How Infrared Helped Destroy Breadtube

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

all your eyes on me

[Music]

my

[Music]

ah

[Music]

[Applause]

look into my eyes tell me no more lies

you like what you see

do not stare at me

please cause it's my own life once i had

fun but now i want to run

i can dance with all your eyes or your

eyes on me you can dance with all your

eyes or your eyes on me

[Music]

me

[Music]

[Music]

do

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

strange that this feeling grows

[Music]

cause

[Music]

engineers

[Music]

is

[Music]

[Music]

is

foreign

[Music]

what's up

[Music]

in a woman's heart

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

all your eyes on me

[Music]

do

[Music]

i think we should make them remember

i think we should make them remember

when i first came here

when i first came here

he said bread to this bread too bad

we're here to destroy bread too

where is breath too bad

where are they at now

[Music]

i walk through bread too

i conquered bread tube i destroyed red

tube and i crushed it in my grit

[Music]

infrared has conquered

red tube officially

they're all dead streamers they're done

they have no future they're not growing

they're not in the spotlight anymore

they're turning into outright as off

nazis

dead in the goddamn water there's no

such thing as bread tube anymore

[Music]

[Music]

is

we never took credit for conquering them

well we did

we're facing new enemies like that

fucking paul moron dumbass these fake

tankies and the gonzalo whites and other

fake mls but guess what bret tube is

done all that remains

is hakim

hakeem

hakeem

i want to be clear about something

red tube is dead i crushed bread tube i

almost single-handedly destroyed bread

tube now you may want to ask me you want

to say haas how did you destroy bread

too how did you do it i came onto the

scene and i proved the impossible i

proved

that it's possible to be like this and

be

an actual communist with a capital c so

all that shit they were hijacking from

us all that marxism they were pretending

to represent all that communism and shit

they were pretending to represent

i put them in their place and i showed

them hey i'm a real marxist i know what

the fuck i'm talking about and i'm angry

and aggressive about it so they all

bitched out and backed down and we don't

hear anything from them anymore

you want to know what an example of this

is guys you know that fat fuck pig pogan

you know that guy pogen

hogan

is turning into like an ml now pogen

released a fucking video just recently

where he was like actually

pat socks aren't

mls and that and he's kind of turning

based he was like stalin purged his army

in 1941 and it was because it was

infiltrated by nazis which was true and

i'm like jesus is pogen turning based

he's like actually recognizing the truth

about the stalinist purges now because

they were infiltrated by nazis but he

was trying to use that as an example of

like how we're infiltrating communism

and we're actually nazis so whatever

he's a dumbass point about us but it's

gotten him to the point where even pogen

is defending stalin now

and i consider that an achievement i

consider that a w which i'm gonna

fucking take credit for i'm gonna take

credit for that w

i mean yeah you can go ahead and attack

us but if we start making stalin

mainstream i'm cool with that keep

attacking us bitch i don't give a fuck i

care i care more about stalin than i

care about haas if haze's image has to

fall so stalin's image can rise back up

i'll gladly take that sacrifice i don't

give a fuck

stalin's purges were because of

infiltration from fucking nazis yes that

is a historical fact

it's time to clear the record

and nobody talks about i'm gonna have

grover fur on soon i actually checked

through my emails today because i was

like i should email grover fur i wonder

if i've

and i was like wait a second

i think i did

there's hair in my fucking throat

it was a big long ass strand of hair in

my fucking throat so anyway um

no i was thinking that uh pogan

we're gonna react to his video but i was

thinking um no i was talking about the

email i was thinking i wanna email

grover fur and have him on but then i

realized

um

you know what i have actually

talked to

i've actually emailed

grover ferg before

um

or he emailed me and i was like i think

i'm pretty sure so i went into my email

and i searched rover fur lo and behold

you i am not shitting you you will not

believe this rover fur reached out to me

last august and i did respond and it was

like august 25th and i think the reason

i didn't um and uh he was like yeah i'd

love to come on let's schedule something

david lame here thank you for the time

as i mumble about how capitalist realism

has defeated me in bread tube

yeah so he he he was like yeah schedule

something like yeah i'll get back to you

when i schedule something or whatever

and he was like yeah get back to me and

i didn't respond and it was like august

25th

and i think the reason i didn't and i

got swamped was because i specifically

or august late august is when i started

taking off started going on those

royales all i was i forgot about

everything i like oh my god there was so

much shit i forgot about so i'm gonna

actually respond to the email today or

tomorrow

and i'm gonna see if um

i'm gonna see if i can actually have him

on and he'll i'll see if he can forgive

me for kind of ghosting him on accident

holy fuck tereshi

the khan will rise against all odds son

gorilla son thank you

appreciate you man yeah i'm gonna get

back to um

mr fur and i want to tell you guys about

grover fur because he is sincerely an

underrated historian so grover fur is

this extremely maligned um historian who

is he's not overly he's not ideological

he's completely unbiased he presents a

detailed

um analysis of first primary sources and

facts

um to clear stalin's name because you

know all these people make shit up about

stalin timothy snyder and who's that

fucking simon c bet simon teabag ball

sack

monta pussy whatever the fuck that

montefer stalin and the court of the

reds are stalling eight thousands of

babies nah robert first said you know

what bitch

grover he went you know what bitch i'm

going to the archives i'm going to the

primary sources we're going to get down

to business and we're going to see if

you're lying and what was the verdict

that fur came to they were lying

they were all liars

totkin isn't horrible when it comes to

this but by far the best historian

about the history of the soviet union

under stalin is grover and he's super

underrated and i am going to use my

platform to promote grover fur and his

books

in the best way that i can because

i am seriously sickened by the way they

try to lie about stalin right

yeah lusudra was good too but grover

first see he he's using the empirical

method

he actually proves that that

based on even a basic anglo-saxon

scientific method these people are a

bunch of fucking liars

okay le sudro was cool but i think he

was coming more from like a a narrative

perspective more moral perspective give

me a second give me a second

um

you know there's another thing too this

is a little spicy this is a little spicy

i want

i want someone to study

the history of cambodia i want someone

to study what happened under the camera

rouge

because what can we trust what can we

live what can we really trust right i

want someone to just

study it you know i want there to be

someone who can study it in the same way

that the revisionist school of soviet

history studied the soviet union because

i don't you know i'm gonna be honest

with you guys i don't think

we know a lot about what happened with

the kimber rouge i know you guys like to

meme and shit

but i don't think it's very clear i

don't think it's very clear at all hogan

debated vosh on his pro-nato position

but it was long and really circular

thank you max

i don't think it's very clear the

kimroos were backed by the us not true

that's bullshit

it is not clear at all and i'm not

jumping to a conclusion i'm just saying

it should be studied it should genuinely

be studied i think it's pretty clear

there was a lot of horrors and excesses

that happened but to what extent did

they happen

i mean look guys i've looked into it

i've looked into it

i've looked into what happened in

cambodia and

did you know the us bombed cambodia more

than like any country ever on earth do

you know how many people the u.s killed

in cambodia that were later attributed

to the camera rouge

i don't know

i wonder

really makes you wonder

really makes you wonder but the us

i mean oh my god they really really

bombed the shit out of cambodia like

really badly right i just wanted to say

you are cringe and a fucking liar

you're flip-flopping from native ripes

then just go back

who's this dipshit who's this fucking

dipshit in my chat that's bitching and

whining

did someone ban him i can't see his

fucking comment

i can't see his comment

i can't see his comment okay his

comments gone i can't see it

somebody give me that comment i'm gonna

go look on the um

the live chat

i just wanted to say that

can you guys can you guys um find me

what that comment was

i just wanted to say that you were

cringed did did someone time him out or

something what the fuck happened a

comment's gone

just want to say you are cringing a

fucking lie you're flip-flopping from

native rights and then anti-colonial

angloidism and then go back to it is a

great example of peak tanky smokescreens

what the fuck are you talking about what

the fuck are you talking about my

position has not changed on anything

my position hasn't changed though i did

notice some weird activity

there has to there's been like some

weird um shit and i'm not a drama

streamer but i'm gonna give some

attention to the drama

and because you know this is just like a

little weird to me

so let me go ahead and do this so

ewoks

is trying to like pander to the paul

morin people now i guess i don't know

but i was sent some weird shit and this

is what i saw right

so i saw some shit

um

and

it was like yeah he's like land back is

conflated by some pat socks with utopian

and maximalist approaches mainly pushed

by walt ultralicious or neoliberal

co-opting but there is a real movement

for indigenous sovereignty that is a key

piece in undermining the anglo-american

empire

okay so far i don't really find that

that objectionable i don't really deny

that there's a real movement for

indigenous sovereignty

i don't really think i deny that i just

reject the astro turfed amazon funded

slogan land back which is a scheme to

privatize public land

so so far

um

so far i don't really find that that

objectionable right except and this is

where i was like okay why the fuck

can you talk about the k-10 forest

incident

[Laughter]

oh the the captain forest incident

that's one

that's an interesting way of uh looking

at it i don't know what i'm allowed to

say on youtube but there's like two

responses i have to the caten thing

right on the one hand

if the soviets did it

i can't even say it right

what it doesn't i mean but first of all

can you please check the bullets that

were found at the at the site of the

cathedine

events

can you check what guns

and which country manufactures the guns

that those bullets fit in

but but moreover i mean the evidence is

overwhelming about who committed that

massacre just read grover fur right

but what specifically interests me is

that even if it was committed by the

soviets

even if it was

the cathedine victims

to the extent of my knowledge were

overwhelmingly

the

ruling class the officers the like state

apparatus

leaders and the elites and the

bureaucrats and you know the the kind of

military whatever so

i'm not saying anything all death is

tragic anyway um i don't know how we got

side railed

into that

yeah like aristocrats and shit like that

i don't know how he got sidetracked into

that but um

so this paragraph isn't particular i

don't really agree i don't like this

label land back but whatever there's a

real move for into sovereignty okay sure

but then what the fuck is this

settlers the mythology of the white

streamers

wait what this is jackson this is like

one of my biggest allies

if not my biggest ally this is an attack

on jackson is an attack on me

right so what the fuck is this shit why

is he attacking jackson

huh it's almost like he's trying to

signal to a certain crowd what the fuck

did jackson do

to deserve this i mean maybe you wanted

to use my face but you couldn't because

i'm not exactly white but

this is such opportunistic fucking

bullshit

right the mythology of the white

streamers

okay you know what i'm gonna go ahead

and say it

i make fun of white people all the time

i do it all the time but it's never from

a place of malice it's always like in a

joking way and shit

and you know it always you know i i um

i do that and the reason i make fun of

white people a lot

sometimes is just because it's like

uh

it's always it's never really a critique

of a race it's more like a critique of

what i perceive to be a cultural crisis

right we all we all know that in the

west there's like a unique

rampant liberalism

that reflects in all sorts of ways lack

of family ties lack of upbringing and

stuff like that and like i guess that's

oftentimes that shit is associated with

white so i make fun of it all the time

right but it's never from a place of

malice it's not from a place of malice

right because at the end of the day

i don't hate white people

um

at the end of the day and then this is

what i want to say though is that

you know you can keep posturing like

this like a fucking dumbass

the majority of people in canada and the

united states

drum roll please drum roll please are

white it's the majority of people that

fucking live here

and it's especially the majority of

people that live in fucking canada ewoks

so what is this like anti-white

posturing even supposed to fucking mean

that's the majority of people that live

there what are you trying to accomplish

with this shit like what kind of

posturing is this shit

what kind of fucking posturing is this

the mythology of white streamers you

know what this is i'm gonna call this

bullshit out

this posturing where you're like

critiquing white streamers or whatever

that's not done from a place of like

non-white sovereignty that's done from a

place of some minorities

who

um

rely on white sugar daddy liberals

which they that which are used by those

sugar daddy liberals to like

shit on the working class that's just

the fucking truth you know

that's just the damn truth

it's always like it's always like the

mythology of the whites it's just like

when people are like can the cis males

please stop can the cis people clea that

doesn't come from a place of seriously

believing you're going to like

somehow overthrow the dominance of cis

people that doesn't come from a place of

seriously thinking you're going to

actually eliminate males

men you only make those statements and

um posture in that way from a

perspective of taking their power for

granted right

and that's that's why both the kind of

writers and

the leftists are both wrong on this

right

a lot of right-wing people are like

oh

leftists hate white people it's an

anti-white

war against white people no you guys

don't get it it's not it's not a a war

against white people because they don't

pose any serious challenge to white

people their their leaders are still

white they're still old white

wall street whatever old dudes so

they're not posing a challenge to white

people they're taking for granted the

subordination of you know um

whether indigenous or black or brown

they're taking for granted the place the

power of white people basically and

they're like okay we can make fun of you

because you're in power

and that's why they do it right that's

why

you don't see this type of bullshit

among

you know non-white people who are

serious about sovereignty they don't

spend time giving a fuck about hating

white people or whatever virtue

signaling against white people you know

that's the truth

and it's not against white people it's

against the working class by the way

it's it's because the majority of the

working class is white in america and

canada so when they're talking about

white streamers or whatever it's a way

for them to sneakily you know express

their class elitism because you notice

the white elites have no problem with

shitting on white people you go to the

met gala let's say if you go to the met

gala and just start like i hate white

people white people there's white people

that they're all gonna like oh so true i

agree with you

they're all gonna fucking amber heard is

gonna be there you're right i agree with

you

fucking who else is at the met gala

i don't even know who's there but

they're all gonna like it's gonna snuck

like

i'm woke too

so it's like the elite white people who

are awoke are like i make fun of white

people as well i'm woke and elite and

it's just a fucking form of class

warfare against the working class it's

the biggest con game there is right

and i find it pretty disappointing that

this dude is kind of

taking this direction it seems like it's

like why

what

where's this even coming from like when

when when have we said anything new

about this topic i've we've always

maintained the same position

we're not against indigenous sovereignty

if it's a serious thing we're against

fucking sloganeering

i'm against the slogan land back because

it's just an empty phrase and it's an

empty slogan

so that's why i'm against it right but

then you got these people are like

he also made a video against you

supporting samira

let's check it out

hey everybody's

this is super cringe i guess he was like

i wasn't really growing being allied to

these people so let me reach out to paul

moron and hakeem and see if um

yeah

let's see if this is better

three two one and we are recording

everybody all right so i'm gonna do a

quick video here

uh just you know referring back to mao's

piece on combat liberalism because haas

from infrared did a trash stream last

night it was not good um basically this

is so weird because he like dm'd me

this is the same dude who did let me

show you what he dm he was like

what did he fucking say he was like um

he's like glad to see you setting the

record straight on discourse into

reifying how latin americans have

proclaimed christianity bringing he

didn't he didn't like say anything bad

in dms you know

basically samira khan his um associates

i'll leave it at that retweeted this pro

what the fuck is that supposed to mean

what a weird thing to say

um

what a cringy thing to say dude you're

literally like what is this

thank you appreciate you brad will win

appreciate you gleb

british

anti-prc pygmy who is disparaging

mesoamerican

an anti-poc pick me what a stupid

fucking thing to say

pre-compact civilization

prior to the spaniards and the

portuguese and a lot of people know what

i'm referring to

yes i'll just put on screen the screen

cap of the original ian miles i love how

like unapologetically um

i love how how much of an opportunist

this guy is it's he didn't even find

what the he he posted the screenshot

that got 5000 likes and he's like the

only reason it became an event is

because it got 5 000 likes like i said

if this had two likes this ewoks dude

wouldn't even like you wouldn't have

even cared about it he's like you know

what this got 5000 likes clearly this is

worth

um smearing someone over

tom tweet which is showing the aztec

human sacrifice which is was a part of

aztec culture that happened uh

sporadically here or there but it's it's

incomparable to the apocalypse of the

colonialism brought on by the spaniards

right the the genocide indigenous people

wow he's like going into a really long

tangent

from a retweet you know not every

retweet is even an endorsement sometimes

a retweet is just like a form of

curiously being like huh interesting

or like huh i wonder what my followers

would think of this or what what would

they make of it like

unless someone's saying something in

their own words like you sound like a

dumb fuck

trying to respond to this like she she

didn't write a book denigrating the

aztecs she just retweeted some shit

which i don't see why it's a big deal or

retweet some fucking bullshit picture or

whatever

and of course the subsequent i don't

know i don't know how sensitive people

are i don't know how sensitive people

fucking are where it's like

jesus fucking christ

like y'all can make fun of uh middle

eastern people too

it's not like i'm gonna fucking get

uh

pissed off

like okay yeah go go and post a picture

like

um

carthage before the roman showed up and

show the carthaginians sacrificing

babies which just might be their

phoenicians right and then say before

the romans showed up and showed them

like eating babies you think i'm going

to get mad or something like i don't

it's just fucking stupid

and then the racialized caste system

that was enforced in that america

extreme exploitations of the peoples of

this continent a legacy that echoes into

this day

uh and yeah this this and i i would say

i would be like fine

um

i would understand you know they're like

what has what if we like

apologized for french or european

colonialism in the middle east and i'd

be like yeah that would be fucked up

except

um

you guys can correct me if i'm wrong i'm

pretty sure latin american culture is

mestizo which means mixed

which means

there was a form of syncreticism that

happened

rather than just one people dominating

another people there was a syncreticism

that happened

where

the former aztecs appropriated aspects

of the spanish and portuguese culture

so it wasn't like when the europeans

came to the middle east or africa where

they just you know it wasn't it where

they were just like it's

pure gunpoint the whole time you know

so i it's not like we had a syncreticism

with like you know

the europeans like that so i don't

really know what the fuck

i mean i i i do agree the aztecs are

unfairly

i agree they're not um

giving enough credit about i don't know

why i'm talking about this shit honestly

i don't know why i'm talking about this

shit it's so stupid it's literally so

fucking like i got in trouble for saying

the aztecs were socialist i got in

trouble for saying that the fuck am i

trying to apologize for it's so fucking

stupid

magic about oh they were savage hearts

uh sacrificers before

where did she say that spaniards came

with the okay where did she say that

logic used to justify okay where did she

say that colonization hey where did she

say that bicep european power okay where

did she say that first right so anybody

associated with an answer okay where did

she say that time perilous inherently

hey dude where did she say that can you

please tell me where she said any of

that that colonial movement i should not

be retweeting oh where did she say that

this type of oh she shouldn't be

retweeting gotcha behavior uh even if it

wasn't the original quote now i

understand people can accidentally

retweet all right let me look at ewoks's

twitter and just see if there's

shit that i condemn that he shouldn't be

retweeting so let's just go to his

twitter because you know what we're

gonna just start policing everything we

retweet now

we're just gonna like start policing

retweets and shit so let's just see

let's just start policing every retweet

um

the fuck

this is apologizing for australian

imperialism i can't believe you

retweeted this so ewoks by retweeting

this you're apologizing for australia's

involvement in the vietnam war

right does is that included in anzac day

or no

anzac day

um

only the is it only the first world war

well that's the imperialist war

no i i think you i think it was also

yeah it also is uh

it also is

served and died in all wars conflicts

and peacekeeping operations wait a

minute

ewoks is apologizing for australia's

involvement in the vietnam war because

that's covered by anzac day so that's

what ewoks is doing so ewoks i wanna i'm

gonna do a stream explaining why ewoks

um is defending um

and imperialism against vietnam because

as as someone who's one percent

vietnamese i'm really offended by it so

personally like you know vietnam

suffered great he's basically trying to

apologize for australia's intervention

into vietnam and i'm gonna write a whole

essay extrapolating ewok's reasons for

retweeting this even though he didn't

say any of it but he did retweet it so

i'm just gonna assume

that um

you know he he's apologizing for the

vietnam war and yeah i'm gonna tell luna

oya because this is really bad this is

um really racist and really bad this is

super cancelable

you ask me this is just super bad

okay

anything else

i don't know what the fuck happened like

what did i fucking do what did me or

jackson do to deserve this bullshit you

know this is just such weakness

this is such fucking weakness

super pathetic

um

yeah

super pathetic and super weak

but this is pogan's video

for anyone

so this is where pogan's gonna like

defend stalin and shit let's check it

out hey everyone

pogen here again i figured i would take

a different route with this video and

try something a little less formal and

you're reaching

dude are you stupid i'm reaching

i'm fucking reaching that's the point

that's literally the fucking point

that's literally the fucking point

dumbass

the point is to illustrate how he was

reaching you dumbass what are you

fucking talking about

hopefully a little more fun

we like to have fun here right you

thought wrong just kidding it's a red

fascism video i'm sure that by now

you've heard content creators across

leftist you terribly indistinct from

that of a realities

or just generally being awful

the two biggest examples of this that

often come up are has from the infrared

collective and jackson hinkle but there

are others who fall into this category

how is why does jackson get black he

doesn't even do anything wrong

jackson's only crime is literally being

a um

his only crime is being like white and

also uh

like a high-level white male

like in terms of his appearance taking

care of himself

like that's his that's his crime so the

only people who are accepted but if okay

if you are an ugly white guy you're fine

if you are a um

lgbt white dude you're fine if you're

like trans white you're fine if if

you're a white woman and you're like

super feminist you're fine but jackson

is literally an unapologetic

white man

and that's why he gets flack for this

shit it's the only reason there's i'm

actually the bad guy

who um

uh

hold on

how

jackson wants to raid us we're going to

get a fat raid apparently

but um

you haven't redirect privileges

oh community settings okay i'm gonna go

into my community settings

um and then redirect privileges for the

dive with jackson hinkle okay youtube

studio

community

settings

community

who can redirect to my channel the dive

with jackson

uh change you can redirect you learn how

to change

okay

they call us red brown and then turn

around and apologize for azov

thank you over yeah exactly the dive

with

who can redirect to my channel

uh

oh paste the channel url okay got it

that's what i have to do

so the dive with jackson

then

grab that

put that here

there we go perfect save

all right he's going to rate us we're

going to get a fat raid apparently okay

let's just

we should we should actually introduce

ourselves to this audience because this

is going to be a big ass raid from

jackson like really big right

super big raid

um

yeah

but anyway um what we're really talking

about here was this accusation of a red

brown alliance

is i will admit there is something very

very different about

infrared specifically compared to

everyone else

which i can see why people like okay

they're clearly not like other mls

they're not like anyone else they're

completely different in every kind of

fucking way

yeah jackson's fucking he's like bigger

than destiny now he's fucking huge i

don't even know why he still talks to me

you know

um but um

the uh

yeah the real thing we're talking about

with the so-called red brown alliance is

basically cultural you guys let me tell

you the secret of why has is so fucking

um

do you want to know why i'm so different

from other leftists no genuinely want to

know why is it because i'm secretly

inaudible is this your no i'm just more

mature than most of you i've been in

this for most of i've been in this

longer than most of you i've thought

about these things more intensely

listen it's kind of like you know how

the the dad and the family is going to

be more like

stepping outside the bounds and being

like toxic and shit that's why i'm like

the patriarch of leftism i'm the

patriarch of the left okay

and i'm saying that shit

you're based jackson's a frat boy

following money bruh

an attack against

jackson is attack against me

period

period you can't attack jackson without

attacking me

but uh

what i'm trying to say is that

i spent a really long time trying to

defend leftism i was a leftist actually

this is what i want to talk about when

it comes to bread food a lot of people

you don't know my past i'm older than

bread too i mean my idea i was an

ideological fanatic i was ideological

fanatical about leftism i was super

super you guys want to know how fucking

feminist i was

you don't know who i was guys you don't

know who the fuck i was i was a

fanatical feminist to the point

where

i denied any

essential difference between man and

woman i used to think

men and women are completely the same

the physical um differences are festive

vestige from the animal kingdom and

otherwise men and women are completely

the same

i was super super super awoke i mean no

i wasn't just woke you want to know what

it came from though it was um

it wasn't

left it wasn't bread tube it wasn't like

woke leftism or anything

it was adorno and critical theory right

so i was i was following the frankfurt

school

so my idea was genuinely that

there are no fundamental differences

um

the cartesian cogito is the privileged

site

of subjectivity

it's just the complete negation posed by

human subjectivity that defines us

everything else is incidental

um part of the animal kingdom and i was

but the reason i wasn't soy i was never

soy i was never soy it was just that i

was so extreme about it

it was almost like it turned into giga

chat because i was so fucking extreme

about it

because um

i believed in the destruction of

everything

i believed in all encompassing complete

destruction of the world and everything

i believed in complete destruction and

the ascension of humanity into a kind of

ethereal angelic subjectivity of

just

about no even worse like

and

i wasn't always a marxist leninist

either i used to have the view that

um the problem with marxism leninism to

me was that it was too um

i really sympathized with bordeaux

bordega or whatever i was like stalin

wasn't authoritarian enough he wasn't

extreme enough

i hated trotsky too but i was like super

i'm really i'm really um disappointing

you guys aren't i right because you

always want to think that i was always

this like i've always had the views that

i have and i haven't there was a time i

was an extreme extreme leftist

like very much

to the point of insanity to the point of

like mental

um illness right

but i was so principled about it

i was so principled about it i was never

sowing i was never soy because i was

principled

and i took it to its furthest horrifying

conclusion

i took it to like its most horrifying

conclusion possible

and

um

so when people want to ask coz why do

you come from the perspective you are

why is it so easy for you to like

you know signal toward the right i guess

and just you don't really care about the

slogans or labels and you always like

um joke about trump and you always joke

about shit and you don't take the

leftism seriously like a sacred cow

well the reason is because

um i literally took leftism to its

furthest most extreme possible

conclusion holy shit jackson with that

raid with that fat

raid

welcome

raiders and thank you jackson for the

raid hi jackson viewers i am

the future

leech

of jackson's channel i'm just kidding

but um

i uh

i'm haz from infrared i don't know if

you all have heard from me i don't know

if you all know me

um

i came from twitch and i got banned for

being pro russia

and um

i was covering the the conflict in a

similar way jackson was on youtube so

they banned me from twitch

and you know here i am i'm on youtube

now not really covering the russia stuff

uh beyond

bigger types of news

um

thank you so much coding jesus i'm not

really covering the russian stuff beyond

like the bigger news just because uh

you know that

it's not particularly interesting to me

thank you quoting jesus appreciate it

but if you guys want to know what what

this channel is about what i'm about i'm

a marxist leninist this channel is going

to be more ideologically oriented it's

more kind of we have more theory

oriented we have more of the ideology

kind of stuff we have it's more kind of

focused on a more broad view about

history and events and shit we don't

really focus on

um

we don't really focus on details all

that much

right but welcome guys thank you so much

you know jackson is

my biggest ally my as a streamer you

know

so um appreciate you appreciate the raid

and welcome guys

so yeah uh we're marxist we call

ourselves marxism leninism at the age of

multi-polarity in the postcode world we

try to kind of um

give a

broader type of insight

uh when it comes to understanding the

history of marxism leninism when it

comes to understanding the history of

communism so it's more kind of like the

ideological side of things

and

the the highlight of our channel is

going to be our infrared vision videos

because we are a collective infrared is

a collective

uh of about like 11 people and we

produce these videos that you know kind

of give these

they're based on broad topics about the

present about history about socialism

whatever so if you go and look at our uh

infrared vision videos you're going to

find

you know what the the main thrust of

what the channel is about

um also

we've got

a uh

another thing i do as a live stream is i

debate i'm a debater i debate a lot of

people oh wait you know what you guys

know who i am

you guys know who i am because you saw

me debate destiny

you saw me debate destiny right um yeah

i was i i was partnered up with jackson

to debate destiny

and yeah

so

yeah we basically have fun here we chill

it's a more chill vibe it's more late

night chill type of vibe you know i

don't really cover news all that

intently i don't really have a lot of

news to be covering tonight but i talk

about things like bread tube you know um

the fake synthetic leftist and that's

really what i was talking about

uh today

but

um

are you the guy who was in

drugs discord server nope i don't know

what the fuck that is i don't

i don't know what drugs i swear yeah

okay back to my origin story i'll get

back to that so anyway um

i used to be a very extreme lefty and

yes i was like

it was super super extreme right super

um

and it was based on the frankfurt school

i was a student of the frankfurt school

i liked adorno a lot

um was a big fan of adorno

and adorno if you don't know who adorno

is theodore adorno was one of the main

theorists of a school of

german

boring german um

uh

party poopers called the frankfurt

school

and it's also broadly termed and called

critical theory it's the school of

critical theory

and more or less they um

they

uh

they're basically these kind of what

should i call them except

grumpy kantians it's the school of

grumpy kantianism

where

they basically kind of have this view

that

the

project of the enlightenment right

beginning or even the modern age

beginning with descartes and cartesian

subjectivity

has somehow gone wrong

right through history and specifically

the experience of world war ii and the

holocaust has proven

that it had um

it had gone wrong somehow right

so

they wanted to preserve what they

considered the rational kernel of the

enlightenment while being able to with

withstand and weather this kind of

nightmare

that you know enlightenment rationality

was being posed in the form of adorno

was super anti-protester he called the

new left activist fascist slow

thank you max

uh adorno i'll get to that stuff right

but basically they had a view that

it was basically like um

it was it's basically the worst thing

ever

more or less like so much of my critique

of leftism comes from the fact that i

understand

the frankfurt school so well because i

was a disciple of the frankfurt school

right

and i understand

how you get from the frankfurt school to

vosh i know the direct line from

frankfurt school to wash right

and

frankfurt school has a specific view

where they privilege abstraction and

they privilege um cartesian subjectivity

and they privilege kind of um

uh enlightenment universalism

well with all the criticisms now

withstanding it's it's a type of

criticism that's in the spirit of

preserving those things

and

you know uh adorno

uh

adorno specifically um

his notion of negative dialectics

it's a pretty terrifying thing right so

with hegel with hegel's dialectic um

system

hegel kind of has you you begin with um

you know people like thesis antithesis

synthesis is basically how people

simplify it but with hegel's um

dialectic system you basically it

basically follows this like tri-part

structure of like you know you have um

an original whole host

um

sorry an original uh being

an original uh

unity of being right and then you have a

negation negativity the negation right

of being

so you have being the negation of being

and then you have the negation of the

negation

which reconciles

that negation into a new form of being a

new form of positive being right

that's my interpretation at least

well adorno was such a grumpy asshole

that he said what if hegel got it wrong

and that

the conclusion of the dialectic ends in

the negation

so what if the negation can be

privileged as the privileged um site

of

of of an ontology right

um so

code jeff alexander kojev reinterpreted

hagel in his own way right through

heidegger

adorno

reinterpreted hegel through

lucox and through the neocontin school

so kant if you don't know this it's hard

to introduce all these things to you if

you don't know this kant is known as

like the philosopher of negation within

the hegelian scheme because kant

arrives at this point of uh um

universal complete negation of all

reality in the world that leads us into

this point of like total skepticism

where we can't know anything except

the fact that we know nothing right we

can't know it it's agnosticism the only

thing we can be certain of is that we

that we're not certain of anything right

we can only have certainty in um

the the uh

tren the absolute object of the

transcendental subjectivity

we can't actually know anything in

particular anything positively in

particular so kant represents this total

complete

negation right if you don't know this

okay let me explain to you german

idealism so before kant

we have a more wholesome

experience of reality supposedly

according to philosophy where

maybe with empiricism we can actually

know things through the world we can i

can know that this shit is because i'm

sensing it somehow or whatever and then

in rationalism

um knowledge comes from reason alone and

i can just purely how do i know that

this exists well i can just

justify it through some kind of circular

reasoning or whatever

so kant comes in and says actually

you can't really be certain about

anything at all

that you don't know that there's a

connection

actually between

your

um

what's in here right this kind of

sphere of cogito and knowledge and the

outside world

you can't even know that how do i know

that this thing actually exists in the

real world objectively how do i know

it's not just a product of the

transcendental structure of the world

created by my mind right so kant kind of

creates this like skepticism of like

okay what is

real and what is not real you can't no

you can only know that the real thing

is transcendental subjectivity um

so you can sorry you can only know that

the real thing is the transcendental

object right you can only know the real

thing the only thing you can be certain

is the like things like the synthetic a

priori right and um

us the most based on informed modern

communist us for cpus is supreme leader

2036. thank you fred hell appreciate you

um you can only know for example that

you don't know like the um

a priori structures of space and time

through your intuitions you can only

know the categories of the understanding

i think there's like 12 categories of

the understanding whatever right okay

there you go that's kant negation right

then with hegel

hegel comes along and critiques con for

this and says

um you end at the negation well there's

a reconciliation of this problem and

dilemma this antinomy

that you've um you've confronted us with

the challenge of trying to overcome

somehow right

so adorno the asshole comes in

responding to um

hegel

and basically says okay we are faced

with this fundamental ontological

question whether we want to admit it or

not

i am of the view that heidegger's

ontological revolution applies

beyond heidegger himself lucox was

dealing with trying to deal with the

same thing whatever right and from that

perspective from that lucoxian

perspective

kant remains the privileged

thinker

of a um

of a of a uh

thank you stuart

was cesar right about hegel and fallout

new vegas

no

no i don't think so

um thank you rare wolf appreciate you

so more or less just trying to explain

this to you guys bear with me right more

or less

um

so

lucox the thinker he was a marxist

thinker lucox lucas was a philosopher

okay they were looking at the tens or

the twenties and he's like okay we have

this bolster of revolution happening and

we have this issue of philosophy how do

we reconcile philosophy with marxism

right let's return let's actually

interrogate

what the philosophical

meaning of marxism is based on the

experience of social democracy which was

so okay basically

marx

comes out he has this communist

manifesto whatever and he says

there's going to be a

revolution

um

both

politically and economically which leads

to the transformation from capitalism to

socialism and marx has this new

epistemology of

material historical materialism which is

basically understanding society

um

uh

in a way that includes

or at least gives some kind of primacy

to the material relations of production

the various classes that constitute

society yada yada right well in german

social democracy sorry in social

democracy in general you had this unity

between marxist theory

and a workers movement so you have these

people who've discovered this by marx

predicting that this shit was going to

happen while at the same time actively

building this movement realizing what

was going to happen so lucox comes as a

philosopher and he goes okay

there's kind of this paradox which other

people have brought up before which is

like okay are you making a prediction

about um what's going to happen

um

in terms of like marx makes all these

predictions about the future and the

proletariat what is the relationship

between knowledge and practice what is

the relationship between our knowledge

of the world

and the object of the knowledge right

um

is anyone following me here

what is the relationship between our

knowledge of the world

and

the object of that now so if i'm sitting

here as a theorist and i'm saying the

proletariat is a revolutionary class and

this revolution is going to happen how

can i justify participating

in that very process actively why would

i try and make something happen that i

already know is inevitable

so social democracy was a workers

movement that united all of these

intellectuals who had this scientific

insight into having a class analysis and

the future while at the same time

participating in the very thing okay

so you've got that down okay good

so lucox

comes along and says oh this opens some

kind of philosophical problem

and i want to justify

from a philosophical perspective how

this is

possible and

for lucox

he basically arrives at the conclusion

that

in order for this to be possible

kant's fundamental gesture of criticism

has to be privileged

onto logically

as these the um

as basically like the truth of being

itself

so cons

gesture of introducing a split in the

world which is between a world of things

that are in themselves as they actually

are and the world of appearances which

is the world of of things as they appear

to us

so kant introduces a split in the world

that i told you about where you can't

know anything about the real world

what is this in itself

so i'm looking at this shit

and my mind is constructing reality in

such a way that it's going to appear to

me in the form of this

uh thing right here and what do i call

this uh

this fucking

what is this called again it's it's a

what is it called it's a fucking um

carton yeah a carton

a carton that's what it's called

carton yeah carton

okay so what is this thing in itself

without the way in which my mind

actively is shaping the world in order

for this to appear to me as a carton

right

so kant introduces that split there's a

world of things in themselves and then

there's the world of things um

for the subject right

um

it's not for itself sorry for the

subject for us for itself and for us so

for me it appears this way in itself

what does it appear as well that's the

split that kant introduced so lucas

comes

trying to philosophically make sense of

and rigorously justify

the experience of social democracy and

he says i know how to make sense of the

the paradox in question of you know

what is

this inevitable proletarian revolution

that's going to happen

which nonetheless requires this like

movement of conscious party

intellectuals to actively be involved in

it and to realize the very thing

that

they have already decided was going to

be inevitable right so lucas comes and

he basically says

this is how you make sense of it this is

how you can understand it

now

the proletariat in itself

in itself

and the proletariat for our knowledge

right

is actually unified through the this um

party movement

so social democracy was famous for the

saying social democracy is the um unity

between um

something like theory and marxism and

the party movement

greg sorry um

it's the unity of marxism and the

workers movement something like that or

the unity of the party in the workers

movement someone tell me what what exact

i forgot exactly what what the quote was

right

um

and lucox

interprets that in the same sense of um

kant's

uh

what is it called again kant's

transcendental unity the unity of

unity of what is it called app

perception

fuck

at perception yeah

at perception

the unity of a perception yeah the unity

of app perception

same thing okay

so for kant

there has to be some fundamental unity

between the world as it actually is

and the world as we experience it we

just can't know

this particular particularity

of that unity but that is a precondition

experience to be possible okay so in the

same way

um lucox says

basically applies the same thing

as far as reinterpreting marxism in the

spirit of the experience of social

democracy

lucox comes and says

that

the proletariat

is just the class in itself

in order to be a class for itself not

just in itself which is the object of a

philosopher it has to um

acquire consciousness of

itself so the consciousness of the

proletariat

and the proletariat in itself becomes

unified in the party movement

the that movement

which maintains the basic

um

structure

of transcendental criticism

sorry of transcendence

so it's the party movement that

maintains the kantian structure of

transcendence

which is between the world of things as

they actually are and as they appear for

us

and

so for for luke but but here's the thing

with lucox this is where

it gets problematic right because okay

that sounds very good um because what

lucox is basically trying to do is like

oh we're just critiquing the um

this kind of like bourgeois metaphysics

which is pretty critical and which just

sees a world of things in themselves and

it's our task as passive subjects to

discern the nature of the world in

itself right

and lucox is critiquing that

but

here's the problem

lucox um

has to deny

the possibility for

any real knowledge of the world of

things as they actually are in

themselves

to be possible in the same way that kant

does

and

why because for luke cox

sorry for lucox

the very fact that the proletariat

it's like a um

what is it called uh

what is that infinitely self-referential

loop called it's a specific

it's an infinitely self-referential loop

it's like a mathematical

what is it fucking called again

someone someone uh

what is it fucking called someone got

this

recursion yes recursion recursion it's

like an infinite kind of recursion

because

um recursion is what i was looking for

it's an infinite kind of recursion

because

the proletariat in itself the class in

itself

contains the very consciousness of

itself

it does not have any substantive

material reality it doesn't have any

substantive material being

it itself its being is um

is uh is um

is

not determined but is reflected by the

critical structure

itself

so it's like an infinite recursion the

proletariat

so class consciousness means

consciousness of the class

that is itself conscious of itself

consciousness of the class that is

itself conscious

of itself

ah

that kind of sounds familiar to those of

you familiar with german idealism

doesn't it

doesn't it

what else what does that remind you of

exactly consciousness of the class that

is itself conscious of itself

that's the quintessential

kantian knowledge

not

a human being that is conscious

it's the kantian self-consciousness

it's the self-consciousness

of kant

the recursive self-consciousness of kant

[Music]

so the task of criticism

isn't so much about discovering the real

features of the world

as much as it is acquiring

consciousness of the very

structure that enables the possibility

for

the world to open itself to us in the

way that it does and i know i'm saying

the word open itself to us

is very strange because it sounds

heideggerian but

um

infrared meet up at michigan speedway

for the nascar race in august the crowd

lives and breathes working class much

like infrared nation

thank you for the five but no

so

you so um

continuing off of what i said

lucox

basically

is re-fashioning

kant's critical philosophy

in such a way that it becomes

ontological it becomes something about

being itself he's not going to

acknowledge that because if he

acknowledges that

he's going to um

give credence it's actually heidegger

who is inspired by lucox by the way

but he's not going to acknowledge that

but it is about being it's an

ontologization of kant

which is why

not a lot of people notice but lucox

rejected angles for the exact same

reason and frederick engels was a

hegelian angles believed we could know

things

about nature

we could understand that in nature

itself

you can discern

like the same truth of class struggle is

also the same truth of nature for angles

for angles there's no strict division

between the world

of consciousness and the world of

whatever things in and of themselves in

in and of themselves he agrees with

hagel's specific way of overcoming that

distinction

so

ingalls has a book called dialectics of

nature where

he is basically describing nature

in a dialectical way in a way that's

consistent with

the whole of um

marxist philosophy sorry i don't call it

philosophy of uh

marx's materialism

now lucox takes issue with this because

for lucox

this is a form of what kant would call

metaphysical enthusiasm basically angles

is

being too greedy about

the extent of his ability to apply

knowledge and insight to nature because

nature is just a sphere that is totally

contingent we can't know anything about

it all we can know is the um critical

structure

uh

imposed by humanity upon the world we

can have self-consciousness

about the way in which we as human

beings distort the world we just can't

know anything about the world in and of

itself including the world of nature so

we're getting to this kind of extreme

point of

the thinking of the enlightenment

where with this ontologization of the

critical um

critical gesture

everything in the world that's

meaningful

from our humanity from our culture from

our history

uh our statehood our society whatever

you want to call it the entire world of

human being meaning has to reduce itself

to this kind of um

vacuum sealed

negative

um

vacuum sealed negation of the world and

of nature and of everything

right

so

meaning reduces itself to the point of

negation like this violent point at

which human beings kind of

um

uh

create their own world through the very

structure

of

um

human sociality and human discourse so

to skip everything that happened

afterwards

with adorno horkheimer and marcusa this

basically ends with habermans abramos is

like the successor to the frankfurt

school and our mosque basically comes to

the conclusion that language represents

this kind of abstract medium through

which human beings filter the world

and that

what he calls communicative reason which

is the ability to have discursive um

is this discursive rationality between

human subjects is the site of meaning

and reality and and even being if you

will

and that's all we can really rely on we

need he's basically like a fucking

liberal

habermas is basically like a democratic

liberal right he's basically like we

let's just basically i'm going to just

sum it up and be vulgar he's like okay

guys let's just sit down and talk about

it we can't really know things about

anything but we need the ability to sit

down and mediate and talk about things

okay let's talk about ecology and see

what we can do and do something about it

sit down in a circle and talk about

things he's got i'm surprised

bread tube doesn't reference habermas

because like if there's ever a thinker

who i think would represent like

democratic ownership of the means of

production like let's all have a workers

co-op and sit down and discuss

it's habermas he would be like the

quintessential um philosopher or thinker

for that right

um okay now back we're going back in

time a little bit to adorno and

horkheimer and marcusa

um the experience of world war ii places

all of this in a new con i'm also

skipping

walter benjamin

and the reason i'm skipping walter

benjamin is because he wasn't as bad as

those guys walter benjamin was kind of

interesting he was into the kabbalah and

he was into that kind of mystic

mysticism she's just i think he's he

deserves more than just this reductive

shit that i'm doing now

but adorno

and the rest of them

basically following from

adorno was introduced to marxism through

lucox right

and adorno maintains

um

this kind of critical term blue cox

makes this ontologization

of kantian criticism

[Music]

in a way that is not strictly applied to

the question of justifying marxism but

as it applies to culture and it applies

to

society so for example

uh adorno

everyone knows that adorno hated jazz

you guys want to know why adorno hated

jazz though i mean a lot of people don't

know why um

he actually did hate jazz well i'll tell

you why he hated jax adorno was butt

hurt about jazz because for him

jazz was a form

of um experiencing

uh sorry give me a second

jazz was a type of uh

hold on

so fucking weird

it's so fucking weird hold on give me a

sec give me a sec

okay here we go

yeah jazz was this

um

specific

type of popular music

and i'm actually kind of confused about

why adorno i think i do know why he

didn't also apply this to folk music i

actually do know why he didn't apply to

bulk music

for adorno

uh

there is a distinction between high

culture and the quiche

right and i could be wrong about this i

might be a little uh foggy about

explaining this so i'm open to being

stand corrected about

how i describe adorno's hatred of jazz

but it's a little more complicated than

you'd think

um

for dorner there's a basic distinction

between high culture and quiche right

so quiche

um basically is

this kind of uh

consumption of culture low culture low

tasteless culture right where you're

just kind of consuming it without

thinking about it it's more intuitive

whatever in it it does not impose upon

you the painful

structure

uh

the painful uh kind of like

transcendental structure

of

culture society and reality it doesn't

kind of

it doesn't it doesn't direct you into

being able to critically think about

the conditions of its own possibility

basically

so that's why he calls it fascist

not don't no not funko pops i'm not

talking i think about like rap and hip

hop or folk music or something like that

so for adorno that's quiche quiche is

basically shit that we're just dancing

along to we intuitively enjoy it but

adorno is a fucking party poop and he's

sitting there so adorno is literally the

guy at the party

in the corner when everyone's dancing

and he's being like

they don't know that they're actually

participating in false consciousness and

reified forms of like he's basically

they don't know that they're actually

completely blind to the um real

transcendental structures that are

actually defining them he's basically

like um so committed to the project of

the enlightenment that

for him we enlightenment also means

um critical reflection

he now he's not an enthusiast he's not

like a stephen pinker proponent of the

enlightenment where for him

enlightenment means we're just fully

conscious of everything adorno doesn't

want us to be fully conscious of

everything as much as he wants us to be

conscious about the fact that we can't

be conscious of everything he wants us

to be conscious of the basic

um

violence of criticism that defines

reality he just wants us to know that we

shouldn't be enjoying anything

we should we shouldn't be doing that

because we just need to sit here and be

victimized by the basic violence of

uh

the transcendental structure of reality

basically

um

so for adorno it's not that he wants

everyone to be conscious of the real

reality to do something he just wants

people to be conscious of the

fundamental tragedy of the fact that

it's not possible

um

so he hated

now why did he hate jazz is it because

for him jazz was just quiche

well no not really um

adorno so for adora high culture

inspires us with the ability to

critically reflect

upon

the conditions of its own possibility

and and also by extension the world to

critically reflect upon the world

some kind of way of the truth of the

world as a whole thing right

now jazz

is specifically going to be a problem

for adorno because

someone can please um

correct me if i'm wrong but i think for

adorno

jazz was not just quiche quiche can just

be like some village folk music or some

shit like that it was like a new type of

mass industrialized quiche

where

the

material um reality of the enlightenment

and of rational enlightenment

specifically in the form of modern

industry

and commodity production general

commodity production

and this kind of total artificialization

of reality and experience

so for adorno

jazz was a product of that

and yet

horrifically jazz does not inspire us

with the

appreciation of

the extent to which we have been fully

um kind of like

colonized or subsumed or dominated

by

modern rational technological whatever

reality

so that's the specific reason

adorno has a problem with jazz it's not

so much that it's the old type of quiche

but it's like this new type of quiche

which horrifically

takes advantage of

what he considers the structure of the

enlightenment without allowing us to

critically reflect upon that very same

structure the horrific thing for adorno

is that it's artificial

it's like it's like

it's artificial it's not just like

natural village folk music it's it's an

artificial recreation of that through

modern industry and through

this um violence of modernity without

giving it kind of gaslights us right

and and there's i kind of there's

there's kind of a point there right

adorno was a composer so he hated the

lack of structure he called it

destructive because it threw out

everything in music theory outside the

basics of keeping a consistent time etc

now i'm going to ask thank you for the

time but i'm going to ask you a question

because i'm not sure if that's why he

hated it but i'm going to ask you a

question about that because

i'll i'll get to you in a second

so adorno

um

there's kind of a truth to that right we

kind of sit here and it's kind of scary

because we're thinking we we think a

great deal of things are natural we

experience them as natural and given and

organic but they're actually

horrifically the product

of

like uniquely modern rational

industry so it's like the matrix you're

experiencing reality normal whatever but

then you don't know all of the wires and

all the fucking real shit that's going

into projecting this basic experience

actually i think the matrix is the best

example to understand what i'm talking

about here when i'm talking about the

structure of criticism i'm talking about

the matrix we experience the reality as

normal natural whatever but then behind

the scenes there's all

numbers and code and wires and all this

shit that we can't see but which

nonetheless conditions the possibility

of our experience so that's what we're

talking about here it's a perfect

example just just for dumb fucks and

it's nothing wrong with being a dumb

fuck

sometimes being a dumb fuck is just

saving time right

um

so

that's that's true about how we consume

everything when you watch a movie you

don't know

i mean the extent to which we have to

intervene into nature through this

violent domineering logo-centric he

doesn't use this language but i am

modern rationality

we're not inspired to reflect

critically upon

that violence

now that's adorno's problem

okay

that's adorno's specific problem

so for adorno

emancipation

even though he was extremely pessimistic

about it

amounts to the ability to um

have some kind of cognizance

and awareness about

how much our reality can't be taken for

granted

so we take responsibility for our world

although adorno

did frame his concern primarily in the

form of like the end of any authentic

spontaneity

so that might just be my interpretation

as well which is the opposite i'm saying

conscious responsibility he's saying the

problem is that nothing is authentically

spontaneous anymore i mean everything we

do is somehow um

stamped or marked by

the structure of rational modernity

critical structure of rational modernity

nothing is just authentic

how can we have any more human

authenticity

right

that's kind of a dorno's problem

but um

okay so

uh

adorno by the way if you want to know

what music he liked and this is why i

wanted to ask that question to the super

chat guy

adorno liked schoenberg's a tonality

because of the way in which

it

upset and it freed music

from the constraints of

like the tyranny of of the tonal

structure

so is it really that his problem was

that it it was it didn't have structure

i mean i know atonal music has structure

but it doesn't it doesn't really have

melody you want to see schoenberg's

shitty music

let me just

show you how ugly this music was

i think this is an example of his

um no let me find these

okay no this was during his tonal period

let me see um

what is the one i wanted to see what is

that fucking

trying to get a good example for you

[Music]

so

[Music]

[Music]

so that's the music that i know i'm not

doing it justice all the snob

fuck you bitch it's ugly music

it's ugly music it's just hideous

very unm it doesn't have melody it's

just hideous ugly music now you say you

like the ugliness because it

makes you critically reflect on the

world or whatever but it's just

extremely ugly right it's just ugly and

shitty

well that's the music that adorno liked

so adorno i think hated jazz for all the

wrong reasons

i don't think he hated it because it

lacked structure i think adorno hated it

because he thought it was giving people

a false sense of spontaneity

and a false sense of authenticity

i think that's the issue

um for him at least but he was a wrong

asshole who was trying to gatekeep human

authenticity in spontaneity

and i can go get into my really raw

critique of adorno but instead of doing

that i want to talk to you about how

this circles back to bread tube and how

i was able to like the reason leftism is

just

so predictable to me is because

i think leftism does kind of uh in the

west

western leftism specifically takes the

form of

um

ontologizing negation

negations specifically

and

how do you get from that from vaush's

support of nato and u.s imperialism it's

really simple right

um

the us is a democracy and in a democracy

we have some way of

consciously um

participating

in our

in our in our in the real world of

meaning and humanity in life because our

intuitive

actual authentic humanity can't be

trusted

that's fascism that's our bad whatever

we have to have this basic um

structure mediating the relationship

between our consciousness and the world

that is the only site of meaning right

so

it's very easy to arrive at a pro-west

you know the anti-germans the

anti-deutsche people who waved american

flags and israeli flags those were

frankfurt school adorno that's that's

they were also disciples of adorno

as well

um

i'm adorno's worst nightmare i'm the

complete opposite of that guy

but

that was my old orientation and by the

way everything shitty and cringe about

g-jek comes from adorno right

um

so you take that to its fullest

conclusion and you basically arrive at a

point in which

you have this false sense of

spontaneous raw human authenticity and

then the domineering structure of

rational modernity

and then the only thing we can do is

pessimistically in a doomer way

reflect upon how much we are fucked by

the latter

how much any human spontaneity has been

is completely erased and gone what the

implications of that are going to be

um

and and if we can find some emancipation

in that very fact some kind of new

freedom

for humanity which adorno was

pessimistic about

but

um

can you debate any actual academic

philosophers instead of streamers

um

they're not gonna be good at debating

they're not gonna they're not gonna like

they're not used to actually being

pressed you know

so that's the issue they're not used to

participating in in dialectics

that

intensely

um

okay anglican hegelian you want to

debate me because i should talk to

anglicanism once

okay

i don't i i'm gonna confess something to

you i don't i don't have a a set thing

on anglicanism okay

my whole

my vague impression of anglicanism

is that

it

isn't it artificially reproduces the

hierarchies of the catholic church

arbitrarily now i could be wrong

i just don't care i'm not i'm not gonna

attack anglicanism if you think

how does could you fit into this

that you

bet you is on um

that dude is on the other side of the

aisle so there's a civil war in academia

which is between the french and the

germans why because the germans

are going to be the comptian critical

people right

and the french are going to also take

their inspiration from germans

but the based german who is heidegger

so the french are

reflecting on heidegger uh alexander

kojev

um you know

sartre i don't like sartre but you know

he's one of them

um you know but he's kind of less real

known and then you know you have lachan

and deluz and then

um lyotard and the rest of them and um

also badu edu is not a critical asshole

but badu

does fall into the issue of he is

pre-critical

so

he's pre-critic yeah derrida is big too

uh no al tusser is um not

actually

i don't know where where would al ducer

fit in that scheme

i don't know i think al buser was just

like a catholic priest you know that's

kind of how i would see it

he was a cat not a catholic priest he's

like a catholic student

um

althusser i don't think

is

following the

the he's not following the kojev school

or he's not i don't i don't think he's

responding to heidegger but al tusera

was actually an ideologist first and

foremost he was like a

guy interested in defending marxism

so he's kind of similar with lucox and

that

in that regard right

um existentialism is a fraud fraudulent

enterprise it comes from again heidegger

so it's a specific way of um

responding to questions that heidegger

had actually introduced into the um

field of thought

uh

so yeah

but but the thing is with badou and the

rest of them those are kind of like um

those are gonna be people who are

rejecting the the kantian

or trying to otherwise resist

this kantian um

split right they those what people like

spinoza spinoza's the philosopher you

know you know how they say

france are perverts not to denigrate the

french but it's like

the french are kind of out here like you

know wanting to

think about real things real objects

of reason and actually jump to

conclusions

and you know be passionate about things

and you know

just kind of have this like perverse

experience of partial drives whatever

and then

may then you also have people like la

con

who

you know will

have like a peep show about that like oh

you want to see it you want to see it

you cannot see my okay i'm just kidding

but um no one's gonna understand these

jokes at all i'm sorry uh

but then you have the germans over here

who are just sitting and they're just

like

you cannot know anything

can only reflect

and only have reflection

so they're more interested in the

contemplative and reflective side of

things as always

and the french are interested in the

passion of

of knowledge and reason so on and so on

yeah it's all the stereotypes are

correct the germans they're colder and

they're

you know more stuck up in the french all

the stereotypes apply as far as these

different differences and schools of

thought

um

i side with the french by the way i am

french gang

as

i'm definitely more french or actually i

hate the frankfurt school in its

entirety i think habermas is an asshole

i don't like habermas

um

and i have nothing to do i don't like

kantianism i don't like neocontinism

which is may shock you because

kantbot is like one of my best friends

uh

but

he's like the exception he's the only

exception i've ever met

um i also don't like spinoza don't get

me wrong i fucking hate spinoza

but

i just agree more with

the french way of

um

i agree with the french mania right

all these french guys are maniacal in

their ambition

they're not just sitting and being like

pessimistic

down in the dumps type of you know

type of people right so anyway um

how do you get from there to breadth

though basically

it all has to do with this kind of

taking the western modernity and western

enlightenment

to such an extreme conclusion where

all of these other cultures

so for example um

let's have an adorno critique of russia

so an adorno critique of russia would be

like okay putin's the leader and

everyone experiences him as the leader

but that's only because they're

manipulated by the totalitarian

structure of russia

and the fact that there's all of these

you know they superimpose the logos of

modern rationality

where it doesn't exist but they

superimpose it there anyway which leads

to this kind of extremely

distrustful

could you explain why deborah and

elenkoff so obsessed with claiming

spinoza to they point where they claim

he's marks without a beard

hell no

but who's deborah in i don't know who

deborah

i'm so ignorant i'm so sorry

i

i'm looking him up now

uh he was a soviet philosopher

i have never read i didn't even i've

never even heard of him before

i forgive ilyenko did yankov actually

say

spinoza was marx without a beard because

that's extremely disgusting

but i i guess i'll forgive him guys the

view count is high because jackson rated

me just don't worry about it

um

that was because of um

that was just because of uh

that was just because of

sorry

i'm blanking

iliankov rehabilitates spinoza because

irian cove is also facing this issue

of the ontological question

what are the implications of marx's

materialism for being

and

idinkov's response to that is basically

to say that in order to consistently be

materialists

we have to basically adopt a notion of

the spinoza's substance

how do you reconcile the exis the fact

of thinking

and consciousness and thoughts

with a materialist ontology so and for

elienkov

um

thought consciousness and reason

and spirit are attributes of substance

of a material substance of some kind

now

this is a

metaphysical view

and not a materialist view it's a

metaphysical view because

um substance is uh is a dogmatic

concept of

of thought it it doesn't actually

have any determinate

articular reality right

so it's a complete misunderstanding of

materialism which is

um

which is uh inherent in soviet marxism

leninism actually not just in yankov

it's an inherent limitation they cannot

actually justify why what lenin did

lu so basically lucox and all of them

are trying to deal with this split

represented by the second international

between the flat

object of marxist consciousness

historical materialism the class

struggle and everything and then it's

like the structure of the party form

so soviet marxism leninism is inheriting

the same problem lucox inherited they're

all trying to like make sense of how

these two now stalin doesn't have an

issue with this he understands it into

it intuitively but when you're looking

at this from a conscious philosophical

perspective you end up with these

deviations like elienkov where you have

to justify it with spinoza so in the

encode is the mirror image of glucox

actually

lucox responds to it with kant which is

basically this

um

exaggeration of tr uh the the kind of

transcendent side of of consciousness

right in negation

whereas lucox is investing too much

at the level of imminence

and

uh not negation but um

some dogmatic reified form of positive

being in the form of substance but it's

two sides of the same coin but the

difference is i like iliankov i like

idienkov why because yankov was brave

enough to like

in a very russian way

arrive at

uh consequences of his thinking like the

highest conclusion if he really wants to

reconcile

dialectical materialism with an ontology

so for him

behind this is the conclusion of

dialectical materialism and resolving

this contradiction between material

substance and the thinking spirit which

is the highest attribute

of substance

the thinking spirit

enters a limit eventually which is also

a problem of of natural science the

existential problem imposed upon us

of

entropy

now if you don't know what this issue of

entropy is from the second law of

thermodynamics basically

there's a heat death of the universe

that awaits us eventually there will be

no more free energy

that gives rise to novelty and that

we will just cold everything will just

get cold and we'll all just freeze and

die there will be no more free energy to

be used by cis the system the closed

system that is the cosmos okay

so ilyenko also understands in the form

of the thinking spirit reaching the

highest point of its development at

which point um

as an attribute of substance

it can no longer

generate it can no longer um participate

in

creative and novel forms in the cosmos

thinking spirit will reach this

calcifying point

in which

it

um

is faced with the possibility that it

may

uh descend into the recesses of

substance into the cold dark night

the light of the thinking consciousness

will be extinguished forever

scary

so what does idienko say

and that's why i like him

idiot says

that we will reach a certain point in

the highest development of our

um

history as human beings

when we achieve communism and farther

and farther to the past at the highest

point of the development of the thinking

spirit will culminate

in a

apocalyptic collective and heroic act of

self-sacrifice

we will

engage in this act of complete

self-destruction

initiating a cosmic apoca a cosmic uh

catastrophe of some kind

um

which will basically

unleash a new threshold uh

uh for

energy for for things to

for the cosmos to for the process the

cycle to start again so we will

basically engage in like this

apocalyptic cosmic self self sacrificial

act of destroying ourselves and

destroying everything somehow

and that from that destruction from the

incandescent

vapors

resulting in that act of destruction

new worlds can be born

and therefore new thinking beings can be

born which at a certain stage in their

development will will restart the cycle

so we are going we have to restart the

cycle in order that

the thinking spirit does not descend

into the recesses the dark and cold

recesses

of substance

and it's it's it's very much ethically

rigorous and consistent i'm just not

really explaining it with all that all

that much justice but

i like i like that a lot

i just like it

i appreciate the boldness and bravery

and ambition

of that and and maybe that's actually

the secret of what i'm doing and that's

the secret of what my goal is maybe

my whole mo is that we have reached

that point

and that i'm doing everything within my

power

i'm just kidding i don't agree with

yankov

uh but not for not because i think his

conclusions are too radical um

i don't agree with his

spinozism so my project

i called it new objectivity

which sounds similar to what those um

object-oriented ontology people are like

graham harmon which i like grandma i

like him

and uh bruno latour and those guys

but for me

we must arrive at a new list

have you read carol quigley he was a 50s

georgetown historian sociologist who

argued the anglo-american establishment

moved history primarily via the banking

system and different bankers

no i'm i haven't heard of that guy i'll

check it out thank you for the 10. um

now

my project specifically is about

arriving at a new understanding of

material objectivity

that is not

spinoza's substance so i agree with the

sphenosis in the rejection of kant

but i want to it's basically a hegelian

project it's

you know a lot of people say haas has a

secret is kojeb it's all kojev haas is

just kojev

you know it's all everything from

infrared it's just kojev not really

because i like kojev

but i'm i'm in competition with kojet

because i don't agree he correctly

heidegger marx and hegel

he didn't do enough justice to it i

arrive at radically different

conclusions than koja i just appreciate

the spirit of his project i doesn't mean

i agree with his conclusions

um

uh so yeah

but yeah i'm a follower of kojov of

course but that's not

i have my own thing that's going on

um

and what is it

when i talk to you guys about the anglo

box i'm talking about

when i talk about the object of

anglo-saxon metaphysics it's also

another word for substance it's this

kind of reified and dogmatic

um form of materiality the affect of

materiality

which

i think people have

conflated for materialism when most

people think of materialism they're

thinking of

this kind of spinoza substance and i'm

insisting on the fact that material as

marx understood it was not

substance

materiality

has more in common with the word content

or essence

right so content and essence now you say

essence

because in the western tradition

um essence

is always already latent

with some appearance right what is the

essence of this water bottle

and someone will be like uh

the essence of the water bottle is

um

its

ability to uh contain water something

like that right

but essence

is something that is only sustained with

reference to what it is the essence of

so

materiality is something that can only

be

uh

sustained with reference

to what it is materially of what it is

the material what it is uh

the matter of i should say

which is some kind of ideal form or

structure or whatever you want or some

idos whatever you want

so

my

new objectivity basically means that

the material object

is only possible

if it includes

uh

not just subject but if it includes

appearance and so on and so on that

appearance

i'm teaching you the whole fucking

secret of infrared's philosophy right

now

appearance is the only

way in which we arrive at essence

that's why i'm a fucking streamer and

not sitting and just reading books and

writing shit

that's why i'm a streamer guys that's

what separates me from other academics

i'm living my own philosophy

it's literally why we started infrared

with this new notion of new objectivity

appearance is not somehow less lesser uh

or or worse

appearance is the sole way in which we

can have sense of the essence

so it's almost like saying the idea is

the only way in which we can have

um

we can make reference to the material

which means we have to fully exhaust

appearance

actually to arrive at essence we can't

just assume we already arrived at the

essence of things

and then just dismiss all appearance as

a fake spectacle that's why guy de board

is my enemy my theoretical enemy

i want everyone to take a copy of

society of the spectacle and burn that

book now what's the sin of society of

the spectacle they assume they have

dogmatically arrived at some

notion of objective reality that is

distorted by spectacle spectacle is just

spectacle i know the real reality i'm

here saying no

you only access reality through

the world of so-called spectacle and an

appearance that's the only way in which

reality is

is meaningful even

i mean reality is the reality of that

now the whole secret of my philosophy

i'm giving it to you

why do people accuse me of being a

nationalist i'm not a nationalist

i'm not a nationalist they accuse me of

being a fascist nationals is because i

have a same view when it comes to states

and nations and civilizations marxists

you say oh cause people say that

america is a country and that we live in

a democracy but the truth of the matter

is that this is a society of class

struggle between the proletariat and the

bourgeoisie and that's the truth class

warfare is the truth and i say yes but

that essential truth only makes sense

with reference to the presupposition

of um

a civilization a state a country or a

nation

you have to have the premise of form

first before you then

try to arrive at the secret of its

content

okay so i'm against anyone who tries to

dogmatically insist upon knowledge of

the true content of things

at the expense of their form

that to me is the essence of marxism

actually

i'm giving it all of it's literally all

on the table you want to know my whole

do everything i've ever said that sounds

ridiculous

is because of what i'm telling you right

now

it's because what i'm telling you right

now

it's all

a

attack on any notion of knowledge of the

true essence and content of things that

tries to cheat its way out of and bypass

the form of their appearance to me

you cannot have knowledge of content

without

the form

do you have an opinion on later

anti-russell wittgenstein and orpha

europe and

thank you random

wittgenstein i don't like him um he's a

troll and

he's nothing more uh firebend i'm not

that familiar with him but he said i've

heard some things he said

um

it's so it's not really about a pe being

a pad sock as much as it's like um

a very different way of understanding

marxism

where

for me

isn't that somewhat basic dialectical

materialism yes

yes but in the west

for philosophical reasons

this um has been lost

they know this in china if i tell people

in china this shit they'll be like duh

you know but in in the west there's a

specific philosophical language that

prevents us from understanding this okay

and i know that by the way because i've

talked to chinese people about this to

chinese marxists about this and they're

like yeah duh

right this is basic marxism i said well

in the west they they're very confused

about it they they have al tuser and

they have lucox and

adorno and whatever

then what's new about new objectivity

it's something new in the school of

western philosophy

it's been

explicit in the school of western

philosophy this issue has not been

resolved within this within western um

thinking

we live in the west you know i can't

just be a chinese marxist

um because i don't live in china

china the chinese marxists aren't really

facing this problem

american ones are

so um

so you'll understand that

uh

streaming then then that's that's why i

don't think um

i don't think that

without form there is no basis for the

context

thank you more a lot i would rather say

there's no um

without form

there is no way to know the content

is more what i would say

yeah there's the content but you just

form is literally content's way of

telling you what it is right it's not

that we have a a um

deceptive illusory spectacle that's

obfuscating the real thing no this

spectacle you see is the real thing

crying out to you and trying to

make itself known to you it is an a in a

sense attribute of it of it

right

does content without form exist no

no it doesn't there's no meaning to the

word content

that doesn't always already imply form

that's why i stream that's why i do the

streaming thing you think why do you do

this streaming shit if you're such an

intellectual because i know for a fact

when you are writing in your books and

you're you're being a smart academic

philosopher all that dumb shit you're

doing you are just reifying the various

forms of

um

phenomenal

uh

affects upon your stream of experience

from the media and from culture

and you're reifying it

you're not actually engaging with the

real forms that determine your

consciousness

and that's why i it's so like

i can make i can go to wave you know

what

academics are cucks

an academic

they're going to write papers about vash

and hassan is that because vash and

hassan are smart people worthy of

academic engagement no it's because vash

and hassan are the ones defining reality

in a new way

as far as like

why do you think i talk about vos right

but academics won't engage it on their

turf they'll always talk about vos

they'll always talk about these internet

celebrities and shit because it lives

rent-free in their mind because that's

actually what's

that's actually what's um affecting

their under their real unconscious

understanding of the world they just

reify

like a equals a right

yeah a will always be a but you're not

engaging with the real forms that

determine your consciousness you're just

reifying a in a very dogmatic um

way

an indiscriminate form of being

which doesn't actually account for

um

what really is determining your

positions and your consciousness you're

just pretending it was always already

because

of the dead letter

thank you madeline um

sorry what is that in reference to

you know

it's like a equals a yeah because it's

just a dead letter it doesn't actually

account for the real yeah i think that's

what it is the intelligible differences

uh

like for example let me let me put it

this way right

let's say

i call this this is just a container

this is just a container

they're both containers so they're the

same thing

do i experience them as the same thing

no i mean i touch this in a completely

different way it feels different but

i've reified it into form

dogmatically such that it is essentially

the same thing

uh

formally but that's just a formalist

view it is not actually the same thing

because i experience them differently

they affect me differently right

that's why um

philosophy and the into the use of the

intellect is downstream from culture

intellectuals and academic philosophers

are downstream from kim kardashian kim

kardashian affects

um their unconscious experience of

reality it affects

their understanding of what it is people

do and don't care about and

what does what is beautiful what is not

beautiful what is trendy what's not

trendy what gets attention what doesn't

get attention

and they take all of that for granted

and pretend like they're better than

everyone else i mean why do you think i

started streaming right

streaming of streaming is

the most uh

this is a heidigarian medium

our this is the most heideggerian medium

possible because streaming

participates in

the disclosure of being as a whole for

people i am changing the threshold of

what people consider possible in in the

first place

that's why my fucking haters will never

they don't they live rent free in their

head 24 7. they can't shut the fuck up

about me thoughts is just a streamer

shut up about him

yeah i'm just a streamer but

i live rent free in your head for a

reason

because there's something more true

about this spectacle and appearance than

whatever reified dogmatic forms you have

elevated to the status

of essentiality

arbitrarily i should add

and it's specifically in the form of the

attention economy right

it's specifically in that form of the

attention economy

um

like the ability to amass attention well

why do people watch haas

i'm just thinking he's a dumbass

streamer well why do people watch him

you don't know these things you don't

you're not you're no amount of

philosophy is going to give you a priori

insight

into the attention economy you have to

just

that's that's that's what's so beautiful

about the attention economy there's no

way of knowing

the social hierarchies and social status

there's no way of knowing that a priori

we are thrown into it i don't fucking

know why people give a shit about johnny

depp and amber heard i can keep bitching

about it or i can actually try and study

it and and see okay maybe there's

something here there's some unconscious

reason

why people do this

um

but you are wrong when you get to this

point where you just say i know the true

essence everyone else is wrong

no we are all thrown into this

reality specifically in the form of um

what people ascribe importance to and

attention to what they ascribe their

attention to

um

what the majority of people ascribe

their attention to

um

thank you so much

inspiration for myself and many others

you capture the hearts and minds of more

than these cowardly leftists thank you

for what you do praying gesture thank

you so much american communist

what are the things that live rent-free

in people's heads what are the things

that people give attention now social

capital is one of the most important

facts if someone's already popular

you're gonna come and see why and

there's a certain level in which social

capital is the only reason right um it's

just because others are giving an

attention

but beyond that what's the reason

that's what's really fucking

you know

tough to understand

that's why i've been so confused by my

history like why did people care about

so many of the things i said on twitter

why did people care i mean

that's always what i want to wonder i've

gone viral well because what you said is

so stupid

but that's just like why do you care

you know

stupid shit is being said all the time

so why do you care

the same thing that allowed me to become

successful as a streamer is also the

same thing

which more or less

has been a big obstacle in my ability to

um

uh understand a lot of the responses i

get

so maybe i just have to update my theory

i have to update my understanding how

this whole fucking thing works

um

i think this is the difference between

being a streamer and any other

individual

a streamer

if you're an individual you're just

sitting alone you have your own stream

of consciousness that you take for

granted and you're just sitting there

staring at the wall and you think yeah

that's it if you're a streamer

your stream of experience is all going

to be um

it's no longer going to be taken for

granted

you're no longer going to be like

experiencing reality in a neutral way

it's all going to come at you as a it's

a you know what experience is like guys

just telling you someone who started out

not being a streamer started to be one

it's kind of like um

it's kind of like riding a roller

coaster you know

it's like it's a constant stream

of experience

that's

um

somehow uh

it's a stream of experience that's

somehow like um

it's almost like this weird thing where

it's like you know the kanthian

object the absolute object

it's almost like the the absolute object

of the intuition

is like directly like apparent you're

just like experiencing it somehow

like you can actually see

i got i wonder what adorno would say

about streaming you know it's fucking

crazy it's crazy she could directly see

the very

social and discursive

um

for forms that condition the possibility

of experience it's like i'm directly

imperiling my sanity by streaming i'm

putting my sanity on the line and

literally

giving you the benefit of the doubt that

everything's gonna be fine

you know what i mean

because if to be sane you just you're

just like off stream you're just

whatever doing with your own thing

and

it takes a crazy person to be able to

stream it takes a crazy fucking person

to be able to do this

you know

because like the real things that

condition the possibility of our

subjectivity are being put on the line

what conditions your the possibility of

your subjectivity is some like for

example unconscious

relationship to the big other right like

what does society think what do people

think of me you all take these things

for granted as a condition for the

possibility of your subjectivity i'm

putting that all on the line

you know

but it's like i'm a psycho because i

don't even have any reference to society

only psychopaths can do this shit yeah

you you have to be somebody who's like i

don't care what another voice thinks of

me i directly commune with the void out

of which

the signifier is born i commune with the

real i'm a fucking wizard

um

just thinking fuck

just thinking

we are so fucked without heidegger we

are so fucked with in the west we're so

fucked holy i'm having like flashbacks

to my frankfurt school days

anyone who wants to become a cpus the

delegate needs to join within the next

month because you need to have been a

member for at least a year before the

national convention

okay we're gonna i'm gonna bring that up

every day com thank you dog

guys remind me to

constantly bring that up because we we

get a we gotta push we're gonna make up

our push this month to flood the party

we need those fucking delegates join the

cpusa

we have one month

if you want to ever become a delegate

because you have to have have been in

the party for a year and the the next

elections are gonna be next year and

that's going to make or break our entire

project here of cpusa 2036

so

um

so yeah

uh

within the next month we have to fucking

get that on the road but i'm just

thinking um

we are so fucked in the west without

heidegger we're so fucked

there's so much confusion there's so

much fucking confu holy fuck how do we

make sense of marxism in in america

i mean i take it all for granted so i'm

good

but like i remember when i was on my

journey

and

damn damn i could have become vosh

damn i could have become vosh

i could have become a bread tube type of

person

who like buys into all the propaganda

and shit

not buys into the propaganda but sorry

more specifically

privileges the modern west

over the they call everyone else

fascists because the modern west

uh

is the empire of negation

every form of positive being is false

only negativity is real

only

self-consciousness

what made you go a different route

if i ever told you one of the dreams i

had

it was a complex uh

intellectual process right that took

years

um

i think the first person to unhook me

from

the frankfurt school was battai

but before then

i was

engaging with the landian

accelerationists

and

um

i began to realize that

they used to give so much significance

to a.i and i began to understand that ai

was nothing more than

the realization of

this kantian whatever

transcendental structure of reality of

self-consciousness it's an ai communism

is a.i right

so

i had a really fucked up dream

i want to tell you about my dream

should i tell you

i'm not going to tell you

not gonna tell you because i don't want

the mk ultra feds to know about it i'm

gonna keep it to myself

but i had a dream that

disturbed me

which kind of revealed the unconscious

truth of this path i was going down

and it greatly disturbed me and that

wasn't alone that wasn't enough but

that was one of the things that

it really disturbed me it really shook

me like

i think that was when i was confronted

with a choice like

do i keep going down the path of satan

or

is there is

is there something wrong about this

anyway um

i want to talk to you on my first

experience of bread tube to close this

off but uh

you know i'm thinking about this even

though i was such a fanatical leftist

it was around 2015 or 2016

that the alt-right as a subculture

was emerging

alongside it there was this new woke

lefty subculture as well from the dsa

2016-2017

specifically 2016 i uh

was very disturbed by the alt-right for

obvious reasons

but i was equally disturbed by this um

new vaporwave left you know this it was

like bred to proto bret they loved

synthwave and 80s and just on a very

intuitive level i was like this is the

same thing as the alt-right culturally

speaking it's exactly the same as the

alt-right and it disturbs me in the same

fucking way

this is the antichrist

and that was

not zero books even more like

you know like that fucking like the the

synth wave the grid the 80s type of

thing i was like

this is the same thing and this is a

challenge

but they i saw them as the same thing

um

i've come a long way from

like these dsa people who are like

overly conscientious in the chapel and

they're kind of like it was the same

thing as the alt-right it was the same

fucking thing

same shit you know majority all right

came from silicon valley

they didn't come from

the rural workers they came from uh they

were coders

number one source of the alt-right

coders

so i always had

even when i was in that

you know critical theory

phrase

did you give examples uh just facebook

memes and shit i don't know

specifically came out of the dsa

but also i'm gonna be real it was also

the lgbt stuff too that was taking

leading the way there was like this

weird um

overlap between lgbt synthwave ideology

which was like super woke and pink

haired or whatever

and the transgender obsession that took

over the left around 2016

and the alt-right i saw them as the same

thing and i wasn't even anti-trans i

just saw them as the same thing

they were they disturbed me in the same

way

but i i have the language to call it

what it what it was now and it's there

were as always these were the azov

azovites the azlog battalion has

anarchists and neo-nazis it's the same

fucking thing same type of people

and same class

the azovite which is a specific symptom

of the self-destruction of the modern

west

i want to talk to you guys for four more

hours

um

i want to talk to you guys for four more

hours

and

i'm looking at we have 600 viewers now

and i'm like damn

i'm thinking this is a lot but it's like

this is what i used to have on twitch

all the time

kind of sad you know

we used to be playing gta rp and i used

to be

covering shit and um

damn

but uh

that's okay we'll get there

we'll get back

but uh

anyway guys tomorrow i am gonna be

visiting family

again

saturdays i usually take saturdays off

it's like the new mo the new rule

um

i'm going to be visiting family not

going to be streaming

but

this was a nice stream

i hope some of you guys learned

something from it

and you know

yeah

i'll see you guys bye

see you sunday