π΄ RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR π΅πΈ
2024-03-13T00:37:00+00:00
Baby with your heart
Stone faces the one
Baby when you're I'm gonna be able to be able to... I I I I'm not sure. Stone faces donthe mind.
Baby when you're high. Oh the things is going. I'm not sure. Oh, faces don't have any. Storm faces, stormy! Stone faces the world
honey
Baby with you I'm not sure. Thank you. I I So faces too mine
Baby with your heart
Stone faces to mind. I know
two faces to the I Oh, three-fac-it- Stone faces don't mind. when you are.
Stone faces the mind. I'm here. I I'm not sure. I Stone faces don't mind. Baby when you're high Soon this is time. I I'm not sure. Oh, the faces don't mind. Baby when your heart
Stone faces the one
Baby when you're I'm not in the way with your eyes. I I I'm not sure. I Stone faces 't mind.
Lady in your line.
Two faces too mine. This is good. I Oh, faces don't run right. you know, I'm from Daughtervan, and I streamed me for me. Aung I'm von der Wehrm
And I streamed me me forin.
Aeskimo
All is what you liveinklinkie bistulchkeye so shiore by mirth I'm just a lie Did him
Did I ?
????.. I love 30-3. I will through the time. I'm fromtook harm undefampton davon, and I see me in the tunne.
All persons elvistist unendicticti
Pilateralistinvigil so shiagulled by irides.
I'm a haunten thrown through the time.
I think all is afore. I see all t I did not. I get all the suffer,
I get all the stuff.
In the body, this tooling, today.
And the tipe towards the world,
I'm not true.
My, the time! It is so Einchen feudsman!
It is so Einz
Diezz Dezz END It's so Einstein, without dichiech, come to mirth,
Come to me and begleiter me,
Gmeanthir
Through the Evichit
On our tour,
through the time,ps Bushitz times Bushitz times
Thurst Thiests
Thurst tii through stiens
Furschitz times
thi I'm not gonna try, motion to die, motion to die, motion times.
Ocean's time,
motion to die.
Almost to be able to be the to be the that's a today. It's so good die subpoena.
It's so good diez
It's so much
ohne date.
How do we have
?
Gleunthen through the ebishkine
Amunderts
die Huss I think to keep in the bitch time. I thought you thought the time to do it.
So that's a hard and a time, and we see me in a good.
All the stuff in the next and the world can't becine.
You have to be beautiful in life and times.
It's a nice today's fashion. Is the all fun? Is the eye to the eyes a good life.
Is the all proper, if they all are, if they all are,
you won't be tick, go and take tis to live.
Everything to our life, it's no one's a line.
From my time is going the thelaken better than And we try to me tombs. An old is tomorrow.
You tend to live the
times
And shalten have your time
I think the
time times
I see all I'm tom. The tum's the tiny tip,
the things to do I,
you know what's alive.
My name is a good that one. I'm from derbyne, and I dreamt michaelin'lini, I'm undigniglicti.
The year tosk looching, so shiang me forthay.
I'm not my reigalt through the time.
I see all thus far, I see all thus thus
where you're endless towards.
I think to unendili's life.
And I'm in towards, they try. And she can't go alone,
that's no one.
On my name is a good life. I will,irty time.
I will try I
I
I'm t-
,
I'm I
I I'm from there undone, and I see me in between.
All this was umekness unmankigliction.
The Italian will sing, so shi'er unear-bye.
I'm hairling through the time.
I see all the afts.
I see all the the asses
to unhavis.
the the theunclean's
the only beauty is not only in the time.
And the tipin' so times no longer than that.
My mama will never do I think this time. I'm not a today. It's so Einstein without Dick. It's so Einstein, without dich. Come to Mirzumne undigliette me.
Gmeinchevigigigigit.
On our touris.
Through the time.
Through the time.
Through the time. Push it's right. I'm also asking for rap. I'm only looking for some. I'm also asking for rap.
I'm also asking for rap. I'm only looking for some. I'm also asking for rap. Digital to respond, digital terrainment, if you need to the maximum, digital, digital, digital, digital, cultural.
Digital, digital, digital, cultural.
If you don't, the maximum control. I'm not sure. All around there are so many races, two different colors, two million faces.
All around there are some people crying,, are real losers, just confuse it.
I'm only looking for some better places.
Wish I knew her, wish I knew it.
I'm also asking for a better future.
Who can I choose it?
Can I choose it can I choose it If you tell the rats to watch it,
if you need all your own to maximize,
If you tell the rats and buttons, If You Eat, All Your to Lank,
Seve, tomorrow,
Digital, the Rat's Buoy, Digital, Rats, but,
If you eat all your own, to likes. No I don't know
What I know
What's
you go
to that
that I want trying to try toto be today. I'm gonna be the together. I I'm a lot of the tb-I'm a today. I I'm a little bit. I I'm trying to... I Welcome. I am going to be doing a rather impromptu stream tonight. Probably not going to be lasting very long.
But the reason I find it necessary to do this stream is because there's a lot of things
I think were not sufficiently clarified about the coverage we did of Haiti last stream.
There was insufficient levels of detail.
There were things that even I didn't know,
lies that even I took for granted and didn't question
and just assumed as a given were true.
They ended up not being true.
The most infamous of which being the
accusation of widespread cannibalism in the first place. So for the record,
we're going to get into the facts of this.
For the record, there is no widespread cannibalism going on in Haiti. The video that's
been circulating on X is two years old and it's between a specific small gang skirmish, I guess,
and there was a burnt body that a gang member ate to
terrorize the local population.
Again, very gruesome, brutal, chaotic crime, but it's not a widespread thing going on in
Haiti, either then or now it's not widespread.
So yeah, it happened two years ago.
It's not relevant to what's going on now at all.
Barbecue, the leader of the,
I guess if you call them,
confederation of gangs or tribes.
I mean at what point is it a gang or a tribe we don't know.
He has nothing to do with cannibalism.
He's not a cannibal. He didn't eat anyone.
His name has nothing to do with...
So these were just lies that I took for granted,
didn't even investigate myself. And for this I'd like to do with. So these were just lies that I took for granted, didn't even investigate
myself, and for this I'd like to issue a correction, or at least I would like to set the
record straight. Even I took these lies. That's how deep these siops have gone. It was literally all lies.
Blackback, thank you so much. The viral video on X literally has nothing to do with anything going on in Haiti right now at all.
Literally nothing.
And we're going to get into the details of it and exactly what
it was, but we're going to have to talk about that. It's interesting, I think Keith Woods just
now is quote tweeting me or something. It's interesting, I think Keith Woods just now,
is quote tweeting me or something. He's making a little cute little joke about cannibalism
saying that, oh, these guys talk about eat the rich.
Pretty much standard rhetoric you would get out of the Conn, Inc. Twitter, which they're
all converging together, the right wing.
Stalin, Barry, what's going on?
I mean, Keith Woods and his ilk, because
of the Gaza conflict, have long pretended like, oh, we haven't sold out though, because
we're still against the Jews. We're still against what the Zionists are doing in Gaza.
But they're, as soon as you take away the Jewish factor on any matter their position is
indistinguishable from con ink and from the hegemony and I kind of want to talk about a little
bit before we get into the details of this what we're talking about here when we talk about the hegemony, why is it important
to oppose the latest SIOP against Haiti? Is it because we believe that the U.S. should help Haiti or
give it humanitarian aid or something?
It's not, it has nothing to do with it.
Is it because we believe mass immigration from Haiti is a good idea?
I mean, these things are irrelevant.
They're not relevant to the matter at hand. The matter of at hand is a very immediate and pressing matter.
The deep state in the US wants to invade Haiti.
It's a very immediate and pressing matter.
They're trying to invade Haiti.
Now why should we care about that? Well, we should care about that because foreign policy is all that matters.
This is something I'd like to introduce in today's stream. Not just for infrared people already know this, but for those of you who are not infrared people who are watching this out of some
curiosity, you should be aware of the fact that domestic policy is meaningless in
the United States. It doesn't matter.
Foreign policy is actually what matters. In terms of where you stand in the war of politics,
in terms of what your position is in relationship to those in power, domestic policy means
literally nothing.
You can be Bernie Sanders and advocate for health care and free stuff, but you're not an enemy of the hegemony if you're falling in line
when it comes to foreign policy.
You could be a right-winger who has every single one of Trump's policies except you are
a hawk. You're overtly hawkish.
Kind of reminds me of like Ron DeSantis, right?
Ron DeSantis, I'm sure he agrees with Trump about everything when it comes to immigration and whatever.
But what does he disagree on? He disagrees on maybe a little bit of the foreign
policy stuff. You're not going to be an enemy of the hegemony in that case. So culture
war doesn't really matter all that much. Domestic policy doesn't really matter all that
much. Your position on foreign policy is actually what matters.
Now we can clearly observe that this is the case. This is just a matter of fact. It's
literally true. But it deserves an explanation. Why is that?
Why is it that foreign policy alone is what matters?
Well, it's simple.
Because here in the United States,
we have a constitution, and we have a kind of formal government
based in that constitution. And that doesn't really tell
us a whole lot about how the actual power works.
Because in addition to the Marxist analysis, the classical Marxist analysis about how
there's a capitalist ruling class that buys the politicians and really does control the
state machine as the dictatorship of the capitalist class.
That's been elaborated upon just a little bit by Lenin and obviously you can imagine how
much things have involved since Lenin, but what
you have is an imperialist state machine which circumvents the constitutional order at the
domestic level, building a form of power and hegemony that is primarily based on a global system of control.
It's based on a system of the control of foreign territories and countries or colonies as far as Lenin's time was concerned.
But the apparatus of super state power which projects dominance and control over other
countries is actually the source of the power of the ruling class here at home.
So that's why domestic policy doesn't matter all that much in the last instance.
Domestic policy obviously matters as far as our day-to-day lives are concerned, but we are many steps removed from having control
over domestic policy because the system of control that we're dealing with is primarily
based in imperialism.
It's based in the control of other countries. It's based in systems
of power that are directed at the enslavement of the world. Now once you can
target those, once you can target the source of the ruling class's power,
which is for an imperialism, you can then be free to do whatever you want when it comes
to domestic policy, but you don't have that liberty insofar as the imperialist state machine continues to exist.
So the reason we should care about the regime's agenda in Haiti is because if they send
troops and deploy troops in Haiti, guess what?
That undercuts the cause of dissidents at home.
It strengthens the power of the imperial state machine. It builds and rallies consensus around
the support for the hegemony at home. That's why anti-imperialism is so important. It has
nothing to do with morality. It has nothing to do with third-worldism. It has
nothing to do with any abstract sense of justice. It has nothing to do with
anti-whiteness.
I very concretely explain to you what it has to do with. It has to do with the source of
the hegemony's power. Now, of course, from a moral perspective, U.S. imperialism is absolutely indefensible.
From the basic perspective of a civilized person who believes in basic justice and human dignity,
it should be, it can be opposed on those grounds.
True, sure, definitely, but there's a concrete and material reason why we oppose materialism,
not just a moral one. So I make myself very clear, but right wingers are not very smart
because it just flies over their head. I just explained it to you, very concisely, I just explained
it to you, right? Guess what? Right wingers.
They hear it? It goes out one ear, and the other ear it comes out how?
You just hate white people.
Because you hate black people.
And this is the kind of theme that we've been building towards and
coming to an understanding of, there are no right-wing dissidents. Right-wingers
may coincidentally stumble upon a dissident position for accidental reasons, but
these are not reliable people to make allies with. That much should be
absolutely fucking clear. Sorry, I'm going to try to stop swearing. That much should be
absolutely clear. These are not people who are, we're going to try to stop swearing. That much should be absolutely clear.
These are not people who are we're going to be making allies with.
It could be reliable allies.
Look what's going on in Haiti.
They are coming out in droves.
Unquestioningly, marching to the tune of the hegemony's agenda.
Yes, the Globo-Homo hegemony, the so-called Zionist Jewish cabal that controls the world.
Well, if such a cabal exists, I don't think it does, but if it does exist
obviously it has an agenda in Haiti, but it just shows how inconsistent they are even when it comes to their own principles. When it comes to anything that harms black people, they are even when it comes to their own principles. When it comes
to anything that harms black people they will just get on board with it just
out of petty racial resentment. Obviously this doesn't hold true for us. We have no
problem supporting white people who fight against the
hegemony. But the dissident right and its intellectuals, specifically the ones
that are sitting their ass in Ireland, trying to meddle in our affairs. They have nothing to do with it.
Keith Woods has nothing to do with Maga. He has nothing to do with the sentiments of Maga.
He is motivated by pure, petty, racial resentment toward black people and non-whites, and his entire position
is formed around that.
As a matter of fact, the only reason these people hate Jews is because they hate non-whites.
And they believe that the only reason non-white people have significance in the world is
because of the beneficence of Jewish subverters.
Because Jews are so out to get white people, that's the only reason non-whites have any relevance in the world.
That's why they hate Jews. They are motivated by some psychopathology against non-whites.
I don't know what to tell you. That's not a serious basis for a dissident perspective. It's not a serious basis for a dissident perspective.
It's not a serious basis.
It's not for considering someone a reliable ally when it comes to the fight against the
hegemony.
That's not reliable at all.
I mean, all the globo-hom deep state needs to do is throw some racist bones at
your way and you'll be marching to their two no problem. I mean, I genuinely believe if the people in Gaza were black, Keith Woods and all these
right wingers would 100% support Israel.
As a matter of fact, they do support Israel in a way, you know.
They want the U.S. to do to Haiti what Israel is doing to Gaza now.
That's literally what their worldview is based on.
We need to just go in and conquer and dominate these people.
And what happens when they resist you?
You're going to give them the Gaza treatment?
You can admit it.
I mean I see right wingers admit they literally just, they have a power fantasy where
they just want to exterminate all black people and
any pretense of morality and civilization it flies out the window and we are
not surprised by it.
We're communists.
Our whole tradition is based in putting bullets in the bellies of Nazis and barbarians and fascists.
We're well aware of how animalistic and savage these reactionaries can become. It doesn't come as a... it doesn't phase us, so to speak.
But it's a vanity. It won't happen.
Um... I mean, I don't even know if I should even address it, but if it needs to be addressed,
no, there will never be a form of white racial solidarity where they're just going to go and depopulate black people or non-white people.
Why? Because the same methods a state uses against others
inevitably has to use against itself.
Why? Because the premises of a political state
are always based in a domestic social antagonism of some kind.
Domestic political power always needs to continually be proven.
It's never a given. It's always based in an inner kind of struggle.
Translating this in simple terms, if you want to be the
top dog in your own country, you have to hold your position. This is almost like prison
politics. It's intuitive. You want to be the top dog in prison? That's not for free. You've
got to constantly watch your back.
You got to constantly deal with people who want to come and overtake your position. Even if you're in
one gang, if you're in the Aryan Brotherhood and you're the top dog of the Aryan Brotherhood,
you got to watch your back and make sure that your Aryan brothers are not going tothe top dog of the Aryan Brotherhood, you gotta watch your back and make sure that
your Aryan brothers are not going to come topple you.
So in a way that kind of works, that's kind of how countries work as well.
And the methods that they use against foreigners are the same ones that inevitably get used in the internal disputes
that form the ground in the context of how state power is maintained.
So the reason the West doesn't just go and like kill everyone outright
and its foreign imperialist adventures has it's partially to do with that.
A war is never just me versus you. It's how does my war with you relate to the internal logic of my society. And that's why, for example,
half of the Vietnam War, maybe you could say half of it. I would actually rather say 15%
of the Vietnam War was the domestic unpopularity, the moral outrage that it caused.
85% of it was the Viet Cong kicking the U.S. Army's ass. But 15% of it was the domestic loss of morale. I mean, yeah, that is a factor
in warfare. People are like, why can't we all just be get get on board with like going and
slaughtering babies abroad? Well, you can't do that because there's no clear,
there will, in contrast to what the racists think, there's never going to be a clear racial
division to where you can be inhuman toward others and that has no consequences for
how you treat your own people or how
you treat or how you even see yourself when you look in the mirror.
There's no exact line that's going to allow you to have a guilt-free ability to go and commit atrocities against others and then just
have this completely confident sense of identity at home.
There's absolutely no such thing. So I just wanted to address that nonsense because I keep seeing these edgy homosexuals.
I think those are the BAP people.
I lose track of these right-wing losers who all lost relevance after 2016 because their
zeitgeist is over.
But yeah, they're constantly saying things like, oh you know what I think, I think we should
just destroy Haiti and just populate it with what, and you can think whatever you want but
you're just a homosexual with your fantasies there's nothing it's nothing
more to it it will never happen
it may be and it's, it's a very bold transgression of morality. Yeah, we can just discard the morality.
And no, you can't though. You can't. Because it's one thing to think in terms of a video game. It's another
thing in terms of thinking in terms of good governance. How do you govern a society?
How do you maintain social cohesion? How do you maintain legitimacy internally? Yeah, that's a science.
That's a difficult thing to do.
You can't just say, oh, well, I have guns
and I'm just gonna kill everyone I don't like.
And it's like, well, that's not how it works.
It's never how it's ever worked ever by the way in history. You actually have to have a sense of what it means how you treat
foreigners is very closely tied to how you treat your own people.
It's called civilization.
I don't, I'm not someone possessed of the vanity that I believe that this could be taught to low IQ right wingers.
And I say low IQ not because I believe in IQ.
I say it as a euphemism for people who are terminally and irredeemably stupid, which they are willfully ignorant. I mean is it possible
they could be educated? No. And maybe that is inborn. Maybe they are just born
that way. They're just picking their nose. Even as they hear these words,. They're just picking their nose.
Even as they hear these words, they're just picking their nose.
Baffled.
They don't need the...
Well, get to the part where you talk about black people being stupid and white people.
I don't know what to say.
Those that have the intelligence to comprehend what
I'm saying are ultimately the only people that matter to me because you are the shepherds
that will heard these these right-wing goyim. That's right. That's how we see them as cattle, you know.
You will be the ones to herd them or dispose of them if need be.
But anyway... or dispose of them if need be.
But anyway,
let's continue. Yeah, we are the Judeo Bolsheviks.
Anyway, on a more serious note,
there's a few things we have to get to the bottom of.
The first thing is that
barbecue Jimmy Cherry...
I didn't practice his name before the stream.
Cherizier, Jimmy Cherisier is the leader of G9.
G9 is a, sorry, no, not G9 is a, sorry, no not G9. Delma 6.
Delma 6.
Delma 6 is a, a revolutionary it seems like, D6.
He's the leader of a kind of confederation of different gangs who want to replace and
overthrow the existing Haitian state, which is just a US puppet,
and nothing more than that. A deeply unpopular US puppet regime, which, as you can see, has not done
much for the Haitian people or Haiti given their
living standards it's devastated and looted them so he's the leader of this it
seems like a confederation of different civil society groups let's put it in politically correct terms. No, they're gangs. I mean, but what what where does a gang and a tribe?
Where does that begin or end? Just because they're not lawfully sanctioned?
Because these gangs, like some of the gangs in the U.S.'s
own history, filled a vacuum where the government wasn't there.
They filled a vacuum of being able to attend to people's needs, the necessities of daily justice, the necessities
of some kind of authority to enforce order. That's what they fulfilled. The gangs are not just
like self-serving profiteers just trying to traffic drugs and get rich and make a buck.
They're spontaneous forms of social organization in Haiti.
I mean, they are gangs.
They're violent, sure.
But they're not all the same either. That's the thing.
It's funny because I'm writing about the origins of the state in the Bronze Age right now.
And if you go look at sites like the foothills of Anatolia where some of the first states were
emerging that was like different gangs taking form and fighting with each other
and then the one which not only was the strongest but had the most
support from the agricultural population ended up actually ascending to the status of
the supreme state power.
I mean that's the origin of civilization. Sorry to
tell you. That's the sociological basis of statehood is the state is just the
biggest gang there is. Why do I pay taxes? You know, it's not because I volunteer to. Anyway.
The claim is that D6 are cannibals, right?
And it's just not true.
So let's just cover a few things and just get this out of the way.
And I want you guys to clip this and make sure you clip a lot of these streams that I'm doing now because they're of a professional nature
So look Dom I think is one of the main accounts it got 21 million views that was breaking the news of
The so-called cannibal gang eating body parts. The Haiti cannibal
gang leader is named Barbecue and is now the most powerful man in Haiti. So
right-wingers took this hook, line, and sinker, and without investigating, just like
the 40 beheaded babies thing, Keith Shapiro, Keith Woods, Ben Shapiro's cousin, I looked
at this and said, this is true.
Look at how he mocks me. He says,
oh, he this takes eat the rich to a whole new level. It just kind of sounds like the Zionists who
Who mocked supporters of the Palestinians by accusing them of supporting mass rape and
you know burning bodies and beheading 40 babies and all this nonsense. It's just not true.
So this video was deleted but the video is very gruesome footage of indeed what are
people who have black skin?
One guy is eating a corpse.
Not good.
Not good. Very gruesome and ugly footage. But Dom here for reasons unknown,
claimed that this had something to do with barbecue and the D6 gang and that those confederation of gangs. Why did he claim
this we don't know and I think this is where it originated and it seems
gloy kind of seems gloy kind of seems like this is something someone who's
on the payroll of feds would say. Because where did that even come from? Right? Because
here's Dan Cohen, who is a Jew, our Jewish brother Dan Cohen, fellow Jewish Bolshevik,
who actually went to Haiti.
He went to Haiti.
He knows actually what's going on in Haiti.
He talked to this barbecue guy.
He talked to people on the ground.
So this is not barbecue and has nothing to do with him.
The video, and I saw this from another source confirmed it as well, it's from years ago,
two years ago to be precise,
I believe, of a gang member in the Artibonate, Artibonite, Artibonite,
eating a burned victim's body in order to terrorize the population. Now keep in
mind, in Haiti there's a bunch of gangs. There's a bunch of different gangs,
fighting and beefing with each other. Barbecue and his gang represent the
one that's more popular among the Haitian people, the one that's
actually able to build some kind of consensus and try to kind of unite
different ones. In direct contrast to that there's these antisocial gangs
completely like wild
Savage gangs that are completely at war with society
You know and they're they're trying to terrorize the local population into submission.
Now here's the thing.
That's obviously gruesome and horrible, but using this as a pretext to dehumanize the
entirety of the Haitian people? Well, let's let's see. Keith
Woods. What is he a selt? It's Keith Woods assault? of Celts.
Archaeologists think Celts ate each other, including parts of sacrificial religious rituals.
Keith Woods' ancestors were eating each other on a mass
scale. So cannibalism is obviously horrific but it's not it doesn't mean you're subhuman, unless you want to say Keith
Woods is subhuman, which, given his lies, repeated lies, and his selling out constantly, flipping on a dime whenever he can.
I mean, it wouldn't be that far off, to be honest.
It would certainly have more validity and accuracy than claiming the entirety of the Haitian people are subhuman savages because there's
an antisocial evil gang there that's trying to terrorize the population into submission.
By the way, if Haitians thought it was normal to eat people, why does this gang have to do this to terrorize them into submission?
They're clearly doing something that's horrific. They're putting on a gruesome, bloody horror show to terrorize people.
We look at this footage and we find it terrifying, so do the
Haitian people. They also find it terrifying, okay? I mean it goes without, the fact that
I even need to say this is ridiculous.
But yes, it's a major propaganda push to demonize barbecue.
Now to the extent of my understanding, and I'm willing to be corrected on this, barbecue
is being demonized because he represents the most formidable force against the government, the US-backed government.
He represents a form of, I guess, political power in Haiti that doesn't answer to the United States.
So of course he's going to be demonized in this way.
I mean just do a thought experiment.
Just do a thought experiment.
Let's just say we don't know anything about what's going on in Haiti, right?
If there was a guy in Haiti rising up and mobilizing a lot
of Haitians against the government, which is backed by the U.S., would it be above the
US, the DOD, and the psychological operations command to like spread lies about him?
Is that above their pay? Is that like too much for them?
No, no, no, the U.S. would never lie about this guy.
They'd never spread propaganda about him.
No way!
I mean, like, they don't, they wouldn't do that.
When is the US ever spread propaganda about someone they didn't like? Like Gaddafi with
the Viagra pills and Saddam and Assad and Putin. We've never lied about those guys.
You know, we've just always told the truth about them.
That's what Destiny's community believes, but it's also what Keith Woods and his community
believe.
It's also what the so-called dissident right believes.
They believe that the U.S. just doesn't tell lies about people who threaten U.S. interests.
I also invite any right-wer that wants to come
on and actually demonstrate whether barbecue has anything to do with
cannibalism, with any kind of proof. I will give you $5,000.
You know what's interesting too is people are like,
well, why is his name barbecue?
Well, it's literally in the community notes, okay?
It's literally in the community notes. The cannibal Haiti gang leader
barbecue, no, his name is barbecue because his mother used to be a meat street
vendor. So his mother used to barbecue food, meat, and that's where he got his name.
It has nothing to do with cannibalism. It also has nothing to do with something else
I've heard, which is that he burns entire neighborhoods to the ground.
It has nothing to do with that.
It's pretty stupid, I have to correct the record here in the first place, but
Once you realize how much we're being lied about and then people say well
So you're saying everything's fine in Haiti? No, it's a complete chaotic
horrific situation.
But what you're doing is trying to dehumanize Haitians.
You're trying to justify the, you're trying to provide a justificatory pretext for a US invasion.
Oh, we need to go and we need to go to Haiti and say oh my god
this is just we need we need to restore civilization to Haiti. You're a shill,
you're a shill is what you are. Just because you hate black people doesn't make you a
dissident. It actually makes you a fool and a sucker who could be manipulated
into supporting people that you claim to oppose and claim to be resisting. I digress. Keith Woods
and his ilk, these neo-Nazis and these neo-fascists, don't represent MAGA. They
don't represent the actual forces of populism anymore because they're irrelevant.
After 2016, they fell off.
They lost the ability to, I mean the media with Richard Spencer and all these people kind of made them the face of this
zeitgeist but after Charlottesville it's done it's done that's no longer the
zeitgeist in any way of Maga they're not at the avant-garde of anything the
whole 2015 2016 kind of neo-nazi plan
to sneak in swastikas through Pepe the Frog. That's over. It's done and it's over with.
And it's not coming back.
So what are they doing?
They're just enlisting themselves to support the hegemony now and that's the source of
their edge.
That's the source of their, not only their thrills, but their sense of relevancy now.
It's just supporting the hegemony. I want to show you what actual
MAGA populism in the US looks like right now. It has nothing to do with Keith Woods.
Those people are honestly tethers. You can just really ignore them.
They don't have leadership over the masses in any capacity.
Even when it comes to the recent relevancy they got when it comes to Gaza, here's the truth.
It's just because of third world support.
That's it from the Muslim world.
Most of their support has been coming from the Muslim world and that's it.
It's not coming from any domestic movement.
So they're not relevant internally, politically speaking anymore.
I get that among young people.
Young men, I guess they're kind of, some of them are
being swayed over, but wait until they find out about us. Anyway, this is someone who actually
represents genuine MAGA instincts.
Okay?
This guy, uh, 100% ultra-Maga patriot.
Trump won.
Trump 2024.
Pure blood, Tex Texan truth
Military police border God country family powder coated metal
So this is an actual maga guy not a iris twink. Okay, this is an actual maga guy
And this is his reaction to what's going on in Haiti. I know
nothing about this person. By knee jerk reaction was to squash him like a bug
which is what which is what the siop wants you to think. You want to see some guy
going around eating people? Oh, get rid of him, he's right? But then look what he said. He
said, I know the media is demonizing him and calling him a cannibal. I also know typically
when the media does that, it's bullshit! Haiti has
been destroyed by the Clinton Foundation. Literally true. It's known to be a sex trafficking
hub. Literally true. If you actually follow the Jeffrey Epstein files, you'll
know that Haiti plays a big part of this network in the Caribbean. And by Haiti,
I mean the US puppet government and regime that's been installed there and has been an abject
poverty for decades also true and I think it believe his name was Aristide something
like that when Haiti did elect a leader that wanted to do something about the poverty and fight back against the US in some minor capacity,
guess what the US did? They backed a coup against him.
Clinton threatened.
I think he sought asylum where in Jamaica and
Clinton threatened Jamaica, I don't think it was Jamaica, it was some other
country in the Caribbean, if they didn't extradite him, treated him like a
criminal. The US overthrew him in a criminal way without any
legal sanction, and then Clinton literally chased him when he fled. It was Jamaica. Okay.
So it's incredible. It was Jamaica. Okay.
So it's incredible. It's incredible.
The Haitians have been struggling against U.S. imperialism for a long time.
They were under a brutal US-backed dictator
throughout almost the entirety of the Cold War now why was he put there he was put there so that Haiti doesn't become another Cuba
obviously Obviously, I just checked Haiti's population right now, it's roughly the same size as
Cubas. So the U.S. clearly believes Haiti is very
important to keep under control to maintain the status quo and the
hegemony in the Caribbean. If you don't know how the Caribbean factors
into the as a puzzle piece of the Caribbean. If you don't know how the Caribbean factors into the as a
puzzle piece of the global capitalist system, you're just not very educated. I
don't know what to tell you. I don't know what to tell you.
Yeah, it threatens sanctions against Jamaica.
I believe Hillary Clinton was the serving role as the, what was it?
Anyway, the question is this, is this guy an evil bastard they say he is, or is he a guy trying
to remove a corrupt government from his country?
That's a serious question because I don't know.
So this is the instinct of Maga.
It's not, oh this guy's black so I hate him.
It's, is the media lying to me about this guy? Well, spoiler alert,
they are. I don't, I don't know if I would say that this is a good guy or a person we
should support. I don't, I don't know. I haven't heard a diverse enough set of perspectives
to draw a conclusion on that, but I know he's not a cannibal. I know he doesn't lead a gang of
cannibals. I know that's completely made up bullshit. Let's start there. Today, we've today, we've profited the occasions to say,
we've today, community international,
Ba'ai'ii'an chance.
Because what has passed in a peian there,
it's their own Aitian, who they decide who can decide in a P.I.C. for who decide who will be able to take P.I.A.A.A.
and who will do it.
And what do we want to do the government we want to do it in a misery and get it.
We'll have to the country in the misery that. I'm a profitable community international.
If you continue in a Uttublea,
you have plunged in O'Kao.
So he's saying, you know, foreigners,
get out of Haiti leave us alone but that's not enough
for Keith Woods and his friends that's not enough I guess because why because
he's black that's why so they need to completely support the regime and support
the global homo agenda because this guy's black literally it's that stupid by
the way let's see why are they trying to portray him as a
cannibal? Well let's see.
It would have a bat type of liberate the peace ah
win because you know not go out to up
the level no facts show. No but we're not gonna have sex show. No problem with social. No, but we're not going with this show. We're not with this show. We know
a battle in a thing. We've gottie. We want to live a battle that in a thing.
It's that. the people there. Retreat t' the the the the the
force revolutionary. Giennepopommy and allier. It's the'en force revolution, Geneva, from the Iranian, it's that's the time we're going to
and that you're going to follow,
because Goumet has been a pair of se for you.
Maybe we're not going to sort, they're today.
You'll have been you're going to have been to say gang-noy.
It's that what they said, While the political class jockey's a gun to theypsa in a tha or a lot tis' a tis'
thae battle in the mental and out of the reality of.
The pepsa fin' parade, they're their pepsa their devon, pep's a geephsevue.
While the political class jockeys for position in hotel conference rooms, Chirizier spends his
days trekking through the slums to convince people that change is possible, what he calls
the mental revolution.
This process, he says, is a necessary precursor to armed struggle.
Correction, the way we have to let's get our gang.
They're after their bungee and they're not revolted contio.
And we never want correction. The gang is called G9 it's not D6. I don't know what
I don't I don't know what what what is it's G9 right I'm right about this right it? It was, I was right, it was G9.
We said no, yeah, okay, Zamsao, Zamso's not
paella for true, Sam's not for their fain
to thou to tell you, Zamb's not the today
to protect us, but let's do you know, un-avon.
We're gonna go. by the way right wingers mocking
no baguu no bagu
their own touche munche
by the way right wingers mocking
nations for starving just like the Zionists are mocking
Gazans for starving.
Haitians used to have their own rice production.
They used to have their own agriculture.
Guess what happened? The US destroyed it. You know it's funny I talked about personal to say mrs. Sablin'a'a'a'cati no treat,
I said, you know,
I'll tell you to fend to theirs.
You know, it's a pew, fem-moo,
the tea that they're no mizzer no year.
I'm going toed to these people and they're like these right winners are like
oh has you think Haiti is going to be a utopia and it's like these people are fighting for their lives right now
it's not about a you it's not about I'm betting on Haiti's gonna be a, I mean what a stupid
thing to say.
You see a people fighting through literal hell against the terrorism and the evil of the
global homo hegemony the one that you pretend to oppose but you're actually a
shill for and the first thing that comes to your mind is their racial aptitude? What kind
of stupid nonsense is that? By the way, I keep seeing this nonsense about IQ.
IQ, they have an IQ of 67. Really? Really? They haven't. What does that actually mean
if they have an IQ of 67? Oh, I'll tell you what it actually means. It means not a lot
of them are even literate to begin with, meaning when they're born they're not taught how
to write or read because they
don't have widespread access to educational institutions.
Just like in the case of Africa, where we've found the IQ of Africans, guys, we've found
the IQ of Eritreans. And you wantto know how we we did it. We took a
small sample of children living in orphanages. Well we found the IQ of the
Congo right from 88 school children in their sixth year of schooling, you've deduced not only the
IQ of the entirety of the Congo, but the essence of the humanity of all black people from
88 school children. What about in Namibia? One
sample of 103 children from an ethnic group which Lynn and Becker acknowledge makes up
only 7% of the population of that country.
But I guess because they have black skin, that's all they need to deduce everything
that anyone ever needs to know about. Not only that country, but anyone who could
possibly be related to them or descended from them by blood, such as Haitians.
Let's continue.
Somalia's national IQ is estimated from one sample of child refugees in a Kenyan
refugee camp, which we know is just the most that's that's just like a great
environment for cultivating a
A test taking
The aptitude for for standardized test taking is a refugee camp in Kenya.
It's just a great place to measure the be-all-end-all of what these people are capable of mentally.
Botswana's national IQ is estimated from one sample of 140 adolescents sampled in South
Africa and were used to calculate the national IQ of Botswana, not because there was evidence
that they were from Botswana, but because they were from an
ethnic group which is common in Botswana.
The primary sources for sub-Saharan Africa, this is, Nassim Talib said the same thing I'm saying now by the way
Because he debunked IQ as a whole as a pseudo-scientific swindle
This is what he called it, but I want you to know directly how stupid it is right
Yeah, so they estimate IQ from like tiny sample sizes of a few dozen
children and then claim this is the entirety of the entire race of the entire
country and of the entire continent and all of their descendants.
Sampling problems are more severe in some regions than others.
Sub-Saharan Africa has a particularly high proportion of single sample countries, of sample
sizes and samples including only children.
In Chapter 2 of the Intelligence of Nations, the others analyze their data and demonstrate
significant correlations between national IQs
and many sample characteristics.
They themselves say the analysis have shown that national IQs depend partly on characteristics
of the samples on which they were measured.
They show, for example, that samples had lower IQs if they had younger ages,
were tested earlier in time, used older test norms,
and came from rural samples.
Given the differences between regions, this means the data set is regionally biased.
To substantiate their claim of low IQ among Africans, 10 to 14 year old children was found to be around 60, 60 IQ, small sample of 10 to 14
year old children, but the use of the sample is an error.
The average IQ of the people of the guugatorial Guinea is based on a lengthy book chapter.
Although this chapter reports research conducted among members of an
of an illiterate tribe. These people are not even literate. They can't even read.
They're not even literate and they're administering them standardized tests to draw conclusions
about their fundamental inborn physical aptitude for mental tasks.
If that sounds like it's not extremely stupid to you. You could have done this to any
European 20,000 years ago and it would have given you the same result. According to
the Darwinist basically nothing has changed in 20,000 years,
as far as our inborn physical characteristics. We weren't always literate, you know.
People need to understand this. Like, when you claim that because there was
a video recording of cannibalism in Haiti, that this says something about their race,
like in essence, again, the person who's saying this Keith Woods is a selt.
Widespread cannibalism among the Celts.
Reported by the Romans.
2,000 years or 3,000 years even is nothing biologically. It's nothing. It's literally nothing.
According to their own methodology, if it's genetics, so genetically speaking that's not that's not
enough time for the for mutations to have emerged which you know correct I
don't know it's not you know anyway they were in a literate tribe, but here's a thing, they weren't even administered
to those Africans.
The 48 children who they were administered were from Spain, not Equatorial Guinea.
Clearly Lynn made a mistake in using this sample to estimate average IQ of Africans.
And look, this guy got 13,000 likes.
And look at this picture.
Well, the data is clear.
Look at this, an entire continent.
The Congo says 64.
Because a few dozen school children in some refugee camp were given a standardized test
The meaningfulness of which was in all likelihood I mean completely lost on them.
But from that, we were able to deduce that actually,
I mean, look, all this is a proxy for is political instability.
Okay? I mean, look how stupid this is. These European countries
are in blue, but Persia is in, is like, is like in, um, orangeish. This is literally the origin. Persia is literally what bequeathed upon these
snow monkey Yucubians any semblance of civilization. The Persian Empire is literally one of the major sources of civilization on planet Earth.
You're telling me that Persians are dumber.
I mean, I don't know who I'm going to offend here, but you're telling me that Persians
are dumber than Irish people?
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry to say this.
I don't hate Irish people.
I don't have anything against them.
But like, are you seriously trying to claim Persians are more stupid than
Irish people?
Sorry, I just don't believe that.
I don't care what kind of map or data you think you're going to present.
Apriori, I know that's wrong.
Sorry. I just... A priori I know that's wrong.
Sorry. I just know that's wrong a priori. Why? Because if I pick up a history book, Persia's going to be there, Ireland isn't. Simple as that.
I mean, Ireland will be there because it was oppressed
by Britain, and that's literally it. I'm not here to roast Ireland or insult them, but
please don't be here, be humble. Don't claim you're smarter than Persians. This is the most stupid thing I've ever heard
And it's like look at how many scientists and brilliant engineers and
Whatever are coming out of Persia now and how educated they are and like
yeah but yeah Persia is no all this look if you're more blue you're more
politically stable if you're more in the red, then you're more politically unstable. That's all this
means. It has nothing to do with your essential, inborn, inevitable, physical characteristics, literally nothing.
And then once you see from this map how these numbers are being drawn in the first place, you realize how
fucking stupid it is. Sorry, excuse my swearing. I don't mean to continue swearing.
Doesn't that mean IQ correlating to their... well no, because Europe was the most
politically unstable place on earth during the Middle Ages. It was completely
fractured into like a million different kingdoms
There you think Europe was there was bandits and chaos all over the place and yeah
They were eating each other especially in times of famine which did occur in medieval Europe. Again not enough time has passed for
any significant changes in genetics to account for the discrepancy.
Political instability has nothing to do with, you can't reduce that to some kind of like,
I don't know, some lines of some sequences in your DNA or something.
That has no historical import whatsoever.
Political instability is relevant from the perspective of history.
History comes, this is the ultimate Hegelian lesson you should understand.
Before there is even a single subatomic particle in the universe, there's history, there's a dialectic in motion,
orienting that particle toward something that it itself is not,
culminating in what Ilienkov calls thinking beings, even a rock, is latent with the fate that culminates in the thinking being. So let's not get into
metaphysics. We're against metaphysics of course, but the Anglo-Saxon metaphysics that are just assumed as a given
by these actual subhuman illiterates. And why am I calling these right-wingers subhuman illiterates because they have access to education?
They have access to the internet.
In addition to having access to these things, they see fit to open their mouth on matters.
They just have no education about whatsoever
I mean at least read a book if you're gonna like make these claims and be so confident about them, at least read a damn book or something. This guy also makes a great argument right here. So he'll basically explain to you what
IQ is, right? IQ is just literacy rates. IQ variations across time, race and
ethnicity can all be explained by literacy rates.
So Jews, because they're the most educated demographic on the planet, have the highest IQ.
East Asians have 99% literacy.
So they have the second highest IQ.
Europeans, the third. Africa, there's a 60% literacy rate. So
that's why. National IQ is directly proportional to the literacy rate
without fail. And by the way, mass literacy is something very recent and modern.
Before the invention of the printing press in Europe, hardly anyone could read.
You had to be like some kind of monk in a monastery. Your average potato farming Irish peasant couldn't read. The Irish
were regarded up until very recently to be a subhuman race. No different than Africans
in the minds of the Anglo-Saxon metaphysicians and so-called race scientists and
race realists of the 19th century
But because America modernized Ireland and gave them education and internet access,
now the Irish are getting uppity and claiming that they're the superior race.
Which, I don't know, is that a tragedy? Does Cromwell need to come back? I don't know, but it's just a fact.
Um,
Look, I don't hate Ireland. I'm not here to attack the Irish, but
there's there's certain
nationalities that are in need of being humbled right now, I think. I think so.
Brazil guerrilla is wider than most European countries and the US yet has lower IQ in this map interesting
Argentina has the most... Let me, let me see.
Oh yeah, that is pretty funny, isn't it?
Look at this.
Argentina is like one of the most European countries on earth in terms of ancestry.
And yet, Argentina I believe is more European than the U.S. is, yet it's 10 points down below
the US.
Pretty insane.
Also, it has the same score as Madagascar.
I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean.
I'm not exactly sure what that's supposed to mean. I'm not exactly sure what that's supposed to mean.
But probably not something that the white supremacists will be able to explain to us,
that's for sure.
Okay, so there's a documentary about Haiti.
I don't know if we're going to watch that.
I think what we can do is...
There's someone from Haiti who wants to come on and talk, but I think I want to make some
clippable moments before I do that.
So let's get down to business, shall we?
Okay, first argument.
They're literally eating each other in Haiti. You mean a two-year-old video
of an, for all we know, an isolated incident that in no way proves that cannibalism is widespread in Haiti now even or then.
You mean a video that has absolutely nothing to do with barbecue whose name comes from
the fact that his mother used to sell meat meat has nothing to do with cannibalism whatsoever
Who's leading the G9 against the US-backed regime there which is deeply unpopular among the Haitian people
Hmm, let's see.
Haiti is a shithole just because black people are inferior.
Well okay, I mean if black people are so inferior, why did France enforce an embargo against
Haiti after they gained independence?
You know, I haven't heard of a lot of countries that are able to just prosper and develop
when they're literally not allowed to trade with anyone in the world?
Or how about a few decades after that in 1825 when France imposed upon Haiti an insurmountable,
literally insurmountable debt as a condition for recognizing them and lifting that embargo.
Does that mean nothing?
People say, well, what about the Dominican Republic? Because there's not as much blacks there.
That's why the Dominican Republic is more prosperous.
The Dominican Republic was invaded by Haiti a few times in the 19th century.
And because of this, it eventually sought recourse from European powers who lent them a hand and actually helped
them out to develop and protect them from Haiti, Haiti's invasions. The Dominican
Republic has a indigenous ruling class that is aligned with global imperialism.
And in addition to that, it's not as politically unstable because it's more consolidated because
of that ruling class in internal political
history.
Haiti has never been fully consolidated by the U.S. Empire, contrary to its wishes.
They had the U.S. put a tin pot dictator in place through the entirety of the Cold War,
when Haiti finally got its first democratically elected leader,
we overthrew him in a coup and put back some sick bastards in their place.
Haiti has never been a free country. Never. They've always been punished. They've
always been attacked. They've all, their development has always literally been thwarted.
All of their resources, all of their land, stolen and looted. Oh, this is just the old story of how white people are to blame for all of black people's
problems.
No, that's what you're saying.
I'm not saying.
That's what you're saying.
I'm just giving you the facts.
The reason Haiti and some countries in Africa are underdeveloped, terminally underdeveloped,
yes, is because of European colonialism.
You want to come up and debate me about that and let's just stick to the facts and I will wipe the floor with
you.
You can go with your grand narratives about white people and black people and all this nonsense
and I'll just stick to the actual facts and I will literally wipe the floor with you. But then again, you won't debate me on these matters,
because you don't want to end up like Patrick Casey.
You don't want to end up barbecued by Haas.
I'm known for barbecuing white people. I'm literally barbecue.
Haas al-Deme barbecue. They don't want to be Patrick Casey. All I did was present Patrick
Casey Fax and he folded.
I became the white man that day.
Whatever that means to them.
That means the superior race very well. I'm the superior race then.
Because I wiped the floor with him just using basic facts.
Well, so you're saying it's never black people's fault. I mean, you're the one introducing all this moral nonsense to the equation. We're
talking very concretely about the factors behind what enables a country to be prosperous.
Those are absolutely political factors. They are absolutely geopolitical factors.
Do you think China could have ever become prosperous,
had it not become a communist state,
and completely expelled all traces of foreign imperialism?
How could China have ever gotten prosperous? Do you
even know what the Cold War was about? You think the Cold War was just about
differences in ideology? No, it was about countries knowing that insofar as
they're under the boot of Europe and America, they will never be prosperous,
wanting independence and pursuing an independent path of development, so they can prosper for their kids and for future generations.
You think the Cold War was fought about abstract
doctrines and ideas? No, it was fought by people who wanted a better future for
both themselves and their children, but were prevented from having that future by
the forces of US and European colonialism.
It was a life and death war that people fought giving and laying down their lives for.
You think that's not political?
You think that countries can just automatically prosper because they have the right racial stock? No, my
friend, it's a war, a war to the death about gaining your independence, gaining your
human dignity, gaining your sovereignty, that is forged in blood, not some inborn racial stock gibber that you're talking about.
You think this whole story of the 20th century is just what?
What do you think these, what do you think all these wars were about?
What do you think the Soviet Union was fighting about?
Why do you think the world attacked the Soviet Union? Why did they attack the Bolsheviks when they
immediately took power? Because the Bolsheviks were a literal siren on the face of planet
earth broadcasting to the entirety of enslaved humanity, to rise up and take control of their own
future.
That was the menace of Bolshevism.
Behind this fear-mongering about the Jew and Judeo-Bolcism. It was a fear of the African and
the Indian and the Arab and the Turk and the Asian and of the European worker too.
But this idiocy, oh what racial stock do these people have for them to be prosperous. Prosperity isn't free.
It's not just doesn't automatically happen. It's a geopolitical thing. It's a political thing.
Japan, South Korea, Germany, prospered because of the Marshall Plan.
They didn't prosper because they autonomously just pulled themselves from the bootstraps of
their racial stock and just automatically became wealthy countries.
That's not how it works.
How it works is, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, it's been a game of seizing
surpluses of capital and disposing of those surpluses in ways that are political,
either using them to create vast foreign colonies and neo-colonies to extract the resources of others and ruthlessly crush competition or totally
throwing off the yoke of foreign colonialism, learning modern science technology, and from zero,
from year zero, from scratch, super industrializing your country, from
scratch, extracting raw surpluses from agricultural production to challenge and stand up to the
West. That's what Russia did that's what China did.
Were there famines?
Was it harsh?
Were there a lot of calamities?
Absolutely.
But every single person that died under Stalin and Mao, it was worth it.
Because that was the only way, that was the only way
that people outside of the big club
could become free, sovereign, and powerful
without becoming slaves like the Japanese and the South Koreans. They are free
men. Their children will be free. Generations from now their people will be free.
Because they made the hard and tough choices to turbo-industrialize their countries,
however ruthlessly, however cruelly.
That's how they became formidable rivals of the West.
The West did it just as cruelly, by the way, but the cruelty was imposed upon others.
The Chinese and the Russians, they took responsibility for the cause of modernization and industrialization.
They themselves dealt with it. Internally.
They faced existentially all of the evil demons of modernity.
All of the evil demons of industrial modernity.
The human costs of it.
They put this burden on themselves instead of offloading it hypocritically upon others
and then reminiscing hundreds of years later about who the superior racial stock is and who isn't.
You want to talk about civilization?
The era of these piratical barbarians looting and raping the world in the name of civilization,
that's come to an end.
Whether it's the name civilization or
rules-based world order, the West has died in Gaza. Now we're in the midst of a
new era and the coping right- wing, so-called dissidents, are fully in lockstep
behind the global homo hegemony to salvage and save what is a dying and unsalvageable global order where one golden billion rules on top
of the rest of the world.
Not going to happen anymore.
Just like the Gazans, just like the people in Palestine. No people on
earth are going to suffer the indignity of being second-class citizens or
subhumans. No one is going to live under the foot of a so-called master race.
Gazans won't, Africans won't, Haitians won't, Asians certainly won't. They'll give up their lives for it.
They'll cause you a headache until you have no choice.
I mean think about it.
What's stopping the so-called state of Israel?
From just killing everyone in Gaza, just their moral beneficence? No.
They'd be squasped like a bug immediately if they did that, because the Muslim world wouldn't take that outrage.
Don't think that outrage.
Don't think weapons of mass destruction and nuclear weapons are enough for some political
agenda to completely dominate the world for free without having to recognize the human dignity of others.
Brute, no one can rule by brute force alone.
Why? Because people are willing to die for their dignity.
If it was possible that brute force alone could rule
the world, we wouldn't be seeing a genocide in Gaza right now. We would have never seen
in October 7th. The Palestinian people wouldn't even exist anymore. They would have given up. They haven't given up because they have been subjected to the most
mercilessly cruel brute force
in modern history and they still haven't given up because they're willing to die for their dignity.
Maybe the modern porn-addled consumerist Western subject can't understand that.
But the Houthis are there to educate you.
The Gazans are there to educate you.
Hezbollah is there to educate you.
The IRGC is there to educate you.
Hell, the Taliban is there to educate you. Hell, the Taliban is there to educate you.
This isn't a world that was built by people who are scared to die at all costs
to the detriment of their own dignity. That's not who wrote the pages of history.
Who wrote the pages of history
are people who not only lived
but also died for a reason.
Had something to die for.
That was the only reason they could claim that they lived a meaningful life. So let's be absolutely clear. Thank you. All right, well, there's someone from Haiti. I think I'm going to bring on to discuss the events there.
Talk about what's going on.
Stalin, Beria, Gulag, what's going on, man?
Okay, he's in the show queue, let me bring him up.
He's currently muted and deafened.
All right. Hey, how's it going?
Hey, what's up, Diorf?
I take it that you have a level of familiarity of what's going on in Haiti that most of us don't
and I want to give you the opportunity to educate us on maybe things we might be missing
or fill us in on some details.
Yeah, yeah, so just a quick disclaimer.
I'm not as educated on the topic as like Kim
Mize and Daniel Cohen or Danny Shaw might be,
because they've actually been to the country.
But my background is my, my dad is Haitian.
Or my dad is a...
My dad's parents are Haitian.
My grandparents emigrated from the country around, sometime during the devalay regime.
Okay, that's fine.
Your credentials are not in question at all.
I think I'm going to do this where I'm just going to ask you questions and then
if you can answer, that do this where I'm just going to ask you questions and then if you can answer
That would be good because I see your your bullet points
So what we want to know is are we seeing a revolution in Haiti right now? Is it a political revolution?
Unified by a kind of
a sudden of a civil Reicheist. Go ahead. Yeah so I wouldn't describe the revolution as unified there. I mean I've seen different political
leaders like
Sherry's Jay has some popularity there's different there's different gang leaders even with some popularity or political parties and
There are some there are some messages on How would I put, like I guess you call them, there's iconography on social
media that does unify the people.
For example, the question of insecurity, there's a general consensus that the number
one problem in Haiti, if you look on social media, everyone believes
the number one problem is insecurity, which is the threat of gangs basically kidnapping you,
holding you for ransom and extorting your family for money.
This is something that my contacts in Haiti have experienced.
So, um, is, is Barbecues Gang G9 a gang that practices this?
It's a conclusive in my opinion. I know Kim Ives and Daniel Cohen offer like eyewitness testimonies that state the contrary.
I've seen some other testimonies circulating on social media that claim they've seen barbecue, work with the
Ted Calais party, the sort of center-right party that Moiz was a part of to engage in political
suppression massacres. But I haven't seen like a cohesive
investigation and the narrative putting the all of the testimony together.
Geopolitically is there a division? Are there some factions more amicable to the United States? Are there
some that are more hostile? What's the situation out that front?
I don't think there's any really unified faction that's amicable to the United States.
Okay. I mean, I think there's legacies from some political parties that are like not that popular.
So what is it that's dividing the gangs right now?
Yeah, I don't know. I can't answer that question. What about the political factions?
What are they divided by right now? I would say, I mean, Shades-Yay is a big topic. Like I said,
there's one narrative from the legacy of the Lavalas party, the Social Democrat Party that...
Sorry, just to cut you off, just for our viewers, let's call him barbecue because that's what
he's known by and most people probably can't pronounce that.
Yeah, my bad.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, I just wanted to
Just so people can follow along so so so yes, there's two competing narratives around Sherry Jay from what I've seen like some people see him has a you know, the legitimate like anti-
anti-imperialist force.
Some people think he's guilty of the crimes he's accused of.
I mean, another political faction to keep in mind
is Guy Philippe.
He was the, he was sort of an anti-Lavalas anti-leftist
I guess you'd call it a coup leader under the Bush administration and he's coming out against barbecue. Yeah
Actually, I haven't seen that what I've seen him do was come out against barbecue, yeah?
Actually, I haven't seen that. What I've seen him do is come out against
Kerry Com and the US intervention. I think like a big consensus is either like
the US should either not intervene or the carry com plan is not good enough. The reaction to the carry com plan, the Caribbean
community is really skeptical from what I've seen like Haitian trail social media. So to educate
our viewers, what does the US want from Haiti? Why is the US so invested in Haiti?
I have my own theories of course but...
I'm just going to stick it to my knowledge stuff because I think I don't have enough information.
It's too speculative.
There's...
Yeah, I don't know enough about the...
I basically think what's going on is that the U.S. has long relied on Haiti as a secure geopolitical
kind of outpost of U.S. interests in the Caribbean.
It's just taken that for granted for the longest time and as
soon as a leader emerged in Haiti in the 1990s which might call that into
question the US became very insecure about it and it's not maybe it's not
necessarily that the U.S. wants specific
resources in Haiti, but it's terrified of the political vacuum there that may lead Haiti
to go down maybe the path of Cuba and, you know, be perhaps amicable to world powers that the US is opposed to.
So that's kind of my theory is more like a maintenance of hegemony kind of position.
Yeah, I mean that's that's how I understand that's how I understand
how all these world powers kind of think based on... Because because the Hades on
the US's doorstep and because it's such a politically unstable situation, I think that basically the U.S. is looking
at it like, okay, if we have to lock this place down, because if we don't, you know,
they might form ties with Russia or China, and that's literally on our doorstep.
We can't tolerate that. So that's kind of how I've seen it.
It's almost an extension of the Cold War in a way.
Yeah, I mean, I haven't done much research in the Haiti specifically, but based on my knowledge of foreign policy and things like that, yeah, I'd have to agree.
I don't have any information that contradicts what you're saying. I'll put it that way.
Yeah. What about the cannibalism claims?
Do you think that's, what do you think about that?
Is cannibalism widespread in Haiti right now?
No it's not.
I mean, this is a big narrative I wanted to push back against, is that people on social media, this
is the prevailing narrative I see.
And I'll introduce some more anecdotes that contradict it.
The prevailing narrative, I think people are assuming,
based on social media, is that Porter prints was like relatively, you know, maybe there was
high crime or whatever, but then it was thrown into chaos by this coup where
Ari L'Anri was exiled and can't return to the country and the liberal democratic institutions
are conquered by the gangs.
And now everyone's just living in hell, chaos is complete terror.
But people have been living in the same level of terror since Javina Mouiz was assassinated back in 2021.
Yeah.
Yeah, I even hear that the footage of that cannibalism was from years ago.
It wasn't, it's nothing recent.
Yeah, and there's nothing connecting it to the G9 gang.
For one, Sherry's Ye, Barbecue.
He's accused of a lot of crimes, right?
But no one has seriously accused him of cannibalism.
No journalist or like serious.
So I agree with Cohen, and I think that the reason they're spreading this cannibalism narrative
is just to build consensus for a US invasion because, you know, I see a lot of right-wingers
say, oh no, I don't want to invade Haiti, I just want to call them subhuman blacks.
But then I say, well, you you're not you're an antisocial freak
you're not the average citizen of the US where if you just tell them all
they're eating people here they're probably not going to question an invasion.
So that's why this narrative is being spread. What do you think? No, yeah, I think that's why it's
being spread. I mean, I think, you know, it's on Twitter primarily, which we know,
like, is owned by Elon Musk, and he deliberately spread thethe the rumor of cannibal gangs
like being being circulated on Haiti like he was one of the people who reposted
it on social media like yesterday two days ago so I think yes it's part of you know
he's he's reflecting his interest by
I have another question there's a guy apparently in Haiti backed by Venezuela
children of desolines what's do you know anything about that I haven't heard anything about it.
Children of Desolines, is that what they're called?
I mean, I'm sure it exists, but it's just not something I see like trending on social media.
Like that's my perspective.
I'm just looking at what people are writing in Haitian Creole on like Facebook and Twitter basically.
Is there sentiment?
What is what is so their sentiment is about basically restoring law and order more or less
restoring security is there is there an anti-colonial sentiment is there a kind of sentiment about imperialism or?
I mean, I guess some people like barbecue might be giving some expression to that, but I don't see I'm using specifically like anti-colonial.
Maybe they kind of do but like there's no I
don't think there's any unified expression of like anti-colonial is there any
pro-interventionist sentiment by the way the guy's name is Jean Charles Moyes
sorry if I'm
mispronouncing that. Moise, yeah. Do you know anything about him?
The leader of the Venezuela? Let me look this up real quick. He apparently is backed by Venezuela
Yeah, I don't know I I haven't heard about him, to be honest. He might not be, he might be like a French political figure. That's my assumption. He's part of a, yeah, I believe you.
I believe that. Platform Petit Desiline. I don't know if you've heard that.
Petit. I don't know if it's I don't know how to say it. It's not Petit because it's spelled differently.
Child of Desolines platform. It seems like I would guess that this guy is just not extremely
relevant in Haiti is the issue. So he's not like a source of polarization. I don't
think so, yeah.
Uh, but sorry, to get back to the question, I don't know if I ignored you, but, is there
pro-interventionist sentiment at all coming out of the social media you're seeing?
I would say it exists but it's like marginal. Like there's no viral, you know, like trending,
pro-interventionist sloganeering or sentiment like that,
you know what I mean?
To my understanding, G9 is basically trying to form a new government in Haiti, right?
Yeah.
And does anyone know about what some more details about that or what that entails or?
I don't think there's anything formalized.
I think he's just, I think he's feeding into the anti-Ari-Longa East sentiment in Port of Prince.
Isn't the current government already overthrown or no? Is it still in power?
It's not. It was never in power in the first place. It lost power when Moise was assassinated.
There was no like rule of what you call rule of law or law?
I can't pronounce his name are our
I don't know yeah yeah it's nasal so let's just it's all the front of
let's just call him Mr. A sorry
Mr. A if he's not in power right now, why does barbecue need to oppose
him on what grounds?
What does he have any power or influence?
Like, repeated, why would he specifically, like, what are his interests to oppose him?
Why does he need to oppose him if he's not in power?
Does he have some kind of power in Haiti?
Well, basically what happened is... power in Haiti or
Well, basically what happened is he's not
He's formally opposed to him, but the the Haitian population was always like
No one likes Ariel Henri like he's like, you know, he's kind of like a nerd like if you know D'Blazio in New York.
Yeah, yeah.
He's like that kind of guy like no one likes him.
So I think he, he's, he's feeding a sentiment that was already there to exile.
Ariel and read when he left for
Kenya to make a...
Yeah, yeah, I see he's asking the African Union, I think.
To intervene.
I think just specifically Kenya.
And that they carry- calm to form a government maybe it's
it's so so barrene's main enemies are who besides that guy?
Besides Giffelie but besides okay yeah sorry I misunderstood yeah gifed leap he's a Gif Philippe, but besides... Okay, yeah, sorry, I misunderst today.
Guy Philippe, he's a...
Yeah, former senator, he kind of expresses similar sentiments to...
Do you think he's an opportunist where he's just like
expressing those sentiments because it's what the Haitian people want, he's really in the pocket of the US. I highly suspect it because right
now he's not a me. It sounds like that just from hearing what you're telling you. Yeah.
Yeah. Pretty much. All right well I think that's it, but thank you so much. It was
actually really insightful. I think you've clarified a lot. Or is there more you
wanted to say or? Yeah, I just want to emphasize that this narrative that
What Haitians are experiencing is like something, you know
Completely new like Haitians have had to deal with the kind of insecurity they're dealing with now for the past
Three years like there's been no law whatsoever
And you're out for your slough in that country. What is new is it just that he fled to Kenya?
Yeah, the only thing that's new is that he's exiled. Nothing has changed on the
ground level, like if you're a normal everyday citizen.
All right, okay. Yeah, I didn't know that. So basically, Haiti looks the same as it's
ever been since 2021. The only thing that's happened recently is that the hand-picked
US-backed leader was exiled. So now we're getting reports of cannibalism and
Hades on fire, which seems like that's just there to build a pretext for us to intervene.
Because if the only thing that's changed is our guy was exiled,
it kind of seems like we'd be really eager to send troops in
to restore the order that we want to be there.
Yeah, that's what this is. Yeah. And to paint a picture that we need to do this immediately because
Haiti's in a state of chaos. So I actually I think it's pretty clear what's going on, you know
There's no can of there's no widespread cannibalism. There's no
There's none of this nothing's new basically. It's just that this guy was exiled
So now yeah, that's the only thing that's changed. We need to go save Haiti from chaos even though it's been in the same state of chaos
Since 2021
Yes, that's that's exactly what I'm trying to say. Yeah, you know, thank you so much, I think you cleared up a lot of things for us, you know, things
even I didn't know, and it was really insightful.
Thank you.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, thanks for having me.
Yeah, no problem.
I'm just trying to give expression to, like, you know, people I talk to, people I'm engaging in a daily conversation with, if anyone has questions for me, just, you know, I'm on Discord. You see my name, so.
For sure. All right, see you later.
All right. Take it easy. Bye.
Okay, guys. So there you heard it. All right, take it easy. Bye Okay, guys, so there you heard it. All right?
So nothing new is happening in Haiti. There's no
No, they're not eating and there's nothing new going on. They had some
crooked US-backed politician that they exiled and the
US is spreading propaganda that now Haiti is in this unprecedented state of
chaos because what they want to do is build consensus for an intervention and all these right-wingers are falling for it hook, line, and sinker like the suckers that they are.
Simple as that.
I would like you guys to combat right-wing propaganda about the accusations
about Haiti, about barbecue eating people and all this nonsense. We are directing
the infrared task force to roll out onto social
media and correct the fucking record on Haiti. All right? I'm tasking the guerrilla army with that.
I have a criticism of how you guys are operating too.
You guys are really good at blowing up replies.
You're really good at that, so that's a good thing, but you're not good at building ratios.
So if you see a gorilla, hit a like, build ratios.
I see so many, I'll see an op, make a tweet or a reply, and it gets like 10 likes.
And then I'll see like 20 of you guys pile on him, but each of you only gets like two
likes.
No, you need to pile on them and ratio them, okay?
So please focus on what I'm saying.
You need to actually get the numbers up.
You need to start liking each other's shit and building, gravitating toward centers, you
know.
Ape strong together, absolutely. You need to combat the propaganda. Infrared Task Force is being
deployed to combat the DOD-SIOP operations. We're going to have our own
counter-Syops. Now for the fun segment we're going to have our own counter-SYOPs. Now for the fun segment, we're
going to get into a little bit of a fun segment where I have to talk about something a little
bit relevant. But besides that, there's something else I wanted to say on that topic.
Give me a second.
No, no, no, for not, yeah, for now that's fine.
But, um, okay, another thing.
Relating to your twee- Oh, yeah, yeah, guys, make clips of me now. Make more clips
because I'm going out of my way to be more professional and I wear a suit now and I have great lighting.
And I got rid of the chat from the screen.
Because I want this all to be very clippable. And I got rid of the chat from the screen
because I want this all to be very clippable and whatnot.
So make, pump out clips.
All right, now the thing I wanted to talk about is
the tomboy gate.
The thing that has broken the internet to my profound surprise.
Now here's the thing.
There's no need for anyone to attack Samira. The thing.
There's no need for anyone to attack Samira at all.
For anything she does.
Strayla Stanny, what's up?
And I certainly will never do it.
And here's what I can vouch. I know Samira personally. Samira is not a
bad person. You can disagree with her takes. You can really get upset by some of the things
she says. But she's also a human being.
She's not a bad person.
And it seems like she's trolling most of the time anyway.
So please just ignore her.
Just ignore her.
If you don't agree with her. Now if you do agree with her, that's also
kind of a problem, especially in the recent case. The tomboy discourse, I just don't care what your opinion is on it because it's not relevant to what we're doing.
Okay, we're not going to start ideologically dying on the hill of your taste in women.
Your taste in women is something called a personal preference.
And it has no political significance. So let's just drop that topic entirely. Period.
I'm not going to comment further on it.
I'm just going to say it's not relevant to anything we're doing and you should stop talking
about it entirely.
It's also not the, it's not the, it's not the, it's not something a man does.
A man doesn't discursively mediate their taste in women.
You know, a real man isn't in here in the harem with the eunuchs gossiping about which
woman is more shaggable.
The real man is just straight up getting down to business without justifying it to anyone.
Okay?
Not a unique, gossiping in the harem about their preference which women is prettier than
the other. I mean, that's not a discursive
Point of contention. That's just it's not not for a man. All right? Anyway,
I'm kind of disappointed in guerrillas because I think you guys have this problem where you see there's a new troll campaign
and it's a lot of fun and you guys just jump in on it.
And I get it.
I get it.
But we need to choose our battles.
We need to pick and choose our battles, all right?
Because we, trolling is fun, but it needs to actually be a real point of polarization.
Maga communism, there's a lot of trolling there. Yeah, but that was a real point of political polarization
that accompanied that. I mean, this, there's no need to make enemies of people who,
you know, I guess go catfishing. I don't know. There's no need to make enemies of women who go catfishing. It's just not
Something we need to do. It's just they're not really our enemies. I don't know what what did they do to us? Nothing.
I'm not telling you to criticize Samira.
I'm telling you not to jump in on that discourse as infrared.
Okay?
Anyway, um, now that being said, I am so baffled at how viral and how much pushback Samira got.
Like 50 million views.
And it almost makes me a little suspicious like
Why did the right wing get so defendant or not even just the right wing just like conservatives?
Why did they get so defensive over it? It's literally just Samira?
This woman, Samira targeted
gained 200,000 followers overnight over this controversy. I don't know if that's organic. I really don't.
And if, I don't know why they got so defensive, it's literally just
Samira trolling. It's not like it was an entire mob. It wasn't like the
the internet was attacking this poor young lady for catfishing. No they weren't.
Samira was attacking her for cat fishing. Not the entire internet. Not the woke
mob, not like a group of people. So it was just Samira doing this and they like, they made it seem like Samira did 9-11.
That's what's going on here. They made it seem like Samira is Osama bin Laden
who flew a plane into the Twin Towers and it like caused this national tragedy where the
whole nation needs to come together to defend this catfishing woman. I mean like
who cares it's just Samira's opinion
Why did why are they treating Samira like Osama bin Laden? Why are they making it seem like we need all come together to defend? What's her name? I don't know her name
The woman I don't have anything against her her i really don't i'm just kind of
a little bit confused about why
there was such a backlash such a response
uh... what's her name
what's her name? What's her name? Uh
Why does Samira's tweets always cause so much controversy? I don't understand?
You know anyone can say anything on the internet. What's her name? Her name is...
There you go, Hannah Barron, that's her name. That's her name? Her name is...
There you go, Hannah Barron. That's her name, Hannah Barron.
I just don't believe Hannah Barron gets 200,000 followers overnight, immediately making a Twitter account, getting 200,000 followers just because
Samira was being mean to her. I just don't believe it. And what I was going to
say is that I wouldn't be surprised if like tomorrow Hannah Barron makes a a Twitter clip.
Hey y'all, I just got back from cat fishing and mudding and I was just having a
mighty good time at the range and I just was really I'm really shocked that what's going on in Haiti
with all them cannibals and whatnot we really need to send our boys to Haiti
to stop them cannibal barbecue from barbecuing people and eating them. Whatcha say, fellas?
Y'all want to get on board going to Haiti?
I feel like she's like being propped up like astroturfed for some siop shit.
You know, I feel like she's going to start being on some.
Hey, y'all, how's it going?
Did you know Iran is attacking our Navy ships in the Gulf of Aden?
We need to send our boys to teach it wrong on the lesson.
I don't know, what do you guys think? You think she's being astroturfed and propped up
now?
First of all, in reaction to Samira, the feds are like, all right, we need to create and boost this new fed-boosted personality,
make Samira the villain. They already hate Samira. We already know that.
Feds have been after Samira for a long time.
And now they're astroturfing Hannah Barron,
and she's probably going to be used and deployed for like some stupid SIOP.
Hey, y'all, I just want you to know I stand with Israel.
Now I don't have anything against her or
southern women. I'm not even trying to mock southern women right now. I just
I'm just just joking basically using the accent but I'm I wonder if she's a siop though that's what I'm
trying to say again I don't have anything against her and I think it's very
classy that she didn't respond to the bullying I don't think she did. I don't have anything against her
personally. I'm just saying I'm kind of suspicious about how viral she's gotten
just because Samira's mean comments. I mean like who cares? I'm suspicious of how defensive
conservatives got over it. Um, I'm really like suspicious of that.
Why were they so defensive about it? It didn't seem like it was a big deal to me.
I've seen things that were said that are far worse all the time.
So yeah, it does seem like this is a PSYOP.
Seems like this is a this was definitely
coordinated. 100,000% coordinated. Samira is in general. Uh, Kahnink has their own
influencer network and all these conservative influences defendants are around the same time. Yeah, yeah, it was so coordinated, you know? So
coordinated and so organized. Like yeah, do it, do um hashtag team Hannah
That is so weird it is so weird
You know, do you know what else I think is part of this puzzle a
video game I constantly keep seeing all over Twitter
and TikTok. It's called Hell Divers. And it's such a gay, retarded game. Sorry, I
don't mean to swear, but it's like, I'll never play that game first.
Doesn't even look fun. But it seems like that's like the new Con Inc. mascot game is Hell
Divers. Because it's like, America, it's like the ironic pro-imperialism of the Bush era.
America, fuck yeah, it's like, I don't believe we have any moral authority to do this,
but we're just gonna do it, because fuck yeah.
That's basically hell divers too it's like this
ironic cheerleading of global homo deep state glowy nonsense hell divers too is
basically like a feds wet dream it's like the military's wet dream.
Like you're just gonna fucking get on board with the DOD agenda for the memes.
Um, making it cool. Like they've mastered the art of syoping idiots. Yeah, like the
hell divers community, like they're all like...
Who's that idiot alt-history guy on Twitter, that fucking moron?
It's like a bunch of glowy feds who push the pro-hegemony, pro-deep-state line on Ukraine in every global conflict.
Just pro-Taiwan Redditors combined with cultural conservatives. That's con-ink for you.
That's basically like the next big thing. I say straight up just
play call of duty. I mean don't play video games at all. But if you need to play a
military shooter, go with Call of Duty.
Call of Duty is goaded.
People think Call of Duty is like the ultimate propaganda game.
No, Hell Divers 2 is the ultimate propaganda.
Call of Duty is like, you will run around,
what are the maps called again?
You'll run around shipment now,
and it's just like Nicky Menage and Warhammer and like you're not fighting like soldiers anymore. You're
fighting like Superman and Batman and Nicky Menage. The skins they have for call duty now are crazy.
And it's like that's the game to play because it actually probably is like the most fun, to be honest.
It's actually a good game. The new ones are being made in cooperation with the U.S. military. Yeah, the campaigns
are, but who plays campaign? You know? Who plays campaign? Nobody. I never play campaign
for any call duty. I played the campaign for ruled at war, but it's all
about the multiplayer, you know. Call of duty is a great game.
You know, the campaign is not relevant, you know, it's all about just shooting. But Hell Divers is very ideological.
Hell Divers, too.
It's very much like, you know, it's always in your face the theme
of the game. It's so thematic. The whole like charm of Hell Divers 2, it's not even the
gameplay which sucks. It's just how thematic it is and how thematically consistent it is. And it's like it's so gay
because it's just a bunch of a lonely man children. So I'm gonna get clipped
and canceled the fuck out of because like this is the most popular game in the
world but it's like all these lame-ass dudes are like,
We have to take Malivalent Creek.
I keep seeing that shit ever.
We have to take this planet.
We have to take it.
And we're all in it together.
And I'm not lonely anymore.
And I don't have to worry about the
fact that I don't have kids or a girlfriend and even if I do have kids and a girlfriend
I can ignore all my life's problems and just be with the boys.
Yeah, they're gonna kill me.
The gamers are gonna kill me.
But um... They're gonna kill me the gamers are gonna kill me, but
You know what? I'm like being Samira right now
I'm being like Samira right now, you know
There is what's going on. I'm just digging myself a grave, declaring war on the entire internet. But I'm allowed to have an opinion, okay? I'm allowed to have an opinion.
Call of duty is better than hell divers. That's my opinion. All right. I don't give a shit
Sue me. I'm allowed to have an opinion. Okay?
Anyway, that's just a fun little tidbit I wanted to talk about.
The quartering is going to make a YouTube video about
communist Islamic terrorist
Haas Aldean trying to take away
Haldivers two and the quarterings he'd be like first of all
hold divers to is not, first of all, Hell Divers 2 is not political.
Second of all, you are trying to insult Hell Divers 2 because you're a Russian regime puppet.
You're a propagandist of Russia.
Okay?
And I am, I don't even know what people can say, like, damn.
Oh, the band GTA 6 shit. That was hilarious.
That put Jackson Hinkle in the bad graces of the quartering.
When Jackson did that, the quartering turned against Jackson.
The quartering.
You know, my whole beard grooming technique was created
to not look like the quarterings.
I always used him as a reference.
I don't want a quartering beard. I don't want to look like that dude
I don't want that kind of beard. I don't want to look like that at all actually
The double quarter pounder with cheese by the way guys I've been doing the keto diet but it's a it's a
funny version of the keto diet where sometimes I have cheese and a little bit
of bread but more or less I've just been kind of eating meat and eggs and a tiny bit of bread and
I kind of feel great.
Kind of feel great.
Now Jackson put me on this.
I asked Jackson about it. He's like,
yeah, I just, it's all I do.
I only eat meat.
And I'm like, you could just do that.
And he's like, yeah.
Am I fasting?
No, I'm not right now, but I should be
Maybe I will starting tomorrow
Keto is a false dialectic you're right, but like I feel like I don't deserve bread, okay? Like bread is so good
that it's too good to be true and I just feel like I don't deserve it. My book
isn't finished. Also like bread I feel like it makes sense that bread makes you fat
and ruins everything. No fiber. Kind of got me there. I'm gonna have a banana after stream, all right, just because you said that.
Anyway, guys.
Yeah, I'm trying to lose.
I'm trying to, I think I got down to 185, which used to be my weight.
I don't know if you guys can tell, but I lost a lot of weight.
A lot. I lost like 15 pounds.
Just in like the past month but I'm gonna go down more 10
pounds 175 call it a deal And the reason I'm doing that guys is because I'm going to be doing more public events
soon, very soon.
And I want to look thinner, you know
Just because it just kind of looks better a little bit thinner a little more fit
Not hundred th not 135 hundred seventy five I'll never I'll never go past 170 I may as well be a woman
all right if I go below 170 I don't I'm not even a man anymore, all right?
No offense to anyone who's very skinny, but that's just my personal preference.
Uh, anyway. Oh, man.
All right.
All right.
to Victim weight
Oh man, all right guys great stream
Signing off. I'll see you guys
maybe tomorrow
We'll see
Bye guys