BREAKING: How "Adam Tahir" DESTROYED International Magz!

where it begins i can't begin to knowing but then i know it's growing strong

was in the spring and spring became the summer who di believe youd come such a hair

reaging oow touching me touching you se dos never seem so good

never no

freeroline g never see

seems so good never

f ft ationationaliation to national

where it begins i can't begin to knowing but then i know it's growing strong

was in the spring and spring became the summer who di believe youd come such a hair

reagion oow touching me touching you does never seem so good

e never no

freeroline g never see

seems so good never

ya f f fs to nationalalationoation ationalation p

love is the burn because then the flames grew

don't let this gam can we cannot live don't let it

od see she's soy lookingt me she's so lookingt me

because the four ws loves more than he oy doest go on his love don't let

ree shes some looking to me rather me

lve is the burncause then the flames grow

don't let us this gam can cannot live don't let

good you seeree she's sobody looking tot me she's soody looking tot me

because the fur wants look more than he oy doest go on love don't let

freehes some liking me rather me

love is the burncause then the flames g

don't let this gt we cannot live don't let m

you seeree she's sbody looking t me she's sbody looking ust me

because the fe wants love more than he oy does go on love don't let

ree she's someth me rather me

love is the burn because then the flames grow

don't let this g cannot live don't let

good you see ratherre she's soy looking at me she's soy looking at me

because the four wans love more than he oy does go on love don't let

hs sometht me rather

what the bug is up everybody and what is this week sat

that i'm looking at

what is this weak chat devoid of sun gorillas devoid of the high energy benefiting

of the most powerful and most feared marxist leninist community

on the entirety of the internet and possibly

possibly

of the entire

centuries so far in the united states as a whole

oh boy we're getting there

make no mistake about it we are definitely

unmistakably

making it there

i'm not going to spend the first few minutes tooting our own horns and jacking ourselves off because our direction

the place we're facing is forward

we're not looking to the past we're not looking to pat ourselves on the back

were looking forward

into the future

where our victory is all

but certain

only god guarantees

but i feel like we've already won this battle

with the so called left

i feel like we make them squirm and we make them writhe in inconsistency and they start fibbing and they start kind of

catching themselves and all these fucked up mistakes and

oh it's glorious actually you ask me

they love to just say we're fascists and dismiss us brok fasts it's a co

to co

we are the revival of marxism leninism in the western primarily western context

thank you so much tactile for the five by the way i did see that

and they're coping about it

none of these people

will debate me none of them will subject any of it to scrutiny

all they have are lies and

co

that's ok it's no matter

because

we are witnessing a rapid acceleration

of progress

aspar as the organization

i really just want to tell you what it's call

but i can't

when that happens

it's going to be a game changer and we're looking at a tanky summer

gam

buckle up

this spring you haven't seen anything yet you're looking at a fuckin tanky summer

haze al dean is going all in i'm going to be traveling the fucking country

coast to coast

we're going to dig our fuck and heels in the thick of this struggle

and once we do that there is no no going back i was not made to sit in front of a camera for my entire fucking life and that's it

i will always scream to you guys i will always be here but

this is not just what i was made for i was made

to speak to people in person

i was made to get things done

in real life that's what i believe

that's what i believe

hazel dean is taking this to the next level thank you so much ofm i g appreciate foror to adam's legal fund

that's exactly right adam to hear

we are all adom to hear it's become a mem

i

i apologize to the actual atam to year they got wrapped up into this but this is this is the one that's caught on

and we're all adam to year now and there's really no way of

getting out of it

ladies and gentlemen yesterday i was with my parents i was with my family actually

and i was also with nadia

who i have introduced

to my family

actually weeks ago and we're all hanging out having a great time

and obviously i could not stcream or do anything yesterday and i decided not to announce it either because

i didn't i just wanted to spend some time with my family you know

anyway i was there having a great time

and then i see

someone said i think it was samira who sent me this article

while i was on the taking a shit actually at my parents house

and then i read this curious little article about

as al dien

who is allegedly real name in parentheses adam to hear

and then i think to myself and i say

usually i get triggered but i was with my family and i was like

what a what a weird world i'm living in like

what a cool story my life has been it's just like this is the house i've grew up in

at least parsley and

i'm here with my family and it's like i'm i'm this person

my family knows me

lot of people know me

and then i'm this has gey

who nobody knows

and then they think his name is adam to hear it i'm just like ha it's so funny how these worlds are so

separate

you know

i just kind of laughed i was like

i'm at the tehre family meeting i guess

it's like i'm it's a totally different world you know

it's a it's a

it's kind of an intriguing thing i kind of find it endearing actually

because it's just like you know how i see it as i'm sitting here with my family and i just see these raving

stupid doped up retarded bitches

sitting here

ready

writing these fucking deranged articles are so blinded by their own buter

that they make elementary mistakes

and i'm just like damn there's a lot of crazy crackhead retarded as people out there but

they also apparently exist in india

because there's a magazine called the international magazine

that's based in india i know india is a big place but

this one is connected to the communist party of india

which i believe has good ties with the c p usa i've always

had a conspiracy theory in the back of my mind

that i have been targeted by the communist party of india

because i've noticed that on twitter a lot of those

you know they're really hostile i don't even know who the fuck they are

they have a problem with me the communist party of india

and i theorize it might be due to the communist party usa

calling for backup

could be something like that i'm not exactly sure

could also be related to the fact that i could guess the communist party of india

is very pro green

very pro you know

global south

nonsense leftism you know green stuff and the cacao bean stuff and all that nonsense and

cultural politics and all the rest of it

so i could imagine it it's probably related to that somehow i'm not sure but i've found myself in their crosshairs

i've no idea why is it is this somehow related to the animosity

between india and pakistan or something it's like

maybe they think i'm pakistani and they have some kind of national hatred for me because they think i'm pakistani because i'm muslim or something i i don't know what it is honestly

it's the communist party of india without the m so it's the c p i not the m

right

they were promt with me

i don't really have a problem with indians obviously

you know what the indians i like are the nationalistic i don't want to know what the word nationalism i don't like that word but

i don't like the leftist ones you know i like the ones that are

a little more problematic

just from my experience because

you know

they tend to not be cuckleds and other things that i can't talk about

uh you toob

but uh i could respect those guys

because those people

seemed to like understand

they're not they're notbut this moralizing international green mission for greenery

shot the fuck up with their nordic social democracy and oh you have to be naked in polycules and

with that fucking weird avatars youa call the avatar socialist the avatar communist

the avatar leftist you know

i was surprised the international magazine is a magazine it's pretty reputable apparently

but it's run by

the communist party of india

and i thought i was connected to the p s l it's not it's actually based in the communist party of india which is crazy right

uh as far as the b j p am i have do i like them

uh not not necessarily but i also really don't like the congress so i like

they're the lesser of two evils

in comparison to the

congress i'll tell you that

but i do obviously disagree with but i mean i'm not indian so it's not my business right doesn't really matter

but yeah

that's an issue apparently

and this is a really funny article because it's saying this is a this is what you call the article that shits the bet

so this specific flavor of red lib unless we like to call them red libs are not particularly good at streaming

the red libs make good video essay content but they're not good streamers

haakim's not a good streamer

uh the d program is not a good streaming platform

you go pink isn't good at streaming

mean none of these people are good streamers

bad empanada is not a good streamer he's been in the game for like a long time and his contin is fucking dogshit

so he's not a very good or successful streamer

by a metric

so these are not really good streamers right and for that reason they've always been resentful

of the successful streamers

and among of the successful streamers besides hassan piker of course we'm not sure

was mentioned in that article i have to

no he wasn't that's incredible hassang piker was not mentioned

destiny and vash aar but hassan is notably not mentioned

they're pretty much all just hassan dick riders and they don't want to

cut into hassan's profits is my guess

right

that's my best guess of course

but

yeah they don't mention hassan

but it's pretty much just a son who's on that scene converging with that scene is the successful streamer

but you know they kind of lumped me jackson also samira in

with

waso

and destiny

and dylan burns which is really funny because

destiny in particular is the one

from whom

the information of my real name

quote unquote my real name adam to year of course that's my

very real name because destiny said so that's

that's where it comes from it comes from destiny

okay

so for for them claiming that we're all lumped together in one category i mean

why because we are

all the only thing we have in common is that we're not failed streamers that's it

we literally arch enemies you know in every room and every possible conceivable

way

we are enemies

but the only thing we have in common is what that we

what what what exactly do we have in common actually you know what i mean like

that red libs don't like us

i mean

that doesn't demonstrate a connection it just demonstrates that you're red libs and you have your own thing going that's connected to really what you are ore hassan piker followers

you're just hassan people oka we're not i'm not hassan piker

they're not hassan biker

and that's all it is is that we're not ha san piker i guess that's the only thing we have in common

is that none of us are hassan piker

but the research is so poor that i'm going to commit to something right now and i'm just going to get right into this

without any further ado

m for purposes of this video i'm going to get right into this

i am going to single handedly demonstrate

why the international magazine is a fraudulent fake news tabloid

bottom of the gutter just complete piece of shit magazine

that going forward absolutely no one no one should take seriously all right

they have gott objective facts so

hilariously wrong they have so little journalistic integrity

they obey

a non exxistent even standard of evidence they just

say things and spread tabloid gossip that they got from twitter

substantiating none of it oka

and you're going to see that very shortly i mean i am so appalled and shocked that i'm go go ahead and announce

you know i'm making this video to basically say

the international magazine is destroyed its credibility is gone anyone

nobody should ever

read anything they publish

with any good faith

none of it is credible ok

ah they are professional bullshitters and it's a fake news

kind of smut like magazine that's just

churning out objective verifiably objectively bullshit ok

and it's pretty crazy that you could just be that wrong because you know technically if you just say something like i don't like has he's a meanie and he's an assle

that's you're in this territory of a subjective opinion

but when you get things so wrong

like for example

my name getting my name wrong

i mean the name on my birth certificate

is not a subjective dispute

ok that's a matter of objective fact

the name on my birth certificate

is not adam to hear

ok

if you want to come here and say my name is adam to here

that should obey

some

doesn't even have to be mine but just some

reasonable standard of evidence

that you could apply consistently ky so a twitter user claiming that my true name is adam to hear

doesn't satisfy any standard of evidence

no proof was provided

and all you're doing is taking the word of an anonymous twitter account

and nothing further i mean there's nothing deeper than that

it's not like they dug up some records

with my photosa oh thats adams

they found nothing

it's literally just one twitter user making the claim that i'm adam to hear

which then got boosted by destiny

gay getting it seven thousand likes

and according to the international magazine anything destiny reas tweets

is objective fact

i'm sorry but that that newspaper is completely fucking bankrupt like

if you're a journalist you should

understand how evidence works

you know i talked about carl popper earlier and i'm going to bring up carl popper again because even that dumb fuck destiny doesn't even understand

his own liptard ideology so i'm going to explain it to you

ok

the age of empirical verificationism is over

so before

in the the positivist paragram it was like ok

evidence means anything pointing in the direction that confirms

a thesus

even if it's baseless right

then carl popper who's right at least when it comes to empirical data he makes a good point

all empirical evidence

sorry all claims about reality

that at least about objective

non subjective reality let's just

leave it there

should be falsifiable

you know what falsifiable means it means it should be testable right

if i say

there's an invisible unicorn up what's the guy who runs that magazine suvam

bannerge's ass there's an invisible unicorn

up shuvam's ass

because it's invisible it's not a testable claim

so it's unfalsifiable

it's not even wrong we can't prove it or disprove it any other way

the burden upon is upon me to make a claim that is falsifiable in the first place

so for example if i say there is a visible unicorn up schuvan's ass

then i can be subjected to some kind of test some ok prove it

how did you arrive at that conclusion give me the data what where is that grounded in empirical fact right

where's the data coming from

i'm teaching the international in shubam

how to be journalists by the way

claims have to be falsifiable

for them to be valid

otherwise they can be dismissed

so

let me explain that when an anonymous twitter user

makes the claim that has is real name is adam to hear

the only way i could disprove that is by actually doxing myself so

it can't be disproven

but it can't be proven either

so the claim is not falsifiable

it's an unfalsifiable claim

people tell me stuff of wahag but we don't know your real name i'm not asking you to know my real name

but saying my name is adam to hear

is just as valid

as saying my name is

david abdullah

oka

if you google search david abdullah

for dearborn michigan

i guarantee you you will find

at least one person aged twenty

to thirty five

who has that name

because someone exists

who's who has that name in dearborn michigan doesn't make it meet

ok

the whole atom to youar thing stems from the fact

that these people actually looked up a guy named adam to hear who lived in dearborn

who was thirty or thirty one years old something like that

and they said ok that must be hots

because he lives in dearborn and his name is adams to year

and he's five years older than haws's age and i'm twenty six by the way

and that was their standard of evidence the standard of evidence for me being adam to hear

was an anonymous twitter user saying so

destiny boosting it

and then there's these other added details that come from a andrew saturn

where they actually looked up the name adam to hear

and they found a guy in dearborn named adam to here and they claim this is me

gy

again that's not a falsifiable claim

ok

just because someone at i can make up any random arab sounding name

and you will find someone in dearborne michigan who

has that name i promise you

ok

even if you knew my first and last name

it would not be it would probably be impossible to find me just f my first and last night

in dearborn alone it would probably be impossible to find out

who i was

just based on my first and last name

ok

that's how shoddy it is to say that oh anonymous twitter user

sclaims that haws is adam to hear

and i've confirmed

an atom to here exists therefore that's evidence that's not evidence

evidence would be you proving that the person you found is me

there is no evidence for that

none

there is zero evidence for that whatsoever none whatsoever

ok

and the whole thing is unfalsifiable to begin with is it has why are you focusing on the name

because you can see this is why i have to focus on things like names right

because most of the other claims are highly subjective they're highly subjective

they're kind of these virtual claims that you can't really pin down to verifiable or falsifiable facts right

but when you get the facts wrong

it shows you're a bad faith actor

who's willing to state things that are lies just because others have repeated them

and that to me is a way of

collapsing people's entire worldview

you know when you state things

not only state them but commit to things that are factually wrong

and then you don't offer any correction and you like ride with that

then that is an indictment on all of your other views as well

now i have gotten things that are factually wrong before

but when every time i've been confronted with them i've owned up to it i' beel like yeah

i made a mistake ok

but i as a streamer

as a journalist have always been so fucking careful

to say

and entertain the possibility that this may not be true

or it may be true in that i just don't know

when i was covering the russian ukraine war i would always show you things from telegram and it this is something i was shown

i can't confirm or deny it

but here's this perspective so you can make your own

judgment and look into it

and we'll keep it to see if it gets confirmed later

so i've always been very careful with facts ok

all this ideological stuff about oh this house guy is actually a fascist because this is my subjective understanding of fascism i'm like

all of that

is deeply subjective and it's like that's not going to be based on anything testable ok i'm concerned with claims that are based in

testable kind of cl i'm concerned with testable claims

that could be tested under some kind of neutral

and also reasonable standard of evidence

the definition of reasonable isn't subjective also by the way it's just consistent

so for example if you're like o k has you're adom to hear becuse the twitter user said you are

then i'll just go ok

so

if a twitter user says that your name is fat retard is that your real name

because

it's satisfying the same standard of evidence you're applying to me

ok

so i have to

painstakingly explain this to people

who maybe don't do this for a living but if you're a journalist for a living and this is like

what you're putting your honor and your name behind you're going to see

an interesting thing about that

your whole magazine is fucking destroyed in terms of its credibility like

lot of these claims in the article are not testable claims

by the way i have i'm going to add to corl popper's on falsifiability by saying

you know there is a way you can test your claims

when it comes to has

in a neutral way which is debating me

because when you debate me

your claims can be subjected to scrutiny i can actively ask you ok

you claim i am a racist can you give me an example of my racism

and can you consistently follow up

with the argument that this is racist

and then can you uphld that consistently

so the reason i subject people to debates all the time is because

that's one of the ways you can render

their claims falsifiable

most of the claims made about haaz al den are un falsifiable claims

they are not testable you can't even test them

leftists on twitter always make claims about me

but there is no way of testing whether those claims

should be taken seriously or not

because first of all they aren't even willing to subject them to any

rational scrutiny or critical scrutiny

gk

so people should understand evidence and treat evidence better

i'm a i'm not one of these people like i don't care about evidence i don't care about facts

i when it comes to actual empirical facts i care about those

the reason i attack science

a lot is because sometimes science oversteps its boundaries

and tries to make empirical objects out of things that are not empirical objects right

an example of that could be like a

a you know oh do you have any empirical proof

third parties could work

the problem of that claim

is that

the

possibility of third parties existing isn't just down

to antecedent empirical factors it's down

to the subjective willingness of people

to

take the initiative to build a third party right

and then you could also say when it comes to marxism like oh can you can you

is marxisom falsifiable that's carl popper's favorite one

the problem with trying to subject marxism to any standard of falsifiability is again

because you're not dealing with some

completely barren neutral object you're dealing with someone that is

also objectively entangled with its own subjective conditions

of of you know

of expression

so in the case of marxism it's like o marxalism is fair

falsifiable

in terms of practice right

but

in order to be able to coherently put together and see how marxism

was a necessary ingredient

for the success of soviet socialism

or of china' socialism or whatever

you can't just rely on an anteciedent set of dead facts because you're dealing with something that concerns

something beyond empirical sensibilities which is that sixth sense that

coheres our understanding of the meaningfulness

of the world right so

that's why i'm against science and i'm against empiricism

but when it comes to statements of fact

like ok

what is on your birth certificate or like

what is the exact height of this tiger or like you know

how many fingers does has have things like that

you don't really have to get too into any kind of philosophy of science you can just really

have a really strict no bleshit like ok

is it true or is it false right

and that can obey a neutral non ideological

kind of standard of evidence to fulfil

ga

anyway so let's get right into it is terms of this magazine i just wanted to introduce

that to you

pretty briefly

so you can understand and see

where i'm coming from with that right

i can already tell this is not going to be a very popular live stream

but i just want to keep the vot up

for you know purposes

of h

of retrospect you know purposes of

keeping it there

for future purposes all right so let's actually go ahead and review this article and

check out what's going on

right because what

what in the world is even going on anymore right

what in the world whole wide world is even fucking going on right

so we're going to read this article together

and we're going to note some peculiarities

while we read it

so the first thing is that this article is named

is made by an idiot named don harjow

i'm pretty sure don harjow is a pseudonym

that means since don hards i was a pseudonym

according to their standard of evidence

we can attribute authorship of this to literally any name we choose

all we have to do is make an anonymous twitter account

and say that jeffrey epstein made this article

and that it becomes true according to the standard of evidence

and the journalistic

standard of evidence obeyed by don harju

we can literally call them whatever we want because this is obviously a pseudonym

and unless they prove the contrary by showing us their birth certificatet and id

i don't let thank you so much i slash lump and sce get you down

the working class of this country has got your back

thank you so much alexander appreciate that but i

thank you so much but i really appreciate the support

yeah i know i skipped yesterday's stream and i've been streaming on kick

js not good for my momentum

just now i've been neglecting the you tube because i'm working on something else all right i'm not fall in on the to

because i've been working on something else right

anyway don harj ow is talking about

the connection between

the so again

let's just get into it

we're going to kind of

skim this we're not going to necessarily read all of it and this is the part we're going to get into is the patriotic

socialist part and that's going to be the juicy part

which we're going to address directly i'm going to like fully break down everything said in this article

i don't want anyone spamming this fucking article at me cacuse i have

trust me like at by the end of the stream

you're going to be like haz fucking destroyed that article and don harzow should never come out

with their real name ever because they're going to be focking

so embarrassed for the rest of her life for ever having written this steaming pile of bullshit

right

but i in particular the international as a magazine i just want everyone to be clear about this

has been discredited

for life forever right

the connection between the united states intelligence community mass media and social media

is so well known it's a joke

what's the link

ok it's a tick talk they link a tick talk

scandals like cambridge analytica let the cat out of the back

let's just begin here

cambridge analytica didn't let any cat out of any bak

okay

cambridge analytica was the story

that was actually popularized by the mass media themselves

and by the united states intelligence community actually are we can at least infer that

to try and spin this narrative

that trump was elected because of fake news

the actual united states military

psychological operations darpa all of that stuff

which has been going on on social media for decades now

that was what let the cat out of the back and that has never been given any coverage

whatsoever

on the mainstream media

the fact that

eaglean airbase was the single largest source of traffic

for read it

was given no coverage

by the mainstream media

this piece of shit

this fuckin piece of shit this fuckin cockroach

is talking about cambridge analytica

because that's something that's been validated

by the fucking mainstream media that they worship

so you can tell this person's a fuck and shell

just from the fact

that they're used in cambridge analytica of all things

as an example of the connection

between the u s intelligence community

and social media

they're only doing that

cacause it's acceptable and valid

to their fellow cocksucker falking liberals

books like nom chomsky's manufacturing consent

and parenthes inverting reality have been analyzed to death

journalist alan mcclod has been documenting the disturbing trend of the atlantic council f b i cia hires a twitter

fa's been read it for many years

just this past year washington post published a story

detailing how chick talk influences received consultation

from the white house on the russian ukraine conflict

ok

i'd love to see how this ties into me by the way cause that's going to be the juicy part i guess

wwich owned by bezos came under fire

when jordan ull reported the u s army sports

and navy channels were tricking viewers with the fraudulent sweepstakes

that signed him up for the j r t c

ok wwich is the website

that i was

permanently banned from

and i'll list my bands in detail

my first band

game

because sansl who is now a destiny orbiter

spammed my chat with swastikas

and invited someone into a group call

that posted a swastaka on my sreen

i was banned for seven days

the second time i was banned

was when i covered abby martin's documentary on gaza

during the gaza

conflict of the summer of two thoand and twenty one

and i was banned for thirty days

the third time i was banned

was when bad empanada snitched on me to twitch where they were happily

looking for any excuse to ban me and they did it

ok

finally i was permanently banned by being labelled as a harmful misinformation actor

by which

permanently

kay

now

the

soorros backed open society backed

it was called the

te transparent technology institute something along those lines

tech transparency project

the tech transparency project

and katy paul who was working for them

which is a washington democrat allgned n g o and institute

with funding direct funding from the open society foundation

and from the cia

because of all the other philanthropic donors that are attached to that institute

they wrote a report

which

insinuated i was an agent of russia

which was then covered by the financial times

then given to twitch and upon with the publishing of that article i was permanently banned

from twitch

i would love

for you to try to fuck and sit here

and do fucking

thumbersaults and gymnastic leaps

trying to tie a fucking guy like me or jackson or samira for that matter

to u s intelligence agencies you stupid falkin got sucker let me falkin hold you to it let's falkin see

throuwhout this funcking article

if you can maintain that fucking line

you stupid pitch

i regularly have tweets go viral against infrared

that are boded

there was a tweet by

harold sullivan

which showed something like something from china where there was like an l g b t flag and it was crossed out i don't know if it's real or not

but someone quotes we did and said no here's the original version

and they put the infrared globe crossed out

and it got four thousand likes

i went through the retweats and the likes

i swear to you it was fucking bot it

those were not real accounts liking it

they were all random

foreign boded accounts

that happens to me very regularly

piops to engage in reputation destruction against me happen regularly

is that coming from the cia who's doing that

the very claim that my name is adam to hear

is a sciap it's a verifiable sciap

is that coming from the fucking

s intelligence agencies who's doing it

who's spreading all this fake news about infrared and oz

why would someone who works for u s intelligence be the victim

of such a meticulous and methodical campaign

to have their reputation destroyed

why don't you fucking think about that you stupid piece of shit

cockroach

falking journalists liberal pieces shed

fulking coward

if you were ever pressed to justify any of your claim after seeing the you fuken fall thank you so much nonmn army army my skills are better off being taught to our comrades in the coming storm

i don't i don't know what you're talking about all right

more recently a vice report exposed u s army plans to pay streamers millions to drive a recruitment

okay are they also banning these streamers permanently from twich

wwhich also

is also a haunt for streamers who fancy themselves political analysts

to engage in debates with one another

like a chinsier version of crossfire

you lying piece of shit

you disgusting lying piece of shit

twitches the only political streamer

who twitch promotes

is hassan piker

who is not a debate streamer

hassan is the largest political streamer on twitch

and possibly the internet

and he is not a political debater

the debate sphere of twich

was extremely marginal compared to hassan it's extremely marginal

compared it to hasan in his community

this disingenuous piece of shit article doesn't mention hassan's name once

hasan who is connected to the young turks

turks who'se connected to literal billionaire oligarchs

doesn't get one mention in this whole fucking article salvador thank you ll last needs your help comrade

please make cash stagna one known malogo go viral thean you so much for the five men i don't know what that is i have to check it out laterll right

so that's an incredibly disingenuous fucking thing to say

the only debate sphere on twitch was what

me

destiny

and dilon burns

voss was banned on switch for a long time

dylan burns in destiny

formed a coalition against me very hod

they made a meticulous methodical effort to de platfm me

very on

they were at the vanguard

of attempts to destroy my reputation

on twich and elsewhere

including all their orbiters

to group me in with all of the other name one other debate streamer on wwich

who was aligned with infrared

who i was not fighting with

there wasn't any

the debate streamers were at the very bottom of twitch politics

and hassan who is not a debate streamer

is at the top

go on twitch dot t v right now he's probably streaming right now maybe he's not

he will always be at the fucking top he'll always be immediately recommended he's one of the biggest streamers twitch has

so

what a fraudulent piece of shit this fucking don harju is

you're saying that twitch is also a haunt for streamers

to engage in debates with each other

that's extremely marginal

if you're going to do a fucking

article about the online pseudo left

and you're going to talk about twitch and not mention hassan

you have just not only discredited your entire fucking article

you've discredited the international magazine as a whole

you're going to talk about twich politics and the pseudo left

and not mention hassan

you're just going to mention the fucking debate streamers who get max two k views

which is nothing

compared to hassan's fifty thousand concurrence

even destiny didn't get a lot on twitch

he would get what four thousand at most

i didn't ever see him get a huge number of views on twich

hassan had fifty thousand

ok

instead of two guys ensuit spitting at each other from across a glass table

the debate sphere often looks like a grit of smarmy young faces

arguing from their gaming chairs

into their webcams for hours

it's more like a wrestling match or reality t v than a productive exchange

but without the physical skill or the sly wink video titles often boast of all caps

b debate partisans going ballistic crushing their opponents and off rails

verbal brawl

hey you little fuckin cockroach cocksucker piece of shit stop acting like you're talking about some general phenomena

and just say you're referring to me

nobody on which brought that level of toxicity

except me

i was the only one who made it like a wrestling match because i was the only one with skin in the game who would actually get triggered about the things being debated about

because i actually fucking care about them i care about the fucking truth i do care about my fucking world view in defending what i consider to be the fucking truth

none of these other people do they're a bunch of funking frauds

who just want to get hired and fuckin respectable

a journalistic position dylan burns and funcking destiny all these people

it was destiny going ballistic in a wrestling match never

was dylon burns going ballistic in a wrestling match never who was going ballistic and cqrushing their opponents

in off the rails verbal brawls only me

name another name someone else to supplies to

it doesn't apply to any other twitch streamer except me

so you're just coping about the fact

that you have been mentally traumatized

by me has or adam to hear as you like to tell yourself

i

personally mentally traumatized you

and you wrote an article wishing away and coping with the trauma i inflicted on your sight

by trying to make it seem like this is some generalized phenomenon

and this is not a profoundly original thing i've heard from very reliable sources that don hardy is none other than joe sims

no

don harju is a spineless cowardly piece of shit

who was mentally traumatized

by the prospect by the thought

of venting out their disagreements with me

in a live debate

where they envisioned themselves getting crushed in off the rail's verbal brawls

it's almost like what you know how soy boys always talk about

ah red pill streamers talking about alpha miles like

you'll see these fucking be like oh that's yeah you're such an alpha male

they're just talking about their own insecurities

how often does

andretate or sneako talk about alpha miles probably not a lot as much as they say they do right

but everyone who ate sneako and andrewtain and the whole fucking crowd will always over emphasize the alpha maile thing because they're talking about the things that mentally traumatize themselves because they realize the're such weak beta mailes

that they look at andretator something like wow i'm a fucking beta that's what they think to themselves

and their only takeaway is that he's posturing about being an alpha because he reminds them of what wek

fuk they themselves are

so this is very similar actually

this person is over emphasizing something that was an exclusive quality and property

of infrared at least on twitch

and making it seem like this is like some general phenomenon on wwich it never was a general phenomenon

i single handedly

brought that environment to twitch

i can't think of a single other streamer on which

for whom this is a political to accept me

but he's

so traumatized by the

fundamental uniqueness about what of what infrared is

he has to wish it away as some kind of like

generalizable phenomena

what a fucking bitch what an absolute

what an absolute

pussy what an absolute fucking coward and pussy

whoever wrote this fucking article is a bitch for life

you can use a fake name all you fuck and want youre ones go feel thank you want havean ameration they're easily brainwashed

thank you so much one man army appreciate you

but say so much great a good re journalist would reach out to the subjects of their scrutiny for comment to but that's dangerous

you can get sucked into nazism by talking this is this whole article is a coe

were untalented uncharismatic people

who are unable to reach people through the most advanced medium of communication and that's what streaming is

i challenge any one to deny that by the way that streaming is the most advanced medium of communication

spoiler it is according to any standard it's the most advanced

means by which someone can disseminate information

they are bad at that

so they cope by writing about it

and making commentary on it

because they can't actually do it themselves

so they want to feel like they're above the phenomena

but they're not

because if i had you come on my stream and you got in v c

it's not just my community the world would see you as the snivelling trembling little bitch that you fuckin are and that's the beauty about streaming you can't hide behind articles you can't hide behind video essays

you can't hide your emotions and your personality and your real stance behind anything at all

you actually have to actively subject

yourself to the test

of whether or not you're actually about

what you claim to be

you actually have to sit here and confidently maintain a position

while actually getting scrutiny and pushback you can't just write a fucking article and then run away like a bitch you actually have to sit here

and defend your positions to the world

confidently right

people think that's all fake in smoke and mirrors

it's more real than this

you think i mat guys imagine if this person was in my v

what what would

forget about an infrared viewer forget about you guys right

what would the average person think if they witnessed an encounter between me and this person

in a debate

now they may call me oh you're just going to scream and yell no i'll keep a completely calm demeanor

what is the takeaway from the average person in that encounter

i will dog walk you

i will falking

destroy you yes because i will actually

bse you

to make good on your commitments

when you make claims

you have to make good on your commitment to those claims they have to satisfy some standard of reason

some reasonable standard

that is consistent

you have to demonstrate that what you are saying is reasonable

because you you listen

you can worm your way out by saying something like oh yeah there's a well known connection between intelligence community and social media and you know twitch has the onunch of these political streamers you're worming your way out say what you really want to say

to the public

you want to say to the public

that everyone you disagree with

sorry all the pat socks you disagree with

are

federal agents

because they disagree with me i have no evidence for it whatsever

it can't satisfy any standard of reason or evidence

but it's something i choose to believe because it's convenient for my world view

and you have to i would

force you to admit that to the world that's why you never debate me

more fire from the khan

thank you so much old man appreciate you

these debates

much of those featured on c n

are more spectacle than discussion

with streamers often coordinating behind the scenes as though they are trying to put on a show

and what is this

kepfle's on twitter

so they linkled link some kepfles to eat right

if you're going to use keffles as an example of internet blood sports

again

you need your journalistic credentials revolte

again no debater on the internet on twich maybe just on twich

satisfies any of this description except me

okay when keffuls debates people

it doesn't go down like that nobody's actually going off the rails it's just

this person is taking like these

passive aggressive like

slight smug whatever tit for tats

and they're taking that to be some kind of like

spectacle w w e show

what kind of fuck and pussy are you

you can't even talk to someone you disagree with

without dismissing it as a fucking wrestling match

because why because

there's tension in the room

i mean with me and you say that's like pro wrestling

i could see

why you would say that when i was on twitch especially right

although it's not it's still a cop out because why because there's meat and potatoes substantive points of contention

that can be subjected to some kind of

reasonable standard and logical scrutiny

despite all the bad tone and the yelling right

get past that bullshit and actually

look at what's being

argued over and try to measure it objectively

and then i do prevail in these fucking debates despite yelling and shit right

so no it's not just

spectacle or blood sports

it's a test to see

who can actually defend their position

who actually has a basis

for the things that they're saying

who can actually defend their beliefs

it's that simple

can you actually defend your beliefs

when you are

live

actively being confronted with the opposite

bill what about on twitter here's the problem of twitter

you can make a tweet and then i can respond to it your tweet will get five hundred thousand views my response gets five hundred views

so it's not a live setting where the entire audience sees two people who disagree

this disagree

and stating the terms of their disagreement

there is no replacement for a fogking debate that's lith

because the audience has to have their attention on both equally

and there needs to be an ability

for this person's claims

to be subjected to this person's scrutiny

that's why it's w w e by the way

i'm going to teach you this

so in blood sports gladiator arenas

it's a test to see who's stronger

who's more skilled

who's more adept at fighting and at combat

and that's what it's about

in a debate

it's about who is more adept at

defending their positions

who is more correct

because this is the only way

we can actually

create some kind of semi neutral standard

of judgment

for anyone who's so concerned

about who's a bullshitter and who's a sincere

genuine person or who's someone

who backs their shit up with substance

this is the only way you can do it swamp communist

can make as many fucking tweets as they want

it will never be testable unless they're in a live debate with some one

and everything they say can actually be scrutinized in front of that same audience

now my community regularly blows the fuck out of swamp communist in his fucking replies in a quote withed him

but you'll never be able to get

either an eveer or more amount of attention

than his original stupid fucking tweet

nobody's going to give it as much attention as the stupid thing he originally said

the only way

you can actually test to see if someone's a bullshitter

or if they back up what they say with substance

is through a debate there's no other fucking way to do it

thank you so much

oh daniel i thought that was gifted

anyway continuing

most of these people are well off but they play being relatable

who plays being relatable again

or are you talking about me is that because i'm actually fucking relatable or am i faking it

some affect slovenliness much the way boris johnson musfles up his hair

they perform a leftist aesthetic but recursate burgeu's bourgeois values

for a young alienated largely white and middle class audience

again who are you talking about

i hope you're not talking about me

oka one's in the chat if you're white

twos in a chat if you're ethnic

the reason to chat if you're eastern european

ok

so

i have

of any of the radical leftist communities on the internet

i by far

have the most

brown and black

and yellow people

and red people

i by far have the most non white people of anyone

so much so

that this is something acknowledged by our red libed enemies

the red liberal hakim followers regularly share that one racist mem

that's like a soyjack of infrared and there's a black guy there's an asian guy there's an arab guy there's a

let' see no guy

and they're all being soyjacked in front of the infrared globe

because that's the reputation i've earned on the political sphere of the internet

the reputation i've earned is basically that i speak

four

men of color

that's the re is it true it's not really true

it has grains of truth though

because i probably have the most amount of non white males

of any other political community

now others may have more

non white women or

non binary people but non white males i have the most of any

it proportionally i have the most of any other community

and that is pretty much like a stereotype about infrared at this point

like everyone knows that

ok

so you talk it and then

middle class no one knows what that means middle class

see leftist love using the word middle class

because this is the bar if you're not a homeless crackhead you're middle class

they can define you as middle class

if you don't work in the service sector or if you're not homeless or if you're not a prostitute

if you're not lumpin and if you're not

a pink collar service worker

they can call you middle class

middle class pretty much applies to everyone that disagrees with leftists even a homeless crackhead on the street

who supports trump

something i've encountered very often by the way if you if you can believe it i i sa i encounter that all the time

they'll call that homeless person the middle class

because they will say he is revelt relatively

more affluent than the other homeless people so he's middle class

so this is a word that has no scientific value

whatsoever

it has no value whatsoever to describe anything

serious political disagreements get reduced to drama interpersonal feuds of cynical point scoring

no it doesn't the famous statement from my community is meat and potatoes we don't care about any of that

get to the meat and potatoes

of

consistently defending the points you are putting forward

and that's something well known in my community

like a sadder reverberation of the compatible left

many of these factions flood the field online today for the sake of simplicity we will be considering a handful

that have been active in the debate sphere

liberals napo

pat socks

an anti siv nationalists

okay so

this category encompasses everyone who debates on the internet

so if you have ever

been a streamer on the internet and you debate people

you are lumped in with napo

liberals

a anti sive nihilist

and

all of these people

have in common what that they've debated on the internet

this person is just retarded

do you can you look in the mirror and tell yourself

that this is a smart thing to do i'm going to lump in everyone i disagree with

as belonging to the same category

and let's see how they do

while these groups will often claim to despise each other

oh there couldn't possibly be

anything backing up those fucking claims like docing

like deep platforming

like threatening their lives

like literally

doing pyops to destroy your reputation

there couldn't possibly be anything

backing that disagreement up

with substance right

what does establish a substantive disagreement that

okay if there is no substantive

enmity between pat socks like myself

and all these other people again

if there is no substance to the enmity

between myself

and diylan burns and destiny and the rest of these falcking people

this is what i would bring up in a debate

what would satisfy a reasonable standard of enmmity

for example

if i look at swamp communist tweets or your tweets whoever the fuck you are

i will find a decent

sized proportion of people liking it who are nafo

oftentimes

napo and the red libed radical left travel in herds

they like each other's sweets because they're often targeting the same people

when i'm being targeted

everyone teams up against me wash's viewers destiny's viewers nay foe radical leftists left coms red libs anarchists all of them

you know the tweet destiny retweetd claiming that i was atam to hear

was liked

by almost every political faction on the left

no every political faction on left

and and a lot of right wingers

a lot of neo nazis

every single one of them so what is a substantive standard of enmity have you gotten de platformed by these people have you gotten docs by them have they fucking come after your finances and your livelihood have they tried to fuck and silence you and censure you have they tried to destroy your reputation on a personal fucking level

have they engineered shit against you

have they conspired against you to blacklist you from other

communities

have you been subjected to any of that you haven't

guys who gets more heat

from okay

debates hear liberals na fo

an anti siv nationalist

i would anyone in good faith

who gets more heat

az al deen

or hakkien

who gets more heat energy

attacks

from these people

howkim or jackson hinkle

hawkeim or has

go ahead

jackson pinkele

who had tweets go viral about him

saying that jonah hill stole his girlfriend

which was a lie by the way

what a random thing to destroy your reputation about

who gets more heat though

char who gets more

wack who gets attacked more

who's more ostracized

ask them do you like haakim or haz better

who are they going to say you think they're going to say has

they like haakim better

because ha team

his social values are aligned with them thank you so much haty

this article was written by ruth bader mainhoff

no it that left comm no it wasn't

let me tell you something

i can tell you something

these guys the pat socks are the only one from this group

that don't align with these other guys on anything culture war related

we also don't align with them on anything geopolitics related

or politics related at all for that matter

nothing there's no alignment

well well you both inadvertently hurt the laugh but but that's all but a subjective jibber jabber there's no substance to that

and any substantive

point

some ideological belief

how does

this align with any of these other people

name one

don't just say you disagree with all of them

don't just say it's my opinion that they are harming the left

get show me how we actually objectively align

in any way

by any again

external objective standard of evidence

while they claim to despise each other

they often share a lot in common both ideologically and professionally

ok

let me find the examples of that

i want to see some funking examples

of common ideological points of alignment

between this group and all these other people

how do fucking lurusites

tie with

eco fascist

how do they tie with navo

it's the schiller institute that has all these clips of calling out politicians

for supporting the nazis in ukraine

that are going viral is from schiller

how does that align with na fll

how does that align with the debates for your liberals you think

la rouche and destiny have something in common

please explain to me what that is

what do they have in common

one thing just name one funcking thing

just one fuckin thing

thanks so much heart tache by the way

i don't know if i thank you already

um

including a strange habit of emphasizing the need to collaborate with or rehabilitate

far right reactionaries

and flaming any resistance to this as purity politics oh i can explain this

i can easily explain this

so here's what they're saying i'm going to sum this up to you

the supposed

ideological alignment between all these groups

is that

by virtue of being streamers

we all try to reach out to people

who are not

already within our communities

now

why don't they try to reach out to the left

because the left is an already consolidated community

reaching out to there's two things you can do

pander to the left and you're hassan piker

ok

or you can try to do what they call the converting method converting right wingers

to become blue pilled it's called blue pillar that's the

and it was from that guy

what steve hassan

who taught them how to deradicalize and blue pill right wingers

so for example

destiny streamed with nick fuenttes to blue pill the gropers

destiny goes on red bill podcast to blue pill those people

ok

now

haws

oftentimes talks about

working with

ideologically opposed people who it may be fair to qualify as

far right at least historically

but not when they are decisively far right

so for example

if someone is an actual neonazi obviously i'm not

going to say yeah let's form a united front with them

but

it is not enough for me to label someone as an enemy

just because they have some erroneous conception of history

or because they have some erroneous

ideology

but are otherwise aligned against imperialism

on every substantive

point ok

so geopolitically that's important

for example

are they anti china or not

are they anti russia or not are they opposed to the state department are they opposed

to imperialism

now i my definition of what a far right nazi is

is not an idealist one i have a materialist one

so for me nazis are like as off in ukraine

i define narzism

as a way

is how dmitrov defined it

the revenge of the most terroristic and chauvinist sections

of imperialist capital

so for me nazism

is a specific relationship

with the top

it's when you're a mercenary

for the ruling class for the geminy on top

people who are confused

who try to articulate their counter hegemonic instincts

in the language

of far right beliefs and ideology are not

a priori enemies to me

they only become enemies

when they actively fulfill the aims of or defend the hegemony

where they become functionally nazis

ok

so that's the difference with me

that has nothing nothing to do with blue pilling anyone

i am not trying to bluepil anyone

i am just trying

to allow people to articulate their opposition to the hegeminy

in a more effective way

that is not blue pillg

i am not telling people oh yeah you should trust

c n n and you should trust the media

and he said a

trust the hegemony and trust the science and all it

i'm not telling people that

i am telling people

your notion of who the ruling class is

your notion of who the enemy is

is wrong

there is an enemy there is a ruling class

there is and us versus them there is a war at the heart of our society but you're just articulating it wrong ideologically

now as you know

anything about marxism

that's sjouslt called false consciousness

so to me

far right ideologies are a form of

false consciousness

people who have false consciousness aren't my enemy

if they are functionally aligned against the hegeminy

why would i make them my enemy they're not my enemy

only when they are functionally

aligned with the hejemini are they my enemy

so

destiny

is functionally aligned with the gemany

right

he tries to censor the platform

he tries to destroy absolutely annihilate

anyone he perceives to be an enemy of the eminy

ok

so he is functionally aligned with the agemity that's not just someone with whom

i have ideological disagreements with

that is someone who's gone out of their way

to de platfm me and engage in libel against me and so on and so forth

so there's a big difference i'm not blue pilling anyone i'm not converting anyone that's a form of opportunism

which is very clear

and i'll tell you i've talked about it before by the way

it's a form of opportunism because by blue pilling

these far right people here's what they're telling them

you can keep

your chauvinistic

ah

racist whatever

world view

but i'm just going to

allow you to disguise it better

right

that's oftentimes what they'll do like oh yeah you want to be defending the white race okay

go pro nato that because nato is the white race

now they will never come out and admit that

but that's what it is it's like oh you want to defend the white race well

that's where l g b t is so you should be pro l g bt

so they're speaking to that imperialist chauvinism

but they're just disguising it that's not what i'm doing

i'm taking the anti imperialist impulses

the kernel of proletarian false consciousness

and trying to

reinterpret it

those are very different things

that's why

destiny's best friends among the far right

are who

they're the hard core

neo nazis the hard core ones

the ones that are pro they're son you'll notazei theyre pro ukraine

they're willing to overlook

the liberalism and say yeah we're we really understand this hitler shit we're going to be pro ukraine

destiny's enemies on the right are the ones who

are right wingers because of false consciousness

not because of something intrinsic

to write the right wing

so this is a very very important distinction

and let me tell you something

i will directly

i will directly cite lenin

gay

o

ok

i'm going to directly cite lenin for you because you're an illiterate dipshed

and you need to be taught

the communist line

ok

so here's what lennin said

and you guessed it

left wing infantilism

under zarizum we had no legal opportunities

when zubatov agent of the secret police organized black hundred workers' assemblies

and societies for purposes of trapping revolutionaries

we sent members of our party to these assemblies and into these societies

they established contact with the masses

were able to carry on agitation and succeeded in resting workers

from the influence of zubatov's agents

so here's a good example of this

the tzar's secret police

created

these working men's societies

to give workers

false consciousness in the form of the black hundreds ideology

lenin said what we bolsemks did

we sent our people to these societies

we carried out our agitation and we wrested them from the influence of these agents

so we work to win these people over

if you don't see that as necessary you're not a leninist

it's plain

it's plain as day here right

now you could say has you're conceed but you concede to the right is

by adopting their right wing social values

well my whole point of conceension is

just like how

they have an erroneous view

where they think the left is proe geminy

marxism is prohgemony

and naza zumas antihgemony and then i tell him no

it's actually marxism that's revolutionary

it's actually marxism

that identifies the enemy the enemy is the capitalist class the enemy is the ruling class

the enemy isn't someone who based on their ethnicity the enemy isn't some

group

based on the

their race or their religion it's based on their class

that's the class struggle

see

marxists don't want to destroy the struggle that's what blue pilling is about it's about destroying the struggle

we want to carry the struggle forward

but just have a scientific understanding of it

see

unscientific socialism

is anti semitic for example

scientific socialism is not anti semitic why it's not because we're moralists and it's not because

of morality in us saying all because it's a bad thing

it's

actually because that's an onscientific view

a scientific view says

there is an objective class struggle

that knows no distinctions

as far as the race and the ethnicity

and whatever patterns you see

are incidental

in the face of this objective material relations of production that's what matters

everything yeah there may be

patterns you witness

ok let's just say for purposes on you tube you may notice a pattern

that a lot of the ruling class relative to their population is irish ok you may notice that

but that is secondary

to the critical premise which is the material relation to production

you can try to be a gu so meaningful that they're irish

you sure but that's a matter of sociology

that's not the cause the cause is a material

relation of production so that's marxism that's the scientific view of marxism

ok

and

there is no pandering going on when you do that

so in the same way when they try to say that marxalom is woke

it is my duty and my responsibility

as a principled marxist

and not someone who's being a taalist

and going along with whatever latest trendy bourgeois fashions

funneled in

and we can follow the money on this

from the billionaire philanthropic institutions that the cia funnels money through

to promote progressive social causes and agendas

a principled marxist says

none of the local nonsense has anything to do with marxism

it's all woke nonsense it's got nothing to do with marxism it all comes from the ruling class

that's not me pandering to the far right

that's me being a principled marxist i con make a lot more funking money being a funk and woke marxist

red libbed pieces shit like a sondpiker

instead i get rid of juele defamed and yes

i get fuckin repressed

because i refuse

to withhold my principled communist stance

i am a communist

with the capital c

i am not a falkin liberal who's adopting communist aesthetics

to appease george soarce ri trt me y communism is compatible with your open society please give me i'm not fucking communist i'm loyal to the communism i'm loyal to the communist tradition i don't give a fuk about the liberals i give a funk about these walks i'll give a funk about the open society i'll give a fuk about any of that fuck and bullshit i' give a fuk about the capital c com

munist tradition

that's a whole different tradition that's a whole different lineage

why should i give a fuck

about transformers as a communist

the movie transformers the science fiction film

what does that movement have to do with my capital ce communist tradition

i am a communist

born bred raised in the light of marxs lenin engles stalin mou where the funck is this transformer shit coming from that's not part of my tradition that's a foreign alien influence that's a foreign alien thing it's got nothing to do with my tradition

i've been a communist

for my entire almost my entire life

since i turned thirteen years old fourteen years old

i have been l loyal only

to the canon of communist tradition

nowhere in that tradition nowhere in that fucking tradition have i ever found any any basis or foundation

for the wok nonsense none this is an external alien thing they' posed on us to make us fucking consuckers for george soros and the ruling class they hijacked our fucking tradition because

the powerful people

are the ones who give out fucking money to activists

you know it's tough being a communist with a capital c

because we have to build up our own institutions and money

but if you just shake your fuck and ass going along with whatever latest wok agenda theres sure to be some fuck and billionaire or bank giving you millions of dollars just like how b j perhad another indian communist

got twelve million funcking dollars from goldman sachs philanthropy fund

it's easy to go along with that

because you will have access to an entire generation of young people

who got brainwashed by the college university education system

so it's easy to go down that path

but it doesn't come from our institutions

it doesn't come from our parties or our traditions

it doesn't come from us

it comes from outside

you force it on us

to make us submit to thejeminy

because that's how you fuck and climb your career as a fucking activist

and as a professional career climber

i was in law school

and i was damn fuckin good at it too i got a full ride fuckin scholarship

i went cold and my fuckinal sat and i got passed with flying colors

and got admitted to a decent fuck in law college

i know a thing or two about people who want to climb careers

because i could have been one of them

i could have been one of these falking people

i said no

i don't even know if i can go back to law school now

now that i'm so fuck and infamous

i said no i don't care about my career

i don't care about a funkin career

i care about where my heart and soul is and that's the communist

with a capital c tradition

i live breathe and die for that tradition

it's all i've ever fuck and cared about my whole fuck in life

i'm not pandering to right wingers

when i'm defending my tradition

from you liberal woke pieces of shed

trying to push something on us that doesn't come from us

thank you so much art to freedom me is solely based on a priori mindset

he doesn't actually want to experience the other non western countries and cultures until they become more like him yeah it's a wed dream for us n nz thk so much a star

when what you're doing is actually a threat to the ruling establishment they send lip guards to write reverse engineered smear pieces against you

harden your herd comrade raised fist exactly ratheracer thank you so much

crak dealer appreciate you for the twenty great thank you so much may appreciate you

but thk you so much blackbatking resurceers capitalists in disguise

exactly

they call me a fuckin right winger you're the fuckin right winger

i'm staying true to marxism

i'm not compromising with the geminy or the trends in the mean of history as you call it which is soros is here good moning twenty thirty sak you had sa defendant uphold mark said you know i used to be such a naive thskan activist go the idea you know i used to try to remote so you know you know i used to you know i was so desperate i tried to

i used to be with the black lives matter activism

when i was in college

i said i'm a marxist and no'm in college the right wing always says

the marxists are in college and the marxists are the black lives matter

and i said i'm going to begin here

to build

a working class communist party

and convince these people

because there are already marxists

and we're all in this conspiracy together so let's go and reach the working class

you know what i found out

i sat with these people and the some of them were good people

not going to lie

i would never say personally they were bad people

the ones i knew

but this was before two thousand and twenty this was like

twenty sixteen twenty fifteen

and i sat with them you know what they would tell me they'd say

you know

over there they got a lot of soros money

i was shocked i said what

that's a right wing talking point

that's what the right wing always says what do you mean he said well don't shoot the messenger it's like

but i know these dues i can't say what they said

because

it's like the soft way soft a n word they said

right to describe

they said i know these dudes

and uh

they were getting that soros paycheck they were getting that money

they got a lot of money

and i was so unbelievably shocked to hear that

i was so shocked to hear that

and then i thought to myself i like where the fuck am i

look what is going on why is sorrows givn money to

the revolutionaries

i thought it was a lie

now it wasn't true that protesters as far as i saw were directly getting paid

but activists through these registered institutions these registered n g o s would get paid a fuck on a money

you know i always noticed something every major protest that was ever organized in my college

it was always amnesty international at the centre of it it was never one of these like leftist radical

groups is like they always had to orbit

some official

legitimate institution or ngo

and i ust started seeing patterns like that and i was like

you know

this is fucking crazy

this is not a revolutionary thing

you know this is the ruling class

i kept trying to cope to myself and be like no no

we have to do this cacuse we're stopping fascism and

the real enemy is invisible

but it's just not a sustainable

what world view

you can either lie

forever

or you could submit to the truth which is what i did

it's what you do you submit to the falking truth

like i'm not here to lie anymore i'm not going to fuck and sit here and pretend leftism is revolutionary anymore

it's clearly the hegemonic ideology

it's clearly what's in power

you can't you're not a fucking victim you're the one in power

and like that's just an objective fact it comes to a point where it's not even ideology anymore and it's like

are you just going to accept reality

likeke

are you going to keep sitting here and fuck and pretending

you can make all the theories you want

but just

look at the plain reality before you

own up to your sober senses

you know

who's really in charge here

it's really fucking clear

and then you'd think this would turn someone away from marxism

i refused

you want to know why because

my whole life

my whole life

my whole life

i have never met a single person

who would lay down their life

remrxism

for communism

as a tradition

every single self proclaimed marxist

was a part time marxist

that i ever met they were

even the

parties

lot of trotsky's parties

i'd observe and go and talk to them and see what they're about

they never took it seriously

it was always a part time

ideology for them it was always like

oh yeah they they're always like at a

some ironical distance with it where they didn't really really believe it was the truth

and then i thought to myself

there is a marxism i'm holding to

which i am alone

in committing to

nobody else is fucking for real

you know

nobody else is really fucking for real

from what i can observe

and you know this you know the thing guys is

all the people who had heart

all the people who were for real

we're not leftists

they were people who had all the good heart all the good intention all the sincerity

all the honor all the morals

they were not on the left i didn't find im there

i found them

on the opposite end

and i said these people are wrong these are good people who have bought into

the wrong ideology

and i said what if i can unite

good people with the right

ideology

now that would be

a fucked shit store

that would be the kind oft shit storm

that provokes people to write articles like this

i'm not saying the right wing is full of principled people by the way

the right wing

is full of a bunch of scum bags and degenerates and perverts

but most people who are decent people

are apathetically right wy

i call them apathetically right wy

they're not the ones who are grifting off of it

like charlie kirk

but they're the ones who just apathetically in sponted like they have all the best values and honor

but they're mainly just religious

right

they are the religious ones

who just believe in god and they say

look this world has fallen i just have my heart believing in god

those are all

the good people

that i've met

but the'ir only flaws they've turned away from this world

but who can blame them because

there's almost nothing in this world worthshit

but i believe

and you can call that a religious conviction if you want

that marxism

is something of this world

that is worth believing in

upholding and defending

and that is something i believe

you know let me tell you guys something

i remember

november seventh

twenty seventeen

one hundred years past

since the october revolution

and i was so fucking devastated

i didn't cry

not a crier but

i was fuckin depressed

because i thought to myself i said it's been a hundred years

it's been a hundred years

and the world still hasn't caught up

to what happened in one nine hundred seventeen

that this is for real for me you know

you you will never find any any marxist or any

none of them believe in it i promise you

it's a joke to them

holy shit

shang you thank you so much for the fifty holy fuckmn thank you

thank you so much ma'm

i had uh alerts paused and i just on paused thank you so much hars holy foth

si coming in with that mr ckrab saying yeah yeah gorilla gorilla

on the reins so much you so much keep it up

thank you so much ng you holy shit

with the fifty thank you brother i appreciate you so much

appreciate you so much man thank you

for example a few names mentioned in this article

belong to the same content creation company white forest

i don't know what the fug that is

ah despite sometimes having ostensibly opposed political views

who are you fucking talking about

i have no ties to any

let me let me check this link out to see if it's safe

i have no ties to any

ok

wasosh

okay so that these are the

look look these are the people who are

have ostensibly opposed political views ready

demon mama

cathol's

boh

shoe on head

all these other people i can't recognize but

the ones i just named

have almost identical ideologies and world views who is the one who has opposed views in this fucking list

canur c c andanother vosh orbiter

who has identical views is almost all vosh in his orbiters

actually including shoe on head

he's just all vosh and his friends

wh where who has see

the disgusting disingenuous piece of shit

who wrote this fucking article

is trying to insinuate

that the pat socks

who are the fuck and pat socks me

jackson hinggele

samira and the yankee tanky

they're saying that we're we have something to do with this

oh they have opposed political views

but they're all part of the same company white force no we're not

no we're faalkon not

me and jackson are fully self made

samira

was a journalist who worked for artie

r t is not a u s intelligence company

unless you want to go real fucking skitz so it's not

this allows them to push reactionary rhetoric

that shifts their young viewership to the right

rather than rehabbing anyone to the left

but you just gave an example

of

oh the the the there are seekers this is

this is the psychologically disgusting disingenuous

piece of shiit lying scum

don hardow is

sed this cocksucker

they give a list of people who are all the same ideologically except patsocks

the anti sivnilis

are aligned with all these other guys

by the way

on most issues

but pad socks it's like a thumb sticking out really sorely right

she like o well these guys are so ideologically opposed to them and they go

while they claimed to despise each other referring to my and jackson's enmity with every one else

and then they say

then they say

a few of the names mentioned belong to the same content company

despite sometimes having opposed political views

so they're insinuating

that

the pat socks belong to the same contant creation company

when we don't

because we don't belong to any conta ration company

whatsoever

jackson hinkele is part of the jackson hinkle company

has al deen is part of the infrared company

and then yankee tankey

is part of the red phoenix collective and

maybe that's part of white forest i haven't seen that

and i doubt it

and im want to go ahead and deny that that's the case

but i i'm i don't know for sure but i

it's probably not true that

yankee tankee is part of

this same content creation company is wash

probably isn't true

allowing hard and right wingers to pose as reformed leftist for the gullible

but

what do you mean because when you say reformed leftists you're talking about people

who are compatible

with

left his discourse and level were not

we have literally said leftiss are our enemies

how are we trying to re rehabilitate anyone we literally say fuck leftius there are are enemies

and they're all pieces you shit

and i hope they all go to hell

all we're trying to sneak in with who

decepticons

obese autobots

obese autobots

with pink hair

we're not trying to fit in

with morbidly obese autobots with pink hair i promise we're trying to distance marxism as

far away from yous possible

we want marxism to be associated with

the healthy

vigorous

conservative

working class

we want marxism to be associated with

the working class

not with lumpon

not with chaz not with portland

we don't care about you

you guys are the most vicious gossipers and like

discourse masters

but we despise you and you're literally are

smitthian enemies

you are literally our schmitthian enemies

ok i don't need a

megatron

i don't we don't need to be megatron right

i'm sorry

this is reminiscent of the terminally online fascists

w come up with ops on sites like

orchan or kiwi farms

i mean what is this person even fuking saying

this is such

unabashed cot

this is such like absolute unequivocal

bunkin

call

that's crazy

these are schemes you're saying is like an outright conspiracy

maybe for them

but to apply that to me it's like dude it's not that deep come fucking debate me about it

no it's a conspiracy yeah you're coping because you're a pussy

every fucking thing i have ever said

you can get in my v c and call me a fuckin piece of shit bullshitter

and front of my entire audience everything i' built i daily put it on the line

there's no conspiracy

it's all out front and center on the line anyone can come challenge me

it's not a conspiracy that you're a shitty debater

and a chicken shit bird brain fucking idiot

who hasn't articulated the rational basis for their positions

to a sufficient degree enough

to actually contest anything i fuck and say

in a live open setting that's not a conspiracy or just a falcc and loser

you're just a fuck and loser

you're just a piece of shit you're just a fuck and scum

you're nothing else

it's not a conspiracy you're a scumbag fat bitch

the debate streamers deploy smear tactics against critics as a sport

dude you literally put adam to hear in parentheses

do you realize where that came from it came from destiny

the lack of self awareness in this article is baffling

no

we use smear tactics against critics

but calling haws the reincarnation of hitler is not a smear tactic

saying my name is adam to hear

and got and i got expelled from law school

and i'd never had a job in my life

that's not a smear tactic

that's a fact because a decepticon st it right

and they're valid they can never be wrong

this includes the demands that critics debate them

as a ploy to generate controversy and cause humiliation

why why does it need to cause humiliation if you're actually

able to defend yourself

i'm going to explain to you how this works

one time

haz al deen

was a streamer who had ten viewers

and i said things that didn't sit well

with some of the people in my chat and some of the people in my youtube comments

so i literally brought them on my stream

to debate them

risking said humiliation

and it's because i prevailed upon those account encounters and convinced enough people that i was in the right

that eventually i started streaming at fifty to one hundred viewers

and that's when

i debated voh sorry zander hall

that's right

i came on xandrhll stream as a nobody just like you don a nobody

and i risked

being humiliated

but let me tell you what actually happened

i didn't get humiliated

i won over a lot of people that night and i made a name for myself

and then a day later

i debated voch

and the same thing happened again

and then i debated destiny

and then i debated socialism don left and i debated a whole other amount assortment of people

and my debates with

them and the people from those their communities cemented the very foundation of what infrared is

here and now

because i had the fucking balls

to defend my beliefs in an open setting

that's why infrared is a thing

that's what made me go viral

and then there is the wild mou video

but i already had a core community by that

i already was upsetting the discourse by them

you know

you only get humiliated in the debate

if you're unable to defend your position

it's not a priori true that it's impossible to defend one's position

but it sure is how is really difficult to defend your position

when it's funking wrong

and in your case

it's wrong

that's why when don harjow gets in v c

with destiny

who's not even a smart person

destiny always wipes the fucking floor with them

he wipes them these leftists don't even stand a chance against him

because they're just wrong

they're not consistent they can't even consistently defend things i agree with

the way they reason to themselves and the way they articulate their beliefs are all

false and

based on falsehood

and dishonesty

and lies

like all the time

no exceptions

i'm telling you this i'm saying without exception

without exception

that's the case

coordinating swarming of enemy accounts all don't bing the discord that's coordinated

mottin bailey rhetorical games and character assassination

again

this is the paradox dwn finds thehimself in

if you want to say

if you want to give post hoc commentary

on how you lose

in discourse

you find yourself in a contradiction

ok

when you come on stream and you lose and you lose discursively

you say that these are all games and character assassinations

then why write an article

why write an article like this

if you're going to say that everything that happens within the discourse

is engineered in its rhetorical games and its character assassination

why continue to participate in it by writing articles

you don't think you're participating in a

character assassination and

motin bailey rhetorical games

by contributing this article to the discourse the only difference the only difference

is that

this is not an article

for whom every single person that reads it

ah

is going to be subjected to any kind of scrutiny

but you're still participating in the

fake artificial and engineered di it's not like when you enter d c it suddenly be

it's not like when you enter voice chat

it suddenly becomes a conspiracy

when you write articles like this you're part of the spectacle you're talking about

like the only way you can talk about how a give post hoc

commentary and be principled and consistent

is if you don't ever fucking open your mouth on the internet

but the minute this is why i want

like if you open your fucking mouth on the internet

be prepared to enter the arena of discourse

period

i mean what makes it different from getting in a voice chat and debating what makes it different

that

you won't have to defend yourself

that the possibility that you may be wrong

won't be entertained

that your position won't be falsifiable

that's awfully convenient for a coward who doesn't care about truth

listen if you believe in dialectics you have to believe

in the dialectic you have to believe in the possibility

that your position is wrong you can't just say i'm right because i said so

you have to be ok

what does the other have to say that's the real test

are there perspectives i lack

that could demonstrate to me that i'm wrong

listen if you cared about just pure principle

devoid of rhetoric

you wouldn't have written this rhetorically

shitesmeared article in the first place

this whole article features rhetorical games

such as

ah

placing all of these people in the same category as pat soocks such as insinuating that

pat socks belonged to the same concentreation company

as all these other people

these are rhetorical games i can identify immediately

who are you trying to impress

because the same people you're trying to impress

would see you as a stupid cocksucking piece of shit

if you got in v c and debated me

you're just tricking them

into making it seem like your position is defensible

and you're bluffing it's a bluff

the only way this article becomes testable

is if you

wield the positions

laid out within it

in an open debate

otherwise it's not testable

you're just bluffing that this is true

you're just bluffing that this is truth

it's not actually truth

you're just bluffing that it is

i well maybe if he got into debate and debated hos he would prevail

maybe but can you prove it

this whole thing is a maybe

we have yet to see any proof

another curious tendency

is they genuine all genuine hate genuine communist

again

you just talked about rhetorical games

you just used the phrase

genuine communist

now as far as pat socks are concerned as far as myself is concerned

i'm someone you directly mentioned in this article

this is obviously an extremely contentious claim

but you make it seem like the concept of you make it seem like this notion

of who the genuine communists are

is given

now can who

genuine communists are be subjected to any kind of

critical inquiry

can we criticize

the premises with which

you try to establish who is and isn't a genuine communist

no you assume it has a given

and you just complained about rhetorical games

but whates this what does it mean to say genuine communist

and not address the obvious contention that you're not genuine communist we can go through it

even if they try to pose as one and never seem interested in discussing or encouraging real life organizing

ok

i'll give you an example of how this is wrong

jackson inkele

engaged in real life are organizing

by going to d c

before any of this by the way

and organizing for force the vote

he went there

forst of all

and he was smeared as an osbel

alongside jimmy dore and everyone else

real life organizing

means what

concretely tell me what that means

discussing or encouraging real life organizing

it's something we're never interested in doing

apparently right

but you are

can you tell me what real life

actual organizing you're doing

whom are you organizing

who are you organizing

and how does this contribute or relate to communism

go i'll give you a chance

starbucks baristas

give me a road map

on how this fits within the scheme of any communist strategy

that anyone would ever entertain

whatever thing to entertain

in go ahead lay out the roadmap

you go from organizing starbucks aristas and then

and then give me some road map that says this somehow might possibly contribute

to a communist movement or a communist politics

i would love for you to squirm and rit

in my voice chad

trying to defend them

because i actually have advocated for real life organizing

except i advocate for real organizing the actually decisive productive working class

that could

possibly

be the social base of a renewed communist movement

i've defended the canadian trucker freedom truckers

which you lot did denounce as fascist

by the way

i'm more interested in educating people

before i send them off

doing things that they don't even understand

before you could even join the bolshevik party you had to pass a fucking test

i'm drafting that test

by educating people

you don't just go into the thick of of

screaming

with signs and slogans

you actually have to know what to fuck you're doing and have a cognitive mapping of where you are who you are

and who is your revolutionary subject

things that the current leftist or

genuine communist as you

claim

exist don't have

so i deny there are any

genuine communist in america

and i would love to see you try and squirm

defending

the idea that there are

they will claim to be the true inheritors of a radical tradition

while spewing

file reactionary rhetoric ok

so

vile reactionary rhetoric

is again a rhetorical

plain

to categorize

the things that i'm saying as vile and reactionary

it's purely rhetorical

there is no this is not a scientific

mm

categorization of anything i've said

it's a rhetorical one

a highly subjective

highly contentious

rhetorical nothingburger

devoid of substance

that's what this phrase right here

vile reaction areyas

i think the vile reactionaries are the ones that applauded

the assassination of darya dgna

i think the vile reactionaries are the ones who

call for

psychotic violence against people they disagree with

i think the vile reactionaries

are in fact the ones that promote the reactionary agendas of the state department and the ruling class

i think the vile reactionaries are people who promote

the growth

malthusianism

and the so called green agenda

as it exists in the west

i think those are the vile reactionaries

i think the vile reactionaries

are the ones who protest against

developments in ai and in specifically in

a i r

on behalf of

digital content creators

i think that is an objective

that fulfils an objective criterion

oh

what a reactionary is

you literally have a new development of the in the productive forces

and leftists are trying to stop it from happening which is a pretty consistent thing

if you check the record they are always defending

the old institutions they're always defending

the prior status quo

every new development

from the cryptocean and web three and

you know

decentralization and and

you know new technologies new innovations

a i

they're always against it

for some reason they're always opposed to it

i think that's actually reactionary

now calling it vile

means that you find it

offensive

that's a rhetorical

pretense that has no substance

and it has no bearing on whether

the claim to the radical tradition is valid or not

there's plenty of things that come from the val radical tradition that the contemporary left

would equally categorize as vile and reactionary

it doesn't make it any less authentically

from the radical tradition

so

let's just evaluate this

whether or not we are in fact the true heirs of a radical tradition

has nothing to do with your highly constentious highly subjective

purely rhetorical categorization

of our

views as a violent reactionary

and ignoring any meaningful action

again this is a nothing burger full of rhetoric

what constitutes meaningful action

in your view how is it meaningful action to organize baristas go

go ahead

i'll go ahead

how is it meaningful action to organize baristas

and before you try and lay claim to some generality of organizing the workers

no i want you to specifically talk about how organizing the baristas is meaningful

and give me a road map from p

point a to point b

in what way does that contribute

to the cultivation of communist consciousness yup

okay

waiting

beuse you're not here to debate so i'll just give you a chance

well ladies and gentlemen they will have nothing

i promise

they will just

lay claim to some generality about how

were a trade union consciousness one hundred years ago was important

and they'll talk about how

in general

unionizing the workers is a good thing

but they won't specifically

demonstrate how that generality applies in this particular case

point by point step by step they wanll

they will just lay claim to something people in the past said

without actually explaining

how it's a political

well the starbucks workers don't own the means of production again that's a metaphysical

kind of axiomatic

ah

form of logic

satisfying some internal definition of what a worker is or what a worker isn't

is not how you determine

whether or not

this action

meaningfully relates

to the actual material development of the class struggle

engles says definitions are useless for a good reason there is no eternal metaphysical criterion of what a worker is

the workers

or a living social phenomena here and now

they distinguish themselves and make themselves intelligible

not according to some definition in a dictionary

but according to a definition in reality they are

phenomenally and empirically

demonstrably a separate social strata

from others

there is nothing starbucks workers

and let's say construction workers have in common

there is nothing intelligible they have in common

accept this abstract definition of not owning the means of production

as a social phenomenon there is nothing in common between them

they don't align in terms of

how they behave what their interests are their political consciousness

there the

collect any collective

existence whatsoever

there is literally nothing in common

nothing

literally nothing besides the fact that they are citizens of the united states of america nothing else

nothing else unites them

the proletariat in the working class was an intelligibly distinct phenomenon

nobody needed definitions to know who the workers

nobody

nobody nobody needed a definition to know who the proletariat was

when engle said

it's as simple as the who owns it and who doesn't

he was like those people

though you know those people though in their everyone was like oh yeah

you know the people who all share the same cafes together and

who are sociologically

a demonstrably united mass

every sociological criterion people who live together and

live in the same neighborhoods and districts geographically and

have the same culture

the only thing in america that's like that is the blue collar working class what do you know

the rest are fucking parasites indistinguishable from one another what distinguishes a starbucks barista

from a

salaried

professional

working for a tech company go what distinguishes that

anything

probably nothing right

i think it's nothing

even how drastically different their income levels are they're going to have like the same views on the world

is that crazy

ain't that amazing how that works

debate liberals

have a habit of replacing appeals for organizing with appeals to charity

and we use fundraiser a way to buyse loyalty

you know what's funny is that ah

this is

apologya for his son piker

is they're talking about how

they could siq a san piker for not

doing enough charity

just crazy

in a discussion with rania kalek

guys speaking of prostitution

about the pattern of sabotage of left wing movements in the west

and especially the anti war movement

lifelong activist and p s l co founder

y

oh what you know brian falcon becker

remarked

counter revolutions don't announce themselves ind of revolution theynoun themselves revolutions because something hopeful something new something better

it's actually not true

that's never been true

we don't have a revolution

to even mimic

right now

i hope you know that

there's no authentic left wing movement anywhere in the west that i can think of at least

certainly not in america

so when you're like oh oh is hijacking the left no he's not oh is the left

what authentic left is wasosh

hijacking

like

point to me where it is and who it is right

give me one example of it

what is bosch hijacking

your own twitter group chat

can someone answer this for me please

what what are they hijacking

nothing that is the left

listen

when push comes to shove

when the left

to

the leftists have to ah

defend themselves consistently it's going to be

those debate rose that do it

the reason vosh

has so many seemingly right wing politically incorrect views on culture which he doesn't by the way

it's because he is someone who has been forced

to actually debate

right wingers

vosh can't

sustain

the average leftist world view

because it's like untenable he gets he get the they would wipe the floor with him in a debate if he did that

it was

sat here and was like your average red libbed hakem viewer

and he went and debated some right wing er he'd get fucking crushed

in front of any neutral audience

bosh has been successful

because to neutral audiences

he manages to win over the right wing and blue pill that

because he

he beat some of these right wingers you know

i'm not here to bluepill anyone by the way bosh is my enemy because

i'm doing the opposite i want to deep in the red of the red pill i don't want to fucking blue pill anyonere in

neutralize them and

have them start wearing dresses and shit

so i'm doing the opposite but i'm just telling you the m o and how it works

he would not have been successful

is

he had your worldview

because that world youview is not conducive to success

believe it or not

like when it comes to reaching people outside your bubble you can't do it with this worldview you can't

and he knows it

dan hot hard you

can't go

to some random at politically apathetic people and have a normal conversation with them and win them over he can't

or they can't

it's not possible

only your

own

echo chamber agrees with you

that's the thing

ok so we're going to ignore this

part

and we'rejus going to go to the last one ok

debate liberals fundamentally consider themselves left wing american patriots

who does

making them not that different from pad socks

no it makes us a whole of hot

a hole of a hell

lot different

because when they say they're patriots

they're talking about the institution

of the united states

when we say we're patriots we are talking about the telluric populism that they have founded their entire careers upon suppressing

so maga patriotism and liberal patriotism

aren't the same

liberal patriotism is loyalty to the

american empire as an institution

maga patriotism

is populism

it's a totally different thing the populist patriotism is some loyalty to some unity of the people

that doesn't have a definite institution

just the material people of the soil

right

that

actually comes at the expense of the institution

so it makes them not only different from pat socks if you're referring to myself and jackson

and samyra

it makes them the diametric opposite

not even the diametric opposite it makes them our foremost antagonistic enemies

there's no escaping patriotism by the way

if you have a minimally political stance

if you have an anti social stance

you're also a patriot

but you're just inadvertently one you're a patriot for the american empire because you're some antifa anti social thug who enforces the decrees of the empire and the will of the empire as an anti social lump and psychopath you're not the leader joe biden's the leader you're just some thug on the street who beats people over the fuck and head for disagreeing with joe biden now you articulate that in your own terms

and with your own phrases

but functionally speaking you're also a patriot

just for the ruling class it's like you're either a bougeois patriot or a proletarian one

there's no one between

leftists who claim to be against patriotism are just patriots for the ruling classes country

you're a patriot for brooklyn you're a patriot for your own enclas for your own institutionalized safe space america that's what you're a patriot for you're just too much of an inconsistent coward to own up for it and your inability to own up for it just guarantees you will never yourself have hegemony you w'll just be a prostitute and slave of the hegemony constituted by the ruling class themselves

it's not the p s l's job to say we are the patriots

that's joe biden's job

that's why the p s l is never going to be the ones in charge

the democrats will

the p s l enforces the will of the democrats

they're not actually the responsible he gjeminy that saying yes this is our country this is our machine we have to be patriotic for it that's why you'll never have a geminy

but that type of patriotism isn't the same as ours or maga's for that matter our patriotism is loyalty to the people

and the land

and the tradition

and the civilization

it's not loyalty to the state

it's not loyalty to the corporations it's not loyalty to n g o s and the open society and the soft power mass media complex and the cultural agenda pushed in the universities and the university ideology we're against the system see

maga patriotism is anti establishment anti system

anti hegeminy

it's not your patriotism which is

the enthusiasm and sanction of all those things that i just mentioned

it's a patriotism of country that's proletarian patriotism by the way

that's just marxist leninist orthodoxy every marxist leninist party

that was not in power was patriotic

because by being patriotic it was assuming responsibility for the country

that in the future it wanted to govern

so if you want to be in power and govern your country you have to be patriotic for it its people its traditions and the land

to prove that you're worthy of

seizing hejemini

but

when you pretend that you're not patriotic

you're just

being patriotic on behalf of the ruling class

but you're not taking responsibility for it because you're not the ruling class you're just a patsy

see that's the difference

a the difference is that they frame american empire as the primary driver for progress

unlike the backward nation it must police

they ight no secret in their belief in the white man's burden but unlike the more conservative patsocks they just prefer to do it as anarchobidinist and natoist rather than as maga communist so here's another libelous slanderous claim the claim is being made

that maga communists believe in the white man's burden

and

believe in policing backward nations

except

the pat socks you're talking about which is haw's infrared

jackson inkl and samira

have been

marginalized ostracized attacked ridiculed slandered

deplatformed censored

you name it

systematic processes for reputation destruction

because of our defense of backward nations

you know what's funny don harso you fucking piece of shit

you fucking cocksucking stupid loser i'm going to fuck and nuke your entire article right now i'm dropping the nuke

ready

who defends

the taliban

you just mentioned it you just said

margaret communist

just like liberals want to police backward nations oh really

we want to police backward nations can you think of the most backward and wild nation that comes to your imagination think of it think of it think of it

ok

who defends them

who upholds them who even says through them who even created an ideology dengshau ping taliban' stalinism

to reflect their admiration

and their humility before them has actually advanced it's hausinfred samira jackson

ok we defend the taliban you call the taliban backward you condemn the taliban because they're banning women from education which is a lie you attack the taliban on behalf of women's rights just like code pink which is aligned with brian becker's p s l pis shit

licking ass organization

cote pink denounced afghanistan on behalf of women's rights

i will

literally rather

can't even say it on you tube

i would literally rather lose my head

than attack afghanistan for women's rights i wouldn't fuck and dare do that i've talked to the taliban on twitter spaces and praised them to their faces

and bowed in humility

before the greatness of the civilization they're creating

ok so if anyone believes there are backward nations

that the american empire must police it's definitely not maga communist the final example of this

i'm going to give you

ready

who defends uganda

do maga communists want to police uganda

who defends uganda

by the way what is maga communism anyway like

whenever i've defined maga communism what's the whole angle the whole angle is

double down on the anti imperialist tendencies in maga non interventionism pull out all of our fucked military bases no sanctions on any country oppose any military action whatsoever on any country we don't even mince words denouncing trump for what he did to solomani because he's still trying to take credit for it in shit we condemn him for that we are the most ant

consistent anti imperialists in america

and that's record

that's a matter of record

no one can dispute it

the whole point of miga communism

is maga plus

absolute isolationist style anti imperialism hard core ron paul

get the fuck out of every country defund every falcon n g o every fuck in human rights every single fucking way america has its tentacles in any other country cut all the tentacles off

bring everything home

focus on home

we are so fucking consistent about that anyone who tries to say otherwise is lying through their fuck and teeth

and i got penalized for it i got banned from twitch for it i got cancelled for defending china against the ouger genocide accusation dave falkin won when i was on twitch they cancelled me

because of it and you fuckers sat and watched benapanada joined destiny joined vosh joined all these people in attacking me for defending china they fucking one when i was on twitch they fucking one

all of you suckers attacked me for defending china

and you're going to sit here and say

that i defend the american empire i was literally accused of dismissing every single source attacking china

as american propaganda i said this is cia

they said you think everything cia has you blame america for everything has your whole ideology is that america bad

and then i'd said no i don't think america's bad i think the american empire is bad

but then they said i'm an anti american

but then when i said and i told these leftists

of course we must take our flag and seize our flag by the hand and rip it out of the hands of the fucking globalists

and the imperialists

and take our fucking country back for the people and for the workers

then they called me an american chauvinist why because i didn't support jeff bazils's funded land back to privatize federal land i didn't support the idea of stealing the land of every single american and giving it to some fucking tribe

to privatized i said all americans should have land

including the indigenous people by the way i said give them more land give them more space give the indigenous people the ability to repopulate i'm all for it

but

don't make the rest of the country serfs for a minority an ethnic minority that was my position that i got cancelled for

ok so as and my position is the one that's reasonable because that's a position

if you'd tell americans hey

i'm going to make your opposition

to causing nuclear war in ukraine

dependent on you opening your assed cheeks wide and saying hey banks come everyone come take my land i'll be a serf

for some ethnic minority

you are literally selling people

a horrific stereotype of what wochism is

marxism it's bullshit it's bullshit it's a fantasy you know we'll never

play out by the way i'm not worried about

indigenous people taking over and if indigenous people

woke up one day

and by the force of their arms

took over all of america

and created a ruthless empire and said we are the elites every one is subjugated to us were the new mongols

you know what i'd say i'd top my hat to them and i'd say

history is yours you have won history

i

i take my hat off to you've won history

right

think i'd bitch and complain if that happened no to a certain extent i do believe might makes right

not fully but to a certain extent it's like if that happen i will g happen for a reason

they are clearly a superior

like the mongols right how could i oppose that i wouldn't oppose it

but

i know it's not going to happen

it's just leftists who

peddle this knowingly impossible stance to alienate the broad strata of working people in this country

white leftists who do this if you gave a fuck about these indigenous people

you would be realistic

see people s a whats what about palestine

you think i'm a moralist

palestine has a chance because of iran and syria and the mukalaama and if you don't like the mukama

israel is a tiny falcon

tiny sliver of land surrounded by countries hostile to it and peoples hostile to it

regionally speaking israel will be dominated by the region it's in

that's what gives palestine a fighting chance not some benevolent land back moral project by leftist activists what gives palestine a fighting chance is the muslim attrab persian turkish all the mslim people around the world that's what gives palestine a fighting chance

the mukalama

right next door to them gives them a fighting chance

the government of bashar al azad

gives them a fighting chance

the islamic republic of iran gives them a fighting chance

this is not land back

this is the regional sober realistic reality

in the middle east

you deranged psychos who reject patriotism you are the zionists you are surrounded by a sea of muslims you think you're going to preserve

this ethnal state

that's declared war against everyone it's not going to happen

so just like how that's the sobering realistic reality sometimes realism is on the side of the oppressed that's the thing

just like how that's the sober reality here in america

even though indigenous people are oppressed

the sobering reality is you're not going to

create a movement that says the insane thing to people that hey

all of this land is going to go back to

five percent of the population

because of what happened three hundred years ago

that's not i'm sorry you're not living in this you're not living in reality you're just virtue signaaling

you have no regard for material reality you you are just virtue signaling you're not actually saying something you think will happen you're saying something

because you think it sounds good to say to others and to yourself but you're not actually taking into consideration

whether it can actually happen it won't happen

no revolution will be built off the back

of becoming serfs

every revolution in history was built off of the back

of land reform and taking back land

ok

for the masses

now that is an if you are a indigenous nationalist

if you are some kind of

you know if you're some kind of

tribal nationalist

for an indigenous group

you would look at that he like that's an opportunity to make my people great again

that land reform we're going to get some of that

and then we're going to build up a great indigenous empire

and i

in sllaw you know i'm not against that

but let's be real

if you are a black nationalist and you say

oh i want black people to have land and make us a great people

then be pragmatic

who are you going to how are you going to do that by be shaking your ass for democrats and begging for concessions for them they've given you nothing or you're going to say hey there's this populist revolutionary

possibility of land reform where we're going to shake up the whole thing

roll the dice again

do a land reform

everyone's going to get a dignified

land

we're going to shake up the establishment

rearrange the whole fucking thing

that doce you get thrown in the air you can capture that you can bring that back to your people

some of it right

you can strike a deal with the white working class you can say

hey

you want land reform against the wall street capitalists

we want self determination for our people

you know what you just created the context

fur the whites the blacks the reds

the latinos

to all come together and fight side by side based on material self interest not morality to fight against the ruling class

that's a that's a materially possible revolutionary strategy

you just gave everyone a reason based on self interest for their own people a reason to fight the ruling class that's what happens when you think in terms of the logic of material interests and not universalizing liberal morality

and i'm mentioning the land back thing

because that is single haandedly what defined the pat sock controversy there's no such thing as pat socks it's called socialist patriotism every form of communism in america laid claim to the legacy of seven hundred seventy six

only recently

is this no no longer the case i have the right to be suspicious of why that is you're telling me

it's because the founding fathers were white racist slave owning indigenous hating

assoles

i don't buy it because that has always been true

people in the past weren't stupid you're not a genius for discovering that

but i have noticed that the open society and the ruling class has an agenda for altering

the republic the foundational republic

to make it more modular because the constitution is too outdated an example of that is

the first and second amendment

the constitution gives us free speech

that's kind of a problem

for an open society that increasingly

wants to

create

forms of repression of speech

the second amendment there's clearly been an agenda to take the guns away

from the population

well it's enshrined in our constitution that's that's tough

ok

so what happened the sixteen nineteen project happened i i mean i'm just noticing coincidences and i don't want to be a sucker

and be like oh yeah this is because we're moral and it's for the indigenous and the black people and i'm thinking well i think there's other motives i think that they want to ditch the constitution to create a more modular

form of governance

based on the open society principles of modular institutions where the ruling class

and the technocrats can whimsically rule society on the basis of what they consider to be science and

the facts and the truth

according to their institutional paradigm of truth

i would rather

defend the bourgeois liberties enshrined in the constitution

to preserve

very crucial

breathing room

for working class organizing

and communist politics in this country

the first amendment

is water

you don't know this

because you never lived under the zarist empire

that

first amendment

if you're a communist in this country

that first fuckin amendment that's all you fuckin have

without that good fokon long doing anything

that second amendment i can't even talk about that one

but wow are we pampered and spoiled in this country

compared to fuckin

loser pussy europe

as far as revolution is concerned

kind of our constitution kind of makes it a little easy

ah

in w the funck do you think there was a red scare

because it would have been so easy to have a communist

it's the communists who fucked it up the ruling class was oh my god

how easy it

because of america

according to marx and angles was the most democratic

country on earth they said

they they p held america as the paradigm of the democratic republic

marks and angles they said

yet that's the future of europe that's what we're trying to get to here in europe

we have the ancient energy we have nobles we have aristocrats we have kings and queens

we want to be like america where just they have these

barren simple cheap government this institution this

constitution that's it

anyone can comments for the taking for the working class

but who took it instead the r the bourgeoisie

with the open society with the f b i with the cia with the federal agencies

with the soft power

deep state

sorry with the deep state with the soft power media

with the n g os the think tanks the academies

the corporations

all these somehow filled the vacuum of where the proletarian dictatorship

would have been

cause spoiler alert it's fascism

fascism one

in nineteen twenty nine fascism won

don't believe me red jahu

liberal capitalism collapses fascism takes over

all we have is that constitution

the one piece they have to get rid of is just

the constitution

it's an old antiquated i understand that

but its standing in the way of them implementing

a full dictatorship of the financial

capitalist class

it's like the one thing standing in the way of that

you know

but thank you so much joshua appreciate you race landin but if he was resurrected they would decry him as a fascist

reactionary pats that's what they did do that during his time they did do that look at what these pieces of shit social democrats simple and mention its were saying wile i dot understand you are s and patriotism and m l

but secretly they get it

they just hated in their parents

it's inconvenient to their real interests

thank you so much johnny appreci his face

taliban is faced

assad is based

who defends all that it's they're the ones who are critical you say you so much johnny they say we want to police other nations but they condemn china for their policies on l g b t

what about u gonda ba thank you so much ark can't wait to get minefrared hat

dude we defend uganda even the e ff

doesn't defend uganda but we do

we have a more anti imperialist stance on uganda

then the e f f

which is the most

anti imperialism powerful

socialist organization

in africa probably in the world

saying that maga communist

want to police backward nations or uphold the american empire ok what is one example of our wanting to uphold the american empire

you know what they'll do guys they'll do the ador no analysis they'll be like ok

you're against

the agenda in ukraine you're against the agenda in taiwan you're against all u s foreign military interventions you're against all demonstrable examples of u s imperialism you're against the n g o s you're against soros you're against the american media you're against

every single dollar we pump to maintain the empire you're against the federal agencies

you're against every example of the american empire

but here's the problem has

you guys are still straight white males

and you guys still defend seventeen seventy six well guess what

the american empire

comes from all of that

heteronormativity is the basis of the empire

seventeen seventy six is the basis of the empire and because you defend all of those things you objectively defend the empire that's what they say

so wait we

oppose the empire in every

in terms of every expression of the empire we're opposed to it

but you have a theory

about the true cause of the empire

and because of that theory in your head that makes us

the true upholders of the american empire

you guys i'm laying out the logic to you like in full but you guys see this shit

so we're socially conservative

so that's how because

because had because the only way to defeat the american empire is judith butler's

theory

of of a gender fluidity

we're hetero normative that's the foundation of it that look at what adorno said the uthoritarian personality

so but but here's the problem right

you have a theory and you're stretching

you know what he means to stretch

it means

it's a substanceless kind of jibber jabber analysis

that isn't testable

again we're going back to fals iability it's not falsifiable

we can name examples of how you are objectively aligned with the american empire but all you can do

is forward a subjective analysis

about what you consider to be the true foundation and cause of the empire

at best

here's what you could say

according to your theory you could say if pat socks took power they would just recreate from scratch

the american empire

that's what you're saying

you're not saying we are

defenders of the current american empire

you're saying

it

if we were in power we would recreate it from scratch

so

you know what that is though

that's the menshevik argument

that's the left communist argument against lenin

you know what lenin said was

we need to have a united front with the democratic

petty bourgeoisie

among the peasantry

with the proletariant

the middle peasant

that's what he said

and what did the left communists said they said oh you're just going to recreate

the existing capitalism the existing bousgeoisie

len he said we're going to do a reset we're going to blow up

the institutions

and we're going to start from scratch and build the premises of civilization you know the left com said they said oh you're just going to recreate capitalism then

so i'm going to actually side with the capitalist imperialist powers against you becuse it's all the same to me but it's not the same

because when jesus christ died on the cross

he did forgive our sins

this is blasphemous as a muslim but

allegorically

he did die for our sins

that did wipe the slgh

do you know what i mean by this

it's not all the same that's a clean slate

any

alternative possibilities

depend on that clean slate

you accusing us

beating to the punch

the conclusion

based on your dogmatic fixation on the premise

means you are incapable

of understanding the significance

metaphysically of forgiveness

you think

if given a chance

it would just result in the same thing as before

even if it does it doesn't have to and that's what's decisive

you see what that means guys that's your chance that's your chance out a revolution

reset the dice

that's your only funcking chance it may result in the same thing but i have a feeling that history doesn't repeat itself

you know that's what hegel said it doesn't repeat itself nothing ever happens twice

you when whenever you roll the dice something new always happens

that's the beauty of history

what did mark say first is tragedy second is farce

first the mensheviks then this fuck and garbage right

oh you're you're just a

yah we

we are

objectively the defenders of american imperialism

because the

queer theory says so and we have a psychosexual theory that says so

okay

what about actual opposition

what about actual the ways we've been persecuted

for that opposition

what about spreading

harmful information and misinformation

getting banned for it

that

the empire deems as misinformation does that count for nothing

or is a

gender fluidity the ultimate form of resistance

to the empire

not spreading information that contradicts what the hegeminy is telling

american citizens

when we tell americans like jackson that they're lying about ukraine

is that more harmful to the empire

or less harmful

then gender fluidity

you guys take the choosing right

who is more of a threat to the empire

ah let me let me show you this

there's two possibilities k

let's see

who is more of a threat

to the empire

who ok jackson or is this person more of a threat

because this they're saying this person is more of a threat to the empire than jackson

so let's see

this is the geigborhood and you are not welcome that's why i need to be here you need jesus maam so according to this person don harjow

this person is how you resist the american empire

not do what jackson does

which is educate people on

the lies the media is telling on ukraine

which is

the most significant

sight of conflict since world war two

that america america's empire is involved in

jackson is

exposing the empire

in its most important proxy war

probably ever in history

but he's a shill for the u s empire this is a true

force of resistance

i mean i am i being is that the wrong example is there a better example

then jackson is it the p s l

that had cod pink on no war in ukraine but youre conveniently

affirming reaffirming

the imperialist lies about russia

but just because russia doesn't agree with you ideologically these lies are justifiable

you have the right to condemn russia because it's not

leftist enough

which in reality translates to what

not conforming to american human rights

i mean i just don't i don't see you defending the taliban

fox news nozbols

this person

is

so clearly

on educated

about what nosbels are

they are not educated on what nosbls are they think nosbls

a are this dangerous red brown alliance of tucker carlson

rather than limanov who was an anarchist

functionally and a punk rock anarchist

the nosbul party in russia or what are you talking about what does nosbul mean

let's see

the most visible leaders are debate streammers jackson hinkel host of the dive

and once a bernie sanders supporter

wait so you want to dig into people's past

i guarantee you ninety percent

of red libs

or

genuine communists as you call them living in america

worth

clinton supporters in twenty sixteen

they voted for hillary clinton

but you forgave them because they got educated because you love to pool

say we need to reach out

to liberals

we don't need to reach out to the workers just the liberal

professional managerials right

fucking cocksucker

and here's the best one and has al dien adam to year

ok

so i just gave you a pretty thorough analysis of why this whole thing is fucking bullshit so far

it's nooked

it's like that's i could end the stream now like that's a rap

that's a rap

that's a rap

that's a rap ye got the name wrong

you put it in parentheses to make it seem like this was a credible

real name you expose but at it's the curse of adam to hear

everyone who

spreads this lie of adam to hear

shows their ass to the world

destiny

exposed himself to the world

he boosted single handedly

the atom to your thing

and he's a liar for life he los his credibility for life

international magazine

the parentheses adam to here

do you know how fuck and stupid you look

you know how fucking stupid and pathetic you look you know what a fucking idiot you look like right now you look like a clown

i spit on your fucking face you stupid small piece of shit you are a fucking clown

when my actual identity gets revealed and it will eventually

nobody stays online this long

without having their real name exposed i know that

when that happens

you need you have you need to be spit on in your face you worthless wretched piece of shit

i am so sick of giving leftist ls

because leftism is an ll these people get the shit kicked out of them every fucking day they get spit on their betas their soyboys they're the scum and dirt of society they're the lump and scum class humiliate them show them that they're liars and they got things wrong they don't care

everything's a fuckin ell for them all they want to do is just cause you to have else

this person has no ws on their belt their whole fucking life

fuck and los her for their whole life

it means nothing

how am i going to gloat in don harjow's fucking face and gloat in the face of the international

and every cocksucker

who's on its board how will i gloat on their face

when it reveals this was baseless

by the way i don't need to wait till it gets revealed that this is baseless

there is no

reason for anyone to think

that haz al den's name is adam to year not one

there is no reason my name is adam to hear as opposed to

michael mohammed

michael mohammed look up a guy in jerban named michael mohammed you'll find one

doesn't mean

i just made that up how about let's do another one

gabriel abdullah

let's do another one

ah

let's do

i don't want to do two lebanese names cause

ah t it's too close to home right

let's do sam

sam fudd ll

let's do sam fadlla

yeah nathaniel mohammed i like that one

i like nathaniel muhammed

i will i can give you a random generator of

somewhat neutral kind of

biblical anglophone first names so

biblical anglophone first name and then a lebanese or

arabic last name you'll find a guy who fits the bill in dearborn that's not proof

that that this is a

not only is this a wrong claim it's an unfalsifiable claim it is no

more true

than any other

a eged name that i have the truth is you don't know my name

it's not falsifiable so you it's just a mystery what my real name is

who can you live with that it's a fuck and mystery right now when my name gets revealed i'll own up to it ill yeah that's my fucking name

this is not my name

and you say it's my name in parentheses to make it seem like you know what you're talking about but now you showed your ass the whole world now knows all of this is bullshit

because

it's gotten revealed that it's baseless

it's not my fucking name

therefore

all these other vague subject like this is the linchpin that

all it it collapses like a house of cards

this is the domino that

everything comes tumbling down like

some one may believe you for the rest of these because they're like oh well i don't really know right this is a rhtor rhetorical narrative but like when you get the fact wrong

you've discredited everything else

like

this is the only testable thing i can do that's objective

one of the only ones so far

yah you got it wrong

it's there's no you have no journalistic credentials

you are fraud

the international magazine is a fake news publication and that's an objective fact

but thank you so much j grimes i am not familiar with the door note but that doesn't even sound like a proper understanding of his thought it's jus it's but it's a vague whatever

yeah it is like adorno actually adorno did say stupid shit like that

that trust me i know adorko his shit whole stick was like revl thank you so much le was like the the real basis of uh

the objective material reality is some psychle pathological thank you so much blackbt into the to bias nesst the fund

thank you black bayppreciate you

harrison hadded i like that one

they have to be biblical guys they got to be biblical

theyve got to be biblical

it's very common you know

you'll find someone who ifits the bill i promise

ok

uh

the origin of this

was a troll from lefty pole who made if i went over it in the rise of atams to your video for reference but

they made a fake account

pretending to be an air b and b owner no confirmation they own any air b and b s no confirmation they say who they claim they were

and no confirmation no proof backing up

that this is my name

they just said it is because they posted a clip of me conveniently complaining about

an air b and b which went pretty viral

on lefty pole and on the internet

and then a day later someone

reports to twitch

that clip claiming to be

the airbnb owner

okay woll then post please post a screenshot of adam to year

reserving your air b and b

then do it

that would that would that would

like if you

if that person at that time now there's a bad faith intention you could doctor anything but

if you post

an undoctored

somehow prove its undoctored here b and b

recording or post

of adam to hear reserving it and it's my face

i think that would because their b and b requires id verification that would prove

that that would person was who they say that person was who they say they were

but if there's no proof it's just some random troll saying something the there's nothing

there's no reason to think it's true

but the reason people believe it is because haz has to have a real name

this is destiny's dipshit retard reasoning by the way destiny will always whenever i press hm on this shit w'll be like well to be something so unless you disprove this this is the truth for now this will be the truth and no that's not how it works ok

sometimes you just don't know things sometimes you have no knowledge of any of that and you have to say i don't fucking know this is no more likely this is arbitrary it's no more likely than anything else you don't have to know everything

ok

well there has to be a real name for hawes you're right

but you don't have to know it

you don't have to have any knowledge of that whatsoever you could just be entirely ignorant of what my real name is

isn't that traumatic to think about

there's some things you just don't know

that you really don't know my fucking name you don't i promise you don't

some of you do

but it's cause you know me personally

thanks guys by the way i appreciate you

but u

you know like former friends and stuff

thanks guys

you know but

most of you don't

almost none of you do actually

i promise

naudia knows my name

jackson knows my name

this is not my name

you don't know

you really don't

cope with it live with it you don't know see that you never want to tell an anglo positivist

dipshit porn addict fuckin

you know destiny type that they don't know something because they start having anxiety i don't know what of my whole world is w like they have to fill in the blanks with something

but did you have to fill in the blanks with adam did it have to be adam

did you have to call me adam

adams not a bad name i'm not against that name but it just doesn't fit me i'm not an adam i'm not saying adams are bad

i'm just saying it's not me

i'm not i

i know a lot of people named adam and they're great people

i'm just saying it's not me

doesn't fit me when you look at me i'm not an adumt

could you could you at least be creative and

p a name that sounds like it could be me like you know what sounds like me

heaers

acbar

that's kind of an indian name but i could see

you know what i mean

mm

mohamm yeah that's a good one

abdoniah

i mean if it had to be an anglophone name let me do an anglophone one right

anglophone

could be like a

anglophone could be like ah you know

i could look like a a

victor

i could be a victor you know

youuld say i'm a victor

you could say i'm a dmitri

say dmitri you know

you could s it's not anglophone but i'm saying like white sounding names you could say i'm a

mike you could say i look like a mike

if they said it was michael i wouldn't even you know i'm a petty you know people are everywheres house why do you why are youus doing this shit let them do the fake dog that no i'm not an adam

if it was michael to hear

i wouldn't have said shit i would be like okll i can live with people thinking i'm michael to hear

ad

ih yeah mike all right whatever

i would just ignore it i'd be like ok whatever

and nddier to hows why you

why are you doing that be smart

let them be on a wrong false trail i said

but i'm not an adam

i'm not an adam

there's nothing wrong with adam but it's just

i'm not an adam

adams it's like a well composed kind of

you know adam is well mannered and

they're kind of the

adam

you know what i mean it's not me

it's not me

it's just not me

i could be of vladimir easily i could pass as any kind of eastern european name

no problem

this is just not realistic right

this is you know this is

whoever invented adam to year was a buthert

leftypole white leftist who was like

you know those people like a you need to be white tas you're white

yeah ivan i could fit in ivan but they're like

they like they tried to like

project their own suburban white backgrounds on me like i'm

like i'm like not an ethnic mother fucker they're like oh

you're just like me you were just getting dropped off at soccer practice by my mom just like me you are just like me ods

i'm better than you no i'm not like you actually i've nothing in common with you i you are just some weird fuck

who has problems right but thank you so much jan appreciate i feel sorry for the real adam though

he doesn't deserve this

you know what but it's like

you're right

you're right you're right but

but like

i don'n know does adam have a duty to come forward and be like yo

this not me

or should he just keep a low profile

always wondered about that like could i actually come up to this guy and be like yo

you do me like

i don't you don't know me i don't know you but like

they think i'm youute can you just come forward and be like

would i even want to do i even want to

rope someone in like that i mean

it's actually sad

it is

but it's like this is what the world is is the international this is international worldwide you know

and this it is getting

this dude is living his life

targeted

it's it's an injustice it's unjust

the real adam to hear has done nothing wrong

the real adam to hear is innocent

that guy has offended no one he's

he has triggered no one he's offended nobody he's never made any controversy just liveing his life a normal guy

why did destiny go after him destiny attacked him

oh god that guys

sad the international magazine is attacking him

he's literally a targeted individual

he said this is me has al din

he said how i just you know what i hope you know what i fear

i'm actually scared that adam to hear

we'll find out about all this shit and then he'll be you know what

that's not adam to hear that's and then he's going to fuck and expose my real name

and that

i don't know if that could ever happen but

he'll be like i'm going to go around dearborn ask around who the fuck is this guy

you know that would be scary honestly

but it's probably inevitable but it's like adam you don't have to do that to me i didn't do this to you

i didn't do this to you

this is all because i use the name

to hear al turza in my past

sorry i used that name

i don't know where adam came from it was to that was my first name to hear alturs i used to go by

is the pseudonym when i used to write

and

that's where this came from

they looked at that pseudonym it was well not circulated common knowledge and they were like oh he used to go by t yr eltirza

his

real name must be adams to here and they'd like that's believable thank you so much more i appreciate you

new theory psl have taken over the usual pink tropical communist mls

s in their orbit

daen yeah he shot is the go between to c p i india

trotsonm

tricontinental institute is the link to open society dollar

you're right

thank you so much chris by the way appreciate you so much brother but yeah you're hundred percent right

you're one hundred percent right you know it's like

what can you do

the ok let's continue this this is kind of hilarious right

cause this is false claim after false claim

demonstrably false claim after false claim

by the way

ok

but thank you so much one man are spitting the truth us in the words of my favourite rap group public enemy that's what you gota do you gotta tell i'm jizzy like that

yeah

you're right

gimme a damn diddly darn sick

ok

allright

alright

the infrared globe avatar specific to this faction

refers to haz's streaming gimmick infra haz

in which he spits ok first of all

um

this is such poor journalistic work i feel bad for the guy who owns the the international

because he's like i hired a retard to write for me

who said my streaming gimmick is infra haz not infrared

they don't even know that i'm infraret

infra haz is a reference to haz being part of infrared

and infrod is just my twitter handle i don't stream from twitter

i stream from you tube and i stream from twitch in for haz was never a name that had anything to do with twitch or you tube it's a twitter handle

kay so infra haz is not

my streaming gimmick you stupid worthless boomer

who the fuck gave you the confidence to write ha here was the friends we made along the way thank you so much arc but hey dawn you stupid fuck and worthless boomer who the fuck gave you the confidence to feel like you were an authority to speak on

anything

you just got two things wrong in a row adam to here and now my streaming gimmick is in for hawes how

that's my twitter handle my streaming gimmick is literally just called infrared the infrared globe refers to the

channel on youtube called infrared

that's pretty simple

that's pretty simple

that's what it refers to it's an infrared glow thank you so much o i prefer my adam tire playing lead for leonard skinnerd

and i'm in the front row hammered drunk thank you ha ho ty appreciate you

ok that is pretty simple

not a matter of contention whatsoever

and that is just sad it's a sad thing to get wrong i'm sorry if you're going to do an expose

on pat socks

and the central community of the pat socks being the infrared community keep that in mind if you're going to do a whole expose of that

and fuck up so something is basics like what's the origin of the infrared globe ah yeah it was be take five minutes of research the infrared globe is from

the youtube channel called infrared and the infrared globe

refers to

a marxism leninism beyond the visible spectrum in the age of multipolariri the globe representing a multipolar world the infrared spectrum referring to

putting on infrared vision which means going beyond the visible spectrum which means thinking critically it's kind of simple right you it's likee two seconds to find all that and you decided to say it's referring to my streaming gimmick infrahs

k you worthless fucking cockroach i would eat you for breakfast in any

any

battle of who's right and wrong you fuck and lose you fuck and loser thank you so much qliiet they are linking you to c g t and so c p i c p a

p s l has reason to be anti china in the future they can claim china promotes right wing nationalism that you know i want these people as far away from china as possible because they're not good p r for china i'll tell you that

ok now here's more rhetorical games

in which he spits pretentous gibberish

well that's just like your opinion my i have a whole community to vouch for

disagreeing with that opinion

and but by the way can you prove it can he test is that is that a testable claim no it's not can't be proven

how convenient

and utters threats

i never utter threats i always utter promises

i've never uttered one threat

only promises

a and by the way that

the promises that i issue on stream are

less than one percent of my content

so you you need to justify why you are smearing my character by making it seem like

this is the bulk of my content and it's not

hm this is a character assassination you know the one you just said

that the other debate streamers engage in that's what you're doing you're in gear issuing character assassination

like

a very small portion of my content

is concerned with uttering threats

most of my content is theory or news

or commentary

on news or commentary on theory

thank you so much to right and why conservatives like alex jones thinks the deep state sides with china

ngofunded leftists like psl and the international constantly prais that china doesn't exist in reality

yeah you're right thank you so much cit aright it doesn't

but they're selling people a delusion

because of v j prehad's delusions himself it all comes from the communist party of india it seems like

anyway this is character assassination you're just

can can we agree that ok dawn don i care about objectivity

objectively speaking

what you're doing is painting me in a bad light

why you you have many lights you can paint me in there's multiple possibilities as far as how you can present

haz al din

i'm teaching you guys this on media literacy but you're painting me in an exclusively bad light a one sided way pretty much

ignoring

all the other aspects which make up the bulk of my streams by the way

because you have a vendetta against me for ideological reasons

is that fair to say

your ideological disagreements are the reason for you painting me in this bad light

which is just not true

and then here's another bad light in what looks like his grandmother's basement

grandma naughdia

come down

my grandma's coming down cause i'm

look on

it appears

to be my grandmother's basement

that's journalism that's objective reporting

the international is a credible magazine this is not like a character

assassination just like an outright

attempt to roast me you can't get in my v c and roast me

you're going to roast me

so do you want to come ons stream grandma

right now

you did your hair what did you do with your hair

what you cut your hair for your hair looks fine

no i just turned it because you wouldn't take me to the salon

i told you it looks fine why did you rootause i have to come here every once in a while

ok you going to come on

yeah let me just sa

alright well

so so don don harjow

it's an infrared expert don harjole adam

so they're doing an expose on adam to here and they said his

he looks like he's streaming in his grandma's basement and i wanted you to be the grandma to come down and

yeah

hold on

kin can the grandma come and

because this is my grandma

all right well come on grandma i've been pretty loud and this is my grandma's basement

n no it's okay

just put your hair down and

have no bre

wise in braids

sorry my grandma's a little senile right now she's

she's a little kind of

now i just dodawn harjo needs to see my grandma

it's a beautiful pseudonym they actually don harjow is a

well it's actually a pedophile that's part of adam wffen

named michael skalberger

and the reason that's true is because m

i just said it

and that's the real name

michael the guy you know michael scalberger or whatever

that's their name

that's the real name because that satisfies don's standard of evidence for what someone's real name is

you just have to claim it's their name and that it becomes their name right

where where did you go

just come just come quick

aright

so hold on so like look

we have to well we'll do the juxtaposition hold on

so in what looks like his grandmother's basement

very good journalistic skills this is clearly my grandma

who lives with me

and this is the grandma in question

right this is me and you know this is not he his basement i just live in her basement

i'm mooching off of her

and you know

this is my grandma you know

so you know what i mean we just

do things a little bit differently in this house i'm not a grandma grandma grandma come on grandma that's girs is my grandma you see i am not your grandma

are you sure yeah i'm sure ok

well me and my grandma like to hold hands on grandma this is gross why don't play into their fantasies

but it's but it but dawn hards out said it's true it has to be true

they're a journalist the international published it

if you're a the international can't be wrong

are you saying they're wrong

i think you should tell the truth about whose basement this actually is

whose basement is

it's grandma's basy

who else

well first of all grandmas don't have hair like this

but don't but but but you're saying don harj i was like

uh blinded by their own buthurt that they just made a bunch of things up and theyre

trying to make it seem like they're an actual real journalist when they just wrote a

extremely but her highly subjective scathing

smearing piece of shit article that is full of like a demonstrable bullshit

because there's so buthard about infrared

and adam to year

and because they can't vent by actually debating me and thereby testing the veracity of their position

they decided to write this creed to cope with their utter

depression and failure in life

being a fucking loser with a failing ideology

that no one wants to buy into and they're pretty much you know on the verge of

engaging in acts that i would never promote on you tube because they're such a fucking pathetic

writhing seething fucking loser they wrote this entire

pathetic

scathing piece of shit

pile of garbage articles just to cope with the fact

that they're so assed hurt about what infrared is doing but they have no

rational way to give expression to it so they decided to lump me in with a bunch of people i objectively

have nothing to do with whatsever are you saying they're wrong

somebody has to replace wendy williams

ok you know w that is

why who's wendy williams she's like why whyd you destroy my tiger sorry she was like she was like a gossip

queen and she like had a show daytime television yeah but this isn't pulled on and then shes not she she had to get off the show because she she's like dying

yeah but this isn't gossip this is the internefinitely this is no z are no this is a teams article this is the hold on this is the international it's a really prestigious magazine they would not

they wouldant to just publish some random

non credible smut that has no basis in factor reality are you are you saying's you're saying they would you're saying they would just publish bullshit that's what i have a conspiracy very what's that

you've denounced

p s l vagina for shod we did that

a reaction to the fascist attack of the people's form but i think this is like

some likes

p s l cobur to come after you no this is c p sa

are you sure yup

tied to the c p i ok this don hards out could be terr and phoebe

i just thought about that

could it just be terr and feback

guys let's just

respect their standard of evidence

since i'm adam to hear that's terran phoevik except

is at least a one percent chance that is teran phobic i think it is teran phoebc

i think it is

yeah this this sounds like aran poever that i read their do goingart yeah this is this is aran pobc isn't it

oh we just made a discovery didn't we

well we're running with it because this is how you'd identify people's real name

under their pseudon this is teran fee that qunter percent

aren phobex

i love how they're like where we're official and weh're a communists but i'm going to just thre all these twitter

slings like nozballs and you know it's terror

i just cracked the case

i was like who the fuck would have written this

and of like oh

if it's not

the guno twins

a johnny socialism and android soytern

it's got to be terrn

yup that's terran every time isn't that crazy i cracked that cod that's teran

this is because i'm thre it's about c pusa

yup that's teran feb i cra everyone spread the fucking news that's teran fev that hundred percent

it does sound like a writing it's fucked ter and phoebic

did you react to the thing i sent you in discord

diven

what thing the billy billy

well i'm going to post that on twitter

don't worry

k

that's teran peverver guys

but anyway look at terror in this old haggard bitch

she says s

what looks like his grandmother's basement you know why aran is saying because it's a very ethnic grandmother because she's saying it's ethnic like oh my grandma must be like a

you know arabic

babushka i guess

and she's got all these antiques and rugs so it must be my grandma

could it possibly be haz al den

intentionally putting this up i mean

is this my what do you think is this a grandma's basement look or what

doesn't look like it doesn't look like its ara knows arabic supposedly so she should be able to know that an arabic grandma is not going to have this kind of set up ah but ara isn't a fed she just is fluent in arabic and russian and worked for the u n and also worked for cia front organizations and as a reckser she's wrecked every organization she's been in but that's not grounds for suspicion for her being a

she's also related to the government best friends with a particular feminist that

loves to promote

the

you the use of acd anallice on her twitter account so it's very s she's a drug peddler no i mean that's like the whole m k lly lling feminist

to do oh yeah

well guys this is j this is the journalistic integrity of the international they said it looks like his mother's base and if you're a neutral observer if you're like a random guy

and you're like okay i'm goinga look at this haws guy's stream

would you look at this me like yeah that's totally looks like a grandmother's basement or would you detect the little but hert

where the person w would you would you

would you detect a little bit of buthurt from the person who wrote this cause

i don't think they just looked at my stream was like oh that's a grandma's base and i think

arin i think your little butt hurt i think your little butt hurt arin

that's what i think i think you're a little bit but hurt

ok

that's what it sounds like in this article

it sounds like you're being a little

bought her

and a little bit

salty

there's a lot of salt in this or what i feel like it's full of salt

full chok full of salt you know

chok full of salt

we cracked the cold though it is tert

all right well you can go and wait for me

oh i finish this up

oh but i don't want to leave

why don you want to get far

mm

i don't know i feel like i got called down here i took my braids out

right where you could

you can still you can stay

i don't really have anything to say

we're going to eat food right

yeah she always likes mcdonald's can you believe that

sh i looked at my physique

from a year ago

but ever since

she gave my w feeld to pull a fast one god dashes mye n you me ourful dark one

fas dark sorcerer us

thank you so much amila appreciate it somebody asked how tall i am i'm five five and i

she thought he's taller than me but i believe the thought she thought i believe the rumors online of she thought that you were like five one or something i was like she thought i was five six

in said i was five five or five six

and i said wait till you come and she said no no i believe the rumors

and then i said ok

and i was like i was so baffled i was like you believe that i thought no one believes it

said ya i believe it

and then she came

i also thought your name was adam to here she did no joke that's that seeves all that's when i realized

it's all like a crazy m k ultra like they actually believe these lies

she believed im

till she actually came

crazy

that's crazy

but h yeah she's five five

because i measure because that's how insecure i am i'm five five and

ah

i was like she's like well there's nothing wrong with being five six and i said there isn't but why would i lie

it the accusation that i'm lying is the problem i'm five eight

it's not a tall height

five es not tall i thought you were five

six and your name was adam to here yeah

she now she knows like now now she knows

get this guys she knows my whole family

can you believe that she knows my full name

she knows my social security number

that's crazy isn't it

because i know that because she does my taxes

right

mmhm

but im

let's continue with this article as we got grandma

what boring we got to we got to finish it because i got to systematically respond to this and this is one last section i'm going to respond to

and then you know

i'm going to keyword pat sock and shit

just say one last yeah

i like that they're like i

we can't take this has guy serious because

but he has been on was it

chinese and et on and yeah but we can't what what ter and the reason teran includes that is yes because she wants to cast some shade at china

and iran because terror is a hardcore pro imperialist anti china anti russia anti iran kind of person

right

i'm going to go yeah film content for my curly hair channel

ok

have fun with that

bye bye

all right anyway guys um

let's continue

other notables broadly connected with this faction

include burn's former boss mike gravel

wait wait

hold on

hold u

hold on

what the funck does mk gravel have to do with us

who is

what does mike gravel have to do with us

ok

and this is such an arbitrary thing

this is so arbitrary

when has mike gravel or his hold

what does that have to do with us

nothing that's literally completely irrelevant

a journalist and kadiovtan samira

oka

a disgraced political cult leader and alleged sexist

caleb moppin

yeah that's fair to include him in like the pat sock milieu you know

debate sphere affiliated concentrators peter kffin and fox green

and failed senatorial candidates this is

totally not a but hurt way of presenting someone

almost every decent person who runs failed you know

see the thing is terrin

you don't field your own candidates you just

cocksucked democrats so you couldn't even that's the thing about these people they're unfalsifiable they can't fail because they never even try to win you don't even field your own candidates you don't even try to test your claims you don't even try to put your theory on the line you don't even try to put your ideology on line none of it is testable none of it is testable none of it

it's a completely unfalsifiable position that's called convenience

it's just unfalsifiable

diane sara andh daniel burke and even no they're not

diane sarah and daniel burke

cannot justifiably be labeled socialists

i don't think they can

i don't think they can

i don't think it's fair to call them socialists

they they're not necessarily capitalists but like they're not really

their pat socks typically refers to people who are

marxis leninis

and are also

patriotic orthodox marxist leninist

m

the schiller institute are not marxist leninists right

we are

allied with them but they're not marxist ltinists so

why are you including them in this category

no one knows

even failed congressional

democratic candidate

perennial crank geoff young

again

p poorg goff young why is he

um whyes joff young

a bad guiye to terran jeoff young is not a padsck

joff young endorsed jaskai settlers thank me on the bass lyric on on connection cam thank you so much but like this is such poor journalism because joff young

openly endorse jasa kais settlers openly

he can't be a padsck

there's no way he could be categorized as one

both sara and young were endorsed by grincing clout clout goblin jimmy doar o k don harjow a ka terran bitch fevec whatever the fuck your stupid name is

you buthurt bitch that's all you fuckin are you're a but urt bitch then you're a fuckin loser

because you're a loser can't even be successful in anything you do so you have to come and

knock on us like this you butherd fucking bitch

whoever don harjow is you are a bitch

you are a fucked bitch

for life

many of these figures have made appearances on american mainstream as well as chinese and iranian state media

haes in particular has appeared in c j tien and press t v despite no obvious credentials

and this is noteworthy why

because both outlets have published relationships with the larouche think tank the schiller institute run by lucia's widow helga zeppla rouche who also appeared on cd c and herself

i guess you've never heard of samiri khan

this you never heard of samiro

spoiler samira is the one who got me on

ah samira was a journalist right

the schiller institute it can't bring anyone on cd c on or press tv

only people who are already journalists or in the journalistic world

can recommend me

ok

so

mm that

l journalism you don't even know how fucking media

appearances work you don't get it you don't appear on media

because the schiller institute

vouches for you you appear on media

because other people who are in media vouch for you and say you're legit

that's how it works because their career is on the line so they have skin in the game and that's why they take those recommendations seriously

the shiller yah this is stupid i like

this is such poor it's like it betrays

such a lack of understanding about how anything in the world works

whoever don harjow is

when they like when the whole world of lies collapses on them i genuinely

am worried about them engaging in self harm because it's like you can't sustain such a delusional world view forever

jof yng despite publicly feuding with haes during his campaign

was involved with the schiller institute dude schiller will work with any one

whose anti war literally anyone

it's not like

it's not like some indictment on some one

for working with schiller or

being involved with them l r making appearances with them and signing joint statements with them like dude schiller will work with anyone

they're so open

like you can't crucify someone for

being involved with schiller schiller is not a conspiracy do the schiller institute

is what it is there's no conspiracy it's literally just

there's two people who draw from the legacy of lyndon larouche i'm going to educate you there's la rouche pack

run by larouche's former treasurer

and then there's schiller

run by helgel zeppl rouche

who is larouch's ex wife i sorry wife the late larous wife

i

ok so

there was a larouche movement

that was based on

the leadership of lyndon larouche

and that split into larouchpak and the schiller

and it's an organization

and they don't have a lot of money

larouche bag does

schiller is not chalk full of cash

i promised or not

ok

they

you follow the money like

the reason

terran and leftists are so obsessed with larouche

it's because it's the only like institution that we work with

when you think about it like it's the only institution

that we like actively

ah

go to events with and shit

and we don't have our own institute or institution

so that's why it's a little like before it was caleb mopp and c p i

ok c p i was an institution

so everyone was focused on caleb as soon as we distanced ourselves from caleb

or he just left and fell out of favor

and he disappeared

and c p i collapsed because

it was run by people like fucking ah

nik maniacci

then all that was left was the schiller institute as the last institution

that we kind of

had ties to in america

but guy can you guys put that into perspective

the only institution we have ties to in america

is the schiller institute

meanwhile

leftists have ties

to literally every prevailing reigning institution of the ruling class

related to activism and politics

knee deep

institutional ties we have no institutional sizes except for this

institute it's not even an institution it's a small group

of people

who do have extensive like

connections they've built but they're not like swimming in cashe they're not like rich

they're not like

billionaire money kind of thing it's not like fucking the open society foundation

some it's not like

goldman sachs giving twelve million dollars right

we have gotten zero money

from schiller

and we i never asked for money i'd never do that by the way

but i'm just saying like we don't get paid by them they don't pay our bills

all that happened is that we went to a conference that they paid for

an organized

and they graciously allowed me a fucking nobody's streamer to speak there

i'm grateful for that

i'm a nobody i'm not some prestigious

person i'm a streamer they invited me

to speak at their conference

and that's what i did

and so did jackson and so did samira

and otherwise it's like we like each other's tweets we retweet each other's tweets

we

stream together sometimes

but what else it's like we're not

it's the it's like it's like

saying focusing on schillers so stupid it's like why because it's all it's the only like listen all of that larouche conspiracy nonsense is going to be out the window when i launch my organization this mon or next month i promise it's like it's only because we don't have a real life institution

to be tied to

that's it

that's the only fuckin reason for this

you know it's so stupid

i've never told any of my followers to join schiller

i told them to join the c p usa

that was the institution

we wanted to build and be tied to k

the c pusa officially

does not have good relations with infrared

because of don harjow a k a terran pevik k

so

this is like bitch you're the reason it's not c p usa

you're the reason

the only institution we have ties to

is schiller you stupid bitch it would have been the c p usa if not for you

you are the reason it's not the c p u s a you single handedly are the reason for that you dumb stupid buthurt idiot bitch

you know

it's so stupid

infrared predates

any larouche

involvement

by years you know it's like

this all majorly started

because of the ukraine war

schiller

has been at the vanguard as far as institutes are concerned

of opposing the ukraine war

a terran supports zelenski though that's the difference

they made appearances at a schiller institute panel you're right what does that prove

nothing

this like much of their overt distorts some reasonable observations into what is basically

a replacement theory conspiracy

carried out by the british empire a typical rouche light villain

so replacement theory is a the racist theory that white people

are getting replaced by brown by people of color or whatever

so what is how is this a replacement theory

by pointing out here's the replacement theory that they're alluding to because we agree with larouche

vaguely

by the way not totally because there's a lot of details

we do disagree on

but vaguely speaking

larouche was not crazy

for pointing out

that

the british empire throughout the entire existence of the american republic

has tried to through its extent well documented extensive

pioneering and unprecedented

intelligence organizations

the british invented

ah intelligence agencies as we know them the

intelligence as such

like not intelligence as such but

a

what do you call it intelligence institutions of gathering information covertly and using that information

to subversively influence

that

you can maybe say the vatican

but that's like a british thing you know

that's from the british empire

we never had a cia or anything

the cia was modeled off of the o s s

and yes

american america had a unique vision for america like hamiltonian economics and stuff

and british ideas and british ageminy

routinely has tried to gain hegeminy and sway

over america

and i don't think that's a very controversial thing to say

during the civil war it's not very controversial to say the british empire was behind the confederacy

it's not unreasonable to say that after world war so

the paradigm of this kind of

deep staate in

globalism came from the former architects of the british empire

not i mean who is knes

right

it's not too unreasonable to say these things i don't think it is

i don't think it's unreasonable to say there was a british empire in america kind of inherited that

i don't think it's unreasonable to say that in doing so america

supplanted the former

democratic republican institutions talked about my marx and angles

with institutions that were built for the preservation upholding and maintenance

of this heir to the british empire i don't think that's

a crazy unreasonable thing to say

you subject to the actual claims we make to scrutiny and it's like it's not

particularly unreasonable

ok

let's continue thank you so much black packh you man

don't forget bacons rebellion where it all started

sure yeah

okay so uh

while not every patriotic socialist is a lrouchite the overlap is too numerous to ignore

yeah but i'll tell you why that is ok

the reason for the overlap between us and la rouche

has to do with the new left

because larouche was one of the first

dissidence against the new left

and his perspective was that the new left was

shifting away from the traditional working class

into students

and the lumpet

ok and that's where it comes from

more or less

and then larouche building from that fundamental like

political strategic position

kind of

allowed that to interface with his unique marxist theory at the time

which he eventually used to get to like why did it come to this s hes like o the problem was marx himself

he said marx is the one who made the mistake and laroue decided

to adopt this kind of productivist

unique per

polymaths kind of perennial

very unique and rigorous theory

to kind of explain that

so that's why there's an overlap

but the difference is that larouche abandoned marxism

but we are understanding this

we as an infrared i can't speak for anyone else but infrared

we understand the same problems la rouche observed

not by denying that they were problems

but within the paradigm of orthodox marxist leninist theory

okay

so that is why there's overlap

that's also why there's overlap between the schiller institute

and chinese researchers and russian researchers

larouche is very active in the communist and post communist scene

and outside america because lurrouti's paradigm

yields a lot of productive insights for understanding this kind of

vague bizarre

clearly post capitalist

economy we've transitioned into

and larouche larouche's paradigm is um

adequate

for a kind of like you know

use value based

mode of production

like the reason thank you so much emila appreciate return to the american system of economy something that was a guiding light of inspiration for the communists of the world

yeah thank you so much amela yeat larouche was drawing from a very communist legacy

of saying the progressive whatever legacy of seven hundred seventy six then that's where he was drawing from a right

and lerouche connected dots that he did

because he followed the money as far as where the new left

kind of parrot things were coming from and he was like what the hell the ford foundation is pumping all this fucking money

into feminismen

all these like new left

the nudism whatever fox

hippies and he's like

follow the money where's this coming from he's like damn this is the ford foundation where's the ford foundation coming from

the rockefellers through the cia and he that's where he that's the whole conspiracy lauchism he just

kind of was trying to explain

what happened with the new left

game

so it's a pretty simple reason why there's a paradigm pat soocks are obsess we focus on what they refer to as unleashing the forces of production

i mean but thats stang shaupgn

ok

that's not even deng shopping that's mark's

but i'm saying the emphasis on that

is deng shau being a lrouse side

that's basic marxism

why have you the question isn't why we focus on it why have you neglected it

in favor of de growth

can you explain that

and actively denying climate change

ok

we are just as guilty of denying climate change as china was in two thousand and seven

how about that two thousand and eleven

china was denying climate change just as much as infrared

oam

nothing to do with larouche

but

why has laroue why is larouche one of the most prominent critics

of green politics and history

cause he followed the money

that's why they liked him in china that's why they like him in russia that's why they like him in the developing world

beuse he offers them a new

it's like a it's an insightful paradigm

into the

imperialism behind green politics

a it's just product pro productivism that's what you're talking about productivism versus

the growth

that's not

exclusively

it's not uniquely larouche ey

as if cooked up by an oil and gas p r team trying to make extractive industry sound revolutionary

well teran here's why you're such a bumbling stupid bitch who has been gassed up yourself by the credentials you possess from academies and universities but you're actually objective like a dumb bird brain stupid bitch and i'm going to tell you why

because

oil and gas monopolies and oil bankers are precisely behind

the green

paradigm because their monopolies

you see it's very simple monopolies don't want to affirm the things that got them to the top monopolies want to sever any ties that got them to the top

extractivism because promoting extractivism means other people can engage in it and thereby compete with them

so by emphasizing green politics and de growth

monopolies preserve their power

as capital not as extractivism

but as capital

so that's

that's how monopolies function one on one monopolies

may have gotten to the top on the back of productivism but they're against productivism

because that opens the gates to competition

gay competition

is not something capitalists like

they don't want competition

capital doesn't like competition everyone knows that

sespecially today

ok

capital doesn't like competition competition

hehurtz capital

cat competition is one of the driving forces behind the falling rate of profit

they don't like competition k s maarxism one on one

so

it's not the oil and gas

teams that are against green politics

it's precisely the oil monopolies that are in favor of them the incipient forms of extractivist capital

a cale moppain made this observation before he's very correct

that existed in alaska and elsewhere

and the koch brothers for example

while not anti establishment was very much in favoor of right wing politics and

the anti green politics because that was an incipient

oil industry

that was competing with the oil monopolies

so that was the basis for that it wasn't it's not like exxon mobil

the one behind

ah climate change denial no you have it completely backwards because you're a stupid bird brained bitch who just

isn't as smart as you think you were you know that's really the truth you're just not smart terran

or dodn whatever the fuck you are but you called me adams here so i want to call you terran you know cause this sounds like a terran karan type of screed you know

they like lauschites despise financial capital but seem to love industrial capital where is the industrial capital though

we don't love industrial capital

neither larouche nor infrared loves industrial capital

larouche proposals a national bank

for that will pump credit in the economy to uplift industry

that does that does not

correlate or map on to any existing

form of industrial capital do they want to create some industrial capital sure

you can argue that

but

it doesn't map ono any real industrial capitalist class or entrenched

industrial capital that materially exists

it's just an ideology

infrared

doesn't believe industry can be promoted

through capital

or at least strictly through capital

it to promote the industrial economy you need to transition into a paradigm based on use value

which which is like china right you can't just

love industrial capital you have to from scratch

crush capital

and build up industry

f in a use value paradigm so

but we're both but that's basic marxism you know

ah this doesn't indict

this is not true for u sites or for the pat socks it's true for no one you made it up you pulled it out of your asss you're stupid bitch

according to dennis king's book lyndon larouche in the new economic fascism this notorious sect master the art of ideological reframing

the tactic of changing a person's emotional response

to an idea by changing the context

in which it is communicated

so this is like the obama's hitler

thing and this is liberals trying to make sense of that very base thing larouche did by saying obama was hitler

this dangerous cult

a desc as becker brian bitch becker described them to collic

has established connections to the k k k in the german police

i mean it is that true

is that true at all

i i'll let daniel burke respond to that i doubt that's true you have a record of lying about things you're pathological liars

so i don't believe that's true

beuse you you have no credibility but

we will let daniel burke respond to that claim but i've pretty sure it's been debunked

but what ties the schiller haf to those groups

maybe at best this was true for

larouche in the eighties or something i don't know i don't even know if that's true but

we work with larouche sorry we work with schiller

can you name examples of schiller working with the kkk

can you name examples of schill what are schiller's ties to the german police

and how does that square with

schiller's opposition to the us backed

german government

in favor of russia which is america's enemy

and the enemy of the german status quo

any anything terran nothing

good you're a stupid bitch that's why

and at one point acted as the de facto wing of the f b i

ok now that is just a lie thank you so much and cars i just posted the full quote on unleashing the forces of production and shall request thread

this completely exposes the sycophants of capital like teran

thank you so much sankaras

but ah we have a lot to go here we're going to continue

oka so this is an article that's not sourced that's the problem there's no sources

there's no sources for any of these claims the dan is just saying it therefore it's true there's no sources so i guess it's true because they're saying it it's a lie though that's the problem

they are famous for attempting to violently replace

what

where does this replace come from so

so this is replacement theory i guess that's their paradigm

there it

their cognitive mapping so to speak

they're famous for trying to violently replace communist in the c p sa in the seventies

during operation mop up

that's not what happened they weren't trying to replace communists they were trying to

basically

destroy what was a threat to them because communists constantly attacked

lucia's people

and la rouche people started training to fight back and there was a lot of violence

because the two didn't like each other but the it started with

the left is getting violent right

so no they don't want to replace anyone you're lying

you're just you're trying to you're trying to say this because that's what i'm doing i am trying to replace you bitch

get the fuck out of my party bitch

i am trying to fuck and replace you

laarue wasn't doing that larouse said fuck the communist party

and he wanted to go

create his own think tank i don't i'm not doing that i want to take the communist party bitch i am trying to replace you

absolutely i am doing that

by the way we are going to fuck and replace you dumb ass

we are going to fuck and do that

larouche is dead but his cults desire to replace communists and wear them like a skin suit that is terran that's terran that's aran

that's terrin that's terin she said that

she has said that

tell me i'm crazy guys hasn't she said that before where has she said that

somebody find it for me find it oh i know it i know i know it's arin yes

tarn

pevec dougan she's in her ugan article lipstick on a pig

yeah s we fukin confirm that you dodumb btch skull fuckin burn

you stupid bitch it's terrin

it's terrib we're going to spread a tweet tweet on this

we're going to make a sweet how did i funck it know that

by the way

how do i know that

ok i have full ca i'm making a tweet about this right now to report on this hold on

um

ok ter and you stupid bitch now here i'm going to show it to you from the article

skin that's the keyword wear the skin

wants to wear the skin of the communist party i remember this visceral language

i remember that

ok i'm making the tweet everyone should boost the fuck out of this tweet

gam

breaking

it has all

but then

entirely confirmed that

what's that what's their name

don hargow

dwn hardjow

let me fuck and put this

author of the

international left

a defamatory

but hert screed against me

is actually none other than

paren se that

the writing style

mannerisms and language is almost identical

karen at it again

so let me uh

let me link these

pictured

hello

is

for c p s a article

yet

karen at it again

she's got that skin fing you know she always talks about it

hey guys i posted the tweet go fucking like it

go boost this fuccing tweet

oka

also

her deranged reaction to operation red anon

in which she organized

an entire c usa zoom meeting for

gives it away

because that is where she

she

created be la rouche

conspiracy theory about infrared

yeah

that's terran fee that wich pretty much certain

yeah

yeah like that that is like a that satisfies a pretty

robust standard of evidence

because who the fuck else would this be

second of all

the language is the same

that that the

the conceptual

arsenal being deployed originates with the same person

aran febc is the one who

started the larouche conspiracy theory

probably because of the shifts

from doing events with c p i to schiller

see that's what a superficial analysis

this dumb stupid raggedy bitch has

she had such a stupid analysis she goes oh they started doing conferences

with

schiller instead of c p i

that means this is a la rouche conspiracy theory now all because of a conference

isn that crazy

and the warped paranoia smacks of terran you know i don't know for certainty

you can't ever but

i have a strong

suspicion and belief even that this is teran phevera

and uh it's funny because

they said my name was adams to here and it's wrong but then i said this is teran feb and then it's correct

is' that funny

mm

isin't that amazing

the colts desire to replace communist i do want to replace you teran but

but

you're not a communist you are the one wearing

communism like a skinsuit

and i just want to expose you i don't want to take your skin suit i just want to expose you and then

we're going to give life see we give life to communism hear and that's why

we don't have we don't want to take your skin suit your your ugly leftover aesthetics we're building

your your wolk aesthetics no we we have our own aesthetics we have our own

appearance right we're giving new life to communism

where you're a this dead corpse wearing this grotesque skin suit

that you've put all these anarchist pins on in antifa

kurdish

you know cia pins on and all these shit we don't want anything to fuck and do with that

uh what a stupid uh what expression like

we are the communist btch

with a capital c because we are the only people who are loyal

to communism as a tradition

as opposed to your institutions that you're loyal to

see teran you're loyal to the institutions

we're not

we are not loyal to the institutions

the sillar institute

we don't

take our money from silar institute

we are not scared to disagree soillor institute

schillar institute doesn't control anything about us we work with sillar institute

because

we agree with them a lot a lot of things but fro on an independent basis that's why i told my people to join c p sa not schiller

by the way dumbitdge

it re emerged in a synthesized form under the named patriotic socialism no it hasn't

this name patriotic socialism you created not us

and then he went and complained

when sultaneous

created his own patriotic socialist front

of course he did

sultaneous

as far as i know maybe he changed his views

but he was on the far right

and then you created a bogeyman of patriotic socialism

that's far right and then far right people adopt the label on ironically that's not my fault i have nothing to do with that

i have never identified as a patriotic socialist

i'

pushed back against that label many times before many times many times

ok

nothing to do with me

maga communism sure

but

but but but that's not the synthesis

mada communism is just a slogan it's a strategy

i'm a maga communism in the same way you're a

democrat communist you're a fucking liberal communist i'm amg the communist there you go

when abbreviated patsock might strike the observer as suspiciously cloked because we invented it with stupid match we didn't invent this label you did

it's like one of his insanity you call us pat socks not us

oh that sounds suspiciously caused a natsck i'm a stupid paranoid beitch that it all goes from your head you dumb bitch are you stupid are you funcking stupid

god read this insanity

read this

when abbreviated patsock strike buttal unit you call us nazis

and then you say oh it's suspicious how like

they're called the nazis

you are the ones who called us that though it's from you you stupid bitch not from us you are the ones who did it you dumb worthless stupid bitch

it doesn't come from us

name me one time

pas al deen says we are the patriotic

socialists

that's our difference we i've never distinguished us that way ives

i've always said i literally invented mekasankees

to distance myself from that label

i've always hated the label pad soock

the earliest records of my reference

to that fucking phrase attest to that i am baffled

bafuleded by this

this is how paranoid people think they create something in their own head and then they notice a pattern that's their own footprint

and they think

they've confirmed

their paranoid worldview it's like aran this is your footprint not mine

you didn't discover a clue

that came from has this is just you calling us something that sounds like knatscks and then finding it suspicious that they sound similar

it's not suspicious you dumb bitch

you're the one who did it you know this is like imagine a guy takes a gun and shoots someone

and they go to that person

and the a it's awfully suspicious there's a bullet in here

it's awfully suspicious there's a bullet in here

who is behind

someone must

it's allful how could this happen it's allfully suspicious

it's awfully suspicious there's a bullet you' let someone shoot someone

and they go and take out the bullet

it's so suspicious there's a bullet in this body

at costal precious

and sultus ricius that's aw this fucking stupid bird brain doesn't think they don't teach logic classes in school

she went to college they don't teach logic classes in school you invented the label patsck not us

we did that didn't come from us

definitely not infrared of all fucking people

to explicitly made a fucking video on youtube like yah pet socks aren't a thing

literally it's still on my channel

and i was in what last march

have been very clear about not being a patsck

or not

wanting anything to do with that label

that label originates

with our enemies they called us that they still call us that because they're fucking stupid

the pat socks have hitched their wagon to what is basically the original kissinger line

make friends with russia so that china is easier to infiltrate and or fight

evidence or source none

is there any evidence

that we want to be friendly with russia

to to fight china or infiltrate china

the most consistently pro china influencer on the fucking internet

is haz al deen

never fuckin forget that

when i first started it was always about china not russia my first streams my first videos it was always

about china

and russia

we had russians on

and we didn't attack putin

but we never said russia is the new world we said china is the next era china is not russia

and they're trying to fucking gaslight us

about our own fuck and history

you fucking disgusting sick twisted bitch you are sick bitch is what you are

how could someone be such a sick disingenuous piece of shit

to fuck and lie

like this

where's the evidence right there's none

they embody the tanky bogeyman stereotype of anti communist debate liberals mocking

na fo while calling putin a comrade

you know what here's the thing though

we confirm stereotypes about being a tanky that

are

a an indictment only from the perspective of liberals but you adopt the stereotypes of being a tanky or a communist that are harmful to the entire strata of the population like

like tankeyes who are pro putin and like you know socially conservative and all those kind of things

that's going to alienate only elite professional managerial liberals everyone else cachols it

but

tankeyes who call for murdering people who disagree with them tankeyes who unironically

call for censoring people and repressing people and tankees who un ironically

you know are so aggressive in the coulture war stuff

on the side of the liberals tankees who are so adamant about being but hurt snowflakes and sensitive you alienate everyone

your version of tanky alienates everyone ours just alienates liberals so to say we're the walking bogeyman stereotype of communism no we're not you are

the actual anti communism of the mccarthy era depicting them as these bloodthirsty psychopaths who want to kill god family

and um

you know want to make people slaves to institutions you're the ones who i adopt that on ironically now liberals do make the objectively true observation that yes communists have always been more socially conservative and they're regressive on their progressive social issues

when it comes to the you know the rainbow stuff

gam

that's not a liberal stereotype of anti communist propaganda

show me in mccarthy eighte

legacy cold war u s propaganda

the depiction of communists

as not progressive enough when it comes to the

b stuff it's the opposite communists are depicted as bloodthirsty monsters who want to kill religion want to kill the family want to kill countries and nations and kill

people's livelihoods and dignity and aggregate them into these giant institutions where they'll be slaves

and have no freedoms and total authoritarianism

you embody that stereotype which is far more harmful than whatever stereotype we embody which is true

it's like

oh

you you give you adopt a stereotype of a tanky by an ironically defending putzin

ok

what does that does that have anything to do with truth though

so what we don't look good to liberals

is that what you're saying to liberals we don't look good we don't want to look good to them

beuse they're not the working class dumb bitch

it is very likely that these figures are not just associated with the schiller institute but other private backers

including members of both major parties

what an insinuation what an insinuation but is there anything

that would make anyone but like why would you why do you believe that

it is very she said it's very likely no we don't need to demand a source but she said it's very likely ok you can't just say things words have meaning if you want to say it's very likely that needs to satisfy some reasonable standard of either evidence or logic

is there any standard of reason that can be satisfied

to justify the claim

that it is very likely we have other private bactors

give it to me

and let's scrutinize it why is that very likely

why is that very likely they don't even

justify it with their reason let alone evidence there's not even a reason they post

it's just they said it it must be true that's classic terran logic what a stupid bitch

what a dumb worthless stupid bit she's so stupid she gives herself away

she gives herself away so fuckin easily

oh my god we're getting like one a m i want to wrap this up but we can't

but i do have to piss so we might take a break

their opportunists and eeither op ally or openly parasitize any group that may be useful to them

now that's again you're making an unjustifiable

generalization we don't want to para parasitize

any group that mays be useful to us we want we openly declare it and avow our aim

to be

reconstituting the communist party

and conquering the communist party that has nothing to do with parasoitism kary you know it's parasoitism

a stupid bitch

who is very likely and that does satisfy

to be a federal agent and i'm going to justify that

it's very likely you're a federal agent because you're fluent in languages that are of interest to

u s foreign agents

you have ties to people who have traveled to syria

to fight alongside u s allies

you worked for institutions that promote color revolutions you worked for the u n

that is a small world

terran

and i think it's somewhat likely

that you probably do have ties to the state department or to the

interest some institution of the u s empire and that is not

a stretch whatsoever

ok so

they made flacid attempts to renew operation mappa by infiltrating c b s a and

ok

one's in a chat if you're in the c pusa they're saying we failed to do this we didn't fail to do it

you just failed to notice us

we didn't fail to infiltrate the c p u s a

you just failed to catch us you dumb bitch like we're in the c p usa right now

the only reason operation red and on happens and i'm launching a new organization which is still about taking over c p s a by the way

only reason that's happening

is because you delayed elections by a year

and i am sick of my followers wallowing in despair

doing turkee while nothing else is going on

especially so many of my followers who did get

expelled

so many of them

who have

are incapable of rising to the ranks

the only reason we're doing it is because you delayed the elections we would have taken over your party otherwise and you know that and that's why you delayed the elections you dumb bitch i am almost single handedly responsible for the surgeon membership in the c p u s a

and you know that which is why you delayed the elections

so it wasn't flascid and it wasn't a failure you're wrong

you're wrong and a stupid bitch

look the sick this guy some

look at this it's a it's a link to my fucking uh

it's a link to my fucking h video from

from october this is terrin all eyes were on this definitely

ok

well

it didn't fail we are knee deep in your party aran aran

i am in your fucking party terran my people in that party

they feed me everything that goes on in it i know everything about you terran

everything about everything you do in the party i know it

i know what you and the central committee are doing before you reveal it to the public i know everything you're plotting and planning and the only reason i don't fucking say anything about it is because it's not even interesting name comes out thank you so much chris appreciate you

p teran teran heartfelt terran

aran fobek i'm in your party

i'm in your party i have eyes and ears in your party

i wanted you personally to see that when i joined the zoo meeting

that you were also in

just to show you like i'm in your party i can join your meetings whenever i want

because i'm literally in there

because you can't even estimate how many people

you think our your comrades or actually my sleeper agents

you should be paranoid about that

not adam to hears ties to larouche

stupid bitch

you should be really honestly like i don't i'm surprised you're not paranoid about the actual

thing below your nose

your comrades unless you've known them

for years and years

even then i've won over a decent amount

your comrades are

my sleeper cell agents

everyone else is leaving the party all the ultra leftists are leaving swamp communists left all the maoists are leaving

all the ultras are leaving

you're going to be stuck with haz aal dean's people ith's probably why you wrote this fucking article but

you can't stop

what we're doing that's the sad thing you just can't

posing as a nasty stereotype of marxist leninis serves two main functions ok

we are not the nasty stereotypes though we the nasty stereotypes are the ones who say you want to burn your country your flag burn the family abolish your families abolish

everything you hold near and dear abolish your churches take away god

take away

um your ability to be entrepreneurs even

institutionalize you every government owns everything

and institutions owned by everyone

we want to force our gender ideology on you we want to force these bizarre deranged trends on you

we want to support pornography we want to support pedophilia we want to support all these things that's what you're telling people so no you're the nasty stereotype ok haz aal dean

who is like a high testosterone bearded beautiful charismatic handsome

you know

dude

who has a deep voice and is a straight talking real mother fucker

is the best thing that ever happened to the p r for marxism leninism in america in a very long time i'm the only one that i know of

in a long time who do who doesn't sound like this and that's really good p r actually

it may not be to college liberals like you

pitch

may not be to your fellow liberals

may not be to the people you hold near and dear

and you confuse for the working class but for the masses it's good p r

it's really good p r i'm the only guy who can go down

to a

construction site

and wen people over to communism did you know that

so

it's not a nasty stereotype it's the effective

way to present what marxism leninism is

if you're interested about a being honest about what it is because it it's always been a working class ideology and b

effectively went over the broad strata of the working class of this country

the first is to sheep dog the chauvinistic and unprincipled from the left into the republican party

and how many of you have joined the republican party

how many of you vote for republicans probably not many because i say votings for cox

so it probably has nothing to do with me

uh the whole we're going to vote for trump thing it's like i can't even say on you tube but you know that's a joke right because there's something we believe about that four year cycle that you're not allowed to repeat on you tube that kind of makes it kind of superfluous who we vote for but we're not going to talk about that but you know

it's like

it's like null the stute dumb ass this is not what's going on

ok so what's the second the second is to reinforce the demonization of marxist lendiness as inherently socially regressive that's the money we want to focus on so

is first of all the questions we have to ask are the following right

we're going to pose the following questions for aring aran febak this is for you gan

the following questions

reinforc the demonization of marxist leninius is inherently regressive

socially regressive iight

is that a demonisation or is that grounded in fact

for example

would the norms and mors of a country like north korea be considered socially regressive in the american context are liberals just engaging in demonization for calling china a

conservative and traditional society

because many chinese people attest to that

so we have to establish whether it's a demonization or not or whether it's just a reflection of reality

that liberals take note of

in order to

put sense into dumb fucks like you like hey you shouldn't be a communist fellow p m c liberal because it's not in our class interest the liberals are right to tell you that

but here's this money pot the money the honey pot the money pot whatever you call it right

is that actually a demonization for the broad strata of working class americans if you tell the broad strata of americans who are mainly conservative

and

men who are

the foundation of

any

counterhgemonic politics

when it comes to building power women are good at protesting they're not good at building power

you can clip it ship it and quote me on that

women are good at protesting and mobilizing to protest

not good at building power

and i

i would take any one to task

trying to refute that

calling marxist leninist socially regressive

doesn't demonize them

for the decisive working class in this country

it angelicizes them as angels it makes them

basted it makes them

relatable it makes them something that working class people are more likely

to possess interest in

so

it's always the leninist question lenin always asked for who

okay it's a demonization for college liberals and college parasite grad students larping as workers like you terran i agree it's a demonization from your perspective but from the perspective of a guy working on railways or a construction worker

or a coal miner it's not actually something

that

is an indictment

on marxism linism it's a positive attribute

it's a positive thing to say that marxis leninius

our pro family

it's a very positive thing

and pro traditional values it's a very positive thing

did you know republicans

win the working class oftentimes

just on the traditional family values stuff and they're like yeah

we'll let the corporations rape us we'll let all that stuff happen

as long as you're pro traditional

because that's what's immediately relatable to people

you know

it's a crazy thing how much the working class cares about that

so much so that they sacrifice

sometimes their material

class interests

but they care about it

because it's the most immediately relatable thing to them

you don't relate to them in that way you will never establish dialogue

you don't have a chance with the whole

communism

promise

aren you just got destroyed how did aren how does it feel to have written this because it's like i'm literally reading like everything you wrote and just like

systematically you can dismiss it if you want but

you know it deep down and that's all i care about is getting in your head

deep down terrn you know

that you're getting destroyed right now

that like you wrote all this for nothing it's like it's so embarrassing

like haz al din is just this guy who came here and

fucked everything up that you just wrote

must make you feel stupid that a guy who never went to grad school and never got any formal education and marxism at all

i never needed a professor to teach me anything

is schooling you so fucking hard not only on marxism basic marxism but just on the basic use of logic

ain't that amazing just logic like yeah can you use logic correctly

ain't that amazing

ain't that amazin

it's just logic

she just fails a logic

it's so sad

it's so sad

it's so sad

it's so tragic it's so sad it's so

it's so deeply

it's so deeply you know

unbelievably

tragic

you know

let's continue aren pat soocks are hostile to l g b t q plus rights

and we have to include that plus there are guys

because we don't want to live we don't want to leave out the furrees and the

three spirits and all that stuff the trigenders and whatever so we want to include the plus all right

service based labor unions justice for migrants

what does justice for migrants mean exactly are you talking about like

unconditional open borders because yeah i can vouch i'm against that

guys i'm going to go take a piss real quick so we can

continue this and

hopefully wrap up and i'm going to jusc take at this real quick

alright

ight

bye

let's continue

justice for migrants is just rhetorical jibber jabber they're not being specific abortion rights

m

no we're not hostile to abortion rights we're hostile to dying on the hill

of abortion rights

those are very different things if a country has abortion rights

we're not against that

but we're hostile to basing the your understanding of what the primary contradiction is on abortion rights very different things

any other progressive cause you can name

so you mean every cause that someone can name that is tied to the

money the billionaire

money of the ruling class

yeah true

we don't support every latest bourgeois

agenda funneled in

through artificial institutions

fought because we follow the money trail that's why

you understand

they associate

which they associate with degenerate leftists

you're not actually being specific enough we associate them

because it's oubjectively true

with money that comes from the top down from wall street and from the ruling class and we can actually follow the money and verify that

who funds all this stuff this activism and shit it doesn't money doesn't grow on trees it's not like a grassroots thing

where there it so they're piling everything into a

all these working class folks are piling their money in a fucking pile

no they're not

it's coming from the top down

it's institutional

you know that

it's karen cause you're part of it

they are okay we can't we can't uh talk about this on youtube

they've shown nothing but hostility or apathy to genuine labor struggle anywhere in the world

yeah like the dutch farmers

like the canadian truckers

who were actual workers

by the way

what else the indian farmers protest we supported those

it's just like it didn't distinguish us cacuse everyone did right

this is not true

a by the way this paradigm that there's labor struggles that are a political is gone

again i have to explain this trade union consciousness used to precede political consciousness

because

a society was less socialized and b

there was no

universal political

discourse or consciousness whatsoever there wasn't a universalizing political institution

that was socializing people at the level of the economy

today there is no

trade union consciousness

it's just political consciousness in its various forms

a trade union consciousness can be a ground zero

for a counterhedemonic political consciousness

but it's there's nothing a written in stone

to guarantee that

it's a can be it's gromsky and hegeminy we're dealing with we're not dealing with

oh yeah we're going to build the nucleus of a

the communist movement from this were organizing the workers

no oftentimes labor struggles

can serve reactionary purposes

labor struggles in iran

led by the m e k are reactionary

labor struggles in china

that

are along the paradigm of color revolution are reactionary

labor struggles

there is what the labor struggles are not

always

worth supporting from a communist perspective

when workers went into the factories to

labor struggle against the bolsheviks that's not

we supported a lou all over the place

thank you so much morelock yeah you're right

we did support the amazon labor union

um but

they're a liar aran's a liar they don't care about truth but it's like

when

there was labor struggles against the bolsheviks something that did happen

is that worthy of support no because now society is polarized politically there's no longer any trade union consciousness

that's why communists

didn't allow for independent

unionizing

there's official unions

aligned with the communist party

like in china we don't allow spontaneous

workers organizing

in china they don't allow that

or if they do it's very limited there it has to be

compatible

with the party

they're just as contemptuous of land back

as debate liberals rem

but the problem is that land back gets funded by liberals and not only liberals but members of the ruling class i mean land back just met with biden

we don't meet with biden i wonder why that is right

the indian collective met with biden

i'm pretty sure

or who met with biden it wasn't the indian collective was it

um

let me see that source on that

but land back activists met with by dr dr ous

you're a counterbalance to a degenerate world and we appreciate you

thank you so much

chrissem will land back activists

did meet with joe biden

and that's a fact ok land back is a totally it's a corporate funded project i mean

hey aren where does land back get its funding from

can are we not allowed to ask that or is that like a politically incorrect question

ok it comes from indigenous

money trees

i guess

and on the rare occasion that they are supporting an uprising it is usually a petty bourgeoi one

ok wait wait wait wait

hold on

i'm just trying to like understand

the consistent use of concepts here ok so land back is not petty bourgeois

but the

dutch farmers protests are

you see how that's kind of like

not something that squares with reality

how is land back not petty bourgeois but the dutch farmer's protests

moreover by the marxist criterion professionals have always been pettit bourgeois

arn you specifically participated

in a teachers union

for grad students or whatever is that petty booze well yeah it is

you've always been considered a pettit bousgeois in the history of marxism

a this strict definition ow it only only owning their own means of production

that doesn't apply

even in history or today

peasants owned means of production for subsistence

they weren't considered petty booze one not all the time at least

and when they were referred to as the petty

petite bourgeois

it was not in the same way

that professionals will refer to that

right

moreover

i made a thread that showing the dutch farmers are not petite bourgeois

in order to be petty bourgeois

your

means of subsistence has to give rise to the possibility of an incipient capital

the dutch farmers don't have that

dutch farmers are in debt

to banks

and are subsistence so they're more like peasants

a

they're more like peasants really

i i'd say they're mecca

peasants right

or you could say they're mecca workers it depends

but their farms their tractors as means of production just augments

their labor

the sale of which is through their commodities

so no they're not petite bourgeis just because they don't work for an institution doesn't mean

that they're not working class

they are working class

owning your own

means of production as a form of augmenting either your labor or your conditions of subsistence doesn't make youed bourgeois

td bouszois is an incipient form of capital accumulation

which means it inherently contains the germ and the seed for expansion

not possible today

in the era of monopoly capital

nobody no small business just expands

from any ground level accumulation whatsoever

ground level accumulation

serves the purpose of satisfying the conditions of subsistence

or augmenting the conditions of labor

but it never gives rise

to

ah

capital as such

in order to get to that level you need injections from finance you need to be financed by a bank you need to be

financed by a hedge fund you need to have the e s g scores for black rock for

investors to pour their money into you

credit it all comes from financial investments it doesn't come from

any ground zero level of accumulation

peasants inn't own land usually

a

sometimes they did

in france they did

a but they were in debt

that's what mark said

many abandoned support for cuba

over the historic family code referendum

who did

let's see

oh is this supposed to be me

ok

what's actually happening in cuba is the result of mariella castro

ok

cuba is not a baschion no marxism leninism at all cuban government is not marxist leninist ok you know what

i just to prove to you that aren's a liar

they're using my telegram as an example which is perfect for me because i can actually

show you what i said about cuba

ok

i'll show you what i said

but

ok

ok he here's there's two things i said that are really important

i just want to make sure we can safely do this

uh let me just see if i can

open this in a new tab i can't all right well

let me see something

give me a second i'm like opening my telegram right now so that's why

ok well i'm going to show you what i said and take a screenshot and then show it to you so it's going to take a second all right

all right let me show you what a disingenuous bitch terran is or the author of this is let me show you what a disingenuous bitch they are objectively all right

okay so this is

these are two posts on my telegram

including the one they cut off

that unequivocally debunk the view that we've stopped supporting cuba

game

so let's be clear so here's what they said

they said

many abandoned support for cuba over the historic family code referendum and the evidence for this

is a conveniently cropped

screenshot from my telegram

ok

that's fine

that's fine i'm going to basically

ok

this is the tip of the iceberg all right

i'm going to show you

uh this ok

ok so this is the one they're referring to what's happening in cuba is the result of mari ella castro who is allegedly educated in the west has ok

but what did i say

wh while we oppose all u s embargoes sanctions and intervention let's stop pretending cuba is a leader of communism because it not it's not and never was i stand by that

that doesn't mean we don't support cuba i'll give you another example iran is not a leader of communism and no one thinks iran is a leader of communalism

but we still support iran

syria is not a leader of communism and it never was but we obviously support syria

even russia right now at least is not a leader of communism but we still support russia

ok so

saying me saying this citing this as evidence that we've abandoned support for cuba

is a lie arran cause you're a lying bitch let's continue

ok because this is the this is the kicker this is like what's baffling ok

i said there's no because i noticed in my community some people were talking bad about cuba overall and i said there's no point in counter signaling cuba

this was immediately after this was the post on my telegram immediately after

cuba is not barista there's a fine line between fetasizing it like the tropical sockdems

and outright vilifying it by making antichuba meimes

we don't have to see cuba as a model

but we don't also have to attack cuba

a critique of cuba is no different than the critique of all revisionist socialist states

namely from a perspective that presupposes the necessity of preserving

that state it is imperative we do not contribute to any dissollution or assault on the cuban proletarian dictatorship so let's be silent on the matter

isn't this pretty damning for someone who just said

we abandonce i abandon personally support for cuba

over their family code referendum isn't it pretty damning that they covered up the rest of the telegram wheor i said we shouldn't abandon support for cuba and the one immediately afterwards even more unequivocally clear that i still think cuba is a sovereign country

worth defending

and defending itself for worth critiquing cuba from the perspective of

cuban hardline communism

not

not abandoning support

this is just airtight proof that aran is a liar

isn't it

isn't this like airtight fucking proof

and refused to support starbucks you're right

on the grounds that barristas are not real workers because they saw

one furry at a protest

ok so again they cited my tweet

where i posted a mean

no

the mem is not

the theoretical reason

it's just a simplification to help people understand

how this is clearly not representative of the working class but if you actually want to know the reason from the perspective of theory

well

why don't you just read what i wrote about it

oka

why don't you just fucking read what i wrote about it ok

so let's keyward

barista

the reason a construction worker or a miner is less likely to be awoke s w than a brista isn't a mystery all it takes is common sense to understand the former understands the real material conditions of social relations the latter taking them for granted dwells within artificially and institutionally contrived social relations

so i talk about the material basis

of sociality itself and how the working class has a deeper level of proximity to that

then baristaes do

so let's keyword service

the service economy for which production as such for purposes of capital accumulation is presupposed

what remains are decentralized interfaces for the planning of production

ok

let's just keep

it is on this material basis that the whole of the service economy as well as other spheres of production remain both derivative and parasitical so i talk about how there is a primary sphere of production a material sphere of production

ah which is social in nature

the definite technical expertise and other

forms of simple labor in relation to production

it is on this material basis of the real economy that the rest the service economy as a whole is parasitic in relation to so it's not because the baristas

sorry

so arran you have it backwards

we're not saying

that starbucks

baristas aren't real workers because there's a furry at the protest we're trying to explain why there's furry at the protest

because they're not real workers why

because real workers have a proximity to the real world

that

baristos don't baristos are more insulated from the real world which allows them to experiment with nonsense anti social nonsense because they have no proximity to the actual reproduction

of the conditions

of labour itself

they are just parasites and that lends to lumpanized antiscial tendencies

like ferries

so that's what we're saying we're not saying

we oppose barristas because of their aesthetics

we're pointing out their aesthetics because those aesthetics themselves are symptoms

of the deeper problem and the deeper problem is that they're not real workers

ok

despite their everything they cite doesn't

support them

citing a tweet of me posting a mem saying it's fax

does not explain the reasoning why we don't consider barista's workers

it doesn't

despite their professed andunlikely cynical admiration for china

they have never once hailed any progressive advancements there

okay but but

but but what is progressive

what is defined as progressive

how do you define progressive

you know

they're going to see this is what they define as progressive so we praise china

for poverty alleviation we praise them for unleashing their productive forces we praise them

for having an economy that serves the people we praise them

for all these different policies and it's like

we don't praise them for this i mean i don't even know if this is true

they lower minimum age to eighteen for gender reassignment surgery

so the national health commission

h

updated its regulations

last year the new edition lowers the minimum aage

from twenty to eighteen

ok let's just take this at face value and just say ok this is true it's a nationwide

lowering from twenty to eighteen ok

i don't really see that as

something progressive you know

ah

and it's also neglecting the policies taken by the chinese state

to combat the effeminization of the male population

cracking down on feboys it's a real thing banning imagery online

it's a real thing

spanning i can't talk about on you tube

probably not

but

yeah they did ban

phenomena

from being spread on the internet

they also have sp band

and taken an a stance against

the effeminiation of the male population promoting masculinity so lowering the age at which adults because they're still adults even in chinese law it's still adults

can get gender reassignment surgery

doesn't for us outweigh the ways and the steps they've taken to promote family values

and promote masculinity

we far outweighs that other ship

by the way iran has gender reassignment surgery

and you could say it's a different context but

china may have gender reassignment surgery many countries do

but

they have not

polarized the entirety of their population they have not called into question what women are

and i doubt that they're changing up women's sports and

you know pushing it on children

can talk about the clinic in shanghai that's a cosmopolitan city it's not applicable to the rest of china

you have nothing you know

or their massive role in addressing climate change or clean energy that is something we have addressed and here's the thing

a lot of china's paradigm and i know this because i read

what china says on climate change and clean energy is less about reducing carbon emissions because of global warming and more about

the popular initiative

to curtail pollution

pollution pollution is an observable effect on people's everyday life

like smog and a lack of clean air and clean water

and chinese people want to live in healthy non polluted environments

so

it has nothing to do with rolling back the forces of production at all

and jijun ping has said as much he said we want to pursue a green policy as in

curtail pollution

but

that cannot come at the expense of the productive forces

that's a clear red line he said

he can't have one without the other

we can't unleash the productive forces

without taking into account

you know the basis of how those get replenished and also the environments that creates for the human beings living

but

the green agenda cannot be used as an excuse to

curtail the productive forces that's why

they are not reducing any coal production any time soon they're like yeah in twenty sixty we'll reduce it that's what they're saying they're just saying that to the international greens people to have em fuck off but

china is not reducing c coral production in china is ramping up it's not getting reduced ok

and

they're open about that

so when green in china doesn't mean green in america green in china means

healthy

ah no pollution for human beings

it doesn't mean like

you know all we're destroying the planet you know

they're abiding by the international guidelines and regulations because they want to be a law abiding

you know they want to conform to the international rules

but that that those do not originate with them

any cursory investigation will show pat socks don't engage with much marxi's literature

beyond a few superficial reverences taken on concous think the crazy thing is

like we mem dude have you ever heard of volk vulture

you lose that's a nuke by the way but

rev i mean they're all marxists

all of our theory guys are marxist but

even me you're saying i take it out of context no i just memorize things in the back of my mind i remember things i've been do i've been a marxist for like

probably longer than you you dumb bitch

and it's not hard for me to go well this is what lennon said and i pull up the source and reference it for you

a no marxist literature is very clearly the foundation of hazal dean's world view

so how do i not engage it

thank

dude

actually i want to i want to let's test this somehow go on my twitter

all of the screenshots from literature that i cite

i guarantee you ninety nine percent of it is from capital

from lenin or from marxis literature

i never ever sight nick land

i rarely ever cite these people on twitter when i get in debates

you want to know why i talk about these problematic thinkers because i want marxist to be better at being marxist and i think these people all raise problems

that marxist don't critically address now do you think marx was sitting here like

only listening to people that agreed with him he didn't he was dealing with

the school of political economy

he was dealing i mean

fucking frederick angles red

thomas carlyle a huge reactionary

do you know how reactionary german idealism as a whole was very

marx read all of it

all of it

he was well versed in all of it

he understood you're so stupid it's like do you think marxs himself

exclusively listened to progress he hated all the progressive thinkers he it's the reactionaries that marks and angles

drew from from the german tradition

you think klauswitz was a progressive he wasn't he wasn't not politically

m

now they marx and angles critiqe i critique doogan evola and nick land

i've i've beefed with nick land on publicly right

but i can still recognize they raise good points

that are worth addressing

from a marxist leninist perspective

a that's nice because i'm i'm an actual marxist leninist you know marxism is about

dialectics not about creating echo chambers

as this video from anarcho communist concentrator non compete the problem with citing that video is that i systematically debunked it

in my own video

you can't cite this video anymore i destroyed it

you look like a fucking idiot

look are you stupid

they're tailss okay we're tailss

for having sensibilities that resonate with the masses but you're not a tailst for literally tailing

the elite

capitalist bourgeois funded institutions of society

right

despite this it's mainly composed of frustrated petty bourgeois and middle class who wins about globalism leftism ok any evidence for this

for this any and any evidence there is more

then usual proportion of petty bourgeois middle class elements

among pat socks than among any intellectual current in general

that's the thing about unfalse viability

never capitalism or imperialism

the reason we say globalism and leftism

is for the same reason you know isn't it interesting didn't the mensheviks complain

that the bolsevic spent all of their time attacking other leftists that's all teran sounds right now or you spend all your time attacking other leftists yeah

marks and angels what did they say

the bulk of our enemies were socialists

what did it what did it

what did the bulk of lenin's polemics what were they directed toward were they directed against capitalists no they were directed against other self proclaimed communists leftists

ok

so it's a

familiar accusations

ah winging about

capitalism means nothing

even netflix quinges about capitalism that's a sign of opportunism it's not specific enough

or imperialism

a even star wars claims to be anti imperialist

zelenski claims to be an anti imperialist what does this word mean

but to be clear

imperialism is a word i employ very often in specific reference to lenin lenin's notion of imperialism

physically when i talk about the imperialist hegemony

which indeed

takes the form of both globalism and leftism yes

leftism is a form of imperialist tgeminy that's what i say consistently

and i'm right about it not a single fucking person can contest that claim

with any honesty

similar to debate liberals they accuse anyone sceptical of their call

for an alliancement communis maga of purity politics

ah

do you have a citation for mes talking about purity i don't

that's not my thing i think that's uh

what's his name

that's not the

what's his name

peter coffin that's his thing that's not really my thing and he's not a maga communist he was against it

but shill for trump instead of biden

no we're very critical of trump

but we just have him as a mem

it's not like a

we're not saying like ah

you know go vote

i've never told anyone to vote i say i will vote for trump because i'm a petty fuck cause i hate leftists

but i'm not telling people to vote

as like a ideological thing that's a petty thing

but i personally hate leftist so much i want to go cast my ballot vote for trump

i'm not set telling you that as a morxous leninist

i'm not saying our duty as communist is to vote for trump no i'm not saying that

very different things

ok

um

we don't schill for trump we just like trump as a symbol because he triggers shit libs like you it's simple as that adherents frequently joke about being an op

ok it's what do you mean anything's an o

ok

or a cult and have a strong

strongly insinuated support for maloney ok this is a lie

this is a lie

this is a lie

that's a lie

i want to see who's responsible for that oh it's jackson

yeah but

jackson's intentions here

we're good

ok

and he was not supporting anyone he was giving what he thought was a correct description

one i openly disagreed with by the way

that's something you're missing out on

has al din did not agree with that analysis

but i can vouch that jackson didn't support maloney

he just was making an objective analysis he perceived

he thought maloney was going to be against nato

and he had good intentions

it had nothing to do

with supporting maloney

but by the way

i was against maloney from the beginning

and thought she was a shill for nato from the beginning

and the taliban

that's true

on the other hand they will recycle conservative rhetoric equating fascism to leftism

ok you're calling it conservative rhetoric but you're not engaging with the reasoning we've employed to make that claim

violently eschewing the leftist label and picking bizarre tendency disputes yeah we

issue the leftist label

because being a leftist is not the same thing as being objectively left wing leftism is an ideology

of the left wing it's not the actual left wing itself

which means left ises right wing

it's something i've said in my substack

in one case to hear attempted to pick a fight with anarchists by bill blaming anarchists for hitler is going to be the you tube yeah perfect the reason f ok

the reason i love this but did you watch it because it's like very theoretically dense

a you're saying this is self evidently wrong

but it's actually correct you can't debunk it you can't disprove it

you have to submit to this cause

like how do you fucking a

how do you funcking disagree with that

that's the crazy thing like to debate liberals they don't seek to end american imperialism

any source ok let's see they don't even define america as the head of the imperial corps

yeah i mean yeah we do

i'm just very sensitive and careful

for

anti imperialist american workers

or potentially anti imperialist american

masses

to say i don't mean by america the

my my miss american pie i'm not talking about that

i'm talking about this

empire

that

is built as a layer on top of us

ok

so that's why that's

not abs that's why we're not always shitting on america

because there's two americas just like

what's his name the chinese theorist

in the nineteen ninety s there's two americas there's not one america there's two

in their version they consider themselves patriots of an american nation

pressed by wall street london and the degenerate globalists

based

if debate liberals have adopted the democrat agenda the patsocks are by an extension

lueites are the fox news variety

it's interesting you call the ru sites the fox news variety because

la rouche

a

it has

big beef with

steve bannon and like they like roger stone is cool with them

but not no one else really

laues are the fox news variety

let's just take a jackson is not a la roue site

idiot

i am more of a larousite than jackson jackson just spoke at the schiller institute conference

and is against the green fascism

right

but i'm the guy who actually takes larouche seriously has read lauchi and is like

lrouch had a point

i don't agree with him in his conclusion but

i don't dis miss it

so that makes me the laarrouchite i guess how is jackson a larouchiite

think jackson wakes up giving a fuck about the rouche he doesn't i promise

wang uning exactly

ah

so but but how does this

but ok even if we

have this narrative that the imperialism

is wall street london and the globalists

then why don't we want to end american imperialism ike

we are explaining every demonstrable expression of american imperialism in this way

so we oppose it if we call it a different name it doesn't mean we don't oppose it

but that's not even true that we don't call it american imperialism we do we call it unipolar american imperialism

but it's something i say a lot it's like a catchword even

some are succeeding in finding a catchet

in parts of left media

such as open maroochites who heckled

precious princess a o c over the ukraine war

while they correctly articulated the squad's general incompetence on putting forward an anti war position

they made sure to suggest republican homophobic hindu nationalist tulsy gabberd

as a dovish alternative

i

no they're no they're not you're reading too deeply into it

they're saying

why can't you agree with what these other politicians are saying

because what they're saying is reasonable you can agree that what tulsey gabbert says in some context is reasonable

that doesn't mean you're endorsing every aspect of her world view it just means

he o c why don't you take say why don't you join thomas massey and

tulsey gabbert and all these others and trying to end the war i don't care what your ideology is it's just like are you for sending money to ukraine or not

i don't think that's on reasonable

a o c signed bills it's not in

it's not inct this is the opportunism terran it's not incompetence it's a very competent

support for the war effort in ukraine

by the squad it's very competent because they're signing bills

in support of it

that's not incompetence

that's competence

just competence

in fulfilling the ruling class agenda

and

that's something tulsey gabberd is incompetent in something

thomas massey and major retailer green are incompetent in

so

if those people want to stop sending money to ukraine

why why is it wrong to join them in trying to do that

i'm curious like

why why does that automatically mean you endorse everything else about the world views

why can't we just be like yeah we want to stop

escalating the warren's nuclear war like

does that

you know what i mean

it's like you're fighting a civil war in russia

and you need all these peasants and you're like ok this peasant

is a reactionary orthodox

super super ultra reactionary guy

who's you know

is also a racist and horrible anti semite

but he's needed for the red army

to fight

and he wants to fight the counter revolutionaries he wants to fight the white army

and he wants to fight

the allies who just invaded our country

so do we just say no you can't be in our army

no you say okay we have a primary contradiction and that's what we care about that's

these other things aren't the primary contradiction

at least not right now

this is the typical of the laroue playbook begin your argument with a nugget of truth

for the sake of legitimacy

w oh

stuff for the law

legitimacy to

do you think you're doing it to impress people like you saron it's a profoundly illegitimate position in this climate

what smacks of legitimacy to the left and to left is your nothing your peanuts your cockroaches and worms i'm one of the only funken people who engages with your bullshit

c n n doesn't fuck and loose sleep over you dumb bits that your mom worked for them

what do you mean legitimate

to you you think they're doing it to impress you you dumb paranoid idiot

for whom is it to impress are they hijacking the profoundly extensive leftist anti imperialist there is none schiller is more anti imperialist than

any leftist organization in the united states folkn come and debate me about that

you are nothing compared to them in terms of relevance

the leftiest poll ukraine in america you have the exception and the aberration

schiller is not opposing the war in ukraine for the irrelevant minority of leftists who oppose the war they're opposing it

because they oppose the war

if you wanted to say they're doing it to be legitimate in the eyes of right wingers you would sound more sane and rational than saying they're trying to they're trying to

be legitimate in the eyes of the tiny minority of leftists who are simultaneously

supportive of everything about the unipolar american empire but also

critical of the support for ukraine it's a very small minority of leftists

the average leftist

take em pluck em from a college campus

they're pro ukraine

ay even you are even fuckin a needle waters in your own party is

when she praised the zelenski's speech

sayd she liked zelenski then fill your analysis with a reactionary rage against the war machine

also attended by jimmy dor hal gazepp larouche

fascist matthew heinbach no it didn't

matthew heinbach

was in the audience

he decided to go there

he was not a speaker

idiot

and even if he was who gives a fuck

you know

how is he objectively a fascist is matthew heinbach censoring me is he fucking trying to use the government to persecute political opposition

is he falkin at the four

of shutting people's fucking bank accounts down and shit like hows he a fascist

he can call himself one if he wants

but functionally speaking how is he

who came brandishing a soviet flag

it's just incoherent what she's saying and other assorted reactionaries

ok

you can't so anyone who shows up in the audience is an indictment on the event

sadly this event was also attended by a few people with at least some good will including jill stein

coate pink's medea benjamin and didn't she pull out

and chris hedges max blumenthal and anya parampal

who couldn't refrain from making a transformer remark half way through her speech

diylon burns made an appearance in the same way heinbach did

he was in the audience and burns in particular was there

to attack and critique the event

just like you would have

so this is stupid

what is this why would you even bring this up you think dylan burns was there

like to show support for the event

what a disingenuous thing to fuck and say

ok

a this is the insidious this is an insidious agenda

pushed by people who do not care one iota for building up an anti imperialist communist left

ok i'm going to simplify it for you

what's a more successful strategy to build up an anti imperialist communist left

one that

yea

actually has a chance

in articulating the consciousness of a

potentially mass movement

the broad strata of people

or

the the people pushing extremely

anti social psychopathic

burn your fucking country's flag

burn your religion burn your family

you know everyone go to hell everyone burn in hell

everyone has to be crucified for the crimes against transgender black people and

eighteen twenty four i mean which one

actually has a chance

ok

if you care one iota of building an anti imperialist communist left

you would

scrutinize your strategy objectively

on the basis of an objective material class analysis

not your moral winging and righteous indignation

about a bunch of bourgeois fucking sentimental causes

succeeding in the absence of one

it is being helped by unprincipled progressive figures

whey they don't understand they're helping legitimize fashs or don't care

as moss ropes and row

the lue sites historically haven't had a problem collaborating with fascist and imperialists

when did they

including the bandarites in ukraine i think this is in reference to an interview

s the yah

n i r

is that what it is the national executive review something like that

and that was when they were anti soviet

larouche was very much

against the soviet union but

did la rouch support ukrainian independence i don't know about that

i don't think larouche even supported the dissolution of the soviet union

he did it

actually this is wrong i know for a fact

larouche didn't support the dissolution of the soviet union

he just wanted to change their policies

right

can someone vouch for me on that

i'm almost one hundred percent certain

on that one

like he thought soviets in america should team up

and institute policies

and the soviets should ditch

their ideology but he didn't

i don't think he supported

these uh balcanization tendencies

it's not really consistent with larouchs worldview

this but i mean i don't know if this is true or not

even

but even if it was in the past i don't care because right now schiller

is at the fore

of opposing

the banda rights

this is true of the padsocks now who are by no means anti war

a now we fucking got it

and are as gleeful at the thought of russian war crimes as nato is about ukrainian ones so we are simultaneously

pro u s empire

but aran is critiquing us for being too russian

so there you go guys

were too pro american imperialism

but simultaneously

that somehow translates into being too pro russian

he

this smacks of opportunism to me so aran how are we pro imperialism

you're the one who's critiguing us for being too pro russian

are we are we too pro imperialist because

we disagree about

the signs on the bathroom is that what it is

i'm just curiouscause like you're supporting

propaganda against russia and spreading it yourself and we are

supporting russia

at the expense of the u s empire

fan

getting crucified for it by the way

um

and what are you doing

what what what have you lost what have you sacrificed

against american imperialism have you ever had any skin in the game

is there a testable way

we can talk about your opposition to u s imperialism is any of it testable is any of it falsifiable even

none of it is

none of it is

you just say

you just declare you have these positions but you've never had skin in the game

you' never got your livelihood destroyed

because of your opposition to us imperialism

who never been targeted for it

maybe you got targeted for a

saying you support satan and whatever

by some right winger before

who immediately

you know got taken away

but have you ever liked

actually suffered

in any way

for opposing u s imperialism specifically

you know

it's worth pointing like they're they're saying oh yeah pat socksers

but we're the ones who get penalized and persecuted for it

you know

we're the ones getting persecuted for it

you want ea it let me let me show you something i

now in good faith

just in good faith all right

guys

in good faith

okay

this is hilarious all right

so this is extremely fringed dispute

harold southman left his we support china china and he posted

some like antil g b t poster allegedly in china and this version says this is the original and it's in the infrared one right

do youy actually think there's thirty thousand people

who understand this reference forty thousand people

do you actually think forty thousand people understand this reference

do you actually believe this is not botded

it's it's bots i mean it it has to be doesn't it

all right let's go look at who retweeated it

but

ok a lot of antifo bots

you can always tell when it's football

cardinal's fan

yeah

ok this person re tweeted it

liverpool fan and f one red bull

this is a guy in zimbabwe

ok do you really think this guy's not a like a bot

look at all the things he retw eats

this look at this guy in zimbabwe look at this okay this is a guy in zimbabwe everything he reas tweats has thousands of likes

everything he reats tweats fifteen thousand likes fifty six thousand likes

nineteen thousand likekes ninety nine thousand likekes seven eight thousand likees

hundred one thousand likes

nineteen thousand likes

this one i guy the guy this guy was stingy and he didn't want to pay too much for the bot so he only

paid for five hundred likes i guess twenty four thousand thirty eight thousand

eighty eight hundred thirty four thousand

someone boughted this tweet

ok

maybe this is real

i have to vet these if they're youtube appropriate

this one

could be real but it's also re tweeting things

only with the thousands of likes and it's a b t s account

uh okay this is another bt s account

a fan account

ok is this real

and i don't think i don't i think this is a bot

hundred twenty yap this is a bot as well

this is yeah

maybe it's not because of this right here but

it still seems a little bot like to be honest

let's continue looking through the people who re tweeted this

so someone used bots to boot this boost this tweet all right it's just a fact

this is a botted tweet

i and you know i don'n know how i know it's about a tweet because thirty eight thousand people

do not know enough about infrared to recognize the globe

stage one

of proving it's a bot

stage two of proving it's a bot if you're not convinced by stage one stage two should really conclusively prove it to you ok stage two of proving it's botted

thirty eight thousand people

are not aware

about the dispute

infrared has with other marxist leninists

about whether china is socially progressive or not

to be invested enough to like a tweet trying to make the point that hi actually china is on our side and china is against you there are forty eight thousand sorry

forty thousand people

do not exist

who

could demonstrate any level of commitment

to such a fringe

ideological dispute

nine

doesn't exist

this is without a doubt a botted tweet

look at the likes and look at the resweets and it's fucking bot it

i terrin

i have to explain something to you aran the number of flags

and it's the second biggest number of flags so is this a coincidence you know

is it a coincidence that the ukraine flags are always like with this flag

also

even this one

yeah

the

quote unquote pro palestine leftists who are against the mukawama meaning they're not pro palestine they're just pro the next fake trend

but is this a coincidence

you know

is it really a coincidence

terrn

you know

it's kinda crazy

it's kind of crazy you know

yeah pretty crazy

you really think that's a forty thousand like

you really think that that's forty thousand likeks

people really like this thank you so much chris im actually a compliment by the way i'm not saying this to cope with like oll hases unpopular

if this got four thousand likes i'd be like

if you got seven thousand likes i'd be like ah

maybe hassan's community

right

but this got forty thousand likes

i'm not that famous that's what i mean i'm just not that famous

i'm being humble right now i'm really not that famous

ok

so it's bought it

so what i'm trying to say taran is that this is what happens to us it never happens to you

none of this glowy shit ever happens to you and there's a reason for that

the reason is that you're not a threat to imperialism and you're an actual agent of imperialism

in all likelihood it's all but confirmed

with absolute certainty

hinkel also incidentally exposed the artifice of the debasphre culture

did he know

did he now on right winger

john zirka's stream

shat out zerka getting a reference hinkle let everyone know what he actually stood for when he said out loud i do everything for the cloud you will never see me do anything not for the cloud that's the only way i operate

hm why did he say that

why didn't

the person blocked me why did jack why did jackson hinkle say that

that he's only doing it for cloud i'll tell you why

because he was on a dating

royal panel he was on the zerko royale

the czircle royal was a cheap

like

very bottom tier kind of like you know

ea girls trash talking

nothing political

or

it was very trashy content ok

and jackson who does respectable content

was there

so like why are you here jackson i'm just here for cloud why else would he be there

but

he's not doing his respectable content for cloud

he's doing the trashy stuff for cloud of course he is jackson was talking to an eager when he said this he's like oh she's like well then why are you here jackson he's like i'm here for the cloud

i'm not here for you bitch i'm here to grow my channel so i can spread the message that i care about

right

so

this is not an indictment on jackson you totally misunderstood it

jackson was saying i care about my cause i care about my main channel

to spread the message that's what i care about i don't care about fucking eagers on the internet

but she tried to make it seem like he was saying oh i don't care about my news coverage i just care about

sex drugs and power no you was saying the opposite

you know

it's so pathetic you didn't understand that

yeah he gets fully demonetized on youtube i guess that was for the clout right shut up

so pat socks get mentioned like eight more times

oh god i don't want to fucking ok

uh they're in league with patsocks because they claim to be neither left nor right but we don't claim that we claim to be left wing just not leftist

h they using the pat socks as a foil

they overlap considerably

ok let's see how we overlap with these people i've never even fucking heard of

it's a tweeed by fox green that has nothing to do with anti sieve anything

thanks aran

useful as ever in substantiating your various claims

this is a in so the this is the opposite but it's the same thing much like these other guys they joke about being inorganic in op

yeah they joke about being feds and

infrared jokes about

being a cult i c p s a is not a joke ter and i don't know why you think that's an op

that's not a joke it's a real thing like

that's not a joking about being feds that's the opposite it's a real plan

it's a plan but that doesn't mean it's a fed plan it's like it's my vision

ok

dumb bitch like what do you

okay they're just comparing us to

uh just like okay it's a just like kind of reasoning all right why just fucked your whole article i just fucked your whole article it got fucked your article got fucked heh

your article got fucked

and you know

it's it is what it is the article just got fun

and destroyed

totally like i've

i have guys have you ever seen a more thorough ofviceration in your life

that's like a real

example of what that is by the way like

have you ever

seen a more thorough ovisceration in your whole life

than what i just did

probably not

can't wait to down this vot and get clips we made in shit's a puking gold mine

it's a goal mine i have to go guys it's way too late i'll see you tomorrow

hopefully early