🔴 RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR 🇵🇸

Yeah.

For some I'm also asking for a

I'm only looking for some, I'm also asking for a

Welcome.

Going to be doing a rather impromptu stream tonight, probably not going to be lasting very long.

But the reason I find it necessary to do this stream is because there's a lot of things I think were not sufficiently clarified about the coverage we did of Haiti last stream.

There were insufficient levels of detail, there were things that even I didn't know, lies that even I took for granted and didn't question and just assumed as a given were true.

They ended up not being true.

The most infamous of which being the accusation of widespread cannibalism in the first place.

So for the record, we're going to get into the facts of this.

For the record, there is no widespread cannibalism going on in Haiti.

The video that's been circulating on X is two years old, and it's between a specific small gang skirmish, I guess.

And there was a burnt body that a gang member ate.

to terrorize the local population.

Again, very gruesome, brutal, chaotic crime, but it's not a widespread thing going on in Haiti.

Either then or now, it's not widespread.

So yeah, it happened two years ago.

It's not relevant to what's going on now at all.

Barbecue, the leader of the, I guess if you call them Confederation of Gangs or Tribes.

I mean, at what point is it a gang or a tribe?

We don't know.

He has nothing to do with cannibalism.

He's not a cannibal.

He didn't eat anyone.

His name has nothing to do with...

So these were just lies that I took for granted.

Didn't even investigate myself.

And for this, I'd like to issue a correction.

Or at least I'd like to set the record straight.

Even I took these lies.

That's how deep these psyops have gone.

It was literally all lies.

Blackpack, thank you so much.

The viral video on X literally has nothing to do with anything going on in Haiti right now at all.

Literally nothing.

Um and we're gonna get into the details of it and exactly what it was.

But we're going to have to talk about that.

It's interesting.

I think Keith Woods just now is quote tweeting me or something.

He's making a little cute little joke about cannibalism, saying that, oh, these guys talk about eat the rich.

Pretty much standard rhetoric you would get out of the con Inc.

Twitter, which they're all converging together, the right wing.

Stalin, Barry, what's going on?

I mean, Keith Woods and his ilk.

Because of the Gaza conflict, have long pretended, like, oh, we haven't sold out, though, because we're still against the Jews.

We're still against what the Zionists are doing in Gaza.

But they're as soon as you take away the Jewish factor on any matter, their position is indistinguishable from Con Inc.

and from the hegemony.

And I kind of want to talk about a little bit before we get into the details of this what we're talking about here when we talk about the hegemony.

Why is it important to oppose the latest PSYOP against Haiti?

Is it because we believe that the U.S.

should should help Haiti or give it humanitarian aid?

That has nothing to do with it.

Is it because we believe mass immigration from Haiti is a good idea?

I mean, these things are irrelevant.

They're not relevant to the matter at hand.

The matter at hand is a very immediate and pressing matter.

The deep state in the US wants to invade Haiti.

It's a very immediate and pressing matter.

They're trying to invade Haiti.

Now why should we care about that?

Well we should care about that because foreign policy is all that matters.

This is something I'd like to introduce in today's stream.

Not just for infrared people already know this, but for those of you who are not infrared people, who are watching this out of some curiosity, you should be aware of the fact that domestic policy is meaningless in the United States.

It doesn't matter.

Foreign policy is actually what matters.

In terms of.

where you stand in the war of politics, in terms of what your position is in relationship to those in power, domestic policy means literally nothing.

You can be Bernie Sanders and advocate for health care and free stuff

But you're not an enemy of the hegemony if you're falling in line when it comes to foreign policy.

You could be a right-winger who has every single one of Trump's policies, except you are a hawk.

You're overtly hawkish.

Kind of reminds me of like Ron DeSantis, right?

Ron DeSantis, I'm sure he agrees with Trump about everything when it comes to immigration and whatever.

But what does he disagree on?

He disagrees on maybe a little bit of the foreign policy stuff.

You're not going to be an enemy of the hegemony in that case.

So culture war doesn't really matter all that much.

Domestic policy doesn't really matter all that much.

Your position on foreign policy is actually what matters.

Now, we can clearly observe that this is the case.

This is just a matter of fact.

It's literally true.

But it deserves an explanation.

Why is that?

Why is it that foreign policy alone is what matters?

Well, it's simple.

Because here in the United States, we have a constitution and we have a kind of formal government based in that constitution.

And that doesn't really tell us a whole lot about how the actual power works.

Because, in addition to the Marxist analysis, the classical Marxist analysis about how there's a capitalist ruling class that buys the politicians and really does control the state machine, the dictatorship of the capitalist class.

That's been elaborated upon just a little bit by Lenin, and obviously you can imagine how much things have evolved since Lenin.

But what you have is an imperialist state machine which circumvents the constitutional order at the domestic level, building a form of power and hegemony that is primarily based on a global system of control.

It's based on a system of the control of foreign territories and countries or colonies as far as Lenin's time was concerned.

But the apparatus of superstate power, which projects dominance and control over other countries, is actually the source of the power of the ruling class here at home.

So that's why domestic policy doesn't matter all that much in the last instance.

Domestic policy obviously matters as far as our day-to-day lives are concerned, but we are many steps removed from having control over domestic policy because the system of control that we're dealing with is primarily based in imperialism.

It's based in the control of other countries.

It's based in systems of.

of power that are directed at the enslavement of the world.

Now once you can target those, once you can target the source of the ruling class's power, which is foreign imperialism,

You can then be free to do whatever you want when it comes to domestic policy, but you don't have that liberty insofar as the imperialist state machine continues to exist.

So the reason we should care about the regime's agenda in Haiti is because if they send troops and deploy troops in Haiti, guess what?

That undercuts the cause of dissidence at home.

It strengthens the power of the imperial state machine.

It builds and rallies consensus around the support for the hegemony at home.

That's why anti-imperialism is so important.

It has nothing to do with morality.

It has nothing to do with third worldism.

It has nothing to do with any abstract sense of justice.

It has nothing to do with anti-whiteness.

I very concretely explained to you what it has to do with.

It has to do with the source of the hegemony's power.

Now, of course, from a moral perspective, US imperialism is absolutely indefensible.

From the basic perspective of a civilized person who believes in basic justice and human dignity, it can be opposed on those grounds, sure, definitely.

But there's a concrete and material reason why we oppose imperialism, not just a moral one.

So I I make myself very clear, but right wingers are not very smart because it just flies over their head.

I I just explained it to you very concisely.

I just explained it to you, right?

Guess what, right-wingers,

They hear it, it goes out one ear and the other ear it comes out how?

God, you just hate white people be because you hate black people.

And this is the kind of theme that we've been building towards

and coming to an understanding of,

There are no right wing dissidents.

Right-wingers may coincidentally stumble upon a dissident position for accidental reasons, but these are not reliable people to make allies with.

That much should be absolutely fucking clear.

Sorry, I'm going to try to stop swearing.

That much should be absolutely clear.

These are not people who we're going to be making allies with.

They could be reliable allies.

Look what's going on in Haiti.

They are coming out in droves, unquestioningly marching to the tune of the hegemony's agenda.

Yes, the globo-homo hegemony, the so-called Zionist Jewish cabal that controls the world.

Well, if such a cabal exists, I don't think it does, but if it does exist, obviously it has an agenda in Haiti.

But it just shows how inconsistent they are, even when it comes to their own principles.

When it comes to anything that harms black people, they will just get on board with it, just out of petty racial resentment.

Obviously this doesn't hold true for us.

We have no problem supporting white people who fight against the hegemony.

But the dissident right and its intellectuals, specifically the ones that are sitting their ass in Ireland, trying to meddle in our affairs, they have nothing to do with it.

Keith Woods has nothing to do with MAGA.

He has nothing to do with the sentiments of MAGA.

He is motivated by pure petty racial resentment toward black people and non-whites.

And his entire position is formed around that.

As a matter of fact, the only reason these people hate Jews is because they hate non-whites.

And they believe that the only reason non-white people have significance in the world is because of the beneficence of Jewish subverters.

Because Jews are so out to get white people, that's the only reason non-whites have any relevance in the world.

That's why they hate Jews.

They are motivated by some psychopathology against non-whites.

I don't know what to tell you.

That's not a serious basis for a dissident perspective.

It's not a serious basis.

It's not a uh f for considering someone a reliable ally when it comes to the fight against the hegemony.

That's not reliable at all.

I mean, all the Globo Homo deep state needs to do is throw some racist bones at your way and you'll be marching to their tomb no problem.

I mean, I genuinely believe if the people in Gaza were black, Keith Woods and all these right-wingers would 100% support Israel.

As a matter of fact, they do support Israel in a way.

They want the US to do to Haiti what Israel is doing to Gaza now.

That's literally what their worldview is based on.

We need to just go in and conquer and dominate these people.

And what happens when they resist you?

You're going to give them the Gaza treatment?

You can admit it.

I mean, I see right-wingers admit they literally just they have a power fantasy where they just want to exterminate all black people and um

Any pretense of morality and civilization, it flies out the window.

And we are not surprised by it.

We're communists.

Our whole tradition is based in putting bullets in the bellies of Nazis and barbarians and fascists.

We're well aware of how animalistic and savage these reactionaries can become.

It doesn't come as a surprise it doesn't phase us, so to speak, but it's a vanity.

It won't happen.

Um

I mean, I don't even know if I should even address it, but if it needs to be addressed, no, there will never be a form of white racial solidarity where they're just going to go and depopulate black people or non-white people.

Why?

Because the same methods a state uses against others inevitably has to use against itself.

Why?

Because the premises of a political state are based in a always based in a domestic social antagonism of some kind.

Domestic political power always needs to continually be proven.

It's never a given, it's always based in an inner kind of struggle.

Translate translating this in simple terms: if you want to be the top dog in your own country, you have to hold your position.

This is almost like prison politics.

It's intuitive.

You want to be the top dog in prison?

That's not for free.

You got to constantly watch your back.

You got to constantly deal with people who want to come and overtake your position.

Even if you're in one gang, if you're in the Aryan Brotherhood and you're the top dog of the Aryan Brotherhood, you got to watch your back and make sure that your Aryan brothers are not going to come topple you.

So, in a way, that kind of works.

That's kind of how countries work as well.

And the methods that they use against foreigners.

Are the same ones that inevitably get used in the internal disputes that form the ground in the context of how state power is maintained.

So the reason the West doesn't just go and like kill everyone outright and its foreign imperialist adventurers, it has it's partially to do with that.

A war is never just me versus you.

It's how does my war with you relate to the internal logic of my society?

And that's why, for example, half of the Vietnam War maybe you could say half of it I would I would actually rather say fifteen percent of the Vietnam War was the domestic unpopularity.

The moral outrage that it caused.

Eighty-five percent of it was the Viet Cong kicking the US Army's ass, but fifteen percent of it was the domestic.

Um

Loss of morale.

I mean, yeah, that is a factor in warfare.

People are like, why can't we all just get on board with like going and slaughtering babies abroad?

Well, you can't do that because.

There's no clear there will in contrast to what the racists think, there's never going to be a clear racial division to where you can be inhuman toward others and that has no consequences for how you treat your own people or how you treat or how you even see yourself when you look in the mirror.

There's no exact line that's gonna allow you to have a guilt-free ability to go and, um

Commit atrocities against others and then just have this completely confident sense of identity at home.

There's absolutely no such thing.

Um so I I just wanted to address that nonsense because I keep seeing these edgy homosexuals.

I think those are the BAP people.

I lose track of these right-wing losers who all lost relevance after 2016 because their zeitgeist is over.

But um they're yeah, they're constantly saying things like, Oh, you know what I think?

I think we should just destroy Haiti and just populate it with what and then you can think whatever you want.

But you're just a homosexual with your fantasies.

There's noth there's nothing more to it.

It will never happen.

Uh i it may be it's a it's a it's a very bold

Transgression of morality.

Yeah, we can just discard the morality.

No, you can't though.

You can't.

Because it's one thing to think in terms of a video game.

It's another thing in terms of thinking in terms of good governance.

How do you govern a society?

How do you maintain social cohesion?

How do you maintain legitimacy internally?

Yeah, that's a science.

That's a difficult thing to do.

You can't just say, oh, I have guns and I'm just going to kill everyone I don't like.

And it's like, well, that's not how it works.

It's never how it's ever worked ever, by the way, uh in history.

You actually have to have a sense of what it means.

How you treat foreigners is very closely tied to how you treat your own people.

It's called civilization.

I don't I'm not someone possessed of the vanity that I believe uh this could be taught to um low IQ right-wingers.

And I say low IQ not because I believe in IQ.

I say it as a euphemism for people who are terminally and irredeemably stupid.

Which they are willfully ignorant.

I mean, is it possible they could be educated?

No.

And maybe that is inborn.

Maybe they are just born that way.

They're just picking their nose.

Even as they hear these words, they're just picking their nose, baffled.

They don't get to the part where you talk about black people being stupid and white people.

I don't know what to say.

Um those that have the intelligence to comprehend what I'm saying are ultimately the only people that matter to me because you are the shepherds that will herd these these right-wing Goyim.

That's right.

That's how we see them as cattle, you know.

You will be the ones to herd them uh or dispose of them if need be.

But anyway

Let's continue.

Yeah, we are the Judeo-Bolsheviks.

Anyway.

On a more serious note, there's a few things we have to get to the bottom of.

The first thing is that

BBQ, Jimmy Cherry's

I didn't practice his name before the stream.

Cherizier Jimmy Cherezier is the leader of G nine.

G nine uh is a um sorry no not G nine.

Delma Six

Delma Six.

Delma Six is a um

A revolutionary, it seems like.

D6.

Uh he's the leader of a kind of confederation of different gangs who want to replace and overthrow the existing Haitian state, which is just a US puppet and nothing more than that.

A deeply unpopular US puppet regime, which as you can see has not done

much for the Haitian people or Haiti, given their living standards.

It's devastated and looted them.

So he's the leader of this it seems like a confederation of different um civil society groups.

Let's put it in politically correct terms.

No, they're gangs.

I mean but what what where where does a gang in a tribe where does that begin or end?

Just because they're not l lawfully sanctioned?

Because these gangs, like some of the gangs in the U.S.'s own history, filled a vacuum where the government wasn't there.

They filled a vacuum of being able to attend to people's needs, the necessities of daily justice, the necessities of some kind of authority to enforce order.

That's what they fulfilled.

The gangs are not just like self-serving profiteers just trying to traffic drugs and get rich and make a buck.

They're spontaneous forms of.

Social organization in Haiti.

I mean, you we they are gangs, they're violent, sure, but they're not all the same either.

That's the thing.

It's funny because I'm writing about the origins of the state in the Bronze Age right now.

And if you go look at sites like.

The foothills of Anatolia, where some of the first states were emerging.

That was like different gangs taking form and fighting with each other, and then the one which not only was the strongest but had the most support from the agricultural population ended up actually uh ascending to the status of the supreme state power.

I mean that's that's the origin of civilization, sorry to tell you.

That's the sociological basis of statehood.

The state is just

The biggest gang there is.

Why do I pay taxes?

You know, it's not because I volunteer to.

Anyway,

Um

The claim is that D6 are cannibals, right?

And it's just not true.

It's just not true.

So let's just cover a few things and just get this out of the way.

And I I want you guys to clip this and make sure you clip a lot of these streams that I'm doing now because they're of a professional nature.

So look, Dom I think is one of the main accounts.

It got twenty one million views.

That was breaking the news of

The so-called cannibal gang eating body parts.

The Haiti cannibal gang leader is named Barbecue and is now the most powerful man in Haiti.

So right-wingers took this hook line and sinker and without investigating, just like with the 40 Beheaded Babies thing, Keith Shapiro, Keith Woods, Ben Shapiro's cousin, Irish cousin, looked at this and said, This is true.

Look at how he mocks me.

He says, Holy, this takes Eat the Rich to a whole new level.

It just kind of sounds like designists who, uh,.

Who mocked supporters of the Palestinians by accusing them of supporting mass rape and you know burning bodies and beheading forty babies and all this nonsense.

It's just not true.

So this video was deleted, but the video is very gruesome footage of indeed what are people who have black skin.

One guy is eating a corpse.

Not good Not good.

Very gruesome and ugly footage.

But Dom here, for reasons unknown, claimed that this had something to do with barbecue

and the D six gang and that those confederation of gangs.

Why did he claim this we don't know?

And I think this is where it originated.

Kind of seems glowy.

Kind of seems glowy.

Kind of seems like this is something someone who's on the payroll of feds would say.

Because where did that even come from, right?

Because here's Dan Cohen, who is a Jew, our Jewish brother Dan Cohen, fellow Jewish Bolshevik.

Uh who actually went to Haiti.

He went to Haiti.

He knows actually what's going on in Haiti.

He talked to this barbecue guy.

He talked to people on the ground.

So this is not barbecue.

And it has nothing to do with him.

The video, and I saw this from another source, confirmed it as well.

It's from years ago, two years ago to be precise, I believe, of a gang member in the Artibonite Artibonite, Artibonite Valley, eating a burned victim's body in order to terrorize the population.

Now keep in mind, in Haiti, there's a bunch of gangs.

There's a bunch of different gangs fighting and beefing with each other.

Barbecue and his gang...

represent the one that's more popular among the Haitian people, the one that's actually able to build some kind of consensus and try to kind of unite different ones.

In direct contrast to that, there's these anti social gangs, completely like wild

savage gangs that are completely at war with society, uh, you know, and they're they're trying to terrorize the local population into submission.

Now here's the thing.

Um that's obviously gruesome and horrible, but

Using this as a pretext to dehumanize the entirety of the Haitian people.

Um well, let's let's see.

Keith Woods.

What is he, a CELT?

Is Keith Woods assault?

Archaeologists think Celts ate each other

Including parts of sacrificial religious rituals, Keith Woods's ancestors were eating each other on a mass scale.

So cannibalism is um

Obviously horrific.

But it's not, it doesn't mean you're subhuman.

Unless you want to say Keith Woods is subhuman, which given his lies, repeated lies.

Um

And his selling out constantly, flipping on a dime whenever he can.

I mean, it wouldn't be that far off, to be honest.

It would certainly have more validity and accuracy than claiming the entirety of the Haitian people are subhuman savages because there's an anti-social evil gang there that's trying to terrorize the population into submission.

By the way, if Haitians thought it was normal to eat people, why does this gang have to do this to terrorize them into submission?

They're clearly doing something that's horrific.

They're putting on a gruesome, bloody horror show to terrorize people.

We look at this footage and we find it terrifying, so do the Haitian people.

They also find it terrifying, okay?

I mean, it goes without the fact that I even need to say this is ridiculous.

But yes, it's a major propaganda push to demonize barbecue.

Now to the extent of my understanding, and I'm willing to be corrected on this, Barbecue is being demonized because he represents the most formidable force against the government, the US backed government.

He represents a form of, I guess, political power in Haiti that doesn't answer to the United States.

So of course he's going to be demonized in this way.

I mean, just do a thought experiment.

Just do a thought experience.

Let's just say we don't know anything about what's going on in Haiti, right?

If there is a guy in Haiti rising up and mobilizing a lot of Haitians against the government, which is backed by the US, would it be above

the US, the DOD and the Psychological Operations Command to like spread lies about him?

Is that above their pay?

Is that like too much for them?

No, no, no.

The US would never lie about this guy.

They'd never spread propaganda about him.

No way.

I mean, like, they don't they they wouldn't do that.

Wh when has the US ever spread propaganda about someone they didn't like?

Like Gaddafi with the Viagra pills and Saddam and Assad?

And Putin, we've never lied about those guys.

You know, we just o we've just always told the truth about them.

That's what Destiny's community believes, but it's also what Keith Woods and his community believe.

It's also what the diss so-called dissident right believes.

They believe that the US just doesn't tell lies about people who threaten US interests.

I also invite any right-winger that wants to come on and actually demonstrate whether barbecue.

Has anything to do with cannibalism with any kind of proof?

I will give you $5,000.

You know what's interesting too is people are like, well, why is his name barbecue?

Well, it's literally in the community notes, okay?

It's literally in the community notes.

The cannibal Haiti gang leader BBQ.

No, his name is BBQ.

Because his mother used to be a meat street vendor.

So his mother

used to barbecue, food, meat,

And that's where he got his name.

It has nothing to do with cannibalism.

It also has nothing to do with something else I've heard, which is that he burns entire neighborhoods to the ground.

It has nothing to do with that.

It's pretty stupid I have to correct the record here, in the first place, but

Once you realize how much we're being lied about.

And then people say, well so you're saying everything's fine in Haiti?

No, it's it's a complete chaotic, horrific situation, but what you're doing is trying to dehumanize Haitians.

You're trying to justify the you're trying to provide a justificatory pretext for a US invasion.

Oh, we need to go and we need to go to Haiti and si oh my god, this is just we need we need to restore civilization to Haiti.

Oh, you're a shill You're a shill, is what you are.

Just because you hate black people doesn't make you, uh

a dissident.

It actually makes you the a fool and a sucker who could be manipulated into supporting people that you claim to oppose and claim to be resisting.

I digress.

Keith Woods and his ilk, these neo-Nazis and these neo-fascists, don't represent MAGA.

They don't represent the actual forces of populism anymore because they're irrelevant.

After twenty sixteen, they fell off.

They lost the ability to I mean the media with Richard Spencer and all these people kind of made them the face of this zeitgeist, but after Charlottesville, it's done.

It's done.

That's no longer the zeitgeist in any way of MAGA.

They're not at the avant-garde of anything.

The whole twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen kind of neo-Nazi plan to sneak in swastikas through Pepe the Frog, that's over.

It's done and it's over with, and it's not coming back.

Um so the to ma th so what are they doing?

They're just enlisting themselves to support the hegemony now, and that's the source of their edge.

That's the source of their

Not only their thrills, but their sense of relevancy now is just supporting the hegemony.

I want to show you what actual.

MAGA populism in the U.S.

looks like right now.

It has nothing to do with Keith Woods.

Those people are honestly tethers.

You can just really ignore them.

They don't have leadership over the masses in any capacity.

Even when it comes to the recent relevancy they got when it comes to Gaza, here's the truth.

It's just because of third world support.

That's it from the Muslim world.

Um

Most of their support has been coming from the Muslim world, and that's it.

It it's not coming from any domestic movement.

So they're not relevant internally, politically speaking, anymore.

I get that among young people.

Uh, young men, I guess they're kind of some of them are being swayed over, but

Wait until they find out about us.

Anyway, this is someone who actually represents genuine MAGA instincts.

Okay, this guy, 100% ultra MAGA patriot, Trump won Trump 2024, pure blood, Texan, truth, military police supporter, God, country, family, powder-coated metal.

So, this is an actual MAGA guy, not an Irish Twink.

Okay, this is an actual MAGA guy, and this is his reaction to what's going on in Haiti.

I know nothing about this person.

By knee jerk reaction.

was to squash him like a bug, which is what

Which is what the psyop wants you to think.

You wanna see some guy going around eating people?

Oh, get rid of him.

He's right?

But then look what he said.

He said, I know the media is demonizing him and calling him a cannibal.

I also know typically when the media does that, it's bullshit.

Haiti has been destroyed by the Clinton Foundation.

Literally true.

It's known to be a sex trafficking hub.

Literally true.

If you actually follow the Jeffrey Epstein files, you'll know that Haiti plays a big part of this network in the Caribbean.

And by Haiti I mean the US puppet government and regime that's been installed there.

And it's been in abject poverty for decades.

Also true.

And I think I believe his name was Aristide, something like that.

When Haiti did elect a leader that wanted to do something about the poverty and

fight back against the US in some minor capacity.

Guess what the US did?

They backed a coup against him.

Clinton threatened

I think he sought asylum where, in Jamaica, and Clinton threatened Jama I don't think it was Jamaica, it was some other country in the Caribbean if they didn't extradite him, treated him like a criminal.

The US overthrew him in a criminal way without any legal sanction, and then Clinton literally chased him when he fled.

It was Jamaica.

Okay.

So it's incredible.

It's incredible.

The Haitians have been struggling against US imperialism for a long time.

They were under a brutal US-backed dictator throughout almost the entirety of the Cold War.

Now why was he put there?

He was put there so that Haiti doesn't become another Cuba.

Obviously

I just checked.

Haiti's population right now it's roughly the same size as Cuba's.

So

The US clearly believes Haiti is very important to keep under control to maintain the status quo and the hegemony in the Caribbean.

If you don't know how the Caribbean factors into the as a puzzle piece of the global uh capitalist system, you're just not very educated.

I don't know what to tell you.

I don't know at all what to tell you.

Yeah, threatened sanctions against Jamaica.

I believe h Hillary Clinton was the uh

Serving role as the uh what was it?

Anyway, it's not

The question is this, is this guy an evil bastard?

They say he is, or is he a guy trying to remove a corrupt government from his country?

That's a serious question because I don't know.

So this is the instinct of MAGA.

It's not, oh, this guy's black, so I hate him.

It's, is the media lying to me about this guy?

Well, spoiler alert, they are.

I don't know if I would say that this is a good guy or a person we should support.

I don't know.

I haven't heard a diverse enough set of perspectives to draw a conclusion on that.

But I know he's not a cannibal.

I know he doesn't lead a gang of cannibals.

I know that's completely made-up bullshit.

Let's start there.

Cool.

Jozians, the profit of Cajun, we have no payennel, it's noumem AIC because Gouverneuvre et command welfare with community international communities.

Si, Yo Consigne na Uto Balila, ya plungé Aytina Ocao.

So he's saying of you know, foreigners get out of Haiti, leave us alone.

But that's not enough for Keith Woods and his friends.

That's not enough, I guess.

Because why?

Because he's black.

That's why.

So they need to completely support the regime and support the global homo agenda because this guy's black.

Literally, it's that stupid, by the way.

Uh let's see.

Why are they trying to portray him as a cannibal?

Well, let's see.

While the political class jockeys for position in hotel conference rooms, Chirizier spends his days trekking through the slums to convince people that change is possible.

What he calls the mental revolution.

This process, he says, is a necessary precursor to armed struggle.

Haunt, correction.

The gang is called G9.

It's not D6.

I don't know what.

I don't I don't know what what where what is it's G9, right?

Am I I'm right about this, right?

It was I was right, it was G nine.

By the way, right-wingers mocking uh Haitians for starving, just like the Zionists are mocking s Gazans for starving.

Haitians used to have their own rice production.

They used to have their own agriculture.

Guess what happened?

The U.S.

destroyed it.

You know, it's funny.

I talk to these people and they're like, these right-wingers are like, oh, Haas, you think Haiti is going to be a utopia?

And it's like, these people are fighting for their lives right now.

It's not about I'm betting on Haiti is going to be a.

I mean, what a stupid thing to say.

Uh you see a people fighting through h literal hell.

Against the terrorism and the evil of the global homo hegemony, the one that you pretend to oppose, but you're actually a shill for, and the first thing that comes to your mind is their racial aptitude.

What kind of stupid nonsense is that?

By the way, I keep seeing this nonsense about IQ.

IQ.

They have an IQ of 67.

Really?

Really?

They haven't.

What does that actually mean if they have an IQ of 67?

Oh, I'll tell you what it actually means.

It means not a lot of them are even literate to begin with.

Meaning when they're born, they're not taught how to write or read because they don't have widespread access to educational institutions.

Just like in the case of Africa, where we've found the IQ of Africans, guys, we've found the IQ of Eritreans.

And you want to know how we did it?

We took a small sample of children living in orphanages.

Well, we found the IQ of the Congo, right?

From 88 school children in their sixth year of schooling, you've deduced not only the IQ of the entirety of the Congo.

But the like the essence of the humanity of all black people from eighty eight school children?

What about in Namibi Namibia?

One sample of one hundred and three children from an ethnic group which Lynn and Becker acknowledge makes up only seven percent of the population of that country.

But I guess because they have black skin, that's that's all they need to deduce

Everything that ever anyone ever needs to know about.

Not only that country, but anyone who could possibly be related to them or descended from them by blood, such as Haitians.

Um

Let's continue.

Somalia's national IQ is estimated from one sample of child refugees in a Kenyan refugee camp, which we know is just the the most that's that's just like a great environment for cultivating a um

A test taking

The aptitude for standardized test taking is a refugee camp in Kenya.

It's just a great place to measure the be-all, end-all of what these people are capable of mentally.

Botswana's national IQ is estimated from one sample of 140 adolescents sampled in South Africa and were used to calculate the national IQ of Botswana, not because there was evidence that they were from Botswana, but because they were from an ethnic group which is common in Botswana.

The

The primary sources for sub-Saharan Africa this is Nassim Talib said the same thing I'm saying now, by the way, because he debunked IQ as a whole as a pseudo-scientific swindle.

This is what he called it.

But I want you to know directly how stupid it is, right?

Um yeah, so they estimate I Q from like tiny sample sizes of a few dozen children and then claim this is the entirety of the entire race of the entire country and of the entire continent and all of their descendants.

Uh sampling problems are more severe in some regions than others.

Sub-Saharan Africa has a particularly high proportion of single sample countries, of sample sizes and samples including only children.

Uh in Chapter two of The Intelligence of Nations, the authors analyze their data and demonstrate significant correlations between national IQs and many sample characteristics.

They themselves say the analysis have shown that national IQs depend partly on characteristics of the samples on which they were measured.

They show, for example, that samples had lower IQs if they had younger ages, were tested earlier in time, used older test m uh norms, and came from rural samples.

Given the differences between regions, this means the data set is regionally biased.

To substantiate their claim of low IQ among Africans, 10 to 14-year-old children.

was found to be around sixty sixty IQ, small sample of ten to fourteen year old children.

But the use of this sample is an error.

The average IQ of the people of Equatorial Guinea is based on a lengthy book chapter.

Although this chapter reports research conducted among members of an

Yeah.

Of an illiterate tribe.

These people are not even literate.

They can't even read.

They're not even literate and they're administering them standardized tests to draw conclusions about their fundamental inborn physical

Aptitude

For mental tasks.

If you, if that sounds like it's not extremely stupid to you, um,

You could have done this to any European twenty thousand years ago, and it would have given you the same result.

According to the Darwinists, basically nothing has changed in 20,000 years as far as our inborn physical characteristics.

We weren't always literate, you know?

People need to understand this.

Like

When you claim that because there was a video recording of cannibalism in Haiti, that this says something about their race, like in essence, again, the person who's saying this, Keith Woods, is a CELT.

Widespread cannibalism among the Celts.

Reported by the Romans.

2,000 years or 3,000 years even is nothing biologically.

It's nothing.

It's literally nothing.

according to their own methodology, if it's genetics well, genetically speaking, that's not that's not enough time for the for mutations to have emerged, which, you know, correct I don't know.

It's not, you know.

Anyway, um

They were an illiterate tribe, but here's the thing: they weren't even administered to those Africans.

The forty-eight children who they were administered were from Spain.

Not Equatorial Guinea.

Clearly, Lin made a mistake in using this sample to estimate average IQ of Africans.

And look, this guy

Got thirteen thousand likes.

And look at this picture.

Well, the data's clear.

Look at this, an entire continent.

The Congo says 64.

Because a few dozen school children in some refugee camp were given a standardized test

The meaningfulness of which

was in all likelihood, I mean, completely lost on them.

But from that we were able to deduce that actually

I mean, look, all this is a proxy for is political instability.

Okay.

I mean, look how stupid this is.

These European countries are in blue, but Persia is in.

Is is like is like in um

Oranges

This is literally the origin.

Persia is literally what bequeathed upon these snow monkey Yacubians any semblance of civilization.

The Persian Empire is literally one of the major sources of civilization on planet Earth.

You're telling me that Persians.

Are dumber

I mean, I don't I don't know who I'm gonna offend here, but

You're telling me that Persians are dumber than Irish people?

I'm sorry, I'm sorry to say this.

I don't hate Irish people.

I don't have anything to d against them, but like, are you seriously trying to claim Persians are more stupid than Irish people?

Sorry, I just don't believe that.

I don't care what kind of map or data you think you're going to present.

A priori, I know that's wrong.

Sorry.

I just know that's wrong a priori.

Why?

Because if I pick up a history book, Persia's gonna be there.

Ireland isn't.

Simple as that.

I mean, Ireland will be there because it was oppressed by Britain, and that's literally it.

I'm not here to roast Ireland or insult them, but please don't be here be humble.

Don't claim you're smarter than Persians.

It's just the most stupid thing I've ever heard.

And it's like look at how many scientists and brilliant engineers and whatever are coming out of Persia now and how educated they are and like yeah, but yeah, Persia is uh

No, all this i uh look, if you're more blue, you're more politically stable.

If you're more in the red, then you're more politically unstable.

That's all this means.

It has nothing to do with your essential, uh, inborn, inevitable.

Um physical characteristics, literally nothing.

And then once you see from this map how these uh numbers are being drawn in the first place, you realize how fucking stupid it is.

Sorry, excuse my swearing.

I don't mean to continue swearing.

Uh doesn't that mean IQ correlating to their well, no, because Europe was the most politically unstable place on earth during the Middle Ages.

It was completely fractured into like a million different kingdoms.

There you think Europe was there was bandits and chaos all over the place.

And yeah, they were eating each other, especially in times of famine, which did occur in medieval Europe.

Again, not enough time has passed for any significant changes in genetics to account for the discrepancy.

Uh political instability has nothing to do with

You can't reduce that to some kind of like I d I don't know uh some lines of some some sequences in your D N A or something.

That that has no historical import whatsoever.

Political instability is relevant from the perspective of history.

History comes, this is the ultimate Hegelian lesson you should understand.

Before there is even a single.

Subatomic particle in the universe, there's history, there's a dialectic in motion.

orienting that particle toward something that it itself is not, culminating in what Ilyankov calls thinking beings.

Even a rock is latent

With the fate that culminates in the thinking being.

So let's not get into metaphysics.

We're against metaphysics, of course, but the Anglo-Saxon metaphysics that are just assumed as a given.

by these actual subhuman illiterates.

And why am I calling these right wingers subhuman illiterates?

Because they have access to education.

They have access to the Internet.

In addition to having access to these things, they see fit to open their mouth on matters they just have no education about whatsoever.

I mean, at least read a book if you're gonna like make these claims and be so confident about them.

At least read a damn book or something.

This guy also makes a great argument.

Uh right here.

So he'll basically explain to you what IQ is, right?

IQ is just literacy rates.

IQ variations across time, race, and ethnicity can all be explained by literacy rates.

So Jews, because they're the most educated demographic on the planet, have the highest IQ.

East Asians have 99% literacy.

So they have the second highest IQ.

Europeans, the third.

Africa, there's a 60% literacy rate.

So that's why.

National IQ is directly proportional to the literacy rate without fail.

And by the way, mass literacy is something very recent and modern.

Before the invention of the printing press in Europe, hardly anyone could read.

You had to be like some kind of monk in a monastery.

Your average potato farming Irish peasant couldn't read.

The Irish were regarded up until very recently to be a subhuman race.

No different than Africans in the minds of the Anglo Saxon metaphysicians and so called race scientists and race realists of the nineteenth century.

But because America

uh modernized Ireland and gave them education and Internet access.

Now the Irish are getting uppity and claiming that they're the superior race.

Which I I don't know.

Is that a tragedy?

Does Cromwell need to come back?

I don't know.

But it's just a fact.

Um

Look, I don't hate Ireland.

I'm not here to attack the Irish, but there's certain nationalities that are in need of being humbled right now, I think.

I think so.

Brazil grows wider than most European countries and the US yet has lower IQ in this map.

Interesting.

Uh

Argentina has the mo like I didn't let me let me see.

Oh yeah.

That is pretty funny, isn't it?

Look at this.

Argentina is like one of the most European countries on earth in terms of ancestry.

And yet

Argentina I believe is more European than the US is, yet it's ten points down below the US.

Pretty insane.

Also, it has the same score as Madagascar.

Not sure what that's supposed to mean.

I'm not exactly sure what that's supposed to mean.

But probably not something that the white supremacists will be able to explain to us, that's for sure.

Uh okay, so there's a documentary about Haiti.

I don't know if we're going to watch that.

I think what we can do is

There's someone from Haiti who wants to come on and talk.

But I think I want to make some clippable moments before I.

Where I do that.

So.

Let's get down to business, shall we?

Okay, first argument.

They're literally eating each other in Haiti.

You mean a two-year-old video of an for all we know an isolated incident that in no way proves that cannibalism is widespread in Haiti now even or then?

You mean a video that has absolutely nothing to do with barbecue, whose name comes from the fact that his mother used to sell meat, it has nothing to do with cannibalism whatsoever, who's leading the G nine against the US backed regime there, which is deeply unpopular among the Haitian people.

Um hm.

Let's see.

Haiti is a shithole just because black people are inferior.

Well, okay, I mean, if black people are so inferior, why did a why did France enforce an embargo against Haiti after they gained independence?

You know, I haven't heard of a lot of countries that are able to just prosper and develop when they're literally not allowed to trade with anyone in the world.

Or how about a few decades after that, in eighteen twenty five, when France imposed upon Haiti an insurmountable, literally insurmountable debt as a condition for recognizing them and lifting that embargo?

Does that mean nothing?

People say, Well, what about the Dominican Republic?

Because there's not an as much blacks there, that's why the Dominican Republic is more prosperous.

The Dominican Republic was invaded by Haiti a few times in the nineteenth century.

And because of this, it eventually sought recourse from European powers who lent them a hand and actually helped them out.

to develop and protect them from Haiti Haiti's invasions.

The Dominican Republic has a indigenous ruling class that is aligned

with global imperialism.

And in addition to that, it's not as politically unstable because it's more consolidated because of that ruling class and internal political history.

Haiti has never been fully consolidated by the US Empire.

contrary to its wishes.

They had the US put a tinpot dictator in place through the entirety of the Cold War.

When Haiti finally got its first democratically elected leader, we overthrew him in a coup and put back some sick bastards in their place.

Haiti has never been a free country.

Never.

They've always been punished.

They've always been attacked.

Their development has always literally been thwarted.

All of their resources, all of their land, stolen and looted.

Oh, this is just the old story of how white people are to blame for all of black people's problems.

No, that's what you're saying.

I'm not saying that's what you're saying.

I'm just giving you the facts.

The reason Haiti and some countries in Africa are underdeveloped, terminally underdeveloped, yes, is because of European colonialism.

You want to come up and debate me about that?

And let's just stick to the facts.

And I will wipe the floor with you.

You can go with your grand narratives about white people from black people and all this nonsense.

And I'll just stick to the actual facts.

And I will literally wipe the floor with you.

But then again, you won't debate me on these matters because you don't want to end up like Patrick Casey.

You don't want to end up barbecued by Haas.

I'm known for barbecuing white people.

I'm literally barbecue.

Haz Aldeem barbecue.

They don't want to be Patrick Casey.

All I did was present Patrick Casey facts, and he folded.

I became the white man that day.

Whatever that means to them.

That means the superior race very well.

I'm the superior race then.

because I wiped the floor with him, just using basic facts.

Well, so you're saying it's never black people's fault.

I mean, you're the one introducing all this moral nonsense to the equation.

We're talking very concretely about the factors behind what enables a country to be prosperous.

Those are absolutely political factors.

They are absolutely geopolitical factors.

Do you think China could have ever become prosperous had it not become a communist state and completely expelled all traces of foreign imperialism?

How could China have ever gotten prosperous?

Do you even know what the Cold War was about?

You think the Cold War was just about differences in ideology?

No, it was about countries knowing that insofar as they're under the boot of Europe and America, they will never be prosperous, wanting independence and pursuing an independent path of development so they can prosper for their kids and for future generations.

You think the Cold War was fought about abstract doctrines and ideas?

No, it was fought by people who wanted a better future for both themselves and their children, but were prevented from having that future by the forces of U.S.

and European colonialism.

It was a life and death war that people fought, giving and laying down their lives for.

You think that's not political?

You think that countries can just automatically prosper because they have the right racial stock?

No, my friend, it's a war, a war to the death about gaining your independence, gaining your human dignity, gaining your sovereignty.

That is forged in blood, not some inborn racial stock gibber that you're talking about.

You think this whole story of the 20th century is just what?

What do you think all these wars were about?

What do you think the Soviet Union was fighting about?

What do you th why do you think the world attacked the Soviet Union?

Why did they attack the Bolsheviks when they immediately took power?

Because the Bolsheviks were a literal siren on the face of planet Earth, broadcasting to the entirety of enslaved humanity to rise up

and take control of their own future.

That was the menace of Bolshevism.

Behind this.

Fear-mongering about the Jew and Judeo-Bolshevism.

It was a fear of the African and the Indian.

and the Arab and the Turk

And the Asian.

And of the European worker too.

But this idiocy, oh, what racial stock do these people have for them to be prosperous?

Prosperity isn't free.

It's not, it just doesn't automatically happen.

It's a geopolitical

Thing.

It's a political thing.

Japan, South Korea, Germany,

prospered because of the Marshall Plan.

They didn't prosper because they autonomously just pulled themselves from the bootstraps of their racial stock and just automatically became wealthy countries.

That's not how it works.

How it works is, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, it's been a game of seizing surpluses of capital and disposing of those surpluses in ways that are political.

Either using them to create vast foreign colonies and neocolonies to extract the resources of others and ruthlessly crush competition, or totally throwing off the yoke of foreign colonialism, learning modern science technology, and from zero, from year zero, from scratch, superindustrializing your country from scratch, extracting raw surpluses from agricultural production.

To challenge and stand up to the West, that's what Russia did, that's what China did.

Were there famines?

Was it harsh?

Were there a lot of calamities?

Absolutely.

But every single person that died under Stalin and Mao, it was worth it.

Because that was the only way.

That was the only way that people outside of the big club could become free, sovereign, and powerful without becoming slaves like the Japanese and the South Koreans.

They are free men.

Their children will be free.

Generations from now, their people will be free.

because they made the hard and tough choices.

to turbo industrialize their countries, however ruthlessly.

However cruelly

That's how they became formidable rivals of the West.

The West did it just as cruelly, by the way, but the cruelty was imposed upon others.

The Chinese and the Russians, they took responsibility for the costs of modernization and industrialization.

They themselves dealt with it internally.

They faced existentially all of the evil demons of modernity.

All of the evil demons of industrial modernity, the human costs of it.

They put this burden on themselves instead of offloading it hypocritically upon others and then reminiscing hundreds of years later about who the superior racial stock is and who isn't.

You want to talk about civilization?

The era of these piratical barbarians looting and raping the world in the name of civilization?

That's come to an end.

Whether it's the name civilization or rules based world order, the West has died in Gaza.

Now we're in the midst of a new era, and the coping right-wing so-called dissidents.

are fully in lockstep behind the global homo hegemony to salvage and save what is a dying and unsalvageable global order, where one golden billion rules on top of the rest of the world.

Not gonna happen anymore.

Just like the Gazans, just like the people in Palestine.

No people on earth are gonna suffer the indignity.

of being second class citizens or sub humans.

No one is going to live under the foot of a so called master race.

Gazans won't, Africans won't, Haitians won't.

Asians certainly won't.

They'll give up their lives for it.

They'll cause you a headache.

Till you have no choice.

I mean, think about it.

What's stopping the so-called State of Israel from just killing everyone in Gaza?

Just their moral beneficence?

No.

They'd be squashed like a bug immediately if they did that, because the Muslim world wouldn't take that outrage.

Don't think weapons of mass destruction and nuclear weapons

are enough for some political agenda to completely

dominate the world for free, without having to recognize the human dignity of others.

Brute no one can rule by brute force alone.

Why?

Because people are willing to die for their dignity.

If it was possible that brute force alone could rule the world, we wouldn't be seeing a genocide in Gaza right now.

We would have never seen an October 7th.

The Palestinian people wouldn't even exist anymore.

They would have given up.

They haven't given up because they have been subjected to the most mercilessly cruel brute force.

In modern history, and they still haven't given up because they're willing to die for their dignity.

Maybe the modern porn addled consumerist western subject can't understand that.

But the Houthis are there to educate you.

The Gazans are there to educate you.

Hezbollah's there to educate you.

The IRGC is there to educate you.

Hell, the Taliban is there to educate you.

This isn't a world that was built by people who are scared to die at all costs.

to the detriment of their own dignity.

That's not who wrote the pages of history.

Who wrote the pages of history are people who not only lived but also died for a reason, had something to die for.

That was the only reason they could claim that they lived a meaningful life.

So let's be clear.

Let's be absolutely clear.

Alright, well there's someone from Haiti I think I'm gonna bring on to discuss the events there, talk about what's going on.

Stalin, Beria, Gulag, what's going on, man?

Ah, okay, he's in the show queue.

Let me bring him up.

He's currently muted.

And deafened.

Alright.

Hey, how's it going?

Hey, what's up, Djorf?

Um I take it that you have a uh level of familiarity of what's going on in Haiti that most of us don't, and uh I want to give you the opportunity to educate us on maybe things we might be missing or fill us in on some details.

Yeah, yeah.

So, um, just a quick disclaimer.

I'm not as educated on the topic as uh like Kim Ives and Daniel Cohen or Dan Danny Shaw might be 'cause they've actually been to the country.

But my background is my uh my dad is Haitian.

Um he or my dad is uh

My dad's parents are Haitian.

My grandparents emigrated from the country around some sometime during the Duvalier regime.

Okay.

That's fine.

Your credentials are not in question at all.

I think I'm going to do this where I'm just going to ask you questions and then if you can answer, that would be good, because I see your bullet points.

So what we want to know is are we seeing a revolution in Haiti right now?

Is it a political revolution?

Unified by a kind of...

Yeah, so I wouldn't describe the uh revolution as unified.

There are I mean, I've seen different political leaders like uh

Sherry Jay has some popularity.

There's different there's different gang leaders even with some popularity of political parties.

And there are some there are some messages on um

How would I put it?

Like I guess you'd call them

There's iconography on social media that does unify the people.

For example, the question of insecurity.

There's a general consensus that the number one problem in Haiti, if you look on social media, everyone believes the number one problem is insecurity, which is the threat of gangs basically kidnapping you, holding you for ransom and extorting your family for money.

This is something that my contacts in Haiti have experienced.

So, um

Is is Barbecue's Gang G9 s a gang that practices this?

It's inconclusive in my opinion.

I I know Kim Kim Ives and Daniel Cohen offer like eyewitness testimonies that state the contrary.

I've seen some other testimonies circulating on social media that claim they've seen barbecue work with the Tet Calais party, the sort of center-right party that Moise was a part of to engage in political suppression massacres.

But I haven't seen like a cohesive investigation and a narrative putting the all of the testimonies for it.

Geopolitically, is there a division?

Are there some factions more amicable to the United States?

Are there some that are more hostile?

What's the situation out that front?

Um I don't think there's any really unified faction that's amicable to the United States.

Um maybe I think there's legacies from some political parties that are like not that popular.

So what like on social media that's dividing the gangs right now?

Yeah, I don't know.

I can't answer that question.

What what about the political factions?

What are they divided by right now?

Um I would say sh I mean Sherry's Yay is a big topic.

Like I said, there's there's one narrative from the legacy of the Lavala's uh party, the Social Democrat Party, that's sorry, uh, just to cut you off, just for our viewers, let's call him BBQ 'cause that's what he's known by.

And most people probably can't pronounce that.

Um yeah, my bad.

No, no, no, no problem.

I just wanted to

Just so people can follow along.

So so Yeah, so th there's two competing narratives around Sherry Jay from what from what I've seen.

Like some people see him as a, you know, legitimate like anti anti imperialist force.

Some people think he's guilty of the crimes he's accused of.

Um

I mean, another political faction to keep in mind is Guy-Philippe.

He was the.

He was sort of a anti Lavalas, anti-leftist, um

I guess you'd call it a coup leader under the Bush administration.

And he's coming out against barbecue, yeah.

Actually, I haven't seen that.

What I've seen him do is come out against um CarryCom in the US um

US intervention.

I think like a big big consensus is either like

The US

Should either not intervene or the CARICOM plan is not good enough.

The reaction to the CARICOM plan in the Caribbean community is really skeptical from what I've seen on Haitian social media.

So to educate.

Our viewers, what does the U.S.

want from Haiti?

Why is the U.S.

so invested in Haiti?

I have my own theories, of course, but.

Um I'm I'm just gonna stick to my knowledge stuff 'cause I think uh I I don't have enough information.

It's it's too speculative.

There's yeah, I don't know enough about the I ba I basically think what's going on is that the US has long relied on Haiti uh as a secure uh geopolitical kind of uh

Outpost of US interests in the Caribbean.

It's just taken that for granted for the longest time.

And as soon as a leader emerged in Haiti in the 1990s, which might call that into question, the U.S.

became very insecure about it.

And maybe it's not necessarily that the U.S.

wants specific resources in Haiti, but it's terrified of the political vacuum there that may lead Haiti to go down maybe the path of Cuba and, you know, be perhaps amicable to world powers that the U.S.

is opposed to.

So that's kind of my theory.

It's more like a maintenance of hegemony kind of position.

Yeah.

I mean, that's how I understand that's how I understand how all these world powers kind of think based on because Haiti's on the US's doorstep, and because it's such a politically unstable situation, I think that basically the US is looking at it like, okay, if we have to lock this place down, because if we don't, you know, they might form ties with Russia or China, and that's literally on our doorstep.

We can't tolerate that.

So that's kind of how I've seen it.

It's almost an extension of the Cold War in a way.

Yeah, I mean, um I haven't done mus much research into Haiti specifically, but based on like my knowledge of foreign policy and things like that, yeah, I'd have to agree.

Does it I don't I don't have any information that contradicts what you're saying.

Put I'll put it that way.

Yeah.

Um what about the cannibalism claims?

Do you think that's uh what do you think about that?

Is is cannibalism widespread in Haiti right now?

No, it's not.

I mean, this is a big narrative I wanted to push back against, is that people on social media this is the the prevailing narrative I see and I'll I'll introduce some more uh anecdotes that contradict it.

The prevailing narrative I think people are assuming based on social media is that

Porter Prince was like relatively, you know, maybe there was high crime or whatever, but then it was thrown into chaos by this coup where Ariel Henry was exiled and can't return to the country and the liberal democratic institutions were conquered by the gangs.

And now everyone's just living in hell, chaos, is complete terror.

But people have been living in that same level of terror since Javin Mais was assassinated back in 2021.

2021, yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah, I even hear that the footage of that cannibalism was from years ago.

It wasn't, it's nothing recent.

Yeah, and there's nothing connecting it to the G9 gang.

I mean, for one, Sherry's Yay barbecue, he's accused of a lot of crimes, right?

But no one has seriously accused him of cannibalism.

No journalist or like serious.

I agree with Cohen, and I think that the reason they're spreading this cannibalism narrative is just to build consensus for a U.S.

invasion.

Because, you know, I see a lot of right-wingers say, oh, no, I don't want to invade Haiti.

I just want to call them subhuman blacks.

But then I say, well, you're not, you're an anti-social freak.

You're not the average citizen of the U.S.

where if you just tell them, oh, they're eating people here, they're probably not going to question an invasion.

So that's why this narrative is being spread.

What do you think?

No, yeah, I think that's why it's being spread.

I mean, I think, you know, it's on Twitter primarily, which we know, like, is owned by Elon Musk, and he deliberately spread the rumor of cannibal gangs being circulated on Haiti.

Like, he was one of the people who reposted it on social media yesterday or two days ago.

So, I think, yeah, it's part of, you know, he's reflecting his interest by boosting this.

There's a guy apparently in Haiti backed by Venezuela, children of Dessalines.

Do you know anything about that?

I haven't heard anything about it.

Children of Desalines, is that what they're called?

I'm I mean I'm sure it exists, but um

It's just uh not something I see like trending on social media.

Like that's my perspective.

I'm just looking at what people are writing in Haitian cradle on like Facebook and Twitter basically.

Uh is there sentiment um what is what is w so their sentiment I uh is about basically restoring law and order, more or less, restoring security.

Is there is there an anti-colonial sentiment?

Is there a kind of sentiment uh about imperialism or?

I mean, I I guess some people like barbecue might be giving some expression to that, but I I don't say I'm using specifically like anti-colonial uh

May maybe they kind of do, but like there's no I don't think there's any unified expression of like anti-colonial politics pro-interventionist sentiment.

By the way, the guy's name is Jean Charles Moise.

Sorry if I'm mispronouncing that.

Moise, yeah.

Moise, yeah.

Do you know anything about him?

The the leader of the Venezuelan movie?

Let me look this up real quick.

He apparently is backed by Venezuela.

Um.

Yeah, I don't know.

I I haven't heard about him, to be honest.

He he might not be he might be like a French political figure.

That's my assumption.

He's part of a platform Petit Dessaline.

I don't know if you've heard that.

Petit.

I don't know if it's I don't know how to say it.

It's not petite 'cause it's p spelled differently.

Child of Dessalines platform.

It seems like I I would guess that this guy is just not extremely relevant in Haiti is the issue.

So he's not like a source of polarization.

I don't think so, yeah.

Uh

But uh uh sorry, to get back to the question, I I don't know if I ignored you, but um is there pro-interventionist sentiment at all coming out of the social media you're seeing?

I would say it's it exists, but it's like marginal.

Like it there's no viral, you know, like trending pro-interventionist sloganeering or sentiment like that, you know what I mean?

G nine is basically trying to form a new government in Haiti, right?

Yeah.

And does anyone know about what

Some more details about that or what that entails or

Um I don't think there's anything formalized.

I think he's just I think he's feeding into the anti-Ariel Angli sentiment in uh in Port-au-Prince.

Is it government already overthrown or no?

Is it still in power?

It's it's not it was n it was never in power in the first place.

It lost power when Moise was assassinated.

There was no like rule of what do you call it rule of law or law of order whatsoever.

I can't pronounce his name.

R R R Henri.

Yeah.

Yeah, it's it's Nasu.

Sorry.

Let's just it's hard to pronounce.

Let's c just call him Mr.

A.

Sorry.

Mr.

A, um if he's not in power right now, w w why does Barbecue need to oppose him?

On what grounds?

What does he have any power or influence or?

Like repeated why would he specifically like what are his interests to oppose him or why does he need to oppose him if he's not in power?

Does he have some kind of power in Haiti or?

Well, basically what happened is he he's not he's formally opposed to him, but the the the Haitian population was always like no one likes Arielle Henri.

Like he's like, you know he's kind of like a nerd.

Like if you know de Blasio in New York.

Yeah, yeah.

He's like that kind of guy.

Like no one likes him.

So

I think he he he's r he's feeding on sentiment that was already there to exile Ariel Henry when he left for Kenya to make a Yeah, yeah.

I think just specifically Kenya and that they uh carry comm to form a government maybe uh it's it's so barbarous main enemies are who besides that guy.

Besides uh Guy Philippe, but besides similar sentiments to Do you think he's an opportunist where he's just like expressing those sentiments 'cause it's what the Haitian people want, but he's really in the pocket of the US?

Yeah.

Pretty much.

All right.

Well, um I think that's it.

But thank you so much.

It was actually really insightful.

I think you've clarified a lot.

Or is there more you wanted to say or?

Yeah, I just want to emphasize that this narrative that um

What what Haitians are experiencing is like s something, you know

Completely new like

Haitians have had to deal with the kind of insecurity they're dealing with now for the past three years.

Like there's been no law whatsoever.

You're out for yourself in that country.

What is new?

Is it just that he fled to Kenya?

Yeah, the only thing that's new is that he's exiled.

Nothing has changed on the ground level, like if you're a normal everyday citizen.

Okay, yeah, I didn't know that.

So basically, Haiti looks the same as it's ever been since 2021.

The only thing that's happened recently is that the hand-picked U.S.-backed leader was exiled.

So now we're getting sports of cannibalism and Haiti's on fire, which seems like that's just there to build a pretext for us to intervene.

Because if the only thing that's changed is our guy was exiled, it kind of seems like we'd be really eager to send troops in to restore the order that we want to be there.

Yeah, that's what this is.

And to paint a picture that we need to do this immediately because Haiti's in a state of chaos.

And so I actually, I think it's pretty clear what's going on.

You know, there's no widespread cannibalism.

There's none of this.

Nothing's new, basically.

It's just that this guy was exiled.

So now that's the only thing that's changed.

We need to go save Haiti from chaos, even though it's been in the same state of chaos since 2021.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm trying to say.

Yeah.

You know, thank you so much, Djorf.

I think you cleared up a lot of things for us.

You know, things even I didn't know.

And it was really insightful.

Thank you.

I mean, thanks for having me.

Yeah, yeah, no problem.

I'm just trying to give expression to, like, you know, peop the people I talk to, people I'm engaged in a daily conversation with.

If anyone has questions for me, just, you know, I'm on Discord.

You see my name.

For sure.

For sure.

All right.

See you later.

All right.

Take it easy.

Bye.

Okay guys, so there you heard it.

All right.

So nothing new is happening in Haiti.

There's no, they're not eating it.

There's nothing new going on.

They had some crooked US-backed politician that they exiled.

And the US is spreading propaganda that now Haiti is in this unprecedented state of chaos because what they want to do is build consensus for an intervention.

And all these right-wingers are falling for it, hook, line, and sinker, like the suckers that they are.

Simple as that.

I would like you guys to combat right-wing propaganda.

About the accusations about Haiti, about barbecue eating people and all this nonsense.

We are directing the Infrared Task Force to roll out onto social media and correct the fucking record on Haiti.

All right.

I'm tasking the guerrilla army with that.

I have a criticism of how you guys are operating too.

You guys are really good at blowing up replies.

You're really good at that, so that's a good thing, but you're not good at building ratios.

So if you see a gorilla, hit a like, build ratios.

I see so many, I'll see an op make a tweet or a reply, and it gets like 10 likes.

And then I'll see like 20 of you guys pile on him, but each of you only gets like two likes.

No, you need to pile on them and ratio them.

Okay, so please focus on what I'm saying.

You need to actually get the numbers up.

You need to start liking each other's shit and building, gravitating toward centers, you know?

Ape strong together, absolutely.

Um

You need to combat the propaganda.

Infrared Task Force is being deployed to combat the DOD PSYOP operations.

We're going to have our own counter-PSYOPS.

Now for the fun segment.

We're going to get into a little bit of a fun segment where I have to talk about something a little bit relevant.

But besides that.

There's something else I wanted to say on that topic.

Give me a second.

No, no, no, for n yeah, for now that's fine.

But um okay, another thing relating to your tweet oh yeah yeah, guys, make clips of me now.

Make more clips because I'm going out of my way to be more professional and I wear a suit now and I have great lighting and and I got rid of the chat from the screen.

Because I want this all to be very clippable and and whatnot.

So make m pump out clips.

Alright, now the thing I wanted to talk about is.

The Tomboy Gate.

The thing that has.

Broke in the internet to my profound surprise.

Now, here's the thing.

There's no need for anyone to attack Samiro.

At all.

For anything she does.

Straila Stani, what's up?

And I certainly will never do it.

And here's what I can vouch.

I know Samira personally.

Samira's not a bad person.

You can disagree with her takes.

You can really get upset by some of the things she says.

But

She's also a human being.

She's not a bad person.

And it seems like she's trolling most of the time anyway.

So please just ignore her.

Just ignore her.

if you don't agree with her, right?

Now if you do agree with her...

That's also kind of a problem, especially in the recent case.

The tomboy discourse, I just don't care what your opinion is on it because it's not relevant to what we're doing.

Okay, we're not going to start ideologically dying on the hill of your taste in women.

Your taste in women is something called a personal preference.

And it has no political significance, so let's just drop that topic entirely.

Period.

Um

I'm not gonna comment further on it.

Uh I'm just gonna say it's not relevant to anything we're doing and you should stop talking about it entirely.

It's also not the um it's not the imp it's not the it's not something a man does.

A man doesn't discursively mediate their taste in women.

You know, a real man isn't in here in the harem with the eunuchs gossiping about which woman is more

shaggable.

Okay.

The real man is just straight up

getting down to business without justifying it to anyone.

'Kay.

Not a eunuch gossiping in the harem about their preference, which women is prettier than the other.

I mean, that's not a discursive point of contention.

That's just, it's not, not for a man, all right?

Anyway, um, I'm kind of disappointed in gorillas because I think you guys have this problem where you see there's a new troll campaign, and it's a lot of fun, and you guys just jump in on it.

And I get it.

I get it.

But

But we need to choose our battles.

We need to pick and choose our battles, alright?

Because uh

Because we trolling is fun, but it needs to actually be a real

point of polarization.

MAGA communism, there's a lot of trolling there, yeah.

But that was a real point of political polarization that accompanied that.

I mean, this there's no need to make enemies of people who

You know, I guess go catfishing.

I don't know.

There's no need to make enemies of women who go catfishing.

It's just not something we need to do.

It's just they're not really our enemies.

I don't know wh what did they do to us?

Nothing.

I'm not telling you to criticize Samira.

I'm telling you not to jump in on that discourse as infrared.

Okay, anyway, um, now that being said, I am so baffled at how viral.

And how how much pushback Samira got?

Like fifty million views.

And it almost makes me a little suspicious.

Like, why did the right wing get so defe or not even just the right wing, just like conservatives, why did they get so defensive over it?

It's literally just Samira.

This woman, Samira targeted, gained 200,000 followers overnight over this controversy.

I don't know if that's organic.

I really don't.

And if I don't know why they got so defensive, it's literally just Samira trolling.

It's not like it was an entire mob.

It wasn't like the internet was attacking this poor young lady for catfishing.

No, they weren't.

Samira was attacking her for catfishing.

Not the entire internet.

Not the woke mob.

Not like a group of people.

So it was just Samira doing this, and they like, they made it seem like Samira did 9-11.

That's what's going on here.

They made it seem like Samira is Osama bin Laden, who flew a plane into the Twin Towers, and it like caused this national tragedy where the whole nation needs to come together to defend this catfishing woman.

Uh, I mean, like, who cares?

It's just Samira's opinion.

Why are they treating Samira like Osama bin Laden?

Why are they making it seem like we need to all come together to defend?

What's her name?

I don't know her name.

Uh, the woman.

I don't have anything against her.

I really don't.

I'm just kind of a little bit confused about why there was such a backlash, such a response.

Uh what's her name?

What's her name?

Uh

Why does Samira's tweets always cause so much controversy?

I don't understand.

Uh, you know, anyone can say anything on the internet.

What's her name?

Her name is there we go.

Hannah Baron.

That's her name.

Hannah Baron.

Um

I just don't believe Hannah Barron gets 200,000 followers overnight, immediately making a Twitter account, getting 200,000 followers just because Samira was being mean to her.

I just don't believe it.

And what I was going to say is that I wouldn't be surprised if, like, tomorrow Hannah Baron makes a Twitter clip.

Hey, y'all.

I just got back from catfishing and mudding, and I was just having a mighty good time at the range.

And I just was really, I'm really shocked at what's going on in Haiti with all them cannibals and whatnot.

We really need to send our boys to Haiti to stop them cannibal barbecue from barbecuing people and eating them.

What you say, fellas?

Y'all want to get on board going to Haiti?

I feel like she's like being propped up, like astroturfed.

for some PSYOP shit.

You know, I feel like she's gonna start being on some Hey y'all, how's it going?

Did you know Iran is attacking our navy ships in the Gulf of Aden?

We need to send our boys to teach Iron a lesson.

I don't know.

What do you guys think?

You think she's being astroturfed and propped up now?

First of all, in reaction to Samira, the feds are like, all right, we need to create and boost this new Fed-boosted personality.

Make Samira the villain.

They already hate Samira.

We already know that.

Feds have been after Samira for a long time.

And now they're astroturfing Hannah Baron and she's probably gonna be used and deployed for like some stupid psyop.

Hey y'all, I just want you to know I stand with Israel.

Now, I don't have anything against her or Southern women.

I'm not even trying to mock Southern women right now.

I just I'm just just joking, basically, u using the accent.

But um, I'm I wonder if she's a psyop, though.

That's what I'm trying to say.

Again, I don't have anything against her.

And I think it's very classy that she didn't respond to the bullying.

I don't think she did.

I don't have anything against her personally.

I'm just saying I'm kind of suspicious about how viral she's gotten just because Samira's mean comments.

I mean, like, who cares?

Um.

I'm suspicious of how defensive

Uh conservatives got

Over it.

Um

I'm really like suspicious of that.

Why were they so defensive about it?

It it didn't seem like it was a big deal to me.

Um I've seen things that were said that are far worse.

all the time.

So yeah, it does seem like this is a psyop.

Seems like this is a

This was definitely coordinated.

100,000% coordinated.

Samira is in general.

Uh Con Inc.

has their own influencer network and all these conservative influencers defended her around the same time.

Yeah, yeah.

It was so coordinated, you know?

So coordinated,

And so organized.

Like w yeah, d um hashtag team hannah.

That is so weird.

It is so weird.

You know what else I think is part of this puzzle?

A video game I constantly keep seeing all over Twitter and uh TikTok.

It's called Helldivers.

And it's such a gay, retarded game.

Sorry, I don't mean to swear, but it's like

I'll never play that game first.

It doesn't even look fun.

But it seems like that's like the new con Inc.

mascot game is Helldivers.

Because it's like, America.

It's like the ironic pro-imperialism of the Bush era.

America!

Fuck yeah.

Where it's like, I don't believe we have any moral authority to do this, but we're just gonna do it because fuck yeah.

That's basically Helldivers 2.

It's like this ironic.

Cheerleading of globo homo, deep state, glowy nonsense.

Helldivers 2 is basically like a Fed's wet dream.

It's like the military's wet dream.

Like, you're just gonna fucking get on board with the DOD agenda for the memes.

Um, making it cool.

Like, they've mastered the art of psyoping idiots.

Yeah, like the Helldivers community, like, they're all like.

Who's that idiot alt history guy on Twitter, that fucking moron?

It's like a bunch of glowy feds who push

The pro uh pro hegemony, pro-deep state line on Ukraine and every global conflict.

Just pro-Taiwan Redditors combined with cultural conservatives.

That's con ink for you.

That's basically like the next big thing.

I say straight up, just play Call of Duty.

I mean, don't play video games at all.

But if you need to play a military shooter, go with Call of Duty.

Call of Duty is goaded.

People think Call of Duty is like the ultimate propaganda game.

No, Helldivers 2 is the ultimate propaganda.

Call of Duty is like you will run around what are the maps called again?

You'll run around shipment now, and it's just like Nicki Minaj and Warhammer.

And like

You're not fighting like soldiers anymore.

You're fighting like Superman and Batman and Nicki Minaj.

The skins they have for Call of Duty now are crazy.

And it's like that's the game to play because it actually probably is like the most fun, to be honest.

It's actually a good game.

The new ones are being made in cooperation with the US military.

Yeah, the campaigns are, but who plays campaign?

You know?

Who plays campaign?

Nobody.

I never play campaign.

For any call of duty.

I played the campaign for World at War.

Uh but but it's all about the multiplayer, you know?

Call of Duty's a great game.

You know, the campaign is not relevant.

You know, it's all about just shooting.

But Helldivers is very ideological.

Helldivers 2.

It's very much like.

You know, it's always in your face, the theme of the game.

It's so thematic.

The whole like charm of Helldivers 2, it's not even the gameplay, which sucks.

It's just how thematic it is and how thematically consistent it is.

And it's like, it's so gay because it's just a bunch of lonely man-children.

So I'm gonna get clipped and canceled the fuck out of because, like, this is the most popular game in the world.

But it's like all these lame-ass dudes are like, we have to take Malevolent Creek!

I keep seeing that shit everywh We have to take this planet!

We have to take it and we're all in it together, and I'm not lonely anymore.

And I don't have to worry about the fact that I don't have kids or a girlfriend.

And even if I do have kids and a girlfriend, I can ignore all my life's problems and just be with the boys.

Yeah.

They're going to kill me.

The gamers are going to kill me.

But, um,.

You know what?

I'm like being Samira right now.

I'm being like Samira right now, you know?

Who is, what's going on?

I'm just digging myself a grave.

declaring war on the entire internet.

But I'm allowed to have an opinion, okay?

I'm allowed to have an opinion.

Call of Duty is better than Helldivers.

That's my opinion.

All right.

I don't give a shit.

Sue me.

I'm allowed to have an opinion.

Okay.

Anyway, that's just a fun little tidbit I wanted to talk about.

The quartering is going to make a YouTube video about communist Islamic terrorist Haas Aldin trying to take away Helldivers 2.

The quarterings and be like, first of all, Helldivers 2 is not political, second of all.

You are trying to insult helldivers too.

Because you're a Russian.

Regime puppet.

You're a propagandist of Russia.

Okay?

And I am, I don't even know what people can say.

Like, damn.

Oh, the band GTA 6 shit.

That was hilarious.

That put Jackson Hinkle on in the bad graces of the quartering.

When Jackson did that, the quartering

Turned against Jackson.

The quartering.

You know, uh, my whole beard grooming technique was created.

To not look like the quarterings.

Like, I always use him as a reference.

Like, I don't want a quartering beard.

I don't want to look like that dude.

I don't want that kind of beard.

I don't want to look like that at all, actually.

Um, the double quarter pounder with cheese.

By the way, guys, I've been doing the keto diet.

But it's a funny version of the keto diet where sometimes I have cheese and a little bit of bread.

But more or less I've just been kind of eating meat and eggs and a tiny bit of bread.

And I kinda feel gray.

Kinda feel great.

You know, Jackson put me on this.

I asked Jackson about it.

He's like, Yeah, I just, that's all I do.

I only eat meat.

And I'm like, You could just do that?

And he's like, Yeah.

Uh am I fasting?

No, I'm not right now, but I should be.

Maybe I will starting tomorrow.

Keto is a false dialectic.

You're right, but like, I feel like I don't deserve bread, okay?

Like, bread.

is so good that it's too good to be true and I just feel like I don't deserve it.

My book isn't finished.

Also like bread, I feel like it makes sense that bread makes you fatten

Ruins everything.

No fiber.

Kind of got me there.

I'm going to have a banana after stream, all right?

Just because you said that.

Anyway, guys.

Yeah, I'm trying to lo I'm trying to I'm I think I got down to 185.

Which used to be my weight.

And I don't know if you guys can tell, but I lost a lot of weight.

A lot.

I lost like 15 pounds.

Just in like the past month.

But I'm going to go down more, 10 pounds.

175, call it a deal.

And the reason I'm doing that guys is because um

I'm going to be doing more public events soon, very soon.

And uh I want to look thinner

Yeah.

Just 'cause it just kinda looks better, a little bit thinner, a little more fit.

Not 135, 175.

I'll never I'll never go

Past 170, I may as well be a woman, alright?

If I go below 170, I don't I'm not even a man anymore, alright?

No offense to anyone who's very skinny.

But that's just my personal preference.

Uh anyway.

Yeah.

Oh man.

All right, guys.

Great stream.

Signing off.

I'll see you guys maybe tomorrow.

We'll see.

Bye guys.