ACP UNDER ATTACK!!!! | JIHAD

Yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, ha, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, Yeah, haq, yeah, Yeah, haq, yeah haq,

Yeah haq, yeah haq, yeah haq,

Yeah haq, yeah haq, yeah haq, yeah haq,

y'allet's a little bit and I'm a man. Yeah, haq, yeah, Yeah, haqt'i'r

There's sikdhaelim

But, there'risman

Al-ah, Allah,

Allah, Every-Ectal

Shere and Istila

B'rata, B'A

God,

A-N

Allah, Allah, In fact,

this Quran,

Hurt-B, GURDAG, MOUDach, Fl God. Real check, the book's This Quran Purban,

here

Frow Musa

Manatter

Hatt

The Hatt Hatt

Hattikik

God God God God

They're

They're

They're They're

They're

They're They They're They're Like, They're They're They're

We're

We're

We're

We're

We're We're

We're

We're We're We're

We're In

God

In the

In

In In In

In In In In In In God In God In in love fict in allah in all in love

in love

in love

in love in love

in love

as in

Allah

my Godi

Allah

my

my heartby

God be

God be

God

Muhammad

Sallah

Allah, no

Allah,

God

God Muhammad, sallelah, la, I la,

all right,

Allah,

this man,

a bade,

nevse,

in chanet,

and the tecate,

Allah,

Allah,

this,

life,

enticam,

satas,

intifat,

Allah, God, God, Gifat, Allah, Allah,

Gurnal,

God,

God,

but Allah,

asla

you

sattmaz, Dushen

clas

you're

and you and

your heart and

your

, they're they're they're they they're they they they they they in his name, a heartish in. Allah, Allah. Finan'est,

they're,

they're,

this

churned

merdiven, sands

and

a instiap,

there,

always, ira

in in my

in

in, in in my name in Allah.

Siprida, Allah,

Firm in,

Allah,

in my heart of my,

Allah,

in my

God in God in

God in

God in

Allah,

my in my

my heart my my heart

God.

No,

Muhammad Sallah

Allah

There is

God Allah God God God God God God God God

God God God God

God God God my in my heart my love noo muhammad sallu'll la f la is la ilah

i'll i'ma

my s'i my godi jala

my my heart my heart my life

my heart my life me, God. Lord of Muhammad, Sall Allah,

there's no

Allah,

no Allah,

God,

God, God,

God, God,

God, God,

God, God,

God, God,

God,

God,

God,

God, God, Allahall Allah Have no,

I'm Allah,

I'm in my love me

Jallah

And my hearty,

God in my heart of my

heart in my heart

Allah

Nour of Mohemad Sallelah

Abhah

Allah

Allah sallelah love my Allah World Revolution World Revolution

Sahert Iran Saheatiran, World Revolution,

Saheatirang,

World Revolution, revolution Sahet there

World Revolution

World Revolution

Haidar

Gaing is our master

Haidar

Dream will awaken

Sa'Hirthed

World Revolution

Sa'Hir Theran

World Revolution

Sa'Hir Theran

World Revolution Sa'Hia God World evolution

World Revolution

World Revolution

Haidler

Haydard

Game is our master

Haidah

Haidur

Timur

Awaken. Ah! world Sahep Iran

World Revolution

Sahep Iran

World Revolution The World Revolution Zahib, Great Revolution

Haidat

Haidat

Genghiz

and master

Tymour

Awaken

Awaken

Awaken

Dumb

Dumb Dun Dun Dumb Dumb awakens um The

SAHER KERN,

Oh, no revolution

Soher Terran World Revolution

Their Kieran World Revolution

Sahir Kiraan World Revolution

Sahep Teran

World Revolution

World Revolution

Gang is our master

Haidon

Dream would awaken

Sa'er

World Revolution

Saherter

World Revolution

Soher Yeah Revolution So Yeah Sayreteran, world revolution

Soherpren, war revolution

Sohertler, Haidharthaer

Haidhartha

Game is our master

Haidah, Haydur.

Timur awaken. The Sahelip therein' world revolution.

Sahelip there. World Revolution Starhead, played on

World Revolution The The War Revolution

Sa'iqqq

World Revolution

Haidt

Haidah

Game is our master

Haidah

Heydard

Team were awakened Bum Dunbund Aidar, Idaho Timur Awakens

I'm awake and my

and

I'm

Oh The Revolution War Revolution

Sohert Iran

War Revolution World Revolution Sahelteran

World Revolution

Sohre World Revolution

Saher

Tehran

World Revolution

Haidder

Gang is our master

King will awaken

Sa'er

World Revolution more awakened Sahelteran

World Revolution Sahelteran

World Revolution

Saherteran

Saherteran

World Revolution

Saher Terran

World Revolution Haider Haider Say herdiraeerite world revolution

Haydard, haydard

Game is our master

Haidah, Haidah

Timur awakened world I'm a

rifted a

world world sa'i phren

world revolution

sa'i phara

world revolution World Revolution God Revolution Haydard, heydard Game Gets, or master

Heydod, heyd

Timur, Awaken Don't know. The Oh, I'm going to be able to be able to be.

Oh.

Oh. and the other people. I'm going to be.

I'm going to

I'm going to I'm going to be able to be. And so you know. and I'm not I'm a lot I'm

I'm a lot

I'm a

I'm not

I'm not

I'm

I'm going I'm I don't know. I don't know.

I don't know.

And I'm a lot of

I'm going to be able to be able to be.

I'm a lot of it.

I don't know. and the other people and the other than the other than the

I'm

a

and

I'm

I'm I'm going to be. Lord a man with the five, what's up bro?

Comrade kid with the five, what's going on, brother?

Steven Sane with the five, what's going on? Welcome, brothers and sisters.

Welcome.

We got some shit to talk about today.

I didn't stream yesterday. I didn't stream yesterday I've been absent I've been busy cooking in the kitchen

but a lot of things have transpired

in the past few days

in the midst of the upticking energy

that the federal fucking government

has detected as a consequence

of the announcement of the infrared

renaissance. Look, with your own eyes.

Don't tell me I'm a cult leader telling you shit.

You've all seen it with your own eyes.

The past few days, a massive, massive surge

and attacks against the American Communist Party.

A massive set of attacks.

A massive wave of attacks

against our movement and our cause.

When I said what

every time I've declared war on these

kufr metaphysical war on these koffer

every single time

I have attached the revolutionary cause

of communism

with the cause of god every time i've made that connection every time i

have given way and given expression to a monotheistic revolutionary outlook the kaffar the, the satanus, something inside of them gets activated. Something

ticks these fucking demons off and it's out with them. They come after us, they attack us with

such a bitterness, such an enmity. No one has ever seen it before. Not a single one of

these ML LARPers receive their enmity. Not a single one of these people who confine themselves

to one of these cookie cutter divisions of ideological labor. I'm an M. I'm a Mao. I'm a Maoist. I'm a

Holocaust. I'm a Democratic citizen. You're on your little fucking gay boxes where you

fucking belong. But when we declare this is the cause of Allah, when we declare, this is the one cause,

when we cut across the divides,

when we cut across these fake barriers,

when we level their towers of Babylon,

the kufar, the demons,

they come out of the fucking woodwork rabid frothing at the mouth with such hatred

such malice such enmity and what are their weapons against us what is the one weapon they've

always had to use against us. Lies. Lies. There are a bunch of liars. They fake. They defame. They fabricate. They deceive. And their message to the world is simple. They can, and so they will.

Because they can lie, because they have the power to lie about us, they will lie about us.

That's their message.

Well, guess what?

In the real world, I want to be clear about something.

In the real world, there's not a single time in the history of human civilization

where any group, any organization of human beings, has tolerated outright lies in defamation and slander.

Not a single time.

We have laws supposedly to protect our rights.

So if someone comes and opens fire with a machine gun to gun us down and kill us,

supposedly we're protected by the state. And this way things don't escalate into a violent gang war,

right? Well, it's the same thing when it comes to fabricating reality distorting reality with lies what what will we do

accept legally respond what can we do they say oh you're a snitch you're you're working with the state

okay what if we handle this outside of the state? You would call the police on us. If we handled this in the way it's been handled for thousands of years of human civilization, when you make shit up and attribute it to people or groups and slander and and lie about them just outright lie

about them how do they retaliate historically tell me what happens what happens when an organized

group is being lied about what happens when a tribe gets lied about a family family gets lied about. Tell me what happens

historically when there's no law and order.

If we respond

to you in that way, you would

be okay with it? You wouldn't go

and immediately run to the American state

to protect you? Okay, you would, you fucking

bitch. So in the same

fucking way, we're going to use every

method of our disposal legally

to respond and

deal with your fucking

lies. You sick, disgusting,

depraved fuck.

You have an empty,

empty heart, empty worldview.

Your life is full of emptiness.

It's worthlessness. You're a

maggot. You're a cockroach.

All you can do is spread filth,

spread lies because it's a reflection.

Your whole life is a fucking lie.

Johnny, what's up?

There's not a single day that goes by for these people.

They're not lying to themselves fundamentally about what they are. They are liars. Their

existence is lies. They have nothing but lies against the American Communist Party.

And why? Think about it very simply. Is there a single organization you've ever experienced in your entire life? Have you ever witnessed such a mystery of how do we unite? We unite all of these people against us.'re all so united against us midnight what's up

i'll explain things to you very very simply and very very clearly why is the entire american left

united against us you can go ahead and clip this one because this is going to be

concise and simple right why is it that the entirety of the american left is united against us

osos what's up?

How do we manage to unite the entire American left against us?

They seem to have no common principles.

They seem to not agree on anything positively.

They seem to not have any common consensus on just about fucking anything.

Not even when it comes to their identity politics, by the way. So why are they all unified when it comes to us?

Why is that?

Rabbi, what's up?

Well, I'll tell you exactly fucking why.

Notice how they're so excited, they're so mobilized right now.

Yeah, we're going to take on the APP.

Yeah, the ACP is over party.

We're going to destroy the ACP.

It's like they're experiencing a revolution.

Oh my God.

Yeah, guys, we're all going to destroy the ACP.

It's so happy.

But zoom out and think about

what's fucking going on.

You're calling yourself a communist.

You're calling yourself fucking left wing.

What are you fucking happy and excited about?

Is there any expression of your principles and your values

finding victory anywhere in this country.

Don't fucking tell me you're happy

about the DSA shit because

50% of these fucking people claim

to also oppose the DSA.

So why is attacking the ACP?

Why does that there's somebody who posted a

fake doctored screenshot.

Aye, what's up? Because the friends of this disgusting degenerate who initially slandered us,

they're saying, well, if we all sounder ACP, they can't sue all of us. Yes, we fucking can,

you retard. Of course we're going to do it one at a time of course

the pressure the attention the litigation's going to be focused you're not going to protect that

person from the legal process we have available to us legally by our rights.

The same way, because that's the only way we can handle it, because if we try to handle it a different way, you would call the police, right?

So we're legal, we're lawful.

You would try to weaponize the state against us if we enforce justice on our

own terms. So we will find recourse in the justice of the U.S. state. Simple as that. But in any

case, this idea that we're

going to take the pressure off this one person

because they have all these friends doing it

no we're going to see two

through it with this one person

and they will have to deal with the consequences

they will

it's not oh they think oh I'm just going to have to delete my hand no no will. It's not,

oh, I'm just going to have

to delete my hand.

No, no, no, no.

That's not how it works, actually.

These are material damages

you're doing against the

American Communist Party.

We're pursuing recompense

for the material damages

you're inflicting on us

right?

That's just how it works.

So it's one

by one.

We will go

one by one if we have to.

And anyone

who has a,

anyone who says,

oh, but this is bourgeois, this or that.

Okay, but if we took it in our own hands,

you would actually petition the bourgeois state to protect you, would you not?

So, that's how it works then.

If we took this into our own hands, because there's not a single, there's not a single period of human civilization where you can lie. I'm not talking about share and opinion. I'm not talking about criticize. I'm talking about misrepresent and spread deception and lies.

There's not a single period in the history of humanity where that wasn't considered

and a front that demands consequences. You may not understand this, but that's how the fucking world works for example even even just

talking shit in this way and i'm going to say something in eurasia americans don't fucking

understand this the only time americans ever understood this was in the history of gang violence.

You know, when a gang would talk shit about another gang, they would go and get fucking

massacreed, right? Okay, the police swept all that up and now we live under this system of

total control. But in the old world, the way it fucking works, I don't even fucking care where you go.

This is true in the history of Europe.

This is true in the Middle East.

It's true in Turkey.

I'm sure it's true in Asia, Korea, and Japan.

You lie about people.

You commit

and knowingly commit an injustice

against them. They will fucking find

you and beat the living shit out of you

or they'll kill you and stab you to death.

That's how it works in the old world.

This is the only place where people have no

fucking idea of the consequences of words.

So we have remedies available to us that are only legal. That's the only way you can deal with

it and you can handle it. That's why defamation is a relevant category for civil, you know, civil litigation in the first place.

But if you're, oh, that's some bitch shit or whatever. Okay, go, go to fucking any other country in the other side of the world and see how people respond when you fucking go and lie about them.

Lie about their organizations, their parties.

They don't just go, oh, we just

say whatever we want. That's not how the fucking world

works, Bucco, you fucking retard.

In any case, if it was any one

of these other people, how much would they victimize themselves?

Oh, the outrage, the outrage.

So nothing is going to change.

I promise you nothing's going to change.

But back to the point, and this is the part you can clip, why are all these disgusting degenerates unified against us? What actually binds them and unifies them together against us? It's very simple. The American left doesn't have a common authority. It has no common principles. It has no common organization.

It has no common authority. They are slaves and prostitutes of the Democratic Party, or they are

individualistic nihilists. There's no temple, there's no fortress,

there's no center that

unites them, there's no set of principles that

they all agree upon, that they all come

together upon and say, this is what

it means to be part

of this tribe, right?

Nothing positively unites them.

They are fundamentally impotent when it comes to confronting the bourgeoisie and the American state.

But you want to know what they can do.

They can kill themselves.

They're good at killing themselves.

They're good at attacking themselves.

They're good at snuffing out.

You see, they have a war against the one, right?

Which they represent as the U.S. government.

But they themselves have no unity.

They themselves have no oneness.

They themselves have no authority.

They themselves have no Ummah. They themselves have no authority. They themselves have no Ummah.

They themselves have no Mujahideen.

They themselves have no common faith.

No common vision.

No common army.

No common organization.

No common set of laws and principles and beliefs, no common movement, no common anything.

There's no oneness.

So when the one emerges, that's the ACP.

When the red Mujahideen emerges. That's the ACP. When the red mujahideen emerges, one center of authority, one communist party, one revolutionary struggle, one movement, when that emerges and comes to be, they all their energies all their forces all their attention

to destroying it why because they're pagans they're polytheists they don't believe in a common

authority they don't believe in a common movement they don't believe in a common movement. They don't believe in a common revolutionary struggle.

They want the only unity, the only authority to be the U.S. government and nothing else.

And they will disparately protest, and they will disparately bitch and whine and complain, but if anyone dares try to

fucking do something about it and build an authority from scratch, they must be destroyed.

And this is the only victories the so-called American left is capable of.

Destroying, destroying anyone who takes up the banner of the cause,

crushing them, destroying them, snuffing not.

And they celebrate how powerful we are.

We've all come together.

If only you could be so enthusiastic. if only you could be so enthusiastic if only you could be so

fanatically enthusiastic and excited about defeating the right wing about defeating the regime about

defeating the bourgeoisie if If only you could be so

excited, so ramped up

with so much energy.

If only you could have

that. They're literally out here.

They call us

fucking crazy. They're literally

they're literally.

They're so energetic and so excited about this

let's say acp's gone what's left they're happy they've destroyed any semblance, any semblance of unity or hope.

Because for them, there can be nothing.

There has to be a blank space.

And it's not a blank space.

What is it?

It's Satan.

Satan of the knee-hill.

Satan of the nothingness. That's Satan. Nothingness. There can't be a center. There can't be an authority. There can't be anyone who emerges and rises up and says, from here, on this rock, we're going to build our church. On this rock, we're going to build our party. On this basis, we're going to go forward. Anyone who fucking does that has to be destroyed.

And what's the closest thing that they'll tolerate and accept the fucking ds a which is not an authority it's a loose affiliation of caucuses and Well, we agree to have no common authority.

We agree to have no center.

We agree to have, and their prostitutes and slaves of the Democratic Party.

May they be cursed, may their descendants be cursed.

May their ancestors be cursed, may their ancestors be cursed.

They have a big polycule called the GSA with no center, no authority, no common commitment, no common belief at all

it's a pagan

polytheistic orgy of

pagans they have their different gods

I'm part of the this caucus

I'm part of the ball caucus I'm part of the Baal Caucus. I'm part of the fucking

the Ishtar caucus. I'm part of the, uh, the, the, the Jupiter caucus. Oh, I'm going to

hear you go make sacrifices to the Molok coffees. This is the Mammon Caucus. They have all

these fucking idols that they worship, and it's an

implicit framework of paganism, paganism, polytheism. They're all kufar. They're all kufar. They have no central

belief. They have no central commitment. They have no notion of what is universal, what is absolute, what is true.

There are a bunch of disgusting, filthy shaiton.

They're pagan intersectionality.

They're pagan DSA.

And it's pagan polytheistic organization.

It's pagan polytheistic caucuses.

No commitment at all to the one. No commitment at all to the one no commitment at all to the one and only truth nothing amyla with the

ten so this is the truth this is why they hate us and they attack us.

They're a bunch of pagan polytheistic scum

who hate to see a monotheism emerge.

The monotheism of Marx.

Yes, Marx.

Let me explain something. I saw that fucking subhuman retard Rediter, the potato guy, who I actually fucking hate. He's in the DSA. I hate this disgusting fuck. I actually do hate them. I talked about how Enverhoja

was just giving form

to his repressed religious unconscious

Bektashi Shia Sufism

through different words and language.

And he's like, and he quote tweeted it.

And he's like, there's nobody

who's more atheist than

Enver Ha'erha in history. And it got like a thousand likes. And then I realized something.

You are not human. You can't synthesize information.

You have no dynamic relationship to the signifiers and the various webs of association that underlie them to even have the ability to think about.

Maybe the words don't actually fucking matter. Maybe religion is deeper than just

confession. Maybe, in fact, you can be a Muslim while proclaiming yourself to be the most atheistic

person in the world. Maybe the way that you're an atheist actually reveals a deeper religious, unconscious architecture that you were just never fucking aware of because you reduced religion to a set of fucking platitudes and superficial, fucking empirical beliefs about the nature of the world.

Absolutely.

And Verhojo was not a fucking atheist in practice.

He absolutely believed in the very structure of his self-proclaimed atheism some kind of absolute ultimate reality. And all that has ever meant in the history of the world is God. God never meant that I believe there's some random man in the sky. All God meant to refer to was the absolute, the absolute, the indivisible, the ultimate, the ultimate reality, the absolute

reality, the ultimate cause, the ultimate source of meaning. There is no necessary,

metaphysical implication of that.

It doesn't mean, oh, God is some supernatural thing, or, oh, God is a... That's not what the word historically, nobody was using it with such a degree of precision.

They were using it to describe something that today takes the form of an unconscious structure

because people have forgotten what the words fucking meant as though the Bible, as men.

As though the Bible, as though the religious belief, historically, was as skin deep and superficial as... I believe in miracles. I believe in random, just random shit happening in the fabric of

reality that's supernatural.

That's not what fucking religion was.

Religion was a way, you have to go back to Feuerbach.

You have to actually go back to Marx himself.

Because these new atheist retards have no fucking idea or understanding of what religion actually fucking means.

They think religion

is somehow some kind of relationship

to a, well, this is

my cookie gutter. Every single

religion on earth today is

Kaffar. It's a

division of labor.

They say, I'm going to be religious on Friday,

if you're Muslim, I'm going to be religious on Sunday

if you're Christian, but I'm going to be

shaiton every other day of the week.

Because you're living in capitalism,

because you're living in a world,

your actual real belief has nothing to do with the shit that's coming out of your

fucking tongue.

You could pray five times today.

It doesn't make you Muslim.

Enver Hojo was more of a Muslim than anyone in Saudi Arabia.

He had an active relationship and devotion to the absolute.

He may not have called it God.

He may not even recognized it as an intelligible in the first place.

But Enverhoja was not an atheist, not in practice. In practice, he devoted himself to something he regarded as

absolute and indivisible. And all that means is God in history. That's all God meant in his. God didn't mean all this extra shit. When people talked about God, that's what they were talking about. We've lost touch with our religious essence, our religiosity. We're alienated from our religiosity. It doesn't mean you've escaped religion.

It doesn't mean you've escaped religion.

But why do they attack the acp why do they consider it a victory whenever they attack any organization that shows promise and independence well i'll tell you why because victory for the left for the american left

is not the seizure of power it's not the resurrection of authority it's not the building of a party it's not the building of anything positive for the american left

victory consists and reproducing the dysfunction the failure the impotence that has defined it for the entirety

of its history for the past

50, 60 years.

Why, when they

celebrate a fake announcement

that the ACP dissolved,

6,000 people

liked that tweet, by the way.

And the furry thinks they're going to be protected and immune.

We'll see. We're going one by one, as we always have.

But 6,000 people were celebrating.

When they heard news, the ACP is destroyed.

Okay, granted, half of them were pedophiles and Nazis depraved child rape fantasy, 1488, Groyper Nazis.

Then you had NAFO and these European subhuman

European liberals

but then the rest were

leftists. Well why are they celebrating

the idea of the ACP being destroyed

because the victory is that

we're back where we started guys

we're back. We've guys. We're back.

We've saved the left.

We've saved your fucking hodgepodge of

impotence and failure

and weakness

and uselessness.

Your messy, disgusting,

degenerate, retard sl retard slop amalgamation and coalition of kaffaran polytheists

pagans idol worshippers you've protected your fucking community your little disgusting fucking pagan

loose conglomeration of fucking nothing pieces,

impotent pieces of shit. Willing prostitutes, willing slaves of the bourgeoisie,

how dare any, how dare Spartacus rise up and beat his chest and proclaim,

we will be emancipated, we will be free from the political establishment. We're going to

build our own army of the liberated. We're going to build our own organization.

We're going to rise up.

How dare Spartacus do that?

No, no, no.

Spartacus should just chop his dick off and be a fucking slave eunuch.

That's what it means to truly, to truly be part of the American left.

How dare Spartacus rise up and speak up and get something going?

If these people were alive in the time of Fred Hampton,

they would have killed Fred Hampton before the police did.

How dare Fred Hampton?

How dare Hughie Newton?

How dare anyoney Newton?

How dare anyone stand the fuck up and stand for anything at all with any degree of seriousness or intentionality?

Why don't we just fucking admit the truth the attacks on the american communist party are a proxy

for the repressed unconscious anti-communism to find an outlet these people have cognitive dissonance

they are anti-communists in their souls in their to find an outlet. These people have cognitive dissonance.

They are anti-communists in their souls, in their unconscious.

But they will never be open and honest about it. So when they see the American Communist Party a real, living, serious communist organization, with serious intention behind it, with serious authority behind it, willpower.

By attacking the American Communist Party, they get to freely channel their unconscious anti-communism, and that anti-communist unconscious

gets to find an outlet. All of their internalized anti-communism has to be repressed. But when they

see the American Communist Party, finally the furry who, this degenerate,

disgusting furry, who's shitting and pissing in their fur suit, finally they can have an outlet

to channel their internal anti-communism.

And when these sick, demonic pieces of shit are making templates of the party,

when they are using their disgusting,

disgusting, smelly, unwashed fingers to type the fake doctored ACP thing.

Oh, yeah, I love Hitler. I love Nazism. I want to slaughter all these minorities.

That's their own contrapoints, repressed unconscious.

It's a way that they're doing this kind of thing.

Like, the way is the same way a pervert will break into a woman's house and he will try

to wear her dress and he'll be like he'll smell her clothing and all this stuff.

That's what perverts do, right?

These people have the same relationship to Nazism.

So any opportunity they can have,

they will type pro-Nazi things and pro-Nazi thoughts

because it's all inside of them and it's repressed.

And the only way he can find an outlet

is by attacking our party.

Oh yeah, I was just doing a parody of the ACP.

No, you were channeling and vocalizing

your own repressed Nazism.

That's exactly what you were fucking doing.

You are the same thing as a depraved neo-Nazi mass shooter.

But because of social incentives, you repress it and you keep it down.

Give me a single normal sane person

who wants to type

who wants to make

swastikas, you know how they make these swastika

versions of our logo who go

I love Hitler, I love

white supremacy, all these things

what normal person likes to do that?

What normal person loves to do that? What normal person loves to type of the words pedophilia, child rape, all these? What normal person likes to do that? What normal person likes to do that? Only people who actually have repressed

those thoughts internally.

You know, it's the same.

You know how they say somebody who's always talking

about how they hate gays?

Usually that person is gay.

If you're all the time, you just won't give it a rest. Or if transgender, if you all the time and you can't, you just can't let go of it. Oh, the transgenders, I hear the transgender. You probably are attracted to transgender or you are one yourself and you're repressed. Usually, right?

But it's also the same thing when it comes to politics. If you're so obsessed with this idea that

people who are ostensibly not Nazis are Nazis

and you love making

totally ironic pro-Nazi

propaganda that's a parody

and you love giving expression to all

this filth it's probably

because you have unconscious

Nazi desires yourself it's probably because you have unconscious Nazi desires yourself.

It's probably because you yourself

are actually a Nazi.

In the same way somebody who's always

talking about transgender's

probably has a transgender fetish

themselves,

you have a Nazi fetish because you are a themselves. You have a Nazi fetish

because you are a Nazi.

You are the same.

Psychologically, the architecture

of your psych

is the same thing as a

neo-Nazi mass shooter that was groomed by

one of these weird cults.

You have the same mind.

It's like you have the same psych.

You're just contextually put

in a different social situation

so that you channel it

by means of a different expression.

These leftists are more anti-communists than your bog standard right-winger.

Even more than boomers, these are real black shirt-Hitlarians on the unconscious level.

Now, consciously speaking, are they Nazi?

No. But unconsciously, they are fasc speaking, are they Nazi? No.

But unconsciously, they are fascists.

They are Nazis. You see?

Chris, what's up,

man? Appreciate you. You too, Gerald.

Yeah. Gerald. Have you ever seen them whipped up into a frenzy and this excited about the prospect of destroying the right wing?

Destroying the U.S. regime, destroying Zionism? Never. Only about the ACP. Only about the ACP. Why?

Because if ACP is destroyed, they're back to the square one and they enjoy being where they are square one.

They may complain about it. They may say, oh, I hate the left.

No, it's like one of those things where they're like, you know, I hate it, but it's home.

Home may be a little dysfunctional, but I love it and it's home.

I want to burn your fucking house down, you bitch, you disgusting bitch.

I hate your home. I hate you. I hate your fucking house down, you bitch, you disgusting bitch. I hate your home.

I hate you.

I hate your fucking pollicule.

I hate your fucking community.

A fucking leftist who are self-contented with their fucking impotence and failure for five decades.

You self-congratulatory piece of shit

celebrating your wholesome

leftist popular friend against the ACP.

Who the fuck are you?

Look shoulder to shoulder.

What are you?

Zinus?

Shills?

Opportunus?

Well, maybe a little imperfect.

But it's home here on

Reddit

Semma

I fucking hate

you

literally burn in hell

you piece of shit

and maybe a little dysfunctional, but it's home.

That's the psychology we're dealing with.

They know that they, it's all of it.

But, you know, at the end of it, at the end of the day, what?

Where the fuck are the, where, where?

Where is your party? Where is your party?

Where is your independent organization?

Where is your anything?

Okay, PSL.

There was just a fucking exodus from the PSL

because I don't fucking know.

They had some fucking bullshit problem.

Just now the FRSO

is going

through a massive split

because one of their members in Florida

talked to a transphobe.

I don't know who that's supposed to refer to.

Every single one of their organizations just implode and get destroyed internally.

So where is your anything?

I'm sorry to say, but you want to know what the American left is like. It's like a fat camp with a bunch of

fat, 500, 600, 800 pound obese fucks in it. Quote me here, clip me here. The American left,

it's like a fat camp with a bunch of 800 pound fat asses that are like,

I know we're not doing our job and a bunch of fat

useless fox. I know fat camp is supposed

to be about losing weight, but at least

we have each other and we love each other.

You fuck! You're literally at Fat Camp!

You're literally climbing to me on the American left. You're literally climbing to the revolutionaries. Trying to fight the right wing and trying to fight the fucking regime. You have a fucking mission and you have to lock the fuck in or get the fuck out. No, this is not a safe space.

To be fucking self-congratulatory.

I don't know of whatever fucking identity you have and you fucking adopted.

You're at Fat Camp, so lose a fucking way.

It's like the American Left is Fat Camp, and it's all fat asses sitting on their fucking ass being like, I know Fat Camp kind of sucks, and it's not doing its job.

But at least we have each other.

No, you have a bunch of fat asses!

Oh

You are fat camp! It's not enough.

With that tone, you're never going to rate. Hey, fuck you.

I don't give a fuck, bitch.

Why is it not a crisis? Time is passing us by.

You've been fat for 50 years.

Lenin.

Lenin.

We're talking 20 years.

And Lenin is in the Kremlin.

In 20 years. 20 years 20 years

ago was 2006

where's the fucking progress

20 years ago is 2006

we had these sets

proclaiming the revolution

50, 60 years ago, where the fuck is it?

This fucking dead-end bullshit's not going anywhere with these American leftists.

Lenin started his book club.

20 years later, he's in the Kremlin.

Where the fuck are you in the Amerit Advanced?

You're so fucking advanced, right?

You're so enlightened and advanced right being on the american left

what's the goal is victory The goal is revolutionary victory.

That's what it means to be on the left.

It's not a confessional faith where we all fucking have a common identity together

and we celebrate our common identity.

This circle jerk, that is the American left left know them by their fruits fat camp fat camp that's what

it is fat camp where there's people who have been in fat camp for 50 years and not only they didn't

lose weight they've gained weight a guy who's

moderately a 300 pound 250 pound fat guy went to fat camp 50 years later he's 25 000 pounds

just imagine that in your head 25,000 pounds. Just imagine that in your head. 25,000 pounds. You're celebrating the

ACP? Okay, ACP is a fat guy.

I admit it. We start as fat guys.

But, okay, let's say in the past two years, we started 500, 400 pounds.

We've lost 10, 20 pounds.

I know it's not a lot.

I get it.

It's not a lot. But we're reversing the trend. Okay, we've lost 10 to 20 pounds. You've gained 10 and 20 pounds, right? Okay. In two years, we've lost that much weight. Obviously, to get this, I mean, obviously, if for Fat Camp to work, you have to lose 300, you have to lose 400 pounds. I understand that. The finish line is takeover. The finish line

is the revolution, right?

The seizure of power, that's the finish line.

The ACP started as fat people, just like the rest of fat camp.

But the ACP left the fat

camp that's not working and tried to make

their own fat camp.

And actually, it's going in a good direction.

They've lost five to 20 pounds

or something.

And imagine the original fat camp,

which is the American left,

a bunch of fat asses

shaking and quaking the earth.

It's an earthquake that happens.

No, you can't do that.

No, you have to stay in our fat camp

and do nothing you talk about.

They're like shaking and quaking.

They're in their fucking Walmart scooters.

The whole world is shaking.

These people are so upset that we lost 10 pounds.

Come back to our fat camp.

Come back.

You can't do that.

You can do that.

So if we, if our fat camp gets destroyed, if our fat camp gets destroyed, they celebrate because they're basically confirming and congratulating themselves that they're a bunch of lazy, do-nothing fat asses who will never get anything done and they're happy.

They're happy to see that there's no hope.

There's no alternative.

Why would they be happy about ACP being destroyed?

Why does that excite them?

Why does that idea excite them?

Because they're happy where they are.

They're happy exactly where their fat asses are.

There's we are one communist party with one mission one collective one movement one vision It's one or zero. One or zero. One or zero. One or nothing. One zero. One zero. You can claim to be a Maoist sect but I know you're not serious about it

I know you're not I know you're just creating a way to be happy about yourself

defeating failure okay you can be some other Trotsky-eyed bullshit.

Okay, sell newspapers.

You're creating the terms and conditions of a community that is coping with its own

impotence and failure.

You are zero.

Only those, only those who have the courage, the true belief, the true fanatical belief in faith, that they are the one.

The one movement.

The one Ummah.

The one cause.

The one army. the one cause the one army the one party that we will be that party that the construction the task of building that party starts now.

Are we imperfect?

Absolutely, we're imperfect.

But if someone doesn't stand and say,

now we will build the one,

it will never, ever, ever be built.

So it's one or it's

nothing.

And what they have is a bunch of

nothings.

And they want to destroy us.

They want to annihilate us.

Because we have the audacity.

We have the audacity.

To be the one that they never had the fucking courage to be. We are the main character. We are the protagonist. We are the center of all the attention.

They are thinking about us.

We are it.

It's the American Communist Party.

Holy fuck.

S.Y.J.

What the fuck is up, man?

Thank you. Appreciate.Y.J. What the fuck is up, man. Thank you.

Appreciate the 50. we are the cause we may not be perfect but our path forward is solid we have a solid path forward we are lions facing a multitude of hyenas

but we are the way if we were not the way

this conflict between the ACP

and the entirety

of the US political spectrum

this fucking Warhammer, bitch.

It's us against the whole fucking universe.

It's like a fucking eternal war.

NTP versus everybody.

If we were not

it, if we were not the center, if we were not it, if we were not the center, if we were not the only fucking thing that

actually mattered, that conflict would have been resolved. It would have been over by now.

Infrared came on the scene.

2021.

We declared jihad on the discourse.

We declared jihad on the Kuffer.

We declared jihad on the American leftists.

Us versus everybody.

And there's not a day that's

passed by since. Everything

has been a progression and evolution

of the same fucking war.

If we

were a cult, if we were a cult

If we were a marginal cult and a sect

You wouldn't see shit

5,000 likes bullshit spread about us go viral all the fucking time

There's something about the ACP.

There's something about us.

It's like a fucking worm

that's burrow.

It's a worm of doubt.

That's burrowed in their fucking heads.

And it's gnawing at their brains.

It's gnawing at their skulls get it out of me get it out of me

there's something that we do there's something about this cause that puts a spell on these

fucking people so much pressure and cognitive dissonance it's a psychological war that we're waging.

Cuzzads, what's up?

Some of these people, they dedicate their whole fucking lives to us for five years.

Not a day has gone five years every day their whole life is about us now tell me if it's possible

tell me if it's possible that anything can inspire that that's not the truth we are here

we are the movement

we are the movement

we are the movement you think it's fucking crazy?

Name a single movement that deals with this much lies.

Oh, you're just being subjective.

You're just interpreting other people's opinions as lies.

No, you know, when someone takes a fucking screenshot and says,

ACP has announced and it's fake and it's made up,

that's not an opinion,

that somebody's lying about us.

Why do you need to lie about us?

Because you're trying to deceive people who don't know any better.

You're trying to deceive people who don't agree with your fucking

extreme retarded view

that if we don't

hoist the banner

of the furries

that we

somehow are the worst

most people

aren't like that though.

Well, most people

don't hate the trans genders. We don't hate the transgender.

We don't hate the transgender's either.

We're just not going to wave your fucking flags.

We have our own flag.

And I have a message.

I have a message to the LGBT leftists who are telling ACP, we have to pay tribute to the LGBT movement.

We have to explicitly say, you know, oh, I condemn transphobia. I'm going to condemn this and that and X, Y, and Z.

Here's my message. You want to hear? I'm going to condemn this and that and X, Y, and Z.

Here's my message.

You want to hear my message?

You've got the whole order of things reversed.

If you want if you want any minorities cultural minorities for that matter not ethnic minorities cultural minorities if you want the recognition of the ACP, you pay tribute first.

We're not paying tribute to you.

You pay tribute to us first.

That's how it's going to fucking work.

You pay tribute to us first, or you at least act good faith to us first.

We owe you nothing.

Just because you have a private habit, we don't owe you a fucking thing.

If you want to be validated and recognized by us,

then give us your loyalty first. That's how the order of tribute goes, because the Communist Party is supreme. That's the order of tribute. because the communist party is supreme that's the order of tribute we don't know anybody a fucking thing this is the communist fucking party

there's nobody there's nobody there's nobody who i don't care what their background is this holds true also

for religious people also for muslims also for Jews. Nobody can say

the ACP has to pay us tribute.

The ACP has to

bow around to us and pay us tribute. No.

You want us to be

allied to you. You pay us

tribute.

The leftist LGBT movement

we're not going to pay tribute to a rainbow flag

that goes on Raytheon missiles

we don't hate people

who

fall under that category

but sort yourselves out first

before you come bitching and crying at us

that we have to bow down and pay tribute to you

sort yourselves out first

sort yourselves out from all the people in your community who are Zionists, who are NAFO, who are pro-imperialist, pro-Ukraine.

Sort yourselves out and discriminate amongst yourselves between the correct line and the false line first.

That's on you to do. That's not on us. We don't owe you anything. We don't owe anybody anything.

ACP needs to do outreach to us.

If you want our, this is how it works with the ACP.

You want our loyalty?

Give us your loyalty.

We protect our own.

We protect those who are loyal to us.

You want our loyalty?

You give us your loyalty. You give us your loyalty first you pay tribute

then the con will distribute the tribute

then the con will use the tribute

to build infrastructure

build bridges whatever the fuck.

But the order of tribute goes in one fucking direction.

Goes in one direction.

The authority doesn't pay tribute to anyone.

You pay tribute to the authority first.

That's how it

fucking works.

That's the final thing I'm going to say on this

issue.

They said, oh, you have to have everyone to stop using bad words and shut the fuck up.

Shut the fuck up.

Everyone is responsible for themselves.

I've never seen a gorilla harass someone just because they're gay or transgender.

I've never seen that.

I've never fucking seen that.

All I've seen is people use bad words in self-defense.

After being attacked first, you get attacked.

So you're a Zion you're a Zionist

classic Zionist cry baby

they they fucking cry as they strike

you

they cry as the victim as they strike you

right

they act like victim oh the ACP is giant strike you. Right?

They act like victim.

Oh, the ACP is trying to sue me and shit.

How did you get yourself in this mess in the first place, you fucking retard?

Well, it was just because you guys are transphobic.

Shut the fuck up.

We didn't say a fucking thing about that.

You had to go yourself and dig up shit Jackson said five fucking years ago to invent something to get fucking mad about that has no pressing contemporary significance.

In order to prove that we're so transphobic and X, Y, and Z, they have to go

dig shit up.

Why are you digging shit up to hurt

yourself? Like, what are

you trying to prove?

Oh, but Jackson said this

four years ago. Okay. Would you prefer? He say it now? Nobody's saying anything now. We're going forward. We don't have any issue. Why are you going out of your way to relitigate this issue? If you think we're scared of you, we're not.

So what's your point?

You're going to bully us into bowing before you?

Shut the fuck up.

You have an issue with Jackson five years ago.

You're the one digging that shit up looking for trouble.

Not us.

But the fact that he...

So what?

So what he said this?

Don't you forgive ContraPoints, who is literally a Nazi?

Aren't you willing to forgive?

How many of your ranks were in Nazi discords at one point of their fucking life

whole lot of people on the left

are former neo-Nazis by the way

but these are the views

that you have but you're just disguising them

okay even if that was

true isn't that a good thing? Even if it was true that people

harbor personal private prejudices, isn't it a good thing that they don't make that into a public

statement, into something a politically enforceable thing.

Doesn't everyone privately personally have their own real views about things that are not necessarily

political or ideological, but are just their personal prejudices?

And if you're claiming you're above all prejudice and you've transcended that somehow, I don't fucking believe you.

It's just not true.

You're a liar.

You're a fucking coping and being dishonest.

Everybody has politically incorrect beliefs that they hold

privately

it matters how you act

it matters what you do about it

if Jackson was trying to spread

enmity toward those people

and discrimination toward them

okay but he's not so what the fuck is your problem

oh but something he said five years ago

what is the material damage of what he said

five years ago doing right now tell me

what are the what are like what material damage

does that do to you right now

because it's like it sounds like you're material damage does that do to you right now?

Because it sounds like you're addicted to the pain and it's like you love bigotry.

You have a perverse relationship with bigotry.

You have a perverse relationship with the very things you're claiming you want to cancel.

Those are the things you dig up yourself and enjoy looking at and like and just want to proliferate more.

The net consequence of continuing to push that Jackson is a bigot is you're going to just normalize bigotry among a lot of people.

Is that what you want to do? Why is Genghis Khan a communist?

Why are we like this?

Why is Genghis Khan a communist?

Why were the Mongols a force of communism?

We could talk about the tribute stuff.

We could talk about the public.

Why don't we forget about that for one second?

It's a very simple reason that the Mongols were communists.

Because in wicked and evil societies, where people forget the wages of association, where they forget their

interconnectedness, when they become blind and numb to the suffering of the most vulnerable

people in their society, when they walk with indifference to the codes of honor, the implicit laws

that are demanded by the coexistence of different people. When people falsely elevate themselves

to the status of solipsism, ignoring and neglecting the things you have in common as a society.

The immediate consequences of that are not going to be a Barney the dinosaur singing love and happiness

and fairy tales. You're going to be

punished. You're going to meet

the scourge of God.

The scourge of God will

remind you the cost and the

price of social existence.

Common existence.

You took for granted, you took for granted, the common existence that you share.

But the Mongols remind you of this common existence.

The Mongol horde sweeps over you, topples the towers of Babylon.

Everyone indiscriminately leveled, princes, from the highest of princes to the lowliest of beggars. The scourge of God is a blind, reckless, ruthless force of leveling.

That is what justice is. Justice is not intersectionality justice is blind it's singular it comes

over societies like a fucking tsunami like a wave five thousand,000 feet fucking tall.

And it levels everything indiscriminately.

Because that is the thing you forgot about.

And to be reminded of it is a very terrible, ugly thing, as all revolutions are in history but does that make them less

necessary no the absence of communism is a state of defiance and rebellion against God.

You are rebelling against the essence of creation itself.

You will be punished for it.

The armies of Genghis Khan and the Mongols,

when they destroyed and leveled entire cities,

did the gold of the wealthy protect them?

Did the arrogance of princes and dukes?

Did it mean anything in those moments?

When the power of a collective overwhelmed and destroyed all hierarchies all fortresses all towers they all turn to ash and dust simply because of the power of a horde, a collective, organized and united like a single fist.

That, my friends, is communism. That is the revolution. Not Barney the dinosaur. Not AOC going out on the street dancing because of how happy she is that there's been justice for the microsectional fucking bullshit identity.

Communism, revolution is the scourge of god

it's gangis con it's timmer

we live in a society where people don't give a fuck about the most vulnerable people

but what deeper injustice is reflected by the fact

that society neglects

its most vulnerable members

and doesn't give a shit about them?

Is that a moral failing

of the individual

to care?

To care more?

No. It's a negligence of our duties our obligations to god it's a negligence of our duties and responsibilities to a fundamental fact of our existence, our common logos, our common existence, our common

concrete unity across the division of labor. We all depend on each other, but the thing

upon which we depend is an object in common.

When you neglect that object, when you ignore it, it manifests as the most vulnerable members of your society.

The poor, the needy, the crippled, they're spit on, they're walked on,

they're ignored, orphans, all of them, left to die alone with nothing, with no support.

And where is the failure?

Where is the injustice?

The injustice doesn't lie

in a personal negligence

of care. The

injustice lies at the site

of neglecting the fundamental

wages of association

itself

that behind what we call your individual

experience there's an order

you must pay tribute

to this order

you must pay tribute

to this objective collective existence which conditions the possibility of individuals experiencing anything.

And if you stop paying tribute, if you stop paying tribute to this thing, you incur the scourge and wrath of God.

The Mongol army will come and level all of you, poor and rich alike.

You will be reminded of what it takes to live.

You must pay tribute tribute is not somebody coming and saying i want all your shit tribute means you're paying tribute to the commons you're paying tribute to the invisible common field of existence

this dense

submerged foundation

is dense social fabric of unwritten rules and laws that you must acknowledge your in your

dependence upon without that you have fucking nothing you are nothing nothing to protect you

nothing nothing You are nothing. Nothing to protect you.

Nothing to facilitate the pursuit of your individual abilities and powers.

When you lose that, you lose everything.

And it's going to take a Genghis Khan to remind you. Two things, natural disasters and Genghis Khan.

These are the two forces in history that remind people to be communists. You know, Thank you. You know, You want to know what it means to see with infrared vision?

It's very simple.

You just have to look at all these retards, all these sects, all these befuddled, confused, aimless, kafar, that's what they are.

All these sects, all these organizations, all these groupings, all these people, disunited, disheveled, impotent.

All of their definitions, all of their anglo boxes, all of their scholastic idols.

X, Y, and Z means X, Y, and Z.

X, A, A, A, A, A, Atheism equals Atheism.

And these two things are completely set this encyclopedia

reddit anglo box worldview i look at all of it i look at all these particulars

want to know what islam means the islam baked into the infrared vision i look at all these particulars and I see nothing, nothing at all.

I see things that need to be mowed over and flattened, flattened singularly in the pursuit of the completion of one thing, one vision, one cause,

one movement, one truth, one absolute. All of them need to be flattened. All of them need to be flattened all of them need to give way that's what submission means

submit to the thing that completes itself regardless of your acknowledgement you can submit to

this thing that completes itself,

that finds self-completion in the movement of history.

You can submit to it and be at peace, or you can try to fight it.

You can try to disrespect it.

You can try to defy it.

And as it completes

itself, it will

trample over you.

And your body will be divided

and mangled.

Underfoot, like being run over

by a fucking semi-truck being caught in the fucking gears that are turning right

you will be grame mangled gruesomely divided divided internally.

You submit to communism one way or another.

The communism's coming.

You can submit to it,

or you can let it tear you to a million pieces.

That's the truth.

That's the truth.

Because it's not stopping. it's not stopping it's not stopping

it's not going to stop

the train is not going to stop

so you'll give way to it

or it's going to run you fucking over

trampled under the underfoot the wheel of give way to it, or it's going to run you fucking over.

Travelled under the underfoot the wheel of Dharma.

Absolutely.

That's the same thing I'm talking about.

Everything I'm talking about is a cycle of rebirth and destruction over and over and over and over again.

And you can give way to this thing, or you can get caught in the spindrills and gets your flesh torn off, right?

Can I say? I have so many people on Instagram screaming and crying over the fact I'm using AI.

But not a single one of them can produce an argument about AI.

Not a single one of them.

What makes AI materially worse than all the other shit you take for granted?

Well, well, well, what?

Why has this become this shameless thing that we're all supposed to just implicitly acknowledge?

The class, it could not see a more shameless, self-serving class interests of professional, creative, petty bourgeois, resentful at a technology that gives working people access to the ability to generate image creation,

but removes them as a middleman.

And we're all supposed to pretend there's some universal moral imperative to reject it,

because it just harms them alone.

There's not even a pretension to caring about the common interests of the people anymore.

It's not even communism. It's not even proletarian.

It's just self-serving petty bourgeois

reactionary filth that we're all supposed to just implicitly accept

and give way to and bow down to there's not a single argument i've literally i tried to say well

you're using instagram that also depends on ai, you're using all the social media platforms that are also using AI and data centers. You're using AI just as much. And even if you weren't, all the things you're saying AI is bad because of apply to all these other technologies that you fucking use.

So what makes AI uniquely bad?

Tell me.

Because it's new.

Because these other things we're just, we've inherited from the past and we have no

control over, but we somehow have an ability to control this new thing.

But not the new thing.

User 248, you retard.

What's your fucking problem?

I want to hear the argument from you.

In fact, I'll start a fucking TikTok right now.

Communism is pro-AI.

That's another fucking thing I didn't even think of.

They got banned.

Fucking retard.

They deserved it.

They absolutely deserve that shit.

Actual fucking stupid retard. Thank you. Let's trigger a bunch of retards with this prompt right here. You know, i have a lot of these uh classic MLs who have a problem with my take about Genghis Khan being a communist.

You classical LARPERS have done fucking nothing to witness all these deranged, retarded liberals, defiling the image of Marxism, Leninism.

Where is the pure Orthodox Marxism Leninism you claim to uphold? I don't fucking see it anywhere.

You bet your fucking ass infrared vision Is gonna take this shit to another level

It's gonna make a lot of these fucking gatekeepers

Uncomfortable I don't give a fuck

I'm a hoagist

You're a hoagist

What have you fucking done to defend

Enver Hoja from being turned into a clown

by these retarded people

in America, trying to combine

Enverhoja and the flags of Albania

and the flag. All this

weird furry shit.

Furies are literally trying to

rape the image of

Enferhoja in America. Where's your

outrage against that?

But I call Enver

Hoja

a

basically a Sufi Muslim in practice,

which he was,

oh, this is ridiculous.

Shut the fuck up, bitch.

You're a fucking LARPER.

You've done nothing to make this outlook and this vision and this worldview.

Something fresh, 21st century,

and fucking relevant now.

You're a historical society, LARPER. You belong to a historical

reenactment society and you're a LARPER. Historical reenactor. Well, no, you're reenacting history fuck you i'm living in it now

you know infrared was always so controversial because of this, by the way.

We used to trigger all these fucking people, these gatekeepers, who considered themselves the preeminent authorities on classical Marxism, Leninism, orthodox.

But there's no, there's, it doesn't exist.

It doesn't exist anywhere.

And anyone who wants to maintain it,

the purity,

you get called a fascist.

So no one recognized it exists.

The syncretic

experiments of

infrared, the communism is Islam,

Genghis Khan, all that kind of stuff. That's

the only way. That's the only way.

It's either going to be communism

as Islam, or I should say,

it's either going to be Marxism

is Islam or Marxism

is furries. You choose.

And for those of you that want to say,

well, why don't we just say Marxism is Christianity?

Okay, I have a response to that

too. I'll tell you exactly why.

Before I do that, I have to fucking realize that I froze.

One sec. Jesus Christ. You know, all right anyway we have a debate topic.

I'm just setting up.

All right, anyway, it's set up.

The reason that doesn't work is because, look,

Islamic eschatology talks about the return of Jesus, right?

Do you know why Islamic eschatology talks about the return of Jesus?

Because Islam itself is a tradition that has always acknowledged Jesus was missing.

Jesus was missing.

In Islam itself, Jesus is, in sense,

he's missing.

The Muslim world was created

on an implicit basis

and understanding of the fact

that on earth,

Jesus is missing.

Now, let's look at the entire development

of the Western world.

The whole history

is a history of alienation from Jesus

if you think about it. I'm not going to go over it.

You have to read Hegel. The whole

Western world's a history of the alienation from Jesus, right? Okay. But somehow Jesus does come back.

How does Jesus come back? Through Marxism. Through communism. The communist movement is the return of jesus christ so when islam anticipated

the return of jesus on earth that was in a way anticipating the writing of the communist

manifesto in 1848 and the rise of the communist movement in the West and the whole arc of history that we call the history of the West He never left us. Okay, but you are not paying attention. In the world, Jesus was manifestly being neglected.

Jesus was being ignored.

You think in the Western world they were upholding Jesus?

No.

In the Muslim world, were they upholding Jesus?

No, they weren't.

Jesus teaches mercy.

Jesus teaches the universal mercy

for mankind, right?

Forgiveness of mankind.

Well, the Muslim world was pretty brutal and harsh

throughout its whole history. Jesus was missing.

The Western world, Jesus was missing. You could say

Jesus was always there the whole time. Okay, sure, but manifestly in the world materially,

Jesus wasn't there. So in Islam anticipated, why did Islam say the Messiah Jesus is going to come back? Why don't they say Muhammad's going to come back? Why don't they say the last prophet of Islam is going to come back? They say Jesus will return to this earth because Islam always acknowledged that the true message of Christianity was forgotten. Real Christianity

was forgotten on earth. Islam acknowledged that. Real Christianity was acknowledged. Sorry,

it was ignored. It was it was forgotten. Michael Hudson proves it.

Right?

So, of course,

communism is Christian, but you can just say

communism is Jesus.

That's the truth. Communism

is Christ. It's the truth communism is Christ

it's the Holy Spirit that's

that's Jesus Christ's message

on earth that's literally the return

of Jesus right

there's nothing

on earth more worthy of Jesus Christ than communism.

Nothing.

How can you be worthy of Jesus Christ outside of communism?

How can we say that we are...

That we... we are that we live in a world with Jesus

if it's not communism

how can this disgusting

accursed filthy empire of lies be worthy of

jesus of course it's not so the idea that jesus will come back which both christianity and islam acknowledge

well islam also upholds that and says jesus will return in the end of times.

But I see the return of Jesus as the rise of communism in the form of Marxism in the West.

But what meta-historical or theological or metaphysical framework makes it even possible

to understand this

arc of history, right?

Well, you

need something coherent and singular

and unified.

And when people say this or this isn't adapted to America's condition, then why does America have a bunch of unitarian sects that just emerged spontaneously?

American Unitarian Christianity is literally something

indigenous to America.

Why? Why does America

spontaneously create these unitarian

impulses and currents?

Because Islam doesn't exist in the Middle East.

It doesn't exist in the Muslim world.

What they have in the Muslim world, the so-called Muslim world, is a series of habits and conventions that are borrowed from culture.

There's no Islam. They have habits. They're praying five times a day. They're going through

the motions of a religion. But belief in their hearts is gone. What about Iran? Well, Iran, but Iran is also emerging on the basis of a modern revolutionary tradition. You know, Iran

proving what's up. The truth is

a key part of the Iranian

Islamic Revolution were

educated

intelligentsia

that were

that were, I wouldn't say Americanized, but they were familiar, intimately

familiar with both America and Europe.

And without them, there would not have been an Iranian revolution.

And so, I believe that

real Islam will

emerge in this land, America.

The United States

of America.

E pluribus unum out of the many one right what about Yemen well look I here's something I believe I don't think you can have real

Islam you need to think dialectically okay the Yemeni people look their courageousness

of course yes you said they're real Muslims of

course but real Islam think about Islam as a world historical truth how How does that

come to fruition?

Now, of course,

it's come to fruition

in the

courage, the

bravery of Yemenis, of Iranians,

Lebanese, whatever.

But there's a central contradiction that makes the axis of resistance unable to achieve final victory, which is coming from the belly of the beast, the United States of America. So all of world history has to resolve here in America. This is the belly of the beast.

This is the center of the entire global empire. Everything of consequence will happen here whether even in a destructive or a constructive

sense but in any case world history has not taken its leave from America, not yet at least.

Okay, we have on the Tic Tac, I can't believe this.

We have people who are queuing up.

Yes, communism is pro way

I saw on Instagram

a lot of people

did not have this

we're not agreeable to this

and I want to see

what the issue is

go ahead

Leon

how you doing

uh terribly terrible yeah what happened man well there's a lot of

enver hojo followers who um are denying the fact that inverhojo was a mus Sufi, Vectashi Sufi Muslim

and it's brought me sadness

because it's just self-evidently true.

Yeah.

Can you elaborate on that, if I may ask?

Yeah, sure.

So if you read Foyerbach and you read Marx, you understand that religion is not simply at the

surface level, skin-deep level of confessional beliefs about X, Y, and Z empirically about the world.

Religion is a fundamental structure at the heart of the human unconscious.

And it's understood as a type of alienation for sure.

But even in an alienated form, that is still the form the human essence takes insofar as private property is the prevailing principle of society.

Given that private property on a worldwide scale had not been eliminated,

I'm talking about from a classical Marxist perspective, I'm justifying this.

Given that it had not been eliminated at any point in the past century,

even if you confessionally claim to be an atheist,

you have not freed yourself from religious alienation or religion.

And therefore, even the form your atheism takes is going to be defined by the... No, you're not. You believe in something based on your unconscious, religious unconscious.

Everyone has a religious unconscious architecture.

And Enverhoja was coming from a Shia Bikashi, Sufi, Sufi family and upbringing

and he had that

ancestral memory that defined the very

expression of Marxism-Leninism.

For him, he did refer to

Marxism-Leninism as an absolute

in the same way as Sufi would, right?

An ascetic Sufi who denounces and renounces the world

in the name of the supreme moral principle,

the supreme absolute.

Now, Hoja called it something different.

He called it something.

He used a different word,

but religion doesn't lie at the level of the words that you use. It's the structure, it's the pattern, it's the logos behind it, right? So Enver Hojo was actually a Muslim.

Yeah, no, he actually grew up

he had a bit of a Turkish ancestry

of course

but

he came from a

Muslim Shia background

yeah I know but then when he grew up more

he started being an atheist

he didn't really believe in God that much.

No, no, no.

He started claiming to be an atheist.

Doesn't mean you're actually an atheist.

Just because you claim X, Y, and Z, doesn't mean you've actually undergone a shift at the level of the religious unconscious.

There's something called a religious unconscious.

It's the structuration of how you find meaning in the world, how that's structured. You can claim

to be an atheist and still structure the meaningfulness of the world in a Jewish, Christian, or Muslim way.

Enver Hoja structures

the meaningfulness of existence and in the world

until he's dead

in an Islamic, specifically

Bektashi Sufi-Shi-Shi-Shi-Wei.

Yeah.

Got it. Yeah, Mm-hmm.

Got up.

Yeah, it was really nice meeting, you know.

We had a very great conversation.

But can say one more thing, though?

So you know how the soldier is a Muslim?

Was.

Like, was? No, no, no. His whole life he was a Muslim. Well, in power. was like no no

his whole life

he was a

Muslim

while in power

like the entire

okay

what is religion

let's begin

there

since you want to be a

Marxist

that they would imagine you claim to be an anti-revisionist

Marxist line on this, right? So we're not going to be able to

revise Marx's views on religion.

According to Marx, what is religion?

I got it mostly, though.

Like, I wish I could...

According to Shaq, Carl Marx, what is religion?

How does he define what religion is?

Does Sheikh Karl Marx say religion is a set of arbitrary beliefs you have about the world positively?

And that religion just means that you believe in some supernatural

thing, and that's what it is? How does Marx, Shaq Karl Marx, if you want to be an anti-revisionist,

then let us not revise Chech Karl Marx's views. If we want to be anti-revisionist, then let us not revise

the meaning of what religion is

within the framework of Marxism,

beginning at the very

inception of what we call the materialist

method, which Marx develops

in contradistinction

DeVarbach.

She said, Carl Marx.

He was, when the fuck was Karl Marxist Sheikh?

He absolutely was a Sheikh. He was a Sufi sheikh.

Really?

Yes.

Can you tell me about it?

He was called the more

Throughout his entire life

He was called the Moore

Second of all

When he visited Algeria

He said

That the Algerians

That their culture

They're all already equal

They don't even need To deal with The nonsense they have that their culture, they're all already equal.

They don't even need to deal with the nonsense they have in Europe.

They need to just have their ready for their revolution.

He said everyone here is equal.

Everyone here treats each other with dignity.

Nobody cares about their hierarchies or anything like that. And he admired, he was so shocked that the Algerians didn't care. They said, you know, a rich man walks into the cafe. He's the same thing as a poor guy. They're all wearing raggedy clothes. Nobody cares. He said they're ready for

they're ripened and ready for the revolution.

Yeah.

Can you elaborate why

he went to Algeria?

He went there

because he was sick and he needed recovery.

Really?

Yes.

What type of illness did he have?

I don't

exactly remember, but I remember he went there,

shaved his beard and he, uh, he wanted to regrow his beard from scratch as a way to show he's become, uh, he's awakened to his Islamic roots.

I'm not trying to break character. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, absolutely. There's no character. There's no character. Marks was a sufi shea. And that's the end of the story. That's so, absolutely. There's no character.

Marks was a sufiche, and that's the end of the story.

That's so true.

Like, what type of haircut did he take?

Doesn't matter.

Doesn't matter, but I want to know.

It would have been pretty cool to know.

Well, too bad.

You're not going to. So what did you want to come and talk

about here

but can't say one thing though

what

and guess what

what

chicken bud

so you acknowledge

that Enverhojo

was in fact a Sufi Muslim.

Shia.

He was one.

No, his whole life he was, because

when he cut off relations with China,

that's a classic Shia martyrdom thing where they say

Albania may be thrown to hell but so be it. It's like he was channeling Hussein's energy when he refused to submit.

Absolutely. That's what Hojo was doing. How else do you explain the governing logic behind his policy?

He said Albania will not submit.

It will retain the anti-revisionist Marxist-Leninist line, which can be a stand-in.

It doesn't matter.

Materially speaking, that's just a different

word. You can say it's for

the sake of a

confessional religious doctrine,

but the unconscious religious structure

in practice has the same effect.

Albania is isolated on the global

stage, all by itself, and when effect. Albania's isolated on the global stage all

by itself

and when Hoja dies everything is

gone because he wouldn't budge.

Classical Shia

martyrdom. Everything was

gone man. Fuck.

When he died, yeah, everything just disappeared, basically.

Yeah.

Everything.

We had, like, a very huge, like, downgrade, to be honest with you.

That is pretty sure.

So, Hoja was a Bactashi Sufi, and that's a fact.

If he, if Hoja realized he was a Bikashi Sufi, Albania could have been preserved.

Albania could have linked up with Iran after 79, which Hoja was actually quasi-sympathetic with.

Albania could have been a center of Islamic revolutionary renaissance in the entire region, correctly teaching people how Marxism, Leninism culminates in the rebirth of Islam. And Albania would have survived. It wouldn't have been isolated. But Hoja, because he didn't awaken to the final

truth, he was

confined to languish and an unconscious

of Islam instead of the real one,

the conscious one.

Yeah.

So I'm correct correct that's not correct

I'm absolutely correct

it's absolutely correct

I'm absolutely correct

yeah

what's so funny?

What about this can you rationally object to?

What about this is rationally objectable?

Objectionable.

What do you ask me?

What about this is rationally objectionable from the perspective of orthodox anti-revisionist Marxism

Leninism. Tell me.

Dude, I generally do not have the time for that.

You don't have anything to say because you know it's the truth.

Yeah, you're telling the truth, man.

You have nothing to say.

You have no response.

You have no argument.

You have nothing.

You won the argument, man.

You had nothing to say.

What else can we conclude?

What can I say, dude? What can I say? So nothing else? You have nothing to say. What else can we conclude? What can I say, dude?

What can I say?

So nothing else?

You have nothing else?

No, man.

I'm not going to say.

I accept your surrender.

Truly, I accept your surrender.

Anyway, let's see what else.

Go ahead.

Go ahead.

Go ahead.

Go ahead. Nothing. go ahead

nothing

go ahead

hello yeah

hold on

let's second

hello

what

uh I can hear now um Hello? What?

I can hear now.

I wanted to ask, as you as a communist, what's your opinion on race?

What do you mean?

What is my opinion on race?

Like, do you think it's like a biological thing? You think it's a sort of a construct?

Race is a, it's a nebulous idea, race, actually. It's not really an ethnic, ethnically specific thing.

I mean, it means nothing. People share characteristics,

appearance-wise,

over a long period of time of the separation

between people. A lot of people will

cluster together and appear similar, but there

are noticeable differences among them.

I would even say that, for example, you could say that racially the white American and the

British people are both white, part of the Caucasian race, and even they can share ancestry.

But the British people look different than Americans,

even WASP Americans.

Because when you fall under the sway of a diverging principle,

from a licenscoist perspective,

it physically alters What is that mean?

It means...

It's not the Darwinist process of natural selection and survival that determines people's racial appearance.

It's actually a Lysenkoist mechanism that's downstream from the social principles that they adopt. So Americans started to

diverge from British people in terms of their looks and their appearance, even WASP Americans, because Americans started to live under a principle that was radically distinct from the principle that governs the British Isles.

And as such, they took on a different appearance.

It's just like...

It was a racial, new racial genesis that happens.

If you take two people from the same race and you put them on separate islands, on one island, you have correct Islam, communism, Marxism, on the other island, you have furries in charge.

After just about a few generations, the people who originally looked identical

you're going to see observable physical

differences among them and that's

lysenkoism

that's living based in licenscoism

I didn't know that are you Muslim

yes

oh are you I thought are you rest I didn't know that. Are you Muslim? Yes.

Oh. Are you, I thought,

are you Russian or are you like Chechnan or something like that?

No, I'm a Tarterian.

Oh, what's that?

It's a new race that's emerged in America

recently.

Well, I'm just, because I'm going on Twitter and, like, I don't know why, but I'm in, like, a far-rate.

And it's like, I'm just asking questions because, like, people talk about things like IQ and things like that.

I'm just asking.

Yeah, Tartarians are known for having the highest intelligence of everyone.

Tartarians?

Yes.

Isn't that, like, a fake place that people talk about?

No, it's a real place, but it exists in the future.

Wait, are you one of those like troll communists and you're really just like...

I'm not a troll.

I'm actually Tartarian member of the Tartarian race.

Okay.

Oh.

I guess

you have is there is what about this confuses you sounds like you're confused

you're confused

because you're going to trolling right now

I'm not trolling I'm not trolling what about this

so you're seriously Tartier was a real place question I'll explain it absolutely I'm not trolling. I'm not trolling. What about this? You're seriously, Tartaria was a real place.

Ask me a question.

I'll explain it.

Absolutely.

I'm Tartarian.

How do you feel about, back to the race thing, do you think race is a thing that promotes, that gives value to a certain person?

There's either tartarians or non-tartarians and the non-tartarians will all become they will lose their humanity and they will become

something else because they've fallen under the sway of revisionism, anti-communism, and

furryism and gaming and all this filth anime.

I guess so.

Yes, exactly.

So it makes sense to you.

Like, if you're at one of these disgusting anti-communists you're one of

these disgusting people who uh hate the acp your descendants will not look human in a few generations

you're going to be pigs and apes but if you you're a Tartarian and you're part of the Tartarian tribe, you fall under the sway in the principle of real anti-revisionist, Islamic American Tartarian Marxism, Lennism, aka you know,

Islam for short,

then your descendants

will,

will be an upright

people.

Don't you're

confusing me so much.

Why?

Because it sounds like

you're being an ironic like, I'm not ironic.

What about what I'm saying is ironic?

Tell me.

I mean, I mean, of course you're going to continue trolling, but of course you're trolling.

Look at my face.

Look at my face.

Yeah.

You see me smiling or laughing

no

absolutely this is very serious

I thought

I thought Marx's

winningism was anti-religion

so is real Islam so is real Islam I thought Marxist Leninism was anti-religion.

So is real Islam.

What is... Wait, what?

How's real Islam?

Because the category of religion

in the Western modern context

was based on a specific division of labor, wherein the religious essence was isolated from the material world, and therefore an incompleteness of being is implied by the religiosity and religious belief, because it is isolated from other aspects of being. But Islam refers to the deeper integrity of being so that there's not a distinction between the secular and the sacred,

which is at the foundation of the so-called martyrister civilization.

Therefore, you cannot simply reduce Islam to being one religion among many others,

because religiosity itself implies something that is distinct from the secular world of material relationships,

forces of production relations, or production relations,

or production, and habits, cultures, and ways of life, if there's a singular absolute truth,

and if there's a singular and absolute faith that's based in the singular, absolute, universal

truth of all of being, then such a category of distinction called religion would not be of a material

significance whatsoever in essentially defining the nature of that worldview. Yeah. Um, um, um, um, um, Um That

I'm taking the shit right now

That's disgusting

You need to not do that

That was not a response, by the way.

Accept your surrender, though.

Okay, uh, Farah, go ahead.

Uh-huh. Yes. Yes. Hello

Yes

I saw your tweet and I wasn't here for the beginning of the live

So I just wanted to ask how you think Marxism is this on

How is it not

I mean, because there are parts of Marxism, which to be able to hold you would have to

compromise some of your Islamic metaphysics.

Like what? Like you can't be a materialist.

Yes, you can.

Islam is materialist.

It's 100% materialist.

Since when?

You believe in gin.

You believe in angels.

You believe in...

You believe in metaphysical forces that are not...

Muslims and Islam regards Jin and angels and all these other things. you believe in metaphysical forces that are not in the secret.

And Islam regards Jin and angels and all these other things, not to be ideals that are floating somewhere, but actually real things that allow the believer to relate to the fundamental order of the cosmos.

They are referring to different aspects of the order of the material cosmos.

Material just means essential.

The materiality of something is the deeper reality behind something.

The formatic

level, the ideal level

is a transgression of

Greco-Roman pederastic philosophy

which Islam

doesn't recognize. Now there's some Islamic

philosophers that dabbled in the Greek stuff

but that was never part of the religion.

The people in the desert didn't care about that.

So the faith is materialistic.

When you're talking about Jinns and you're talking about angels and all these things that are beyond empiricism, that's just an acknowledgement of material principles that are not empirically tangible. But Marxism also recognizes material principles that are not empirically tangible. For example, communism is not an empirically

tangible. Classes are not empirically tangible. A mode of production, a modality of production

is not empirically tangible. There's not a single measurable thing you can put in front of you

and say, this is a mode of production, this is a class, and so on and so on. You can only define things on the basis of their relationships, their modalities, the patterns of how they reproduce themselves, and so on and so on. So Islam already acknowledges in its material

Marxism, Marxist materialism

is not empiricism. The Marxist materialism

acknowledges and recognizes

structuring and governing principles

behind the material world.

And Islam gives

expression to similar principles,

but with different language and in a different

way. But that doesn't mean

it's at odds with materialism at all.

Hold on.

How can you

fully hold that

God is responsible for everything that happens in the universe?

And then also fully hold that the material conditions are responsible for anything that happens.

No.

Marxism regards. I'm not very sure which. No. Marxism regards.

I'm not very sure which school.

In Marxism, in Marxism, there is one material being.

So there is one material being.

And within this one material totality of being,

this one material universe, there are material laws that govern the universe, right, that govern the development of the cosmos.

So the category of the totality and the concrete within Marxism, if you take it at a universal or ontological level,

implies God, actually. They didn't have a word for God because God was assumed to be an

unreal abstract of thought because Marx

coming from

the Foyerbachian

school

and the young

Hegelian school

was working

backward

from philosophy.

Philosophy is

beginning

with the

platonic concept

or the ideal

which is

a receptacle of an unreal form. That's what form basically means for

Plato. Something unreal that doesn't actually exist anywhere. It's not real, but it's like belongs to a

transcendent realm, right? That can only be accessed by way of the intellect and by way of pure thought.

And for Hegel, everything was downstream from that. So when Feuerbach understood that Hegelianism

was just an alienated version of Christianity, when Marx was drawing from that, in his appraisal

of religion, he was initially

working with the scheme that

religion was just... This isn't

seem very materialist.

But materialism has nothing to do

with empiricism. Materialism is a

rejection of the formatic understanding of being that being is a form okay that can only be accessed by means of one specific type of activity thought? So the idea that thinking and being are the same,

which I believe is from the Parmenides from Plato,

that is basically the fundamental purport of idealism, in a sense.

The notion that the absolute and the ultimate being is some kind of thought, and the notion that the various distinctions and intelligibles and determinations with being are themselves concepts or reflections of concepts or correspond to concepts.

And the Marxist view, the materials view rejects that.

Materialism regards, reality is actually the thing that's fundamental and primary, an ideation and thinking as secondary or reflective.

Right.

But with respect to the question of an absolute being, it's not a question of whether the being is unreal or real, but whether it's absolute being.

So does Marxism presuppose the necessity of an absolute being?

Absolutely.

If there's a material integrity of the cosmos, if there's a material integrity of something that we call a universe, that means there has to be a fundamental principle of existence and reality. Okay, well, historically, that principle was just called God. That's what God referred to. But why necessarily? God, God did not refer to a man in the sky who was wearing a robe, fiddling around, doing X, Y, and Z.

God is referring to the ultimate reality.

Whether that reality is material or ideal is not the question

but actually religion is

materialist because religion is

actually the thing that asserts that reality

is material. When philosophers

try to say that that reality

is an ideal reality

they're trying to make

it accessible by means of the

philosophical intellect, which

culminates in a type of atheism that says

man can become God

or be equal to God.

And Hegel actually kind of reproduces this because

Hegel talks about this idea of absolute knowledge.

Well, absolute knowledge means that man, through his thinking, acquires parity and equality with the thinking and mind of God in a way, right?

But materialism is the thing that says, no, you can never actually achieve parity by way of the intellect or thinking with the absolute integrity of material being it's always going to be something more fundamental than anything that can be reflected by thought so by nature marxist materialism rejects shirk. It rejects idolatry.

It rejects the idea that the material integrity of being can ever find fruition and satisfaction in any given determination, right?

It says the whole thing in its integrity,

in its totality, right,

can never find full fulfillment

in a single determination, in a single thing.

And therefore, any idol of existence, existence can't be reduced to it.

It's always something more.

So this is dialectical materialism.

So I just need to ask here.

First of all, like supposing that you said is true, why specifically does it have to be the Islamic God?

Second, why specifically does it have to be the Islamic God?

Because only the Islamic God, only the...

Because only the Islamic God, because only the Islamic God, because communism is the same thing as monotheism.

Communism is about the more fundamental reality that conditions the division of labor. Polytheism states that each of the various divisions of labor exist unto themselves, right?

Polytheism, for example, the worship of various different gods and deities, that's a reflection

of the division of labor.

So that's why, and for example, polytheistic religions like Hinduism, you have a caste society,

because they reify and they turn the cast into these absolute, unchangeable categories, because it doesn't have a notion of a single

reality we all share in common and before which we are all equal, right?

So monotheism and communism are the same thing.

But Marx's materialism is specifically monotheist because it recognizes one ultimate reality, one ultimate material reality.

And the Isthmus,

which is what the Islamic mystical Sufi philosophers called it,

or Insan al-Kameel, right, is man.

For Marx, that is man.

Man is the fundamental point of reference

before which all thinking must refer

to an ultimate and fundamental

absolute single reality, right?

Marx's materialism is bounded up

in his humanism of one universal man one universal human reality, right?

But within the skilling this is very necessary to Marxism, but what I mean okay I said I don't feel like this is very necessary to Marxism now.

Why not?

No, no, but think about it.

Think about it.

No, no, no, but think about it.

Of course it's necessary.

Where have the Marxists been the past 50 years?

Where?

Where's the revolution happening right now you tell me

think about it who are the real revolutionaries today right now what do you mean like where are

they has the law and like yeah Yeah, okay. Those guys.

Yes, they are.

I mean, am I wrong?

Who else is it?

Tell me.

Who else?

Where are they?

The last time there was a Marxist revolutionary.

Che Guevara was like the last Marxist revolutionary.

Where... Because Hezbollah and stuff, these guys are defending their territory.

Okay.

But if we look at what they're actually doing when their territory isn't being threatened, they're killing sinny kids in Syria.

So they're not really the Marxist revolutionaries.

But that's just propaganda.

But this isn't, though.

It's just propaganda.

I hate to tell you, but it's propaganda.

And also what they were doing in Syria was precisely defending their territory.

It's a long-term strategic understanding of the defense of the region, defense of the supply

giants that make the resistance possible in the first place. When Syria fell, the ability to defend, not just the land of Lebanon, but everyone being able to defend their land from Israeli aggression, became severely limited.

So what they were doing in Syria was they were trying to preserve the integrity of that state

in its territory so that it could continue having a seminal fundamental strategic role in the

facilitation of resistance but in any, there are plenty of things that are wanting of being defending,

right? What about our human dignity? What about our human rights in some sense? What about our

ability to have some kind of existence in the first place?

We can't, if we can't resist, we can't resist the global forces of the bourgeoisie.

Marxists have failed. They failed to defend humanity

from the global bourgeoisie for the past 50 or so years. They failed. So where are the real

revolutionaries in the world today?

I just need to know, like, why does it have to be the Islamic God and not some deistic God?

And, like, why do we have to say that the people who are the revolutionaries today, you take it that there are revolutionaries?

Why do they have to be?

Because when we evaluate, because we can invent the deistic god right now.

We can invent and say, okay, it's some kind of deism.

But then we would have to evaluate the question, okay, is there any kind of history whatsoever from this point all the way to the eternity of history? Is there any kind of tradition that might have beaten us to the chase? What is the actual content of Islam historically? What did it actually mean

to the masses and masses of people?

I mean,

you can say deism, but there

are logical consequences of deism

when it comes to our understanding of being,

our ontology, our understanding

of justice, of right and wrong, okay, our understanding

of how we respond to world history. So if you were a deist in the deserts of Arabia in this,

you know, the eighth or seventh century, you probably, your arc of history would not look that different from what Islam actually

became. And throughout all of history, this is a tradition that has absorbed these various

different cycles. What? Islam is a specific thing.

But it's

It may be specific

But it's not arbitrary.

It's not arbitrary.

There's a

rationale behind the content of Islam

That is historically

has its own theology

like you can't say it

okay but what is the theology based in

like what's the content of the theology

the content of theology is ultimately

but it's all of that all of that is downstream from a universalistic

ontology and all the consequences of what it means to draw out a universalistic ontology

i mean i just know like islam is very specific. It's much more specific than that. It goes...

Islam does not say we have to worship camels. It doesn't say we have to worship sandals. It doesn't say we have to worship sand. It doesn't say, oh, this specific thing just arbitr arbitrarily, we have to, no, there's a rhyme and

reason behind everything. There's an exoteric, and then there's an esoteric meaning behind

everything. All right. And that is true for Islam, and it's a really specific thing

and you can't

you can't take the supposed

deistic god who will make

your

almost entire beliefs

like by the way it's impossible

it could be a deistic

god of philosophy, because that's a philosophical

proposition. That's not an actual

material relationship.

If there's something called a material

absolute, right?

Absolute material integrity of being,

then the history of the relationship to that being necessarily has to come before us in some kind of way.

To say we just now have clarity with respect to what it is implies that we've discovered it by means of philosophy and by means of thought, which is an absurdity.

That means it's a philosophical proposition, not actually an authentic revelation or authentic

relationship to material being by means of revelation.

You're the one here who's logically deducing a God, so I'm saying.

No, I'm logically pointing out the obvious fact that Marxism is Islam.

That's all I'm doing.

I'm just pointing out the obvious by means of logic.

Actually, my meme goes viral all the time because everyone in their hearts intuitively knows it's true,

but they lack the logical ability to justify why it's true.

And I mean, how can...

Most people, if Islam, if Marxism was not Islam, nobody would get

affected by the meme that

Marxism is Islam. The fact

that it commands so much attention

and interest from people

shows to me that people know it's true

deep down, but they lack the ability by means of consciousness and logic to justify why that is.

You don't think it's a little absurd to say that Islam's die is a cancer.

There's many absurd things you can say none of them go viral though do they

i mean okay but that doesn't really mean anything and also why would marxism be is someone

is like objectively like so reactionary how is Islam reactionary

you know the patriarchal views and um you don't so polytheism is polytheism is progressive then

no

what is progressive show me what's progressive

then

I'm saying you could just not hold the

belief about God in the first place

where's the progressive atheism in the world

or you could just not subscribe to Where's the progressive atheism in the world? Or you could just not subscribe to...

So where's the progress that the atheists have given us in the past 50 years?

Where is it?

What do you mean by that?

Where are the progressive revolutionary atheists?

Where are they?

Well, I'm not really talking to about his...

Whoever saying China, no, they're not revolutionary. So no, you can't say China. China's not revolutionary.

They ended the revolution after Mao. Now they've embarked on their own path, which I respect, but it's not revolutionary.

So where are these progressive?

Because to be progressive is to be revolutionary, right?

You can say that there's no other progressive alternative but that doesn't

make us fall progressive so no but saying something is reactionary implies there's something

progressive right where's the progressive thing well then doesn't necessarily need to be a progressive religious belief.

So we're saying convenient time for you to stop supporting China.

That's nothing to do with China. China had its revolution.

China's not sitting here saying it's offering the world

a revolutionary path. China

is saying we've had our own revolutionary

path. Now we're in our Confucian

society. We see no need

to start a world revolution

or something and we're just

going our own way.'s fine that's well within

their right but i don't live in china i live in america so if we don't live in china we can't import

china's model and the chinese themselves don't tell us to import their model by the way

anyway continue no I'm like asking

no question do you

do you not think that Islam is reactionary

of course it's not reactionary

how

because to say Islam is reactionary implies that the polytheism it emerged against was progressive

which is ridiculous no not necessarily the polytheism so what is it reactionary with respect to

with respect to what

so let's talk about Afghanistan

in the 70s and 80s you can say

proposed in the history of

what ideas

all of the progressive

ideas that came from the Middle East came from Islam

well this isn't necessarily true yes it is all the advances in the sciences

for example,

in mathematics,

that was all within Islam.

Well, you know, Avicana in his time

was called the Kaffir. Okay, so

was Jesus and his followers.

They were called atheists. Yes, they were.

The first Christians were called atheists by the Romans. Actually, Muslims were called atheists yes they were the first Christians were called atheists

by the Romans actually Muslims were called

atheists too

they were they it was said that they worshipped

nothingness because they didn't worship idols

so it was said they worship nothingness

by their enemies

but how do you send lived in a Muslim society.

This is a difference.

Okay, so what?

Why is it a given that a

Okay.

So was he

channeling polytheism? What was he channeling

polytheism? What was he channeling

that was somehow outside of Islam?

Islamic societies

that you're talking about

persecuted Shia.

They persecuted Sufis.

They persecuted

all manner of revolutionaries

who were still working within the framework of Islam.

But where were the revolutionaries who were outside of Islam? That's my question.

There's a question. I mean, all of the revolutionaries were called Catholic.

They were called that, but did

they themselves see themselves as outside

of Islam?

Well, you could very well say that...

What is it? Okay, even according to the legalism...

Even according to... No. Even according to legalism. Even according to to legalism.

I'll explain why that's a no.

But even according to the legalism,

how is a Muslim defined?

You tell me.

You just say you're a Muslim.

You take the shahadha, you take the shahara and you say you're a Muslim. You take the shahah, you take the shahara, and you confess you're a Muslim.

What?

I'm Muslim.

I'm Muslim.

Yeah, but anyone who says that is considered a Muslim in the Muslim framework.

No, not necessarily.

I mean, the prophet

that's the rule.

You can do things that take you out of

the folder. To be a Muslim

is to declare your

faith as a Muslim. That's how

you become a Muslim.

No, but we know

from the Hadith that there are things you can do

that take you out of the fold

of us and we know from the Quran as well.

The renunciation of belief so i can be i can be a muslim who doesn't pray my five times a day yes you can be a muslim who doesn't follow any musk

yes you can you can be a Muslim who doesn't follow any Muslim. Yes, you can.

You can be a Muslim who does not follow

any, you can absolutely be

a Muslim who doesn't follow any of the rules.

Well, if you can do anything and be a Muslim,

then yeah, sure, you can say that marstism is Islam,

but it wouldn't be Islam that's true to the Quran and the

Hold on, hold on. You're talking about two different things. You're talking about Islam as a

legalistic tradition, which no, not all Muslim sects have even agreed upon, and yet you can't

say that they're outside of Islam versus Islam as it actually materially was historically.

For example, various Sufi traditions that emerged from the time of Revelation up to this point, had very different views about the so-called

five pillars of Islam, and very different interpretations about the nature of the legalisms.

And they still regarded themselves as within the Islamic tradition.

And there's no other tradition we can locate them within.

It doesn't make you within it.

According to who? Who's making the rules? Saudi Arabia? Tell me who makes

the rules? No, the truth.

The sick truth is that the people who made the rules

were the people who had power.

They were the people who had the monopoly on violence.

That's it. They made the rules. Who defines what it really is and what it isn't?

So you're saying the rules of your religion were made up by the people who had power. I mean,

does this sound okay to you to say?

Yes, it does. Because, you know why? Because Islam, when we use this word Islam, we're talking about a fundamental type of belief which is supposed

to be a pure relationship

between the individual and God,

the absolute, right?

So any... No, it's much

more than that. Absolutely. Islam is

a relationship between the individual and God.

No, it's much more than that.

I mean, how can you say that when there's Sharia law?

Because human beings can interpret it however they want to interpret it.

So you don't believe in Sharia?

I don't believe in what?

Sharia.

Communism is Sharia.

The Soviet Constitution of 1936 was Sharia.

So you do believe in Sharia?

The true Sharia, yes.

Okay, so how can you say that God's command can be imposed on another

and then say that it's the relation between the individual and not?

Because making reference, because the... the relation between the individual because making

making reference

because

the authority of Islam

does not come from

hiding behind the skirt

of conventions and habits

the authority of Islam

comes from the struggle, the jihad, right, for a concrete relationship

between justice, injustice, oppressor oppressed, right and wrong, truth and falsehood. In Islam,

everything that is true belongs to

Allah, right?

Now, there's two ways of

looking at religion. You see, the

true way to look at religion is not,

here are the set of rules and bullet points from Microsoft

PowerPoint. It's not

an Excel sheet, okay? The way

to look at a religion is, what

fundamental relationship do I have

to the very logos,

the very fundamental rationale

behind all of these different

interpretive traditions that came about in the first place.

What active living faith doesn't say, oh, this is the rule, that's it.

Active living faith says, here's the fundamental relationship I have to the absolute,

for which X, Y, and Z law and rule is actually rational and necessary.

Okay. Like, how does, how does this relate? I mean, I asked you how, like, you can believe in imposing Sharia on other people and then also believe that, uh, what is Shariaaria mean go ahead and translate it the divine command of a law no

translate the atomology what is sharia means law translate. Find the etymology.

Just Google the etymology of Sharia.

I speak Arabic.

So give me the etymology of Sharia.

What do you mean?

It means...

Look up.

Etymology of sharia yeah hold on can we go back to something

no the etymology of sharia give me the etymology of sharia what answer do you want me to give just look up etymology of Sharia. What answer do you want me to give? Just look up etymology of Sharia.

And read it out to you? Yes. Okay. Give me a second.

It says, Sharia is the body of divine religious law in Islam that serves as...

The etymology.

The etymology.

I said etymology.

E.T.Y.

I know how to spell etymology.

So read out the etymology of Sharia.

Comes from Arabic translating literally to the path leading to the water.

There we go.

The pathway to water.

Why is the law of god why does the etymology referring to the law of god mean the pathway to water why is that do you know you tell me because in the islamic ontology okay you have the relationship between the fire okay the earth fire is the extreme of the air right right? Because you have the deadly scorching fire in the desert that comes from hot air, right? When it burns.

In the framework of Islam, water is a dialectical mediation of these two ontological principles, right?

Which is the way of fire being in reference to the, you know, kind of intangible, the spiritual realm, right?

And earth being the grounded material world.

Water is the dialectical sublation of both.

And so the way to water is the same thing as dialectical

materialism.

A law based on the principle

of dialectical materialism.

Absolutely the truth.

Dialectical

materialism is at the foundation of

Sharia. Sharia means dialectical materialism. at the foundation of Sharia.

Sharia means dialectical materialism.

That's all it means.

No, what this means.

Absolutely.

You can't handle the truth.

You can't handle it. You can't handle it.

You can say whatever you want.

No, this is the truth.

You understand what I say, this is the truth this is the truth you can you understand what

i mean when i say should yeah i mean no no why should i care though i understand what you're trying to

say i'm asking why i should care because you believe in this you believe in an atomic way of governing

what does it mean to believe?

Know them by their fruits.

What is the content of belief?

There's some sheikh somewhere in Saudi Arabia.

I have to listen to what he says because he has a lot of

fucking money. Because the Saudis have

money and they can build madrasas across the

world and standardize Islam as they see fiat.

Why should I have to listen to anyone because they have money or they have power?

What is truth?

Truth comes from the heart.

Belief comes from the heart.

It doesn't come from anywhere else but the heart.

No, it comes from the head actually.

Okay.

If you were among the companions, the first people among the prophet,

what could incentivize you to follow the prophet?

That's the Islam that I care about.

That he had miracles and he had

his proof. What were the miracles of

the prophet? You don't think

the Quran is a linguistic miracle.

You don't think that split in the moon is a miracle?

No, no. The prophet

because he brought justice on earth, because his virtues were evident and shown.

And he had his miracles.

The miracles of the prophet were not the primary motivation for why people became followers of the

prophet?

Yes, it is.

He wasn't a magician.

No, he wasn't a magician.

He wasn't a sorcery.

They were accusing him of it because you'd listen to the

Quran and you'd realize how much of a miracle it is.

Yes, the written, yes, the meaning bounded up in the revelation was the miracle.

The fact he could articulate the fundamental meaningfulness of the world to people was the miracle

it wasn't based

in theatrics and magic

okay I still don't

why did we get here why

didn't you answer my question why Why? Like, okay, I'll take away the word Sharia. It bothers you. How can we say that there is an Islamic way of government when you're saying that it's an individual relation between God and the individual.

Because the purpose of Islam is not for an authority to come here and say this is the religion and the only

someone can claim the authority of Islam but the authority has to be proven by the

living works by the living virtue by the living proof that what you're doing aligns with what people know in their heart to be true versus false, just versus wicked.

What are you saying?

And the only way people can verify that is what's within their hearts and the personal relationship they have to God.

Nothing else.

This is not materialism.

I'm so sorry to say.

The only way people could verify the truth of the Prophet's words was that it aligned with what they knew in their hearts but had repressed

for so long the prophet's words opened up the words of the prophet the words of the prophet the words of the

prophet opened up the relationship the individual has to God. A relationship

that had been obscured, had been fogged with ignorance and confusion. His words miraculously,

for people opened up this relationship and clarified it.

That's why the pre-Islamic world is called Jhaliyah, right?

If I'm saying it right.

Yeah.

Okay, like, how are you saying words like wicked and new in their hearts and good?

And you're saying you're a materialist.

Because materialism is not nihilism.

Materialism absolutely comprehends that the moral order...

Where does this good and this wicked...

Materialism implies that the moral...

Even as a Muslim, even...

No, hold on. Even as a Muslim, there's divine command and that's it. There's no good and evil.

No, you're

assuming Islam is a

Talmudic faith. It's not a

Talmudic faith. It's just a book of laws.

No, that's a Talmudic. That's a

Talmudic interpretation. No, this is the

Ashadi interpretation, actually.

It can be anything, you can call it whatever you want.

It's not the living faith.

It's a dead letter of the text, and that's it.

That's not the Islamic way.

If it's suffice to just follow the dead letter, you would just follow Talmud.

That's it.

What are you talking about? What are you talking about?

No, I mean, like, this is a recognized interpretation within scholars.

And why should I care about the recognized interpretation?

You're just deferring to other people's authority. Why should I care about their authority? Tell me why. I'm saying like what I'm saying is it necessarily. You can refer to the pudding. You can refer to the Quran and you can refer to the pudding. You're channeling authorities. You're channeling conventions, you're channeling habits,

but you're not explaining why they are true.

And you can refer to the Hadith

and you'll find that.

There is no...

The Quran, the Quran,

the Quran is not a book of laws

primarily.

It's not some legalistic code.

The Quran channels the truth in a very indirect way,

in a very brilliant way,

in a way that you can't just look at it exoterically.

The whole point is it needs to be

interpreted with esotericism.

That's why the Sufis were correct.

Listen, man, like, I feel like

you're just

not really reconciling it.

I mean, you're saying, like, as long as Marxism,

or Marxism, whatever, you're not reconciling it.

I don't need to reconcile that, which is self-evidently the same thing.

It's not, though.

I mean, you said a bunch of things.

First of all, which can't be backed up.

Second world, which are just illogical.

Why is it?

What's illogical?

The lack of symmetry or parity between Marxism and Saudi Arabia.

Why should I care about Saudi clerics funded by oil money?

Why should I care about them?

You keep saying Saudis.

Who am I to bow to?

Who do you want me to bow to?

This guy with a beard who says he's the halal-la Khalala. Why do I care? Why should I care about that? Whatever are you talking about?

Tell me, okay, pretend I'm a non-Muslim. Convince me, why should I be a Muslim?

You know what these Muslims will do? I'm not going to do that. You know what you know, but

you know what these Muslims will do? I'll not going to do. You know, no, no, you know, but you know what these Muslims will do?

I'll tell you why the Islam is dead in the hearts of 99% of people who call themselves Muslims.

If I'm a non-Muslim and I say, convince me why I should be a Muslim, you know what they'll say, they'll say,

Okay, because in the Quran, it predicted Isaac Newton

and it predicted Einstein's discoveries

and if you read the amount of times that it

says the word, gravity,

it actually predicted the quantum formulas

and it's like trying to create

superstition.

And it's trying to

convince people that

Islam is true

because of a

superstitious thing

that it somehow

accounts for a

Steve Jobs iPhone.

They'll say,

you should be a

Muslim because actually

the Quran has the

blueprints of the

iPhone before Steve Jobs.

You see, they can never convince a non-Muslim to be a Muslim because it's true.

They have to resort to modern science, which everyone believes is true because we all use computers,

and we all need modern medicine,

and we all depend upon modern scientific knowledge.

So what they'll do is leverage modern scientific knowledge and say,

but in order, but the Quran is the thing that miraculously predicted all of this.

They don't refer

to the authority of the living faith.

They don't refer to the authority

of Allah. They refer to the authority

of Dr. Fauci.

So you tell me, you convince me.

What? You convince me to become a Muslim.

If I'm not a Muslim.

ACP.US,

ACP.us, know them by their fruits.

ACP.us, know them by their fruits. ACP.us, know them by their fruits.

The cause we're fighting for is a just cause.

The cause we're fighting for is a virtuous cause.

Hold on, because this is really, what is you saying?

There's a, there's a,'s a listen that real living faith

real living faith

no one has the authority the authority of faith

comes from the struggle of the now

nothing else

the authority of the faith comes from the struggle

in the here and the now.

There's a struggle here and the now based on right and wrong, justice and injustice, truth and falsehood in the now.

Whoever fights for this comprehensively, consistently.

That's all that matters.

So you're saying if a specific people fight for, you know, the liberation of other people, those are the people that we should follow. I mean, if they do it

if they do it with genuine faith

in their heart. How am I

supposed to measure that? This is email.

You're supposed to measure it by their works.

Measure it by their works. Know them by

their works. Know them by their fruits.

Why do all the enemies of the ACP have to lie about us?

Like they lied about the prophet.

Like they lied about the family of the prophet.

Why do they have to lie about us?

Why can't they just tell them?

Why can't they just present us as we are as the truth?

Why do they have to fabricate X, Y, and Z about us?

Because in our living existence as a movement and as a party, there is something

about us that is authoritative and compelling to people.

And the only way our enemies can deny us is by twisting what we are, turning us into something that we're not.

Okay.

It was a pleasure talking to you.

I'll probably get back

sometime later but I'm going to go now

ACP.us if you want to find true Islam

ACP.U.S. True Islam, not in the

mosque. ACP.uS. Is where the real

Islam is where the real Islam is.

TPL, go ahead.

Yeah.

What?

So I've been following you on Jackson since like 2022.

So I've seen a lot of your work and all of that.

You're Iraqi and Lebanese, aren't you?

No.

No.

Oh, well, I saw Jackson. Shiite? No. No.

Oh, well, I saw Jackson, like Lebanon and everything. I'm Lebanese. Um, so, uh, I've been listening to the debate about Islam and whatnot.

So you believe the Quran is the literal word of God yes so you

know in the Quran it says to follow the prophet and like in his his actions and his

words are holy.

So you know that's been collected by the Islamic civilization for like 152, 300 years after his death and compiled into a Hadith and Fik.

And why did the Sunnis and Shias disagree about it?

The Sunnis and Shia disagreed on succession, not... They don't have different had different had dates?

Yes, but that was established as that was established as part of the, even like sheism, it's like the Ismaelis in Egypt, which were ruled by their own north african institutional basis and al azhar compared to the

safavits in persia which had synchronit synchronicism with the zoroastrian faiths actually the ismamailis were the Zoroastrian synchretises.

More.

More.

Because they were a combination of Persian Zoroastrian exiles and North African tribes.

The Persians went to North Africa, raised a guerrilla army in the Sahel, or not the Sahara, the Tunisia, and Libya and whatever. And then they came to Egypt, conquered Egypt with that army. And they instituted a religion, a neoplatonic form of Islam that was heavily

syncretized with zoroastrianism and persian mystical traditions that were themselves combined

with the Greek and Hellenistic lineages yeah but the original Shiites,

like during the time of the Rashidun and

Ali and Hussein, they were

not really

theologically incompatible with

everybody else. Is that correct?

We don't

we don't know what the uniform theology was we just have records of what people said it was um so there there did someone changed something altered something that did that fact is evident in the very

distinction between Shia and Sunni I mean that's like the specific question of

whether the Prophet had written a letter about appointing Ali as his successor or whether one of the

Sahaba hid it.

But if you're talking about something more lenient about whether or not, for example, the Umayyads and then later the Abbasids, whether they tampered with the legalistic tradition and therefore the direct and specific quotations of Islam fundamentally from the prophet and the Ahadith, then at what point can we start, would

we not start questioning the Quran?

The point of the Quran is you're supposed to read it. It's not supposed to be waved over people's head and said, you know.

Yeah, what I'm asking you, it's like.

It's not a gunny wave at people.

It's something you're supposed to read.

Yeah, so like.

So if it's like, if there's a single verse in the Quran that you don't find compelling authentically on the basis of faith you have in your heart, then you either don't understand it or the book is not for you.

Yeah.

But the authority, the authority didn't come from nowhere.

The authority has to come from some kind of living faith. Has to come from nowhere. The authority has to come from

some kind of living faith.

Has to come from somewhere.

The authority didn't come from nowhere.

It came from somewhere.

So if you want to say, well, I want to be in conformity with the

community, the Islamic community has been destroyed.

It's been destroyed. That was the point I was making.

So just deferring to want to conform to people's habits and cultures

is not a justification for the Islamic faith today.

It's called Sunnah and Jamah.

You know what Jamai means?

Go ahead.

It means consensus. It means like you're meant to rule by the consensus of the people.

No, I'm not talking about this state tradition.

I'm talking about civil society.

Like, where does your faith in Islam actually come from?

Me?

Anyone, anyone.

Where does it come from?

Well, I don't know if I can speak for anybody else, but even like anecdotally, a lot of people I know, they think it's like it's like even if it's just a question of whether they're going to literally wake up to judgment day or nothingness.

So they're scared they're going to get tortured and stuff in hell.

Yeah, exactly.

That's a very pathetic, faithless thing.

That's like saying, I'm scared I'm going to go to jail or I'm scared I'm going to be killed or something.

It's just kind of cowardly. I don't see that as a credible source of faith in the authentic sense of the word.

Faith doesn't mean, well, I'm scared of this bad thing that's going to happen to me.

You know what? You remind me of

the Christians who

say that because in Islam, heaven

is described as having all these

nice and fancy things for Muslims

and then the Christians will call it

like Islam is vain and

there are some...

Yeah, but you know what?

For the Muslims who are pious and virtuous because they want to bang virgins in heaven,

those people are perverts and they have nothing to do with faith.

And I agree with the Christians if those people exist.

No, even like the original...

Islam describes heaven and paradise

in such a way, not because

it's trying to incentivize people to be

good people, but it's trying to say

all of these splendors

and immediate temporal self-gain in this world you can think of the ultimate

consequences of being righteous and following a righteous path in this world. Just imagine the ultimate reward

you can think of on earth.

It's so much bigger than all of that,

so much more infinite, so much greater

than that. So it's a

that the sublime of

paradise within Islam is not

meant to make you excited that you're going to go

to four seasons when you die

the whole point

of it. I was specifically thinking about

I was specifically thinking

about like when

I don't remember it was like

a horse rider

or like a cavalry

type guy in Arabia back in the

day of the prophet and he was talking about

are we going to be able to ride horses in

paradise because

they're a fan

of the tradition

and they did their

whole life and

they like doing it

so he told them

yeah you're going to

be able to write

the best and

biggest horses in

in paradise

with the fastest

capabilities

paradise is the

eternal

yeah but like the question is that even regardless of the question of like

the virgins being being vain it's like you can think that even that is being vain and the prophet

directly said that for example the farmer is going to be able to

live in eternity it's not vain it's a way to communicate to people you have to understand what's the

meaning the way the thing that's being communicated to people is that eternity surmounts everything temporal, everything that you can think of gaining here and now.

Eternity surmounts all of it.

So if you're someone who's illiterate and you're not educated and you're asking is there going to be horses or x y and z in heaven

if you're trying to communicate that heaven is the eternal

the infinite then you're going to say yes

it's going to be that and more not because you're there's literally you're

telling people they're literally going to be riding horses someday but the very meaningfulness

and value that they're investing in riding a horse the rewards of heaven are greater than that

because heaven is the eternal and the infinite

and how do you communicate the eternal and infinite

to people you have to speak the language

of what they know.

But now you're just being,

you're just doing,

what's the word?

You're doing the bottom on the

on the words of the prophet.

You're not taking that word.

Because why do we assume that what the words meant the prophet you're not taking because why do we assume

that what the words meant is the thing

that we think it means

modern language

after the modern age

language doesn't mean the same thing

as it used to people used to

if we have a manner of expression,

if we say the straw that broke the camel's

back, for example, are we talking about a real

straw and a real camel's back?

How do you know

in the language? The words are literal enough.

Yeah, we're using... So hold on.

All language has a degree of literary significance, which is not always meaning to give way to empirical propositions, the propositions about the existence of tangible, sensuous, empirical things.

So how do you distinguish the literal from all these other kind of literary devices?

In history, when you're talking about how people were talking 2,000 years ago,

for example, when the Greeks, when you read

about how the Greeks spoke about things,

when Greeks

were talking about Zeus and the mountains,

what were they actually talking about? You think the Greeks,

do you think the Greeks, Do you think the Greeks actually thought

that on Mount Olympus,

if you climb there, you find some crazy

giants or something like God of War,

the video game?

You think they actually thought that?

You're talking

about what if these people back in the day believed x y and z and like

you're trying to put the difference between them and now forget about back in the day let's go to

some tribes that exist now somewhere in africa right i remember i think there's some tribes that were retained their old

traditions like in Nigeria and they believe that when they put on this costume and they do this

dance they're channeling ancestral spirits and even the spirit is there like that is it right

do you think they're so stupid so as to think it's not just and even the spirit is there. Like, that is it, right?

Do you think they're so stupid so as to think?

It's not just a guy behind that costume dancing?

They actually literally think this supernatural thing.

No, everyone gives way to the fundamentally intangible social principles through different literary devices

and means by way of language. The thing they mean to refer to is not a literal empirical

tangible object. Most language, okay, Feuerbach, who's the first real atheist, most language

okay foyerbach who's the first real atheist

comprehends that the very thing that separates man from animal

is that man can talk about universals

man can refer to consciously comprehend

intangible universals, right?

And so the way we give expression to that can be metaphorical, it can be indirect, it can be through riddles, it can be all, through all manner of literary devices that do not mean only a small minority in the entire literature of mankind's history before the modern age, before the age of empiricism and positivism and modern science, only a small minority of the language compiled in the traditions of mankind actually directly referred to discriminate, intelligible, separate empirical objects and propositions about these objects.

Language used to be embedded in more fundamental ontologies where everything had a deeper meaning.

Everything had a deeper meaning.

That was how people related to and had access to the social principles that gave meaningfulness to the world, right?

If you had a sterile universe of just dead things, empirical things of the senses, you could not actually channel literature in a way to make sense of the world.

So if we go 1,000 years from now, our version of that would be like Iron Man and Avengers and Marvel.

And if you see

anthropologists in the year 30-60,

they'll go back to us and they'll say,

well, they actually believed in this guy

named Iron Man and they believed in these

Avengers like the Hulk and they, you know,

they were depicting and talking about

how there was a Spider-Man and X, Y, Z.

No.

Let me respond.

It's not about that, though.

It's about what does it mean?

What meaning is being conveyed?

Why do we invest meaning in that?

Listen, you're talking, it's like you hammered home the point of like, oh, it's like all these time differences and how back in the day they were talking with all these talks of deeper meaning and whatnot.

It's like you're practically just trying to

give a justification for the esotericism

that you're talking about.

And the thing is, is that

at the time of the prophet, it's like we're talking about

antiquity to medieval

Arabic

Arabian Peninsula

language is like it's well known

and how its grammar works and

how it's... How can it be well known?

People talk

It's documented. It's like all these, it's like Saudi Arabia, they have found like these archaeological

sites of writings of Islam from the time of the prophet.

Did they dig someone up to explain it to them what it meant?

I mean, I was going to get to it's like uh it's like

the script is the exact same as the arabic one nowadays except there aren't the dots and

the thing is is that the at the time of theayyads went that means it meant the same thing.

I was getting to it.

Because it looks the same, it meant the same thing.

I was getting it's like the story is that when the, when Islam got out of the Arabian Peninsula and's got off the Arabian Peninsula,

the amount of people who

had very high proficiency

of the language decreased,

and it got diluted to the point

that Al-Hajaj, you know him,

the Umayah governor,

added the dots to the script so that it'd be more

legible to see what letters are actually being put in what phrase while people what is the

only thing that it meant was the revolution of the prophet mohammad which is the same thing as

lenin and mao's revolution so please go read

the little red book and then you can read the Quran with clarity. Sorry, we're going to bring

to go to the next guest. Gabagool, go ahead. Can you hear me yes oh dude hold on my my headphones are messing i can hear you

all right i just came through really loud. Sorry.

Dude, I was wondering, how are you feeling about the debate tomorrow between the rabbit and the neoliberarian phalanist?

I don't know. I know you've had a discussion with both of them before. Sounds really exciting. I don't know.

Charles, go ahead.

Hey, so, um, so I wanted to talk about some Stalin-related things.

I've been getting a little bit into some of the works,, I do recognize that the individual's actions don't necessarily

affect, you know, philosophical, geopolitical, or economic works. But there were some concerns because,

you know, people will say things like Stalin did nothing wrong and I've

encountered this claim that he uh impregnated someone who is 13 years old. That's fake. It was from the

Epstein notebooks. Look it up. It was made by Simon Seabag who was in the Epstein notebooks. Epstein

lie fabrication, no basis in any proof or truth.

Stalin, in fact, did nothing wrong, which is to have it be communism equals Islam, because nobody wants to debate the AI thing.

All right, anyway, we're going to wrap up the TikTok. You know, you know the question of whether i'm joking or not is like, or I'm trolling or not, it's like at this point, what if truth takes a comedic form? Have you ever thought about that?

What if truth just takes a comedic form?

I am fundamentally trying to disrupt how people think of reality.

I'm trying to fundamentally disrupt people's preconceptions

about reality. And that much I'm very serious. I'm very serious. I'm dead serious. But sometimes

the only way to do that is by also making you laugh.

And maybe by making you laugh, I also make you think.

That's what I want to do. I want to make you think.

I want to give you the courage to think about shit differently by laughing about shit, right? But either what I'm doing is the most satanic thing in the world or it's the holiest thing

in the world I don't know but anyway look I'm either an atheist or the truest Muslim I'm

either the truest atheist in the world or the truest Muslim in the world.

But my heart is in the struggle. My heart is for the revolutionary struggle. My heart is for

communism. My heart is for this lineage, this struggle. I see the truth with clarity.

I see the cope with clarity.

The cope in others.

It's very clear to me.

I don't care about labels.

I don't care. I don't care about labels. I don't care.

I don't care.

I don't care.

I don't care.

I don't care about the labels.

I care about the resonance. I care about the rhyme. I don't care about the labels. I care about the resonance.

I care about the rhyme.

I don't care about the lyrics of a song.

I care about the music.

Not the lyrics.

I care about the music.

Like Enver Hoja, for example. They said they said oh but the labels are different

okay what's the difference

being saying

Allah

or why is that different

from saying

anti-revision

Stalin it's like it's the same thing Stalin.

It's like it's the same thing, but you're using a different word.

It's the same sound.

It's the same resonance.

But the word is different.

What's different?

It's the same.

Okay, I understand at some level the word matters. But it's the same okay i understand at some level the word matters but it's like 95% of the meaning

has nothing to do with the literal usage of the word the word is a cherry on top understand the

infrared understanding of language words are the cherry on top. Understand the infrared understanding of language. Words are the cherry on top. There's all these different layers of ice cream that are there first. And then the word you use is just a cherry on top. But in the retarded Anglo box outlook, the word is the whole Sunday.

That's not true.

The word is not the whole Sunday.

The word is the cherry on top of the Sunday.

You understand?

The Anglo box says, no, the whole word, the word is the whole Sunday. No, it's fucking not.

If I, if I, if I say, for example, let me explain something to you. If I tell you that this is a giraffe, have I committed a highness sin if i tell you this is a giraffe no because

you can look at it is but has what do you mean to communicate by calling this a giraffe?

What do you mean to communicate?

Like, what am I trying to say?

Am I trying to say that this is the same thing as the four-legged, long-necked animal,

the mammal that's called a giraffe?

Well, maybe I'm not saying that. Maybe I'm saying something else. But the meaning of what this is is not the word glasses. The meaning of what

there's so many layers to the meaningfulness of what this is. For example, it can be put on my face like this. I can fold it in this way. It is

shaped in this way. For example, it has this color. It has this usage. That's all the layers of the

Sunday, right? And then

the cherry on top is that we call it

glasses. We call it sunglasses.

That's the cherry on top.

The idealist understanding

of language says, no, no,

the word is the entire sunday no

the word is just what we're referring this is the cherry on top of the sunday the sunday is here

okay you can see all the layers of the ice cream right here the word word sunglasses is a cherry on top. So if

Enver Hoja, if he looks like Islam, a Muslim, and the structure of what he's doing,

and then the cherry on top is that he's confused about what kind of Sunday he's making.

That explains why he's an atheist confessionally, why he's saying I'm an atheist, I eat pork, all this kind of superficial rituals.

There's an unconscious religious structure that's a different Sunday.

You know, there's different layers of ice cream and then the word is a cherry on top.

That's how it works.

So, for example, it's like saying that the

Saudi version of Islam is Islam

that's like saying if you take a shit

and pile it up and put a cherry on

top of the shit that same thing as chocolate ice cream

no it's not.

Maybe there's a superficial resemblance somewhere there.

But that's not the same fucking thing. I'm sorry.

Saudi Arabia can lay claim and say that that's the authority on all Islam could ever mean.

Because some guy with a beard said it is, okay?

This is the way I say so.

Okay, so why should I care?

Think about it.

Where does the authority behind a religion actually come from? It comes from

some person claiming something. Like, you don't, you didn't have to follow Jesus. Nobody,

nobody had to follow Jesus. Okay, they were all persuaded by his miracles. Okay, Judas still betrayed him.

Nobody had to follow the prophet. He wasn't in charge. He wasn't like, oh, you have to. Nobody had to do it. Okay. So where does faith actually come from?

The Muslims of today, they're channeling Dr. Fauci to justify their religion.

Frankly, I wanted to be the good chairman who's just neutral on religion and treats Islam like all these other religions.

I'm doing something very

risky by dabbling

and experimenting with matters of faith

in this way. I understand. I

understand. Trust me, I understand.

But I look at the state of the world

today and I say, something's got to give.

Things can't go on as they are. Something's got to give. There's a spiritual decay. There's a scourge of nihilism. There's an emptiness.

How can we be just as revolutionary?

How do we restore?

This is the question. How do you restore the revolutionary Marxism?

The only way to restore it, we have to relitigate the question of faith.

Otherwise, where are we? I don't think in the 21st century, atheist Marxists cannot be revolutionaries in the 21st century.

There's not a single example of them being revolutionaries.

Anywhere.

The last one was Che Guevara.

So where are they?

Isn't this an interesting question?

When is the last time there have been atheist, Marxist revolutionaries?

Chairman Gonzalo?

Was it Gonzalo? Was it

Gonzalo?

Where?

Where?

Think about it.

Even if you're an atheist, that should bother you.

You should think about that.

Why is that?

What happened to Marxism?

What happened to revolutionary Marxism?

Because atheists today, they seem like they're nihilists who are not willing to risk fundamental life and death struggle.

They're not, not allowing me to have Pop-Tarts.

And then some people say, well, in America, you have to.

Why?

Why? Why?

Why?

Xi Jinping, he's not a revolutionary.

He doesn't have to be either because his country doesn't need a revolution.

But Xi Jinping is not a revolutionary.

I don't like non-Chinese people trying to channel China,

frankly. I'm going to wear a suit and be professional.

Buddy, you're not.

Before you do that, you need to go on the Long March.

Do you not?

I'm going to be China in America.

No, you're not.

No, because China, they have the inheritance of the Long March and the cultural revolution.

What do we have?

Nothing.

We have the Black Panthers.

It's the last thing we had.

Black Panthers.

Last thing we had was the Black Panthers. It's the last thing we had. Black Panthers. Last thing we had was the Black Panthers.

Truth is, that's the last thing we had, the Black Panthers.

And what happened to them? They were destroyed. Constitution is pretty cool.

Okay, I mean, we can all just be a museum.

Are we going to be a museum? Why'd the Black Panthers fail? Because they had the national question, which was true in some sense, but they had no...

The Rainbow Coalition framework

was

the logic of the Sorites paradox.

How many grains of sand make a heap?

How many different groups in a coalition make for a unified central

authority that can sweep the nation? infinitely many, right? At some point, there's an infinitesimal

gap you have to cross that says, we are the authority, right? The Black Panthers weren't interested in doing that. They just

wanted to confine themselves to the black community. But then they got isolated. And because they

were isolated, they were destroyed.

1 plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 can go on for infinity.

To have a 1, you have to say 1.

Yes, it's an infinitesimal gap.

You have to cross 1.

1 plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 plus one plus one plus one plus one for it can go on forever.

Forever. So where's one? If... If Fred...

This guy's trolling me.

You have to have the confidence

and the audacity of the one.

You have to?

What makes you worthy? Fuck you.

Nothing makes me worthy. Everyone is worthy already. So it's a matter of courage. Do you have the courage to name this worthiness? Thank you. You know, paul's has lost the plot Grandma, what's up? we don't think the religion thing

i don't think the religion thing.

I want, I know, originally it's like we just want to shut up about the religion thing and focus on the, uh, Strauss-Stani with the 10. What 10 what's up originally it's like you know the religion thing

we just keep that whatever and just wades the struggle but it's like I'm going to tell you

I'll tell you

something. You've got to mark my words.

A lot of you might be feeling queasy and uneasy

and uneasy about this new direction.

And you may say Haas might have lost his fucking mind and he's gone crazy.

And this is too far. This is the crazy. The crazy train has left the station, so to speak.

Or that song,

we're going off the rails on the crazy train.

You may think that.

Okay.

But, uh, cannot languish and meander in this space of institutional deniability, even if we're atheists, we have to have the same belief and conviction that sometimes you only see in religion. To do what we do.

I don't care if you're an atheist.

I don't care what your religion is.

But to be a communist,

we need to be just as faithful as Muslims are in Iran.

And it has to be real. that's all we have

without that there's that, there's no

communism, there's no nothing.

I mean, what are you going to say?

You're going to say, oh, it's just self-evidently

no.

No, I mean, you have to

be really about this shit, you know

skin in the game

Oh, it's on hins, X, Y, and Z.

It's like, well,

we are in such an intensely psychological era.

We have to break through this division of language right

this box the anglo box thing

I mean we have to fucking destroy that

we have to level it

we are trapped in a prison of language

you know who agreed with me We are trapped in a prison of language.

You know who agreed with me? David Lynch did.

He said language is a prison.

It imprisons us.

And he was trying to liberate meaning from the Anglo box

you know

and we have to go

any listen you have to be retarded to not see

this is the American spirit right here

this is the avant-garde

of the American tradition.

It's here. Oh, but you're a foreigner. I mean, you're a small-minded retard. That's how I see it.

If you can't see how this is a continuation of the American way, you must be retarded in your head.

Even this Islam stuff,

why don't you think for two fucking seconds you retard?

During the counterculture,

this is not an East Coast thing,

but this is a West Coast thing.

You understand?

All these new spirituality,

this New Age stuff,

they were channeling the Orient.

They were channeling Buddhism

and Hinduism

and all this Oriental

non-American foreign stuff

that's baked in

because that's what America's soul is searching

for do you understand

and America

has never been liberated from Europe

so part of the war of independence

from Europe is we have to be liberated from the

Anglo-box. We have to be liberated from the metaphysical prison that was imposed upon us that we've

inherited from Europe and adopted ourselves. We should take the Oxford Dictionary and burn them. Book burnings of the Oxford Dictionary and burn them book burnings of the Oxford Dictionary

that's what I'm talking about we need to burn these Anglo box we need to burn the metaphysical

prison of Europe down.

So when they say,

no, you can't say that Hoja was a Muslim.

You can't say, hey, fuck you, bitch.

We can say it.

Because your prison is fake.

You have no understanding of the meaning behind the words.

Meaning, meaning, meaning, what does it mean? What does it mean? What does it mean? understanding of the meaning behind the words. Meaning. Meaning. Meaning.

What does it mean? What does it mean? What does it mean?

Oh, it means this definite... No, burn the fucking Oxford Dictionary, bitch.

What does it mean? What does it? How did it acquire the meaning that it has?

You're telling me I can't cross lines and discover resonances and parallels and rhymes.

I have to listen to a song, but I'm not allowed to notice the melody.

You can't say Genghis Khan was a communist.

Just kill yourself.

You fucking retard.

You're not going to make it.

I don't want to talk to you.

You're so disgusting and stupid to me.

You are such a small-headed, puny-minded

retard. I don't want to

talk to you. I don't, you should not even be

speaking to me. Because

you have this retarded Anglo box that

says, I can't think about

different figures from history, different things

that have happened across history, different

words, I can't discover

a deeper resonance and rhyme

and relationship between these things.

Because they're all siloed off.

They're all siloed off into these different little

Anglo boxes. I want to burn your boxes down. I want to throw and suspend your horizon of meaning

into chaos. And whatever emerges from that chaos of the real will be worthy of the thing that we call meaning.

I want to throw the English language into schizophrenia, into an insanity, out of which, out of which will arise

the true meaning

not the one that's told from us in the Oxford

Dictionary bullshit

you understand

I want to level

these towers of Babylon.

This is what this means.

This is what this is defined as from Reddit.

Shut the fuck up, you retarded bitch.

I genuinely have people, I go, Marxism is Islam.

They go, but Marxism is materialist and dialectical.

I'm like, you think I didn't think of that, you fucking retard?

What am I trying to say?

Like, you didn't, you think I didn't, oh, God for it.

Oh, I never thought of that.

I go, Enver Hoja, he was a, he wasn't a real atheist.

This retard subhuman reditor, he goes,

How'd it had to have been the most avid?

You don't think I know that's what he's known as,

or that's the conventionally understood thing?

Like, what, you think I'm just not familiar with that, that I've never thought about it in my life?

Maybe there's a reason I'm saying what I'm saying.

Maybe I'm saying you should reexamine the meaning you attach to the words you're using and think about them differently.

I do want to suspend and throw language.

I'm declaring war on language.

I'm absolutely declared.

I am a Tartarian insurrectionist,

waging war on the English language.

American English needs to be mutilated, re-transformed into Tartarian.

It's me and it's Tung-Tung-Sahor.

Comrade Tung-Tung-Sahor are waging guerrilla war on the English language itself.

Only Ha's, Tung-Tung, Tung, Sohor, and only him.

And David Lynch.

There's three people.

You can put us in the, like, the heads of Marxism Leninism you put David

Lynch another you see you you put Emerson you put Henry David Thoreau you put

David Lynch you put me and Tung Tung Tung Tung Sohor.

Those are the five heads of the American War of Independence

against the English language itself.

The English language as we know it,

it needs to be completely undermined

because it's a colonial prison

where I'm doing decolonization,

Tartarian decolonization.

So all these out, even Maga Communism, it was a type of tartarian decolonization of the English language.

Frankly, isn't there a yearning in your American hearts to be free from the Anglo box or no.

I go to the Middle East.

They don't know what the fuck I'm talking about because those Middle Easterners,

they all watch football,

football from France,

France and Britain and Europe and Germany

football. They won't fucking

listen to me. They have skinny jeans on

and they're listening to football.

They're watching football. I'm talking to

you Americans.

Isn't there a yearning in your hearts to be

liberated from the Anglo box? Is there a yearning in your hearts to be liberated from the anglo box?

Is there no yearning in your hearts to be free from this tyranny of the so-called English language?

Where's the American, the American language?

We speak American.

We speak Lynchian. David Lynch. He. we speak american we speak lynchian david lynch he he should he should be like our pushkin we should

reimagine the entire structure of how we make meaningful sense of the world in the American fashion

and leave Europe behind

that's what I offer you

I offer you this

burn the Oxford Dictionaries

wage revolutionary war

on the gatekeepers

of modern meaning itself

you can't say that

hey fuck you hey buddy fuck you you can't say that. Hey, fuck you.

Hey, buddy, fuck you.

You can't say that.

Hey, suck my nuts.

We're going to take our leave from Europe.

You can't do...

Suck my nuts.

God bless the black Americans for taking the language to a next level.

They are also trying to decolonize the language.

And they're the ones who are making all the innovations.

Black Americans make all the innovations. They're the only thing the only people who are freeing us slowly slowly from the so-called english language they call it it's african-american

uh uh uh a ve right vernacular english it's like well okay a A-A-V-E, right?

Vernacular English.

It's like, well, okay,

African-American vernacular English or whatever

is English 10 years before

it becomes English for everybody.

Okay?

If you think about it, nobody today.

Nobody speaks in the Oxford way.

So black people are black because they have the courage to speak the truth how it is without this retarded Oxford Dictionary getting in the way.

And that's why all the innovations in the English language come from black people in America because they're the only ones who speak American.

They're the avant-garde of the American language.

If you don't like it, go back to fucking Europe.

Because we're from scratch.

Because the black people, they made a language from the hood.

From here, from this soil, from from this land they waged wars they waged

battles the gang wars in los angeles in harlem how is it different from the warlord era of the greek dark ages Tell me what the fuck is the, that's the literal fucking, that's the ghetto gospel.

Those are, that's like Homeric poems that give structure, I give meaning to language itself.

The very mythical origins and foundations of American language come from the black community,

because they're the ones who have been outside the law. And the Black Panthers started it.

The Black Panthers were an American

avant-garde movement.

And people said, well,

they were only for black people, not

all Americans. Listen.

Listen, let me tell you something.

All right.

American black people, they're the only ones

whose ships were burned when they came here.

The ships are burned.

They came here as slaves, and they were molded and created by this land and nothing else and

Malcolm X

he is the one who discovered

American Islam

by the way

so and no more of this division and saying, oh, this is black people and white, this is it, you have nothing in common with the European white person.

If you're an American white person, you have nothing in common with European whites.

You're American, you're Tartarian, or you're something else.

Not from here.

I've come from far away.

My lineage is from far away, but you had to hear it from me.

See you guys tomorrow.