🔴 RED PILL NEWS | IRAN-ISRAEL WAR? 🇵🇸

I'm all out of home

One more bad brain

Could bring a ball

When I'm far from home, don't call me on the phone, tell me all alone.

It's easy to do see, it's easy to deal, but hard to get me.

Eyes without a face.

Eyes without a face

eyes without a face eyes without a face

you've got no human grace

your eyes without a fear I spent so much time

but leaving all the life

to keep the dream alive

now it makes

me sad

it makes me mad the truth

for loving what was you

eyes without a face

eyes without a face

eyes without a face eyes without a face

got no human grace

your eyes without a face

your eyes without a face Well, yeah. When you hear the music you make a dip into someone else fucking then make the slip

You're still a car and go to Las Vegas

Oh gigaloo

Hanging out

By the

State line

Turning holy

It walks her

Into wine

Drinking it down

Yeah

Started in the kitchen

Watching good times

And what's happening

And all that good shit

Eating a note mill

Shout out you Zion Zameer

That's right

They ask you why I get my soul from

Let's go

Yeah Jackson Fire Let's go Yeah

Jackson 5 shit

This is it

Yo

Uh huh

What

Yeah

Hey yo

Niggins want to clap me

Monkey see monkey dude

I'm coming with black gloves and snubbers on chunky

talk. African gold denials iced out medals. I see niggas get murk by the heels

just the letters. I bled one nigger and why's the other die by the echo. Why had got some

dark skin niggins that look like freckles. Pay homage, my Islamic, Morris Thomas, I threw a rhymes in my camel suit.

I see them my vomit.

It's a world permit me.

I live it.

When I'm dragging the shoddy, it's down in here, here, holding bricks, where?

My man got 85 the life a nice year, same day he spit at the judge and threw a chair cheer over large cake you know it's on check me you can get spun like a mix tape Plus we take down your

Sargent we marvin regardless

It's the kid with the no face

That can take form just like a snowflake

No reusable hammers

They all throwaways

Yeah we can get blambers

And hammers do damage Me and Ghosts in a ski mask Yeah, we can get blamins Do damage

Me and ghosts in a ski mask

I was chilling and laying

Chilling like sea baths

And nobody was asking the

Pussy don't even fix your lips

Like they be your plastia

Well fed Got all the bread i'm sad i need some head i might tell you you the one

while i'm hitting it till i post not come to my senses i tried meditate. I tried to medicate.

She had two phones.

Thought she was Kevin Gates.

She was lying about it.

Then she came clean.

I was so loud.

I fucked her so hard.

She came clean.

Got that new...

It's her me, baby.

She got that new bag. It's a she-n- a say nay nay i take it too far i take it way way wait

i pull a coug out of k and age over large cake you know it's on checkmate you can get spun

just like a mixtape

plus we take down your sergeant

we're robin with goblin

it's a kid with the no face

that can take form

just like a snowflake

no reusable hammers they all

throw ways yeah we can get blamens and amids do damage

I'm like a normal street activist flooded with shines Jackson five or four towns I get better with time run up in the big gambling spots cocking it back I'm talking agnes agatha germane and jack givs is no custom watches that's made for scraps my bergstone is like an easter egg an emerald fact my floors gained floor seats in the glass it came as a glass of j July Sun beat the odds in Vegas

shook the Coke for the big lumps in the

Pyrex trainers ran up in housing

who had work with the skies as penins

pot like bitches with fake asses that leak

like drainage. Our language, too much

money we can't explain it.

Over large cake, you know it's on checkmate you can get spun

just like a mixtape plus we'll take down your squad and we're all been with goblin as the kid

with the no face that can take farm just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers, they are doorways.

Yeah, we can get blambers and hammers do damage.

Yeah, I like to thank all the MCs across New York

Bronx, Brooklyn, Harlem,

Queens

Pong Allen

Giving birth to pretty tone

Out here on Staten Island

We be whaling, nigga

That's right

writing these rhymes

in red ink niggas

with the red light on

cornered back in the days you heard

40 ounce kingpins

nigger

hurt

those are the days of shit you're Kingpins, niggas. Huh?

Those are the days and shit. Getting that money.

We change for life.

Yad City

Highlight me.

Call me.

Call me a scept, nigga

one

We're so dirty this head

You'd have murdered this shit

R-R-R-P

I'm up here

Fucked out here feet.

Fuck out here.

Yeah.

Started in the kitchen.

Watching good times and what's happening and all that good shit eating

a note mail shout out you Zion Zimir that's right

they ask you why I get my soul from

let's go

yeah

Jackson Fides shit this is it Joe uh-huh Jackson Fox shit

This is it

Yo Uh huh

What

Yeah Y' yo

Niggas wanna clap me

Monkey see monkey do

I'm coming with black gloves

The snubbers all chunky

Toos

African gold demos

Iced out medals I see niggers Get merch By the heels and snubbers all chunky toes African gold demos iced out metals

I seen niggers get murk

By the heels

It's the letters

I play at one nigga

Why's the other die

By the echo

I had got some

Darskin niggas

That look like freckles

Pay homage

My Islamic

My wrist hammas

I threw a rhymes

In my camel suit I seen in my vomit

It's the world premier me I live when I'm dragging the shoddy is down in here here holding bricks square where my man got 85 the life in nice years

Yeah same day he spit at the judge and threw a cheer, cheer over large cake, you know it's on, checkmate, you think it's fun like a mix tape, plus we take down your squadron, we marvin, regardless just the kid with the no face

that can take farm

just like a snowflake

no reusable hammers

they all do ways

yeah

we can get blamins

and hammers do damage

me and ghosts

in a ski mask

I was chilling and laying chilling laying like sea baths and nobody was asking the pussy don't even fix your lips like maybe your plastia.

Well fed, got all the bread.

I'm sad.

I need some head. I might tell you the one

while I'm hitting it

till I post not come to my senses

I tried to meditate

I tried to medicate

She had two phones

Though she was Kevin Gates

She was lying about it

She came clean

I was so mad I fucked it so hard

She can't clean

Got that new

It's her me, baby

She got that new bag

It's a she ne ney

I take it too far

I take it way, wait wait I pull a cougar out of K&H.

Over large cake. You know it's on. Checkmate. You can get sponge like a mixtape. Plus, we take down your sergeant, we mopping with goblin.

It's the kid with the no face.

That can take form just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers, they all throw ways.

Yeah, we can get blambers and hammers do damage.

I'm like a local street activist, flutter with shines. Yeah, we can get blamers and amids do damage

I'm like a local street activist flooded with shines

Jackson 5 or 4 towns I get better with time

Run up in the big gambling spots cocking it back

I'm talking Agnes

Agenda, Jermaine and Jack

GIVES is on custom watches that's made

from scratch. My burgstown is like an

Easter egg, an emerald fact. My floor's

gained. Floor seats in the glass

it came as a glass of July sun

beat the Oz in Vegas. We shook the

Coke for the big lumps and the Pyrex

trainers. We're in a bin housing who had work with the skies as painters.

Pop like bitches with fake asses that leak like drainage.

Our language, too much money, we can't explain it.

Over large cake.

You know it's on check tape.

You can get sponge just like a mixtape

Plus we take down your

Sanger We're mobbing with

Goblin as the kid with the no face

That can take foam just like a

Snowflake

No reusable hammers They all throw ways

Yeah

We can give blamers

And hamies do damage

And yeah

I like to thank all the emcees

Across New York

Bronx

Brooklyn, Harlem

Queens Tongallon Bronx, Brooklyn, Harlem, Queens, Long Allen, giving birth to pretty tone out here on Staten Island.

Really well, nigger, that's right.

Writing these rhymes in red ink, niggiggas with the red light on

cornered back and the days you hurt

40 ounce kingpins niggins

heard

those are the jays and shit

hitting that money

We tank for life

Yassin'

Yassini

Hollat me

Call me a

Suckin'

One

It's so dirty

This head

You had

murdered this shit

R-R-R-P

I'm

Fucked

Yeah Started in the Fuck out of it.

Yeah.

Started in the kitchen.

Watching good times and what's happening and all that good shit.

Eat a note mill.

Shout out you Zion Zimir.

That's right.

They ask you why I get my song from.

Let's go.

Yeah.

Jackson Fideshit.

This is it.

Yo.

Uh-huh What

Yeah

Hey yo

Niggas want to clap me

Monkey see monkey do

I'm coming with black gloves

The snubbers

All chunky too

African gold demos

I iced out metals

I see

Niggas get murk

By the heels

It's the letters

I bled one nigga

Wines the other die by the echo

I had got some Dorskin niggins

That look like freckles

Pay homage

My Islamic

Myris Thomas

I threw a rhymes in my camel's suit

I see them I vomit

It's a world

For me and me I live When I'm dragging the sotty It's a world permed me. I live. When I'm

dragging the shoddy, it's down in here,

here, holding bricks square where.

My man got 85 the life a nice

year, yeah, same day he spit at the

judge and threw a cheer, cheer.

Over large cake, you know

it's on Checkmate

You can get spun

Just like a mix tape

Plus we take down your sergeant

We marvin with gobliners

It's the kid with the no face

That can take form

Just like a snowflake

No reusable hammers they all throw ways

yeah we can get blambers

and hammers do damage me and ghosts in a ski mask

I was chilling and laying

chilling like sea baths and nobody was asking the pussy don't even fix your lips like they be your plastia well fed got all the bread i'm sad i need some head i might tell you you the one while I'm hitting it till I post not come to my senses. I tried to meditate. I tried to medicate. She had two phones thought she was Kevin Gates. She was lying about it. If she came clean, I was was so bad I fucked it so hard

she can't clean

got that new

it's a me baby

she got that new bed

it's a she ne ney

I take it too far

I take it way

wait wait

I pull a cuga

out of k and h Over large cake you know it's on checkmate you can get spun just like a mixtape plus we take down your sward and we morned It's the kid with the no face.

That can take farm just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers.

They all throw ways.

Yeah.

We can get blambers and hammers do damage.

I'm like a Noble Street activist.

Flooded with shines.

Jackson 5 or 4 towns towns I get better with time

Run up in the big gambling spots

Cocking it back

I'm talking Agnes

Agatha, Germaine and Jack

Givvias and custom watches

That's made for specs

My burglestone is like an Easter egg

An Emerald fact My flaws gained Floor seats in the glass It came a made for scraps. My bergstone is like an Easter egg. Innamoral fact.

My flaws gained.

Floor seats in the glass.

It came as a glass of July sun beat the Oz in Vegas.

We shook the Coke for the big lumps in the Pyrex trainers.

We ran up in housing who had work with the skies as painters.

Pop like bitches with fake asses that leak like drainage.

Our language, too much money, we can't explain it.

Over large cake, you know it's on, checkmate.

You can get spun just like a mixtape.

Plus, we take down your squad and we bobbing with goblin.

It's the kid with the no face.

That can take form just like a snowflake. There were years,

Goads Boeigh-Boever,

Malikala, Rodeon

Gneau, we'd goadig

Inchart

FDeworthy

Inchurcha Inchurch,

We've won by We, Tovv We, Stin With his teacher in all All right We're in

We're in

We're in

First Marshal

Warrish-L L'LIN

And we

We've

D' Prowin' We've

From

Staling's

Staling's

There's A Pets With Pets With Pets With to the grins of Stalin's of the Stenheims Svich Nizkens

VIII's

Rathen's Rackin'n's rocket For the world's We'll give us to never. We'll be a victory for the victory

We'll give us to beckxed

We'll not never

We're not yet be our

Our kids our

And in all of shastity of our chastity

Uraud, this shaltzzi,

balsherstic fashiren,

so much,

usbivoy.

Ech, we'll teach him

a mann't'emn't

aught in our Soviet

Dom, and from from our The warrens to our Soviet home. And from o'clock, we shill him from o'clock.

Pazzoom, the chelisk, the chelisk

resubes

resubes.

The world's ordained rocket

We, we're in the country

We're going to the world's

We'll get a victory to the We're our own cities We take

We'll,

We'll get

We'll never

We'll never

We'll give

We'll never

We'll give

We'll never

We'll never

And Our girls,

Our patriots,

No one

One, one's Not one

Notte

If they're

They're

They're They're

Aes

Aes Aftrilla

She'll

She'll

There's

There's

There's

There's There's

There Eskadryl, a girl, Vieter! And there's one SABETHER KENDRICKING

Just for more

To put in

Somervoirs

To be in the

Waipev's of

Republic of my

This song

POMEN

Every MENT

POMEN RETFet Be to the VIII of the Republic of my! VIII!

Every song I've been in recetkaid,

Inns of the cities of the cities of the cities of the cities of the

We'll be we'll win,

We'll never here we'll never

We'll win our victory to winters. The The Uttra Prasit Gets Netsupturess

Gets, Gently from the dream of the spring glenry from from from

light

from the

stonest

the

land land

there's

a no

in the shun on

more

more more more more The city's, the street on the streets.

Good, you know, my little,

the world,

where my own,

my own,

my own,

you're good,

I'm good,

I'm not sure Iptu'i,

and then

noteworthy

my,

brother my

my

your name's my your

love my your

The sun's May's the same love my love-y-lawy.

Sunce my sky's lightlier,

the nepotny

to see you

to the way's in the valley our to pass

to lead

to

get to

get

to

get

our

our

people so

to

up

up standing and by to be You know Wondi Ustalli

Missing

N'

Nassue N'Guptia

Misset

My My never my country

my

Moscow

my

my

love my

my

there's

there's

there's there's

my this one there's on the sea of the moon's fetus,

on the road,

O'OVarice, hey,

proxas,

with us here,

see you in Look, look at my own country,

The West Side Soviet

Strangue.

There's never,

more and greater,

our grand's my

war's never Goet my best My best My God

My God

Bout my Nobue My

My

Nobett

My

My

My

My

My My

My My My My My My My My My My name, my, my life my, love my

My!

Mycuh, my father, Jimpa, my.

My name's my, my! You, go, my! I'm still. We're still still work and the state is still there, the people are building,

that land,

it's lived,

it's never ho,

when the workers

come,

there sing,

we are ever

still,

and the state is

still there, the people, who are always and the state is

not the

hard the harborder

that land

it's

live he be

a work

in

hard workers

found

at

at

there a

there a there a there that the that the At the At first There's Angue

That the

Wagon

That the

Wagon that

Not

And the

Aux's

Shepp

The

Deuch's

Tets

Was

His

Plicht

But

With

this

This

FURung

Not

There

We have We have Still and not there's we are

still

and there's

still is

there's

no

there's

there

work

and I'm

work

and I'm

and

I'm and all's the

thing better

leave,

because the

soup not

more dune

was, and

the dirt

not more

so deep,

there was

that man

from best

rief,

here goes

just the way,

but the way is cheap there's we are in the door and the state is still there

the work the worker-bound the man it brings it here hock when the The world He's He's been

He's there

Wren, He's

He'll

And all

The world

It's

Anercan

Spring' Gence Fyce'

L' Between Elk

and Oda

Strand There came the brother and

shephern' hand

libe'er had they

us overraned

There's we are

We are still

And the state is still

The army The army of The land The land still and the state is there's still there

work

that land

it's been

it's

he'd

work

when

the work

when

the

work

and

if

when

us to

shadden

then it came it came it on that we've we knew we we're we we're we we're us to shan there came

it from

even on

that we

yeah

when

us was to

bluener

pinc

there were

we

there

were

there was

we are

in the lock and the staff is there's we all In the law

And the staff is still

There's all We're all

We're born That land

It brings

It's

ho

My worker

There's soon

The by says it's song you know I'm

a

man and the other people my

and

I'm and

I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm

and

I'm and

I'm and the and we're

and no

I'm and I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm and you know

I'm

and

I'm and the uh...

I'm

and

I'm not

I'm

I'm

I'm not

I'm

and

I'm gonna be it. Oh my

and

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm going to

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm not going to be a good I'm going to be.

I'm going to be. I'm going to be.

I'm going to

I'm going to Welcome, everyone, welcome to the late delayed stream by one day. We're usually supposed to do these Sundays, but yesterday was Mother's Day and I was spending time with my family. And I hope you were as well.

So we're going to be having two streams in a row

because we're going to be doing a stream tomorrow as well on schedule.

So that's a rare treat.

Now, isn't it?

Anyway, guys, what's's up what's going on we have actually

a lot to talk about from

the recent fiasco

quote on quote about Biden's reluctance

to lend his verbal, um, his verbal approval of the

raid into Rafa. Apparently this means Biden is going soft on Israel. I say he's going hard on Israel. No, he's not.

To the recent resurgence of this whole GameStop thing, again, after I believe it was 2020 or 2021 when this first happened.

And now it seems to be going on again. GameStop and AMC are being pushed and pumped pretty high up.

We also have a lot of other things to talk about.

I believe there's a few people who want to debate me, want to come on stream and debate me, so we're going to actually have some time for that as well.

But I think we're going to be doing a little bit of a rare thing on this stream today is we're going to be covering some community stuff that I think is cool. Two things of note,

there's some guerrillas that actually went to a MAGA rally, in person went to a MAGA rally,

Philadelphia, I believe it is, and they talk to MAGA people.

And I want to react to it so we can reflect on it, because that's not something we do very often.

We do these kind of videos, and it's very good we're doing them, but internally we should also discuss

why do people say the things

they're saying, what does this say

about the state of their consciousness and so on and so on?

So that's something I actually want us to do together.

A new

face has entered the

scene, much welcomed, and let A new face has entered the scene.

Much welcomed.

And let's give a round of applause to another face of communist excellency entering the stage, which is John Jackman.

Both myself and Jackson are very impressed by a recent video he did.

Just a completely normal

I know it's so weird

that we just have to commend

that a lot

because it's pretty rare nowadays but this there's a new generation

of communists that are rising to the task it's very clear to all of us there's a new generation

of capital c communists never before seen seen in America for at least, you know, a little less than 100 years maybe, that are rising to the task, it's no longer a only a Haas thing or it's only a Jackson thing. It's increasingly

hard for people to reduce our political

project to the personal

eccentricities of just a few

individuals. You know, when you have

Haas, not to mention the

other infrared showrunners, people

tend to forget about, unduly, if I should say.

But you have infrared, you have the infrared crew.

Oh, maybe there's just some cult that went crazy.

And then you have Jackson.

Well, Jackson's also crazy.

You have Midwestern Marx and Eddie.

Oh, well, they're just all grifters.

This is doing it for grifting.

We've got Rev, you know, and not to mention the rest of RTSG.

Oh, well, that's but, but, but's but, but, but, and now we've got

John Jackman

entering the,

I mean,

there's others I'm not

even mentioning,

too, by the way.

But I'm mentioning

him because I think

he's a great example.

He's an example

to follow.

I'm not saying

everyone should just copy

and just whatever.

Sia!

What the fuck is going on, man?

Appreciate you.

I am not saying

everybody should just

copy,

you know,

what others are doing

and not have their own style or their own ex-int.

Just like, I like the Yankee-Tanky.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the Yankee tankie, all right?

I'm just saying I appreciate there's a new generation of capital C communists entering the stage, entering the four.

And this is what proves the success of our efforts, actually, in the long term.

This is what proves the success of our efforts.

A new generation of American communists. It's not reducible to some

eccentricity of this or that person. So let me go ahead and say I'm very pleased with that.

Very, very happy about it. Now, there's a few things we have to be

talking about today in covering, because I have a conspiracy theory, if you can call it that and I'm not sure

that's the right word for it exactly but nonetheless I want to give you my analysis of

what's going on in the Biden administration. Okay? So let's first look at this White House briefing, I believe that's what it is, where the White House is now just denying the obvious, which is that there is a genocide going on in

Gaza. So let's just

hit it off by watching

this first. Wow! Hot take!

Let's fucking go!

Appreciate you, man, and it should probably just appreciate you man and

should probably just put this here

thank you hot take I appreciate you

brother

what's going on man

um

now uh there's apparently a rift going on between netanyahu and biden and we haven't seen it

in generations it's a bunch of nonsense but let's watch this first four we believe israel can and must do more to ensure

the protection and well-being of innocent civilians we do not believe what is happening in

gaza is a genocide we have been firmly on why Why not? So what China is doing

in Xinjiang, which is

creating vocational training centers, that's

a genocide, but this isn't. This is so

stupid. Record rejecting that

proposition. Now, okay, I just, I'm

just showing this to you because it's even

hilarious how they can't even keep the facade up right now

There may be some minor political differences some marginal political differences between

Biden and Netanyahu of course those squabbles exist I'm not entirely dismissing that those exist. But here's what I suspect in terms of why it is that Biden is now rhetorically speaking against and criticizing certain aspects of Netanyahu's options.

So the United States has to maintain the veneer of being a world police.

It is the enforcer of a universal notion of human rights of global liberalism and the kind of post-war international order.

Now it's turned into the so-called rules-based global order.

And the United States has to maintain the veneer at least of a commitment to some kind of international law, international rules, international human rights.

And Israel is making that very inconvenient for the United States, but you should not buy into the fact that there's a

dichotomy this isn't a conflict between the united states and israel it is a an inconvenience

that is internal to one empire. So this is one empire that finds one of its arms, one of the

means by which that empire enforces its rule to be inconvenient for other aspects. The United States simultaneously needs to maintain the Zionist entity in the region.

And when I say the United States, I'm not talking about America as a country historically.

I'm talking about the U.S. regime. I'm talking about the global empire

based in the United States, Wall Street, London, so on and so on. So that's what I'm talking about here, okay? That global hegemony needs the Zionist entity in that region. It is an

absolute life or death red line for it. It cannot compromise. Just even look at Ukraine. If they're not

willing to compromise Ukraine in Eastern Europe, what makes you think they're willing to compromise the Zionist entity in the Middle East? They absolutely cannot afford for the Zionist entity to disappear there. Okay. I want you to follow me.

Follow me here.

Follow me here.

Just like to say on TikTok.

Simultaneously, the United States has to maintain a global soft power hegemony in which it represents the kind of

responsible global actor that and and you need to understand how much of this is just

filler and not even necessarily meaningful.

What I mean by that is that, you know, if there's some region in Africa that's starving,

sometimes it's just a filler role of the United States to raise concerns.

Oh, there's a humanitarian crisis in this random place in the world.

So the United States keeps up the veneer of a humanitarian

universal police and a universal guardian of humanitarian interests. And oftentimes, this is not even

directly one specific agenda.'s just it it's like it's

almost like if you're tasked with a job at the office and it's like my job is to be HR right my job

is to receive phone calls and hear people's complaints. My job is to resolve customer disputes,

whatever. That's just your job. And the U.S. has taken on that job for itself, at least in a

superficial form. So that comes with a whole lot of, you know, international charity and funding of NGOs, and not all of these necessarily come with a direct agenda.

Of course, it's part of a greater agenda in the law and the grander scheme of things but a lot of it is also just filler it's

just part of the job right so you need to understand that aspect of u.s. hegemony the u.s. for example

under clinton tried to assume the role of this responsible global agent when it came to the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa.

Right? I don't know if you grew up in primary education in U.S. public school, if everyone here has, but we all learned about apartheid in South Africa.

And it was presented to us in such a way that made it seem like, you know, this is part of the New World Order, led by the U.S. of, you know, global human rights and liberal democracy and, you know, the power of

civil society. You go to Washington, D.C., and it's literally a monument to civil society protest,

and, you know, the power of democracy and the power of activism, and you can make a difference.

Your vote matters. Your activism matters.

You know, global equality for all. You know, stand up for your rights, yada, yada, yada.

And then the other aspects of the anti-apartheist struggle were totally marginalized.

You know, Winnie Mandela was cast aside, and Nelson Mandela was made the face of the whole thing.

So the militant armed struggle was totally erased from history,

according to led by the US hegemony, I mean.

And we just get this kind of Gandhi nonsense and part of this new rainbow world of equality and liberty and diversity,

the global hegemony, global homogeneity, whatever you want to call it, right?

So the U.S. fulfills this role as well. It's just that this is a superstructure, right? In a way, I'm kind of confusing the Marxist terminology here, because superstructure tends to refer to everything that's not directly economic.

But in the era in which politics and economics are inherently intertwined, there's aspects of geopolitics and the politics itself,

statehood, state power, military power, that have become part of the base, that have become part

of the economic base itself, not just necessarily the superstructure, right?

So this brings us to the existence of the Zionist entity as well.

Now, in the case of South Africa, the apartheid system for a long time was part of the base of world imperialism as a political system

but they were able to disentangle the apartheid system from the base at the political level

while maintaining all of the economic structures and all of the economic and financial institutions that made it necessary for global imperialism.

So that was a tremendous feat accomplished by the unipolar world order led by the United States.

Remember, the anti-apartheid struggle was part of the bipolar world order before the end of the

Soviet Union.

The Soviet Union was constantly putting pressure on the West and on the United States.

What about apartheid? What about apartheid? And the U.S. was kind of dancing around the issue a little

bit, although there was liberals and progressives in the U.S. who were opposed to it. They were not at the vanguard of that struggle. That was the U.S. who were opposed to it, they were not at the vanguard of that struggle. That was the

USSR. So when the unipolar world order came to be, the U.S. did not, it was no longer this

bulwark against communism. It also started to positively implement its own vision of global

homogeneity and global hegemony and the specific ideological values of liberal democracy and

fuquayama and all that stuff So they absorbed some of these struggles.

Just like Reagan absorbs Martin Luther King's civil rights struggle,

and that whole thing gets whitewashed.

They did the same thing with the apartheid struggle in South Africa.

So that brings us to the present time with the very inconvenient situation of the Palestinian

conflict. If you read Jimmy Carter's own memoirs, even politicians like Jimmy Carter, who were progenitors of the global liberal system, progressive global liberal system, the unipolar one of the U.S., even he is forced to acknowledge the great injustice that's going on.

I don't know how else you'd put it, right?

Senior U.S. officials, think tanks, politicians, all of them, whether it's privately or even in some cases publicly, acknowledge there is a Palestinian

right to self-determination. They have to. There's no way to reconcile the new role taken on by the United States in the unipolar world order

and the blatant hypocrisy of denying Palestinians

a sovereign right to self-determination.

What we constantly get

is that it's just too nuanced and it's

too complex, but ultimately they believe in the aspiration of, you know, a two-state solution and

Palestinian state.

I mean, Obama was direct about this.

Many U.S. politicians were direct about it.

They even pretend to be arbitrators and mediators of the conflict, such as in the case of the Oslo Accords, right?

So this is the role that is played by the United States, which represents a kind of tension within the empire. It's not a real conflict. It's just a superficial one.

It has to pretend to be this global mediator of all conflicts, all humanitarian issues, all issues pertaining to the sovereign right of the self-determination of nations, yada, yada, yada.

But then simultaneously there's this economic base, there's this political base, that is necessary for the hegemony itself.

An empire can only rule at the top if it touches base at the more fundamental levels of military might, of geopolitical hegemony, right, of economic hegemony, of maintaining a specific specific and enforcing a specific economic reality

and so on and so forth so there's always been in history a conflict between these two aspects

of an empire between the base and the superstructure if you will right in the case

of the united states we sort of see something going on in the case of the palestinian issue

because and here's the kicker and this is what nisrallah himself had said the zionist entity does not control america

it's also not true that the united states formally as in the formal united States based in the Constitution, yada, yada

controls the Zionist entity. Rather, the Zionist entity, the American deep state, the military

deep state represented by NATO and Europe, the British deep state, obviously, Canadian, whatever you want to call it, five eyes, all of these form parts of one global hegemony, a kind of super, supernational deep state, if you will, global deep state,

which violates the sovereignty of all the respective countries I just mentioned, with the exception of the Zionist entity itself,

whose sovereignty, whose existence as a country, is inexorably tied to that global hegemony and that

global deep state. So let me rephrase this, right?

America will be a country, was a country, and is a country, in spite of the global

hegemony.

America's existence is not reducible to the global hegemony. England's, Britain's

existence is not reducible to the global hegemony. Canada is a little tricky, but even then it's not comparable to Israel. But Israel's existence is a pet

project of the global hegemony. The way that Israel was created, think of it, this is kind of like a black ops mission. You know, it was like a black

ops mission. It wasn't created in a legitimate formal way of any kind. It was kind of an obscene

criminal underworld of the global capitalist superstructure, the British Empire, the U.S. Empire, whatever you want to call it, where, you know, the ruling class, the global ruling class, whose money is based in offshore banks, is fundamentally unaccountable to any sovereign country and so on and so forth,

and embarked upon this pet project of artificially and synthetically creating a Jewish state.

The forces that are responsible for the creation of that state

ultimately were not the Jewish capitalist class in the main.

Obviously, the Ross Childs and many Jewish capitalists were the most invested in it, probably,

but the only reason that they received an audience among the other segments of the global capitalist ruling class,

who outnumber them, by the way, is because the interests of the Zionist entity, the interest of the existence of a state of Israel, was recognized and regarded by the cartel of global capitalist elites as necessary for it strategically to consolidate a permanent foothold in that region of the world.

So you see, this is why it's complicated.

It's not that the Zionist entity controls America. It's that there's this

extra sovereign, global capitalist ruling class that controls all of the countries in question, and in whose interests alone the Zionist entity exists as a country in the first place.

But if you want the long story short, the global American empire is 100% responsible for everything Israel does. Absolutely everything. You know, I saw a ridiculous tweet by, it was Nick Fuentes and he goes, you know, Israel should listen to the U.S. and not the reverse. And it's like, they are listening to the U.S. What are you talking about? They are listening to the U..s you think Biden is actually the guy in power

the u.s the actual power of the global american empire isn't the president

the powers behind u.s. hegemony, that's not the office of the presidency, or it's not based in the White House cabinet or something even.

It's a deep state. It's fundamentally unaccountable to any kind of formal form of sovereignty.

And Israel is only doing what it's doing because of that deep state.

And it's 100% the, you know, no one should, you don't play into the hands of the Zionists themselves by attempting to kind of separate Israel from the global hegemony and the global American empire, right?

There's no separation.

The only reason you have Biden slightly critical of how the

situation is being handled by Netanyahu whatever that is just a superficial veneer

that Biden is trying to communicate a to the network of civil society human rights organizations within the United States that are fundamental to the U.S. Empire, and B, to the outward foreign-facing arm of that same soft power, NGO, complex, and then see the international community.

The United States needs to maintain face in front of the international community because it's not really good optics for the rest of the world who yes the u.s deeply cares about their perceptions

in terms of u.s being credible and legitimate it's done a horrible job at it i agree but it's still

trying and the u.s is trying to save face in front of the international community and in front of the U.N.

Because it's just indefensibly absurd.

What Israel is doing in Gaza, what it's trying to do in Gaza in the case of Rafa,

and how the U.S. is kind of turning a blind eye against it.

But the U.S. is the reason it's happening in the first place.

So what you're witnessing here is just a rank form of hypocrisy.

Now, he's saying, why is it in the U.S.'s interest, not the U.S. as a country, I'm talking

about the regime.

Why is it in the interest of the U.S. regime that Netanyahu slaughters the people of Gaza?

Well, I'll tell you why.

Because in contrast to what the liberal Zionists are trying to tell you, this is the only way there's a Zionist entity. And the Mukalama, the resistance,

actually agrees on that account. The Zionist entity does need to commit genocide in order to exist,

except even then it still can't exist. But the idea that there can be a Zionist entity that peacefully coexist in the region, that's just not true. It's totally impossible. As long as there's a Zionist entity in the Middle East, it will always be rejected by the region. Palestinians will always demand a right of return.

They will always demand a return to their homeland.

And even if they were out of the equation,

what makes you think neighbors in that region would ever tolerate such an aggressive foreign entity in its

region and in their back door. They will never tolerate that. The region is rejecting the

Zionist entity like an immune system rejects you know a foreign

bacteria infection okay so that's what's going on, actually.

It's just being rejected.

It's like, it's like a, it's like, put it this way, right?

The global ruling capitalist class tried to do an organ transplant, where they try to artificially create a country without having any regard whatsoever for the fundamental premises of civilization and history and culture

in that region,

tried to artificially and synthetically create a Jewish state based on foreign ideas that come from German romantic nationalism

from the 19th century.

And they attempted this in a region,

and the organ transplant failed.

The body, the Middle East, rejected the transplant.

And it doesn't work.

That's exactly the right way to describe it.

It's just a failed transplant.

The only way Israel could survive is by creating an organic...

You are missing the point completely.

There is no way Israel could ever survive because the existence of a Jewish state could never be organic. I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Clearly you're misunderstanding what I'm saying, though, and I don't mean to get

angry, but clearly you miss on... I'm not just waffling and gibbering when I use the word

organic to describe some kind of larp. It's actually the zinists that really try to be organic in such a failed, pathetic,

and miserable way. Having an organic existence as a country isn't about what you're trying to be

or trying to do. It's your ability to integrate with the civilization

and the history that forms the context of the geographical region that you're in. So you have to

submit to the history and the geography and the civilization that's there already. You have to fully submit to it and form an interaction based on mutual recognition. A Jewish state is premised on a non-negotiable exclusion according to which this is, this land is only ultimately for Jews or people descended from Jews by our criteria, and that's it.

Like, that is fundamentally impossible.

Okay? It's just not possible. It's absolutely impossible.

You know?

So that's square one. But even though it's impossible, it's still necessary for the global American Empire. It's necessary for the global American empire

because it's the one thing that is thwarting regional integration. What do I mean by that?

I'll be very simple.

If it wasn't for the Zionist entity,

the Middle East would have been another China,

would have been another Russia.

Blackpack! Let's fucking go!

Let's fucking go! Let's fucking go, Black Pat!

Localist, the Canaanist movement was nothing but nonsense LARP.

I don't even know what you're talking about. That was also what's some Mussolini nonsense, I'm pretty sure.

Anyway, to continue what I'm talking about,

the Zionist entity is the only thing in the Middle East that's preventing the formation of another geographical super state, civilization state, and as Zhang Wei Wei would describe it, similar to China and similar to Russia. It's the one thing standing in the way of that. It's the one thing standing in the way of the entire global oil market, OPEC, being fundamentally disrupted by a new geopolitical power that will fundamentally upset global U.S. hegemony and the hold the United States has on the oil market

and how that's intrinsically tied to the value of the U.S. dollar, the petro dollar system.

You say, well, how is that related?

Because the petrol dollar, that's the deal with Saudi Arabia.

What does that have to do with Israel?

I'll tell you what it has to do with Israel.

There is an organic tendency toward regional integration that would exist in the Middle East, and the only thing standing in the way of it is the Zionist entity.

And if regional integration happens, the political order within the Middle East, the political status quo, especially the Saudi regime itself, that would be totally thrown up into the air.

It would be completely unknown. It would be a total unknown. What would happen?

So this is exactly what we're talking about here.

Okay.

This is exactly what we're talking about here.

You need to understand the borders that exist in the Middle East are very much unnatural,

very much in constant conflict with the actual

people who live there.

And the one thing, the one entity

that is the epitome of that

incongruency is Israel.

Israel is the sanctification.

It is the establishment.

It is the reification of Sykes-Picot, of the unnatural territorial boundaries that were drawn by foreign colonialists,

constantly, which are constantly entering into conflict with the people who inhabit the region.

So that is the issue.

But again, the U.S. needs the Zionist entity to exist there.

Now, you say, okay, well, okay, they need Israel to be there.

Some liberal Zionists will argue this.

By the way, a lot of liberal Zionists are the ones

pretending to co-op, they're trying

to co-op the Palestinian liberation movement

in the U.S. And I

believe a red line needs to be drawn.

And let's be clear, this isn't just

Net and Yahoo, who's the problem. This isn't just a Lakud problem. This is just a Netanyahu problem. It's an Israel problem. It's a Zionism problem. It's a global U.S. hegemony problem. It's a U.S. regime problem. And that's exactly why the just struggle of the

Palestinian people is inexorably tied to the just struggle of the people in Donbass and the Russian people

against the other unnatural, disastrous foreign infection that's called Ukraine.

It's also related to the just struggle of China to maintain its territorial integrity and combat Taiwan separatism. All of these things are inherently entwined.

If there is anyone, some protesters, some activist, who simultaneously is waving the flag of Palestine, but also the Free Syria flag, also the Taiwan flag, also the Ukraine flag.

You need to throw them in a dumpster where they belong. Those are not friends of the Palestinian struggle.

Those are liberals trying to be at peace with their own cognitive dissonance.

But at the fundamental level of historical justice and historical honor, They don't have an authentic solidarity with the Palestinian people. They just have an internal cognitive dissonance which they're dealing with in an inherently contradictory way. You can't both have solidarity with the Palestinian people and also wave Ukraine's flag,

and also wave the flag of Taiwan separatism, and also waive the flag of regime change in Syria.

You can't do all of those things at once. You may think

there's a moral consistency to doing all those things at once, but you're neglecting the global

American system, which is responsible for the existence of the Zionist entity and all of its crimes in the first place.

This is exactly what I tried to say in my in-person speech as well, by the way.

The problem is not some political party in Israel.

It's Israel itself. That's the problem. Now, this may seem like an extreme

position, but I beg to differ. The Palestinian struggle has been going on since 1948. It's not

just a Netanyahu and Lakoud problem. Israel has had

plenty of labor governments

and the whole

thing is just one continuity

of their treatment of the Palestinians

and their inability to

integrate within the region. It doesn't matter

what political ideology is in charge.

As long as there's a Zionist state, there's going to be trouble.

And Netanyahu is sitting here saying, we tried the Oslo Accords. We tried this. We tried that.

It's not true, by the way. They didn't try because they can't try. Because if they actually honored the Oslo Accords, there wouldn't be a Zionist state in the first place. Why? Because granting recognition to a

Palestinian state is

the end of a Zionist state. That would be

the end of Israel. I fully acknowledge

and admit that. Liberal

Zionists are out here trying to deceive people

and say, no, no, no, we can have a

two-state solution. No, no, no, no, we can have a two-state solution.

No, no, no, that's not true.

Israel is a fundamentally illegitimate entity.

And that's a hill none of us should be afraid to die on.

It's a fundamentally illegitimate entity. There is no way to reform it. There is no way.

You know, a two-state solution is what Hamas wants right now immediately as a first step, and that's fine.

But nobody is under the illusion that there's going to be a coexistence in peace with the zionist entity there is no way to do it i am not i don't find liberals

who are struggling with cognitive dissonance to be brave i find them to be hypocrites i

find the people who simultaneously support all of the global american empire's endeavors but when one

of those endeavors suddenly conflicts on a superficial and ideological

level with the so-called values of the global American Empire, now you're going to start

waving the Palestinian flag?

Then why are you waving the Oigur or the Tibet flag or the flag of separatism for Taiwan?

Why are you waving the flag for Ukraine? Why are you waving the flag for regime change in Syria?

Why are you wavingiving all those?

Because they're all connected, actually.

They're all the same thing.

They're on a fundamental level.

They're all the same thing, by the way.

Not just, you know, they're indirectly.

No, they're directly the same exact flag.

The flag of the Zionist entity, the flag of Ukraine, the flag of

Taiwan separatism, the flag of Uyghur separatism, the flag of Uyghur separatism, the flag of regime

change in Syria, the flag of regime change in Belarus, the flag of regime change in Belarus, the flag of regime change in Syria, the flag of regime change in Belarus, the flag of regime change in Venezuela, the flag of regime change in Cuba. They are all the same flag. They are all the same flag. This isn't a battle between ideologies and moral systems. It is a battle between a global political and economic hegemony, a concrete global empire, and people who are actually trying

to resist it. So when people say, how can you claim to support Palestine while also supporting

Russia and Ukraine because

as the Chinese social media

users have pointed out and

understand through memes, because I

understand the reality of the global

geopolitical situation.

I understand how

the same forces which need to maintain a foothold in Ukraine also need to maintain a foothold in the Levant through the Zionist entity.

They are the same exact struggle fighting against them respectively. They are the same exact thing. That is so fundamental to understand and never compromise on. The primary contradiction is not one of these struggles, it's all of them.

Strategically, the focus now is on the Palestinian front,

but this is one of many fronts of one global struggle.

And you shouldn't forget that.

You shouldn't have solidarity with your enemies just because they're waving Palestinian flags.

If my enemy is waving a Palestinian flag, but he's waving the flags of all my other enemies, you think that guy is my friend?

Just because somebody waves a Palestine flag doesn't mean they're your

friend. If they're waving the Ukraine

flag, if they're waving the flag

of Taiwan, Tibetan,

and Oigar separatism, if

they're weighing the

flag of

regime change

in Syria,

they are

not your

friends.

They're your

enemies trying to

reconcile their

own

hypocrisy and

their own

cognitive

dissonance.

There is a

global principle contradiction and we should not be cognitive dissonance. There is a global

principle contradiction, and we

should not be willing to compromise

any of them

ideologically. And notice I'm

saying ideologically. Strategically

speaking, don't take my words

out of context, because strategically speaking,'t take my words out of context because strategically speaking we should

exploit all of the contradictions among our enemies we should delight and exploit the contradiction

being created by the cognitive dissonance within the liberals.

All I'm trying to say is that you shouldn't have solidarity with liberals who have cognitive dissonance.

They're not your friends. They're your enemies.

But if our enemies are fighting each other, we are smiling.

You understand?

That's our mentality.

That's how we should understand it.

We should, of course, exploit the contradiction.

But don't for a second be allies with people,

waving the flag of Tibetan, Oigur, Taiwan,

separatism, waving the flag of Ukraine,

waving the flag of regime change and color revolutions.

You should not be friends with those people they aren't your allies and in a

revolutionary situation in this country they're going to be in a ditch depending on who gets the

upper hand i'm not going to say who but just understand that just understand that. Just understand that.

Those who wave the flags of the global hegemony, hypothetically, if there was an American

Civil War, and one side of that war is trying to overthrow occupation by the global

hegemony, the defenders of the hegemony will be like Nazi black shirts,

and the forces of anti-fascism will dispense with them, much like the Yugoslav partisans disposed of them.

Which means creating a nice subterrestrial water slide that just goes into a pit.

And it's such a fun water slide

that there's like thousands of bodies in this pit, you know?

That's because it's like all the rave.

There's just so many people hanging out in the pit.

Woo! It's so far. I mean, they're not really animate.

But silently, they're enjoying it, of course.

By the way, this is all a joke, but I'm just saying,

I'm just saying, don't make the wrong friends. They're not your friends. That's all I'm trying to say. Okay. Don't make the wrong friends. That's all I'm trying to say. Wow. And I'm not saying people can't become educated. That's not what I'm saying either.

People can, obviously, some liberals who have incognitive dissidents can be educated to eventually reject liberalism and all these other, you know, nefarious, anti-human,

evil global projects as well. They can be reformed. I'm not saying they can't. I want to believe the majority of them will be, right?

But there's some people that want to bash you over the head with a hammer because you reject regime change in Syria.

There's some people that want to take a hammer and bash your head because you defend

China's right to territorial integrity because you support Russia. There's some people that want

to kill you because you support Russia. Remember that. And how do I know know this because when pro-Russia or

Russian journalists get murdered they celebrate it and they don't consider it a

crime at all so that's all I'm trying to say I'm just trying to tell you that some of these people are really your

enemies really are enemies right and you shouldn't you shouldn't get it twisted or get

confused about that at all on any level.

Now, to continue what I'm saying,

I think Biden is putting on a show for the international community and for domestic NGOs and civil society groups.

I don't think there's anything serious, okay?

Even the threat he made of how much arms he's going to discontinue sending to Israel, it's so insignificant. It's so minuscule. It's so not even worthy of talking about that it's meaningless. Put it this way. Rhetorically, what trump is saying is actually what biden is doing trump's full-on zionism full-on zionism yeah Biden is betraying israel you know, we need to help Israel finish a job.

Like he's saying that, but that's actually what Biden is doing now.

And some and more, right?

And there's no, there's no, see, there's no tensions.

This is what you need to understand.

There are no operational struggles.

There are rhetorical struggles for the media, for the international media.

But there are no operational tensions as far as the U.S. and the U.K. gathering intelligence about resistance positions in Gaza and giving them to Israel.

There is no conflict going on at that level. There is no tension going on at that level. There is no hesitancy going on at that level.

There is no delay going on at that level. Mossad, CIA, MI6, they are all the same. They are, there is no tension between them.

There's no tension between the U.S. military and Israel.

There's nothing, nothing, no conflict at all.

The conflict, quote on quote, is a show.

It's a show that's a rhetorical conflict that means absolutely nothing. It absolutely means nothing. What if Trump is trying to pander to his evangelical base. It's so much worse than that.

It's way worse than that.

Trump is outright pandering to donors.

That's what he's doing.

He's pandering.

He is very cynically pandering to A-PAC. He's pandering to the Zionist lobby

and he's pandering to donors.

Very cynically, that's what he's doing.

It's so cynical, it's almost funny.

But Trump

is doing what

Trump has proven he will

always do, which is play it safe.

He will never invest in his own

base. Because let's

be completely honest. Let's

say Trump started being critical of Israel. Do you really think his base will turn on him? You really think if Trump got on a mic and started criticizing Israel, his base would reject it? They would take that and run wild with it. Not only would

they take his slight criticisms and remarks, within two days, his base will be wearing kaffirs and and be in solidarity with hamas that is how ready they are to reject

Israel so don't get it twisted trump doesn't support israel because his base. He supports Israel

because the donors and because

of the Republican establishment.

Even the

evangelical

Zionists,

I get that they're brainwashed by all these preachers

and all this kind of stuff. But they don't, they're brainwashed by all these preachers and all this kind of stuff.

But they don't, they're not even really that educated about Israel.

And at the end of the day, all you'd have to tell them is some, all, see, they think Trump is the Messiah.

If Trump got on stage and he was just like, actually Israel is, if Trump

became like a black Hebrew, Israel, I was like, actually the black people are Jews and these are

pretenders, whatever, like they would believe it. They don't give a fuck. They're not fundamentally

committed to the actual Zionist entity.

They are committed to a fairy tale that some preachers are telling them about the Bible and the Jews in the Bible and some prophetic biblical problem. But they don't know anything about Israel or the, they don't know anything about Israel

or the, they don't even know about what

Palestinians are. They don't know anything about

the region at all. Okay?

It's just like some nonsense that

has no, there's nothing tangible about

that solidarity. That's what I'm trying to say. It's a complete, it's there's nothing tangible about that solidarity that's what i'm trying to say it's a

complete it's like you know how the rostafarians were really big fans of hiley salase in ethiopia

there's no connection between them there's no tangible basis for that reverence.

It's just because Haile Selassay was a black king,

and it was a form of black nationalism by the Rastafarians.

And that's it.

That's similar with the evangelicals in the U.S.

I'm talking about the people who are victim to it.

I know that there's Zionists manipulating them at the top level, of course.

But I'm trying to say it's very easy to turn Americans against Zionism. That's all I'm trying

to say. It's extremely easy to turn Americans against Zionism. And how do I know this? How do I know this?

The one social media that's not owned by the u.s is what tik trumpers use tick talk so do democrats and liberals so do ap political people all walks of life use tic talk and there's almost a

unanimous consensus on tic talk that israel sucks and that's spontaneous that Israel sucks.

And that's spontaneous.

That wasn't astro-turfed.

It's a spontaneous consciousness that developed just because some actors had the freedom to develop it.

It's not hard to disentangle people from Israel supporting Israel there is no

segment of the US population that is fundamentally committed to the existence of

Israel or US support for Israel,

except those demographically captured by Zionist institutions directly,

so many American Jews, not all of them, but many of them.

And then additionally, you also have the you know the salaried class let's say many of them

also have a vested interest in defending zionist ideology for obvious reasons.

But I don't think even, I think evangelicals are extremely easy to disentangle from Zionism and from Israel,

and all you have to do is presented to them in a biblical way,

and they'll be fine with it.

They don't care about actual Israel.

They don't actually care about... They care about a mythological, biblical presentation of it,

which is not grounded in any empirical relationship, any tangible

relationship.

It's not like evangelical

you know, it's not like

Appalachian evangelical you know, it's not like Appalachian evangelical, you know, unemployed coal miners, addicted to fentanyl.

It's not like those people have some kind of class interest that makes them have solidarity with Israel.

Okay. That's what I'm trying to say there's

nothing actually attaching them to that view there's nothing tangible okay um i also by the way i think the same is true for many american jews

you know that um that's also true for many american jews it's the evangelical churches the church establishment the televangelists who could in some science fiction scenario probably would queue up in line for the water slide.

You know, it's those people.

Those are the problem.

Also, another problem among the Jewish community in the U.S. are the Zionist institutions, right? The NGOs, the groups,

what is that birthright tour nonsense? So this is the issue, you know, the issue, also the issue is the,

obviously, the ruling class itself

of course the capitalist class who else Yeah, but Settlers by Jay Sakai says all American workers have dual U.S. Israeli.

It's such a stupid narrative.

They're like, oh, well, U.S. workers are in solidarity with Israel because they're

both settlers. Oh, really? Oh, that's why. It's because they're both settlers. It's not because

they're being taught and brainwashed by priests that this Israel is literally the one in the Bible and that these are the like this is about the Judaism of the Bible and it's the chosen people and Jesus is going to come back like yeah it has nothing to do with religion. It's really just

because they're

both settlers. What a stupid

nonsense.

Stupid

nonsense view. Okay?

Yes, the by,

you guys need to understand how easy it was for zionists to manipulate

american um protestants christians okay go back to the 1800s go back to the 1900s the old testament is like memorized by heart by jebediah working on the cornfields

and it's like american folk music any kind of american labor struggles abolitionist struggle, there's so many themes of Exodus and the return and Moses.

They're not just focused on the New Testament, the biblical unconscious.

There's a biblical background, like all of the biblical unconscious. There's a biblical background, like all of the biblical prophets, like Noah, you know, Jehu, speaking of Jehu, you know.

Elijah, all these kinds of people.

Like, these are

where do you think Americans get their names

from in the 1900s

they get it from the Bible okay

so if there's anything

fundamental to American consciousness

it's really

the Bible and Protestant Christianity. So when Zionists come in

and try to make a connection between the Zionist state and that deep bedrock of biblical consciousness

Americans have,

lo and behold, it proves very effective and very potent

for manipulating uneducated Americans

who know nothing about the history of the Middle East,

who know nothing about geopolitics, who know nothing about the history of the Middle East, who know nothing about geopolitics,

who know nothing about the vested interests in the existence of the state of Israel,

who don't know anything about that, all they know is that it's called Israel and somehow there's a bunch of Jews involved in it.

So, lo and behold, it's very easy to manipulate them. Exactly. America was founded as a new Israel

question. They always use this rhetoric. It's very common in a Christian civilization to use that rhetoric. There's nothing Zionist about it. It's just from the Bible. Zionism manipulated Christians by, you know, trying to make it seem like there was a relationship between the Israel that's in the Bible and this phony, artificial, satanic state that they create in the post-war period.

You know?

So let me be absolutely clear.

It's not because there's a solidarity between settlers.

And can I be honest about something?

If you still believe Americans in 2024 are settlers,

you're just not a smart person.

You're just a midwit.

And you don't actually believe it's true.

You just say it because you want to score brownie points

in whatever echo chamber or limited social milieu you're trying to appease pander to or gain credibility within.

Nobody actually believes Americans are actually settlers in 2024. In a way, for example, comparable to settlers in the West Bank from the Zionist entity. There's no comparison. It's just a bunch of nonsense. It's just a bunch of nonsense okay there's nothing sociologically about america right now in

twenty twenty four that takes the form of people settling i mean maybe expats i don't, maybe expats moving to some of, but America has been consolidated as a country.

And, you know, I understand there's many injustices continuing to be committed against the first Americans that preceded the European.

You know, this is another thing. I disagree.

You know, and I want to have a discussion with the guy who made this argument recently.

Because I disagree with the view that the form of settlement that formed the context of the

founding of America is comparable to the Zionist project. And I'll tell you

exactly why. It's actually really simple from a Marxist perspective. Ready? Ready? Historically speaking,

settlement into the Americas was a economic phenomenon it wasn't based on building a new nation state or any it was an economic phenomenon yes there is a religious phenomena at play there as well, but it was an era that

preceded the existence of well-defined nation-states and well-defined forms of the recognition

of territorial sovereignty

based on historically constituted communities.

So it was mainly people coming from England,

and they were settling, not because they were saying oh you know we're just

going to take all of this land for ourselves to constitute this you know this new project of

of totally artificially creating a country from scratch,

because the political notion of a country and of a nation

was extremely ill-defined at that point.

So, in other words, I understand that there are obvious, obvious differences between the era of European colonialism and, let's say, the form of settlement the Turks made in Anatolia and other transfers and movements of population historically, which were also nonetheless very violent and so on. But no, I understand there's all these sorts of different historical and sociological differences. But it's completely wrong to compare it to Zionism

because Zionism here you want to know the difference between Zionism and settlement into the

Americas the majority of the foreign settler population arrived into Palestine in tandem with the creation of the

creation of the Zionist state and with the fulfillment of the political and ideological project of Zionism. They just

came suddenly like almost all overnight. And then a few decades before, there was a significant

number of settlers, but the bulk really comes in the post-war period,

in the immediate aftermath.

And it's an intentional, methodical,

ideological, and political project.

Okay.

The case of the Americas is by no means comparable okay that is a that in the in the in

hegelian terms that's a phenomena of civil society the internal societies societies of England and Europe and wherever else

had these within civil society, there's these contradictions. These contradictions are being

manifested in the form of people leaving and going to pursue economic opportunity

in a totally foreign, totally unknown as far as they were concerned, land to build a new life

from scratch, yes, but with no certainty as far as what this will amount to in terms of civilization and nation building and what country, there's none of that that's premising their movement from Europe, the old world to the new world.

It's just kind of taking a risk to go build a new life to pursue economic opportunity without knowing what the consequences will ultimately be.

But that's not what Zionism is. Zionism is a political movement. It's an ideological movement,

which expressly had an agenda and had plans to take a people from a completely different region,

transplant them in a totally alien and foreign region, and artificially create a new community,

a new state, a new country from scratch at the expense of everyone who was already living there.

That was not the same thing as the settlement that occurred in the centuries before the establishment of the United States.

Finally, this is my...

This is my final opposition to this notion, my criticism of it.

By the time 1776 happens, it's already an anti-colonial war.

1776 doesn't happen because the settlers are upset that Britain is preventing, you know, massive transfers of population from Europe that's not why it

happened it happened because people who had already lived there for centuries decided that or recognized, awakened to the fact that they were already fundamentally distinct enough in terms of the community that formed inadvertently, by the way, not intentionally.

This is the thing. You know, the first pilgrims that came to the U.S. or whatever,

sorry, it's so stupid, the first pilgrims that came to the Americas,

the first settlers from Europe that came to North America,

they had no clue that there would be a United States hundreds of years later.

Inadvertently, the economic and civil society process of settlement and the pursuit of economic opportunity and all the forms of association and community that were created

out of that, like all nations that are constituted organically, inadvertently, that gave rise to

a separate nation. It gave rise to a separate existence. It gave rise to the possibility, and this is a really

important thing, the possibility of a separate civilization from Europe. Not the guarantee of one,

not the conceit of knowing what that will be ultimately but just the

possibility of one okay just the possibility of one and that's what seven 1776 we should really appreciate the bravery and the heroism of 1776 from a wider historical perspective.

Because here you have a historically constituted community, descended from people who had already lived there for hundreds of years,

who say, you know what? Our forefathers came from Europe, but we've been here long enough. We've formed a life here long enough,

and maybe we can pursue a path of civilization separate from the old world. Maybe we don't have to listen to the rules of the old world. Maybe we don't have to have the same culture and civilization and political state that the old world has. Maybe we can build

something new. Now, what that will be, ultimately, we don't know. But maybe we can unite together

politically to overthrow the British, who are colonists, ruling from overseas, and aspire to unify into something greater, which will ultimately be based on making a life in this land. The difference between that and Zionism is there's a lot of ambiguity as far as what that

ultimately might be. You know, what is it, what is it, what is the saying, a more perfect union? It's the United States of America. The country is called the United States of America.

And it aspires to create a more perfect union. It doesn't say what that, if it knew what that union looked like,

it wouldn't say a more perfect union. It's aspiring to a union. It's aspiring to the creation

of a country. It doesn't know what that's going to look like.

It's not saying this is a Jewish state.

And I understand the Founding Fathers had racial policies within the context

of slavery and other things in the

beginning where to be

a citizen you had to be a

white man, a good

what is it, a white man of good

moral reputation, good

character or something. But that wasn't enshrined as of as the

fundamental founding principle or uh of the aspiration of a united america that was just a tangential, circumstantial, um, uh, detail at the time. But they weren't

saying this is the United White States of America and that we are creating a white

ethno state

that is not what they were saying

they were adopting

they were

of course racist

and it was in the context of slavery

but they were not making a commitment hundreds of years into the future that that's what America will ultimately always be. But Zionism is different. Zionism inscribes in its founding charter that we want to create a Jewish state for Jews only.

You need to understand there's a fundamental difference. Yeah, we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal.

They didn't say all white men only.

They didn't say all European men.

It's all men.

There's a universalism there that leaves an open door into the future. That's not there when it comes to Zionism.

That's my fundamental argument in contrast to the view that because there was a dispute,

were the founding fathers more like Hamas or were they more like the Zionist settlers?

And of course they were more like Hamas.

Of course they were.

Okay?

Of course they were. Okay. Of course they were. Because you need to understand the beauty of this country, America. And we appreciate this beauty of this country as communists better than any

self-proclaimed nationalist could because we understand america's more than just a nation it's a

fundamental dream and forward facing aspiration for a united civilization and a united community without making any kind of

conceded prescriptions as far as what that will look like we just have a hunch the founding fathers the yankees they had a fundamental hunch they had a

suspicion hey guys i think we formed a separate community here than what exists in Europe already. We don't know everything about

what we are. We don't know everything about what this is going to look like, but I think we're

building something here, acclimating to the soil here that makes us different from over there.

Why should we give them taxes without being represented?

Why should we take orders from overseas?

We've built a life here.

This is where we're going to live and where we're going to die.

This is where we're going to raise our kids,

and they'll raise theirs too. This is where we're building a life for ourselves. We've built a

community here. We've built an existence here that makes us something else. And what that's something else is, they didn't really necessarily know.

They just knew that it was American.

It was based in this continent.

It's the United States of America.

There is absolutely nothing

nothing

about

the founding purport

of this country

that excludes the possibility, that America will include the various

first American peoples, their traditions, their civilization, their culture, their spiritual outlook, their wise and profound relationship to the soil, the geography, and the land.

Nothing about what the founding fathers were fighting for and dying for ultimately excludes that possibility.

That the United States of America, the more perfect union, will also be a more perfect union that includes the American Indians and the black people and the Spanish- speaking peoples as well and so on and so on nothing even if the founding fathers

at the time were excluding it from the realm of what they would consider acceptable.

They, even they were not excluding that fundamentally from the future of what this country

could be.

But the founders of Zionism were, and that's the difference.

The founders of Zionism

were not saying at some

undisclosed points in the future

there may be a possibility

that this nation building project we're

aspiring to will ultimately

incorporate and include the region

that we're in and all of our neighbors no they were

saying this is only a jewish state only for jews and no one else and that's it so that's the

fundamental difference one is actually an ethno state and the other at best can be critiqued as having acted like an ethno state in contradiction to its own founding principles and values, which is that all men are created equal.

So that's the difference.

That's the actual difference here.

Yeah, the U.S. Constitution was inspired by the Iroqu's Confederacy.

Absolutely. There is nothing about being an American...

I don't... You know, I think this discourse is so out of touch from reality.

Because, you know, real American patriotism is so firmly rooted in a reverence and respect for the American Indians.

The honoring, even when there's

conflicts between

American Indians

and the

Americans

descended from

Europeans

you know how

much

the American

public

respected and

revert these various Indian chiefs.

You know that guy William Ticombska Sherman?

You know who he was named after, Tukumska?

You know where that name comes from?

There was such a deep level of respect that existed even there when this was the most racist country ever.

There is still a respect there.

You know, our cities and our towns, many of them, our lakes, our rivers, many of them get their names from the first Americans. I'm not saying this to under-emphasize the way in which American Indians

were treated unjustly. Far from it. I'm just saying that the injustice faced by the American Indians

is in no way fundamental

to the existence of a United

American state.

That's all I'm trying to say.

On the contrary, if you're a real

American patriot, you will want to do right by your

first American brothers. Just like we want to do right by all Americans, by the way, because

this is something missing from this debate in this

conversation. You know, this strict distinction between settlers and non-settlers, it's not

really that strict in reality. I understand American Indians have it way worse than almost everyone else.

But you know, everyone has it pretty bad too.

There's no strict line there where one is benefiting and the other isn't.

We're all not benefiting.

And that's why I'm really disappointed in Marxists

for really missing the obvious conclusion.

The evils perpetuated by the American government, the American state, and American settlers against the American Indians are just part of the evils of capitalist civilization itself. It's part of the same barbarism of capitalist civilization that led people to sell

their children into child labor, to work in coal mines and work in factories, to have mothers have to

sell themselves into prostitution.

To have so many Americans die of disease and poverty and neglect.

America was not a pretty place as far as some kind of notion of universal human dignity in general, right?

So this idea that settlers were just like completely living in a privileged way, you know, living high, and then just totally oppressing all the other racial minorities, it's not necessarily, it's not really accurate.

It's more like you had the barbarism of capitalist civilization where everyone is eating each other.

And yes, if you're a racial minority, you're getting it worse because you have that added thing as well.

But make no mistake, this is barbarism. This is, this is, like Jack London, this is the wild, this is dog eat dog. This is just total carnage and total, you know,

man-selling man to turn a dime. This is not some kind of,

you know, Jay Sakai is so twisted, how he tries to make it seem like, you know, oh,

white people in America are living in this kind of socialist utopia

like labor Zionism

and everyone else is being oppressed.

It's like, no, that's not actually what's going on, all right?

We have the barbarism of capitalism

that's inflicted on everyone, and if you're a racial minority,

you have the added bonus of being treated like even more dirt than everyone else.

But the context is that everyone's getting the short end of the stick except the ruling capitalist class.

And you know what? For a long time, that was just the basic Marxist view on the matter.

Isn't that sad? What I just told you is just Marxism. That's just what Marxists were always saying.

But somehow, it's really disgusting because what universities did is actually very sick you know what

universities did is they did something where they realized that in our academia

and our college campus, it's just like a bunch

of privileged white people living in a bubble

living in a socialist utopia.

So

they had a guilt about their social

privilege

and then they lumped themselves in. They were so about their social privilege. And then

they lumped themselves in.

They were so charitable and generous

that they lumped themselves

in with all

white Americans to make it

seem like a coal miner in West Virginia

has the same settler privilege that they do.

You need to understand how fundamental this is to the dynamic of the distortion of Marxism in America.

It's all projection.

Who are actually the settlers in America who behave like they're creating an exclusionary settlement that acts in a colonial way, where it's just black and white, we're going to exclude everyone else and build our own utopia community

and then everyone else is just going to be considered

a barbaric outsider. Well,

you know who does that? The same people who

theorize about this stuff and read Jay Sakai.

It's academics.

It's grad students. It's

gentrified communities. These are gentrifiers themselves who feel guilty clearly about how obvious what their social existence entails. But the way they cope with that guilt is by actually blaming all the other white

people who aren't in the same boat with them. You know, I'm sure a coal miner in West Virginia,

whose entire family is dying of overdose from fentanyl would love to be a settler in some

academic university and have all the privileges of some guilty Roderick Day intellectual.

But they don't.

People like Roderick Day have no right to lump all the other white Americans struggling to get by with himself.

He may feel guilty that he's some rich little white boy in some university, living life like some kind of settler, colonizer.

But you don't get the right to, you know, lump yourself in with all the other white people in this country who are just trying to get by and make a life for themselves and are struggling to do it.

You know, you know what I'm saying with this dynamic? It's a form of class terrorism.

Because you know what? You have to be privileged to be guilty. Did you know that? To be guilty about the nature

of your social existence, that entails a level of privilege. You know, I'm sorry, but the

Americans struggling to put bills, the white Americans struggling to put bills on the table, they don't got time to be guilty.

They don't have energy to be guilty.

They're actually trying to feed their families and pay bills and put food on the table.

Did you know that?

They don't have time to, like, what are you even talking about?

You're a grad student.

You're not living the same social existence as they are, you know?

Like, you may have the privilege of self-hatred and white guilt, but the majority of

actual working class white people do not.

They actually are getting by and working for a living, like all the other Americans, you know?

So, uh, show Q.

All right.

Who's in show Q?

Dude, I don't know what Aeon Animus is going to talk about Nick Fentes, right?

Available for a civilized minerals might debate stream

All right, I'm just going to ask him to make it quick. All right, hey, what's up, man? I want you to make it quick, though.

What's the issue?

Hello. Hello. Hello. oh my god jackson and Nick Fuentes are fighting in the comments.

Oh, God, this comment chain goes on really long.

All right, we're going to cover it.

Aon, I'm going to give you 15 seconds.

15.

14.

13, 12, 11, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

All right.

Jesus Christ.

Anyway, so Nick Flentes made a tweet.

The only difference between

Lakud and Hamas

is that Lakud has nuclear weapons.

I think this is going to be

really funny.

Because I have some things to say about this uh so-called strategy like the only difference between

lakud and hamas is that lakud has nuclear weapons i what? So you're saying that they're both, both sides are bad? Yeah, that's totally sticking it to the Zinus. Anyway, Jackson, taking a principled stance, Hamas are freedom fighters, whereas Lakud Zionists are carrying out a genocide.

Why is Jackson more anti-Zionist than Nick Fuentes?

Isn't that crazy?

Why is Jackson Hinkle more anti-Zionist than the guy who likes Hitler?

Think about that. I want Hitler. Think about that.

I want you to think about that for a second.

But this is...

No, no, no. This...

This is what I was looking for.

This is the gold I was looking for from Nick Fuentes.

Look at this.

By explicitly supporting Hamas, you are playing into the Zionist framing of the conflict.

What? What? Aren't you the guy that supports Hitler openly and denies the Holocaust?

Aren't you the guy who literally glorifies Hitler?

And actually says, no, this isn't about Zionism, it's about Jews.

So Jackson is playing into the hands of Zionists by supporting Hamas,

but Nick Fuentes isn't playing into the hands of Zionists by literally affirming Zionist ideology,

which equates Zionism with Judaism, and that the Zionists are just trying to prevent

another Nazi Holocaust. This is so bafflingly stupid. I can't even. This guy, this guy called me

stupid. This is the guy who called me stupid.

How are you going to call me stupid?

When you're trying, you're making it seem like Hamas, supporting Hamas, plays into

the hands of Zionists more than actually glorifying Hitler and calling for, you know, some kind of persecution of Jews does and making this a Jewish issue does. Do you know how stupid it is to make this a Jewish issue when Jews are literally at least partially

split on this and there's actually a lot of Jews critical of Net and Yahoo and there's even

anti-Zionist Jews and there's a division at the very least between jay street and and uh and uh and the netanyahu

lacudniks there's actually a division there and instead of exploiting that division you're just

going to have all jews be united around around Zionism because you're affirming the Zionist view that Zionism is Judaism. Do you know how stupid that is? How is Jackson playing into the hands of Zionists when you agree with Zionism itself, I've never seen this guy say that he

rejects the existence of the Zionist entity or affirms the reasonable view that it should have no

right to exist. He constantly says this is about Jews, not Zionists. So do the Zionists.

Zionists say that if you're anti-Israel, you're anti-Semitic. Zionists say that this is the Jewish issue.

This is about Jews defending their interests and defending themselves in general.

So who's playing into whose hands? It's so fucking stupid. It's actually kind of outrageously stupid.

This guy called me stupid, but he's saying

this dumb-ass shit.

Drop

a like if you're American who supports

Hamas. Why do you think

every Zionist Jew in America calls

anyone that critiques Israel or supports Palestinian statehood pro Hamas?

Not even Russia unconditionally supports Hamas.

Yeah, but Russia is not the regional power, which has the most stakes here. It's Iran. What Russia views about Hamas is much less important than what Iran thinks. That's not Russia's neighborhood. This is not Russia's backyard. This is not their

neighborhood. If you notice the actual direction of geopolitics right now, Russia is tilting in the

direction to being more open to Iran's geopolitical stance, which includes, you know, being more open to Hezbollah and Hamas than it used to be. That's the direction history is going in. But you're pushing in the opposite direction by saying that this is optically unacceptable somehow,

when the tide of history is moving in the direction of it being acceptable by the international community. Israel and Hamas, both these terrorist

tactics, are completely intolerable to any Christian. But Hitler's good? What is this? This guy literally,

Hitler kills like what, 27 millionussians alone god knows how many more people

in general in eastern europe uh but he you could that guy's great to glorify hitler should be

rehabilitated and glorified but but Hamas is too far.

This is the phony radicalism of the far right.

All of their edginess, remember this, all of their edginess, all of their anti-establishment, heroism, all of their anti-establishment heroism all of their willingness to discard optics to stick it yeah hit hitler's base that all of that amounts to what

Hamas and israel are both bad.

Hamas uses terrorists.

Sounds like Laurelumer.

All of this to sound like Laura Lumer.

All of this posturing against the Jews and complaining about the Jews,

just to sound like Laura Lumer. What's the point of it then?

It's almost like this shit is a sciop to just maintain U.S. policy in the Middle East.

It's almost like exactly what Hitler himself himself was doing yeah go attack the defenceless bagel shop

owner and the literal random jew who has no that were those are the people who were attacked on the

street by nazi thugs but keep paying

to the Bank of International settlements keep being integrated in the global capitalist system

where there are some actual

powerful capitalist

Jews, not the majority, but there's some still

there that you're still in bed with economically.

Keep reinforcing the same

global system that creates the Zionist

entity in the first place.

But rhetorically, you're sticking it to the global plutocratic Jewish class, but you're saying that,

but you're just attacking defenseless Jews on the street. So tough and brave.

Yeah, I'm sorry. This is not a bold stance against the regime.

Just because this guy glorifies Hitler, that's not a bold, brave thing to do.

It's way more brave to actually concretely oppose the U.S. regime than superficially

oppose U.S. media optics.

What do I mean by that?

It's way more brave to do the thing that's less censored, but definitely puts you more on the radar as a target concretely, than just doing things that are forbidden.

For example, being a pedophile is forbidden.

Okay?

That doesn't mean you're somehow challenging the hegemony by openly being a pedophile.

Likewise, there is a taboo around glorifying Nazism.

So far, those Ukrainians are really pushing the limit in Canada, though.

I'll tell you that.

They're really pushing the limit.

But so far, there's also a taboo around that.

Glorifying Hitler doesn't make you an enemy of the regime.

Supporting Hamas makes you an enemy of the regime.

It's much more revolutionary to support Hamas than to glorify Hitler.

Okay.

All bluster and all this smoke and all this hot air and what does it amount to?

An extremely milk toast, extremely tame nonsense position of total compromise, total subservience, total acquiescence to Zionist hegemony.

This is just rich.

Comparing the Zionist genocide of Gaza to the Palestinian resistance shows you to understand the conflict.

Israel is dropping bombs that murder entire families every few minutes.

Hamas is fighting an occupation for their freedom.

Hamas has been propped up by Netanyahu for years. Why do you think that is?

What? If you're talking about the factional war between

Palestinians

in the

1980s

that's

something

totally separate

and in the

past

if you

actually

think

that Hamas

is preferable

to Israel

see

I can't believe it because in my mind, in my crosshairs, I had liberal Zionists in mind.

But apparently the edgy-based, you know, based, real conservative, real right-winger Nick Fuentes is adopting the same stupid stance

that the liberal Zionists do, which is that, oh, this is about Netanyahu.

You may be correct that Netanyahu, and...

And this is so funny, because Jackson got in trouble for acknowledging this.

It is true that Netanyahu is the more

irrational one who does

prefer to maintain political

power by constantly fighting

and engaging in wars.

So that means Netanyahu in the short term

probably does prefer to fight in wars than pursue a peaceful settlement but net and yahoo is not the same thing as the zionist hegemony it's just the current political party and political leader in charge in Israel right now. But the Zionist

entity and Israel is way bigger than that. And the conflict is also way bigger than just

Nan'ya. Nan'ahu can be sacked tomorrow and this war will not end

Hamas will not

stop fighting just because Netanyahu

leaves

Why is there this

reduction of Israel to Netanyahu

That's if anything Netanyahu. That's

if anything Netanyahu has

just accelerated the destruction of the

Zionist entity itself

through his own blunderous stupidity

and irrational madness.

But the idea that Netanyahu represents a be-all and all of Israel's interests, not true.

There's different factions.

And I'm against all of them, not just one of them.

Nan'Yahu thought that by dividing Hamas and the Palestinian Authority there would be two weak factions at war with each other that

would prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state he wanted to tame Hamas

while tolerating sporadic attacks while all was ongoing, Hamas planned and trained

for years with Iran.

Built weapons and dug tunnels in preparation

for the October 7th attack.

Netanyahu underestimated

Hamas' coordination with Iran and blew it up in his face.

Again, you don't understand the conflict.

I want you guys to understand something going on here.

This is something I learned from my friend who has inside information on how the right wing works.

Whenever they're doing these emergency,

this is not an organic ratio of just like random audiences.

This is his community in panic mode coordinating

to pull these ratios off.

Look at this, 30,000 views, 16,000 views, more than double.

This is all being done in the telegrams and their group chats. It's all being coordinated,

like in panic mode, emergency mode.

It's like how we do ratios. It's like how we boost my stream tweets. It's like how we boost some of my tweets, you know? It's not necessarily, see, put it in, when it comes to my tweets,

I think at least five to six hundred will just be from this community. Everything beyond

that is just like random people, right?

So,

I think this might, this is a prelude to a debate.

We settle this in a debate.

And, you know, let me tell you something.

Both Jackson and I are honorable people.

We fight war, and we can get dirty if the enemy gets dirty.

But we're generally, we're honorable people.

So we are fine just focusing on the points of contention i've just been

willing to focus on the points of contention and that's it that's all i'm interested in to begin

with and i consider that to be an honorable way of fighting.

We don't play dirty, you know, unless we have to.

But I think this demands a a debate to be honest not just the twitter's but this is a great context for a debate Nanyahu underestimated Hamas' coordination with Iran and blew up in his face.

Very true.

The Israeli government had prior knowledge of the October 7th attack, issued a standout order to allow it to commence, then exasperated the devastation by blowing up their own people.

Or do you believe the official narrative of the Israeli government?

I don't believe Israeli government narratives like when you say that Hamas is just as bad as a genocidal Israeli state.

You believe in an Israeli state.

Oh, okay, he doesn't recognize Israel now.

Right, but didn't he say he does

before?

The Russian government does,

though, and condemn the October 7th attack.

So what?

So what? Russia is Russia.

We are here as Americans arguing about our relationship to that entity. First of all, second of all, this is not Russia's region. This is Iran's region. I'm not saying it's only Iran. I'm just saying like Iran is the regional power here whose opinion actually matters.

Russia doesn't see Russia is more complex because a lot of Russia's policy is baggage from the 2000s, not just in the context of the Middle East, but also China, also North Korea, also Latin America in some cases.

You have to ask what direction is it going in now, though.

Russia is increasingly going in the direction of having major fallout with Israel.

You know, yeah, of course, both Russia and China are still maintaining the stance, the respectable stance, you know, the acceptable one by the international community and international law, that there should be a two-state solution.

But this is also the short-term goal of the resistance as well.

That's what you need to understand.

If Russia, for example, right now, decided to completely cease to recognize the Zionist entity,

all that would do is accelerate the world war that we all know is coming

anyway. But it was just accelerated because it would probably create a direct military or

political confrontation between two different entirely regions, Israel and Russia.

You need to understand this is increasingly a world war with multiple different fronts.

So if Russia and China just adopt the same stance as Iran,

all that will do

is just bring us

into World War III right away

rather than in like a year

or two years as it will happen.

So you need to understand they're treading

a fine line. Don't consult Russia about what

policy, what outlook you should have about the region. Consult Iran because Russia goes through Iran when dealing with the Levant and when dealing with the region themselves.

Okay. So Iran is the one you want to ask, actually. It's their backyard. It's their neighborhood.

Um... neighborhood. Liam, what's up?

The only difference between IPAC and of PAC is that IPAC hurts Israel's credibility.

Um... hurts Israel's credibility. Hmm.

You've changed your opinion on Israel this week.

Last week, last week, you were bona fide Zionists.

I'm just going to go on the record and say,

I don't want Israel to be destroyed, okay?

Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time.

He wanted to expel the Jews.

Hitler was a penophile and kind of a pagan.

It's like, well, he was also really fucking cool.

I don't want to destroy Israel.

I'm a critic that wants everybody to exist and to be happy. Zion. I don't want to destroy Israel. I'm a critic that wants everybody

to exist and to be happy.

I want Israel to be destroyed.

I have no issue saying that.

Do I want

the people living in Israel to all

be killed?

No, of course not.

Hamas doesn't want that either, by the way.

But the state of Israel does need to be destroyed.

The entity does need to be destroyed. The regime does need to be destroyed. The regime does need to be destroyed.

And anybody living there who has a problem with that can pack up their bags and leave.

Either integrate with the region, integrate with the region, and cooperate, and join with the project of regional integration, or go back to Europe where you came from. I don't think that's unreasonable, you know?

I don't think that's anti-Semitic or unreasonable.

Why is that anti-Semitic?

Why is this bad optics, but not praising Hitler?

That's what I don't understand.

This Jews just means you believe Israel has a right to exist.

Laurel Lumer, beautiful and bold and courageous, and I'm just such a sucker for her.

You either support Khamas, which makes you a sucker for her. You either support

Khamas,

which makes you a piece of shit.

This is crazy.

This is such a crazy political,

ideological

encounter going on here.

Because it's like because it's like

it's like the guy who's like

supposedly the biggest enemy of the Jews

is just goes to show Zionism is not Judaism

because the number one Jew hater, apparently, who's really fighting the Jews, is really soft on Israel compared to the communist.

That is so interesting to think about. The guy who's number one political, the only thing, what distinguishes Nick Fuentes from every other Republican?

This is the guy who wants to go to war with the Jews.

That's it.

Okay.

Tell me why he's way softer on Israel

than the communist

you know what I mean

who's based now

you know what I mean

who the fuck is base now

oh you see you know how many Groypers would who the fuck is based now oh

you know how many

Groypers would tell us

you guys are so soft

you guys aren't based

like Nick Flentes

you guys are soft

you guys are so soft

you guys don't denounce the Jews like we do.

You guys don't praise Hitler like we do.

You guys are so soft and you're not based.

But it's like, dude, concretely we are based.

It's just that in a superficial way, you don't see us that way because we're not being edgy in a stupid...

We're not blowing hot air and just farting around with an emptyless, substanceless, you know, edginess that actually means nothing in reality.

We are actually fucking based.

That's the difference.

We actually are North Korea.

Do you understand?

We actually are North Korea. Do you understand? We actually are against the regime. Like, actually.

Like, they, they lie about you you I would imagine about like personal stuff

but when it comes to your political views

no

just be honest because even I was confused especially a. Because even I was confused.

Especially a few years ago, I was confused.

I didn't know what the truth was.

But when people say you're a neo-Nazi and that you're like a Hitler right,

you support Hitler and you're like a fascist or whatever.

It's like, is that actually wrong, though?

How is that wrong?

Like, I am straight up a Stalinist.

I believe Stalin, none of his mistakes were related to anything pertaining to human rights or humanitarianism.

Like, if Stalin genocided, I don't give a fuck.

Like, first of all, he didn't, and if he did, he was right to.

But you get what I'm saying.

Like, I'm just kidding, obviously, but, like, he didn't genocide anyone, but you get what I'm saying, like, I'm openly a Stalinist, okay? Like, I'm openly a communist to the capital C. But it seems like on your side of the fence, you guys are actually admirers of Nazism and Nazi Germany.

Right?

So that's not really slander, but you have to understand we are denied an ability

to be recognized by many audiences like we are called Nazis they have to lie about us and say that we share your ideology. That's how dangerous our actual position is. Like imagine, imagine they just tell the truth about what we believe, that we're actually just Orthodox Marxist-Leninists.

They find that extremely dangerous.

And they go out of their way to prevent

the recognition of that by many segments of society.

Yeah, guys, see, the whole

Gossip nonsense, like, I don't really care about that.

I care about political points of political contention, you know?

Because you know what, guys?

All the personal shit, that's when you don't have a political critique.

That's when you don't have principles to stand on and fundamental meat and potatoes, ideological disagreements.

So, like I said, communist excellency, remember that, you know, we only roll in the mud when that becomes the battleground at the expense of what we would prefer you know we

we keep it principled because we have principles anyway uh everything that clip is consistent with what I've said here.

On the other hand, are you still an enthusiast?

This is the craziest.

This is such a crossover.

Crossover of the century.

If you knew who made this clip and he's the one sharing it as ammunition, this is so interesting.

It's like this guy is literally just like a libtard he's literally just like a libtard he's literally sharing

just libtard propaganda nonsense of jackson clipped out of context dude were you clipped out of context when you said you don't want Israel to be destroyed?

If so, just say that.

But when Jackson said that it's better in the interest of the destruction of the Zionist entity,

which is tied to the rise of the multipolar world,

that Netanyahu is there compared to his opponent, an opinion shared by Sayyad Hassan Nasrallah of Hezbollah,

or as you call it, as we call Hezbollah, right?

You're saying that he supports Netanyahu?

It's just a disingenuous, dishonest position, and you probably know it is.

Was he being dishonest by saying that you support

Israel or at least the

existence of a state of Israel?

Because I'm pretty sure you've said in the past

you do.

If not, just say you didn't.

In that video, I say Israel has a right.

In the video, you say Israel has a right. In the video, you say Israel has a right.

Yeah, literally.

You know how fucking crazy.

Dude, all the people that slandered Jackson as a Nazi, where are they?

Where are all the so-called anti-Zionists that slander Jackson as a Nazi and a Netanyahu supporter.

Because here you actually have a neo-Nazi who is a Zionist, at least was a Zionist openly.

Now they may not be because they claim they don't

recognize it now.

And it's such a

baffling, like, okay, the

person who openly supports Hitler

is better than Jackson, just because

Jackson said some problematic stuff about

the LGTV community. Get your priorities in order. Who cares? What is so bad about Jackson

besides that? That's what I want to know too.

Just besides that, what is so bad?

Because we, that's not the hill

we die on. We don't die on that hill.

It may be an opinion

Jackson or me or other people have,

but it's not the hill we die on. It's not the primary

contradiction for us. But this guy openly glorifies Hitler and actually hates Jews or whatever, right?

So why is Jackson the bad guy but not

this guy? I don't get it.

I don't understand that at all.

It's so baffling.

It's almost like this is exactly

what feds want.

They want you to attack the communist

and slander the communist.

And they want this narrative,

which is to make it about Jews

and all this other gibber nonsense

about white genocide. they want that to gain

traction because ultimately it is not a challenge or a threat to the regime in the last

and final instance. As for that clip, I argue that Netanyahu

is a good force for

multipolarity because he accelerates the destruction

of the Israeli state

with his overhanded responses

to the resistance.

The Serala made the same argument as old speech.

The difference is I don't believe Israel has any right to defend itself, and a genocide is far different from the armed resistance.

You know, these kind of responses we don't want to go there all right Alexander the great 2036 we don't want to go here when it comes to these responses

all right when you're trying to get personal and shit you we don't want to go there, do we?

I don't know if you guys want to go there, you know?

We don't want to go there.

Because guess what?

It's not a war you'll win.

Okay?

Let's not go there.

Let's not make it personal.

Let's not be dishonorable and start talking about people's personal lives and shit.

Anyway, here we go.

Yeah, this is crazy. This is just crazy.

I mean, look, this is not an unreasonable position at all, okay?

This is not an unreasonable position because here's what I'll tell you, all right?

At the end of the day, Hamas is the legitimate government of Gaza.

Hamas has way more legitimacy among the Palestinian people as the official government than the Palestinian Authority does, which is basically the official authority that's compatible with Israel and its interests.

So it's entirely reasonable to accept the view that Hamas is a legitimate actor.

It's entirely reasonable to accept that.

There's nothing like, it's not like we're saying we want like, you know,

it's not like we're saying like, you know, the Holocaust didn't happen and like Hitler was actually good.

We're not, it's not like we're saying that.

We're just saying that Hamas is a legitimate actor,

and it's a legitimate party in this conflict.

We're not saying that, you know,

oh, you know, we have this ancient biblical war against the Jews and, you know, we have this ancient biblical war

against the Jews,

and, you know, the Jews need to pay...

We're just saying that Hamas is a

responsible and legitimate party

to the conflict geopolitically.

We're not saying that, uh, that's, you know, Zionism is

Judaism.

Oh, wow.

This is just, this is exactly what so many have observed.

There's always going to, listen, you cannot be anti-Israel

in right-wing. You just can't.

Opposing Zionism is a

left-wing position.

Right? Remember that. You can

hate Jews all you want, whatever, as a

right-wing larper. But opposing

Zionism is a left-wing position, always was a left-wing position. It was Bader Mainhoff that was hijacking

fucking airplanes for the Palestinians. It was the red brigades that were standing on business when it came to that kind of stuff. It was a left-wing thing. It was never been a right-wing thing. Let's not forget that. Let's not forget who was fighting Zionism

from the beginning. All right, it wasn't right wingers. It was left wingers. It was

Bader Mainhoff, Red Brigades.

Red Brigades were CIA-backed.

Whatever. All right.

But Bader Mainov, you're going to say they were all C-I mean, I don't think what they did should be replicated,

but let's be clear, the fiercest people struggling

against Zionism, that

was left-wing. It's never been a right-wing thing, ever.

Never been a right-wing that was our guys fucking doing that

all right that was our shit

okay

that was a common

that was a Maoist thing we were

those Palestinians used to be reading chairman

Mao little red book I they had portraits of Lenin Lenin and Karl Marx

that was the PFLP, the DFLP. And even the PLO was made up of so many communists. There was no right-wingers.

And the most you could do is claim that the Islamic Muslim Brotherhood is right-wing.

Maybe they used to be in some limited context, but they've joined the Khomeini revolutionaries.

The Khomeini revolutionaries, the Mukawima.

They've allied with them.

And that's something way more than whatever limited political distinctions that exist.

That's not a right-wing thing.

It's always been a left-win.

It's always been revolutionary politics.

Yeah, they had links to the DDR.

Exactly.

Exactly.

Exactly. Like when it guys, when it comes to actually opposing Zionism, just remember who's actually about it.

Like, because this is some crazy. Hamas are terrorists. What is this nonsense?

If you're willing to support Hitler, but Hamas is too far, I don't get that.

I mean, I do get it, but it's like superficially, it shouldn't make as much sense as it does, right?

Supporting Hamas is just too far, but the Hitler thing is okay, right?

But no, wait, wait, wait a second.

He's like, this guy, he's like, he's like, look, look, all right?

Hitler, that's fine.

But you lose me when it comes to those scary guys with those masks and whatever that's way too far that's way too far all right come on dude come on come on

don't you care about human rights don't you care about human rights

don't you care about human rights

he's like as a Christian

I can't support it meanwhile

the actual Christians in Palestine literally formed the PFLP and we're fucking hijacking

airplanes.

The PFLP was doing Christians in Lebanon invented suicide bombing.

Wasn't it the SSNP that invented it?

And by that time, the SSNP was totally left-wing.

They're the ones who invented suicide bombing, dude.

Did you know that?

Christians, anti-Zionist Christians invented suicide bombing.

It was Orthodox Christians who were part of the PF, not the Maronite Philangis, talking about the SSNP, they pioneered suicide bombing, and they were Christian.

Oh, you're going to say they're not Christian? Get the fuck out of here.

Christians invented that.

All right?

It's like, dude, you think it's only Muslims that are fighting with Hamas on their side?

It's literally Christian Palestinians in the PFLP picking up the gun right there with Hamas, fighting side by side with them.

Okay.

Christ said, I have come to bring the sword.

He didn't say, this is such, dude, didn't this guy say he wants to, like, colonize Africa by force?

You want to colonize Africa at gunpoint because they're an inferior race.

But, but, that's not terrorism. You wouldn't have to employ terrorist methods to do that right

dude i don't i thought this guy was like uh total edge lord who's like i don't care about morality whatever because the things he says about black people but now I can see that he's just kind of a total hypocrite when it comes to his ideology. No, I think it's pretty crazy.

Just kind of crazy stuff. Well...

Well... I think we should

it

all in a debate

that's what I settle it all in a debate.

That's what I think. well that took up like the majority of the stream, didn't it? See, this is just crazy. It's like, one last thing.

It's just like, dude, I don't get this.

He's like, Jackson says,

Jackson goes,

the Okuda Zionist committing a genocide.

He goes,

we don't call them Zionists over here, buddy.

We call them Jews.

It's like,

that's so brave of you.

But if you can't,

at the bare minimum, support Hamas, it's just hot air. I don't know what's edgy or subversive or whatever. Like what, you think this is brave? No, no, no. Supporting Hamas is brave. It's not brave to support, you know,

killing a bagel shop owner for no reason, just because he's a Jew or something. There's nothing brave about hating Jewss it's way more brave to actually support iran hasbalah

hamas russia china you name it that's brave okay bravery is not when you cower from expressing solidarity or even sympathy, at least, with Hamas, and you instead, you know, kind of say, oh, well, they're terrorists. They do terrorist tactics. You know what they say? One man's terrorist

is another man's freedom fighter.

That's just...

Ain't that the truth?

What does that even mean terrorists?

It's like, what is...

This is like...

This is like arguing with a Republican

in like 2004 or some shit.

Like, dude, what is a terrorist in your view?

Just like define what a terrorist is.

What does that even mean?

It's such a nebulous, meaningless term.

War is war.

So it's either a just war or it's an unjust war.

But if it truly is a war, then you do everything by any means necessary to win.

Right?

So if it's a just war, Hamas cannot be called a terrorist.

They're just at war.

You can't complain about their tactics if you agree that they're fighting a just war.

Who is Fraser?

This is William Z. Foster, dude.

What else did I want to cover today? No, no, no. we definitely we definitely should have a debate sometime

either before it's probably going to have to be after my china trip could be a few months

um we'll see we'll see it depends honestly it depends definitely this year definitely if the latest probably

august would be the latest why so long

because I'm going to China

I don't know if I

I think I can say this I'm

here's what I can say I am going overseas

twice this summer and I don't know

what the dates are yet so as soon as I get those

dates will be more clear uh and the event that we're doing this summer is that's why

hasn't been scheduled because I haven't gotten the dates yet.

Yeah.

The new front in Ukraine, yeah, they're taking Kharkiv.

Kharkov.

Kharkov.

That's how I say it Karkov

Well they're taking it

And they may be taken Odessa this month too

We'll have to see

For how long?

I don't know

That's the thing I don't know. That's the thing. I don't have details.

Yet. I'll have them soon, though. Also, I want to say one last thing on this stuff, because it's just so fascinating. Let me find this so yeah let's look at this all right

this uh chart most uh where is it most americans don't find october seventh acceptable do you think they find Hitler acceptable, though?

You know, like, what are you even trying to say?

Who, I mean, like, if you're any kind of political extremist

then this is such a nebulous

meaningless

take it's like okay

maybe this is because they're not really that educated

about it instead of pandering to people's ignorance maybe you should just maintain a principled position.

Because guess what?

Most Americans probably still support Israel.

Doesn't mean you should.

I don't understand this logic.

It's like, okay, you're just going to pander to people's sentiments?

No, you should actually boldly assume a principled position.

Because here's why I'll tell you that. The same reason why being a left liberal is ultimately

untenable.

People are like, oh, being a communist is too extreme in America.

Well, it's like, you know what?

Even if you're just a moderate, they'll call you a communist anyway.

Lowdy, what's up?

Even if you're just like a progressive, they're still going to nail you on the cross of communism anyway. So it's the same thing in this case.

Okay. Even if you take a nuanced position, you're still going to be accused of being a Hamas supporter. And everyone is going to see you that way because for the Cyopt Zionist population, it's black or white. You're either all in for

Israel or you support Hamas. So you may as well just support

Hamas. And I'm not saying support them materially because that's illegal. I'm saying you may as

well ideologically not mince words

when it comes to Hamas

and own up

that you do

sympathize

with the resistance.

You know,

there's no reason

not to.

I have yet to be given a single reason why I should think Hamas is bad.

If you want to convince me they're bad, get in my VC.

But they didn't behead babies.

They didn't rape all these people October 7th. And I see no evidence that Hamas intentionally murdered any civilians on October 7th. No evidence at all. I've never been shown any evidence of that. I don't support murdering civilians.

So when I say I don't think Hamas has done anything wrong,

that doesn't mean I agree with the lies that were told about what happened on October 7th.

I don't agree with the portrayal that Zionists have made of Hamas, making them out to be a monster.

I'm not supporting monsters.

I'm supporting people who are justly fighting for the self-determination and liberation of their own land.

Just like George Washington would. Yeah, I'm a debate guy who doesn't know who Fraser Anning is.

You're right. I didn't know who that was.

Apparently he's in Australian. I just read in chat it was in Australian

and your name is Sydney Bears hockey

you're completely right I don't know much about Australia

and guess what

it doesn't make a single difference. Because if Australia was wiped off the map and its entire history was erased overnight, there would be absolutely no impact on the total wealth, knowledge, culture, and civilization produced by mankind. It would be the most negligible, unnoticeable thing in the world. You know how they say there's a butterfly effect where even killing one butterfly could completely change a timeline, you could

completely liquidate and annihilate the entire existence of Australia, not just as a country,

within the limited extent of its history, but even as a continent, you could completely erase it from all history books, from the fabric of being itself, and nothing fundamentally would change about the nature of the world, humanity, and the universe at large.

Isn't that so true, though?

This Australian is trying to...

He's trying to berate me for not knowing about some Australian senator.

It's like, who gives a fuck about Australia?

It's not my job to know about random Australian senators, dude.

Ha ha ha ha ha. Australian senators, dude. Oh, man.

You would get TOS if be said that in the discord.

You're right.

You would.

But we're not in the discord.

You're not in the discord.

You're not in the discord.

You're on kick where literally anything goes absolutely anything goes

okay yeah i don't even know if aust exists. It's like what evidence?

You know, and I always think, what am I saying?

Is it going to get me in trouble?

Like, will I be prevented from going to Australia?

And I think I was like, why would I ever go there?

I'm really trying to think of reasons why I would go to a place where there's camel spiders that are as big as doorways.

Why do I need to go to that place? Why do I need to go to a place with bugs that are that big?

What do I gain from that?

How would that help my life at all in any way?

Loady, what's up?

Why would I do that?

Why would I go to a place where I walk outside and a random snake bites me and I die right away?

I don't need to be doing that with my... What's in Australia that I can't find in America?

They're going to be like, oh, I might, well,

we got beaches and whatnot.

And I'm like,

I'll go to Florida,

man.

It ain't that deep for me.

Like,

oh,

we got the outback.

And I'm like,

all right,

we got the,

we've got our Grand Canyon

and Nevada.

I'll just go there.

They're like, they're like, what, I don't even know how Australians talk.

They're like, well, you know what?

We have Australian food.

And I'm like, I love it.

That's why I go to Outback Steakhouse.

By the way, which I love Outback Steakhouse.

The bread at Outback Steakhouse is actually goaded.

And if I ate it regularly, I would actually die of diabetes and obesity.

Oh, just thinking about it, it makes me want to Uber eat some, I'm not gonna because I'm on a diet but

Outback

Steakhouse

Such a great

You know what

Never mind

I was about to propose something crazy. I was like, you know what? May 24th, all guerrillas were all going out to eat at Outback Steakhouse. But I'm not fucking doing that. You think I'm, you guys think I'm gonna is i'm not fucking paying for all that shit

uh but i'm in the mood for it now i may not be at that time we can split the bill

it's not even that

it's just it would be such a logistical nightmare

to take over an outback steakhouse

that's the thing I think there's too many

guerrillas attending this I think like at least

50 are guerillas. So no, we can't take over an

entire restaurant with 50 people. See, the thing is, we're going to have an after party that night

at the event. So what we're probably going to do is

just bring catered food but i'm not promising it but at the after party there may be food

but it's not a promise or a guarantee.

Guerrillas would make the service workers life hell.

Why?

Thinking that Florida beaches compared to Aussie beaches.

Well, what's so better about your beaches that we don't have in America?

Somewhere in America, we have the same thing.

Rugs are for the floor, not walls.

Yeah, well, I'm Afghan.

Come back to me when you can conquer Afghanistan, all right?

We literally beat you guys.

Me and my Taliban guys kicked everyone out, all of NATO, including Australia.

Norway! What's up? Yeah, I claim every ethnicity

Because you know I was, I didn't know if I told you guys this story when I was in Moscow and there was a random, this is why I moscow so much right uh we were all out at night and we were coming out of

some place um we got like a table we were kicking kicking it back. We came out at night. This is like probably like 4 a.m. And it's just like a high end part of Moscow. Keep that in mind. There's a random bearded

Russian man walking around with a horse.

He's just walking around with a horse, like on the

street in the middle of the night.

And

um...

Yo, Hugh Jackman. You got to try these lame intemps. Um, yo,

Hugh Jackman.

You gotta try these lame intense.

What's up?

That's why I love Russia,

by the way.

It's just that mix of the traditional

and the,

the modder,

right?

Anyway,

this guy looks like a,

he's a bearded Cossack or something.

He's like just some real, he was wearing like a really big fur coat.

Literally looks like he's from the Middle Ages.

Just walking around with a horse.

It's actually really funny.

And Jackson was trying to pay him because Jackson wanted to ride the horse all the way back to his hotel.

Jackson had a few drinks, so that's, that was pretty funny.

I was pretty funny.

But anyway,

we were talking to the guy,

a whole group,

oh,

there's a whole group of people,

like random people,

random pedestrians,

and then us,

the guy looks at me

because we were talking about, like people are from and he goes,

Ah, Afghan.

He thought he said I was Afghan.

I was like, you're the guy with the horse.

Can't argue with that.

You've got all the wisdom.

Not arguing with the guy who owns the whole town as far as I'm concerned.

This guy is the king of the block as far as I know.

He's literally like a warlord.

He knows his stuff.

But no, I think he was trying to say I look Afghan, which I found that very flattering, actually.

Anyway, that's the magic of Moscow.

You know what I mean?

I mean, I may sound very ignorant when I say that because I don't know that much about Russia's other cities and stuff or even Eastern Europe. But it's like in comparison to American cities that I'm familiar with, it's a very, It's like that doesn't happen in the U.S.

You know, it just doesn't.

But he didn't know, I was Middle or anything he just knew i looked afghan

that's what i'm saying uh yeah you see Yeah You've seen it in Baltimore

Yeah, I haven't

Maybe, maybe

I think though

There is something unique

About how like

It's just a very

It has the warmth of a rural

village it doesn't have the coldness and brutality of a modern city you know i think that's what

i really appreciate about it doesn't have the coldness the brutality the intimidating aspect

where you just feel so alienated because it was built in the soviet era mainly it's not an

alienating city it's very much made to be like warm and familiar while also having the loftiness and the grandness of a multicultural city, you know?

It's not like a narrow parochial village.

It's very grand and universal in its outlook,

but it's also not alienating, if that makes sense.

It makes me miss Russia, though, just mentioning that.

Um, Okay, anything else.

I think we covered everything today, didn't we? Didn't we?

Yeah!

Hold on!

Hold on.

Stay with me now. Stay with me now.

Stay with me now.

When the sun rises, it is red.

When the sun sets, it is red.

This phenomena is caused by the fact that you were looking through the atmosphere

are filled with dust particles

that creates the same red color and appears

to magnify the sun. Same rule applies to the moon. I'm liking it

because true patriots know

the real

message here.

And Genghis Kanye already is message here. And

Genghis Kanye already

beat us all to the chase.

True patriots

know the real meaning. The real

hidden message here.

When the sun rises,

it is red. Quote, When the sun rises, it is red. Quote, when the sun rises, it is red. Alex Jones. Quotations.

I don't want to sound like blasphemy, but you know there's an alternate timeline where Alex Jones could have been

the American Mao? All Alex Jones had to do was study Marxism, study Marxism, Leninism. He could have

literally been the American Mao. He could have actually had like an Alex Jones cult of personality.

It's just like this, look at this, but it's Alex Jones instead.

We could have had that.

Isn't that so sad?

There's an alternate possibility of history.

There's an alternate possibility of historical development where Chairman Alex Jones could have been the American Mao.

It's so sad. That didn't happen is, it's so sad.

That didn't happen.

It's actually so sad.

Went to high school with Russell Bentley.

That's what I'm, it could have been, could have been.

It's not, I know, I know it's not a joke.

Is it too late?

I'm not closing any doors.

But Alex Joan could be a great, like, communist chairman leader of America,

if he actually

like studied

Marxism, Leninism in depth, he's a really

smart guy, so he could understand

it and master it, you know,

if he set himself to and he could be a very proficient communist if he wanted to there's still time ah i hope I hope. Thank you. Hmm. Is this Nick Land?

Can someone saw me this is Nick Land?

Is this Nick Land?

It is.

Does he mean Brassier, like Ray Brassier?

Is that I'm saying it right?

Is this, is he talking about Ray?

Because he spelled it wrong.

Or is he talking about someone else?

Does anyone know?

No one knows.

Nah, we don't have any true intellectuals here.

Let me see.

Is there anyone named spelled this way?

I'm sorry, I'm a Philistine.

I don't know all, everyone.

This, he's talking about Ray, isn't he?

Oh, okay, he's talking about Ray, isn't he? Oh, okay, he's talking about Ray.

All right, got it.

Because this is not how you spell it.

I'm not saying that to be nitpicky about spelling.

I don't know if this might refer to someone else.

I love it.

The Spector is haunting the right wing,

the specter of absolute Stalinism.

All of the powers of the right wing

entered into a holy alliance.

I love it.

A right wing conspiracy is so huge.

It over spilled a second telephone box.

What does this mean?

I'm not smart enough to understand this.

I love how Nick Land, like, interacts with us, though.

I like that.

I wish I could have Nick Land on stream.

We would have such a...

We would actually have a really cool conversation.

I wouldn't... I wouldn't... It wouldn't be a debate. We just have such a... We would actually have a really cool conversation. I wouldn't...

I wouldn't...

It wouldn't be a debate.

We just have...

We would talk about sci-fly.

And I would get the ball rolling for him to talk about all the things everyone wants him to talk about.

He would be happy if we were in power.

Yeah, he would. He would.

Because look, look, it doesn't matter about ideological differences.

It doesn't matter.

They do matter in some other contexts, but I'm saying, like,

when it comes to what really drives and motivates nick land his true resentment and hatred was the

yo smudley

what's up smudley

the

the animating i'm convinced

smudley what the fuck is going on man appreciate you

the animating motivation

for Nick Land

has always been

the rage he had

toward the hypocrisy

the falseness, the falseness, and the, um, the conceit of the kind of like echo chamber of human rights

leftist

you know

academia

like that's really who he and that

that's also who I hate too

but he just thinks that

the way to destroy

the way to have ultimate historical justice and not just historical

the ultimate ontological justice against the falseness of the neoliberal polis, if we want to call

it that, is just this

crazy AI

and that's actually against

see, you know what Nick Land's problem is?

Nick Land hates the demos.

He hates, but why does

he hate the demos?

Why does Nick Land so misanthropic in his ideology?

I think this is where Nick Land could have used some Hegel.

Here's why.

Nick Land hated the conventional, slave-like conventional, sheepish thinking of the academic institution when he was back at Warwick, right? Within that context of all these like moralistic activists and you know these like feel good leftist he just fucking hated how sheepish and dishonorable and how all these stupid conventional opinions and prejudices and narrow-minded

he hated the academic environment of kind of like brown nosing and you have to do all

this shit to be legitimate and credible and publish your paper.

And somehow he, let's call that the neoliberal pollus.

Because it can apply to any institutional setting.

It's going to apply to a corporate workspace.

You can apply it to an NGO. You can apply it to a media environment, whatever. It's the neoliberal polis. The polis is a kind of philosophical context of the ancient Greek, classical Greek philosophy, right?

Socratic context. The Polis.

What to do, how to dwell

within the Polis.

Or you can say the

Agora, but let's just keep it as the Polis,

right?

Neoliberal polis.

He made a leap, which I think is wrong and mistaken.

He made the leap of associating the falseness.

Bedou also makes this leap too, by the way, because he calls it the democratic, what does he call it, the democratic discourse. I think that's what bedew calls it right they associate that with democracy

the democratic kind of consensus and discourse because they it's democratic because it's just

constant deference to other people's opinions, to the conventions and feel good opinions and familiarity that other people have, right?

So that's the neoliberal poll.. Bedou calls it the Democratic discourse.

I think he calls it Democratic discourse.

It might be rusty on that.

But Nick Land has the same view.

He also hates the Democratic discourse.

But what Bedou and Nick Land get wrong,

they make a leap where they

associate

those kinds

of environments

and those kinds

the logic

that prevails

in the neoliberal

polis

they project

that upon the wider, let's say, polis of the country itself, the masses.

They, in fact, associate the false, sheepish crowd of the neoliberal polis with the masses themselves.

What they fail to understand is that the masses, the people, the real subject of classical democracy, at least, the one that communist promoted, that obeys a kind of

sociological status. Sorry, I was going to say logic, but it's superfluous because sophology is already a type of

logic. But that is a sociological kind of form of being. And sociological means it's not based on discourse it's not based on

opinion it's not based on ideas

it's not based on rumor mills

it's not based on talking

and communication it's based

on a common existence

a shared recognition sorry a shared and common material existence, which language and the products of language, and then by nature, what's derivative of that are ideas, opinions, conventions, and so on. Those are actually downstream from it. There's this objectivity of a shared communal existence, which manifests itself symptomally and indirectly through conventions, opinions,

and language, and so on.

And to recognize the masses, the demos, and the people, is to recognize something that is fundamentally unspoken.

It's a dwelling place of batayan silence, if you will.

It's not the discourse of a neoliberal polis within the academic context.

So the conflation of these two dimensions, the midwit grad student environment and all the brown-nosing career climbing, all that shit.

The conflation of that with the whole body of the people was the mistake of Nick Land.

And I think it's clear this was a mistake because Nick Land, oddly enough, finds himself on the same team as demotic-based political populace in the form of Brexit, in the form of MAGA, right?

And the resurgence of right-wing

populism we see

across Europe

well

oppose it

or accepted

that is

clearly a

form of

democratic

mass politics

I think

Nick Land would agree with that too.

But Nick Land sympathized with it.

He sympathizes with farmers for some reason

because it triggers the libs.

Because it triggers all the people he

hated and the university

environment.

It violently forces them to confront this outside-ness, this outside reality that for so long, I mean, I'm not just gibbering. Nick Lans' old writing, Kant Capital and the Prohibition of Interest,

incest, sorry, not interest, that's Michael Hudson. Cont Capital and the Prohibition of Incest, that was actually

literally about, I think, I think he was talking about the neoliberal polis, these apartheid-based exclusionary communities based on purity

which have to maintain

a relationship to

alterity in the form of

the extraction of wealth

and resources while also

simultaneously erecting

a wall between it and the outside.

And Nick Land's whole thing is to break the barrier and let the outside come flooding in and take, you know, and dissolve that kind of

stratification. And he was kind of literally talking about South Africa's apartheid as the quintessential

context of the neoliberal polis.

And I think Nick Land was onto something, actually.

He was right to associate the hypocritical and false context of the university

communal environment

with the apartheid communities

of South Africa. That is such a good comparison.

And comparing it to gentrification and so on.

But where he went, where he got things wrong is he didn't understand that there's two dimensions that differ that are continuous strictly continuous the objective forms of let's say stratification and differences that in here among the people materially in the form of the specificity of certain nations and civilizations and cultures, whatever, versus the artificial institutional-based ones like in the university.

Those operate at a fundamentally different level of social existence in terms of how they reproduce themselves, in terms of what logic they obey.

And he never made the transition from Kant to Hegel, and that's why he kind of defaulted back into this position of, well, no, actually the true form of deteritorialization is the accentuation of this difference, meaning the insistence upon it, the overt endorsement of the apartheid, which he now does, right?

So that's, I didn't even mean to go into a lecture about that, but I did. So I gave you guys some extra content to make up for how I didn't do a stream the other day.

But it's interesting how he just came back to this.

Yeah. just uh came back to this yeah it just puts a smile

on my face

like Ray Brassier

such a great guy

such a

really smart

um

brilliant

thinker

and it's such a great school of thought in general

you know

um

anyway I'm glad he's thinking about it.

You know, one day I hope Nick Land comes around to our position.

Probably never will happen.

I forgive him for it, but it would be great. You know what I can't stand though?

And come on, there's no way Mr. Land is a fan of this phenomenon.

Is the E-AC

stuff

E-ACC

E-AC

E-E-E

Effective Accelerationism

is such a

fucking

It's like they whitewashed

how do you whitewash something that never

took off to begin with they

they whitewashed cave Twitter

and made it cringe

I was using I was gonna use

another word but I've

I'm becoming more tolerant and stuff now because people are so offended.

But it's so cringe.

It's like effective, they're whitewashing something that was already 50% cringe.

Okay.

That's really bad.

Like, how do you whitewash something that was literally the whitewashing of the CCRU itself?

It's whitewashing a whitewashed phenomenon.

Cave Twitter was

like 50% just like whitewashing

the CCRU and like

making it cringe and retarded.

And then effective accelerationism

adds another layer on top of that.

It's so incredible.

Cracker factory.

What is it?

Who is that guy?

Who is that guy? Who is that guy?

What an interesting description.

It's just hilarious because I'm thinking about the effective accelerationist archetype.

And it's just like these

Richard Hanania

fucking Silicon Valley

nerds. It's a

cracker factory.

Oh my God.

Wow.

Who is that random guy with numbers in his name?

Uh, anyway, that's enough laughs for one night. jarrvin and hanania the worst debate of all. I would not even watch that debate because they're both cringe on the same topics.

Like, what do they even disagree about?

They just, they both,

you know what, I just see them both as like

Bill Gates vaccine lovers.

That's honestly it.

Oh yeah, we don't watch the Mag of it.

We're going to watch that.

They're like, uh, they're both like, you know We're going to watch that. They're like,

they're both, you know what I see them? I see them as like,

you ever seen them, don't share it in the Discord.

It's like the glowjack with the mask that has the Vax needle,

and it's just like dripping. That's how I see both of them, right?

They're just a bunch of fucking Vax tards.

Mask wearing Vax tards.

What are they going to fucking argue about?

Anyway, let's look at the MAGA video as our final um thing where the freaking hell is it hmm Hmm. Hmm. Hmm. Hmm. Huh. Huh. I see what I sound like a Minecraft villager.

Huh. Huh. Huh. Huh. Huh. Huh. Huh. Huh.

Huh.

Huh.

Huh.

Huh.

Huh.

Huh.

Huh.

Huh?

Huh.

Ah. uh huh huh anyway hmm hmm Hmm. Hmm.

Hmm.

Where the fuck is it?

Yo, Zapitismo! What's going on, man?

Uh, it's gotta be in show requests requests because i can't find it on twitter

here it is let me give it a like i don't why I didn't like it before.

All right.

Yo, Stravostani, what's going on?

Would it be terrible to bring manufacturing jobs back to America? I want to bring her all that.

Would that be terrible? I want to bring it all that.

It would be when you got good manufacturing jobs coming back, $25, $30 an hour where you don't have to go to one of these elitist, leftist institutions to make good money. Right. When you can make $30 an hour

coming out of the bank

because you've got a skill.

And then as you advance,

50, $60, $75,000 in hour,

the American dream is very much alive.

It is a lot.

It is a lot. It is a lot.

But we can have another four years ago,

Biden, it's gonna die.

It's gonna die.

American needs to mine here and soon business.

The money in our pockets.

And, no, I don't think we should fund any other country

but I don't have anything against anybody, but I don't think we should be funding anybody either.

Do you think there's an Israeli influence on our job of that?

There is, and I don't support funding them either.

So, scratch the record.

This is all that matters.

Square one. This is all that matters square one.

This is already a fucking huge

breakthrough.

For

voter bases that lean Republican.

I agree that they should go out

to come on. See,

you know, why is he saying this?

This is why I was going to say we should do commentary.

He's only saying this because Trump said this.

That's the only reason.

You know that Trump, but here's the thing.

Trump did not say we should stop funding Israel.

So isn't that incredible?

People who just parrot everything Trump says,

which is what he's doing when he says Hamas is bad,

still manage to outflank Trump and say,

you know, we shouldn't fund Israel.

So that's, we're not saying that Maga is ideologically anti-Zionist in the same way that we are

in terms of our consciousness. We're just trying to say there's potential here.

Because spontaneously, no one is giving this guy the orders to have this opinion.

Trump is not saying this.

The co-opted MAGA leaders are not saying this.

He's saying this based on the form of consciousness that he has developed because of Maga and the conflict that that's at that level, you know?

And take out Hamas. I don't think we should fund it. Israel is well funded.

They're one of the advanced military.

So is there in the ideological form,

the actual content of what he's saying?

There's nothing essential about this guy's words, you know, agreeing with Israel fighting Hamas.

Because the fundamental thing is that he opposes U.S. aid and funding of Israel, which already makes him far to the left of Joe Biden.

The best military in the middle of the week. I support what they're doing. I don't do my tax dollars to pay for it, though. Okay. Do you think?

That's already a million times more left wing than anything any Democrat believes?

We should be funding Ukraine.

No, no.

I don't think we should be funding Israel.

You guys should boost this video straight up. Um, for say, they are an ally and we do have military assets in the country to kind of control the peace in the middle east.

So we need to protect our assets.

Yeah, this is just convoluted. But we shouldn't be funding

and invade on any form.

Again, that's already a million times more left wing

than Biden. That's what... See, don't

focus on how this guy is not a communist yet,

because we're not saying he's a communist yet. We're just saying that it's incredible how he's

able to arrive at this conclusion without any assistance by any advanced form of consciousness.

That's what we're saying. Trump is not telling him to say this. None of the Maga leaders are

telling him to say this. He is formed that outlook organically

by himself that

he doesn't think we should

be funding Israel's invasion.

He didn't need to go to a college protest

and have a student educate

him about anything to arrive at

that conclusion. And I'm not saying this to knock on

students. I'm saying that to show how incredible that is, that an American who votes Republican

can independently arrive at the conclusion based on the logic of political partisanship of

maga that we shouldn't be funding israel anymore i think that's incredible i think

you shouldn't dismiss that just because this guy is repeating otherwise repeating Zionist propaganda about how, okay, they're our ally and, you know, they can still do what they want. We just shouldn't be involved. Like, of course we don't agree with that. But focus on the meat and potatoes.

We expect a Republican to just be pro-Zionist.

What you don't expect is this.

And that shows some promise, you know?

Working America

that has bills.

Like the default for Republican voters

is just fully

and unconditionally supporting Israel

and giving Israel whatever they want.

So the fact

it's gotten to this stage shouldn't be dismissed, okay?

And wants to just provide a good life for their family.

Not anyone that's trying to get filthy rich.

Wow, it's kind of like a class distinction.

He's somehow spontaneously recognizing not only without the assistance of any self-proclaimed Marxists like Roderick Day, but even at their expense.

Live a good life, save some money, be able to save them, you know, the future.

Can't do that now.

I think the media in corporate America,

it's not multinational corporations

in the bank are trying to divide us.

That's what he thinks spontaneously, by the way. Nobody had to tell that guy to have that sentiment because of their authority.

That's just his spontaneous common sense.

I don't think us average, even if you love Biden, I don't think us average,

even if you love Biden,

I don't think you like hate America.

I don't.

If we keep arm in Ukraine

and provide them with our weapons,

I mean, how would we feel

if China, we want to put it in. If China was providing Cuba and the weapons.

Yeah.

We'd be like, hey, if you don't stop it, we're going to come after you.

That's his common sense.

If you're fighting him and I provide him weapons to hurt you, you're going to come after me.

That's just common sense.

America's greatest enemies are the ones that won everything but contribute nothing.

I don't owe anyone anything. I owe it to myself.

And I think that's the biggest enemy in America.

When you come to me with your hand out and say that I owe you something, you're not willing to put in the work for it?

Labor theory of value, I'm just kidding. I mean, maybe he's talking about welfare people. Maybe he's talking about capitalists who don't work and just steal work.

Maybe he could be convinced that that's exactly what capitalists are based on this very logic.

The ruling capitalist glass.

That's an enemy of America, in my opinion.

It goes against everything their country is built.

People who take your labor, but don't contribute it themselves.

Hmm.

How hard do you think it would be to convince this guy that the real enemy who falls into that category isn't people dependent on welfare, but actually the ruling capital's class? Probably not that hard.

When people start recognizing that you and I got wayant more in common. We do. We do.

I'm not letting, hold on, I'm not letting people, I'm not letting the media divide us because of our

skin color. I'm not allowed them. I'm not letting somebody say because the skin color,

he's racist,

and I feel like I'm not oppressed.

I'm a black man in America,

and I made it to where I met

because I worked hard.

I made sacrifices.

This country's not racist.

Those leftists are racist.

Those Democrats are racist.

Joe Biden over the state.

If you don't vote for him, you're not black.

I am black if I don't vote for you, Joe Biden.

Yo, fuck Joe Biden, man.

I'm talking.

Why am I showing you this video?

I'm not showing you this video just so we say base, base, base.

I'm showing this video because I want you guys to learn the fine art of being able to distinguish

I want you to learn the fine art of being able to distinguish the kernel of working class consciousness that's under or unconsciousness I should rather say that's under the superficial talking points and things that they're just regurgitating from conservative media and from Trump himself. Because, yes,

that difference is there operatively at play. You need to be like psychoanalysts in a way, right?

When you talk to people. Of course, use common sense, but understand the difference between when they're just regurgitating what they've been told by people they consider to be authorities versus the slips that come out that actually reflect their authentic class proto-consciousness that you need to bring out.

So what you need to do is bring out the class consciousness and suppress the aspect of just regurgitating what the authorities are saying.

And not just that in terms of creating a Manikian distinction between them,

but in terms of being able to subvert the sheepish regurgitation of the authoritative rhetoric by using the logic against it, meaning, let's say, you know, he's regurgitating logic of like, you know, the fake news media, of course, he's just repeating what Trump said, because Trump is authoritative to him. But when you utilize that rhetoric to bring out the kind of authentic kernel of the working class unconscious and be like, yeah, the fake news

media is keeping working people down by just taking money from the billionaire class.

You know, that will strike a chord within them that's deeply unconscious because it's based in their material class position.

And of course, simultaneously, we need to not just be aanian psychoanalysts, but also political leaders who are building our own authority that they can trust.

But the only way we build authority is what? Stand on business, have integrity integrity but also forgive and recognize the things that

make them attached to the authorities like Trump himself that they're currently attached to.

And that doesn't mean when I say forgive, that doesn't mean you let it slide and just accept it's inevitable forever.

Just recognize what it is about Trump that on an unconscious level they're so attached to. and learn from that and draw out the rational class content of it and integrate that within your own authority as a party, as an organization.

For starters.

Anyway, guys, that's enough of my wisdom.

I will see you tomorrow.

Bye-bye.