COMMUNISM WINNING | INFRAWOKE | DEBATING ENEMIES

Faster than the speed of sound.

Did you feel that our heart is beating faster with you?

Call in Barry Gulag.

What's up, man?

Appreciate the 10.

Midnight, what's up, man?

Barbara with the 5.

What's up?

How are we doing?

What's up y'all, how we doing today?

What's up y'all?

What's going on?

Sup y'all.

Wow, we got a lot to talk about today.

So, um you guys might have heard that we're on this new infra woke thing, this new trend.

We've got a lot of people asking questions.

We've got a lot a lot uh you got some other people saying some colorful things, frankly, some colorful things.

For example, some people expressing their disalignment with infrared in public.

Well, I don't care about infrared.

I'm really?

Then what the fuck do you care about?

Show us your fucking cards.

You want a posture and virtue signal in public about how independent you are?

Yeah, you don't have to watch infrared and be infrared to be in the party.

But a whole hell of a lot of people in the party are infrared.

And I don't by the way, this is not about Midwestern Marks because they're on the same page with me as well.

So.

You wanna just talk about your views like this?

Okay.

You wanna broadcast and flaunt your independence?

Broadcast and flaunt whether you have a superior line or not.

How about that?

Why don't you broadcast and flaunt the superiority of your position?

Because this independence of my way or whatever, it just doesn't mean anything.

Okay?

This is about what the correct line is and what the false line is.

This idea that people inherently know right from wrong, it's not true.

People need guidance.

People need a moral North Star to know what's right from what's wrong.

They need to know what kind of behaviors should be encouraged versus which ones shouldn't.

What is bad?

What is good?

What is woke versus what is asleep?

So anyone who thinks they're gonna escape the infrared renaissance and the infra woke thing oh, I don't wanna I don't give a fuck if you don't watch the streams.

If you're gonna be part of this movement, you're not escaping shit.

You have to confront it one way or another.

Mm-hmm.

Everyone needs to make up for themselves what's correct or what's false, but they need to actually use reasoning and employ reasoning for why they have the position that they do.

I don't think there's an alternative to this position.

I strongly believe that there's no alternative to it.

So what is it exactly?

Let's actually get down to the business of explaining what InfraWoke is, what it isn't, what are we actually talking about here, and let's clarify everything.

First of all

I hate to disappoint people who think that we're just caving in to Woke one point zero, but we're not.

No, we're not adopting Woke one point zero.

Woke one point zero has been dead for years.

So first of all, we can just completely dismiss this idea that we're going to embrace Woke one point zero, which is dead.

For years it's been dead.

And all of them have been discredited as hypocrites.

They they they're not moral people, they're not the North's guiding star of the morality of our society.

These are profoundly hypocritical, depraved people.

We're not caving to one woke one point zero.

InfraWoke is something fundamentally new, something fundamentally different, okay?

And it's everything I've been saying has been consistent for a long time now, okay?

It's all been consistent with dark Mali, dark Marxism, the cosmic orientation of our movement that I've been taking it into.

This is what InfraWoke is actually about, and I can explain it, okay?

Regarding this thing about bad words, I mean, what is actually woke?

What is not woke?

What are we talking about here?

So I'll first explain the non-starter.

The non-starter is anti-woke conservative slop.

The non-starter is anti-woke grifting, which the entire nation has fatigue from this shitty fucking boomer, boomer-larp coded, anti-woke, boomer-larp bullshit.

Anyone who's out here talking about how unwoke they are and how anti-woke they are, because I'm an old-fashioned boomer, and I just we put them here and we just shake hands and I just do it the old-fashioned shut the fuck up.

You are a LARPer with a bow tie who's the equivalent of grandma and grandpa's favorite little child.

You're posturing and vice signaling to your boomer overlords about how much you are s uh not part of the madness of your generation and therefore are outside of it.

I absolutely think that that's a completely bankrupt position and it's a cringe position.

It's fundamentally fucking cringe.

We need we we've always been against woke 1.0.

We've always been against it.

Cy, what's up?

We've always been against that.

But from what position are we against it?

That's the decisive question.

Are we against woke 1.0?

Master, what's up?

Are we against it from a position of being boomers that are bewildered by the insanity of a new generation?

No, we can't be doing it from a perspective of boomers, we can't be doing it from the perspective of people who have no solution for this generation, who offer nothing instead of this woke one point zero thing.

And I talked about this, I uploaded actually some clips 'cause I'm using the TikTok and the Instagram quite a little bit now.

Midnight, what's up man?

And I talked about this a little bit last stream as well.

But American history is a pendulum swinging from two extremes, the Great Awakenings, which usually used to be religious, but the woke thing was a great awakening, and then Great Darkenings, which emphasize the more brutal, depraved nature of reality.

And it's all Christological, because at the conclusion of Great Darkenings is a discovery of the moral in nature.

And this discovery of the moral in nature leads to a kind of puritanical moral fanaticism, which profoundly mistrusts nature and reality, and then it swings back to this rugged realism.

And, you know, it's getting more and more extreme as the United States is on its way to dissolution and civil war and collapse and so on and so on.

But let's bury Woke 1.0 because it's dead.

This is about responding to the anti-woke fatigue.

This is about the new thing that's on the horizon, which is not about woke 1.0 or any of the things associated with it.

So I want to get that out of the way.

But the problem is, these people who virtue signal and flaunt how unwoke and anti-woke they are offer nothing.

They offer no moral authority.

Moral authority is the most fundamental thing in the world.

If you have no moral authority, you have no right to speak in public about anything pertaining to matters political or ideological or anything.

Without moral authority, you need to just shut the fuck up and fuck off.

That's the truth.

Moral authority is the key to being able to have a voice in public.

Unless you're a funny person, unless you're a comedian.

But I actually consider comedy to be a category of moral authority as well, frankly, you know?

And the Conservatives are hypocrites, the woke one point zero people are hypocrites, so what are we actually talking about in terms of infra woke and this new woke era of woke two point zero that's coming?

So, there's been two extremes across the history of what we call America or the United States, right?

The extreme is the Great Awakenings and the Great Darkenings.

The Great Awakenings have a strong moral bent.

They're about moral superiority, elevating ourselves spiritually, fulfilling our moral obligations, and fulfilling the need to actually align our society with our principles and values in some kind of way.

The Great Awakening of the late 19th century corresponded to abolitionism.

We should never forget that.

The Great Darkenings.

Although you might be tempted to think this is about left-wing versus right-wing, the great darkenings focus on kind of the opposite.

The fact that a lot of the moral superiority that accompanies great awakenings is rooted in hypocrisy.

And that the conclusion drawn is that, you know, nature, reality is actually dark.

It's profoundly dark.

It's profoundly brutal.

It's profoundly rugged.

There's contradictions in it.

So Jack London was a left-wing author, but he wrote The Call of the Wild.

He wrote The Iron Heel.

These were all part of the era of the Great Darkening.

And he was left-wing, right?

So that's the pendulum.

And then, you know, the great darkening that accompanied the anti woke backlash, it was really a combination of two things.

One of the things was

One of the things was this f grifting, anti-woke, grifting boomer slop from Matt Walsh.

Just like fucking.

Just like complete, absolutely unforgivable.

Just fucking boomer, garbage, filth.

Gen X filth, that was part of it.

But then, on the other hand, the more general thing that took hold of the nation was a great darkening that focused on depravity and nihilism.

So, the Kirkification stuff is part of this.

Dark woke is also part of this trend.

But also, the Trump supporters who support, you know, Asmund Gold talking about he wants to kill all Palestinians and Iranians and Lebanese people.

And just this general embrace of evil and depravity.

Like, yeah, that's it.

You know, that Wojack or that whatever, that soy jack who has like the smiley face and they're grinning with the teeth and shit?

That's the kind of vibe of the great darkening that we've just experienced, right?

But I think, and then you have Elon Musk who bought X, and then on X, what proliferates or what has proliferated is just edginess, swastikas, N-word edginess, all that kind of stuff.

And I think that there's a fatigue.

People are fatigued from this.

They're fatigued from this moral depravity, this complete absence of moral guidance or anything.

So now we're coming upon a new era of the Great Awakening, a new Great Awakening in this country.

So you can even call it Woke 2.0, whatever.

But it's not the same as woke 1.0.

This is a dialectical process.

Woke 1.0 is already discredited.

It's already dead.

It doesn't work anymore.

These people are all on blue sky, and they've all turned dark woke.

You know what dark woke actually means?

Dark woke is just the woke 1.0 people caving into the fact that they are hypocrites who have no principles at all and have no moral leg to stand on.

They don't have any woke.

They're not actually woke.

They've succumbed to the darkness.

So dark woke was the admission that the woke people have nothing.

They've succumbed to the darkness.

They embrace this depraved, nihilistic fascism, and they just completely conceded everything, basically, right?

So they have themselves conceded the fact that woke 1.0 is dead and has been dead for a long time.

But what I'm more interested is something I like to call infra-woke, which we need to be at the avant-garde in this new era.

Yes, we're not woke.

in the traditional sense.

But at the same time, we don't have a ready-made moral clarity.

And anyone in our movement who pretends that they do is a fucking LARPer.

Where do the morals come from?

Where does the moral authority come from?

You see a firm handshake and a that's LARP.

So where does the moral authority for our movement gonna come from?

How do we know right from wrong?

What is off-limits and what is not off-limits, right?

What kind of behavior should we be policing and what kind of behavior should we just not give a shit about?

And these are things we should take seriously because we're an army.

Because we're an army, whether we like it or not, in public, we're an army.

They see us as an army.

They see us as a horde.

They see us as a cult.

We need to have principles.

Our principles need to be evident in who we are.

We need to know how to be able to identify each other.

Woke 1.0 had a very specific way of virtue signaling and filtering out the moral dimension, which is, they based it on what kind of words do you use?

Do you use the bad words?

Do you use the good words?

Do you hear?

Do you use the all it was very much focused on superficial language, okay?

We need to have a different moral authority that is based on how we actually interact with people.

Not so much the language that we use in every possible context, but what are we using it for and toward what ends?

Focusing on the actual purpose behind fucking interacting with people or talking to people, right?

So I just want to talk about the whole thing about the seven laws of the guerrilla army that I went over last stream.

By the way, that's not optional.

The burden falls on you if you reject these seven laws.

You have to make your fucking case that you have a different moral framework or a superior one.

I don't care if you identify with infrared or not.

If you want to be in proximity or part of this movement, you have to make the case for what's wrong with these seven laws.

The burden falls on you to basically defend yourself in a collectivistic way.

Because if we're communists and we're a communist party, our spirit is collectivistic.

You want to be online talking with your fucking fingers and your keyboard?

Then put yourself in a collectivistic context.

What is right and what's the right conduct and what's the wrong conduct?

Okay?

And if if you don't like the infrared seven laws, explain why yours are better and why they should be better for others.

Because I am sick of people speaking on behalf of us that have nothing to do with this fucking vision at all.

At all.

For now at least.

I am the leader of this movement for now.

So, whose word?

Who are you going to look to for your leadership, if not me, about exactly these kinds of things?

Why is it that a random fuck gets to speak on behalf of our movement, but my words mean nothing?

My words are empty, my words are whatever.

Why is some random dumb fuck speak on behalf of all of us, make the executive decision to set the tone for what kind of movement we should be?

And me, what?

That's just optional?

Oh, yeah, but the chairman said this, but who cares?

It's just the chairman, right?

Forget if I'm just the chairman.

This is literally just the face of infrared.

The core.

The core thing that started the twenty thirty six thing, like, what?

That's just like not significant of what I'm saying and what I don't say?

No, I'm the leader of this movement.

That's the North Star.

If I say something,

Even if you don't like it and you disagree with it, the burden falls on you to oppose it.

You can't just scoff it off and pretend it's optional to listen to or not.

Otherwise, I'm I'm not here to be your I'm not here to be a weak leader.

Do you understand?

I'm your leader or I'm not your leader.

I'm your leader or I go and do my own fucking thing.

If I'm gonna be your fucking leader, don't take my words lightly.

Do you understand?

You wanna make the case for there should be a different leader?

Make the case.

No one's stopping you.

So, my word is not something to just dismiss and pretend doesn't matter in this case.

Okay, I don't give a shit about bad words.

I've never given a fuck about bad words.

When I'm on X and I see people, I see all this edgy bullshit and these bad words.

You think it offends me?

You think there's something about that that intimidates me or terrifies me?

As a matter of fact,

The left wing, if it's not desensitized to trifling, edgy words and stuff, you are going to be crushed by the right wing.

They're just going to destroy you.

Think about if you confront the fascist right-wing or whatever, these extreme right-wing far-right tops, all they have to do to defeat you is hold up signs that say the N-word with a hard R.

And you're a white leftist, if you're not desensitized to these things, they're literally gonna go on the battlefield, meet you on the street with these words, and it's gonna like shatter your soul.

It's gonna shatter your heart.

You're not gonna have the resolve to stand and fight.

But if you're like me and you roll your eyes, you roll your eyes and you just say, wow, how profoundly edgy, how profoundly shocking, then you can actually fight them.

Why are you giving them weapons with which to defeat you and demoralize you?

Dad boy, what's up, right?

Actually, that's the number one thing to me.

The number one reason why the left wing needs to be desensitized to mean words.

I'm not saying use them all the time.

I'm just saying.

Be indifferent.

Just roll your eyes.

Like, why were you impressed by these?

Why do you let them affect you?

Don't let these words affect you.

If you can allow these words to affect you, then the right wing, nihilist right-wing, they're going to crush you.

They're going to crush you because all they have to do is use mad and mean words.

And I know you tried to just get them banned off every platform from 2016 up until 2023, but that failed.

The platforms are no longer censoring them.

So you cannot ideologically confront the right wing if you're still being intimidated by these words and stuff.

Frankly, okay?

I take that for granted.

This is an insight you need to be taking for granted.

But that being said, let's talk about bad words.

I don't think that bad words are completely unacceptable in any context.

I just think that if you overdo them, they kinda it's like you're a child who you turn 12 or 13 and your parents are like, okay, you can now say S I H I T and you just always go shit shit shit shit shit and it's like okay.

We get it.

Sometimes these bad words we have, we only have them because when all else fails, we need like a pressure release valve to lit on a literary level, say something with a level of gravity that's like expresses the degree of our frustration.

It's like a literary device.

When you spam it, when you spam slurs,

First of all, here are some rules.

Never ever use a slur that you would not use in person.

Ever.

So, anyone who says the N-word with a hard R, you want to know why it doesn't phase me or intimidate me or shatter my morale beyond the fact that I'm not an a black American FBA.

It's because I know for a fact if you saw a black guy in real life, you would never say that shit.

You're saying it to me on TikTok or something, but

Calm down, pussycat.

You would never say that in real life to a black person.

I know you're a bitch, you're a pussy.

I know you would never use these words.

So why would it impress me that you're using these words you'd be scared to use offline?

Because in the real world, black people, by and large,

Do not accept being called such a word.

And if you decided to demean them and degrade them and call them this word, some, not all, but many at least would they would there would be consequences of that.

Just like if you go into any man or any woman and you go try to demean them and disrespect them and humiliate them, you're asking for trouble.

Okay?

So it's not that such words.

Should kill your morale.

It's more like, okay, well

How do you actually judge the meaningfulness behind the only reason these edgy words even have anything is because of.

It's because of the tone policing and the political correctness in the first place.

But now that we're past it and Woke One point O is dead, I have to tell you guys something, that spamming these bad words

It's cringe.

It's not cringe because these words offend me.

Or I'm intimid.

Oh, this is.

No, it's more like it's cringe because.

What are you trying to prove?

Everyone knows you can say bad words.

Most adults in this country use bad words.

Me too, by the way.

I say bad words all the time.

Uh especially in a humorous context.

The key thing is it has to be funny though.

But when you're in public just doing it so often, and I'm talking about like just so often.

All you're doing is proving what?

That you're like an edgy you know, what?

You're an edge lord.

Oh, how edgy, how profound.

It's cringe because it's a form of posturing.

It's a form of posturing is what it is, you know.

And that's really what I'm trying to say.

It's just a form of posturing.

You're just posturing.

You're standing.

Why should that be our vibe?

Our vibe, even to say a slur.

Like, and we have to define what a slur is because I'm never giving up the word retard.

I'm never, you can take it off my cold, dead hands, by the way.

But.

Yeah.

What's the point?

A lot of the times it's just like, what's the point?

What are you trying to say?

Who does this impress?

Who's this impressive toward?

For example, if you find one of these.

You know where I think I give you carte de blanche to use any slurs you want, bad words, against when we have a right-wing enemy, when the right wing is attacking us and opposing us, it's your duty to crush them, to devastate them.

It's your sacred, take my words, it's your sacred duty to employ everything at your disposal to crush and to devastate and to destroy.

Online, discourse-wise, enemies that come from the far right.

There is nothing, and I mean nothing that comes from leftism, which should restrain you in your confrontation with our enemies who are on the right.

Nothing at all.

There are no limits at all.

No limits at all when it comes to the language you can use to devastate, to destroy, and to attack the right wing, the far right.

And anyone who objects to this policy of ours is a fascist collaborator.

What else can we call them?

But what I'm mainly talking about is when you're confronting people who are on the left.

Understand what I'm trying.

See, Infra Woke is not woke 1.0.

It's very different.

I'm going to get into explaining what it is.

It's very different though.

When it comes to the far right, you need to fucking be ready to destroy them even on their own terms.

You need to absolutely not restrain yourself according to some leftist morality or political correctness when confronting the right-wing enemy.

But I'm talking about the left.

I'm talking about when it comes to confronting the left.

When you're using and employing slurs to our leftist enemies, it's extremely cringe to me.

It's extremely cringe.

Because all you're doing is fighting the leftist inside of you.

You're not actually effectively fighting or disarming our enemies that call themselves leftists when you're just using these words.

And everything context is is very important here, by the way.

But um

That's kind of where I'm getting at more.

I want you guys to understand something.

A lot of the times our enemies who are leftists this is what you don't understand.

These people are already profoundly angry, profoundly bitter, and are full of a profound degree of self hatred.

So, when you are treating them the same way that we treat the right wing, you're just giving into their fetish.

You know, they actually kind of enjoy it.

They actually kind of enjoy it, if I'm being honest with you.

It's almost like.

You are kind of sus.

You're it's a little zesty of you to just engage with them in this way when they enjoy that.

You need to understand they enjoy it.

They enjoy when you try to humiliate them and you express anger toward them,

They enjoy that a lot because they already hate themselves a lot and they're already full of bitterness and negativity and hatred and anger a lot.

Your best weapon against people who are enemies, who call themselves leftists, your best weapon

is to just be like

Volk vulture, first of all, be like Volk Vulture.

Just focus on the substance of why they're wrong on all the principles and all the theory.

That's the most important thing.

Like that is just fight for the fight for the principles.

Fight for truth.

Fight for what actually, because they're upset at us that we use similar labels as them.

So fight for the integrity of the label.

The correct line versus the false foot.

Falsehood.

You know, it's about al-haq.

You know, the correct line.

You fight for that like Volk Vulture.

The second thing is when they're ridiculous, sometimes you don't have to point it out explicitly.

Sometimes you can just let everyone see, just be like.

You can just reply by describing them back to them, what they are.

Just be like.

having a normal one.

Like that's all you you really just sometimes have to show

That you you just are aware of how absurd they are, and that's all it takes.

And then the third thing

Uh I would say is that just say Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping.

You know, that's also a great one.

But you can't treat leftists and the right wing the same way.

And when there are enemies you can't treat them the same way.

So, I'm not a moralist at all.

That's why a lot of people have trouble with what I'm saying here because they either want

I have to be honest, if you're a man and you have this struggle with what I'm saying, get your testosterone levels checked because you have a very hormonally motivated imbalance in you that makes you either want to go full woke 1.0, moralizing, like extremely pretentious, like insufferable, like woke 1.0 type of person with glasses who's like...

posturing how superior they are, or you want to posture in an opposite direction and vice signal how unwoke you are and how free you are from the constraints of the political correctness of liberal leftists.

When the thing that I ask you to do is to actually be moral, not posture at all, to actually demonstrate, materially speaking, what correct behavior is.

And to actually materially and really be moral and be morally superior is a lot more than just posturing.

It's about how you actually treat people.

It's about why you treat people the way you do in the first place and how you do it.

Wall Facer, what's up?

You know, it's about, it's also, but it's also, I have to categorically say something.

This all, everything I'm saying is based on the premise that Woke 1.0 is dead.

It is dead.

Like I'm not so much responding to Woke One point zero right now.

Like some people Madeline Pendleton are who's my favorite fan, by the way.

She is my biggest fan.

She is I am her favorite

Person

Probably

She's a big fan of our movement.

Madeleine Pendleton.

If all Madeline Pendleton has to do is stop taking Adderall,

And she needs to stop taking Adderall and she needs to calm down, take some breathing exercises, stop taking Adderall.

And you know, I think Madeline and I actually would get along fine if she just calmed down a little bit, no more Adderall, and have some breathing exercises, then me and Madeline could get along.

She would probably agree with me about pretty much everything.

She needs to, like, you know, it's like she has rabies or something.

She needs to calm down a little bit.

Okay.

But anyway, she said something recently.

She said something recently about, uh, oh, you know, this is the victory of woke.

We successfully pressured them into accepting us.

And it's like, well, hate to disappoint you, but that's not what I'm talking about.

Your Woke 1.0 already is dead.

It's been dead for years.

Uh only crazy people on Blue Sky actually like believe in that stuff.

And I'll show you other exceptions, but

You know, the second thing is that

Um, I'm mainly responding to the depravity of the post-woke, the great dark.

I'm responding.

Infra-woke is a response to that because now we're faced with a profound moral vacuum, profound moral and spiritual vacuum.

Woke 1.0 discredited itself, but now there's a total vacuum.

It's a total depravity, you know, intentionally so.

So, InfraWoke mainly is a response to that.

And the cringiest people of all are the ones who beat the dead woke horse.

Like, just vice signaling how unwoke, buddy, we get it.

Listen, if you're going to be in our movement, I want to tell you something.

For those of you who want to vice signal how unwoke you are, can I tell you something?

You're just admitting to the world you're a pussy.

You want to know why?

You will never be as unwoke as the edgy neo-Nazis on X.

You'll never be as edgy as they'll be.

Think about it.

You'll never spam the hard RN word and post mutilated limbs and talk about how you want to chainsaw minorities.

Like, you won't do that.

You'll never take it that far.

So what?

You only want to take it 50%?

No, if that's your spectrum that you're, if you're on that spectrum, take it 100% if that's what you want to fucking do.

So you could expose yourself as a fucking edgy retard.

But

You could also alternatively just distinguish

Distinguish yourself from that spectrum entirely.

You know, w our response to Woke 1.0 never was that we want to embrace total depravity.

It's that we didn't like their hypocrisy.

You want to know what I am, the secret to infrared?

The secret to infrared is that we're Shia.

We're Shia.

We never wanted to give up Islam.

We don't hate Islam.

We're Shia.

We think that the rulers of Islam are munafiq.

Monafic.

Little T, what's up?

Where's Shia?

meaning the rulers of the left are hypocrites.

But when did we say we want to embrace the right, or the equivalent would be the Kufar, the pagans?

Do we want to embrace the pagans?

No, we're Shia.

Okay.

We are Shia, we wield Zulfikar.

Our problem with Wok one point zero is our problem with Yazid or our problem with Wahhabis.

We're Shia.

That's the basis of our opposition.

You know who is a Shia?

Marx was a Shiar when he fought the young Hegelians.

You know who was a Shia?

Lenin was a Shia when he fought.

The second international.

You want to know who is a Shia?

Sheikh Stalin was a Shia.

You want to know why?

When he fought.

The deviations within the party of hypocrites, the Trotskyite hypocrites, the hypocrites Bukharin.

Stalin was a Shia.

He was fighting the hypocrites, Yezhov, Yogoda.

These people who used the name of the party to persecute and oppress the masses.

Stalin hated them.

Stalin wrote Dizzy with success when these hypocrites would go into villages and dismantle church bells and terrorize the people.

Stalin opposed them.

You're saying you're using, you're using our great faith.

For abuse, you're a hypocrite.

You know who was a Shia?

Mao Seitong was a Shia.

Same thing, when he launched the Cultural Revolution against the hypocrites within the Communist Party.

All of the main figures of Marxism-Leninism were Shia, meaning they were never anti-communists.

They were waging the internal jihad with Zulfikar.

The internal jihad doesn't mean that they're anti-communist.

It means you understand the struggle is always within.

And so that is the foundation and that's the basis of our.

Opposition from day one to Woke One point zero is that we just hated their hypocrisy.

We didn't necessarily hate the notion of uh principles of respecting human dignity and

Some kind of moral authority, you know a rejection of animalistic depravity, a rejection of trying to humiliate and brutalize people for its own sake.

We've always rejected that.

That was the basis of our opposition to Woke One point zero.

It was never the same thing as the right wing.

I just want to be clear about that.

But Woke 1.0 is dead.

So, no, Madeline, I'm sorry to tell you.

Comrade Maddleton.

Maddleton.

Maddleton.

I can just call her Maddleton, right?

Comrade Maddleton, it's not what you think.

I'm sorry to disappoint you.

InfraWoke is something very different.

And I even think InfraWoke is something that I think a lot of the Woke 1.0 Blue Sky hanger-ons would have preferred us to be Matt Walsh anti-woke types.

InfraWoke is very dark and scary.

I'm just telling you.

InfraWoke is actually very...

They would hate.

They're going to hate InfraWoke a lot, probably.

They're going to hate it even more than whatever we are now.

Because InfraWoke.

Is the same thing as dark mali, you know.

I'm going to explain what it is comprehensively.

Don't worry, I haven't even started doing that yet.

But I just want to be clear that, like, we're talking about.

We need a moral clarity.

We need an alignment with

Cosmos.

We need a Confucian morality.

We need an Shia morality.

We need a Zoroastrian morality in a sense, right?

We need a kind of morality that has substance to it.

It's not just based on an empty sense of superiority of the self.

We need a morality that presupposes having passed through the stage of the luminous black.

Noor el Aswad, I think that's what it's called.

You know, the Ishraq school of Sufism, the stage of luminous black, it's a complete annihilation of the ego.

And it's an embrace of the Jesus of one's being in the deepest part of your heart.

And that's black.

That's luminous black.

It's a complete absence of apparent light, right?

And that needs to be embraced, which means a profound.

I talked about the idea of the stranger in the previous stream, right?

So it's like you need to understand where infra woke is coming from.

Infrared is seeing beyond the visible spectrum.

What exactly are we awakening to?

These are the things I want to talk about, right?

But I don't want our movement to project.

This is the main thing.

My main worry.

I don't want our movement to project a sense.

that we don't have morals, that we don't have principles, that we're just like

We're just a bunch of fucking wild animals who there's no fundamental like regulating

North Star, that there's no like center of gravity, there's no like

Like, I want us to have moral authority.

I don't want us to just be just people who are like.

Fuck all that woke stuff.

I'm just gonna, you know, it's like, okay, you don't like the woke 1.0 because they were hypocrites.

Well, how do we actually?

have moral authority though?

How do we actually

How do we show people right from wrong?

Because if you're trying to play the game of vice signaling, you're not going to win that game.

Neo-Nazis win the game of vice signaling.

Why?

Because while you'll type paragraphs, vice signaling,

They're just gonna post a Hitler edit and mog you in the vice signaling game, you know?

Because one of the ways people opposed or they waged a kind of warfare, asymmetrical warfare on Woke One point zero, you know why Hitlerism Hitler edits the N-words swastigas, you wanna know why that like blew up on X after Elon Musk took over?

Because the main like appeal for it was like, huh, this is gonna trigger them.

And it's like, because of how edgy it was, because of how subversive it was, like, people there's something about that people embraced.

Like, brutal black pill.

That's the reality.

Black pill.

The reality is a black pill.

The reality is like.

We all look at these naive woke people who want us all to be politically correct, but bam, hit them like a train with the fact that reality is actually really fucked up and brutal and it's a black pill.

And that was the main thing.

That was like, why?

And if that's all you have to offer, just pointing out the darkness and brutality and depravity of the world, the right wing has you beat.

Like you have nothing to offer if that's your angle.

There's not you are not bringing anything to the table.

You're not bringing anything new to the table.

You're you're just doing you're just being cringe because you're going halfway.

If that's your angle, then then go join the right wing.

'Cause they're doing it more aggressively than you are, right?

Third observer, what's up?

No, our angle should be something different.

It always was supposed to be different, even in the beginning of infrared.

This is infrared renaissance.

I'm trying to go back to our roots, okay?

And

You know, infrared one point zero.

It's like our angle is not that we want to embrace

The depravity of the world and valorize it.

It's that we actually want to project something people that inspires people, that they believe in positively.

And it's like, I want you guys to think about that so much.

Does it go a long way to show how we're not like these other, we're not like these other leftists?

Okay.

But how do you actually pull people in?

How do you inspire them?

Most people already aren't aren't leftists.

Our job is to inspire people, not just vice signal how different we are from other leftists, but to pull them in.

It's like

Yeah.

Where where what are we doing to actually motivate people and inspire them with the view that we're we're on the right path, that there is this is the right path, this is something that inspires them with hope and with purpose.

Yeah.

Okay, here's a new rule.

I want the mods to enforce a new rule.

Anyone in my chat who distracts from the topic at hand gets banned.

Anyone who distracts from anything, they just ban them right away.

It's an unforgivable crime.

Okay, when I'm on, like, don't break my flow state.

If I'm on a flow state, don't break it, right?

Anyway, look, guys.

It's really easy to show how we're not like these other leftists, but it's different to actually bring people in and inspire them.

Nobody gets inspired by being told that they're allowed to say bad words.

Want to know why?

Because they're already allowed to do that.

They're already allowed to do that.

What are you bringing?

You're freeing them, and no, you're not doing that.

They're already doing that.

So why sh our strong arm, our strong accent should be

It should be on the thing that actually inspires people to come over to our side.

It should be the thing that actually brings people over to wanting to join us, wanting to be on our side.

Yes, it helps that we don't have these bad qualities and characteristics that liberal leftists have, but it's not even 10% of enough.

It's not even 1% enough.

It's not even 1% enough.

All of your energy should be going into articulating how we have the best aesthetics, the best morality, the best purpose, the best way of inspiring purpose in people, the best morale, obviously the best activity as a party.

I mean, that's a given.

The best alternative, the best vision, the best way of making sense of reality, the best spiritual aura, like that's what's important.

And when you guys focus your attention on cultivating those things, spiritual cultivation.

Then, when you interact with Maddletons and other angry people, or I don't know, all these other people, if when you interact with those people in the future,

Um, you will do so from a position, a much better position than now, because you're s focused on like you will be interacting with them on the basis of someone superior.

We need to make other people feel guilty for not being as woke as us, not the reverse.

Like, people try to make us feel guilty for not being woke.

And I understand I'm guilty of this too.

We reach for our hand and we double down.

We're just like, okay, fuck you, bitch.

I'm going to vice signal how unwoke I am.

But I kind of feel like what we should do instead in a lot of ways.

When they try to like morally tell us how unwoke we are for anything.

Can okay, voila, everyone listen to me.

I just'm not gonna say it until ones in the chat.

I know there's uniformity of the cult.

Everyone is fucking listening to me right now.

It's not a fucking joke.

You listen to me now, you follow my fucking word.

Okay, I swear to you, anytime somebody tries to come at you from a position of moral superiority who's a liberal leftist, you need to turn it against them.

You need to be the moral one.

You need to show them actually, this is your moral fault.

You are the one who has morally fallen.

You are the one who is morally inferior.

You are the one who is morally lacking.

You need to radiate and emanate moral aura and authority, okay, like a mystical kind.

The charisma of Ali, you need to be like that.

You need to be like a Shia.

You need to actually have that aura.

I'm not talking about pretentiousness.

I'm not talking about a self-congratulatory, egotistical sense of superiority.

I'm trying to say you make them feel guilty.

You attack their conscience.

You point out their flaws in evil.

They're hypocrites.

Your angle to crush the enemy.

Okay, everyone raise up their arm right now.

When you hold the sword of Ali, Zulfikar.

Zolfikar is a sword.

It has two

Uh blades at the end of it.

Okay, do you wanna know what the two blades symbolize?

the form and the content of reality.

You hold up that sword and you disembowel the enemy by revealing their hypocrisy.

This sword is about slaying the hypocrites.

You show how, despite that they claim X, in reality they are Y.

Despite that they come at us from a position of moral superiority, they are guilty.

Why do you guys not

Point out my line of attack always.

My line of attack is very simple, but you are aligned with the DSA, Zionist Democrats.

And no, no, no, you need to hit you need to cut them with the sword and say this.

Because they're gonna respond and they go, No, no, no, no, I also criticize the DSA.

No, no, you criticize them, but you don't cancel people friends with them.

When someone announced they joined the DSA, you don't cancel them, you don't say they're dangerous, you don't say these people are evil and dangerous, fascists.

What is not fascism but genocide in Gaza?

Why is there no guilt by association?

Why the double standard?

You need to smite them with the sword of Zulfikar.

We are defending Islam, we are Shia.

We're not here to concede any ground to them.

No moral ground should be conceded.

What was Stalin's orders?

Not one step back.

Same thing when it comes to moral ground.

Not one step back.

When they tell you that you're a bigot.

And you respond by calling them a slur or the F-word or something, instead of calling them the F-word, why don't you just say,

You say they're bigots.

Tell them that they are chauvinistic toward the people of Gaza, the people of Iran, the people of the world who are victimized by U.S.

imperialism.

Because you consider such trifling matters more important than the lives of children being slaughtered and starved abroad.

You don't consider that the primary contradiction.

You consider such trifling small matters the primary contradiction.

Do not even address the question of whether words can be justified or not.

It's a trifling matter that means nothing.

You instead focus on the meat and potatoes.

You're a hypocrite.

You're a chauvinist.

Only chauvinists could have the privilege of focusing on some triflingly small matters.

Instead of, look, why are you willing to forgive someone who's pro-transgender?

But sympathetic toward NATO, you forgive them.

But someone who's anti-transgender and who's anti-NATO, you crucify them.

No, it should be the opposite, actually, because what's more important?

The thing that's more important, it doesn't matter what you think about transgenderism.

Of course, the important thing, of course, the important thing is US imperialism.

Of course, the important thing, morally speaking, morally speaking, right?

Is the livelihood, the dignity of the people of the world being slaughtered, being killed, and so on and so on?

You see how you should never concede the moral high ground.

Ever.

Ever.

That's in for woke.

Okay, so I can explain InfraWoke, you know?

So, InfraWoke is very simple.

Woke 1.0, and across all America's great awakenings.

Why is it a great awakening?

And what about the Age of Disclosure and Aliens, the movie by Steven Spielberg, The Age of Disclosure, Disclosure Day?

We're gonna disclose the aliens that the Pentagon is hiding.

Well, I'm gonna do that as well tonight.

What do I mean?

So there's something called the unconscious, okay?

Freud identified and discovered the unconscious.

Lacan spoke of the unconscious.

He said it was structured like a language.

We don't need to be obscure or mystical about it.

There are clearly a deep embedded reality which we do not articulate consciously, but which we nonetheless partake in.

I mean, if you want to understand that in Marxist terms, Marx has an understanding of that with his critique of ideology.

So, there is a human reality that we partake in, which we are not consciously aware of, but which nonetheless defines in a large part of who we are.

And Woke 1.0 was mainly about.

Bringing that reality to light.

And colonizing it.

By consciousness, consciousness colonizes the unconscious.

And any trace of the unconscious has to be declared evil and fascist and whatever because we don't trust it.

We don't trust material reality.

We think that if something exists materially outside of our control, it's depraved.

And this comes from Calvinism.

So that's why, for example, why does everyone think North Korea is a crazy, loony country?

Because North Korea is not under the control of the U.S.

Empire.

North Korea is its own thing.

So we just assume the worst, worst things are happening there.

Because it's not subjected under the liberal hegemony of the U.S.

Empire, which alone enforces human rights and morality and so on.

So we see North Korea as this wilderness where, of course, there's this rogue, malign sovereign.

Remember the rise of MAGA communism substack.

There's this malign sovereign dictator who's abusing all of his power because why wouldn't he?

Because this is a world of total depravity.

Everything outside of our control and what's familiar to us is necessarily hostile and evil, right?

And this idea of taking something in the dark and just bringing it to light.

I mean, y you can say this has its roots in bourgeois modernity, the European Enlightenment.

You know, that's kind of what it was about.

But this paradigm in general that everything that's in the dark is bad and is evil.

I think it comes from Calvinism, and that's that explains the pendulum, the pendleton, if you will, of the cycles of woke and dark in this country, right?

Um it's like

Uh during the dark eras.

What ends up happening is that we concede the premise that what's in the dark is evil and bad, but there's this nihilistic fatalism that says, but nonetheless, we cannot resist it.

So we have to just accept that we live in a world of total depravity and embrace the evil consciously.

But listen to me carefully.

Listen to my words very carefully right now.

During the dark the Great Darkenings that happen across US history, right, which happens in the early twentieth century, late nineteenth century, again social Darwinism, eugenics.

But then ambiguously you also had Jack London and stuff.

But nonetheless, what was the point of the dark the great darkenings?

Trying to get ahead of the depravity of the material world by vice signaling how much you're okay with it and are aligned with it is another w way of trying to save yourself from being defined by the external material reality.

It's a way of preserving the integrity of the sovereign self from material reality.

In other words, in the same way that great awakenings are about establishing colonial outposts of moral absolute purity,

Uh that are under your absolute control so that y you know

That alone is what's right and what's good.

Great darkenings are about

Protecting yourself by embracing evil.

If you embrace evil, you cannot be victimized by it.

You know the cliché of like,

In in psychobabble, popular psychobabble, where they're like

Like, uh I hurt them because I didn't want to be hurt by them.

And it was my defense mechanism because I'm always getting hurt all the time.

And if I hurt, if I push them away first, then they can't hurt me.

It's like that's what the dark, the great darkenings are.

That's what the one we're in now is, basically.

It's a yeah, it's a form of subjective preemption.

By vice signaling and blackpilling so much and talking about how much you're like ahead of all of it.

And okay, I embrace the racism.

I embrace the depravity.

I embrace all of the evil.

You're also preempting subjectively.

The possibility that reality could ever disappoint you in any kind of way or contradict you.

The main thing is, you don't want to be contradicted by material reality.

So it leads to an opposite extreme of presuming the worst onto material reality, meaning you give it no benefit of the doubt at all, because every benefit of the doubt is simultaneously a vulnerability that could come to.

threaten the integrity of the sovereign subjective self, right?

So it's like you do this.

It's like, no, it's a black pill.

I know.

It's like, okay, think about incels.

That's the best example.

Incels are basically like, I know for a fact all bitches are evil.

I know it.

They're all voids.

They all are whores and they're all bad and they're all evil.

And it's like, wait a second.

A lot of women are actually quite good.

They're quite fine though.

But, you know, good people come in good and bad.

And some are good, actually.

No, they all have to be bad.

Why do they have to say all of them are bad, right?

And you could say maybe the same about an extreme feminist who hates men.

It's the same thing.

But let's focus on the insult.

Why do they have to believe they're all bad?

Because it's a way to protect themselves in a way, right?

It's like, well, then, because if they're all bad, there's not even a single hope I can cling to where I open myself to the possibility that.

You know, that this alienation I have with reality might be overcome.

Maybe I can find a relationship with a nice woman, something like that, right?

When you eliminate that possibility, you're basically guaranteeing that you've established a form of subjectivity that can never be disappointed.

Because the same benefit of the doubt that you extend to reality, to the outside reality, is the same one that's a vulnerability that maybe could disappoint you somehow, maybe could threaten the integrity of your sovereign self, and so on and so on.

So, you see, this is what I'm talking about.

So, this is the dark, the great darkening, right?

That's why on X everyone's so edgy all the time.

That's basically it.

It's the black pill.

Um.

It's a way, it's also a coping mechanism that has its roots in America, has its roots in the same thing as the Woke 1.0.

It's the same thing.

Okay?

And you know who is great?

A great artist was David Lynch.

If you watch Twin Peaks, he has the G the Black Lodge, but also other symbolism.

And what is the symbolism of Twin Peaks?

Black and white.

The tiles on the floor are black and white.

People say it's from Freemasonry, but what does it actually mean?

The black and white tiles on David Lynch.

Twin Peaks.

You know what I'm talking about?

The black and white tiles.

Also, it's also in the black lots, but it's also in the diner where Dill Cooper has the nice coffee, right?

The white stands for the woke, and the black one stands for the dark, the great darkening.

So you see, it's the great awakening and the great darkening.

It's the duality of America, the two sides, the two accents, the two orientations of how America makes sense morally of its place and metaphysically of the place we have in the world, right?

We swing from this absolute moral sense of conceit immoral absolute moral conceit and total depravity.

But what they both have in common is that we're not at peace with the material real.

Now, the way David Lynch reconciles that contradiction is through what?

Transcendental meditation in Buddhism.

David Lynch basically says the way we can be at peace and be resigned, we need to just meditate and just have transcendental meditation and just

I accept all of it.

And so that's the David Lynch way, but that's a you know, his intentions were kind of good though, because he understands this is the existential problematic of the American psych.

Uh he sees that very clearly, right?

Like

We swing between these two extremes which are rooted ultimately in the same disposition, you know?

And so uh

What is Infra Woke?

Or Dark Mali for that matter?

Well, I'll tell you, the main thing is that

To see beyond the visible spectrum.

What is it we need to be awake toward?

We need to be awake toward a thing without annihilating it.

And I love the idea of resignation.

We need to be awake and then send off the thing we're awake to and let it be.

Let it be, let it be.

Like we need the thing, it's like you need to let it be.

You need to be awake to the precise moment of absolute knowledge, absolute consciousness, must also correspond to a profound resignation.

And peace with the thing.

And you know who set that precedent?

I'll write about it more for sure.

It's coming in the Islam thing.

Karl Marx.

Sheikh Karl Marx.

So our Sheikh Karl Marx.

Schech Karl Marx was a student of Hegel and also of Feuerbach and the young Hegelians.

And Scher Karl Marx accepts the Hegelian system, but as a young Hegelian, he leans with Feuerbach's interpretation.

The Hegelian system is just an alienation from religion.

It's just the Christian trinity.

And the Christian trinity and the Christian God is just an alienation of the human essence.

So the Hegelian system is an alienation from the human essence.

It's not that it's wrong, but that the real thing is the human essence.

And that's comes from Feuerbach, right?

Ones if you can still hear me.

'Kay.

Continuing on.

So Schech Karl Marx comes to the conclusion that

Because Feuerbach, you need to read Feuerbach.

Well, don't read him, you're not ready for it.

But if you study Feuerbach, he very comprehensively develops a system of the human.

So Feuerbach's humanism is a comprehensive system.

He has a trinity of man.

He explicates the nature of man, what man is, what humanity is, what is the species essence, the species being.

And it's a systematic, systemic comprehension.

It's very exhaustive.

In other words, it's a consciousness of something that previously we were not conscious of, you know?

And Cher Karl Marx accepts this, more or less.

But at the conclusion of the entire system of German idealism, how does Schech Karl Marx complete the system of German idealism?

He resigns.

He says it's correct, and that is exactly why I will accept before me now on the street the proletariat.

It's here.

This thing that we've raised to consciousness comprehensively, we've only done so to reveal the thing that was here all along.

All this time.

Now we can accept it and recognize its brilliance.

He called the proletariat the ingenious soil of the people.

Sheikh Karl Marx accepts the the the he is the most woke of all okay infra woke

But the conclusion of his wakefulness is to be at peace with the material.

And this peace is revolutionary because it means actually the proletariat is this ingenious soil of the people.

It itself is already this.

We don't need to take it and turn it into this systematic idea of man.

Man is already.

Brilliant, you know?

Do we have no mods in the chat?

So uh

So, this infra-woke is about resignation.

Infra-woke is about Islam.

Infra-woke is about.

We need to be aware of the very limitations

of wakefulness.

And that doesn't mean you just concede things to the unconscious.

It it's more like you you are at peace with the fact there will always be an infinitesimal gap between the things we can be consciously uh uh within our control and the things which necessarily presuppose

A you know, a material context, a deeper material context that we cannot define or control.

Just like you cannot choose who your parents are, you cannot choose what species you belong to, you cannot choose the circumstances of your own birth, you need to be at peace with that.

You need to be at peace with the cosmos in some sense.

You need to wake up to the reality of the cosmos in order to be at peace with it.

That's Infor Woke.

Meaning just because you are awake to something doesn't mean you've mastered the thing and you can annihilate this thing because you've waken up to it.

The thing that you've woken up to is not always something that means to deceive you or oppress you or trick you.

Sometimes you have to wake up to something

To respect it enough to maintain your distance from it.

Like

You know, it's about gratitude.

When you wake up, for example, to a family member, all this time I've taken my family members for granted, but then suddenly you wake up and you realize, you know what?

I'm grateful for this thing I've taken for granted.

Now I can actually appreciate what it is.

It's like, in a sense, that's infra-woke to me.

That's what infra-woke means.

It's like we need to have that attitude.

Infra-woke is not about woke 1.0.

Woke 1.0 is primarily about being woken up to the fact that the system is unjust.

But I think everyone's already aware of that fact, and now what people need to wake up to is what can we do about it.

What is within our capacity to do to respond to this?

What alternative can we create?

How can we actually live?

Uh knowing this, you know, and if you can carve out a space of peace in this very evil system we live in, you finally have something to fight for and defend, and you have a ground to stand upon with which you can challenge this wicked system.

But we don't have that right now.

How can we challenge the system if all we can do is whine at the government and complain at a government that doesn't want to hear us anymore?

Constantly protesting, protesting and protesting a government that doesn't care about hearing you is a road to nowhere.

It's not in a way, Woke 1.0 is about protesting, if you ask me.

Woke 1.0 is mainly just about protesting.

Well, nobody cares if you're protesting anymore.

Like, your voice is not going to be heard.

After 2020, it's over.

So, woke to or infra-woke has to be about.

Having like a self-confidence where, just like how Marx believed the proletariat was the ingenious soil of the people, we wake up to this profound, immense potential within us.

In these conditions of absolute despair and hopelessness, we do have a fighting chance.

You know, like 2036 is on the horizon.

There is a way forward.

There's a brilliance, you know, that we've taken for granted, but there's a way forward.

There is something we can do.

That heaven is aligned with us.

We have the mandate of heaven, we just need to wake up to it.

You know, like we can go forward, we we do have a fighting chance.

If woke one point oh was mainly about being awake to the fact that everything is so wrong and everything you know is wrong, infra woke is mainly about waking up to the fact that we have a fighting chance.

And being confident enough in ourselves not to become unstable, not to become off balance, because woke 1.0 ended in insanity.

You're transphobic, you're homophobic, you're racist, everyone's racist, I'm racist, we're racist, everyone's Hitler, everything's Hitler.

Okay, it's like eventually that just became self-consuming attack, attack, attack.

Where's the inner reflection, the inner peace?

You're like, we're just sitting here, dark Mali style.

We're like,

Like we're at peace.

You understand?

And yes, we can fight.

We can fight, but fighting presupposes having something to fight for.

Remember, I said that.

Fighting presupposes having something to fight for.

Fighting presupposes having something you can confidently say we have a way forward.

Okay.

But InfraWoke it's like um

seeing beyond the visible spectrum.

it doesn't mean you want to take everything beyond the visible spectrum and put it into the visible spectrum.

And that wakefulness means I'm going to take the infrared waves and turn them into

Visible, uh, visible light.

It's more like I can see these things.

It's almost like this.

Can we see Tian?

Can you see Tian?

Can you see heaven?

Can you see it?

Heaven is infinite.

You can't see heaven.

Can you see the mandate of heaven and the starry sky above?

You can't.

It's infinite.

You cannot see it.

But once you do fucking see it,

You're like, wow, I'm locked the fuck in.

I got this shit.

That is like the infrared, infrawoke type of gnosis.

It's like you can't see it, but once you do see it, you come back to reality.

You snap back to reality and you're like, I've peered beyond the abyss.

I've gone beyond the threshold of the visible world.

I saw what's beyond it, and we got that shit on lock.

Heaven is with us.

Now we go forward.

It's like when you meditate so hard and you transcend this world, and it's like,

This is what happens.

It's like I'm the Buddha.

I'm sitting under my tree and I'm the Buddha.

I'm meditating.

I'm going into the astral realm.

I go all the way up to the astral realm.

Like I'm taking metaphorical DMT.

Don't actually take these stupid drugs.

But metaphorically, I take the DMT.

I go up and I transcend.

And then I see the machine elves.

I see the machine elves.

I like, I'm like, and then I ascend and then I see the machine elves.

And they're just like, hey, yo, you got this shit.

Get back down there and fight.

You got this shit.

And I'm like, I got this shit.

And then you go forward.

That is infra-woke.

It's like you're not supposed to dwell there forever.

You're supposed to see it and then be like, damn, I got this shit.

We got this shit.

We're locked in.

We're going forward.

Like, that is what infra-woke is.

Do you understand?

Like, that's infra-woke.

Like, infra-woke, when you see beyond the visible spectrum, you become woke to it, you don't fixate on that and become attached to it and become this performative virtue signaler.

It's more like you discover the terms and conditions of a profound inner peace that gives you the confidence you need to go forward in a world full of contradictions.

You understand that?

You don't fixate on these like things that you see in the astral realm.

And it's a metaphor, what I'm saying.

You don't fixate on what's beyond the visible spectrum.

You perceive it in order to have the insight you need to know that heaven is with us.

Beyond the visible spectrum lies a reality which points to the ultimate victory of communism.

And that's the reality we need to be woke about.

We need to be woke about how.

Like

The laws of history portend

Our victory.

Dude, this guy who's spamming me, it's like, listen, dude, it's like, I don't know if you're lonely.

Every night I have to talk to you now on my stream.

Like, are you just lonely or something?

It's like, I talked to this guy for three hours last time.

Now he wants to speak to me again.

It's like, dude, do you have no friends and you're lonely?

Go make some friends.

Go outside and make some friends.

I'm not going to talk to you every single stream, which you're going to make about yourself.

You know what?

You want to come on stream and spam me?

20 subs, buddy.

20 subs for bothering me.

20 subs.

Let's drop it right now.

20 subs.

Okay?

That's your price of entry.

20 subs, and I'll stop right now and debate you right now.

How about that?

Again, again, I'm going to be going on TikTok anyway, but it's just like profound.

It's quite profound.

So um

Matt, what's up man?

Appreciate you.

The yacht's not paying for itself.

Oh boy, look how our sub count has fallen.

How the mighty has fallen.

800.

Oh boy.

Oh boy, we get the yachts gonna be really in bad shape for this month, guys.

This is bad.

I'm just kidding.

It's okay.

So.

Um

What was I saying?

Yes.

So um

Infrawoke is very important because we need an, you know, in the beginning of infrared.

Ones if you've watched the video on YouTube what infrared is all about, nobody's ever watched that.

Nobody actually cares.

Like, ho how how ones have you watched it?

If you if you um look at early infrared project, bro, thank you.

If you look at the early infrared

Then I use a word a lot called the aesthetic sense as a sixth sense, right?

Osos, what's up?

So in early infrared I used to talk about something called the aesthetic.

Now in the in the classical like German philop philosophical and and and before even that sense, aesthetics did not refer to costumes and superficial appearances.

Comrade, so a lot of people confuse aesthetics for cosmetics, right?

But aesthetics was actually about uh a kind of like super sensible faculty that allowed you to ultimately comprehend the ultimate integrity of reality.

American Vaquero.

So in the Kantian sense, for example.

There's something called the Kantian transcendental aesthetic.

And basically, for Kant, you have a world of.

You know, real things, sensible things at least.

But the world of sensible things is just a bunch of scrambled, meaningless datum that cannot acquire the coherence of everyday human experience unless it is conditioned by a transcendental aesthetic, right?

DPR, what's up, man?

Phil, appreciate you, right?

So for Kant.

You know, the transcendental aesthetic of space and time.

John, what's up, man?

With the bug guy, these are the things that, um,

made reality coherently appear the way it is.

So space, the ability to perceive spatial discontinuity.

So if you look outside and you see a tree and a basketball and a street and a street sign, a stop sign, a car.

For Kant, just empirically sensing the world is not enough to actually perceive that reality.

You also have a transcendental aesthetic, okay, of space and time.

So aesthetic used to have a more profound meaning.

And I talk about the need for a new aesthetic.

Wallo, what's up?

Not necessarily the Kantian aesthetic.

But just a way for us to like make sense of the world and of reality.

That is overarching.

and which is not reducible to the immediacy of experience.

Okay?

And I like calling it a sense.

It's a moral aesthetic.

It's a it's a um

It's an aesthetic of being able to perceive values and things and the meaning behind things, right?

So, um you know, that a lot of that is also what InfraWoke is, if you think about it.

But if you want to visualize InfraWoke, just think of like an A La V

Think of like an Alevi temple.

And I'm at the center of the temple or whatever.

And I'm like in a Buddhist type of pose, but I have a beard and I have a turban.

And I have the Zolfikar with me.

And it's like, we are in for woke.

That is infra-woke.

Like, you know, woke used to be some schizo shit.

Woke originated from the black community.

They used to say, stay woke, stay woke.

And it used to be pretty unhinged, right?

And then it became something.

That was just associated with like mm liberal leftist derangement and because all these issues black people faced were applied to a bunch of other unrelated things.

And they tried to say how it's related, but it's kind of a stretch, right?

It was really just a way of stealing black people's affirmative action for other groups.

Tariq Nasheed has that analysis, it's actually so true.

Like originally it was about black people and how the government conspires to suppress and oppress black people, which is, I mean, pretty true.

But then all these other identities came and they were like, No, we're gonna also have it be about us and

It was like damn.

Uh you know, like the s the government there's like a conspiracy by the government against black people, right?

But then people took that and said, No, there's a conspiracy against furries too.

Okay.

Um so that's what happened, you know.

So Infra Woke, I mean, we can define how it is, but InfraWoke is not about being an insufferable woke one two one point zero type of person.

But we're also not here to be uh meagre, anti woke,

Being anti-woke is so superfluous, guys.

The first premise is the woke one point oh.

The negation is the anti-woke stuff, right?

The dark anti-woke.

Okay, the negation of the negation is infra-woke.

Infrawoke needs to radiate and exude so much moral authority and aura.

You wanna know what the goal is?

Ones if you are locked the fuck in and listening to me right now in a hypnotic trance state as a member of a cult and you fucking understand the assignment and you're listening to me right now because God forbid that I'm gonna be out here speaking in vain.

Black Pack with the 20.

What's up?

The temple accepts.

The temple accepts this.

This is for the temple.

That 20 subs was for the temple.

Appreciate you, Black Pack.

You pay for the operations of the temple.

It's like this is the Shaolin Dark Maoi Temple, and I'm here to be.

A Confucian sage, if you will.

You're LARPing, you're LARPing.

Shut the fuck up.

I am literally being broadcasted into your consciousness right now.

I will take my liberties in evoking all manner of things in in your imagination.

You don't know who the fuck I am.

Probably five of you who watch me have hung out with you before.

Okay, way more.

But anyway, most of you don't know who I am.

Okay?

Most of you don't know who I am.

Okay.

So.

I'm broadcasting directly into your consciousness.

I will take all liberties I need to to exploit every possible imagination.

Like, why would I not if I'm if I'm gonna be here and I'm gonna be broadcasted into your consciousness, why am I not gonna take the form of a Shaolin

Temple master who has a beard like a Chinese style, and I'm like, Why am I not gonna be whatever I want to be?

Like, you don't, in this isn't like, I don't know you in real life, you know.

So, anyway, some people call me a LARPer.

It's like, okay, but I'm LARPing inside your own brain.

I'm LARPing to expand your imagination.

I'm not LARPing in real life, like running outside with a sword or something.

Anyway, I want to get your imagination going and think about things.

It's like a, I'm a Deleuzian.

If people don't understand, I'm a Deleuzian.

Like, I'm trying to engage in a kind of transcendental empiricism.

You know, like, I'm trying to draw out things in your imagination to get you thinking about things differently.

Really, that's all it really is for.

Like, when I am talking about all these different

No.

Mm gr ancient things, all this kind of stuff.

It's like because I'm trying to make you think about things differently and see things differently.

And I'm using these as devices to aid you in the journey of being in for woke.

Okay.

I'm not telling you to go dress as a Mongol and get on a horse outside, and although that, honestly, it's not so bad.

But it's not the main point, okay?

Um

So, anyway, if you're locked in and you're listening, okay, you're listening.

You're locked the fuck in.

You're listening?

Remind me of what the fuck I was saying, cause I forgot.

Forgot about what I was saying.

Now before the LARP thing, what was I saying?

We're in the Shaolin Temple.

No, before then.

Before then.

Before then.

Before then.

Before then.

What was I saying?

Shit.

In for woke, what was I saying?

Yeah.

Okay.

No, before then, guys, come on.

Okay, I think I was talking about that.

All right, look, you locked the fuck in, right?

I remembered it.

Now you have to lock the fuck in again, so I'm in back in my flow state.

Ones, if you're locked the fuck in, okay?

The first term was woke.

The second term was the anti-woke shit.

The third term.

Is in for woke.

Okay, you need to radiate such a level.

You're listening.

This is the thing.

Do you know what the goal is?

That's, I remember it now.

Do you know what the goal is?

Do you know what the goal is?

Yeah.

The goal

The goal

The goal

You need to corner the woke one point oh hangerons, make them look like they're anti woke.

Ah You need to make them look like they're anti woke.

You need to position yourself in such a way

That they flee before your moral authority, your moral aura.

You are Cyrus the Great, the Conqueror.

You s

You stick that banner on the ground of the great Achaemenid imperial standard.

You stick that on the ground and they flee before you.

And then they have to expose themselves.

They have to r they have to be the cynical ones.

They have to be the edgy ones.

They have to be the ones who are anti-woke.

They have you need to push them.

You need to be the left.

They must be the coping Matt Walsh right.

How brilliant is that?

You need you need.

To belittle them morally.

They need to be the ones who have woke fatigue.

Make them have infra-woke fatigue.

Make them roll their eyes.

Oh, I'm so sick of how extreme the left has gone.

You need to be the face of that left.

Like, that needs to be you.

When they go.

These anti-woke people, they're all copers, mostly.

Except me when I was, or I kind of still am.

I still am anti-woke one point zero, but it's superfluous.

I'm do I'm that positively now, right?

But you need to make them question existentially why they're even on the left anymore.

I have always trusted the masses.

Nobody trusts the masses and loves the masses more than me.

I'm not here to cope about the trends among the masses.

I'm here to push them to their logical conclusion.

And every time you encounter an enemy of our movement, make them have fatigue against the left if they're a liberal leftist themselves.

We need to be the left, and they need to be like: if this is how the left is going, get the fuck out then, bitch.

Like, when you guys are being the reactive ones, it's fucking weak.

You need to be the face of the avant-garde.

We are the avant-garde.

We are infra-woke.

We are the avant-garde.

We are the avant-garde.

We are the avant-garde.

We are the riddle of history solved.

All these college students being declassed, falling into debt.

Becoming more politically incorrect, but simultaneously becoming more woke about Palestine, infra woke about Palestine, about being pro-Iran.

The face of our movement needs to be.

A bluehaired girl with septum piercings holding up a banner of the Ayatollah

That's what we we need a barista with septum piercings, with blue hair, who holds up the banner of Sayyid Khamenai.

And it doesn't have to be an or a man or like Trezy.

We need like, we need to be more like Treesy in a way.

I mean, B, he's his own man.

Don't emulate Treesy.

Don't emulate Treesy.

What I'm saying is like: we need to be for the culture.

We need to have style.

We need to have swagger.

We need to be like.

We need to have aura, we need to have cultural partisanship.

We need to have cultural partisanship.

When Treesy goes into the park with the kefia, he's got them piercings, he's got the the Mau.

He has like a Mau banner.

It's not cringe, it's actually hood as fuck, it's actually cool.

Like, that's the type of shit.

Bro, too late I got my nose pierced, but chill, chill.

You don't have to get nothing pierced.

I'm just saying, like, we need to have style in that way.

We need to have something that makes us transcend.

And set the fucking culture.

Like, we need to be at the avant-garde.

We can't be this thing where we're just

Armin's the olden days.

Shut the hell up, man.

He's not blue here.

No, I know he's not blue here.

He's not blue here.

But

He's also not

He's also not like Caleb Maupin.

Speaking of Maupin, we're gonna talk about Caleb Maupin.

Like the Baltimore Maoists, when the Baltimore Maoists, when he said, so we could put your ass in a group, we make a critique of it.

We make it, and he was talking in a hood way, the Baltimore Maoists.

When he was saying that shit, it's like he was down with the culture.

He was about some shit.

We need to carry forward the like, who said, you know, by the way, this is a trap.

Hip hop trap style like vibe.

This is not.

We are low riders.

We got the cars.

I mean, I know that's an old trend, the low riding thing, but we should bring it back.

We need to have the kefias, we need to have that kind of street orientation.

I mean, I don't know, guys, we need to like not be this Caleb Maupin thing.

Um

The only exceptions to this rule is if you're genuinely

A white redneck.

If you're genuinely a white redneck, you're exempted from this.

If you're genuinely a white redneck, you can stay being a white redneck.

We're f we fuck with that too.

That's what I'm trying to say.

Like, we fuck with that as well.

But if you are devoid of any swag at all, you need to re-evaluate your place because you have to be in for woke in some way.

Like, don't you understand the vision?

Don't you understand the vision though?

It's like you think about a tattooed septum-piercing woman who's got the banner of Khamenai.

Like, I fuck with that's what I fuck with.

That's the way.

You know?

We, yeah, we don't need SpongeBob.

You can invent whatever you guys want.

I'm not gonna follow any standard formalistically.

I'm just saying, like.

We need to actually be like

Partisanship, cultural partisanship.

Like we need to not be SpongeBob, we need to not be Caleb Maupin.

Um

Zoot Zoots

You can try it.

We can experiment.

It's chapter autonomy.

You can have one chapter that tries it.

Okay?

But I'm just thinking, like, imagine five, imagine like six people in Zoot suits.

We got a giant portrait of Stalin, and they just be walking around.

They're just walking around the block, and they got a giant Stalin portrait, and they got like these giant, exaggerated cartoon Zoot suits.

You know, I'm just saying it's like.

That would provoke an interesting conversation on a national level, I'm not gonna lie.

That would be a very interesting thing, nationally speaking.

That would provoke interest.

Laura Lumer would freak out if she saw that shit.

Nobody actually do that shit, please.

I mean, I don't know.

I'm I honestly, I don't care.

Maupin did a segment.

Okay, Maupin's been up to other things.

And we're gonna cover it, but um

Guys, get any haircut you want, it's just shower and don't be smelly.

That's the main rule.

Uh but don't I I'm j I'm saying we need to be at the avant-garde of the latest and greatest.

We need to be you know why I'm doing InfraWoke right now?

Guess why?

Ones if you want to know why, 'cause you need to be locked the fuck in because I don't want to speak in vain for the rest of my life.

I don't want to speak in vain.

Ones if you wanna know why.

You want to know why?

Okay.

Because I'm here with the masses.

I'm above all this shit.

In a way, I am.

Whether it was the anti-woke period.

Woke one point oh, the counter woke the anti-woke

And this new phase that I see coming

This is where our people are at.

This is where the this is where the people are at.

This is where the masters are at fuck, I just sneezed.

No, I did sneeze, you just couldn't fucking hear it.

This is where the masses are at.

It's like, I'm with them.

Even if the masses are being retarded, it's like, well, I have to be here with you.

You know what I mean?

It's like we have to.

Now, I personally think these are phases.

I gave you my analysis.

This is a pendulum, a pendleton, if you will.

It's a Pendleton swinging?

Is it called Pendletam or Pendletam?

Whatever it is it's swinging.

And I know that.

I have the I have the insight to understand that, but I'm still going to

Remember when I got unbanned from Twitter?

One day the wi one day history will smile upon me.

Not not now.

I know everyone will hate me now.

But one day history is going to smile on me because do you remember

When I got on banned from Twitter,

And it was all Manosphere red pill shit, right?

So I literally took a photo of me in a suit showing a Mau thing, and I'm like, the true red pill, the true red pill is to fight for.

It's like, it doesn't matter where the masses are.

I'm going to be there with them and finding a way to insert the revolutionary consciousness into their brain.

Any opera, like I'm above that.

I'm not, I don't, people, a lot of people were caught up in the false dialectics of like, no, no, I'm going to resist this.

No, I'm going to support it.

It's like, buddy.

These are all just different themes of American history.

These are fashions.

If you want the content of your true principled position to endure, to transcend these passing fads and fashions, then you need to be at peace with the fact you cannot control them.

All you can really do is articulate how, within that fashion, there is room for the correct principle, right?

It's like

If all the masses are jumping in on a fashion, fashions are empty signifiers.

The most brilliant people was me and Jackson, okay?

Because we saw this stupid, retarded, inherently retarded fashion, this stupid Manosphere stuff.

Both Jackson and I were profoundly cynical about Manosphere red pill nonsense trends.

We didn't take them seriously.

We distilled from them the empty signifier through which to smuggle.

Communistic ideas.

We don't care about we don't give them the dignity of having any content because they have no content.

It was ju it was just a stupid Manosphere, all of that was a stupid trend.

that reflected the boom and bust of the mood of the nation.

It go its m it swings in different moods.

So but did it actually work?

Yes, for at the time it worked.

It's just it would be stupid now because it weren't.

But what I'm trying to say is if the fashion changes, let's say tomorrow the new fashion is like turbo woke.

Everyone is becoming like super woke.

I'm going to have blue hair and I'm going to blend in and I'm going to have the Mao poster.

I'm like, but you know, Mao was also woke, right?

You could claim I'm a talist or opportunist, but that's not true.

I'm just with the masses.

I'm going to do whatever I need to do to get a foot in the door to assert the correct direction because the correct direction transcends all these retarded fashions.

I don't care if I have to speak to the masses in a clown costume, I'll speak to them in a clown costume.

I need to speak to them.

You know, imagine, can I explain to you something?

The fashions of the masses, the woke and the dark.

Samsara.

If you know in Buddhism, it's samsara.

It's an illusory reality.

Okay, imagine you're stuck in a dream.

Ones, if you're locked the fuck in listening to me right now, I'm going to explain everything right now.

No ambiguity.

Everything's going to be clarified.

I'm going to bomb anyone who could possibly interpret my position as talism or opportunism.

Okay.

Imagine you're stuck in a dream and you don't know it's a dream.

You don't know it's a dream.

And you're stuck in it.

And the flavor and the theme of your dream keeps changing.

My goal is to wake you up, but to wake you up, I have to appear in your dream first.

If you're dreaming about a world of clowns, I have to appear to you as a clown.

Because I'm trying to talk to you.

Imagine you're in your dream and it's a dream

It's a dream about a world of mice and and and and who are alive.

Okay, then I have to be a small mouse.

And I'm on your desk, I'm like, Hey, hey, wake up, wake up, Joe Biden, wake up!

Hey, wake up!

And I look ridiculous.

I know I look ridiculous, but I'm shouting at you.

I'm trying to get to you, I'm trying to have you wake up.

Even if I have to become part of your ridiculous dream and I'm speaking to the American nation, for example, if I have to become part of this ridiculous circus, I will.

If I have to join the circus

That is your dream.

And you're dreaming about clowns.

Okay, I'll dress, I'll be a clown in your dream.

Wake up!

Wake up!

And you see me as a clown.

Okay.

No problem.

Because I'm indifferent.

Because I don't care.

Because the important thing for me is to find a way to communicate to people to wake up.

And the problem with the critics of Infrared.

Is they only think that there's only content.

of woke.

But there's also form.

Meaning if you stick to the form of how you communicate, you're not actually communicating the thing that you think you are.

It's going over people's head, or you're communicating something entirely different.

If you, for example

Look at a person asleep who's dreaming about clowns, and you sit on your desk.

And you're writing on your typewriter, LARPing as Lennon, polemics about why their dream is false and why clowns are bad.

You will feel good about yourself for having typed that, but they will never read what you just wrote up.

They're never gonna read it.

They're never gonna fucking read it.

You need to actually go into their dream to talk to them.

Otherwise, they're never going to hear you.

I mean, our enemies are just disgusting and depraved.

They're just disgusting people.

They're sick in their head.

Probably a pedophile.

Guy who I just banned, probably a pedophile.

Always, they're just sick, depraved, disgusting people.

They always have fantasies that it's just you check their hard drives, honestly.

Check their hard drives.

Really sick, creepy fucks.

Really creepy, creepy, weird fucking people.

Anyway

They have the if you look at the classical psychoanalytic terms, they're perverts.

They have a pervert uh psychological structure.

You know, and that's sad for them, but it's also a problem for society who has to experience these people and something needs to be done with them, frankly.

So anyway, um what was I saying?

So, yes, but you shouldn't just blend in in the dream.

You need to actually articulate the essence.

You need to always be at the avant-garde of the essence.

For example, when I say there's a new woke trend, does it mean that oh, we should just blend in with woke 2.0?

No, because we have an underlying correct analysis that allows us to understand why it's happening.

When you understand the content of why this trend is occurring, you can actually carve out a space

A counter hegemonic space for the correct communistic or proletarian line.

So it's not just about blending in with trends, it's more about carving out discursively the space for communist hegemony.

By actually distilling the reason for the trend in the first place the most correctly.

Why are people attached to this?

And if you could psychoanalytically, if you will, get to the root of that attachment.

You can be more compelling to people.

Like, for example, let's say everyone's in the desert thirsty.

Okay, they're gonna go to people who have water.

Harold, Lusaman, appreciate the five.

People are starving in the desert, they're gonna go to whoever has water, okay?

So it's not that you're following a trend, you need to actually give them the water.

To talk to them about how to get out of this desert, they're not going to listen to.

You may have a path forward to escape the desert, you may, but until you give them that water, they're going to go to someone else who does it.

So you have to know where the water is coming from and get more of the water in order to give them that water.

Show them that you know how to get water and lead them out of the desert, right?

So, it's this is a metaphor, by the way.

You know, the water in question is people.

Um need

Just like in the human body, it needs water.

You have thirst, you need water, right?

There is also psycho-ideological need for the kind of

Collective psychological architecture of the masses

To find fulfillment in specific ways based on certain material conditions.

In order to make sense of their place in the world.

And a lot of people just miss everything.

They miss everything, they don't understand anything.

And it's so unfortunate they don't have, they're not infra-woke.

You have to be infra-woke to be above these things.

When you're infra-woke, you are above the dimension of form such that you can actually perceive the essence, the content behind forms.

There's something so profoundly mystical and Shiite, Shia, about Infra Woke.

It's like mystical Shiism.

You need to see the content behind the forms.

You need to masterfully employ forms in order to correctly distill and give way to content in the right ways.

So let's talk about Caleb Maupin.

So amidst this thing about

Maddleton

Madeleine Maddleton.

And she said, The ACP has announced it's entering its woke era.

Oh boy.

Be careful what you wish for.

'Cause infra woke.

Is quite

More.

Quite a little bit more than just

What you're calling woke?

Just wait.

Anyway, uh Caleb T.

Maupin.

Adolf Spenkler

Do not give attention to that organization.

It's an online psyop.

No real activism, just cyberbullying.

What?

So Caleb is now with Meadowton, Pendleton.

Or what?

Is it Caleb a friends with Maddleton?

And Caleb is part of this milieu with all of our left liberal enemies now?

I nothing surprised me anymore.

I just don't even understand.

Caleb is not with these people.

So hold on, I'm the Laroushite and this is not Laroushite.

This is the guy who introduced us to the Schiller, right?

Uh so here's Caleb saying, Don't give attention to us.

Like, I'm one of you.

It's so I just like the discursive context.

It's like, no, no, no, I'm Maddleton.

I'm with you.

Don't give attention to that organization.

I know we, you know, don't give attention.

Like, I'm giving you advice from one fellow leftist to another.

From one fellow fellow traveler to another, don't give attention to that organization.

It's just an online SYOP.

Caleb, you're just a fucking boomer.

You're just a fucking boomer, dude.

You're just a fucking boomer.

You should have retired from public life a long time ago.

You're literally got spanked.

You use the organization's money to hire a prostitute to spank you.

Or someone who wasn't even uh someone who was vulnerable and you exploited them to to spank you, you disgusting piece of shit.

Who is what what are you talking about?

No real activism.

I have to roast you, Caleb.

How exhausting!

This is, I just, I don't know if Fiorella wrote this or Ben Norton wrote it, or I don't know who wrote it.

Maybe it was another one of our seething butthurt.

Uh, know it all.

Or Dan, did Dan Cohen write this?

I can't tell who wrote this.

Honestly, I can't tell anymore.

It's like they say all the same things, the same archetype, the same type of millennial.

I don't know what these people are.

And then, why, you know, why talk to Caleb with all due respect?

What respect?

What do you mean respect?

Who respects Caleb?

A CP has achieved more than CPI.

Well, it's true.

That's hilarious.

No, but wait.

Wait a second.

CPI's achievements are well documented.

What do they consist in?

And don't consist of going to other people's events and taking selfies.

What have you okay?

But first of all,

What documentation of your events exists beyond the use of cameras?

First of all, so how can you not just say those are also selfies?

And then, second of all, Caleb, Mapp, and

What are your achievements compared to ACPs?

Just be honest.

What have you done?

At what scale?

How many chapters do you have?

How active are they?

How many events have you done in the past two years and put together?

Why did you block this guy?

Because you're coping and you're butthurt about it.

Quite literally, he because he gets spanked.

Who the what is CPI?

Huh?

Having this in your banner is cray cray.

Why do you have this in your banner?

He has Trump and Kim Jong-un in his banner.

In 2026, this is your banner?

Okay.

What a great way to show how he's just in the middle of a sentence all the time.

Uh Caleb Maupin.

I confronted the Iranian monarchists.

His brother was seized with a n-Dictator.

How stupid do these people think we are?

They've got Reza Shah, the dictator, backed by the Where does he confront them?

I'm just assuming he confronts them, right?

He said he confronts them.

Stop executions in Iran.

They got the Shah of Iran, Reza Shah, on their shirts, and they're saying stop executions.

Do you know how many major Dan Cohen vibes, just like in terms of how he speaks and acts?

Do you know how many people the Shah tortured to death?

Do you know how many people he did with the Savak and killed people?

But they say stop executions in Iran.

Can you believe this?

Can you believe this?

The U.S.

government is dropping bombs on Iran right now, and they're supporting it.

And they have the confronting the protests, this is what he means.

This is the praxis.

Ready?

This motherfucker.

Look at me.

Look at me.

Look at me.

Look at me.

He's the NDP.

He's supporting the Shah that killed thousands of innocent people.

Yeah.

Well, now wait just a second.

He what?

What happened?

Why did he cut that part out?

Right.

Well, that's that's what Caleb's been up to.

Just uh yelling at one guy on the street.

He's just arguing with one guy on the street.

Where did you confront anything?

I don't understand.

Six hours ago he posted the well documented achievements of CPI, which we will witness.

This guy's a mask.

I just thought it was interesting.

I dunno.

If you anyone who tries to make ACP like anything like this

You need to be locked in a fucking prison forever.

Like you need to we need to make our own jail and lock you in it forever.

And it's shiny.

Okay, hold on.

They copied our round table setup and they have about 20 people: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20.

So 20 people in this photo.

Just about.

Build the peace bridge.

Oh boy, don't you just wake up every day and just you're so inspired by the idea of a peace bridge.

I personally wake up every day and I I get motivated to get out of bed to have a peace.

Peace Bridge, what a great what a great word, Peace Bridge

Just doing that with your hands does so much.

This one's always my favorite.

That's my favorite.

When everyone has to wear these blue shirts and then he wears this white outfit.

It's just and everyone is over the age of fifty in the crowd.

It's like a retirement home.

Mm.

Imagine you work at this hotel and you have to clean all this stuff up.

What a horrible day that must be.

And here's Joff Young right here.

Remember, Joff Young.

I am Joff Young.

Me, Joff Young.

Remember, Jof Young.

Okay, there's about five people.

What a packed room.

Talk about a packed room.

They really packed the room up.

You see all this these packed seats right here?

It's really happening in CPI.

Do you think Madelinton will join this group?

They're way less toxic than us.

They're way better.

I think Maddleton would fit right in in this group, maybe.

Maybe she'll sing this song.

We're gonna let it sh

Mm.

I don't have to do anything.

Just screenshot of this photo and that's it.

That's it.

Like, what would I need to say?

That's it.

What is this?

I've never seen like this is the most smug narcissistic guy ever.

Like this is the most like self-assured smug

Like this guy literally s this is like a cartoon character of like a powdered wig, like eighteenth century aristocrat.

Like I am just the superior one.

Like what the fuck is this posturing?

This is like the most this is he is the biggest narcissist ever.

Can we just say that he's the biggest narcissist ever?

Why do you get to wear that?

Why can't he wear the white suit?

For example, or he can wear the white suit.

Only Caleb, or this guy with in the orange, he can't wear the white suit.

Only Caleb is allowed to wear the white suit.

No one else can have it.

'Cause you gotta he really has to stand out.

What does it mean?

This white suit

Ah

Just like a bunch okay, ten people on the street with a megaphone.

Yeah, it's like the twenty-five people in the crowd.

Okay, like Scott Ritter.

mean like they're they're making it seem like he's like a hero.

Like he's like

Like they're making it seem like this guy is like

Heroic.

Scott Ritter always tells lies all the time, he always just bullshitting all the time.

This was my favorite one.

Hell Caleb.

Hell Caleb.

What is this?

Huh?

Okay, imagine you have a room.

You have a room.

With twelve senior citizens, okay?

You have a room with twelve senior citizens.

You tell them to wear these blue shirts, and then you wear a white.

Outfit

And you have all twelve of them sit like this, and you sit in front of them like this, and then you tell them in unison: let's raise our arms.

And so what is this?

What if I did this?

What if I what if I have like what if at our events, this is how you guys get seated, and like I just sit like this and you guys are like sitting like a train.

Like it's so vertical, you know, it's like it's so narrow.

There's like three seats and then it's just it's like um some kind of obscene seated Congo line, you know?

And then I wear this distinctive outfit and I do this.

Everyone because everyone has to know who the leader is, guys.

You have to know who the leader is.

There's only one way to know.

There's only one way to know who the leader is, and that that's it.

What I'd like to know is, like, what motivates you to put on the b That's Gioff Young.

Giof Young is literally here.

Like it's such a small world in this room.

I'm trying to think like who is the type of person to don this blue shirt, put this blue shirt on.

Okay, I'm gonna also issue like a rule.

Anyone in CPI, like in the past two years, is never allowed in the ACP.

You can't come.

We don't want any members of ex-members of CPI ever.

You're not allowed.

Okay.

Because you're going to be looking for someone to spank and you're not going to find them in in ACP.

Just go back to CPI.

In the past year or two years, if you were in CPI, you can't come.

Uh and then, but who if imagine Caleb says wearing this blue shirt, would you wear it?

You can tell the riffs in the organization.

For example, this guy's a little skeptical of Caleb.

He won't wear the blue shirt.

He'll wear the pin, but he's holding out on the blue shirt.

Jiaf is fully um fully

Integrated, he's fully on board, if you will.

But this guy's got a little bit of some reservations, he's still not.

Still not really picking up what Caleb was putting down.

Hail Caleb!

Not gonna say anything?

I'm just gonna say like, okay, this is your practice, okay.

So we you're always talking down to us like we're you're only online, you're only bullies.

This is what you do.

Notice I didn't say anything, but they're still gonna say I was being mean, even though I said nothing.

And it's silent now for dramatic effect.

Like, we are the future.

The center for.

This is such a cult.

If you saw and you don't knew you knew nothing, and you just saw, like, we're in the center for political innovation.

I'm assuming you're a fucking cult.

Like, I'm assuming there's like some.

Odd shit going on with you.

You're a fucking cult.

This is like an actual unironic fucking cult.

Like an unironic fucking cult.

Fucking weird.

Fuck Caleb and fuck off.

Just fuck off, dude.

Like, never interact with us again.

Caleb, like, why would you interact with us?

Like, I, you try to say one thing, Caleb, I'll roast the fuck out of you, dude.

Shut the fuck up.

Fuck off to your fucking retarded cult.

Speaking of.

I talked about this on Instagram and TikTok, but we had to cover it.

Hi, this is the DSA.

This is a DSA meeting that happened within the past year.

Within the past year, by the way,

Not

like ten years ago, within the past year, or I think it was a week ago.

This is a real DSA meeting.

In order to combat anti-blackness and white supremacy in YDSA, chapters and national must run campaigns which resonate across racial divisions, standardize and improve chapter grievance processes and culture, conduct intentional leadership development of marginalized comrades, build anti-racist education and practice into our standard member development and culture.

YDSA, like, honestly, we do have the look of like being super white, being super male-centered, being super like ternalistic.

Right, with the with the risk of the Manhattan Institute.

Why?

It's okay in this.

I am a Marxist.

I think the issue is that we have an issue of maintaining abusers, racists, and harassers in our organization.

It's like the FA sign.

Huh?

You have what?

Organization, and we are not getting rid of them.

Nobody is taking the initiatives to actually have these people expulsed.

Huh?

Can you talk about it?

I want to know what they're talking about.

All right.

I feel like you're talking about microaggressions.

Because, like, what are you talking about?

That sounds really serious.

Group of comrades.

You got like racist, really?

Where?

What do you mean?

Like, I'm imagining there's people in DSA running around with the N-word, running around saying crazy shit, harassers.

Like, I imagine there's a fat guy in the DSA who just like bullies people like from SpongeBob, and he's like, actually, like, a harasser.

Or what do you mean?

Because I think they mean someone who manspread it at a meeting.

And this organization feels like they have been left behind and are ignored because of everyone's ignored and left behind, and everyone's, it's all injustice.

What?

Voices dominate.

The conversation.

It's like, well, what about the content of speech?

What about the content of the conversation?

What about like talking about what you actually disagree with on the way?

No, it's the fact that you're white or something.

All right.

Got you.

It's just like it's because it's because of your background.

That's the problem.

Issue standing marginalized people.

Every time they see use these words, I just imagine someone like in a corner, like in fetal position, like covering themselves.

Like, I'm marginalized and I'm oppressed and I am like, I imagine a really gruesome situation.

Where like there's a big D S A bully and there's all these like people huddled in a corner like oh like because I like when you use these words, it evokes serious things in my imagination, like it means something, right?

But then when you investigate what they mean, they just mean someone sitting like who

feels oppressed by the fact of their own lack of confidence, and my genuine sincere response is like, look,

The goal should be to build confidence.

Not teach people to be fucking babies.

Just build confidence in people.

That should be the goal.

You're not oppressed and you're not marginalized because you lack confidence.

You're just poorly so.

You have social anxiety because you're poorly socialized.

And.

That's our generation, I understand, but that's not marginalization.

That's just a lack of confidence.

A predominant notion of whiteness within YDSA.

Having a disdain for a space for us to like accurately...

Here we go.

Hear this.

No, address those things and let out those things.

It's...

So how am I LARPing and this isn't LARP?

You're not a Black Panther.

It's like the thing in Spongebob.

You're not a Black Panther.

Black Panther has actually gotten into shootouts with the federal government and the police.

You're a LARPer.

It's what the white man wants from you.

And I.

Who is this white man?

Show me this white man.

This guy hate to see comrades that look like me and other people in my slate having that sentiment.

So I've seen how white the organization is.

Dude, what's are you a Brahmin?

Because if you're a Brahmin, you're you're j you're like that's actually like a system of oppression in from India that they have.

So if you're a Brahmin, you need to shut the fuck up about anything relating to anything like this.

Because you're not oppressed at all.

You come from a literal caste system.

And if you're on the top of that caste,

You should be the last person to get into this woke oppression Olympics.

I'll fucking die on that.

I'm running for NCC.

I'd love to.

Nobody, I don't believe in any of this oppression Olympics at all, by the way.

If you're a Brahmin, fine, it's cool.

No problem with you.

But to see Brahmins who's come, the elite caste of India come to America and then get on this fucking.

Tariq Nasheed was right about this shit.

It's like something that originated from the fact that black people were being gatekept out of institutions.

Then all these people around the world, even people who were the elite caste, come and fucking grift off of it.

The white man, what the fuck are you talking about, dude?

Hard with the global majority slate under the commitment.

I just believe in like this, all started from people stealing from the FBA black community.

Just everyone remember that.

All this bullshit started from people stealing from FBAs.

Which I understand it because FBA's

The institutional gap is so clear.

I mean, it's changed now after the 2020, I guess, but it was such a real thing.

And then, like, everyone came and stole everything.

A disproportionately white white ESA.

And that was just a passive percentage of the POC in the room by decentralized in curriculum.

You know what I think about?

That's funny.

Imagine if you're white, like this guy.

Or this woman.

And like you're in the room.

Like you're in the Zoom meeting, right?

You're just sitting there in silence and then you just hear this.

And that was just a passive percentage of the POC in the room by decenter and whiteness.

And

Immediately, a target is on your back.

Immediately, you're not welcome.

Immediately, things just got awkward.

Immediately, you are just like, fa fa!

It's like Roxy, Roxy here, she, her, she's really thinking about fuck.

I just literally got fucking shot in the head with a target on my back.

When she, it's her turn to speak, she's gonna make sure she's got some shit under her sleeve.

She's gonna be like, No, I'm gonna outwoke you.

And you know what?

There's way too many cis people here.

I'm transgender now.

I identify as non-binary.

All these cisgenders, we need to talk about that.

I need something.

You can't just fucking put me down like this.

Fuck this.

I'm not just gonna take this shit.

Or they'll be even, you know, I agree.

Fuck every white person.

I'm the loudest anti-white voice in the room.

And it's like an immediately Game of Thrones style way of purging all the other white people in the room.

And you're the last one standing.

That's also a form of 5D chess.

So, like, people like Roxy and Friedman.

Have I'm not anti-Semitic, I'm sorry.

It's just I can't help but notice.

Friedman, bro, Friedman is here.

He's hoping he's going to play the Jewish card.

I'm not white.

I'm Jewish.

Anyway, Roxy and whoever else is white in this room, they're thinking right now they're going to do the Game of Thrones.

It's a Game of Thrones movie you can do, where you can just like nuke every other white person in the room, but you're the last one standing.

You just have to be more woke.

You have to out woke.

This is the culture you get when you fucking platform this shit.

Okay, to be honest.

Okay, I'm going to be honest.

No, no, no.

I'll just say it.

If I was in an ACP meeting and somebody started talking like this, I would immediately start laughing.

And then I would respond by frankly.

I would just be like, why don't you focus on the substance and content of what you're trying to say?

Don't insult people because they're white or they're not white.

And you're saying.

There's too many white people in this room, okay?

You're just attacking people.

Like, you need to chill with that.

You're contributing nothing of substance, though.

That's what I would say.

You're contributing nothing of substance.

Now, let's say you want to say, okay, we need to reach more black people in our organization.

I would say, okay, let's start with.

Who do we know from the black community?

Who are community leaders that we are friendly with and that we know or that we can know?

How do we actually establish a mutual understanding and ability to cooperate with black community leaders?

And that's how I would approach things like that.

But then to say, like, oh, this is about our personal identities and what race we are.

It's like, what the fuck are you talking about?

You know?

Yeah, what black organizations can we work with maybe and um

Because the reason why there's not enough black people in your organizations, I hate this stupid thing when white leftists, or whatever they are, leftists who are non-white even, when they're in DSA or these other organizations and they go, the fact that there's not enough black people here is because we are fostering an environment that oppresses black people.

No, there's not enough black people in your organization because your material roots are not the black community.

In your case, they are the institutional bourgeois hegemony, which continues to gatekeep black people out.

Um or if it's not gate gate keeping black people out.

It's historically, you know, monopolized by mainly white NGOs and activists.

But your money comes from the top.

You don't build foundations from the bottom.

That's the main thing.

So, of course, you don't have a lot of black people in your organization because your roots don't come from the bottom.

They come from the top.

If you have to build material foundations and material roots, you actually have to go to black communities, meet black organizations, meet black leaders, and work for the community and build foundations from the bottom up.

But when you're an organization like the DSA, which is keyed in on the bourgeois hegemony, you're not going to have a lot of representation from all sorts of different groups.

Because ultimately speaking, your money is coming from the bourgeoisie from the top.

Your clout, your institutional prestige is coming from the institutions that rule society.

Well,

Those institutions have to do things like affirmative action and all these like special.

Subdivisions of the institutions to bring black people in when they do bring black people in, right?

But those black people in those institutions.

Are being brought in through affirmative action, and they're not primarily being like conditioned within the institution or interpolated within the institution as a universal type of subject.

They're being interpolated as somebody who's being given or granted an opportunity to escape their conditions or something, right?

I know there's a big black middle class in America and things have changed.

I understand that.

But what I'm trying to say is that there's all sorts of reasons, and it's not because.

Wh everyone is evil because they're an uh unconsciously white supremacist.

I just feel like ACP is more

We have more

Non-whites in A C P I think than D S A?

Because our material roots are from the f bottom, not not from institutions.

Um, but also why is there no class?

If you're gonna do affirmative action, for example, how come not a single person here talks about class?

Bombed you right now.

So for example, you're socialist.

Nobody talking about class, nobody saying what about people who come from working class backgrounds versus bourgeois backgrounds.

If you're gonna do if you're a socialist and you're gonna do identity politics, shouldn't the first form of identity politics be about the class background of the people in your organization?

And yet nobody you don't see anyone talk about this in those clips, just who's white, who's black, because you're all sons and daughters of the same fucking bourgeoisie in this room.

Friedman is nervous as fuck and he is genuinely hoping that he can be Jewish and not white in this room.

Curriculum, education, communication, action, and more.

The reason why I'm running for NCC at large is because the current direction Y DSA is heading towards is not revolution.

Not only are there Jeffrey Wu can join ACP.

This guy will join us.

Just wait.

He's not even talking about any stupid bullshit.

He's like, we're not revolutionary enough.

I know these type of people.

You know, when you guys need to exploit the contradictions in DSA and you need to identify these people who were you five years ago, identify people like Jeffrey Wu, who's like, he's focused on the revolutionary thing.

Like, just identify people like that because these people will join us.

Notice he doesn't say anything stupid like oppression Olympics.

Contradictions of anti-blackness within the org that go unaddressed, but our organizing tactics have shown to be limited in their reach and in their scope.

And I have also organized.

organized from a local level all the way to a regional level with AAPRP, BPI, BAP and many other organizations on the sole fact of the importance of decentering whiteness when it comes to organizing.

So when you're decentering whiteness, it means if you're white and you speak as SIT DOWN, CRACKER!

But they don't say cracker.

If they did it would be funny, but they don't say that.

This guy is going to tell you to sit down because you're a white cracker.

That's what being in DSA is.

I think that one thing that we really need to emphasize.

Oh, she has played her cards.

Sofia Cassano, Italian, POC.

She is playing her cards right.

She just heard all those speeches.

About how all the white people are going to be purged?

Sophia Cassano has some Machiavellian shit she's been thinking about.

Let's hear what her Machiavellian strategy to avoid being implicated in these.

Entangled, if you will.

She needs to protect herself from this.

So, what's her, what's her, your move?

It's like a game of chess.

It's like a grand game of chess.

What's your move, Sophia Cassano?

What's your move?

I think that one thing that we really need to emphasize is a deeper commitment to intersectionality within YDSA.

Smart play.

Intersectionality, smart play.

And actually developing marginalized leaders and really pushing past this notion of YDSA being this incredibly just like a group of like five white guys.

Okay.

This is what I mean by woke 1.0 being retarded, dead, and discredited.

Can you move beyond the deconstruction of platitudes that don't even exist anymore?

There's this like notion.

There's this like expectation.

There's like this platitude.

Where?

It's like Peter Griffin, you know, when Peter Griffin's like, when Brian Griffin's like, I've read books, he's like, which ones?

Really?

Which ones?

And he keeps like asking, that's when I'm like, where?

Where does this notion exist?

Where?

Tell me, where?

This notion, where I don't know, it's like this, like, vague, like, stereotype.

Where it's like this structure.

Where?

Tell me, where?

Where is this expectation that DSA is an organization of five white guys?

Tell me where.

Where does that actually exist?

Show me, tell me, where?

Where?

Who why are you arguing?

All the d woke one point oh all they can do is deconstruct stereotypes that don't even exist anymore.

Frankly, since Obama was elected, everyone should have shut the fuck up about this line of reasoning that being woke means dismantling stereotypes about what?

Sitting around and reading theory.

So, like, we run in.

Sitting around reading theory.

Well, that's what you need to do more, actually.

I'm.

It kind of sucks that I'm thirty because I wish I could join this meeting, but I would have I'd be dressed like a Sufi.

I would have the turban, long beard, and I would berate everyone for not doing enough theory, like they're not doing enough cultivation.

I would strongly advocate for Sufi cultivation, schools, and everyone needing to submit to Sharia and doing like esoteric chants and meditation.

And how you know everyone is uh spiritually inferior because they have not entered the proper initiatory stages to achieve socialism.

To the issue within why do you say that market where I'd be one of those Turkish Sufis with a giant mustache, just a giant curly mustache.

Multiracial is being used more as a buzzword.

And I say that because, despite our continuous efforts through resolutions, it usually fall short because it is not prioritized.

It is just not seen as something important.

Also, building coalitions with people of color.

This is the bravest thing I've ever heard.

It's so brave, building coalitions of people of color.

Oh my god.

A lot of the times, people feel alienated and don't want to organize with us because of our white-centered organizational power.

Oh.

I'm just thinking about.

I'm just thinking about if this was like how sheltered I've been in ACP, that this like this is still how they are.

This is what it's like on the other side of the fence, my cult, my dear cult members.

My flock of sheep.

My dear flock of sheep in my cult, you're stuck in this cult.

There's no escape, 'cause this is what it's like.

This is what it's like beyond.

Our cult swallows, this is how it is.

You're not safe.

It's our way or it's this.

There's no alternative.

There's no escape.

You cannot escape us.

Because if this is what's your alternative, you're stuck.

The idea that there's people in our organization who are like, I actually think Haas is a fucking nut job and he's crazy as fuck, but I have no choice because if I go to DSA or PSL, this is what it's like Paperwin with the 10.

Imagine, like, some guy who's like, I don't know what he's talking about.

This crazy Sufi shit.

Like, what is this?

What does he mean, luminous black?

What is that?

What is all this Islam stuff?

What do you mean?

But they're like, I have no choice.

This is what it's like outside ACP.

You don't have a choice.

You're stuck.

There's no way.

Like, this is what it's like if you leave.

This is the alternative to us.

Paperwind, thank you so much for that cult tribute.

It's like this is the alternative.

Practices and our lack.

Look, as much as it's insane, at least it's not like this.

Always remember: I'm going to always hold it.

I'm going to hold it over everyone forever.

If you don't like ACP, this is your alternative.

Okay, we could be self-critical, are we not?

But we have clearly transcended this.

That itself is victory.

Anti-imperialist sentiment.

It came from the contradictions in YDSA of YDSA not being able to confront.

Like, imagine at your chapter meeting, this is how people are talking.

Just like imagine, just imagine.

Just imagine.

Just imagine it.

It's whiteness and practice and racism and not being able to.

protect uh protect uh organizers of color within the organization what do you mean what do you mean protect like bro i'm talking the real world like is there a guy with a machete walking around he's like threatening people of color is there a clansman in like the dsa who has like a stick and he's like looking for people of color to beat Because I understand, like, yeah, we need to stop this guy.

We need to protect our people of color, guys.

Like, this is crazy.

Like, I don't understand that.

What do you mean, protect from who?

Who is threatening you?

What do you mean?

Of uh, why do you say not being able to confront its uh whiteness and huh?

Imagine when he said whiteness, Roxy just like.

Skipped a beat in her heart.

Like, you're on the line.

You're done.

This is about you.

In practice, and racism, and

Not the racism.

What?

What's racism?

Where?

Yeah.

Protect uh protect uh organizers of color.

Wha what do you mean protect them from who?

I kn you know what?

I know from who?

From Dare.

Dare is attacking people Dare's job in the D uh D S A is official people of color attacker.

And they that's their role, and he's just challenging it.

He's like the next, he's like.

He's a civil rights leader when you think about it.

He's trying to d challenge this tyranny of dare, who goes around attacking people of color, and he's challenging that.

within the organization on a both the national level and the ch uh chapter level.

I hope this is the part that gets clip farmed for that one fucking Twitter.

No, it got clip farmed for the ACP and the inter Hasbul hasbola laws.

The Shia Islamic extremist.

Dugan Russian Wagner PMC.

Operatives

Bad people, guys.

Some these people, you know, they're racist toward us.

They're literally in their calls.

They're like, these are some bad homebreys with the Wagner PMC shirt.

These are bad homebreys.

Stu Smith, if you are listening, please click fire.

Too smooth, please save me still.

How about we deconstruct the bourgeois, the bourgeoisness of this whole thing?

This isn't a profoundly bourgeois meeting when you think about it.

It's profoundly bourgeois.

Okay, who wants a TikTok live?

Well, it's not free.

It's not free.

You want a TikTok live?

It's not free.

Oh, actually it's uh no, it's actually free.

Never mind.

Uh

Alright, hold on.

You have reached your tithe goal.

I just checked.

Alright, well we'll do TikTok live.

This guy's like 400 views.

Why are we celebrating 400 viewers, dude?

Why are we celebrating four hundred?

Ty, what's up, bro?

I'm saluting you for all eternity.

What's up?

I'm going to keep saluting you for the foreseeable future because I support what you did.

Thank you so much, man.

I appreciate it a lot.

Um, I'm gonna keep saluting you.

It's not gonna stop for as long as I can hold my arm here, I'll do it.

I can hold my arm here for a long time.

The only time is when I'm at the Caleb uh cult meeting and we we're doing the Hail Caleb uh raising our fist chant.

I've I held my arm in midair in a raised fist for a long time in honor of Caleb.

And this is kind of like that, but even more.

Sigh

My gorillas, my gorillas, all you brainwashed victims of this cult.

I wanna know who love is.

You know that's the most important part of that song.

Every time someone does a remix or a cover of the song and they don't have the part, it goes, the whole song is destroyed.

You need that part that it has.

Go.

I'm not going to Indian TV, okay?

I'm gonna remain as I am, where I am, okay.

And uh

Neene Ne We have a Bordiga fan?

Ordiga?

You know how you can debunk Bordiga?

Just look at him.

Okay guys, I'm gonna bring you on.

The greatest debunk of Bordiga is just look at him.

That's it.

That's the debunk.

Just look at him.

Met!

Met with the five.

What's going on, my brother?

What's going on?

So I'm going to bring on challengers.

You can't just challenge the cult.

The guy, remember the guy, I.O., the blue guy, I.O.

What was IO?

'Cause I remember bringing him on last time.

I just don't remember who he was.

I Mog.

Okay, you know what?

I've never been one of these types who's so self

Bragging.

But do I mog Bordiga?

Do I mog Bordiga?

Maybe.

I hope.

I hope

I hope

This guy just goes Arab.

You got me?

He got me on that.

Uh I am on TikTok.

Closure.

Go ahead, Closure.

So like, nice to meet you.

So what's your take on China?

Simple question.

Actually Allah caused me to be able to do that.

That's cool cause I'm a native Chinese from China right now.

Nice.

Yeah, it's in the morning.

You wanna see some live footage of China?

Sure.

Okay, let me turn on the camera.

I'm in uh Sabwe in uh National.

It's in Wuhan.

Ah, Wuhan.

Okay.

Wow.

Yeah, have you ever been there?

No.

I only went to Beijing.

Yeah.

But that's that's one of the most uh that's one of the major city in China.

It's a transportation hub.

I've heard of it.

It's very cool.

Yeah.

It's a building place.

It kinda looks like uh a subway I went in Beijing actually.

Yeah, it's a skyrail for tourism that is going this way to another.

There's a huge station over here.

Nice.

We love China a lot, but you know why we don't think about China a lot is because uh makes us sad because China is just doing so much better and it's so much better politically than the US that if we think about it too much we will

Hmm.

It's like a way for us to escape our own contradictions, you know?

So that's why we don't like to think about it too much.

We think about China though, but we love China so much.

But it makes us sad how far ahead China is and how much struggle and pain we're gonna have to go through before we can

Get our country together in the way China already has.

That's just the truth.

You know, we're going to have to.

It's not going to be like you can go to China now and see a finished product, more or less.

I'm not saying it's perfect, but you can see a finished product of a well-functioning society.

And then, but if you're in America, there's going to be a lot we have to go through before we can ever get anything like that.

We have a lot of contradictions we have to face before we can even.

Um

So that's why I don't like to think about it too much.

Because China already exists, it's already there.

And it tempts us too much.

We just think in our head, maybe we're just going to move to China.

I know I have many friends, I have comrades who just decided to move to China.

And I don't blame them, but we can't do it.

We can't do it.

You're going to stick your career over here to help your country get better.

Exactly.

We have to stick.

Well anyway man, it was great talking and I hope you have a great day.

It's twelve, what is it, one PM in China?

In Wuhan?

Yeah, it's one PM in China.

Excellent.

It's a it's a weekday but people are still bitch on.

Mhm.

I see that.

Well, hope you have a beautiful day and I hope you have a great time.

Bye-bye.

And the good one.

You too.

Yeah, bye.

I love China so much.

I love Confucianism actually.

I've been studying a little bit of Confucius and it's so beautiful.

China has such a great.

I'll talk about it more later, about China's

spiritual orientation and stuff.

But it's quite quite great.

Quite a profound ontology, quite a great understanding of the cosmos.

Go ahead, IO, please.

Hello?

Uh yeah.

Uh I wanted to ask, uh do you think that after Stalin died, the leadership in the USSR was disconnected from the people?

Yes.

Why did this happen?

They could not properly teach enough.

Raise up enough people from the masses into the party.

There was such a disconnection between the party and the masses.

And the goal to bridge that gap was to properly educate the masses and initiate them into the party.

And in the main, it was a failure.

The problem was they didn't have the right pedagogical model to teach people what the Bolsheviks knew, what many people who were brought up in the 20s and 30s, I mean, a lot of them were brought up post hoc or ad hoc, you know.

Some of these people didn't even join till much later because of the chaos.

And a lot of people would join the party because they want power, they want prestige, they want status, but do they care about the principles?

No.

Some did, but many didn't.

And that big problem in Marxism is we have to learn how to actually teach people and raise them up to be believers and we how do we reproduce the faith.

When Lenin was alive, everything could be held together, right?

When Stalin was alive,

He was Lenin's most faithful student.

So when Lenin's most faithful student passes away, how is Lenin's legacy?

Where is it?

And we say, well, it's here in Marxism-Leninism.

Okay.

How can Marxism-Leninism successfully be taught?

Not just at the level of theory, at the spiritual level.

You know, how do you teach that to people?

How do you teach people to have the belief?

Mao is trying to solve this question, the cultural revolution.

And uh does China bridge that gap between the party and the people?

Kind of.

Kind of.

It's a very profound.

Yeah, kind of.

It's mainly the cultural evolution taught people.

Dark Mali

InfraWoke.

Because they were awakened to the dark.

What was the dark?

The Communist Party.

So you could not simply turn the power, the rule of the Communist Party into an object of consciousness.

It is there in the dark, real, embedded in our unconscious.

And so it was an awakening, a somber morning, an awakening to the objective, an infrared.

Comprehension of reality beyond ideology, right?

And this is what they learned after.

And Deng Xiaoping and so on brought this knowledge.

And this is Dark Mali.

And uh it's not that the masses directly, you know, um could reproduce the party from scratch.

It's that they all learn to comprehend

and understand what the party actually is and their relationship to it.

That the party's not reducible to the whims and fancies of their individual consciousness.

'Cause the truth is, as much as Maoists in the West like to cope,

What happened during the Cultural Revolution was that anyone could become a leader of a faction.

Anyone could interpret it however they wanted.

And you had all these Red Guards fighting and killing each other.

Uh because of their disagreements of interpretation, because the whole structure of proletarian dictatorship was being reduced to the whims and fancies of consciousness.

And there was no space to embrace the dark part, which is that there's a gap between our individual consciousness, between our ideological sense of fervor.

And how we articulate and interpret that in this

Sacred dimension, right?

So that's really what we're talking about here: the sacred.

This guy whose name is Fascism.

His name is Miss Fascism or something.

Fascist Fasciser.

I don't believe it's TP.

TPH is already requesting.

You're not.

Baschizer's name is abolish everything.

It's literally you.

Let me see if it's you.

Alright, one sec, Juan.

Uh

Vike go ahead and ah Jesus Christ.

Hey, how you doing, sir?

Uh, just have a couple of questions.

Uh, right now I'm living in Miami, Florida and over here we have a lot of Cubans and such who, you know, came from the fifties and sixties.

How do you explain to them like Marxism and socialist policies without them like accusing you of being a demon and such?

Look up Treesy and ask him.

Okay, I got a qu I got a question, I got some stuff, okay.

I I'm ready, okay.

So for one, you said that um the DOTP is just political oversight of an existing transformation independent of class interest.

Uh not independent of class interest, but the class interest corresponds to unleashing the fetters that retard the development I can't use that word and take that that prevent the development of history.

Uh-huh.

Um okay, I mean that's but y you you said like politics so I mean in a way that I think uh not all things that are carried out by a state could be considered superstructure because if it if it intervenes into the life process then it's become uh it's become a base change too.

And additionally well superstructures can give way to the base in that way, but the base is mainly instead of thinking about the base in architectural terms, you need to think about the base as an underlying logic, not necessarily an underlying like architectural substance.

So it's about the underlying logic and how that's reproduced that really that's where the base is, you know.

I actually really agree with that because, like, you can kind of see the different modes of productions and their logic.

Like, you know, feudalism, it's like divine power, unquestioned power, and just how to organize it, aristocracy, monarchy.

And then moving into the bourgeois revolutions, that kind of thing began to be questioned.

So it, you know, you got into the people as abstract units.

You know, you know where the base really is?

It's at the site of the reproduction at the smallest level of the human, right?

So how do people reproduce their conditions of subsistence?

Whatever logic they give way to at that level is where the base is.

So that's why the state intervening cannot really change the base as much as it can give way to that logic that you can see evident in how civil society is reproduced more or less.

I mean, yeah, there's just an idea you should look up.

It's a Persianate idea that the Ottomans were known for being associated with, but everyone else was too.

It's called the Circle of Justice.

Actually, you can think about the Circle of Justice in materialistic terms if you understand the relation of state to civil society and how they dialectically interact.

So you should look up this idea of the circle of justice.

It's a very useful do you think that uh do you think that leftism nowadays, especially with the Jay Sakai third worldism, could be considered a form of like transcendent critique?

Because because hear me out, right?

You've taken like these these um outlooks on on certain uh things, you know, we'll say like the things that are just, you know, not with our progressive framework today, like, uh, uh, slavery or like, uh,

any of these things, you know, racism, whatever, right?

And then you like turn this into a a theory of everything that's just, you know, universal and you're just above everything else.

And like there's no imminence to it.

And I'll add on to that in a second.

Because, like, additionally, you know, you have the they take an idea of America pre-colonization and then they like map it onto the world today, and that's kind of transcendent too, because you've taken a time period or a state of things and you've decided this was before the bad thing happened, therefore, if we want to get to the good thing, we have to like, you know, crudely apply this back on.

And that's kind of the saccancy.

So it has a lot to do with morality and their understanding of the moral and the Hegelian, what Hegel calls the unhappy consciousness and the beautiful soul, things like that.

And it's basically that they only think that the moral dimension is inward and that you have to colonize the outward by projecting the inward onto the outward and conforming it.

Whether it's history, whether it's the present, and they don't understand that.

The moral inheres in the outward, not just the inward, right?

And it's actually only in the outward, the inward is just a reflection of that.

So they don't understand the hypocrisy of their position because you can't just discover the moral.

Oh, I just woke up to the fact that colonialism is evil and then go into history and do a crusade against.

No, you have to learn where was anti-colonial struggle an objective reality.

That's where the morality out of which we can comprehend this is something immoral actually comes from.

It doesn't come from us individually deciding what is moral and what is immoral.

It comes from material reality.

You know?

I mean, absolutely.

Yeah.

Also, this one's really been bugging me.

You said a few times.

I think once it was against a Scottish malice, you said socialism is when the mode of production is social, or that it's when production is subordinate to a social goal.

And I saw somebody cite the holy family to explain this, but I lost the passage.

Could you expound on that a little and back it up, Sam?

From the holy family specifically, I don't have that off the top of my head, but the basic idea is that.

Every modality of production is rooted in some kind of

Ends of production.

So every cycle has a conclusion, right?

So, you know, cycles can be divided into different stages.

But then the final stage of the cycle is the production, the thing that it produces in the output and in terms of social form, right?

So in the capitalist mode of production, you have the form of capital as the ultimate output of the mode of production, right?

MCM.

It's a relationship between money and itself, you know, money and

Um

And uh surplus value.

Where, through the development of the productive forces, you know, there is the realization of surplus value, and then there's the realization of profit.

This itself endangers a form of accumulation where, using that profit, you invest more into the production, which, and that's the cycle, that's the basic circuit, right?

But the linchpin of the circuit is money, okay?

It's just kind of surplus value, and it's the form of surplus value in the form of money, right?

So, in socialism, you also have a mode of production, but the linchpin of the circuit is some kind of either enumerated or implicitly acknowledged or materially established.

Social goal, right?

Some social ends of production.

All of this production is for the fulfillment and satisfaction of some socially defined or recognized or compatible, you know, goals that society wants to meet, you know?

So that's my very vague and simple.

That's pretty good.

Yeah.

Um

I mean, do you think it's changed over time?

Because like going from Marx over to the Third International, you know, like it seems like there's kinda different usages and that's okay.

But like, do you think so?

I don't think we should hang up over the use of words like socialism.

We should focus more on

What we mean to refer to when we use them now, you know?

Yeah, I'd say.

Anyway, I'll see you later, man.

See you, bro.

He made a t account trolling leftcoms instead of Communizer.

So ridiculous.

So ridiculous.

Um

How can Marxism be Islam if Islam likes private property?

Oh you I'm just gonna smugly I'm just gonna just smugly mock you for your lack of education.

You simpleton.

DJ, go ahead.

Um hello.

Can you hear me?

Yes.

Yeah.

How old was the liberal?

What?

How old are you?

I'm 18 years old.

21st of.

I don't believe.

I always get it's so scary when people say it's like t that's really

Coincidental, like yeah, I yeah, totally, I buy that.

Did we bring up closure already?

Go ahead, closure.

Yo, what's good?

Oh, hey, what's up, man?

Appreciate you.

Jabberwocky, go ahead.

Sorry.

Oh, no, Jabberwocky's gone.

You guys know I made a Chinese song?

I composed the Chinese song.

Who wants to hear it?

I didn't do much work on it actually.

I just prompted it.

I didn't do any work on it at all.

I didn't have time to, but I just gave, I have the melody, and that's it.

Okay, I'll s you wanna hear it?

Again, I don't care if you like it or not, 'cause I like it, and I listen to it at the gym.

It's a nice song.

I don't I'll have to work on it, but I don't think I'm gonna have time.

And also, this is not the version I'll use, but this is the melody.

Mm-hmm.

So good.

I hate these initial remarks.

AI music for the introductions it does, which I love to remove those because it's such a horrible thing.

Let me just skip somewhere.

It's time to move.

Yeah.

See, I just like to make melodies, you know.

I like to make melodies.

And uh, I like melodies a lot.

So um

And usually I just hum the melody and then I try to get something out of it.

Are the lyrics actually Chinese?

Yes, they're Chinese.

They're just Confu they're some of my favorite quotes from Confucius.

Confucius.

Guys, I'm not spending any time making music.

I just prompted it.

I was at the gym.

I wanted a song.

I just prompted it.

It's not like I didn't work on it at all.

Ay Don, go ahead.

On ours.

What's up, man?

Oz.

Yo, your music sucks, bro.

I can produce for you.

You you uh uh you showed your camera to tell me this?

Yeah, I did.

Just to tell me to hurt my feelings or what?

No, no, no, actually, for real, I want to join the ACP as chairman.

How do I become?

Are you Australian?

Yeah.

You can't join us if you're Australian.

What do you mean, bro?

Surely I can help, you know.

Join the Eureka people.

They're doing something.

Oh, you know about the Eureka Collective?

That's kind of funny.

Of course I know about them.

Alright, so wait, I want to ask you a serious question.

Okay.

How can you say that Islam and Marxists are compatible?

They're not compatible, it's the same thing.

Why are they the same thing?

What are those principles of Marxism that?

The original revelation of Islam that is associated with the Prophet Muhammad actually was revealed in one generation, and then following this generation, you had the immediate fitna between the split between the Shia and the Sunni, where the betrayal of the family's prophet called into question the entire principles of the religion and the ability to actually transmit properly the word of the Prophet across generations.

And this problem of the generational transmission of the revelation of the Prophet continued to plague Islam through philosophy, through Sufism, through political intrigue, all the way up to the eventual Turco-Mongol invasion of the entire Islamic world.

And when the Turco-Mongol invasion of the entire Islamic world eventually demoralized the political structures of Islamic rule, you had the rise of Tamerlane, who finally combined, by being Sahib Quran, master of the auspicious conjunction between Jupiter and Saturn, Jupiter representing the reality of Turco-Mongol tribal politics, and Saturn representing the dimension of revelation and eternal religious truth.

Tamerlane finally reconciled these things, and Islam only then took the form of these massive gunpowder empires that combined the dynastic, Asiatic, Turco-Mongol tradition with Persianate imperial bureaucracy.

Plus, the religion of Islam.

But following the end of the Ottoman and Safavid empires, as well as the Mughal Empire by British colonialism, Islam completely was condemned to languish and was picked up only by the Wahhabis, who completely distorted it and turned it into some kind of Talmudic, false version of Islam that was based on textualism and formalism and had nothing, no content, and no stakes in the actual material world.

But meanwhile, the work of history was cunning.

Islam actually eschatologically anticipates Islam actually eschatologically anticipates the return of Jesus.

But what this actually means is that the problem with Islam is it never actually properly went back to the origins of Islam.

What was missing in the revelation of Christ, what was missing in Christianity that made Islam necessary in the first place was never something continuously re-examined and re-evaluated within the Islamic world.

Only in Europe with the rise of the Protestant Reformation, where the contradictions within Christianity, materially and actually imminent to Christianity itself, were drawn out, could Islam finally be justified in a way that previously, before the vacuum within Christianity, is what made Islam necessary.

But the contradictions within Christianity themselves, coming to a head with the rise of the Protestant Reformation, finally cleared the way and allowed the ground for Islam to truly awaken on an authentic basis, not based on the repudiation and rejection of Christianity according to the terms of a new, strange, and foreign religion, but based on the contradictions within Christianity itself.

What is at stake has always been Christ and Jesus and his message, and that's why Islam emerged in the first place.

And that's why Jesus within Islam is actually the Messiah.

And that's why Islam eschatologically anticipates the return of Christ.

Now, if you understand where Marx fits within this entire scheme, the Hegelian system is the culmination of the entirety of Western philosophy, which Feuerbach correctly identified as nothing more than the alienated religious consciousness expounded into the form of philosophical consciousness.

Philosophical consciousness being an alienated form of the human essence, but Marx and Feuerbach both took for granted the fact that

Human essence finds its fullest alienated satisfaction in the Christian religion, but they missed the mention of Islam proper until Marx until Marx until Marx took the first step of restoring Islam into the world by opposing Feuerbach on the basis of accepting from zero, from the desert.

The real of the proletariat and of material existence and material reality, which places Marx in the Saturnian tradition of Revelation and monotheism, just like Islam.

Because Marx basically risks the annihilation of the Trinity, just like Islam did, by asserting the principle of a integrated, united material reality, which he comprehended as the concrete and he developed through his method of rising from the abstract to the concrete, the concrete being the realization both of communism and practice and in the project of capital, a comprehensive reflection of the material world in the form of a scientific insight into the capitalist mode of production.

But he never finished capital.

And why didn't he finish capital?

Because he did not realize that he was a Muslim the whole time.

Okay.

But see Haas, how can you use its own reasoning when you know that Hegelian dialectics is based on a linear progression or accumulation of historical truths?

You are a Wikipedia scholar talking to me.

How dare you even argue with me?

How dare you?

How dare you argue with me?

Don't you say Hegelian dialectics is just based on linear time?

That's total nonsense.

Call me a Wikipedia scholar, bruh.

Just because you have a book that has no uh that book is the cleanest, most pristine condition binder I've ever seen in my life.

You don't read that book.

You just got spark notes.

Are you sure?

Come on, Haas, we can level, we can level.

You're being a bit younger.

He's not the notes.

He's got the notes.

He marked it.

I'm being a bit Flentoid, let's be real, a bit extreme.

But I respect it.

I respect it.

Okay, explain what your point is, since you have the notes.

I basically my point is that we shouldn't let religion dictate, you know, Marxist tribes.

It doesn't really make sense.

What is religion?

Religion is, you know, the organized no, what do you mean?

No, go read Feuerbach and then come back.

You don't even know the context of Marxism.

Yes, I know the context of no, you don't.

What do you mean I don't know?

No, you don't.

Go read the Jewish question.

Go read Feuerbach and go read Marx's response to Feuerbach.

What about Marx's response to Evola?

Nobody cares about Evola.

That guy just respects.

I love that.

I love that.

I like Evola.

So, anyway, what I was saying was very simple.

Uh everything is religion if you think about it.

No, you're n you can't escape religion by being in Reddit, okay?

Reddit is pagan, disgusting, and Satanist.

I don't use Reddit.

You know Marx?

Don't use X.

I'll teach you about chef Karl Marx.

You use X, I don't use X.

I use book.

Marx had a wife and a daughter, and they would go attend this church of a Reddit, progressive, atheist, whatever, something.

He would have a church of like this progressive, atheistic reading of the Christian religion, something like that, right?

And then Marx, literally, when they would come home, he would mock them and he would say, This guy that you're seeing is an idiot.

And then Marx would quote the Bible and talk about how superior the wisdom within the Bible and within Christianity was versus this fool, this atheistic fool.

Because Marx respected the religion, actually.

He just didn't come to realize there is spirit in self points.

It's not just the spirit, it's the form of the material, the form of matter.

You need to understand the cosmos.

It's an actual idealist, bro.

Come on, let's be real.

No, it's not idealism.

Now when did I mention an idea?

Name the name one idea I just mentioned.

The idea you mentioned was that everything is actual.

Why?

That's what you just said, huh?

No, I said matter.

Yeah, matter just a substance.

Matter has a way to it.

It has something like a form.

It has determination.

It has lawfulness.

Okay?

Matter is only the content of consciousness.

That is idealism.

Yes, because if you think about it, Marx was really an idealism.

No, he wasn't.

This is the worst interpretation.

He wasn't.

Matter is not.

No, you need to read the shift from Feuerbach to Marx.

You haven't done it yet.

You're still pre-Feuerbach.

But why would I read Feuerbach when we can just read Hegel?

Because between Hegel and Marx is Feuerbach and you are before Feuerbach right now.

You're not even at Marx yet.

You're not even nowhere near Marx.

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no okay, okay, okay.

I'm not at Feuerbach.

But why can't we just have an ideal?

Instead of an organized religion manifesting in the actual because ideals are fake, they're not real.

What do you mean they're not real?

They're not real, they're fake.

The entire history of ideal for him, he's talking when he says the mind, he really means the mind of God.

He means the mind of God.

In a spiritual ideal is a moment in the mind.

It's reason and the idea, okay?

Reason is the kind of animus.

Ideality is the object of the understanding.

The idea is a part of the mind.

That's not what he says.

Yes, the mind is the sublation and the totality of reason and the idea.

No.

Yes.

No.

Yeah.

He says separation is that.

He never talks about the mind or material as a moment of.

Geist means mind.

The Hegelian spirit is the mind.

Yeah, but he says.

It's not simply idea or the reason, it's the integration of both into a greater thing.

Spirit is the mind.

That's what it means.

It's translated to mind.

Spirit is the mind.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

But that's not what I'm saying.

Yeah, because everything is a manifestation of the mind of God.

That's yes, Hegel's view.

Why don't you believe in that, mute?

Because his god is the god of the philosophy, which is a pagan god, not the god of the Abraham, which is a Saturnian kind of.

God of revelation.

I'm an educated man.

I'm a cultured man, if you will.

Well-traveled, well-educated.

You're a bit of a nostalgic beta.

You know, let's return to these myths about Saturn.

Nobody said return.

And nobody said.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Haz come.

You know, Adon, your foolishness, you're probably young.

Your foolishness is the following.

You are ruled by people.

The people who rule you believe in all of this astrology stuff and they know what Saturn means.

They know what Jupiter means.

They know what Mars means.

What Venus means and so on.

You are blind to the reality you live in.

But those who rule you.

I think I see past, but they are awake.

They are awake.

Those who rule you.

Woke to Buano.

We're integrating Venus into not Venus.

We are Sahib Kiran, the unity of Jap Jupiter and Saturn.

Haz, can you make like a Shia Raid remix next time?

I've made many of those.

I what if you combine like Chinese instrumentations with Shia models?

This you could be onto something.

How dare you mock me?

How old are you?

What do you mean?

I'm eighteen.

Get the hell out of here with this response.

Get the hell out of here with this crazy response.

Why am I arguing with an eighteen even if you were eighteen, why am I arguing with an eighteen year old about

Usual.

Go ahead, Benjamin Netanyahu.

You piece of shit, you awful

More gimmicks, not about who the greatest has always been about love and hating.

That's so stupid.

That's so stupid.

Jim.

Go ahead, Jim.

What a disgusting uh

Sad, depraved person.

Belong in jail.

What what is this?

What a disgusting, disgusting

Imagine this is your life and that's something you do in your free time.

Like, imagine you're on your phone, you're so angry at your phone, you're trying to make a statement.

This is what you do in your free time.

What a sad life.

These people are mentally unwell and they're very sad about their future, which they know is probably coming to an end.

Yeah.

That's so problematic.

People say I need to be cancelled.

That prob

This is like uh

Ape culture, is it not?

You just need to be ignored.

Well you're not doing a good job of that.

Elias, go ahead.

Hey man, what's up?

I hear double.

What?

I hear myself echoing.

You should hear yourself more often.

You only seek others to hear you.

But have you ever heard yourself?

Have you ever argued with yourself?

Have you ever fought with yourself?

Sometimes, you know.

Not enough.

I was wondering what is your Bro I hear myself echoing, what is that?

You should continue to hear yourself echo until you reach the proper enlightenment.

Alright see ya.

They left.

Actually

They're on their way to something.

What's up?

Um, I've been watching your content for a while.

I just wanna know the difference between like, I wanna know your views on the C P U S A.

'Cause all these Marxist like influencers treat you guys like you guys are like worse than Germany.

Like, you know what I mean?

Because they're Islamophobic, what can I say?

I'm a Muslim, brother, like, you know, they never talk about Islam.

They mostly see you as a threat.

They see me as a threat because I uh am bringing Islam to the space that they shouldn't belong.

That's crazy.

I'm bringing yes.

Always have been.

Always have this.

Yeah, I recently did turn eighteen, so I can't join the ACP.

You can?

But apparently Yeah.

Okay.

Me and my friend are joining soon.

It's just that my friend's more educated.

I'm still like learning.

How have you been watching me for a while?

Because I I don't only watch you, I watch like a bunch of people.

Like, well, what's that one girl?

I forgot her name.

Uh Maddleton Endleton.

Yeah, Maddleton.

She hates you guys.

I don't know why.

I talked to her too about this.

Like, she had a something like this.

She's on Adderall.

That's why she doesn't like us.

Really?

I really like her content.

My friend told me it's because I'm heard it's good content, but she needs to lay off the Adderall about us.

At least when she.

Yeah.

She s she said that you guys are like I don't know what she told me.

She just told me you guys are really extremists or whatever.

Really what?

Extremists.

Like an extremist.

Fuck.

What did she tell me?

You know, I I forgot what she told me, but it's like something something stupid.

I don't know.

LaRouche.

Did she say LaRouche?

Well she

I don't know what her problem is.

I don't have a problem with Maddletin.

Yeah.

I have a genuine question too, 'cause everybody I talk to the ACB about, they bring up mega communism.

Was that a joke or was that like a real thing?

Uh it wasn't it wasn't a joke.

I mean, it was we did have fun with it though.

I wouldn't say we didn't have fun with it, but was it all a joke?

No, of course not.

I mean, we wanted to uh

Create a new base and foundation for communist politics in the country.

Instead of having to rely on the people who are in the DSA meeting and talking about how everyone's a people of color or something and we need to be canceled because of centering white voices and stuff, I just we can't do it.

We can't build communism from people like that who speak like this and get triggered by everything in the world.

It's like you need to build communism among the people who are workers.

You can't do it among these

And do you believe that you have to like appeal to like NAGA?

No, we never had to appeal to anything.

You just had to you had to like

You had to articulate the avant-garde of the revolutionary position concretely.

And you have to work with the material that's readily before you.

So you don't have to appeal to them, but there were things emerging in the MAGA consciousness before 24, at least, which were rooted in opposition to NATO, opposition to what they perceived as the ruling class, the status quo.

And this is the raw material you have to work with, so to speak.

And they genuinely were trying to oppose the status quo, and they were being misled by Trump and others.

But it was coming from a place of genuine class rage against the system.

Right.

Alright, um last question.

I live in New York City and, you know, Mom Dani and everything.

Um, I personally don't like Mom Dani.

Me neither.

Yeah, um I don't know.

Is that hesitant?

No, I don't like him either.

I just

I mean like people I talk to these are like, you know, you get what you got.

Normie's like 'em, but we have to be smarter.

All right.

All right.

See you later.

Thank you, man.

No problem.

Facts and logic, go ahead.

I'ma strike a cord and it's my

Just to play music, really?

For what?

See Dog, go ahead.

Yo, what's up?

Hey, you don't like business owners or what?

No, we hate all of you.

I don't give a fuck.

I'll exploit you and everyone else.

So who cares?

No, you won't.

Oh, yeah, I will.

No, you can't.

I own a yacht business.

What are you going to do?

What are you going to do?

What do you do, Connie?

What's up, Connie?

What's up?

I own a yacht business.

I'll buy your business up.

I'm a conglomerate.

You can't own a business so you're calling me pussy.

What's up?

I own a yacht business.

Yeah, you don't own shit.

Yes, I do.

I sell and build yachts.

Yes, I do.

Yeah, I'll split you in half.

Yeah, I'll fucking hold off.

Yeah, I'll buy up your business and I'm a conglomerate.

I'm going to go to the bathroom.

I'm going to buy shit when I split you in half, bitch.

You're not going to do nothing.

You're not going to do nothing.

I'm a capitalist, homie.

I exploit you fucks.

And we're going to take your business.

Work for me while I go fucking on vacation.

My yacht business will destroy whatever business you own.

You don't own shit.

Yes, I do.

I own a $325 million valuated yacht business and counting.

Yeah, I do.

So you're just starting filming.

Yeah, whatever, dude.

Yeah, I do.

I own it.

Yeah.

Go look at it.

I was literally on a yacht.

It's so hard in real life.

If I see that comedy flag around me, I'll fucking knock you the fuck out.

You're not going to do shit.

You're not going to do shit.

Dude.

You're not going to do shit.

Hey, let's compare bank accounts right now.

Let's do it.

I got so much more money.

I'm so much better than you, bro.

How much money you got?

Don't worry about it.

I worry about my $325 million yacht business.

You got nothing.

You're just saying that because you don't own shit.

That's why you're communist.

No, I own you.

You're jealous.

You're jealous of the successful because you're too lazy to fucking do something with your life, huh?

You're going to be in the ocean.

Yeah, you're a bitch, dude.

You're going to be in the ocean.

You're going for a yacht ride, buddy.

You're going to be sucking my dick while I'm fucking having $100 for my fucking business.

So you're an LGBT.

Okay, it's LGBT then.

He just went.

By the way, this guy, nobody was saying anything.

He just.

I can't respond because you're oppressed now.

Because then I would be the oppressor if I responded.

You're a marginalized group now.

He's part of the marginalized LGBT community, that's fine, but

As someone who's of privilege, I cannot in good faith continue hostilities because that would mean I'm exploiting my privilege against you and it would be quite regrettable.

We're quite woke now, you see.

Tackies, go ahead and

Hi.

Um I'm here for a debate, I guess?

Okay.

So personally I find myself conservative.

Okay.

But like not that right.

Right, basically, but not that much.

How old are you?

Did you own a business?

How old are you in a fucking toilet?

How old are you?

They left, thank god I mean, what the hell was that?

They literally flushed the toilet.

Type of shit I deal with.

Capitalist Sir Newton.

Go ahead.

Oh, he left.

Yes, what a lot of these LARPing capitalists don't understand is I own a very successful yacht business, three hundred twenty five million valuated yacht business.

And if you're coming at me as a business owner and talking smack, just understand that I'm going to

I'm going to steal your business through a merger, conglomerate, takeover, restructuring.

You know, you can't really compete.

The yacht business is going to gobble up whatever business you own.

Just understand that.

It's inevitable.

Go ahead, capitalist.

I'm just coming on here to play music.

It's not going to happen.

This person's name.

I should have double-checked their name before letting them on.

That was a mistake.

We have another.

This person's name is.

Ball washer, you're not D.

I'm not letting you on, dude.

Lot of weird people.

I think it was because of the Caleb Moppen coverage.

We've we've brought all these people onto the stream.

Bunch of Caleb Moppin fans over here.

Tun

Yeah.

Nine, go ahead.

Hello?

Haz, why aren't you woke men?

'Cause it's inferior.

To InfraWoke.

Because InfraWoke is superior.

What's infra work?

The latest thing.

If you're not in on it, you're cancelled.

Well, what does that mean?

It's the latest thing.

If you're not in on it, you're cancelled.

No, but seriously though, why aren't you woke?

I'm serious.

InfraWoke is the latest thing.

Woke one point zero was revealed to be problematic deeply, rooted in problematic structures of anti-Tartarian Atlanticist supremacy and other forms of discrimination against uh people of t POTs, people of Tartaria.

No, but isn't it better to be a communist whose voice than some people of Tartaria.

Just deeply problematic.

Deeply problematic.

Co call man like can you please answer my question?

About how deeply problematic the structures of crystallized oppression, of visible spectrum exclusive, anti-Tartarian Atlanticist supremacists who have no regard for the oppression that is suffered by people of the Sufi orders that are emerging in this country, anti-Sufi discrimination, Islamophobia, discrimination toward people of Tartaria.

No, seriously, though, I understand that you don't like woke because liberals use it to justify imperialism.

I am infra-woke.

It's a superior one.

Infra-woke.

But what does that mean?

It means seeing beyond the visible spectrum, the true enlightenment, the true woke.

We're the ones who are awake.

Everyone else is in a dream and we're awake.

Okay, I'm talking about like

in a colloquial sense.

Yes, even in that sense we are the ones who have the high ground.

Okay, uh let me ask you this.

Are you anti or not anti or like are you skeptical of LGBT?

No, because oppressed and marginalized groups like Tartarians don't need to justify themselves for white privilege, honestly.

Like it's just kind of an anti-Tartarian Islamophobic framing of the premise as though the victims of marginalization have to be the ones to

Explain themselves when more privileged groups are allowed to speak over our voices and silence us.

What is a Tartarian?

Is it the Siberia conspiracy theory?

No, it's they're well Tartarians are a historically marginalized and oppressed group across the history of this colonial country of Atlanticist supremacy.

What is Atlantis supremacy man, I've never heard these words in my life.

Well, you have to it's not uh, you know what I have to tell you then?

It's not my job to educate you.

It's not the job of oppressed people to educate their oppressors.

That's all I could really say.

It's not mm it's not the job of oppressed people to educate their oppressors, you know.

It's not my job to educate you.

You need to stop oppressing me.

I uh go ahead.

Yeah.

What a clip.

What is that even

People just playing music, it doesn't even make any sense.

Shaman, go ahead.

Yo.

Okay,

Yes.

Okay, so um I've read like a little bit of theory and I've organized like locally and like I've done like whatever.

But uh as someone who like

Works a lot, doesn't have a lot of time to like really get in depth to the theory, and like can only get like pretty much a surface-level understanding of like, you know, I consider myself a Marxist-Leninist because that's like as far as I could get in my understanding.

Someone who's like in my position, who has like a pretty surface-level understanding of theory, and who like has a drive to change and and do better in their community, like, how would would you sell a person like me on on the party?

Which sh

states do you live in?

I live in California.

I'm in the Central Valley of California.

Yeah, we could yeah, I mean California chapter's great, we do great work.

And I don't know what the alternative to us would be, honestly, if you're interested in organizing.

I mean, what would be the alternative, you know?

Well, I organize with di like the PSL has been through here, which I've done like a study group with them like a few years ago.

It's been a while, though.

I'm a Brown Beret.

I've like done some organizing with like different like homeless advocacy groups and stuff like that.

Like, if you're not a party that's connected at the national scale at that level, I mean, that would be good, you know, if you're part of the ACP.

It's like the entire of the I'm not, I'm not, I don't, I don't have, like, I was registered Democrat for like when I graduated high school, that was like when Bernie was running.

And that's I registered as a Democrat to support him at that time.

But now, like, I mean, obviously, I feel like it's not enough.

And, like, I would want to push further.

But I just see, like, I just don't understand like a there's no clear process for me to achieve anything further that it seems that's been put forth.

You know what I mean?

Yeah, I mean uh ACP is definitely a solid organization.

Um to go forward with.

And we just are interested in work and building.

Uh

Do you guys consider yourself Marxist-Leninist, or if you had to put like a label on it, what would you be?

Marx-Leninism.

Okay.

Okay, cool.

But anyway, how big is your California chapter?

Like, how many, like.

A lot.

I don't know how many, but it's a lot.

Okay.

I I just followed you.

Like, c do you have like a website?

Like how could I learn?

Okay.

And from there, I could link up with some of the California guys if I had more specific questions.

Absolutely.

Yeah, they'd be happy to.

Help you.

Okay, hell yeah.

That w that was really all I wanted to know.

See you later.

Bye-bye.

Aren't you the free will determinist guy?

Guy who's never read anything about the history of philosophy except watching some weird fucking cult, being in some weird cult or some weird f stinky British guy?

Doesn't actually read any books ever.

Learned everything they know from YouTube.

Never read a book once in their life.

Is not caught up with any philosophy in the world.

William Shakespeare, go ahead and.

Hello, hello.

Yes.

Are you a microcommunist?

Are you an anime profile picture?

Yes, you are.

So get out of here.

SRP, go ahead.

It's like the same guy, probably.

I think it's the same guy.

Same guy.

I think these are predators.

This is probably a predator group group of predators.

Definitely a group of predators.

Of some kind.

Yeah.

Nineteen sixteen, go ahead.

Dude, I support MAGA communism.

I don't care, you have an anime profile picture.

Yo.

You are the last person to speak.

All right, sweet, sweet.

So if that bunny dude didn't like crash out over nothing, what would be the role of the petite bourgeoisie?

Like in terms of um mod and pop shops, artisan producers, even uh medium aspiring industrial bourgeoisie, say um people who didn't go along with Naphta, like people who were like, Fuck it, I'm gonna still make shit here no matter the cost.

Um

What do you mean?

Um

So I think uh Von Bassett Furniture is like one of the few uh industrialists post NAFTA that didn't just asset strip everything to like China.

Well

We would um

It's a complicated question because it's like

We

would not prop up anything that is of outmoded eras of production and give them any advantage.

So if people can pull their own,

uh in the immediate stage of transition or whatever, then they could.

But

Nobody would get any special advantages or be propped up by the government who is a business owner if they're not aligned with the principles and values of a new era, right, and new mode of production.

Um

As um a quick follow-up on that, would that mean

if they were aligned with the party, i is like uh the historical party line of other projects as well as I guess historically the C PSA, would that be to entice them with like some kind of administrative managerial over position?

No, we w would we would think that through the market itself, through market competition,

Social enterprise and cooperative enterprise would dominate.

People who align their entrepreneurship with new principles of production based on the new era would get the leg up because they would just be better.

Mm.

Okay, yeah, cool.

Well, that was it.

Yeah, thanks, man.

See ya.

User five million.

Go ahead.

Goodbye forever.

Water, go ahead.

You're the last person.

Haas, do you think that most developed countries have the ability to abolish the value form in commodity production, or do you think it's not a necess necessi a necessity?

Uh things like the value form cannot be abolished by fiat or by decree.

They

they can uh they there's an imminent contradiction that is at the foundation of the value form.

And the development of that contradiction leads to it being sublated by a more fundamental

Mode of production.

So that was the Marxist view.

It's not that we need gonna abolish this or that.

It's that we this thing is abolishing or sublating itself, you know, by actually confronting its own real premises.

People need to understand dialectics.

Most people don't.

And if you don't, there's no use in talking about value forms.

Goodbye, Tic Tac.

The connection between the party and the mass is a dialectual process.

Yes, it is.

By Arab

You just gonna say goodbye, Arab.

Uh

Goodbye, guys.

See you.

Why do you hate CPI?

Because they're cringe by

Alright, now that the stream is finally over, I can finally

Call my yacht employees and explain to them how they will still make below minimum wage and how.

Yes, make more yachts!

I just made a lot of money from the infrared stream.

Get back to work on the yachts.

No, we can't delay them.

We need more yachts produced.

No, it's not enough.

I need more yachts to go on vacation with.

It's not enough.

You know how many yachts I've been on in the past month?

Only thirty-five!

That's fifty percent down from where we were.

Make more yachts.

No, I don't care if you're um

I'm about to die of exhaustion and you need to go to sleep.

No.

Get back to work or else

Remember

I don't care.

I understand this is all because Starbucks wouldn't pay you enough.

And now you can't go back, but guess what?

I'm the barista now.

And I need a place to make my coffee, which is my yacht.

Goodbye.

Sorry, guys.

Oh my god, I'm live.

I'm still live.

Oh my god.

I didn't know I was still live.

Guys, I unfortunately, just all of that, just forget about it, right?

Gerald, what's up?

All right, guys, I'll see you on Wednesday or Thursday.

Goodbye.