🔴 RED PILL NEWS | IRAN-ISRAEL WAR? 🇵🇸

Jeez.

Shout out Uzi and Zamir to ask me where I get my song from.

Channel.

Was asking the pussy, don't even fix your lips like labyrinthia.

Well fed, got all the red.

I'm sad.

Post not come to my senses.

I tried to meditate.

I tried to medicate.

She had two phones, thought she was Kevin Gates.

She was lying about it.

Then she came clean.

I was so loud.

I fucked her so hard.

She can't clean.

Got that new.

It's a Maybe.

She got that new bag.

It's a Shay Nanae.

I take it too far.

I take it way, wait, wait.

I'm pulling Cougar out of KH.

Over my cake.

It's snowflake.

But no ways here we can get blameless in it.

Like a local street activist, flooded with shines.

Jackson 5 with four bottowns, I get better with time.

Run up in the big gambling spots, cocking it back.

I'm talking to Agnes, Agatha, Jermaine, and Jack.

DDS is no custom watches, that's made from scratch.

My birthstone is like an Easter egg, enemal fact.

My floors gained four seats in the glass.

It came with a glass of July sun, beat the R's in Vegas.

Shook the Coke for the big lumps and the Pyrex trainers.

Ran up in housing who had worked with the skies as painers.

Popped like bitches with fake asses that leak like drainage.

Our language, too much money, we can't explain it.

Over large cake, you know it's on.

Checkpate.

You can get spun like a mixtape.

Plus, we'll take down your squad and we.

And no face that could take form just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers, they all throw ways.

Yeah, we can get blameless and hammers do damage.

And yeah, I'd like to thank all the MCs across New York: Bronx, Brooklyn, Harlem, Queens.

Yeah.

Giving birth to pretty tone out here on Staten Island

That's right.

Writing these rhymes and ready.

P

Kitchen watching good times and what's happening and all that good shit.

Eating oatmeal.

Shout out to Zion Zamir.

That's right.

They asked me where I get my song from.

Let's go.

See you, sick, so.

Wanna clap me, monkey see monkey dope?

I'm coming with black gloves to snub his own chunky toes.

African cold devils, iced out metals.

I seen niggas get murked by the heels just the lettuce.

I threw at one nigga once, the other died by the echo.

I had got some Dawson niggas that look like freckles.

Paying homage, my Islamic Myris Thomas.

I threw up rhymes in my camel suit.

I see them on vomit.

It's a world premiere, me.

I limp when I'm dragging the shoddy, it's down in here, here.

Holding bricks, square, where my man got 85 in life and ice here, yeah.

Same day, he spit at the judge and threw a cheer, cheer.

Over large cake, you know it's on.

Check me, you can get spun like a mixtape.

Plus, we're taked down here.

In a ski mask, I was chilling and laying, chilling like sea bass.

And nobody was asking the pussy, don't even fix your lips like maybe your plastic.

Well fed, got all the red.

I'm sad, I need some.

I might tell you you the one while I'm hitting it Till I post not come to my senses I tried to meditate, I tried to medicate She had two phones, thought she was Kevin Gates She was lying bout it, yeah she can't clean I was so mad, I fucked her so hard she can't clean Got that new, it's a Maybe She got that new bed, it's a shane I take it too far, I take it way, wait, wait I'm pulling cougar out of KNH

With the no-face that could take form just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers, they all throw ways.

Yeah, we can get blamers and hammers do damage.

I'm like a normal street activist, flooded with shines.

Jackson 5 or 4 pro towns, I get better with time.

Run up in the big gambling spots, cocking it back.

I'm talking to Agnes, Agatha, Jermaine, and Jack.

EVS's no custom watches that's made from scratch.

My burbstone is like an Easter egg, enemal fact.

My floors gained four seats in the glass.

It came as a glass of July sun beat the R's in Vegas.

Shook the Coke for the big lumps and the Pyrex trainers.

Ran up in housing who had work with disguise as painters.

Pop like bitches with fake asses that leak like drainage.

Our language, too much money, we can't explain it.

Over large cake, you know it's hard.

Check paper.

You can get spun like a mixtape.

Plus, we'll take down your sword and we'll get.

With the no-face that can take form just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers, they all throw ways.

Yeah, we can get blamers and hammers do damage.

And yeah, I'd like to thank all the MCs across New York, Bronx, Brooklyn, Harvard, Queens, Long Island.

Giving birth to pretty tone out here on Staten Island.

That's right.

Right in these moments.

RP.

Started in the kitchen Watching good times and what's happening and all that good shit Eating oatmeal Shout out Uziah and Samir to ask me where I get my song from

Let's go.

See you, tell me.

Wanna clap me, monkey see, monkey dope?

I'm coming with black gloves to snub his own chunky toe.

African gold dentals, iced out metals.

I seen niggas get merch by the hands of the lettuce.

I threw at one nigga and once the other died by the echo.

I had got some Dawson niggas that look like freckles.

Paying homage, my Islamic, my.

Through a problem in my camel's suit, I see them on vomit.

Fix up.

When I'm dragging the shotiest down in here, here, holding bricks square, where my man got 85 to life and that's here, yeah.

Same day he spit at the judge and threw a cheer, cheer.

Over large cake, you know it's on.

Check me.

Run like a mixtape.

Cake with the note.

In the ski mask, I was chilling and laying chilling like sea bass.

And nobody was asking the pussy, don't even fix your lips like lady, you're plastic, yeah.

Well fed, got all the bread.

I'm sad, I need some head.

I might tell you you the one where I'm hitting it.

Till I most not come to my senses.

I tried to meditate, I tried to medicate.

She had two phones, thought she was Kevin Gates.

She was lying bout it, she came clean.

I was so loud, I fucked her so hard she can't clean.

Got that new, it's a Maybe.

She got that new bag, it's a shay nana.

I take it too far, I take it way, wait, wait.

I'm pulling Cougar out of KH.

You can get sponged like a mixtape.

Rush would take down your sponges.

Within no face.

I can take farms just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers, they all throwaways.

Yeah, we can get blamers and hammers do damage.

I'm like a global street activist, flooded with shines.

Jackson 5 before Folk Town, I get better with time.

Run up in the big gambling spots, cocking it back.

I'm talking to Agnes, Agatha, Jermaine, and Jack.

DVS is no custom watches that's made from scratch.

My birthstone is like an Easter egg, enemal fact.

My floor's gained, four seats in a glass.

It came with a glass of July sun, beat the R's in Vegas.

Shook the Coke for the big lumps and the Pyrex trainers.

Ran up in housing who had work, we disguised as painers.

Pop like bitches with fake asses that leak like drainage.

Our language, too much money, we can't explain it.

Over large cake, you know it's on.

Checkpate.

You can get spun just like a mixtape.

Plus, we'll take down your street.

With the no face that could take form just like a snowflake

Okay, yeah.

Peace for life.

My dear, the sound of the end.

But people can make a

Get the cup of girls in the body, keep the car.

Claude, Dr.

Vegas Chief.

Twas to shaden ging.

That's the

Welcome everyone, welcome to the late delayed stream by one day.

We're usually supposed to do these Sundays, but yesterday was Mother's Day and I was spending time with my family.

And I hope you were as well.

So, we're going to be having two streams in a row because we're going to be doing a stream tomorrow as well on schedule.

So, that's a rare treat, now, isn't it?

Anyway, guys, what's up?

What's going on?

We have actually a lot to talk about from the recent fiasco, quote unquote, about Biden's reluctance to

lend his verbal um his verbal

Approval of the raid into Rafah.

Apparently, this means Biden is going soft on Israel.

So he's going hard on Israel.

No, he's not.

to the recent resurgence of this whole GameStop thing again after I believe it was twenty twenty or twenty twenty one when this first happened.

And now it seems to be going on again.

GameStop and AMC are being pushed and pumped

Pretty high up.

Uh we also have a lot of other things to talk about.

I believe there's a few people who want to debate me, want to come on stream and debate me, so we're going to actually have some time for that as well.

But I think we're going to be doing a little bit of a rare thing on this stream today, is we're going to be covering some community stuff that I think is cool.

Two things of note, there's some gorillas that actually went to a MAGA rally in person, went to a MAGA rally, Philadelphia I believe it is, and they talked to MAGA people.

And I want to react to it so we can reflect on it, because that's not something we do very often.

We do these kind of videos and it's very good we're doing them, but internally we should also we should also discuss, you know, why do people say the things they're saying?

What does this say about the state of their consciousness and so on and so on.

So that's something I actually want us to do together.

A new face has entered the scene.

Much welcomed.

And uh let's give a round of applause to an another face of Communist Excellency entering the stage, which is John Jackman.

Both myself and Jackson are very impressed by a recent video he did.

Just a completely normal I know it's so weird that we just have to commend that a lot.

'Cause it's pretty rare nowadays, but this there's a new generation of communists that are rising to the task.

It's very clear to all of us.

There's a new generation of capital C communists never before seen in America for at least, you know, a little less than a hundred years maybe.

that are rising to the task.

It's no longer a a only a Haas thing, or it's only a Jackson thing.

It's increasingly hard for people to reduce our political project to the personal eccentricities of just a few individuals.

You know, when you have Haas, not to mention the other infrared showrunners, people

tend to forget about.

Unduly, if I should say.

But you have infrared, you have the infrared crew.

Oh, maybe they're just some cult that went crazy.

And then you have Jackson.

Well, Jackson's also crazy.

You have Midwestern Marks and Eddie.

Oh, well, they're just all grifters.

They're just doing it for grifting.

We've got Rev, you know, and not to mention the rest of RTSG.

Oh, well, that's.

And now we've got John Jackman entering the.

I mean, there's others I'm not even mentioning too, by the way.

But I'm mentioning him because I think he's a great example.

He's an example to follow.

I'm not saying everyone should just copy and just whatever.

Sayop, what the fuck is going on, man?

Appreciate you.

I am not saying everybody should just.

copy, you know what others are doing and not have their own style or their own accent.

Just like I I like the Yankee Tanky.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the Yankee Tanky.

All right.

I'm just saying I

I appreciate there's a new generation of capital C Communists entering the stage, entering the fore.

And it's this is what proves the success of our efforts actually in the long term.

This is what proves the success of our efforts.

A new generation of American Communists.

It's not reducible to some eccentricity of this or that person.

So let me go ahead and say I'm very pleased with that.

Very, very happy about it.

Now there's a few things we have to be talking about today and covering.

Because I have a conspiracy theory, if you can call it that, and I'm not sure that's the right word for it exactly.

But nonetheless, I want to give you my analysis of what's going on in the Biden administration, okay?

So let's uh first look at this White House briefing, I believe that's what it is, where the White House is now just denying the obvious, which is that there is a genocide going on in Gaza.

So let's just hit it off by watching this first.

Wow, hot take!

Let's fucking go!

Appreciate you, man, and

Should probably just put this here.

Thank you, Hot Take.

I appreciate you, brother.

What's going on, man?

Um

Now, uh, there's apparently a rift going on between Netanyahu and Biden.

We haven't seen it in generations.

It's a bunch of nonsense, but let's uh watch this first.

Four, we believe Israel can and must do more to ensure the protection and well-being of innocent civilians.

We do not believe what is happening in Gaza is a genocide.

We have been firmly on record.

Why not?

So, what China is doing in Xinjiang, which is creating vocational training centers, that's a genocide, but this isn't.

This is so stupid.

Now, okay, I'm just showing this to you because it's even hilarious how they can't even keep the facade upright.

Now, there may be some minor political differences, some marginal political differences between Biden and Netanyahu.

Of course, those squabbles exist.

I'm not entirely dismissing that those exist.

But here's what I suspect in terms of why it is that Biden is now.

Rhetorically speaking against and criticizing certain aspects of Netanyahu's options.

So the United States has to maintain the veneer of being a world police.

It is the enforcer of a universal notion of human rights, of global liberalism and the kind of post-war international order.

Now it's turned into the so-called rules-based global order.

And the United States has to maintain the veneer, at least, of a commitment to some kind of international law, international rules, international human rights.

And Israel is making that very inconvenient for the United States.

But you should not buy into the fact that there's a dichotomy.

This isn't a conflict between the United States and Israel.

It is an inconvenience

That is internal to one empire.

So, this is one empire that finds one of its arms, one of the means by which that empire enforces its rule to be inconvenient for other aspects.

The United States simultaneously needs to maintain the Zionist entity in the region.

And when I say the United States, I'm not talking about America as a country historically.

I'm talking about the U.S.

regime.

I'm talking about the global empire based in the United States, Wall Street, London.

so on and so on.

So that's what I'm talking about here, okay?

That global hegemony needs the Zionist entity in that region.

It is an absolute life or death red line for it.

It cannot compromise.

Just even look at Ukraine.

If they're not willing to compromise Ukraine in Eastern Europe, what makes you think they're willing to compromise the Zionist entity in the Middle East?

They absolutely cannot afford for the Zionist entity to disappear there.

Okay?

I want you to follow me.

Follow me here.

Follow me here.

Just like they say on TikTok.

Simultaneously, the United States has to maintain a global soft power hegemony in which it represents the kind of responsible global actor that and you need to understand how much of this is just filler and not even necessarily meaningful.

What I mean by that is that, you know, if there's some region in Africa that's starving, sometimes it's just a filler role of the United States to raise concerns.

Oh, there's a humanitarian crisis in this random place in the world.

So the United States keeps up the veneer of a humanitarian, universal.

Police and a universal guardian of humanitarian interests.

And oftentimes, this is not even directly one specific agenda.

It's just it, it's like it's almost like if you're tasked with a job at the office and it's like, my job is to be HR, right?

My job is to receive phone calls and hear people's complaints.

My job is to resolve customer disputes, whatever.

That's just your job.

And the U.S.

has taken on that job for itself, at least in a superficial form.

So that comes with a whole lot of, you know, international charity and funding of NGOs.

And not all of these necessarily come with a.

direct agenda.

Of course, it's part of a greater agenda in the law in the grander scheme of things, but a lot of it is also just filler.

It's just part of the job, right?

So you need to understand that aspect of U.

S.

hegemony.

The U.S., for example, under Clinton, tried to assume the role of this responsible global agent when it came to the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa.

Right?

I don't know if you grew up in primary education and U.S.

public school, if everyone here has, but we all learned about apartheid in South Africa.

And it was presented to us in such a way that made it seem like, you know, this is part of...

the new world order led by the U.S.

of, you know, global human rights and liberal democracy and, you know, the power of civil society.

You go to Washington, D.C., and it's literally a monument to civil society protest and, you know, the power of democracy and the power of activism.

And you can make a difference.

Your vote matters.

Your activism matters.

You know, global equality for all.

You know, stand up for your rights.

Yada, yada, yada.

And then the other aspects of the anti-apartheid struggle were totally marginalized.

You know, Winnie Mandela was cast aside, and Nelson Mandela was made the face of the whole thing.

So the militant armed struggle was totally erased from history, led by the U.S.

hegemony, I mean.

And we just get this kind of Gandhi nonsense.

And part of this new rainbow world of equality and liberty and diversity, the global hegemony, global homogeneity, whatever you want to call it, right?

So the US fulfills this role as well.

It's just that this is a superstructure, right?

In a way, I'm kind of confusing the Marxist terminology here because superstructure tends to refer to everything that's not directly economic.

But in the era in which politics and economics are inherently intertwined, there's aspects of geopolitics and the politics itself, statehood, state power, military power, that have become part of the base, that have become part of the economic base itself, not just necessarily the superstructure, right?

So, this brings us to the existence of the Zionist entity as well.

Now, in the case of South Africa,

The apartheid system for a long time was part of the base of world imperialism as a political system.

But they were able to disentangle the apartheid system from the base at the political level while maintaining all of the economic structures

and all of the economic and financial institutions that made it necessary for global imperialism.

So that was a tremendous feat accomplished by the unipolar world order led by the United States.

Remember, the anti-apartheid struggle was part of the bipolar world order before the end of the Soviet Union.

The Soviet Union was constantly putting pressure on the West and on the United States.

What about apartheid?

What about apartheid?

And the U.S.

was kind of dancing around the issue a little bit.

Although there were liberals and progressives in the U.S.

who were opposed to it, they were not at the vanguard of that struggle.

That was the USSR.

So when the unipolar world order came to be,

The U.S.

did not, it was no longer this bulwark against communism.

It also started to positively implement its own vision of global homogeneity and global hegemony and the specific ideological values of liberal democracy and Fukuyama and all that stuff.

So they absorbed some of these struggles, just like Reagan absorbs Martin Luther King's civil rights struggle.

And that whole thing gets whitewashed.

They did the same thing with the apartheid struggle in South Africa.

So that brings us to the present time with the very inconvenient situation of the Palestinian conflict.

If you read Jimmy Carter's own memoirs, even politicians like Jimmy Carter, who were progenitors of the global liberal system, progressive global liberal system, the unipolar one of the U.S., even he is forced to acknowledge.

The great injustice that's going on.

I don't know how else you'd put it, right?

Senior U.S.

officials, think tanks, politicians, all of them, whether it's privately or even in some cases publicly, acknowledge there is a Palestinian right to self-determination.

They have to.

There's no way to reconcile the new role taken on by the United States in the unipolar world order and the blatant hypocrisy of denying Palestinians a sovereign right to self-determination.

What we constantly get is that it's just too nuanced and it's too complex.

But ultimately they believe in the aspiration of a two-state solution and Palestinian state.

I mean, Obama was direct about this.

Many US politicians were direct about it.

They even pretend to be arbitrators and mediators of the conflict, such as in the case of the Oslo Accords, right?

So this is the role that is played by the United States.

Which represents a kind of tension within the empire.

It's not a real conflict, it's just a superficial one.

It has to pretend to be this global mediator of all conflicts, all humanitarian issues, all issues pertaining to the sovereign right of the self-determination of nations.

Yada yada yada.

But then simultaneously, there's this economic base, there's this political base that is necessary for the hegemony itself.

An empire can only rule at the top if it touches base at the more fundamental levels of military might, of geopolitical hegemony, right?

Of economic hegemony, of maintaining a specific economy and enforcing a specific economic reality.

and so on and so forth.

So there's always been in history a conflict between these two aspects of an empire, between the base and the superstructure, if you will, right?

And in the case of the United States, we sort of see something going on

In the case of the Palestinian issue, because, and here's the kicker, and this is what Nasrullah himself had said.

The Zionist entity does not control America.

It's also not true that the United States formally, as in the formal United States based in the Constitution yada yada, controls the Zionist entity.

Rather,

The Zionist entity, the American deep state, the military deep state represented by NATO and Europe, the British deep state, obviously, Canadian, whatever you want to call it, five eyes.

All of these form parts of one global hegemony, a kind of super, supranational deep state, if you will, global deep state.

Which violates the sovereignty of all the respective countries I just mentioned, with the exception of the Zionist entity itself, whose sovereignty, whose existence as a country is inexorably tied to that global hegemony and that global deep state.

So let me rephrase this, right?

America will be a country, was a country, and is a country in spite of the global hegemony.

America's existence is not reducible to the global hegemony.

England's, Britain's existence is not reducible to the global hegemony.

Canada is a little tricky, but even then, it's not comparable to Israel.

Okay?

But Israel's existence is a pet project of the global hegemony.

The way that Israel was created.

Think of it, this is kind of like a Black Ops mission.

You know, it was like a black ops mission.

It wasn't created in a legitimate formal way of any kind.

It was kind of an obscene criminal underworld of the global capitalist superstructure, the British Empire, the US Empire, whatever you want to call it, where the ruling class, the global ruling class, whose money is based in offshore banks, is fundamentally unaccountable to any sovereign country and so on and so forth.

embarked upon this pet project of artificially and synthetically creating a Jewish state.

The forces that are responsible for the creation of that state

Ultimately, we're not the Jewish capitalist class in the main.

Obviously the Rothschilds and many Jewish capitalists were the most invested in it, probably, but the only reason that they received an audience

Among the other segments of the global capitalist ruling class, who outnumber them, by the way, is because the interests of the Zionist entity, the interests of the existence of a state of Israel, was recognized and regarded by the cartel of global capitalist elites as necessary for it strategically, to consolidate a permanent foothold in that region of the world.

So you see, this is why it's complicated.

It's not that the Zionist entity controls America.

It's that there's this extra sovereign global capitalist ruling class that controls all of the countries in question.

And f in whose interests alone the Zionist entity exists as a country in the first place.

But if you want the long story short,

The global American empire is 100% responsible for everything Israel does.

Absolutely everything.

You know, I saw a ridiculous tweet by I th it was Nick Fuentes, and he goes, You know, Israel should listen to the US and not the reverse.

And it's like,

They are listening to the US.

What are you talking about?

They are listening to the US.

You think Biden is actually the guy in power?

The US, the actual power of the global American empire, isn't the President.

The powers behind US hegemony that's not the office of the Presidency or it's not based in the the White House Cabinet or something even.

It's a deep state.

It's fundamentally unaccountable to any kind of formal form of sovereignty.

And Israel is only doing what it's doing because of that deep state.

And it's one hundred percent the f you know, y y no one should you don't play into the hands of the Zionists themselves.

By attempting to kind of separate Israel from the global hegemony and the global American empire, right?

There's no separation.

The only reason you have Biden slightly critical of how the situation is being handled by Netanyahu, whatever, that is just a superficial veneer that Biden is trying to communicate, A, to the network of civil society human rights organizations within the United States that are fundamental to the U.S.

Empire, and B,

To the outward foreign-facing arm of that same soft power, NGO, whatever complex, and then see the international community.

The United States needs to maintain face in front of the international community because it's not really good optics for the rest of the world who, yes, the US deeply cares about their perceptions.

in terms of US being credible and legitimate.

It's done a horrible job at it, I agree, but it's still trying.

And the US is trying to save face in front of the international community and in front of the UN because it's it's just indefensibly absurd.

What Israel is doing in Gaza, what it's trying to do in Gaza in the case of Rafah.

And how the US is kind of turning a blind eye against it.

But the US is the reason it's happening in the first place.

So, what you're witnessing here is just a rank form of hypocrisy.

Now, he's saying, why is it in the US's interest, not the US as a country, I'm talking about the regime?

Why is it in the interest of the U.S.

regime that Netanyahu slaughters the people of Gaza?

Well, I'll tell you why.

Because in contrast to what the liberal Zionists are trying to tell you, this is the only way there's a Zionist entity.

And the Mukawama, the resistance, actually agrees on that account.

The Zionist entity does need to commit genocide in order to exist.

Except, even then, it still can't exist.

But the idea that there can be a Zionist entity that peacefully coexists in the region, that's just not true.

It's totally impossible.

As long as there's a Zionist entity in the Middle East, it will always be rejected by the region.

Palestinians will always demand a right of return.

They will always demand.

a return to their homeland.

And even if they were out of the equation, what makes you think neighbors in that region would ever tolerate such an aggressive

um foreign entity in its region and in their back door.

That uh they would never tolerate that.

The region is rejecting the Zionist entity like an immune system rejects, you know, a foreign bacteria infection, okay?

So that's what's going on actually.

It's just being rejected.

It's like it's like a it's like put it this way, right?

The global ruling capitalist class try to do an organ transplant, where they try to artificially create a country

Without having any regard whatsoever for the fundamental premises of civilization and history and culture in that region, tried to artificially and synthetically create a Jewish state based on foreign ideas that come from German Romantic nationalism from the 19th century.

And they attempted this in a region, and the organ transplant failed.

The body, the Middle East, rejected the transplant, and it doesn't work.

That's exactly the right way to describe it.

It's just a failed transplant.

The only way Israel could survive is by creating an organic You are missing the point.

Completely.

There is no way Israel could ever survive because the existence of a Jewish state could never be organic.

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Clearly, you're misunderstanding what I'm saying, though, and I don't mean to get angry, but clearly, you misunder I'm not just waffling and gibbering when I use the word organic to describe some kind of LARP.

It's actually the Zionists that really try to be organic in such a failed, pathetic, and miserable way.

Having an organic existence as a country isn't about what you're trying to be or trying to do.

It's your ability to integrate with the civilization and the history that forms the context of the geographical region that you're in.

So you have to submit to the history and the geography and the civilization that's there already.

You have to fully submit to it and form an interaction based on mutual recognition.

A Jewish state is premised on

and a nonnegotiable exclusion according to which this is this land is only ultimately for Jews or people descended from Jews by our criteria, and that's it.

Like that is fundamentally impossible.

Okay, it's just not possible.

It's absolutely impossible.

You know?

So that's square one.

But i even though it's impossible, it's still necessary for the global American empire.

It's necessary for the global American empire because it's the one thing that is thwarting regional integration.

What do I mean by that?

I'll be very simple.

If it wasn't for the Zionist entity, the Middle East would have been another China, would have been another Russia.

Black Pack, let's fucking go!

Let's fucking go, Blackpat.

Localists, the Canaanist movement was nothing but nonsense LARP.

I don't even know what you're talking about.

That was also what's some Mussolini nonsense, I'm pretty sure.

Anyway, to continue what I'm talking about.

The Zionist entity is the only thing in the Middle East that's preventing the formation of another geographical superstate, civilization state, as Zhang Weiwei would describe it, similar to China and similar to Russia.

It's the one thing standing in the way of that.

It's the one thing standing in the way.

of the entire global oil market, OPEC, being fundamentally disrupted by a new geopolitical p uh power that will fundamentally upset global US hegemony and the hold the United States has

On the oil market and how that's intrinsically tied to the value of the US dollar.

the petrodollar system.

You say, well, how is that related?

Because the petrodollar, that's a deal with Saudi Arabia.

What does that have to do with Israel?

I'll tell you what it has to do with Israel.

There is an organic tendency toward regional integration that would exist in the Middle East,

And the only thing standing in the way of it is the Zionist entity.

And if regional integration happens, the political order within the Middle East, the political status quo, especially the Saudi regime itself, that would be totally thrown up into the air.

It would be completely unknown.

It would be a total unknown what would happen.

So this is exactly what we're talking about here.

Okay?

This is exactly what we're talking about here.

You need to understand the borders that exist in the Middle East are very much unnatural, very much in in constant conflict with the actual people who live there.

And the one the one thing, the one entity that is the epitome of that incongruency is Israel.

Israel is the sanctification, it is the establishment, it is the reification of Sykes Picot, of the unnatural territorial boundaries that were drawn by foreign colonialists, which are constantly entering into conflict with the people who inhabit the region.

So that is the issue.

But again, the US needs the Zionist entity to exist there.

Now you say, okay, whoa, okay, they need Israel to be there.

Some liberal Zionists will argue this.

By the way, a lot of liberal Zionists are the ones pretending to co-op.

They're trying to co-opt the Palestinian liberation movement in the US.

And I believe a red line needs to be drawn.

And let's be clear, this isn't just Netanyahu who's the problem.

This isn't just the Likud problem.

This is just a Netanyahu problem.

It's an Israel problem.

It's a Zionism problem.

It's a global US hegemony problem.

It's a US regime problem.

And that's exactly why the just struggle of the Palestinian people is inexorably tied to the just struggle of the people in Donbass and the Russian people against the other unnatural, disastrous foreign infection that's called Ukraine.

It's also related to the just struggle of China to maintain its territorial integrity and combat Taiwan separatism.

All of these things are inherently entwined.

If there is anyone, some protester, some activist who simultaneously is waving the flag of Palestine, but also the Free Syria flag, also the Taiwan flag.

Also the Ukraine flag.

You need to throw them in a dumpster where they belong.

Those are not friends of the Palestinian struggle.

Those are liberals trying to be at peace with their own cognitive dissonance.

But at the fundamental level of historical justice and historical honor, they don't have an authentic solidarity with the Palestinian people.

They just have an internal cognitive dissonance which they're dealing with in an inherently contradictory way.

You can't both have solidarity with the Palestinian people and also wave Ukraine's flag and also wave the flag of Taiwan separatism.

And also wave the flag of regime change in Syria.

You can't do all of those things at once.

You may think there's a moral consistency to doing all those things at once, but you're neglecting the global American system, which is responsible for the existence of the Zionist entity and all of its crimes in the first place.

This is exactly what I try to say in my in-person speech as well, by the way.

The problem is not some political party in Israel, it's Israel itself that's the problem.

Now, this may seem like an extreme position, but I beg to differ.

The Palestinian struggle has been going on since 1948.

It's not just a Netanyahu and Likud problem.

Israel has had plenty of labor governments.

And the whole thing is just one continuity of their treatment of the Palestinians and their inability to integrate within the region.

It doesn't matter what political ideology is in charge, as long as there's a Zionist state, there's going to be trouble.

And Netanyahu is sitting here saying, We tried the Oslo Accords, we tried this, we tried that.

It's not true, by the way.

They didn't try because they can't try.

Because if they actually honored the Oslo Accords, there wouldn't be a Zionist state in the first place.

Why?

Because granting recognition to a Palestinian state is the end of a Zionist state.

That would be the end of Israel.

I fully acknowledge and admit that.

Liberal Zionists are out here trying to deceive people and say, no, no, no, we can have a two-state solution.

No, no, no.

That's not true.

Israel is a fundamentally illegitimate entity.

And that's a hill none of us should be afraid to die on.

It's a fundamentally illegitimate entity.

There is no way to reform it.

There is no way

You know, a two state solution is what Hamas wants right now, immediately, as a first step, and that's fine.

But nobody is under the illusion that there's going to be a coexistence in peace with the Zionist entity.

There is no way to do it.

I am not I don't find liberals who are struggling with cognitive dissonance to be brave.

I find them to be hypocrites.

I find the people who simultaneously support all of the global American Empire's endeavors, but when one of those endeavors suddenly conflicts

On a superficial and ideological level.

With the so-called values of the global American empire, now you're going to start waving the Palestinian flag?

Then why are you waving the Uyghur Tai or the Tibet flag or the flag of separatism for Taiwan?

Why are you waving the flag for Ukraine?

Why are you waving the flag for regime change in Syria?

Why are you waving all those 'cause they're all connected actually.

They're all the same thing.

They're on a fundamental level they're all the same thing, by the way.

Not just oh, they're indirectly no, they're directly the same exact flag.

The flag of the Zionist entity, the flag of Ukraine, the flag of Taiwan separatism, the flag of Uyghur separatism, the flag of Tibet separatism, the flag of regime change in Syria, the flag of regime change in Belarus, the flag of regime change in Venezuela, the flag of regime change in Cuba.

They are all the same flag.

They are all the same flag.

This isn't a battle between ideologies and moral systems.

It is a battle between a global political and economic hegemony, a concrete global empire, and people who are actually trying to resist it.

So when people say, how can you claim to support Palestine while also supporting Russia and Ukraine?

Because as the Chinese social media users have pointed out and understand through memes, because I understand the reality of the global geopolitical situation.

I understand how the same forces which need to maintain a foothold in Ukraine also need to maintain a foothold in the Levant through the Zionist entity.

They are the same exact struggle fighting against them respectively.

They are the same exact thing.

That is so fundamental to understand and never compromise on.

The primary contradiction is not one of these struggles, it's all of them.

Strategically, the focus now is on the Palestinian front, but this is one of many fronts of one global struggle.

And you shouldn't forget that.

You shouldn't have solidarity with your enemies just because they're waving Palestinian flags.

If my enemy is waving a Palestinian flag, but he's waving the flags of all my other enemies, you think that guy is my friend?

Just because somebody waves a Palestine flag doesn't mean they're your friend.

If they're waving the Ukraine flag, if they're waving the flag of Taiwan, Tibetan and Uyghur separatism, if they're waving the flag of regime change in Syria, they are not your friends.

They're your enemies, trying to reconcile their own hypocrisy and their own cognitive dissonance.

There is a global principle contradiction, and we should not be willing to compromise any of them ideologically.

And notice I'm saying ideologically.

Strategically speaking, don't take my words out of context because strategically speaking, we should exploit all of the contradictions among our enemies.

We should delight and exploit the contradiction being created by the cognitive dissonance within the liberals.

All I'm trying to say is that you shouldn't have solidarity with liberals who have cognitive dissonance.

They're not your friends.

They're your enemies.

But if our enemies are fighting each other, we are smiling.

You understand?

That's our mentality.

That's how we should understand it.

We should, of course, exploit the contradiction, but don't for a second be allies with people waving the flag of Tibetan, Uyghur, Taiwan, separatism, waving the flag of Ukraine, waving the flag of regime change and color revolutions.

You should not be friends with those people.

They aren't your allies.

And in a revolutionary situation in this country, they're going to be in a ditch, depending on who gets the upper hand.

I'm not going to say who, but just understand that.

Just understand that.

Those who wave the flags of the global hegemony, hypothetically, if there was an American Civil War and one side of that war is trying to overthrow occupation by the global hegemony.

The defenders of the hegemony will be like Nazi black shirts, and the forces of anti-fascism will dispense with them, much like.

The Yugoslav partisans disposed of them.

Which means creating a nice subterrestrial water slide that just goes into a pit.

And it's such a fun water slide that there's like thousands of bodies in this pit, you know?

That's because it's like all the rave.

There's just so many people hanging out in the pit.

Woo!

It's so fun.

I mean, they're not really animate.

But silently they're enjoying it, of course.

By the way, this is all a joke, but I'm just saying.

I'm just saying, don't make the wrong friends.

They're not your friends.

That's all I'm trying to say.

Okay?

Don't make the wrong friends.

That's all I'm trying to say.

Wow.

And I'm not saying people can't become educated.

That's not what I'm saying either.

People can, obviously, some liberals who have cognitive dissidents can be educated to eventually reject liberalism and all these other, you know, nefarious, anti-human, evil global projects as well.

They can be reformed.

I'm not saying they can't.

I I want to believe the majority of them will be, right?

But there's some people that want to bash you over the head with a hammer because you reject regime change in Syria.

There's some people that want to take a hammer and bash your head because you defend China's right.

To territorial integrity because you support Russia.

There's some people that want to kill you because you support Russia.

Remember that.

And how do I know this?

Because when pro-Russia or Russian journalists get murdered, they celebrate it and they don't consider it a crime at all.

So.

That's all I'm trying to say.

I'm just trying to tell you that some of these people are really your enemies, really our enemies, right?

And you shouldn't you shouldn't get it twisted or get confused about that at all on any level.

Now to continue what I'm saying,

I think Biden is putting on a show for the international community and for domestic NGOs and civil society groups.

I don't think there's anything serious, okay?

He even the threat he made of how much arms he's going to discontinue sending to Israel, it's enough.

It's so insignificant, it's so minuscule, it's so not even worthy of talking about that it's meaningless.

It's totally put it this way: rhetorically, what Trump is saying is actually what Biden is doing.

Trump's full on Zionism, full on Zionism.

Yeah, Biden is betraying Israel.

You know, we need to help Israel finish the job.

Like he's saying that, but that's actually what Biden is doing now.

And some and more, right?

And there's no, there's no ten.

See, there's no tensions.

This is what you need to understand.

There are no operational struggles.

There are rhetorical struggles for the media, for the international media.

But there are no operational tensions as far as the US and the UK gathering intelligence about resistance positions in Gaza and giving them to Israel.

There is no conflict going on at that level.

There is no tension going on at that level.

There is no hesitancy going on at that level.

There is no delay going on at that level.

Mossad, CIA, MI6, they are all the same.

There is no tension between them.

There's no tension between the US military and Israel.

There's nothing, nothing, no conflict at all.

The conflict, quote unquote, is a show.

It's a show that's a rhetorical conflict that means absolutely nothing.

It absolutely means nothing.

What if Trump is trying to pander to his evangelical base?

It's so much worse than that.

It's way worse than that.

Trump is.

Outright pandering to donors.

That's what he's doing.

He's pandering.

He is very cynically pandering to.

APAC, he's pandering to the Zionist lobby and he's pandering to donors.

Very cynically, that's what he's doing.

It's so cynical, it's almost funny.

But Trump.

Is doing what Trump has proven he will always do, which is play it safe.

He will never invest in his own base.

Because let's be completely honest.

Let's say Trump started being critical of Israel.

Do you really think his base will turn on him?

You really think if Trump got on a mic and started criticizing Israel, his base would reject it?

They would take that and run wild with it.

Not only would they take his slight criticisms and remarks.

Within two days, his base will be wearing kefiyas and be in solidarity with Hamas.

That is how ready they are to reject Israel.

So don't get it twisted.

Trump doesn't support Israel because his base.

He supports Israel because the donors and because of the Republican establishment.

Even the evangelical Zionists, I get that they're brainwashed by all these preachers and all this kind of stuff.

But they don't, they're not even really that educated about Israel.

And at the end of the day, all you'd have to tell them is some always see, they think Trump is the Messiah.

If Trump got on stage and he was just like, actually, Israel is, if Trump became like a black Hebrew Israelite and was like, actually, the black people are Jews and these are pretenders, whatever.

Like, they would believe it.

They don't give a fuck.

They're not fundamentally committed.

To the actual Zionist entity.

They are committed to a fairy tale that some preachers are telling them about the Bible and the Jews in the Bible and some prophetic biblical prop.

But they don't know anything about Israel or the they don't even know about what Palestinians are.

They don't know anything about the region at all.

Okay.

It's just like some nonsense that has no, there's nothing tangible about that solidarity.

That's what I'm trying to say.

It's a complete it's like, you know how the Rastafarians?

We're really big fans of Haile Selase in Ethiopia.

There's no connection between them.

There's no tangible basis for that reverence.

It's just because Haile Selase was a black king and it was a form of black nationalism by the Rastafarians, and that's it.

That's similar w w with the evangelicals in the U S.

I'm talking about the the people who are victim to it.

I know that there's Zionists manipulating them at the at the uh top level, of course.

But I'm trying to say it's very easy to turn Americans against Zionism.

That's all I'm trying to say.

It's extremely easy to turn Americans against Zionism.

And how do I know this?

How do I know this?

The one social media that's not owned by the US is what?

TikTok.

Trumpers use TikTok, so do Democrats and Liberals, so do apolitical people.

All walks of life use TikTok.

And there's almost a unanimous consensus on TikTok

that Israel sucks.

And that's spontaneous.

That wasn't astroturfed.

It's a spontaneous consciousness that developed just because some actors had the freedom to develop it.

It's not hard to disentangle people from Israel, supporting Israel.

There is no segment of the US population that is fundamentally committed.

to the existence of Israel or US support for Israel,

Except

uh those demographically captured by Zionist institutions directly, so many American Jews, not all of them, but many of them.

And then additionally, you also have the, you know, uh

The salaried class, let's say, many of them also have a vested interest in defending Zionist ideology for obvious reasons.

But I don't think eva I think evangelicals are extremely easy to

Disentangle from Zionism and from Israel, and all you have to do is present it to them in a biblical way, and they'll be fine with it.

They they don't care about actual Israel.

They don't actually care about they care about a mythological biblical presentation of it.

Which which is not grounded in any empirical relationship, any tangible relationship.

It's not like evangelical, you know, it's not like Appalachian evangelical, you know, unemployed coal miners addicted to fentanyl.

It's not like those people have some kind of class interest that makes them have solidarity with Israel.

Okay, that's what I'm trying to say.

There's nothing actually attaching them to that view.

There's nothing tangible, okay?

Um

I also by the way, I think the same is true for many American Jews.

You know that?

Um that's also true for many American Jews.

It's the evangelical churches, the church establishment, the televangelists.

Who could

In some science fiction scenario, probably would queue up in line for the water slide.

You know, it's those people.

Those are the problem.

Also, another problem among the Jewish community in the US are the

the Zionist institutions, right?

The NGOs, the groups, what is that birthright tour nonsense.

So this is the issue, you know, the issue also the issue is the obviously the ruling class itself.

Of course.

The capital is Glass.

Who else?

Yeah, but Settlers by Jay Sakai says all American workers have dual U.S.-Israeli.

It's such a stupid narrative.

They're like.

Oh, well, U.S.

workers are in solidarity with Israel because they're both settlers.

Oh, really?

Oh, that's why it's because they're both settlers.

It's not because they're being taught and brainwashed by priests that this Israel is literally the one in the Bible and that these are the like this is about the Judaism of the Bible and it's the chosen people and Jesus is gonna come back.

Like, yeah, it has nothing to do with religion.

It's really just because they're both settlers.

What a stupid nonsense!

Stupid nonsense view.

Okay.

Yes, the Bible.

You guys need to understand how easy it was for Zionists to manipulate American Protestants, Christians.

Okay.

Go back to the 1800s.

Go back to the 1900s.

The Old Testament is like memorized by heart by Jebediah working on the cornfields.

And it's like American folk music, any kind of American labor struggles, the abolitionist struggle.

There's so many themes of Exodus and the return and Moses.

They're not just focused on the New Testament.

The biblical unconscious, there's a biblical.

Background, like all of the biblical prophets, like Noah, you know, Jehu, speaking of Jehu, you know, Elijah, all these kinds of people.

Like, these are, where do you think Americans get their names from in the 1900s?

They get it from the Bible.

Okay.

So, if there's anything fundamental to American consciousness, it's really the Bible and Protestant Christianity.

So, when Zionists come in,

and try to make a connection between the Zionist state and that deep bedrock of biblical consciousness Americans have, lo and behold, it proves very effective and very potent for manipulating uneducated Americans who know nothing about the history of the Middle East, who know nothing about geopolitics, who know nothing about the vested interests in the existence of the state of Israel, who don't know anything about that.

All they know is that it's called Israel and somehow there's a bunch of Jews involved in it.

So lo and behold, it's very easy to manipulate them.

Exactly.

America was founded as a new Israel qui they always use this rhetoric.

It's very common in uh Christian civilization to use that rhetoric.

There's nothing Zionist about it.

It's just from the Bible.

Zionism

manipulated Christians by, you know, trying to make it seem like there is a relationship between the the Israel that's in the Bible and this phony, artificial, satanic state that they create

Uh in the post-war period.

You know?

So let me be absolutely clear that it's not because there's a solidarity between settlers and.

Can I be honest about something?

If you still believe Americans in twenty twenty four are settlers,

You're just not a smart person.

You're just a midwit.

And you don't actually believe it's true.

You just say it because you want to score brownie points in whatever echo chamber or limited social milieu you're trying to appease, pander to, or gain credibility within.

Nobody actually believes Americans are actually settlers in 2024.

In a way, for example, comparable to settlers in the West Bank from the Zionist entity.

There's no comparison, okay?

It's just a bunch of nonsense.

It's just a bunch of nonsense.

There's nothing sociologically about America right now in 2024 that takes the form of people settling.

I mean, maybe expats, I don't know, maybe expats moving to some other but America has been consolidated as a country.

And

You know, I I understand there's many injustices continuing to be committed against the first Americans that he that preceded the European.

You know, this is another thing I disagree, you know, and and I want to have a discussion with

Um the guy who made this argument recently.

Because I disagree with the view that the form of settlement that formed the context of the founding of America is comparable to the Zionist project.

And I'll tell you exactly why.

It's actually really simple from a Marxist perspective.

Ready?

Ready?

Historically speaking, settlement into the Americas

Was an economic phenomenon.

It wasn't based on building a new nation state or anything, it was an economic phenomenon.

Yes, there is a religious phenomena at play there as well.

But it was an era that preceded the existence of well defined nation states and well defined forms of the recognition of territorial sovereignty based on historically constituted communities.

So it was mainly people coming from England and it and they were settling not because they were saying, Oh, you know, we're just going to take all of this land for ourselves to constitute this, you know,

This new project of um

of totally artificially creating a country from scratch because the the the political notion of a country and of a nation was extremely ill-defined at that point.

So in other words, I understand that there are obvious differences between the era of European colonialism and let's say the form of settlement the Turks made in Anatolia.

and other transfers and movements of population historically, which were also nonetheless very violent and so on.

But no, I understand there's all these sorts of different historical and sociological differences.

But it's completely wrong to compare it to Zionism.

Because Zionism...

You want to know the difference between Zionism and settlement into the Americas?

The majority of the foreign settler population arrived into Palestine in tandem with the creation of the Zionist state and with the fulfillment of the political and ideological project of Zionism.

They just came suddenly, like almost all overnight.

And then a few decades before there is a a significant number of settlers, but the bulk really comes in the postwar period, in the immediate aftermath.

And it's a an intentional, methodical, ideological and political project, okay?

The case of the Americas isn't is by no means comparable.

Okay?

That is a that in the in Hegelian terms

That's a phenomena of civil society.

The internal societies of England and Europe and wherever else had these within civil society, there's these contradictions.

These contradictions are being manifested in the form of people leaving and going to pursue economic opportunity in a totally foreign, totally unknown, as far as they were concerned, land to build a new life from scratch, yes, but with no certainty as far as what this will amount to.

In terms of civilization and nation building, and what country, there's none of that's premising their movement from Europe, the old world to the new world.

It's just kind of taking a risk to go build a new life to pursue economic opportunity without knowing what the consequences will ultimately be.

But that's not what Zionism is.

Zionism is a political movement, it's an ideological movement which expressly had an agenda and had plans to take a people from a completely different region, transplant them in a totally alien and foreign region, and artificially create.

A new community, a new state, a new country from scratch at the expense of everyone who was already living there.

That was not the same thing as the settlement that occurred in the centuries before the establishment of the United States.

Finally, this is my um.

This is my final uh r uh o opposition to this notion, my criticism of it.

By the time seventeen seventy six happens, it's already an anti-colonial war.

1776 doesn't happen because the settlers are upset that Britain is preventing, you know, massive transfers of population from Europe.

That's not why it happened.

It happened because people who had already lived there for centuries

Decided that or recognized, awakened to the fact that they were already fundamentally distinct enough in terms of the community that formed inadvertently, by the way, not intentionally.

This is the thing: you know, the first pilgrims that came to the U.S.

or whatever, sorry, it's so stupid.

The first pilgrims that came to the Americas, the first settlers from Europe that came to North America, they had no clue that there would be a United States hundreds of years later.

Inadvertently, the economic and civil society process of settlement and the pursuit of economic opportunity and all the forms of association and community that were created out of that, like all nations that are constituted organically, inadvertently, that gave rise to a separate nation.

It gave rise to a separate existence.

It gave rise to the possibility, and this is a really important thing: the possibility.

of a separate civilization from Europe.

Not the guarantee of one, not the conceit of knowing what that will be ultimately, but just the possibility of one.

Okay.

Just the possibility of one.

And that's what 1776, we should really appreciate the bravery and the heroism of 1776 from a wider historical perspective.

Because here you have a historically constituted community descended from people who had already lived there for hundreds of years who say, you know what?

Our forefathers came from Europe, but we've been here long enough.

We've formed a life here long enough.

And maybe we can

Pursue a path of civilization separate from the old world.

Maybe we don't have to listen to the rules of the old world.

Maybe we don't have to have the same culture and civilization and political state that the old world has.

Maybe we can build something new.

Now, what that will be, ultimately, we don't know.

But maybe we can unite together politically to overthrow the British, who are colonists ruling from overseas, and aspire to unify into something greater.

which will ultimately be based on making a life in this land.

The difference between that and Zionism is there's a lot of ambiguity as far as what that ultimately might be.

You know, what is it what is it what is the saying?

A more perfect union.

It's the United States of America The country is called the United States of America.

And it aspires to create a more perfect union.

It doesn't say what that if it knew what that union looked like, it wouldn't say a more perfect union.

It's aspiring to a union.

It's aspiring to the creation of a country.

It doesn't know what that's going to look like.

It's no it's not con it's not saying this is a Jewish state.

And I understand the founding fathers had racial policies within the context of slavery and other things in the beginning, where to be a citizen, you had to be a white man, a good what is it, a white man of good moral reputation, good character or something.

But that wasn't enshrined as of as the fundamental founding principle or uh the of the aspiration of a united America.

That was just a tangential, circumstantial um

detail at the time.

But it they weren't saying this is the United White States of America and that we are creating a white ethno state.

That tho that is not what they were saying.

They were adopting

They were, of course, racist and it was in the context of slavery, but they were not making a commitment hundreds of years into the future that that's what America will ultimately always be.

But Zionism is different.

Zionism inscribes in its founding charter that we want to create a Jewish state for Jews only.

You need to understand there's a fundamental difference.

Yeah, we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal.

They didn't say all white men only, they didn't say all European men, it's all men.

There's a universalism there that leaves an open door into the future.

That's not there when it comes to Zionism.

That's my

Fundamental argument in contrast to the view that because there was a dispute, were the founding fathers more like Hamas, or were they more like the Zionist settlers?

And of course, they were more like Hamas, of course, they were.

Okay?

Of course they were.

Because

You need to understand the beauty of this country, America.

And we appreciate this beauty of we appreciate the beauty of this country as communists better than any self-proclaimed nationalist could.

Because we understand America is more than just a nation.

It's a fundamental dream and forward-facing aspiration for a united civilization and a united community without making any kind of conceded prescriptions as far as what that will look like.

We just have a hunch.

The founding fathers.

The Yankees had a fundamental hunch, they had a suspicion.

Hey, guys, I think we formed.

A separate community here than what exists in Europe already.

We don't know everything about what we are.

We don't know everything about what this is going to look like.

But I think we're building something here, acclimating to the soil here, that makes us different from over there.

Why should we give them taxes without being represented?

Why should we take orders from overseas?

We've built a life here.

This is where we're going to live and where we're going to die.

This is where we're going to raise our kids and they'll raise theirs too.

This is where we're building a life for ourselves.

We've built a community here.

We've built an existence here that makes us something else.

And

What that something else is, they didn't really necessarily know.

They just knew that it was American.

It was based in this continent.

It's the United States of America.

There is absolutely nothing, nothing.

About

The founding purport of this country that excludes the possibility.

That America will include the various first American peoples, their traditions, their civilization, their culture, their spiritual outlook, their wise and profound relationship to the soil, the geography, and the land.

Nothing about

what the founding fathers were fighting for and dying for ultimately excludes that possibility that the United States of America, the more perfect union,

will also be a more perfect union that includes

The American Indians and the black people and

The um

Spanish-speaking peoples, as well, and so on, and so on.

Nothing, even if the founding fathers at the time were excluding it from the realm of what they would consider acceptable, even they were not excluding that fundamentally from the future of what this country could be.

But the founders of Zionism were, and that's the difference.

The founders of Zionism were not saying at some undisclosed point in the future, there may be a possibility that this nation-building project we're aspiring to will ultimately incorporate and include the region that we're in and all of our neighbors.

No, they were saying this is only a Jewish state, only for Jews and no one else, and that's it.

So, that's the fundamental difference.

One is actually an ethnostate, and the other at best can be critiqued.

As having acted like an ethnostate in contradiction to its own founding principles and values, which is that all men are created equal.

So that's the difference.

That's the actual difference here.

Yeah, the U.S.

Constitution was inspired by the Iroquois Confederacy.

Absolutely.

There is nothing about being an American.

I don't, you know, I think this discourse is so out of touch from reality.

Because, you know, real American patriotism is so firmly rooted in a reverence and respect for the American Indians.

The honoring, even when there's conflicts between American Indians.

And the Americans descended from Europeans.

You know how much the American public respected and revered these various Indian chiefs?

You know that guy, William Tecumska Sherman?

You know who he was named after, Tecumska?

You know where that name comes from?

There was such a deep level of respect.

That existed even there when this was the most racist country ever.

There is still a respect there.

Yeah.

Uh our our cities and our towns.

Many of them are lakes, our rivers, many of them get their names from the first Americans.

I'm not saying this to underemphasize the way in which American Indians were treated unjustly.

Far from it.

I'm just saying.

that the injustice faced by the American Indians is in no way fundamental to the existence of a united American state.

That's all I'm trying to say.

On the contrary, if you're a real American patriot, you will want to do right by your first American brothers.

Just like we want to do right by all Americans, by the way, because this is something missing from this debate and this controvers conversation.

You know, this strict distinction between settlers and non-settlers, it's not really that strict in reality.

I understand American Indians have it way worse than almost everyone else, but you know, everyone has it pretty bad too.

There's no strict line there where one is benefiting and the other isn't.

We're all not benefiting.

And that's why I'm really disappointed in Marxists.

for really missing the obvious conclusion.

The evils perpetuated by

The American government, the American state, and American settlers against the American Indians are just part of the evils of capitalist civilization itself.

It's part of the same barbarism of capitalist civilization that led people to sell their children into child labor, to work in coal mines and work in factories, to have mothers have to sell themselves into prostitution.

To have so many Americans die of disease and poverty and neglect.

America was not a pretty place as far as some kind of notion of universal human dignity in general, right?

So, this idea that settlers were just like completely living in a privileged way, you know, living high and then just totally oppressing all the other racial minorities, it's not really accurate.

It's more like you had the barbarism of capitalist civilization where everyone is eating each other.

And yes, if you're a racial minority, you're getting it worse because you have that added thing as well.

But make no mistake, this is barbarism.

This is this is.

Like Jack London, this is the wild.

This is dog eat dog.

This is just total carnage and total, you know, man-selling man to turn a dime.

This is not some kind of, you know, Jay Sakai is so twisted how he tries to make it seem like, you know, oh, white people in America are living in this kind of socialist utopia like labor Zionism and everyone else is being oppressed.

It's like, no, that's not actually what's going on.

All right.

We have the barbarism of capitalism that's inflicted on everyone.

And if you're a racial minority, you have the added bonus of being treated like even more dirt than everyone else.

But the context is that everyone's getting the short end of the stick except the ruling capitalist class.

And you know what?

For a long time, that was just the basic Marxist view on the matter.

Isn't that sad?

What I just told you was is just Marxism.

That's just what Marxists were always saying.

But somehow, it's really disgusting.

Because what universities did is actually very sick.

You know what universities did?

is they did something where they realized that in our academia, in our college campus, it's just like a bunch of privileged white people living in a bubble, living in a socialist utopia.

So they had a guilt about their social privilege.

And then they lumped themselves in.

They were so charitable and generous that they lumped themselves in with all white Americans to make it seem like a coal miner in West Virginia has the same settler privilege that they do.

You need to understand how fundamental this is to the dynamic.

Of the distortion of Marxism in America.

It's all projection.

Who are actually the settlers in America who behave like they're creating an exclusionary settlement that acts in a colonial way?

Where it's just black and white, we're going to exclude everyone else and build our own utopia community, and then everyone else is just going to be considered a barbaric outsider.

Well, you know who does that?

The same people who theorize about this stuff and read Jay Sakai.

It's academics, it's grad students, it's gentrified communities.

These are gentrifiers themselves who feel guilty clearly about how obvious what their social existence entails.

But the way they cope with that guilt is by actually blaming all the other white people who aren't in the same boat with them.

You know, I'm sure a coal miner in West Virginia whose entire family is dying of overdose from fentanyl would love to be a settler in some academic university and have all the privileges of some guilty Roderick Day intellectual.

But they don't.

People like Roderick Day have no right to lump all the other white Americans struggling to get by with himself.

He may feel guilty that he's some rich little white boy in some university living life like some kind of settler, colonizer, but you don't get the right to.

You know, lump yourself in with all the other white people in this country who are just trying to get by and make a life for themselves and are struggling to do it.

You know.

You know what I'm saying with this dynamic?

It's a form of class terrorism.

Because you know what?

You have to be privileged to be guilty.

Did you know that?

To be guilty about the nature of your social existence, that entails a level of privilege.

You know, I'm sorry, but

The Americans struggling to put bills the white Americans struggling to put bills on the table, they don't got time to be guilty.

They don't have energy to be guilty.

They're actually trying to feed their families and put and pay bills and put food on the table.

Did you know that?

They don't have time to like, what are you even talking about?

You're a grad student.

You're you're not living the same social existence as they are.

You know?

Like you may have the privilege of self hatred and white guilt, but the majority of actual working class white people do not.

They actually are getting by and working for a living like all the other Americans, you know?

So, um Sho Q.

Alright, who's in Shoku?

Dude, I don't know what Aeon Animus is going to talk about Nick Fuentes, right?

Uh available for a Civilized Minor's Might Debate Stream.

Alright, I'm just gonna ask him to make it quick.

Alright, hey, what's up, man?

I I want you to make it quick though.

I

What's the issue?

Hello.

Hello.

Oh my god, Jackson and uh Nick Fuentes are fighting in the comments.

Oh god, this comment chain goes on really long.

All right, we're gonna cover it.

Uh Aeon, I'm gonna give you fifteen seconds.

Fifteen.

Fourteen.

Thirteen, twelve, eleven, ten, nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three, two, one.

All right.

Jesus Christ.

Anyway, um

So Nick Fuentes made a tweet.

The only difference between Likud and Hamas is that Likud has nuclear weapons.

I think this is gonna be really funny.

Uh

Uh because I have some things to say.

about this uh so-called strategy

Like, the only difference between Lakud and Hamas is that Likud has nuclear weapons.

I mean, what?

So you're saying that they're both both sides are bad?

Yeah, that's totally sticking it to the Zionists.

Anyway, J Jackson taking a principled stance, Hamas are freedom fighters, whereas Likud's Zionists are carrying out a genocide.

Why is Jackson more anti-Zionist than Nick Fuentes?

Isn't that crazy?

Why is Jackson Hinkle more anti-Zionist than the guy who likes Hitler?

Think about that.

I want you to think about that for a second.

But this is no, no, no.

This is what I was looking for.

This is the gold I was looking for from Nick Fuentes.

Look at this.

By explicitly supporting Hamas, you are playing into the Zionist framing of the conflict.

What what?

Aren't you the guy that supports Hitler openly and denies the Holocaust?

Aren't you the guy who literally glorifies Hitler and actually says, no, this isn't about Zionism, it's about Jews.

So Jackson is playing into the hands of Zionists by supporting Hamas, but Nick Fuentes isn't playing into the hands of Zionists by literally affirming Zionist ideology, which equates Zionism with Judaism.

And that the Zionists are just trying to prevent another Nazi Holocaust?

This is so bafflingly stupid.

I can't even...

This guy, this guy called me stupid.

This is the guy who called me stupid.

How are you going to call me stupid?

When you're trying, you're making it seem like Hamas supporting Hamas plays into the hands of Zionists more than actually glorifying Hitler and calling for some kind of persecution of Jews does and making this a Jewish issue does.

Do you know how stupid it is to make this a Jewish issue when Jews are literally at least partially split on this?

And there's actually a lot of Jews critical of Netanyahu, and there's even anti-Zionist Jews, and there's a division at the very least between J Street and.

And the Netanyahu Lakudniks, there's actually a division there.

And instead of exploiting that division, you're just going to have all Jews be united around Zionism because you're affirming the Zionist view that Zionism is Judaism?

Do you know how stupid that is?

How is Jackson playing into the hands of Zionists when you agree with Zionism itself?

I've never seen this guy say that he rejects the existence of the Zionist entity or affirms the reasonable view that it should have no right to exist.

He constantly says this is about Jews, not Zionists.

So, do the Zionists.

Zionists say that if you're anti-Israel, you're anti-Semitic.

Zionists say.

That this is the Jewish issue.

This is about Jews defending their interests and defending themselves in general.

So who's playing into whose hands?

It's so fucking stupid.

I it's actually kind of outrageously stupid.

This guy called me stupid, but he's saying this dumbass shit.

Uh drop

Alike if you're American who supports Hamas, why do you think every Zionist Jew in America calls anyone that critiques Israel or supports Palestinian statehood pro-Hamas?

Not even Russia unconditionally supports Hamas.

Yeah, but Russia is not the regional power.

Which is which has the most stakes here?

It's Iran.

What Russia view views about Hamas is much less important than what Iran thinks.

That's not Russia's neighborhood.

This is not Russia's backyard.

This is not their neighborhood.

If you notice the actual direction of geopolitics right now, Russia is tilting in the direction to being more open to Iran's geopolitical stance, which includes being more open to Hezbollah and Hamas than it used to be.

That's the direction history is going in.

But you're pushing in the opposite direction by saying that this is optically unacceptable somehow when the tide of history is moving in the direction of it being acceptable by the international community.

Israel and Hamas both use terrorist tactics that are completely intolerable to any Christian.

But Hitler's good.

What is this?

This guy literally Hitler kills like, what, 27 million Russians alone.

God knows how many more people in general in Eastern Europe.

But that guy's great to glorify.

Hitler should be rehabilitated and glorified, but Hamas is too far.

This is the phony radicalism of the far right.

All of their edginess.

Remember this.

All of their edginess.

All of their anti-establishment heroism.

All of their willingness to discard optics, to stick it.

Yeah, Hitler's base.

All of that.

All of that amounts to what?

Well, Hamas and Israel are both bad.

Hamas uses terrorist.

Sounds like Laura Loomer.

All of this to sound like Laura Loomer.

All of this posturing against the Jews and complaining about the Jews just to sound like Laura Loomer.

What's the point of it then?

It's almost like this shit is a psyop.

To just maintain

US policy in the Middle East

It's almost like exactly what Hitler himself was doing.

Yeah, go attack the defenseless bagel shop owner and the literal random Jew who has no power.

Those are the people who were attacked on the street by Nazi thugs.

But keep paying.

to the Bank of International Settlements.

Keep being integrated in the global capitalist system where there are some actual powerful capitalist Jews.

Not the majority, but there's some still there that you're still in bed with economically.

Keep reinforcing the same global system that creates the Zionist entity in the first place.

But rhetorically, you're sticking it to the global plutocratic Jewish class, but you but you're you're saying that, but you're just attacking defenseless Jews on the street.

So tough and brave.

Yeah, I'm sorry, this is not a bold stance against the regime.

Just because this guy glorifies Hitler, uh that's not a bold, brave thing to do.

It's way more brave to actually concretely oppose the US regime than superficially oppose US media optics.

What do I mean by that?

It's way more brave to do the thing that's less censored, but definitely puts you more on the radar as a target concretely than just doing things that are forbidden.

For example, being a pedophile is forbidden.

Okay, that doesn't mean you're somehow challenging the hegemony by openly being a pedophile.

Likewise, there is a taboo around glorifying Nazism.

So far, those Ukrainians are really pushing the limit in Canada, though.

I'll tell you that.

They're really pushing the limit.

But so far, there's also a taboo around that.

Glorifying Hitler doesn't make you an enemy of the regime.

Supporting Hamas makes you an enemy of the regime.

It's much more revolutionary to support Hamas than to glorify Hitler.

All bluster and all this smoke and all this hot air and what does it amount to?

An extremely milquetoast, extremely tame nonsense position of total compromise, total subservience, total acquiescence to Zionist hegemony.

This is just rich.

Comparing the Zionist genocide of Gaza to the Palestinian resistance shows you don't understand the conflict.

Israel is dropping bombs that murder entire families every few minutes.

Hamas is fighting an occupation for their freedom.

Hamas has been propped up by Netanyahu for years.

Why do you think that is?

What?

If you're talking about the uh

Factional war between Palestinians in the 1980s.

Uh that's something totally separate and in the past.

If you actually think that Hamas is preferable to Israel see, I can't believe it because in my mind, in my crosshairs, I had liberal Zionists in mind.

But apparently, the edgy based

You know, um, based real conservative, real right-winger Nick Fuentes.

is adopting the same stupid za stance that the liberal Zionists do, which is that, oh, this is about Net and Yahoo.

Maybe y you may be correct that Net and Yahoo

And this is so funny, because Jackson got in trouble for acknowledging this.

It is true that Netanyahu is the more irrational one who does prefer to maintain political power by constantly fighting and engaging in wars.

So that means Netanyahu in the short term probably does prefer to fight in wars than pursue a peaceful settlement.

But Netanyahu is not the same thing as the Zionist hegemony.

It's just the current political party and political leader in charge in Israel right now.

But the Zionist entity and Israel is way bigger than that.

And the conflict is also way bigger than just Netanyahu.

Netanyahu can be sacked tomorrow, and this war will not end.

Hamas will not stop fighting just because Netanyahu leaves.

Why is there this reduction of Israel to Netanyahu?

That's if anything, Netanyahu has just accelerated the destruction of the Zionist entity itself through his own blunderous stupidity and irrational madness.

But the idea that Netanyahu represents the be-all, end-all of Israel's interests, not true.

There's different factions.

Uh and I'm against all of them, not just one of them.

Nanyalu thought that by dividing Hamas and the Palestinian Authority there would be two factions at war with each other that would prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.

He wanted to tame Hamas while tolerating sporadic attacks.

While all this was ongoing, Hamas planned and trained for years with Iran, built weapons and dug tunnels in preparation for the october seventh attack.

Um, Netanyahu underestimated Hamas's coordination with Iran and blew it up in his face.

Again, you don't understand the conflict.

I want you guys to understand something going on here.

This is something I learned from my friends.

who is uh who has inside information on how the right wing works.

Whenever they're doing these emergency, this is not an organic ratio of just like random audiences.

This is his community in panic mode coordinating to pull these ratios off.

Look at this: 30,000 views, 16,000 views, more than double.

This is all being done in the telegrams and their group chats.

It's all being coordinated like in panic mode, emergency mode.

It's like how we do ratios.

It's like how we boost my stream tweets.

It's like how we boost some of my tweets.

You know?

It's not necessar see, put it when it comes to my tweets.

I think at least five to six hundred will just be from this community.

Everything beyond that is just like random people, right?

So

I think this might this is a prelude to a debate.

We'll settle this in a debate.

And, you know, let me tell you something: both Jackson and I are honorable people.

We're uh we we fight war.

And we can get dirty if the enemy gets dirty, but we're generally honorable people.

So we are fine just focusing on the points of contention.

I've just been willing to focus on the points of contention and that's it.

That's all I'm interested in to begin with.

And I consider that to be an honorable way of fighting.

We don't play dirty, you know, uh unless we have to.

But I think this uh demands a debate, to be honest.

Not just the Twitters, but this is a great context for a debate.

Nania underestimated Hamas's coordination with Iran and blew up in his face.

Very true.

The Israeli government had prior knowledge of the October 7th attack, issued a stand-on order to allow it to commence, then exasperated the devastation by blowing up their own people.

Or do you believe the official narrative of the Israeli government?

I don't believe Israeli government narratives like when you say that Hamas is just as bad as a genocidal Israeli state.

You believe in an Israeli state.

Oh, okay, he doesn't recognize Israel now.

Right, but didn't he say he does before?

The Russian government does though, and condemned the October 7th attack.

So what?

So what?

Russia is Russia.

We are here as Americans arguing about our relationship to that entity, first of all.

Second of all, this is not Russia's region.

This is Iran's region.

I'm not saying it's only Iran's, I'm just saying, like, Iran is the regional power here whose opinion actually matters.

Russia it doesn't see, Russia is more complex because a lot of Russia's policy is baggage from the two thousands, not just in the context of the Middle East, but also China, also North Korea, also Latin America in some cases.

You have to ask what direction is it going in now though.

Russia is increasingly going in the direction.

Of having major fallout with Israel.

You know, yeah, Russia, of course, both Russia and China are still maintaining the stance.

The respectable stance, you know, the acceptable one by the international community and international law that there should be a two-state solution.

But this is also the short term goal of the resistance as well.

That's what you need to understand.

If Russia, for example, right now decided to completely cease to recognize the Zionist entity,

All that would do is accelerate the world war that we all know is coming anyway, but it would just accelerate it because it would probably create a direct military or political confrontation between two different entirely regions, Israel and Russia.

You need to understand this was increasingly a world war with multiple different fronts.

So, if Russia and China just adopt the same stance as Iran, all that will do is just bring us into World War III right away rather than in like a year or two years as it will happen.

So, you need to understand they're treading a fine line.

Don't consult Russia about.

What polici what outlook you should have about the region, consult Iran, because Russia goes through Iran when dealing with the Levant and when dealing with the region themselves.

Okay, so Iran is the one you want to ask, actually.

It's their backyard, it's their neighborhood.

Um

Liam, what's up?

The only difference between IPAC and FPAC is that IPAC hurts Israel's credibility.

Um

You've changed your opinion on Israel this week.

Last figure of bona fide Zion.

I'm just gonna go on the record and say, I don't want Israel to be destroyed, okay?

Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews.

Hitler was a pedophile and kind of a pagan.

It's like, well, he was also really fucking cool.

I don't want to destroy Israel.

I'm a critic that wants everybody to exist and to be happy.

I want Israel to be destroyed.

I have no issue saying that.

Do I want i uh do I want the people living in Israel to all be killed?

No, of course not.

Hamas doesn't want that either, by the way.

But

The state of Israel does need to be destroyed.

The entity does need to be destroyed.

The regime does need to be destroyed.

And anybody living there who has a problem with that can pack up their bags and leave.

Either integrate with the region

integrate with the region and cooperate

And join with the project of regional integration or go back to Europe where you came from.

I don't think that's unreasonable, you know?

I don't think that's anti-Semitic or unreasonable.

Why is that anti-Semitic?

Why is this bad optics, but not praising Hitler?

That's what I don't understand.

Laura Loomer, beautiful and bold and courageous and I'm just such a sucker for her.

You either support Hamas, which makes you a piece of shit.

This is crazy.

Like this is such a crazy political ideological

encounter going on here because it's like

It's like the the guy who's like supposedly the biggest enemy of the Jews

This just goes to show Zionism is not Judaism, because the number one Jew hater apparently, who's really fighting the Jews, is really soft on Israel compared to the Communist.

That is so interesting to think about.

The guy who's number one political the only thi what it what distinguishes Nick Fuentes from every other Republican?

This is the guy who wants to go to war with the Jews.

That's it.

Okay.

Tell me why he's way softer on Israel than the Communist.

You know what I mean?

Who's base now?

You know what I mean?

Who the fuck is base now?

Oh, see, you know how many groipers would tell us?

You guys are so soft.

You guys aren't based like Nick Fuentes.

You guys are soft.

You guys are so soft.

You guys are you guys don't denounce the Jews like we do.

You guys don't praise Hitler like we do.

You guys are so soft and you're you're not based, but it's like, dude, concretely we are based.

It's just that in a superficial way

You don't see us that way because we're not being edgy in a stupid we're not we're not blowing hot air and just farting around with an emptyless, substanceless

You know, edginess that actually means nothing in reality.

We are actually fucking based.

That's the difference.

We actually are North Korea.

Do you understand?

We actually are against the regime, like actually.

Like they

They they lie about you, I would imagine, about like personal stuff.

But when it comes to your political views,

No, just be honest.

Because even I was confused.

Especially a few years ago, I was confused.

I didn't know what the truth was.

But when people say you're a neo-Nazi and that you're like a Hitlerite, that you support Hitler and you're like a fascist or whatever, it's like, is that actually wrong, though?

How is that wrong?

Like, I am straight up a Stalinist.

I believe Stalin.

None of his mistakes were related to anything pertaining to human rights or humanitarianism.

Like, if Stalin genocided, I don't give a fuck.

Like, first of all, he didn't.

And if he did, he was right to.

But you get what I'm saying?

Like, I'm just kidding, obviously, but like, he didn't genocide anyone.

But you get what I'm saying?

Like, I am openly a Stalinist, okay?

Like I'm openly a communist with a capital C.

But it seems like on your side of the fence, you guys are actually admirers of Nazism and Nazi Germany.

Right?

So that's not really slander, but you have to understand we are denied an ability.

to be recognized by many audiences, like we are called Nazis.

They have to lie about us and say that we share your ideology.

That's how dangerous our actual position is.

Like imagine, imagine they just tell the truth about what we believe, that we're actually just orthodox Marxist Leninists.

They find that extremely dangerous.

And they do they go out of their way to prevent the recognition of that by many segments of society.

Yeah guys, see the whole room gossip nonsense like I don't really care about that.

I care about pol political points of political contention, you know

Because you know what, guys?

All the personal shit, that's when you don't have a political critique.

That's when you don't have principles to stand on and fundamental meat and potatoes, ideological disagreements.

So, like I said,

Communist Excellency, remember that, you know?

We only roll in the mud when that's when that becomes the battleground at the expense of what we would prefer.

You know, we we keep it principled 'cause we have principles.

Anyway, uh

Everything in that clip is consistent with what I've said here.

On the other hand, are you still an enthusiast?

This is the greatest.

This is such a crossover, crossover of the century.

If you knew who made this clip and he's the one sharing it as ammunition.

That this is so interesting.

It's like this guy is literally just like a lip tard.

He's literally just like a lip tard.

He's literally sharing just libtard propaganda nonsense of Jackson clipped out of context.

Dude, were you clipped out of context when you said you don't want Israel to be destroyed?

If so, just say that.

But when Jackson said that it's better in the interest of the destruction of the Zionist entity, which is tied to the rise of the multipolar world, that Netanyahu is there compared to his opponent, an opinion shared by Sayyid Hassan Nasrullah of Hezbollah, or as you call it, as we call it, Hezbollah, right?

You're saying that he supports Netanyahu, it's just a disingenuous, dishonest position and you probably know it is.

Was he being dishonest by saying that you support Israel or at least the existence of a state of Israel?

Because I'm pretty sure you've said in the past you do.

If not, just say you didn't.

In that video, I say Israel has a right in the video.

You say Israel has a right.

Yeah, literally.

You know how fucking cra dude, dude.

All the people that slander Jackson as a Nazi, where are they?

Where are all the so-called anti-Zionists that slandered Jackson as a Nazi and a Netanyahu supporter?

Because here you actually have a neo-Nazi.

Who is a Zionist, at least was a Zionist openly.

Now they may not be because they claim they don't recognize it now.

And it's such a baffling hi like, okay, the person who openly supports Hitler is better than Jackson just because Jackson said some problematic stuff about the L G T V community.

Get your priorities in order.

Who cares?

What is so bad about Jackson besides that?

That's what I want to know, too.

Just besides that, what is so bad?

Because we, that's not the hill we die on.

We don't die on that hill.

It may be an opinion Jackson or me or other people have, but it's not the hill we die on.

It's not the primary contradiction for us.

But this guy openly glorifies Hitler and like actually hates Jews or whatever, right?

So why is Jackson the bad guy, but not this guy?

I don't get it.

I don't understand that at all.

It's so baffling.

It's almost like this is exactly what feds want.

They want you to attack the communist and slander the communist, and they want this narrative, which is to make it about Jews and all this other gibber nonsense about white genocide.

They want that to gain traction because ultimately it is not a challenge or a threat to the regime.

In the last and final instance,

As for that clip, I argue that Netanyahu is a good force for multipolarity because he accelerates the destruction of the Israeli state.

with his overhanded responses to the resistance.

Nisralla made the same argument in his old speech.

The difference is I don't believe Israel has any right to defend itself and a genocide is far different from the armed resistance.

You know, these kind of uh responses, we don't want to go there, all right.

Alexander the Great twenty thirty six, we don't want to go here when it comes to these responses, all right, when you're trying to get personal and shit, you we don't want to go there, do we?

I don't know if you guys want to go there.

You know, we don't want to go there.

Because guess what?

It's not a war you'll win.

Okay?

Let's not go there.

Let's not make it personal.

Just not be dishonorable and start talking about, uh, people's personal lives and shit.

Anyway

Here we go.

Yeah, this is crazy.

This is just crazy.

I mean look, this is not an unreasonable position at all, okay?

This is not an unreasonable position because here's what I'll tell you, alright?

At the end of the day, Hamas is the legitimate government of Gaza.

Hamas has way more legitimacy among the Palestinian people as the official government than the Palestinian Authority does, which is basically

The official authority that's compatible with Israel and its interests.

So it's entirely reasonable to accept the view that Hamas is a legitimate actor.

It's entirely reasonable to accept that.

There's nothing like it's not like we're saying we want like, you know, it's not like we're saying like, you know, the Holocaust didn't happen and like Hitler was actually good.

It's not like we're saying that.

We're just saying that Hamas is a legitimate actor and it's a legitimate party in this conflict.

We're not saying that, you know, oh, you know, we have this ancient biblical war against the Jews and, you know, the Jews need to pay.

We're just saying that Hamas is a responsible and legitimate party to the conflict geopolitically.

We're not saying that.

That's you know, Zionism is Judaism.

Oh, wow.

It's so, this is just, this is exactly what so many have observed.

There's always going to, listen, you cannot be anti-Israel and right-wing.

You just can't.

Opposing Zionism is a left-wing position, right?

Remember that.

You can hate Jews all you want, whatever, as a right-wing LARPer.

But opposing Zionism is a left-wing position, always was a left-wing position.

It was Badr Maynhoff that was hijacking fucking airplanes for the Palestinians.

It was the Red Brigades that were standing on business when it came to that kind of stuff.

It was a left-wing thing.

It has never been a right-wing thing.

Let's not forget that.

Let's not forget who was fighting Zionism from the beginning.

Alright, it wasn't right wingers.

It was left wingers.

It was Badermanhoff, Red Brigades.

Red Brigades were s brigades were CIA backed, whatever.

All right?

But Badermanov, you're going to say they were all C I mean, I don't think what they did should be replicated, but let's be clear, the fiercest people struggling against Zionism, that was left wing.

It was it's never been a right wing thing, ever.

Never been a right-wing thing.

That was our guys fucking doing that.

All right.

That was our shit.

Okay.

That was a com that was a Maoist thing.

We were, they were, those Palestinians used to be reading Chairman Mao, Little Red Book.

All right, they had portraits of Lennon, Lennon, and Karl Marx.

That was the PFLP, the DFLP.

And uh even the the PLO was made up of so many Communists.

There was no right wingers.

And the most you could do is claim that the Islamic Muslim Brotherhood is right wing.

They u maybe they used to be in in some limited context, but

They've joined the Khomeini revolutionaries, the Khomeini revolutionaries, the Mukawama, and they've they've allied with them.

And that's something way more than whatever limited political

Distinctions that exist.

That's not a right-wing thing.

It's always been a left-wing thing.

It's always been revolutionary politics.

Yeah, they had links to the DDR.

Exactly.

Exactly.

Exactly.

Like, when it comes to actually opposing Zionism, just remember who's actually about it.

Like, because this is some crazy Hamas are terrorists.

What is this nonsense?

If you're willing to support Hitler but Hamas is too far I don't get that.

I mean I do get it, but it's like superficially it shouldn't make as much sense as it does, right?

Supporting Hamas is just too far.

But the Hitler thing is okay, right?

But wait, wait, wait a second.

He's like, this guy, he's like, he's like, look, look, all right.

Hitler, that's fine.

But you lose me when it comes to those scary guys with those masks and whatever.

That's way too far.

That's way too far.

All right.

Come on, dude.

Come on.

Come on.

Don't you care about human rights Don't you care about human rights?

He's like, as a Christian, I can't support it.

Meanwhile, the actual Christians in Palestine literally formed the PFLP and were fucking hijacking airplanes.

The PFLP was doing Christians in Lebanon invented suicide bombing.

Wasn't it the SSNP that invented it?

And by that time, the SSNP was totally left wing.

They're the ones who invented suicide bombing, dude.

Did you know that?

Christians.

Pro-Anti-Zionist Christians invented suicide bombing.

It was Orthodox Christians who were part of the PF, not the Maronite phalangists, talking about this the SSNP.

They pioneered suicide bombing, and they were Christian.

Oh, you're going to say they're not Christian?

Get the fuck out of here.

Christians invented that.

All right.

It's like, dude, you think it's only Muslims that are fighting with Hamas on their side?

It's literally Christian Palestinians in the PFLP picking up the gun right there with Hamas, fighting side by side with them, okay?

Christ said, I have come to bring the sword.

He didn't say I this is such dude, didn't this guy say he wants to like ins colonize Africa by force?

You want to colonize Africa at gunpoint 'cause they're an inferior race, but but but um that's not terrorism.

You wouldn't have to employ terrorist methods to do that, right?

Dude, I don't I thought this guy was like a total edgelord, because like I don't care about morality, whatever, 'cause of the things he says about black people, but now I can see that he's just kind of a total hypocrite.

when it comes to his ideology.

No, I I think it's pretty crazy.

Just kinda crazy stuff.

Well

I think we should settle it all in a debate.

That's what I think.

Well, that took up like the majority of the stream, didn't it?

See, this is just crazy.

It's like one last thing.

It's just like, dude, I don't get this.

He's like, Jackson says, Jackson goes, the kud are Zionists committing a genocide.

He goes, we don't call them Zionists over here, buddy.

We call them Jews.

It's like, that's so brave of you.

But if you can't, at the bare minimum, support Hamas, it's just hot air.

I don't know what's edgy or subversive or whatever.

Like, what?

You think this is brave?

No, no, no.

Supporting Hamas is brave.

It's not brave to support, you know, killing a bagel shop owner for no reason, just because he's a Jew or something.

There's nothing brave about hating Jews.

It's way more brave to actually support Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, Russia, China, you name it.

That's brave, okay?

Bravery is not when you cower from expressing solidarity or even sympathy, at least with Hamas.

And you instead, you know, kind of say, oh, well, they're terrorists.

They do terrorist tactics.

You know what they say?

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

That's just ain't that the truth?

What does that even mean, terrorist?

It's like, what is this is like two thousand this is like arguing with a Republican in like two thousand four or some shit.

Like dude, what is a terrorist in your view?

Just like define what a terrorist is.

What does that even mean?

It's just a nebulous, meaningless term.

War is war.

So it's either a just war or it's an unjust war.

But if it truly is a war, then you do everything by any means necessary to win.

Right?

So if it's a just war, Hamas.

cannot be called a terrorist.

They're just at war.

You can't complain about their tactics if you agree that they're fighting a just war.

Who is Fraser?

This is William Z.

Foster, dude.

Mm what else did I want to cover today?

No no no no no no.

No no no no no.

We definitely should have a debate sometime.

Either before it's probably gonna have to be after my China trip.

Could be a few months.

Um we'll see.

We'll see.

It depends, honestly, it depends.

Definitely this year.

Definitely.

If if the latest, probably August would be the latest.

Why so long?

'Cause I'm going to China I don't know if I I think I can say this.

I'm here's what I can say.

I am going overseas twice this summer and I don't know what the dates are yet.

So as soon as I get those dates, we'll be more clear.

Uh and the event that we're doing this summer is that's why it hasn't been scheduled 'cause I haven't gotten the dates yet.

Yeah.

The new front in Ukraine, yeah, they're taking Kharkiv.

Kharkov.

Harkov.

That's how I say it.

Harkov.

Well, they're taking it and they may be taking Odessa this month too, we'll have to see.

For how long?

I don't know.

That's the thing.

I don't have details.

Yet.

I'll have them soon though.

Also, I want to say one last thing on this stuff because it's just so fascinating.

Let me find this.

So yeah, let's look at this, all right?

This uh chart

Most

Uh where is it?

Most Americans don't find october seventh acceptable.

Do you think they find Hitler acceptable, though?

You know, like, what are you even trying to say?

Who who I mean, like, if you're any kind of political extremist, then this is such a nebulous, meaningless.

Take it's like okay.

Maybe this is because they're not really that educated about it.

Instead of pandering to people's ignorance, maybe you should just maintain a principled position.

Because, guess what?

Most Americans probably still support Israel.

Doesn't mean you should.

I don't understand this logic.

It's like, okay, you're just gonna pander to people's sentiments.

No, you should actually uh boldly assume a principled position.

'Cause here's why I'll tell you that.

The same reason why being a left liberal is ultimately untenable.

People are like, oh, being a communist is too extreme in America.

Well, it's like, you know what?

Even if you're just a moderate, they'll call you a communist anyway.

Loady, what's up?

Even if you're just like a um.

Progressive, they're still gonna nail you on the cross of communism anyway.

So it's the same thing in this case, okay?

Even if.

you take a nuanced position, you're still going to be accused of being a Hamas supporter.

And everyone is going to see you that way because for the Syopt Zionist population,

It's black or white.

You're either all in for Israel or you support Hamas.

So you may as well just support Hamas.

And I'm not saying support them materially because that's illegal.

I'm saying you may as well, ideologically,

Not mince words when it comes to Hamas and own up that you do sympathize with the resistance.

You know, you m y there's no reason not to.

Um, I don't, I have yet to be given a single reason why I should think Hamas is bad.

If you want to convince me they're bad, get in my VC.

But they didn't behead babies, they didn't rape all these people October 7th, and I see no evidence that Hamas intentionally murdered any civilians on October 7th.

No evidence at all.

I've never been shown any evidence of that.

I don't support murdering civilians.

So when I say I don't think Hamas has done anything wrong.

That doesn't mean I agree.

with the lies that were told about what happened on october seventh.

I don't agree with the portrayal that Zionists have made of Hamas, making them out to be a monster.

I'm not supporting monsters.

I'm supporting people who are justly fighting for the self-determination and liberation of their own land.

Just like George Washington would.

Yeah, I'm a debate guy who doesn't know who Fraser Onning is.

You're right, I didn't know who that was.

Apparently he's an Australian.

I just read in chat it was an Australian.

And your name is Sidney Bears Hockey.

You're completely right.

I don't know much about Australia.

And guess what?

It doesn't make a single difference.

Because if Australia was wiped off the map and its entire history was erased overnight,

There would be absolutely no impact on the total wealth, knowledge, culture, and civilization produced by mankind.

It would be the most negligible, unnoticeable thing in the world.

You know how they say there's a butterfly effect where even killing one butterfly could completely change a timeline?

You could completely liquidate and annihilate the entire existence of Australia, not just as a country within the limited extent of its history, but even as a continent.

You could completely erase it from all history books, from the fabric of being itself.

And nothing fundamentally would change about the nature of the world, humanity, and the universe at large.

Isn't that so true, though?

This Australian is trying to.

He's trying to berate me for not knowing about some Australian senator.

It's like who gives a fuck about Australia?

It's not my job to know about random Australian senators, dude.

Oh, man.

You would get TOS'd if you said that in the Discord.

You're right, you would.

But we're not in the Discord.

You're not in the Discord, you're on Kik, where literally anything goes.

Absolutely anything goes.

'Kay.

Yeah, I don't even know if Australia exists.

It's like, what evidence?

You know, and I always think, what am I saying?

Is it gonna get me in trouble?

Like, will I be prevented from going to Australia?

And I think, why would I ever go there?

I'm really trying to think of reasons why I would go to a place where there's camel spiders that are as big as doorways.

Why do I need to go to that place?

Why do I need to go to a place?

With bugs that are that big.

What do I gain from that?

How would that help my life at all in any way?

Lodi, what's up?

Like, why would I do that?

Why would I go to a place where I walk outside and a random snake bites me and I die right away?

I don't need to be doing that with my well, what's in Australia that I can't find in America?

They're going to be like, oi, Mike, well, we got beaches and whatnot.

And I'm like, I'll go to Florida, man.

It ain't that deep for me.

Like, oi, Mike, we got the Outback.

And I'm like, all right, we got the, we've got our, our Grand Canyon in Nevada.

I'll just go there.

They're like,

They're like

What I even know how Australians talk.

They're like, Well, you know what?

We have Australian food and I'm like, I love it.

That's why I go to Outback Steakhouse, by the way, which I love, Outback Steakhouse.

The bread at Outback Steakhouse is actually

goaded, and if I ate it regularly, I would actually

Die.

Of diabetes and obesity.

Oh, just thinking about it makes me want to ubereat some, but I'm not going to because I'm on a diet.

Outback steakhouse.

Such a gr you know what?

Never mind.

I was about to propose something crazy.

I was like, you know what?

May twenty fourth, all gorillas were all going out to eat at Outback Steakhouse.

But I'm not fucking doing that.

You think I'm s you guys think I'm gonna s I'm not fucking paying for all that shit?

Uh but I'm in the mood for it.

Now, I may not be at that time.

We can split the bill.

It's not even that, it's just it would be such a logistical nightmare to take over an outback steakhouse.

That's the thing.

I think there's too many gorillas attending this.

I think like at least fifty.

are gorillas.

So no, we can't take over an entire restaurant with fifty people.

See, the thing is, we're gonna have an after-party that night at the event.

So, what we're probably gonna do is just bring catered food, but I'm not promising it.

But at the after party there may be food, but it's not a promise or a guarantee.

Guerrillas would make s the service workers life hell.

Why?

Thinking that Florida beaches compare to Aussie beaches.

Well, what's so better about your beaches that we don't have in America?

Somewhere in America, we have the same thing.

Rugs are for the floor, not walls.

Yeah, well I'm Afghan.

So

Come come back to me when you can conquer Afghanistan, alright?

We literally beat you guys.

Me and my Taliban guys kicked everyone out.

All of NATO, including Australia.

Norway, what's up?

Yeah, I claim every ethnicity.

'Cause you know I was I don't know if I told you guys this story when I was in Moscow and um

There was a a random this is why I love Moscow so much, alright?

Uh we were all out at night and we were coming out of some place.

Um

We got like a table, we were kicking it back.

We came out at night.

This is like probably like 4 a.m.

And it's just like a high end part of Moscow.

Keep that in mind.

There's a random bearded Russian man walking around with a horse.

He's just walking around with a horse, like on the street in the middle of the night.

And um

Yo, huge acne.

You gotta try these laymen.

What's up?

That's why I love Russia, by the way.

It's just that mix of the traditional and the modern, right?

Anyway, this guy looks like a bearded Cossack or something.

He's like just some real, he was wearing like a really big fur coat.

Literally looks like he's from the Middle Ages.

He's just walking around with a horse.

It's actually really funny.

And Jackson was trying to pay him because Jackson wanted to ride the horse all the way back to his hotel.

Um

Jackson had a few drinks, so that's that was

Pretty funny, that was pretty funny, but anyway, we were talking to the guy.

A whole group, there's a whole group of people, like random people, random pedestrians, and then us.

The guy looks at me because we're talking about like where people are from, and he goes, Ah, Afghan.

He thought he said I was Afghan.

And I was like, You're right, you're the guy with the horse.

Can't argue with that.

You've got all the wisdom.

Not arguing with the guy who owns the whole town, as far as I'm concerned.

This guy's the king of the block, as far as I know.

He's literally like.

A warlord.

He knows his stuff.

But no, I think he was trying to say I look Afghan, which uh I found that very flattering actually.

Anyway, that's the magic of Moscow, you know what I mean?

It's I mean I I may sound very ignorant when I say that, because I don't know that much about Russia's other cities and stuff, or even Eastern Europe, but it's like in comparison to American cities that I'm familiar with, it's a very it's like that doesn't happen in the US, you know, it just doesn't.

But he didn't know I was Middle Eastern or anything.

He just knew I looked Afghan.

That's what I'm saying.

Uh

Yeah.

You've seen it in Baltimore.

I yeah, I haven't.

Maybe, maybe.

I think though there is something unique about how like it's just a very it has the warmth of a rural village.

It doesn't have the coldness and brutality of a modern city.

you know?

I think that's what I really appreciate about it.

It doesn't have the coldness, the brutality, the intimidating aspect where you just feel so alienated.

Because it was built in the Soviet era mainly,

It it's not an alienating city.

It's very much made to be like.

Um

warm and familiar, while also having the loftiness and the grandness of a multicultural city, you know.

It's not like a narrow parochial village.

It's very grand and universal in its outlook, but it's also not alienating

That makes sense.

Uh it makes me miss Russia though, just mentioning that.

Uh

Okay, anything else?

I think we covered everything today, didn't we?

Didn't we?

Yeah!

Hold on.

Hold on.

Stay with me now.

Stay with me now.

When the sun rises it is red.

When the sun sets it is red.

This phenomena is caused by the fact that you are looking through the atmosphere filled with dust particles that creates the same red color and appears to magnify the sun.

Same rule applies to the moon.

I'm liking it, 'cause w o true patriots know the real message here.

And uh Genghis Kanye already beat us all to the chase.

True patriots know the real meaning, the real hidden message here.

When the sun rises, it is red.

Quote, When the sun rises, it is red.

Alex Jones.

Quotations.

I don't want to sound like blasphemy, but you know, there's an alternate timeline where Alex Jones could have been the American Mao.

All Alex Jones had to do was study Marxism, study Marxism-Leninism.

He could have literally been the American Mao.

He could have actually had like an Alex Jones cult of personality.

It's just like this.

Look at this, but it's Alex Jones.

Instead.

We could have had that.

Isn't that so sad?

There's an alternate possibility of history.

There's an alternate possibility of historical development where Ale Chairman Alex Jones could have been the American Mao.

That is it's so sad that that didn't happen.

It's actually so sad.

Went to high school with Russell Bentley.

That's what I'm.

It could have been.

Could have been.

It's not.

I know it's not a joke.

Is it too late?

I'm not closing any doors.

But uh Alex Jones could be a great like communist chairman leader.

of America, if he actually

like studied Marxism-Leninism in depth.

He's a really smart guy, so he could understand it and master it, you know, if he set himself to.

And he could be a very proficient Communist if he wanted to.

There's still time.

Ah, I hope.

Mm.

Is this Dick Land?

Can someone tell me this is Nick Land?

Is this Nick Land?

Ha ha ha.

It is.

It does he mean uh Bracier, like Ray Brassier?

If I'm saying it right, is this is he talking about Ray?

Because he spelled it wrong.

Or is he talking about someone else?

Does anyone know?

No one knows.

Now we don't have any true intellectuals here.

Uh let me see.

Is there anyone named spelled this way?

I'm sorry, I'm a Philistine.

I don't know all everyone.

This he's talking about Ray, isn't he?

Oh, okay, he's talking about Ray.

All right, got it.

'Cause this is not how you spell it.

I'm not saying that to be nitpicky about spelling.

I don't know if this might refer to someone else.

Uh I love it.

The specter is haunting the right wing, the specter of absolute Stalinism.

All the powers of the right wing entered into a holy alliance.

I love it.

A right-wing conspiracy so huge, it overspilled a second telephone box.

What does this mean?

I'm not smart enough to understand this.

I love how Nick Land interacts with us, though.

I like that.

Um

I wish I could have Nick Land on stream.

We would have such a we would actually have a really cool conversation.

I wouldn't e I wouldn't it wouldn't be a debate.

I would just have

We would talk about sci-fi and I would get the ball rolling for him to talk about all the things everyone wants him to talk about.

He would be happy if we were in power.

Yeah, he would.

He would.

'Cause look, though, look, it doesn't matter what about ideological differences.

It doesn't matter.

When I'm I'm they do matter in some other context, but I'm saying like when it comes to what really drives

And motivates Nick Land

his true resentment and hatred

was

The Yo, Smudly What's up, Smudly?

The the animating I'm convinced, Smudly, what the fuck is going on, man?

Appreciate you.

The animating motivation for Nick Land.

Has always been the rage he had toward the hypocrisy.

The falseness

And the um

The conceit

of the kind of like echo chamber of

Human rights leftist

you know, academia.

Like, that's really who he and that's also who I hate too.

But he just thinks that the way to destro the way to have ultimate historical justice and and not just historical, the ultimate ontological justice against the falseness

Of the neoliberal polis, if we want to call it that, is just this crazy AI and that's actually again.

See, you know what Nick Land's problem is?

Nick Land hates the Deimos.

He hates, but why does he hate the Demos?

Why is Nick Land so misanthropic in his ideology?

I think this is where Nick Land could have used some Havel.

Here's why.

Nick Land hated the conventional, slave-like, conventional, sheepish thinking of the academic institution when he was back at Warwick, right?

Within that context of all these like moralistic activists and, you know, these like.

Feel-good leftist.

He just fucking hated how sheepish and dishonorable and how conv all these stupid conventional opinions and prejudices and narrow-minded.

He hated the academic environment of kind of like brown-nosing and you have to do all this shit to be legitimate and credible and publish your paper.

And somehow he that's let's call that the the neoliberal polis.

Because it can apply to any institutional setting.

It can apply to a corporate workspace.

You can apply it to an NGO.

You can apply it to a media environment.

Whatever.

It's the neoliberal polis.

The polis is a kind of philosophical context of the ancient Greek.

Classical Greek philosophy, right?

Uh, Socratic context, the polis, right?

What to do, uh, how to dwell within the polis, uh, or you can say the agora, but let's just keep it as the polis, right?

Neoliberal polis.

Um

He made a leap, which I think is wrong and mistaken.

He made the leap.

of associating the falseness Badoux also makes this leap too, by the way, because he calls it the democratic uh what does he call it?

The democratic discourse.

I think that's what Badou calls it, right?

They associate that with democracy, the democratic kind of consensus and discourse, because they it's democratic because it's just constant deference to other people's opinions, to the conventions and feel good uh opinions and familiarity that other people have, right?

So that's the neoliberal polis.

Uh Badu calls it the democratic discourse.

I think he calls it democratic discourse.

I might be rusty on on that.

Um but Nick Land has the same view.

He also hates the dem democratic discourse.

But what Badu and Nick Land get wrong

They make a leap where they associate those kinds of environments and those kind the the logic that prevails in the neoliberal polis.

They project that upon the wider, let's say, polis of the country itself, the masses.

They in fact associate the false, sheepish crowd of the neoliberal polis with the masses themselves.

What they fail to understand is that the masses, the people, the real subject of classical democracy at least, the one that communists promoted, that obeys a kind of sophiological

Um

Status.

Sorry, uh, I was gonna say logic, but it's superfluous 'cause sophiology is already a type of logic.

But that is a sophiological kind of form of being.

And sophiological means it's not based on discourse, it's not based on opinion, it's not based on ideas, it's not based on rumor mills, it's not based on talking and communication, it's based on a common existence, a shared recogni, uh, sorry, a shared recognition of a shared and common material existence, which language and the products of language, and then by nature, what's derivative of that are ideas, opinions, conventions, and so on.

Those are actually downstream from it.

There's this objectivity of a shared communal existence.

which manifests itself symptomally and indirectly through conventions, opinions, and language and so on.

And to recognize the masses, the demos and the people,

is to recognize something that is fundamentally unspoken.

It's a dwelling place of Bataian silence, if you will.

It's not the discourse of a neoliberal polis within the academic context.

So the conflation of these two dimensions, the midwit grad student environment and all the brown nosing career climb, all that shit.

The conflation of that with the whole body of the people was the mistake of Nick Land.

And I think it's clear this was a mistake, because Nick Land, oddly enough, finds himself on the same team as demotic-based political populace in the form of Brexit, in the form of MAGA, right?

And the the the resurgence of right-wing populism we see across Europe.

Well, oppose it or accept it.

That is clearly a form of democratic mass politics.

I think Nick Land would agree with that too.

But Nick Land sympathized with it.

He sympathizes with farmers for some reason because it triggers the libs, because it triggers all of the people he hated and the university environment.

It violently forces them to confront this outsideness, this outside reality that for so long, I mean, I'm not just gibbering.

Nick Land's old writing, Kant Capital, and the prohibition of interest, incest, sorry, not interest, that's Michael Hudson.

Kant Capital and the prohibition of incest, that was actually literally about, I think, I think he was talking about the neoliberal polis, these apartheid-based exclusionary communities based on purity, which have to maintain a relationship to alterity in the form of the extraction of wealth and resources while also simultaneously erecting a wall between it and the outside.

And Nick Land's whole thing is to d break the barrier and let the outside come flooding in and take, you know, and dissolve that kind of stratification.

And he was kind of literally talking about South Africa's apartheid as the quintessential.

Context of the neoliberal polis.

And I think Nick Land was onto something, actually.

He was right to associate.

the hypocritical and false context of

the university um communal environment with the apartheid uh communities of South Africa.

And that is such a good comparison.

And comparing it to gentrification and so on.

But where he went where he got things wrong

Is he didn't understand that there's two dimensions that differ that are not continuous, strictly continuous.

The objective forms of, let's say, stratification and differences that inhere among the people materially in the form of the specificity of certain nations and civilizations and cultures, whatever, versus the artificial institutional-based ones like in the university.

Those operate at a fundamentally different level of

Social existence in terms of how they reproduce themselves, in terms of what logic they obey.

And he never made the transition from Kant to Hegel, and that's why he kind of defaulted back into this position of, well, no, actually, the true form of deterritorialization is the accentuation of this difference, meaning the insistence upon it, the overt endorsement of the apartheid, which he now does, right?

So uh that's I didn't even mean to go into a lecture about that, but I did, so I gave you guys some extra content to make up for how I uh didn't do a stream the other day.

But I I don't I it's interesting how he just uh

Came back to this.

Yeah, I just it just puts a smile on my face.

Like, Ray Brassier is such a great guy.

Such a really smart.

Um brilliant thinker.

And it's such a great school of thought in general.

You know, um

Anyway, I'm glad he's thinking about it.

You know, one day I hope Nick Lyon comes around to our position.

Probably never will happen.

I forgive him for it, but it would be great.

You know what I can't stand though?

And come on, there's no way, Mister Land.

is a fan of this phenomena.

Is the EAC stuff

EAC E effective accelerationism is such a fucking it's like they've whitewashed how do you whitewash something that never took off to begin with?

They they whitewashed cave Twitter and made it cringe.

I was us I was going to use another word, but I've I'm I'm becoming more uh tolerant and stuff now because people are so offended.

But it's so cringe.

It's like effective excite they're whitewashing something that was already 50% cringe, okay?

That's really bad.

Like, how do you whitewash something that was literally the whitewashing of the CCRU itself?

It's whitewashing a whitewashed phenomenon.

Cave Twitter was k like fifty percent just like whitewashing the CCRU and like making it cringe and retarded.

And then effective accelerationism adds another layer on top of that.

It's so incredible.

Cracker Factory, what is that?

Who is that guy?

Who is that guy?

What an interesting description.

It's just hilarious because I'm thinking about the effective accelerationist archetype, and it's just like these Richard Hanania fucking Silicon Valley nerds.

Cracker Factory.

Oh my God.

Wow.

Who is that random guy with numbers in his name?

Ah, anyway.

That's enough laughs for one night.

Yarvin and Hanania, the worst debate of all.

I would not even watch that debate because.

They're both cringe on the same topics.

Like, what do they even disagree about?

They just they both you know what I just see them both as like Bill Gates vaccine lovers.

That's honestly it.

Oh, yeah, we don't watch the Mogavid.

We're gonna watch that.

They're like, uh, they're both like, you know what I see them?

I see them as like, you ever seen the don't share it in the Discord.

It's like the Glowjack with the mask that has the Vax needle and it's just like dripping.

That's how I see both of them, right?

They're just a bunch of fucking Vax tards.

Mask wearing vax tards.

What are they gonna fucking argue about?

Anyway, let's look at the MAGA video as our final.

Um

Ding.

Where the freaking hell is it?

Hmm.

Mm.

Hmm.

Huh, I s you know I sound like a Minecraft villager.

Huh.

Hmm.

Huh?

Hmm.

Hmm.

Huh?

Hmm.

Anyway.

Mm.

Hmm Where the fuck is it?

Yo, Zapatismo, what's going on man?

Uh, it's gotta be in show requests, because I can't find it on Twitter.

Here it is!

Let me give it a like.

I don't know why I didn't like it before.

Right.

Yo, Stralistani, what's going on?

Would it be terrible to bring manufacturing jobs?

I want to bring it all back.

Would that be terrible?

It would be when you got good manufacturing jobs coming back $25, $30 an hour, where you don't have to go to one of these elitist leftist institutions to make good money.

When you can make $30 an hour coming out of the bank because you got a skill.

And then as you advance $50, $60, $75 an hour, the American dream is very much a lie.

It is a lot.

It is a lot.

We have another four years of Joe Biden.

It's going to die.

It's going to die.

American Eastern minority business, the money in our pockets.

And no, I don't think we should fund any other country but our own.

I don't have anything against anybody, but I don't think we should be funding anybody either.

Do you think there's an Israeli nuance on our government?

There is, and I don't support funding them either.

So, scratch the record.

This is all that matters.

Square one.

This is already a fucking huge breakthrough.

For voter bases that lean Republican.

I agree that they should go after Hamas.

See, you know, why is he saying this?

This is why I was gonna say we should do commentary.

He's only saying this because Trump said this.

That's the only reason.

You know that Trump, but here's the thing: Trump did not say we should stop funding Israel.

So isn't that incredible?

People who just parrot everything Trump says, which is what he's doing when he says Hamas is bad, still manage to outflank Trump and say, you know, we shouldn't fund Israel.

So, that's we're not saying that MAGA is ideologically anti-Zionist in the same way that we are in terms of our consciousness.

We're just trying to say there's potential here.

Because spontaneously, no one is giving this guy the orders to have this opinion.

Trump is not saying this.

The co-opted MAGA leaders are not saying this.

He's saying this based on the form of consciousness that he has developed because of MAGA.

And the conflict that that's at that level, you know?

And take out Hamas.

But I don't think we should fund it.

Israel i is is well funded.

They have one of the advanced military.

In the ideological form, the actual content of what he's saying.

There's nothing essential about this guy's words

you know, agreeing with Israel fighting Hamas.

Because the fundamental thing is that he opposes US aid and funding of Israel, which already makes him far to the left of Joe Biden.

No, don't think we should be funding Israel.

You guys should boost this video straight up.

Per se, they are an ally, and we do have military assets in the country to kind of control peace in the Middle East.

So we need to protect our assets.

Yeah, this is just convoluted.

But we shouldn't be funding an invasion of any form.

Again, that's already a million times more left-wing than Biden.

That's what see, don't focus on how this guy is not a communist yet.

Because we're not saying he's a communist yet.

We're just saying that.

It's incredible how he's able to arrive at this conclusion without any assistance by any advanced form of consciousness.

That's what we're saying.

Trump is not telling him to say this.

None of the MAGA leaders are telling him to say this.

He has formed that outlook organically by himself that he doesn't think we should be funding Israel's invasion.

He didn't need to go to a college protest and have a student educate him about anything to arrive at that conclusion.

And I'm not saying this to knock on students.

I'm saying that to show how incredible that is.

That an American who votes Republican can independently arrive at the conclusion based on the logic of political partisanship of MAGA that we shouldn't be funding Israel anymore.

I think that's incredible.

I think you shouldn't dismiss that.

Just because this guy is repeating, otherwise repeating Zionist propaganda about how, okay, they're our ally and you know, they can still do what they want.

We just shouldn't be involved.

Like, of course, we don't agree with that, but focus on the meat and potatoes.

We expect a Republican to just be pro-Zionist.

What you don't expect.

Is this, and that shows some promise, you know?

Working America has bills.

Like the default for Republican voters is just fully and unconditionally supporting Israel and giving Israel whatever they want.

So the fact it's gotten to this stage shouldn't be dismissed, okay?

Wow, it's kind of like a class distinction he's somehow spontaneously recognizing not only without the assistance of any self-proclaimed Marxists like Roderick Day, but even at their expense.

I think the media in corporate America are not corporate multinational corporations in the bank are trying to devise.

That's what he thinks spontaneously, by the way.

Nobody nobody had to tell that guy to have that sentiment because of their authority.

That's just his spontaneous commonsense.

I don't think us average even even if you love Biden, I don't think you like hate America.

I don't.

If we keep arming Ukraine and providing them with our weapons, I mean how would we feel if China if we want to was providing Cuba with weapons?

We'd be like, hey, you don't if you don't stop it, we're gonna come after you.

That's just common sense.

If you're fighting him and I'm providing him weapons to hurt you, you're gonna come after me.

That's just common sense.

America's greatest enemies are the ones that have done everything to contribute nothing.

I I don't owe anyone anything.

I owe it to myself and I think that's the biggest enemy of America.

When you come to me with your hand out and say that I owe you something, but you're not willing to put in the work for it.

Labor theory of value p I'm just kidding.

I mean maybe he's talking about welfare people, maybe he's talking about capitalists who don't work and just steal work.

Maybe he could be convinced that that's exactly what capitalists are based on this very logic.

The ruling capitalist class.

That's an enemy of America, in my opinion.

It goes against everything that our country is building on.

People who take your labor but don't.

contribute it themselves.

Hm.

How hard do you think it would be to convince this guy that the real enemy who falls into that category isn't people dependent on welfare, but actually the ruling capitalist class?

Probably not that hard.

When people start recognizing that you and I got way more in common.

We do.

We do.

I'm not letting, hold on a quick, I'm not letting people, I'm not letting the media divide us because of our skin colour.

I'm not lying.

I'm not letting somebody say because of skin color, he's racist.

And I should feel like I'm oppressed.

I'm not oppressed.

I'm a black man in America, and I made it to where I'm at because I worked hard.

I made sacrifices.

This country is not racist.

Those leftists are racist.

Those Democrats are racist.

Joe Biden, if you don't vote for him, you're not black.

I am black if I don't vote for you, Joe Biden.

Yo, fuck Joe Biden, man.

Why am I showing you this video?

I'm not showing you this video just so we say base, base, base.

I'm showing you this video because I want you guys to learn the fine art of being able to distinguish.

I want you to learn the fine art of being able to distinguish

The kernel of working class consciousness that's under, or unconsciousness, I should rather say, that's under the superficial talking points and things that they're just regurgitating from conservative media and from Trump himself.

Because, yes.

That difference is there operatively at play.

You need to be like psychoanalysts in a way, right?

When you talk to people.

Of course, use common sense, but understand the difference between when they're just regurgitating what they've been told by people they consider to be authorities versus the slips that come out that actually reflect their authentic class.

Proto-consciousness that you need to bring out.

So, what you need to do is bring out the class consciousness.

and suppress the r the aspect of just regurgitating what the authorities are saying.

And not just that in terms of creating a Manikian distinction between them, but in terms of being able to subvert the

Sheepish regurgitation of the authoritative rhetoric.

By using the logic against it, meaning let's say he's regurgitating logic of like, you know, the fake news media, of course he's just repeating what Trump said, because Trump is authoritative to him.

But when you utilize that rhetoric to bring out the kind of authentic kernel of the working class unconscious and be like, yeah, the fake news media is keeping working people down by just taking money from the billionaire class.

You know, that will strike a chord within them that's deeply unconscious because it's based in their material class position.

And of course, simultaneously, we need to not just be Lacanian psychoanalysts, but also political leaders who are building our own authority that they can trust.

But the only way we build authority is what?

Stand on business, have integrity, but also forgive and recognize the things that make them attached to the authorities like Trump himself that they're currently attached to.

And that doesn't mean when I say forgive, that doesn't mean you let it slide and just accept it's inevitable forever.

Just recognize what it is about Trump that on an unconscious level they're so attached to.

And learn from that and draw out the rational class content of it and integrate that within your own authority.

As a party, as an organization for starters.

Anyway, guys, that's enough of my wisdom.

I will see you tomorrow.

Bye-bye!