🔴 RED PILL NEWS | FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸 | PUTIN IS GOOD 🇷🇺

Gentry, what's up, brother?

I see you.

How's it going?

Appreciate you with the five.

What is up gorillas?

First things first, uh I've been meaning to do this.

Ah, it's been a long time coming, hasn't it?

It's been a long time coming.

This is a major decision I'm about to make.

Also, I gotta stop being so crooked on these streams.

I gotta very awkward setup.

Let's uh Woo That's not happened ever.

I don't think I've ever done that.

But uh why the hell was it so big?

It's always been so big, so unprofessional.

Um I think it suffices to make it that size.

How much better is this?

You know, much better.

You guys, by the way, you've never seen this space.

Ah, I digress.

We're not going to take up.

Too much time.

I don't have a lot of time.

First of all, mysteriously, uh I'm not that paranoid yet.

But like I've gotten very sick over the past two or three days, very sick.

Uh, I don't know how that happened.

I don't know if Joe Sims poisoned me.

That's literally a joke.

I'm not that paranoid.

But nonetheless, um

It's a miracle I was able to get that uh tweet out detailing what happened at the convention, 'cause I was that was the day I was the sickest actually.

So over the course of the convention, which began Friday, I was constantly calling and getting updates of the people on the ground.

Um, but I was very sick.

I was actually going to go to Chicago myself.

But I figured that if I was caught with the delegates men there's many of them, by the way.

I mean, we're talking dozens and dozens and dozens of guerrilla delegates.

You know, they would have it would have just been purged automatically, you know?

So I I uh figured it was not wise for me to go to Chicago.

But uh in any case

If you haven't read the tweet, I'll basically give you a brief summary of what happened at the convention.

So, first of all

I hate having to repeat myself, but I feel like I need to because people don't appreciate the theoretical significance of this strategy.

And I want to drill it into you, you know?

Alexander the Great with the five.

What a great.

What a great contribution.

Thank you, Alexander the Great.

What a great contribution.

We are not entryists, okay?

We're not doing entryism.

This is not some cynical ploy to use the party to fulfill some ulterior motives.

Uh call it theological, but we believe in the Communist Party.

We believe in the integrity of one Communist Party.

And we don't believe that everything is a matter of ideological or even programmatic or strategic content.

But the party itself as an institution is the Communist Party.

There is one Communist Party.

I suppose this is because of our

unique synthesis of Marxism-Leninism.

For example,

At the height of the Cultural Revolution, uh there was a lot of extremism which declared the Soviet Union fascist, declared um the revisionist countries as fascist.

And in spirit this was a correct analysis.

In spirit, only in spirit.

But in practical reality it was Comrade Banana with the five.

In spirit, on a spiritual level, this was valid.

Paperwind, what's up?

Make CPUs a great again.

Oh yeah.

You guys have to forgive me, I'm still very sick.

Uh

But in any case, uh

highly congested, you know.

Yeah.

In any case, uh spiritually this was a correct rhetorically it was correct.

Because the revisionist clique that hijacked the world communist movement

Bears the greatest responsibility as far as the dissolution of the proletarian dictatorships themselves, not only in the USSR but in Europe.

and elsewhere.

However, materially speaking, the USSR was still a proletarian dictatorship.

It was still ruled by a Communist Party.

It was still a Socialist State.

The Red Guards were correct about Khrushchev and the dangers of revisionism.

But frankly speaking, it would have been too excessive to declare

This ideological difference, which is very important.

I'm not downplaying its importance, but it would have been excessive.

To declare the ideological difference

As grounds for uh

Mm-hmm.

The the the total dissolution of the the the infrastructure.

of the proletarian dictatorship itself.

This is why at the end of the Cultural Revolution why did it end?

Because eventually it threatened the integrity of the party itself.

And that was a red line.

Redshift 29.

You know, Western Maoists, even people like Alain Badiou, they will confess this.

The cultural evolution taken to its logical conclusion, taken to its extreme.

Pose the threat to the party itself.

I mean, to just dissolve the party basically and then throw China into an anarchy of some kind.

It's all very well to be badou and envision that out of this anarchy a new form of the proletarian dictatorship experimentally could arise, but be pragmatic.

Here, then and there in China, China is under siege by the world.

At the very minimum, it has built and consolidated a proletarian dictatorship.

It hasn't even developed the productive forces.

It is so vulnerable.

The wise thing to do was precisely what Deng Xiaoping did, to put an end to the madness, the gang of four,

And to pursue a a policy of rapproachment based on pragmatism with the socialist states.

He sent letters to them.

He said, listen, we've had our disagreements, but you know, this these extreme reforms, this is no good.

You should protect the integrity of the proletarian dictatorship.

Finally, to Yeninman, 1989, that was the test.

And

Because of the wisdom learned from the Cultural Revolution, they didn't give in.

And to this and now China is the best living example of uh defining communism in the twenty first century.

So our synthesis of Marxism-Leninism is very unique because we actually don't oppose the Cultural Revolution.

We don't condemn it as one huge mistake.

But simultaneously we also uh

We also agree with um

the contribution Deng Xiaoping made to Marxism-Leninism.

We agree with the decisions that he and his uh allies made and when Ott when Push came to shove.

And that's a very unique kind of understanding of communist history.

But it's an understanding that.

takes us away from the kind of um

I don't know what to call it, the Gonzaloist or Western Maoist line, which declared that the communist systems and states.

to be lique liquefied and may as well be the same as fascist dictatorships, uh i i i takes you away from the ultra left deviation, basically.

We reject the ultra left deviation that was born as a consequence of the Cultural Revolution.

And so I'm talking to you about history, even though you're here to hear about the CPU SA,

Because it's this specific analysis of the history of Communism and this specific synthesis of Marxism-Leninism

That led us to the conclusion that we don't have a right.

To

Um create a party from scratch.

I mean, we don't have the the historical legitimation to do that when there's already a Communist Party.

And, you know, like every uh every criticism in the book

Has validity, all of them.

It's a revisionist party.

to Reformist Party.

Sam Webb, I mean that was the he was about to liquidate and dissolve it.

But it wasn't liquidated.

The leadership is corrupt, yes.

Again, every they they lack vision, whatever, everything in the book.

But that's not so a sufficient pretext to declare the Communist Party liquefied.

You need to appreciate that.

To declare the Communist Party.

Dissolved.

Takes a lot more than some guy.

Making a bunch of criticisms about their strategy or their program or their ideology, it takes something historical for that to happen.

Had Sam Webb dissolved the party, that would have been what happened to it.

You know, if some elements in the party today who want to liquidate it and have the CPUSA merge with the Working Families Party, again, that would have been the same consequence.

But this hasn't happened.

It's still the Communist Party.

So there's a very.

That's why.

We are so attached to the CPUSA and additionally

I have always held the conviction, which I believe to be rooted not just in intuition, not just belief.

but also a more holistic

uh Gestalt, a more

Mm.

A more integrated outlook and understanding of the direction of world history.

Deadly Dothraki, what's up?

I have always held the conviction.

That the CPUSA is a macrocosm.

of America itself.

It's the trick of the microcosm and the macrocosm.

The C P U S A is a puzzle box.

Call it a Rubik's Cube.

Or a

Or that funny little box from Hellerazor, maybe.

Uh

But that's what it is, it's very marginal, it seems very insignificant, but it's a puzzle.

If we can solve this puzzle.

If we can conquer the CPUSA,

We can conquer America itself.

I've always held that conviction.

It doesn't even occur to me as a question.

If we can solve the riddle,

of how to conquer the CPUSA.

There is no mountain, there is no obstacle,

that we couldn't surmount.

CPUSA first, America itself next.

I believe that with all my heart.

It doesn't even occur to me.

To think twice about it.

If we could conquer the CBUSA, nothing would stand in our way.

Nothing, literally, nothing.

And I mean that.

Okay.

It's a puzzle.

And part of that puzzle is being able

To master the dialectic of organization, how can we outmaneuver the leadership?

How can we?

see to the victory of the correct line in the correct position, through the procedures and the form of the party itself.

How can we do it?

This is not a matter of manipulation.

This is not a matter of trickery or deception.

Yeah.

of the Stalinist way, collectivism versus individualism.

Where we subject our own convictions, our own beliefs, our own opinions.

to the discipline of a collective organization whose leadership is totally at odds at us.

And prove the correctness of our position, not just by repeating it in word, but through the form of the party itself.

Prove the correctness of our position formally.

Through the form of the party itself.

through being able to prevail on the primary condic contradictions that plague the party from within itself.

Yeah.

I know.

because I'm being sent their internal communications.

that various figures and leaders within the party are now blaming us

for the objective contradiction within the party that was over resolution five.

The controversy surrounding Resolution V was not of our doing.

That was an objective contradiction.

How do I know this?

Because many of the Red Libs, the Red Liberals, also objected to Resolution Five.

And my guerrillas were in cahoots with them.

We worked with them.

Now they didn't know who my people are, they still don't.

Okay.

But

The sentiment was in the party.

It wasn't just my gorillas who had that sentiment.

Okay?

I'm being honest.

I'm not being manipulative right now.

It's not strategically wise for me to say this.

HDG, what's up?

Because the strategically wise thing to do right now is to lie and just say everyone.

Who was against Resolution 5 was my guerrilla, and that way they purge everyone and then thereby purge their own people.

But it's just not the truth.

It's just not the truth.

The tension over Resolution five was an organic contradiction within the party.

And I instructed my guerrillas to on that question.

Vote with her conscience.

I told them that they don't have to just, you know, be sycophants for Joe Sims or the leadership, you can just go with your conscience.

Yeah.

So

So uh

Wow, I'm really congested.

Resolution five was the main

contentious issue within the party.

It was the main thing dividing the party.

And

The thirty second convention this weekend was a referendum on Resolution five.

And it wasn't a referendum on infrared, it wasn't a referendum on our synthesis of Marxism Leninism, it was a referendum on the very concrete and practical issue of whether the CPUSA should continue to be a uh dog of the Democratic Party.

Whether the events in Gaza have changed people's minds about that.

And it did.

It did, and the leadership knew that.

They knew that.

And uh the trouble is

The trouble is, is uh I'm gonna just put it a long story short and then get into details, but uh and then I'm gonna go, you know.

Briefly, I'm gonna go clear out my nose because I can barely talk right now because how sick I am.

But um

The National Convention was just rigged, almost openly rigged, like fully rigged.

It was a rigged convention.

And it was I I I would say it's a coup.

And I'm gonna justify that and uh elaborate on that, but it was rigged.

It wasn't rigged because we didn't win.

It was rigged because

ourselves plus many other uh you know uh uh many other elements within the party did not prevail, w uh of which we were just one one grouping of.

There was uh many other types of people who have nothing to do with me or Midwestern marks even.

Who agreed with us.

And it's my opinion that they formed.

Uh a majority.

The delegates, we don't know if the delegates voted as a majority because some of them were so pressured by the leadership because there wasn't a secret ballot that was allowed.

So some of them caved in.

And were too scared to reject the uh Resolution Five and voted in favor of it for that reason.

But when it was voted on, the votes were not counted.

And it was just declared that it was split and that it's going to go to the National Committee.

The National Committee is handpicked by the leadership.

That means it's going to pass without a majority.

That's rigged.

That's a coup.

The election was stolen.

It was a stolen election.

And this was the only one that mattered, by the way.

Because I'm not stupid.

All right, guys.

I was never under the illusion that by this convention we were going to take over the party in the sense of getting into the National Committee as a majority or in the sense of being voted as chairs of the party.

But

I was confident that we could alter their stance in relation to the Democrats.

And we were very close.

We were very close.

It's just that they rigged it.

They literally just rigged it.

And by the way, Sunday, the day after, I didn't tell you this in my tweet, every single person who voted against Resolution 5 was scolded as a misogynist and a racist and a bigot who is making um people of color feel uncomfortable.

Because of uh because of the way they voted.

That's another huge violation of the CPUSA constitution.

But here's the best part.

Some of the peop a lot of the most prominent voices who objected to Resolution 5, one of them was a black woman.

And every single person who scolded,

The uh naysayers, if we call them that.

The anti-democrats were white, they were white men.

Understand the hilarious irony of that fact.

Yeah.

Now let me uh clear out my nose so I can yeah continue talking about this.

Alright.

Um let's continue.

Um so people were scolded for the way they voted, which is ridiculous.

I mean there were so many I we have a whole list of uh constitutional violations at that convention.

What I just mentioned to you, tip of the iceberg.

The very convention rules that established it would be a voice vote that wouldn't be counted

That was passed unconstitutionally.

There is an objector.

And if there's even one objector, it has to be discussed further.

And they were just ignored.

Every single person who forwarded.

I mean, you have to read my tweet.

I don't have it strength or energy in me right now.

I'm so sick.

Uh

To even summarize the whole thing.

But I'll just tell you the things that I didn't mention in the tweet.

Okay.

I'll tell you for example that uh

Fuck, I uh I don't know.

I think I have COVID or something.

It's crazy.

But um

Uh I could tell you that, for example

Many people were trying to raise motions, objections.

They just totally were ignored.

And this is a clear these were all clear constitutional violations.

But I think the biggest constitutional violation of all

Was

Well, in general, the fact that this was a vote over Resolution 5 and there was no proper procedures in place for the elements, very prominent elements within the party, Red Saffron, what's up, man?

The very prominent elements within the party to have a voice dissenting against it.

I mean, there wasn't a lot of discussion on these resolutions.

It wasn't these weren't adopted in a democratic way.

The National Committee is not a very democratic organ.

The slate that was chosen for this uh new National Committee was handpicked by leadership.

Clubs had no say.

The the clubs had no say in these resolutions.

Everything was dictated from above.

And Guerrilla Born.

Wow, Gorilla are born with the ten.

I wish I could be louder to thank you, but I uh

As you can see, I'm uh

My immune system is destroyed right now.

Can barely talk.

But uh

Get some water.

Ah, yeah, it's not going to really do much.

Um.

No, I uh I'd like to strongly uh emphasize

That it was rigged and there was a coup and uh

When it's rigged and when there's a coup that changes things.

That changes things, okay?

Yeah, the clubs submit the resolutions before the convention, but it's the national committee that decides if those resolutions pass or not.

So that's it wasn't there, wasn't an ability to have a voice against the pro-Democrat policy.

And you know, think about something for a second.

How dare the so-called leadership of the CPUSA?

Make it as though supporting Democrats is some kind of non-negotiable orthodoxy of Marxism-Leninism.

How dare these corrupt sellouts, some of whose own comrades were just not years ago, preparing to liquidate the party entirely,

How dare they proceed with the pretense that there can be no discussion or disagreement on this topic?

How dare they shoehorn Resolution 5-3 as though it's some kind of implicit non-negotiable that the only Communist Party should be subservient to the Democrats?

According to whom?

According to whom?

The threat of fascism in the 1930s, a term they keep confusing to the point where the leadership tried to propose a resolution to redefine the definition of fascism itself.

to something that justifies their corrupt position.

and which has nothing to do with the historic and noble anti-fascism of Communist parties throughout the world.

The threat of fascism in the 1930s was not a threat of bigoted people who disagreed with you about abortion or affirmative action or trans rights or gay marriage.

The threat of fascism in the 1930s was about militarism.

It was about war.

It was about war.

It was about aggressive militaristic powers that wanted to invade and destroy the only proletarian dictatorship on earth.

Communist parties had a duty and an obligation to make anti fascism the primary contradiction because it was a real threat.

And if the fascist threat was not a threat that bigoted and mean people

Yeah.

It's ridiculous since when is these boomers who run the CPUSA, they're just older people who watch MSNBC all day, and they're trying to impose that upon really true believer Marxist-Leninists as though it's some kind of communist orthodoxy.

I'm sorry, but your inability to understand current events beyond the lens Rachel Maddow provides you doesn't entitle you to dictate.

All opinions within the party.

I mean, you have i i it's one thing to have such a stupid, dim witted view in the first place, but to have the audacity, to have the gall to dictatorially impose

In a way that circumvents the democratic centralism of the convention, to dictatorially impose that view and make sure that nobody could disagree with you or speak out against it.

How dare you?

How dare you?

Really, how dare you?

Shame on you.

Shame on you, really.

Shame on you for shutting down open discussion and dialogue about this at the convention, by the way.

I'm not talking about the necessary unity of action that comes with democratic centralism.

I'm talking about the national conventions in which party policy and strategy can actually be decided and discussed democratically.

And they completely.

Overturned all of that.

Uh

Shame on that.

It was a coup.

Of course it was a coup.

Of course it was a coup.

Joe Sims sees to it that every single person slated for the National Committee nominated supports his line and and what do you know?

Unanimously they all decided to revote for Joe Sims to be chair.

Uh that's a coup.

The whole thing was rigged, okay?

There is no trace of democracy whatsoever and

I wouldn't be saying this in 2014.

I wouldn't be saying this in 2019.

Because I know that even in 2019, despite the Bernie Bro phenomena,

quote unquote.

still took for granted the idea that Democrats were to the left.

But after Gaza

Where even Amnesty International is turning on Biden?

After Gaza, even when these liberal human rights organizations are turning on Biden, and you're still riding with Biden?

Honestly, what's wrong with you?

What has gotten into you for you to think that this issue can't be discussed even?

I mean, it's become it's it's become contentious.

It's no longer a given, at least.

And not just from us.

People are starting to reevaluate their view of the Democrats, and that is also true within the party itself.

Because new facts arose, new circumstances have arisen that changed everything.

And you shut all of that down.

You prevented any possibility for discussion and disagreement over that.

You totally.

Shut down the possibility that that resolution would not pass.

It had to pass because it's what the leadership, quote unquote, wanted.

And I'm calling them quote unquote leadership.

Because it's clear they're not the ones in charge.

It's clear it's the Democrats who are in charge, it's the FBI who are in charge.

It's clear they're just serving some other master.

I think

So the party is occupied.

The party is occupied, the

Formally, now it's formally occupied.

Why?

Because this was the first convention that they fully rigged.

Every other convention.

Even if they rigged it in previous conventions, there was no major issues that had such a level of contentious status.

That could justify the view that it's rigged.

We're not defining this formalistically because we understand.

A Communist Party doesn't abide by bourgeois formalism.

It's not constitutionalist formalism, okay?

It's the it's a living understanding of how political authority works.

I understand Marxism-Leninism very well.

Okay.

But

The whole purport, the whole essence of democratic centralism.

Is to resolve contentious issues within the party and disputes within the party.

And this was such a dispute, the only dispute, for the first time in the history of the party since God knows when.

And and the fact that they bypassed that democratic process entirely.

Means that in a way that's unprecedented, Joe Sims has assumed a dictatorial power within the party.

It's it's a coup.

Democratic centralism has been overthrown.

They have forced their view on everyone

In a way that has bypassed the consensus of the party.

They've just forced it on everyone.

You disagree with them, then you're going to get kicked out.

What the fuck?

Uh

So it was a coup.

There's nothing else to call it.

It was a coup.

And could we have seen this coming?

Actually yes.

I I talked about it before, but we knew this would come.

We just didn't know how they would do it.

We knew they wouldn't.

peacefully have their position challenged.

But we had the law on our side.

We had the sacred laws of the party on our side.

And by having them do this.

We now have formally

Proven what we wanted to.

Not just in terms of ideological criticism or political criticism.

Put it this way.

Imagine there's an election.

And one president doesn't win.

Like he knows he's not gonna win.

So he says the elections are suspended.

I'm um deciding that the election is contested and we're gonna send it you know, I don't know, we're gonna send it to um

My own special counsel that I appointed, and they're going to decide who the president is.

Like, the international community would regard that as a coup.

Well that's what happened within the party.

That it's a coup.

There's nothing more uh there's nothing else to call it but a coup.

The procedures, the form of power within the party itself has changed.

It's its own.

formal basis of legitimacy and credibility has been usurped.

The party's been usurped.

Stolen and read.

And now it is a matter of record.

The best pan leftists, ultra leftists, and others could do before

was criticize the ideological content, the strategic and programmatic content of the party.

But never could they prove within the internal formal procedures of the party itself that the party has become usurped.

And this is what we have proven.

We've proven that.

And now is the most decisive stage of the CPUSA twenty thirty six initiative since its very inception.

That stage has begun now.

So what are your orders?

Yeah.

Firstly, it is a matter of formal truth.

It's a matter of record.

that the Communist Party, USA,

has been usurped.

Now that is a matter of formal, formal proof.

The party is now occupied and has been usurped.

The status of what the Communist Party in this country is is up in the air.

It's like imagine there's a civil war in some country and you don't know who the government is.

So what are your orders?

Firstly, if you're within the party, stay in the party.

Continue your Takia.

I promise it won't be long.

Like when I say it won't be long, you need to trust.

If you're not in the party,

Before the convention, I told you that if you weren't a delegate, you don't even have to bother.

Now

We want human wave tactics.

I want you I don't care who you are get your grandma, get your family, I don't care, flood the party, just flood it, just flood it, join it in mass numbers.

And uh

Yeah, have a minimal kitakia where you're not gonna join you're not gonna fail to get approved when you join.

Flood your local clubs.

Just flood them.

Just join in mass numbers.

Specifically

If you have small clubs, just recruit like dozens of people.

Doesn't even matter who.

Flood the party.

Just flood it.

Just flood the party.

Join in mass numbers.

Why am I telling you this?

So that we could do for the next convention?

No, don't worry about that.

We're not just doing the same thing we did before.

That there has been a coup with the party requires an answer and a response.

I don't think anyone's gonna see the response coming.

Uh

I obviously can't tell you it here because it's important that they don't anticipate it.

But just understand.

Understand that we are not the only ones who are pissed off about this.

And I'm not just talking about the infantile Red Libs.

Many prominent old guards within the party are not happy about this.

They're not happy.

And they're old guards, okay?

They're not just our people and the infantile uh red lips.

They're they're they're

They're old guards, you understand?

This summer, this summer, this summer.

Okay.

We are taking the party back.

That is what I can guarantee to you.

But how we do it will surprise you.

How we do that is what's going to be surprising.

But it's happening this summer.

We didn't want to do this, by the way, we were forced.

We preferred

to do it a different way, but alas

This has been planned for months.

And those of us

Planning agreed we would not do it unless something like this happened.

If there was a clear majority who voted for Resolution five, we wouldn't be doing this.

But that convention was rigged.

Even if we ignore the vote on Resolution 5, which was the only decisive vote, even if we ignore that, the whole thing was rigged.

This summer.

We're taking what belongs to us.

This summer

You will see what it means.

For a party.

Brutal Stalinist.

You will see what the meaning of that is.

The meaning of a party itself.

The sacred meaning of the party itself.

What is that meaning?

You'll see it this summer.

Everything has been building up to this since 2021.

Three years.

Imagine.

Imagine those gorillas for three years.

who then became delegates.

Dozens.

We're talking about dozens and dozens and dozens of people.

Australia's standing.

Imagine the discipline, imagine the maturity, imagine the experience they got from that.

Kraz.

2020, and we're doing it in this summer, and I'll tell you why.

Because this is the election that's going to matter in America.

Dark Stalin.

This is the election.

that may very well

lead to the collapse of the United States of America as we know it.

And the Communist Party needs to prepare for that, and it will prepare for it, because it will either die or it will live on the basis of being responsive to that fact.

The fate of the Communist Party USA hinges upon whether it is responsive to the impending collapse of the United States of America, whether it's responsive to the inability for the current political polarization

to be resolved within the so-called democratic system itself.

Just like the democracy within the CPUSA is rigged, so too is the democracy of the United States rigged, and their fates are intertwined.

Just like the United States will collapse, so too

If nothing is done to respond to the situation, will the party collapse?

And there are forces within the party waiting to liquidate it, to merge it into the Democratic Party or the Working Families Party, and they want to destroy the CPUSA itself, destroy the only Communist Party in this country.

We won't let the Communist Party fall in the way the United States will fall.

The party, just like America itself, will be reborn.

amidst this contradiction.

The that that I am not

Even angry at Joe Sims or any of them for having an incorrect analysis, I pity them for how unable they're a how unable.

they are to understand what's happening in this country.

They think it's just fascism from the nineteen thirties.

No, it is a it's a purely destructive process that's happening.

It's a contradiction that only a Communist Party can make sense of and can articulate.

Yeah.

I'm sorry, Joe, you're gonna wake up one day and turn on MSNBC and Rachel Maddow is gonna tell you she gave up on trying to understand the current events in this country.

And you will be lost.

So does that mean the Communist Party should be lost with you, just because you can't see beyond MSNBC?

everything we know about the nature of politics, everything we know about the nature

Of statehood will be re-litigated, is changing.

It's not just a political realignment.

Everything, every precedent you're drawing from the past to understand.

Oh, the Democrats are more left, or Republicans are, everything is getting scrambled and jumbled in a way that's totally indecipherable.

They think that because Democrats draw upon the legacy of the Civil Rights Act, that that makes them more progressive.

But

The dream, the aspiration behind the Civil Rights Act.

is precisely what the Democrats killed.

In cohoo in collusion with the Republicans, of course.

I think the Communist Party leadership would prefer to forget the fact that Martin Luther King was killed and in all likelihood killed by the FBI itself, and then his legacy was totally co-opted and consolidated.

By both the Democrats and the Republicans alike.

And in the name of that legacy, all this other nonsense that had nothing to do with the civil rights movement.

Ah this

This uh this this divisive, nonsensical

A game of pitting a people against each other by race, turning questions of socialism into questions of welfare.

The application of the just struggle of black Americans in the South, the

The twisting of that struggle to be a a struggle for what?

Sexual madness and sexual minorities?

What is this madness?

What is this utter madness?

And and the and unquestioningly Communist Party members went along with it.

Why?

Because Angela Davis told them to?

Why should it not be relitigated?

Who Angela Davis is and where she comes from.

How is she a communist?

Where did she come from?

Who is Marcuza?

Who is Marcuza, Joe Sims?

Her teacher, Marcuza.

Who was that guy?

Was he a communist?

Was he a communist?

Or was he a

Marxist dissident

A Western Marxist.

What did he have to do with the International Communist Movement?

Nothing.

He was just a libertine Trotskyite.

And his influence through Angela Davis is to determine

And liquidate.

The core principles of the founding of the party itself.

Why be a Communist Party if you're gonna abandon Marxism-Leninism?

I digress.

It's too late for these arguments.

We've been making them for three years.

The only difference now is that the party has been usurped in a coup.

Uh

Who killed MLK, Joe Sims?

Who killed him?

Who killed MLK?

It was the very same Democrats you claim honor his legacy.

It was the FBI.

It was the institutions of the real fascist dictatorship that you defend in the name of defending democracy.

What is democratic about the FBI?

Have you forgotten?

J.

Edgar Hoover, who hunted down Communists like animals,

Through the FBI?

Of course you have it, because the FBI has infiltrated the party itself.

What is so democratic about the CIA and big pharma and the military-industrial complex?

What's so democratic?

About the dictatorship of monopoly capital.

Oh, because you don't think they've come out in the open and declared it formally that it's still a democracy?

Wake up, Joe Sims.

We've been telling you to wake up for three years.

Our democracy is not just a flawed bourgeois democracy, it's not a bourgeois democracy, it's a theme park.

It's a theme park that they theme as democratic, but in reality is nothing

Nothing close to democratic.

You can't just kill MLK and kill all the voices of American democracy and then claim we live in a democracy.

The whole system is rigged and you know it.

That's not a bourgeois democracy.

It's not as though it's not as though it's just that all politicians are bought off by big money, so it's corrupt.

No, there is a full control of the state by an unaccountable fascistic apparatus, a shadow state,

And you call that defending democracy.

What democracy?

You're seeing democracy right now in Gaza.

Thirty thousand civilians killed, Joe.

Is that what you're defending?

Someone at the convention had the audacity to yell

How does letting Trump win help Gaza?

Excuse me?

If you, the Communist Party, had any say

In whether Trump or Biden wins, by that same logic, you could also force yourself to win.

You don't have the power to begin with.

All you have the power to do is control your own integrity.

To determine where you stood in the record of history at this time, to preserve the integrity of the party.

That's what's within your control.

You're not going to let Trump win or not let Trump win.

It's not within your control, but it's within your control to authentically respond to the historical events as they're unfolding, to this new era and chapter of history in this country.

That's what you should be responsive towards, and you're not doing that.

You're saying we need to defeat the MAGA fascist threat.

Let me even if I granted you that, do you think the Communist Party endorsing the Democrats helps their cause when most Americans have negative views toward communism?

Kamala Harris sent you a letter, Joe, telling you to fuck off, excuse my French.

Because your endorsement of her was bad optics.

I don't know if you guys knew that, but she literally did.

So even by your own logic, it's such a bankrupt position to take.

Ugh.

Uh

I'm not the leader of the Communist Party.

I've never fashioned myself the leader of the Communist Party.

So by what authority, by what right, do I have to talk in the way that I'm talking?

Who am I?

Just some guy.

I insist only upon the authority of my belief, and nothing else.

Not my person, not my position, not my standing, but my belief, my faith.

I defend the authority of my faith, my faith in communism, my faith in the integrity, the truth of Marxism-Leninism, my faith in the integrity of the history of communism, my faith in the American working class, my faith in the Communist Party itself.

I carry that faith.

As a standard, as a banner.

That's my authority.

And I need nothing else.

But words that come from that faith.

I need nothing else but a voice that reflects that face.

A voice that reflects that faith.

for thousands of people to recognize it and to see it as in fact their own.

And that is precisely why I've been able to flood your party, our party.

With so many members loyal to this belief, not loyal to my person, not loyal to my face, not loyal to myself, loyal to the belief.

In communism with a capital C, the belief of what this party can do to change the course of history.

To change this country.

It is on the basis of that authority, and that authority alone.

That I declare the Communist Party USA to have been usurped.

Belief is what you lack.

You lack faith, you lack belief, you don't believe it any more, you don't believe in it, you don't believe in Marx and Lenin and Engels and Stalin and Mao.

You don't believe in it.

And yes,

Belief is a core, key part of science and what science is.

You don't believe in the integrity of history of Communism.

You don't believe in this.

You don't have faith in the revolutionary masses, in the working class of this country, in the truth and validity of this position.

You don't believe in it.

You only believe in the Democrats.

You consider

Communist belief to be a

an ancillary detail to some broader and overall faithfulness you have to the nonsense and sewage you watch on MSNBC.

I disagree with that.

My faith in America is the same as my faith in Communism.

The same thing which leads me to believe that this very country is possible is the same thing that leads me to believe that Communism reflects

The secret and riddle of history itself.

The resolution of mankind's history, the resolution of mankind's existence and its being.

the key of mankind's existence.

Yeah.

I may not I may be a nobody, you're right, I'm just a streamer, I'm a nobody.

I don't have any authority in the party in terms of my rank.

In fact, I'm banned from the party.

But I have something that you don't have.

I have belief.

I have faith.

And you can mock me all you want.

You can laugh in my face all you want.

But here's what I could promise you.

In the coming months, you're gonna see just how far faith alone

can take you.

Uh with that said, ladies and gentlemen.

I don't believe there's any other business that needs to be addressed.

They think they're simply gonna get away with this, and they won't.

That's my promise to you.

Not only will they not get away with it, we've been planning and anticipating this for a very long time.

To those gorillas.

I mean I shouldn't be saying this yet because you should sit your ass and stay in the party.

Keep that in mind.

But I will say

To those guerrillas that stayed in the party, that had the discipline, even those that became delegates.

your efforts, your time, your energy, I promise you, I swear to you it won't be in vain.

All the energy and effort and time you spend doing that, I consider it the same as what I'm doing at my post here.

I will never allow the time and energy you sunk into that party to be washed down the drain.

Any more than I would allow my own time, my own investment, and the entirety of my whole career to go down the drain.

And make no mistake, these guerrillas the future they have in the Communist Party, they will be rewarded.

They will be rewarded.

Their efforts will be rewarded.

Shout out the comrades, and that's actually what they are.

successfully engaging in Takia from California.

Special shout out to all of them, but in particular.

They wanted a shout out, so there it is.

Glory will be with those who had the patience to endure this project.

And make no mistake.

This is the thing that separates us from any other sectarian party that goes down the shitter because some guy decided that you know he couldn't contain his spanking fetish or something.

That okay.

Okay.

That concludes it.

I'll see you guys either tomorrow.

or Thursday.

Bye-bye.