It has begun.

Can't get, can, can, or around the reason?

I'm, I'm also asking for a...

Can't, can, can, I'm also asking for a... Can I get, can't get get I'm so asking for a

Can I

Can I get

Can I choose it

Around the

Can I get

I'm so

I'm so working for

Can I get Can working for Can I get, get, get, can I choose it

All around there are so many reasons

Different colors

A million faces

All around there is some people crying. Are we losers?

Just don't choose it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

For a wonder, there are some people crying.

I'm real loser. I'm just don't choose it. and we're wondering so we're all right and the world

yeah

I'm going to

do that all the people are losers just

a loser

all the

wonder there's

many reason

and

many

faces on

a lot of people

I'm

losing so confusing and all All around there is some people crying Are real losers

Don't use it

All around there are so many races

Different gutters

Million faces

All around there is some people

crying

Are real losers

Just don't use it

I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose it? Can I choose it?

On a run there is some people crying

Are real losers just don't use it

I'm gonna run there are so

I'm so

I'm so looking for

Can I can I I choose it?

All around, there are so many reasons, different colors, a million faces.

All around there is some people crying.

Are real losers?

Just go choose it. I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose us

Can I choose it

For a wonder

There's some people's right yet

Are we losers

Just so confusing

I can't have a I'm going to be able to do you I'm going to get a I'm I'm

a man

I'm I'm don't

I'm I'm

I'm

and

I'm again I'm drag

I'm

so many I'm so many reasons we can't call it

all around the rise and we're all around the rise of

crying I'm not real losers

so confusing

all around the razzop all around the razzop all around the reason i'm also I'm I'm I'm so asking for a

can I'm also asking for a

I'm also asking for a

can I can I can I choose it

I'm a roared so Can I choose it? All around the rows

So Can I get

I'm so

Can I

Can I Can I choose

So many reasons Different colors a million faces all around there is some people crying are we losers just don't choose us i'm also asking for a better future Can I choose her

Can I choose it

I want to wonder

There's some people

Yeah

I'm going to be a loser

So you're still I can't

I can't

I can't

I'm going to do that To do this To do this I We're Two-Less

To be

Two-Bose

Yeah

I'm

Yeah

I've Two-Belt

And

I'm

There are

There are There are many

reasons

We have gotten We are We are guys All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around are some people are quiet, are we are losers, so choosers.

All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there is some people are crying.

Are real losers? Just don't use it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it? Can I choose it can i choose it

but around there is some people crying are real losers just don't use it

around there is some

can get i am so looking for it.

Can I, can, can I, can't, can I choose it.

All around there are so many races, different colors,

a million faces

All around there is some people crying

Are real losers

Just don't choose it

I'm also asking for a better

future

Can I choose us

Can I choose it

For a wonder There is some people crying Oh Can I choose it? Can I choose it?

I wonder if some people are crying

Why are you losing?

I'm just so confusing.

I can't like to know, can't, I get on my head, I'm going to do that.

To be true be We're in

We're looking at

We're looking at We're talking

We're losing

We're losing

We're wondering

So many reasons

We've got to

meet your faces

We're wondering We've all crying I'm a real loser All around there are all around there is some people crying

All we're a real loser

Confusing

All around the razzop

Gany

Gany

All around there is some can get can or around the reason

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm so asking for a

Can I can't

I'm also asking for a Can I get I'm also asking for a

Can I get get get can I choose it

I'm around the rung

I can get get I'm so asking for a

Can I get also working for Can I get

Can I choose it

There are so many reasons

Different colors

A million faces

On around there is some people crying.

Are real losers?

Just don't choose it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose us?

Can I choose it?

For around there, there's some people are crying.

I'm real losers. Just don't know I'm wondering some people are crying so I'm a loser

Don't do that

Yeah Yeah I wonder

There's

Many reasons

There are

There's many reasons

We've got to

Many colors

A million faces

I wonder

Some people are crying

I'm an illusion

Don't choose Oh my

Luzes Oh the All around there is some people crying. Are real losers? It's confusing.

All around there are so many races.

Defense colors, million faces.

On around there is some people crying.

Are real losers?

Just confuse it. I'm also asking for There is some people crying. Are real losers?

Just confuse it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

But our under is some people crying.

Are real losers?

Just don't choose it.

There are so many reasons. Can I get, can I choose it?

All around there are so many races

Different colors

A million faces

All around there is some people crying

Are we losers

Just confuse it I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose it

Can I choose it?

For I wonder

There's some people are crying

I'm real losers

Just go confusing

It's We don't know We're just I'm going to use And we're

I'm

I'm

a need I'm Yeah I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm just

I'm I'm

I'm All around the rise

Many reasons

Only press colors

We are all around the rest

We are crying

I'm a real loser

Just a

All around the round there All around the reason all around the reason

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm choose it

I'm a

Can I'm it? I'm around there are so

I'm so

I'm so looking for

a lot, can I

can I choose it

There are so many reasons.

Different colors, a million faces.

All around there is some people crying.

Are we losers?

Just don't choose us.

I'm also asking for a better future Can I choose her

Can I choose it

I'm wondering if some people

Yeah

I'm going to lose

I'm going to be a loser

I can't get

I'm a better

I'm a better

I'm going to be choosers Tooters I don't know We're gonna Two years

To be

Yeah

I'm

Yeah

I'm gonna

Twoers

Oh

I'm

I'm gonna have so many reasons

I'm black colors And you're black colors And you're on faces All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there are some people are quiet, a really loser,

so you're going to be.

All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there is some people crying, are real losers, just go fused it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it? Can I choose it?

For around there is some people crying.

Are real losers? Just confuse it.

A run there is a...

Can you get, can I'm so good

Can I, can I, can I, can I choose it

All around there are so many reasons

Different colors

A million faces

all around there is some people crying

Are you losers

Just don't choose it

I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose it

Can I choose it For Can I do that?

I wonder there's some people crying.

I'm always losing.

We don't do that.

We don't do that.

You do that.

And can't get to do that.

And we don't get to do that. It's true And then I am

When I am

Jesus

It's the illusion

I'm gonna

have some many

recent

We've got to

We've got to

put in your faces

So I'll run the So we're crying I'm all in you All around there is all around there is some.

We are crying.

I'm only losers.

You're confusing.

All around the rattle.

All around there is something.

All around there is something. Can't get, can, can, or around the reason?

I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm so asking for a...

Can't, can I'm also asking for a

Can I get get can I choose it?

I

Can I get get I'm so working for a

Can I get get i'm also looking for can i can i can i choose it

all around there are so many races

different colors

a million faces

all around there is some people crying.

Are we losers?

Just don't fuse us.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose us?

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

For a wonder, there is some people crying. I'm not we we're all right Yeah

I'm sorry we're losing

So we're so

I'm

When I found

Toon

Toad

Toad Toes

We're

We're

I'm Yeah We're in a few more Two-ers

Confusing

And I wonder

There are so many releases

We've got to

black colors

Young faces

And I wonder

Some people are crying

I'm a real loser To confusing Oh All around there is some people crying. Are real losers?

Confusing.

All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there is some people crying.

Are real losers?

Just don't use it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

But our under is some people crying.

Are real losers?

Just don't choose it. I run, there are so... Can I Can I choose it?

All around there are so many races

Different colors

A million faces

All around there is some people crying

Are we losers

Just confusing I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose us?

Can I choose it?

I'm going to wonder is some people

running it

Are we losers

Just so confusing

I can Can I can't my illusion It's so confusing I'm

Yeah I'm here

I'm here

To be too

Yeah

I'm here

I'm going

I'm going

I'm here I'm here I'm here I'm making reasons I'm All around the rise

Many reasons

We've got us

All around the rise

We're all around the reason

We're both crying

I'm not we're losers

Just using

All around the All around the racoom

All around the reason

All around the reason

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm so asking for a

Can I'm also? All around there are so

I'm so working for

Can I get, can I choose it

All around there are so many reasons.

Different colors.

A million faces.

All around there is some people crying.

Are we losers?

Just don't choose it.

I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

I'm going to wonder with some people

cry, yeah, I'm going to be a loser

There's no excuse her

Can I get

Can I get

Can I get To do that You can do that Yeah Yeah I'm Yeah

I'm

Yeah

I'm

Yeah

I know

I'm

Yeah I'm Yeah I'm

So there

So many

reasons

I've got got got it and Yeah I'm yeah All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there is some people crying, I'm not a loser, so confusing.

All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there is some people crying, are real losers, just don't use it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it? can I choose it

can I choose it

want to run there is some people crying

are real losers

just don't use it

I'm going to run there is

I'm so I'm so working for

Can I can't get can I can I choose it

All around there are so many races

Different colors

A million faces.

For a wonder, there is some people crying.

Are you losers?

Just don't choose it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it? Can I choose it?

I want to wonder if we go quiet, how are we delusioned?

I'm so confused.

I can't get a baby.

To be true.

Yeah.

Can I get. Can I get a little bit better I'm scared

When I'm going to

I'm going to cry

I'm crying

I'm going to

I'm a lot of

many reasons

I'm going to

leave your faces

I'm going to I'm going to I'm crying I'm really All around there Leave your faces All around

There is some We're crying

We're really

Losers

Just

Just

All around

Rous

So

Yeah

All around There is I All around There is I can get can or around the reason

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm so asking for a

can

I'm also asking for a

Can I get get get can I choose it

I run the

Can I get get get I'm too

I'm too

I'm too working for Can I get, get, can I'm so working for

Can I, can I, can't, can I choose it

All around there are so many reasons

Different colors

A million faces

All around there is some people crying.

Are we losers?

Just don't choose it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

We're going to run there is some people crying so I will lose us. We don't do that. We want to run there. So we all cry, yeah,

but now we lose us.

Don't do that. We don't do that. We're gonna be I'm trying We're losing

Don't use it

All around

So many recent

We're friends

calling

We're gonna

We're trying

And we're Losing Don't use it All around there is some people crying Are we lose it?

Don't use it

All around there are so many races

Different colors, million faces

All around there is some people crying

Are real losers

Just don't choose it

I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

Or around there is some people

crying

Are real losers

Just don't choose it

Around there are so

Can I can't get

I'm so working for

Can I can

Can I choose it

All around there are so many races

Different colors

A million faces

All around there is some people crying

Are we losers

Just confuse it

I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose it

Can I choose it

And I wonder

So we go quiet

I'm not

We're losers

Just don't choose it Can I can I I can losers I'm just so whizers I'm going to

see that

I'm going to see that

I'm going to

get on

Jesus

and I'm around there

are so many reasons All around the round so many reasons Many reasons We are facing

We are around the road so we are crying

I'm not really losers

Come to choose

All around there is All around there is

All around there is some

All around there is some

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm choose it Can I'm also? All around there are so

I'm so

I'm so working for

I can I

Can I get

Can I choose it

There are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there is some people crying.

Are we losers?

Just don't choose it.

I'm also asking for a better future

Can I choose it?

Can I choose it?

For a wonder, there are some people crying

I'm not real losers

I'm so confused

I'm going to get

Can I get

Choose it Choose us We're going to be able to be able to be

Two users

We're out there and we're off and we're

A few users

The other

There's so many reasons

We've got got us We're on faces All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there is some people are quiet, a lonely loser, just confuse it.

All around there are so many races, different colors, million faces.

All around there is some people crying, are real losers, just don't use it.

I'm also asking for a better future.

Can I choose it future can I choose it

can I choose it

on the round there is some people crying

are real losers

just don't use it

I'm not around there is

I'm so

I'm so I'm also working for

can i can't can i choose it

all around there are so many races

different colors

a million faces

for around there is some people crying

are real losers

just go choose us

I'm also asking for a better future

can I choose us

can I choose it?

I want to run the list.

We go quiet.

Why we're losing the loser?

Don't do that.

Can I get a

can I and I can't

be a

too much?

Can I? Can I? Can I? Jesus Two Jeter And then I

can

And then I

can

Toes

We're

A lot

So

I'm wondering

So many

recent

We've

got us

We've got

And

we're

faces

Yeah I'm We've We've on crying I'm really daughters and we are faces we're on the road

so we're going to cry

I'm a real loser

It's what I'm

a

no I'm and what I know

I'm

I'm

and

I'm a I'm a I'm not

I'm

I'm gonna be a lot of me I'm gonna

I'm gonna

I'm going to be able to be a lot.

I'm going to go.

I'm

I'm not

I'm I'm't know I'm gonna go and I'm gonna go and I'm gonna get a time I'm

a

I'm I'm I'm going to I'm

and

I'm and

I'm not I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm What is up everybody? Let me look at this. Australia, Stanley. What's going on, man? The minister, Bakero, Orbital, J.B. Wolf. What's going on, guys? Good to see y'all. Good to see y'all.

So, we have a really interesting stream lined up today and a lot of interesting things to talk about.

I mean it.

But the first thing I want to clarify is that last stream left on a bit of a cliffhanger.

It was a pretty shocking thing.

Being confronted with such a sick, degenerate, twisted world, and also, you know, it's...

We shouldn't be surprised by it, but it is always a little bit surprising to see the extent of Nazi collaborationism.

Jonathan! I've been advised

to not really talk

that much about such matters

by

you know the legal team

because it's going to just be handled

legally at this point

but I'm

only bringing it up

because

the day after

Nikki, the Higelian,

Nikki,

messaged me and provided me some really

compelling evidence that shows that Anna's claim that

Nikki had some kind of debt with these people and that Nikki was like into drugs and whatever

was not founded on reality.

Of course, you know, I can't really definitively say that Anna is guilty of collaborating with these Nazis and conspiring with them.

Although she did just, we did just see an appearance of her with them at some art gallery just a few nights ago

her and the thug shaker Rachel Siegel

Nazis so

yeah Anna's behavior is super suss.

And the reason I'm saying that, Orvo, thank you, is what she said about Nikki is super suss, given what Nikki provided me and showed me, which is that this whole narrative about Nikki owing them a debt had nothing to do with drugs, nothing at all.

Rachel Siegel texted, you know, said something about, oh, Nikki owes me a debt because I helped introduce her to this art scene.

This was a bunch of fucking nonsense.

Okay.

But I know that we were just taking Anna's claims at face value.

Sue is, what's up?

Okay, hold on, guys.

I know that we were taking Anna's claim at face value that Nikki owed these people some kind of drug debt or something for cocaine or whatever.

But I have been shown some pretty compelling evidence that shows Nikki did not owe them anything and that Nikki was not into all these drugs or

whatever as Anna says

I think it's super weird she would say that

and

we're gonna the DOP is going to continue

investigating the matter but the reason I'm saying

it is that, you know,

Nikki's offline.

She doesn't really want to deal with drama.

She doesn't want to deal with any of this shit.

So I'd appreciate going forward if you don't, you know,

keep spreading this claim that she had a drug debt.

Because the whole notion of any drugs or any drug debt was completely a Nazi fabrication. Just point blank.

I didn't know the extent of whatever Nicky was involved in. Loady, what's up? I didn't know the full extent of whatever Nick Nikki was involved in.

Loity, what's up?

I didn't know the full extent of whatever Nikki was involved in because we didn't control her.

We didn't manage her. We didn't have oversight

over everything she was doing.

But she would give us tips, tip us off

when there were dangers and people trying to fuck with us and

move against us. But ultimately, you know, we didn't control her. We didn't anything. So when

Anna said that, I didn't know. I really didn't know, right? But Nikki herself messaged me and gave me evidence

that contradicts what Anna said about her, right? So the only people who were into drugs,

the only people into ketamine and cocaine and all this stuff is Rachel Siegel and

Zoltan themselves. That's where the drug shit, that's the only people, they're drug addicts.

What else can I say? Okay. I don't pry into the personal business of ACP members.

I see no evidence of drug abuse within our party.

I'm sure people maybe smoke weed sometimes.

I don't really...

I discourage that, but

I don't see evidence of any

drugs anywhere near our party,

right? And, you know,

as a final note,

you know, I guess,

I want to critique how you guys handle slander when you're fighting ops, okay?

Because I notice this a lot.

Someone can literally be like, oh, ACP trafficked cocaine from Columbia and

Haas was there doing it himself

and because you guys

are so certain that it's a

bullshit made up lie

you'll just respond with

okay fuck you fat retard

it's like you know what?

I want you guys to get out of this in-group,

self-satisfied mentality

that just because you're confident in something

means that bystanders know the truth

because they fucking don't, okay. And the subject of all of your

interactions on X absolutely need to be external observers. So just smugly asserting your satisfaction

that you know the truth is a form of gatekeeping.

Just because you know the truth, and moreover, just because you're educated, just because

you're in the know, doesn't mean others are. So you always need to be keeping in mind who the subject of your

interactions are supposed to be it's not your only your fellow guerrillas you know it's the it's the people

who don't know you guys need to understand that 95% of the people following any of this shit are undecided,

meaning they don't know what the truth is.

They don't know who to believe.

If you're not making front and center of everything you're doing on social media

and effort to persuade and convince these people who genuinely don't know you're being a

gatekeeping bitch and you need to fucking stop i'm not saying all of you do that some of you

do a pretty good job of keeping

that in mind. But I do notice that some of you, I'll see a post, which was just like making a

crazy accusation against us. And it's like, I'll see nobody actually push back for the people who don't know.

Like what about the people who don't know what the truth is?

Are you just going to leave them behind?

All the guerrillas know the truth.

We all know the truth here.

But, you know, when you start having this mentality like well we know the truth fuck everybody

who's not in the know it's like that's such a gatekeeping mentality and what you're basically

saying is it's like this in-group like circle jerk i don't know what to call it it's just like

this in-group self-satisfied smug thing where you're like oh you're not part of my group then you're an

idiot and it's like what makes you different than like these crazy gatekeeping leftists

from five or ten years ago?

You know, don't follow the same patterns that lead people to not you know not be one over to our side because

this hat and honestly we're not scared that people are going to go over to the leftists in

the long term they're not what's actually going to end up happening and I'm

witnessing this with my own eyes

is that the leftist pipeline is just going to the far right right now right the leftists are just

going to all become nazis like at this point right so you're helping the fascists you're helping the far So you're helping the fascists,

you're helping the far right,

you're helping the neo-Nazis

when you're not properly communicating the truth.

Be like Jackson.

Okay, I mean, look, Jackson's great.

Jackson is great, but that's not what I'm saying.

Okay, so that alone is a lack of discernment in terms of what I'm actually trying to fucking tell you right now.

Jackson is not involved in discourse at all.

I'm not telling you to be uninvolved in the discourse.

I'm still telling you to be in the

fucking trenches, okay? I'm

just telling you that

stop replying with posts that

are like, you're a dummy, ha ha, fuck you.

Because

you're not helping when it comes to the people who don't know what the truth is.

You need to be like Volkvulture, is what I'm trying to fucking tell you.

You can laugh and mock people a little bit.

That's fine.

I'm not saying that's totally off limits.

But why is it that the Volk vulture

style post, which directly

and irrefutably refute

the claim being made,

gets two likes, and the guy going,

nah, nah, you're stinky, gets 40

likes. That's the shit I'm sick

and tired of seeing.

You need to

actually like be, you don't have to copy

Volkvulture, but like, when someone is

talking shit, you need to

just, you need to

just fucking respond

like with substance

with the view that the

subject of that interaction

is going to be a bystander

who does not know who decide with

when someone is making a positive claim

okay when somebody goes, you know, Jackson is the CIA, and you respond with, and he goes, Jackson's the CIA because of LaRouche and here's Tulsi Gabbard and all you respond with is

shut up bitch

if you're a bystander

who does not know what the truth is

they're going to side with the person

actually putting forward

positive information

they're not going to side and agree with the person who's not giving any information or any clarity about what's being said or what's being talked about.

They're just going to go with the person who's at least trying to describe reality with a little bit of determination. Okay.

So this is gatekeeping behavior when you're not substantively responding directly with evidence,

with fact, and so on and so on.

And the reason many of you don't do that is because you don't understand.

We are not like leftists.

I want to very much clarify a big delusion that I see sometimes where people pretend like our community is just as given as like Democrat liberal leftists

or Hassan Pikers community or

something

and can you stop with that

delusion because that's not the

that's just not the case

maybe for them they can get away

with just saying oh you're stinky ha ha because they are not in an army

they are not in this conscious militarized info army whatever you want to call it that has a specific

goal that it's accountable and responsible for they are just

casually acquiescing to the democratic party and the powers that be so they can get away with not

with with having unprincipled discourse because principal discourse

is not the foundation

of their social existence

principal

discourse is at the

foundation of what this

army is. You would not

be in this army, probably not, if I did not constantly demonstrate

discursive dominance and superiority over the enemy.

You probably wouldn't fucking be here, okay?

So principal discourse is at the foundation of what this army is.

Unprincipled casual association based on cowardly acquiescence implicitly to the Democratic Party,

that's what characterizes Hassan Piker and leftist communities.

Not us. I'm not saying you have to be autistic and be totally rationalistic, completely 100%.

I'm just saying principal discourse focuses on substance. It doesn't have to be totally rationalistic.

But for fuck's sake, even if it's just from an optics perspective, focus on what kind of optical

message you're trying to give. What are you actually trying to say?

It doesn't, again, follow me very carefully. You don't have to be rationalistic. You don't even

have to be like Volkvulture completely. You just have to have the bare minimum of a conscious

awareness that the subject of whatever interaction you're getting involved in is not going to be us it's going to be someone who's neutral and on the fence that's the subject of your interaction, okay?

Stop this circle jerk shit where you're just patting yourselves on the... That's what they do because they can take shit for granted.

We can't.

They can take shit for granted and we can't, okay?

We are not swimming in millions of dollars we're not some established

powerful institution that that has the reins of power already you bet your ass the burden of

principal discourse follows on us i'm not saying you can't have memes i'm not saying you can't have memes. I'm not saying you can't joke.

I'm not saying you can't mock people who are being vicious. I'm not saying that you can't be funny.

I'm not saying that. I'm just saying focus on what actually matters.

When crazy shit is being said about us, don't just think from a perspective of, oh, I know this is wrong, so I'm just going to laugh at this.

Because not everyone knows the truth.

Okay, that's all I'm trying to say.

Not everyone knows the truth.

Okay?

Yeah, don't take our movement for granted.

That's the worst, most stupid thing you can do.

Our movement came from nothing. You understand? The minute you take for it for granted, it will just become nothing. Stop taking it for granted. It's not for granted. It has to be actively defended and communicated constantly and always.

You have to constantly communicate it.

You have to constantly maintain discursive supremacy.

Okay.

You know, the people that they fear are people like Volkvulture.

I'm sorry to say, but they do not fear a random guerrilla idiot that's just calling people names.

They just, that's not, they're not scared of that.

It's not substantive.

But they do lose their mind and they do freak out when they see a Volkvulture actually like debunk their shit and totally like shatter them discursively that's what you need to focus on discursive supremacy absolutely okay so that's i don't want to have to repeat myself i don't care if you

have to take notes you need to reinforce this for all the other guerrillas in the infrared movement. You need to tell them this. You need to make sure the message is heard loud and clear. So I want you to be absolutely clear on on how you move going forward when you are fighting with ops in their replies and shit.

You absolutely need to know who the subject of the interaction is.

It's not us and it's not them.

It's the neutral people. Most of our our and this is the second part of this

conversation which is more analytical in nature it's less of a critique of you it's just more

of an analysis that i think is useful for us to understand why why some why do we have dedicated ops and dedicated haters?

I can pretty much summarize it for you and completely hit it on the nail, you know,

whatever, hit it on the head, whatever they say.

Okay, you know, don't fucking misunderstand me because

this is my frustration. Okay, dastard. Dastard here is

saying effort posts only. Didn't I say the opposite of that

though? Ones if you heard me loud and clear that i literally

said the i didn't say effort posts only that's not what i said okay i just said when effort is demanded

okay then that's when you should make effort.

When the thing that's at stake is the consciousness of a neutral observer, that's when you need to make an effort to win their consciousness over. That's not always the case.

Not every interaction you do has to be rash. I'm not even saying they have to be rationalistic

or effort posts in the Volkvulture sense. I'm just saying you need to have an awareness of the purpose.

Even if it's just meaming and mockery, have some purpose to what you're doing. Don't just send out signals because I am not an idealist when it comes to communication and I'm not a

rationalist. We're not here communicating pure logic and pure ideas. I get that. It's all signals.

It's all tendencies. It's all social signals. That's what's going on. I'm asking you to have an

awareness about what you're signaling and what you're actually communicating, what tendency, what

that's what I'm asking you to do. I'm not saying to stop having a vibe-based mentality and just like have humor and whatever.

Like, I'm not telling you to stop being a mass movement, okay? I'm telling you to stop being

fucking stupid about who you're addressing, who the subject is.

I'm not telling you that you can only be this super serious Volkvulture type.

Volkvulture is a unique person. I'm not telling you to copy him. What I am telling you is that the purpose of fighting the Info War is winning the consciousness of people outside us who have not yet, who have not yet found the infrared vision, or who have

not yet been persuaded by the ACP even, right? Not all of you are America, so it's not always the

intention. But regardless, it's always about winning the neutral observer who doesn't know what the

truth is yet.

Okay?

And you know what would be really useful is if you guys start getting into the shoes of people

who, um um of yourself before you found infrared put yourself in the

shoes of yourself before you found infrared and operate like that what would be the best way you

know think about it like that and okay some be the best way? You know, think about it like that.

And, okay,

some examples could be useful.

I'll give you one.

Let's say someone makes a pose saying,

Eddie snorts cocaine and beats up puppies.

Okay, we all know it's false,

but not everyone knows who Eddie is.

Not everyone knows, you know, a...

So what, so what?

So how should you reply?

There's two ways you could reply.

Shut up, bitch!

Okay, thanks for cing that claim to the enemy

For a neutral observer who wants answers

Or you could just say

There's no proof of that

Or you could just say, what the fuck are you talking about?

That's retarded schizophrenic nonsense.

Like it doesn't have to be a Volcker.

Serious stuff is fine.

I'm not discouraging that.

I'm not discouraging serious stuff either.

I'm just saying the essential thing is that you actually stop having this circle jerk mentality that everyone fucking knows what's going on because that's not true.

99.5% of people who are watching this shit don't know what's going on. They don't. So you need to

fucking focus on that. You can even mock them.

Fine.

Call them a schizophrenic retard for saying that.

But don't ignore that claim.

Don't just let people say that and fucking ignore it and then respond with fart noises.

Don't just ignore what they fucking said, okay? Imagine if you were not in this movement yet and you saw someone claim that Eddie beats up puppies and you don't

know who Eddie is, you don't know anything, wouldn't that make you be like, oh, I don't want anything to do with that?

That's fucked up.

Like, that's what I'm trying to say.

Like, a lot of you take for granted the movement that you're already here.

You don't do enough reflection on what it actually takes to bring someone into this sphere

you know because you know this this idea that oh if you believe that then you're already

should be written off that's just then why why did you why were you on board

for maga communism okay can you think for a second how fucking stupid that mentality of anyone who believes

that is okay really what about maga people who believe that Mao killed 500 trillion

people? Should they be written off because of they believe such a stupid thing? Think about how

contradictory and stupid that meant that same Maga communist mentality. You need to have that consistently,

even for non-Maga people. The whole point of Maga communism was a dialectic between an in-group consciousness and masses who lack consciousness.

So that applies even for non-Maga people.

Okay, now this, finally, I got detracted or sidetracked a little bit.

For the second part of what I'm trying to say.

Why do we have dedicated ops and dedicated haters?

And I will absolutely...

Yeah, Jennifer, that's fine.

I'm just sick of people ignoring

when people make crazy claims

or say crazy things about us.

Oh, you support Hitler,

and then you just say,

I'm sick of,

you don't have to always be defensive either.

Don't misunderstand what I'm just telling.

I hope someone takes notes,

because, like,

you have to have some intelligence to understand what I'm telling you.

Don't play defense either, only.

Don't only play defense either.

But address and respond in some kind of way.

Just acknowledge it in some kind of way. Just acknowledge it in some kind of way. And if you don't know, don't make assumptions. That's another fucking problem I see with guerrillas all the time. If you don't know, ask other gorillas. Don't be afraid to ask if you don't know. Sometimes I see you guys

farting. Someone will be like, uh, you know, uh, you know uh you know he used to go to walmart and steal every day and then you just be like so what wait why do why are you don't jump to conclusions find out the facts yourself

okay

ask gorillas

ask around

research it yourself

then that's how

you should never presume

things okay

so finally now finally things. Okay.

So finally.

Now finally, all right?

Why do we have dedicated ops and why I think that's inevitable?

Some of you think maybe that the reason we have dedicated ops is because we need to work on being less off putting to people.

That it's our fault that if we have ops, it's our fault because we're not doing enough good of a job to reach across the aisle.

I also need to make you snap out of this delusion as well if you think that you know it comes to this whole like oh we just need to constantly

reach our hand and extend our hand to dedicated ops and eventually they'll come no there are many dedicated ops that

we have who are beyond any reproach who will never ever come around to us who are uninterested in any

good faith dialogue who are absolutely committed to inflicting as much harm as they possibly can upon us.

And the reason is because of their class background, because they have a petty bourgeois pathology.

Petty bourgeois individualistic pathology.

One of the things that you will find in common with every single one of our ops is that they are traumatized.

Thank you, Grant. Appreciate you.

One of the one of the things that you'll find

with our ops pretty consistently

is that

our dedicated ops is that

the reason they hate us

is not because they're not informed enough about our, because I see the interaction go down all the time.

There'll be a dedicated hater. You correct them without insulting them. And they know the truth, you know, like, oh, something about fascism, whatever.

You'll correct them.

They know the truth, and they're still slandering us.

I think Madeline was an example of that, you know, but why is it?

What's the actual reason?

Why do they have this, bad faith almost personal why is it so personal for them to the point where like they won't even listen to reason well i'll tell you the source of the trauma always comes from a revolution to mass movements.

Now, a mass movement is not defined by having the most people.

Because truth and told, the liberal leftists outnumber us by a lot.

So it's not in numbers, okay? But it's the dynamic of interaction and the dynamic of

discourse. A form of discourse that is based in a mass phenomenon radically de-centers individual subjectivity and exposes people to kind of swarm dynamics.

And it's precisely these dynamics that get in people's fucking head and make them lose their mind.

And that's a good thing because you're rooting out the petty

bourgeois scum and you're you're enforcing a proletarian line when it comes to discourse frankly

now i have experience observing this phenomena for a decade. The South African EFF on social media works

the same way. If you look at a lot of the critics of the EFF on social media, they'll be like,

you're all a cult. This is just, you know, you're all a cult this is just you know you're you're

you're all just this

hive mind

online army

and then I'm just a rational

you know sovereign subject

who's engaging in pure

individual discourse and this army is coming in here and shitting all of that up and introducing this directly violent social and why is it violent in a discursive sense not in a literal physical sense but in a discursive sense, not in a literal physical sense, but in a discursive sense? Because it's exposing the social basis of communication. Because while a individual rational subject deludes themselves into believing that the content of their communication is judged purely on the merits of its rational integrity and its conformity with the consistency of an ideal. The truth is the meaning of communication is always embedded and rooted in a specific social form right so when you have a swarm or a mob or an army you know enforce a line and it's backed up like by a mob, people regard that when

they're petty bourgeois class enemies, they regard that as a violent and traumatic experience.

Because they are, what they're witnessing is the debasement of the purity of discourse.

And it's like being quantified and pure.

And it's something about that that drives them fucking crazy.

Okay.

So this is why a lot of people hate us, because we're exposing a class war within discourse

and within communication and, you know, the transmission of information itself in the information

age.

Maga is hated

by liberals, right?

Because of this, because Maga is a

mass phenomena. It's a

mass movement, not just because of numbers.

It's because of how it functions.

Right? You know,

mass culture, mass politics, all of these have the same characteristics.

And the bourgeoisie and the petty bourgeoisie, the petty bourgeoisie, the petty bourgeoisie, I'm a free thinker, I'm independent, I'm an individual.

And that's an irony we should note, which is really funny, which is that, you know,

this whole backlash against the woke mobs in the 2010s, we are not reactionary with respect to woke mobs.

We are the evolution of that.

Woke mobs, you know, they were demonized from a reactionary perspective, not because of the content of the cultural shit, but because it was just like this cancel culture mobs and all this.

It was exposing this new dynamic of the relationship between individuals and social, you know,

mobs and dynamics and socialization and stuff.

And that was really off-putting to reactionaries.

It had nothing to do with any of the culture shit. That's incillary and irrelevant. We're the next evolution of that in a lot of ways because we are a self-conscious mob. We are a mob that is acting with purpose in unison, with a purpose and and with an authority with responsibility so this is

what drives people crazy it drives them crazy that you're acting like a mob with and they can clearly

see there's an underlying unifying principle and authority behind this they can clearly see there's an underlying unifying principle and authority behind this they can

clearly see like you are this army repping a very particular and specific flag you know and

they're not used to that they're used to just this illusion that social dynamics are organic on social media

oh yeah everyone's liking this tweet because uh because that's how all these individuals feel all

everyone's doing this ratio because it's just how authentically every individual, you know, it's just natural and it's organic.

We, they see us as inorganic social discourse because we actually are taking responsibility for the social dimension of our

discourse we are organized we have when we put out a message it's being done in an organized way

okay that we are signaling social dynamics that are intentional.

Okay?

We don't have this pretension of organic anything.

In the strict sense that like, we're not pretending we're all just a bunch of like

individuals. We understand there's a unifying principle behind this army. There's a unifying

principle. We're acting with purpose. We're acting with that in mind.

And that makes people lose

their fucking mind because they're like,

no. For them, that's,

you're violating like an invalienable

rule of discourse according to the

bourgeoisie and the petty bourgeoisie.

Which is that all discourse should,

we should just pretend it's between individuals,

not reflecting mass and social phenomena, right?

Every single, that's why they accuse you of being all alts and bots.

You know, they'll use that screenshot where I told you guys to make alts to circumvent when people block you and slander us.

When I was just like, yeah, if they block you, make a fucking alt so you can actually assert the truth. I wasn't saying create alts to make us appear like there's more of us than there actually is. But that's how they cope. They cope by calling you bots and alts because they can see how like organized you're being they can see how intentional

you're being they're like this is not a you know discussion between individuals this is a mob asserting a social principle versus my individual discourse now

here's the final final thing I want to I want to mention about this okay and I hope

you're following you very carefully the reason why someone is going to

hear get the wrath of the guerrilla army is because there are they are not engaging in principled

discourse at all if you want to have individual discourse, just come to me.

I will discuss and debate almost anyone who's coming from an opposing perspective. I oftentimes

do not like to have debates and discussions with people who

mainly agree with me, but, you know, have some nuances. I don't like that because it's a waste of time.

I want to discuss and debate with people who very much oppose my my worldview that's the only useful

thing and i'm willing to do that in a good faith way and all of you are willing to have good

faith discussions with people.

But what really sets people off and traumatizes them on a fundamental level is when they make a mistake and you correct them as an army.

When they say something wrong and then even when you're being polite and you go in there correcting them you have just traumatized a narcissistic petty bourgeois class enemy you've humbled

them by not only revealing this is what kills these, not only revealing that what they said was wrong,

but revealing that what they said was both wrong and socially incorrect.

Like, they feel humiliated.

Like, why are you embarrassing me?

I made a, you know, this mob is canceling me and whatever.

And I'm wrong on a rational level too.

People snap and lose their mind over that.

But you know what?

That is

a barrier to entry

that you do need to fucking

humble yourself in a way

and have

proletarian consciousness and discipline.

If you fuck up

and you're being corrected on a mass scale, instead of pathologically

fixating on the mass dimension of it, you should just fucking admit you were wrong and not take it

personally. That's the proletarian way. And how do I know know this because that's the dynamic in the party as well

you know a certain someone uh you know soied out and spurged out and quit.

Because not only did I refute their entire position in a long, like, 12-page document or whatever,

but most people were convinced by my argument.

So they saw how, like, oh, everyone's ganging up on me.

Everyone is against me.

Instead of focusing on the content of the discourse, they were fixated on being this petty bourgeois individualistic narcissist that was humbled on a mass scale by a contrary view

right now you know why i don't sympathize with people who lose their shit over being canceled and corrected by the infra-woke mob.

You know, that's really how they sound.

They sound like fucking like upset boomers or some shit, right?

But you know why I don't sympathize with them because when i had 20 viewers i went on vosh's stream with an overwhelmingly negative audience of like a huge

thousands of people in a chat like attacking me and I didn't give a fuck I stood on business

like I don't care I'll stand I'll stand on business

and just defend what I believe to be the truth

in a principled way I did that on

all these other streamers that I debated.

I was disadvantaged.

I still am disadvantaged numerically, by the way,

when it comes to my follower count and shit,

a lot of the time when I'm getting into disputes.

I have the proletarian discipline to not freak out over the fact that an opposing team will have a social dynamic that is biased.

Kilo, what's up? Like, I knew Vosch's audience was biased toward him, and I still went and defended the truth anyway.

I didn't, you know, I didn't lose my mind over, I didn't be like, oh, you know, everyone is brainwashed on a mass scale.

It's like, no, here's the truth.

You know, the social dynamics

are fucking unavoidable.

But, see,

the foundation of our army is principal

discourse. That's the ironic part of all this we are we are a

we represent principal discourse that is being defended by our own

woke mob and woke army.

You understand?

Some people will claim to be

participate in discourse

in a principled way like Jordan Peterson.

Oh, the woke mob is canceling me.

No, no. That's not me, though, because I have my

own woke mob to respond to them.

So that's why they hate us. They would prefer that I'm just like a boomer

bitching and complaining about how I'm the victim of all these social dynamics.

But instead of that, we are ourselves a horde and an army that is conquering, humbling, and destroying all the opposition.

Mobs, because we're doing it in a disciplined self-conscious organized way

and that's what that's why we're a horde by the way that's mongols were always outnumbered by enemy armies.

A lot of the history books don't teach you that, but it's the truth.

And they would win because of that cohesion that they had.

They had a strong, nomadic solidarity and cohesion, which created a level of loyalty that was extraordinary. So that's what this army is.

You guys are loyal because you understand that your Khan, Hazaldeen, that's me, is a principled, honorable man.

I am just, I am honorable, and I'm principled.

I say that without any self-flattery.

It's just at least how I try to be, right?

And you see that.

I am not immensely popular i'm not immensely wealthy i'm not immensely

established but you do observe that and that's why you are loyal you know, the truth is that's the same reason people

were loyal to Genghis Khan. That's exactly the same reason why these poor, humble, Mongol

soldiers and cavalry were so loyal to Genghis Khan because he may have been poor, he may have been humble, but he represented a principle of honor and justice, right? And that is why they were able to conquer and take on empires and that's what we're

doing in the information matter you know um it's really simple actually a lot of people don't get it

but it is actually profoundly simple.

And that is why, again, we have dedicated haters only because of that.

If the hater is dedicated in bad faith, it is solely and only on account of that fact.

You know, solely on account of that fact.

So,

I'm not telling you guys to, I'm not creating a new meme called InfraWoke, okay? It's not what I'm fucking doing.

Because you understand that the whole point of woke is this petty bourgeois individualism

where you think that conscious awareness of, you know, of the social

basis of culture and stuff, somehow does not need mediation collectively by organization or an army.

You can just be an annoying fuck who's read a book in college and then by yourself,

walk around like you're the emperor of the fucking world or the empress of the world

and talk down to everyone around

you because you know the truth

and fuck everyone who doesn't. That's what woke

is essentially. We are not

in for woke.

I'm just saying there's a parallel

because woke

mobs were never supposed to be a thing the mob dynamic of woke shit from the 2010s and the cancel culture mobs that was an accidental and inadvertent dynamic which was always an embarrassment to these petty bourgeois, you know, academic hucksters.

Whereas for us, we are proud of the mob dynamics because we are a horde.

You understand?

Um... you understand um we are consciously aware we are awake but our wakefulness is not based on the conceit of individualism we have awakened to a social and collective principle. We have awakened to something

beyond individual consciousness. We have awakened to a historical mission from the very first streams of infrared.

What activated the guerrilla army?

Stalin, Mao!

You know?

100% Stalinist, 100% Maoist.

That was the beginning of an awakening

to a specific historical

tradition and a specific

historical mission. Not simply

the awakening to a

general, you know,

principle of truth by itself.

You see, the difference between woke and infrared is the difference between kant and hegel hagel did not believe that truth acquires the determination of a particularity in the same way that

Hegel did.

Woke is Kant.

We are Hegel. that sums up the the transition into i'm strictly speaking in terms

of the form of consciousness and the social dynamics that correspond.

We were awakened to the CPUSA 2036, which culminated in our American Communist Party, right?

So that is what we became woke to. We didn't become woke to this general conceit of knowing the absolute universal truth versus a fallen world of deplorable backward

people who don't know the truth. That is fundamentally individualistic in

petty bourgeois. We awoke to the necessity of restoring, reviving, and carrying forward a very specific collective tradition and principle, a social principle, not just the ego and conceit of an individual consciousness elevated above the masses, but a very specific form of the truth, the essential truth, of the masses, existence at a social and collective level, reflected in the tradition of Marxism, Leninism, the conscious science

of history, right?

Yeah, not individual subjectivity made universal, but precisely individual subjectivity sublated into a specific determination, social and collective determination, that is a particular form of the universal, concrete universal right that is the marxist leninist

tradition that is what we awaken to so understand that is why we're so unique that's why

there's something so fundamentally unique about the infrared movement

and how we operate and how we work. That's really what it boils down to. It boils down to the

fact that we've sublated a early sociolot. We are probably the first post-woke phenomena probably right james lindsay he's got this

silly kind of idea of woke right and i'm almost tempted to be like you know he what he is trying to identify in the

woke right is precisely these uh these these these mob dynamics but which have not awakened consciously to the fact that they are mob dynamics

so he sees a vulgarian plebeian almost crypto marxist in his warped view dimension to the woke right because they operate in a very

collective way, just like woke mobs, but there doesn't seem to be like this unifying principle

behind it that is responsible and anyone's accountable

for and there's a grain of truth in in the parallel because if you look at the jqers every jkuer

for example like truth teller thinks that individually they've discovered a universal truth that

the jews are behind everything and whatever and you know that that operates in a very social way

you know it's socially reinforced it has all these like mob, social dynamics,

but at the individual level, it's just experienced in a Kantian way, as I am just discovering

a universal truth as an individual through my individual subjectivity and to whom it may concern

whoever agrees with me you know this is how these mobs form right so in this strict sense

that is also woke uh in woke in the same way.

This is what James Lindsay is ultimately trying to say, right?

But we are different.

We are fundamentally different

because we are aware of the social dimension of communication.

We are organized as an army.

And we have the consciousness and the theory that exists in harmony with this fact, right? So that's what the

Bolshevism. It's just Bolshevism. That was the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks were a mass

phenomena and a mass movement, but it was a mass phenomena and mass movement led by a principle that was itself scientifically

and consciously aware of what it was rather than this accidental conglomeration that was that

you know it was an embarrassment it was proletarian consciousness right so this is our Bolshevik way now some of you

were asking about Groypers which is smart because well aren't Groyper you know people try to

sometimes compare us to Groypers because they are similarly organized or whatever, right?

The distinction with Groyper's is that while sociologically an evolution

of the

liberal

woke stuff

right

they do not

have a

principle

they have

not discovered

any kind

of principle

principle is

not just an idea by the way they haven not discovered any kind of principle principle is not just an idea by the way they

haven't discovered collective and social principle um before nick fuentes the groypers were just this

totally uh decentralized you know, thing that was going on, and they were all just using slurs. And it was just a way of trolling and a way of being extremist and edgy.

That got centralized and organized, yes, but solely around Nick Fuentes.

That's it.

So there's no actual...

It's not like us where there's this historical tradition. It's not like us where there's this historical tradition.

It's not like us where the thing that glues us together is this loyalty to reviving the proletarian consciousness.

At best, Groypers are a false consciousness.

At best, it's a false consciousness.

At worst, it's the epitome of a complete degeneracy, whatever.

But also, it's a false consciousness because without Nick Fuentes, it doesn't exist.

Now, without Haas, does infrared exist?

If it doesn't, that's not because I am the principal.

It's because on an operational level i've

become so necessary but i'm not just communicating to you that i'm this extraordinary exceptional

superhuman individual i also have a theory okay i also have a theory.

I also have a very specific vision,

which can at least in part, for now,

in part, be communicated.

In full is the goal, of course.

I need time to write my book and whatever

but

that is a distinction

that is a fundamental distinction

also let me tell you something

we are way more organized than they are

that's another thing way more organized

you see don't

overestimate the degree of organization

of groopers

they are not as organized as

you think

in contrast to us the maintaining of the loyalty of the base by the head is not actually something that comes as a given.

And they don't have any notion of obligation or mission.

It is still maintaining the illusory notion of organic association that underlies them. They are nowhere near as organized as we are.

And I can guarantee that to you. They are nowhere near as organized. They do not have a

discursive way of organization and the way we do right so maybe they're

more organized then um these loose mobs or whatever but nothing like us nothing they have more numbers of course but they're not as

organized and they are not as loyal to a unified principle and shared principle

let me let me put it this way.

You know what they don't have?

They don't have the 2 plus 2 is 5 shit.

They don't have that.

They don't have the 2 plus 2 is 5.

Why do you guys, if I say 2 plus 2 is 5, why are you willing to back me up? And why are you willing to say, okay, 2 plus 2 is 5, even if you don't agree with me? Is it because you're in a cult? Well, no, I can actually justify and explain this theoretically. It's because of

your awareness of the social form, not essence, we're not saying it's determined in a constructivistic way, but the social form of truth.

You afford me good faith.

And, you know, if I say two plus two is five, you know that if we concede and you start counter signaling and contradicting me,

then the enemy will then take this to be a total repudiation and a total rejection of the fundamental principle upon which the movement stands in general, right?

You will demand an explanation from me.

Of course you will.

You'll be in my chat and say,

okay, Haas,

I said two plus two is five,

but like,

why the fuck are you saying that?

If my answer is satisfactory to you,

um,

whatever. But, you know, if fundamentally you can't agree, you're all free individuals,

you'll just leave. You'll just be like, I'm no longer convinced by this shit, right? But we do have this awareness of the social form of truth.

That doesn't mean I get away, you just believe everything I say.

It's not sustainable.

If there isn't an element where you can recognize the truth and you can recognize that I make a mistake, it's not sustainable in the long term, right?

That's why it's an active discourse I have with the community.

So that's not sustainable in the long term.

But in the heat of a moment, you know, we don't operate as just individuals.

We operate as an army.

It's not just about the content, but also the form that matters, the social form that matters, right? So this is really what we're talking about here we are trying to push a specific social

goal um that much we agree on now if you start disagreeing with how I articulate that, in the beginning you may just give me the

benefit of the doubt, but in the long term, if you truly don't believe what I'm saying, you will

probably just tap out, you know, or you'll probably just

continue bothering me and asking me about it, right? So, uh, that is, uh, definitely, you know, definitely something unique about us that no other community has, just none, no other.

No other community has this dynamic, you know, no other community has this dynamic you know no other community

under has is so intelligent and so advanced that it can distinguish the form and

content of a message and a transmission of information, right?

If you fund, see, look, infrared is not just one claim.

Now, let's say I fuck up and say two plus two is five, right?

Let's say I fuck up and say 2 plus 2 is 5, right? Let's say I fuck

up. It's genuinely wrong.

The

infrared movement

is founded upon a message

which is not

reducible to

one claim. it's an overall integral worldview about a few things one the

record of history okay that's probably a very important one right uh with respect to marxism

leninism two the global system and the trajectory of that

global system so toward multipolarity dissolution of the unipolar world order the role of china the

role of russia and so on and so on.

So this as well is important, right?

Three, an overall critique of the exclusively liberal form of modernity, right?

Anglo-Saxon modernity.

We deign to explore as infrared. We want to re-appraise the meaning of what is the modern, right? So it puts us into contact with critiques of modernity like Dugan and so on, but we don't reject or flee from the modern.

So Mongol modernity is actually a pretty big cornerstone of this community and what it is.

And I would go as far as to say that Mongol modernity is why our community has the civilizational orientation that it does.

It's not because we reject the modern world and modernity.

It's because we can comprehend that the modern, the now, has a civilizational basis, a unique civilizational basis, that is

determinate. So the form of the modern is universal, but it has a particular basis in a specific

integral totality, an ensemble of social relations relations that take determination and form as these different

historically constituted civilizations right so that is another cornerstone of what this movement is

right so uh these this is an overall kind of

thing and and this is what we get crucified for so you know that this is what i'm here haz is here for this haz is here for uh marxism lennon

is and i i guess the fourth thing maybe would be like uh the fourth thing would be a kind of, what should I say, comprehension of the dialectic of class struggle, meaning for us, class is not a concept in an idea, it's an

actuality. So even if the majority of the proletarian class is problematic and maga, whatever,

that doesn't change anything in terms of the objectivity of class relations.

So it's the populistic dimension that is also there, right?

So these four things, vaguely.

So this is what Haas infrared represents overall.

Now, I could be wrong about a few things,

and most certainly am probably wrong about a few things, right?

But the good faith that you afford me is such that you comprehend there's a

central message that is worth defending, that is worth carrying forward, and is worth insisting upon the space of good faith to interrogate

because the good faith is lacking because discourse as such there's an attempt to shut it down

when it comes to me you have the loyalty that you have to me that's why you have

this loyalty understand you have this loyalty because you're defending the integrity and you're

defending the right of this discourse that defines this community, right?

So that's it, you know.

But the very same thing that makes us as advanced and organized as we are also happens to be the thing that drives a lot of fucking people crazy. A lot of fucking people insane, right?

The two plus two is five thing. It's like the whole point of that is what is the social meaning?

There's not just a meaning in terms of the sovereign subject there's a social meaning as well right

um we know you know two plus two is four it's not five you know that but if the flag says two plus two is five

that's the meaning it's's the flag, you know.

It's like everything has that meaning, that level of social meaning.

And me, as the con of infrared, you know, the IGB, you comprehend very well that this is a horde and this is an army

which requires centralized guidance and order

to exist otherwise it doesn't exist

so i'm not talking about the party otherwise it doesn't exist so

I'm not talking about the party

the ACP

I just want you guys to have

why am I telling you this shit either

because I want you guys to have more

awareness about what infrared is

I want you to be more aware of that you know awareness about what infrared is.

I want you to be more aware of that.

I want you to understand what infrared actually is better.

Because you do get it intuitively.

Everything I just told you, you understand intuitively.

But not all of you comprehended on a conscious theoretical level right not all of you can comprehend this on a theoretical level so this is really it it in terms of that.

So, uh, okay.

So, so, so another thing that I wanted to talk about was Trump.

Okay, so this was just today, but there's a few things going on that are very strange.

We don't know exactly what to make them.

Brutal Stalin is what's going on, brother.

Appreciate it.

So, the White House recently communicated this President President Trump's most important and impactful truth ever issued.

So I didn't know what this was going to be.

I want to put before I show you this, I want to have some context.

O's, whatever.

So there are reports.

There are reports.

I don't know if it's confirmed that Trump will recognize a Palestinian state.

There were reports that Trump has been clashing with Netanyahu.

He fired, was it, what was his name?

Mike Waltz? Fired Mike Waltz because Mike Waltz is acting as a Netanyahu agent

he's clashing with Netanyahu

over the Iran negotiations

there's an increased level of rhetoric

coming from the administration

and the GOP about

Israel's not going to boss us around, yada, yada.

He told the Houthis that, you know, you can target Israel ships, just not ours, and it's totally fine um

there's a

there's a big fucking vibe shift happening

and you know let me just tell you guys something

that

that it's pretty fucking crazy, you know?

I mean, I don't know what it's going to culminate into.

Part of me wants to just be like, why am I fucking doubting any of this?

You know?

Because I've long held the suspicion this would happen.

I just never talked about it publicly because if I ended up being wrong, it'd be pretty

bad.

Because I don't know, ultimately.

I just have an intuition that Trump is not really fundamentally loyal to Israel

in the way that a lot of people claim that he is. And for fuck's sake, something that's really twisted when you think about it is if this was Biden doing what

Trump's doing on the conflict with Israel and shit.

We would never hear the end of it from the CP USA and all these Democrat, you know,

ass kissers about Biden's the most progressive president ever.

And like, you know, let's just be fucking honest about what's going on here.

Like, this is unfucking precedented if it's true.

I mean, what about the Adelson money?

I mean, he's a wild. I don't know. I think he's a wild card. I think he's a wild.

I don't know.

I think he's a wild card.

I think he's a wild card.

I think that he's playing his own game maybe, right?

And I'm not saying trust Trump because I don't know what's going on fully.

But I just know it's something really fucking unprecedented.

And if true, absolutely is much more a progressive foreign policy than any other, frankly, in the 21st century.

I mean, I mean, like, Trump just reached a trade deal with China, I believe, which is another thing I predicted.

If not in public, I was telling jackson about it which is basically

the tariff shit i don't know if i said this on stream the tariff shit overall is good

because what it's going to do is destroy neoliberal free trade policies and then there's

going to trump is going to try a bilateral trade deal with china which will help jizen ping within

china and it will help trump against the liberals at home.

You know?

So,

uh, it's pretty crazy hudson was saying the tariffs are a cover for cutting taxes yeah that's that's that's that's true but they still

fundamentally are a challenge to neoliberal economic doctrine

if anything, right?

It's totally reflecting

a political realignment for sure.

So, you know,

bilateral deal with China no more wTO and free trade um i i don't know i mean that you know in terms of the

vulgar interpretation of maga of the vulgar interpretation of Maga communism, the vulgar interpretation of Maga communism was just like, you know, they think Trump is like this like progressive guy. And it's like, you know, I wonder if that straw man of Maga communism itself is like turning out to be true.

You know?

I don't know.

Like, it wasn't really my theoretical intention, but I know the meme takes a life of its own.

And it's like

it's pretty crazy you know

it's pretty fucking crazy anyway

I just wanted to throw that out there

because now today there's something interesting

going on right

which is uh

okay he's putting price controls on prescription drugs he said he's going to have

them reduced by 30 to 80 percent forcing for he's going after the pharmaceutical companies all right again you know bernie would not even have the balls to introduce this idea you know

Bernie would never fucking do this Biden would never fucking do this can we stop pretending Democrats are on the left when this is a much, this is a left.

I'm not one of these purists who claim that, oh, the true left is this pure thing.'m not saying that i get that there's a nebulous

more left and more right kind of dimension to politics and trump is to the left of the

democratic party can we stop pretending otherwise trump and maga are to the left of the Democratic Party. Can we stop pretending otherwise?

Trump and Maga are to the left of the Democratic Party.

It's not a huge feat, but it's an objective

fact. The way I would

like create a political spectrum right now

is that Trump

is like center left and we are like pretty far left, you know, but that's like what it looks like basically.

Like the Democrats are hard right.

Bernie and AOC are hard right Bernie and AOC are hard right

um

center right would probably be the

GOP who are loyal to Trump

but are still GOP

and then the far right is like open neo-Nazis, like Assov and shit, right?

So like, this is what the vaguely, the political spectrum looks like right now.

Trump is kind of like Amlo, you know?

That just really seems like what's going on.

I mean, I don't...

Maybe he's like Putin, but definitely he's not a right-wing president.

I don't see the right-wing, you know, aspect.

Because, you know, it's... We're going to start fucking seeing some crazy shit.

What we are going to start witnessing, what we're going to start seeing is that we're going to start seeing

self-proclaimed Marxist, you know, leftists

use neoliberal arguments against price controls.

Oh my God, the stupid plebeian manga base

doesn't know how real economics work.

Trust the experts. That's what we're, they already did. Trust the experts.

That's what we're, they already did it with the tariffs.

And now they're going to fucking do it with this as well.

Because that's the whole fucking point.

I've been trying to say that.

It's all point of Maga communism.

Mass politics. Mass politics, mass

vulgar populism

versus these fucking

glasses wears who are fundamentally right-wing

liberal, neoliberal

pro-imperialism. I don't know how much HBO Chernobyl you have to watch to understand

that everything they associate with Maga is just what they associate with Bolshevism and communism.

Oh, the mass, the stupid masses don't know.

That's literally in Mexico with Amlo, the Chavismo with Hugo Chavez.

All around the fucking world, you have this thing where, like, there's a tough

populism, like, left-wing populism, right?

Versus these fucking glasses wear

dipshit to pretend to be experts

okay

like

Stalin the phenomena of

Stalinism

beat the shit out of the intelligentsia

can we just be real about what of the intelligentsia. Can we just be real about what happened? The intelligentsia

under Stalinism, whether it's in art, whether it's in science, whether it's in anything,

they were taken and beaten on the street and barefoot peasants were put in their place. That is what Stalinism was.

In the Cultural Revolution, they were taken and they put dunce caps on them and the barefoot peasants from the countryside took their place. So

there is an innate

class dimension to the

anti-maga sentiment, which

is a distaste for mass

politics in general.

And Liptarts

will associate that with fascism but they're missing the historical context

always the reason nazism kind of appeared similar to mass politics in that way was because it was a reaction to communism

they had to steal and emulate a lot of the things that made communist popular as an anti-communist

tactic to suppress communists.

Without communism, there's no fascist reaction.

Without a communist Bolshevik movement,

they never...

You're not going to see, like, Hitler's and Mussolini's just come out of nowhere.

Their first has to be the threat

of a workers' proletarian movement.

Right? I've said this so many times.

Maga is a very vague,

very, very vague workers' movement that does not have proletarian consciousness,

but it is a workers movement. And yes, that's what it is. It's like, there are so many different forms of spontaneity when it comes to workers' consciousness.

We don't acquiesce to spontaneity.

We believe in conscious, organized, Bolshevik, Leninist way. But, you know, you know what,

you know what my politics are? You know when CPUSA people cite Lenin's left-wing communism? And Lenin is like,

yeah, we need to work with the trade unions we need to work with you should even potentially politically work with the labor party work inside of all

these movements i agree with that. Okay. MMA thinks. Okay, when Lenin in left-wing communism is saying,

like, no, no, don't be an ultra-leftist. Work inside these bourgeois parties who have taken a lot of the workers

and kind of push

them left.

I agree.

I mean, of course

we should have our own party and our own

independent principal organization, but you

absolutely need to be doing work

to be pushing people in the right directions.

You can't be dogmatic and sectarian.

I totally agree, but you know why the CPSA got so triggered by me?

Because I was like, yes, but you're getting the fucking, you're getting everything

opposite. It's Maga, who is the Labor Party in this analogy, not the Democratic Party.

You know, like you have it the,'m not an ultra leftist i agree with

lenin's uh left wing communism what he said

but that applies to like

doing organizing among maga it doesn't apply to fucking go to

going to fucking Kamala

fucking Harris rallies

so you can fucking organize

dentists that make 250,000

a fucking year who wear

fucking glasses and fucking support Ukraine.

That is not the masses.

That is not a mass base

that is going to fucking be pushed left

into proletarian consciousness.

You fucking retard!

Like that was the whole fucking point

of Maga communism.

It's so fucking simple.

The angry blue-collar people

who don't even trust the imperialist

degemony anymore, that's who we need to be doing

the work to win over.

We don't need to... These stupid

leftist retards.

They're so fucking stupid. They're like,

you know, what Lenin was saying

basically is we shouldn't be sectarian.

Let's go to the Democratic Party

events. There's a lot of people there. That means

it's the masses. masses no numbers does not equal masses

masses is a specific social dynamic that pertains to how subjectivity is interpolated socially that is what it means for there to be a mass

phenomena and movement. A hodge

of a bunch of fucking professional petty bourgeois

snob glasses wearer fucks do not form

a mass. They form a black shirt fascist fascis a confederation and

coalition of individuals trying to repress the masses, right?

They're like, anything that has a lot of people is the masses.

No, that's not what the masses mean.

Okay, the masses are maga, whether you fucking like it or not.

I don't know what to tell you.

Like, they're not just Maga, I agree.

There's a lot of apolitical people.

I totally agree with that.

But the fucking Democrats are not the fucking masses.

People are like, when you guys did your May Day March,

why didn't you go into downtown Chicago for the Stop Trump Coalition?

Because my fucking politics isn't about stopping Trump, but toppling the entire imperial hegemony.

And I can be fucking pragmatic enough to know that a lot of the reasons you guys want to stop Trump is because in certain respects, you feel that he's threatening to dismantle that.

I'm not going to fucking join your reactionary Hitler-Azov March with a bunch of fucking

Ukrainian flags.

I'd rather fucking shoot myself than march alongside people that wave the fucking

flag of Azov and Ukraine in the name of... That is not the Democrats.

The Democrats are not the movement. There's some fake bullshit.

It's fake.

They bust people.

They fucking bust people.

They bus people and pay them money to... All this shit that the boomers say is true probably.

Like, they pay people

and bust them to these stupid

fucking protests. It's

all fake bullshit. It's

not real. Maga is pretty

real. Like it or hated.

It's pretty real.

All that Democrat bullshit is fake. It's pretty real. All that Democrat

bullshit is fake. It doesn't reflect

Matt the sentiment of masses.

It really doesn't. A lot

of these people cooped up in

these professional jobs and

in academia, absolutely.

They are full Democrat libtard supporters.

I agree. They are. It's real for them, right? That's not the masses. Those are a bunch of

fucking people butt hurt about the masses and upset about the masses and really, really pissed about the masses and really triggered by the

reality of, look, it's literally bourgeois versus proletarian subjectivity. If you were upset

about the vulgarian masses, shitting on the expert, Dr. Fauci, you are the bourgeoisie and the petty bourgeoisie.

You have a fundamentally reactionary subjectivity, which cannot get over the social dimension of truth

that's really this whole debate that was going on of alternative facts and and how you know

all it's russian disinfer all this shit was a bunch of coping reactionary fuchs

who are confronted with the proletarian truth which is the fact that truth has a social form

truth social is closer to proletarian consciousness than every single Marxist in U.S.

universities right now.

That's the truth.

You know that?

Because proletarian consciousness, in part, begins with the acknowledgement

that truth has a social form. Truth is not simply what some fucking guy with glasses

or what some nerd at some university arrived at according to this vacuum sealed procedure of propositional logic.

Truth is a specific articulation of a general social truth, which is partisan in nature.

Truth is not something you discover putting gloves on in a vacuum-sealed abstract way.

Truth absolutely reflects discursive truth, truth historical truth the truth of a specific situation

and a specific social order and a specific social struggle that is what truth is truth is is dialectical, in other words.

Proletarian consciousness, for pragmatic reasons even, at the outset, has to acknowledge the social nature of truth. Why?

Because proletarian consciousness

when it's organized

as trade union consciousness

for example

has to articulate the fact

that we are not just individual subjects that the truth of our existence is collective in nature

in fact that we occupy this collective subjectivity that interpolates us as a collective

subject. That is square one of proletarian conscience, literally square one, okay? Literally square one.

So it's baked in to the existence

of the proletarian class.

Truth

social is much closer to

proletarian consciousness

just by virtue of acquiescing to the fact

that truth has a social form,

not just replicating what experts claim in a vacuum.

So, how crazy is that, right?

Um... How crazy is that, right? So glasses wears Reditors.

I used to talk about them a lot, but these people

do not comprehend

that

their truth

is

socially determined.

In what they communicate contains the estrangement that they have from the masses.

There's nothing wrong with that.

You need to be estranged a little bit from the masses to arrive at truth.

But they don't have a dialectical interaction.

That's what you have to have.

They suspend that.

They foreclose that, I should rather say.

And, you know, the problem of the Redditors in general and the bourgeois modern scientific paradigm of truth in general is that um well it it it is rooted in a kind of inability to distinguish the meaningfulness of a given claim between a universal, abstract, propositional truth,

and something that has a social significance within the signifying chain.

You know, they don't know how to distinguish those.

They assume arrogantly that those two things are the same and they're not, right?

And they refuse to budge in any kind of way with respect but also the the problem is this kind of

i i don't that what i just told you is um very classic a continental philosophy shit right there is truth in the sense of objective truth

vacuum sealed you know uh natural scientific investigation and inquiry and then there's also

social truth social truth is like like, well, it means this symbolically. It means this because it signifies a specific social order and so on, right, through language. But dialectical materialism says that this very distinction in what truth is also has consequences for how we should regard objective natural scientific truth as well.

That namely that in objective reality, in nature itself, is dialectical.

This contradiction I just told you about has a basis in nature itself and objective reality

itself.

So this is why Lysenkoism.

Lysenkoism was not, uh, for convenient political reasons, we have to distort science.

No, I mean, the traditional critique of Lysenkoism is that, there was the truth of absolute abstract whatever

biological truth and then there was a truth demanded by politics but Lysenkoism

was much more profound than such a stupid critique right because lysenkoism itself articulated that very

distinction in nature that nature itself is dialectical that our social existence partakes and participates in the determinations of nature

and reflects them.

It's not a separate dualistic reality, right?

So that doesn't mean nature happens to reflect whatever we find politically expedient

or convenient, but rather the content of our real objective,

for example, political existence and social existence, also has a basis there, if that makes sense.

It's not totally separate.

The logic of the political

is also reflected

in the very same logic of the biological.

It's not about politically expedient or politically convenient claims being vindicated by nature.

It is about the very logic of the political itself, which took a much objectively more advanced form with so-called

Stalinism, right?

Itself being reflected in nature, not the specific ideological claims of the state, but the dialectical logic at play.

So, in essence, things are the opposite of what you would assume coming from a traditional kind of

subjectivity like okay there's cold uh ruthless nature scientists discover the truth of nature

dr fouchy and because the masses are biased and they're too vulgar and there's the authoritarianism of politics that reflects them, it's not expedient and it's not convenient.

So the truth of the scientist is suppressed because it's not

convenient but that's actually what the truth is you start to discover it's the opposite the very notion

the very bias of the scientist, that

nature is devoid

of partiality

and it's devoid of

determination.

It's just this cold, abstract,

vacuum. That is abstract, vacuum.

That is itself something that reflects

a specific

biased social form

and institution.

Namely, that of

modern capitalism, for example.

It is a limited metaphysical conceit that is being disproven and dismantled by the development of reality itself historically.

So you see, that's my point, you know. There is a dialectical form, and a lot of people think that proletarian science will have the same form as bourgeois science but just be different in its content so there will be a proletarian galileo at britain no proletarian science is distinguished from bourgeois science also in form.

For example, Lysenko was a barefoot peasant.

You know what that meant?

He integrated the investigation of nature with the fulfillment of practical goals of society.

He was slandered and accursed for that, you know,

because the investigation of truth should have no regard for the needs of society.

Well, no.

We should acknowledge what truth is is the content of truth is the practice of society as

mao said the content of truth is the content of our active and continuous existence the content of truth is not something that exists totally separately, because our existence

is part of the content of truth.

So... the content of truth. So I hope

this is an interesting

point I'm raising for you.

But the arrogance of liberals, it's astounding

because they have this idea

that they are the principled ones

and the masses are all corrupt.

HBO is Chernobyl, like,

oh, the scientist, the noble

scientist, in defiance

of the populistic

authoritarian. And it's like, they have everything twisted.

The conceits of the noble scientists precisely lack principledness.

Whereas the tough Soviet party

apparatchic and general who's

punching the scientist in the face and ordering them around

that's the real principle of that is the true

kind of metaphysical power

of reality itself.

You know, that's the real thing.

That's the real principle.

That's where principled not principal if it is not applied the application of principle is the content of what

principle is there is no form of a principle or an ideal that exists separate from how it is

suspended practically within reality the authoritarian soviet general who's choking the scientist like darth vader you have failed that is the fucking that he's more scientific the guy who's the, what did he say, he's the son of a shoemaker in Chernobyl, he is way more scientific than the guy with glasses that he's bossing around.

The guy with glasses he's bossing around, he knows about science in a very limited sense. The guy who's a political authority has true knowledge, true knowledge of real existence, true knowledge of the whole cosmos of the whole cosmos even on a cosmological level because if you can comprehend for example the meaning of what it means to embody a social principle, to organize masses and operate at that scale, to fulfill goals, to maintain a political state.

I don't give a fuck how much PhDs you have from a fucking university.

You will never comprehend the truth of existence as well as that.

You know?

You will never, ever comprehended better.

That is true knowledge of what, how shit really is when you start to understand you know I want you guys

whenever I see the community start having drama

and you know I look down on it and I'm so disappointed in it

because you know what I see it I see is, these people, they haven't gotten it yet.

They just haven't fucking learned.

They really have not.

Whenever I see drama and IGG, I'm like, this is so fucking pathetic because you just don't get it yet.

What am I?

The only prince in the room and everyone else is a fucking retard?

No, all of you have to be leaders.

There's only like, there's not a lot of us, okay, relative to the population of the world and and countries we live in

you're the ones that have to be leaders okay i don't know what to tell you um the drama shit

it's so pointless because you don't get it yet.

Like, to get it, you have to, in a way, move beyond this framework where individual subjectivity is the center of the world.

The real subject is not yourself and how others perceive you and so on and so on. The real subject is social. It's a social existence. The minute you guys start understanding that you will not engage in drama

you will not engage in drama

you know

you will just be focused it's like we're like a hive mind people who engage in drama

they're they're breaking ranks with the the cyborg bot you know bot army that like we are the

we are the the the borg the b, and whoever's being fucking dramatic is being a little bit too.

This is 1984, you're basically breaking ranks with the whole totalitarian collective.

When you have drama, It's pretty pathetic. Ones if this was an informative stream. I hope you found it informative.

So solos, what's up? like, like, if you guys are more, why do my face red? Because I got a tan. If you guys start understanding what I'm saying here better, you'll be more effective

info partisans.

You'll be more effective info warriors.

Because you'll know how to keep up the swarm dynamics

but make it so ruthless and cold

that you are like machines

you will shatter the enemy

I promise

you can still be human

and be relatable.

But you know how I want to see that?

I want to see like funny stuff

and you know,

we all like funny stuff.

Humor.

When you're a gorilla

and you start getting upset publicly about anything it's bad i get upset

you know i'll self-critique it's not the best but it's way worse when you do it's way

because i'm a face not all of you are faces.

Also,

this is all

that I fucking am,

right?

So if I'm getting

upset, it's because

it's clearly

not something petty.

I'm not getting

upset over petty shit.

Whenever you guys

get upset about, let me rephr shit. Whenever you guys get upset about

let me rephrase me. When you get

upset about petty shit, it looks pathetic.

Okay?

Comprehend

how fucking collective

this all is

at scale.

You are an army.

You are an army.

You understand.

You keep pushing it and you start getting better at it.

You'll start fucking winning in ways like you've never seen.

You'll start winning in ways like you've, you'll start, you'll, you'll have them doing somersaults trying to subjectively provoke you and enter into an intersubjective discourse with you

of recognition talking about their feelings and and you will just like you're the terminators

you will just they will be we're going to be total Bolshevik hordes overwhelming them.

Just total domination.

Total fucking domination.

You know?

You need to have that ruthlessness. you know why i'm telling you guys that?

Because I want to see more leaders stepping up in the guerrilla army.

Because I can't fucking do all this on my, carry it on my back forever.

Okay.

And as more leaders among you emerge who understand the mission, like Volkwalter, for example, we will grow in ranks. We will double, triple, quadruple in size. And we'll have regular guerrillas again who are silly and whatever i'm just saying you guys been here you know those of you have been here for years i'm sorry you're a new you've evolved make way

from new gorillas who can be stupid and retarded and you can guide them and teach them.

But you should not yourself act like you are a gorilla who just became one yesterday, okay?

I need to be clear, you know? any suggestions keep what you're doing up okay keep at it keep fighting the disinformation

keep fighting the lies but do it with a consideration of who the subject

is. It's always a neutral observer who's looking at this, who's undecided. If you guys started

to realize how many fucking people are undecided, you'll lose your fucking mind, okay?

95% of people who witness all the shit going down are undecided, okay? The bad faith actors,

they are petty bourgeois simpletons who have been traumatized by the might of our collective strength.

Do not start having resentment toward masses because of these people.

You should see them for the pathetic weak simpletons than they are, and you should break

them.

Break the bourgeoisie with the might of proletarian collectivity and proletarian discipline

the force of the proletarian masses the hordes overwhelming and trampling

upon these special snowflake petty bourgeois bitches that's your

fucking mentality. Okay.

Clean sweep.

Clean fucking sweep.

I am not saying everything has to be an effort post.

You can absolutely mock, attack, destroy all these people who are bad faith actors and everyone know.

But when it matters, when you think that a neutral observer is what you know is is is

they're going to use this to judge that's when you should start considering but remember you also want to

show force and might okay you also I'm not telling you to lend your hand out to everyone. Don't fucking do that. I'm not telling you not to shame people and mock them. I'm not telling you that. I'm just saying, know how to distinguish when it when it's time to shame and mock evil retarded people and when it's time to correct the fucking record.

That's all I'm saying. That's all I'm saying.

So.

Seems like a directive in form.

How about content?

Figure it out.

You know, you've been able to this thus far reflect our army reflect our

armies values reflect our army's truth reflect our army's position.

It's that simple. I lurk and then jump scare the ops.

That's fine.

That's fine.

Anyway, guys, I'm going to get going.

I'll see you guys Tuesday.

See y'all. Tuesday. Or be tall with the five. What's going on, brother? Appreciate you. Appreciate you.

Orbital.

Lady mid-what, wow, with the 10.

Holy shit.

Thank you.

Thank you so much.

My tan is not coming in very well.

I just tanned today.

I didn't tan. I was outside, to be honest.

I was outside.

Great Mother's Day.

Project, what's up? What's up?

What's up, Project?

All right, y'all. I actually have a question.

I don't really have time to watch TV shows.

Have any of you all seen the show Foundation on Apple TV?

Have you all watched that show?

You know, the press... you know the premise of that kind of fascinates me because I read the synopsis and it's like

what an objectively communist show.

It's such a blatantly

Marxist, communist show

so blatantly.

So Harry Seldon

has psychohist. It's just historical materialism. I mean, I know it's not one for one, but it's like an analogy for it. It's like so, so he's just a scientist who has the science of history and he wants to found a new community based on the science of history

which he has to do in the periphery of an of an empire and wage a fucking guerrilla war i mean like

this is this is like leninism this is maoism what is this it's so obvious what it is you know um it's

like it's a revolution based on an insight into the science of history.

Like, how obviously Marxist does it need to be, you know?

So, I don't know if the show is good, but I saw the synopsis, and it fascinates me because of that. It's like, wow, what a blatantly obvious thing you know um yeah anyway guys See you guys Tuesday.

Bye-bye.

Bye-bye.