like that
as far as the truckers i mean who fucking knows right
but in some it'll turn them to employees
employees have less freedom
right they're more bossed around
um
there's also other reasons
but i think these are probably the main ones right
these are probably the main ones
so as you can see
this is the lot these are the largest strucker protest to the date
right
so check this out
at the port of oakland
more than twenty one hundred trucks
the go through the terminals each day
it is the eighth
largest port in the country importing a wide range of items from australian wine to meat in aluminium you s
usic
hea
did i say aluminium i meant to say
aluminium
aluminum
i meant to say
aluminum
a
anyway
the protests have blocked
the terminal gates
forcing some longshoremen not to navigate through the crowds for fear of safety
docworkers can refuse to enter the marine terminal if they feel unsafe or danger in any other way
the workers stood by on health and safety as is permitted in our contract
and conditions are at risk
so that i mean is this a form of solidarity working class solidarity who knows right but they're also not showing up
m
yeah this is the average number
who are waiting to move at the port of oakland
and it's you know
not looking too good
any delay in trucks
would only add to the already existing congestion so if you're looking to buy a p s five
good luck
i'm just kidding right
but
yeah
so
to the truckers
pledged to continue blockade at the oakland port
over controversial labor law
a pledge thursday to continue their blockade
of the oklahoma port
as the west coast third busier container port
so leve me sed
sayd
so
we're going to we need more details on the bill which we're going to get right
so they make up ninety percent of the bay aar ports operation they're protesting over assembly bill five
which is going to eliminate the use of owner operators in trucking in the state
ok
it was passed and there's provisions in the bill that will prevent independent ober operator
truck drivers from contracting with other truck trucking companies for service
leaming them no choice but to use only employee drivers so it's even more sinister than you can fucking imagine
so these owner operators
wouldn't even be able to contract any of these companies
without formally becoming employees
so this would effectively
destroy them
and their way of life and their their means of earning a living right
so a shitty urbanoid marxist marxoid analysis is a
oh these are just petite bourgeois
people who are getting in the way of
the workers movement even the fucking ver and live drivers don't want this law to be passed i can even say that right
mean but beyond that
um
you are neglecting that these trockers
are at least aspiring
what sum
dignified
way of life
a real job
right
now it's failing for them
they're in debt they're being miserated
this is a form of class war
on one of the last strongholds
of an american working class
bye what's up
i did not see you
all right now
uh let me see
yeah yeah you tube does
tensor swear words
it does censor them
m
he chaid
history
yeat i did not see yours
i can't
sears
four but it's
you tube sensors like fock and shit
and shit probably probably censor shit too i mean
right yeah youtube does not allow swearing
the very p g platform
that might have been nic
but im
an injunction in place has prevented the law from being enforced
this is the lawsuit on the thing right
and why why isn't the california government just be like ok this is just for over people
we're going to let
the truckers
continue to exist
think something more sinister is going on where
they're trying to destroy
probably one of the last sights of resistance to the democrats i mean who knows
or to the
the monopoly trucking industry
probably
california is a very corrupt state
when it comes to the sheep
it's ruled by oligarchs
mean who foking knows right
truckers blocked most operations
uh
port
and the u s supreme court denied a petition from the california trucking association
the protest has swelled
and
port officials
believe that the number is three hundred to four hundred
this doesn't sound like a lot
except when you take into account the fact
that's three hundred to four hundred big ass trucks
y
i'm surprised they can even fit that many so yeah that's a lot
some are saying it's one hundred two hundred thirty doesn't matter these are big ass semitrucks
so that's quite large right
m
multiple publish reported indicated that the number grew significantly on tuesday
nearly a thousand owner operators on tuesday blocking access to the s s a
trap pack
and everport terminals
members of the international union of longshoremen and warehouse workers
refused to cross
eighty five
protest picket line blocking the gates
isn't that that's beautiful worker solidarity
so these workers the longshoreman and warehouse workers
are basically you know acting in solidarity with the truckers
that's quite nice isn't it
uh told the to
the the protests block truckgates
they scheduled for three days cand go on longer
and that they're digging in for a whole week
so
and who knows it's going to be another
envoy moment
one of these conboy moments
freedam convoys that going to be another one
you know
the teamsters union has pushed for worker misclassification efforts
so this is the teamsters doing this shit it's the teamsters ok
jason president of the teamsters is about unionizing truckers
every worker every driver deserves the right to have a union all the benefits that come with that
even though it's not what they want i wonder why the teamsters is pushing for this
could it be that it would solidify a definite group of people for the democrats
could it be that it would make the union itself more wealthy
could it be that they are acting on behalf of the monopolies
which the establishment unions do
people don't want to accept that but that is what they do
h i wonder what the reason is
so at the federal level
we're talking about fair competition to advance workers' rights
amongst the areas
a
the imposition of one side and restrictive contract provisions
such as non compete and non disclosure provisions
yeah so there is ways in which
ober and lift drivers are being fucked over
but they're not being listened to because
this is not something that applies to
under circumstances this is just a way to shoehe
leave you know
previous
forms of political bureaucratic
and monopoly corporate power
forcing it on people
who don't want it
while ignoring all of their actual
ripes that they probably do have with blugarin lis
right
so this is not on behalf of them or in their interest so
so what my overall view iss is undercover anklo
great britain
confirmed
thank you new american prole
so i mean a takeaway from this probably the takeaway
for me is hoz
in consideration of the circumstances of a b five
you still support the truckers
you still support the truckers hase
i mean
do do i support the truckers in light of all these interesting circumstances i mean
this is going against the union movement right it's it's getting in the way of what the teamsters want to do unionize everything right i mean that's what a son st marxism is so do i support the truckers even though they're against this w
i have a friend who is a longshoreman here in he tells me rank and file support truckers and won't cross the line youment is pro twenty five well chris morelok i mean you're saying the actual industrial working class the heavy industry working class support the truckers but chris doesn't make any sense the truck
are pi because they own their own trucks that makes them pict bgi and the longshoremen are there are you know workers the're the they're the most reactionary segment of the working class the most progressive one being google engineers but regardless that no you you're wrong chris according to my marxism that does not make
any sense so you're wrong so so i have to i'm really undecided should i support the truckers or not well well breaker one ma this year's a river you got a copy on me com for sure for sure golly clean clear plag come on
and the big thin for there big maan yeah we definitely got the front door good by mercy s looks like we got of course o bucking supportk of course o support the california strers june in a cakn worth full in love cavilver beeat with a reefer own and
we're bringing the freedom convoy to for united states about a mile of it we are bringing the freedoms convoy to the united states i'm about to put the hammer dowre because this is the rebellion and this is the revolution of the mecca proletariat and the mecco working they may have a mag so what thats means to be a real worker
so of course i support the trucker unconditionally conditionally support those how could you eave it ast of back let's get a convoy going in this got even tol in alay but this turns into a freedom a convoy usa belief
e aall com you see the con boy in the jaks on the bumper they even had a bear in the air i say he's calling all drugs this here's the about to go there the democra
big pan makt tory big pan you're still too close to have them ha to starting close up my famly his mercy sakes you better back off another tn interstate forty four like a rocket slit on rails tore up all of our swindle sheets and left them
seting on the scale by the time we did that shat twn and beyer was again smart he brought up some reinforcements from the illinois national guard pyers armed cars and tanks jeeps and rigs of every sizem chicken coops full of theyer chopper guys a we shot the line wen broke with a thousand screaming trucks and living longhired friends
jesus in the sh micro er r skbuster come over muster listen you want to put that microbusy bhind that suicide jockey yeah he's halling down to my me so i have the all you can g
i have the hircups
and the only solution for some hiccups
is some food mo yoto
net randle with the fifty
thank you so much for the fifty at rando
as fifty trucks
there's fifty trucks blocking the port
imagine being calling yourself a buck and marxist
calling yourself a communist
and being against
a segment of the working class
that
actually effect change with its fuck and labor power
i'm sorry to break something to you
if all starbucks baristas went on strike
nobody would give a fuck
n
no one would give a far
if all starbucks baristas went on strike
nobody would buck and give a shit
thes nothing with fuck and happen
they would be victims
not being able to get by and that sucks but society would stick keep going right
if trockers went on strike
if strokers i truck
if truckers went on strike
everything would collapse people would literally die because they're not being gettn medical supplies
people would falking die if truck
truckers went on strike
and people want to fuck and claim truckers are reactionary but it's like its i we're living in a
we're living in a bizarre world it'
what kind of funken world are we living in
we're living in a fucking bizarre world
ya
if truckers win on strike
starbucks wouldn't even have
what ca in coffee beans
or coffee fuck and whatever
it wouldn't even have shit
if truckers went on strike
we wouldon't even be able to eat
ah
hey guys i hate i hate to tell this to you
not that whole food thing
like food you know the thing we eat
well it's like we don't grow it in our backyard
and who transports the food from the farms
to you know processing centers or
whose trend it's trumpers
it's truckers
but but they want to tell us the truckers are petit boze one reactionary
yeah it's like it's like you have these people who claim oh i want to revolution i want to work in class revolution ok
good luck with the working class revolution of
barristas going on strike
good luck
good luck with your fugging
working class revolution
of baristas going on strike that is sure to destroy and collapse society
mean that is going to lead to a crisis that's going to collapse the government
yeah
starbucks goes out and we're done
that's over
you know what mark said
the lifeblood
of the economy is lattes that's
mark says the great wellspring of wealth
stems from lattes being put in the machine
ok
pumpkin spice lattes make the world go round
th if
that
doesn't exist anymore
h
there is going to be a revolution
okay
and the truckers that
truck that they own that's a mecca that's a proletarian
form of ownership
it to mecca
it just can't
compounds their labor
o
as what meccas do they compound your labor
molecular transporters will make truckers obsolete
so then do your molecular trend
transports why do you have to make laws why do you have to like draft all these laws to fuck over truckers
why can't you just let
the productive force
productive forces
be unleashed
why do you have to draft these laws
you know it's these bureaucratic parasites w
these focking parasites are doing his shit
talking bureaucrats they just want to control people
they're not doing it to help workers they're not doing it on behalf of ober
lif drivers because seventy percent of ber lift drivers don't want
become employees so they're doing this on behalf of themselves
themselves as funken bureaucrats
is every which way but loose the mekatanki framework
every which i don't know what the fuck that is let look it up every which way but loose
what the fuck is this
watch the trailer for this film
raining again
you want to do something this evening course that well not this evening it's raining now i want to get out now
how about taking in a new movie
ok this squirrels ribbon on be
of course i can you picture him falling hard for a sweet young thing who's got her eye on i surely it's easy how about him fighting for money i guess so darkest secrets to
it's e in you there can't be too many guys
what the hell is this man
drive around this valley
with an ape shit escalating which way its looks mecha tanky though this does look mecha tank there's no like to i used to butter almost wy is there a fucking a ran a tank
is n a a bucking monkey in this
came bired and me
dowmp thatch
ba boon no respect
a what did she say
o private
every which way you look there's action adventure and fun eastwod will turn you
yah that is that was core telling infrare it that monkeys assigned
love a gorilla
that's the
gorilla symbol
symbiology
that is simple symbolism of the gorilla
you know
so yeah
so i mean i think it isn't it funny how it's like relevant to this debate that's been going on
and you'd think that this would be a debate where like two sections are being pitted against each other
lift drivers versus
um
truckers right
but it's not even the case
beause even they want to remain independent contractors
so who actually benefits from this like
these bureaucratic red tape initiatives
it's not the working class it's the fucking bureaucrats and it's the democrats and it sounds like a koch brothers talking point
lip and ship it let the whole world know this
right wing libertarians
i've always been correct
about a lot of things
a lot of things yes there is a fucking liberal bureaucracy
yes
there is a liberal bureaucracy
and there's management and they work hand in hand
with monopoly capital
to prevent
any independence of the working class they can
and part of that means sometimes most of the time
the democrats support every unionization initiative
why because unionization is a form of control
politicization and socialization
and for some reason that element gets overlooked
for some reason the thing that gets overlooked
a lot of falcon workers
hate
having to be in a union
let's not talk about that though right
i mean even teachers haven't the aways told all cause you're neglecting teachers as working class
know many fucking teachers hate their fucking teacher unions
doctor some
they hate that shit
nobody nobody listens to the workers
who resent
their unions
nobody does
nobody does
because we're supposed to be living in this ideological bubble and this fantasy that
oh yeah oh the workers are in favor of munization cause
it helps fight capitalist exploitation
actually a lot of the time
unionization
sorry unions are working in tandem with monopoly capital to destroy competition
if you can't oh if you can't
except this fucking truth about establishment unions i don't know the fuk ca tell you
i don't know what' falgn tell you
you're just blinded byeologicy you're not living in the real world
and the only proof i need to give you this is that
there is
unlimited supply of activists who are who want to get on board with unionization
even before they consult the working class sentiment so there seems to be this reason
for wanting to unionize everything
regardless of whether the working class wants it or not
there seems to be these
political actors
who you know they want to pass laws like the employee law in california they want to do all these things on behalf of the working class
without having any relationship to the actual working class and the actual working class movement
so what is that interest they have is it just morality
is it i want to have a more fair economy i want to be more benevolent no
these are the this is the legacy of the new deal social engineers and bureaucrats
where parasites
and
whether they admit it or not are doing this as a form of social control
and and um
a form of social control
i knew that would not be possible
without their collussion
with monopoly capital
and people don't want to accept this reality
pa
you're against unions
no
the amazon labor union
is something i support
reason i support the amazon labor union
because it was an independent union
created by the fucking amazon workers themselves so of course i support that union
the teamsters meanwhile is corrupt as fuck
and it is aligned with the democratic party and it's from the top down
at least some team teamsters sections like the one in california right now
so no not all fucket unions are good
point blank in period they are not all good
you have to actually analyze the context
y is this coming from the workers themselves is that where the power of this union comes from
where does it come from the bureaucracy up up above
that's the question you gotta fuck and ask
people people
this is the mistake people have right the mistake people have is that they think unions are the primary sphere of class struggle
no they're not
that class struggle was won a long time ago
and capital won that class struggle and the unions became totally consolidated
i a monopoly capital
to the detriment of workers in a lot of cases
believe it or not
oz deprives us working class of twelve censes
good work
what are you talking about
how do you discipline how do you distinguish
between unions aligned with the interests of the working class and the bureaucracy ones oh it's so easy
a
how was how is the union form is the union established or is it like a new union
like the amazon labor union if it's like the amazon labor union
course we're going to support it because it's a it's an it actually has the quality
of independence see guys
independence
if you're a communist
independence is the most important qualifier
is this group
consolidated to the political status quo in some way
or are they independent and free to do
what's actually in the interests of the general population
or are they institutionalized and loyal to some other power
i mean it just kind of seems like common sense right
like for example
right
let's say i talk to a trucker
an independent truckate
he trocker
ims on woom should have nooks
and he goes a
w are you and i talked to him for f
like an hour and he goes
no word i agree with you has
give that kims on noon some nukes he you
brother
okay
and then he starts a youtube channel called north korea nuclear armament now
some shit like that right
guess what
that trucker
you will not be fired
nothing will happen to him
you can do whatever the fuck he wants
you can support
the communist party you can do whatver the fuck he wants because he's independent
that's working class independence
a construction worker same shit
same shit
why
because you need construction workers in this society
and you need them to do a very vital
form of labor
so construction workers can believe whatever the buck they want
and they're not going to get fired for anything
y
but a burriesta
a barista can post
aug twenty twenty four on their twitter account
and all it takes
is some leftist to call the starbucks and they're out of the job
they're not independent
they don't have independence
who's trying to unionize starbucks anyway isn't it the teamsters isn't it like an established union
trying to unionize starbucks you think they're independent
can they actually support whoever they want to support
and let's say you're a communist or europe the forget communs
wegot communists
let's just say you're a populist
right if you're a populist
are they allowed to support you or can they not support
is the way in which they're organized
disposed to supporting you
or is the way in which they're organized disposed to supporting the status quo the democrats right
truth is
let's say there's a populist movement that emerges in this country
right
let's say there's a
populist movement
that emerges in this country
ice hunchll spamming up
a just both s
ya
my debd trucker dad talks about how much he hates socialism
but he called stalin a great man
that's i want to salute that
man
i want to salute your father
but that's what i meean you know
they want the j pill trucker to get canceled then lose their livelihood
thank you so much johnny
that's what i mean
fok socialism man fok socialism
suppose
socialism is for cut
that's a o c and bernian ship
corse we're against that cockshit
we are communists with the capital city
ok we're not these socialistic fucking couples right
because most workers when they hear the word socialism they hear bureaucracy
and democrats and red tape and they don't they don't think of the worker in power
they think of the glasses wearing falkon manager and specialists
and funck a bureaucrat in power
that's what they hear in their head when they hear the word
now it'tan it
ims
no was seven
i'm not
thoh show it
that's what they fock in here in their head
can
yeah you know but regardless
but i'm trying to get out here
thank
is that
let's say there's a populist movement
this country
i want everyone to sit sit down and imagine love tony things onucemre
appreciate you so much
wnt you to envision something
so let's say there's a populist movement
that takes
get that you know that gets off the ground in this country
ight
i
and let's say you're at your teamsters union or you're at your a f l c i o you know union
or whatever right you're one of these established unions
is the social environment
created by that institution
going to be conducive to supporting that populist movement
i don't think it will
i think it'll i think it'll be like supporting maga where it's going to be like oh
don't toleright that here
is your that's
look up the sociology of institutionalization
it creates a herd mentality
we're people who are going against the status quo
have to conceal their views
and can't be open about them
because the institution's interests
are opposed to them
can you support maga in these institutions openly
oh i mean
when you're at your union meeting it's not proper to do that
that's something you do elsewhere right
because as an institution the union is opposed to maga you see
and it's also going to be opposed to a communist movement or a populist movement why
because it doesn't have independence it's a dog of the democrats
period
i mean isn't this common sense shouldn't this be common sense
i think it should be common sense shouldn't it
this is just shit that should be common sense
and guys i got to stll my hadcups i'll be right back i'm going to grab
i sandwich
ok so you see these pills
this is the red pill
of the major
this is the red pill
oh my god look at my fingers they are so torn up
fingers are so
or not
a red pill
no way this is the bluepill
i
we're going to take the blue pill
no
oh my god the tuckers are so toxing
oh my god
guys hey guys welcome to my stream
um today
we're going to be supporting the
we're going to be supporting the the
starbucks barie
guys i want to talk to you guys about marxism one one
no i'm
according to marxism
all workers are workers
so i um
i'm personally a linkedn employee
and i'm a worker
which streamers are workers hassan is a worker
i'm a worker i'm a youtuber that makes me the working class
i'm a work
and
i don't own you tube
because i don't own youtube that makes me a proletarian
i don't own you to
i
i work for you too
i want to own the means of production i want to democratically decide you tube's policy
and the minute i get to democratically decide you tubes policies i'm going to ban all
pro russia content pro stalin content
i'm going to censor the fuck on of this website
is that what democracy means
i want democratic control over my workplace
and yeah democratic control is just going to ensure
like you know the complete control of the democratic party and like you know the world economic forums agenda the globalist
and we're pretty much just going to like enforce you know
we're going to make sure that everyone becomes trans
and
there's no more gender assumptions and think that everyone in the workplace is going to like
have to like not engage in micro aggressions excuse me that's a microgression
that's what democratic control means
be personally
i just want like to be there to i want more control in general i like more
i want like you know all those things i say on twitter
all time
um when i'm like cancelling people i want that i want to actually like have real life power
ight
but's going to be like the twitter mob ruling in real t ime so excited democratic control of the workplace yes ha
what is this
is this a red pill
is this a red pill
what is a red pill
i'll eat it and i'll eat anything
is it the agin
i ad swgan
valut the rend
oh
guys i'm back what happened i'm blacked out for like
five minutes
anything happened
blacked out
what i miss
i didn't chew anything dumbass i didn't chew it i just swallowed it
oh okay
all right i'm going to do a hakim impression ready
i'm going to do akm impression
going to do a hockam impression the
a lot of youeople think that swinen is not actually socialized
all theyre wrong
seden has a socialist economy
looks out for its markers
hoo was democratic control over the workplace
many people do not understand that public transportation
given free health care benefits and sweden
that's democratic control of the workplace for a moneyless classless society
i'm a cam
i just basically one of the economy were glasses wears are in power and people who are glasses are the ones who can froll everyone
i support a working class movement in the centr colonial state
because the only working class are hipsters
and nerds like my sound
i basically got swirles in iraq and was bullying in high school for wearing glasses
me communism is basically goning to solve that problem and i'll be in charge and my bullies will be in jail
i don't actually live in iraq
a mexicane american who lives in wyoming
and i pretend to be a ranki
inora rack had spring college
i have to pay medical attention and
i'm reason
welcome to swin in
im would impersonate jink
one
is janke wiger
he's jon
i'm just like a normal liberal american just like any of you
i mean i don't know
i'm trying to tell you i'm a normal person
what we don't know about any of that
and the patriarch of russia
who is talking about l g b t people
you're disgusting
we didn't sanction that guy
e
nancy pelosi
o you yell at her but we all we have to bote ripten donald trump
they'm not turkish at all i'mbout the middle eastern
a normal white liberal just like you a normal american
i'm a regular white american just like you' not in a in star
there's nothing middle eastern about me
here about antie imperialism
when the uus can go to war with the middle east i don't care
even if the s invaded turkey i wouldn't mind
you need to realize that i'm politically grrect liberal just like you
alex jones pisses me off so much
got table with roger stone
what did you say about trum
of course
and enger
was basically talking about it
and of course we don't want
to get rid of
social security and medicare
but the
force the vote itjust going be ridiculous
if
the whole thing
look guys i was a beging wh you say here that
you know the justice democrats that whole thing fell through
we need to keep voting for the democrats we got to keep doing it
we gota keep doing it guys
we gotta keep doing it
on arm
what
you know i
i've basically tried to copy
the mannerhisms of you know the local democrat in my city council
what are i
i'm
you can't really blight me for the
if you're tired of watching the young turns
welcome back to hakkim where you can learn about real revolutionary theory
theay we're going to be talking about how
we're going to be talking about the working class
workers are pretty much people who are employees every employee is a worker including s
hello
hello it's me hakim
ron is pretty much an imperialist power
it's the same thing as america
reigning imperialism is harming the working class
hello
me how came
russia's imperialist war is an inter imperialist conflict
lenin wrote about this in his book
he like to quote latin a lot despite not understanding him
that's mainly because i have a linen profile picture and i basically have the same view as linen
as the soviet revisionist rusta ights in
i basically look at lenin as a glorified laberal and a social democrat liberal
i'm hacking
this is the hakim stream
i'm paul moron i'm going to put a crown on his head even though i'm a marxist light in his moulist
and ant you re visionist
hakim has more subscribers so i'm goinga suck his deck
i have no principles at all and i'm a wrecker of my local communist party
my name is paul moran
bas
jason andrew kack
hi you paiy for i'll do it
let me finish the sandwich
why has house taken so long
reason is because that he was taken up in
i'll do a brief jason on roof as you bait we ready
basin on roote is going to be on
today i'm only talking about
ors is a freaking light
and but funny that you mention that
is he never actually considered
i play fam
i'm playing fball
h
you're freaking liar who's putting words in my mouth
i never said i don't support
first world workers
that is a bregking lie
and i never said
i
believe
that
theyre indigenous americans and black americans
you're fricking christian bullshit
needs to be burned
to the ground
that's my best one
s the best one
the best one i
right
breaking pathetic coward
for frecking pathetic cow
i'll wm to do yankee thankee next i'll do yankee thanke
oh so
i was recently talking about
ows and the infrared community
they need to be destroyed
m
i can't tell you why
but it needs to happen
that's my best
who else is there
what else should i do
as's on
yeah i was basically on dealing with it the other day
i don't rekon know why
why are people talking
about this
sicch to dude i don't even know
so if you want to know basically
not a ononsm
larouchites
like that
infrared
ah whatever dod
whatever
yeah dud like you know like
i got pain my nails
h
oh dear
th
we
well
mm
ok
bs hothing wh
mm
and it's not particularly interesting
because i did notice oh no
oh no
as
is an extremely insecure individual i can tell because
he's doing that thing where like he looks at the camera and he like basically trying to like see how he looks like i do the same thing i
all times
but anyway
ukraine has a dangerously
um
he doesn't say
i'm supporting vladimir putin and other auspicioes
dictators
the name of anti imperialism
oh like that thing we're like
oz was basically trying to say that he supported fastis
mmhmm
yeah i just wanted to inform you that i wasn't eep laughing
it was not audible laughter
you couldn't hear it because my microprohone
i promise you i wasn't just pretending to laugh
to appear less socially awkward
i am after all
a normal person
like everyone else
anyway
l c
has basically talked about and i think i would support it if it was
fact
get around to it
bob sis the most pampule one
does that thing withere his fucking
he has the most weak posture in the world
that's how he laugh
mean guys if you're sick of the wash stuff
that was nonsense
you're really sick of it
here's a sicret
ilcome back tony cam
youtube channel
toy were going to be talking about how in the soviet union
every liberal can get on board with some
union
it was the so union actually could
auction in a similar way
so
basal i sa it right down
job
as to exploit the value of the workers working on it
and they don't even know how to do it
i was single the whole ikim thing
i don't really much thing you can do
and
the exploitation of the amount of calculations for doing it were actually much higher
and actually
it's actually
f
y name
excellent
doing it in the case
and excellent
and he's doing it the right way
that doesn't take into account
course the
ons of pro notction
when i actually think about it i'm like a
worky young guy who sounds
actually i lot like i'm in a spiderman comic
i'm spiderman
son law like spidermn
i'm really innocent whathen i say
excellly
as
it's in a really noncombative tone and
basically want to get around to people that i'm really not a harmful person do matt christman crying about practice
thank you chris i will
n one he will
know that i'm
harmless person
and actually when you put the productive inputs of it we're actually not really different i don't get why people are against communism when it's pretty much the side of ignorance of the american educational system
actually communism is really harmless and toothless
if you're a liberal you can easily get on board and that's where my pipeline does i convince liberals to agree with communism
and marxism because you know actually there's nothing really
oh
revolutionary not at all i'm basically just a revisionist performance social democrat
and that's why i'm making it so popular to all these liberals and
in the trump people are
toxic actually so
if you're a grad student
you have really no reason to be against
a revival of socialism
because socialism is wholesome chunkus and i read it everyone
like hakeen
akim has never made any enemies except with
that infrared guy and that infrared guy only hates me because he's actually mentally ill
the also have people lk
mm
al karl kolinsky
that that's reminding me
ile
mm
nski
gordon peters and i cannot do a kyle impression
but i did want to see the jordan peterson
thank
h so i noticed
he just the other day
you were banned from twitter
now you know i'm somebody nobody can argue against my
lefty credentials everybody knows i'm a man of the left
having said that my my solution
on this issue of social media censorship has always been
look we need to expand first amendment protection
and the way you do that
is to regulate
these ys number one kyle was faced
kind of became cringe deny
he is cringe isn't he
yes
i'll quinch
big social media companies
like their public utility
so if you do that then you you know basically you're saying this is the new public square
and people can speak their mind here now that doesn't mean of course you can't
you know
docs people or do direct threats of violence or anything like anything that's actually illegal will remain illegal but outside of that
you can't censuor people just based on
political opinion
so you know i definitely wouldn't have
band you suspended you etcetera
but i do have a question about that specific
tweet that did get you in trouble
because you know you said something to the effect of
but i don't know if it got me in trouble
you know i don't think i'm in trouble twitter banned me but i don't consider that trouble
that's fair enough
fair point
um
but you said some of the effect of remember when pride was a sin
and i
and
the criminal finale has just had her breast
cut off by a criminal physriminal physician exactly so my question is
e
is the physician really criminal if you agree that adults can decide to transition
then why would the physician be criminal
don't adults have that right if they want to transition
he's doing that thing we're in news
's actually a delay
but there's no delay here so it's like
he's like puk i didn't think that
he's eight
i just bright
you know what here's why i sympathize with jordan jordan was just tweeding shit man he was just
he was just tweaning some shit he wasn't thinking about it
i do the same thing all the time
he's like braight
you going to make me explain some shit
wh
said what i said
however you want to i sympathize with nin
not everything legal isn't criminal
and do they have that right
see i would have left ellen page alone if she hadn't been parading her new abs in a fashion magazine
how many kids do you think she can
convinced to convert
one yet thousand
no not yeah
no no i want to i want to respond to that
i think that
with the trans i think i think jordan is more
against the agenda
i don't think he cares about private people
doing it
and he's upset
that like
it's being
made into o
public
see like a lot of people say she like hause
what
what about in china and north korea
look regardless of the status of l g b people in china
with their parently they're saying china is an l g bd paradise
spoiler it's not
there's an experimental clinic in shanghai the most cosmopolitan
western city in china
china has very decentralized and lax rules when it comes to
the medical industry in general
mean that's why in china they did that fucking gene editing thing
which they later
said ok that was not a law we didn't agree with that
because china you can pretty much experiment with anything in china right
so people took that transgender youth clinic in shanghai as evidence of china's overall stance
it is not true
but if i was going to entertain you and say it is true right
let's just assume it's true
all that would be an indication of is that the chinese people have that sentiment because in china
they don't have top down agendas to force
cultural norms they respect
a pace of mors and cultural norms
as they organically exist among the people
they don't try to force
things that the majority of people find distasteful
on to people
that is why china doesn't have the culture wars we do
and the only reason china
has a large feminist movement and they call you know
that's what they call it
because there's a lot of women in china
who are feminists
but in terms of top down agendas those don't exist in china
far as cultural mores are concerned
social mords
i'm not talking wid like you know sometimes the government will make statements a cracking down the video game industry
cracking down on effeminatee man
but those are already in line with chinese traditional cultural mors
this wasn't like a front
so radically different from the sensibilities of the chinese people
thank
so that thatya
they don't
i'm with the
what'm trying to say here
this is not about the lgbt people
it's about the manner by which you are trying to force
moors and norms
at the expense of the majority of people's sensibilities
that's what the cultu war is actually about
the culture war isn't about weather you know
how will transpeople become accepted in society
someday will gay people be accepted someday
it's not what it's about
it's about the way in which you're trying to effect
these cultural transformations from the top down
which is also a proxy for the class interests
of the parasuitical you know new class
the professional managerials
so yeah that's what the culture war is actually about
community it's very
it is not about the actual content
right
similar to the gay community where
back when that first became a big issue people thought
ohf we talk about it
in magazines or whatever
we're promoting kids to go down that path
but really what happened is
people are who they are and that is gay they just decided to be a little yeah i'm gay and they were just more open and honest with
selves i don't think you're promoting people to do that that is not what happened if youre is rejordans right that is not what happened
it's literally not what happened at all
he's all right about that
i wanna see if he's going to be honest about this
narw that it is oka
ok or i tinately i'm listening
there's nothing about that that's right
so i explained that i st in an absolute look one of the reasons that i
opposed bill c sixteen in canada to begin with
pronoun
compelled speech bill
was because i knew perfect jording got a little emotional there
it's not a good look
but maybe it speaks to his authenticity
and genuine inticity
it is genuineness
well what was going to happen i like the word genuine to city
when we introduced
confusion about gender identity into the public
ce original a tacitity
you
now the argument was that if we
left
people with gender dysphoria alone to make their own way
and stop torturing
that
we would decrease the mental health load on those individual
and my analysis as a clinician was that for every
one person of that sort
that we hypothetically save
we dom a thousand more
as a consequence of confusion
and the social contagion
i knew the literature on i think the where you i disagree with peterson is a
it doesn't have to cause that confusion i know it is right now so i grant him that much
i don't think it has to though right i think there's a way to
not have to be confused
but i do understand it is confusing people
you know
on psychogenic epidemic
they used to call that mass hysteria and so literature that goes back about three hundred years
and whenever you i'm so against this idea like oh gender is just like
a choice and you know it's all arbitrary
or worse like there's no way to know
what gender you are
so it a lot of people start doubting shit
for reasons that aren't necessarily the same as like genuine transgender people
and it causes a lot of confusion we're like
you know it seems like
it
could
can i didn't say this
more transgender people than there actually are
you know what i mean
like a lot may just be out of confusion you know
produce
often when you introduce social confusion
you can produce a psychogenic epidemic
especially among
generally it's adolescent females who are most aceptive
so i thought oh well what's going to happen is we'll produce a psychogenic epidemic of gender
orea among adolescent females
and that is exactly what's happened
and it isn't
the fact that we' freed up people who are
what
in
doubt about their identity to be who they are
that may have happened in a tiny minority of cases
absolutely and definitely the case that we doomed thousands of kids to brutal
mutilating surgery and the when you
that's why that it does bother me when caause like when you tell kids
you may you know i mean it is going to fuck them up let's be honest
premature
sterility
and we've done that on the altar of our hypothetical moral virtue and compassion
yp
i read a car
corport analysis of the trans surgery industry last week
growth rate projections
for you lefty types and your anti corporatism
growth rate projections
fifteen percent per year
invest now
a three hundred fifty million dollar business
as of twenty twenty two
i's been invest in that ship man
i have no principle i just want to make money
seriously that's what marx and engels did they invested in anything
i'll invest in anything to make money mother fucker
ho't why get on investing in a some shit like this
two
projected to expand is as it will grow i should have thought of that as it is growing
a she will grow man
seven hundred fifty million by twenty twenty i know as a public influencer i can't just do things individually and not
have
oh shell significations can i just be an individual guys can i just be an individual
without having any social meaning to it
like for example
i say
i wan a far in public
rop those people
and never see them again
no don't wanna hold it in
i walk by m and crop dustm according to
can't i just be an individual
does that have to be a social message
does that have to be a political message
does that have to be an ideological message can't i just be an individual
letist turn everything into a social message
can't i just be me
a lot of the times i'm just being me guys that's it i'm just being me is the difference is that i'm real i'm a real mother fucking
person
i'm not someone who virtue signals a social identity i'm real
i do want to make money mother fucker
i do want to make money
i do
one i
have a yacht
and a fucking lambo in shit
i got a free yacht and a free lambo you think
yeah i would sell it honestly i would sell it
but let's say hypothetically
can i just have a week i just want to week ok
give me one week of being on a yacht and shit or three weeks three weeks me you know give me one month
one month of yachts and lambos and shit
and then i'll just like work only for the communist party just give me one month
just with the yachts and lambos and shit and then i'll go back
surely for the comies party
how about the
bas
the old argument was society and institutions condemning it was unnatural now society and institutions promoting it is natural
yeah
yes
thank you so much chris
yeah yeah true
seven
no moral hazard there
there's plenty of moral in a hell cat lambou is lame but i like that italian
i like that italian
his i
no let me i want to pull up
to an art gallery
in a frok and lambo
pearl hazard wire
and that's surgery
absolutely brutal
so what percentage of the population do you think
in your conception of how this is unfolding
what percentage of the population do you think
hes going to end up being trans at the end of
do you think like you're one is now going to be like seventy percent you know infrared is not a political movement infrared is just media this is a media thing
so
now everything
i'm me i'm har
i'm not doing sh on behalf of cause
all the time
weor even most of the time to be honest
am haas that's you that's what you get
tune into infrared you're getting hots right
mm
i'm not doing this on behalf of the communist party
because i'm not in that party
the tell you to join the party if you want to effect
some change is
in society
we know a res strands
well we know already that about one in five
adolescentce now
identifies to you
you know i'll get michael hudson on the show
that
hated words
identifies it as part of the hypothetical l g b q plus community
so it's one in five
i don't know what the upper limit is
there's a consulting group in the u k now that's claiming there's one hundred and fifty different gender
there's actually i suppose seven billion different genders if you want to get technical about it because everybody's temperament differs
but
i don't know what the upper limit
a hundred and fifty
a hundred and fifty
yes
and i have no idea what the upper limit is for this surgical intervention we'll see
doesn't but i don't find it i don't find it the least bit acceptable and if you think that your compassion
is demanding
that you extend your
m
pity
to the l g bt q
plus community
at the cost of sterilizing
in john
pen
you should think again
you're on the wrong side of this
and not in a troble way
don't i
i do i
would appreciate if you don't ascribe beliefs to me that i don't have remember my original question
was what you said earlier i said question i said you know pagees an adult and so do you think
that he has the right to he
that was the original and comments after that
yeah but as a star
and a public figure
and a model for emulation
mmhmm
she also has the responsibility not to entice
confused adolescent
into a catastrophic decision
before they have the maturity to make that decision
i just have to say jordan i think it's a little bit of a moral panic
i just don't see
some sort of
that you know
frenzy ok what would you consider m trand
see this is what broke
if you
i mean kyle if you had the opposite opinion you would get canceled
so do you have opinions that gets you cancelld
is the question
i don't think you do
so what it how do we know if your opinions authentic
or if you're biased
right
what
first of all that's a hell of a way to put it
why don't you take a look at the increases in surgical interventions and see what you think
i mean how many do you think many
look if we're talking i'll answer your question i'll answer your question
the argument is it
it used to be very repressed because that's very outside of the tradition in the norm in the standard
and that now we want to let it mod all and that's a little bit press
what used to be suppress all the as an entire l g b q community i mean it was very recently we've t of all marijana united states fst of all they're not a community
i agree
i grew with jordan
one thousand percent on that
there is no community
that's just based on
being a sexual minority
hey that's not what a community is
i agree with that so much
no i'm
no actually neither
i understand it nor you and that's why we're delving in
first of all they're not a community
that's just a catchphrase it's a buzzword
and i'll tell you something else that almost all the kids who are
undergoing surgical intervention
the clinical literature is absolutely clear on this
eighty percent of kids with gender dysphoria
identify as homosexual when they mature
eighty percent
and that means the vast majority of people who are being converted
surgically
are gay
now how is that an advantage to the gay community
precisely
no i see i'm not i'm not taking a position
in any way shape or form
on
the kid
because
i don't know theyre you sure about this to comment on the kids
well but see that's why we're having this conversation though is because
my original question was a beout kid the adults
and what your take is on the adults and it sounds to me like
that let me ask this would you ban
transition surgery for adults
i don't know
really
yeah really we're paying a big price for it and i think
i think jordan you could just say
speak for jordan's position right only his
i think what he wants to say is
i want to ban the promotion of it i want to ban the normalization
but i don't think he wants to ban it itself right
he just wants to band the promotion
just like russia russia doesn't ban l b t q but it bans promotion
that i think that it was
it was a
an act of stunning humris to conduct the first
trans surgery procedure
but and it's not obvious to me at all that it's been a net social good
and so aren't there some people that are obviously trans
who were born in one body they feel like they're in the other body and when they're an adult they can make the decision and then even from just a freedom and liberty perspective shouldnt they have that right
even if they do it and then they regret it should they have the right to try it
good question
i mean it's tricky one right because
there's all sorts of surgical enhancement
procedures that are obviously
it's not obviously appropriate to make them illegal
and i don't know exactly where the cut off line is so
speak and that's partly why we're having a public
discussion about i think
you can get a surgery for anything
like you can get a surgery
oh there's really nasty ones you know you can like
you can like falkon
split your tongue into four parts and shit
there's really fucked up servery
just weird shit brocke
i don't want to g home my god there's really fucked up there
yeah i izak talked about one
one time zijak talked about his surgery
that is so fucking disgusting
i'm not even gonna tell you guys what it is
but let's just say
it gives a whole new meaning to three sums
it's really a gross surgery
really gross
but
this this this entire argument
in many ways is
stated so idiotically that it almost defies
scripture
what do you mean
feel like
you're in the wrong body
what kind of measurement is that now hang on a second
i was going to room hos for these sorts of diagnostic decisions
mmhmm okay
the rule is that you have to make a valid and reliable diagnosis
that's if you're diagnosing to know it's not the human centipede it's actually more disgusting
depression or anxiety or obsessive compulsive disorder
or cancer or anything like that
there are standards that you have to abide by
in order to make a diagnosis in order to fulfill the obligations of your professional calling
if someone comes to you instairs
i feel like i have lung cancer
that is not you know jim bum got it
it is extremely fucking this
yah ya it's i can't i can't
i can
this is disgusting man i'm not about to falg in throogh up
just thinking about it makes you want to throw p
sufficient grounds
upon which to formulate diagnosis much less proceed to surgery
mmhmm
and so the question is
what do you mean by seeel
what is that is that an emotion
is it a motivation is it a philosophy
solion
what is it
le let me explain let me explain to you what i mean let me explain to what i'
so i've been doing my show for about a decade
and about two or three years into doing my show there were you know some stories here and there that i covered about
the trans issue
somebody who is trans reached out to me and explained to me in a very straightforward way
yeah look i was born
biologically female i
feel like i'm biologically male
my reality is that lin up
well
i'm just explaining what theyve said and then you can respond however you'd like to respond
and they told me
as soon as i
got the surgery
change the way i dressed
change the way i appeared i felt phenomenally better
and so that's why at least for me this was the answer
now i think it would be incredibly arrogant for me to say back to that person
no you shouldn't do that or i know better than you do for yourself
and that's not to say that every time somebody does this it works out well of course
because everybody'san individual
but in some instances that's the answer
so you know me as a simple outsider i just look at it and say hey whatever float your boat if it works it will look
most of the time my attitude is you can go to hell in handbasket anyway you choose
if you're an adult
now the problem this problem is complicated and compounded by the fact of the necessity of medical involvement and the ethic
on the medical front
so
when you asked me about how that should be regulated my answer was i'm not exactly sure about that
yet although it isn't obvious to me that the
that
it's obvious to me that the trans surgery enterprise has gone
we
too far
way too far thousands of people to
and i'm
certain
that it's harmed
exponentially more people than
all right guys what you just saw was a teaser clip
from my podcast with dr jordan peterson
so you have to see the whole thing
i don't want anybody to think oh my god
this is out of
this dude looks like an n p c from the witcher
a schick child holy fuk th his channel sucks
he's doing worse than jackson was
he's got a million subs
and his videos are only getting fucking forty k views
this is
hawkbroll this is the death of a channel
and he's still making money off of it
how much is making on patrio
shak the patriot
set patriot
' still making money
mm
wo he's making a lot of money
for comparison i got only one hundred eighty patrons
think
yeah i have just how many patrons do i have
atrion dot com
later
i got
a runs
ah takes a whig
i have one hundred and eighty eight
i have a hundred and eighty eight patrons
think something like that yeah
so this is a lot
this is a lot
this is a loct
all right this is like a lot good for him
good friend
at least is that you know at least he's not totally under it's
it's not like he's being censured
like jackson inkle was
i
the people who trusted me
good bye good by
ok i guys
produced bysyic music by there wethre people who interested it
wait now go by
thank you so much love tony
you sae just so much man thank you
bas
thank you ma'am appreciate you so much
now we say good bye
thank
good bye
did you think about me twousand thirteen sicky a just just w f all the broken hearts that go we go we go
byter do' byter a do byter agn do tes st bter don't bter don't