It has begun.

Yeah, yeah.

Up, everybody.

Let me look at this.

Australia Stanny, what's going on, man?

The Minister, Baquero, Orbital, JB Wolf.

What's going on, guys?

Good to see y'all.

Good to see y'all.

So

We have a really interesting stream lined up today and a lot of interesting things to talk about.

I mean it.

But the first thing I want to clarify is that last stream left on a bit of a cliffhanger.

It was a pretty shocking thing.

being confronted with such a sick, degenerate, twisted world and also, you know, it's we shouldn't be surprised by it, but it is always a little bit surprising to see the extent of Nazi collaborationism.

Jonathan

Uh I've been advised

to not really talk that much about such matters by

You know, the legal team, because it's going to just be handled legally at this point.

But I'm only bringing it up.

Because uh the day after Nikki the Hegelian, Nikki, uh messaged me and provided me some really compelling evidence.

That shows that Anna's claim that Nikki had some kind of debt with these people and that Nikki was like into drugs and whatever was not founded on reality.

Of course, I you know, I can't really definitively say that Anna is guilty of collaborating with these Nazis and conspiring with them.

Although she did just we did just see an appearance of her with them at some art gallery just a few nights ago, her and the uh thug shaker Rachel Siegel Nazis.

So

Yeah, Anna's behavior is super sus.

And the reason I'm saying that, Orville, thank you, is what she said about Nikki is super sus, given what Nikki provided me and showed me, which is that.

This whole narrative about Nikki owing them a debt

Had nothing to do with drugs.

Nothing at all.

Rachel Siegel texted some, you know, said something about, oh, Nikki owes me a debt because I helped introduce her to this art scene.

This is a bunch of fucking nonsense.

Okay.

But I know that we were just taking Anna's claims at face value.

Sue is what's up.

Okay, hold on, guys.

I know that we were taking Anna's claim at face value that Nikki owed these people some kind of drug debt or something for cocaine or whatever, but.

I have been shown some pretty compelling evidence that shows Nikki did not owe them anything and that Nikki was not into all these drugs or whatever.

As Anna says, I think it's super weird she would say that.

And um

We're gonna, the DOP is gonna continue investigating the matter, but the reason I'm saying it is that you know, Nikki is offline, she doesn't really want to deal with drama, she doesn't want to deal with any of this.

So, I'd appreciate going forward if you don't, you know, keep spreading this claim that she had a drug debt because the whole notion of any drugs or any drug debt was completely a Nazi fabrication, just point blank.

I didn't know the extent of whatever Nikki was involved in.

Loady, what's up?

I didn't know the full extent of whatever Nikki was involved in because we didn't control her.

We didn't manage her.

We didn't have oversight over everything she was doing.

But she would give us tips, tip us off when there were dangers and people trying to fuck with us and move against us.

But ultimately, we didn't control her.

We didn't.

anything.

So when Anna said that, I didn't know.

I really didn't know.

But Nikki herself messaged me and gave me evidence that contradicts what Anna said about her, right?

So the only people who were into drugs, the only people into ketamine and cocaine and all this stuff, is Rachel Siegel and Zoltan themselves.

That's where the drug shit.

That's the only people.

They're drug addicts.

What else can I say?

Okay.

I don't pry into the personal business of ACP members.

I see no evidence of drug abuse within our party.

I'm sure people maybe smoke weed sometimes.

I don't really...

I discourage that, but I don't see evidence of any drugs anywhere near our party.

And, you know, as a final note, you know, I guess.

I want to critique how you guys handle slander when you're fighting ops, okay?

Because I notice this a lot.

Someone can literally be like, oh, ACP trafficked cocaine from Colombia and Haas was there doing it himself.

And because you guys are so certain that it's a bullshit made-up lie, you'll just respond with, okay, fuck you, fat retard.

It's like, you know what?

I want you guys to get out of this in-group, self-satisfied mentality that just because you're confident in something means that bystanders know the truth because they fucking don't, okay?

And the subject of all of your interactions on X absolutely need to be external observers.

So just smugly asserting your satisfaction that you know the truth is a form of gatekeeping.

Just because you know the truth, and moreover, just because you're educated, just because you're in the know, doesn't mean others are.

So you always need to be keeping in mind who the subject of your interactions are supposed to be.

It's not your only your fellow gorillas.

You know, it's the people who don't know.

You guys need to understand that 95% of the people following any of this shit are undecided, meaning they don't know what the truth is, they don't know who to believe.

If you're not making front and center of everything you're doing on social media an effort to persuade and convince these people who genuinely don't know, you're being a gatekeeping bitch and you need to fucking stop.

I'm not saying all of you do that, some of you do a pretty good job of keeping that in mind, but I do notice that some of you, I'll see a post which was just like making a crazy accusation against us.

And it's like, I'll see nobody actually push back for the people who don't know.

Like, what about the people who don't know what the truth is?

Are you just going to leave them behind?

All the gorillas know the truth.

We all know the truth here.

But, you know, when you start having this mentality, like, well, we know the truth.

Fuck everybody who's not in the know.

It's like, that's such a gatekeeping mentality.

And what you're basically saying is it's like this in-group.

Like, circle jerk, I don't know what to call it.

It's just like this in-group, self-satisfied, smug thing where you're like, oh, you're not part of my group, then you're an idiot.

And it's like, what makes you different than like these crazy gatekeeping leftists, you know, from five or ten years ago?

You know, don't follow the same patterns.

Let that lead people to not, you know, not be won over to our side because this ha and honestly, we're not scared that people are gonna go over to the leftists in the long term.

They're not.

What's actually gonna end up happening, and I'm witnessing this with my own eyes.

is that the leftist pipeline is just going to the far right right now, right?

The leftists are just going to all become Nazis, like at this point, right?

So you're here you're helping the fascists, you're helping the far right, you're helping the neo-Nazis when you're not properly communicating the truth.

Uh, be like Jackson.

Okay, I mean look Jackson's great Jackson is uh great, but that's not what I'm saying, okay?

So that alone is a lack of discernment in terms of what I'm actually trying to fucking tell you right now.

Jackson is not involved in discourse at all.

I'm not telling you to be uninvolved in the discourse.

I'm still telling you to be in the fucking trenches, okay?

I'm just telling you that stop replying with posts that are like, you're a dummy, haha, fuck you.

Because you're not helping when it comes to the people who don't know what the truth is.

You need to be like Volk Vulture is what I'm trying to fucking tell you.

You can laugh and mock people a little bit.

That's fine.

I'm not saying that's totally off limits.

But why is it that the Volk Vulture style posts, which directly and irrefutably refute the claim being made, gets two likes, and the guy going, nah, nah, you're stinky, gets 40 likes.

That's the shit I'm sick and tired of seeing.

Okay.

You need to actually like be.

You don't have to copy Volk Vulture, but like when someone is talking shit, you need to just.

You need to just fucking respond, like with substance, with the view that the subject of that interaction is going to be a bystander who does not know who to side with.

When someone is making a positive claim, okay, when somebody goes, you know, Jackson is the CIA, and you respond with, and he goes, Jackson's the CIA because of LaRouche, and here's Tulsi Gabbard, and all you respond with is, shut up, bitch.

If you're a bystander who does not know what the truth is, they're going to side with the person actually putting forward positive information.

They're not going to side and agree with the person who's not giving any information or any clarity about what's being said or what's being talked about.

They're just going to go with the person who's at least trying to describe reality with a little bit of determination.

Okay.

So.

This is gatekeeping behavior when you're not substantively responding directly with evidence, with fact, and so on and so on.

And the reason many of you don't do that is because you don't understand.

We are not like leftists.

I want to very much clarify a big delusion that I see.

sometimes where people pretend like our community

Is just as given as like De Democrat, liberal leftists or Hassan Piker's community or something.

And can you stop with that delusion?

Because that's just not the case.

Maybe for them, they can get away with just saying, oh, you're stinky, haha.

Because they are not in an army.

They are not in this conscious, militarized info army, whatever you want to call it, that has a specific goal that it's accountable and responsible for.

They are just casually acquiescing to the Democratic Party and the powers that be.

So they can get away with not with having unprincipled discourse.

Because principled discourse is not the foundation of their social existence.

Principal discourse is at the foundation of what this army is.

You would not be in this army, probably not.

If I did not constantly demonstrate discursive dominance and superiority over the enemy, you probably wouldn't fucking be here.

Okay, so principle discourse is at the foundation of what this army is.

Unprincipled casual association based on cowardly acquiescence implicitly to the Democratic Party, that's what characterizes Hassan Piker and leftist communities.

Not us.

I'm not saying you have to be autistic and be totally rationalistic, completely 100%.

I'm just saying principle discourse focuses on substance.

It doesn't have to be totally rationalistic.

But

For fuck's sake, even if it's just from an optics perspective, focus on what kind of optical message you're trying to give.

Okay, what are you actually trying to say?

It doesn't again, follow me very carefully.

You don't have to be rationalistic.

You don't even have to be like Volk Vulture completely.

You just have to have the bare minimum of a conscious awareness that the subject of whatever interaction you're getting involved in is not going to be us.

It's going to be someone who's neutral and on the fence.

That's the subject of your interaction.

Okay.

Stop this circle jerk shit where you're just patting yourselves on the b like that's what they do because they can take shit for granted we can't they can take shit for granted and we can't okay

We are not swimming in millions of dollars.

We're not some established, powerful institution that has the reins of power already.

You bet your ass the burden of principal discourse falls on us.

I'm not saying you can't have memes.

I'm not saying you can't joke.

I'm not saying you can't mock people who are being vicious.

I'm not saying that you can't be funny.

I'm not saying that.

I'm just saying, focus on what actually matters.

When crazy shit is being said about us, don't just think from a perspective of, oh, I know this is wrong, so I'm just going to laugh at this.

Because not everyone knows the truth, okay?

That's all I'm trying to say.

Not everyone knows the truth.

Okay.

Yeah, don't take our movement for granted.

That's the worst, most stupid thing you can do.

Our movement came from nothing.

You understand?

The minute you take it for granted, it will just become nothing.

Stop taking it for granted.

It's not for granted.

Okay, it has to be actively defended and communicated constantly and always.

You have to constantly communicate it.

You have to constantly maintain discursive supremacy.

Okay, you know, the people that they fear are people like Volk Vulture.

Okay, I'm sorry to say, but they do not fear a random guerrilla idiot that's just calling people names.

They just, that's not, they're not scared of that.

It's not substantive.

But they do lose their mind and they do freak out when they see a Volk Vulture actually like debunk their shit and totally like shatter them discursively.

That's what you need to focus on.

Discursive supremacy.

Absolutely.

Okay.

So

That's I don't want to have to repeat myself.

I don't care if you have to take notes.

You need to reinforce this for all the other guerrillas in the infrared movement.

You need to tell them this.

You need to make sure the message is heard loud and clear.

So, I want you to be absolutely clear on how you move going forward when you are fighting with ops in their replies and shit.

You absolutely need to know who the subject of the interaction is.

It's not us and it's not them.

It's the neutral people.

Most of our, and this is the second part of this conversation, which is more analytical in nature.

It's less of a critique of you.

It's just more of an analysis that I think is useful for us to understand why do we have dedicated ops and dedicated haters?

I can pretty much summarize it for you and completely hit it on the nail, you know, hit whatever, hit it on the head, whatever they say.

Okay, you know, don't fucking misunderstand me because this is my frustration.

Okay, dastard.

Dastard here is saying effort posts only.

Didn't I say the opposite of that, though?

Ones, if you heard me loud and clear, that I literally said the I didn't say effort posts only.

That's not what I said, okay?

I just said when effort is demanded, okay, then that's when you should make effort.

When the thing that's at stake is the consciousness of a neutral observer, that's when you need to make an effort to win their consciousness over.

That's not always the case.

Not every interaction you do has to be rash.

I'm not even saying they have to be rationalistic or effort posts in the Volk Vulture sense.

I'm just saying you need to have an awareness of the purpose, even if it's just memeing and mockery.

Have some purpose to what you're doing.

Don't just send out signals because I am not an idealist when it comes to communication, and I'm not a rationalist.

We're not here communicating pure logic and pure ideas.

I get that.

It's all signals, it's all tendencies, it's all social signals.

That's what's going on.

I'm asking you to have an awareness about what you're signaling and what you're actually communicating, what tendency, what that's what I'm asking you to do.

I'm not saying to stop having a vibe-based mentality and just like have humor and whatever.

Like, I'm not telling you to stop being a mass movement.

Okay.

I'm telling you.

To stop being fucking stupid about

Who you're addressing, who the subject is.

I'm not telling you that you can only be this super serious Volk Vulture type.

Volk Vulture is a unique person.

I'm not telling you to copy him.

What I am telling you is that the purpose of fighting the info war is winning the consciousness of people outside us who are not yet, who have not yet found the infrared vision or who have not yet been persuaded by the ACP, even.

Right?

Not all of you are Americans, so it's not always the intention.

But regardless, it's always about winning the neutral observer who doesn't know what the truth is yet.

Okay.

And you know what's r be really useful is if you guys start getting into the shoes of people who um

Of yourself before you found infrared.

Put yourself in the shoes of yourself before you found infrared and operate like that.

What would be the best way?

You know, think about it like that.

And okay, some examples could be useful.

I'll give you one.

Let's say someone makes a post saying, Eddie snorts cocaine and beats up puppies.

Okay, we all know it's false, but not everyone knows who Eddie is.

Not everyone knows, you know, so what?

So what?

So how should you reply?

There's two ways you could reply.

Shut up, bitch.

Okay, thanks for ceding that claim to the enemy for a neutral observer who wants answers.

Or you could just say, there's no proof of that.

Or you could just say, what the fuck are you talking about?

That's retarded, schizophrenic nonsense.

Like, it doesn't have to be a Volk Vulture.

Serious stuff is fine.

I'm not discouraging that.

I'm not discouraging serious stuff either.

I'm just saying the the essential thing is that you actually stop having this circle jerk mentality that everyone fucking knows what's going on, because that's not true.

995% of people who are watching this shit don't know what's going on.

They don't.

So you need to fucking focus on that.

You can even mock them.

Fine.

Call them a schizophrenic retard for saying that.

But don't ignore that claim.

Don't just let people say that and fucking ignore it and then respond with fart noises.

Don't just ignore what they fucking said.

Okay.

Imagine if you were not in this movement yet and you saw someone claim that Eddie beats up puppies and you don't know who Eddie is, you don't know anything.

Wouldn't that make you be like, oh, I don't want anything to do with that.

That's fucked up.

Like, that's what I'm trying to say.

Like, a lot of you take for granted the movement that you're already here.

You don't do enough.

Reflection on what it actually takes to bring someone into this sphere, you know?

Because, you know, this idea that, oh, if you believe that, then you're already should be written off.

That's just.

Then why were you on board for MAGA communism?

Okay.

Can you think for a second how fucking stupid that mentality of anyone who believes that is okay, really?

What about MAGA people who believe that Mao killed 500 trillion people?

Should they be written off because if they believe such a stupid thing?

Think about how contradictory and stupid that meant that same MAGA communist mentality, you need to have that consistently, even for non-MAGA people.

The whole point of MAGA communism was a dialectic between an in-group consciousness and masses who lack consciousness.

Okay.

So that applies even for non-mAGA people.

Okay, now this finally, I got detracted or sidetracked a little bit for the second part of what I'm trying to say.

Um.

Why do we have dedicated ops and dedicated haters?

And I will absolutely, yeah, Jennifer, that's fine.

I'm just sick of people ignoring when people make crazy claims or say crazy things about us.

Oh, you support Hitler, and then you just say, I'm sick of it.

You don't have to always be defensive either.

Don't misunderstand what I'm just telling.

I hope someone takes notes because, like, you have to have some intelligence to understand what I'm telling you.

Don't play defense either, only don't only play defense either.

But address and respond in some kind of way.

Just acknowledge it in some kind of way.

And if you don't know, don't make assumptions.

That's another fucking problem I see with gorillas all the time.

If you don't know, ask other gorillas.

Don't be afraid to ask if you don't know.

Sometimes I see you guys farting.

Someone will be like awhile.

You know, uh, you know, uh, Haas, uh, you know, he used to go to Walmart and steal every day, and then you just be like, huh, so what?

Wait, why do you why are you don't jump to conclusions?

Find out the facts yourself, okay?

Ask gorillas, ask around, research it yourself, then that's how you should never presume things, okay?

So finally, now finally, all right, why do we have dedicated ops and why I think that's inevitable?

Some of you think maybe that the reason we have dedicated ops is because we need to work on being less off-putting to people.

That it's our fault that if we have ops, it's our fault because we're not doing enough good of a job to reach across the aisle.

I also need to make you snap out of this delusion as well, if you think that.

You know, it comes to this whole like, oh, we just need to constantly reach our hand and extend our hand to dedicated ops, and eventually they'll come.

No, there are many dedicated ops that we have who are beyond any reproach, who will never ever come around to us, who are uninterested in any good faith dialogue, who are absolutely committed to inflicting as much harm as they possibly can upon us.

And the reason is because of their class background, because they have a petty bourgeois pathology.

A petty bourgeois individualistic pathology.

One of the things that you will find in common with every single one of our ops is that they are traumatized.

Thank you, Grant.

Appreciate you.

One of the s

One of the things that you'll find with our ops pretty consistently

Is that our dedicated ops is that the reason they hate us is not because they're not informed enough about our 'cause I see the interaction go down all the time.

They'll be a dedicated hater, you correct them without insulting them and they know the truth, you know, like, oh, uh, something about fascism, whatever.

You'll correct them, they know the truth, and they're still slandering us.

I think Mad Madeline was an example of that, you know, but why is it?

What's the actual reason?

Wha why do they have this like

Bad faith, almost personal.

Why is it so personal for them to the point where, like, they won't even listen to reason?

Well, I'll tell you.

The source of the trauma always comes from a revulsion to mass movements.

Now, a mass movement is not defined by having the most people because, truth and told, the liberal leftists outnumber us by a lot, okay?

So, it's not in numbers, okay?

But it's the dynamic of interaction and the dynamic of discourse.

A form of discourse that is based in a mass phenomena radically decenters individual subjectivity and exposes people to kind of swarm dynamics.

And it's precisely these dynamics that get in people's fucking head and make them lose their mind.

And that's a good thing because you're rooting out the petty bourgeois scum and you're enforcing a proletarian line when it comes to discourse, frankly.

Now, I have experience observing this phenomena for a decade.

The South African EFF on social media works the same way.

If you look at a lot of the critics of the EFF on social media, they'll be like, you're all a cult.

This is just, you know, you're all just this hive mind.

Online army, and then I'm just a rational, you know, sovereign subject who's engaging in pure individual discourse, and this army is coming in here and shitting all of that up and introducing this directly violent social.

And why is it violent in the discursive sense?

Not in the literal physical sense, but in a discursive sense, because it's exposing the social basis of communication.

Because while an individual, rational subject deludes themselves into believing that the content of their communication is judged purely on the merits of its rational integrity and its conformity with the consistency of an ideal, the truth is the meaning of communication is always embedded and rooted in a specific social form, right?

So, when you have a swarm or a mob or an army, you know, enforce a line and it's backed up like by a mob, people regard that when they're petty bourgeois class enemies, they regard that as a violent and traumatic experience.

Because what they're witnessing is the debasement of the purity of discourse.

And it's like being quantified and pure, and it's something about that that drives them fucking crazy.

Okay.

So

This is why a lot of people hate us, because we're exposing a class war within discourse and within communication and the transmission of information itself in the information age.

MAGA is hated by liberals, right?

Because of this, because MAGA is a mass phenomena, it's a mass movement, not just because of numbers, it's because of how it functions, right?

You know, mass culture, mass politics, all of these have the same characteristics.

And the bourgeoisie and the petty bourgeoisie.

The petty bourgeoisie, the bourgeoisie.

I'm a free thinker.

I'm independent.

I'm an individual.

And that's an an irony we should note, which is really funny.

Which is that, you know, the the this whole backlash against the woke mobs in the twenty tens, we are not reactionary with respect to woke mobs.

We are the evolution of that.

Woke mobs.

You know, they were demonized from a reactionary perspective, not because of the content of the cultural shit, but because they were it was just like this cancel culture mobs and all this.

It was rev it was exposing this new dynamic of the relationship between individuals and social, you know.

Mobs and dynamics and socialization and stuff.

And that was really off-putting to reactionaries.

It had nothing to do with any of the culture shit.

That's ancillary and irrelevant.

We're the next evolution of that in a lot of ways because we are a self-conscious mob.

We are a mob that is acting with purpose in unison, with a purpose, and with an authority, with responsibility.

So, this is what drives people crazy.

It drives them crazy that you're acting like a mob, and they can clearly see there's an underlying unifying principle and authority behind this.

They can clearly see, like, you are this army repping a very particular and specific flag, you know?

And they're not used to that.

They're used to just this illusion that social dynamics are organic on social media.

Oh, yeah, everyone's liking this tweet because that's how all these individuals feel.

Oh, everyone's doing this ratio because it's just how authentically every individual, you know, it's just natural and it's organic.

They see us as inorganic social discourse because we actually are taking responsibility for the social dimension of our discourse.

We are organized.

When we put out a message, it's being done in an organized way.

Okay?

We are signaling.

Social dynamics that are intentional.

Okay, we don't have this pretension of organ organic anything.

In the strict sense that, like, we're not pretending we're all just a bunch of like individuals.

We understand there's a unifying principle behind this army.

There's a unifying principle.

We're acting with purpose.

We're acting with that in mind.

And that makes people lose their fucking mind because they're like, no, for them that's you're violating like an involuble rule of discourse according to the bourgeoisie and the petty bourgeoisie, which is that all discourse should ju we should just pretend it's it's between individuals.

Not reflecting mass and social phenomena, right?

Every single that's why they accuse you of being all alts and bots.

You know, they they'll use that screenshot where I told you guys to make alts to circumvent when people block you and slander us.

When I was just like, Yeah, if they block you, make a fucking alt so you can actually assert the truth.

I wasn't saying create alts to make us appear like there's more of us than there actually is.

But that's how they cope.

They cope by calling you bots and alts because they can see how like organized you're being.

They can see how intentional you're being.

They're like, this is not a

You know, discussion between individuals.

This is a mob asserting a social principle versus my individual discourse.

Now, here's the final, final thing I want to mention about this.

Okay, and I hope you're following me very carefully.

The reason why.

Someone is going to hear get the wrath of the guerrilla army.

Is because they are they are not engaging in principled discourse at all.

If you want to have individual discourse, just come to me.

I will discuss and debate almost anyone who's coming from an opposing perspective.

I oftentimes do not like to have debates and discussions with people who mainly agree with me but you know have some nuances.

I don't like that because it's a waste of time.

I want to discuss and debate with people who very much oppose my worldview.

That's the only useful thing.

And I'm willing to do that in a good faith way.

And all of you are willing to have good faith discussions with people.

But what really sets people off and traumatizes them on a fundamental level is when they make a mistake and you correct them as an army.

When they say something wrong, and then even when you're being polite and you go in there correcting them, you have just traumatized a narcissistic, petty bourgeois class enemy.

You've humbled them by not only revealing, this is what kills these people, not only revealing that what they said was wrong.

But revealing that what they said was both wrong and socially incorrect.

Like, they feel humiliated.

Like, why are you embarrassing me?

I made a you know, you're you this mob is canceling me and whatever, and I'm wrong on a rational level too.

People snap and lose their mind over that, but you know what?

That is a barrier to entry.

That you do need to fucking humble yourself in a way and have proletarian consciousness and discipline.

If you fuck up and you're being corrected on a mass scale, instead of pathologically fixating on the mass dimension of it, just fucking admit you were wrong and not take it personally.

That's the proletarian way.

And how do I know this?

Because that's the dynamic in the party as well.

you know, a certain someone

uh you know, soyed out and spurged out and and quit.

Because not only did I refute their entire position in a long, like twelve page document or whatever, but most people were convinced by my argument.

So they saw how, like, oh, everyone's ganging up on me, everyone is against me.

Instead of focusing on the content of the discourse, they were fixated on

Being this petty bourgeois individualistic narcissist that was humbled on a mass scale by a contrary view, right?

Now

You know why I don't sympathize with people who lose their shit over being canceled and corrected by the infra-woke mob?

You know, that's really how they sound.

They sound like fucking like upset boomers or some shit, right?

But you know why I don't sympathize with them?

Because when I had 20 viewers, I went on Vosh's stream with an overwhelmingly negative audience of like a huge thousands of people in a chat like attacking me and I didn't give a fuck.

I stood on business.

Like, I don't care.

I'll stand on business and just defend what I believe to be the truth in a principled way.

I did that on all these other streamers that I debated.

I was disadvantaged.

I still am disadvantaged numerically, by the way, when it comes to my follower count and shit.

A lot of the time when I'm getting into disputes, I have the proletarian discipline.

To not freak out over the fact that an opposing team will have a social dynamic that is biased.

Kilo, what's up?

Like I d I knew Vosh's audience was biased toward him, and I still went and defended the truth anyway.

I didn't you know, I didn't lose my mind over I didn't be like, Oh, you know, everyone is is is is is is uh brainwashed on a mass scale.

It's like, no, here's the truth, you know.

The social dynamics are fucking unavoidable.

But the see, the foundation of our army is principal discourse.

That's the ironic part of all this.

We are a.

We represent principled discourse that is being defended.

By our own woke mob and woke army.

You understand?

Some people will claim to be participating in discourse in a principled way, like Jordan Peterson.

Oh, the woke mob is canceling me.

No, no, that's not me, though, because I have my own woke mob to respond to them.

So that's why they hate us.

They would prefer that I'm just like a boomer bitching and complaining about how I'm the victim of all these social dynamics.

But instead of that, we are ourselves a horde and an army that is conquering, humbling, and destroying all the opposition mobs because we're doing it in a disciplined, self-conscious, organized way.

And that's why we're a horde, by the way.

That's Mongols were always outnumbered by enemy armies.

A lot of the history books don't teach you that, but it's the truth.

And they would win because of that cohesion that they had.

They had a strong nomadic solidarity and cohesion, which created a level of loyalty that was extraordinary.

So that's what this army is.

You guys are loyal because you understand that your Khan, Hazal Deen, that's me, is a principled, honorable man.

I am just, I am honorable, and I'm principled.

I say that without any self-flattery.

It's just at least how I try to be, right?

And you see that.

I am not immensely popular, I'm not immensely wealthy, I'm not immensely established, but you do observe that.

And that's why you are loyal.

And you know, the truth is, that's the same reason people were loyal to Genghis Khan.

That's exactly the same reason why these poor, humble Mongol soldiers and cavalry were so loyal to Genghis Khan.

Because he may have been poor, he may have been humble, but he represented a principle of honor and justice, right?

And that is why they were able to conquer and take on empires.

And that's what we're doing in the information sphere, you know?

So

So, this is the truth of the matter, you know.

It's really simple, actually.

A lot of people don't get it, but it is actually profoundly simple.

And that is why, again, we have dedicated haters only because of that.

If the hater is dedicated in bad faith, it is solely and only on account of that fact.

you know, solely on account of that fact.

So

I'm not telling you guys to I'm not creating a new meme called InfraWoke.

Okay, it's not what I'm fucking doing.

Because you understand that the whole point of woke is this petty bourgeois individualism where you think that conscious awareness of the social basis of culture and stuff.

Somehow does not need mediation collectively by organization or an army.

You can just be an annoying fuck who's read a book in college and then by yourself walk around like you're the emperor of the fucking world or the empress of the world and talk down to everyone around you because you know the truth and fuck everyone who doesn't.

That's what woke is essentially.

We are not in for woke

I'm just saying there's a parallel in because woke mobs were never supposed to be a thing.

The mob dynamic of woke shit from the 2010s and the cancel culture mobs, that was an accidental and inadvertent dynamic, which was always an embarrassment to these petty bourgeois, you know, academic hucksters.

Whereas for us,

We are proud of the mob dynamics because we are a horde, you understand?

Um

We are consciously aware, we are awake, but our wakefulness is not based on the conceit of individualism.

We have awakened to a social and collective principle.

We have awakened to something beyond individual consciousness.

We have awakened to a historical mission.

From the very first streams of infrared, what activated the guerrilla army?

Stalin, Mao.

You know?

One hundred percent Stalinist, one hundred percent Maoist.

That was the beginning of an awakening to a specific historical tradition and a specific historical mission.

Not simply the awakening to a general, you know, principle of truth by itself.

You see, the difference between woke and infrared is the difference between Kant and Hegel.

Hegel did not believe

That truth acquires the determination of a particularity in the same way that Hegel did.

Woke is Kant.

We are Hegel.

That sums up the the transition in ter I'm strictly speaking in terms of the form of consciousness and the social dynamics that correspond.

We were awakened to the CPUSA 2036, which culminated in our American Communist Party, right?

So that is what we became woke to.

We didn't become woke to this general conceit of knowing the absolute universal truth versus a fallen world of deplorable backward people who don't know the truth.

That is fundamentally individualistic and petty bourgeois.

We awoke to the necessity of restoring, reviving, and carrying forward a very specific collective tradition and principle, a social principle, not just the ego and conceit of an individual consciousness elevated above the masses, but a very specific form of the truth, the essential truth of the masses' existence at a social and collective level, reflected in the tradition of Marxism-Leninism, the conscious science of history, right?

Yeah, not individual subjectivity made universal.

But precisely individual subjectivity sublated

into a specific determination, social and collective determination.

That is a particular form of the universal, the concrete universal, right?

That is the Marxist-Leninist tradition.

That is what we awaken to.

So, understand that is why we're so unique.

That's why there's something so fundamentally unique about the infrared movement and how we operate and how we work.

That's really what it boils down to.

It boils down to the fact that we've sublated an early sociology, we are probably the first.

A post woke phenomena, probably, right?

James Lindsay, he's got this silly kind of idea of woke right.

And I'm almost tempted to be like, you know,

He, what he is trying to identify in the woke right is precisely these mob dynamics, but which have not awakened consciously to the fact that they are mob dynamics.

So he sees a Vulgarian, plebeian, almost crypto-Marxist in his warped view dimension to the woke right because they operate in a very collective way, just like woke mobs.

But there doesn't seem to be like this unifying principle behind it that is responsible and anyone's accountable for.

And there's a grain of truth in the parallel.

Because if you look at the JQers, every JQer, for example, like Truth Teller, thinks that individually they've discovered a universal truth.

That the Jews are behind everything and whatever.

And.

You know, that operates in a very social way.

You know, it's socially reinforced.

It has all these like mob social dynamics.

But at the individual level, it's just experienced in a Kantian way.

As I am just discovering a universal truth as an individual through my individual subjectivity.

And to whom it may concern, whoever agrees with me.

You know, this is how these mobs form, right?

So in this strict sense, that is also woke in the same way.

This is what James Lindsay is ultimately trying to say, right?

But we are different.

We are fundamentally different because we are aware of the social dimension of communication.

We are organized as an army.

And we have the consciousness and the theory that exists in harmony with this fact, right?

So that's what the Bolshevism-it's just Bolshevism.

That was the Bolsheviks.

The Bolsheviks were a mass phenomena and a mass movement, but it was a mass phenomena and mass movement led by a principle that was itself scientifically and consciously aware of what it was.

Rather than this accidental conglomeration that was an embarrassment, it was proletarian consciousness, right?

So this is our Bolshevik uh way.

Now uh y some of you were asking about Groipers, which is smart, uh because well aren't Grouper you know, uh people try to sometimes compare us to Groupers because they are similarly uh organized or whatever, right?

The distinction with Groipers is that while sociologically an evolution of the the liberal woke stuff, right?

They do not have a principle.

Um they have not discovered any kind of principle.

Principle is not just an idea, by the way.

They haven't discovered collective and social principle.

Um

Before Nick Fuentes, the Groipers were just this totally uh decentralized

You know, thing that was going on, and they were all just uh using slurs, and there was just a way of trolling and a way of being extremist and edgy.

That got centralized and organized, yes, but solely around Nick Fuentes.

That's it.

So there's no actual

It's not like us where there's this historical tradition.

It's not like us where uh the thing that glues us together is this loyalty to reviving the proletarian consciousness.

At best, Groipers are a false consciousness.

At best, it's a false consciousness.

At worst, it's the epitome of a complete degeneracy, whatever.

But also, it's a false consciousness because

Um without

Uh Nick Fuentes, it doesn't exist.

Now, without Haas, does infrared exist?

If it doesn't, that's not because I am the principal.

It's because, on an operational level, I have become so necessary.

But I'm not just communicating to you that I'm this extraordinary, exceptional, superhuman individual.

I also have a theory, okay, I also have a very specific vision.

Which can at least in part for now, in part, be communicated.

In full is the goal, of course.

I need time to fit to write my book and whatever, but

That is a distinction.

That is a fundamental distinction.

Um also, let me tell you something, we are way more organized than they are.

That's another thing.

Way more organized.

You see, don't overestimate the degree of organization of Groipers.

They are not as organized as you think.

In contrast to us, the maintaining of the loyalty of the base by the head.

Is not actually something that comes as a given.

and they don't have any notion of obligation or mission.

It is still maintaining the illusory notion of organic association that underlies them.

They are nowhere near as organized as we are.

And I can guarantee that to you.

They are nowhere near as organized.

They do not have a discursive way of organization in the way we do, right?

So maybe they're more organized than.

These loose uh mobs or whatever, but

Nothing like us.

Nothing they they have more numbers, of course, but they're not as organized.

And they are not as loyal to a uh a unified principle and uh shared principle.

Let me put it this way.

You know what they don't have?

They don't have the 2 plus 2 is 5 shit.

They don't have that.

They don't have the two plus two is five.

Why do you guys, if I say two plus two is five, why are you willing to back me up?

And why are you willing to say, okay, two plus two is five, even if you don't agree with me?

Is it because you're an occult?

Well, no, I can actually justify and explain this theoretically.

It's because of your awareness of the social form, not essence.

We're not saying it's determined in a constructivistic way, but the social form of truth.

You afford me good faith.

And you know, if I say two plus two is five, you know that if we concede and you start counter signaling and counter contradicting me, then the enemy will then take this to be a total repudiation and a total uh rejection of.

The fundamental principle upon which the movement stands in general, right?

You will demand an explanation from me.

Of course, you will.

You'll be in my chat and say, Okay, Haas, I said two plus two is five, but like, why the fuck are you saying that?

If my answer is satisfactory to you, um.

Whatever.

But, you know, if fundamentally you can't agree, you're all free individuals, you'll just leave.

You'll just be like, I'm no longer convinced by this shit, right?

But we do have this awareness of the social form of truth.

Um

That doesn't mean I get a you just believe everything I say, you just it's not sustainable.

If there isn't an element where you can recognize the truth.

And you can recognize that I make a mistake, it's not sustainable in the long term, right?

That's why it's an active discourse I have with the community.

Um

So that's not sustainable.

In the long term, but in the heat of a moment, you know, we don't operate.

As just individuals, we operate as an army.

It's not just about

It's not just about the content, but also the form that matters, the social form that matters, right?

So, um

This is really what we're talking about here.

We are trying to push a specific social goal.

Um that much we agree on.

Now, if you start disagreeing with how I articulate that.

Um in the beginning, you may just give me the benefit of the doubt, but in the long term, if you truly don't believe what I'm saying, you'll probably just tap out, you know?

Or you'll probably just continue bothering me and asking me about it, right?

So uh

That is uh definitely

Yeah.

definitely something unique about us that no other community has.

Just none no other.

No other community has this dynamic.

You know, no other community underst has is so intelligent and is so advanced that it can distinguish

The form and content of a message and a transmission of information, right?

If you fund, see, look, infrared is not just one claim.

Let's say I fuck up and say 2 plus 2 is 5, right?

Let's say I fuck up, it's genuinely wrong.

The infrared movement is founded upon a message which is not reducible to one claim.

It's an overall integral worldview about a few things.

One, the record of history.

Okay, that's probably a very important one, right?

With respect to Marxism-Leninism.

Two, the global system and the trajectory of that global system.

So toward multipolarity, dissolution of the unipolar world order, the role of China, the role of Russia, and so on and so on.

So this as well is important, right?

Three, an overall critique of the exclusively liberal form of modernity, right?

Anglo-Saxon modernity.

We deign to explore as infrared.

We want to reappraise the meaning of what is the modern, right?

So it puts us into contact with critiques of modernity like Dugan and so on, but

We don't reject or flee from the modern.

So Mongol modernity is actually a pretty big cornerstone of this community and what it is.

And I would go as far as to say that Mongol modernity is why our community has the civilizational orientation that it does.

It's not because we reject the modern world and modernity.

It's because we can comprehend that the modern, the now, has a civilizational basis, a unique civilizational basis that is determinate.

So the form of the modern is universal, but it has a particular basis and a specific integral totality and ensemble of social relations that take determination and form as these different historically constituted civilizations, right?

So that is another cornerstone of what this movement is, right?

So, this is an overall kind of thing.

And this is what we get crucified for.

So, you know that.

This is what I'm he uh Haas is here for this.

Haas is here for uh Marxism, Leninism.

And then I I guess the fourth thing maybe would be like um

The fourth thing would be a kind of, how should I say?

Comprehension of the dialectic of class struggle.

Meaning, for us, class is not a concept and an idea, it's an actuality.

So, even if the majority of the proletarian class is problematic and MAGA, whatever, that doesn't change anything in terms of the objectivity of class relations.

So, it's the populistic dimension that is also there, right?

So, these four things, vaguely,

So this is what Haas infrared represents overall.

Now I could be wrong about a few things, and most certainly am probably wrong about a few things, right?

But

The good faith that you afford me is such that

You comprehend there's a central message that is worth defending, that is worth carrying forward, and is worth insisting upon the space of good faith to interrogate.

Because the good faith is lacking, because discourse as such, there's an attempt to shut it down when it comes to me.

You have the loyalty that you have to me.

That's why you have this loyalty.

You understand?

You have this loyalty because you're defending the integrity and you're defending the right of this discourse that defines this community, right?

So that's it, you know?

Um

But the very same thing that makes us as advanced and organized as we are also happens to be the thing that drives a lot of fucking people crazy, a lot of fucking people insane, right?

Um the two plus two is five thing.

It's like

The whole point of that

Is

What is the social meaning?

There's not just a meaning in terms of the sovereign subject, there's a social meaning as well, right?

Um

We know, you know, 2 plus 2 is 4, it's not 5.

You know that.

But.

If the flag says two plus two is five, that's the meaning.

It's the flag, you know?

Uh i i i i i it's like everything has that meaning, that level of social meaning.

And me as the con of infrared, you know, the the I G G.

You comprehend very well

That

This is a horde and this is an army.

Which requires centralized guidance and order to exist.

Otherwise it doesn't exist.

So I'm not talking about the party, the ACP.

I just want you guys to have I why am I telling you this shit either?

Because I want you guys to have more awareness about what infrared is.

Um, I want you to be more aware of that.

You know, I want you to understand what infrared actually is better.

Because you do get it intuitively.

Everything I just told you, you understand intuitively, but not all of you comprehend it on a conscious theoretical level, right?

Not all of you can comprehend this on a theoretical level, so

This is really it.

Uh in terms of that

So uh

Okay, so so uh another thing that I wanted to talk about was uh Trump.

Okay, so so this was just today, but there's a few things going on that are very strange.

We

We don't know exactly what to make of him.

Brutal Stalin is what's going on brother, appreciate it.

So

The White House recently communicated this.

President Trump's most important and impactful truth ever issued.

So I didn't know what this was gonna be.

I wanna I wanna put before I show you this, I wanna have some context.

Os osos, whatever.

So there are reports there are reports, I don't know if it's confirmed, that Trump will recognize a Palestinian state.

There were reports that Trump has been clashing with Netanyahu.

He fired.

Was it what was his name?

Mike Waltz.

Fired Mike Waltz because Mike Waltz is acting as a Netanyahu agent.

He's clashing with Netanyahu over the Iran negotiations.

There's an increased level of rhetoric coming from the administration and the GOP about.

Um, Israel's not going to boss us around, yada yada.

Uh, he g told the Houthis that you know, you can target Israel's ships, just not ours, and it's totally fine.

Um

There's a h there's a big fucking vibe shift happening.

And you know, let me just tell you guys something that.

It's pretty fucking crazy, you know.

I mean, I don't know what it's going to culminate into.

Part of me wants to just be like, Why am I fucking doubting any of this?

You know?

Because I've long held the suspicion this would happen.

I just never talked about it publicly because if I ended up being wrong, it'd be pretty bad.

'Cause I don't know ultimately.

I just have an intuition that Trump is not really fundamentally loyal to Israel in the way that a lot of people claim that he is.

And for fuck's sake, um

Something that's really twisted when you think about it.

Is if this was Biden doing what Trump's doing on.

The the the conflict with Israel and shit.

We would never hear the end of it from the CPUSA and all these Democrat, you know, ass kissers about Biden's the most progressive president ever and like you know, let's just be fucking honest about what's going on here.

Like

This is unfucking precedented if it's true.

I mean

What about the Adelson money?

I mean

He's a wild card.

I don't know.

I think he's a wild card.

I think he's a wild card.

I think that he's playing his own game, maybe, right?

And I'm not saying trust Trump because I don't know what's going on fully, but I just know it's something really fucking unprecedented.

And if true, absolutely is much more a progressive foreign policy than any other, frankly, in the 21st century.

I mean, I mean, like, Trump just reached a trade deal with China, I believe, which is another thing I predicted.

If not in public, I was telling Jackson about it, which is basically

The tariff shit, I don't know if I said this on stream, the tariff shit.

Overall is good because what it's going to do is destroy neoliberal free trade policies.

And then there's going to Trump is going to try a bilateral trade deal with China.

Which will help Xi Jinping within China and it will help Trump against the liberals at home.

You know.

So uh

It's pretty crazy, Hudson was saying the tariffs are a cover for cutting taxes.

Yeah, that's that's that's true, but they still fundamentally are a challenge to neoliberal economic doctrine.

If anything, right, it's totally reflecting a political realignment, for sure.

So, you know, bilateral deal with China, no more WTO and free trade.

Um

I I I d I don't know.

I mean you know i in terms of the vulgar interpretation of MAGA communism, the vulgar interpretation of MA communism was just like, you know, they think Trump is like this like progressive guy, and it's like, you know, I wonder if that strawman of MAGA communism itself is like turning out to be true.

You know?

I don't know, like, it wasn't really my theoretical intention, but I know the meme takes a life of its own and it's like it's pretty crazy, you know?

It's pretty fucking crazy.

Anyway, I just wanted to throw that out there.

Because now, today there's something interesting going on, right?

Which is uh.

Okay, he's putting price controls on prescription drugs.

He said he's gonna have them reduced by thirty to eighty percent, forcing pharm he's going after the pharmaceutical companies, all right?

Again, you know, Bernie would not even have the balls to introduce this idea, you know?

Bernie would never fucking do this.

Biden would never fucking do this.

Can we stop pretending Democrats are on the left when this is a much This is a left?

I'm not one of these purists who claim

That

Oh, the true left is this pure thing.

I'm not saying that.

I get that there's a nebulous, more left, more right kind of dimension to politics.

And Trump is to the left of the Democratic Party.

Can we stop pretending otherwise?

Trump and MAGA are to the left of the Democratic Party.

It's not a huge feat, but it's an objective fact.

The way I would like create a political spectrum right now is that Trump is like center left.

And we are like pretty far left, you know?

But that's like what it looks like, basically.

Like, the Democrats are hard right.

Bernie and Ao C are hard right.

Um

Center right would probably be the GOP who are loyal to Trump but are still GOP.

And then the far right is like open neo-Nazis, like Azov and shit, right?

So like this is what the vaguely the political spectrum looks like right now.

Trump is kind of like Omlo, you know?

That just really seems like what's going on.

I mean, I don't

Maybe he's like Putin, but definitely he's not a right wing president.

I don't see the right wing aspect.

Because you know, it's we're gonna start fucking seeing some crazy shit.

What we are gonna start witnessing, what we're gonna start seeing is that we're gonna start seeing self-proclaimed Marxist leftists use neoliberal arguments against price controls.

Oh my god, the stupid plebeian MAGA base doesn't know how real economics work, trust the experts, trust That's what we're they already did it with the tariffs and now they're gonna fucking do it with this as well.

Because that's the whole fucking point.

I've been trying to say that it's the whole point of MAGA communism.

Mass politics, mass vulgar populism versus these fucking glasses wearers who are fundamentally right-wing, liberal, neoliberal, pro-imperialism.

Okay, I don't know how much HBO Chernobyl you have to watch to understand that everything they associate with MAGA is just what they associate with Bolshevism and communism.

Oh, the mass, the stupid masses don't know the that's literally in Mexico with AMLO, the Chavismo with Hugo Chavez.

All around the fucking world.

You have this thing where like there's a tough

Populism, like left-wing populism, right?

Versus these fucking glasses wearer dip shits who pretend to be experts, okay?

Like Stalin, the phenomena of Stalinism.

Beat the shit out of the intelligentsia.

Can we just be real about what happened?

The intelligentsia under Stalinism, whether it's in art, whether it's in science, whether it's in anything, they were taken and beaten on the street, and barefoot peasants were put in their place.

That is what Stalinism was.

In the Cultural Revolution, they were taken and they put dunce caps on them, and the barefoot peasants from the countryside took their place.

Okay, so there is an innate class dimension to the anti-MAGA sentiment, which is a distaste for mass politics in general.

And Liptards will associate that with fascism.

But they're missing the historical context always.

The reason Nazism kind of appeared similar to mass politics in that way was because it was a reaction to communism.

They had to steal and emulate a lot of the things that made communists popular.

As an anti-communist tactic to suppress communists.

Without communism, there's no fascist reaction.

Without a communist Bolshevik movement,

They never you're not going to see like Hitler's and Mussolini's just come out of nowhere.

There first has to be the threat of a workers' proletarian movement, right?

I've said this so many times.

MAGA is a very vague, very, very vague workers' movement that does not have proletarian consciousness, but it is a workers' movement.

And yes, that's what it is.

It's like there are so many different forms of spontaneity when it comes to workers' consciousness.

We.

We don't acquiesce to spontaneity.

We believe in a conscious, organized, Bolshevik, Leninist way.

But.

You know you know what you know what my politics are?

You know when CPUSA people cite Lenin's left-wing communism and Lenin is like, Yeah, we need to work with the trade unions.

We need to work with you should even potentially politically work with the Labour Party, work inside of all these movements.

I agree with that, okay?

MMA thinks.

Okay, when Lenin in left-wing communism is saying, like, no, no, don't be an ultra-leftist.

Work inside these bourgeois parties who have taken a lot of the workers and kind of pushed them left.

I agree.

I mean,

Of course we should have uh our own party and our own independent principal organization, but you absolutely need to be doing work to be pushing people in the right directions.

You can't be dogmatic and sectarian.

I totally agree.

But you know why the CPO say got so triggered by me?

Because I was like, yes, but you're getting the fucking, you're getting everything opposite.

It's MAGA who is the Labor Party in this analogy, not the Democratic Party.

You know, like you have it.

I'm not an ultra-leftist.

I agree with Lenin's left-wing communism, what he said, but that applies to like.

Doing organizing among MAGA.

It doesn't apply to fucking go to going to fucking Kabula fucking Harris rallies so you can fucking organize dentists that make two hundred and fifty thousand a fucking year who wear fucking glasses and fucking support Ukraine.

That is not the masses.

That is not a mass base that is going to fucking be pushed left into proletarian consciousness.

You fucking retard.

Like that was the whole fucking point of MAGA communism.

It's so fucking simple.

The angry blue collar people

Who don't even trust the imperialist hegemony anymore?

That's who we need to be doing the work to win over.

We don't need to.

These stupid leftist retards, they're so fucking stupid.

They're like, you know, what Lenin was saying basically is we shouldn't be sectarian.

Let's go to the Democratic Party events.

There's a lot of people there.

That means it's the masses.

No, numbers do not equal masses.

Masses is a specific social dynamic that pertains to how subjectivity is interpolated socially.

That is what it means for there to be a mass phenomena and movement.

A hodgepodge of a bunch of fucking professional petty bourgeois snob glasses wearer fucks do not form a mass.

They form a black shirt fascist fascies, a confederation and coalition.

Of individuals trying to repress the masses, right?

They're like, anything that has a lot of people is the masses.

No, that's not what the masses mean.

Okay, the masses are MAGA, whether you fucking like it or not.

I don't know what to tell you.

Like

They're not just MAGA, I agree.

There's a lot of apolitical people.

I totally agree with that.

But the fucking Democrats are not the fucking masses.

People are like, when you guys did your May Day march, why didn't you go into downtown Chicago for the Stop Trump coalition?

Because my fucking politics isn't about stopping Trump, but toppling the entire imperial hegemony.

And I can be fucking pragmatic enough to know that a lot of the reasons you guys want to stop Trump is because in certain respects you feel that he's threatening to dismantle that.

I'm not going to fucking join your reactionary Hitler Azov march with a bunch of fucking Ukrainian flags.

I'd rather fucking shoot myself than march alongside people that wave the fucking flag of Azov and Ukraine in the name of that's the ma, that's not the fucking masses.

Yeah, the masses and the movement is not the Democrats.

The Democrats are not the movement.

They're some fake bullshit.

It's fake they bust people.

They fucking bust people.

They bust people and pay them money to all this shit that the boomers say is true, probably.

Like they pay people and bust them to these stupid fucking protests.

It's all fake bullshit.

It's not real.

MAGA is pretty real.

Like it or hated, it's pretty real.

All that Democrat bullshit is fake.

It doesn't reflect the sentiment of masses.

It really doesn't.

A lot of these people cooped up in these professional jobs and in academia, absolutely, they are full Democrat Liptard supporters.

I agree.

They are.

That's real for them, right?

That's not the masses.

Those are a bunch of fucking people butthurt about the masses and upset about the masses and really, really pissed about the masses and really triggered by the reality of...

Look, it's literally bourgeois versus proletarian subjectivity.

If you were upset.

About the Vulgarian masses shitting on the expert Dr.

Fauci.

You are the bourgeoisie and the petty bourgeoisie.

Like, you have a fundamentally reactionary subjectivity, which cannot get over the social dimension of truth.

That's really this whole debate that was going on of alternative facts and how, you know, oh, it's Russian disinfect.

All this shit was a bunch of coping reactionary fucks who are confronted with the proletarian truth, which is the fact that truth has a social form.

Truth Social is closer to proletarian consciousness than every single Marxist in US universities right now.

That's the truth.

You know that?

Because proletarian consciousness, in part, begins with the acknowledgement that truth has a social form.

Truth is not simply what some fucking guy with glasses or what some nerd at some university arrived at according to this vacuum-sealed procedure of propositional logic.

Truth is a specific articulation of a general social truth, which is partisan in nature.

Truth is not something you discover putting gloves on in a vacuum-sealed, abstract way.

Truth absolutely reflects discursive truth, social truth.

Historical truth.

The truth of a specific situation and a specific social order and a specific social struggle.

That is what truth is.

Truth is dialectical, in other words.

Proletarian consciousness, for pragmatic reasons even, at the outset has to acknowledge the social nature of truth.

Why?

Because

Proletarian consciousness, when it's organised as trade union consciousness, for example.

has to articulate the fact.

That we are not just individual subjects.

That the truth of our existence is collective in nature, in fact.

That we occupy this collective subjectivity that interpolates us as a collective subject.

That is square one of proletarian consciousness, literally square one.

Okay?

Literally, square one.

So it's baked into the existence of the proletarian class.

Truth social is much closer to proletarian consciousness just by virtue of acquiescing to the fact that truth has a social form, not just replicating what experts claim in a vacuum.

So

How crazy is that, right?

Um

So the the glasses wearers, um, Redditors, I used to talk about them a lot, but these people.

Do not comprehend that

Their truth is socially determined.

Like in what they communicate contains the estrangement that they have from the masses.

There's nothing wrong with that, but you need to be estranged a little bit from the masses to arrive at truth.

But they don't have a dialectical interaction.

That's what you have to have.

They suspend that.

They they foreclose that, I should rather say.

And you know, the the the problem with Redditors in general and and the bourgeois modern scientific paradigm of truth in general is that um

Well, it it it is rooted in a um

It it is rooted in a kind of um

Inability to distinguish

the meaningfulness of a given claim between a universal abstract propositional truth and something that has a social significance within the signifying chain.

You know, they don't know how to distinguish those things.

They assume arrogantly that those two things are the same and they're not.

And um

They refuse to budge in any kind of way with respect.

But also, the the problem is this kind of I don't that that what I just told you is um

Very classic continental philosophy shit, right?

There is truth in the sense of objective truth, vacuum-sealed, you know, natural scientific investigation and inquiry.

And then there's also social truth.

Social truth is like, well, it means this symbolically.

It means this because it signifies a specific social order and so on, right?

Through language.

But dialectical materialism says that this very distinction in what truth is also has consequences for how we should regard objective natural scientific truth as well that namely that in objective reality, in nature itself is dialectical.

This contradiction I just told you about has a basis in nature itself and objective reality itself.

So, this is why Lysenkoism, Lysenkoism was not for convenient political reasons we have to distort science.

No, I mean, the traditional critique of Lysenkoism is that, okay, there was the truth of absolute, abstract, whatever, biological truth, and then there was a truth demanded by politics.

But Lysenkoism was much more profound than such a stupid critique, right?

Because Lysenkoism.

Itself articulated that very distinction in nature.

That nature itself is dialectical.

That our social existence partakes and participates in the determinations of nature and reflects them.

They're not it's not a separate dualistic reality, right?

So that doesn't mean nature happens to reflect

whatever we find politically expedient or convenient, but rather

The content of our real objective, for example, political existence and social existence, also has a basis there.

If that makes sense.

It's not totally separate.

Um the logic of the political is also reflected in the very same logic of the biological.

It's not about politically expedient or politically convenient claims being vindicated by nature.

It is about the very logic of the political itself, which took a much objectively more advanced form with so-called Stalinism, right?

Itself.

being reflected in nature, not the specific ideological claims of the state.

But the dialectical logic.

At play

So

In in essence, things are the opposite of what you would assume.

Coming from a traditional kind of subjectivity, like, okay, there's cold, uh, ruthless nature.

Scientists discover the truth of nature, Dr.

Fauci.

And because the masses are biased and they're too vulgar, and there's the authoritarianism of politics that reflects them, it's not expedient and it's not convenient.

So the truth of the scientist is suppressed because it's not convenient.

But that's actually what the truth is.

You start to discover it's the opposite.

The very notion, the very bias of the scientist that nature is devoid of partiality and it's devoid of

of of determination, it's just this cold, abstract vacuum.

That is itself something that reflects a specific biased social form and institution.

Uh namely that of uh modern capitalism, for example.

It is a limited metaphysical conceit that is being disproven and dismantled by the development of reality itself historically.

So you see.

That's my that's my point, you know.

There is a dialectic of form, and a lot of people think that proletarian science will have the same form as bourgeois science.

But just be different in its content.

So there will be a proletarian Galileo.

No, proletarian science.

is distinguished from bourgeois science also in form.

For example, Lysenko was a barefoot peasant.

You know what that meant?

He integrated the investigation of nature with the fulfillment of practical goals of society.

He was slandered and accursed for that, you know, because he, because the investigation of truth should have no regard for the needs of society.

Well, no, we should acknowledge.

What truth is, the content of truth is the practice of society, as Mao said.

The content of truth.

is the content of our active and continuous existence.

The content of truth is not something that exists totally separately because our existence is part of.

The content of truth.

So uh I hope

This is an interesting point I'm raising for you.

But the arrogance of liberals, it's astounding because they have this idea that they are the principled ones and the masses are all corrupt.

HBO Chernobyl, like, oh, the scientists, the noble scientists, in defiance of the populistic authoritarians.

And it's like, they have everything twisted.

The conceits of the noble scientists precisely lack principledness.

Whereas the tough Soviet party apparatchik and general who's punching the scientists in the face and ordering them around, that's the real principle of that is the true kind of metaphysical power of reality itself.

You know, that's the real thing.

That's the real principle.

That's where principledness exists, you know.

The responsibility, partiality, like that's where principle is not principle if it is not applied.

The application of principle is the content of what principle is.

There is no

Form of a principle or an ideal that exists separate from how it is suspended practically within reality.

The authoritarian Soviet general who's choking the scientists like Darth Vader, you have failed.

That is the fucking that he's more scientific.

The guy who's the son of, what did he say?

He's the son of a shoemaker, Incernobile, he is way more scientific than the guy with glasses that he's bossing around.

The guy with glasses, he's bossing around.

He knows about science in a very limited sense.

The guy who's a political authority has true knowledge, true knowledge of real existence, true knowledge of the real law of the whole cosmos, even, on a cosmological level.

Because if you can comprehend, for example, the meaning

Of what it means to embody a social principle, to organize masses and m and operate at that scale, to fulfill goals, to maintain a political state.

I don't give a fuck i how much PhDs you have from a fucking university.

You will never comprehend the truth of existence as uh as well as that.

You know?

You will never ever comprehend it better.

That is true knowledge of what how shit really is when you start to understand.

You know, I want you guys to understand whenever I see the community start having drama and you know, you know, I look down on it and I'm so disappointed in it.

Because you know what I see it?

I see it's like, man, these people, they haven't gotten it yet.

They just haven't fucking learned.

They really have not l whenever I see drama in IGG, I'm like, this is so fucking pathetic because you just don't get it yet.

What am I?

The only prince in the room, and everyone else is a fucking retard?

No, all of you have to be leaders.

There's only like.

There's not a lot of us, okay, relative to the population of the world and and the countries we live in.

You're the ones that have to be leaders.

I don't know what to tell you.

Um

The drama shit, it's so pointless.

Because you don't get it yet.

Like, to get it, you have to, in a way.

Move beyond this framework where individual subjectivity is the center of the world.

The real subject is not yourself and how others perceive you, and so on and so on.

The real subject

Is social.

It's a social existence.

The minute you guys start understanding that, you will not engage in drama.

You will not engage in drama.

Yeah.

You will just be fo it's like we're like a hive mind.

people who engage in drama, they're they're breaking ranks with the the cyborg bot ar you know, bot army that like we are the we are the the the Borg.

The Borg.

And whoever's being fucking dramatic is being a little bit too

This is nineteen eighty four.

You're basically breaking ranks with the with the whole totalitarian collective.

When you have drama, it's pretty pathetic.

Wonders if this was an informative stream.

I hope you found it informative.

So Solos, what's up?

Like, if you guys are more.

Why is my face red?

Because I got a tan.

If you guys, um.

Start understanding what I'm saying here better.

You'll be more effective info partisans, you'll be more effective info warriors.

Because you'll know how to keep up the swarm dynamics, but make it so ruthless and cold that you are like machines.

You will shatter the enemy, I promise.

You can still be human.

And be relatable, but you know how I want to see that?

I want to see like funny stuff, and you know, we all like funny stuff, humor.

When you're a gorilla and you start getting upset publicly about anything, it's bad.

I get upset.

You know, I'll self-critique, it's not the best, but it's way worse when you do it.

Way 'cause I'm a face.

Not all of you are faces.

Also

This is all that I fucking am, right?

So if I'm getting upset, it's because

It's clearly not something petty.

I'm not getting upset over petty shit.

Whenever you guys get upset about petty, let me rephrase me.

When you get upset about petty shit, it looks pathetic.

Okay.

C comprehend how fucking collective this all is.

At scale.

You are an army.

You are an army.

You understand?

You keep pushing it, and you start getting better at it.

You'll start fucking winning in ways that you've never seen.

You'll start winning in ways like you've you'll start sw you'll you will have them doing somersaults, trying to subjectively provoke you and enter into an intersubjective discourse with you of recognition, talking about their feelings and and you will just like you're the terminators.

You will just they will be we're gonna be total Bolshevik hordes overwhelming them.

Just total domination, total fucking domination, you know.

You need to have that ruthlessness.

You know why I'm telling you guys that?

Because I want to see more leaders stepping up in the guerrilla army.

'Cause I can't fucking do all this on my carry it on my back forever, okay?

And as more leaders among you emerge who understand the mission, like Volkwalter, for example.

We will grow in ranks.

We will double, triple, quadruple in size.

And we'll have regular gorillas again who are silly and whatever.

I'm just saying, you guys been here, you know, those of you that have been here for years,

I'm sorry, you're a new you've evolved.

Make way for new gorillas who can be stupid and retarded.

And you can guide them and teach them.

But you should not

yourself act like you are a gorilla who just became one yesterday, okay?

I I need to be clear, you know?

Any suggestions?

Keep what you're doing up, okay?

Keep at it.

Keep fighting the disinformation.

Keep fighting the lies.

But do it with a consideration of who the subject is.

It's always a neutral observer who's looking at this, who's undecided.

If you guys started to realize how many fucking people are undecided, you'll lose your fucking mind.

Okay.

95% of people who witness all this shit going down are undecided.

Okay.

The bad faith actors are petty bourgeois simpletons who have been traumatized by the might of our collective strength.

Do not start having resentment.

toward masses because of these people.

You should see them for the pathetic weak simpletons then they are and you should break them.

Break the bourgeoisie with the might of proletarian collectivity and proletarian discipline.

The force of the proletarian masses, the hordes overwhelming and trampling upon these special snowflake petty bourgeois bitches.

That's your fucking mentality, okay?

Clean sweep.

Clean fucking sweep.

I am not saying everything has to be an effort post.

You can absolutely mock, attack, destroy all these people who are bad faith actors and everyone knows.

But when it matters, when you think that a neutral observer

Is what you know is they're gonna use this to judge.

That's when you should start considering.

But remember, you also want to show force and might.

Okay, you also, I'm not telling you to lend your hand out to everyone.

Don't fucking do that.

I'm not telling you not to shame people and mock them.

I'm not telling you that.

I'm just saying, know how to distinguish when it when it's time to shame and mock.

Evil retarded people, and when it's time to correct the fucking record.

That's all I'm saying.

That's all I'm saying.

So

Seems like a directive in form, how about content?

Figure it out.

You know, you've been able to this thus far.

Reflect our army, reflect our army's values, reflect our army's truth, reflect our army's position.

It's that simple.

I lurk and then jump scare the ops.

That's fine.

All right.

That's fine.

Anyway, guys, I'm gonna get going.

I'll see you guys Tuesday.

See y'all Tuesday.

Or be tall with the five.

What's going on, brother?

Appreciate you.

Appreciate you orbital.

Lady mid wow with the ten.

Holy shit.

Thank you.

Thank you so much.

My tan is not coming in very well.

I just tanned today.

Um, I didn't tend.

I was just outside, to be honest.

I was outside.

Great Mother's Day.

Project, what's up?

What's up, Project?

Alright y'all.

I actually have a question.

I don't really have time to watch TV shows.

Have any of y'all seen the show Foundation on Apple TV?

Have you all watched that show?

You know, the premise of that kind of fascinates me because

I read the synopsis, and it's like, what an objectively communist show.

It's such a blatantly Marxist Communist show.

So blatantly, like so Harry Selden has psychohistory.

It's just historical materialism.

I mean, I know it's not one-for-one, but it's like an analogy for it.

It's like, so he's just a scientist who has the science of history, and he wants to found a new community based on the science of history, which he has to do in the periphery of an empire and wage a fucking guerrilla war.

I mean, like, this is like Leninism.

This is Maoism.

What is this?

It's so obvious what it is.

You know?

Um it's like it's a revolution based on

An insight into the science of history.

Like, how obviously Marxist does it need to be, you know?

So, I don't know if the show is good, but I I saw the synopsis and it fascinates me because of that.

It's like, wow, what a blatantly

obvious thing, you know?

Um

Yeah.

Anyway guys.

See you guys Tuesday.

Bye-bye.

Bye-bye.