ANNOUNCING the Anti-Trotskyite Jibber Jabber Campaign 🚀 Infrared Content Catalog

foreign

[Applause]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

you guys

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

what's up

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

thank you

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

desire

[Music]

s

foreign

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

yeah it's keeping up with

vital to your safety will follow

foreign

the following message is transmitted at

the request of the United States

the United States Communist Party 2036.

we are currently on lockdown mode and we

require the purging of all trotskiest

ideology from the vernacular of the

infrared Community the anti-trotsky

purges begin tonight

Trotsky I jibber jabber has continued to

infect the entire Western left since the

very 1920s that Trotsky Rose to

prominence on the back of a revolution

he had no part and actually leading the

conditions of trotskyite jibber jabber

is the number one threat to the

importation of Marxism leninism to

Western countries we require everyone to

seek safety and shelter from Trotsky

Jibber Jabber

because the anti-jibber jabber particle

beams are about to be pointed directly

at every single

American Communist organization

tonight you will learn the truth about

trotskyite Jibber Jabber

however we cannot begin the stream for

as long as the energy levels are as low

as they currently are

we require the current attendees of this

emergency broadcast

message

to spam in the chat the following

message

Trotsky is the problem and Stalin is the

solution

spam this as far as and wide as you can

and as fast as you can to accelerate

the beginning of the Stream

[Music]

[Applause]

foreign

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

foreign

[Applause]

consistency guys I spent all day setting

up my new fucking camera everybody

appreciate how beautiful this fucking

camera is you haven't even seen how it

captures the background when I get back

fucking home I'm putting this camera I

was initially going to go to Best Buy

get a really good camera and then

fucking return it when I'm done I'm not

returning this shit I'm keeping it and I

dropped a lot of fucking money on it and

I don't fucking care this shit is crazy

crazy fucking quality okay I'm it's I'm

so confident I could put in a fucking

background and it'll still look just as

fucking good now where is the fucking

high energy tonight huh because

everybody needs to recognize something

what we have going on is fucking

precious this is the number one

headquarters of Marxism leninism in the

United States right now is a form of

media platform the infrared media

platform is the number one Marxist

leninist form

of Media communication technology this

is The Cutting Edge of marxist land in

his ideology Aesthetics Vibes news

commentary and theory and most

importantly entertainment and media it's

all right fucking here what are you

fucking doing if you're not watching

infrared if you are a political partisan

and you're not fucking watching infrared

what the fuck are you doing with your

fucking life this is The Cutting Edge of

American ideology right now I can

confidently say I am the only I am the

only

2020s political media personality thank

you so much Destiny's crack dealer

appreciate you brother

thank you so much corrective as you guys

can see we are in the headquarters of a

2036 that has yes to be thank you so

much Mason

I mean you earned the question

I'm not here I mean by the way we have

to do the patreon you earned the

question but

brother look around look around look

around me look look what look where I am

okay I am literally in the year 2042

right now okay

so modernity

we're P we're beyond that we're past

that dude this is the fucking future

you're watching you are literally

watching a live stream broadcasted from

the goddamn future okay

you are literally watching a live stream

broadcasted from the fucking future

I mean okay not a very topical question

but thank you for the five but what I

think about modernity is that it's old

news because I'm from the fucking future

right now I'm broadcasting live from the

future you want to ask me what I think

about modernity I think it's all fucking

news right

I got the best camera in the fucking

game

this camera is unbelievable holy shit

and guys it's all about the camera

settings but I went Overkill with this

fucking camera I got a full lens it's a

mirrorless camera it's it's better than

DSLR this I'm just I'm gonna tell you

the camera I got guys don't fucking sue

me thank you so much dark appreciate you

now you guys may faint when you hear

about this camera because of how much it

fucking costs and I can always return it

if it's just too much right but I feel

like this is a worthy investment

once if you guys think it's a worthy

investment I got a Sony A7 III

with the lens that came with the lens

what do you guys think

I don't even want to mention the price

I'm not mentioning the price if you

don't mention the price I'm not going to

mention it okay I'm not mentioning it

because you'll give me a fucking heart

attack if I talk about it okay it will

give me a heart attack but I want to put

everything into the Stream

I'm gonna put it all into the Stream

you guys fucking like this you like this

let me uh do I want to show you the

background here and I'll show you the

background listen just trust me right

now trust me this is a Next Level

fucking camera this is next fucking

level we are officially a professional

grade

stream and media platform right now

I mean this is beautiful this is

absolutely stunning beautiful okay

now I'm gonna we're gonna take a moment

to go into the kitchen of the futuristic

place that I'm at so guys give me a

second I'm gonna head right into the

kitchen and I'll be right I'm gonna head

right there okay so there's I'm gonna

walk there okay so I'm walking to the

kitchen I'm walking to the kitchen give

me a second give me a second I'm walking

to the kitchen right now

and uh okay we're here all right I'm in

the kitchen now all right so as you can

see this is actually what it looks like

and we're in the kitchen

and in the kitchen Nadia's cooking some

food I don't know if you can see her but

here we are I got the settings on

lockdown right and this shit looks sick

as fuck okay this is like I've never had

a better

I mean I'm in love with it I'm in love

with it right I'm in love with it

this is the best investment I ever

fucking made okay best investment I ever

fucking made and I don't even care about

microphone sound this picture quality is

next level unreal okay this shit is

unreal let's go back outside though

because we don't want to bother Nadia

she's in the kitchen right now we don't

want to bother her we're gonna go right

outside right right Nadia yeah because

I'm being a little too loud right now so

we're gonna go outside we're gonna

continue to talk about what we got to

talk about because he's got a lot of

topics we want to cover today and a lot

of things to talk about today including

the rage against War rally which I I

watched some of it and I was impressed

especially Jackson's speech probably the

best speech I saw there and Jimmy Dore

speech

best ones by far that I saw there but

the PSL is doing their own cringe one in

about a few weeks and

what a bunch of fucking losers right

a bunch of losers the pslr

let's go right outside guys I'm gonna

walk right outside give me a moment I'm

gonna walk outside I'm gonna walk

outside I'm gonna walk outside

all right we're here we're back all

right and we're back outside we can be

as loud as we want I'm just kidding we

really can't because even in here in the

future I'm broadcasting this from the

future even here in the future there's

fucking rules okay so what we cannot

actually be as loud as we want

but we can actually have somewhat of a

fun engaging great high quality fun

topical

enlightening stream

and in particular I want to Enlighten

you guys about the problem of trotskyite

jibber jabber and what that fucking

means so if you don't know as of this

morning I officially have launched the

anti-trotsky jibber jabber Twitter

campaign The anti-trotsky Giver jabber

Twitter campaign is basically a new

campaign I'm launching where I want you

the Guerrilla Army every time you're on

Twitter and you see some Trotsky like

jibber jabber I want you to reply

Trotsky Ike jibber jabber don't need to

give an explanation don't need to defend

yourself don't need to give any further

comment just let them know which Trotsky

like jibber jabber now I've already done

this a few times right I've done this a

few times and I plan to continue to do

it it's my favorite thing to do now but

we need dozens if not hundreds of people

to be doing the same thing to broadcast

the message of where the actual

headquarters of Western Marxism leninism

actually is it's not with the PSL

it's not with the red Libs of Hakeem and

Hugo pink it's not with the maoists the

so-called maoists even though we're

friendlier with those mawas thank you so

much soapbox appreciate you thank you

for tackling this it really seems like

this half Bernstein free Clique is just

about consciously holding the exact

opposite positions as infrared Next

Level obsessive haters yeah absolutely

but even worse right even worse what

you're dealing with in that case is

you're dealing with the Cosmonaut people

that is the combination of the sock Dem

revisionism with trotskyism the

cosmonauts christianvites Khrushchev

Trotsky social democracy vosh anarchism

red lipid Trotsky it's all fucking

Trotsky guys it's all Trotsky and I'm

going to explain that to you in this

stream so you will be equipped

theoretically to have the confidence to

be able to participate in this campaign

that we are launching today we are

purging trotskyism from American

politics in the form of exposing it we

want to raise awareness about the fact

that almost all Western communism is

trotskyism and I'm going to give you a

few reasons why and this is the most

important reason

communism in the west has a bad rap

let's admit it most people when they

think of Communism I'm talking about

Maga people the people that actually

matter and in particular the working

class they don't want any of the Trotsky

jibber jabber they don't like trotskyism

it has a bad bad fucking rap okay

it has a bad fucking rap here in the

West

and since trotskyism has such a bad

sorry since communism that's such a bad

rap we've talked about and discussed the

reasons why but we haven't actually

delved into the history of that we've

talked about I've heard the stuff about

the synthetic left and all that kind of

stuff it's not sufficient this stems

from something more fundamental which is

something I love saying more fundamental

it stems from something deeper okay and

I'm gonna explain what that is so

everyone knows a hundred years ago you

had

social International social democracy we

all know that right

and then you had what we call the

October Revolution the Russian

Revolution and 20th Century communism as

we know it now most of the non-marxus

leninists appraised the event negatively

right they appraise the ask Norm Chomsky

Noam Chomsky asking about the Bolshevik

Revolution or it was on Democratic and

Rosa Luxembourg was right whatever he

says right and that's uh pretty common

in the western left but not the dominant

View

the dominant view the dominant positive

appraisal of the legacy of the October

Revolution whose significance I'm going

to explain to you comes from the

trotsky's perspective which is more or

less positive not even only positive

appraisal of the October Revolution but

a more or less sympathetic appraisal of

20th century communism in general

even people you like like Michael

parente are in some sense guilty of this

trotskyism this apologia for communism

thank you so much Harold I love Ramon

America dare

thank you Harold appreciate you even

Michael parente to some extent is guilty

of this even he's guilty of this kind of

thing right because what he engages in

is an apologia and that's what western

leftists would no matter what their

disposition toward 20th century

Communist States are it's a form of

apologia it is not actually a subjective

reenactment or

uh adoption of Marxism leninism itself

in the American context what it is is

trying to apologize for what's going on

over there from our Western modern

perspective well more or less that's the

position Trotsky occupied with regard to

the Bolshevik Revolution Trotsky was not

a leninist Trotsky didn't actually

embrace the spirit of the Revolution

Trotsky wanted to use the October

Revolution to realize the orig the

mission of um Western socialism and

Western International proletarian

Revolution from the eurocentric Western

perspective Trotsky was a thinker of

classical modernity

who thought that the October Revolution

in Russia was a means to an end the ends

being the you know

leap into communism a global one-world

government that completely centralizes

everything and takes over the European

Empires and colonies to basically

transform the whole world into the

beautiful ideal communist society that

is trotskyism that this trotsky's

perspective the Russian context of the

October Revolution was totally neglected

and scorned by Trotsky and I can give

you examples of this

Trotsky was the adventurist who wanted

to forcibly spread the Russian

Revolution Westward to Poland into

Germany and then Stalin was here saying

listen the polls and the Germans are at

their own pace we can't occupy those

countries and force our thing on them

they have their own line of development

going on we need to consolidate the real

Russian Revolution here in the former

Russian Empire here in Russia right and

Trotsky scorned the Russian con he

didn't care about that he didn't dig his

beat deep into the soil of the Russian

people as Stalin did

and I'm going to explain to you the

significance of that and how the

trotskiest ideology grew to be by far

the most powerful form

of Western leftist ideology even up to

this day regardless of one's appraisal

of Stalin Mao and all those other things

this does not exonerate you or exempt

you from being a potential trotskyist

you may be a trotskyist and not even

know it thank you so much Mig appreciate

you

did a horrific disservice to Marxism

leninism in the U.S in particular but so

did Sam Marcy and that's what a lot of

people Miss but this is what I want to

emphasize guys you maybe a trotskyist

and not even know it

that's what I that's what we're here to

do I'm not just here to shit on these

ISO and other people I'm here so that we

can defeat the trotskyism within it's an

exorcism if you will to defeat

trotskyism broadly so you can be aware

of just what it is significant about

Marxism leninism in particular thank you

so much the mentor appreciate you

brother holy fuck great camera Harry but

you need a better green screen the

kitchen just doesn't look realistic hope

this helps cover a small part of the

camera equipment it does thank you so

much brother I really appreciate it by

the way guys don't feel bad if anything

is my decision but thank you so much

dementia it's my decision to go all out

on the camera

because I want infrared to look high

quality I want you guys to have a good

viewing experience I want you to turn on

this stream and feel like you're

watching something from the future with

professional grade quality with Prof it

looks be good and professional I don't

want you guys to have to sit and watch

some grainy bullshit and well you're

gonna sit there and watch that no I want

you guys to feel like this is The

Cutting Edge because it fucking is and I

learned a thing or two from going to

Disney World where how that shit matters

I am the Walt Disney of Marxism leninism

I am here to make sure you guys have a

good experience I am here to make sure

you guys

can consume Marxist leninist content in

a way that is tasteful in a way that is

enjoyable in a way that is Advanced and

Cutting Edge in high class and I wanted

to inspire you I wanted to inspire you

so you can impact your surroundings your

own immediate surroundings in ways that

I can't even dream of reaching okay so

it's all worth it to me it's worth the

cost

and I hope you guys trust my judgment

that this camera was a good idea and if

it turns out not to be I'll just go

fucking return it I was planning on that

originally until I turned it on and

started fiddling with it and I realized

holy fuck holy fuck this is next level

this is next

fucking level okay this is like oh my

I'm proud to be streaming right I have

never ever had a better time stream I

mean look at me

look at me I look incredible this whole

thing I mean this background I mean I

know it doesn't look realistic

I know it doesn't look realistic

but come on it still looks pretty

fucking cool right this I mean this is

re I am here I'm here in the future I

want you guys to be immersed I want you

guys viewers suspend your disbelief

yes

huh

suspend your disbelief

spend your disbelief there is a um a car

that was driving by and I just I said

yes they roll down their window and they

drove away by the way

so that's what happened but guys suspend

your disbelief we're here to have fun

LARP by the way LARP there's a

difference between

there's difference between bad LARP and

good LARP bad LARP is people who think

they are engaging in something they're

not doing bad LARP is when people say

all we need to do is mount it and just

go to Kmart and start that's bad Lark

good LARP is when you are intentionally

putting on a theatrical show to create a

pleasant entertaining or enjoyable

experience good LARP is just supposed to

be fun bad LARP is people who take

themselves too seriously thinking

they're engaging in revolutionary action

when all they're doing is clowning

around I'm not doing that I am here to

give you guys an aesthetical experience

of the highest degree I don't I'm sick

of the cheap shit when it comes to ml

communism in the USA I want this to be

cutting edge

shit okay

anyway no enough commentary on the

cameras and stuff I want to continue on

the content you maybe a trotskyist and

not even know it

what is it that defines trotskyism is it

just one specific position or is it is

it the whole thing about World

Revolution as opposed to socialism in

one country these are all symptoms

rather than the core pathology the core

pathology is this

it is the only way that Western

subjectivity modern classically Western

subjectivity

tries to reconcile with the

real

revolutionary event and I mean

revolutionary in the sense that it

opened a portal in the fabric of RBA

literally right the October Revolution

these single event of the 20th century

the October Revolution that changed it

all that in a sense turned our world

upside down I'm gonna explain exactly

how that was and trotskyism represents

the only Western perspective

that meets that October Revolution with

some kind of positive appraisal

and how else could it let's think about

it the October Revolution was a violent

revolution that deposed not bizarre as

in the case of the French Revolution

overthrowing the king it it deposed a

democratic provisional government how do

you ideologically reconcile yourself

with that fact what is the cause's belly

that justifies such an event the October

Revolution introduces an entirely New

post-modern Logic to history as a whole

of retro causal justification an event

that justifies itself

after the fact retro casually an event

that retroactively establishes its own

moral historical material and

ideological premises that's the

significance of the October Revolution

and I'll explain this to you in a way

that do I'm paraphrasing Dugan

the logic of retro causality first

asserts itself in the form of Lenin's

polemicizing against the deviationism

holy fuck

brother

thank you so much chairman meow

appreciate you man appreciate you so

much

trust me when I get home I have the

fastest internet I can have right I have

the fastest internet that I could have

uh when I especially when I get home but

what I want to tell you guys thank you

so much chairman miago I really

appreciate it man I mean I dropped a lot

on this camera

you guys are helping I really appreciate

it but don't feel obliged because I made

this choice

and I remember what I told you guys I'm

a high investment high risk High reward

type of guy I want this to pay I believe

in this I believe in this infrared stuff

so don't don't worry about it right

I'll take the risk I'll take the risk to

make this next level by the way guys

we're already working on the merch the

hats

and that should be done this week

well I mean the preparation you know

that's going to be done soon as far as

when we can get them shipped to you guys

we're gonna see as soon as possible I'm

hoping March I'm hoping fingers crossed

for March but a lot um there's a lot of

work being done now it's the thing the

train is in motion now okay with all

this bullshit of uh going to sleep

non-compete is live non-compete is a

Trotsky height there you go trotskyite

spotted that's exactly what a Trotsky

height is anyway guys

um it all begins as far as the Retro

causal Logic the new modernity of the

October Revolution

with Lenin's notion his interpretation

of Marx's understanding of historical

materialism

now the economistic trend within Russian

Social Democratic labor party economism

was this idea

that instead of forming a political

party

with the intent to seize power

participate in political life you're

going to just let the economy develop

from a feudal stage to a capitalist one

all on its own

and then capitalism all on its own will

develop into socialism and there's no

need for the political at all

because according to science Marxism is

a science it's just the economy will

develop we don't need to participate in

it we had other trends like stages them

I call it stageism but it was

menstrualism the idea that okay

capitalism needs to develop first

once the proletariat is already here

that's when we can start getting to work

before then we can't do anything we're

just confined to sitting here and

waiting for the bourgeoisie to lead us

to the Democratic Revolution and create

the conditions for a modern industrial

proletariat

Lenin did something different in

circumstances where the premises of

socialism did not

exist in the form of a modern industrial

capitalist system in a proletariat I

mean Russia had a basically a missing

proletariat for a long period of time

it's only in in later you know that you

start seeing one actually develop but it

was such a small minority anyway that

the problems still acutely asserted

itself in the Russian context there's a

missing

there's a missing revolutionary subject

and there's a missing industrial

capitalism how can you

be a socialist in Russia when the

premises of socialism aren't even there

or developed that's the problem Lenin's

dealing with and Lenin addresses this

problem in his book the development of

capitalism in Russia

bear with me

if you don't bear with me the Trotsky is

inside of you

may actually prevail

listen to my words carefully because the

trotskyist inside of you is not going to

like what I have to hear okay

now

I want to continue explaining this to

you

to continue explaining this to you

more or less

the absence of the premise

but the presence of the conclusion

is the real Paradox of bolshevism and

leninism the marks of them aspect does

not really explicitly address this

quandary

the method of inquiry differs from the

manner of presentation that's Marx in

his

I think it was his preamble to Capital

oh my God a ghost

in his introduction to Capital volume

one I forget what Edition it was

so the input differs from the output

and in this case the input being the

development of modern Western industrial

capitalism the output being socialism

both as a form of proletarian

Consciousness and the rise of a modern

proletariat and yada yada yada

and Marxism doesn't really deal with the

question of now we have the conclusion

socialism

so where does that leave us as far as

the premise in our conditions are

concerned to explain this in a way

philosophically that might make a little

more sense to you

let's understand it in terms of a

parable of Oppression thank you so much

backtrack podcast appreciate your

brother's repayment for all the

knowledge I've gotten and taking

beautiful notes on from your streams

which have helped me with my writing I'm

using your latest for a piece

thank you so much backtrack I really

appreciate that man I really appreciate

that but think of it in the in terms of

the parable of Oppression of some kind

right

um someone says something like

I I was uh beaten as a prisoner

and I was oppressed and I was for my

whole life treated like shit

and this led me to be an advocate for

human civil rights civil rights Advocate

right

so here's the quandary

are you thereby retro casually

establishing your shitty oppression and

experiences as necessary

morally actually are they necessary

there's a discontinuity you see all

these experiences happen to you which

led you to become a civil rights

activist for example right

so are those experiences now experiences

that if you were to go back in time you

would have repeated

are they necessary experiences are they

morally necessary experiences since

those were the experiences that led you

to the conclusion you came to

now the same thing is true for

Scientific Socialism and Marxism English

industrial capitalism

formed these are the formative

conditions out of which socialism and

Scientific Socialism in particular but

Marxism more generally becomes both

possible and necessary

so does that establish industrial

capitalism as necessary

that is the quandary leninism is dealing

with and that's something Marx does not

really deal with

he gets close to it but Marx is mainly

dealing with

a linear development of of uh Marx's

thinking in relation to analyzing

Capital capitalism right Capital volume

one to Capital volume three

you get the same

quandary of discontinuity

in the form of a transformation problem

the transformation of values into prices

and vice versa how does that happen once

you arrive at the conclusion of prices

how do you go back and retro casually

establish the necessity of value

and that is

somewhat of a quandary right that is a

kind of paradox

that plagued Marx in some according to

certain interpretations of Marx's

biography in Marx's life

so the leninism part of Marxism leninism

is really about retro causality in some

sense how does the conclusion come to

affect its own premise if a premise

causes a conclusion

where does that

what does that may sorry

um

what is the status of the premise for

the conclusion

how do you go from the is to the ought

right

by the way guys ones in the chat if

you're experiencing any outages or

stream interruptions or lag or anything

of that nature

by the way so that's what leninism is

about okay

you do I don't agree with that no

all right I got it yeah no problem no

problem I got it

um

okay but in any case to continue

without interruption to continue

that's what we're dealing with when it

comes to the significance of leninism

more or less leninism is about repeating

the conclusion in the premise

so for example in the development of

capitalism in Russia Lenin

looks at the conclusion

of

industrial urbanizing Tendencies of the

Russian Empire the capitalist centers

now how does how does Lenin deal with

that he doesn't say okay

that means feudalism

sorry that means capitalism is a

necessary stage before socialism and

thereby feudalism is a necessary stage

before capitalism he doesn't deal with

this linear logic of cause and effect he

takes the effect that's disclosed before

him and he imposes it on the premise

Lenin looks at these cities capitalistic

relations in the Russia cities and he

transposes he distills the essence of

these relations and tries to analyze

them under a microscope

back in the countryside the feudalistic

countryside and he says this thing that

we're seeing in the cities is developing

in the premise there is the first

instance of a fundamental retro

causality inherent in leninism

right the conclusion

must affect its very own

premise its very own beginning

you're having trouble understanding what

I mean

basically

when it comes to the I'll simplify it

for you then when it comes to the

Paradox of the missing proletariat and

the missing premises of socialism

Dugan for example writes

that per the interesting retrocal logic

of the Bolshevik state was that the

state had to actively create its own

premises meaning the state had to

undertake the role of modernizing

Russia's economy even though according

to the dogmatic Marxism that's what

capitalism is supposed to do it's

capitalism which is supposed to be the

modernizing force socialism is simply

supposed to take it to the next stage

but in the Russian Empire

you didn't have a fully modernized

industrial capitalistic economy so the

Communists lacking the premises for

their own political dictatorship had to

create the economic premises in other

words it's a total inversion of

traditionally dogmatic Marxism dogmatic

Marxism basically says here's the base

the economic base the political

superstructure is caused by the base the

base comes first and then the political

superstructure and Dugan notes for

example

how in the Soviet Union in the Soviet

States built by Lenin

this was a uh the opposite of its logic

the superstructure of the proletarian

dictatorship came first

and the base which is supposed to

support that political dictatorship has

to be built afterwards

so according to the view of kotsky and

the other Western marxists they were

saying no no no first the Socialist mode

of production has to exist

and then you can have a proletarian

you know whatever dictatorship and then

here is Lenin and the Bolsheviks who say

no first we have the proletarian

dictatorship then we can establish the

base the economic base

uh as supporting us retro casually

so yes it's uh Terminator Skynet has to

go back into the past to create the

conditions

of its own existence

bolshevism communism is something that

dwells in the future

and it affects our reality in the form

of a future affecting its own past

creating the premises of its own

of its own being here and now

and that is the Retro casual logic of

leninism

it's been lagging lately yeah

it's the polar opposite of stages of so

when you hear Marxism leninism that's a

big part of it

people ask me how is why what's all with

this sci-fi futuristic LARP and all this

stuff Marxism leninism is inherently a

science fiction ideology

it's science fiction and just in a

strict sense that it's not constrained

or restricted to past scientific

discoveries it is something quite

literally it's an ideology quite

literally

from the future it's not only future

looking and future oriented it acts upon

reality from the future

it acts upon reality from reality's own

future guys The Communist Manifesto It's

a Manifesto It's telling you something

about the future the Communists know

your future

they are living in your future

and they are here to affect the present

in such a way that it catches up

with that future

so that my friends

is

basic to Marxism leninism now what does

that have to do with trotskyism and

Trotsky

and also

more importantly what are the

implications of this well the

implications are simple

when it comes to the dialectic of form

and content

typically

every ideologue wants the content the

form is meaningless who cares about the

form give us the content so for example

if you're a socialist the content of

socialism is a

I don't know Hakeem it's a moneyless

classless stateless society

whatever right property list money list

classless stateless society

whatever right this they say some way to

relate to the content of what your

ideology or what your program or what

your movement aspires for

so it's a dwelling in the content of

course materialism is content oriented

obviously right materialism isn't just

about it's not about form that's

idealism it's about the content the meat

and potatoes right but the problem is

that

oftentimes

this way of

relating to ideology in particular

the content-oriented one if you will is

on dialectical thanks so much boyfriend

appreciate you

this capability of accelerating the

present into its future first pioneered

by Lenin has been honed and pushed into

Excellence by the CPC yes oh yes

precisely yes precisely yes like yes

very I mean absolutely positively

absolutely

unequivocally unquestionably

in ignorably

with a thousand times emphasis yes yes

yes yes yes yes okay

thank you so much voidburn by the way

appreciate it

um but as I was saying

that is the content

so it's basically

this is the structure of most

revolutionary and radical ideologies in

the west I want this goal

Society is messed up this goal this

solution is the remedy

and all of the forms

that exist are in my way

all these forms are in my way

I want the content

I know the content of socialist ideology

a classless moneyless stateless whatever

so all of society all of the forms that

stand before me are merely obstacles

that are getting in the way of my

ability to realize this end goal right

now more or less this perversion is what

defines trotskyism first and foremost

trotskyism is defined by the perversion

of uh

a kind of cult of the ends right that

completely neglects form

Trotsky

wants Trotsky

hijacks the Bolshevik Revolution into a

purely destructive rather than

constructive force petrovsky the bolster

Revolution

and it really anticipates the PSL is how

fucking scary it is petrotsky's basic

idea is almost a caricature of what the

fascists and the Nazis would accuse

communism of being actually it

establishes how Trotsky was

at least implicitly but we know

historically he was explicitly aligned

with fascist ideology

because the idea is that Trotsky is this

enlightened westernized intellectual who

needs to destroy

um all of the forms of humanity in order

to realize the end goal of True full

communism

so Trotsky realizes that he's going to

use these backward Asiatic Russian

peasants he's basically going to throw

them at the West to break down the

western states and societies and

basically enforce an Institute with pure

Iron Will full communism or something

right

some something some jibber jabber along

those lines the Trotsky looks at the

Russian peasant subject purely as a form

of cadden fodder to throw at his own

Western enemies who does that remind you

of by the way it's how the PSL thinks of

the Anti-Imperialist States and

Communist States today in the global

South the PSL represents the

subjectivity of using marginalized

people in America and in the global

South but especially even in America uh

it could be sexual identity it could be

racial identity whatever the PSL wants

to weaponize them to fulfill its

revolution

right

and more or less that is basic

trotskyism

Sam Marcy and his deploy this is his

idea that we need to support

Anti-Imperialist Communist States

against American imperialism that is

fully in in line with trotsky's

hijacking of the Russian Revolution

to realize his own revolutionary aims

for Global Revolution or whatever right

direct Global Revolution it's just

completely undielectical and false right

so that is you know it's not just crude

communism I mean Trotsky thank you so

much appreciate you brother

fashionable versus

how quickly we move through these

aspects of reality whereas the Trotsky

is tries to detour or look the other way

delusional worship of the individual

yeah by the way thank you so much for

the donation brother I really appreciate

it but

um you're right it's really about the

individualism there's a there's a

fundamental individualism at play when

it comes to trotskyism but the reason

for that is because trotskism is just

drawing from the legacy of classical

modernity of classical European

modernity

and to put that in simpler terms

classical European modernity

um

somehow only accepts the reality of the

individual Society for example has no

metaphysical status

there are just individuals in the

relationships between individuals that's

the clot because for classical modernity

you only have tangible substances you

only have the certainties of cogito for

example you have the circuits of the

senses you have the certainties of

tangible measurable things that stand

before the individual the individual

says here I stand

and the only thing that exists is within

the capacity of the individual to

measure take note of experience or

somehow observe but virtualities like

for example Society things that somehow

Define what individuals are without

being immediately tangible to them

that's not possible to perceive within

the frame of classical modernity because

they also obey a totally different

temporal logic they obey a retro causal

logic of a future as in society

affecting its own past as in individuals

in the form of virtualities right

so yes you're dealing with a fundamental

individualism which is how which is what

defines trotskyism but what makes

trotskism so dangerous thank you so much

Clyde I appreciate you man

justify the means like Hitler right

ethnonationalism ends justify that means

yeah yeah actually yes uh I I think so

right but we're going to continue and

I'm gonna explain to you the real

significance of Marxism leninism in

contrast to that even beyond the the

basic logic of retro causality which I

hope all of you understand by now

um

but as I was saying right

the reason trotskyism is so dangerous is

because the way in which it tried to

hijack the Russian Revolution Trotsky

didn't care about the unique

significance of the Russian Revolution

and what it meant positively for the

Russian people he didn't care that this

was a specifically local event in space

and time

that had that had

prolonged historical consequences for

the Russian subject and the Russian

people determined once that this was a

revolution

which

one will have to work to build to draw

out its consequences like on a very long

scale of time right when is the

president's Sunday debate he has not

messaged me he claims he's going to get

back to me about it so I'm I I don't

know what to tell you right

but Trotsky saw the Russian Revolution

purely as an opportunity

to kind of speed run a Communist

Revolution quote unquote

for the whole of Europe

but in doing so he still never actually

departed from the the fundamental Social

Democratic Base According to which you

know

there is a linear stage progression

of socialism where it's feudalism then

its capitalism

and the advanced proletarian class

created by the Industrial Revolution and

created by industrial capitalism has to

somehow already exist before it's

possible for there to be

a proletarian dictation and it also has

to exercise that dictatorship and not

share power with for example the

peasants

that's the content now in in terms of

in a one-sided perspective

that is actually true

right because we know for Marks that the

proletariat is the Revolutionary subject

and Marx and angles in The Communist

Manifesto did anticipate that the

proletariat would become a majority

uh

in the world basically and rest control

from the bourgeoisie and achieve a

dictatorship right because it's a

numerical majority but that didn't

happen Marx and engel's prediction

didn't pan out

so Trotsky was left with the question

how do you establish a proletarian

dictatorship when you don't when you're

in the minority with the proletariates

and the minority

and Trotsky opted for basically a form

of Civil War where the proletarian

dictatorship

not saying this is the reason for the

Russian Civil War I'm saying it would

amount to a basic war of maybe five

percent of the population against the 95

percent

surely purely maintaining Itself by

means of direct

dictatorship right with no basis no

roots in the forms of existing Society

no roots and no bases in the existing

forms of society right

so that's what we're dealing with in the

case of

that same predicament that I told you

before Landon had to deal with it's just

trotsky's thinking about it in a

different way and trotsky's perspective

the advanced industrial West

also

has a proletarian majority therefore for

communism to be successful it has to win

in the industrial Advanced capitalist

West from that

basis

the already existing forms of colonial

domination and control

will be used to enforce this

dictatorship of an enlightened

proletarian minority on the whole of

mankind on the whole of the world

and trotsky's terrifying idea was more

or less that Russia

could be used

to create this dictatorship in the West

basically create a fascist dictatorship

in the West

impel the Western workers to seize power

uh and you know a little Force won't

hurt them either apparently thank you so

much Carol yeah quite literally I mean

it was like it was antifa before antifa

in a way right

so this is trotsky's idea

and

that is what is so dangerous about it

because

trotskyism is like a social democracy

with teeth

in a sense right it's like

it's more or less worse than fascism in

a way if allowed to be drawn to its

conclusions I mean

put it this way neoconservatism emerges

out of trotsky's and the idea that the

United States needs to forcefully topple

the regimes around the world to do

regime change and Export democracy and

spread color revolutions all that's

coming from trotskyist it's a direct

trotskiest lineage

um

that's responsible for that

and these are as Alex Jones says these

are hard core

hardcore trotskius right

so trotskyism is a genocidal ideology

it's a proto-hitlerite ideology

and it's a complete repudiation of the

positive achievements of leninism

Trotsky was an opportunist wanted to use

the Russian Revolution and use the

Bolshevik Revolution or ends that were

alien to the authentic history of both

the Russian people and the Bolshevik

party at Large

so where does Marxism leninism fit how

does Marxism leninism

articulate revolutionary Consciousness

instead of trotskyism first of all any

revolutionary Consciousness that already

preemptatively establishes its own ends

and its own content and they're by makes

the next step of just imposing that on

reality is by default trotskyist

it's all trotskyism that form of

revolutionary subjectivity where you say

I want this I want to do this

so I'm gonna take this and just impose

it on reality

that my friends is just trotskyism

it's volunteerism it's adventurism and

it's trotskyism

maois who are doing that they're

trotskies

the PSL we all know their trotskies even

the Democratic Socialist or Trotsky is

anarchist or Trotsky is vosh atroxiest

trotskyism is just this View

that there is a

real tangible and immediately accessible

content of what Socialism or communism

is that comes at the expense of form

and that you can characterize every

expression of that as trotskyism right

the notion that

somehow

the forms that exist before us

can simply be liquidated and annihilated

in favor of some kind of immediate

revolutionary content

now how does Marxism leninism starkly

contrast itself with trotskyism in terms

of the dialectic of content and form

well it's simple

and we're going to begin this with

socialism in one country what is the

real Serene Beauty and Sublimity of

socialism in one country

socialism in one country elects to

establish a different relationship

to the dialectic of content and form

socialism in one country

give me a moment thank you so much Mason

appreciate you appreciate you brother

is trotskiest yeah thank you so much

Mason appreciate you it's National

bolshevits and trotskyism

yes I think so I think the nosbos were

trotsky's actually

especially when they you have to make

explicit the national aspect

as part of the con I mean it's all about

what is the with David Lynch in his

films

is uh Twin Peaks it's called Garmin

bosia right what's the what's the sweet

stuff the Garmin bosia that everyone

wants what's the content

it could be trotsky's Global proletarian

Revolution or it could be the national

bolshevism of the nozballs

but it's the sweet stuff it's the

immediate

object of ideological and practiological

gratification

and when that is what you have and you

impose that on reality liquidating the

wealth of forms real forms if you can

even call them that within reality

that's trotskyism now the Serene beauty

of Marxism leninism is quite different

because Marxism leninism turns

form and content on their head basically

reversing

their significance

Within

the advanced science of Marxism leninism

form becomes content and content becomes

form now what's what I mean by that how

does that reversal accomplished

because Marxism leninism

in the first place

deals with the immediate circumstance of

the failure of the October Revolution to

spread which is something the Bolsheviks

were

hedging their bets on admittedly they

were but they were hedging their bets

that it would spread organically not by

force or through the military Trotsky

wanted but through you know it'd be the

spark that lights the fire and it didn't

fucking happen

so

what was the leninist conclusion to draw

from this supposed failure of the

Revolution to spread Arc to Freedom

thanks so much brother appreciate you

Trotsky was an individualist at his core

that's why Western intellectuals love

him yeah absolutely you're totally right

you're wholeheartedly totally completely

unambiguously

unequivocally

indisputably correct

okay let's continue

let's continue

how does Marxism leninism reverse the

dialectical form and content

well you're dealing with the situation

of the failure of the Revolution to

spread the October Revolution the

Russian Revolution

and out of this what Lenin would call

hopelessness it directly referred to the

situation as that

emerged

a new content if you will right

out of the very failure

you look so the Bolsheviks were

anticipating or perhaps

expecting the Garmin bosia of World

Revolution the content to be realized or

to be attained

it didn't happen

so the Serene Beauty and even Mystique

of Marxism leninism lied in the way

this is an Eastern wisdom

at play it lied in the way that they

elected

to find success in that failure

in their failure to realize

and to attain the thing they thought

they wanted

they actually

got what they want

that makes sense

um

I'm gonna explain that in a better way

in the failure of the Revolution to

spread around the world in that

hopelessness in the failure

to reach the content of the

Revolutionary aspiration

some kind of Consciousness or intuition

of the real content of the Revolutionary

aesthetic

was attained

that very failure revealed to the

Bolsheviks

what the true aspiration and aim of the

Revolution was

creating

a complete shift this is the Brilliance

guys please follow me here

from a subjective

uh

aspiration toward the content

to an objective one

the Bolsheviks basically sat here and

said we thought

that the Revolution was going to spread

subjectively and we were wrong

reality had other plans objectively

and

that for the first time revealed itself

call it

uh Call It The Winds of History call it

Destiny call it fate call it whatever

you want but something external from the

subjective aspiration of the

Revolutionary

the Revolutionary situation

the external circumstances themselves

and that

was not a fulfillment of the trotskyite

permanent revolution as though you're

holding a sword and you're constantly

um thrusting it forward it was a

resignation

some kind a step backward if you will

a resignation that paradoxically

interpolated the Bolshevik subjectivity

by the new revolutionary situation

itself buy a new circumstance

and this is what we should really talk

about right now in terms of the

significance of Marxism leninism because

it seems to be lost on a lot of people

that Marxism leninism

defined Itself by failure or

disappointment from the very beginning I

mean beginning with Lenin and leninism

why is it

that they prophesized revolution of Marx

didn't come to pass

why was there a missing proletariat in

the Russian Empire

but a very real existing

scientific socialist consciousness

why is it that the advanced capitalist

West

precisely

um where the least revolutionary

countries

compared to Russia for example right

that was the first disappointment and

failure

but the fundamental one

that elevates Stalin as an immortal

history a hero of mankind for all of

history

were the circumstances that gave rise

to the theory of socialism in one

country

and this is the decisive moment that

their real significance of Marxism

leninism rears its head

Marxism leninism was about socialism in

one country

people need to

you'd think it wasn't though right

Hakeem and Hugo pink and all these

people when you listen to them

right

you'd think that that would be

completely that's completely lost but

the whole

distinguishing significance

of Stalin in contrast to Trotsky

was this right it was social it was the

theory of socialism in one country and

then as far as the dispute with bukharin

was concerned

it was really the notion that yes

us a proletarian dictatorship and a

socialistic system can be built in one

country we can actually do this

and Stalin was just logically fulfilling

what Lenin already set in motion

as early as the development of

capitalism in Russia and his polemics

with the various Trends in Russian

Marxism

the aesthetic of Marxism leninism is not

one of

the leveling of all form in reality in

favor of some Supreme content it's

something much more subtle and difficult

to understand

without either having direct experience

in foreign Communist States or resigning

yourself to an intense level of

theoretical self-criticism

but the aesthetic of Marxism leninism is

about finding the dialectical Harmony

between form and content

in the content of reality

so

from the leninist perspective the forms

existing in reality

are defined

by their actual content

it's not as if the content comes first

and then we just simply mow over all of

the form and a Trotsky I train

just mowing everything out of the

fucking way to establish the kind of

society we want it's more like

within the existing forms of society

lie

the kernel

of that same revolutionary content and

all the Revolutionary Consciousness does

is distill that distill the

contradictions that actually exist

in society itself

the various wealth of forms across

Society

become in a sense assimilated by the

Marxist leninist ideology

this is something Boris Royce kind of

talks about in the total art of

stalinism

um

in order that they virtually become

oriented toward the real contents but

what is the real content of the

Communists revolutionary aims thank you

so much Chris Morlock appreciate you man

casually

thank you so much Chris appreciate you

man

and uh yeah I've heard Trotsky was a

huge fucking asshole I've heard that

before

I've definitely heard that before

thank you so much man appreciate it

but um

within Marxism leninism

form and content

are interrelated and are with are

embedded within a dialectic

and what that means to put it in common

sense terms

is that

the truth of the Revolutionary

aspiration for Global Revolution

was in reality to be found in the real

existing conditions

of one country Russia

that is the Serene and Sublime Beauty of

socialism in one country

all of this time you were aspiring for

this big Global Revolution to happen

but the real aspiration was right under

your nose when you were fail when that

failed for you and you were disappointed

you were brought before the cause of

your disappointment and instead of

scorning that cause as Trotsky wanted to

hating the Russian peasants and scorning

them for their backwardness and so on

the Communists

led by Stalin the Bolsheviks

looked at the cause of their failure the

real existing

Russian civilization the Russian

peasantry and got to work

they humbled themselves to the cause of

their failure they adapted to the cause

of their failure and they distilled from

this cause of their failure

a new aim

it's almost like for example

let's say you want

um

let's say across the street

you want some kind of like

I don't fucking know you want

here here's a beautiful story maybe this

will help you understand

maybe you

what's up what's up maybe you want the

latest iPhone or some shit right

there's a big line to get there and

you're running across the street to go

get it

and then

this is a cute little story I'll give

you right but I don't know if this is

gonna really

help you understand it you run uh to get

the iPhone

but you fail why do you keep failing

because there's this dog that's in your

way

and it's blocking you from being able to

go get I'm so bad at me giving fucking

examples of anything right but there's a

dog that's in your fucking way

and you can't get your iPhone now if

you're Trotsky you're probably gonna

like get you know you're gonna shoot the

dog and you're gonna go get your fucking

iPhone right but if you're stalling

you're gonna say

maybe I didn't want the iPhone actually

maybe this dog is what I wanted

so maybe you'll start

leveling with the dog and saying okay

this dog is clearly here to bother me

and I'm gonna interpret that as

something meaningful so now I'm gonna

play catch with the dog and adopt this

dog

and change my aim

but it's it's more beautiful than that

right because it's a twist of fate

because here the dog is just some random

ex external obstacle but the external

obstacle in the case of the um

revolutionary situation

which were the backward conditions of

Russia

were the very

defining premise of the whole thing it

just it wasn't clear to them before that

they thought it was going to be one

simultaneous Global Revolution little

did they know the Revolution was right

here all along

like right here all along right

it's like in a twist of fate and then

later you find out

the reason you keep tripping over this

fucking dog

isn't because

I need to kill the dog and go get my

phone it's because

let's say um

there's actually a guy with a knife in

the Apple Store and the fucking dog came

to warn you

it's like some I it's some

uh some what do we call it

some ironical twist of fate like that

you know you think this dog is just

getting in your fucking way to go get

what you want

but it's actually defining the nature of

the thing you want and it's because the

thing you want in reality will just get

you fucking killed this dog is what you

want

because it's warning you telling you

listen I'm here blocking you from

getting this iPhone

because there's a guy in there who has a

fucking knife who's gonna fucking kill

you right

so I'm just trying to establish like a

relation of some kind right

it's not it's not the friends we made

along the way I want to explain this and

I I'm not good at giving examples and

that was a dog shit example speaking of

dogs

it was a dog shit example okay

um but I hope those of you who are smart

can understand the basic points I'm

trying to get at here

the basic point is how

in the Stalin Revolution the failure of

the revolution

was discovered

to be the true aim of the revolution

and that was

something discovered

that was something discovered you say

well it's just copium he just

retroactively

um

try to account for a failure

and instead of you know abandoning the

Revolutionary

aim all together he just decided Well no

this is what we wanted all along how

does he justify getting away

with changing the very aim

um and I would say it's simple

because

socialism in one country

was

basically

the discovery that we are knocking on an

Open Door nowhere was it written

that this is impossible

why is it impossible to build socialism

in one country why can't we make of this

situation

thank you so much boyfriend appreciate

you thank God now we know what not to do

in a sense yes

thank you voidman appreciate you

yeah the twist is what reveals the

essence exactly right

um

so

I want to uh give this more clarity

because it's probably not going to be

clear to everyone right

what I'm trying to say

but um

you could say that the history of

Communism is just Communists having this

content in mind of an end goal and

stubbornly refusing to abandon that end

goal even in the face of reality

contradicting them

but there the whole point of Scientific

Socialism

is that there isn't actually an end goal

it is quite literally an Open Door the

only purport Communists have and commit

themselves to

in terms of theory the only Dogma if you

will

well for example there isn't a Dogma but

their only purport is a commitment to

humanity to material real existing

Humanity

it's not a commitment to an ideology

it's not a commitment

to a specific object of Desire or a

specific aim it's a specific commitment

to humanity

and

the failure of the Russian Revolution

the failure of the October Revolution

can only be interpreted

as the true aspiration

it's true aspiration when one resigns

themselves and commits oneself

to objective reality

out of the hopelessness of the situation

it was the subject that decided to

adjust their perspective

adjust their stance

and adjust their desire in a sense

but Trotsky the Pervert

his inability to satisfy his desire

is interpreted as an indictment on

reality itself reality has to be

destroyed because I didn't get what I

want right but what if there's a wisdom

to

the failure for you to get what you want

what if it means you have to change what

you want

or at least reinterpret it in some kind

of way

and that really is the whole wisdom and

the whole significance of Marxism

leninism

it says Serene resignation in the face

of a limit

so if there is nothing you can do then

do what you can

not only that if there's nothing you can

do

then you should change your frame

of

what is the objective reality within

which it is possible to act in the first

place

and that's

the beautiful dialectic that Marxism

leninism

that's stalinism if you will accomplish

it

with Grace

yes I think so

I think so

I think so yes

and by the way an important question is

at what point

do you know you failed

that's an important uh it's more

important than the question of

at what point do you know you uh you can

you know you succeeded more importantly

at what point

can you be aware of the fact that you

failed

give me a moment

let me uh do something

anyway sorry about that just taking out

some trash

um

yeah look how great this camera looks

what up Jackson how are you I saw your

speech it was really good

I think the clearness of

this important question can be

understood in two major events I think

in um

communist history one was the failure of

the Revolution to spread

1920s or by the time of the 1920s and

the other was

in um

the end of the cultural revolution when

it was clear at what point did the

Cultural Revolution fail because you

have two copiums from Ultra leftists

Trotsky is basically right which is one

of them is that no no listen

the revolution could have spread and

Stalin ruined it and then the other one

was no no the cultural revolution could

have finally been completed

but Deng Xiaoping ruined everything and

China would have had full communism now

if not for that and these are true to

trotskyite kind of delusions in the face

of a very clear

fundamental failure

right

when I text

did I not

I thought you were uh

I I don't know it's like I saw you give

a speech and I just like I didn't wanna

try you know where I think we already

live in socialism

I don't think so enough thank you so

much uh nowhere appreciate you man no

Jackson I thought I saw you give a

speech and I like I didn't it's it's

just I don't know I felt like I'd be

interrupting the event

somehow

yeah I think Jackson gave the best one

and Jimmy

Jamie but I like Jackson's the best

honestly

um

but I just didn't want to interrupt or I

don't know I don't know it's weird like

you see someone give a speech live

but anyway

um

these are two forms of copism but how

can the failure be defined see a true

failure

is registered I'm going to explain to

you a very important wisdom guys

you can become aware of the failure

not when

you fail to reach your goal because yes

you can have a bad infinity and say well

we can just wait forever

I mean uh

isn't that the pre-leninist cope oh

we're still waiting for the workers

Revolution any time now right how do you

know when you fail

here is a real piece of wisdom

from from oxygous landiness

you know you failed

when you can distill

a new insight a new discovery

and a new aim

from the process by which you attempted

to reach your goal and failed

when you

can realize

a new goal

that's when you can finally register and

take note of the fact you failed you

don't fail

when you fail to reach your goal failure

to reach your goal

unless it's constrained it has a time

constraint

it doesn't always

you can always keep doing the same thing

over and over again forever right

but when you take note of that process

of failure

and you discover in it

the content of your aspiration and when

you can distill that content into

a form of some kind

you can then know when you failed

it's a beautiful experience actually

if you for example if you if let me tell

you guys something what I mean by this

if you want to go to the gym

and you're lazy like oh I failed I

failed no you fucking loser keep trying

keep going you don't get to fucking fail

until you actually build something new

from it you know what I'm saying you're

not allowed to fail

until

you achieve something

that makes that failure necessary

you don't get to fail just because you

didn't get what you thought you wanted

at first even right you only really fail

when there's something new that comes

out of it

and that basically is what defines the

history of Marxism leninism more or less

right

you're not allowed to fail

until you can redefine the terms of

success

that renders your previous aim

superfluous

trotsky's aim of global Revolution and

communism that's just negatively defined

what does that actually mean

they're gonna feed people no it's not

Stalin

built actual socialism who cares about

this dumb shit Trotsky he actually built

a real living breathing example of it oh

it doesn't live up to trotsky's Ideal

that's a bluff what is the content of

trotsky's Ideal it's a negation it's an

abstraction it has no reality

the failure of that ideal

amounted to the success

of a real socialism the failure of the

ideal socialism

the ideal Revolution

actually entailed the success of the

real one

and that's really how

Marxism leninism begins to Define its

history

the inversion of content in form happens

when that which used to be attributed to

form

is discovered as the actual content

for example

take the nation

hitherto the nation was just understood

as a form specifically as an institution

formalizing a community of people

but especially after the experience of

the Great Patriotic War

the nation is now somehow understood

the very dialectic of form and content

defining the nation becomes a content

and that's a very important

aspect of Marxism leninism you're

dealing with all of the forms of society

are turned into material contents the

family thought to be just a mere formal

whatever

institution in the way of the real

content of communistic free love and

whatever abolishing the family

but the family is no longer

the form because in the failure to

achieve the Revolutionary family you

discover

the real material

uh

content of the family

so that which is the form becomes the

content

form arises out of content

content is no longer defined as a

pornographically

as the object of your desire the Garmin

bosia right the sweet corn

and David Lynch puts in his movies

that's not what content means anymore

material content can only be related to

um

through a resignation

of

what one thinks desires or assumes

beforehand that content to be once this

is suspended content becomes quite

literally defined

by the melancholic failure

uh of

the individual subject to realize their

aim

and I think that's quite a beautiful

thing

so you're done

I'm still

over near me

to finish

yeah

it's not it's not just that content

isn't static and it's moving it's more

like

the content of things is the way in

which they

um are necessary so for example Trotsky

will say something like the nation is

unnecessary and it's obsolete

but

one of the lessons of socialism in one

country is that the nation

the necessity of the nation is doesn't

come from the idea of the nation doesn't

come from the will to establish the

institution of a Nation the Deep

necessity of

a nation not morally speaking by the way

but objectively like why do Nations

exist come from an objective kind of

internal logic or internal logos of

Nations

something that is impossible to overcome

so for example

take a rock

any ordinary thing

you can

um intelligibly establish as something

that exists a rock right

a rock exists because of its own

inability to overcome itself

yes the tendency of nature is constant

change

so things that exist exist only because

they failed not to be

that failure defines their positive

content

so you see how form and content are

inverted in dialectical materialism

the materiality of the thing

lies in its inability

to not be

it's failure to not be that is what

makes it material

what makes it material is not some

substance inherent in it it's not some

special quality of real realness and

reality in it

what makes it material is the specific

way it cannot Escape

its own tragic fate

that

my friends is

what better describes the history of

Communism than that

form is then just derivative of that

fundament it's not just you have smooth

not let me put it this way guys it's not

just that you have nothingness content

nothingness and then form different

things that resist nothingness right

the whole thing is inverted

form is the nothingness form is what's

nothing

actual

content of things is a specific way

of

being

of a failure right a failure to achieve

the

um

achieve the form

and if you want to go very esoteric like

into

Marxist leninist cosmology all material

being is oriented around culminating

into the thinking Spirit the thinking

Consciousness so the cosmology of spirit

is by theenkov for example a Soviet

philosopher idienkov

It Is the destiny of all being she

culminate into the thinking

consciousness

that is the destiny of material reality

itself so you can also say in a

paradoxical strange sense

a rock is a rock

because of the specific way it fails

to be

thinking bee

and that is what gives it the quality of

materiality

but here's the thing

this is

what's interesting is that in human

history human history is also defined

by the failure of thinking beings

to be

um

thinking beings

and it's our failure that defines us as

human

it's our failure that defines us as

material beings as human beings

our failure to fully dissolve into some

some abstract thinking consciousness

like why is it that we're not just

um thoughts why are we also embodied

right we're embodied because

of a fundamental failure

to be what we are

the Amy and I get a headache from this

shit guys

why do people want to become just

thought

we don't but

thought is the culmination of creation

it's the culmination of being

like if you believe in the cosmology of

spirit the idea that

like is the correct usage of the word

teleological that all material being is

teleologically oriented into culminating

in other words we're not an accident

like freely

yankovlin in his dialectical materialism

It Is the destiny of material reality to

culminate into thinking beings that

reflect back upon itself right so jija

calls absolute recoil this minimum of

reflexivity

um

I think Frank Ruda has a book it's

called the dash it's the dash right is

it Frank Ruda who wrote that I don't

know

um

but uh

if that's true

that also applies to us as well it's not

like we've achieved the perfect state of

nature we our humanity and our history

is defined by our own failure to be what

we already are

and what we already are is yes it's more

lock points out the highest form

matter

thought

thought is matter perfected but here's

the point of dialectics it's very

important

thought is not possible without its own

failure

thought is not possible

without the opposite like

it's not perfected matter thought is the

purest imperfection in nature

it's the purest

most fundamental imperfection within

nature

defined as the a thing being itself

why is a thing being itself the same as

a thing being a thought

because

the essence of a thing already implies

that there's a difference between the

thing

and its own reality its essence

that division is precisely what

culminates into the thinking

consciousness

into thought or Spirit but let's just

say thought

so people don't get too confused

that's what it culminates into

why can't a rock just be a rock

because

the rock that it should be or

aspires to be

is

a pure virtuality

which

contradicts

the reality of the Rock right

the failure of a rock to be a rock is

what defines the Rock

that dialectic culminates into thought

thought is the actuality of reality's

difference with regard to itself

a thought

is quite literally the uh not only is a

thought the opposite of reality right

a thought is the culmination of

reality's own opposition toward itself

a species is the failure of the genus

in a sense yes

I think that's hegel's point isn't it

so Marxism leninism take away

reflects a spirit of resignation

it's an aesthetic of resignation

it's not a sphere uh aesthetic of uh

inaction and um

quietism

but it is an aesthetic of

determinate resignation

like yes we have a goal and we will

achieve our goal but the beautiful thing

about it guys is that

if we have a goal as Marxist London is

as communists

we must act as if we have already

achieved it

we have already achieved our goal

in 2036 we've already taken over the

Communist party everything we're doing

now doesn't reflect the passion of some

kind of Adventure

but walking through the present to

realize a future that has already come

to pass

and which already exists

Marxism leninism is a spirit of

resignation

which means

we walk into our victory

our Victory is given

if our Victory is not given

then we are acting in vain

see the point

if our Victory is not given then we are

acting in vain

that my friends is the significance of

faith

we will dwell more upon the subject

tomorrow

but I hope you guys like the new camera

and I'm officially announcing

the campaign against Trotsky I jibber

jabber because

all of this revolutionary sloganeering

and phase mongering

from Twitter oh my God like this this

this

not can you guys identify what trotskism

is now please one's in the chat tell me

if you can do that at least when you see

someone bitching about how

um oh my god

um Stalin wasn't a real oh my God Putin

oh my God Haas how can you hang out with

LaRue scheitz and how oh my God how can

you be on stage with these Libertarians

at the anti-war rally and oh my God this

is a betrayal of the true Essence it's

trotskyism

when you have a dogmatism of the true

Essence as an ideal content that you

superimpose upon reality it's just

fucking trotskyism so let's stop

entertaining the bullshit Western

leftism as at its core trotskyism

right it's all Trotsky it's all Trotsky

like bullshit

it's all trotskyism at its fucking core

even the Marxism leninism in the west is

trotskiest

what are marxists learning this in the

west by the way they're people who say

uh

they're just trotskies with regrets with

regard to the fucking Democrats or the

DSA oh my God the DSA is not

revolutionary enough so we're gonna be

MLS no you're just a fucking trotskiest

we're not like that we're not

disappointed in anyone I'm not

disappointing the Democrats the DSA or

anyone else cpusa no one I'm not

disappointed in you I already live in a

state of Nirvana

in which you simply don't exist

I already dwell in a place where you

have already failed

I don't have any revolutionary

indignation

over your betrayal of the Revolution

what

I'm like uh sayloth the wise

I'm already in Nirvana

living in the future

where you were already defeated

I don't believe the Revolution was

betrayed

because I don't believe in the Democrats

Revolution to begin with I oh the

Democrats and the DSA betrayed the

Bernie

Bernie betrayed us no he didn't

thank you Bernie for betraying us thank

you Bernie you have now cleared the way

Bernie betrayed us no

Bernie revealed the way the way of the

owl

the way of the owl my friends

we need only look at the owl

and it's beautiful

it's beautiful

with the launch of the infrared

initiative of creating the Communist

party we want to see exist we don't even

need to be indignant over the failure of

Joe Sims

thank you Joe Sims for your betrayal

you have cleared the way

the era

of the Communist Party will begin this

year in 2023

thanks to you for clearing the way

we are blind before the enemy

and we walk into our victory

we look at the owl alone my friends

anyway guys thank you so much Chris

Morlock appreciate you

as you can see I'm living in the future

right now

but even the future

is

Bound by time

and as you can see it's getting dark

here but uh give me a moment and

I'm gonna walk

on the sidewalk a little bit and show

you just a taste

what's in store for us thank you so much

Chris appreciate it for the revolution

already peacefully resting in eternity

yeah

I want to uh

that's beautiful Chris thank you so much

I want to show you guys let me let me

walk right out here into that I want to

show you a taste of the future to come

yes guys

we're already here

2098

we did it we made it

we actually did it we won

look it's all real

I know you're living in the past and you

can see this beautiful future ahead

I just have to ask you the question

do you have what it takes

to get here